May 3, 2024 • 50 mins
In a world where corporate influence often eclipses individual rights, Invitation2Freedom's episode with Taylor Johnatakis and his wife Marie serves as a clarion call to rediscover our moral compass. As we navigate the complexities of decisions in the shadow of the law, it's paramount to remember the distinct difference between being mere participants in a system and being conscious, moral beings who can assert our authority and protect our unalienable rights.
In this episode, we dive headfirst into a thought-provoking conversation with Taylor Johnatakis at the intersection of law, morality, and the people’s role in society. Marie and Lisa continue exploring a variety of issues that challenge the traditional left-right paradigm.
Secure your Freedom at https://your.invitation2freedom.com/plans
Takeaways
-
Scrutinize your contracts.
-
Assert your authority.
-
Seek truth and commUNITY.
Timestamps
00:00 Revisiting the essence of our collective identity.
05:44 4th and 14th amendments redefine rights and citizenship.
07:47 Implementing experimental ideas on a grand scale.
10:24 Corporations and bodies competing for constitutional rights.
15:03 Semantics matter, especially in legal cases.
18:27 Balancing commitments while maintaining freedom of choice.
23:28 Realizing the reality of mind control programming.
25:52 Speculating on Trump's controversies and their impact.
28:46 Surprised by famous person's unexpected arrest.
32:12 Dead Sea Scrolls reference.
37:08 Criminal defendant waives rights, treated like dead vessel.
38:02 Apology accepted, claim settled, no harm done.
43:24 Jury's role in law's moral implications.
44:46 People need to transcend legal limitations for justice.
47:26 Organizations' influence, more faith in corporations.
🔗Please consider the Johnatakis Family Help fund by visiting this link:
https://www.givesendgo.com/johnatakisfamilyhelp
Subscribe to their website for updates! www.peasantsperspective.com
Taylor's Who Bakes the Cake? 3/3/2024 www.peasantsperspective.com/lettersandessays
Disclaimer:
The information contained herein is not intended to be a source of legal advice. You should not rely on the statements or representations made by the hosts or guests. The purpose of this podcast is to give guidance and to educate those in the community on how to be self-reliant members of the constitutional Republic of the United States of America and as such it is strongly recommended that you do your own research. Invitation2Freedom does not assume any responsibility for the actions or non-actions taken by any of the hosts, guests or listeners, and no one shall be entitled to a claim for detrimental reliance on any information provided or expressed herein. We reserve our right to assemble, and we do so peacefully and without trespass.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome. This is your invitation to Freedom.
The podcast that challenges the traditional left right paradigm
and explores a narrative centered on unity and reclaiming
our rights. Each episode will explore topics from how
we got where we are to what a peaceful journey looks like to get back
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
(00:22):
Hello. Hey, Taylor. We're having a little bit of technical difficulties,
but we're glad we got you here now. Okay. No
worries. Are we live? We we are not exactly live. We're
recording. I was not able to get the live to connect. We were trying to
do multiple platforms. So you have Marie and I here. We're doing our
Zoom recording, and and then we'll hopefully live
(00:44):
broadcast it. So your bride is with me. Oh,
wonderful. Hello. Hey.
So I haven't actually read anything or anything like that. So if you wanna
kick us off, that would be great. We're just yeah. Okay. Well,
I may as well read it then. So I've got it right here with me,
and I I named this one I think I've taken to the
(01:06):
case. So this is, you know, for those of you that don't have
contacts, since I've been here in Yale, I've been writing a lot of
essays. And Marie posts these essays, on
peasantsperspective.com, and they they range from all
over the place. Sometimes it's different Lamentations. Sometimes it's something that's a
little bit more targeted or explaining some principle or something
(01:28):
that just I feel like it's important to get out of my head. So this
one is, I'll be treated to you. Often times when
I get asked what now or what can we do when discussing the
peril and pitfalls that our country or society and community
space, the current peril we face requires something more than a
mere Band Aid deal or more fee off money thrown at
(01:50):
it. Many perils are so vacant in the proverbial case that
requires us to examine the taste very ingredient to
see why it Taylor so bitter. My suggestion is to
examine the very words by which we find ourselves and to see if
our misappropriation and misunderstanding has given us a natural
ingredient list that is quickly becoming unpalatable.
(02:13):
Let us examine 2 words which most do not do not
comprehend fully their significance. Black's Law defines
people as a state as the people of the
state of New York, a nation in its collective and political
capacity. The aggregate or bounds of the individual who
constitute the state in a more restrictive sense and as
(02:34):
generally used as constitutional law, the entire body
of those citizens of a state or nation who are invested with
political power for political purposes. In summary,
the people are the collective body of people. Generally,
the people are viewed in a larger sense of collective.
It's who all political power resides. However,
(02:58):
the definition begins with a state and then there's a
semicolon. What does this mean? A state means
a few things. According to Black, in its largest
event, quote, state is a body politic or a
variety of men. Again, another sense of the
collective is the state, and the state, the people,
(03:20):
all true. But Black's law also says a state
is, quote, the circumstances or condition
of a being. So a being
is also a state as if a state of
being. Ask yourself, who are you at this given
time? Are you at this given time in a state of
(03:43):
being? I hope so. Who is listening to this? It's not
a man or woman in a state of conscious being.
It's not a threat to say you are a people
above the people. You are one being,
a people who make up the people, the collective.
Next, let's look at the word person. It's important to
(04:06):
note in all the black law definitions of people and
state, the word person is not used.
You'll see why, but it's because the people
are alive. They are beings
in the individual and collective state. Black's law
defines a firm as in general usage of human
(04:29):
being, I e a natural purpose. Though by
state, the term may include excuse me, go by
the statute. The term may include labor
organization, partnership, and associations,
corporations, legal representatives, trustees,
trustees and bankruptcy, or received receipts. Scope and delineation of
(04:50):
the firm is necessary for determining those bankruptcies 4th
Amendment of the Constitution of 4th protection since this
amendment expressly Lisa to persons. It
goes on to say, under the law, an individual organization
and corporation, a corporation is a person within the
meaning of the 14th Amendment Equal Protection and due process
(05:13):
provisions of the United States Constitution. So
to summarize, a person is both a potential
human being and a corporation or
just about any other nonliving entity.
The people are exclusively living beings. The
persons are not necessarily living beings,
(05:36):
but all persons, corporations, and humans are
equal. What does this mean? The founders made clear
distinctions. For example, the 4th amendment, it
says, the right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and events. They
clearly under the people as the being
(05:58):
and the person as the court or body. There is a
difference. Fast forward to the 14th amendment which reads,
all customs born or naturalized in the United States are subject to the
jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the
state where they reside. Do you see the sleight of
hand? It could have read all people born
(06:20):
or nationalized. But instead, in 18/68,
all purpose was used, and the labor union, the
corporation, and the husband became equal to a citizen.
The 14th continued. No state shall make or enforce any law
which celebrates the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States, nor any state deprive any person of life, liberty,
(06:44):
or property without the law, nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the law.
I often ask myself the question, if the people in
18/60 8 understood that by granting persons,
remember non fictional entities, all the protections of
law, which was originally designed to protect
(07:07):
the people from the purpose, the fictional
entities. The people now compete with
corporations like Facebook and Apple and other
persons for rights like freedom of speech or association.
The people are superior to the state. The
people, the being, control the person,
(07:29):
the body. But now the body is equal to the
being. The states have a poisonous ingredient. The
corporation is equal to its master, both collectively
and individually. The consequence of the 14th Amendment has
created 50 states that are also alike. The idea of
50 experiments where good and bad ideas could be tested has led to
(07:52):
often bad ideas being implemented on a grand scale.
It has led the communities and both committees and board of
directors in the form of conference, usurping rights
intended to be reserved to the people. In a
figure descent, the living have become the dead.
By treating your life as a mere franchise of a corporate state,
(08:15):
what can we do? Start acting alive. Start
calling yourself a people, a living being rather
than a person. You are a being with a person.
Be the change you wanna see in the world. Once you put this small
switch into understanding, you will start to see how you
are in your living capacity superior to
(08:37):
anything else. The people are the power. The
people can make the change. The people on a board of
directors can claim the action of a corporation. The
people can change their state, but the person is
reliant upon the state. Change the ingredients, change
the state. It's the people who face the state.
(08:59):
Wow. And that concludes my reading for today, Michael.
Dang. That was good. Like, really, it it was I
had so many visuals of, like
remember 2,001 Space Odyssey? Like, the the
computers taking over? No.
Well, that that's essentially what's happened. Right? We we are literally dealing
(09:22):
with a situation where the living being are equal to a
corporation. Now as long as Steve Jobs is around, and he's in Taylor of
Apple, Steve Jobs is a living being. It's his creative. That's his
corporation corp body. Right? He is the mind behind the
corp, the body. But then when Steve Jobs dies and someone
takes over and they have a board of directors and they have bylaws and they
(09:44):
have shareholders, All of a sudden, the body, the
corpse, starts to have a mind of its own, and it
doesn't have morality. It doesn't know the difference between right and wrong.
It doesn't have a mother or father to honor so that their days may be
long upon the land. And next thing you know, the board of directors
who don't act in the name of I am somebody, they ask in the name
(10:06):
of the shareholders of the fiduciary do you see where I'm going with this? All
of a sudden, they're telling Tim Cook, yeah. Go go tell tell them
we don't wanna associate Apple with Donald Trump. Right? Hey, Twitter. Hey.
We wanna throw Donald Trump off of Twitter because we have freedom of speech and
we have freedom of who's we? Twitter. Okay. And
if a corporation can suddenly say, I don't wanna associate
(10:28):
with somebody, but I'll take your money. You see what I'm saying?
Like, why are we competing with corporations
for our rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights?
Because the 14th Amendment says persons, which are defined
as labor unions, corporations, fictional
entities, are equal to the living beings.
(10:50):
The being is the consciousness. The person is the physical
body, the court. Right? We've let
our bed, the court, the bodies, the corporation, the
labor unions become equal to the body. And therein
is an ingredient that spoils the
experience of living in a free society
(11:12):
because the corporation, the person, have no
consciousness. Right? And they run a buck. It it
very literally is a zombie, nation.
Right? Where you have corporate bylaws that run things
that that in many cases will never change themselves.
They can't make all things. And that is that is a
(11:35):
scary place to be, and it is a direct result of the 14th amendment,
which is the sole litigated amendment of all of us.
Right? Because of this very issue, corporations have
sued to have rights of a citizen. This also leads to this new
definition of a citizen. United States code section 18
or United States code 18 section 1 defines citizen,
(11:58):
and it talks about that a citizen is a vessel.
Well, a vessel is another person. It's a pain. So all of a
sudden, apple is a vessel, you see what I'm saying, and it's a
citizen. So we might we might think, well, citizens have
to be kidding. No. They don't. No. They don't. A
citizen is just a vessel. It's very fascinating how these
(12:20):
little words create an ingredient list that Marie us sit
go, what's going on here? You know what I'm
saying? Like, now you hear things about, like, the the
stakeholders. You know, who are the stakeholders in other different issues? Because
We're anonymous. Like, corporations all of a sudden have an equal voice to
the living beings that are being being affected by something.
(12:42):
It's really stunning when you break it down. And the key to fixing this
is you have to be the solution. You have to change the way you refer
to yourself and the way you see the world so that you can see with
these eyes and ears. Or instead of saying, I am a person,
say, I have a person. I have a
body. I have a corpse. Right? I have a
(13:05):
person, but I am and then say your name. I
am a people. I am in an state. I am in an
state of being. I am conscious. I
have a person. I might have multiple persons. I might
have my body, my physical person. I might have a
corporation that I started. That's a person too, by definition. You
(13:27):
You see what I'm saying? You literally could have multiple persons
to a people. Like, change the way we say it, and all
of a sudden, pretty soon you'll get a you know, I'm just speaking
very grandiose for this moment, but you'll get a critical mass of people who will
say, hey. What's amendment? The 14th amendment that say, all people who
are born, as in all conscious moral beings
(13:48):
that are born are entitled equal protection. But We The
People install the corporation whatever the heck we want. We're not
gonna be equal to the corporation. We are superior to it. The
other thing too is in the dictionary, a municipality is a
person. So all of a sudden, you compete for your
rights with cities and state or the state of New
(14:10):
York. So the people are no longer superior to the person
as defined as a state or a government entity. Right?
We compete with them for our rights, for our protection.
Our chief amendment is one where We The People We the People
have to take a critical look at it, and We the People are the solution.
Love that. Marie, did you wanna say something? Yeah. That's really good. And I
(14:34):
think Terry's gonna be cut off in a minute, but I just was thinking, you
know, with Twitter, with Donald Trump I mean,
we really do need to reevaluate how we look at
corporations, the master. Like, they've become a
master to the people. Yep. The body has in the
scripture, it talks about Christ being the brain, the head, and the
(14:55):
body being the church. Think of it in terms of of being,
the consciousness, the consciousness of Christ and the church.
We'll come back. It is really interesting when you think about it. And, you
know, it's funny because I was, like, I I was talking to Taylor, and I'm
like, so, you know, you and I in just normal book,
like, conversations, like, would we would it make a difference? Like, what are we
(15:18):
you know we're often not I mean, semantics
are important, but often in just casual conversations, we don't think a ton
about stuff. We often have, you know, people in person, we have
kind of a general idea. And he's like, it's so interesting to watch, like, right
now, the Supreme Court ruled on Trump the ballot.
And he they're like he's like, they rule on the little words.
(15:41):
They pick apart these little war words and what do they mean, and then they
interpret it to those words. So, really, when you do
when you do exchange words that for us might seem like not a big
deal, when you bring that up in court cases and different things
like that, it becomes a very big deal. It is a
very big deal. And what he's pointing to, which is standing
(16:02):
in our morality, standing as living
people, and getting used to that and realizing how we
have bought into the idea of the protections
of the corpse. Yeah. That we feel that we're
in better shape to enlist in creating the corp
because it supposedly gives us less liability.
(16:25):
And so it's a mind game. And when when
I'm speaking with people and I say, well, I would rather contract
with you as a living woman to another living woman. I
don't wanna contract through a corp. I want to contract
as living beings Yeah. And the morality of that.
Right? And people say, well, I'm a corporation because of
(16:47):
the the liability protection. It's like, no. You're
a corporation because we have bought into
this entire system of
what what what if we called it the law of
corporation or the law instead of it being land, air, and
water law, it is corporate law.
(17:10):
We are governed by corporate law,
and this 14th amendment overtook everything.
That's why there's so much fighting going on with it. It is
so interesting. And I think a lot of it just has to do with being
aware and realizing where your consent lies
and realizing what contracts you've gotten into that you didn't realize that you got
(17:33):
into. And that you can do something about that. Yeah. You can do something about
that. It was interesting. Taylor recently called in on a vigil. It's
called Northern Neck. I think I mentioned it last time. Mhmm. I
thought it was in California. It's not. It's in the Eastern United States, the
north, somewhere up there. Anyway but he had
talked about how, you know, when you contract with the birth certificate,
(17:55):
with the Social Security card, with your driver's license, with any licensing that you
get with your business and everything like that, That is a contract that
has all sorts of terms and agreements and all sorts of things like that. Are
you aware of that? You know, like, yes, there's a benefit. Are you aware
that you're, you know, sacrificing whatever for that benefit? And
we all have the right to contract. We all have the right to, you know,
(18:17):
to contract in whatever way that we'd like, but we should know that we're
contracting, and we should know what we're giving up. And we should we're we're benefiting
you know, how we're benefiting from it. So And it's tricky
because we may come to the decision where we say, okay. I don't wanna participate
anymore. But there's this balance because we if we
wanna act this way as living beings and walk
(18:39):
this way, there are certain contracts that we
have that we need to keep
in place because you can't you can't just cut your nose
off to spite your face. So to completely comprehend
that, I had a situation where I needed to file a police
report on a grand theft Larson. Did I share that with you?
(19:01):
I think you did. And I couldn't file the report if I didn't use
my my driver's license. So before I'm
gonna give up my driver's license, I need to comprehend
what benefits I'm getting from that and just choose
when I need my license so that I've chosen the contract to
get that benefit when I am needing it. But I don't
(19:24):
need it to drive because I can choose to travel. I'm
not driving in commerce. I'm traveling as
a as a living people. And even that, you know, there's a lot
of custom and stuff within our culture that that's really
not understood. I mean, if we've got a mass amount of people that can
understand that and we can explain it to each other and the benefit of that
(19:46):
of not having that contract and how that would look, I think that that
otherwise, sometimes, you know, I remember reading about someone that was it was
a young it was a teen, and he I think he was, like, 19 or
something in Utah. And he was driving under those same
conditions, you know, and it got out of hand, and he actually
end up getting shot. And Oh. 6 months
(20:09):
ago. Yes. No. I know him well. Chase. I know him.
Yeah. I I know of him through yeah. Okay. Through the work that I
do, and it was horrible. And part of he was traveling, not
driving, and he spoke to the officers regarding
that, and the officers weren't having any of it.
And the the key to it is we can stand,
(20:32):
but we can't argue because our box is too small,
and they're armed. So if you get pulled over, you don't wanna
start schooling the police officers on the side of the road.
No. No. That's not the time and place. And a lot of what we're
talking about here is equity. Right? A lot of what we're talking about is standing
in that small square. Yeah. And I think, you know,
(20:55):
with everything, there there is prudence. And I think the more
that, you know, the idea even that Taylor is expressing with
people in persons and maybe just understanding the ramifications of
that. Like, if we can share this enough and
have it applied in enough situations, then we change the
custom of the culture. And that is really
(21:17):
like, to me, that's a peaceful way of doing it. You can also
do the Ayn Rand situation and just withdraw and, you know, and
start your own thing in your own location if that is something that
you can do. And just and however that looks, I think
A lot of people are doing that. They're calling it homesteading. Right? Right.
Yep. So they said I'm not yep. I'm not gonna purchase your food anymore. I'm
(21:40):
not gonna do this. We're gonna be self sufficient. Yeah.
And so I think that there's power in that.
I think you don't feel like so much you're, you know, dealing
with politics in the way that things go and how, you know, the
different customs that we create as time goes on with
our different using different vocabulary and stuff like that. I don't think
(22:03):
we realize how far away we have gotten
from where we started with even
the revolutionary war, with the constitution. We're
talking the other day about the word democracy and how
in in relation to with January 6th, a a threat to democracy.
(22:23):
And it's just so ironic because we don't have a
democracy. We have a republic. And we don't want a democracy.
Democracy doesn't show up anywhere in our founding papers. There's no
interest, but we've been we've been programmed. You know?
It's this signaling. I know. I this may sound
surprising and crazy, but it has been intentional.
(22:45):
Uh-huh. That there's this book called the 5,005,000 year
leap by Skousen, and he talks about the different things that
happened that show how intentional this was, the move
from using verbs, like words to describe what we
are to then make people think that we are a democracy.
And, you know, it's interesting because at first, Taylor like, you know, I'm I'm
(23:08):
not trying to overthrow the government. Oh my gosh. And, you know, you're a threat
to democracy. And he's like, well, actually, in the most literal
sense of that, I guess I am. Like, this isn't the government
that we'd have agreed to and is under the constitution and different things
like that. Like, this is a republic. You guys are a threat to the
republic. Exactly. And what a concept. And you you talk
(23:30):
about I remember when I first started hearing mind control,
all the mind control and and mind programming, I was like, this is so far
fetched. And the conspiracy theorists, it was such a turn off.
But you start realizing that those are actually that's
actually happened. And what he what he was saying
earlier today regarding listening
(23:52):
to these things, that is mind control and zombieism.
Like, we have bought into that programming, right,
TV programming, and it has been intentional.
And it's far fetched to think all these people got together
and did this, but you know what? It's not that many people.
It's the media and and them being
(24:15):
an arm of the Democratic Party. And the Democratic
Party got taken over. Why you know, it's
like the 2 parties are almost the Uniparty. It's
they're they're 1 in the same, but the Democrat
party under Kennedy was not today's
Democratic party. No. Not at all. And I think that we've even seen
(24:37):
that. Is it Bill Maher that's like, I don't even know what's going
on. And, anyway, just, you know, people that are like, I don't
recognize my party. It's got And we don't rec and they don't recognize the
country. I mean, this this is so bizarre, what we are
living through, and is and thank goodness today
that Supreme Court decision that came down
(24:59):
that had the Colorado putting Trump
back on the ballot and 30 other 30 other
states trying to keep him from being on the ballot.
And the most important part, and I thought of you and Taylor, of the
decision is that one of the supreme court judges said it
has not been proven that Trump
(25:22):
tried to do an insurrection. Yeah. Yeah.
I mean, they're just that's huge. And for the j sixers,
that's huge. That is huge. Step in the right
direction. Actually, this last week, there was one of the
appeals went to the higher a higher court, and it has to do with a
lot of the j six cases, including Taylor's. Given
(25:44):
that extra point, right, that it was
Yep. The enhancements. The enhancement. Mhmm. That's huge.
A big deal. It's a big deal. You know, I think about Russiagate
and all that stuff, the accusations about Trump and Russia, and
then years later I think 4 years later at the end of his presidency,
oh, I guess there's nothing. And I think about that even with, like,
(26:07):
January 6th and stuff like that. This stuff takes so much time to
flush out. And in the meantime, they can just have a heyday with their
words and what they call it and what they call you and what they say,
and it's just it's it's
overwhelming. But to me, I'm like you know, with all these things that keep
coming up, I wonder if people that see Trump in
(26:29):
a certain way can take a step back and
say, wow. You know? Like, why are they doing all this
to him? Like It it it it it literally is
it literally it's part of the evidence that there's
probably something to trying to silence him. Yeah. Right?
It's like, whoever they cancel is probably speaking some truth. And I
(26:51):
hope everyone takes a look at each situation and
discerns it for themselves and comes to their own conclusion
as opposed to accepting whatever we're fed, whatever
programming, because we have the capacity
to discern. It's within us to know what the truth
is, and it doesn't have to be a long
(27:13):
arduous trek to figure it out and to come together with
other people that will allow you to explore and talk about it and say, what
do you think, and why do you think that? It's so important. And
we don't even have to agree, but I just wanna know where you're coming Freedom.
You know? But and let's start with that. Something else that happened this
week was that reporter Freedom, I wrote it down, Blaze
(27:35):
Media, Steve Baker, He
was arrested and charged this week. For
reporting. For simply reporting. Okay.
So let me get let me pick this up really fast. Glenn
Beck, I actually posted it on my website because I
have that part that we showed last time. It's called other peasants. Yep.
(27:57):
Yep. Yep. And it's got the Sunday devotional and then the stuff about other
people around January 6th. This is what Glenn Beck said
on Twitter that I copied and pasted and put on here.
The FBI has arrested Blaze Media investigative journalist
on 4 misdemeanor charges, knowingly entering or remaining
in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority.
(28:20):
And he says in parentheses, so will they arrest the New York Times
journalist who entered before Steve through a broken window?
Wow. Will they? No. Another
charge, disorderly and destructive conduct in a restricted building or grounds
didn't happen. Disorderly conduct in a capital building
didn't happen. Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol
(28:43):
building, didn't happen, Glenn Beck. Anyway, I
just thought it was so interesting. I you know, he is a pretty
famous person and someone that we often think of as insulated
from this kind of thing. And my
heart just dropped when I saw that. And then also a little bit of
me was like, you know, they have been able to paint
(29:05):
these men and women in a certain way. And I
think seeing that clip of him getting
arrested by the FBI, they wanted him to wear, like they asked him to wear
sandals and a t shirt. He's like, no.
Anyways so and some of this stuff, I'm like, this is so ridiculous. You guys
are just letting looking for photo ops. Are we falling for this?
(29:29):
Anyway I can imagine that many people are, and I it's almost
like they're trying to expose themselves. It's hard to believe
Yeah. That they don't have the introspection. And and I feel like
and I'm starting to hear that people
serving in some of the police
forces and in the military, they're gonna they're starting to stand
(29:53):
up and say, I'm not I'm not doing this. This is morally wrong.
It's just wrong. And the FBI, CIA, all
everybody who is serving the corpse is
being told they need to do something, or in the medical
profession, inoculating these children or
whatever, you have to stand up. You cannot
(30:16):
go on. Yeah. I agree. I think
too now since there has been some time with COVID, and I think
a lot of the medical professionals have seen some really severe
backlash with heart issues, strokes, different things like that. I'm
curious the sentiment about it all. And I really
do think between all of that, between lying about
(30:38):
a lot of that, lying about political stuff surrounding,
like, Trump's death Yeah. And it'll take over. But
I just wonder. I mean, you guys are shooting yourselves in the foot. You are
you've you've played your cards too much. You have
you know, I'm like, this is When the COVID thing came out and I
contacted my daughter's pediatrician, and I said, you know, she has some health
(31:00):
issues. Obviously, she can't get this. Can you please write her a medical
excuse? And she said, well, we just got a letter from the AMA,
American Medical Association. They're calling saying that
if we do that, we'll lose our license. And I thought, oh, so you don't
wanna lose your Lisa, so you're gonna inoculate these kids. So it's not
about best practice. Just to work there. And there's a lot of,
(31:23):
you know, fear they're gonna lose their income. But what about your conscience and
the morality of it? Taylor, you're back. Yes. I
am. Yay. Hello, sir. But what do we
got? What do we got? What do you got for us? Well, we've just
been yacking it up, continuing after you inspired us on the 14th
amendment and how we're gonna choose not to be corpse
(31:45):
and recognize that we are people and we need to
recognize morality, and we just were talking about
those who work for corpse that are being asked to do things that
are amoral, that they take a look at that, you know,
whether they're serving in the military, they're serving in police departments,
or they're doctors, whatever it is,
(32:07):
to to be aware of what you're doing
and be a person. Important. So in the in there's a
you know, people have heard of the DeadSpeak. Right? The Dead Sea Scroll is called
the Nag Hammadi script. There's one particular book that's called the Book of
Promise. And I know people might have different feelings on it or whatnot, but I
find this one particular passage in the book of promise very
(32:29):
interesting. So Jesus is saying he says this. He says,
he who finds the end of the world finds a corpse,
and he who sees the corpse is superior. So if you break
that down at the time of the universe, then that corpse is the root word
of corporation. It's the person. It's the body. He's
you find a bond. Right? You find a dead body. You find a
(32:53):
corpse. And he who sees, you who is
being that actually sees and hears and sees
is superior to the court. K?
So this this is both true on an individual level
and on a collective level. At the time when Jesus said that, you have the
institutional role. You have the senate. You have the
(33:15):
office of the governor, right, who the Republican Title was,
who had to fulfill a role. The person in our DNA, we have the
person of president. You know, they said that office. A
thing. A bureaucratic feat. Right? And so he's saying, when you
get to the end of the world, you're gonna end up finding a corpse, a
body, a person is a thought set.
(33:37):
But if you see it, if you recognize it as your as
it, your superior. In our day and
age, you are exactly right. How many doctors have a sense of
morality, know what's right or wrong, but the court,
the body, the hospital, you see what I'm saying? The
it tells them what they must do. The it
(33:59):
without morality. Put a mask on. Put the mask on the box. Just do it.
Take this experimental shot. But but but but it's experimental. I don't wanna be
tested on. Do it. Because the if, the
corpse, doesn't actually know what's right or wrong. It doesn't have that sense of
morality because it is not a being. It is not
endowed with our creator with certain unalienable minds.
(34:22):
There's a reason why Thomas Jefferson did say all customs are created equal.
He said all men are created equal. Men implies
you're alive. Well, men are created equal, and men
and women collectively are endowed with
certain unalienable, unalienable rights.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You can terminate a corporation.
(34:45):
You can get rid of a labor unit, but you cannot get rid of a
man or woman. That's a different moral level. You can't inform
shop. Does that make sense? There's a difference, and
we, the people, need need to start recognizing that difference. We need to
start seeing the corp as being superior. We need to
start seeing the government as a court as being superior to
(35:07):
it. We need to start injecting our moral decision
and our moral knowledge of right or wrong
into that, into the equation, which right now,
there's no morality. Right? I mean,
holy cow. Think about the Internet as a person because it
is. It's completely what we not everything. It's on
(35:31):
it. Well and it and it also like an alarm along because there's
not a being behind it. It it's out. It gets it
gets ahead of itself. Then, you know, we say, like, put the car before the
horn. Right? The top of the cart, the the thing
that's being towed along, it's in front of the horse, the living thing. The cart
gets put in front of the horse, and what happens? Nothing good.
(35:53):
Well and on social media, a lot of the problem is anonymity.
Right? That everybody without morals can easily
express their opinions and run away
as as gross as they could be. Right? Yeah. I mean, there's there's a
lot to be said about your good name. Right? Your good name that's attacking you
(36:13):
as a being. And if you have to act in your name, people have free
speech. They can be obscene and do whatever, but it
sure would be nice if we knew who they were. Right? Oh, yeah.
You're right. The anonymity that creates a corpse, that creates a fiction,
creates a screen name, a vanity name, something that's not real, that you just
spat off nonsense and is not accountable. Accountable means
(36:36):
liable to pay. Well and that's that's one of the things that's one of the
things for me doing this with you 2 that gives
me a sense of peace and,
purpose, because I don't want to do it anonymously. I want to
say I believe in this and what has happened,
and I I don't believe in what has happened being the right thing, but
(36:59):
I believe in in taking the time and energy
to expose what's going on for you as a family and to
not do it anonymously. Lisa of the most difficult things as
a criminal defendant, you get treated like a person, and the first thing they want
you to do is give over your living rights to what it occurs. Have a
right to see I'll waive that. Right? You have a right to
(37:21):
speak for yourself and, I'll waive that and hire someone else to do
it. You have a right to settle all the charges and and take your excuse.
I'll waive that, but you're starting to talk to them. You don't you just sit
quietly next to them like a dead vessel. Right? You How about
confronting your accuser and having you You're just a
person. And it's like, no. No. No. No. I'm a living man. I have rights.
(37:42):
That makes sense. Lisa, that is very much the criminal justice system convert you to
a person, and then they treat you as that. You know, you're competing with
your rights with a bunch of entities. And Maria Maria is living
there? Maria is saying it's also you have the right to
confront your accusers. And here you are,
the United States for the the person who's charging you, who's
(38:04):
claiming, wrong against you and all of things. In my
case, I was I was able to do this. I stood in front of the
officers to follow the area of secret service, and I said,
you know, just well, for the for the non people that I get to interact
with, I said, you accept my sincere heartfelt apology for my whole that's
it. And so so the parliamentarian, the secret service to the officer,
(38:25):
with the exception of the FBI, he really didn't wanna accept my apology. They all
accepted my apology, so the claim is settled. Hey. There's no living
man that was brought to that court that could say you harm me.
In the case of the officer, I asked them specifically, did
I hurt, harm, injure, and threaten you? Because if I hurt, harm, injure, and threaten
you, then I owe a matter of restitution. As as a right,
(38:47):
as a man, I need to make you whole. They said no. All 3
of them said no. And then I said, you you said, like, a zero
heart Taylor apology. And all 3 of them said, yeah. One of
them said, it's water under the bridge. He smiled. He smiled.
It's water under the bridge, man. No problem. The other one, the the one that
I interacted with the most, he said, no, man. We're good. It's captain's chest. And
(39:10):
he said, no. We're good. We're good, man. Thank you so much.
I said man to man. I Taylor accuse them of what the
supposedly people I have called in, allegedly. Right? I asked
them, did I hurt harm insurance or anything away? No. You said my apology
for my soul and the events that day. You know? So it's very odd.
And they said, yeah. And then I said, I accept your testimony, and I
(39:32):
returned to the settlement disclosure without arguing with the fact that I'm
not here to cast someone. I'm not here to make arguments. I'm not here to
litigate today. I'm here to settle the claims against
right? And I was able to do that. The standby counsel that was assigned
to me by the court, not the guy I asked. He fired up. Didn't pay
him. He's not not my attorney. But, you know,
(39:55):
casually in the hallway, we felt he's like, man, I am loving that.
I've never seen that in a corporate. I've never seen it where you could square
up with something like that. And And I was like, well, that's how I would
do it on a constructive site because I have the right to take my future.
That's right. I have the right people making claims or charges against me,
a man, a living being. I have a right to get fight with
(40:16):
them. Yes. Of course, I have that. And the the prosecution
objected to it, and the judge overruled it. I think they objected for it
3 times or 4 times, and the judge overruled it every time because
he I believe I believe he cognized that,
yes, you have, as a man, as a living moral
authentic being, you have the right to face your future and
(40:38):
think good. This prevent him from drawing in here, and we can talk about
maybe the reason why he did that some, you know, some other time.
But this is all resolved. But, you know, again, you have to ask
yourself who's in charge, the moral sentient being
or the person of the judge, the office of
the judge. As the judge said to me, I only have the ability which the
(41:00):
legislature prescribes. It seems he's following a
court. He's following an act. He's following a
a a lesson, you know, a a a set of writing instead of being a
living being making moral decision. Now then you're That's
my observation about making a claim or allegation in any way. I'm
just saying it kind of as a generality. You know, he said at the
(41:22):
end, well, he remanded me. There is no evidence that you're a flight risk.
And I'm pretty sure that's the quote exact. I don't have the transcript. It says
there is no evidence that you're a flight risk, but there's no evidence that you
will not commit violence on the former congressman's behalf. Now
will or will not are the same thing.
There's no evidence that you will or will not
(41:45):
commit violence on the former president's behalf that you were handed me. He
I've made a judgment. K? And he has every right to do that at that
point. But I still have a right to settle all the claims he's performing.
And, you know, we're in this dilemma. You know, we're we're
I I know who I am. I know who I am very well. And at
the end of the day, you know, I will follow the law to the letter
(42:08):
of the law and I including all of my unalienable
rights. That's my that's my duty. You know, I have I
have played in my mind the the
idea and the the reliving of what you went through. If I
were a jury, given the instructions, and I
wanted to be a woman, would it have
(42:29):
been possible to to not accept
the instructions that were given? Is it is it possible
for any of us just to be on juries and to say to the judges,
we're we don't accept these parameters? These are not
moral. It's not fair. You would have you would have to be a you
would have to be a pretty strong willed living being
(42:52):
knowing, you know, the different moral position between right or wrong and knowing what your
moral obligation is while sitting on a jury. Because the way the judge's
composition thing was we follow the law. I'm gonna tell you the
law. This is what the law says. These are the jury in front.
If f y z, you must convict of the law. If f y
z, you must convict of the law. So when you hear those things,
(43:15):
again, if you don't know that you're superior to, quote,
the law in in a legalistic sense, not so much in a a
law Taylor kind of way. Right? But if you don't understand that that you
as a member of the jury have the right to solve a patient, no matter
what the evidence, you can make a moral decision to acquit. Does that
make sense? You can because in a in a very true sense, the
(43:37):
law, the written law, and to the living man are
equally on trial. The jury is to decide if the law is
even worth it. I mean, there is an element of truth
to the fact that they Marie some laws so that people
will break them so that they can have control, so that they can break speeding
tickets, so that they can have speed traps, so that it you go on and
(43:58):
on and on. Right? They make that I mean, that's one of the the dystopian
problems that we have with our society. There are some laws that are literally made
to be broken so that they could charge you and either make money or
have control or whatever the case is. So a jury is supposed
to intercept an element of of living morality into it and
say, hey. That law is a fight. That law is not, you
(44:20):
know, just. That law is not moral. And
I I I judge the law more than I judge the man. And there's other
instances where maybe the law is inadequate and the jury goes, you know
what? This is wrong. You know what I mean? The the the jury has an
incredible amount of power, but the way that they do, they write the jury instructions
the way that the judge trusts them and to instruct them. I will tell you
(44:40):
the law, and I'll you know, I'm paraphrasing everybody. And I'll tell you if you
go off the law. Here, let me read this. Right? So it would take a
very strong willed moral person on a jury
to stand up to his peers on that jury or, you know, to
stand up to the quote law and make a superior
decision to it. It's it's the way it is. That's why in
(45:02):
the United States of America, you know, between we deal with let's just
make 8.2%, it's difficult to do that. But a lot of that
is because the average the average people
do not understand the difference between a people and a person. They do not understand
the difference between their moral consciousness and
the custom of the corporation and that they're not necessarily
(45:24):
equal. You know what I'm saying? Like, they they have based themselves
to the level of a thing, a fictional entity instead
of being ascending to their level of consciousness.
Right? And and if you were to get scriptural, you talk about Christ consciousness, things
like that. But that that's probably is the element of what's happening here
is people have to space themselves to be fictional entity living
(45:47):
in a matrix instead of ascending and living the true
law, which is due no entry, due no harm, love God, love your
neighbor as yourself. Right? So simple.
Yes. As of between those two things. We need to extend as a
people understanding that we as individual people have
purpose and as a people. Always comes too soon.
(46:09):
Always, especially for you. I am gonna transcribe
this. A lot of what he said here,
we need to study, and it is very simple.
The the the system we live in
and we're entrapped in has it very convoluted. But
what he just said is part of the education we've gotta focus
(46:32):
on. And it's interesting too because when you go back to when it was
set up, like, even the fact there is the jury
nullification exists. And people don't know.
Yeah. It's evidence that there is something there.
And there are things like that all over the place. We just have no idea
our power. And and I would venture to say,
(46:55):
all the judges who put forth
that they are directing the law
and it is a misdirect, that's so
amoral. And those are the directions that they're given by the
corpse. And it's it's They're supposedly doing
what they're supposed to do according to the courts, just like the AMA
(47:18):
tells the doctors to inflict this experimental
vaccine. I mean, we have to stop. That's
what I was just gonna say. We've seen it all over the place within the
within the last couple years. It's these organizations that tell
you, you know, we have all these things that are like, yes. We you know,
doctors, you prescribe what you need to, and there's this best practice and stuff like
(47:40):
that. But the second that the corporation wants to come in and implement
something, people have so much faith in that corporation,
so much faith in studies and different things like that. And I'm not saying that
those aren't valuable. But what I'm saying is they are not
moral and they are not sentient, like like we have been
talking about this whole time. And often there is a board of people that
(48:02):
have all sorts of, you know, different things. Like, there's a reason why
doctors are able to freely practice, like, best
practice things. You know what I mean? Like, that was Well, they take an
oath. They take an oath to our health. So what are
they doing intellectually, morally? What are they doing with that?
What did this pediatrician do with that? When I
(48:24):
said to her, you can't you you gotta, you know, help my daughter
not do this. Oh, well, I'll lose my license.
How are you squaring that? Is there any cognitive dissonance there for you?
Right. Yep. Yep. The corporations have overcome
the people, and it can't and it wasn't set up to be that way. It
wasn't it doesn't have to be that way. We just have to shift how we
(48:46):
look at things, how we think of things, how we how we see,
I think, people in general idolize people,
organizations, things like that. We need to take a step back, and we need to
look at the better good, the greater good. And, yeah, the
days are over that, you know, Bill Barr can say, oh, there's nothing to see
here, folks, and then no one looks because people are looking.
(49:08):
And we've got lots of people coming together doing this. You
know? You're not alone. We have an entire
community of people in our platform. Marie and
Taylor have their website, and, you
know, we're gonna keep doing these broadcasts. Great. Thank you
so much, Lisa. Thank you, Marie. Big test. Speak
(49:30):
soon. Thanks. Have a great one. You too. Bye.
Thank you so much for tuning in to this episode. If our
podcast resonates with you, know that you're not alone.
There's a private community awaiting your discovery at invitation
to Freedom, where we come together in the spirit of
unity and ask some tough questions, share
(49:53):
insights, educate, and assist people who are interested
in reigniting the American spirit and living free.
We hope that you'll accept this invitation to check us out today.
Visit invitation to freedom dot com. That's invitation
with the number 2, freedom.com.
Welcome. This is your invitation to Freedom.
The podcast that challenges the traditional left right paradigm
and explores a narrative centered on unity and reclaiming
our rights. Each episode will explore topics from how
we got where we are to what a peaceful journey looks like to get back
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
(00:22):
Hello. Hey, Taylor. We're having a little bit of technical difficulties,
but we're glad we got you here now. Okay. No
worries. Are we live? We we are not exactly live. We're
recording. I was not able to get the live to connect. We were trying to
do multiple platforms. So you have Marie and I here. We're doing our
Zoom recording, and and then we'll hopefully live
(00:44):
broadcast it. So your bride is with me. Oh,
wonderful. Hello. Hey.
So I haven't actually read anything or anything like that. So if you wanna
kick us off, that would be great. We're just yeah. Okay. Well,
I may as well read it then. So I've got it right here with me,
and I I named this one I think I've taken to the
(01:06):
case. So this is, you know, for those of you that don't have
contacts, since I've been here in Yale, I've been writing a lot of
essays. And Marie posts these essays, on
peasantsperspective.com, and they they range from all
over the place. Sometimes it's different Lamentations. Sometimes it's something that's a
little bit more targeted or explaining some principle or something
(01:28):
that just I feel like it's important to get out of my head. So this
one is, I'll be treated to you. Often times when
I get asked what now or what can we do when discussing the
peril and pitfalls that our country or society and community
space, the current peril we face requires something more than a
mere Band Aid deal or more fee off money thrown at
(01:50):
it. Many perils are so vacant in the proverbial case that
requires us to examine the taste very ingredient to
see why it Taylor so bitter. My suggestion is to
examine the very words by which we find ourselves and to see if
our misappropriation and misunderstanding has given us a natural
ingredient list that is quickly becoming unpalatable.
(02:13):
Let us examine 2 words which most do not do not
comprehend fully their significance. Black's Law defines
people as a state as the people of the
state of New York, a nation in its collective and political
capacity. The aggregate or bounds of the individual who
constitute the state in a more restrictive sense and as
(02:34):
generally used as constitutional law, the entire body
of those citizens of a state or nation who are invested with
political power for political purposes. In summary,
the people are the collective body of people. Generally,
the people are viewed in a larger sense of collective.
It's who all political power resides. However,
(02:58):
the definition begins with a state and then there's a
semicolon. What does this mean? A state means
a few things. According to Black, in its largest
event, quote, state is a body politic or a
variety of men. Again, another sense of the
collective is the state, and the state, the people,
(03:20):
all true. But Black's law also says a state
is, quote, the circumstances or condition
of a being. So a being
is also a state as if a state of
being. Ask yourself, who are you at this given
time? Are you at this given time in a state of
(03:43):
being? I hope so. Who is listening to this? It's not
a man or woman in a state of conscious being.
It's not a threat to say you are a people
above the people. You are one being,
a people who make up the people, the collective.
Next, let's look at the word person. It's important to
(04:06):
note in all the black law definitions of people and
state, the word person is not used.
You'll see why, but it's because the people
are alive. They are beings
in the individual and collective state. Black's law
defines a firm as in general usage of human
(04:29):
being, I e a natural purpose. Though by
state, the term may include excuse me, go by
the statute. The term may include labor
organization, partnership, and associations,
corporations, legal representatives, trustees,
trustees and bankruptcy, or received receipts. Scope and delineation of
(04:50):
the firm is necessary for determining those bankruptcies 4th
Amendment of the Constitution of 4th protection since this
amendment expressly Lisa to persons. It
goes on to say, under the law, an individual organization
and corporation, a corporation is a person within the
meaning of the 14th Amendment Equal Protection and due process
(05:13):
provisions of the United States Constitution. So
to summarize, a person is both a potential
human being and a corporation or
just about any other nonliving entity.
The people are exclusively living beings. The
persons are not necessarily living beings,
(05:36):
but all persons, corporations, and humans are
equal. What does this mean? The founders made clear
distinctions. For example, the 4th amendment, it
says, the right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and events. They
clearly under the people as the being
(05:58):
and the person as the court or body. There is a
difference. Fast forward to the 14th amendment which reads,
all customs born or naturalized in the United States are subject to the
jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the
state where they reside. Do you see the sleight of
hand? It could have read all people born
(06:20):
or nationalized. But instead, in 18/68,
all purpose was used, and the labor union, the
corporation, and the husband became equal to a citizen.
The 14th continued. No state shall make or enforce any law
which celebrates the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States, nor any state deprive any person of life, liberty,
(06:44):
or property without the law, nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the law.
I often ask myself the question, if the people in
18/60 8 understood that by granting persons,
remember non fictional entities, all the protections of
law, which was originally designed to protect
(07:07):
the people from the purpose, the fictional
entities. The people now compete with
corporations like Facebook and Apple and other
persons for rights like freedom of speech or association.
The people are superior to the state. The
people, the being, control the person,
(07:29):
the body. But now the body is equal to the
being. The states have a poisonous ingredient. The
corporation is equal to its master, both collectively
and individually. The consequence of the 14th Amendment has
created 50 states that are also alike. The idea of
50 experiments where good and bad ideas could be tested has led to
(07:52):
often bad ideas being implemented on a grand scale.
It has led the communities and both committees and board of
directors in the form of conference, usurping rights
intended to be reserved to the people. In a
figure descent, the living have become the dead.
By treating your life as a mere franchise of a corporate state,
(08:15):
what can we do? Start acting alive. Start
calling yourself a people, a living being rather
than a person. You are a being with a person.
Be the change you wanna see in the world. Once you put this small
switch into understanding, you will start to see how you
are in your living capacity superior to
(08:37):
anything else. The people are the power. The
people can make the change. The people on a board of
directors can claim the action of a corporation. The
people can change their state, but the person is
reliant upon the state. Change the ingredients, change
the state. It's the people who face the state.
(08:59):
Wow. And that concludes my reading for today, Michael.
Dang. That was good. Like, really, it it was I
had so many visuals of, like
remember 2,001 Space Odyssey? Like, the the
computers taking over? No.
Well, that that's essentially what's happened. Right? We we are literally dealing
(09:22):
with a situation where the living being are equal to a
corporation. Now as long as Steve Jobs is around, and he's in Taylor of
Apple, Steve Jobs is a living being. It's his creative. That's his
corporation corp body. Right? He is the mind behind the
corp, the body. But then when Steve Jobs dies and someone
takes over and they have a board of directors and they have bylaws and they
(09:44):
have shareholders, All of a sudden, the body, the
corpse, starts to have a mind of its own, and it
doesn't have morality. It doesn't know the difference between right and wrong.
It doesn't have a mother or father to honor so that their days may be
long upon the land. And next thing you know, the board of directors
who don't act in the name of I am somebody, they ask in the name
(10:06):
of the shareholders of the fiduciary do you see where I'm going with this? All
of a sudden, they're telling Tim Cook, yeah. Go go tell tell them
we don't wanna associate Apple with Donald Trump. Right? Hey, Twitter. Hey.
We wanna throw Donald Trump off of Twitter because we have freedom of speech and
we have freedom of who's we? Twitter. Okay. And
if a corporation can suddenly say, I don't wanna associate
(10:28):
with somebody, but I'll take your money. You see what I'm saying?
Like, why are we competing with corporations
for our rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights?
Because the 14th Amendment says persons, which are defined
as labor unions, corporations, fictional
entities, are equal to the living beings.
(10:50):
The being is the consciousness. The person is the physical
body, the court. Right? We've let
our bed, the court, the bodies, the corporation, the
labor unions become equal to the body. And therein
is an ingredient that spoils the
experience of living in a free society
(11:12):
because the corporation, the person, have no
consciousness. Right? And they run a buck. It it
very literally is a zombie, nation.
Right? Where you have corporate bylaws that run things
that that in many cases will never change themselves.
They can't make all things. And that is that is a
(11:35):
scary place to be, and it is a direct result of the 14th amendment,
which is the sole litigated amendment of all of us.
Right? Because of this very issue, corporations have
sued to have rights of a citizen. This also leads to this new
definition of a citizen. United States code section 18
or United States code 18 section 1 defines citizen,
(11:58):
and it talks about that a citizen is a vessel.
Well, a vessel is another person. It's a pain. So all of a
sudden, apple is a vessel, you see what I'm saying, and it's a
citizen. So we might we might think, well, citizens have
to be kidding. No. They don't. No. They don't. A
citizen is just a vessel. It's very fascinating how these
(12:20):
little words create an ingredient list that Marie us sit
go, what's going on here? You know what I'm
saying? Like, now you hear things about, like, the the
stakeholders. You know, who are the stakeholders in other different issues? Because
We're anonymous. Like, corporations all of a sudden have an equal voice to
the living beings that are being being affected by something.
(12:42):
It's really stunning when you break it down. And the key to fixing this
is you have to be the solution. You have to change the way you refer
to yourself and the way you see the world so that you can see with
these eyes and ears. Or instead of saying, I am a person,
say, I have a person. I have a
body. I have a corpse. Right? I have a
(13:05):
person, but I am and then say your name. I
am a people. I am in an state. I am in an
state of being. I am conscious. I
have a person. I might have multiple persons. I might
have my body, my physical person. I might have a
corporation that I started. That's a person too, by definition. You
(13:27):
You see what I'm saying? You literally could have multiple persons
to a people. Like, change the way we say it, and all
of a sudden, pretty soon you'll get a you know, I'm just speaking
very grandiose for this moment, but you'll get a critical mass of people who will
say, hey. What's amendment? The 14th amendment that say, all people who
are born, as in all conscious moral beings
(13:48):
that are born are entitled equal protection. But We The
People install the corporation whatever the heck we want. We're not
gonna be equal to the corporation. We are superior to it. The
other thing too is in the dictionary, a municipality is a
person. So all of a sudden, you compete for your
rights with cities and state or the state of New
(14:10):
York. So the people are no longer superior to the person
as defined as a state or a government entity. Right?
We compete with them for our rights, for our protection.
Our chief amendment is one where We The People We the People
have to take a critical look at it, and We the People are the solution.
Love that. Marie, did you wanna say something? Yeah. That's really good. And I
(14:34):
think Terry's gonna be cut off in a minute, but I just was thinking, you
know, with Twitter, with Donald Trump I mean,
we really do need to reevaluate how we look at
corporations, the master. Like, they've become a
master to the people. Yep. The body has in the
scripture, it talks about Christ being the brain, the head, and the
(14:55):
body being the church. Think of it in terms of of being,
the consciousness, the consciousness of Christ and the church.
We'll come back. It is really interesting when you think about it. And, you
know, it's funny because I was, like, I I was talking to Taylor, and I'm
like, so, you know, you and I in just normal book,
like, conversations, like, would we would it make a difference? Like, what are we
(15:18):
you know we're often not I mean, semantics
are important, but often in just casual conversations, we don't think a ton
about stuff. We often have, you know, people in person, we have
kind of a general idea. And he's like, it's so interesting to watch, like, right
now, the Supreme Court ruled on Trump the ballot.
And he they're like he's like, they rule on the little words.
(15:41):
They pick apart these little war words and what do they mean, and then they
interpret it to those words. So, really, when you do
when you do exchange words that for us might seem like not a big
deal, when you bring that up in court cases and different things
like that, it becomes a very big deal. It is a
very big deal. And what he's pointing to, which is standing
(16:02):
in our morality, standing as living
people, and getting used to that and realizing how we
have bought into the idea of the protections
of the corpse. Yeah. That we feel that we're
in better shape to enlist in creating the corp
because it supposedly gives us less liability.
(16:25):
And so it's a mind game. And when when
I'm speaking with people and I say, well, I would rather contract
with you as a living woman to another living woman. I
don't wanna contract through a corp. I want to contract
as living beings Yeah. And the morality of that.
Right? And people say, well, I'm a corporation because of
(16:47):
the the liability protection. It's like, no. You're
a corporation because we have bought into
this entire system of
what what what if we called it the law of
corporation or the law instead of it being land, air, and
water law, it is corporate law.
(17:10):
We are governed by corporate law,
and this 14th amendment overtook everything.
That's why there's so much fighting going on with it. It is
so interesting. And I think a lot of it just has to do with being
aware and realizing where your consent lies
and realizing what contracts you've gotten into that you didn't realize that you got
(17:33):
into. And that you can do something about that. Yeah. You can do something about
that. It was interesting. Taylor recently called in on a vigil. It's
called Northern Neck. I think I mentioned it last time. Mhmm. I
thought it was in California. It's not. It's in the Eastern United States, the
north, somewhere up there. Anyway but he had
talked about how, you know, when you contract with the birth certificate,
(17:55):
with the Social Security card, with your driver's license, with any licensing that you
get with your business and everything like that, That is a contract that
has all sorts of terms and agreements and all sorts of things like that. Are
you aware of that? You know, like, yes, there's a benefit. Are you aware
that you're, you know, sacrificing whatever for that benefit? And
we all have the right to contract. We all have the right to, you know,
(18:17):
to contract in whatever way that we'd like, but we should know that we're
contracting, and we should know what we're giving up. And we should we're we're benefiting
you know, how we're benefiting from it. So And it's tricky
because we may come to the decision where we say, okay. I don't wanna participate
anymore. But there's this balance because we if we
wanna act this way as living beings and walk
(18:39):
this way, there are certain contracts that we
have that we need to keep
in place because you can't you can't just cut your nose
off to spite your face. So to completely comprehend
that, I had a situation where I needed to file a police
report on a grand theft Larson. Did I share that with you?
(19:01):
I think you did. And I couldn't file the report if I didn't use
my my driver's license. So before I'm
gonna give up my driver's license, I need to comprehend
what benefits I'm getting from that and just choose
when I need my license so that I've chosen the contract to
get that benefit when I am needing it. But I don't
(19:24):
need it to drive because I can choose to travel. I'm
not driving in commerce. I'm traveling as
a as a living people. And even that, you know, there's a lot
of custom and stuff within our culture that that's really
not understood. I mean, if we've got a mass amount of people that can
understand that and we can explain it to each other and the benefit of that
(19:46):
of not having that contract and how that would look, I think that that
otherwise, sometimes, you know, I remember reading about someone that was it was
a young it was a teen, and he I think he was, like, 19 or
something in Utah. And he was driving under those same
conditions, you know, and it got out of hand, and he actually
end up getting shot. And Oh. 6 months
(20:09):
ago. Yes. No. I know him well. Chase. I know him.
Yeah. I I know of him through yeah. Okay. Through the work that I
do, and it was horrible. And part of he was traveling, not
driving, and he spoke to the officers regarding
that, and the officers weren't having any of it.
And the the key to it is we can stand,
(20:32):
but we can't argue because our box is too small,
and they're armed. So if you get pulled over, you don't wanna
start schooling the police officers on the side of the road.
No. No. That's not the time and place. And a lot of what we're
talking about here is equity. Right? A lot of what we're talking about is standing
in that small square. Yeah. And I think, you know,
(20:55):
with everything, there there is prudence. And I think the more
that, you know, the idea even that Taylor is expressing with
people in persons and maybe just understanding the ramifications of
that. Like, if we can share this enough and
have it applied in enough situations, then we change the
custom of the culture. And that is really
(21:17):
like, to me, that's a peaceful way of doing it. You can also
do the Ayn Rand situation and just withdraw and, you know, and
start your own thing in your own location if that is something that
you can do. And just and however that looks, I think
A lot of people are doing that. They're calling it homesteading. Right? Right.
Yep. So they said I'm not yep. I'm not gonna purchase your food anymore. I'm
(21:40):
not gonna do this. We're gonna be self sufficient. Yeah.
And so I think that there's power in that.
I think you don't feel like so much you're, you know, dealing
with politics in the way that things go and how, you know, the
different customs that we create as time goes on with
our different using different vocabulary and stuff like that. I don't think
(22:03):
we realize how far away we have gotten
from where we started with even
the revolutionary war, with the constitution. We're
talking the other day about the word democracy and how
in in relation to with January 6th, a a threat to democracy.
(22:23):
And it's just so ironic because we don't have a
democracy. We have a republic. And we don't want a democracy.
Democracy doesn't show up anywhere in our founding papers. There's no
interest, but we've been we've been programmed. You know?
It's this signaling. I know. I this may sound
surprising and crazy, but it has been intentional.
(22:45):
Uh-huh. That there's this book called the 5,005,000 year
leap by Skousen, and he talks about the different things that
happened that show how intentional this was, the move
from using verbs, like words to describe what we
are to then make people think that we are a democracy.
And, you know, it's interesting because at first, Taylor like, you know, I'm I'm
(23:08):
not trying to overthrow the government. Oh my gosh. And, you know, you're a threat
to democracy. And he's like, well, actually, in the most literal
sense of that, I guess I am. Like, this isn't the government
that we'd have agreed to and is under the constitution and different things
like that. Like, this is a republic. You guys are a threat to the
republic. Exactly. And what a concept. And you you talk
(23:30):
about I remember when I first started hearing mind control,
all the mind control and and mind programming, I was like, this is so far
fetched. And the conspiracy theorists, it was such a turn off.
But you start realizing that those are actually that's
actually happened. And what he what he was saying
earlier today regarding listening
(23:52):
to these things, that is mind control and zombieism.
Like, we have bought into that programming, right,
TV programming, and it has been intentional.
And it's far fetched to think all these people got together
and did this, but you know what? It's not that many people.
It's the media and and them being
(24:15):
an arm of the Democratic Party. And the Democratic
Party got taken over. Why you know, it's
like the 2 parties are almost the Uniparty. It's
they're they're 1 in the same, but the Democrat
party under Kennedy was not today's
Democratic party. No. Not at all. And I think that we've even seen
(24:37):
that. Is it Bill Maher that's like, I don't even know what's going
on. And, anyway, just, you know, people that are like, I don't
recognize my party. It's got And we don't rec and they don't recognize the
country. I mean, this this is so bizarre, what we are
living through, and is and thank goodness today
that Supreme Court decision that came down
(24:59):
that had the Colorado putting Trump
back on the ballot and 30 other 30 other
states trying to keep him from being on the ballot.
And the most important part, and I thought of you and Taylor, of the
decision is that one of the supreme court judges said it
has not been proven that Trump
(25:22):
tried to do an insurrection. Yeah. Yeah.
I mean, they're just that's huge. And for the j sixers,
that's huge. That is huge. Step in the right
direction. Actually, this last week, there was one of the
appeals went to the higher a higher court, and it has to do with a
lot of the j six cases, including Taylor's. Given
(25:44):
that extra point, right, that it was
Yep. The enhancements. The enhancement. Mhmm. That's huge.
A big deal. It's a big deal. You know, I think about Russiagate
and all that stuff, the accusations about Trump and Russia, and
then years later I think 4 years later at the end of his presidency,
oh, I guess there's nothing. And I think about that even with, like,
(26:07):
January 6th and stuff like that. This stuff takes so much time to
flush out. And in the meantime, they can just have a heyday with their
words and what they call it and what they call you and what they say,
and it's just it's it's
overwhelming. But to me, I'm like you know, with all these things that keep
coming up, I wonder if people that see Trump in
(26:29):
a certain way can take a step back and
say, wow. You know? Like, why are they doing all this
to him? Like It it it it it literally is
it literally it's part of the evidence that there's
probably something to trying to silence him. Yeah. Right?
It's like, whoever they cancel is probably speaking some truth. And I
(26:51):
hope everyone takes a look at each situation and
discerns it for themselves and comes to their own conclusion
as opposed to accepting whatever we're fed, whatever
programming, because we have the capacity
to discern. It's within us to know what the truth
is, and it doesn't have to be a long
(27:13):
arduous trek to figure it out and to come together with
other people that will allow you to explore and talk about it and say, what
do you think, and why do you think that? It's so important. And
we don't even have to agree, but I just wanna know where you're coming Freedom.
You know? But and let's start with that. Something else that happened this
week was that reporter Freedom, I wrote it down, Blaze
(27:35):
Media, Steve Baker, He
was arrested and charged this week. For
reporting. For simply reporting. Okay.
So let me get let me pick this up really fast. Glenn
Beck, I actually posted it on my website because I
have that part that we showed last time. It's called other peasants. Yep.
(27:57):
Yep. Yep. And it's got the Sunday devotional and then the stuff about other
people around January 6th. This is what Glenn Beck said
on Twitter that I copied and pasted and put on here.
The FBI has arrested Blaze Media investigative journalist
on 4 misdemeanor charges, knowingly entering or remaining
in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority.
(28:20):
And he says in parentheses, so will they arrest the New York Times
journalist who entered before Steve through a broken window?
Wow. Will they? No. Another
charge, disorderly and destructive conduct in a restricted building or grounds
didn't happen. Disorderly conduct in a capital building
didn't happen. Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol
(28:43):
building, didn't happen, Glenn Beck. Anyway, I
just thought it was so interesting. I you know, he is a pretty
famous person and someone that we often think of as insulated
from this kind of thing. And my
heart just dropped when I saw that. And then also a little bit of
me was like, you know, they have been able to paint
(29:05):
these men and women in a certain way. And I
think seeing that clip of him getting
arrested by the FBI, they wanted him to wear, like they asked him to wear
sandals and a t shirt. He's like, no.
Anyways so and some of this stuff, I'm like, this is so ridiculous. You guys
are just letting looking for photo ops. Are we falling for this?
(29:29):
Anyway I can imagine that many people are, and I it's almost
like they're trying to expose themselves. It's hard to believe
Yeah. That they don't have the introspection. And and I feel like
and I'm starting to hear that people
serving in some of the police
forces and in the military, they're gonna they're starting to stand
(29:53):
up and say, I'm not I'm not doing this. This is morally wrong.
It's just wrong. And the FBI, CIA, all
everybody who is serving the corpse is
being told they need to do something, or in the medical
profession, inoculating these children or
whatever, you have to stand up. You cannot
(30:16):
go on. Yeah. I agree. I think
too now since there has been some time with COVID, and I think
a lot of the medical professionals have seen some really severe
backlash with heart issues, strokes, different things like that. I'm
curious the sentiment about it all. And I really
do think between all of that, between lying about
(30:38):
a lot of that, lying about political stuff surrounding,
like, Trump's death Yeah. And it'll take over. But
I just wonder. I mean, you guys are shooting yourselves in the foot. You are
you've you've played your cards too much. You have
you know, I'm like, this is When the COVID thing came out and I
contacted my daughter's pediatrician, and I said, you know, she has some health
(31:00):
issues. Obviously, she can't get this. Can you please write her a medical
excuse? And she said, well, we just got a letter from the AMA,
American Medical Association. They're calling saying that
if we do that, we'll lose our license. And I thought, oh, so you don't
wanna lose your Lisa, so you're gonna inoculate these kids. So it's not
about best practice. Just to work there. And there's a lot of,
(31:23):
you know, fear they're gonna lose their income. But what about your conscience and
the morality of it? Taylor, you're back. Yes. I
am. Yay. Hello, sir. But what do we
got? What do we got? What do you got for us? Well, we've just
been yacking it up, continuing after you inspired us on the 14th
amendment and how we're gonna choose not to be corpse
(31:45):
and recognize that we are people and we need to
recognize morality, and we just were talking about
those who work for corpse that are being asked to do things that
are amoral, that they take a look at that, you know,
whether they're serving in the military, they're serving in police departments,
or they're doctors, whatever it is,
(32:07):
to to be aware of what you're doing
and be a person. Important. So in the in there's a
you know, people have heard of the DeadSpeak. Right? The Dead Sea Scroll is called
the Nag Hammadi script. There's one particular book that's called the Book of
Promise. And I know people might have different feelings on it or whatnot, but I
find this one particular passage in the book of promise very
(32:29):
interesting. So Jesus is saying he says this. He says,
he who finds the end of the world finds a corpse,
and he who sees the corpse is superior. So if you break
that down at the time of the universe, then that corpse is the root word
of corporation. It's the person. It's the body. He's
you find a bond. Right? You find a dead body. You find a
(32:53):
corpse. And he who sees, you who is
being that actually sees and hears and sees
is superior to the court. K?
So this this is both true on an individual level
and on a collective level. At the time when Jesus said that, you have the
institutional role. You have the senate. You have the
(33:15):
office of the governor, right, who the Republican Title was,
who had to fulfill a role. The person in our DNA, we have the
person of president. You know, they said that office. A
thing. A bureaucratic feat. Right? And so he's saying, when you
get to the end of the world, you're gonna end up finding a corpse, a
body, a person is a thought set.
(33:37):
But if you see it, if you recognize it as your as
it, your superior. In our day and
age, you are exactly right. How many doctors have a sense of
morality, know what's right or wrong, but the court,
the body, the hospital, you see what I'm saying? The
it tells them what they must do. The it
(33:59):
without morality. Put a mask on. Put the mask on the box. Just do it.
Take this experimental shot. But but but but it's experimental. I don't wanna be
tested on. Do it. Because the if, the
corpse, doesn't actually know what's right or wrong. It doesn't have that sense of
morality because it is not a being. It is not
endowed with our creator with certain unalienable minds.
(34:22):
There's a reason why Thomas Jefferson did say all customs are created equal.
He said all men are created equal. Men implies
you're alive. Well, men are created equal, and men
and women collectively are endowed with
certain unalienable, unalienable rights.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You can terminate a corporation.
(34:45):
You can get rid of a labor unit, but you cannot get rid of a
man or woman. That's a different moral level. You can't inform
shop. Does that make sense? There's a difference, and
we, the people, need need to start recognizing that difference. We need to
start seeing the corp as being superior. We need to
start seeing the government as a court as being superior to
(35:07):
it. We need to start injecting our moral decision
and our moral knowledge of right or wrong
into that, into the equation, which right now,
there's no morality. Right? I mean,
holy cow. Think about the Internet as a person because it
is. It's completely what we not everything. It's on
(35:31):
it. Well and it and it also like an alarm along because there's
not a being behind it. It it's out. It gets it
gets ahead of itself. Then, you know, we say, like, put the car before the
horn. Right? The top of the cart, the the thing
that's being towed along, it's in front of the horse, the living thing. The cart
gets put in front of the horse, and what happens? Nothing good.
(35:53):
Well and on social media, a lot of the problem is anonymity.
Right? That everybody without morals can easily
express their opinions and run away
as as gross as they could be. Right? Yeah. I mean, there's there's a
lot to be said about your good name. Right? Your good name that's attacking you
(36:13):
as a being. And if you have to act in your name, people have free
speech. They can be obscene and do whatever, but it
sure would be nice if we knew who they were. Right? Oh, yeah.
You're right. The anonymity that creates a corpse, that creates a fiction,
creates a screen name, a vanity name, something that's not real, that you just
spat off nonsense and is not accountable. Accountable means
(36:36):
liable to pay. Well and that's that's one of the things that's one of the
things for me doing this with you 2 that gives
me a sense of peace and,
purpose, because I don't want to do it anonymously. I want to
say I believe in this and what has happened,
and I I don't believe in what has happened being the right thing, but
(36:59):
I believe in in taking the time and energy
to expose what's going on for you as a family and to
not do it anonymously. Lisa of the most difficult things as
a criminal defendant, you get treated like a person, and the first thing they want
you to do is give over your living rights to what it occurs. Have a
right to see I'll waive that. Right? You have a right to
(37:21):
speak for yourself and, I'll waive that and hire someone else to do
it. You have a right to settle all the charges and and take your excuse.
I'll waive that, but you're starting to talk to them. You don't you just sit
quietly next to them like a dead vessel. Right? You How about
confronting your accuser and having you You're just a
person. And it's like, no. No. No. No. I'm a living man. I have rights.
(37:42):
That makes sense. Lisa, that is very much the criminal justice system convert you to
a person, and then they treat you as that. You know, you're competing with
your rights with a bunch of entities. And Maria Maria is living
there? Maria is saying it's also you have the right to
confront your accusers. And here you are,
the United States for the the person who's charging you, who's
(38:04):
claiming, wrong against you and all of things. In my
case, I was I was able to do this. I stood in front of the
officers to follow the area of secret service, and I said,
you know, just well, for the for the non people that I get to interact
with, I said, you accept my sincere heartfelt apology for my whole that's
it. And so so the parliamentarian, the secret service to the officer,
(38:25):
with the exception of the FBI, he really didn't wanna accept my apology. They all
accepted my apology, so the claim is settled. Hey. There's no living
man that was brought to that court that could say you harm me.
In the case of the officer, I asked them specifically, did
I hurt, harm, injure, and threaten you? Because if I hurt, harm, injure, and threaten
you, then I owe a matter of restitution. As as a right,
(38:47):
as a man, I need to make you whole. They said no. All 3
of them said no. And then I said, you you said, like, a zero
heart Taylor apology. And all 3 of them said, yeah. One of
them said, it's water under the bridge. He smiled. He smiled.
It's water under the bridge, man. No problem. The other one, the the one that
I interacted with the most, he said, no, man. We're good. It's captain's chest. And
(39:10):
he said, no. We're good. We're good, man. Thank you so much.
I said man to man. I Taylor accuse them of what the
supposedly people I have called in, allegedly. Right? I asked
them, did I hurt harm insurance or anything away? No. You said my apology
for my soul and the events that day. You know? So it's very odd.
And they said, yeah. And then I said, I accept your testimony, and I
(39:32):
returned to the settlement disclosure without arguing with the fact that I'm
not here to cast someone. I'm not here to make arguments. I'm not here to
litigate today. I'm here to settle the claims against
right? And I was able to do that. The standby counsel that was assigned
to me by the court, not the guy I asked. He fired up. Didn't pay
him. He's not not my attorney. But, you know,
(39:55):
casually in the hallway, we felt he's like, man, I am loving that.
I've never seen that in a corporate. I've never seen it where you could square
up with something like that. And And I was like, well, that's how I would
do it on a constructive site because I have the right to take my future.
That's right. I have the right people making claims or charges against me,
a man, a living being. I have a right to get fight with
(40:16):
them. Yes. Of course, I have that. And the the prosecution
objected to it, and the judge overruled it. I think they objected for it
3 times or 4 times, and the judge overruled it every time because
he I believe I believe he cognized that,
yes, you have, as a man, as a living moral
authentic being, you have the right to face your future and
(40:38):
think good. This prevent him from drawing in here, and we can talk about
maybe the reason why he did that some, you know, some other time.
But this is all resolved. But, you know, again, you have to ask
yourself who's in charge, the moral sentient being
or the person of the judge, the office of
the judge. As the judge said to me, I only have the ability which the
(41:00):
legislature prescribes. It seems he's following a
court. He's following an act. He's following a
a a lesson, you know, a a a set of writing instead of being a
living being making moral decision. Now then you're That's
my observation about making a claim or allegation in any way. I'm
just saying it kind of as a generality. You know, he said at the
(41:22):
end, well, he remanded me. There is no evidence that you're a flight risk.
And I'm pretty sure that's the quote exact. I don't have the transcript. It says
there is no evidence that you're a flight risk, but there's no evidence that you
will not commit violence on the former congressman's behalf. Now
will or will not are the same thing.
There's no evidence that you will or will not
(41:45):
commit violence on the former president's behalf that you were handed me. He
I've made a judgment. K? And he has every right to do that at that
point. But I still have a right to settle all the claims he's performing.
And, you know, we're in this dilemma. You know, we're we're
I I know who I am. I know who I am very well. And at
the end of the day, you know, I will follow the law to the letter
(42:08):
of the law and I including all of my unalienable
rights. That's my that's my duty. You know, I have I
have played in my mind the the
idea and the the reliving of what you went through. If I
were a jury, given the instructions, and I
wanted to be a woman, would it have
(42:29):
been possible to to not accept
the instructions that were given? Is it is it possible
for any of us just to be on juries and to say to the judges,
we're we don't accept these parameters? These are not
moral. It's not fair. You would have you would have to be a you
would have to be a pretty strong willed living being
(42:52):
knowing, you know, the different moral position between right or wrong and knowing what your
moral obligation is while sitting on a jury. Because the way the judge's
composition thing was we follow the law. I'm gonna tell you the
law. This is what the law says. These are the jury in front.
If f y z, you must convict of the law. If f y
z, you must convict of the law. So when you hear those things,
(43:15):
again, if you don't know that you're superior to, quote,
the law in in a legalistic sense, not so much in a a
law Taylor kind of way. Right? But if you don't understand that that you
as a member of the jury have the right to solve a patient, no matter
what the evidence, you can make a moral decision to acquit. Does that
make sense? You can because in a in a very true sense, the
(43:37):
law, the written law, and to the living man are
equally on trial. The jury is to decide if the law is
even worth it. I mean, there is an element of truth
to the fact that they Marie some laws so that people
will break them so that they can have control, so that they can break speeding
tickets, so that they can have speed traps, so that it you go on and
(43:58):
on and on. Right? They make that I mean, that's one of the the dystopian
problems that we have with our society. There are some laws that are literally made
to be broken so that they could charge you and either make money or
have control or whatever the case is. So a jury is supposed
to intercept an element of of living morality into it and
say, hey. That law is a fight. That law is not, you
(44:20):
know, just. That law is not moral. And
I I I judge the law more than I judge the man. And there's other
instances where maybe the law is inadequate and the jury goes, you know
what? This is wrong. You know what I mean? The the the jury has an
incredible amount of power, but the way that they do, they write the jury instructions
the way that the judge trusts them and to instruct them. I will tell you
(44:40):
the law, and I'll you know, I'm paraphrasing everybody. And I'll tell you if you
go off the law. Here, let me read this. Right? So it would take a
very strong willed moral person on a jury
to stand up to his peers on that jury or, you know, to
stand up to the quote law and make a superior
decision to it. It's it's the way it is. That's why in
(45:02):
the United States of America, you know, between we deal with let's just
make 8.2%, it's difficult to do that. But a lot of that
is because the average the average people
do not understand the difference between a people and a person. They do not understand
the difference between their moral consciousness and
the custom of the corporation and that they're not necessarily
(45:24):
equal. You know what I'm saying? Like, they they have based themselves
to the level of a thing, a fictional entity instead
of being ascending to their level of consciousness.
Right? And and if you were to get scriptural, you talk about Christ consciousness, things
like that. But that that's probably is the element of what's happening here
is people have to space themselves to be fictional entity living
(45:47):
in a matrix instead of ascending and living the true
law, which is due no entry, due no harm, love God, love your
neighbor as yourself. Right? So simple.
Yes. As of between those two things. We need to extend as a
people understanding that we as individual people have
purpose and as a people. Always comes too soon.
(46:09):
Always, especially for you. I am gonna transcribe
this. A lot of what he said here,
we need to study, and it is very simple.
The the the system we live in
and we're entrapped in has it very convoluted. But
what he just said is part of the education we've gotta focus
(46:32):
on. And it's interesting too because when you go back to when it was
set up, like, even the fact there is the jury
nullification exists. And people don't know.
Yeah. It's evidence that there is something there.
And there are things like that all over the place. We just have no idea
our power. And and I would venture to say,
(46:55):
all the judges who put forth
that they are directing the law
and it is a misdirect, that's so
amoral. And those are the directions that they're given by the
corpse. And it's it's They're supposedly doing
what they're supposed to do according to the courts, just like the AMA
(47:18):
tells the doctors to inflict this experimental
vaccine. I mean, we have to stop. That's
what I was just gonna say. We've seen it all over the place within the
within the last couple years. It's these organizations that tell
you, you know, we have all these things that are like, yes. We you know,
doctors, you prescribe what you need to, and there's this best practice and stuff like
(47:40):
that. But the second that the corporation wants to come in and implement
something, people have so much faith in that corporation,
so much faith in studies and different things like that. And I'm not saying that
those aren't valuable. But what I'm saying is they are not
moral and they are not sentient, like like we have been
talking about this whole time. And often there is a board of people that
(48:02):
have all sorts of, you know, different things. Like, there's a reason why
doctors are able to freely practice, like, best
practice things. You know what I mean? Like, that was Well, they take an
oath. They take an oath to our health. So what are
they doing intellectually, morally? What are they doing with that?
What did this pediatrician do with that? When I
(48:24):
said to her, you can't you you gotta, you know, help my daughter
not do this. Oh, well, I'll lose my license.
How are you squaring that? Is there any cognitive dissonance there for you?
Right. Yep. Yep. The corporations have overcome
the people, and it can't and it wasn't set up to be that way. It
wasn't it doesn't have to be that way. We just have to shift how we
(48:46):
look at things, how we think of things, how we how we see,
I think, people in general idolize people,
organizations, things like that. We need to take a step back, and we need to
look at the better good, the greater good. And, yeah, the
days are over that, you know, Bill Barr can say, oh, there's nothing to see
here, folks, and then no one looks because people are looking.
(49:08):
And we've got lots of people coming together doing this. You
know? You're not alone. We have an entire
community of people in our platform. Marie and
Taylor have their website, and, you
know, we're gonna keep doing these broadcasts. Great. Thank you
so much, Lisa. Thank you, Marie. Big test. Speak
(49:30):
soon. Thanks. Have a great one. You too. Bye.
Thank you so much for tuning in to this episode. If our
podcast resonates with you, know that you're not alone.
There's a private community awaiting your discovery at invitation
to Freedom, where we come together in the spirit of
unity and ask some tough questions, share
(49:53):
insights, educate, and assist people who are interested
in reigniting the American spirit and living free.
We hope that you'll accept this invitation to check us out today.
Visit invitation to freedom dot com. That's invitation
with the number 2, freedom.com.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.