In preparation for article/speech that I want to write, I wanted to do a consultation with Dr. Doug McGuff both to check my understanding and to make sure I didn't make too many errors in describing the science behind my latest distinctions:
1. The difference between so called optimal and good results is very small and is likely irrelevant in the long run. In fact, what may be optimal for one goal may well be detrimental to a different goal. (health vs performance being just one example)
2. Obsessing over "optimal" may in fact be an obstacle to "good" results.
3. Expanding on Doug and John's suggested definition of health as being largely dependent on balance between anabolic and catabolic states. As an over riding principle, in the absence of which, most if not all other discussions on what's "good" or "bad" for you or for your health or for your results, are not necessarily wrong but wholly incomplete and besides the point without this context. (straightening deck chairs on titanic)
4. We discuss also why many studies for reasons above, and others may bear little relevance to real world results. (among many shortcomings, I don't care what you can accomplish in 6, 8 or 12 weeks.... because I and my clients are hopefully planning our health and fitness for a lifetime)
Spooky Podcasts from iHeartRadio
Whether you’re a scaredy-cat or a brave bat, this collection of episodes from iHeartPodcasts will put you in the Halloween spirit. Binge stories, frights, and more that may keep you up at night!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.