Is MAHA Pushing the WEF’s Wearable Agenda? w/ Dr. Ealy

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
Welcome to Man in America, a voice of reason in a
world gone mad. I'm your host,Seth Holehouse. So as we look at
what's happening under the Trumpadministration, and as I've been
really kind of trying to bringattention to, I'm seeing being
objective here, I'm seeing a lotof different actions that I feel
like are leading us more intosome sort of potential

(00:35):
technocratic system where thisdigital infrastructure has more
and more control. And there's alot of red flags I'm seeing. The
Palantir, you know, kindaintegration into the government,
big tech CEOs and big tech, youknow, standing up behind Trump.
You know, what is their agenda?Even RFK junior, the past couple
of days coming out, sayingliterally I'll play the video in

(00:57):
this interview, saying that hisvision is for every American to
be wearing a wearable technologyin the next four years, which is
really, really strange that hewould say that. Like, why is
that that important? Do youwanna make America healthy
again? Start by banning theCOVID vaccine, and then go look
at the childhood schedule.
And there you go. You can youcan make America more healthy,

(01:17):
get rid the autism you'retalking about so much, and that
much more. So I have a lot ofquestions with this, but joining
me today is my good friend,doctor Henry Ealy. And I
appreciate him because he's atruth teller. He doesn't try to
say niceties to say you likehim.
He says what's on his heart andwhat he believes to be true. And
so this is gonna be really avery candid, very frank, honest,

(01:39):
sober discussion about where thecountry is heading and whether
or not there is some sort ofKlaus Schwab esque, you know,
transhumanist agenda that'sseeping into the fabric of the
American culture and and thisthe the fabric of our society
because we need to be vigilantin watching for this stuff. So
please enjoy the interview withdoctor Henry Ealy. You probably

(02:02):
think your four zero one k issafe, that it's growing, that
it'll be enough for yourretirement. But what if it's
not?
Here's the truth most peoplenever hear. Your four zero one k
was never designed to make youwealthy. It was created in a
corporate boardroom to shiftretirement costs and investment
risk onto you, designed to keepyour money trapped, exposed to

(02:24):
Wall Street crashes, inflation,and uncertainty you can't
control until now. Right now,Americans are taking back
control by turning to realassets like gold and silver.
Noble Gold Investments hashelped thousands protect their
future by converting part oftheir retirement savings into
physical gold and silver so theycan stop worrying about the

(02:46):
market and start sleeping betterat night.
So talk to Noble Gold today andlearn how safe and easy it is to
roll over your four zero one kinto a tax advantaged precious
metals IRA without penalties orheadaches. Visit
goldwithseth.com or call (626)654-1906 to get your free wealth

(03:08):
protection kit, including a stepby step guide to get started.
It's time to get your money outof the danger zone and into
something real. Again, that's(626) 654-1906 or
goldwithseth.com. Doctor HenryEaly, man, is it so good to have
you back on.
Thank you so much for joining metoday.

Speaker 2 (03:28):
Oh, Seth, thanks for having me back, and big shout
out to everybody in youraudience. Thanks for all the
love and support and everything.We really, really appreciate it.

Speaker 1 (03:35):
Oh, absolutely. Actually, Arlo, it's funny
because we just were on on thisinterview for, like, two or
three weeks ago. And, of course,I I I could do weekly interviews
with you and never get bored.But I was scrolling through my
Twitter feed. I I refuse to callit x.
To me, x is almost like you'retaking something and making it
even more transhumanist, butit's calling it, like, a single

(03:58):
letter x. Right? And isn't it Ithink it was Derek Bros I was
talking to who told me that inthe transhumanist kind of
organizations that you you haveto kinda give your children a
name that's it's like anumerical name. And so people,
like, look at Elon Musk and howhe named his his one child is is
some weird kind of kind of namethat it it's actually part of

(04:19):
the whole transhumous agenda tomove into these just numerical
and alphabetical kind of numbersand codes for things. Anyway,
I'm kinda digressing a little

Speaker 2 (04:30):
bit there. Did he talk about why?

Speaker 1 (04:32):
No. It's to

Speaker 2 (04:34):
get you away from naming children based upon
biblical names and naming thembased upon angelic names.
Really? Yeah. Interesting. Theywant they want everybody
completely dissociated withanything relevant to or that
would allude to a, a sacredtext.

Speaker 1 (04:52):
Wow. Interesting. Well, I was always happy with
the the origin of Seth. I thinkthat Seth was the name Seth,
think he was no one of Noah'ssons, if I remember correctly.
Or Noah

Speaker 2 (05:03):
I'm not familiar.

Speaker 1 (05:04):
No. No. No. No. Either way.
Like, it's kind of continuing ononto the the topic at hand.

Speaker 2 (05:10):
Name, though. Right?

Speaker 1 (05:11):
It is. Yeah. It it is. I I I forget it's up on top
of my tip of my tongue. I wasscrolling through my Twitter
feed, and I came across a recentclip of RFK talking about
wearables, which I'll play theclip, and I thought immediately,
I gotta get doctor Elian to talkabout this because this is right
up your alley.
And I see you almost every, youknow, comment RFA RFK puts out

(05:33):
there. I'll see your reply to iton there. It's like, you're just
hammering, which is really good.

Speaker 2 (05:38):
There well and and just to be fair, I want
everybody to know I'm not just ahammer. I'm objective. And so
president Trump pulled the theapparently the funding from
Gavi. Yeah. We have to confirmthat.
I don't want the headline. Iwanna see the actual line item
in the dollars pulled out, andI'm sure that was due to some
of, RFK junior's influence. Andso you wanna give credit where

(06:00):
credit is due. That is, in myopinion, so far of all the moves
I've seen, that has been thebest move. Pulling money from
these these really cabalcabalistic, you know, demon
demonic organizations is a goodmove always.

Speaker 1 (06:15):
Oh, I I couldn't agree more. I I saw that over
the past couple of days as well.Because I think RFK put a
statement out about it and, youknow, and how Gavi wasn't, kind
of, you know, doing the propervaccine research. And so

Speaker 2 (06:27):
But but but here's let me let me let me jump on
that one real quick. K? Whywouldn't you do that earlier
than you did it? Why did itcoincide right after this very
poorly received commentary onwearables?

Speaker 1 (06:43):
That's true. So you think that it it was kind of,
he's trying to kinda bringpeople back in. Right?

Speaker 2 (06:50):
So the way the way this stuff kinda works for them
and behind the scenes is theyhave a they have a list of how
much ground they can give oncertain things, like today on
Thymarisol saying we just won'trecommend it to pregnant women.
You're not recommending mercuryto pregnant women? How nineteen
ninety of you? I can go get yousome dial up Internet if you
like. So, like, what we have todo is understand that when they

(07:14):
take a lot of heat, they havesomething sitting there waiting
that they can give us to try toplacate us.
And so the thing that is tryingto placate us is we'll pull from
Gavi. Now they say they pullfrom Gavi, but we know Gavi is
Bill Gates, and we know BillGates' fingerprints are all over
this HHS. So that might besomething where they said, well,
we're gonna do it, and you thinkthey're gonna do it. But if you

(07:36):
don't go and follow-up and checkand make sure that they actually
did it, it just became aheadline to win the conversation
and steer you away from talkingabout this this absolute fiasco
of everybody's gonna be wearingwearables, in the next four
years, which, of course, syncsup with their agenda twenty,

(07:57):
thirty milestones. Milestones.
So, you know, we have to starthaving conversations. We have to
understand. They're ahead of usin terms of how they understand
how we think and how we work.They have so much data. Of
course, they're ahead of us.
You have to be aware that whenthey are saying something and
they look like they're giving ussomething, we haven't really
been given anything. It was partof their we can we can give them

(08:19):
this if they if they need acrumb, we can give them this.
Nothing of significance willhave occurred, Seth, until the
pharmaceutical companies aresuing the HHS. When the they are
suing the HHS, now we havesomething going that that they
hadn't planned for. But until wesee the pharmaceutical companies

(08:39):
suing Robert f Kennedy junior,this administration, this is all
part of the plan.

Speaker 1 (08:44):
It's all charade. It's interesting interesting.
I'll I'll play the clip. Justhad a quick thought. You
mentioned that they're monitoryou kinda that they're
monitoring and and they'regauging the reaction.
And my my first, I was like, oh,wow. I wonder if they're
actually kinda looking atTwitter and seeing what the
public response is. But then Ithought to myself, why do that?
They've got Palantir. They'remerging Twitter data with

(09:06):
literally, like, literally withheart rates.
And they can say, wow. Withinthis large amount of
conservatives in this database,we saw that this particular
comment increased the emotionalkind of rage frequency by
seventeen percent. And, like,that's literally what they're
probably doing as they're youknow, and you're probably on

(09:26):
you're probably on the top ofsome Palantir list.

Speaker 2 (09:29):
Yeah. Why why

Speaker 1 (09:30):
is it because

Speaker 2 (09:30):
they want your biometric data? Exactly. The the
biometric data gives themability to control what what is
going out. It doesn't meanthey're gonna change their
trajectory on anything, andthat's why I say we have to wait
until we see a lawsuit. Alawsuit means that the plan
isn't going according to planand that there's some disruption

(09:51):
between the government and theand the ruling, whatever elite
that are are dictatingeverything.
Until we see that, nothing hashappened.

Speaker 1 (10:01):
I see. So it's kinda like without a lawsuit,
basically, what that's tellingus is that we're still pretty
happy with how things are goingat HHS Mhmm. From the
perspective of Big Pharma. Well,let me I'll go and play that
video now. It's it's a shortone, and then I I've got a
follow-up video of Klaus Schwab,which I'll play those back to
back, and then and then we'llkinda dive head into this.
So here's RFK, twenty twoseconds.

Speaker 3 (10:21):
Diet, about their physical activity, about the way
that they live their lives. Wethink that wearables are a key
to the MAHA agenda, makingAmerica healthy again, and we
are gonna we my my vision isthat every American is wearing a
wearable within four years.

Speaker 1 (10:40):
And I'll just comment really quickly. I'll let you
comment as well. But that seemslike a strange statement. Right?
My vision is that every Americanis wearing a wearable within
four years.
That that that that's notsomething that you would just
say casually. It's almost likeyou were supposed to say that.

(11:00):
It's so precise that my visionis that every American is
wearing a wearable in the nextfour years. What do you what do
you think?

Speaker 2 (11:08):
Well, it it suits right up with, their their
intention of for the enslavementof humanity. You know? It it
syncs up with agenda 2030. Itsyncs up with the advent of the
smart city, the fifteen minutecity. It syncs up with the,
increased usage of the WBANnetwork, the widebody area

(11:30):
access network.
You you folks, we you have tostart doing some reading. And
this is, Seth, where I will takepeople straight to because the
easy thing is we say something,it sounds outlandish, and it it
it and it is outlandish. It'sabsolutely psychopathic when you
hear what they're talking about,but you have to then go and
follow the money. So then whatI've been doing this week is
taking people to PurdueUniversity. University.

(11:52):
They have a center for Internetof bodies. They have a funded
center at Purdue University forthe Internet of bodies, and this
is the conversation we have toget out to people. All of these
little baby steps that don'tseem to sync up are actually to
get you into the transhumanisticagenda. There you go. World's

(12:16):
first center for the Internet ofbodies right there.
All of this is to make thisnormal, transhumanism normal.
All of this is to the x,changing Twitter to x and going
dark, and all all of this is tonormalize it. So it's this slow
kinda turning up of the pot, youknow, the frogs in the pot kinda
thing. It's that slow turning upof it, and this is our time

(12:39):
where we have to beexceptionally vocal, ambivalent.
And, I mean, I'm I'm openlyhostile to it, and I'm not gonna
hide that because of somebody'sfeelings or something like that.
I was raised my my father I wasraised on doctor Seuss and
Harriet Tubman and, you know,and Frederick Douglass. My

(13:00):
father drilled into me whatslavery is so that I could see
it wherever it was even by adifferent name. And when we get
into the history of our country,we have a couple of very
important events that have takenplace that take us into this
conversation, Seth. Alright. On06/19/1865, we have Juneteenth.

(13:24):
We have the official end of thecivil war with general order
number three executed inGalveston, Texas. Right? So now
the war's over. Everybody'sfree. They didn't have a plan
for that.
So the powers that be thatrealized they were losing
control over the country spentthe next six years coming up
with the act of eighteen seventyone. The act of 1871 creates

(13:49):
Washington DC and turns ourcountry from a republic into a
corporation. You wanna verifythis, you can and you can see
that The United States is acorporation on Dun And
Bradstreet. You can go and seethat The United States Supreme
Court is on the, same thing. TheUnited States Supreme Court is a
corporation.
Our supreme court isn't a branchof government. It's a

(14:12):
corporation. Alright? And theseare crazy things to come in
contact to because that's notwhat we've been taught at all
through civics or anything thatwe've learned. We thought that
these were independent, butstarts explaining why isn't the
system working because thesystem is working exactly the
way it's designed.
It's not designed for us. Whatthey figured out at the end of
slavery was they were thinkingtoo low. They only saw black

(14:35):
people as slaves. They didn'tsee poor people of all different
you know, whether you'reimmigrant, whether you're white,
didn't matter. They didn't seeeverybody else as slaves, and
they said, you know, we cannotwe can do this better.
So what they started erectingwas a structure of control, and
this starts with in the, lateeighteen hundreds and the
eighteen eighties. You have thereally, it's about it's about

(14:57):
1871 this starts. You have theadvent of the eugenicist
movement. Now the eugenicistsare crazy people. Alright?
These are psychopaths withmoney, but they are smart enough
to realize nobody's gonna beable to understand, let alone
figure out what eugenicism is,so they rebrand themselves. They

(15:18):
call themselves progressives.And so now anybody who's in the
world that's calling themself aprogressive is also calling
themself a eugenicist, andthat's where you see what are
the progressive movements oftoday. The progressive movements
of today are climate change.Right?
We have to do everything we canto stop climate change. Never

(15:39):
mind that, yeah, the climate ischanging because they're
changing it. You see, thesechemtrails we see in the sky,
they're to drop down aluminumand barium and, of course,
genetically modified organisms.We inhale those in. Those are
going to short circuit our body.
That's what aluminum in thehuman body does. If you wanna do
a quick search on on aluminum inParkinson's, for example, you'll

(16:01):
find over 200,000 studies onthis. We have all the data in
the world to know what aluminumdoes. But what a lot of people
don't know about aluminum, Seth,is that aluminum is also, when
it gets into the soil, going tostunt root growth, and it's
going to cause crop collapse.Okay?
And and and it's going to alsopromote fungal and yeast

(16:24):
infections in the human body andfungal infections on our crops.
So they get what they want inthat here's a problem that we
created, but we're gonna blamethe sun. We're gonna blame
carbon. We're gonna blame carbonemissions. We're all carbon
beings.
If you read through what theyhave agreed to, they wanna get

(16:45):
down to zero carbon emissions.That means there is no life on
this planet if we have zerocarbon emissions. I wrote a peer
reviewed paper on this. So whereit takes us to is this deeper
understanding of this biggeragenda agenda, and that's where
you see the Internet of bodiesat Purdue University, the first
one. Well, that's the first.
You if you don't think there'sgonna be more centers for

(17:07):
Internet of bodies at majoruniversities throughout this
country, you are tripping. BillGates is going to fund all of
that. And what we have to do nowis we have to have this honest
conversation about we are beingmarched back into slavery by a
different name. And if we don'thave the courage to have this
conversation, then we aredooming our children, and I

(17:28):
refuse to let that happen.

Speaker 1 (17:30):
Well, I'll pull this up right here. Patent number
O60606, which I'm sure you'refamiliar with. And this is a
patent to, harvest body energy,right, to mine cryptocurrency
using body activity data. So youhave a human body down there, it
shows. You have a sensor.
You have the user device, suchas an Apple Watch or a wearable

(17:54):
that then connects to acommunication network that goes
into, you know, probably aserver, cryptocurrency systems.
But I wonder, yeah, I wonder whothe patent holder is for this.
Oh, you never would have guessedit. Microsoft technology. My
goodness.
But let me let me just play thisquick video of Klaus Schwab.
This is fifty one seconds, and,we'll play this because

(18:18):
actually, it's funny enoughthat, you know, look at patent
O60606. You look at RFK.Everyone's wearing a wearable
next four years. Let's play thisright here.
Klaus Schwab from the horse'smouth, and let's see what what
what he has to say. Let's let'ssee if this person says, seems
like the WEF has rebrandeditself as MAGA or MAGA and MAGA.
Well, let's see what ClausSchwab has to say. Actually,

(18:43):
what I'm gonna do for peoplethat are listening on the audio,
I'm gonna, read the translationto this over top of it because
it's not, in English, I don'tthink. The guy says, today, at
the end of this, we are talkingabout chips that can be
implanted.
When will that be? Claus Schwab,certainly the next ten years, at
first, we'll implant them in ourclothes.

Speaker 2 (19:02):
Uh-huh. Certainly wearables commodity.

Speaker 1 (19:05):
And then we can imagine that we will implant
them into our brains or in ourskin. And in the end, maybe
there will be a directcommunication between our brain
and the digital world. What wesee is a kind of fusion of the
physical, digital, andbiological world.

Speaker 3 (19:28):
We think that wearables are a key to the MAHA
agenda, making America healthyagain, and we are gonna we my my
vision is that every American iswearing a wearable within four
years.

Speaker 1 (19:41):
So there you go. And Klaus Schwab's saying, it starts
off with wearing them on ourbody, on our skin. The next
step, implants. You look at ElonMusk. What's Elon Musk building?
Neuralink. Brain implants. Themerger of man and machine. The
atheist view of evolution isthat man evolves through
technology. Anyway, so Yep.

(20:04):
I'll pass it back over to you.

Speaker 2 (20:05):
Yeah. That's it. And this is where we have to wake up
right now. You know, I one of mycuriosities as a child is that
my father's teaching me aboutHarriet Tubman. You know?
I mean, you wanna talk about themost badass woman in US history?
This woman not only gets herselfout of slavery, goes through the
underground railroad, getherself out of slavery. She has
at least 16 recorded trips backto the South, never lost one

(20:28):
person that she was liberating.And how did she do that? She
carried a gun, and she toldevery single person that was
going with her, if you give upour position, they might get us,
but I'm gonna kill you first.
Now that's serious, and we needto have that kind of seriousness
right now because she understoodthe horrors of slavery having

(20:49):
lived in it. We don't have thatperspective yet. We don't have
the understanding of just howhorrible what they are proposing
is because they have gottenfantastic at marketing and
selling us a lie. The the firstlie is the climate change. The
second lie is gonna be thisfifteen minute smart city where

(21:09):
everything you need is rightthere.
We they learned from their theirfiasco with Hitler. You have to
remember, these are the samefamilies that funded Hitler that
are funding this right now. Theylearned that it humanity, when
when you try to force them intosomething, you will be met with
opposition, violent opposition.But if you make humanity afraid

(21:35):
and if you sell convenience,then what you are gonna do is
sell safety and convenience topeople that are otherwise
afraid. And, of course, they'resusceptible to being afraid
because you have seeded themwith so many preprogrammed ideas
of how horrible things were orcould be if they don't do what
you tell them to do.
This is the idea of them raisingsheep. We we instead of raising

(22:00):
eagles in this country for thelast, you know, hundred years
plus, we've been raising sheep.The last eagles were really the
World War two generation. Thoseare the last ones. When you ask
them why they didn't wanna dosomething, f you.
That's why I don't wanna do it.Now you wanna get into it more?
What a great eagle attitude. I'ma predator. I don't need your

(22:23):
permission to do anything.
What they figured out was, okay.They don't want to be forced
into it, but can we teach themto buy into it and actually pay
us for their own imprisonment,for their own poisoning, for
their own injury, for their owndeath? Can we get them to do
that? And they did. This iswhere we are today.

(22:45):
We pay for our own poisoning. Wepay for our own enslavement. We
pay for all of these thingsbecause they have sold it to us
as something that is either safefor us or something that is
going to be convenient for us.Now, Seth, you're a dad. Do you
need a smart do you need yourwashing machine to be smart?

Speaker 1 (23:05):
No. Actually, we vehemently oppose, like, every
device that I buy. Like, know,our our our, stovetop is that
oh, I bought an older model. Wehave a we have a Wolf. Right?
Beautiful, nice you know, thenew ones are really expensive. I
found an old one on FacebookMarketplace for a couple
thousand dollars. Old one, smartone. Same with our fridge. We've
got a Sub Zero fridge.

(23:26):
Brand new, really expe I foundan old one on Facebook
Marketplace. It's not smart.Couple thousand dollars. Right?
Every everything that we bought,I'm I'm putting in AC units
here, and and why I had to put amini split in for for cooling.
I found the non smart version.Right? So almost everything that
we do, we we try everythingpossible. No smart, no Alexa,

(23:47):
none of that stuff. But anyway,you're asking me.
Right? You're saying as a dad,do I need a smart, you know,
water? No. Heck no.

Speaker 2 (23:52):
Right. Well, and this is the thing. Like, I go into
people's houses, and whenAlexa's on, I go and unplug it.
They don't know I do it, but Iwhenever I see an Alexa, unplug
it. I'm like, yeah.
And while I'm here, we're nothaving a recorded session, you
know, and everything. Right?Like, we we've when I was
growing up, when you weregrowing up, there must have been
much more conversations becauseright to privacy was a very real

(24:13):
comment. It was a very realphrase, you know, and that you
have a right to privacy that youknow? And this comes out of this
World War two generation thatwas very adamant about their
privacy, because privacy andfreedom go hand in hand.
We don't hear thoseconversations anymore. We don't
hear these conversations aboutyou have a right to your medical
privacy. You have a right to theprivacy of your own decisions,

(24:33):
blah blah blah blah blah. It'slike, no. Tell everybody.
Put it out on social media.There's no privacy. You know?
Virtue signal and all this otherstuff. Well, you know, when we
start looking at this whole ideaof wearables, it starts you
know, I'm I'm a big believer inwhen people show you who they
are, believe them.
Believe them the first time. RFKjunior, and this is what I wanna
bring to everybody's attention,has a pretty nasty laundry list

(24:57):
forming right now. There's acouple of things like the Gavi
you could give up. If you wannacelebrate Skittles or Froot
Loops, go right ahead. I'm notgonna celebrate either of those.
If you wanna do a cartwheel overbeef tallow in a fast food
restaurant that has that doesn'tmove my needle whatsoever. What
does move my needle and in thewrong direction, however, is the
Arcturus twenty three zero fourmRNA self amplifying shots that

(25:21):
got fast tracked on April 10.That moves my needle. My my
thing is we sent you in, bro. Wesent you in to take vaccines off
the schedule, not to add more,and certainly not to fast track
any of these shots.
Right? Not to fast track any ofthese shots, that are self

(25:44):
amplifying. Now what's crazy,Seth, when you get in this, and
I'm just gonna keep talkingabout this all the time, we have
to have this conversation. Whenwith that particular platform,
what did they promise us?Transparency.
Radical transparency. Right?That's the that's the marketing
phrase. No longer will thereever be a vaccine that goes into

(26:05):
a clinical trial and is nottested against a truly inert
placebo, meaning like saltwater,saline. Well, you go and look at
the clinical trials on this,what do you find?
Arcturus twenty three zero four,mRNA self amplifying shot. What
is why am I so concerned aboutit? I'm not getting the shot.

(26:25):
Right? And why am I concerned?
Because it's self amplifying.That means whether you get the
shot or not, you're gonna comein contact with somebody who got
the dang shot. And when they getthe dang shot, you're going to
get vaccinated. You're gonna beexposed to the same thing that
their body cannot stopproducing. K?
That's how it all works. This iswhy this is Alamo moment for us
on this one. Well, I went intothe clinical trials on it, and

(26:49):
what did we find? You go toclinicaltrial.gov. You look up
the Arcturus twenty three zerofour platform, and what do you
see in there?
They're not testing it against aplacebo. They're testing it
against two other shots. TheArcturus, the the control group,
which is supposed to get theplacebo, will get the first shot
will be the Arcturus shot. Thesecond shot will be the first

(27:10):
generation bird flu, h five none bird flu. Okay?
That's that's what they'retesting it against. So you just
lied to us, and there's the youcan see it right there. There's
the the little hyperlink, to it.You just lied to us. You just
told us that we were gonna betesting that you're gonna be
testing against it, and you'renot testing against it.

(27:32):
Right? Look how easy that wasfor you to find, Seth. You
didn't you know, you weren'tthat we we weren't you didn't
know we were going in thisdirection. But when you look at
these studies and you startreading through, and I think
it's still is it still July 21?Yeah.
July 21 is the phase onecompletion. Right? When you look
at the studies, you know, yousay, well, why why do we need
this? Well, now I got anotherpiece of that information of why

(27:55):
we need why they say we needthis right now. I was talking
with farmer Joel I was justinterviewing him before I came
on for, for my radio show.
And I was like, this doesn'tmake sense to me. Why did they
choose the bird flu? The theArcturus 20 304 is the h five n
one bird flu shot. Okay? That'swhat they're doing.

(28:16):
And so I asked him a questionthat I'd always been curious
about. You know, do you, as afarmer, producing chicken and
cow and, you know, pigs, do youhave the right, the authority
still at this point in time tosay I'm not getting any of my
animals vaccinated? And he waslike, yes. That noose is
tightening, his words, but as oftoday, every farmer in the

(28:40):
country chooses whether or nottheir animals are vaccinated.
Oh, that's awesome.
I didn't realize that. I thoughtthere would be a lot of
regulation kinda mandating it.You'd have to jump through all
these hoops. He's like, nope. Asof today, I can just say we're
not doing it.
K? And there's a bunch of farmsout there that are doing it. I
highly encourage you to callyour farmers and buy as local as

(29:01):
you can and make sure thatthey're not using any of these
shots. So if you start puttingtwo and two together, you
realize there's a huge marketthat they haven't tapped yet.
There's this huge market of notonly mandatory vaccines for
children, not only mandatoryvaccines for specific segments

(29:22):
of the adult workforce, butthere can be mandatory
vaccinations for all livestockin this country.
And if you can push those thingsthrough, what else do you get?
Automatic liability protectionfrom the 1986 National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act and the PREPAct if it's considered for

(29:44):
emergency use, which theArcturus twenty three zero four
is, you get double protection.So now when these mRNA self
amplifying shots start wipingpeople out, no big deal. That's
just part of the agendas. It'spart of agenda 2030, 2050, 2075.
It's part of the agendas to getthe world population down to a

(30:07):
very manageable I think whatthey had it listed at for 2075
was 500,000,000.

Speaker 1 (30:13):
You know, I'm creeping up on 40 now, and let
me tell you, my body is feelingit. Between chasing my two
little girls around gettingclimbed on like a jungle gym and
constantly being on dad duty, myback and knees are basically
begging for a break by the endof the day. I used to bounce
back faster after a workout or along day outside, but now not so

(30:33):
much. That's why I'm excited toshare something that's really
made a difference for me, QualiaSynolytic. It's a first of its
kind formula designed to helpyour body naturally eliminate
senescent cells.
Basically, are zombie cells thathang around long after useful
and just clutter things upmaking you feel stiff, tired,
and old. So here's the deal,these zombie cells can seriously

(30:57):
drag down your energy, slow yourrecovery, and make your joints
ache. But, Qualia Synolytic ispacked with nine plant based
vegan compounds that areclinically tested to clear out
those zombie cells, helping youfeel years younger. And the best
part is that you only take ittwo days a month, So literally
just twice a month you take it.So I've been using it for a few

(31:18):
months now, and honestly, it'sbeen a game changer.
My soreness is way down. Myrecovery is faster, and I've got
more energy to keep up with mylittle girls. So if you want to
experience the science offeeling younger, go to
qualialife.com/seth for up to50% off your purchase and use
the promo code seth for anadditional 15% off. That's

(31:39):
qualialife.com. That'squalialife.com/seth for an
additional 15% off yourpurchase.
And folks, your older self willthank you. And a big thanks
today for Qualia for sponsoringmy show today.

Speaker 2 (31:57):
Or something like that. Like, that was the target
goal, for it. Right? And whenyou start putting that together,
you have to understand we're ateight a little over
8,000,000,000 right now. That'sa lot of people that not only
are going to die, that's a lotof people that aren't going to
be replaced through procreation.
And now it starts making senseof why would you have these
shots in the chemtrails and thefive g? Why would they all how

(32:20):
do they all work together? Well,they all work together to kill
people, and they all worktogether to enslave people, and
they all work together to reducefertility. That's what they all
work together to do. Why do youthink they don't want you using
tobacco?
Because tobacco disables some oftheir bioweapons and because it
also tobacco inspires maletestosterone. Guess why they

(32:41):
don't want you taking in anycholesterol? Because every
single reproductive hormone isbased upon cholesterol. And so
if they tell you yourcholesterol levels are too high,
and they let's say yourcholesterol levels in The United
States units are at 200, twotwenty five. As a doctor, I'm
like, that's great.
That's where they need to be.You know? I'm okay with it even
being a little bit higher, butthey're gonna they're gonna tell

(33:02):
you that they need to be underone eighty. And now they're
starting to move into lower thanone fifty, which just means that
you don't have enoughcholesterol to make these
important reproductive hormones.And that's right where they want
you because now instead of youbeing an eagle, you get to
become a sheep.
Alright? And that's And

Speaker 1 (33:21):
One quick thing for you because this just came out.
You're talking aboutdepopulation. A peer reviewed
study of one point three millionpeople in The Czech Republic
found in two two thousand twentytwo, vaccinated women had a had
thirty three percent fewersuccessful conceptions per 1,000
than unvaccinated. A thirtythree percent or a a reduction.
Right?
A thirty three percent fewersuccessful conceptions. It it's

(33:46):
like you you put this witheverything you're talking about.
The the and you get into BillGates' father. You get into
Margaret Sanger. And oh mygoodness.

Speaker 2 (33:56):
We wanna go there. We we can go we can go way into all
that.

Speaker 1 (33:59):
Right? Well, you warned me. We're gonna have some
fun today. So I'm I'm justthrowing out some some some
softballs for you.

Speaker 2 (34:05):
Right. Well well, I mean, what is Margaret Sanger?
Margaret Sanger, of course, isthe founder of Planned
Parenthood, and what is sheadvocating for? Birth control.
What you have to understand isthe eugenicists give themselves
away.
They call first of all, theycall themselves progressives.

Speaker 1 (34:21):
Yeah. Well, so it's family planning.

Speaker 2 (34:22):
Right? Right. Exactly. We're gonna plan your
family. Oh, really?
I can plan that pretty well.Just give me give me a night
with my lady. We'll we'll planit just fine. Right? So, that's
that Margaret Sanger comes onthe scene.
It's not an accident that wheredoes Margaret Sanger's first
clinic show up in? Do you knowwho's

Speaker 1 (34:41):
girl? Sorry. Right?

Speaker 2 (34:42):
Yeah. Black neighborhoods. She went straight
to Harlem. Her first her firstclinic this is what you have to
understand. Margaret Sangeropens up the first abortion
clinic.
This is how psychopathic webecome and how quickly things
can be accepted by futuregenerations. And when Margaret
Sanger opens up her firstclinic, she opens up in Harlem,
and she opens it up, course, tobe able to kill black babies.
Margaret Sanger was a notedracist. She published and in her

(35:07):
writings, it is easy to see howshe felt about black people. It
was it was not it was clear.
She was a eugenicist to thehilt. Now she is trying to do
something never done in thiscountry before, aborting babies
of any race. What and now, ofcourse, it I'm not saying it

(35:28):
never happened. Of course,happened. I'm saying she's
trying to create a business outof it, right, where and and and
all this.
She could not get any doctors togo and perform those DNCs. So
she and a bunch of unqualifiednurses started performing those
DNCs, and within a week or two,I forget how long it was, she

(35:50):
had the authorities firing downon her, and she had to flee to
Europe because she was about toget arrested. Alright? And how
she got out, I don't that'sanybody's guess. Right?
How does a eugenicist that'sthat's performed a criminal act
killing babies get out of thiscountry, and then she's
magically allowed to come backto this country without having

(36:11):
to serve any time? And shestarts this is, again, post
World War two. She now startsadvising in in the
administration. Well, how didthat happen? Operation
Paperclip, maybe, bringing insome Nazis.
Maybe we have a little AlanDulles doing some some dark
things, everybody. Right? So youwhen you start getting to is an
understanding that wherever yousee the word control, this is a

(36:35):
telltale sign that you aredealing with the eugenicist.
Centers for disease, what?Control.
And the rest of it is andprevention. But isn't it
interesting how they never sayCDC p? They never say center for
disease control and prevention.It's always centers for disease

(36:55):
control because because that'swhat they care about is control.
Margaret Singer, what is shetalking about?
Birth control. What are theseWEF clowns talking about right
now? Population control.

Speaker 1 (37:10):
Actually, I'll I'll jump in quickly. Here's a few
quotes. These are MargaretSanger quotes. I I haven't I
haven't read these particularquote. Maybe I've I've come
across a couple of these things,but, I'll read a few of these.
We should hire three or fourcolored ministers preferably
with social service backgroundsand with engaging personalities.
The most successful educationalapproach to the Negro is through

(37:30):
a religious appeal. We don'twant the word to go out that we
wanna exterminate the Negropopulation. Okay. Another quote.
Eugenic sterilization is anurgent need. We must prevent
multiplication of this badstock, referring to the African
Americans. Three, the most thisthis is this is actually the
worst thing. The most mercifulthing that a family does to one

(37:51):
of its infant members is to killit. Like, did what?
It's like Look, literally, themost merciful thing that a
family does to one of its infantmembers is to kill it. Mhmm.
That was Margaret Sangerpublished in the woman rebel
volume one number one in 1922.

Speaker 2 (38:10):
1922.

Speaker 1 (38:11):
And another one. Birth control it'd be birth
control. There you go. Birthcontrol must lead ultimately to
a cleaner race. Mhmm.
So all the all the the liberalsthat are all about BLM and
Planned Parenthood, here you go.

Speaker 2 (38:27):
There you go. Right? So all these women that are out
there, especially, I think therewas a new in a state, there was
now you can can abort the babyall the way up to the the day of
it. Maybe it wasn't a state.Maybe it was a country that was
doing this.
But this is how we went from youwent from in the early nineteen
hundreds, couldn't find aphysician that would support

(38:48):
this woman's psychopathic natureand tendencies to today having
whole rallies about how it's awoman's right it's a woman's
right to murder her child inwomb. Like, is there any greater
crime against God than murderinga child in a womb? Like, this is

(39:08):
this and I and if you've everdealt with women, and I, of
course, have that have had thesethese procedures done, you talk
to them beforehand, they'rescared. They're scared about the
future, what's going to happen.They don't know that they can
actually be a great mom inalmost every case that I've
talked to.
Yes. You can be a great mom.Yes. It's gonna be hard.

(39:29):
Nothing's harder than being amom.
You know what I mean? That's whyit's that's why we need you to
be that. You are the everythingabout humanity is centered
around a woman being able todevelop life in her body and
then feed that life when thatbody comes out. Everything is
about that central theme rightthere. Well, Margaret Sanger and

(39:53):
her her psychopathic control,What they don't tell you about
Margaret Sanger is, number one,she loved to cock hold her
husband.
She actually there are storiesof her going to, to Europe to
have sexual, orgies, becausethat's what eugenicists do, of
course, too, to have the an orgyparty while her husband could

(40:16):
not participate but had towatch. This is this this is the
type of woman that you'retalking about right here. This
is a woman that is all bent on,as you saw in the quote. It's
her words of, she could notstand black people, and she
wanted them eradicated becausethey black people, in her
opinion, polluted the gene pool.And she certainly didn't want
anybody like me running aroundwhere my dad is black and my

(40:39):
mother's white.
Like, I would be the biggestabomination to this woman.
Right? So what you have tounderstand is why is this person
or at least you have toquestion, why does this person
have any sway over any policiesor anything? How did she go from
being a criminal and having toflee the country to coming back
and being funded with our taxdollars? How did that occur?

(40:59):
And then what you have tounderstand is her role in the
advent of the feminist movementand getting women to start to
destroy the family structurebecause it wasn't what they
learned was and and and this isabout this is, with the the new
deal from the, Rooseveltadministration. They the reason
that they went into birthcertificates and they went into

(41:22):
death certificates was simple.They wanted to know who they
could tax. Prior to birthcertificates, prior to death
certificates, you don't know howmany Americans are alive. Most
Americans are living off of oneincome.
That's one taxable income. Andthey got the bright idea, well,
what if we had two taxableincomes? What's the benefit of
that? Well, you break down thefamily. When mom and dad have to

(41:43):
go to work, nobody's there toraise the children.
Who gets the children?Government gets the children.
And now the government gets getsto decide how the children are
being indoctrinated. And in thiscase, now you get the advent of
certain things like feminism andteaching women that all men suck
and teaching women that theworst thing they could be is a

(42:05):
mother. I mean, you wanna talkabout psychopathic people.
The worst thing you could be asa woman is a mother. The worst
thing that you could be is ahomemaker. There isn't a more
important job in our world thanbeing a mom, and there isn't a
more important profession thanbeing a homemaker. That's why we
called it homemaking. It's nothousemaking.

(42:29):
It's homemaking, a place wherean entire group of people can
come into one living space andfeel that they are at home and
relax and chill the f outbecause mom's got this. Right?
Well, happens when you startteaching little girls from the
time that they're little girlsthat they've been wronged by a

(42:51):
man that they've never met? Whathappens when you start teaching
them that their best and biggestaspiration should be to be a guy
and compete with guys insteadwhich let me let me say some
crazy stuff right now. Alright?
Since I'm on my last day beforeI'm about to go on break, let's
say some crazy shit right now.Okay? For a woman to want to be

(43:13):
a man is a demotion. Alright?Now a lot some women are gonna
be like, wait.
Hold you got you have to wrapyour head around this. I got
into an argument with women whenI said this, Steph, the first
time. I said, this is how strongthe cognitive dissonance of
feminism is in a woman's mind. Iam telling you that the pinnacle
of life itself on this planet iscenters around a woman.

(43:37):
Everything works off of a woman.
There isn't a more importantperson to protect in our society
than women, especially women ofchildbearing age. And I include
women beyond their childbearingage as well because they carry
the wisdom of passing down whata woman needs to be in order to

(43:57):
be that homemaker, right, andcreate an environment that a man
is not only gonna wanna protectbut that a man is going to want
to be present in at all times.No man wants to hear how much we
suck. Ladies, just spoiler alerton that one. We don't wanna hear
that, especially when we aren'tthe men that suck.
If there's somebody in your pastthat sucked, I feel for you.

(44:19):
Right? Come here. I'll hug it.We'll hug it out, but I'm not
that dude.
Okay? So don't hold me to thesame threats that you would want
to hold that dude to. That'swhat feminism teaches these
women. It teaches them that theworst thing that you can be as a
mother, the worst thing that youcould be as a homemaker, the
worst thing that you could be iswant to actually take care of

(44:40):
your man and make sure your manwho's out there in the world
getting his ass kicked everyday, pinballing around, comes
home and knows he's coming hometo a loving environment. Heaven
forbid that that should be themessage we teach from cartoons
to movies to books to justregular familial conversation
and commute.
Heaven forbid we should do that.Well, we don't do that anymore.

(45:04):
At one time, we did, and thatwould usually centered around
the church, but we don't do thatanymore. Why? This is the
massive influence, the excessiveinfluence of progressive ideals
and brought to youpredominantly, like, by women
who were racist and horriblehuman beings, period, like

(45:25):
Margaret Singer.
Margaret Singer is if you ifthat is your idol, if that is
your person that you're saying,I liked her. I like what you are
saying is you are a racist. Whatyou are saying is you like
killing babies. What you aresaying is you can't stand family
structures or family units. Whatyou are saying is you hate your
society, and what you're sayingis you hate your country.

(45:46):
Those are all the things that awoman like that creates. So,
ladies, let me say something toyou just from a guy perspective.
Let me let you in to the lockerroom conversations that guys
have right now. Okay? We loveyou.
You are at the top. We love youso much. We will put up with
some craziness here. We put upwith more craziness than we

(46:08):
should, stuff that doesn't makesense because we love you. Okay?
We will fight for you. We willdie for you. We will do so many
things for you if you simplytreat us right. I'm not talking
about a dude that is is not agood dude. I'm talking about
good dudes, and there's a lot ofgood dudes out there.
But if all you do is bring tothe table complaints and

(46:32):
especially complaining aboutevery dude you meet, nobody
wants to hear that. So let metell you what every man knows.
You're at the top of the foodchain. How do we know? Because
we have sayings about this.
Happy wife. Happy life. Havesayings about this. Whatever
mama wants, mama gets. We havebecause we understand my job is

(46:56):
to make sure mama stays happy.
That's my job. And just likegood little boys, because we're
taught this to do this with ourmoms, just like good little
boys, all we need is a littlebit of praise. All we need is a
little bit of praise. Make usfeel, oh, I did good. Thank you.
That's all. That's all we need.Who taught us that? Mom taught
us that. We always wanted toimpress mom and make mom proud

(47:18):
and make mom happy andeverything.
Ladies, if you're not takingadvantage of that, you're
missing out the key to thesimplicity of what men are. We
want to please you. Weunderstand what our role is. Our
role is to walk the perimeterand protect the central point
that you are for the focus ofall life. That's our job.
And a good man gets that and agood man does it. But if you

(47:41):
hold good men up like feminismwants you to do as being bad
men, then you are going to findyourself very alone. That's what
we see going on in our worldright now. A lot of women who
bought into the lie of feminismbrought to you by Margaret
Sanger are at these ages intheir life where you should be

(48:01):
with people who love you, butyou gave those people up because
somebody told you that thosepeople were bad and you believed
that lie. So you young ones outthere listening to me, grab your
man and learn how to take careof your man.
You wanna learn how to take careof your man? Go to a woman who
is has a relationship with aman. Do not take advice from

(48:25):
single women. Let me say this toyou again. I'm gonna piss a lot
of ladies off with this.
I don't care.

Speaker 1 (48:29):
I'm I'm already looking forward to the comments
on this one.

Speaker 2 (48:32):
The comments are gonna be over the top. Ladies,
the worst woman to take advicefrom when you're talking about
relationship is a woman who isnot in a relationship. That is
the worst person to take it.They don't know what you have to
do, the compromises, thesacrifice, the things you have
to just let go sometimes. Yes.

(48:53):
We leave the toilet seat upoccasionally. It's not because
we don't love you. We forget.Right? I got stuff on my mind.
Right? I you put the toilet seatdown. It's alright. It wasn't
that bad. Right?
I mean, you can tell me about itlater. I'll fix it. You know
what I mean? But sometimes Iaccidentally do that. That
doesn't make me a bad dude.
Right? But the thing I wanna getacross to is just we are here to

(49:17):
work for you if you know how topush the right buttons. And too
many women think it's just sex,and too many women think it's
just food. No. It's how you makeus feel.
It's the same thing for you forus to you, how we make you feel.
It comes down to that. And thelie of feminism is that you can

(49:37):
be happy without a man. That'sthe lie, that you can be happy
without knowing the fulfillmentof raising a child. That's a
lie, that you can be happywithout a group of people that
are centered around you as weshould be because everything
rotates and revolves around youas the universe.

(49:57):
You are at the top of the foodchain being a woman. We don't
exist as a people on this planetwithout you. There is no reason
to relegate yourself to wantingto be a man. There is no reason
for it. It is a demotion.
Please do not take that demotionbecause that's what feminism is

(50:19):
offering you, a demotion intocompeting with a man when you
are already superior to what aman is. Now you wanna give me
some hate mail? You wanna comeat me? Come at me. I'll talk
with you with love, or maybe.
I don't know. I've been prettyhot under the collar on on
Twitter and, you know, recently.No. I'm I'm not gonna I'm not

(50:41):
gonna promise that. You saysomething stupid to me, I'm
gonna say something stupid backto you.
Okay? That's just who I am. Youhit me, I'm gonna hit you back.
That's who I am just soeverybody knows. Okay?
You come in with respect. I'mgonna come back at you with
respect. You come in with love.I'm gonna come back with you
with love. You but if you talksome ish to me, I'm go I'm gonna
go off on you.
Okay? Because I don't carewhether you're man or women

(51:02):
because I keep I treat womenequal to men, I guess. I that's
what feminism taught me to do.So, anyway, everybody, this
getting back to the point ofthis, the wearables. Why is this
such a big deal?
And what you've hopefully gottenout of what I've shared with you
today, we have been lied to ourentire lives. Eugenicists have

(51:23):
been in control for the lasthundred and forty years and
probably a lot longer than that,but I'm saying since things
massively changed in thiscountry. Since 1871, eugenicists
have been in control. Nowclearly in the early parts and
up until the nineteen twenties,they weren't all the way in
control. That's why MargaretSanger has to flee.
But now at this point, they'rein absolute control. And how do

(51:47):
we know? We can't even get astupid shot that's killed over
40,000 people that we know ofoff the market. 40 that's
40,000. If they 40,000 people,the shot that has killed more
people than all the other shotscombined is the mRNA shot.
If there's no you cannot arguethat in any way, shape, or form.
We can't get that off themarket, and our guy is in the

(52:10):
place with the stroke of the penauthority who can do that. I got
into a big argument with JamalHolly, last week over this
because he kept saying withoutany evidence that he can't do
that. And I showed him theevidence that he can. I showed
him the legal authority of thesecretary of the health and
human services, and that's justone little part of his full

(52:31):
legal authority.
Today, secretary Kennedy couldsay very simply, I am revoking
the FDA approval. I'm overridingand revoking simply because the
data that was submitted wasfraudulent. I will give Pfizer,
Moderna, x amount of time toprove the safety and efficacy.
And then at that time, we willreevaluate the data, and we will

(52:53):
consider their application anew.He could do that.
He could have done that from dayone, and I advised them to do
that from day one. They didn'twanna do that. They wanted to go
after Froot Loops. That'sstupid. Okay?
So Froot Loops weren't killingour children. These shots are,
and these shots are part of theentire chemtrail, five g
Internet of bodies thing. It'syou have to understand that when

(53:15):
you we're talking about theseshots in the Arcturus twenty
three zero four, we aren't justtalking about, like, we gotta
get these out and everything'sgonna be great. No. There's
another piece of the pie, fiveg.
No. There's another piece of thepie coming, six g. No. There's
another piece of the pie, wband, that's coming. No.
There's another piece of thepie, the blue light spikes
coming off and activating Trojanhorse bioweapons that they're

(53:37):
releasing it. No. There'sanother part of Because why is
this happening? Because we havean unholy alliance that we have
not checked. The militaryindustrial complex in bed with
the cult of Asclepius, thatstarted with COVID maybe a
little bit before.
K? That's why you startedhearing them say doctors saying,
well, it's an acceptable numberof casualties. You've I heard

(53:57):
doctors saying that, and that'swhen you look at the shots, they
say we say, hey. Forty thousandpeople died. Pull the shot, and
they say, no.
That's an acceptable numberbecause look how many people did
it. That's not medicine anymore.That's how a military thinks,
acceptable casualties. Well, nowwho did they just bring in in a
big, big way? Silicon Valley.
And how do we know this? Thereare people in Silicon Valley

(54:19):
with no military training, nomilitary background that just
got promoted to lieutenant, justgot sworn in as lieutenants in
the United States Army. Andwhere are those people from? Of
course, Palantir and healers.You have to understand this is
such a evil, unholy alliancethat it sets us up into the

(54:40):
potential that I do not wannasee our children get brought
into the meat grinder that isslavery even if it's slavery by
a different name.
It's still slavery. There yougo. Look at that. Meta boss.
Right?
Oh, Zucker. God. Wish I couldsay the name I have for him on
air. But what I wanna get acrossis that if you haven't done your

(55:05):
homework and at least startedreading on the Internet of
bodies, you have to read look atthis. This is these are peep not
a day of training.
Yes. I don't know if these arethe actual people or what.

Speaker 1 (55:18):
Yeah. These are. Yeah. This is a it says army
chief of staff, general RandyGeorge swears in four new
officers in Virginia. Prettysure that that I think that that
yeah.
That was 06/13/2015.

Speaker 2 (55:32):
Andrew Bosworth. Bosworth. The boss. Yep. Right?
This is ridiculous.

Speaker 1 (55:39):
This is ridiculous. Here's what's crazy. Right?

Speaker 2 (55:41):
It's called do we have to do tenets?

Speaker 1 (55:43):
It's called detachment two zero one.

Speaker 2 (55:46):
Detachment two zero one. Event two

Speaker 1 (55:49):
zero one. It's just like I mean, how crazy? Just
just, like, taking everythingthat you're kind of talking
about. Just taking a step back.Let's just imagine.
Yeah. Let's imagine that allthis was happening under Kamala
Harris. Say she won, and sayher, you know, kind of head of
HHS was Pete Buttigieg. Justjust for, you know, who knows
what to say it was. Right?

(56:09):
Imagine if if all this washappening under that
administration where we'reseeing in our minds. We're
seeing, oh my gosh. They'reswearing in Silicon Valley, you
know, kind of executives intothe and into high positions in
the army. They're merging.They're bringing Palantir, this
massive military industrialcomplex program.

(56:31):
Right? And and Silicon Valley,in so many ways, is just a front
for the military industrialcomplex. Right? I mean,
Facebook. Facebook wasn'tinvented by Mark Zuckerberg.
It was invented by DARPA aslifelong, and they closed it
down. They rebranded it so thepublic would accept it because
they're smart. So that way,we're all voluntarily giving
them all of our data. Right? Andyou see, wow.

(56:52):
Elon Musk, he buys Twitter. He'sall about free speech. No. He
bought one of the world'slargest data harvesting
platforms on Earth. Yes.
Like, it's like, it the wholething. Like, it's like, oh,
well, how did he get his money?Well, military industrial
complex contracts. So, like,again, if if you saw this all
happening under Kamala Harris,the same people that are just

(57:13):
there's they're saying trust theplan or that are saying, look.
It's you know, I won't turn backon Trump or whatever.
Like, I still look. I still havea lot of hope for Trump. I
there's some things that I Ihope that he makes the right
decision. Right. Right.
Same with RFK junior. Like, Iprefer them over the other
option, hands down. However,it's my job to look at this

(57:33):
objectively and say, woah. Thisis this is not good. You know?
RFK coming out saying that hewants every American with
wearables.

Speaker 2 (57:42):
Right. I don't And, Seth, this is where you're right
over target. Remove the names.

Speaker 1 (57:47):
Is what

Speaker 2 (57:48):
I've been teaching people. Remove the names. Remove
your emotional attachment to theperson that you don't even know.
Exactly. Okay?
You don't know these people.Okay? Remove it and just look at
the action. Would this would yoube okay if this was Kamala
Harris doing this? Would you beokay if this was Biden doing

(58:09):
this?
No. Not at all. I'm I'm gonna Igotta wear a a wearable. No. I'm
not I'm not doing and and I haveto pay for it too?
No. I'm not doing that. Why?Because I don't first and
foremost, why? F you.
That's why. Right? Number one.Right? That's what a free person

Speaker 1 (58:25):
is. My body, my choice. Right?

Speaker 2 (58:27):
Right. My butt my body, my choice apply now
because it that's my body, andit's my choice. But why don't I
want to wear have a wearable on?Lot of reasons. You have to
appreciate symbology.
Why did they have everybody weara mask that they knew would not
work and and everybody knewwould not work? Why would why
did you need that? Because youneeded the symbology of

(58:48):
subservience. Masking was atactic used during slavery to
silence slaves and to make surethat there was no, there were
there was no potential forgroups forming. This is why you
they made sure you you takedifferent slaves and you drop
them off in different areasbecause now they don't know the

(59:09):
language of the other slavesthat are around.
It it it you it takes a longtime to come together. And then
you'll still have people thatare like, screw this. I'm out of
this. And I'm and and thosepeople, you grab and you
castrate them. You castrate themimmediately in front of
everybody else to watch so theycan see how painful it is, and
then you get to put that personwho you've castrated out amongst

(59:32):
that same group, and now thatperson is a shell of themselves,
okay, for the rest of theirlives.
This is all intentional. This isthe whole idea of the whipping
boy. You have one person, one ofthe slaves that you just beat
the absolute crap out out of nomatter whether they did
something wrong or not just toconstantly send a message to
everybody that's watching. Youdon't want this. Okay?

(59:56):
So when you are looking at themasking, it's part of a larger
symbology, and we saw thewhipping boy syndrome. What did
they how many doctors who werespeaking out had magical stuff
coming from their their stateboards? My state board, the
reason I didn't get anything wasbecause I told on myself every
time. I got a letter from theattorney from the state board,

(01:00:18):
Seth, telling me that I have tostop telling on myself. I
because I said, you're gonnahear it from somebody else.
Somebody's gonna make upsomething I said. I might as
well just tell you what I said,you know, straight away, and I
might as well have my attorneytell you what I said. Right? But
there's the masking right there.And you see the little device?
There's your six feet distancingright there. Keep people away

(01:00:39):
from each other. This is thiswas all slavery in in modern
times. It was by a differentname. Right there.
You're seeing it right there.Okay? What is a wearable? Look
at that. Look what's around thatslave's neck that has the the
mask on.
Look at it. What's around theneck? There's your wearable
right there. And what is thatwearable doing? Two very

(01:01:01):
destructive things for yourfuture and especially for your
freedom.
First and foremost, it'sreporting your whereabouts in
all of your biometric data. Andif you think that they're going
to keep that private, if youthink they're only gonna take
certain things that they tellyou, you are a fool. Okay? The
second thing that it's doing inthis case, just like the,

(01:01:22):
there's pictures of slaves thathave the the chains carved into
their body and and basicallyleading to gangrene and ripping
up their ankles and all thisother stuff. What this wearable
is going to do is going to emitalternating current in the form
of radio frequencies because ithas to have two ways.
It's gotta be an antenna, andit's gotta be able to send. So

(01:01:43):
it's got just like your phone.Instead of your phone, which I
have, and I turn all theantennas off, there's no
antennas on on my phone rightnow while I'm not using it. I
keep my phone on a grounding matto make sure that any of the
radio frequencies don't affectmy body. I touch a grounding mat
when I touch my phone to makesure that I'm not being impacted
adversely by what this phone cando.

(01:02:06):
I go to great lengths to makesure I know what I'm doing with
their technology so I can use itand not have it kill me. A
wearable now is on your bodytwenty four hours a day. It is
using electricity, and your bodyis electric, and it will compete
with your body's electricity.The wearable is going to damage

(01:02:28):
your body, period. RFK juniorknows about this.
He's spoken about this before hewas confirmed. He knows this.
There's no such thing as a safewearable. So what do they tell
you? Well, the good outweighsthe bad.
Really? The good for yououtweighs the bad for me? No.
That I agree with. The good forme outweighing the bad for me?

(01:02:49):
No. I don't agree with that. So,no, I don't how did we manage to
get here thousands of yearswithout wearables? Gee. I
wonder.
Right? I maybe we had figuredsome stuff out know, a little
bit. So what I'm what I I'mgetting across to people is this
is a yet another major stepforward in their agendas. This
is yet another major stepforward in the Internet of

(01:03:11):
bodies. This is Klaus Schwab,what he's act act he's
advocating for.
Why would you ever go along withanything Klaus Schwab is
advocating for? And now this issomething that RFK junior spoke
out against, but then magically,two people show up in his life
out of nowhere. We have neverheard of these people. I've been
around for a long time, folks.Callie and Casey Means show up.

(01:03:35):
What companies do they run thathave been, of course, propped up
very much like the the Facebook.Which companies they run?
TrueMed and Levels. Now Levelsis run by Casey Means and or at
least she's the figurehead forit. And what is it?
A biometric monitoringsurveillance system. So isn't it

(01:03:58):
interesting how RFK junior talksopenly about there being no
conflicts of interest? Isn'tthat interesting? There should
be no conflicts of interest, butthat the largest conflicts of
interest are occurring right nowwith KC and Cali Means. And
isn't it interesting how CaliMeans, who lied about being

(01:04:20):
lobbyist, isn't it interestingthat Cali Means has been
steering this whole HHS MAHAapproach since he showed up out
of nowhere?
Isn't it interesting that hesteered it into talking about,
beef tallow and then talkingabout Froot Loops and then
talking about Skittles? Isn't itinteresting that they're saying

(01:04:40):
we don't have to change anyfederal regulations? These
companies will do it on theirown in two years. That's the
win. The companies will get allthis stuff out of their all
these these horrible food dyes.
Okay. So now you guys leaveoffice. What's gonna prevent
them from going back? Can youexplain that to me? Because you
haven't chain you haven't bannedanything.
You haven't taken you haven'tsaid, hey. You told me that

(01:05:01):
there's only 400 approvedchemicals in the European Union,
but here there's over 10,000.You haven't shown me that you
have a willingness to ban atleast one of those 10,000, and
you're gonna trust a bunch ofliars in corporate America that
only care about their bottomline to be good people? This is

(01:05:22):
this ridiculous idea of altruismthat Kennedy seems to be married
to, but what is Kennedy when youget down to it? Oh, are we are
we gonna go there?
Yes, Seth. We're about to gothere. Kennedy identifies
himself as a progressive. Andthis is what you have to watch
about all of these folks thatcame from the democratic side of

(01:05:43):
things into MAHA to supportMAGA. The vast majority of them
see themselves as progressives,and that's without understanding
what an progressive really andtruly is.
Now, Kennedy, I don't know if hereally and truly understands
what a progressive is, but thevast majority of people that
call themselves progressives donot realize they are calling

(01:06:04):
themselves eugenicists. At onetime before I learned all this,
I used to consider myself aprogressive. Why? Because it
sounds good to be progressiveabout something. Right?
Except when progressive meansexperimenting on children using
CRISPR. Except when progressivemeans everybody having a
wearable attached to their bodytwenty four hours a day throwing

(01:06:26):
off their electricity, exceptwhen it means that we are
proving cancer salmon fleshgrown in a petri dish for entry
into our food supply without anystudies to support its safety,
efficacy, or even necessity. Youwanna eat some salmon? Clean up
the oceans. We are also it's abad idea to consider yourself

(01:06:48):
progressive when you aresupporting the mRNA shots in any
capacity, but especially theArcturus twenty three zero four
self amplifying platform.
All things that through hisactions, secretary Kennedy has
shown support for. He has evengone so far as to say that our
greatest innovation in thefuture will be CRISPR and the

(01:07:08):
genetic modification of thehuman genome. That is a far cry
departure from anything he saidbefore he was confirmed.

Speaker 1 (01:07:17):
So And we wouldn't get into the guy operation stork
speed.

Speaker 2 (01:07:20):
That well, yeah. And then we and then we have, of
course, along with that, theMNEXT spike that gets approved
for the for the mRNA shotsbefore anything. Right? It it's
just healers walks like a duck.It talks like a duck.
It's a duck. Okay? Let's not kidourselves that what we're seeing

(01:07:43):
is okay. You have to have thecourage to remove the name of
the person that you like andsay, what would I say about this
if it was coming from somebody Ididn't like? Because as soon as
you do that, you've entered intowhat Seth is teaching you, which
is about being objective.

Speaker 1 (01:08:05):
It's also objective. Go ahead. As we're kind of
wrapping up here, it's not justsaying, what if this is coming
from somebody that I didn'tlike? It's what if this is
coming from somebody that Iwasn't hoping was gonna come
save me? Right.
Because that's a it's a bigdifference. If you just don't
like somebody, or if you likesomebody, but if you think

(01:08:26):
someone's gonna come in, andthey're gonna do all the things
that you think are gonna saveour children and save our skies,
and you're you're you're reallyputting that person in a very
special place. Mhmm. It'sdifferent than like, oh, I like
the Tigers, and you like theMets, and, you know, whatever.
Right?
It's it's it's it's yeah. It'scrazy to put it all together.

Speaker 2 (01:08:48):
When you put you get take and that's why I've been
saying there were no sacredcows, especially not me. Don't
you ever do that to me. I willcheck you. Okay? No sacred cows.
Don't put anybody on thepedestal. Everybody's held to
the same standard. Right? Iswhat you're doing good or not
good? And it's pretty black andwhite in today, and they can try
to dress it up however theywant.

(01:09:10):
What did RFK junior tell you hisjob is? My job, quote, unquote,
is to help restore trust invaccines in Americans. No. No.
No.
No. No. No. That's that's notwhy we supported you to to send
you into Washington. I we sentyou in there to ban vaccines.

(01:09:34):
And if all you did was ban theCOVID vaccine, it over the four
years, massive win. That's allyou and you and don't tell me.
Jamil Holly, I you know, bro,we've gone at it once. Respect
you. Completely disagree withyou.
He has the authority today to dothat. So you have to ask why

(01:09:55):
isn't he doing it if it's in hisheart to do it. Well, that would
mean that there's somebodycontrolling him. Okay. Well, now
who's controlling you?
And but the bigger question,Seth, is why are you allowing
yourself to be controlled? Whynot just ban it? Go for big air.
They're gonna file lawsuits andeverything. You're gonna lose
your job.
They might even kill you. But Idon't think they can because now

(01:10:20):
that would be three Kennedysthat have been mysteriously
offed. And with everything thatpeople know today about how
there are certain groups fromother countries who have been a
little bit too involved in howpolitics go in our country, I
don't think that's gonna turnout too well. But maybe I'm

(01:10:42):
wrong about that. MaybeAmericans are just too sheepish
now.
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:10:46):
Well, I think what's important is that we have
conversations just like this.Mhmm. This is what's important
is that we talk openly aboutthis. You know, I might, you
know, I have people in thecomments saying, you've turned
your back on Trump, yourturncoat. Like, no.
I haven't. I'm I'm holding himto the standard that I expect
him or RFK or any these peoplethat I put in effort towards

(01:11:11):
helping to advance theirpolitical career, the various
things I have control overdoing, I'm holding them to the
standard that I expect, and it'spretty black and white for me.
And and that's a and so that's athing.

Speaker 2 (01:11:24):
And and you're right, Seth, and you're right on with
that. So let's let can weaddress that real quick?

Speaker 1 (01:11:28):
Please do. Anybody that wants

Speaker 2 (01:11:30):
to bring heat? K. I have questions for you because I
like to ask questions. Do youlove Trump more than you love
your country? That's a realquestion.
I love my country more than Ilove any any one person in
politics. Do I hope that thatperson has the same love for my

(01:11:50):
country that I have? Yes. And itwould has he professed that he
has the same love that I havefor my country? And I have no
reason not to believe him, but Ihave a lot of questions because
his actions aren't alwaysmatching that up.
And that's fair for me to beable to say. But there's one
other question that's even moreimportant for everybody. Do you

(01:12:11):
love somebody in politics morethan you love God? Because I'm
gonna tell you straight up, Iwork for God, and God has told
me with in no uncertain terms tospeak truth. My job is to say
what makes people uncomfortable,to say the things that people

(01:12:31):
are thinking, feeling, but notnecessarily saying yet.
And if that means I gotta takeheat to do it, I gotta take heat
to do it. That also means thatyou bring heat to me, I'm gonna
bring heat back to you as wellbecause I am not in this for
ideology. I'm not in this to bea religious, you know, part of a

(01:12:53):
cult. I'm in this to help get usback on track. We are so far off
the rails right now that thevery future of humanity and our
children and our grandchildren'sfuture is in doubt today.
And if we're not willing to havethat conversation about why is
it in doubt and what do we needto do as individuals and as a

(01:13:16):
collective to restore thepromise of freedom to future
generations, then we have failedevery single person that has
provided us with the perceptionof freedom that we think we have
today. And don't tell me thatyou're a patriot in doing that.
Savi.

Speaker 1 (01:13:36):
That's it, man. Doctor Ealy, before we sign off,
I wanna bring up two differentwebsites quickly. Mhmm. One of
them is your website,energetichealthinstitute.org.
Recommend people, you know,checking the website.
I'll put the links in thedescription. Anything,
everything about what you'redoing here. You've also got a

(01:13:58):
new book you just came out with.I'll put this in the description
as well, the book of questions.And, you wanna just give a quick
kind of elevator pitch for this?
Let us know what it is.

Speaker 2 (01:14:09):
We've been through so much, Seth, the last five years.
I mean, pretty much everybodywho's been involved with this is
dealing with trauma in someform, some form of relived pain,
especially with each new thingthat comes out that's not in our
favor. Right? And so, I've beenvery blessed by God to have
received, a number of visionsabout, what happens when we

(01:14:35):
pass, when we transition. Ithink one of the big ways to
eliminate a control system is toremove any fear of death.
Think that's one of theirstrongest control mechanisms is
fear of death. And my messagefrom God that I've been
privileged to be able to writeabout and share is that there's
nothing to fear, and I wannashare those stories with you. I

(01:14:57):
also share stories of from mylife, like when my mother was
killed by the cult of Asclepiusin the hospital. You know? And I
want people to understand you'renot alone, not by a long shot,
and God has never given up onyou.
You know? We've been through alot. I don't wanna talk about
COVID all the time. I want totalk about things that actually

(01:15:18):
have spiritual significance forus. Because when we find our
spiritual strength, we find thecourage to be able to do what I
wanna create in this world, andI hope you do too.
I wanna make evil fear us for achange. I wanna live in a world
where we love each other, andevil is terrified of that. We

(01:15:44):
can do that. We can create thattogether. So this is one of my
first forays into that more ofself help topic.
You don't have to it doesn'ttake years and years and years
to overcome trauma, folks. I'vebeen helping people overcome
trauma for my entire career. Itjust takes a moment for you to
make the decision that you aregonna overcome it, and you're
gonna do something deliciouslydangerous, that you're gonna

(01:16:07):
transform any pain that you'veexperienced in your past into
strength in your future. And allthat is is a decision that you
have the right and freedom to beable to make when you are ready
to make that decision. The bookof questions will help you get
to that moment a lot faster thanyou thought possible.

Speaker 1 (01:16:28):
Doctor Ehle, such a pleasure speaking with you. I I
hate that we've got a timelimit. I I think we could go for
another couple of hours.Probably. But I I know that this
was this was last minute,because I I was trying to
respond quickly to theannouncement with RFK.
I know you're the guy for it.Thank you for for doing what
you're doing. Thank you forgiving me and the audience your

(01:16:49):
time. I really appreciate it,and I I look forward to our next
conversation. This this wasgreat.
It's really important. And Ialso I hope that anybody that's
made it this far in and isn'tall upset about being feminist
or whatever it is, share thisvideo. Right? Share the video.
Share the podcast.
Let's get more people havingthese conversations. It's
really, really important.

Speaker 2 (01:17:09):
Amen. And, Seth, I wanna say thank you to everybody
in your audience for listening,even for a moment, and it's okay
for us to disagree. You knowwhat I mean? That's as long as
we are not disagreeable witheach other, that we still
respect each other and and showthat in what we do. The only
time you're gonna get a side ofme that you see sometimes on
social media is if I feel likeI'm being disrespected.
I will not be disrespected andcertainly not in public. Like,

(01:17:32):
that is not gonna happen. But,on the other side of it, I wanna
say, Seth, to you, thank you somuch for creating this forum and
giving people the opportunity tohear and have these
conversations and be in thatreally key important cog in the
wheel of of healing, because Ireally believe in my heart
that's where we are heading isinto the healing of our nation.

(01:17:55):
We have clearly some more traumathat we gotta go through, which
drives me up the wall becauseit's really unnecessary, but I
guess we gotta do it. But Ithink if we hold fast to, our
faith and remember that to Godgoes all the glory, it starts
making things a lot easier forus, and all we gotta do is the

(01:18:17):
work.
And I don't know about you,Seth. I'm a worker. I like doing
that work.

Speaker 1 (01:18:20):
Oh, me too. Me too.

Speaker 2 (01:18:22):
You know? Well So thank

Speaker 1 (01:18:24):
you for that. Again, Ann. Yeah. It's wonderful
speaking with you. Hey, folks.
I've got a quick but reallyimportant update. So right now,
DC politicians are trying tokill the very tax credits that
are helping bring manufacturingback from China and putting
American workers on the job.These credits are fueling US
energy independence, rebuildingour supply chains, and hitting

(01:18:45):
the Chinese Communist Partywhere it hurts. And look. This
isn't theory.
It's actually happening. We'retalking real factories, real
jobs right here on Americansoil. But if they repeal these
credits, we're gonna losemillions of jobs. We got over a
trillion dollars from oureconomy, and we hand China a
massive win. So here's the deal.

(01:19:06):
President Trump, don't letcongress pull the plug on
America's comeback. Stam firm.Protect the energy tax credits.
Keep putting America first.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Is MAHA Pushing the WEF’s Wearable Agenda? w/ Dr. Ealy

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

Is MAHA Pushing the WEF’s Wearable Agenda? w/ Dr. Ealy

Stuff You Should Know