Episode 298: Episode 298: Post-Information Blues

With upwards of fifty percent of the Internet now estimated to be AI-generated slop (propagated by [you guessed it] AI "agents" [chatbots]), Edmund Matuk III (Crazy Eddie) and his co-host, (Sailor) Jack return to this developing story.

New York City mayoral race leader, Zohran Kwame Mamdani, has been reportedly on something of a private apology tour with members of the NYPD and their corresponding union. Then, called out on Fox News about his purported remorse being behind closed doors, the New York State Assemblyman offered a public mea culpa. As our leaders are inherently imperfect (being chosen from among us, imperfect beings ourselves), why isn't the public more willing to forgive the perceived failings of its leaders? Is it because we automatically assume the worst and refuse to believe any request for forgiveness to be genuine? Your co-hosts discuss these matters of the heart in an effort to ascertain where we're at as a Nation.

The duo then segues into our zero sum, binary thought processes as a society: for instance, both agree murder is wrong. We can all agree on that, right? So why can two things not be true at once? Why can one not call out the ghastly events of 07 October 2023, killings at the behest of Hamas, as being just as wrong as the subsequent innocent civilian deaths at the hands of the Israeli military? If you (the Royal "You) condemn what Hamas did, then automatically you're a Zionist with no regard for the plight of starving Palestinian babies? Or, on the other hand, if the same Royal "You" expresses consternation over the conduct of the Israeli military, then you're an anti-Semite who disregards the death of Israeli grannies? Is there no sensible framework for discussion here, no middle ground to be found? Or is this truly "the foreign policy equivalent of Roe v. Wade", just as polarizing as abortion rights in America?

With episode 300 looming not far in the future, Edmund Matuk III & Jack DeViney also discussing 1 or 2 of their upcoming guests. One of them, a dynamic woman of nigh-unparalleled insight and wisdom at so young an age, is one of the brightest minds DeViney says he's had the privilege to encounter. They also discuss inviting Representative Ocasio-Cortez (AOC [D-NY]) on and that, like another aforementioned guest, they also intend to let her complete sentences and finish her thoughts. Fancy that, right? But apparently, modern public discourse features a good many men who do not believe in showing their peers (women, in particular) the same respect they'd like to receive. SAD!

As always, thank you all for joining us and sticking with us as we near the end of our first decade as a publication. Merci!