May 28, 2025 • 44 mins
🔥 In This Episode:
🗳️ Albuquerque Mayoral Race Update
- There’s a surprise contender in the Albuquerque mayor’s race that could shake things up.
- We break down the latest polling numbers, who’s rising, who’s falling, and why this election just got a whole lot more interesting.
📰 The Albuquerque Journal COVID Controversy
- Mark goes off on a new Albuquerque Journal article pushing COVID vaccinations for kids—as if it’s still 2020.
- He asks the question many are thinking: Have we learned nothing? The elites were wrong before, and it looks like they’re doing it again.
🌍 Trump, Putin & Foreign Policy Confusion
- Is Donald Trump an isolationist or a global enforcer?
- Mark argues that Trump needs to pick a lane. Trying to be both isn’t working, especially when it comes to his stance on Russia.
📊 Polling Breakdown: Who’s Winning, Who’s Losing
- We dive into fresh polling numbers on Trump, as well as the Republican and Democratic parties.
- What the numbers say may surprise you—and we break down the hidden trends that the media won’t touch.
🐶 The Most Dangerous Dog List Is Out… and New Mexico’s Watching
- A New Mexico favorite breed makes the list, but one unexpected dog is on it too!
- Krysty reacts and shares what it means for dog lovers across the state.
🌪️ Crazy Weather Stories You Have to See to Believe
- Tornadoes in Eastern New Mexico produced some of the most stunning photos we’ve seen in years.
- And in China, a paraglider gets caught in an updraft that nearly freezes him mid-air.
- Mark brings the meteorological heat and explains what really happened.
Website: https://www.nodoubtaboutitpodcast.com/
Twitter: @nodoubtpodcast
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NoDoubtAboutItPod/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/markronchettinm/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ%3D%3D
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
all right, we're rolling, no doubt about it.
Podcast, welcome to wednesdaynight, thursday morning,
whenever you're catching thisfriday, whatever saturday, enjoy
it.
It's evergreen this thing?
Yeah, not really, but you know,give it maybe four or five days
at the most.
Now this thing starts to stink.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Well, no, so it doesn't okay, people can listen
to it a week later.
All right, that's fine.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
I mean, come on guy be nice if you, if you, stayed
with us on these things.
We've got a lot going on.
We'll do some local stuff hereoff the top.
We'll do some mail, whichyou're going to do here in just
a second.
Talk a little bit about themayor's race, by the way,
hearing some rumor on polling,I'll give you a little bit of
the dirt on what I'm hearing akind of interesting guy running
(00:42):
for mayor who we had not heardof and he's doing quite well, at
least on signatures.
We'll get to that and a littlebit of an article from the
journal talking about COVIDvaccines and pushing hard for
COVID vaccines for kids, whichokay Interesting stuff with
Trump and Russia.
Russia's starting to call himout, which is interesting stuff
to see how this is all going toplay out, and I thought this
(01:05):
sort of thing might happen atsome point and we'll get into
the details on that.
But it is interesting.
New polling data is out acrossthe country for Republicans and
Democrats.
Each has a stronghold oncertain issues and some you
would expect, and I think somewould be a little bit of a
surprise here as well.
There is now the latest list ofdangerous dogs, and one of the
(01:26):
favorite dogs of New Mexico ison that list.
So we will get into that Someincredible pictures of severe
weather across Eastern NewMexico, some tornado pictures
which are just stunning, so wewant to show you those.
And then one paraglider caughtup in a storm and he ended up in
a really tight spot and islucky to be alive, and we'll
show you that as well.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Okay.
Well, let's start with somemail, because we've got products
to talk about, we've got allkinds of things to get out.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
We're jacking some products here.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
So let's uh, let's start with Sagittarius.
It says hope you guys had agood Memorial day honoring our
fallen military heroes.
I've got a three-part questionfor the crew.
First question for Mark andChristy what are your opinions
and thoughts of the Democratformer mayor of Las Cruces, ken
Miyagishima?
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Okay, we call him Mayor Ken.
Okay, mayor Ken, yeah, yeah,running for governor, yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Second question what kind of chance do you think he
has against the other Democratsrunning for governor?
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
That's actually a two-part question.
I don't know she might have hada third question, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Listen, I cut these real quick sometimes no, hey
look, I understand.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Sorry, sagittarius.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
We go with your top part of the comment.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
So, mayor Ken, I think obviously we're commenting
on a Democratic primary whichwe're by no means qualified to
comment on, but we'll do itanyway.
I think he's going to havetrouble raising money, and so I
think the way he'll benefit isif he can find a lane, raise
some money, stay in the race inhope of a breakdown of Holland
or Bregman.
I think Holland or Bregman havea better chance.
(02:52):
Holland definitely, as we'vesaid.
I think Bregman trying to runas a centrist is laughable, but
whatever, there are someRepublicans over the past couple
of weeks who held a fundraiserfor him, for for Sam Bregman,
which I think is an unbelievablemistake, but whatever.
So I think Mayor Ken will havetrouble fitting in that lane.
However, given what's going onwith Holland and that Holland, I
(03:14):
think, is either going to notget hit and get through or
she'll get hit and she has aglass jaw and she's going down
Right.
But my guess is, if I had toput a paycheck on it, it'll be
that she'll slide her waythrough without ever having to
really get into the middle ofthese things and fight it out.
So I think, if that's the case,mayor Ken probably never gets
the opportunity to get sometraction, but he's always got
(03:35):
that puncher's chance, giventhat the front runner is very
vulnerable If she does start tobreak down a glass jaw.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
I've never heard that expression.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Oh, it's a, uh, it's a boxing turn well, I figured
that rocky.
Yeah, I put it it means that ifyou get hit, your jaw is gonna
break.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
You're going down, let me give you my two cents on
this, which is very different,very different, two cents.
Just because of being in astatewide campaign with you for,
uh, two races, I learned a lotabout the differences between
bernalillo county so albuquerqueproper, and how important that
is when you're running in astatewide race and Las Cruces,
and how those two communitiesrarely know about each other or
(04:10):
people in those communities.
For example, a lot of peopledidn't know who you were in Las
Cruces because they don't getour television stations down
there.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
They get El Paso.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
They get El Paso market right, so vice versa.
I don't know who Mayor Ken isNever even heard of the guy
right.
They get El Paso market right,so vice versa.
I don't know who Mayor Ken isNever even heard of the guy
right.
So I think what's going to haveto happen is can he get enough
money raised to get name ID upin the northern part, up here in
Bernalillo County, as we'vesaid numerous times?
Not that the other countiesdon't matter, but Bernalillo
County is the biggest county ina statewide race and it really
(04:40):
matters what kind of benchmarkyou can make in Bernalillo.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
County.
Right, and really, when youtalk television, marcus.
So to be clear, albuquerque isabout three quarters of the
state, so it's not justBernalillo County, it is you
know it is.
Silver City, Socorro County,all the way up to Farmington,
all the way over to ColfaxCounty and all the way down to
Lee County.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
I'm saying, like what always shocked me was that in
Las Cruces that was basicallythe only county it's Las Cruces,
yeah.
They did not know who you were.
They're in Clovis.
They didn't know who you were.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Yeah, Clovis is Amarillo.
So yeah, those, yeah, no.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
I was shocked.
That was like a shockingdifference, like you could see
the difference in a name ID whenyou crossed into that city
where people did not know you,against the rest of the state,
the rest of the state.
So I just think if Ken is wellknown down in Las Cruces, he'll
have to market himself acrossthe whole state because a lot of
us won't know who he is.
Speaker 1 (05:29):
So that's all I was trying to say there.
True, and again, hollandperforms like she should, and it
will never matter.
Speaker 2 (05:34):
She doesn't come back to the Sam Bregman Republicans
throwing him uh fundraisers.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
There are some Republicans, uh, that were very
supportive of us, that that are,that are that have thrown him a
fundraiser, which I think is aterrible mistake goodness, and
it is it is a mistake you shouldnot make.
I mean, if you're gonna burnmoney, just go out to the
backyard and just light it onfire.
It'll at least keep you warmfor a minute, because that's
more than what a donation for arepublican to bregman will do
(06:01):
for you donate it to our show,our show guys.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
If you want to donate some money to a Republican
cause or conservative cause, no,I don't want Bregman money.
Speaker 1 (06:10):
If that money has the stank of Bregman on it, I don't
want it.
I don't want it, guy, oh gosh.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Okay, yeah, a guy who changes his stripes depending
on who's asking for him.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Oh, yes.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
You'll Uh as you'll learn.
You'll learn that if you, as we, keep watching him in this race
he'll be whatever you need himto be, as we go along in this
election cycle.
So, okay, l Davis rocks.
She says great show.
Creatine is one of the mostresearched supplements.
A friend who was a nutritionalcoach said that if the elderly
took creatine, they wouldreceive benefits we talked about
(06:40):
.
But also, especially as we age,if someone were to fall and
break a hip or a bone, they'llrecover faster.
One of the most importantthings with creatine is to make
sure you drink plenty of water,which I know many elderly are
not great at.
Not only elderly are not greatat it.
Sometimes the rest of us arenot so great at it.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
No, it's really good advice.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
More creatine um conversation here, uh says.
There's so many creatineproducts out which one to use?
Well, of course we had to bringour favorites in, right, so I
made you bring up yours, whichare disgusting, but I told you
to bring it up, yeah, so, uh,mark's is go ahead and show that
and tell everybody it's calledcreate.
I support creatine gummies.
Speaker 4 (07:15):
I know, Do you eat my ?
You use mine.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
I take dad's creatine every day.
Speaker 4 (07:25):
I don't love the way it tastes, but I like the way it
works.
Speaker 1 (07:26):
Yeah, and it makes me thirsty, but you know creatine
makes everybody thirsty.
Yeah Well, and it helps.
And again, creatine helps to,helps you in the gym and the
respect that it kind of pushesyou to be able to lift a little
bit more.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Okay, and the reason I take cognitive health too.
Yeah, I was gonna say thereason I take creatine is
because we get older women, welose muscle mass faster which
I'm sure any woman out therewho's lifted for her life knows
that because it's tough to keepthe muscle on.
And number two, just brain fogand helping us, like keep active
memories.
So I have two different, twodifferent kinds.
I use the pause nutrition Okay.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
All right, it's online, you can get that.
Sure, it's $80 a bottle.
Speaker 2 (07:56):
It's not $80 a bottle here.
You know what's great aboutthis one it's powder and it's
flavorless, Unlike those thingsoh, they're delicious.
Speaker 1 (08:02):
These are watermelon flavored.
Oh gross, they're gummies.
They're fantastic.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
And then this other one I've just started is called
Rho Nutrition and it's liquid.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
You have multiple different creatines.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
I do because I'm trying to find different
creatines that I like.
So yeah, I'm kind of a samplerof things.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
I guess.
So yeah, don't worry.
Multiple bottles.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
There was a special for Memorial.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Day.
Okay, just because it's on saledoesn't mean you have to buy it
Sometimes, when we want to savemoney, we do Anyway.
You aren't saving money.
You're spending more money.
Speaker 2 (08:36):
Listen when the boxes show up from Amazon you just
don't pay attention.
How about them apples?
All right, okay.
Okay, now here's this guy, mike.
Mike, you called this like itis for Mark.
Uh, it says apparently Marksupplement is A&W root beer.
Um, which is you know he is, uh, he is an A&W fan and diet.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
It's yeah, it's zero sugar.
A&w.
It's delicious.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
It really is Fantastic you think that we're
getting sponsored by all theseplaces.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Yeah, no, we're not getting a dime.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
We're not getting a dime, we're just telling you
what we like.
All right, Okay.
And then this one.
I don't know where Deborah wascoming from with this.
I don't know if she was upsetthat we were talking about the
Trump calling Putin out, andmaybe we were like, hello, what
did you think Putin was going todo?
I don't know if that's whatgenerated this comment, but
Deborah says Trump's IQ ishigher than you realize.
(09:25):
He is not a fool.
He plays D chess 5D chess.
For goodness sakes, okay, Idon't think he's saying that.
Trump's dumb.
I don't think he'd be thepresident of the United States
if we thought Trump wasn't.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
No, I don't think he'd be president, I always
thought that was comical whenpeople were like George Bush,
you're an idiot you know it'slike no, he's not.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
You're not an idiot, I don't think that's the quite
the thing that we're trying totalk about.
I I mean, you go ahead andrespond to that however you want
, but honestly, our story wasreally about, uh, the fact that
if you think putin was justgoing to be like, oh, trump's in
office now, I think I'll justand the war, yeah, let's go to
he's into this thing for amillion people, like meaning
they've lost up to a millionpeople.
Speaker 1 (10:02):
It's craziness, and if you think you're just going
to say to them, oh, you're goingto change this, you're not.
So the reality is that we'regoing to have a showdown here to
some degree, so get ready.
I mean, this is going to be oneof those deals, and it's not
like we can't handle Russia.
However, this is significant,and so I think we're going to
talk about it here in a bit.
(10:22):
But we're not saying that.
But we're also going to tellyou what we think and when we
think it.
And if we disagree with whatTrump's doing, we're going to
say we disagree, I disagree whathe's done with Russia and
Ukraine.
I don't think it's going to work, and I don't think JD Vance is
right on this.
I think Rubio is more right onthis than Vance is Okay.
So when we them, we're going totell you that, and we're not
here to be some honk for Trumpor anybody else.
(10:44):
I think a lot of what's goingon and a lot of what he's done
is good, but there's stuff whereI think he's making mistakes
and and we're about to talkabout some of that Okay.
So if you want somebody who'sjust going to just rubber stamp
everything that theadministration does.
There are plenty of people outthere who are, who are you know
sniffing up that tree.
We're not one of them.
But we'll also tell you just behonest with you and you can
(11:05):
disagree and tell us we're fullof it.
That's totally fine.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
I think it's also like it's called a conversation,
which I think is what we needto be bringing back, is that
you're not always just singingthe praises of one leader or the
other.
You can be fair and balancedand try to say listen.
I disagree with them on thispart and which I have been very
vocal about all through theelection.
All the last two years we'vebeen online on on this show, so
I think we call it like we seeit, we always will, and that's
(11:34):
kind of, if you want to watchour show, great, that's kind of
where you're going to get withus on that.
So anyway, okay, let's move on.
Let's talk a little bit.
These petitions that are due uh, coming up June 21st, by the
way for all the signaturesrequired to get on the ballot
for the mayor's race here inBernalillo County A lot, of
signatures that you need to havein Albuquerque.
compared to what?
Is it 3,400 or 3,000, somethinglike that?
(11:55):
You need to have to be on theballot and I think a statewide
race is what?
3,400 or 3,500?
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Yeah, something in that neighborhood.
So the city does put out thenumbers.
So it's kind of interestingbecause you're seeing all the
candidates kind of scramble hereEls, let's go in here tight and
kind of show you what's goingon.
And if you look at some of this, you'll see a surprising name
at the top of the list.
Now, not only is he at the topof the list because he's got all
the signatures he needs, butit's it's interesting just to
(12:25):
look at how this is going andhow many have been rejected.
So Daniel Chavez is running formayor.
I believe he's an independent,I don't know him.
He apparently owns a bunch ofof parking lots downtown, so I
don't know.
Probably charge for parking andstuff like that.
I think he's done pretty well.
So he put some money in forhimself, and what he clearly did
here is he hired canvassers togo out and get signatures for
(12:45):
him, which is a pretty commonthing to do.
There's nothing wrong with that.
But he's got himself alreadyverified Thirty four hundred
signatures.
He's on the ballot and he sayshe's not going to use the public
financing.
So he says he's going tobasically raise money himself or
put money in himself.
Ok, so, so he's got that.
So he's already using some ofhis money for that.
Okay, so he's all set to go.
(13:10):
Now you got some of these othercandidates who this is where
we're talking about.
If you don't have even a denthere, say you're not at 500
signatures here already, you'redone.
Okay, you're really going tohave trouble.
So if you look and see here,brian Fajar, he's 69 signatures.
Um, uh, miss adair's got four.
Uh, she's got 14 signatures.
Not gonna happen.
Uh, ubias has 2 000 signaturesso he's closing in.
He's 70, 70 ish percent of theway there.
(13:32):
He'll get there.
It looks like herrick isdoesn't have any signatures.
Louis sanchez has 1382.
He's he's, he's in.
He's knocking on the doorsteptrying to get that done.
Uh, miling armijo, she's onlyat 700.
That's going to be a heavy liftunless she wants to pay money
to get that done.
Miling Armijo, she's only at700.
That's going to be a heavy liftunless she wants to pay money
to get people to go canvas andget signatures for her.
Eddie Varela Eddie's got 1,562.
(13:53):
Really impressive.
That's really good.
He's got to keep going.
Obviously he's halfway andEddie's getting there.
But Patrick Seiss, he's gotvery few signatures.
Darren White he'll get thereeventually.
I think Darren, if he gets intoa tight spot, will likely bring
canvassers in and get thesignatures that he needs.
And Mayor Keller, he's almostthere, he'll get there, he's got
a machine, so he's fine.
(14:14):
So all I'll tell you on this isI think you probably have
looking at these numbers and ifthese things play out, you're
going to have Keller, you'regoing to have Darren White
making this, you're going toprobably have maybe Louis
Sanchez, you buy us and Chavez,so you're going to have a fair.
You're going to have four orfive candidates that are going
to make it.
Um, and that's on the higherside of what we thought about
maybe three or four.
(14:34):
I think four or five, judgingby these.
And again, this is just to geton the ballot.
This isn't the public financing.
You got to have 3,700signatures and they've got to
give you $5 donations.
Okay, so that's why the publicfinancing is tougher than this.
This one's easier.
This is just hey, will you signthis?
And it just has to be somebodythat's a registered voter in
(14:56):
Albuquerque, not BernalilloCounty, albuquerque, and then
you can only sign one.
You can only sign one Exactly,so that's how that works.
So this is easier than the thangetting the public financing is
.
So just so you know.
And, by the way, so there'srumor out there that polling has
been done.
Okay, and the polling basicallyshows Keller with about a 10
(15:16):
point lead.
Wow, okay, however however andthis is why this is interesting
Keller's got 10 point leads, gotapproval rating in the 20s
though.
Oh.
So what you've got here is acouple of people in this race
have name ID.
It's really Keller and it'sreally Darren White.
Those are the two people whohave some name ID.
Keller obviously has high nameID.
Darren's.
(15:37):
Darren's probably would besecond behind him.
So just something to thinkabout.
But if you're, you know, ifyou're Darren White and you're
looking at this, you're you'reprobably in second in this poll.
That's my understanding.
And then, with Keller, you'reconcerned because your approval
number is so low.
So what that shows is peopledon't know the other candidates.
So once they get to know theother candidates, you start to
(15:58):
lose support because you don't.
So if your approval ratings inthe 20s, he's done OK, but I do
think he's going to spend a lotof money to try to boost that up
and see what happens here.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
It's going to be a close race.
I know that this is like abipartisan race and all of that
thing.
It's not.
You know you're not supposed toreally talk about the parties
and all that, but I do thinkit's important because, you know
, right now, looking at this, itlooks like you're lining up
probably more Democrats to be onthe ballot than potentially.
The only Republican is going tobe Darren White, daniel Chavez
(16:29):
Right, he's either anindependent or a Democrat.
Speaker 1 (16:30):
We're not really sure ?
Speaker 2 (16:30):
No, he's an independent.
Oh, he's an independent.
Okay, so yeah, and he's anindependent.
Speaker 1 (16:33):
Oh, he's an independent, okay, and so yeah
and he's, but what's interestingwith him is getting those
signatures.
So he clearly, if you look atthe number of signatures that
have been rejected, that heturned in.
Speaker 2 (16:43):
Seems super high.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
Well it's super high because he paid for it.
So what he did was he putcanvassers out there and they
got a bunch of signatures thatthey get rejected.
It's not that he spent realmoney to go and get these
signatures to get on the ballot,and so that's why he has so
many rejections.
He has 20,.
Let's see what he has here2,336 rejected signatures.
(17:12):
That just shows you he spentthe most money by far of anyone
to go get this done, cause hisguys just go around that they're
not.
They're not activists who goaround and say are you a voter,
are you?
You know they do all this.
They just get people to sign.
They try and burn and theyeventually get there and got him
the 3,000 signatures that heneeded, or 3,400, or whatever he
has here.
So, as you look at thosenumbers, that's why he's got so
many rejected signatures, justbecause he paid a lot of money
to get these done.
And again, nothing wrong withthat.
(17:33):
I mean, that's just fine.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
Well, it'll be interesting to see what his
platform is, how the differencesthat show up about these guys.
I can't wait to.
I mean, I've never heard ofthis guy, which doesn't mean
anything, but it'd beinteresting to see.
Like, what's he going to say?
Speaker 1 (17:48):
Oh, we need to reduce crime, we need to reduce
homelessness.
We've got to come together.
This shouldn't be a fight thatis political.
I don't know.
You know, he has a boilerplatewebsite which doesn't say much.
So we'll see how effective heis at communicating and how
effective he is at getting hismessage out there.
And is he good in a room and dopeople start to gravitate
toward him?
And you'll know pretty quickly.
If you start coming out ofrooms and people are like I
(18:08):
really like this guy, he'sreally good, then you'll know.
And then if he has the money toput in himself which he
apparently does, at least tosome degree, then he could be a
contender.
But if not, if he's just one ofthese guys that puts in
$100,000, blows $100,000 onexpensive consultants and some
polling and some canvassers,well then he'll flame out
quickly.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
But we'll see.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
He's got a shot.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Okay, well, something interesting coming out Now.
The CDC has made some reversalson the COVID vaccine.
However, the Journal took a new, like a kind of the standard
approach of writing that story,so we wanted to show it to you
guys.
It says here the New MexicoDepartment of Health falls in
line with CDC reversal of COVIDvaccines.
(18:52):
Kids and pregnant women are nolonger recommended to vaccinate.
This is by Jillian Barkhurst atthe journal and basically he
she goes on to say a couple ofthings.
A health and human servicessecretary, robert F Kennedy jr,
announced Tuesday that thecenters for disease control and
prevention will no longerrecommend COVID-19 vaccines for
children and pregnant women,contradicting the medical
(19:13):
consensus among pediatriciansand OBGYN.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
Oh, there's a consensus now.
I forgot to see that.
That's where you start to seeher articles show its colors.
Right there there's a consensusand you're against.
This is old talk that we'veheard a million times, right,
which is there's a science,there's the science, and then
there, and then there's this,this guy over here, which again
is ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
But anyway, keep going well, and that's the first
sentence too the new mexicodepartment of health will follow
this protocol quote as of now.
Officials said Kennedy is bestperhaps best known for
questioning the safety ofvaccines and other governmental
health interventions.
I don't think that's what he'sbest known for, but whatever
this fear and vaccine hesitancyaccumulated in Kennedy's Make
America Healthy Again initiative, his platform when he ran for
(19:54):
president in 2020, beforedropping out and endorsing
President Donald Trump, thischange on the federal level will
trickle down, making thevaccine less affordable and
accessible, said Dr Tina Tan, aninfectious disease physician at
Lurie's Children's Hospital ofChicago.
So, basically, if you keepgoing, if you go on here, it
says.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
And then Kennedy says this yeah, kennedy says.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
Last year the Biden administration urged healthy
children to get yet anotherCOVID shot, despite the lack of
any clinical data to support therepeat booster strategy in
children, kennedy said.
In a video released on socialmedia, tan called this claim
completely incorrect and evendangerous.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Then in the next paragraph okay, they completely
contradict what they just said,and she says this for children.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
Most infections are mild, but there is a slight
chance of contractingmulti-system inflammatory
syndrome, a disease where organsand tissues swell months after
their initial symptoms, leadingto hospitalization.
Tan said.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Okay, again, that is less than 1%.
And just sit there and say,everybody keep daxing up to make
sure that this one little areayou know that is less than 1%.
And to sit there and say,everybody, keep daxing up to
make sure that this one littlearea, you know that this slight
chance of a slight chance isdealt with.
This is the kind of thinkingand the science has been decided
and you have to do this andeven though there's a tiny
chance, this is the sort ofstuff that's maddening.
This is an article right out of2022 or 2021.
(21:15):
Really it is or 2020, for thatmatter.
You agree with the sciences.
We lay it out.
That's not true.
It's ridiculous and the fact ofthe matter is, if we could go
back in time and not vaccinateour kids, I would have not
vaccinated them.
They did not need to bevaccinated, are my parents?
Absolutely?
I would have vaccinated myparents and remember this
(21:35):
vaccine came out in a verycompressed time frame, when we
needed it very, very quickly.
And now there's an opportunityto step back and do more
peer-reviewed research to figureout exactly what's going on
with this and the impacts onkids, the impacts on adults, all
of it.
You know what's going on withvaccine injury.
(21:57):
Is it a significant issue, isit not?
This is what should behappening here, not this old
school.
We've already decided, as thescience community take another
shot, stick it.
I don't believe, I don'tunderstand why the journal is
doing this.
I really don't, and theperspective of it is incredibly
irritating when you read it.
This old well, what we'vedecided?
(22:19):
The science has been decided.
No, it hasn't been decided.
Speaker 2 (22:21):
Well, and they're like how about the data on
actual how many kids were sogravely impacted by COVID that
were unvaccinated?
I think that'd be aninteresting piece of data that I
have yet to find, which I havebeen looking for.
So, again like can we look atdata and then make the decision
on what's?
Speaker 1 (22:37):
best for no, because it's been decided.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
So it's just like- that science has spoken.
Have the conversation, and thatis again like.
You may not agree witheverything that RFK Jr has to
say, but at least he's stirringthe pot and saying let's have a
conversation about this stuff,let's figure it out.
Is this actually still theprotocol I read recently?
They're actually reviewing now.
Do children today need all 72vaccinations that they're
(22:59):
recommending?
Have we done any data researchon that lately?
Have we actually studied thoseresults yet?
Are they absolutely necessary?
And I would love some new dataon that because, trust me, as a
kid I didn't get 72 vaccinations.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Right, right, no, no, no, there's definitely and
that's again.
You're right, though, to saythat that a discussion needs to
be had on some of this stuff.
And again, we vaccinated ourkids and and, believe me, they
got the COVID vaccine too, whichwe regret I got it, which I
regret getting you know for forreasons that we don't discuss on
this show, but it is.
It is definitely a regret ofours, but again, I'm glad we had
(23:34):
it, I'm glad my parents got it,so I think it definitely served
a good purpose.
Speaker 2 (23:40):
It's just to go now.
It just shouldn't have beencrammed on everybody's throat
and it shouldn't have beenmandatory to keep your job to
travel.
All that Absolutely true, thefact when a government comes in
and says you have to do this oryou're going to lose your job,
or you cannot travel, or youcan't go to school or you can't.
I mean all the fact that therewas just not enough information
(24:01):
out there at the time to makethat call.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Right, and now there is enough information, and to
still write articles like this,like it's 2020, is irritating,
right.
That's why that's where Ipulled it.
But OK, so let's get to Trumpand what's going on with Russia.
We had a clip in our last showwhere Trump was talking about
Vladimir Putin sort of going offthe deep end with sending a ton
of missiles and drones intoUkraine, and the reason we want
(24:25):
to talk about this issue againis because we're starting to see
things kind of reach a boilingpoint with Russia, and the
interesting thing is, how isTrump going to handle this?
Because I think he's beingcalled out by Russia and the
question is he's got one of twodirections to go.
It'll be interesting to seewhich one he takes, but let's go
back to the soundbite withTrump and then we'll get Putin's
response and then the Russianresponse more broadly.
(24:48):
So here's Trump about four daysago.
Speaker 3 (24:52):
Yeah, I'll give you an update.
I'm not happy with what Putin'sdoing.
He's killing a lot of peopleand I don't know what the hell
happened to Putin.
I've known him a long time,always gotten along with him,
but he's sending rockets intocities and killing people and I
don't like it at all.
Ok, we're in the middle oftalking and he's shooting
rockets into Kiev and othercities.
(25:13):
I don't like it at all.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
OK, let's stop right there.
That's good enough, else Allright.
So Putin then responds so thereis a translation on this, so
we'll just let you listen tothis and then we'll get into it.
We need to get them in achokehold.
Speaker 3 (25:31):
They're trying to strangle us and we should
reciprocate.
We did not chase anyone out.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
No, you invaded, but whatever.
Speaker 3 (25:41):
We provided the best possible conditions to work in
our market and they're trying tochoke us.
And we should act in a mirrorfashion.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Okay, and then that's .
It's not a?
A, so he was talking about avariety of different things in
that, but but the overall pointhere is he's starting to push
forward, and then trump hearsthis, and then trump responds
with this he says what vladimirputin doesn't realize if if
things weren't for, if it wasn'tfor me, lots of really bad
things would have alreadyhappened to Russia, and I mean
(26:17):
really bad.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
He's playing with fire.
Speaker 1 (26:19):
Okay, and then the Russian news network comes out,
rt, which is the basicallystate-sponsored media in Russia.
What do they say?
Speaker 2 (26:28):
President Trump warns Moscow, claiming Russia avoided
quote real bad consequencesonly thanks to him.
Putin doesn't realize he'splaying with fire.
Trump's message leaves littleroom for misinterpretation until
he posts the opposite tomorrowmorning.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
Okay, so they're calling him out.
They're basically just callinghim out and saying oh, you say
this now, you're gonna saysomething else tomorrow morning,
whatever.
They are flat out calling himout.
And then Dmitry Medvedev, whowas the former president of
Russia and now is kind ofPutin's bag man, okay, and
Russia says you know, it wouldreally be bad as world war three
(27:02):
.
That's what he said.
So you got something interestinghere, because I think Trump's
being pulled in one of twodirections.
I is being pulled by a certainpart of the, the Republican
establishment now, which iswe're the party of peace.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,no, no, no, no, no, no.
Don't do anything, don't doanything, right.
Kind of the JD Vance model,which is why we involved in all
(27:24):
these things.
We don't need to be.
Don't touch any of it, OK.
Well, if you don't touch any ofit, putin's knows that he's
watching, xi Jinping knows thathe's watching.
Eventually they're going tocall you out and they're going
to say OK, we'll do what we want.
I'm going to fire as manymissiles as I want into Kiev.
What are you going to do aboutit, mr?
Don't get involved in anythingNow.
(27:45):
I'm not saying you have to beinvolved in all these things,
but Trump's got to make thedecision, which is one of two
things Is he either Mr Peace,who always backs away and won't
do anything, or is he?
I'm a man of my word.
If I had to guess Trump is adon't cross me guy, my guess is
he's not.
Mr.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
Why are we involved in this?
(28:06):
Why are we involved in this?
You can't be both.
You can't be both, and Russiais going to force him to choose.
So what we're seeing now iswe're seeing troops and troop
movements in places like Swedenand Finland, and they're
concerned with what's going onnow.
New members of NATO and Finlandand they're concerned with
what's going on now.
New members have made NATO andwhat's going to happen here?
What, what?
What does Trump do?
(28:26):
Does he level massive sanctionson Russia?
Maybe that that might be a goodway to start?
Does he go to his, his goodfriend Zelensky, and again
whipping Zelensky forever?
But at a certain point, youstart to realize who the big
problem is, and I got news foryou it ain't Zelensky.
You can disagree on what to dowith the Ukraine, but the
(28:49):
problem here is the fact thatPutin went into Ukraine.
Putin is continuing to moveforward here, and if you think
he's going to stop, what makesyou think that?
Are you okay with him takingall of Ukraine?
And if you are, then are youokay with him going into Poland?
Because what makes you thinkhe's not going to?
He took Georgia, he took Crimea, he's trying to take all of
(29:13):
Ukraine.
What do you think this is?
And so this whole thoughtprocess that we can be like,
well, stay out of it.
Ukraine's terrible.
No, it's not.
Now it doesn't mean we putsoldiers on the ground
Absolutely not.
But do we give more weapons toUkraine?
Maybe, maybe.
Do we sell them more weapons,maybe?
I mean.
So all I'm saying on this isyou can't be Captain Peace and
(29:37):
Captain Don't Cross Me at thesame time.
You can't be that person.
It doesn't work.
Don't cross me at the same time.
You can't be that person.
It doesn't work.
So now, I'm not saying we gotto bomb anybody, we don't.
But you better adjust the wayyou're approaching this.
If you're Trump because Trumpis going to be forced to say
which one he is, and I thinkhe's going to be captain Don't
cross me.
And so when he's captain, don'tcross me, he's going to drop
(29:59):
some serious sanctions and myguess is he opens up more arms
sales to Ukraine.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
Okay, all right.
Well, let's look at a littlebit of this approval ticking up
a little bit for Trump, like hisapproval ratings are slowly
increasing again.
Right now it's looking like hisapproval rating is at 53%,
which is up 7%.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Yeah, Rasmussen yeah.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
And so this is the highest approval he's had since
mid February, which isinteresting.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
Yeah, I think he said some things you know kind of
start to settle out a little bit, and I think you know this kind
of ebbs and flows.
I also think if, if the economycontinues to improve, if they
pass, you know, the bigbeautiful bill through both
houses and you get it, you getthe prolonged tax cut, you get
things like that, I think thatstuff could be good, you know,
and we'll wait and see whathappens.
(30:47):
Some of the other things, butnot not a total surprise, and I
think a lot of this is buoyed byHispanics as well.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Yeah, it says here that, uh, his job approval with
Hispanics is strong right now.
If you look at this, uh, 60% ofHispanic voters approve of what
Trump's doing, to 40% whodisapprove.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
Yeah, those are solid numbers, right so?
And then this gets.
Then this gets us to the otherpoint, right?
So we broadly look at theparties, and they were, they
were polled as well, and this isinteresting.
So which party wins which issue?
Okay, immigration Republicanshave a 16 point advantage over
Democrats.
Immigration Republicans have a16-point advantage over
(31:23):
Democrats.
Crime Republicans a 16-pointadvantage.
The economy 8-point advantage.
Here's what I'm talking aboutfrom April, when you had all the
tariff craziness.
Right Now that starts to backdown and all of a sudden,
republicans are up 8 onDemocrats with the economy.
Gun laws up 7 for Republicans.
Inflation Republicans up six.
(31:44):
Okay, so again, inflationcontinuing to decrease.
That's good.
Now, what issues are Democratswinning on?
Gender identity, plus five.
Education, important plus eight.
Healthcare important plus 10.
Abortion, plus 12.
And climate change plus 10.
(32:04):
Abortion plus 12.
And climate change plus 18.
So, again, if you care aboutclimate change at all or you
care about abortion, some bigissue for you that you're flying
your flag on, you're going tolike Democrats for that.
But interesting stuff.
Now one other thing as we getready and Ella, this is clip 22,
as we get ready for the genericballots coming up here in 2026,
(32:25):
who do you favor, right, just abroader question.
Usually, democrats are aheadsignificantly on this.
Who do you favor?
And right now it's very closeDemocrats 48, 45 for Republicans
, and so those numbers arecoming down too.
Okay, republicans are stayingwhere they are, but Democrats
numbers are coming down a littlebit as well.
(32:45):
So, again, just something towatch.
If you're at 48, 45 going into2026, you got to toss up
election on whether theRepublicans lose the house and
the Republicans do not lose theSenate with those numbers.
Speaker 2 (32:57):
Okay, and let's explain that a little bit.
I think just again, when youhave somebody in office, a
political party in office soright now obviously we have
Trump in office what does thattypically do to your state rate
or the federal races in thestates?
Right, it usually kind ofsometimes flips those correct,
and this is saying it's notnecessarily going to do that.
Speaker 1 (33:14):
Well, I think that really with a broader question
is, when you ask the genericballot question, you just are
getting a temperature on howpeople feel about the parties
and usually, as a general rule,you would see Democrats with
around a 10 point advantage.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
When there's a Republican in office.
No, no, no, no.
Now just in general.
Speaker 3 (33:32):
Yep, yep.
The Dems always have a 10 pointadvantage.
Speaker 1 (33:34):
They, for a long time , have had a significant
advantage in that.
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
Interesting yeah.
Speaker 1 (33:38):
It's not necessarily have anything to do with who
who's in office or whatever.
Yeah it's not necessarily haveanything to do with who who's in
office or whatever.
So yeah, and so that numberscome down and that's again.
You saw evidence of that in2024.
Like, you saw the country shiftRight and I think this is still
an example of that that there'sno reason to believe right now
that Democrats are pulling backa bunch of votes.
They haven't found that messageyet.
They don't have it yet.
(33:58):
Like they keep, they're hittingTrump on various things and
everything else, but they don'thave a reason for people to go
back to them.
If they get that reason, thenyou'll start to see those
numbers widen back out again.
If Trump can keep the economyhumming along, if he can fix
some of these other issuesoverseas, then then that number
is going to stay.
That gap's going to stay and Ithink you'll see a very the
house is going to be a totaltoss up right On whether
(34:20):
Republicans hold it or not.
I think the odds are stillprobably good that the Democrats
take it back over with a fewextra votes, but we'll see.
They're not going to get theSenate.
The Senate's going to stayRepublican.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
Okay, so we'll see.
All right, so now we're goingto talk about a dangerous dog.
Speaker 1 (34:33):
Yeah, so we got the.
Yeah, I know we're like jumpingall over the place on this, but
I saw this and I know how manyNew Mexicans I have some good
friends who have pit bulls andand actually they can be such a
sweet dog, but so, but I sawthis study and I thought it was
interesting.
It says most dangerous dogstudy reveals the 10 breeds most
likely to land you in court orthe hospital, which is not great
(34:54):
.
So let's look at this uh reportin a nutshell here and I always
love when they do in a nutshellokay, a little bit of a little
bit of a nutshell here, okay.
Okay.
Pit bulls are the statisticaloutliers.
They account for almost 27% ofall dog breeds.
That's a really high number and61 fatalities far more than any
(35:15):
other breed, despite being asmall fraction of the dog
population.
That is a bummer.
A vaccination rates aretroublingly low.
The most dangerous breeds havepoor vaccination compliance.
That's not necessarily asurprise With shepherds at just
9.25%.
So German shepherds mainly, andpit bulls at 17%.
So if pit bulls are morevaccinated than German,
(35:36):
shepherds are creatingadditional health risks for the
bite victims as well, which is atotal bummer.
And even family friendly breedscan be risky.
This is going to be shockinghere.
Okay, so let's go to the listand show you what's going on
with this list, of course, andhere it is.
Okay.
So this is percent of all bites.
I mean the, the, the number onpit bulls.
(35:56):
Just, I think obviously you gotto make sure, if you get a pit
bull, that you're you'retraining it well, you're you're,
you know, raising it in anenvironment where you really
care for it, cause there are alot of new Mexicans who love pit
bulls.
Speaker 4 (36:07):
I mean and they're.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
They can be really sweet dogs, but like anything,
you got to be careful.
German Shepherds, mainly um,are second on the list is most
dangerous.
Uh, boxers are up on that list.
Uh, let's see Rottweilers.
Oh sorry, german shepherds areat five.
So and then you get down toaustralian cattle dogs and then
get all the way down check outnumber 10.
Speaker 2 (36:29):
Yeah, that's the.
The crazy one is the lab.
Yeah, a labrador's retriever.
Speaker 1 (36:32):
I mean, those are just like the sweetest dogs ever
yeah, so, yeah, they, they are,but but still I think you got,
you know, incidents 136 and thenpercent of all bites.
There's 6% of all bites here.
Their vaccination rate isactually a bit higher here and
the severe bite rate is lowerthan some of the higher, higher
(36:54):
dogs that you see there.
But it just is kind of one ofthose things that you never
quite know, and a lot of thishas to do with how you raise a
dog.
Speaker 2 (37:01):
Right, well, and the Huskies are not on there,
because you know what theHuskies do They'll just woo you
to death.
They will just bark and woo atyou and sing to you, like that's
what they do, yeah.
Speaker 1 (37:08):
But no, huskies are thought of as dogs that can bite
too.
I mean, it's definitely.
You know, we read all sorts oflists about Husk people who
don't get a Husky, but it's notnecessarily because they'll bite
you.
Speaker 2 (37:21):
It's because they will dig holes in your house and
run away from you.
Well, there is that and all theother things tear up your shoes
.
That kind of thing A little bitdifferent.
Speaker 1 (37:29):
Oh man, okay.
So we want to show you someamazing, amazing pictures from
Floyd, new Mexico.
And so we had severe weather onSunday and that season you know
we get into may, may is severeweather season in new mexico,
clash of air masses, and itleads to some incredible
pictures.
So this is, uh, quincy vagelwho said, one more set of photos
(37:52):
from yesterday's tornado chasein and around floyd, new mexico,
showing the tornado shift froma ghostly white toward a red
swirling menace.
I greatly appreciate all thesupport and feedback.
Quincy did an incredible job onthese pictures.
So here's the ghostly white Imean just unbelievable, probably
an EF1 tornado, maybe an EF2,but probably an EF1 right there.
(38:16):
Let's go back up to thepictures and that's an
incredible shot.
And then you start to see itdraw the dust up from the
surface Right, and so that's whyyou're getting that color.
Start to mix in here and thentake a look at this picture
Unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (38:32):
Looks like out of a movie it is.
It's a stovepipe tornado it is.
Speaker 1 (38:37):
It is beautiful structure on this and this is
the kind of tornado we like outin the middle of nowhere.
Speaker 2 (38:42):
Right Doesn't hurt anybody.
Speaker 1 (38:46):
Yeah, structure on this and this is the kind of
tornado we like out in themiddle of nowhere, right yeah,
not.
Right in the middle of a town,not going after anything, and
then check out this last shot asit starts to rope out.
Speaker 2 (38:51):
You can see just picking up more dirt.
It literally looks like a car.
It looks like something fromthe movies.
Yeah, it's unbelievableHollywood movie.
It's unbelievable, it is Greatshots.
Speaker 1 (38:59):
Oh, quincy did an unbelievable, it just did an
incredible job and we do getsome of that stuff.
So we do have moisture now overthe state.
It's been good we're gettingsome rain, especially in the
Northern mountains here.
That's been very good.
Fire danger backing off alittle bit temporarily.
Anyway, month of June tends tobe hot here and it tends to be
dry and with less severe weather.
So we'll wait and see what endsup happening here.
(39:19):
But the more moisture we canstay in the mix with which I do
think we're going to see somemoisture here over the next two,
three days Northern mountainsare going to stay, you know, at
least wet in and out, withshowers, humidity levels up
higher.
You can see in the Albuquerquearea you've got more cloud cover
lately.
You know, we've seen that eachday.
This is not.
Ella has been very concernedabout the UV index out there
trying to get a little bit ofsun and she's concerned.
Speaker 2 (39:40):
Yeah, if you have a teenager who's now watching
these apps that tell you whenit's the best time to go outside
in the sun.
So it's the weather app.
Speaker 4 (39:48):
I mean, it's been around forever.
I think the UV index.
It's not a new thing.
But it's like why waste yourtime out in a UV of five when
you could go out there at nineor 10,?
Speaker 1 (39:57):
you know what I'm saying.
Let's not get too much sun.
Okay, it's not good for yourlittle skin.
I mean, you get some, cause it,the sun is good for you.
Speaker 4 (40:03):
And then it makes you look good.
Speaker 1 (40:05):
Oh gosh.
Speaker 4 (40:06):
Makes your hair bright and your skin dark.
It's beautiful.
Speaker 1 (40:08):
All right, okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (40:11):
Spoken like a teenager.
Speaker 1 (40:12):
All right.
Speaker 2 (40:12):
I can't argue with her.
Speaker 1 (40:18):
I was the girl that laid underneath my black
trampoline.
Speaker 2 (40:21):
Okay, so I could just toast myself.
Speaker 1 (40:23):
Not the best choice of my life, right, really
Definitely not no, is your skinnow you're like, hey, I'm glad I
did that.
Speaker 2 (40:30):
Uh, I would say, I started wearing sunblock 20
years ago.
So, that you know.
At least I got ahead of thegame.
Speaker 1 (40:35):
You did a little bit.
Speaker 2 (40:41):
You did a little bit.
Speaker 1 (40:42):
Apparently it's important to get good.
Well, yeah, that's what?
Speaker 2 (40:44):
yes, so that's what I worked with the uh, a cancer
doctor, and they actually said15 minutes of sun a day on your
back, the largest range area.
I thought it was your face no,no no on your back, no I thought
like if you get vitamin d onyour back, is is actually very
healthy for your immune system.
So he he was very clear insaying I'm not suggesting you go
out there and just bakeyourself.
(41:05):
He just said but there is adifference between laying out in
the sun and actually trying toget the vitamin D from the sun
as an immunity builder, and soyou're supposed to get it across
your back for 15 minutes a dayif you can.
That is what the cancer doctorI worked with had recommended,
so take that for what it is.
Speaker 1 (41:22):
Okay, one more weather story and then we'll get
out of here, okay.
Okay, this story is from China.
Paraglider gets caught in anupdraft in a store.
Okay, now here's the thing thatyou got to know he gets sucked
up five miles into the right.
Okay, so you figure how high isfive miles up?
Roughly it's about 25, 25,000feet, 20, I think.
(41:45):
He went as high as 28,000 feetand, to give you an idea, the
temperature drops roughly, onaverage in the atmosphere four
degrees for every thousand feet.
So therefore, as he goes up, heends up in air that's about 40
below zero.
Holy moly and so check out thevideo.
It's just wild to watch thisguy like he is locked into this
super cold air and he can't get,he can't do anything about it.
You know, it's not like he canput him pull himself down.
(42:06):
The updraft just keeps takinghim and he's just sitting there,
going I don't know what to do.
And you see, his hands are inthose sort of mittens that are
on the side of his parachute.
There it is.
See his hands there, see howhigh up he is.
He he's completely locked intosuper cold air and he can't move
his hands because he's got him,you know, kind of inside those
(42:29):
mittens which are keeping himwarm and he's just sort of
sitting there.
He's like how do we get out ofhere?
Eventually the updraft backsdown and he eventually lands.
Speaker 2 (42:39):
He's lucky to be alive I was gonna say that had
to be very scary.
This was over china by the way.
Speaker 1 (42:45):
Yeah, it's in china.
It had to be very scary for himnow.
Oh my god, do you have?
Speaker 2 (42:48):
any idea how long he was up there?
Speaker 1 (42:50):
I don't I mean it doesn't, it didn't say but I do
know it got as low as 40.
Uh, fahrenheit and celsius.
At that point fahrenheit andcelsius collide, so it's wow,
it's doesn't matter.
Five miles into the sky, yeah,yeah, basically 20 basically
he's at the top of everest isthe way to look at it holy cow
and and that's just super cold.
I mean year round that's supercold.
(43:11):
Doesn't matter that it's mayright right it just, I mean, it
just is so, so cold, so anyway.
But you can see him kind oflooking around going.
This is crazy so well.
Speaker 2 (43:19):
I wonder if he'll be in that paraglide anytime soon
after that I might be like Ithink I'm done, I'm gonna retire
from that danger sport.
Speaker 1 (43:26):
I mean, think about it like he has no engine on him
or anything.
No, he can't.
He just well, it's like a kite,and if you can't if you have no
way to get back down, you justhave to wait for the air yeah,
you kind of got to try to steeryour way out of it a little bit,
if you can.
Um, he was able to do that, butrealistically he can't do a lot
.
A lot of that just depends onhowever it shakes out.
Speaker 2 (43:45):
Holy cow, yeah.
Speaker 1 (43:46):
And, by the way, one quick thing we are working on
One of the stories we talkedabout in the gas price story
that some of the newrestrictions that could well be
imposed on New Mexicans, raisinggas prices 30 to 40 cents.
We are working on that rightnow, getting some clarity on it,
and we'll have more on it foryou.
We're but that is not somethingwe're we're forgetting about
and it's something you need toknow about, and we're going to
(44:07):
have more on it shortly, Ipromise.
Speaker 2 (44:09):
Okay, All right.
Well, hopefully you wereentertained today and you know
to go buy some creatine.
Speaker 3 (44:14):
That's the takeaway or A&W root beer One or the
other I mean
Speaker 4 (44:23):
one of those or the back here soon.
You've been listening to the noDoubt About it podcast.
We hope you've enjoyed the show.
We know we had a blast.
Make sure to like, rate andreview.
We'll be back soon, but in themeantime you can find us on
Instagram and Facebook at noDoubt About it podcast.
Speaker 1 (44:41):
No doubt about it, the no Doubt.
Speaker 4 (44:42):
About it Podcast.
No doubt about it, the no DoubtAbout it Podcast is a Choose
Adventure Media production.
See you next time on no DoubtAbout it.
Speaker 1 (44:51):
There is no doubt about it.
all right, we're rolling, no doubt about it.
Podcast, welcome to wednesdaynight, thursday morning,
whenever you're catching thisfriday, whatever saturday, enjoy
it.
It's evergreen this thing?
Yeah, not really, but you know,give it maybe four or five days
at the most.
Now this thing starts to stink.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Well, no, so it doesn't okay, people can listen
to it a week later.
All right, that's fine.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
I mean, come on guy be nice if you, if you, stayed
with us on these things.
We've got a lot going on.
We'll do some local stuff hereoff the top.
We'll do some mail, whichyou're going to do here in just
a second.
Talk a little bit about themayor's race, by the way,
hearing some rumor on polling,I'll give you a little bit of
the dirt on what I'm hearing akind of interesting guy running
(00:42):
for mayor who we had not heardof and he's doing quite well, at
least on signatures.
We'll get to that and a littlebit of an article from the
journal talking about COVIDvaccines and pushing hard for
COVID vaccines for kids, whichokay Interesting stuff with
Trump and Russia.
Russia's starting to call himout, which is interesting stuff
to see how this is all going toplay out, and I thought this
(01:05):
sort of thing might happen atsome point and we'll get into
the details on that.
But it is interesting.
New polling data is out acrossthe country for Republicans and
Democrats.
Each has a stronghold oncertain issues and some you
would expect, and I think somewould be a little bit of a
surprise here as well.
There is now the latest list ofdangerous dogs, and one of the
(01:26):
favorite dogs of New Mexico ison that list.
So we will get into that Someincredible pictures of severe
weather across Eastern NewMexico, some tornado pictures
which are just stunning, so wewant to show you those.
And then one paraglider caughtup in a storm and he ended up in
a really tight spot and islucky to be alive, and we'll
show you that as well.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Okay.
Well, let's start with somemail, because we've got products
to talk about, we've got allkinds of things to get out.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
We're jacking some products here.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
So let's uh, let's start with Sagittarius.
It says hope you guys had agood Memorial day honoring our
fallen military heroes.
I've got a three-part questionfor the crew.
First question for Mark andChristy what are your opinions
and thoughts of the Democratformer mayor of Las Cruces, ken
Miyagishima?
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Okay, we call him Mayor Ken.
Okay, mayor Ken, yeah, yeah,running for governor, yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Second question what kind of chance do you think he
has against the other Democratsrunning for governor?
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
That's actually a two-part question.
I don't know she might have hada third question, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Listen, I cut these real quick sometimes no, hey
look, I understand.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Sorry, sagittarius.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
We go with your top part of the comment.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
So, mayor Ken, I think obviously we're commenting
on a Democratic primary whichwe're by no means qualified to
comment on, but we'll do itanyway.
I think he's going to havetrouble raising money, and so I
think the way he'll benefit isif he can find a lane, raise
some money, stay in the race inhope of a breakdown of Holland
or Bregman.
I think Holland or Bregman havea better chance.
(02:52):
Holland definitely, as we'vesaid.
I think Bregman trying to runas a centrist is laughable, but
whatever, there are someRepublicans over the past couple
of weeks who held a fundraiserfor him, for for Sam Bregman,
which I think is an unbelievablemistake, but whatever.
So I think Mayor Ken will havetrouble fitting in that lane.
However, given what's going onwith Holland and that Holland, I
(03:14):
think, is either going to notget hit and get through or
she'll get hit and she has aglass jaw and she's going down
Right.
But my guess is, if I had toput a paycheck on it, it'll be
that she'll slide her waythrough without ever having to
really get into the middle ofthese things and fight it out.
So I think, if that's the case,mayor Ken probably never gets
the opportunity to get sometraction, but he's always got
(03:35):
that puncher's chance, giventhat the front runner is very
vulnerable If she does start tobreak down a glass jaw.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
I've never heard that expression.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Oh, it's a, uh, it's a boxing turn well, I figured
that rocky.
Yeah, I put it it means that ifyou get hit, your jaw is gonna
break.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
You're going down, let me give you my two cents on
this, which is very different,very different, two cents.
Just because of being in astatewide campaign with you for,
uh, two races, I learned a lotabout the differences between
bernalillo county so albuquerqueproper, and how important that
is when you're running in astatewide race and Las Cruces,
and how those two communitiesrarely know about each other or
(04:10):
people in those communities.
For example, a lot of peopledidn't know who you were in Las
Cruces because they don't getour television stations down
there.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
They get El Paso.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
They get El Paso market right, so vice versa.
I don't know who Mayor Ken isNever even heard of the guy
right.
They get El Paso market right,so vice versa.
I don't know who Mayor Ken isNever even heard of the guy
right.
So I think what's going to haveto happen is can he get enough
money raised to get name ID upin the northern part, up here in
Bernalillo County, as we'vesaid numerous times?
Not that the other countiesdon't matter, but Bernalillo
County is the biggest county ina statewide race and it really
(04:40):
matters what kind of benchmarkyou can make in Bernalillo.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
County.
Right, and really, when youtalk television, marcus.
So to be clear, albuquerque isabout three quarters of the
state, so it's not justBernalillo County, it is you
know it is.
Silver City, Socorro County,all the way up to Farmington,
all the way over to ColfaxCounty and all the way down to
Lee County.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
I'm saying, like what always shocked me was that in
Las Cruces that was basicallythe only county it's Las Cruces,
yeah.
They did not know who you were.
They're in Clovis.
They didn't know who you were.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Yeah, Clovis is Amarillo.
So yeah, those, yeah, no.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
I was shocked.
That was like a shockingdifference, like you could see
the difference in a name ID whenyou crossed into that city
where people did not know you,against the rest of the state,
the rest of the state.
So I just think if Ken is wellknown down in Las Cruces, he'll
have to market himself acrossthe whole state because a lot of
us won't know who he is.
Speaker 1 (05:29):
So that's all I was trying to say there.
True, and again, hollandperforms like she should, and it
will never matter.
Speaker 2 (05:34):
She doesn't come back to the Sam Bregman Republicans
throwing him uh fundraisers.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
There are some Republicans, uh, that were very
supportive of us, that that are,that are that have thrown him a
fundraiser, which I think is aterrible mistake goodness, and
it is it is a mistake you shouldnot make.
I mean, if you're gonna burnmoney, just go out to the
backyard and just light it onfire.
It'll at least keep you warmfor a minute, because that's
more than what a donation for arepublican to bregman will do
(06:01):
for you donate it to our show,our show guys.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
If you want to donate some money to a Republican
cause or conservative cause, no,I don't want Bregman money.
Speaker 1 (06:10):
If that money has the stank of Bregman on it, I don't
want it.
I don't want it, guy, oh gosh.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Okay, yeah, a guy who changes his stripes depending
on who's asking for him.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Oh, yes.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
You'll Uh as you'll learn.
You'll learn that if you, as we, keep watching him in this race
he'll be whatever you need himto be, as we go along in this
election cycle.
So, okay, l Davis rocks.
She says great show.
Creatine is one of the mostresearched supplements.
A friend who was a nutritionalcoach said that if the elderly
took creatine, they wouldreceive benefits we talked about
(06:40):
.
But also, especially as we age,if someone were to fall and
break a hip or a bone, they'llrecover faster.
One of the most importantthings with creatine is to make
sure you drink plenty of water,which I know many elderly are
not great at.
Not only elderly are not greatat it.
Sometimes the rest of us arenot so great at it.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
No, it's really good advice.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
More creatine um conversation here, uh says.
There's so many creatineproducts out which one to use?
Well, of course we had to bringour favorites in, right, so I
made you bring up yours, whichare disgusting, but I told you
to bring it up, yeah, so, uh,mark's is go ahead and show that
and tell everybody it's calledcreate.
I support creatine gummies.
Speaker 4 (07:15):
I know, Do you eat my ?
You use mine.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
I take dad's creatine every day.
Speaker 4 (07:25):
I don't love the way it tastes, but I like the way it
works.
Speaker 1 (07:26):
Yeah, and it makes me thirsty, but you know creatine
makes everybody thirsty.
Yeah Well, and it helps.
And again, creatine helps to,helps you in the gym and the
respect that it kind of pushesyou to be able to lift a little
bit more.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Okay, and the reason I take cognitive health too.
Yeah, I was gonna say thereason I take creatine is
because we get older women, welose muscle mass faster which
I'm sure any woman out therewho's lifted for her life knows
that because it's tough to keepthe muscle on.
And number two, just brain fogand helping us, like keep active
memories.
So I have two different, twodifferent kinds.
I use the pause nutrition Okay.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
All right, it's online, you can get that.
Sure, it's $80 a bottle.
Speaker 2 (07:56):
It's not $80 a bottle here.
You know what's great aboutthis one it's powder and it's
flavorless, Unlike those thingsoh, they're delicious.
Speaker 1 (08:02):
These are watermelon flavored.
Oh gross, they're gummies.
They're fantastic.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
And then this other one I've just started is called
Rho Nutrition and it's liquid.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
You have multiple different creatines.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
I do because I'm trying to find different
creatines that I like.
So yeah, I'm kind of a samplerof things.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
I guess.
So yeah, don't worry.
Multiple bottles.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
There was a special for Memorial.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Day.
Okay, just because it's on saledoesn't mean you have to buy it
Sometimes, when we want to savemoney, we do Anyway.
You aren't saving money.
You're spending more money.
Speaker 2 (08:36):
Listen when the boxes show up from Amazon you just
don't pay attention.
How about them apples?
All right, okay.
Okay, now here's this guy, mike.
Mike, you called this like itis for Mark.
Uh, it says apparently Marksupplement is A&W root beer.
Um, which is you know he is, uh, he is an A&W fan and diet.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
It's yeah, it's zero sugar.
A&w.
It's delicious.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
It really is Fantastic you think that we're
getting sponsored by all theseplaces.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Yeah, no, we're not getting a dime.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
We're not getting a dime, we're just telling you
what we like.
All right, Okay.
And then this one.
I don't know where Deborah wascoming from with this.
I don't know if she was upsetthat we were talking about the
Trump calling Putin out, andmaybe we were like, hello, what
did you think Putin was going todo?
I don't know if that's whatgenerated this comment, but
Deborah says Trump's IQ ishigher than you realize.
(09:25):
He is not a fool.
He plays D chess 5D chess.
For goodness sakes, okay, Idon't think he's saying that.
Trump's dumb.
I don't think he'd be thepresident of the United States
if we thought Trump wasn't.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
No, I don't think he'd be president, I always
thought that was comical whenpeople were like George Bush,
you're an idiot you know it'slike no, he's not.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
You're not an idiot, I don't think that's the quite
the thing that we're trying totalk about.
I I mean, you go ahead andrespond to that however you want
, but honestly, our story wasreally about, uh, the fact that
if you think putin was justgoing to be like, oh, trump's in
office now, I think I'll justand the war, yeah, let's go to
he's into this thing for amillion people, like meaning
they've lost up to a millionpeople.
Speaker 1 (10:02):
It's craziness, and if you think you're just going
to say to them, oh, you're goingto change this, you're not.
So the reality is that we'regoing to have a showdown here to
some degree, so get ready.
I mean, this is going to be oneof those deals, and it's not
like we can't handle Russia.
However, this is significant,and so I think we're going to
talk about it here in a bit.
(10:22):
But we're not saying that.
But we're also going to tellyou what we think and when we
think it.
And if we disagree with whatTrump's doing, we're going to
say we disagree, I disagree whathe's done with Russia and
Ukraine.
I don't think it's going to work, and I don't think JD Vance is
right on this.
I think Rubio is more right onthis than Vance is Okay.
So when we them, we're going totell you that, and we're not
here to be some honk for Trumpor anybody else.
(10:44):
I think a lot of what's goingon and a lot of what he's done
is good, but there's stuff whereI think he's making mistakes
and and we're about to talkabout some of that Okay.
So if you want somebody who'sjust going to just rubber stamp
everything that theadministration does.
There are plenty of people outthere who are, who are you know
sniffing up that tree.
We're not one of them.
But we'll also tell you just behonest with you and you can
(11:05):
disagree and tell us we're fullof it.
That's totally fine.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
I think it's also like it's called a conversation,
which I think is what we needto be bringing back, is that
you're not always just singingthe praises of one leader or the
other.
You can be fair and balancedand try to say listen.
I disagree with them on thispart and which I have been very
vocal about all through theelection.
All the last two years we'vebeen online on on this show, so
I think we call it like we seeit, we always will, and that's
(11:34):
kind of, if you want to watchour show, great, that's kind of
where you're going to get withus on that.
So anyway, okay, let's move on.
Let's talk a little bit.
These petitions that are due uh, coming up June 21st, by the
way for all the signaturesrequired to get on the ballot
for the mayor's race here inBernalillo County A lot, of
signatures that you need to havein Albuquerque.
compared to what?
Is it 3,400 or 3,000, somethinglike that?
(11:55):
You need to have to be on theballot and I think a statewide
race is what?
3,400 or 3,500?
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Yeah, something in that neighborhood.
So the city does put out thenumbers.
So it's kind of interestingbecause you're seeing all the
candidates kind of scramble hereEls, let's go in here tight and
kind of show you what's goingon.
And if you look at some of this, you'll see a surprising name
at the top of the list.
Now, not only is he at the topof the list because he's got all
the signatures he needs, butit's it's interesting just to
(12:25):
look at how this is going andhow many have been rejected.
So Daniel Chavez is running formayor.
I believe he's an independent,I don't know him.
He apparently owns a bunch ofof parking lots downtown, so I
don't know.
Probably charge for parking andstuff like that.
I think he's done pretty well.
So he put some money in forhimself, and what he clearly did
here is he hired canvassers togo out and get signatures for
(12:45):
him, which is a pretty commonthing to do.
There's nothing wrong with that.
But he's got himself alreadyverified Thirty four hundred
signatures.
He's on the ballot and he sayshe's not going to use the public
financing.
So he says he's going tobasically raise money himself or
put money in himself.
Ok, so, so he's got that.
So he's already using some ofhis money for that.
Okay, so he's all set to go.
(13:10):
Now you got some of these othercandidates who this is where
we're talking about.
If you don't have even a denthere, say you're not at 500
signatures here already, you'redone.
Okay, you're really going tohave trouble.
So if you look and see here,brian Fajar, he's 69 signatures.
Um, uh, miss adair's got four.
Uh, she's got 14 signatures.
Not gonna happen.
Uh, ubias has 2 000 signaturesso he's closing in.
He's 70, 70 ish percent of theway there.
(13:32):
He'll get there.
It looks like herrick isdoesn't have any signatures.
Louis sanchez has 1382.
He's he's, he's in.
He's knocking on the doorsteptrying to get that done.
Uh, miling armijo, she's onlyat 700.
That's going to be a heavy liftunless she wants to pay money
to get that done.
Miling Armijo, she's only at700.
That's going to be a heavy liftunless she wants to pay money
to get people to go canvas andget signatures for her.
Eddie Varela Eddie's got 1,562.
(13:53):
Really impressive.
That's really good.
He's got to keep going.
Obviously he's halfway andEddie's getting there.
But Patrick Seiss, he's gotvery few signatures.
Darren White he'll get thereeventually.
I think Darren, if he gets intoa tight spot, will likely bring
canvassers in and get thesignatures that he needs.
And Mayor Keller, he's almostthere, he'll get there, he's got
a machine, so he's fine.
(14:14):
So all I'll tell you on this isI think you probably have
looking at these numbers and ifthese things play out, you're
going to have Keller, you'regoing to have Darren White
making this, you're going toprobably have maybe Louis
Sanchez, you buy us and Chavez,so you're going to have a fair.
You're going to have four orfive candidates that are going
to make it.
Um, and that's on the higherside of what we thought about
maybe three or four.
(14:34):
I think four or five, judgingby these.
And again, this is just to geton the ballot.
This isn't the public financing.
You got to have 3,700signatures and they've got to
give you $5 donations.
Okay, so that's why the publicfinancing is tougher than this.
This one's easier.
This is just hey, will you signthis?
And it just has to be somebodythat's a registered voter in
(14:56):
Albuquerque, not BernalilloCounty, albuquerque, and then
you can only sign one.
You can only sign one Exactly,so that's how that works.
So this is easier than the thangetting the public financing is
.
So just so you know.
And, by the way, so there'srumor out there that polling has
been done.
Okay, and the polling basicallyshows Keller with about a 10
(15:16):
point lead.
Wow, okay, however however andthis is why this is interesting
Keller's got 10 point leads, gotapproval rating in the 20s
though.
Oh.
So what you've got here is acouple of people in this race
have name ID.
It's really Keller and it'sreally Darren White.
Those are the two people whohave some name ID.
Keller obviously has high nameID.
Darren's.
(15:37):
Darren's probably would besecond behind him.
So just something to thinkabout.
But if you're, you know, ifyou're Darren White and you're
looking at this, you're you'reprobably in second in this poll.
That's my understanding.
And then, with Keller, you'reconcerned because your approval
number is so low.
So what that shows is peopledon't know the other candidates.
So once they get to know theother candidates, you start to
(15:58):
lose support because you don't.
So if your approval ratings inthe 20s, he's done OK, but I do
think he's going to spend a lotof money to try to boost that up
and see what happens here.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
It's going to be a close race.
I know that this is like abipartisan race and all of that
thing.
It's not.
You know you're not supposed toreally talk about the parties
and all that, but I do thinkit's important because, you know
, right now, looking at this, itlooks like you're lining up
probably more Democrats to be onthe ballot than potentially.
The only Republican is going tobe Darren White, daniel Chavez
(16:29):
Right, he's either anindependent or a Democrat.
Speaker 1 (16:30):
We're not really sure ?
Speaker 2 (16:30):
No, he's an independent.
Oh, he's an independent.
Okay, so yeah, and he's anindependent.
Speaker 1 (16:33):
Oh, he's an independent, okay, and so yeah
and he's, but what's interestingwith him is getting those
signatures.
So he clearly, if you look atthe number of signatures that
have been rejected, that heturned in.
Speaker 2 (16:43):
Seems super high.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
Well it's super high because he paid for it.
So what he did was he putcanvassers out there and they
got a bunch of signatures thatthey get rejected.
It's not that he spent realmoney to go and get these
signatures to get on the ballot,and so that's why he has so
many rejections.
He has 20,.
Let's see what he has here2,336 rejected signatures.
(17:12):
That just shows you he spentthe most money by far of anyone
to go get this done, cause hisguys just go around that they're
not.
They're not activists who goaround and say are you a voter,
are you?
You know they do all this.
They just get people to sign.
They try and burn and theyeventually get there and got him
the 3,000 signatures that heneeded, or 3,400, or whatever he
has here.
So, as you look at thosenumbers, that's why he's got so
many rejected signatures, justbecause he paid a lot of money
to get these done.
And again, nothing wrong withthat.
(17:33):
I mean, that's just fine.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
Well, it'll be interesting to see what his
platform is, how the differencesthat show up about these guys.
I can't wait to.
I mean, I've never heard ofthis guy, which doesn't mean
anything, but it'd beinteresting to see.
Like, what's he going to say?
Speaker 1 (17:48):
Oh, we need to reduce crime, we need to reduce
homelessness.
We've got to come together.
This shouldn't be a fight thatis political.
I don't know.
You know, he has a boilerplatewebsite which doesn't say much.
So we'll see how effective heis at communicating and how
effective he is at getting hismessage out there.
And is he good in a room and dopeople start to gravitate
toward him?
And you'll know pretty quickly.
If you start coming out ofrooms and people are like I
(18:08):
really like this guy, he'sreally good, then you'll know.
And then if he has the money toput in himself which he
apparently does, at least tosome degree, then he could be a
contender.
But if not, if he's just one ofthese guys that puts in
$100,000, blows $100,000 onexpensive consultants and some
polling and some canvassers,well then he'll flame out
quickly.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
But we'll see.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
He's got a shot.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Okay, well, something interesting coming out Now.
The CDC has made some reversalson the COVID vaccine.
However, the Journal took a new, like a kind of the standard
approach of writing that story,so we wanted to show it to you
guys.
It says here the New MexicoDepartment of Health falls in
line with CDC reversal of COVIDvaccines.
(18:52):
Kids and pregnant women are nolonger recommended to vaccinate.
This is by Jillian Barkhurst atthe journal and basically he
she goes on to say a couple ofthings.
A health and human servicessecretary, robert F Kennedy jr,
announced Tuesday that thecenters for disease control and
prevention will no longerrecommend COVID-19 vaccines for
children and pregnant women,contradicting the medical
(19:13):
consensus among pediatriciansand OBGYN.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
Oh, there's a consensus now.
I forgot to see that.
That's where you start to seeher articles show its colors.
Right there there's a consensusand you're against.
This is old talk that we'veheard a million times, right,
which is there's a science,there's the science, and then
there, and then there's this,this guy over here, which again
is ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
But anyway, keep going well, and that's the first
sentence too the new mexicodepartment of health will follow
this protocol quote as of now.
Officials said Kennedy is bestperhaps best known for
questioning the safety ofvaccines and other governmental
health interventions.
I don't think that's what he'sbest known for, but whatever
this fear and vaccine hesitancyaccumulated in Kennedy's Make
America Healthy Again initiative, his platform when he ran for
(19:54):
president in 2020, beforedropping out and endorsing
President Donald Trump, thischange on the federal level will
trickle down, making thevaccine less affordable and
accessible, said Dr Tina Tan, aninfectious disease physician at
Lurie's Children's Hospital ofChicago.
So, basically, if you keepgoing, if you go on here, it
says.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
And then Kennedy says this yeah, kennedy says.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
Last year the Biden administration urged healthy
children to get yet anotherCOVID shot, despite the lack of
any clinical data to support therepeat booster strategy in
children, kennedy said.
In a video released on socialmedia, tan called this claim
completely incorrect and evendangerous.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Then in the next paragraph okay, they completely
contradict what they just said,and she says this for children.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
Most infections are mild, but there is a slight
chance of contractingmulti-system inflammatory
syndrome, a disease where organsand tissues swell months after
their initial symptoms, leadingto hospitalization.
Tan said.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Okay, again, that is less than 1%.
And just sit there and say,everybody keep daxing up to make
sure that this one little areayou know that is less than 1%.
And to sit there and say,everybody, keep daxing up to
make sure that this one littlearea, you know that this slight
chance of a slight chance isdealt with.
This is the kind of thinkingand the science has been decided
and you have to do this andeven though there's a tiny
chance, this is the sort ofstuff that's maddening.
This is an article right out of2022 or 2021.
(21:15):
Really it is or 2020, for thatmatter.
You agree with the sciences.
We lay it out.
That's not true.
It's ridiculous and the fact ofthe matter is, if we could go
back in time and not vaccinateour kids, I would have not
vaccinated them.
They did not need to bevaccinated, are my parents?
Absolutely?
I would have vaccinated myparents and remember this
(21:35):
vaccine came out in a verycompressed time frame, when we
needed it very, very quickly.
And now there's an opportunityto step back and do more
peer-reviewed research to figureout exactly what's going on
with this and the impacts onkids, the impacts on adults, all
of it.
You know what's going on withvaccine injury.
(21:57):
Is it a significant issue, isit not?
This is what should behappening here, not this old
school.
We've already decided, as thescience community take another
shot, stick it.
I don't believe, I don'tunderstand why the journal is
doing this.
I really don't, and theperspective of it is incredibly
irritating when you read it.
This old well, what we'vedecided?
(22:19):
The science has been decided.
No, it hasn't been decided.
Speaker 2 (22:21):
Well, and they're like how about the data on
actual how many kids were sogravely impacted by COVID that
were unvaccinated?
I think that'd be aninteresting piece of data that I
have yet to find, which I havebeen looking for.
So, again like can we look atdata and then make the decision
on what's?
Speaker 1 (22:37):
best for no, because it's been decided.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
So it's just like- that science has spoken.
Have the conversation, and thatis again like.
You may not agree witheverything that RFK Jr has to
say, but at least he's stirringthe pot and saying let's have a
conversation about this stuff,let's figure it out.
Is this actually still theprotocol I read recently?
They're actually reviewing now.
Do children today need all 72vaccinations that they're
(22:59):
recommending?
Have we done any data researchon that lately?
Have we actually studied thoseresults yet?
Are they absolutely necessary?
And I would love some new dataon that because, trust me, as a
kid I didn't get 72 vaccinations.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Right, right, no, no, no, there's definitely and
that's again.
You're right, though, to saythat that a discussion needs to
be had on some of this stuff.
And again, we vaccinated ourkids and and, believe me, they
got the COVID vaccine too, whichwe regret I got it, which I
regret getting you know for forreasons that we don't discuss on
this show, but it is.
It is definitely a regret ofours, but again, I'm glad we had
(23:34):
it, I'm glad my parents got it,so I think it definitely served
a good purpose.
Speaker 2 (23:40):
It's just to go now.
It just shouldn't have beencrammed on everybody's throat
and it shouldn't have beenmandatory to keep your job to
travel.
All that Absolutely true, thefact when a government comes in
and says you have to do this oryou're going to lose your job,
or you cannot travel, or youcan't go to school or you can't.
I mean all the fact that therewas just not enough information
(24:01):
out there at the time to makethat call.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Right, and now there is enough information, and to
still write articles like this,like it's 2020, is irritating,
right.
That's why that's where Ipulled it.
But OK, so let's get to Trumpand what's going on with Russia.
We had a clip in our last showwhere Trump was talking about
Vladimir Putin sort of going offthe deep end with sending a ton
of missiles and drones intoUkraine, and the reason we want
(24:25):
to talk about this issue againis because we're starting to see
things kind of reach a boilingpoint with Russia, and the
interesting thing is, how isTrump going to handle this?
Because I think he's beingcalled out by Russia and the
question is he's got one of twodirections to go.
It'll be interesting to seewhich one he takes, but let's go
back to the soundbite withTrump and then we'll get Putin's
response and then the Russianresponse more broadly.
(24:48):
So here's Trump about four daysago.
Speaker 3 (24:52):
Yeah, I'll give you an update.
I'm not happy with what Putin'sdoing.
He's killing a lot of peopleand I don't know what the hell
happened to Putin.
I've known him a long time,always gotten along with him,
but he's sending rockets intocities and killing people and I
don't like it at all.
Ok, we're in the middle oftalking and he's shooting
rockets into Kiev and othercities.
(25:13):
I don't like it at all.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
OK, let's stop right there.
That's good enough, else Allright.
So Putin then responds so thereis a translation on this, so
we'll just let you listen tothis and then we'll get into it.
We need to get them in achokehold.
Speaker 3 (25:31):
They're trying to strangle us and we should
reciprocate.
We did not chase anyone out.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
No, you invaded, but whatever.
Speaker 3 (25:41):
We provided the best possible conditions to work in
our market and they're trying tochoke us.
And we should act in a mirrorfashion.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Okay, and then that's .
It's not a?
A, so he was talking about avariety of different things in
that, but but the overall pointhere is he's starting to push
forward, and then trump hearsthis, and then trump responds
with this he says what vladimirputin doesn't realize if if
things weren't for, if it wasn'tfor me, lots of really bad
things would have alreadyhappened to Russia, and I mean
(26:17):
really bad.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
He's playing with fire.
Speaker 1 (26:19):
Okay, and then the Russian news network comes out,
rt, which is the basicallystate-sponsored media in Russia.
What do they say?
Speaker 2 (26:28):
President Trump warns Moscow, claiming Russia avoided
quote real bad consequencesonly thanks to him.
Putin doesn't realize he'splaying with fire.
Trump's message leaves littleroom for misinterpretation until
he posts the opposite tomorrowmorning.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
Okay, so they're calling him out.
They're basically just callinghim out and saying oh, you say
this now, you're gonna saysomething else tomorrow morning,
whatever.
They are flat out calling himout.
And then Dmitry Medvedev, whowas the former president of
Russia and now is kind ofPutin's bag man, okay, and
Russia says you know, it wouldreally be bad as world war three
(27:02):
.
That's what he said.
So you got something interestinghere, because I think Trump's
being pulled in one of twodirections.
I is being pulled by a certainpart of the, the Republican
establishment now, which iswe're the party of peace.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,no, no, no, no, no, no.
Don't do anything, don't doanything, right.
Kind of the JD Vance model,which is why we involved in all
(27:24):
these things.
We don't need to be.
Don't touch any of it, OK.
Well, if you don't touch any ofit, putin's knows that he's
watching, xi Jinping knows thathe's watching.
Eventually they're going tocall you out and they're going
to say OK, we'll do what we want.
I'm going to fire as manymissiles as I want into Kiev.
What are you going to do aboutit, mr?
Don't get involved in anythingNow.
(27:45):
I'm not saying you have to beinvolved in all these things,
but Trump's got to make thedecision, which is one of two
things Is he either Mr Peace,who always backs away and won't
do anything, or is he?
I'm a man of my word.
If I had to guess Trump is adon't cross me guy, my guess is
he's not.
Mr.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
Why are we involved in this?
(28:06):
Why are we involved in this?
You can't be both.
You can't be both, and Russiais going to force him to choose.
So what we're seeing now iswe're seeing troops and troop
movements in places like Swedenand Finland, and they're
concerned with what's going onnow.
New members of NATO and Finlandand they're concerned with
what's going on now.
New members have made NATO andwhat's going to happen here?
What, what?
What does Trump do?
(28:26):
Does he level massive sanctionson Russia?
Maybe that that might be a goodway to start?
Does he go to his, his goodfriend Zelensky, and again
whipping Zelensky forever?
But at a certain point, youstart to realize who the big
problem is, and I got news foryou it ain't Zelensky.
You can disagree on what to dowith the Ukraine, but the
(28:49):
problem here is the fact thatPutin went into Ukraine.
Putin is continuing to moveforward here, and if you think
he's going to stop, what makesyou think that?
Are you okay with him takingall of Ukraine?
And if you are, then are youokay with him going into Poland?
Because what makes you thinkhe's not going to?
He took Georgia, he took Crimea, he's trying to take all of
(29:13):
Ukraine.
What do you think this is?
And so this whole thoughtprocess that we can be like,
well, stay out of it.
Ukraine's terrible.
No, it's not.
Now it doesn't mean we putsoldiers on the ground
Absolutely not.
But do we give more weapons toUkraine?
Maybe, maybe.
Do we sell them more weapons,maybe?
I mean.
So all I'm saying on this isyou can't be Captain Peace and
(29:37):
Captain Don't Cross Me at thesame time.
You can't be that person.
It doesn't work.
Don't cross me at the same time.
You can't be that person.
It doesn't work.
So now, I'm not saying we gotto bomb anybody, we don't.
But you better adjust the wayyou're approaching this.
If you're Trump because Trumpis going to be forced to say
which one he is, and I thinkhe's going to be captain Don't
cross me.
And so when he's captain, don'tcross me, he's going to drop
(29:59):
some serious sanctions and myguess is he opens up more arms
sales to Ukraine.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
Okay, all right.
Well, let's look at a littlebit of this approval ticking up
a little bit for Trump, like hisapproval ratings are slowly
increasing again.
Right now it's looking like hisapproval rating is at 53%,
which is up 7%.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Yeah, Rasmussen yeah.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
And so this is the highest approval he's had since
mid February, which isinteresting.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
Yeah, I think he said some things you know kind of
start to settle out a little bit, and I think you know this kind
of ebbs and flows.
I also think if, if the economycontinues to improve, if they
pass, you know, the bigbeautiful bill through both
houses and you get it, you getthe prolonged tax cut, you get
things like that, I think thatstuff could be good, you know,
and we'll wait and see whathappens.
(30:47):
Some of the other things, butnot not a total surprise, and I
think a lot of this is buoyed byHispanics as well.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Yeah, it says here that, uh, his job approval with
Hispanics is strong right now.
If you look at this, uh, 60% ofHispanic voters approve of what
Trump's doing, to 40% whodisapprove.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
Yeah, those are solid numbers, right so?
And then this gets.
Then this gets us to the otherpoint, right?
So we broadly look at theparties, and they were, they
were polled as well, and this isinteresting.
So which party wins which issue?
Okay, immigration Republicanshave a 16 point advantage over
Democrats.
Immigration Republicans have a16-point advantage over
(31:23):
Democrats.
Crime Republicans a 16-pointadvantage.
The economy 8-point advantage.
Here's what I'm talking aboutfrom April, when you had all the
tariff craziness.
Right Now that starts to backdown and all of a sudden,
republicans are up 8 onDemocrats with the economy.
Gun laws up 7 for Republicans.
Inflation Republicans up six.
(31:44):
Okay, so again, inflationcontinuing to decrease.
That's good.
Now, what issues are Democratswinning on?
Gender identity, plus five.
Education, important plus eight.
Healthcare important plus 10.
Abortion, plus 12.
And climate change plus 10.
(32:04):
Abortion plus 12.
And climate change plus 18.
So, again, if you care aboutclimate change at all or you
care about abortion, some bigissue for you that you're flying
your flag on, you're going tolike Democrats for that.
But interesting stuff.
Now one other thing as we getready and Ella, this is clip 22,
as we get ready for the genericballots coming up here in 2026,
(32:25):
who do you favor, right, just abroader question.
Usually, democrats are aheadsignificantly on this.
Who do you favor?
And right now it's very closeDemocrats 48, 45 for Republicans
, and so those numbers arecoming down too.
Okay, republicans are stayingwhere they are, but Democrats
numbers are coming down a littlebit as well.
(32:45):
So, again, just something towatch.
If you're at 48, 45 going into2026, you got to toss up
election on whether theRepublicans lose the house and
the Republicans do not lose theSenate with those numbers.
Speaker 2 (32:57):
Okay, and let's explain that a little bit.
I think just again, when youhave somebody in office, a
political party in office soright now obviously we have
Trump in office what does thattypically do to your state rate
or the federal races in thestates?
Right, it usually kind ofsometimes flips those correct,
and this is saying it's notnecessarily going to do that.
Speaker 1 (33:14):
Well, I think that really with a broader question
is, when you ask the genericballot question, you just are
getting a temperature on howpeople feel about the parties
and usually, as a general rule,you would see Democrats with
around a 10 point advantage.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
When there's a Republican in office.
No, no, no, no.
Now just in general.
Speaker 3 (33:32):
Yep, yep.
The Dems always have a 10 pointadvantage.
Speaker 1 (33:34):
They, for a long time , have had a significant
advantage in that.
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
Interesting yeah.
Speaker 1 (33:38):
It's not necessarily have anything to do with who
who's in office or whatever.
Yeah it's not necessarily haveanything to do with who who's in
office or whatever.
So yeah, and so that numberscome down and that's again.
You saw evidence of that in2024.
Like, you saw the country shiftRight and I think this is still
an example of that that there'sno reason to believe right now
that Democrats are pulling backa bunch of votes.
They haven't found that messageyet.
They don't have it yet.
(33:58):
Like they keep, they're hittingTrump on various things and
everything else, but they don'thave a reason for people to go
back to them.
If they get that reason, thenyou'll start to see those
numbers widen back out again.
If Trump can keep the economyhumming along, if he can fix
some of these other issuesoverseas, then then that number
is going to stay.
That gap's going to stay and Ithink you'll see a very the
house is going to be a totaltoss up right On whether
(34:20):
Republicans hold it or not.
I think the odds are stillprobably good that the Democrats
take it back over with a fewextra votes, but we'll see.
They're not going to get theSenate.
The Senate's going to stayRepublican.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
Okay, so we'll see.
All right, so now we're goingto talk about a dangerous dog.
Speaker 1 (34:33):
Yeah, so we got the.
Yeah, I know we're like jumpingall over the place on this, but
I saw this and I know how manyNew Mexicans I have some good
friends who have pit bulls andand actually they can be such a
sweet dog, but so, but I sawthis study and I thought it was
interesting.
It says most dangerous dogstudy reveals the 10 breeds most
likely to land you in court orthe hospital, which is not great
(34:54):
.
So let's look at this uh reportin a nutshell here and I always
love when they do in a nutshellokay, a little bit of a little
bit of a nutshell here, okay.
Okay.
Pit bulls are the statisticaloutliers.
They account for almost 27% ofall dog breeds.
That's a really high number and61 fatalities far more than any
(35:15):
other breed, despite being asmall fraction of the dog
population.
That is a bummer.
A vaccination rates aretroublingly low.
The most dangerous breeds havepoor vaccination compliance.
That's not necessarily asurprise With shepherds at just
9.25%.
So German shepherds mainly, andpit bulls at 17%.
So if pit bulls are morevaccinated than German,
(35:36):
shepherds are creatingadditional health risks for the
bite victims as well, which is atotal bummer.
And even family friendly breedscan be risky.
This is going to be shockinghere.
Okay, so let's go to the listand show you what's going on
with this list, of course, andhere it is.
Okay.
So this is percent of all bites.
I mean the, the, the number onpit bulls.
(35:56):
Just, I think obviously you gotto make sure, if you get a pit
bull, that you're you'retraining it well, you're you're,
you know, raising it in anenvironment where you really
care for it, cause there are alot of new Mexicans who love pit
bulls.
Speaker 4 (36:07):
I mean and they're.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
They can be really sweet dogs, but like anything,
you got to be careful.
German Shepherds, mainly um,are second on the list is most
dangerous.
Uh, boxers are up on that list.
Uh, let's see Rottweilers.
Oh sorry, german shepherds areat five.
So and then you get down toaustralian cattle dogs and then
get all the way down check outnumber 10.
Speaker 2 (36:29):
Yeah, that's the.
The crazy one is the lab.
Yeah, a labrador's retriever.
Speaker 1 (36:32):
I mean, those are just like the sweetest dogs ever
yeah, so, yeah, they, they are,but but still I think you got,
you know, incidents 136 and thenpercent of all bites.
There's 6% of all bites here.
Their vaccination rate isactually a bit higher here and
the severe bite rate is lowerthan some of the higher, higher
(36:54):
dogs that you see there.
But it just is kind of one ofthose things that you never
quite know, and a lot of thishas to do with how you raise a
dog.
Speaker 2 (37:01):
Right, well, and the Huskies are not on there,
because you know what theHuskies do They'll just woo you
to death.
They will just bark and woo atyou and sing to you, like that's
what they do, yeah.
Speaker 1 (37:08):
But no, huskies are thought of as dogs that can bite
too.
I mean, it's definitely.
You know, we read all sorts oflists about Husk people who
don't get a Husky, but it's notnecessarily because they'll bite
you.
Speaker 2 (37:21):
It's because they will dig holes in your house and
run away from you.
Well, there is that and all theother things tear up your shoes
.
That kind of thing A little bitdifferent.
Speaker 1 (37:29):
Oh man, okay.
So we want to show you someamazing, amazing pictures from
Floyd, new Mexico.
And so we had severe weather onSunday and that season you know
we get into may, may is severeweather season in new mexico,
clash of air masses, and itleads to some incredible
pictures.
So this is, uh, quincy vagelwho said, one more set of photos
(37:52):
from yesterday's tornado chasein and around floyd, new mexico,
showing the tornado shift froma ghostly white toward a red
swirling menace.
I greatly appreciate all thesupport and feedback.
Quincy did an incredible job onthese pictures.
So here's the ghostly white Imean just unbelievable, probably
an EF1 tornado, maybe an EF2,but probably an EF1 right there.
(38:16):
Let's go back up to thepictures and that's an
incredible shot.
And then you start to see itdraw the dust up from the
surface Right, and so that's whyyou're getting that color.
Start to mix in here and thentake a look at this picture
Unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (38:32):
Looks like out of a movie it is.
It's a stovepipe tornado it is.
Speaker 1 (38:37):
It is beautiful structure on this and this is
the kind of tornado we like outin the middle of nowhere.
Speaker 2 (38:42):
Right Doesn't hurt anybody.
Speaker 1 (38:46):
Yeah, structure on this and this is the kind of
tornado we like out in themiddle of nowhere, right yeah,
not.
Right in the middle of a town,not going after anything, and
then check out this last shot asit starts to rope out.
Speaker 2 (38:51):
You can see just picking up more dirt.
It literally looks like a car.
It looks like something fromthe movies.
Yeah, it's unbelievableHollywood movie.
It's unbelievable, it is Greatshots.
Speaker 1 (38:59):
Oh, quincy did an unbelievable, it just did an
incredible job and we do getsome of that stuff.
So we do have moisture now overthe state.
It's been good we're gettingsome rain, especially in the
Northern mountains here.
That's been very good.
Fire danger backing off alittle bit temporarily.
Anyway, month of June tends tobe hot here and it tends to be
dry and with less severe weather.
So we'll wait and see what endsup happening here.
(39:19):
But the more moisture we canstay in the mix with which I do
think we're going to see somemoisture here over the next two,
three days Northern mountainsare going to stay, you know, at
least wet in and out, withshowers, humidity levels up
higher.
You can see in the Albuquerquearea you've got more cloud cover
lately.
You know, we've seen that eachday.
This is not.
Ella has been very concernedabout the UV index out there
trying to get a little bit ofsun and she's concerned.
Speaker 2 (39:40):
Yeah, if you have a teenager who's now watching
these apps that tell you whenit's the best time to go outside
in the sun.
So it's the weather app.
Speaker 4 (39:48):
I mean, it's been around forever.
I think the UV index.
It's not a new thing.
But it's like why waste yourtime out in a UV of five when
you could go out there at nineor 10,?
Speaker 1 (39:57):
you know what I'm saying.
Let's not get too much sun.
Okay, it's not good for yourlittle skin.
I mean, you get some, cause it,the sun is good for you.
Speaker 4 (40:03):
And then it makes you look good.
Speaker 1 (40:05):
Oh gosh.
Speaker 4 (40:06):
Makes your hair bright and your skin dark.
It's beautiful.
Speaker 1 (40:08):
All right, okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (40:11):
Spoken like a teenager.
Speaker 1 (40:12):
All right.
Speaker 2 (40:12):
I can't argue with her.
Speaker 1 (40:18):
I was the girl that laid underneath my black
trampoline.
Speaker 2 (40:21):
Okay, so I could just toast myself.
Speaker 1 (40:23):
Not the best choice of my life, right, really
Definitely not no, is your skinnow you're like, hey, I'm glad I
did that.
Speaker 2 (40:30):
Uh, I would say, I started wearing sunblock 20
years ago.
So, that you know.
At least I got ahead of thegame.
Speaker 1 (40:35):
You did a little bit.
Speaker 2 (40:41):
You did a little bit.
Speaker 1 (40:42):
Apparently it's important to get good.
Well, yeah, that's what?
Speaker 2 (40:44):
yes, so that's what I worked with the uh, a cancer
doctor, and they actually said15 minutes of sun a day on your
back, the largest range area.
I thought it was your face no,no no on your back, no I thought
like if you get vitamin d onyour back, is is actually very
healthy for your immune system.
So he he was very clear insaying I'm not suggesting you go
out there and just bakeyourself.
(41:05):
He just said but there is adifference between laying out in
the sun and actually trying toget the vitamin D from the sun
as an immunity builder, and soyou're supposed to get it across
your back for 15 minutes a dayif you can.
That is what the cancer doctorI worked with had recommended,
so take that for what it is.
Speaker 1 (41:22):
Okay, one more weather story and then we'll get
out of here, okay.
Okay, this story is from China.
Paraglider gets caught in anupdraft in a store.
Okay, now here's the thing thatyou got to know he gets sucked
up five miles into the right.
Okay, so you figure how high isfive miles up?
Roughly it's about 25, 25,000feet, 20, I think.
(41:45):
He went as high as 28,000 feetand, to give you an idea, the
temperature drops roughly, onaverage in the atmosphere four
degrees for every thousand feet.
So therefore, as he goes up, heends up in air that's about 40
below zero.
Holy moly and so check out thevideo.
It's just wild to watch thisguy like he is locked into this
super cold air and he can't get,he can't do anything about it.
You know, it's not like he canput him pull himself down.
(42:06):
The updraft just keeps takinghim and he's just sitting there,
going I don't know what to do.
And you see, his hands are inthose sort of mittens that are
on the side of his parachute.
There it is.
See his hands there, see howhigh up he is.
He he's completely locked intosuper cold air and he can't move
his hands because he's got him,you know, kind of inside those
(42:29):
mittens which are keeping himwarm and he's just sort of
sitting there.
He's like how do we get out ofhere?
Eventually the updraft backsdown and he eventually lands.
Speaker 2 (42:39):
He's lucky to be alive I was gonna say that had
to be very scary.
This was over china by the way.
Speaker 1 (42:45):
Yeah, it's in china.
It had to be very scary for himnow.
Oh my god, do you have?
Speaker 2 (42:48):
any idea how long he was up there?
Speaker 1 (42:50):
I don't I mean it doesn't, it didn't say but I do
know it got as low as 40.
Uh, fahrenheit and celsius.
At that point fahrenheit andcelsius collide, so it's wow,
it's doesn't matter.
Five miles into the sky, yeah,yeah, basically 20 basically
he's at the top of everest isthe way to look at it holy cow
and and that's just super cold.
I mean year round that's supercold.
(43:11):
Doesn't matter that it's mayright right it just, I mean, it
just is so, so cold, so anyway.
But you can see him kind oflooking around going.
This is crazy so well.
Speaker 2 (43:19):
I wonder if he'll be in that paraglide anytime soon
after that I might be like Ithink I'm done, I'm gonna retire
from that danger sport.
Speaker 1 (43:26):
I mean, think about it like he has no engine on him
or anything.
No, he can't.
He just well, it's like a kite,and if you can't if you have no
way to get back down, you justhave to wait for the air yeah,
you kind of got to try to steeryour way out of it a little bit,
if you can.
Um, he was able to do that, butrealistically he can't do a lot
.
A lot of that just depends onhowever it shakes out.
Speaker 2 (43:45):
Holy cow, yeah.
Speaker 1 (43:46):
And, by the way, one quick thing we are working on
One of the stories we talkedabout in the gas price story
that some of the newrestrictions that could well be
imposed on New Mexicans, raisinggas prices 30 to 40 cents.
We are working on that rightnow, getting some clarity on it,
and we'll have more on it foryou.
We're but that is not somethingwe're we're forgetting about
and it's something you need toknow about, and we're going to
(44:07):
have more on it shortly, Ipromise.
Speaker 2 (44:09):
Okay, All right.
Well, hopefully you wereentertained today and you know
to go buy some creatine.
Speaker 3 (44:14):
That's the takeaway or A&W root beer One or the
other I mean
Speaker 4 (44:23):
one of those or the back here soon.
You've been listening to the noDoubt About it podcast.
We hope you've enjoyed the show.
We know we had a blast.
Make sure to like, rate andreview.
We'll be back soon, but in themeantime you can find us on
Instagram and Facebook at noDoubt About it podcast.
Speaker 1 (44:41):
No doubt about it, the no Doubt.
Speaker 4 (44:42):
About it Podcast.
No doubt about it, the no DoubtAbout it Podcast is a Choose
Adventure Media production.
See you next time on no DoubtAbout it.
Speaker 1 (44:51):
There is no doubt about it.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.