March 4, 2025 • 12 mins
Get ready for a thrilling ride as we dive into the most baffling and shocking murder mysteries that will leave you speechless! From cold cases to recent crimes, we're counting down the most mind-boggling whodunits that will keep you on the edge of your seat. With twists and turns at every corner, these true crime stories will make you question everything you thought you knew about humanity. So, if you're ready to have your mind blown, then join us as we explore the most jaw-dropping murder mysteries that will leave NO BODY left behind! #truecrimestories #crime #crimedocumentary #truecrime #facts #truecrimedocumentary
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/one-crime-at-a-time--4661577/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/one-crime-at-a-time--4661577/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
It's a murder case. The evidence is overwhelming, text messages, motives,
suspicious behavior, perhaps even an eyewitness. The prosecution is confident
they can secure a conviction, but there's one critical element missing,
the body. In the legal world, these are known as
no body murder cases, and they're more common than most
of us would imagine. They sound like something out of
(00:32):
a crime novel or a chilling true crime podcast, but
these cases are all too real, and disturbingly, the number
of no body cases is on the rise. Imagine this.
A loved one, your sister, your best friend, vanishes without
a trace. You go to the police, begging them to investigate,
but the lack of a body makes everything infinitely harder.
(00:54):
Without physical remains, police struggle to prove a crime even
took place. Is it a murder, a disappearance, or someone
choosing to start over and abandon their old life. This
ambiguity becomes a predator's playground. In the past, the phrase
no body, no crime was a grim truth, a reflection
of the difficulty in prosecuting a murder without that physical
(01:16):
cornerstone of evidence. Historically, many cases stalled for precisely this reason.
But as forensic science, digital evidence and investigative techniques have evolved.
No body murder cases are no longer impossible, far from it. Today,
they bring with them both a chilling insight into the
art of deception and a strange hope for justice even
(01:37):
when the undeniable proof the body is absent. The human
body is often a crime's most vital piece of evidence.
Gunshot wounds, strangulation, marks, bruising. All of it tells a story.
But without a body, without tangible proof that a murder
has occurred, it becomes monumentally harder to convict someone of
the ultimate crime. It's a legal loophole well known to
(01:58):
criminal's statisticians and even fictional villains, but it's far from simple.
The first challenge of these cases is fundamental establishing that
a crime has even been committed in the first place.
Let's pause and remember the average murder investigation. Forensic experts
critically evaluate the human body at the crime scene to
determine not just how someone died, but when and often
(02:22):
who may have been responsible. But take that body away,
and what you're left with is many times a confusing
shadow of events. When does a missing person officially stop
being missing and start being seen as a murder victim,
This very question can drag investigations into dead ends, wasting
precious time. A teenager who vanished at night may be
(02:44):
initially categorized as a runaway. A domestic violence victim might
be written off as having simply left their partner in secret.
But in cases where the victim's disappearance is more sinister,
every missed hour or day can mean losing critical forensic evidence.
In the absence of a body, investigator's turn to circumstantial evidence.
They dig through phone records, search histories, financial transactions, and
(03:07):
surveillance footage. Sometimes this reveals behaviours telling a chilling story,
perhaps a search for how to dispose of a body,
or flights booked to a far off country. Historically, this
lack of direct evidence made no body prosecutions incredibly rare.
In fact, for much of legal history, the absence of
a body almost guaranteed a case would never even make
(03:30):
it to court. But times and technology have changed. Today.
Advancements in forensic science, combined with better understanding of circumstantial evidence,
have made it possible to secure convictions without ever locating
the victim. But how did we get here and what
does it say about the direction our justice systems are heading.
Let's take a step back in time. Historically. The first
(03:53):
recorded no body conviction dates back to seventeenth century England.
A man named John Mathers was hanged for the murder
of his landlord, despite the fact that no body was
ever discovered. That case stirred outrage at the time. How
could someone be executed under such circumstances. Following that for centuries,
convictions without a body were considered almost unattainable, Judges were
(04:16):
reluctant to set a precedent, prosecutors avoided such cases, and
if they did proceed, the absence of a body often
worked in favor of the accused. But then came the
twentieth century, a period when crimes became more meticulous, killers
more cunning, and disappearances more calculated. Suddenly, criminals were learning
from their predecessors. They understood that disposing of a body
(04:39):
could make the difference between life in prison and walking free.
Cases of murderers who strategically hid their victims buried deep
in forests, sunken yachts, dissolved in chemicals began to climb.
Sworn confessions and circumstantial evidence were often all families had
to hold on to, leaving courts in the impossible position
(04:59):
of way ying suspicion against the law's need for proof.
One of the first and most famous no body convictions
in modern history dates back to nineteen fifty seven in
the UK. The case of John George Hay, known as
the acid bath Killer, shocked the world. Hay confessed to
murdering six people and dissolving their bodies in sulfuric acid.
(05:20):
The first major no body conviction in the United States
came in nineteen seventy seven in the case of Marcia Trimble.
Marcia was a nine year old girl from Nashville, Tennessee,
who vanished in February of that year. For months, no
body was found, but witnesses came forward describing the last
moments she was seen alive. A combination of those descriptions
(05:40):
and forensic evidence led to a conviction. It became a
groundbreaking moment for no body cases, proving that a person
can be found guilty of murder even when the most
critical piece of evidence is missing. But not all no
body cases and in resolution. Take, for example, the case
of Tara Grinstead, a high school teacher and former use
duty queen from Oscilla, Georgia, Tara disappeared in October of
(06:03):
two thousand and five, no body, little evidence. For over
a decade, rumors engulfed the small southern town with no
arrest in sight. It wasn't until twenty seventeen, twelve years later,
that a suspect confessed, claiming to have killed her and
burned her body. Even then, authorities faced a difficult challenge.
(06:23):
Without a body and with little corroborating evidence, building a
case remained painstakingly difficult. Then there's the story of Joan
Bowman from Putnam County, Indiana. In nineteen seventy five, Joan
mysteriously vanished after reportedly attending a late night date with
her estranged husband, Charles. Friends and family became increasingly concerned
(06:43):
as the weeks turned to months and then to years,
but no remains were ever discovered. Finally, decades later, Charles
was arrested and charged. One of the most famous cases
is the wood Shipper case. The year was nineteen eighty six,
the setting the serene, snow covered town of Newtown, Connecticut.
It was here that Richard Crafts, an airline pilot, lived
(07:04):
with his wife, Helly Crafts, a Danish born flight attendant
and their children. Hell had been contemplating divorce. She had
reportedly told friends and her divorce attorney that if anything
ever happened to her, it wouldn't be an accident. Little
did she know how chillingly prophetic those words would be.
Hella Crafts disappeared on November nineteenth, nineteen eighty six. Initially,
(07:26):
Richard claimed she had gone to Denmark to visit relatives,
but her friends and family noticed something unusual. Hell was
meticulous and she never left loose ends behind. She also
wasn't returning calls, something entirely out of character for her.
Police began to investigate, but there was no body. Searches
of the Craft's home didn't yield a smoking gun, or
rather a smoking wood chipper. That truck driver, a local
(07:52):
man named Joseph Hine, was plowing snow along the banks
of the Housatonic River late one night when he saw
something bizarre out there in the frigid col It was
a large wood shipper parked near the river bank. To
his surprise, he also saw a man operating it, feeding
something into the giant maw of spinning blades. Though unnerving,
Heine thought little more of it at the time and
(08:13):
continued on his route. But when news broke of Hella's disappearance,
Heine couldn't shake the oddness of what he'd seen and
decided to report it to the police. This tip proved crucial.
Investigators returned to the site near the Hausatonic River and
began combing through the snow banks and frozen ground. With
forensic tools. They were able to find bone fragments that
were later determined to be from Hella Crafts. With this information,
(08:37):
they were able to charge and convict Richard Craft's. Perhaps
the most famous case in recent years is that of
Susan Powell, a young mother from Utah who vanished under
deeply suspicious circumstances in December of two thousand and nine.
Susan Powell was a twenty eight year old mother of
two boys, Charlie and Braden, living in West Valley City, Utah,
with her husband, Josh Powell. Outwardly, the Powell seemed like
(09:00):
a typical suburban family, but behind the scenes, Susan's life
was marred by turmoil. Friends, co workers, and even Susan
herself documented her growing fears about Josh his controlling behavior,
financial recklessness and increasing unpredictability. On December seventh, two thousand
and nine, everything came to a breaking point. Concerned when
(09:21):
Susan didn't show up for work, friends and family contacted authorities.
Inside the Powell home, investigators found Susan's purse, phone, and
other personal belongings, but no sign of Susan. Josh Powell's
story only deepened the unease. He claimed he had taken
their two young sons camping in the Utah desert in
the middle of the night, an odd choice, particularly given
(09:44):
that it was bitterly cold outside. He said he had
no idea where Susan was. This bizarre alibi raised red
flags right away. Over time, pieces of the puzzle began
to emerge. There was Susan's journal detailing her growing concerns
about her husband's increasingly possessive and disturbing behavior. And then
there was a video Susan filmed in two thousand and eight,
(10:04):
a full year before her disappearance. In the video, she
documented the couple's possessions and stated clearly, if something happens
to me, it may not be an accident, even if
it looks like one. Her words were a haunting foreshadowing
of the storm to come. Despite her misgivings, Susan stayed
for her boys for the hope that things might get better,
(10:26):
but the tensions between her and josh only grew more unbearable.
In the months before her disappearance, Susan reportedly sought advice
from a divorce attorney. She feared that leaving josh would
provoke him that he might retaliate in unpredictable and dangerous ways.
Despite being named a person of interest, Joshua Powell was
never charged in her disappearance. Joshua killed himself in the
(10:48):
couple's two young sons in February twenty twelve, after custody
of the boys had been given to Susan's parents. West
Valley City Police closed their active investigation into Susan's disappearance
in May twenty five, thirteen, stating their belief that Joshua
killed Susan and that his brother Michael aided him in
concealing her body. For investigators, these cases are nightmares without
(11:10):
a body, there's no direct proof of death. Prosecutors must
build their cases with circumstantial evidence, forensic traces, or, in
rare instances, a killer's confession today, investigators can reconstruct invisible
clues left behind, but technology alone doesn't solve these cases.
It takes dedicated teams of investigators, revisiting case files, interviewing witnesses,
(11:34):
and connecting seemingly unrelated dots to piece together a picture
of guilt. Because here's the thing. Convictions in no body
cases don't rest on one single smoking gun. They're built
on cumulative evidence, tiny clues that on their own may
seem insignificant, but together tell a story no jury can ignore.
(11:54):
And perhaps one of the most significant developments in these
cases is the increase in conviction even without a body,
if prosecutors can show a compelling chain of circumstantial evidence.
Thank you for listening. If you found this story informative,
please consider subscribing and share your thoughts in the comments below.
It's a murder case. The evidence is overwhelming, text messages, motives,
suspicious behavior, perhaps even an eyewitness. The prosecution is confident
they can secure a conviction, but there's one critical element missing,
the body. In the legal world, these are known as
no body murder cases, and they're more common than most
of us would imagine. They sound like something out of
(00:32):
a crime novel or a chilling true crime podcast, but
these cases are all too real, and disturbingly, the number
of no body cases is on the rise. Imagine this.
A loved one, your sister, your best friend, vanishes without
a trace. You go to the police, begging them to investigate,
but the lack of a body makes everything infinitely harder.
(00:54):
Without physical remains, police struggle to prove a crime even
took place. Is it a murder, a disappearance, or someone
choosing to start over and abandon their old life. This
ambiguity becomes a predator's playground. In the past, the phrase
no body, no crime was a grim truth, a reflection
of the difficulty in prosecuting a murder without that physical
(01:16):
cornerstone of evidence. Historically, many cases stalled for precisely this reason.
But as forensic science, digital evidence and investigative techniques have evolved.
No body murder cases are no longer impossible, far from it. Today,
they bring with them both a chilling insight into the
art of deception and a strange hope for justice even
(01:37):
when the undeniable proof the body is absent. The human
body is often a crime's most vital piece of evidence.
Gunshot wounds, strangulation, marks, bruising. All of it tells a story.
But without a body, without tangible proof that a murder
has occurred, it becomes monumentally harder to convict someone of
the ultimate crime. It's a legal loophole well known to
(01:58):
criminal's statisticians and even fictional villains, but it's far from simple.
The first challenge of these cases is fundamental establishing that
a crime has even been committed in the first place.
Let's pause and remember the average murder investigation. Forensic experts
critically evaluate the human body at the crime scene to
determine not just how someone died, but when and often
(02:22):
who may have been responsible. But take that body away,
and what you're left with is many times a confusing
shadow of events. When does a missing person officially stop
being missing and start being seen as a murder victim,
This very question can drag investigations into dead ends, wasting
precious time. A teenager who vanished at night may be
(02:44):
initially categorized as a runaway. A domestic violence victim might
be written off as having simply left their partner in secret.
But in cases where the victim's disappearance is more sinister,
every missed hour or day can mean losing critical forensic evidence.
In the absence of a body, investigator's turn to circumstantial evidence.
They dig through phone records, search histories, financial transactions, and
(03:07):
surveillance footage. Sometimes this reveals behaviours telling a chilling story,
perhaps a search for how to dispose of a body,
or flights booked to a far off country. Historically, this
lack of direct evidence made no body prosecutions incredibly rare.
In fact, for much of legal history, the absence of
a body almost guaranteed a case would never even make
(03:30):
it to court. But times and technology have changed. Today.
Advancements in forensic science, combined with better understanding of circumstantial evidence,
have made it possible to secure convictions without ever locating
the victim. But how did we get here and what
does it say about the direction our justice systems are heading.
Let's take a step back in time. Historically. The first
(03:53):
recorded no body conviction dates back to seventeenth century England.
A man named John Mathers was hanged for the murder
of his landlord, despite the fact that no body was
ever discovered. That case stirred outrage at the time. How
could someone be executed under such circumstances. Following that for centuries,
convictions without a body were considered almost unattainable, Judges were
(04:16):
reluctant to set a precedent, prosecutors avoided such cases, and
if they did proceed, the absence of a body often
worked in favor of the accused. But then came the
twentieth century, a period when crimes became more meticulous, killers
more cunning, and disappearances more calculated. Suddenly, criminals were learning
from their predecessors. They understood that disposing of a body
(04:39):
could make the difference between life in prison and walking free.
Cases of murderers who strategically hid their victims buried deep
in forests, sunken yachts, dissolved in chemicals began to climb.
Sworn confessions and circumstantial evidence were often all families had
to hold on to, leaving courts in the impossible position
(04:59):
of way ying suspicion against the law's need for proof.
One of the first and most famous no body convictions
in modern history dates back to nineteen fifty seven in
the UK. The case of John George Hay, known as
the acid bath Killer, shocked the world. Hay confessed to
murdering six people and dissolving their bodies in sulfuric acid.
(05:20):
The first major no body conviction in the United States
came in nineteen seventy seven in the case of Marcia Trimble.
Marcia was a nine year old girl from Nashville, Tennessee,
who vanished in February of that year. For months, no
body was found, but witnesses came forward describing the last
moments she was seen alive. A combination of those descriptions
(05:40):
and forensic evidence led to a conviction. It became a
groundbreaking moment for no body cases, proving that a person
can be found guilty of murder even when the most
critical piece of evidence is missing. But not all no
body cases and in resolution. Take, for example, the case
of Tara Grinstead, a high school teacher and former use
duty queen from Oscilla, Georgia, Tara disappeared in October of
(06:03):
two thousand and five, no body, little evidence. For over
a decade, rumors engulfed the small southern town with no
arrest in sight. It wasn't until twenty seventeen, twelve years later,
that a suspect confessed, claiming to have killed her and
burned her body. Even then, authorities faced a difficult challenge.
(06:23):
Without a body and with little corroborating evidence, building a
case remained painstakingly difficult. Then there's the story of Joan
Bowman from Putnam County, Indiana. In nineteen seventy five, Joan
mysteriously vanished after reportedly attending a late night date with
her estranged husband, Charles. Friends and family became increasingly concerned
(06:43):
as the weeks turned to months and then to years,
but no remains were ever discovered. Finally, decades later, Charles
was arrested and charged. One of the most famous cases
is the wood Shipper case. The year was nineteen eighty six,
the setting the serene, snow covered town of Newtown, Connecticut.
It was here that Richard Crafts, an airline pilot, lived
(07:04):
with his wife, Helly Crafts, a Danish born flight attendant
and their children. Hell had been contemplating divorce. She had
reportedly told friends and her divorce attorney that if anything
ever happened to her, it wouldn't be an accident. Little
did she know how chillingly prophetic those words would be.
Hella Crafts disappeared on November nineteenth, nineteen eighty six. Initially,
(07:26):
Richard claimed she had gone to Denmark to visit relatives,
but her friends and family noticed something unusual. Hell was
meticulous and she never left loose ends behind. She also
wasn't returning calls, something entirely out of character for her.
Police began to investigate, but there was no body. Searches
of the Craft's home didn't yield a smoking gun, or
rather a smoking wood chipper. That truck driver, a local
(07:52):
man named Joseph Hine, was plowing snow along the banks
of the Housatonic River late one night when he saw
something bizarre out there in the frigid col It was
a large wood shipper parked near the river bank. To
his surprise, he also saw a man operating it, feeding
something into the giant maw of spinning blades. Though unnerving,
Heine thought little more of it at the time and
(08:13):
continued on his route. But when news broke of Hella's disappearance,
Heine couldn't shake the oddness of what he'd seen and
decided to report it to the police. This tip proved crucial.
Investigators returned to the site near the Hausatonic River and
began combing through the snow banks and frozen ground. With
forensic tools. They were able to find bone fragments that
were later determined to be from Hella Crafts. With this information,
(08:37):
they were able to charge and convict Richard Craft's. Perhaps
the most famous case in recent years is that of
Susan Powell, a young mother from Utah who vanished under
deeply suspicious circumstances in December of two thousand and nine.
Susan Powell was a twenty eight year old mother of
two boys, Charlie and Braden, living in West Valley City, Utah,
with her husband, Josh Powell. Outwardly, the Powell seemed like
(09:00):
a typical suburban family, but behind the scenes, Susan's life
was marred by turmoil. Friends, co workers, and even Susan
herself documented her growing fears about Josh his controlling behavior,
financial recklessness and increasing unpredictability. On December seventh, two thousand
and nine, everything came to a breaking point. Concerned when
(09:21):
Susan didn't show up for work, friends and family contacted authorities.
Inside the Powell home, investigators found Susan's purse, phone, and
other personal belongings, but no sign of Susan. Josh Powell's
story only deepened the unease. He claimed he had taken
their two young sons camping in the Utah desert in
the middle of the night, an odd choice, particularly given
(09:44):
that it was bitterly cold outside. He said he had
no idea where Susan was. This bizarre alibi raised red
flags right away. Over time, pieces of the puzzle began
to emerge. There was Susan's journal detailing her growing concerns
about her husband's increasingly possessive and disturbing behavior. And then
there was a video Susan filmed in two thousand and eight,
(10:04):
a full year before her disappearance. In the video, she
documented the couple's possessions and stated clearly, if something happens
to me, it may not be an accident, even if
it looks like one. Her words were a haunting foreshadowing
of the storm to come. Despite her misgivings, Susan stayed
for her boys for the hope that things might get better,
(10:26):
but the tensions between her and josh only grew more unbearable.
In the months before her disappearance, Susan reportedly sought advice
from a divorce attorney. She feared that leaving josh would
provoke him that he might retaliate in unpredictable and dangerous ways.
Despite being named a person of interest, Joshua Powell was
never charged in her disappearance. Joshua killed himself in the
(10:48):
couple's two young sons in February twenty twelve, after custody
of the boys had been given to Susan's parents. West
Valley City Police closed their active investigation into Susan's disappearance
in May twenty five, thirteen, stating their belief that Joshua
killed Susan and that his brother Michael aided him in
concealing her body. For investigators, these cases are nightmares without
(11:10):
a body, there's no direct proof of death. Prosecutors must
build their cases with circumstantial evidence, forensic traces, or, in
rare instances, a killer's confession today, investigators can reconstruct invisible
clues left behind, but technology alone doesn't solve these cases.
It takes dedicated teams of investigators, revisiting case files, interviewing witnesses,
(11:34):
and connecting seemingly unrelated dots to piece together a picture
of guilt. Because here's the thing. Convictions in no body
cases don't rest on one single smoking gun. They're built
on cumulative evidence, tiny clues that on their own may
seem insignificant, but together tell a story no jury can ignore.
(11:54):
And perhaps one of the most significant developments in these
cases is the increase in conviction even without a body,
if prosecutors can show a compelling chain of circumstantial evidence.
Thank you for listening. If you found this story informative,
please consider subscribing and share your thoughts in the comments below.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.