All Episodes

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
SPEAKER_11 (00:10):
Welcome back.
It is the Pat's Peeps Podcast.
346.
Yep, I missed yesterday.
Oh well.
Dang it.
I missed.
I had some I was inundatedyesterday.
Absolutely inundated.
The stuff.
It's my brother Tim's birthday,so I couldn't do a podcast.
Happy belated birthday to mybrother Tim.

(00:32):
Although we did celebrateyesterday.
Thank you for being a part of myPat's Peeps podcast.
My name is Pat Walsh.
I am the host of the Pat WalshRadio Show, KFBK News Radio,
93.1 FM, 15.30 a.m., streaminglive everywhere on the free
iHeart app.
But today is the 9th of October,2025.

(00:53):
Looking out the studio window.
A beautiful day, my friends.
It is gorgeous.
It's sunny, but the clouds arekind of rolling in.
It's cooler outside.
I'm loving it.
Looks like we may get some uhrain even next week.
So heck, um I'm just enjoyingthis very much.
Wherever you are listening,thank you very much for

(01:13):
listening.
And please check outpatspeeps.com where we are
working on some really coolstuff right now.
Where as we speak, we are weworking on the Who Drew the Maps
t-shirt and signs.
And you're gonna find those thisafternoon or this evening when I
uh when I'm on my show.
They'll be ready to go, and I'llbe telling you all about the Who

(01:37):
Drew the Maps?
Of course, this stemming fromlast night, we were talking
about this on my radio show fromthis interview, Julie Watts, CBS
uh in Sacramento doing aninterview.
Uh and or there, maybe it's uhmaybe it is a uh not an
interview.
Uh it was supposed to be aninterview with a unbelievably,

(02:00):
in my opinion, front runner.
Are you kidding me?
For the gubernatorial race ofCalifornia, Katie Porter.
This is astounding.
Case some of you missed ityesterday.
I'm gonna go on a rant todaybecause I just gotta cleanse the
palate.
I gotta get this off of my mind.
Some of this I talked about myshow on my show last night, and

(02:21):
I don't usually uh you know, Idon't usually repeat anything,
but I got more takes on this.
So what I'd like to do is Iwould like to to uh talk about
listen to this in case you'venot heard it.
This is a an interview,supposedly an interview, tried
to be an interview.
Julie Watts from CBS inSacramento interviewing Porter

(02:42):
yesterday, made national news.
Here you go.

SPEAKER_03 (02:46):
What do you say to the 40% of California voters who
you'll need in order to win?
Um, who voted for Trump?

SPEAKER_11 (02:53):
How would I need them in order to win, man?

SPEAKER_03 (02:55):
Well, unless you think you're gonna get sixty
percent.

SPEAKER_11 (02:58):
So, what you miss right there, unless you're
watching it, this is when Katiedecides she's gonna look at the
cameraman or whoever she maybeit's her colleague, whoever's
there in the studio with her,she looks right at him.
God, what an absurd question bythis woman to ask me something
like that.

SPEAKER_03 (03:13):
It's just of the vote.
You think you'll get sixtypercent all everybody who did
not vote for Trump will vote foryou.
That's what you're saying.

SPEAKER_04 (03:19):
In a general election?
Yes.
But you just said you don't needthose Trump voters.
Well, you asked me if I neededthem to win.

SPEAKER_11 (03:25):
Why?

SPEAKER_04 (03:25):
You don't I feel like this is unnecessarily
argumentative.

SPEAKER_11 (03:28):
Yeah, it is unnecessarily argumentative, big
beefy Katie.
Give me a break.
What a hard ass.
Listen to her.
Yeah, it doesn't have to becombatative.
She's she's asked combative.
She's just she's asking you aquestion like she did the other
week.
She's an investigative reporter.
So what is your question?

SPEAKER_03 (03:44):
The the question is the same thing I asked
everybody.
Right.
That this is being called theempowering voters to stop
Trump's power.
Stop Trump said I support it.

SPEAKER_04 (03:56):
So and the question is what do you say to the 40% of
voters who voted for Trump?
Oh, I'm happy to say that.
It's the do you need them to winpart that I don't understand.

SPEAKER_11 (04:06):
She's happy.
I uh didn't seem that happy.

SPEAKER_04 (04:08):
I'm happy to answer the question.
As soon as you have it written,and I'll answer it.

SPEAKER_03 (04:11):
I was fooled.
We've also asked the othercandidates, do you think you
need any of those 40% ofCalifornia voters to win?
And you're saying no, you don't.

SPEAKER_04 (04:18):
No, I'm saying I'm gonna try to win every vote I
can.
Uh-huh.
And what I'm saying to you isthat Well, to those voters.
Okay, so so you I don't want tokeep doing this.

SPEAKER_11 (04:27):
See, she ran out of steam right there.
So now she's gonna tap out.
She won't she don't want to keepdoing this.
My God, this is so unfair.
I'm tapping.
She's being mean to me.
I'm gonna call it.

SPEAKER_04 (04:37):
She's gonna call it You're not gonna do the
interview with us.
Nope, not like this, I'm not.
Not with seven follow-ups toevery single question you ask.

SPEAKER_11 (04:46):
Yeah, you don't want to have you don't want to have
follow-ups to the question fromyou know, an investigative
reporter.

SPEAKER_04 (04:51):
Every other candidate has answers.
I don't care.

SPEAKER_11 (04:53):
Yeah, she doesn't care.

SPEAKER_04 (04:54):
I don't care.
She does.
I want to have a pleasant,positive conversation.

SPEAKER_11 (04:58):
She doesn't care what Californians think.

SPEAKER_04 (05:00):
She doesn't care.
If every question you're gonnamake up a follow-up question,
then we're never gonna getthere.

SPEAKER_11 (05:06):
Get where?
Get where.

SPEAKER_04 (05:10):
And we're just gonna circle around.

SPEAKER_03 (05:11):
You've never had to do this before, ever.
You've never had to had aconversation to end an
interview.
Okay, but every other candidatehas done this.

SPEAKER_11 (05:21):
Uh what part of See right there.
What part of see, she was gonnabe a smart ass right there, too.
But then she knew it, so shethrows a curveball.

SPEAKER_04 (05:30):
I'm me.
I'm running for governor becauseI'm a leader.

SPEAKER_11 (05:33):
Yeah, she was gonna say it, there's a curve from
Porter.
Doesn't want to go through thatstatement.

SPEAKER_03 (05:38):
So I am going to make so you're not gonna answer
questions to reporters?
Okay, why don't we go through?
I will continue to ask follow-upquestions.

SPEAKER_11 (05:46):
She's a leader that won't answer reporters'
questions.

SPEAKER_03 (05:48):
Because that's my job as a journalist, but I will
go through and ask these.
And if you don't want to answer,you don't want to answer.

SPEAKER_04 (05:54):
So nearly every legislative I don't want to have
an unhappy experience.

SPEAKER_11 (05:59):
Oh no.

SPEAKER_04 (05:59):
And I don't want this all on camera.

SPEAKER_11 (06:01):
Yeah.
With your sunny disposition.
Yeah, let's not let's not makethis an angry, uh, unhappy
experience, all right.
You know what it reminds me of?
Reminds me if you go back liketo the early 80s, like maybe 84.
Remember the Wendy's commercialwith the Russian swimsuit,
Russian swimsuit models?

(06:22):
That's what she reminds me offor some reason.
Katie Porter.
Katie comes in out in the bulbburlap sack.

(06:43):
That's what she reminds me of.
Big beefy Katie in burlap.
Not having a choice is no fun.
Having a choice is better thannothing.
That's right.
Remember that.
Uh come election time and you'revoting for a governor.
Remember this.

(07:05):
Good point, Wendy's.
I love that commercial.
Yeah, that's that's great.
You know, let's look at a coupleof days ago.
Same kind of thing.
K C RA's Ashley Savala, who doesa great job on Channel 3.
She's gonna ask the two leadingDemocrats, including the
election commission chair, aboutwho is it?

(07:29):
Tell us who it is that is doingthe redistricting maps.
I think uh Californians who aregonna be voting on this, I think
they have the right to know.
And and here she is, well, itdidn't go that way.
Keep that in mind, okay.

(07:50):
Newsom and the Democratspromised transparency.
That's the key word to thinkabout here.

SPEAKER_13 (07:57):
They struggled to answer a basic question in all
of this.

SPEAKER_01 (07:59):
Very basic question.
Casey R3 Capital Corps wanted toask you the ball joins us now
with what she repeatedly askedtoday.

SPEAKER_02 (08:05):
Yeah, I mean, it really wasn't clear.
Uh that I mean, that basicquestion is who exactly is
responsible for these maps.
In that special election, whocan California voters look to
specifically when they want toknow who put these new
congressional districtstogether?
It really was not clear in anyof the hearings today.
Both the state Senate andAssembly elections committees

(08:26):
had a lengthy discussion on theredistricting push overall.
A reminder that this ishappening is California already
has an independent redistrictingcommission that is responsible
for doing this work after thecensus.

(08:47):
So we asked both the Democraticleaders of each elections
committee who is responsible fordrawing these new proposed
congressional districts.
Good luck.
Who exactly is responsible forthe maps?
Who do we tell California votersdrew these?

SPEAKER_05 (09:01):
Well, so the maps have been posted on our website
for 8 o'clock yesterday.
The lines are very clear.
Right.

SPEAKER_11 (09:07):
Uh uh Who um uh this was eight o'clock last night or
this morning.
Who who was it?

SPEAKER_05 (09:13):
Go on and observe and see what we're doing.
Their adjustments.
Many counties and many districtsare not getting touched at all.
So uh Madam Chair, I'm sorry.

SPEAKER_02 (09:21):
My question is who is responsible for the maps
specifically?
Who do we let California votersknow are responsible for the
maps that they are beingpresented with?

SPEAKER_09 (09:29):
Yeah.
I mean, I mean I think it was acollaboration.

SPEAKER_11 (09:32):
Yeah, it was a collabo.
Listen to the other so-calledair quote democratic leader
there.
Yeah, it was a collaboration.
It was a little collabo betweensome of them.

SPEAKER_05 (09:42):
Specifically.
Thank you.
I don't have the full list righthere with you.

SPEAKER_11 (09:45):
Um I'm sorry, uh, I don't have the full list.
Um Yeah, I'm the electioncommission chair.
Let me look.
Um you say this was eighto'clock last night, huh?
Oh no, no, no.
Oh, is it this morning?
She'll correct that in a moment.
I'm looking through.
I you know, I don't have thelist of uh the people who
literally just did this.

(10:06):
Uh and I know I'm the electioncommission chair, but I just
don't have that with me.

SPEAKER_05 (10:11):
We can certainly get that to you, but we'll get that
to you.
Are transparent, they'retransparent.

SPEAKER_11 (10:17):
She can't answer the question.

SPEAKER_02 (10:19):
The names of the people.
The names of the people, theorganizations.
Right.
Governor Gavin Newsom promisedthat no special interests or
this would be transparent.
This would not be done in a badthing.

SPEAKER_11 (10:28):
Listener just wants to talk over her the whole time.

SPEAKER_02 (10:31):
So we're trying to ascertain in the very short
amount of time to deliberatethis.
Who exactly are the mapsresponsible?
There's a lot happening veryquickly.

SPEAKER_11 (10:39):
And who are the maps?
Who's responsible?
Uh, there's a lot happening veryquickly.
I didn't ask that.
I didn't ask, hey, is it goingquickly?
Is it's a process moving along?
Is it going yeah, then thatwould be appropriate.
She's asking, who drew the maps?
And the folks that were dropped.
Those t-shirts are coming outtoday, my friends, at
PatsPeeps.com.
Who drew the maps?
I'll be I will tell you aboutthem on my show tonight.

(11:01):
We also have signs coming out.
Who drew the maps?
Those are limited edition upuntil the fourth of November.

SPEAKER_05 (11:18):
Right.
And so we're basing these on theVoting Rights Act, and we're
looking at really bringing thevoters into this process, and
that's why we're going to anelection on November 4th.
Who drew the maps?
Because at the end of the day,the voter's voice is what
matters.

SPEAKER_11 (11:31):
Yeah, uh, who drew the maps.

SPEAKER_02 (11:32):
We're asking because I mean, we're asking because
voters back in 2008 and 2010took the power away from
politicians to draw maps becausethey did not like that it was an
incumbent protection plan.

SPEAKER_11 (11:42):
So we now remember, we voted in California for that
to not let politicians draw themaps.
We voted for that.
They do not care.
Just listen.

SPEAKER_05 (11:56):
These are definitely unusual times.
We are no longer governing in ademocracy.

SPEAKER_11 (12:01):
Did you hear that?
This is the election commissionchair who just said as a
response to California votersvoted for this.
Her response is, well, sorry,we're no longer living in a
democracy.
She just literally said itdoesn't matter what you voted

(12:22):
for, and we're not going to tellyou who is redistricting, and
then blaming the other people,Donald Trump, for being the
authoritarian government.
While telling us that they'regoing to be transparent.

SPEAKER_05 (12:35):
We are seeing things that we care so deeply about in
California.
Right, like things that peoplevoted for that you don't want to
go through with education forchildren, our immigrant
community, our LGBT community.

SPEAKER_11 (12:46):
Can you tell us who's uh redrawn the maps?

SPEAKER_05 (12:50):
They are getting decimated by this
administration.

SPEAKER_11 (12:52):
Decimated.
No, they're not.
How are LGBTQ community?
How are they getting decimatedby the administration?
Tell us.
Explain that.
But see what you're doing isyou're sidetracking because you
don't want to answer thequestion at hand.
They're not, they don't careabout your vote, but it's an

(13:13):
assault on California democracyby Trump.

SPEAKER_05 (13:24):
We have this election on November 4th, and at
the end of the day, the voterswill decide what is important to
please remember that.
Please remember what she'ssaying when you're voting and
whether they want to adjustthese maps to give California
the voice it needs in Congress.

SPEAKER_11 (13:38):
Even if you're voting yes on this, how could
you accept this as an answer?
It's not an answer.
Obviously, they're hidingsomething.
Lobbyists.

SPEAKER_14 (13:51):
Were state lawmakers involved in drawing the maps?

SPEAKER_11 (13:54):
By the way, did you that's a great question?
And listen to the end of this.
This is pathetic.

SPEAKER_14 (14:01):
But but who so then who adjusted them last night at
8 p.m.?
It was my understanding thatthey were by 8 a.m.

SPEAKER_05 (14:08):
They were out there.

SPEAKER_11 (14:09):
Oh, so it wasn't 8 p.m.
It was 8 a.m.
Okay, so uh I still don't havethat in front of me.

SPEAKER_05 (14:16):
And so there was a collaboration, but we can get to
the people that actually do.

SPEAKER_02 (14:19):
So then why does the legislation say the detailed
maps were prepared by theAssembly and State Senate
Elections Committee?
Right.

SPEAKER_05 (14:25):
So the reality is that it was a collaboration and
we can give people specifics.
But I think what's mostimportant.

SPEAKER_11 (14:31):
She doesn't want to get into the specifics.
Yeah, hesitate there.
It says that, but she doesn'twant to really address that.
She doesn't want to get into thespecifics, who's lying here and
who isn't.
Be honest with yourself.
This is a lie.
I mean, honestly, you no matterwhat side you're on in terms of
political idealism, you gottathink about what she's not

(14:54):
saying.
But you can't say it.

SPEAKER_05 (15:00):
To make a judgment on lines of the lines.

SPEAKER_11 (15:03):
This is the best part.

SPEAKER_15 (15:05):
When you consume something, when you consume
something, don't you want toknow who makes it?
When you are presented withsomething, don't you want to
know where it's coming from?
Don't voters deserve it.
When I go to a restaurant, Idon't need to meet the chef.
I just enjoy the food.

SPEAKER_11 (15:16):
Did you hear that?
You do not deserve it,California voters.
Please.
Because when she goes to arestaurant, she doesn't have to
meet the chef.
She just has to enjoy the food.
Isn't that great?
Yeah, that's great.
Meanwhile, here is a sickening.

(15:41):
Sickening sound bite, in myopinion.
From the mayor of Seattle.
His name is Bruce Harrell.
The mayor of Seattle.
We'll play a couple of mayorsfor you here.
Here's Bruce Harrel who says,you know what?

(16:04):
I really don't care what yourcriminal track record is.
I don't care.
It's not about that.

SPEAKER_01 (16:12):
If somebody has offended six, seven, eight
times, even if it's a minoroffense, but they continue to
fail to turn their life around,at what point do you balance
public safety to giving thisperson, you know, some
accountability?
What is that balance?

SPEAKER_08 (16:27):
So let me make something very clear.
Uh I was the one that sponsoredthe ban the box legislation when
everyone opposed it because thecriminal system has had a
disparate impact on black andbrown communities.

SPEAKER_11 (16:39):
Let me let me Right away, right away, right away.
We have to go to the race card.
Always the victim.
Always the victim.
And there he goes right to it.
It's always, you know, unfair toblack and brown people.
Always.

(17:00):
It gets very tiring to hear thistrash, but I'll let him
continue.
Lead with that.

SPEAKER_08 (17:05):
So when this person is committing six or seven
crimes, I don't know his or herstory.
I don't know.
Maybe they were abused as achild.
Maybe they're hungry.
So my my remedy is to find theirlife story to see how we could
help first.
I have no desire to put them injail.
Did you hear that?
But I need to protect you.

(17:25):
And that's the calibration thatwe have.

SPEAKER_11 (17:27):
I put places He has he has no desire.
Despite their lengthy seven,eight times arrested.
Who cares?
He needs to know their story.
He'll sit down with each andevery one of them.
He'll learn their story.
We'll learn their pitiful story.
So we can make sure that they'rea victim.
He doesn't care that they'vebeen arrested seven or eight

(17:50):
times.
They got to collaborate.
I'm not collaborate, they got tocalibrate that to make sure
somehow they do that and somehowkeep you safe.

SPEAKER_08 (18:00):
I'm sorry, what did you say?
What did you say?
But I need to protect you.
That's the calibration that wehave.
I put police officers on thestand.

SPEAKER_11 (18:06):
He wants to protect you.
So he's put police officers onthe stand.
I mean, again, forget about theseven or eight crimes that a
criminal has committed.
He's put police officers on thestand.
I've cross-examined them.
He's cross-examined them.

SPEAKER_08 (18:18):
So whether they commit seven or eight crimes
today is not the issue.
The issue is why are theycommitting these crimes?

SPEAKER_11 (18:24):
So the seven, eight crimes, that's not an issue,
says the mayor of Seattle.
Um, by the way, let's go to howabout DeCarlos DeWan Brown Jr.
who killed this Ukrainian, thisbeautiful woman, Irina Zaruska.
How about this punk here?
Because remember, the mayordoesn't care about your seven,

(18:44):
eight, nine, ten, eleven,twelve, thirteen, fourteen
violent crimes.
Whatever.
Let him walk around.
This dude, Brown Jr., had alengthy criminal record,
including felony breaking andentering, armed robbery with a
weapon for which he served fiveyears in prison.
He had multiple violent assaultarrests.

(19:05):
He also had a history ofpsychiatric issues, uh,
including schizophrenia, violentbehavior.
He was released from prison in2020.
He was arrested for misuse of a911 call before uh stabbing this
beautiful young woman to death.
His original crime spans over adecade.

(19:26):
His first court case is back to2007.
That's how far it goes back.
Convicted of armed robbery in2014 with a dangerous weapon,
served more than five years inprison, was released in 2020.
Violent assaults, you bet you.
He'd been arrested at leasttwice for violent assaults
before this stabbing.

(19:47):
Breaking and entering, convictedon felony breaking and entering
charges.
In a current year, he wasarrested for misuse of a 911
call from a hospital, a hospitalbed, and was released without
bail, which is another issue.
The not the bail issue.
No cash bail.
And by the way, yeah, oh, thisis the guy who we gotta feel

(20:11):
he's a victim, even though hemurdered this girl, and then
afterwards said, I got thatwhite girl, I got that white
girl.
Oh, this poor victim.
All right, here is let's doanother mayor.
This scumbag with the lowestmayoral ratings, I think, pretty

(20:31):
much in history.
Brandon Johnson of MurderousChicago.
What they had like 30-some shmurders or whatever over the
last weekend.
Same thing on Labor Day weekendwhile he's up there telling
everyone how safe that city is.
Here he is being questioned byWilliam J.
Kelly, a reporter.

(20:52):
It's no wonder this guy, BrandonJohnson, has such incredibly low
ratings.
Listen for yourself.

SPEAKER_07 (21:01):
Over the last week, I've literally interacted with
over 300,000 plus.
Listen to Brandon Johnson'ssmart ass uh uh response, real
Chicagoans who say that it ishate speech for you to evoke the
Civil War, to evoke bringingback the Confederacy, to uh say

(21:23):
that law enforcement is asickness when you yourself have
over 150 sworn police officerson your detail.
What do you say to these peopleand will you ask your 150 uh
sworn police officer, uh CPDdetail to stand down if you and
your wife Stacy are everattacked, shot at, or rammed

(21:44):
with uh uh a protest or vehicle?

SPEAKER_10 (21:46):
Well, first of all, I'm sorry to hear that your
numbers of interactions havegone down.

SPEAKER_11 (21:52):
That that's his only reply, just a smart ass reply
about his interactions to toonly 300,000.

SPEAKER_07 (21:58):
Nothing about the murders of millions, but
personally I've interacted withover three.

SPEAKER_11 (22:02):
Nothing about police.

SPEAKER_07 (22:04):
It went down this week.
No, it's going up.
Higher than yours, by the way.
By the way, check out yourcomments.
Cut check out the comments onyour feed.

SPEAKER_10 (22:12):
I th I think it's um it's important to be able to
make sure that to the peoplethat you're talking to, though,
you're talking to less and lesspeople every week so that they
know the truth.
Here's what uh here's what I'vesaid.

SPEAKER_11 (22:27):
That the and your support is dwindling day by day.

SPEAKER_10 (22:30):
Addiction on jails and incarceration and the
addiction of militarism.

SPEAKER_11 (22:37):
Militarism, it is an evil.

SPEAKER_10 (22:39):
Dr.
King made that very clear.

SPEAKER_11 (22:41):
He wants this guy, Brandon Johnson, called law
enforcement or jail and allthese other things.
He called it a sickness.
Law enforcement, according toBrandon Johnson, is a sickness.

SPEAKER_10 (22:58):
He did.

SPEAKER_11 (22:59):
And so I believe it's incumbent upon us to make
sure that the real Chicagoans hewants police that he defunded.
He wants Chicago police that hedefunded thanks to the pressure
back then, they don't have muchpressure now, on Black Lives
Matter.
Um, he defunded the police, butnow he wants the police

(23:20):
department to go to arrest theICE agents for doing their job.
He signed a bill, he wants theuh that's uh incredible.

SPEAKER_10 (23:30):
For the real people of America, right?
Instead of sending billions ofdollars overseas, I mean, like
the Biden administration did forso many years.

SPEAKER_11 (23:38):
We should be spending it on the people right
here in the city of Chicago.
Boy, now you say it.
You didn't say that the lastfour years.

SPEAKER_07 (23:43):
Well, the real Chicagoans that I talk to, that
I communicate with, um, mostlyblack and brown.

SPEAKER_11 (23:50):
I'll bet people who are, quote, black and brown are
sick and tired of hearing this.
Uh, a couple of posts yesterday,um, and they happen to be from
people who were, as you want toput it, black and brown, who
said they were sick and tired ofhearing it.
I'll tell you one right now.
I'm not gonna say their name,but I'll give you an example.

(24:11):
And this is verbatim.
I'm not gonna clean it up oranything.
This is what they said.
All you idiots talking down oneverything, I mean everything in
capitals, Trump does, even whenit's amazing, have real hate in
your hearts.
And you all need help.
I guarantee you will havesomething negative to say, or
there will be crickets.
While he is about to make a hugepeace deal with Hamas in Israel.

(24:34):
And make no mistake, you uh hewill get a Nobel Peace Prize for
this.
And you, in capital letters, youknow who you are.
I will have some bullshit tosay.
The difference between me andyou is when a Democratic
president gets a Nobel PeacePrize for amazing things, I had
mad respect and was overjoyedfor our country, SMH.

(24:56):
Also, on another note, uh BenBad Bunny for Super for the
Super Bowl.
He sat at there.
Uh I'll finish what she said.
Uh that POS sat and was laughingat the Yankees game while they
played God Bless the USA.
I think we need a petition tostart getting this weirdo out.
So don't give me the old blackand brown, we all feel this way,

(25:17):
and we're all victims.
Some people are sick of it.
And I got more of that very samething yesterday, Mayor.

SPEAKER_07 (25:23):
Tell me that you don't seem to know the
difference between illegalaliens and real Chicago
citizens.
Um they feel that you are sidingwith the illegal aliens over
them in their communities.
Um and sadly, let's get to thequestion.
Let's see.

SPEAKER_11 (25:40):
Now let's get to the question.
Get to the question, the PR guy.

SPEAKER_07 (25:44):
The real question is simply this.
Uh I don't know how to make itany more direct.
An illegal alien from Nicaraguagrabbed a woman on the north
side last week.
You got a question?
Listen to that smart ass.
You got a question?
Knocked her unconscious andraped her.
If that had been your wife,Stacy, if that had been your

(26:05):
wife, Stacy, would you want ICEto would you want ICE?
They're not gonna get into it.
To deport her, to to deport thatillegal alien.
Let's move on.
Yes or no?
Answer the question as a man.
Not as a mayor, but as a man,would you want ICE to support
that rapist?

SPEAKER_11 (26:21):
And then listen to when the other guy comes in on
the phone.

SPEAKER_07 (26:25):
No?
Okay.
Mayor, whatever it is.
That's the answer for realChicago.
That's right.
Sorry for being late totraffic's bad.

SPEAKER_10 (26:34):
You're not blaming me for the traffic, are you?

SPEAKER_11 (26:38):
Yeah, no kidding.
He comes down with an excuse.
I'm sorry.
Guy kissing his butt.
I'm sorry, maybe the traffic wasbad.
I'm sure you're not blaming me,are you?
Yeah, what about the woman thatwas raped and beaten with her
head smashed?
Oh, you're not gonna addressthat.
You know, they don't care.
When they don't care about yourrecord, they're gonna keep

(27:01):
somehow keep you safe.
It's a joke.
Especially when you have peoplelike Jay Jones.
You heard about this?
Jay Jones, he's gone as far asto just go ahead and threaten to
murder his opponent and hisopponent's family.

SPEAKER_09 (27:17):
This week, Democrats are dealing with an October
surprise of their own.
After messages sent by aDemocratic candidate for
Attorney General Jay Jonessurfaced.
The messages sent to anotherlawmaker talked about shooting
the Republican Speaker of theState House, Todd Gilbert.
One of the messages read, Threepeople, two bullets, Gilbert,
Hitler, and Pol Pot.

(27:37):
Wow.
Gilbert gets two bullets to thehead.
Adding, put him with quote, thetwo worst people you know, and
he receives both bullets everytime.
The messages were sent back in2022 after Jones had already
resigned from his seat in theHouse of Delegates.
Oh, it's okay, Bob.
They were sent back in 2022.

SPEAKER_11 (27:55):
I was, you know, clear, that was so 2022.
Jeez, now we're in 2025, ofcourse.
We can forget about the fact hewanted to murder his opponent
and his family.
Right?

SPEAKER_09 (28:04):
Jones responded in a statement Friday, writing, I
take full responsibility.
Really?

SPEAKER_11 (28:10):
Gosh, that is so noble of you, Jay Jones.
You took responsibility for yourwords.
She's I am very impressed.

SPEAKER_09 (28:20):
He offered his deepest apologies to Speaker
Gilbert.
Well, then it's all better.
And went on to say, reading backthose words made me sick to my
stomach.
I am embarrassed, ashamed, andsorry.

SPEAKER_11 (28:31):
Yeah, speaking of embarrassed and sorry, here is
the racist views of none otherthan oh god, now I gotta prepare
my gag reflex when I say this.
Whoopi Goldberg.
Whoopi Goldberg on the view withJordan Behart.

(28:52):
Oh god, I need a puke bucket.
Here they are condoning racistactivity at the Super Bowl.
Because, you know, supposedlyice is gonna be there, and if
your skin isn't lily white,according to them, essentially,
you're gonna be harassed andprobably taken away from the
Super Bowl.

SPEAKER_06 (29:11):
Either that or they're spreading She's going to
go to the Super Bowl and roundup.
How's she gonna know who's who?

SPEAKER_11 (29:19):
Uh-huh.

SPEAKER_06 (29:19):
Because the Supreme Court has given permission to
question anyone who has aSpanish accent who has a listen
to Joy.

SPEAKER_11 (29:26):
Anyone who's got a Spanish accent.
Listen to that Snide.
Anyone who's got a Spanishaccent.

SPEAKER_06 (29:33):
Anyone who has a Spanish accent who has a dark
skin.
Yeah.

SPEAKER_11 (29:36):
So yeah, that's what they're gonna do.
Because, you know, people whoare um have a Spanish accent,
who are here legally, who wentthrough all the work to do that
legally, probably still havethat Spanish accent.
Yeah, I'm sure that's what'sgonna happen.
IC is gonna come in, they'regonna come into the Super Bowl,
and if you speak, if you have aSpanish accent.

(30:00):
They're gonna grab you.
If you have dark skin, you'redone.
You're going right to jail.
That's it.
Oh, but it gets so much better.

SPEAKER_06 (30:06):
Hey, here's the thing.

SPEAKER_11 (30:08):
Here comes whoopee.
Everybody.
Your great advice.
This is amazing.

SPEAKER_06 (30:13):
Get a little cocoa butter, sit in the sun.

SPEAKER_11 (30:16):
That is the first thing.
And then and cocoa butter?
Is that what you said?
You say cocoa butter?
And sit in the sun.
So you want to get darker.
This is the only time you canprobably ever do this.
Right, because Whoopi said youcan.
So this is the only time thatyou're allowed to be racist.

(30:37):
Is when Whoopi says it's okay.
Give yourself a Latin accent.

SPEAKER_06 (30:41):
Whoopi, that is such a good idea.

SPEAKER_11 (30:43):
And listen to Joy Behar.
Oh, Whoopi, that is such a goodidea.
Let me kiss your rumposaurusreal quick.
And the crowd barely clapped.

SPEAKER_06 (30:54):
You know, Whoopi, that is such a good idea.

SPEAKER_11 (30:57):
That's a great idea.
That's a really good idea.
I'll finish up with this one.
I'm glad I got all this off ofmy chest today.
I really needed this.
I get it built up in me, youknow, and I need to release it
uh here on Pat's Peeps 346 on aThursday.
I don't want to have to worryabout this over the weekend.
Here's a couple of uh, in myopinion, losers, straight up

(31:21):
racists.
Joy Reed, who lost her show, DonLemon, who lost his show.
Here they are talking about JDVance.

SPEAKER_00 (31:31):
Let's just be clear now.

SPEAKER_11 (31:33):
Again, here they are talking about the vice president
JD Vance.

SPEAKER_00 (31:36):
I can't stand JD Vance.
Let's just be clear.
It's never there's nothing hecould do.
He could literally like rescuemy cat out of a burning
building, and I would still hateJD Vance.

SPEAKER_11 (31:46):
There you go.
She'd still hate the guy.
I think I need a palettecleanser after all of that.
And so I have the perfect thing.
So I pulled I I actually pulledtwo records off.
Again, two very good records.
I had to make a choice.
So I'm gonna go with this onetoday.
Pull this off my rare record 45collection shelf.
I'm gonna pull it out of thesleeve.
Let me see what kind ofcondition it's in.

(32:07):
Um it looks in pretty darn goodcondition.
I'm not gonna say mint on thisone, but in in very good
condition.
Looks like it's been played.
This is the first time that I'vefeatured Philly Groove Records
on Pat's Peeps.
That is a cool label.
It's a red label and it's gotthese like cool black patent

(32:28):
leather shoes on it.
Man, that's awesome, like floorshines or something.
Philly Groove Records, and the Pin Philly has a record, a 45
record around it, around thebase of it.
There are three radio stationstickers on this.
One just says 57 on a whitesticker, one says 1970, and the

(32:48):
other a red sticker, looks likesome kind of uh, I don't know,
it says 258.
I love this song.
This song to me represents anera of music that as uh a kid I
loved it.
I love people like uh theShylights and the stylistics and

(33:09):
that era of soul music.
And this is one of those, youknow, the dramatics, things like
that.
This is one of those bands, oneof those groups from that era,
the temptations.
There were so many good ones.
But this is from a soul group.
Co-written by producer Tom Bell,lead singer William Hart,
released as a single in 1969 onPhilly Groove.

(33:33):
Uh, and this was off theirself-titled third album.
Isn't that interesting?
It's gets you get to the thirdalbum before you make it a
self-titled album.
Don't you usually do that on thefirst album?
Anyhow, it's the third album.
The song reached number three onthe Billboard RB chart, went to
number 10 on the Billboard Hot100 in 1970.

(33:55):
Overseas, this song peaked atnumber 22 on a UK singles chart,
uh number 81 in Australia.
They won a Grammy Award for thebest RB uh music vocal uh uh
vocal performance, I should say,by a duo or a group for this
song in 1971.
And this is a um a prominentexample of that Philadelphia

(34:18):
soul style.
It's a slow ballad, layeredstrings and horns, great
harmony.
Like I say, and it reminds me ofuh that you know, it reminds me
of elementary school, theDelphonics, didn't I blow your
mind this time?
Pat's Peeps, 346.

(34:42):
Happy Thursday.

SPEAKER_12 (34:50):
I give my heart and soul to you.
Jesus is a two.

SPEAKER_11 (35:40):
I guess I have to say I don't own this music.
Just exposing it, critiquing it,giving information.
Have a great Thursday, okay?
Thank you for listening.
Please go to Pat's Peeps, pleasecheck out our merchandise, and

(36:04):
please, please support our localbusinesses.
See you on the radio.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.