August 20, 2025 • 48 mins
Have you ever felt like something about the entire coronavirus narrative just doesn't add up? You're not alone.
The unprecedented response to COVID-19 represents perhaps the most extensive coordinated gaslighting campaign in modern history. From the way deaths are counted (as revealed by health officials themselves who admit that "even if you died of a clear alternate cause but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death") to the deliberate misrepresentation of CDC guidelines about school reopenings, we're witnessing a systematic manipulation of data to justify the erosion of civil liberties.
The contrast couldn't be more striking between how President Trump approaches governance and how state governors are behaving. While the Mexican President praises Trump for respecting Mexico's sovereignty and national dignity, Americans are being subjected to increasingly draconian measures from their state governments. As CDC Director Robert Redfield explicitly stated, their guidelines were designed to help schools reopen safely, yet governors and local officials are using these same guidelines as "rationale to keep schools closed."
Washington state provides a perfect case study in how this manipulation works. Governor Jay Inslee's mask mandate contains exemptions for medical conditions that don't require disclosure—yet this information is deliberately obscured to create the impression that masks are universally required. Meanwhile, the state has systematically undermined election integrity through same-day registration, automatic voter registration through welfare agencies, and acceptance of tribal IDs without address verification.
The time for passive acceptance has passed. We must recognize that we're not just fighting a virus—we're fighting for the preservation of our fundamental rights and republican system of government. Are we peasants or citizens? The answer depends entirely on our willingness to resist.
Ready to take a stand? Subscribe to the Peasants Podcast for regular updates on how to protect your rights and fight back against government overreach.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
cupcakes had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, Every one of us.
(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
All right, welcome to anotherepisode of Peasants Podcast.
We are going to jump in it here.
This morning I got.
Well, we're going to jump in itbecause I'm talking and I'm not
going to stop until we're doneright.
(01:00):
So I'm an hour late gettingthis show out this morning
because I drove all the way hereto my office without my
computer bag.
I had to drive all the way backhome.
I had to load up an excavatorin the process of doing this.
So I've been up since about 430 this morning, driving,
hauling equipment back and forth.
It's been the longest morning.
(01:22):
But I am here and we are goingto do this thing and we are
going to talk about coronavirus.
I hate talking about coronavirus.
It's the most frustrating thing.
It is the largest criminalgaslighting exercise that has
ever been done on planet earth.
It is the largest gaslightingproject ever done on planet
(01:43):
Earth, and millions, billions ofpeople are falling for it, and
it is in our faces.
There's so much evidenceagainst the reaction to
coronavirus.
I want to be clear about that.
I don't doubt that there's acoronavirus.
I don't doubt there's a novelcoronavirus.
I don't doubt there's a novelcoronavirus that came forth in
(02:06):
2019, right.
I don't even it's a wholedifferent topic the origins of
it, if it came from a bat soupor if it came from a lab.
Those are all fun, great,awesome discussions.
I don't care, though.
I don't care if it was swineflu.
I don't care if it's Africanbird flu.
I don't care if it's Ebola fromthe Ebola river in the Congo.
I don't care if it's Africanbird flu.
(02:27):
I don't care if it's Ebola fromthe Ebola River in the Congo.
I don't care.
Call it an epidemic, right?
It's so inconsistent.
When we argue with people aboutcoronavirus on medical terms and
(02:50):
we let them define the termsand we let them define the data,
we end up where we're at now.
We end up in a retarded, stupidplace as a society.
It can't be any more simple, soI'm going to do a lot of
coronavirus stuff.
I've got a couple personalstories, but I want to show you
an example of republicanism.
This is critical for us to havebecause I get a lot of feedback
(03:14):
from my especially myconservative friends.
Why isn't Trump doing something?
Let me explain to you whyTrump's not doing something.
Because sometimes the way youdo something sets precedent for
the future.
And because our past presidentsand our past leaders have been
weak and feckless, they'veleaned on strongmen and what's
happened is those strongmen havecreated protocols and
(03:34):
procedures and precedent towhere now we're being led by
strongman tyrants at all levels.
So let me show you the correctform of government.
Let me show you how two nationsshould interact.
So what I'm going to play foryou is an excerpt from Donald
Trump's press conference withthe president of Mexico
(03:55):
yesterday.
So president of Mexico came init's his first foreign trip.
It's his first trip to theUnited States, Washington DC,
and he came to celebrate andkick off the USMCA.
But I want you to pay attentionto what the president of Mexico
says.
Now.
He's speaking in English.
He has a very soft, almostfeminine voice.
I actually thought there was atranslator at first, but that's
actually his voice.
He's just a soft-spokensocialist, let's just put it
(04:18):
that way.
But listen to what he says.
It's like honeydew, it's justso sweet.
Just listen to how he describesthe relationship with the US.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
It is very important for us to be launching this new
agreement, but I also wanted tobe here to thank people of the
United States, its governmentand thank you, president Trump,
for being increasinglyrespectful with our Mexican
(04:53):
fellow men.
And to you, president Trump, Iwant to thank you for your
understanding and the helpyou've given us in issues
related to trade, commerce, oil,as well as your personal
support for the acquisition ofmedical equipment that we needed
urgently to treat our patientsof COVID-19.
(05:19):
But what I mainly appreciate isthat you have never sought to
impose anything on us, violatingour sovereignty.
Instead of the Monroe Doctrine,you have followed, in our case,
the wise advice and illustriousand prudent George Washington,
(05:43):
who said, quote nations shouldnot take advantage of the
unfortunate condition of otherpeoples.
End of quote.
You have not tried to treat usas a colony.
On the contrary, you havehonored our condition as an
(06:04):
independent nation.
That's why I'm here to expressto the people of the United
States that their president hasbehaved with us with kindness
and respect.
You have treated us just aswhat we are a country and a
(06:30):
dignified people, a free,democratic and sovereign people.
Long live the friendship of ourtwo nations.
Long live the United States ofAmerica.
Long live Canada.
Long live the United States ofAmerica.
Long live Canada.
Long live our America.
Long live Mexico.
Long live Mexico.
(06:51):
Viva Mexico.
Speaker 2 (06:55):
I love it.
Can you imagine how it mustfeel as a Mexican citizen,
someone who's proud of yourcountry, to essentially have
been a colony of America for thelast long time?
We've taken advantage of Mexico.
Nafta took advantage of Mexico.
Nafta didn't do a lot of goodthings for Mexico.
It was really in bigbusinesses' advantage.
(07:17):
And the USMCA changes thatBecause remember it essentially
institutes a minimum wage, so itinstitutes a wage across the
borders that is consistent, sothat it's not cheaper for an
American company to outsource toMexico.
But by that same token, itmeans that Mexicans aren't taken
advantage of because of theirwillingness to work for cheaper
labor.
It's really good all around asfar as those benefits.
(07:39):
There's other little nuances.
You know, the devil's always inthe details.
And UMCA in 20 years we'll knowwhat its shortcomings are too.
Just like NAFTA, but on thesurface and just as a whole, it
has a lot of the protectionsthat NAFTA didn't have, and
NAFTA didn't have themintentionally, okay, so why did
I play that?
I played that because this isan example of how our president
(08:00):
actually acts.
Don't get caught up in the mediahype about this tyrannical
president who's a threat todemocracy.
Let me ask you this Is DonaldTrump a threat to Mexican
democracy?
Really, truly, is he a threatto Mexican democracy?
You have a socialist presidentin Mexico praising our populist
president right, saying thatyou've honored our sovereignty.
(08:23):
Why is that?
Because our president believesin borders.
Our president believes he's thepresident of the United States
and not the president of theworld.
He doesn't need to treat therest of the world like a colony.
He doesn't need to takeadvantage of the third world.
We don't need to do that.
Why would you need to takeadvantage of the third world
when you have poverty in theAppalachian Mountains?
Why don't you take advantage ofthe Appalachian Mountains?
Why don't you take advantage ofthe Appalachian Mountains and
bring some prosperity there?
(08:44):
Right?
If the idea is that by beingglobalist, you're bringing
prosperity to other nations,which is, you know, a false sale
, why not use that same logic tobring impoverished communities
around our nation some benefit?
So really cool.
Now let me translate that tothe coronavirus.
President Trump is a Republican.
(09:04):
He believes in states' rights.
Do you have to have a strongfederal government?
Yes.
Do you have to have a strongfederal government for
international politicking?
Yes.
But do you need a strongfederal government to manage
within the United States?
The answer is no, not usually.
Now, the way the country's beengoverned for the last 30 years,
a strong executive, a strongpresident, is able to basically
(09:28):
manage across borders.
They set education standardsthat every school across the
country has to use.
I mean, part of the challenge wehave right now with this
epidemic is we're all looking tonational figures.
We're looking to three medicalprofessionals dr redfield, dr
fauci and dr bricks, and they'rethe end-all, be-all.
Whatever signal they put out,everyone else is supposed to
(09:48):
puppet.
And then it gets complicatedeven more so because, like
everything, the devil's in thedetails.
By the way, true Pundit has agreat breaking story.
He's got a hospitaladministrator and I'm using this
podcast that he did thisinterview with this hospital
administrator in Utah to kind offill in some gaps and
understand some things, and Ihighly recommend anybody go take
(10:08):
a listen to that.
You can just find it ontrueponditcom.
It's this week's breaking storyand this high-level, very
high-level hospitaladministrator in the largest
health organization in Utah isjust waving all kinds of flags
saying there's just nothing goodabout this.
Patients are being coded asCOVID that aren't really sick.
The hospitalization rate isdropping way down.
(10:30):
Most of the patients who havedied have truly died of their
comorbidities, not ofcoronavirus.
There's lots of instances wherehe was talking about families
that were getting back a hold ofthe hospital because, you know,
on the death certificate theyfound out that their loved one
had coronavirus.
Covid-19 was coded as a COVIDdeath, even though they'd had,
you know, chronic heart diseasefor years.
(10:52):
In one case they had someonewho died of renal failure who'd
really truly been on like day today hospice care for six months
, coded him as a coronaviruspatient because he was in a long
term care home where theythought coronavirus had been.
I mean story after story likethat.
That's in the state of Utah.
He even goes into detail abouthow the Mormon church is
facilitating in the cover-up andin the false information and
(11:15):
spreading of false information.
And he then goes a step furtherand says I'm very concerned
because some of the worstcharacters in human history have
been medical professionals andthey've used medical as the
justification to take away yourliberty, your rights and things
like that.
And he goes into some detailabout that and he's basically
saying they're starting withforcing you to wear a mask and
it's just going to go from there.
(11:36):
And that's what he sees andhe's trying to blow the flag and
fortunately he got the truepundit and he's got some decent
circulation.
People think he's super biased.
He's not biased at all.
He just he'll break storiesthat no one else will break.
Just for reference, a lot of you, a lot of my listeners,
probably saw the Plandemic withJudy Miskovich, who kind of came
out against Dr Fauci and calledhim on his fraud.
(11:58):
That story broke through TruePundit.
She went through True Punditand did her thing and then had
the plandemic release.
Anyways.
So that's Donald Trump and forone thing it's good to know
that's how Mexico is.
But imagine if that's how ourdeveloping relationship is with
all the other countries in theworld.
Imagine if, as we'rewithdrawing, we're withdrawing
(12:19):
diplomatic pressure, we'rewithdrawing political pressure
to influence elections.
Isn't it interesting that theyconstantly say Donald Trump is a
threat to democracy?
But if I had to guess, I wouldsay this Mexican president say
he's probably the first Americanpresident to respect Mexican
democracy in decades and DonaldTrump will also honor states'
(12:41):
rights and governors' rights,which he has done.
So now let's get back tocoronavirus.
I want to spend a little bit oftime talking about Washington
state specifically, although weare going to jump around the
country just a little bit.
So Washington state put out themandate saying you have to wear
a mask, and I've kind offollowed this story on the
podcast.
So if you listen to a coupleepisodes you might've already
heard different clips from JayInslee and things like that.
(13:02):
But Jay Inslee said you know,first of all, when we introduced
the mask mandate, he said it'snot going to be enforced by law
enforcement.
So no, law enforcement is goingto enforce this.
But we want peer pressure, wewant to raise people's
consciousness.
He talked about it being asignal that we care about other
people's lives.
So the whole thing is just anexercise in symbolism, as the
New England Journal of Medicinecalled masks.
(13:23):
They use the actual word, theyare a quote talisman.
A talisman is just a symbol.
Right, it's a symbol of yourvirtue, and so that's what Jay
Inslee's got going on.
So yesterday I've done this on acouple stores now you know
where I walk in and they say,hey, you got to put a mask on.
I say, oh, I have a concealedcarry permit, and usually they
just back right away.
I mean it's happened.
Oh gosh, I mean it seems likeevery other.
(13:45):
Every other time I have to gointo a store.
I get asked about not wearing amask and most people don't want
to push back too much, butevery now and then you'll get
someone who wants to push back alittle bit, and yesterday that
happened to me.
I walked into a FergusonWaterworks in Seattle which is a
pipe store it's where I get alot of my pipe fittings for our
septic business and things likethat and went in there just to
get some normal parts and a guyyelled out hey, you got to have
(14:07):
a mask.
And my partner was with me andhe said, okay, and he just threw
on a mask they gave us.
They had some paper masks atthe door that they would just
give to guests, which is fine.
And he threw on a mask and Iwas like I'm not throwing on a
mask, I can't wear a mask.
I have a concealed carry permitand he goes.
Well, it doesn't matter, Idon't care if you have a
concealed carry permit.
No one told me that concealedcarry permits didn't have to
wear a mask.
You got to put on a mask and Iwas like I'm not putting on a
(14:27):
mask.
So rather than cause a fussright there at that moment, I
just walked out let my partnerbe in there, he's going to do
the shopping, get what we needed, walk back to the truck and I
just, you know, went online juston Facebook video.
I saw this video this was thisis Jay Inslee.
(14:50):
This was a press conferencethat he gave yesterday and he
got asked a question about themask mandate.
So let's just hear what JayInslee has to say about masks.
Speaker 4 (14:52):
The second thing I will say is, if you do have a
medical condition that makeswearing a mask difficult for you
, you do not have to tell thebusiness what that medical
condition is.
You simply tell the businessowner the business what that
medical condition is.
You simply tell the businessowner I have a medical condition
that exempts me and that willbe honored by the business.
So, Jay Inslee said that.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
Now the way that the guidance that came out from the
state was, it didn't really makethat clear.
So I got that clip.
I mean that is a 19-second clip.
I got that clip, I walked backinto Ferguson, I put it on my
phone on speakerphone as loud asI could.
I walked up right to the guythat had told me I had to wear a
mask and I played that wholeclip.
I played that whole clip and Ilooked at him and I said I have
a medical condition.
(15:34):
And he just looked at me withthis blank stare on his face and
said okay, and that was it.
And then I just walked aroundthe store the rest of the time
without a mask on and my partnerwas like well, that's my go-to
now.
I'm not putting another mask on, I'm just saying I have a
medical condition.
So Jay Inslee is saying here youknow you don't have to wear a
mask if you have a medicalcondition, but you don't have to
(15:54):
disclose what that medicalcondition is.
So don't wear a mask, folksDon't wear a mask If you're
state.
Say you have a medicalcondition, say you got one.
Force Jay Inslee to make somekind of mandate that requires
you to disclose your privatehealth information, violate
HIPAA, because here's what'sgoing to happen.
This gentleman that you'regoing to hear from now is going
(16:15):
to come right back at him.
His name is Aaron White and heis the chairman of the Freedom
Foundation, and he has filedlawsuits against Jay Inslee.
So take a listen to this.
Speaker 5 (16:28):
All right.
Thanks so much, Emma.
As coronavirus cases continueto surge across the US, more and
more governors are beginning toimplement a mask requirement,
and that's not sitting well witheveryone, even in liberal
states like Washington, where alawsuit has been filed against
Governor Inslee's mask order,claiming it exceeds his
constitutional authority.
Joining us now to tell us moreabout this is Aaron Witt,
National Director of the FreedomFoundation, which is the
(16:51):
organization behind the lawsuit.
Aaron, thanks for joining us.
Talk to us a little bit aboutthis lawsuit.
Speaker 6 (16:58):
Yeah, sure.
So while we are the FreedomFoundation, we're not opposed to
people wearing face masks or,in fact, even businesses
mandating that people wear facemasks.
We're not opposed to peoplewearing face masks or, in fact,
even businesses mandating thatpeople wear face masks.
We are thoroughly opposed tothe governor and the governor
Inslee and the Department ofHealth Secretary making this the
law of the land in Washingtonstate.
And, to make things worse,there's no real end date in
(17:19):
sight for this mandate.
It could go as long as it takesto find a vaccine, and that
could be who knows years.
So are people really going tobe happy wearing face masks for
potentially years to come?
Yeah, aaron, is there a fineinvolved?
Yeah, there is a fine.
In fact, you could even getjail time for not wearing a mask
(17:39):
You're kidding.
No, it's unbelievable.
It's unbelievable, GovernorInslee.
He wants to create two classesof people and his end goal is to
create separation in Washingtonstate and throughout the
country.
On one hand, you have everyday,otherwise law abiding citizens
that don't want to wear masksformer residents of the CHOP
(18:01):
zone in Seattle that canbasically get away with what
they want, and Governor Insleeis going after people that don't
want to wear face masks.
You can do whatever you want inthe name of Black Lives Matter,
but if you want to go outsideyour house without a face mask
on, you could face a fine, jailtime and criminal charges.
His idea of society is sick.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
His idea of society is sick.
I completely agree with him.
In a different interview wherehe sits down with Mike Huckabee
on his podcast, this same AaronWith talks about the fact that
in Washington State, at aminimum, at a minimum our death
count is 13% inflated.
At a minimum.
They did a cursory audit wherethey were able to determine
(18:44):
comorbidities that were beyond ashadow of a doubt.
The cause of death, rather thancoronavirus Gunshot victims,
car accident victims, renalfailure was something that was
on there that had nothing to dowith coronavirus there were
people who were just on acursory look were obviously not
(19:05):
coronavirus deaths 13 percent.
On top of that, Washingtonstate has adopted the most
liberal possible way to countcoronavirus cases.
They also have stopped countingpneumonia and flu.
Don't even count it.
There have been no pneumonia orflu deaths in the United States
since, I think, March 15th.
What that means is every singleflu, every single pneumonia
(19:27):
death are being counted ascoronavirus, regardless of if
they've taken a test or not.
So organizations like FreedomFoundation are filing these
lawsuits.
We've got to support them if wecan, If you can, make small
donations to these conservativegroups Judicial Watch, Freedom
Foundation they're doing thelegal work that is difficult for
us to do.
(19:48):
Now, what is our job?
Our job is to resist.
We've got to resist.
We are getting to a point ofcraziness.
Here's Tucker Carlson on masksand social distancing.
Speaker 7 (20:01):
Many schools that do plan to reopen will do so under
a series of restrictions thathave no basis of any kind in
science.
It's a kind of bizarre healththeater.
Students will be kept six feetapart.
Everyone will have to wear amask, class size will be limited
.
In some schools, there will bescheduled bathroom breaks, et
cetera, et cetera.
(20:21):
No sports.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
So across the country , right, people are trying to
decide on how to get preparedfor school, how are we going to
get ready for schools, how arewe going to open up schools?
And I've heard over and overand over again, you know, we
hear about the threats, all thedifferent things that are
happening and all the fearmongering.
In fact, here's a super clip ofthe fear mongering.
(20:43):
This is just a super clip.
It's running through a lot ofthe liberal media, but listen to
the way they talk aboutcoronavirus, listen to the way
they talk about the numbers.
Just listen to this.
This is what the majority ofAmericans are hearing about
coronavirus and it's not basedin reality.
Speaker 5 (20:59):
Governors across the country and some of these
hotspot states that it's goodnews that it's just younger
people because they have abetter survival rate.
That is a fallacy.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
The president also points out the coronavirus death
rate is down.
That's true for now.
Speaker 7 (21:15):
But the death toll.
You can't celebrate it rightnow when you're seeing people
heading into the hospital.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Because we've seen this story before.
In some ways, it never reallyended.
In a lot of ways, it is worsethan ever.
Speaker 7 (21:24):
And, of course, as we see younger people infected and
going into the ICUs, it spreadsto older populations.
That death rate will change.
These people go home, thesepeople infect their parents and
their grandparents.
Those people get sick, they endup in the ICU and they either
die or they take it fromsomebody else that could have
used it.
So actually the virus hasbecome more dangerous.
Because it can infect morepeople, it's more easily able to
(21:48):
take root in the community.
So it's changing in a worse way.
Speaker 8 (21:51):
This is going to be catastrophe upon catastrophe.
Just to say hey, look at thedeath rate now is extremely
superficial.
Speaker 5 (21:58):
Does the US need another stay at home order?
Speaker 3 (22:02):
If the virus continues to rage like this, we
have no choice.
Speaker 8 (22:05):
The White House and their calculation.
This is about trying to instilla sense of normalcy.
Then we all know that lifecan't really feel like it's back
to normal.
I mean it can't feel.
Americans can't feel that theyhave the virus under control.
We have absolutely zero chanceand by zero chance I mean zero
Z-E-R-O, zero chance of movingpast this with Donald Trump in
(22:26):
that job.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Death rates are going to go up following all of these
large infections.
And Dr Fauci, again, is doingwhat he's been doing from the
beginning.
Speaker 8 (22:34):
He's been telling you the truth and you haven't want
to hear it.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
He's been telling you the truth and you haven't
wanted to hear it.
So let's not go to Dr Fauci,but let's go to Dr Redfield.
So, across the state, acrossthe country, certain governors
including in my state, jayInslee have said you know, we
can't reopen schools because ofthese CDC guidelines.
Keep that in mind.
We can't reopen schools becauseof the CDC guidelines.
So, rather than takeculpability and take
responsibility and be decisionmakers and executives themselves
(23:02):
everything from the schoolboards to the governors, right
up the chain of command they'repushing this up to unelected
people to make these decisions.
Robert Redfield's not elected,dr Birx isn't elected, fauci
isn't elected okay, so you putthe decision in their hands,
because the politicalrepercussions are what Minor?
Who pays the politicalrepercussions for them?
Donald Trump, because he'stheir boss.
(23:22):
So let's hear what the CDC isactually saying about reopening
schools.
This is critical.
Just pay attention.
This is Dr Redfield.
Now I've got some thoughts aboutDr Redfield From everybody that
I've heard from that knows himpersonally.
They say he's a God-fearing man, he's a born-again Christian,
he's relatively soft-spoken andyou know what?
From all appearances it seemsthat way.
(23:42):
I do believe he's corrupt.
I believe he's a corruptocrat.
I think he steals money fromthe medical system I think he
puts himself.
Maybe not even you know, hedoesn't know it's openly illegal
because I'm sure he hasattorneys drawing up contracts
and things.
But this guy's a grifter.
He has made millions of dollarsoff of medical things that he
has been able to grant licenses,grant permits, approvals, et
(24:04):
cetera, et cetera.
Through the CDC.
He owns stock in some of thebusinesses that make vaccines
then the CDC being the world'slargest buyer of vaccines.
You can see where this goes,okay, but nonetheless, this guy
sounds like he's got a decentheart, like he cares.
And I have a little perspectiveon this because, growing up
religious, if you Google myformer church and you Google
corruption, religious if youGoogle my former church and you
(24:27):
Google corruption, you will finddozens and dozens and I mean
it's just page after page ofpeople who held positions of
power in the church I grew up inthat were convicted of
essentially white-collar crimes,everything from money
laundering to, you know, rentschemes, all kinds of stuff.
So a lot of times people thatare religious, they think of
crime in terms of violence.
They don't think in crimes interms of, like, financial damage
(24:48):
, just the reality.
I mean Utah is the world'scapital for pyramid schemes and
financial crime, and the reasonfor that is because of the
religious trust that's there.
This is this embedded trustwith other people of your faith.
Anyways, I bring that up just tosay I think Dr Redfield is one
of those guys that he's.
He's got a good soul.
He just is in a bad system andhe's financially corrupt, less
(25:11):
so than Dr Bricks and Fauci.
Dr Bricks and Fauci, in myopinion, are, like you know,
lizard people.
I mean they, they are just on awhole nother level of
corruption and and it's in, I, I, I kind of just skim the
surface on them because it'sagain, it's one of those things
where devil's in the details.
Someone like Dr Fauci who'sbeen in charge of the NIH for 38
years, right, there's a lot ofstuff to dig through, but
(25:32):
there's also well-executedcover-ups, like the entire HIV
cover-up.
Okay, so this is Dr Redfieldtalking specifically about the
CDC.
This is a press conferenceyesterday.
Listen to the way he goes abouttalking about this.
Remember, donald Trump respectsthe nation of Mexico, he
(25:53):
respects the state of Washington, he respects the chain of
command.
He's not a threat to democracy.
In fact, he's exposing theweaknesses in our democracy and
the fact that we've elected weakpeople.
But listen to Dr Redfield.
Speaker 9 (26:01):
First and foremost, I want to make it very, very
clear that the guidance that CDCcontinues to put out for
schools K through 12 and higherlearning is intentional for
reopening and keeping ourschools open.
That's its purpose.
We recognize that there's avariety of unique circumstances
(26:21):
for different schools anddifferent school districts, and
so we've outlined a number ofstrategies that those schools,
those administrators, can use toaccomplish this goal safely.
But I want to make it veryclear that what is not the
intent of CDC's guidelines is tobe used as a rationale to keep
(26:42):
schools closed.
Cdc guidelines are is to beused as a rationale to keep
schools closed.
Speaker 2 (26:46):
CDC guidelines are not to be used as a rationale to
keep schools closed.
If you've been paying attentionto your local news, you have
heard the CDC be used as arationale for why we shouldn't
open backup schools.
Now he's going to go intoanother thing and I wish he
would have defined this.
(27:07):
But he does mention it.
But what's the differencebetween a guideline and a
prescription?
Speaker 9 (27:12):
We're prepared to work with each school, each
jurisdiction, to help them usethe different strategies that we
propose that help do thissafely so they come up with the
optimal strategy for thoseschools.
I think it's critical and itwould be personally very
disappointing to me and I knowmy agency if we saw that
(27:33):
individuals were using theseguidelines as a rationale for
not reopening our schools.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
Okay, so their guidelines?
Now it would be disappointingto them.
So your local school board?
What are they doing?
See earlier on in the podcast.
In a previous episode I've saidyou have to take their shame and
you have to put it back intheir face.
Okay, if you have a leader thatis telling you CDC says XYZ to
justify a draconian measure ornot opening school, put that
(28:06):
shame back in their face.
No, they didn't.
The entire point of theguidelines is there are
guidelines.
These are best practices.
You can't meet all of them.
Look, maybe you can't do sixfeet of separation, but if you
spread the desks all the wayfrom wall to wall, maybe we can
get five feet.
Okay, great, the guideline issix.
We can't get six, so we'll bestpractice it and go to five.
That's what the CDC wants tosee happen.
(28:26):
Hey, you know what we shouldn'tdo assemblies.
We can still have all the otherfunctions of school, but we
just shouldn't do assemblies.
Or how about this Instead ofhaving an hour lunch with two
half hour, you know, half theschool eats in the first half
hour, half the school eats andthe second half hour, spread it
out over three, make it an hourand a half.
That way you reduce the load inthe cafeteria by three.
(28:47):
That's called followingguidelines.
They're not prescriptions onmust be.
This Can't open the school ifyou can't get six feet of
separation 100% of the time.
No, no, no, no.
Find what works on yourindividual school.
There are rural schools inAmerica where they could do 10
(29:09):
feet of separation if theywanted to.
You know there's communitiesthat have slowly had their
populations go down, that stillhave huge schools right, I know
a couple of them in WesternWashington where you've got like
a school that's much largerthan the community needs because
of the logging industry left.
Eventually, the kids left andso you're left with these huge
schools with like 50 kids inthem.
There's no need for anythingthere.
They can achieve all of thesocial separation guidelines.
Here's another one.
This was more of a longer forminterview and it's chopped up,
(29:30):
but it's chopped up to just kindof the things that we need to
hear.
Now.
Robert Redford in ClassicFaction does what's called
double speak, so he'll say hispoint and then sometimes he kind
of backs off.
It a little bit because youknow devils in the details.
There's nuance to this stuff ita little bit because you know
devils in the details.
There's nuance to this stuff,but don't get lost in what he's
saying.
The signal and the noise right.
Robert Redfield is not onTrump's side.
(29:51):
Robert Redfield is not on theside of we should just open up
the economy, and this wholething's a scam.
He is benefiting personally fartoo much from the financial
instruments that are being usedin this coronavirus thing, the
bailouts, the vaccine money.
You follow the money, you willfind Robert Redfield is getting
some of it.
So I'm not saying that this islike our savior.
(30:14):
What I'm saying is he, as theleader of CDC, where the buck
has to stop, will eventually beheld accountable if the CDC is
doing things that are just wrong.
And so he's trying to protecthis institution, and rightly so.
But listen to the way he goesthrough this.
Speaker 9 (30:29):
CDC encourages all schools, all schools, to do what
they need to reopen.
The guidance that we've put out, as the Secretary mentioned, is
guidance and I want people tosee it as guidance to reopen.
Mentioned is guidance and Iwant people to see it as
guidance to reopen.
Nothing would cause me greatersadness than to see any school
(30:50):
district or school use ourguidance as a reason not to
reopen.
Cdc never recommended generalschool closure throughout this
pandemic.
We see schools, as has alreadybeen mentioned, as a vital part
of our society.
Is that we have to stay focusedon protecting the vulnerable,
those individuals that havemultiple medical conditions,
(31:12):
those individuals that areelderly with multiple medical
conditions.
As I mentioned, our householdstudies, the role that children
play in the transmission cycle.
For example, in our householdstudies, so far there was
limited implications that thevirus was brought into the
household by a child.
I think when we looked atindividuals under the age of 45,
(31:44):
they represent 2.4% of all thedeaths in this country and when
you look at them, thoseindividuals under 45 frequently
had a significant comorbidity,significant obesity, diabetes,
type 1.
So this virus does seem to bevery limited pathogenicity for
children, but I do think gettingahead of the curve that you're
talking about how you're goingto handle cases of COVID in the
(32:05):
school when you diagnose them,so that doesn't become some type
of you know nine o'clock atnight phone call tree that goes
through the community and thenext thing you know you have the
school shut down for you know aweek, rather than everyone
being on board.
How we're going to handle this.
I think that's really importantfrom a risk versus risk point
of view, that we need to reopenour schools and we need to plan
(32:31):
to keep our schools reopened.
I think this really is theimportant message and this is
why we're having thesediscussions to get people to
understand that we need toreopen the schools.
We can do this safely.
We need to commit to it and weneed just to get it done.
Speaker 2 (32:49):
That's it, guys.
So when someone says the CDCsays the CDC says no, no, they
didn't.
The CDC didn't say that.
The CDC is saying get back toschool, don't use our guidelines
as a rationale to not open backup.
Okay.
So now we're going to jump overto New Jersey here and this is
a.
This is actually someone else'svideo and it's dubbed over, but
(33:11):
he does a pretty good analysis,so I'm just going to let it
play.
But this is.
They're talking about the deathrate.
And listen.
The facts are facts.
They're a stubborn thing.
They're not going to change.
Focus on the facts and you'lldebunk all of the spin.
See the signal through thenoise, right?
So listen to this smartreporter who breaks this down
(33:33):
and you'll hear the commentary.
Hold on.
Maybe this is a littledifferent video format for me
here.
Speaker 5 (33:42):
It reported the death of a teenager in Cook County.
Are you familiar with this case?
If so, is this the state'sfirst teenage death and can you
tell us if the teenager inquestion had underlying
conditions?
Speaker 8 (33:57):
Okay, we're going to get a definition now of how you
can determine whether or notsomeone died with COVID.
Speaker 10 (34:10):
Very simple.
I don't have that informationat my disposal at this time.
I know we have had people ofall age groups die.
I just want to be clear interms of the definition of
people die.
Speaker 8 (34:22):
Okay, here comes the definition of death by COVID.
As long as you were positivefor COVID when you died, you are
(34:48):
a COVID death.
Even if you got in a car wreckor you fell off a cliff, for
whatever reason that you died,as long as you had COVID, it's
counted as a COVID death.
Listen.
Speaker 10 (34:57):
So that means that if you were in hospice and had
already been given a you know afew weeks to live, and then you
also were found to have COVID,that would be counted as a COVID
death.
There it was.
Speaker 8 (35:12):
Okay, she's going to make it more simple for us.
Speaker 10 (35:15):
It means that if, technically, even if you died of
a clear alternate cause but youhad COVID at the same time,
it's still listed as a COVIDdeath.
You died of a clear alternatecause, but you had COVID at the
same time, it's still listed asa COVID death.
Speaker 8 (35:26):
So technically, even if you died of an alternate
cause, if you had COVID when youdied, it's called a COVID death
.
You wonder why the numbers aremessed up.
Speaker 2 (35:38):
So to put this in perspective, we actually have a
lower total death rate than wedid last year at the same time.
So if you take the annualamount of deaths for all causes
and then you put it on, thisyear, we have a lower total
cause of death.
But we've got this huge COVIDnumber right, this COVID number.
But look at the total number offlu deaths that's way down like
(36:00):
to 6,000.
And we stopped counting.
The CDC doesn't want thatinformation anymore.
Pneumonia that's a standalonething, right, and it's caused by
a lot of different reasons.
No cases, none, zero.
Okay, you go through the otherissues here and it's like, oh,
(36:27):
this is a scam.
This wasn't any worse than anyregular year.
The average age of death forcoronavirus patients is above
the average age of death.
Look at what they said aboutpeople under 45, what Dr
Redfield said Of the 40,.
You know, 2% of all the COVIDdeaths, of all the COVID deaths
that have been coded, 2% of them.
There are 130,000, 2% of them,right, I mean Washington state.
(36:48):
13% of our reported numbers arenot COVID.
So you know, I figure 13% isprobably across the country, but
let's just go with the bignumber 130,000,.
2% of those are under 45.
So you know you're talking what2,000, see 100,000, 2% of
100,000 is.
Is that 20?
Whatever you get the point, youstart doing that and then he
(37:09):
says, oh, and they have majorcomorbidities.
Well, how many of the peopleunder 45 were the car wrecks,
the gunshot wounds, right, thethings that had absolutely
nothing to do with coronavirus?
It's a scam.
This is the largest corrupt,criminal gaslighting program
that's ever been run on theworld and lots of people are
falling for it.
(37:29):
They are taking our freedoms inthe name of science and
medicine.
It devolves upon you, theperson listening to me talking,
to take a stand somewhere.
Take a stand, open your eyes.
The numbers are fake.
We know we've relied to aboutthe origins of the virus.
(37:52):
China's never even fessed up tospreading it.
They never even told the who.
I mean we're leaving the WorldHealth Organization over this
thing because they mishandled it.
They never even told the who.
I mean we're leaving the WorldHealth Organization over this
thing because they mishandled it.
Based on the current data andnumbers that we have now, this
was never a pandemic.
It never reached the level ofpandemic.
All the projections that we hadended up being bunk faults.
(38:16):
This is an incredible,incredible exercise in
gaslighting.
Now, last thing, last thing Iwant to cover is I want to cover
elections.
Okay, elections are one ofthose things that's absolutely
critical for it.
All right.
So this is about electionintegrity and this comes from
Amber Crawback.
She is running for Washington'sfourth district, for, I think,
(38:39):
house, and so, anyways, she'sjust she's running, and if
you're in her district, if yousee her signs, see her, vote for
her man, she is on top of it,but she says this.
So I'm just going to read herthread.
Time to take a systematic lookat some Washington state
election integrity concerns, ifpossible.
I'd love for our region's mostdiligent researchers and
reporters to take a look at thisas well.
And I'm just going to read thethread and I'll just mention the
(39:01):
links and evidence she has hereas a preemptive point of
clarification.
I will be supporting Secretaryof State Kim Wyman's re-election
this year.
My best guess is that she isstuck between a rock and a hard
place on this issue.
I have no doubt she is wellqualified for the job she has
taken on.
Here we go Over the last 40years, the Washington state
legislature has systematicallymade changes to the state's
election system that I believeundermine our elections to the
(39:23):
point that we can no longerprovide assurance of election
integrity to the people ofWashington state.
Starting in the mid-1980s,permanent absentee voting was
established for retirees andthose struggling with
disabilities.
In the early 1990s the benefitswere expanded to include any
voter in Washington state.
To include any voter inWashington state In November
2004,.
Shortly after moving toWashington, I witnessed the most
(39:44):
Washingtonians would considerthe most memorable example of
mail-in balloting troubles inour history, illustrated in the
gubernatorial race betweenChristine Grigor and Dino Rossi.
And then she's got the charthere and it looks, based on the
chart, that Dino Rossi ran awaywith this thing.
To cite Dino Rossi, winningboth the election and the
automatic recount.
Gregor took the seat afteradditional ballots were
discovered, additional ballotsdiscovered in a second manual
(40:05):
recount paid for by Gregor.
And then she's got all thelinks and the articles here.
Side note the law firm Gregorhired to manage the manual
recount happened to be.
Remember the names guys PerkinsCoie who's Perkins Coie?
Perkins Coie is the law firmthat Hillary Clinton hired to
pay Fusion GPS in England andGlenn Simpson to create the
Steele dossier to meddle in anelection.
(40:27):
So Gregor previously hiredPerkins Coie, a now known
election meddler through theRussiagate scandal, to also
oversee the recount inWashington Gosh, how convenient,
right?
Maybe the Russiagate scandalwasn't the first time Perkins
Coie meddled in an election, gofigure.
After Grigor's team hadcompleted a manual recount and
(40:49):
was declared the winner by 133votes.
So after she was the winner by133 votes for state governor,
with ballots being found afterthe race was called originally,
over 1,000 fraudulently castballots were identified by
Rossi's team.
Because Washington voters don'tdeclare party when registering,
(41:09):
there was no way to determinethose votes helped.
Under Christine Gregor,washington election policy
changed quite rapidly.
In 2009, she signed theNational Popular Vote Bill
obligating Washington's electorsto cast their vote for the
National Popular Vote winnerrather than the state popular
vote winner.
One of the major loopholes inthe Washington election
integrity is, so long as theregistrant has a name, address,
(41:32):
id number, signature and checkin the I am a citizen box, our
Secretary of State is legallyprohibited from verifying the
person's registration is valid.
One of my biggest concernsabout election integrity in
Washington State is that we havenever run an audit for our
voter rolls for non-citizens andnon-residents.
Since we are a sanctuary state,our cities struggle with
(41:54):
rampant homelessness problem,which is a major fraud risk.
Up until recently, this type ofaudit was all but impossible to
do because there was nodatabase of US citizens
available to use to query theWashington state voter base.
It would have been required amanual auditing, which does not
appear to be lawful.
However, as of a few months ago, dh Secretary, governor or
Department of Health and DHS Govhas provided a citizenship
(42:17):
database that state officialscan use to verify census
information.
Washington's Secretary of Stateshould be legally permitted to
use this database in her effortsto maintain and clean voter
rolls.
I am frustrated that this workhasn't happened, but I am
assuming that the reasonSecretary Wyman has not already
run this audit is because it'san election year for her and she
will be sued into the groundfor it by the left, not because
(42:38):
they have cause, so we'll justhave to wait for assurance of
election integrity.
2019 was a particularly busyyear for dismantling the
security of Washington stateelections.
We saw same-day registrationimplemented for the first time.
This year, automatic voterregistration implemented even
those who are not eligible tovote like 16-year-olds and, as a
side note, there are only ahandful of specific agencies
(42:58):
that are permitted toautomatically register voters
who employ their services.
The approved list appears toconsist of agencies that provide
social services to underservedpopulations.
So basically, if you're usingany kind of welfare program in
Washington, they automaticallyregister you to vote.
Another issue of electionintegrity hasn't gotten much
attention is the inclusion ofprovisions that now allow tribal
IDs to be used as valid IDregistering to vote in
(43:20):
Washington State, even if theapplicant doesn't have a
verifiable address.
This is a significant hindranceto our assurance of election
integrity, as I don't believeWashington State officials have
any jurisdiction over tribal IDs.
I don't believe we even havethe authority to get the number
of new tribal IDs given out eachyear, much less a list of names
.
This means there is no UnitedStates checks and balances to
ensure the individuals receivingtribal IDs are US citizens, and
(43:43):
it is reasonable to beconcerned that non-citizens from
Central America are illegallyimmigrating into our tribal
communities.
So the question is howdifficult is it in the sanctuary
state of Washington for anindividual from Central America
to get a tribal ID in Washingtonstate and use it to register to
vote, and how might the triballeaders be compensated for
bringing in and hiding illegalimmigrants?
Interestingly, on top of thelack of oversight accountability
(44:05):
, there was a lot of state andfederal money given to the
tribes this year.
Washington Senator Patty Murraywas very happy to know hundreds
of millions that would be givento tribes for the purpose of
building new housing, fromspecial provisions for the
governor to entering intoagreements with tribes, to
providing taxpayer funding forhealth care and more.
In any case, washington triballeaders made out big time this
year in financial provision andbenefits.
(44:27):
Thanks to Washingtonbureaucrats, even broadband
internet, which we can't get for10 houses in my rural
neighborhood for under 100K.
They're getting it in all.
The tribes House leaderrepresent, jt Wilcox and his
family seem to have quite anintimate relationship with a
number of tribal leaders.
I think it might be helpful tohave his thoughts and agreements
on these provisions as well.
Thank you for letting me know,yep.
(44:50):
So that's the end of our thread.
Pretty fascinating.
So, guys, election integrityhere's the deal.
The game plan has to change.
We got to fight like the leftfights.
That means you got to go topeople that are unreasonable,
that are jerks.
You got to call their employer.
You got to do the exact samething they do to conservatives.
It is the only way to play.
They have changed the rules.
They've changed the groundrules.
(45:11):
This election that's coming up,there's no guarantee of nothing.
There's no guarantee of nothing.
If it's not such anoverwhelming, stomping victory
from the right, they'll steal it.
They stole this election thatshe's talking about here by 133
votes, with a minimum of athousand votes cast fraudulently
(45:31):
Minimum.
They will steal it and you areliving through the precursor to
what they're going to do.
You think it's bad now?
You think it's a littleunfortunate now?
Just wait.
You just wait until they getfull control again.
What Donald Trump is doing isthe right thing.
He's allowing the local states,the local government, the
(45:53):
different nations to handletheir own stuff.
Us citizens need to be enraged.
If our local leaders aren'thelping us, you can't blame
Donald Trump.
You can't blame Donald Trump.
All right, you can find me.
You can find me on Twitter atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Facebook atthe Peasants Perspective, and
(46:16):
you can email me at peasantspodat gmailcom.
I look forward to talking toyou again tomorrow.
Thanks for spending some timewith me today.
Speaker 1 (46:26):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working classes oh,there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Pleaseplease good people.
(46:47):
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week, yes, but all thedecisions of that officer have
to be ratified at a specialbi-weekly meeting.
(47:07):
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of pure internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the l he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
(47:29):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
(47:51):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
(48:12):
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
That's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
cupcakes had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, Every one of us.
(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
All right, welcome to anotherepisode of Peasants Podcast.
We are going to jump in it here.
This morning I got.
Well, we're going to jump in itbecause I'm talking and I'm not
going to stop until we're doneright.
(01:00):
So I'm an hour late gettingthis show out this morning
because I drove all the way hereto my office without my
computer bag.
I had to drive all the way backhome.
I had to load up an excavatorin the process of doing this.
So I've been up since about 430 this morning, driving,
hauling equipment back and forth.
It's been the longest morning.
(01:22):
But I am here and we are goingto do this thing and we are
going to talk about coronavirus.
I hate talking about coronavirus.
It's the most frustrating thing.
It is the largest criminalgaslighting exercise that has
ever been done on planet earth.
It is the largest gaslightingproject ever done on planet
(01:43):
Earth, and millions, billions ofpeople are falling for it, and
it is in our faces.
There's so much evidenceagainst the reaction to
coronavirus.
I want to be clear about that.
I don't doubt that there's acoronavirus.
I don't doubt there's a novelcoronavirus.
I don't doubt there's a novelcoronavirus that came forth in
(02:06):
2019, right.
I don't even it's a wholedifferent topic the origins of
it, if it came from a bat soupor if it came from a lab.
Those are all fun, great,awesome discussions.
I don't care, though.
I don't care if it was swineflu.
I don't care if it's Africanbird flu.
I don't care if it's Ebola fromthe Ebola river in the Congo.
I don't care if it's Africanbird flu.
(02:27):
I don't care if it's Ebola fromthe Ebola River in the Congo.
I don't care.
Call it an epidemic, right?
It's so inconsistent.
When we argue with people aboutcoronavirus on medical terms and
(02:50):
we let them define the termsand we let them define the data,
we end up where we're at now.
We end up in a retarded, stupidplace as a society.
It can't be any more simple, soI'm going to do a lot of
coronavirus stuff.
I've got a couple personalstories, but I want to show you
an example of republicanism.
This is critical for us to havebecause I get a lot of feedback
(03:14):
from my especially myconservative friends.
Why isn't Trump doing something?
Let me explain to you whyTrump's not doing something.
Because sometimes the way youdo something sets precedent for
the future.
And because our past presidentsand our past leaders have been
weak and feckless, they'veleaned on strongmen and what's
happened is those strongmen havecreated protocols and
(03:34):
procedures and precedent towhere now we're being led by
strongman tyrants at all levels.
So let me show you the correctform of government.
Let me show you how two nationsshould interact.
So what I'm going to play foryou is an excerpt from Donald
Trump's press conference withthe president of Mexico
(03:55):
yesterday.
So president of Mexico came init's his first foreign trip.
It's his first trip to theUnited States, Washington DC,
and he came to celebrate andkick off the USMCA.
But I want you to pay attentionto what the president of Mexico
says.
Now.
He's speaking in English.
He has a very soft, almostfeminine voice.
I actually thought there was atranslator at first, but that's
actually his voice.
He's just a soft-spokensocialist, let's just put it
(04:18):
that way.
But listen to what he says.
It's like honeydew, it's justso sweet.
Just listen to how he describesthe relationship with the US.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
It is very important for us to be launching this new
agreement, but I also wanted tobe here to thank people of the
United States, its governmentand thank you, president Trump,
for being increasinglyrespectful with our Mexican
(04:53):
fellow men.
And to you, president Trump, Iwant to thank you for your
understanding and the helpyou've given us in issues
related to trade, commerce, oil,as well as your personal
support for the acquisition ofmedical equipment that we needed
urgently to treat our patientsof COVID-19.
(05:19):
But what I mainly appreciate isthat you have never sought to
impose anything on us, violatingour sovereignty.
Instead of the Monroe Doctrine,you have followed, in our case,
the wise advice and illustriousand prudent George Washington,
(05:43):
who said, quote nations shouldnot take advantage of the
unfortunate condition of otherpeoples.
End of quote.
You have not tried to treat usas a colony.
On the contrary, you havehonored our condition as an
(06:04):
independent nation.
That's why I'm here to expressto the people of the United
States that their president hasbehaved with us with kindness
and respect.
You have treated us just aswhat we are a country and a
(06:30):
dignified people, a free,democratic and sovereign people.
Long live the friendship of ourtwo nations.
Long live the United States ofAmerica.
Long live Canada.
Long live the United States ofAmerica.
Long live Canada.
Long live our America.
Long live Mexico.
Long live Mexico.
(06:51):
Viva Mexico.
Speaker 2 (06:55):
I love it.
Can you imagine how it mustfeel as a Mexican citizen,
someone who's proud of yourcountry, to essentially have
been a colony of America for thelast long time?
We've taken advantage of Mexico.
Nafta took advantage of Mexico.
Nafta didn't do a lot of goodthings for Mexico.
It was really in bigbusinesses' advantage.
(07:17):
And the USMCA changes thatBecause remember it essentially
institutes a minimum wage, so itinstitutes a wage across the
borders that is consistent, sothat it's not cheaper for an
American company to outsource toMexico.
But by that same token, itmeans that Mexicans aren't taken
advantage of because of theirwillingness to work for cheaper
labor.
It's really good all around asfar as those benefits.
(07:39):
There's other little nuances.
You know, the devil's always inthe details.
And UMCA in 20 years we'll knowwhat its shortcomings are too.
Just like NAFTA, but on thesurface and just as a whole, it
has a lot of the protectionsthat NAFTA didn't have, and
NAFTA didn't have themintentionally, okay, so why did
I play that?
I played that because this isan example of how our president
(08:00):
actually acts.
Don't get caught up in the mediahype about this tyrannical
president who's a threat todemocracy.
Let me ask you this Is DonaldTrump a threat to Mexican
democracy?
Really, truly, is he a threatto Mexican democracy?
You have a socialist presidentin Mexico praising our populist
president right, saying thatyou've honored our sovereignty.
(08:23):
Why is that?
Because our president believesin borders.
Our president believes he's thepresident of the United States
and not the president of theworld.
He doesn't need to treat therest of the world like a colony.
He doesn't need to takeadvantage of the third world.
We don't need to do that.
Why would you need to takeadvantage of the third world
when you have poverty in theAppalachian Mountains?
Why don't you take advantage ofthe Appalachian Mountains?
Why don't you take advantage ofthe Appalachian Mountains and
bring some prosperity there?
(08:44):
Right?
If the idea is that by beingglobalist, you're bringing
prosperity to other nations,which is, you know, a false sale
, why not use that same logic tobring impoverished communities
around our nation some benefit?
So really cool.
Now let me translate that tothe coronavirus.
President Trump is a Republican.
(09:04):
He believes in states' rights.
Do you have to have a strongfederal government?
Yes.
Do you have to have a strongfederal government for
international politicking?
Yes.
But do you need a strongfederal government to manage
within the United States?
The answer is no, not usually.
Now, the way the country's beengoverned for the last 30 years,
a strong executive, a strongpresident, is able to basically
(09:28):
manage across borders.
They set education standardsthat every school across the
country has to use.
I mean, part of the challenge wehave right now with this
epidemic is we're all looking tonational figures.
We're looking to three medicalprofessionals dr redfield, dr
fauci and dr bricks, and they'rethe end-all, be-all.
Whatever signal they put out,everyone else is supposed to
(09:48):
puppet.
And then it gets complicatedeven more so because, like
everything, the devil's in thedetails.
By the way, true Pundit has agreat breaking story.
He's got a hospitaladministrator and I'm using this
podcast that he did thisinterview with this hospital
administrator in Utah to kind offill in some gaps and
understand some things, and Ihighly recommend anybody go take
(10:08):
a listen to that.
You can just find it ontrueponditcom.
It's this week's breaking storyand this high-level, very
high-level hospitaladministrator in the largest
health organization in Utah isjust waving all kinds of flags
saying there's just nothing goodabout this.
Patients are being coded asCOVID that aren't really sick.
The hospitalization rate isdropping way down.
(10:30):
Most of the patients who havedied have truly died of their
comorbidities, not ofcoronavirus.
There's lots of instances wherehe was talking about families
that were getting back a hold ofthe hospital because, you know,
on the death certificate theyfound out that their loved one
had coronavirus.
Covid-19 was coded as a COVIDdeath, even though they'd had,
you know, chronic heart diseasefor years.
(10:52):
In one case they had someonewho died of renal failure who'd
really truly been on like day today hospice care for six months
, coded him as a coronaviruspatient because he was in a long
term care home where theythought coronavirus had been.
I mean story after story likethat.
That's in the state of Utah.
He even goes into detail abouthow the Mormon church is
facilitating in the cover-up andin the false information and
(11:15):
spreading of false information.
And he then goes a step furtherand says I'm very concerned
because some of the worstcharacters in human history have
been medical professionals andthey've used medical as the
justification to take away yourliberty, your rights and things
like that.
And he goes into some detailabout that and he's basically
saying they're starting withforcing you to wear a mask and
it's just going to go from there.
(11:36):
And that's what he sees andhe's trying to blow the flag and
fortunately he got the truepundit and he's got some decent
circulation.
People think he's super biased.
He's not biased at all.
He just he'll break storiesthat no one else will break.
Just for reference, a lot of you, a lot of my listeners,
probably saw the Plandemic withJudy Miskovich, who kind of came
out against Dr Fauci and calledhim on his fraud.
(11:58):
That story broke through TruePundit.
She went through True Punditand did her thing and then had
the plandemic release.
Anyways.
So that's Donald Trump and forone thing it's good to know
that's how Mexico is.
But imagine if that's how ourdeveloping relationship is with
all the other countries in theworld.
Imagine if, as we'rewithdrawing, we're withdrawing
(12:19):
diplomatic pressure, we'rewithdrawing political pressure
to influence elections.
Isn't it interesting that theyconstantly say Donald Trump is a
threat to democracy?
But if I had to guess, I wouldsay this Mexican president say
he's probably the first Americanpresident to respect Mexican
democracy in decades and DonaldTrump will also honor states'
(12:41):
rights and governors' rights,which he has done.
So now let's get back tocoronavirus.
I want to spend a little bit oftime talking about Washington
state specifically, although weare going to jump around the
country just a little bit.
So Washington state put out themandate saying you have to wear
a mask, and I've kind offollowed this story on the
podcast.
So if you listen to a coupleepisodes you might've already
heard different clips from JayInslee and things like that.
(13:02):
But Jay Inslee said you know,first of all, when we introduced
the mask mandate, he said it'snot going to be enforced by law
enforcement.
So no, law enforcement is goingto enforce this.
But we want peer pressure, wewant to raise people's
consciousness.
He talked about it being asignal that we care about other
people's lives.
So the whole thing is just anexercise in symbolism, as the
New England Journal of Medicinecalled masks.
(13:23):
They use the actual word, theyare a quote talisman.
A talisman is just a symbol.
Right, it's a symbol of yourvirtue, and so that's what Jay
Inslee's got going on.
So yesterday I've done this on acouple stores now you know
where I walk in and they say,hey, you got to put a mask on.
I say, oh, I have a concealedcarry permit, and usually they
just back right away.
I mean it's happened.
Oh gosh, I mean it seems likeevery other.
(13:45):
Every other time I have to gointo a store.
I get asked about not wearing amask and most people don't want
to push back too much, butevery now and then you'll get
someone who wants to push back alittle bit, and yesterday that
happened to me.
I walked into a FergusonWaterworks in Seattle which is a
pipe store it's where I get alot of my pipe fittings for our
septic business and things likethat and went in there just to
get some normal parts and a guyyelled out hey, you got to have
(14:07):
a mask.
And my partner was with me andhe said, okay, and he just threw
on a mask they gave us.
They had some paper masks atthe door that they would just
give to guests, which is fine.
And he threw on a mask and Iwas like I'm not throwing on a
mask, I can't wear a mask.
I have a concealed carry permitand he goes.
Well, it doesn't matter, Idon't care if you have a
concealed carry permit.
No one told me that concealedcarry permits didn't have to
wear a mask.
You got to put on a mask and Iwas like I'm not putting on a
(14:27):
mask.
So rather than cause a fussright there at that moment, I
just walked out let my partnerbe in there, he's going to do
the shopping, get what we needed, walk back to the truck and I
just, you know, went online juston Facebook video.
I saw this video this was thisis Jay Inslee.
(14:50):
This was a press conferencethat he gave yesterday and he
got asked a question about themask mandate.
So let's just hear what JayInslee has to say about masks.
Speaker 4 (14:52):
The second thing I will say is, if you do have a
medical condition that makeswearing a mask difficult for you
, you do not have to tell thebusiness what that medical
condition is.
You simply tell the businessowner the business what that
medical condition is.
You simply tell the businessowner I have a medical condition
that exempts me and that willbe honored by the business.
So, Jay Inslee said that.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
Now the way that the guidance that came out from the
state was, it didn't really makethat clear.
So I got that clip.
I mean that is a 19-second clip.
I got that clip, I walked backinto Ferguson, I put it on my
phone on speakerphone as loud asI could.
I walked up right to the guythat had told me I had to wear a
mask and I played that wholeclip.
I played that whole clip and Ilooked at him and I said I have
a medical condition.
(15:34):
And he just looked at me withthis blank stare on his face and
said okay, and that was it.
And then I just walked aroundthe store the rest of the time
without a mask on and my partnerwas like well, that's my go-to
now.
I'm not putting another mask on, I'm just saying I have a
medical condition.
So Jay Inslee is saying here youknow you don't have to wear a
mask if you have a medicalcondition, but you don't have to
(15:54):
disclose what that medicalcondition is.
So don't wear a mask, folksDon't wear a mask If you're
state.
Say you have a medicalcondition, say you got one.
Force Jay Inslee to make somekind of mandate that requires
you to disclose your privatehealth information, violate
HIPAA, because here's what'sgoing to happen.
This gentleman that you'regoing to hear from now is going
(16:15):
to come right back at him.
His name is Aaron White and heis the chairman of the Freedom
Foundation, and he has filedlawsuits against Jay Inslee.
So take a listen to this.
Speaker 5 (16:28):
All right.
Thanks so much, Emma.
As coronavirus cases continueto surge across the US, more and
more governors are beginning toimplement a mask requirement,
and that's not sitting well witheveryone, even in liberal
states like Washington, where alawsuit has been filed against
Governor Inslee's mask order,claiming it exceeds his
constitutional authority.
Joining us now to tell us moreabout this is Aaron Witt,
National Director of the FreedomFoundation, which is the
(16:51):
organization behind the lawsuit.
Aaron, thanks for joining us.
Talk to us a little bit aboutthis lawsuit.
Speaker 6 (16:58):
Yeah, sure.
So while we are the FreedomFoundation, we're not opposed to
people wearing face masks or,in fact, even businesses
mandating that people wear facemasks.
We're not opposed to peoplewearing face masks or, in fact,
even businesses mandating thatpeople wear face masks.
We are thoroughly opposed tothe governor and the governor
Inslee and the Department ofHealth Secretary making this the
law of the land in Washingtonstate.
And, to make things worse,there's no real end date in
(17:19):
sight for this mandate.
It could go as long as it takesto find a vaccine, and that
could be who knows years.
So are people really going tobe happy wearing face masks for
potentially years to come?
Yeah, aaron, is there a fineinvolved?
Yeah, there is a fine.
In fact, you could even getjail time for not wearing a mask
(17:39):
You're kidding.
No, it's unbelievable.
It's unbelievable, GovernorInslee.
He wants to create two classesof people and his end goal is to
create separation in Washingtonstate and throughout the
country.
On one hand, you have everyday,otherwise law abiding citizens
that don't want to wear masksformer residents of the CHOP
(18:01):
zone in Seattle that canbasically get away with what
they want, and Governor Insleeis going after people that don't
want to wear face masks.
You can do whatever you want inthe name of Black Lives Matter,
but if you want to go outsideyour house without a face mask
on, you could face a fine, jailtime and criminal charges.
His idea of society is sick.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
His idea of society is sick.
I completely agree with him.
In a different interview wherehe sits down with Mike Huckabee
on his podcast, this same AaronWith talks about the fact that
in Washington State, at aminimum, at a minimum our death
count is 13% inflated.
At a minimum.
They did a cursory audit wherethey were able to determine
(18:44):
comorbidities that were beyond ashadow of a doubt.
The cause of death, rather thancoronavirus Gunshot victims,
car accident victims, renalfailure was something that was
on there that had nothing to dowith coronavirus there were
people who were just on acursory look were obviously not
(19:05):
coronavirus deaths 13 percent.
On top of that, Washingtonstate has adopted the most
liberal possible way to countcoronavirus cases.
They also have stopped countingpneumonia and flu.
Don't even count it.
There have been no pneumonia orflu deaths in the United States
since, I think, March 15th.
What that means is every singleflu, every single pneumonia
(19:27):
death are being counted ascoronavirus, regardless of if
they've taken a test or not.
So organizations like FreedomFoundation are filing these
lawsuits.
We've got to support them if wecan, If you can, make small
donations to these conservativegroups Judicial Watch, Freedom
Foundation they're doing thelegal work that is difficult for
us to do.
(19:48):
Now, what is our job?
Our job is to resist.
We've got to resist.
We are getting to a point ofcraziness.
Here's Tucker Carlson on masksand social distancing.
Speaker 7 (20:01):
Many schools that do plan to reopen will do so under
a series of restrictions thathave no basis of any kind in
science.
It's a kind of bizarre healththeater.
Students will be kept six feetapart.
Everyone will have to wear amask, class size will be limited
.
In some schools, there will bescheduled bathroom breaks, et
cetera, et cetera.
(20:21):
No sports.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
So across the country , right, people are trying to
decide on how to get preparedfor school, how are we going to
get ready for schools, how arewe going to open up schools?
And I've heard over and overand over again, you know, we
hear about the threats, all thedifferent things that are
happening and all the fearmongering.
In fact, here's a super clip ofthe fear mongering.
(20:43):
This is just a super clip.
It's running through a lot ofthe liberal media, but listen to
the way they talk aboutcoronavirus, listen to the way
they talk about the numbers.
Just listen to this.
This is what the majority ofAmericans are hearing about
coronavirus and it's not basedin reality.
Speaker 5 (20:59):
Governors across the country and some of these
hotspot states that it's goodnews that it's just younger
people because they have abetter survival rate.
That is a fallacy.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
The president also points out the coronavirus death
rate is down.
That's true for now.
Speaker 7 (21:15):
But the death toll.
You can't celebrate it rightnow when you're seeing people
heading into the hospital.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Because we've seen this story before.
In some ways, it never reallyended.
In a lot of ways, it is worsethan ever.
Speaker 7 (21:24):
And, of course, as we see younger people infected and
going into the ICUs, it spreadsto older populations.
That death rate will change.
These people go home, thesepeople infect their parents and
their grandparents.
Those people get sick, they endup in the ICU and they either
die or they take it fromsomebody else that could have
used it.
So actually the virus hasbecome more dangerous.
Because it can infect morepeople, it's more easily able to
(21:48):
take root in the community.
So it's changing in a worse way.
Speaker 8 (21:51):
This is going to be catastrophe upon catastrophe.
Just to say hey, look at thedeath rate now is extremely
superficial.
Speaker 5 (21:58):
Does the US need another stay at home order?
Speaker 3 (22:02):
If the virus continues to rage like this, we
have no choice.
Speaker 8 (22:05):
The White House and their calculation.
This is about trying to instilla sense of normalcy.
Then we all know that lifecan't really feel like it's back
to normal.
I mean it can't feel.
Americans can't feel that theyhave the virus under control.
We have absolutely zero chanceand by zero chance I mean zero
Z-E-R-O, zero chance of movingpast this with Donald Trump in
(22:26):
that job.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Death rates are going to go up following all of these
large infections.
And Dr Fauci, again, is doingwhat he's been doing from the
beginning.
Speaker 8 (22:34):
He's been telling you the truth and you haven't want
to hear it.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
He's been telling you the truth and you haven't
wanted to hear it.
So let's not go to Dr Fauci,but let's go to Dr Redfield.
So, across the state, acrossthe country, certain governors
including in my state, jayInslee have said you know, we
can't reopen schools because ofthese CDC guidelines.
Keep that in mind.
We can't reopen schools becauseof the CDC guidelines.
So, rather than takeculpability and take
responsibility and be decisionmakers and executives themselves
(23:02):
everything from the schoolboards to the governors, right
up the chain of command they'repushing this up to unelected
people to make these decisions.
Robert Redfield's not elected,dr Birx isn't elected, fauci
isn't elected okay, so you putthe decision in their hands,
because the politicalrepercussions are what Minor?
Who pays the politicalrepercussions for them?
Donald Trump, because he'stheir boss.
(23:22):
So let's hear what the CDC isactually saying about reopening
schools.
This is critical.
Just pay attention.
This is Dr Redfield.
Now I've got some thoughts aboutDr Redfield From everybody that
I've heard from that knows himpersonally.
They say he's a God-fearing man, he's a born-again Christian,
he's relatively soft-spoken andyou know what?
From all appearances it seemsthat way.
(23:42):
I do believe he's corrupt.
I believe he's a corruptocrat.
I think he steals money fromthe medical system I think he
puts himself.
Maybe not even you know, hedoesn't know it's openly illegal
because I'm sure he hasattorneys drawing up contracts
and things.
But this guy's a grifter.
He has made millions of dollarsoff of medical things that he
has been able to grant licenses,grant permits, approvals, et
(24:04):
cetera, et cetera.
Through the CDC.
He owns stock in some of thebusinesses that make vaccines
then the CDC being the world'slargest buyer of vaccines.
You can see where this goes,okay, but nonetheless, this guy
sounds like he's got a decentheart, like he cares.
And I have a little perspectiveon this because, growing up
religious, if you Google myformer church and you Google
corruption, religious if youGoogle my former church and you
(24:27):
Google corruption, you will finddozens and dozens and I mean
it's just page after page ofpeople who held positions of
power in the church I grew up inthat were convicted of
essentially white-collar crimes,everything from money
laundering to, you know, rentschemes, all kinds of stuff.
So a lot of times people thatare religious, they think of
crime in terms of violence.
They don't think in crimes interms of, like, financial damage
(24:48):
, just the reality.
I mean Utah is the world'scapital for pyramid schemes and
financial crime, and the reasonfor that is because of the
religious trust that's there.
This is this embedded trustwith other people of your faith.
Anyways, I bring that up just tosay I think Dr Redfield is one
of those guys that he's.
He's got a good soul.
He just is in a bad system andhe's financially corrupt, less
(25:11):
so than Dr Bricks and Fauci.
Dr Bricks and Fauci, in myopinion, are, like you know,
lizard people.
I mean they, they are just on awhole nother level of
corruption and and it's in, I, I, I kind of just skim the
surface on them because it'sagain, it's one of those things
where devil's in the details.
Someone like Dr Fauci who'sbeen in charge of the NIH for 38
years, right, there's a lot ofstuff to dig through, but
(25:32):
there's also well-executedcover-ups, like the entire HIV
cover-up.
Okay, so this is Dr Redfieldtalking specifically about the
CDC.
This is a press conferenceyesterday.
Listen to the way he goes abouttalking about this.
Remember, donald Trump respectsthe nation of Mexico, he
(25:53):
respects the state of Washington, he respects the chain of
command.
He's not a threat to democracy.
In fact, he's exposing theweaknesses in our democracy and
the fact that we've elected weakpeople.
But listen to Dr Redfield.
Speaker 9 (26:01):
First and foremost, I want to make it very, very
clear that the guidance that CDCcontinues to put out for
schools K through 12 and higherlearning is intentional for
reopening and keeping ourschools open.
That's its purpose.
We recognize that there's avariety of unique circumstances
(26:21):
for different schools anddifferent school districts, and
so we've outlined a number ofstrategies that those schools,
those administrators, can use toaccomplish this goal safely.
But I want to make it veryclear that what is not the
intent of CDC's guidelines is tobe used as a rationale to keep
(26:42):
schools closed.
Cdc guidelines are is to beused as a rationale to keep
schools closed.
Speaker 2 (26:46):
CDC guidelines are not to be used as a rationale to
keep schools closed.
If you've been paying attentionto your local news, you have
heard the CDC be used as arationale for why we shouldn't
open backup schools.
Now he's going to go intoanother thing and I wish he
would have defined this.
(27:07):
But he does mention it.
But what's the differencebetween a guideline and a
prescription?
Speaker 9 (27:12):
We're prepared to work with each school, each
jurisdiction, to help them usethe different strategies that we
propose that help do thissafely so they come up with the
optimal strategy for thoseschools.
I think it's critical and itwould be personally very
disappointing to me and I knowmy agency if we saw that
(27:33):
individuals were using theseguidelines as a rationale for
not reopening our schools.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
Okay, so their guidelines?
Now it would be disappointingto them.
So your local school board?
What are they doing?
See earlier on in the podcast.
In a previous episode I've saidyou have to take their shame and
you have to put it back intheir face.
Okay, if you have a leader thatis telling you CDC says XYZ to
justify a draconian measure ornot opening school, put that
(28:06):
shame back in their face.
No, they didn't.
The entire point of theguidelines is there are
guidelines.
These are best practices.
You can't meet all of them.
Look, maybe you can't do sixfeet of separation, but if you
spread the desks all the wayfrom wall to wall, maybe we can
get five feet.
Okay, great, the guideline issix.
We can't get six, so we'll bestpractice it and go to five.
That's what the CDC wants tosee happen.
(28:26):
Hey, you know what we shouldn'tdo assemblies.
We can still have all the otherfunctions of school, but we
just shouldn't do assemblies.
Or how about this Instead ofhaving an hour lunch with two
half hour, you know, half theschool eats in the first half
hour, half the school eats andthe second half hour, spread it
out over three, make it an hourand a half.
That way you reduce the load inthe cafeteria by three.
(28:47):
That's called followingguidelines.
They're not prescriptions onmust be.
This Can't open the school ifyou can't get six feet of
separation 100% of the time.
No, no, no, no.
Find what works on yourindividual school.
There are rural schools inAmerica where they could do 10
(29:09):
feet of separation if theywanted to.
You know there's communitiesthat have slowly had their
populations go down, that stillhave huge schools right, I know
a couple of them in WesternWashington where you've got like
a school that's much largerthan the community needs because
of the logging industry left.
Eventually, the kids left andso you're left with these huge
schools with like 50 kids inthem.
There's no need for anythingthere.
They can achieve all of thesocial separation guidelines.
Here's another one.
This was more of a longer forminterview and it's chopped up,
(29:30):
but it's chopped up to just kindof the things that we need to
hear.
Now.
Robert Redford in ClassicFaction does what's called
double speak, so he'll say hispoint and then sometimes he kind
of backs off.
It a little bit because youknow devils in the details.
There's nuance to this stuff ita little bit because you know
devils in the details.
There's nuance to this stuff,but don't get lost in what he's
saying.
The signal and the noise right.
Robert Redfield is not onTrump's side.
(29:51):
Robert Redfield is not on theside of we should just open up
the economy, and this wholething's a scam.
He is benefiting personally fartoo much from the financial
instruments that are being usedin this coronavirus thing, the
bailouts, the vaccine money.
You follow the money, you willfind Robert Redfield is getting
some of it.
So I'm not saying that this islike our savior.
(30:14):
What I'm saying is he, as theleader of CDC, where the buck
has to stop, will eventually beheld accountable if the CDC is
doing things that are just wrong.
And so he's trying to protecthis institution, and rightly so.
But listen to the way he goesthrough this.
Speaker 9 (30:29):
CDC encourages all schools, all schools, to do what
they need to reopen.
The guidance that we've put out, as the Secretary mentioned, is
guidance and I want people tosee it as guidance to reopen.
Mentioned is guidance and Iwant people to see it as
guidance to reopen.
Nothing would cause me greatersadness than to see any school
(30:50):
district or school use ourguidance as a reason not to
reopen.
Cdc never recommended generalschool closure throughout this
pandemic.
We see schools, as has alreadybeen mentioned, as a vital part
of our society.
Is that we have to stay focusedon protecting the vulnerable,
those individuals that havemultiple medical conditions,
(31:12):
those individuals that areelderly with multiple medical
conditions.
As I mentioned, our householdstudies, the role that children
play in the transmission cycle.
For example, in our householdstudies, so far there was
limited implications that thevirus was brought into the
household by a child.
I think when we looked atindividuals under the age of 45,
(31:44):
they represent 2.4% of all thedeaths in this country and when
you look at them, thoseindividuals under 45 frequently
had a significant comorbidity,significant obesity, diabetes,
type 1.
So this virus does seem to bevery limited pathogenicity for
children, but I do think gettingahead of the curve that you're
talking about how you're goingto handle cases of COVID in the
(32:05):
school when you diagnose them,so that doesn't become some type
of you know nine o'clock atnight phone call tree that goes
through the community and thenext thing you know you have the
school shut down for you know aweek, rather than everyone
being on board.
How we're going to handle this.
I think that's really importantfrom a risk versus risk point
of view, that we need to reopenour schools and we need to plan
(32:31):
to keep our schools reopened.
I think this really is theimportant message and this is
why we're having thesediscussions to get people to
understand that we need toreopen the schools.
We can do this safely.
We need to commit to it and weneed just to get it done.
Speaker 2 (32:49):
That's it, guys.
So when someone says the CDCsays the CDC says no, no, they
didn't.
The CDC didn't say that.
The CDC is saying get back toschool, don't use our guidelines
as a rationale to not open backup.
Okay.
So now we're going to jump overto New Jersey here and this is
a.
This is actually someone else'svideo and it's dubbed over, but
(33:11):
he does a pretty good analysis,so I'm just going to let it
play.
But this is.
They're talking about the deathrate.
And listen.
The facts are facts.
They're a stubborn thing.
They're not going to change.
Focus on the facts and you'lldebunk all of the spin.
See the signal through thenoise, right?
So listen to this smartreporter who breaks this down
(33:33):
and you'll hear the commentary.
Hold on.
Maybe this is a littledifferent video format for me
here.
Speaker 5 (33:42):
It reported the death of a teenager in Cook County.
Are you familiar with this case?
If so, is this the state'sfirst teenage death and can you
tell us if the teenager inquestion had underlying
conditions?
Speaker 8 (33:57):
Okay, we're going to get a definition now of how you
can determine whether or notsomeone died with COVID.
Speaker 10 (34:10):
Very simple.
I don't have that informationat my disposal at this time.
I know we have had people ofall age groups die.
I just want to be clear interms of the definition of
people die.
Speaker 8 (34:22):
Okay, here comes the definition of death by COVID.
As long as you were positivefor COVID when you died, you are
(34:48):
a COVID death.
Even if you got in a car wreckor you fell off a cliff, for
whatever reason that you died,as long as you had COVID, it's
counted as a COVID death.
Listen.
Speaker 10 (34:57):
So that means that if you were in hospice and had
already been given a you know afew weeks to live, and then you
also were found to have COVID,that would be counted as a COVID
death.
There it was.
Speaker 8 (35:12):
Okay, she's going to make it more simple for us.
Speaker 10 (35:15):
It means that if, technically, even if you died of
a clear alternate cause but youhad COVID at the same time,
it's still listed as a COVIDdeath.
You died of a clear alternatecause, but you had COVID at the
same time, it's still listed asa COVID death.
Speaker 8 (35:26):
So technically, even if you died of an alternate
cause, if you had COVID when youdied, it's called a COVID death
.
You wonder why the numbers aremessed up.
Speaker 2 (35:38):
So to put this in perspective, we actually have a
lower total death rate than wedid last year at the same time.
So if you take the annualamount of deaths for all causes
and then you put it on, thisyear, we have a lower total
cause of death.
But we've got this huge COVIDnumber right, this COVID number.
But look at the total number offlu deaths that's way down like
(36:00):
to 6,000.
And we stopped counting.
The CDC doesn't want thatinformation anymore.
Pneumonia that's a standalonething, right, and it's caused by
a lot of different reasons.
No cases, none, zero.
Okay, you go through the otherissues here and it's like, oh,
(36:27):
this is a scam.
This wasn't any worse than anyregular year.
The average age of death forcoronavirus patients is above
the average age of death.
Look at what they said aboutpeople under 45, what Dr
Redfield said Of the 40,.
You know, 2% of all the COVIDdeaths, of all the COVID deaths
that have been coded, 2% of them.
There are 130,000, 2% of them,right, I mean Washington state.
(36:48):
13% of our reported numbers arenot COVID.
So you know, I figure 13% isprobably across the country, but
let's just go with the bignumber 130,000,.
2% of those are under 45.
So you know you're talking what2,000, see 100,000, 2% of
100,000 is.
Is that 20?
Whatever you get the point, youstart doing that and then he
(37:09):
says, oh, and they have majorcomorbidities.
Well, how many of the peopleunder 45 were the car wrecks,
the gunshot wounds, right, thethings that had absolutely
nothing to do with coronavirus?
It's a scam.
This is the largest corrupt,criminal gaslighting program
that's ever been run on theworld and lots of people are
falling for it.
(37:29):
They are taking our freedoms inthe name of science and
medicine.
It devolves upon you, theperson listening to me talking,
to take a stand somewhere.
Take a stand, open your eyes.
The numbers are fake.
We know we've relied to aboutthe origins of the virus.
(37:52):
China's never even fessed up tospreading it.
They never even told the who.
I mean we're leaving the WorldHealth Organization over this
thing because they mishandled it.
They never even told the who.
I mean we're leaving the WorldHealth Organization over this
thing because they mishandled it.
Based on the current data andnumbers that we have now, this
was never a pandemic.
It never reached the level ofpandemic.
All the projections that we hadended up being bunk faults.
(38:16):
This is an incredible,incredible exercise in
gaslighting.
Now, last thing, last thing Iwant to cover is I want to cover
elections.
Okay, elections are one ofthose things that's absolutely
critical for it.
All right.
So this is about electionintegrity and this comes from
Amber Crawback.
She is running for Washington'sfourth district, for, I think,
(38:39):
house, and so, anyways, she'sjust she's running, and if
you're in her district, if yousee her signs, see her, vote for
her man, she is on top of it,but she says this.
So I'm just going to read herthread.
Time to take a systematic lookat some Washington state
election integrity concerns, ifpossible.
I'd love for our region's mostdiligent researchers and
reporters to take a look at thisas well.
And I'm just going to read thethread and I'll just mention the
(39:01):
links and evidence she has hereas a preemptive point of
clarification.
I will be supporting Secretaryof State Kim Wyman's re-election
this year.
My best guess is that she isstuck between a rock and a hard
place on this issue.
I have no doubt she is wellqualified for the job she has
taken on.
Here we go Over the last 40years, the Washington state
legislature has systematicallymade changes to the state's
election system that I believeundermine our elections to the
(39:23):
point that we can no longerprovide assurance of election
integrity to the people ofWashington state.
Starting in the mid-1980s,permanent absentee voting was
established for retirees andthose struggling with
disabilities.
In the early 1990s the benefitswere expanded to include any
voter in Washington state.
To include any voter inWashington state In November
2004,.
Shortly after moving toWashington, I witnessed the most
(39:44):
Washingtonians would considerthe most memorable example of
mail-in balloting troubles inour history, illustrated in the
gubernatorial race betweenChristine Grigor and Dino Rossi.
And then she's got the charthere and it looks, based on the
chart, that Dino Rossi ran awaywith this thing.
To cite Dino Rossi, winningboth the election and the
automatic recount.
Gregor took the seat afteradditional ballots were
discovered, additional ballotsdiscovered in a second manual
(40:05):
recount paid for by Gregor.
And then she's got all thelinks and the articles here.
Side note the law firm Gregorhired to manage the manual
recount happened to be.
Remember the names guys PerkinsCoie who's Perkins Coie?
Perkins Coie is the law firmthat Hillary Clinton hired to
pay Fusion GPS in England andGlenn Simpson to create the
Steele dossier to meddle in anelection.
(40:27):
So Gregor previously hiredPerkins Coie, a now known
election meddler through theRussiagate scandal, to also
oversee the recount inWashington Gosh, how convenient,
right?
Maybe the Russiagate scandalwasn't the first time Perkins
Coie meddled in an election, gofigure.
After Grigor's team hadcompleted a manual recount and
(40:49):
was declared the winner by 133votes.
So after she was the winner by133 votes for state governor,
with ballots being found afterthe race was called originally,
over 1,000 fraudulently castballots were identified by
Rossi's team.
Because Washington voters don'tdeclare party when registering,
(41:09):
there was no way to determinethose votes helped.
Under Christine Gregor,washington election policy
changed quite rapidly.
In 2009, she signed theNational Popular Vote Bill
obligating Washington's electorsto cast their vote for the
National Popular Vote winnerrather than the state popular
vote winner.
One of the major loopholes inthe Washington election
integrity is, so long as theregistrant has a name, address,
(41:32):
id number, signature and checkin the I am a citizen box, our
Secretary of State is legallyprohibited from verifying the
person's registration is valid.
One of my biggest concernsabout election integrity in
Washington State is that we havenever run an audit for our
voter rolls for non-citizens andnon-residents.
Since we are a sanctuary state,our cities struggle with
(41:54):
rampant homelessness problem,which is a major fraud risk.
Up until recently, this type ofaudit was all but impossible to
do because there was nodatabase of US citizens
available to use to query theWashington state voter base.
It would have been required amanual auditing, which does not
appear to be lawful.
However, as of a few months ago, dh Secretary, governor or
Department of Health and DHS Govhas provided a citizenship
(42:17):
database that state officialscan use to verify census
information.
Washington's Secretary of Stateshould be legally permitted to
use this database in her effortsto maintain and clean voter
rolls.
I am frustrated that this workhasn't happened, but I am
assuming that the reasonSecretary Wyman has not already
run this audit is because it'san election year for her and she
will be sued into the groundfor it by the left, not because
(42:38):
they have cause, so we'll justhave to wait for assurance of
election integrity.
2019 was a particularly busyyear for dismantling the
security of Washington stateelections.
We saw same-day registrationimplemented for the first time.
This year, automatic voterregistration implemented even
those who are not eligible tovote like 16-year-olds and, as a
side note, there are only ahandful of specific agencies
(42:58):
that are permitted toautomatically register voters
who employ their services.
The approved list appears toconsist of agencies that provide
social services to underservedpopulations.
So basically, if you're usingany kind of welfare program in
Washington, they automaticallyregister you to vote.
Another issue of electionintegrity hasn't gotten much
attention is the inclusion ofprovisions that now allow tribal
IDs to be used as valid IDregistering to vote in
(43:20):
Washington State, even if theapplicant doesn't have a
verifiable address.
This is a significant hindranceto our assurance of election
integrity, as I don't believeWashington State officials have
any jurisdiction over tribal IDs.
I don't believe we even havethe authority to get the number
of new tribal IDs given out eachyear, much less a list of names
.
This means there is no UnitedStates checks and balances to
ensure the individuals receivingtribal IDs are US citizens, and
(43:43):
it is reasonable to beconcerned that non-citizens from
Central America are illegallyimmigrating into our tribal
communities.
So the question is howdifficult is it in the sanctuary
state of Washington for anindividual from Central America
to get a tribal ID in Washingtonstate and use it to register to
vote, and how might the triballeaders be compensated for
bringing in and hiding illegalimmigrants?
Interestingly, on top of thelack of oversight accountability
(44:05):
, there was a lot of state andfederal money given to the
tribes this year.
Washington Senator Patty Murraywas very happy to know hundreds
of millions that would be givento tribes for the purpose of
building new housing, fromspecial provisions for the
governor to entering intoagreements with tribes, to
providing taxpayer funding forhealth care and more.
In any case, washington triballeaders made out big time this
year in financial provision andbenefits.
(44:27):
Thanks to Washingtonbureaucrats, even broadband
internet, which we can't get for10 houses in my rural
neighborhood for under 100K.
They're getting it in all.
The tribes House leaderrepresent, jt Wilcox and his
family seem to have quite anintimate relationship with a
number of tribal leaders.
I think it might be helpful tohave his thoughts and agreements
on these provisions as well.
Thank you for letting me know,yep.
(44:50):
So that's the end of our thread.
Pretty fascinating.
So, guys, election integrityhere's the deal.
The game plan has to change.
We got to fight like the leftfights.
That means you got to go topeople that are unreasonable,
that are jerks.
You got to call their employer.
You got to do the exact samething they do to conservatives.
It is the only way to play.
They have changed the rules.
They've changed the groundrules.
(45:11):
This election that's coming up,there's no guarantee of nothing.
There's no guarantee of nothing.
If it's not such anoverwhelming, stomping victory
from the right, they'll steal it.
They stole this election thatshe's talking about here by 133
votes, with a minimum of athousand votes cast fraudulently
(45:31):
Minimum.
They will steal it and you areliving through the precursor to
what they're going to do.
You think it's bad now?
You think it's a littleunfortunate now?
Just wait.
You just wait until they getfull control again.
What Donald Trump is doing isthe right thing.
He's allowing the local states,the local government, the
(45:53):
different nations to handletheir own stuff.
Us citizens need to be enraged.
If our local leaders aren'thelping us, you can't blame
Donald Trump.
You can't blame Donald Trump.
All right, you can find me.
You can find me on Twitter atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Facebook atthe Peasants Perspective, and
(46:16):
you can email me at peasantspodat gmailcom.
I look forward to talking toyou again tomorrow.
Thanks for spending some timewith me today.
Speaker 1 (46:26):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working classes oh,there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Pleaseplease good people.
(46:47):
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week, yes, but all thedecisions of that officer have
to be ratified at a specialbi-weekly meeting.
(47:07):
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of pure internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the l he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
(47:29):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
(47:51):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
(48:12):
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
That's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.