Democracy vs. Republic: Understanding Our Constitutional Foundation

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Wow, that's really loud, that's loud, wow, wow.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
Could be this.
Got this maxed out.

Speaker 3 (00:29):
And when they went to the queen to tell her her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here, youtake the bomb we're getting
screwed man.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's going tobe through podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's got to stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.

(01:07):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasants Perspective.
We made it.
We made it All it all.
Right, I'm getting the chatsout.
Where are the chats on therumble?

(01:29):
Oh, I know what the problem is.
I'm looking at yesterday's.
Oh man, good morning everybody.
Welcome to another episode ofthe peasants perspective.
We're so glad to have you.
We've got more fallout from theTrump Russia meeting, as well
as and I'd call it fallout, andI'd as well as we've got a whole

(01:51):
bunch of fun stuff we're goingto be looking at today, so let's
go ahead and dive in.
Just as a little reminder, thisis Janine Janine Piro.
She was the judge that was onFox News for years and years and
years.
Apparently, she used to be anold prosecutor up in New York, I
believe.
Well, she's now the UnitedStates attorney for the District

(02:11):
of Columbia, and she arrestedsomeone yesterday for attempting
to eliminate Donald Trump.

Speaker 7 (02:17):
Hi everyone, it's Judge Janine.
I just wanted to let you knowhere from the United States
Attorney's Office in DC, fromthe United States Attorney's
Office in DC, that an individualby the name of Nathalie Rose
Jones is now in custody, chargedwith two federal crimes, for
knowingly and willfullythreatening to take the life of
the President of the UnitedStates.
She did come from New York toWashington DC and she has been

(02:40):
threatening and calling for theremoval of the president.
And, even worse, as she got toDC, her threats were on Facebook
and Instagram and she continuedto call the president a
terrorist and was working tohave him eliminated.
She is now in custody.
She will be prosecuted to thefull extent of the law.

(03:01):
Make no mistake about that.

Speaker 2 (03:04):
All right, I got real mixed feelings about this.

Speaker 8 (03:07):
I wonder what kind of a care in this was.
See, that's the challenge,because this could have been my
aunt.

Speaker 2 (03:14):
That's the challenge.
I remember when I was in prison,there was this guy.
His name was Beck and hisgrandma was a super fan of
January.
There you go.
I wrote her a couple of lettersand he gave me a Jordan
Peterson book which I need toreturn to him somewhere.
He's got about six, seven moreyears on his sentence, but
anyways, he his grandma Right,who's like a big, huge Trump

(03:38):
supporter and a big fan ofJanuary Sixers.
She was like so you're in therewith January Sixers, oh my gosh
, give him a hug.
And she was like so excited,you're in there with january
sixers, oh my gosh, give him ahug.

Speaker 9 (03:47):
And then she was like why do I think of that?
Joe biden?

Speaker 2 (03:48):
I just want to poke his eye, as I'm like mom, you
can't say this on the on theprison phones they listen to
this stuff.
Yeah, she's like I just feelthat way I'd punch his throat.
Anyways, I just want to throatpunch him.
He was a bitter boy man, he.
I remember one time stepping byon the, walking by him on the
phone, and he's like oh, theyjust want to take us out in the
field and shoot us in the head.

(04:09):
Mom, oh geez, oh, he had a realbum rap deal.
He was got a gun and drugcharge.
Oh no, anyways, he was fromalabama and it showed, but uh,
but uh, he was down on the gulfcoast, but uh, he got

(04:34):
transferred from where I was atdown to pensacola and he was
like I'm going close to home.
Apparently his house is likeacross the river, across the bay
or something like that.

Speaker 8 (04:38):
You know I'm not from the south, but I know that you,
when you start talking badabout Bama, you get yourself in
trouble really fast.

Speaker 2 (04:49):
Those boys.
They're good guys.
My best friends in prison werefrom Mississippi, you know.
So that is what it is OK.
So I'm a little I have likethis kind of concern with this
lady getting arrested, comingdown to eliminate donald trump.
Now, on one hand, totallylegitimate, can't be threatened
in public officials can't betrialing to dc.

(05:10):
You can't have the ways, themeans or the you know.
If you're out there trying tohire hits or something like that
, you're going down.
But just knowing what I know Imean, did she have a bike rack
exactly?
Just knowing what I know,having been through the, the
trial, right, they'll pull outstuff that you had zero
intention to mean.
Anything like me putting out anemoji fire, light them up.

(05:33):
Tweet made it into trial thatwent out in the summer bullhorn
in her backpack yeah, in thesummer of 2020.
So the crazy thing about thisis I had this political article
pulled up, but we'll play thisother art.
We'll show you this otherarticle first.
So meanwhile, on one handthey've gotten an indictment or
they've arrested this girl.
I don't actually know thenature of exactly how they

(05:54):
arrested her, but in DC, rightthe electorate there's like 96
percent Democrat and I used tohave this thought oh, oh, that
doesn't really matter, like ifyou present somebody with a
crime, most people will see thecrime.
That is not the case.
So julie kelly posts thisanother example of what the
trump doj is up against.

(06:15):
In washington dc.
This month, a dc grand jurytwice refused to indict a woman
arrested for interfering, thenassaulting, an fbi agent
involved in an ICE operation inWashington.
This is particularlyinfuriating.
The same DC grand juriesquickly brought the same charge,
the 111 felony.
I got that one against hundredsof J6s, even for minor scuffles

(06:37):
with police.
The magistrate judge assignedto the case, michael Harvey,
signed hundreds of J6 arrestwarrants.
Harvey is now low key mockingthe doj for for lacking evidence
in the case rather thanadmitting an indictment on the
assault.
Interference statute depends onthe political affiliation of the
individual charge andsympathetic dc residents sitting
on the grand jury.
Us attorney pierre's officeadmits grand jury refused ice

(06:59):
interference charges twice.
So it comes down here.
Two presentations to the grandjury returned a bill, no bill.
Both times a bill is a bill ofindictment.
Harvey said suggesting theevidence is wanting, given the
standard for indictment, isprobable cause, suggesting the
government may never get anindictment.
Grand juries are tasked withdeciding whether there is
reasonable basis to supportcharging someone with a crime a

(07:20):
much lower burden forprosecution than the than a
beyond a reasonable doubtstandard of criminal juries, and
typically take their decisionafter hearing evidence only from
the government.
At the federal level grandjuries return indictments or
true bills in the vast majorityof cases.
So they've been rejected twicein front of a grand jury in DC,
probably again because ofaffiliation.

(07:42):
And oh, this is an illegalimmigrant and it's an ice.
You know it's for an ice raid.
The zeitgeist is real.
There was an expectation in dcthat you would convict all
january sixers.
In fact, uh, one of the jurymembers in my jury her spouse,
wife her wife was a journalistfor the atlantic magazine

(08:02):
actually came out to my houseand interviewed my wife.
She was on the jury and she waslike, oh, I hope I'm not on one
of these January 6 cases.
Now you are.
In fact, during the void yearof my trial, multiple jurors had
already served on January 6trials and were dismissed so
they were recycling the jurypool.
Oh geez, yeah.
So in more DC news, fbi tapsMissouri attorney general to be

(08:26):
number two at the fbi.
This is a gentleman namedandrew bailey.
He's to share the role insecond in command at the fbi as
the administration tries tocontain tension over the
handling of files related to thesex offender jeffrey epstein.
I actually don't think that'sthe case.
I think what's happening isbongino can only do so much, and
so they're bringing in a secondhand, because on one hand,

(08:47):
they're cleaning up DC, they'regoing, they're doing major
nationwide initiatives againstchild trafficking and other like
violent crimes, and they'regoing after the grand conspiracy
case.

Speaker 8 (08:59):
Well, also, they're targeting sanctuary cities and
targeting sanctuary cities, yep.

Speaker 2 (09:05):
So bailey has resigned as attorney general for
missouri and he'll be movingout to dc and assisting bongino
in that role.
Some people have said, oh, thisis the end of bongino, he's
going to go after this.
Some people have said, no,that's not really the case.
I tend to think this isprobably going to be two guys in
that role.
I think one of them is going todo your normal fbi work and the

(09:25):
other one's going to do thegrand conspiracy.
Yeah, specialized stuff.

Speaker 8 (09:29):
That's my opinion I think if mon gena was going to
be gone, he'd be gone now.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
The previous attorney for missouri was their now
senator, eric schmidt very goodsenator, and he was a very good
attorney general.
He's the one who sued the bidenadministration over censorship,
which ultimately they lost, andI think it's still kind of
working through the courts.
And then andrew bailey tookover.
Andrew bailey continued a bunchof these really pro mega

(09:54):
lawsuits.
Missouri, and no doubt about it, is the center of the political
rights lawfare movement.
Missouri is the center of theconservative universe when it
comes to legal matters.
They have the most, the bestlegal brains coming out of there
.
They're smattered all throughthe federal government.
They are by a mile leading theway.

(10:16):
It's kind of the equivalent oflike what New York produces as
far as liberal attorneys,missouri produces conservative
attorneys.
Wow, now Andrew Bailey.

Speaker 8 (10:24):
I got no idea, idea.
I mean, how are they floatingunder the radar like that?

Speaker 2 (10:28):
they don't.
So trump's lead uh generalcounsel is uh al al scharf or
eric scharf al scharf, I can'tremember his name, but he's also
from missouri and he ranagainst andrew bailey for
attorney general.
Got a little bit of mud fightbetween the two of them because
andrew bailey is a good old farmbred, grown missouri boy and
schmidt is born in missouri buthe's educated in new york, has

(10:51):
big new york donors, hasconnections right.

Speaker 12 (10:54):
So that was the thing, oh you don't want some
new york guy.

Speaker 2 (10:56):
He's really not missourian, he's new york but of
course he was trump's attorneythat won, uh, multiple of those
appeals, like he was Trump'sattorney and now he's Trump's
general counsel.
So a lot of people when ithappened, the local talk radio
down in Missouri cause you knowI listened every day, the local
talk radio down in Missouri waslike this might be a blessing
because sharp is being, you know, going to the white house and

(11:20):
he's probably going to end up insome like appeals court judge,
ship or something and he's goingto bless the day that he didn't
end up being attorney generalbecause he'll have much longer
impact going the route he'sgoing with his pedigree.
But Ed Martin, who's also fromMissouri Okay, you know who Ed
Martin is Eagle Ed Martin.
We played him yesterday in theprivate side nine minute video

(11:42):
with oh yeah.
Yeah, so Ed Martin's also frommissouri so it was my attorney,
mark mccluskey, dealing with myj6 stuff.
So missouri is the center ofthe conservative political
universe.
When it comes to law and legallawyers, florida is probably the
base, but missouri isdefinitely the law uh breeding
ground.
You.

(12:02):
They don't have nice beaches todistract law students, so they
keep busy.
But anyways, one of the thingsabout Andrew Bailey, again, just
seeing things from allperspectives, I was in prison
and while I was in prison therewere two separate cases in
Missouri that were Missouristate capital murder charges.
Both of them returnedacquittals when the person was

(12:24):
on death row, so they'd beenthrough multiple appeals or
whatever, and one of them camethrough, if I'm not mistaken, no
evidence and a completemistrial which overturned the
conviction and supposed to.
That person was supposed towalk free.
He'd been, she had been inprison I 12 years or 20 years

(12:45):
some very long time.

Speaker 8 (12:46):
No evidence.
How'd she get convicted in thefirst place?
It?

Speaker 2 (12:48):
happens all the time, dude.

Speaker 8 (12:49):
Oh my gosh.

Speaker 2 (12:50):
Go talk to the Innocence Project.

Speaker 8 (12:51):
All right.

Speaker 2 (12:52):
Like it happens all the time.
So she went to go get releasedthere were two instances, so if
I cross stories I'm sorry, butwent to go get released and
Andrew Bailey submitted a motionbasically saying we can't let
her out of prison because of herbehavior in prison oh geez what
because she'd gotten in fightsand stuff like that.
So therefore you couldn't lether out and it's like, well, she

(13:13):
shouldn't have been there inthe first place.
You put her in that position,you, the state right.
So I believe he lost thatappeal.
But he fought hard to keep aninnocent woman in prison.
Okay Fought hard, okay, and thecourt basically said let her out
by midnight on a certain date.
And they finally did.
There was another gentleman,the same thing he was.

(13:34):
He was in prison, death row.
He was exonerated, casedismissed.
The court ordered him removed.
He gave away all his stuff inprison, gave it all away, was
sitting in discharge, called r&d, receiving and discharge, or
sitting in discharge with hispaperwork to process out, and
his wife was on the way to theprison to pick him up and andrew

(13:55):
bailey called it off, sent himback to his cell and filed a
motion to essentially retry thething I believe that I believe.
Ultimately it prevailed and theguy got out.
But his wife got on the radio,conservative radio.
Why is this happening?
This is so not fair.
You know very tragic story.
In fact she went on to Fox Newsand talked about it.
That's Andrew Bailey.
So Andrew Bailey, bulldog forthe conservatives, real MAGA

(14:20):
warrior, but like many MAGAfolks, we lean on the side of
fascism.

Speaker 8 (14:25):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (14:26):
It's just the truth.
We lean on the side of thestate.
We back the blue to a fault,even when they're wrong.
I don't know that.
That's the way I want to be,because I've been on the side of
the wrong when the blue iswrong.

Speaker 8 (14:39):
I don't want to be like that.

Speaker 2 (14:42):
Exactly so.
I point this out, not becauseI'm not supportive.
I cheer this on.
I think andrew bailey is agreat attorney general.
I would love to have him as myattorney general.
He'll keep your streets clean.
But unfortunately, theconservatives motto is better
that 10 guilty men walk freethan one innocent men go to jail
, and conservatives are usuallymore like.

(15:03):
It's better that 10 innocentmen go to jail than one guilty
man walk free.
And I say that not because Ithink that's at the core of
people's hearts, but it's at thecore of the policies okay, does
that make sense?

Speaker 8 (15:15):
well, because I was trying to read my heart going.
I can't find that anywhere.

Speaker 2 (15:20):
It's not what we want .
It's not what we want.
It's not at the court.
We, we all agree, better that.
I hear what you're saying but inpractice it's wrapped up in the
policy.
In practice, right In Florida,you go to jail.
In Florida, you do somethingwrong, you commit a motor
vehicle violation, you getcaught shoplifting, you go to
jail.
There's no extenuatingcircumstances, there's no

(15:42):
understanding.
You go to jail here inwashington right, you might not
go to jail, they're going tohear your story out.
They're going to take all theequities into account.
Oh, you're poor.
Okay, you can steal.
I don't like that either.
Yeah, right, it's.
It's the two.
You've gone too far to the leftand the right, and then
ultimately, I, you both end upwith a boot on my neck because
you both got to clean up thestreets, right?
and at that point, nobody caresabout the innocent I watched a

(16:05):
piece yesterday.

Speaker 8 (16:05):
It was another country, it's australia, um but
a gentleman had a little bit toomuch to drink and he ran over
some kids and killed four ofthem and went to jail you know,
deservedly and the the piece wasinteresting because the man in
jail got to meet the father ofthe kids.

(16:29):
Oh, sorry, and and it's kind ofan interesting meeting up when
you're meeting up with the guythat murdered your kids, and
this father understood that thiswas an accident and this guy
truly was.
He was extremely sorry, ofcourse, but both of them

(16:54):
recognized that the reason he'sin jail is not because it's to
protect the public.
Yeah.
And that's it.
And this gentleman that ranover the kids understood that
and he's like you know, itdoesn't matter what the feelings

(17:14):
are between, because he wasvery repentant and the father
was very forgiving and sobetween them they were basically
family now and there was noanimosity between them.
But this guy's staying in jailPrice had to be paid, price had
to be paid for the public, yep,and that was kind of the point I

(17:35):
pulled away from that wholestory and I just thought that
was interesting to bring that upat this moment, just because of
what we're talking about.

Speaker 2 (17:41):
That was my big aha.
It wasn't a big aha in prison,just because of what we're
talking about.
That was my big aha.
It wasn't a big aha in prison,but I remember, prior to going
to prison, a family member saidwell, I want felons to go to
jail, so if you're found guilty,you know you're a felon.
You're going to jail and I waslike I don't know, like I, I I'm
not a drug dealer you know whatI mean.
Like I don't know that I don'tknow that these things are equal

(18:01):
.
And through time and watchingmy trial and then for him it was
actually watching DonaldTrump's New York trial that's
when he was like this isn'tright, this isn't how it's
supposed to be.
And that's when he started tolook at my case and was like, oh
, I can see more what'shappening here.
But he said that I want, I wantfelons to go to jail.
And I thought what a virtue,right, what a virtue that gets
weaponized.

(18:21):
Well, we want bad guys to go tojail.
So if you say he's a bad guy,then go to jail.
Well, who's saying he's a badguy?
Have you heard both sides, youknow?
And when I got to prison I gotby the time I got there and I
started, especially when Istarted realizing most of these
people need rehab, and you'relike you could probably cut the
prison population in half if youjust had decent rehab centers.

(18:43):
But then I started to see thereal underworkings and I was
like, oh no, some of thesepeople here are sociopaths.
People here will eat your faceoff.
They do not have regard forpublic safety or cooperation or
anything like that.
And so, yes, the state's job isto protect society from our own
vices, from our own, theproducts of our families.

(19:05):
That don't go well.
You know what I mean.
Like I get it, but but therehas to be some type of balance.
I'm not, I'm not sitting heresaying here's the solution,
we're all dumb for not doing it.
I'm saying these arecomplicated issues and,
unfortunately, this is why I say, in practice, conservatives
would rather see 10 innocent menin prison than one guilty man

(19:27):
walk free.
In its utility, in its practice, because of this idea of law
and order and you know what Imean Like it's better to
sacrifice one or two innocentpeople.

Speaker 8 (19:37):
In this Australia case, the thought was that the
public is being protectedbecause there is this, you know
state that'll do it.
Yeah, yeah and there is such aa damning, you know, consequence
, and so if the consequence isnot, you know, followed through,

(19:57):
then you know what's the pointof having a consequence, or even
a law in the books yes, so yep.

Speaker 2 (20:04):
No, you got to fall through and again, I'm not
sitting here acting like I gotall the answers.
In fact, I'm the exact opposite.
I don't have all the answers,but I know that there's some
things I don't like.
There's also some crossover here, because we have some
politicians that seem to thinkthat they can kind of do
whatever they want without anyaccountability, and, uh, it
would be nice to see someaccountability, just for

(20:26):
accountability's sake and whatyou see is when the democrats
are in charge, or the left, orthe conservative, or the
liberals, or the collectivistsor the communists or whatever
you want to call them right,they'll come after the middle
class right, whereas when therepublicans are in charge,
they'll come after the lowerclass it's kind of a different,
but either way, they're kind ofjust coming after people.

(20:47):
Some of them need to becomeafter.
Obviously, I'm a huge supporterof deportations, so this is a
flashback clip.
This is from steve pichenik.
Oh, I was going to mention oneother thing.
I watched a documentary yearsago about the green river killer
and when he was being sentencedyou know all the victims
families was you're evil, you'rethe devil incarnate just he
just sat there completely stonecold, like he did not care.

(21:07):
But when one man got up and hewas he looked like santa claus
big beard, big round belly.
He even had suspenders on andhe was like I forgive you.
You know, find god in yourheart, I forgive you.
Blah, blah and the green riverkiller just became an emotional
mess.
It was forgiveness that piercedhis heart rancor, bitterness,
anger he could deal with that hecould deal with that.

(21:27):
He couldn't deal withforgiveness okay, so this is
steve pachanik and this is, uh,back when he was on alex jones's
show right after the 2016election, and there was this.
I'm playing this because I Ifell victim to this, but I
didn't believe it, but I wantedto believe it.
Does that make sense?
Yeah, I wanted to believe this.

(21:49):
It gave me hopium.
In fact, I believe we evenplayed this on the show and
talked about I remember playingsome Bill Barr clips that gave
me a lot of hopium you want somehopium.
Let's get this, as we were inthat transition period between
the 2016 election and January6th and then January 20th, so at
the point that this came out,I'm pretty sure I was already
well, I know for a fact, I wasalready indicted.

(22:10):
Didn't know it yet, but thiscame out and this was like the
last little shot of Hopian thatmaybe at the last moment
there'll be some type of youknow, military intervention.
Somebody's coming to come inand do the right thing military
intervention.

Speaker 19 (22:24):
Somebody's coming to come in and do the right thing.
Let me just say again what Isaid in 2016.
There are honorable members ofour intelligence, military and
civilian community in thegovernment who understood
exactly how corrupt Biden andthe Democratic machinery is, was
and will be.
This is really a stingoperation, contrary to what

(22:47):
everybody else said.
Trump knew this was happening,eric knew this was happening and
warned the public.
I knew this was happening.
However, I could not sayanything about it.

Speaker 2 (22:59):
What happened was we so Steve Pachanik, just so you,
you guys know he writesfictional stories.
Now he used to work at thestate department, allegedly also
involved with the cia, and he'sone of these script writers so
is he like tom clancy well, uh,his operations that he wrote
that then were acted out byseals and whatever did make it

(23:23):
into Tom Clancy novels.
Yes, so those guys get theirtips and their storylines from
real life events and then theywrite a story about it and
that's the only way these secretoperators can get their claim
to fame.
Have you read that Clancy book?
I'm Roger in that book.
So Steve Pachinick is one ofthese guys and he and he works

(23:44):
with psyops, with the statedepartment, and he stretches all
the way back into Reagan.
Now he's retired.
So he comes on Alex Jones' showand does these little things.
And I don't know if he's goingto say it here in just a minute,
but Alex Jones kind ofchallenges him, like listen,
we've had everything promised tous and nothing has come through
.
We've just been out here dyingon the vine, steve, and Steve's
on the vine, steve and stuff.
Like well, I can speak thetruth because I don't have to
sell, you know, supplements tosurvive.

(24:05):
And alex took a little offense.
Well, this doesn't.
If there's not a sting, you'renever coming back on my show.
He's like that's great deal.
We're never coming back on yourshow.
He's back on his show because Ithink steve helps him sell some
lotions, potions and pills.
He's talking about the 2016election, having been this giant
stink.

Speaker 19 (24:22):
Watermark every ballot with what's called the
QFS blockchain encryption code.
In other words, we know prettywell where every ballot is,
where it went and who has it.
So this is not a stolenelection.
On the contrary, we reversedthe entire game of war along the

(24:44):
lines of the Sun Tzu the art ofwar and Trump was brilliant and
still is brilliant at it.
When the art of the war, youpull back, allow your enemy to
make all the mistakes that theyare making, manipulate the
situation, expose them and thencome in for the final killing.
And that's what's happening now.

(25:07):
None of this was unexpected.
The genius of Trump is that heis able to pull back at any
point and manipulate theopponent without the opponent
ever realizing.
And he said I will use commonsense or my intelligence, ie
both literal and figurativeintelligence.

(25:27):
What was not announced was thatwe watermarked all the ballots
with what I said at UFSblockchain, which is a very hard
encryption code to break.
And the second thing is we sentprobably 20,000 or more
National Guards 48 hours ago.
None of it was reported and Ithank the press for not

(25:49):
reporting it and others.
So what in fact is happening isyou're seeing a sophisticated
sting operation that wasinitiated by Trump.
I'm just a lowly peasant inthis game and, honestly, I was
informed that I could saysomething about it today only
last night.
This is not a surprise here.

(26:09):
This is the biggest stingoperation, probably in our
country, that we've ever had Touse it in terms of counting,
knowing which ones were fake,which ones were not.
It's a very sophisticated code,so if you just throw them away,
these are cyber communication,uh implementations that we have
the code for.
We know exactly what was thrownaway, we know exactly what was

(26:32):
placed, we know exactly who hasit and we know exactly where it
went.
I can't go any further thanthat what do you think of that,
ron?

Speaker 2 (26:41):
when was this, this clip?
Four years ago.
That was 2021, just afterJanuary 6th.

Speaker 8 (26:47):
This was the shot of hopium that was keeping me
moving.
I was like, okay, great, thisis art of war.
Blah, blah, blah.
We're going to get to see someof the most brilliant moves I've
ever seen in my life.

Speaker 2 (27:02):
All of a sudden, on January 20th they're going to
line up for the inauguration andhere's going to come the troops
.
Yeah, exactly, I think, and I'mwe're releasing the episode, so
eventually you'll get to hearin real time what our thoughts
on that were on the audio side.
So if you want to catch oldseason one episodes, uh, we've
been uploading them every day.
We upload an episode, currentepisode in an old episode.

(27:22):
Every day at 6 am the oldepisode comes out.
Those are from 2020 and 2021.
And it's hilarious because someof the titles you think we could
have played them today.
In fact there's almost likeoverlap sometimes Rod
Rosenstein's a day in the thingand then Rod Rosenstein makes it
in the new.
Hey, freaking people.
So if that wasn't a big stingoperation, I became fodderder in

(27:42):
it because clearly they didn'tprove anything.
Clearly the cyber ninja thingdidn't move the needle
nationally.
I mean, we all saw what we saw.
Clearly the cyber symposiumthat lindell did and that
information, the p caps orwhatever he got, that didn't
seem to go anywhere.
I don't know that anybodythat's meaningful disputes that
the machines are hackable, butthere's been multiple versions

(28:03):
of how they're hackable and it'shard to tell if we're talking
about different machines or ifit's just being let a full load
of bull bloney.
One of the things someone saidto me when you know, with the
steve pachinik clip was like,well, I mean, he's a spy doing
spy stuff, I mean how do you?
know you're not getting played.
It was like, oh my gosh, Itotally could be getting played.
This is insider, that's yourdouble agent right there, I

(28:27):
don't know.
So the reason I played that isbecause obviously yesterday
Trump put out the thing sayinghe's going to lead an effort to
end mail in voting and to endthe shady machines.
Well, mark Elias, you know MarkElias is right.
Mark Elias was one of thePerkins Cooey lawyers.
He's the lawyer that helpedlaunder the dossier into the fbi

(28:49):
.
He eventually the heat came onperkins cooey and he separated
from perkins cooey and startedhis own law firm.
But he's one of these democratlaw firms that does election
integrity, goes aftertransgender issues.
Basically it's a tds law firm.
You know anything tds, they'llwrite up a lawsuit.
So Mark Elias is beinginterviewed by this podcaster

(29:12):
and being asked specificallyabout.

Speaker 6 (29:13):
Trump's announcement about going after mail-in
ballots.
I am I'm pretty alarmed by thestatement that Trump put out on
Truth Social, the bleat he putout about mail-in ballots.
I want to read that foreverybody.
But first, mark, I guess I'mwondering could you give us kind
of an alarm scale for you onwhat you're seeing out of out of
the White House today onmail-in ballots?

Speaker 15 (29:31):
I think it's very alarming.
I think you know anytime thepresident of the United States
says that he is going to shutdown the predominant method of
voting in, you know, a quarterof the states, a method of
voting that Democratsdisproportionately rely on
versus Republicans, and, to boot, is also going to attack
unspecified voting equipment.
I'm not sure what votingequipment this is that he's

(29:52):
attacking, but he's going toattack that.
It is a, it is.
It is something we have to takeboth literally and seriously.

Speaker 6 (29:58):
Yeah.
So here's the statement beginsI'm going to lead a movement to
get rid of mail in ballots andalso, while we're at it, highly
inaccurate, very expensive andseriously controversial voting
machines which cost 10 timesmore than accurate and
sophisticated watermark paper,which is faster and leaves no
doubt.
Okay, so we'll stay with thatfor a second, but we move
forward.
He goes on to talk about how hehas an executive order plant.

(30:22):
Uh, he's finding a's signing anexecutive order to help bring
honesty to the 2026 midtermelections.
Remember, the states are merelya quote agent for the federal
government in counting andtabulating the votes.
They must do what the federalgovernment, as represented by
the president of the UnitedStates, me, tells them for the
good of our country.

(30:42):
There's a lot there.

Speaker 15 (30:44):
But the punctuationuation, the
capitalization, the occasionalquotations around words.
Kevin, you and I sharesomething in common you worked
for jeb bush, I worked forhillary clinton, and there are
times like this that I justthink how the fuck did we lose
to this guy?

Speaker 2 (30:57):
how, how well, I have some suggestions.
Your your grammar doesn'tmatter when you kill soldiers in
benghazi.
Your grammar doesn't matterwhen you steal villages of
children in haiti.
Your grammar doesn't matterwhen you're not flying around on

(31:18):
private jets with underagegirls.
I don't know, I just say it.

Speaker 8 (31:21):
I don't know I'm like , I don't like this guy already.

Speaker 2 (31:23):
Nobody does Him and Norm Isom give me the creepy
vibes, but you know, those arethe frontline soldiers on the
other side.
I mean, those are the peoplethat come and fight.
So that's his disdain.
You know, all this punctuationis horrible.

Speaker 8 (31:36):
Well, plus he's just playing stupid, Like oh, what
machines is he even talkingabout?

Speaker 2 (31:44):
talking about.
Oh, shut up, trump puts outthis.
Nobody in the world doesmail-in ballots.
I don't know that.
That's a fact.
There's a lot of countries, butit doesn't surprise me.
I know france is like what?
Like I know, in the 2016election, when they had french
uh parliamentarians coming overto the war room to talk to steve
bannon, they're like we're justrunning a bunch of elections
now.
This is very bad.
This is very bad.
We got rid of mail-in voting.
It's you cheat, they cheat.
It's no good, no good.
You know what it's like, yikes.

(32:06):
And here we are doing it.
Chats excuse me, excuse me,ladies and gentlemen's audio
listeners, I apologize forfilling your ears with my phlegm
.
Okay, it's been kind of quieton the chats this morning.
Youtube tiffany and carlitowelcome, welcome, yes, uh,
tiffany.
And carlito says I fell for theqfs watermark stuff too, still

(32:26):
waiting, ha ha ha.
And I'm like yeah I know I put420 days in prison waiting too.
Okay, uh, over on rumble.
Pony boy, good morning.
And carlitz, good morning toyou as well.
So thank you so much forjoining us.
We're a little light today.
It feels like we're flyinglight, flying fast, no
turbulence.
It's pretty good if you guyschatted more, I'd slow the slow

(32:50):
down, read your chats, butyou're not chatting, so we're
just gonna fly through thisstuff soon yeah, and yesterday,
by the way, our ad reads didn'tcount, so rumble you got a free
ad read and you know, go getyour flow tube, ladies and
gentlemen, but we did it wrong,so don't tune out.
If you're on rumble, if you'reon youtube, migrate over to
rumble.
Just open a new tab.
We got to get enough viewersover there so that we can do
another ad read.

(33:10):
Remember, we have like aminimum number of ad reads we
have to do in the month andwe're already halfway through
the month plus, so we're gonnahave to slam some ad reads in.
Okay, this is chris cuomotalking with benny johnson.
I think it's funny, bennyJohnson being a creature of the
right, a DeSantis supporternonetheless, but we'll forgive
that for a moment.
He does have good hits.

(33:31):
He's talking to Chris Cuomo,who formerly was a not just a
Kool-Aid drinker, a Kool-Aidmixer, passed it out to millions
of Americans.
Ok, lots of John Jones going.

Speaker 8 (33:41):
You take your shots too, you know so and then he's
always like oh well, I didn'tknow I was making kool-aid I
didn't know.

Speaker 2 (33:49):
I didn't know there was a little poison in it.
So, on top of that, his brotherwas the governor of new york
right killing folks, killingfolks and nursing homes.
So, allegedly, allegedly sothis topic comes up about COVID
right and how people didn't knowCOVID.
And this is Chris Cuomo.
I've made Mr.
I make lots of mistakes, I'vebeen wrong about a lot of things

(34:10):
, but now that I'm trying tosurvive on my own out in the you
know, the world of supply anddemand news.

Speaker 8 (34:15):
We need all the ventilators.

Speaker 2 (34:16):
Yeah, exactly, mr Supply and demand news.
Now he's tacking to the Tackinto common sense because like,
oh, I can't cover this stuff,they're not paying me enough
money to say these nonsenselines in two minute clips, right
, so he's talking to Benny,talking about covid, and his
logic here is a little bit funny.
I went back.

Speaker 17 (34:35):
You are not.
Oh no, leave my kid as exposedas possible.
All four of them should get it.
No, we were figuring it out inreal time.
It was weird in real time, buta lot of this is hindsight,
where I'm pro freedom, nottyranny.
You weren't saying that shitright in the beginning,
beginning, benny because wedidn't know any better.

(34:55):
Well, absolutely we were.

Speaker 1 (34:57):
That was the way that I was living, but no, I went
back and looked.

Speaker 17 (35:01):
You were not a big detractor until later, and
that's okay.
There are plenty of things thatwe should still know, that we
don't know.

Speaker 2 (35:09):
The problem is what is later, after the two weeks to
flatten the curve, because Iknow I was like okay,
president's saying it, okay, twoweeks.
Okay, we'll watch.
I've seen the videos in wuhan.
I can kind of see the zeitgeisthere, you know.
I know the energy is going onsomething's weird two weeks of
flatten the curve.

Speaker 8 (35:27):
So hold on, I'll give everybody grace for two weeks
yesterday I was listening to alocal radio station that has
some lefty leaning djs, surprise, and they were talking about um
working from home, remotely forfederal workers here locally in
the state.
And they're like, well, youknow, should workers be in in

(35:49):
the office?
Well, if it promotes, you know,better efficiency, then maybe
we should be getting back towork.
Well.
And then they had this wholediscussion about, well, how long
should people be back at workand should should federal
workers, you know especially.
They were talking about, like,um, health and human services,

(36:10):
and um, for your favoritedepartment, the, uh, the health
department, oh yeah, and they'relike, you know, these guys
should be back at work becauseit just promotes better
efficiency and people get, youknow, better service.
And there's a lot of people thatare just complaining about
service.
And then they got to thisdiscussion, this point of

(36:31):
discussion, where they were like, well, how long should people
be back at work?
I mean, how long should thispolicy have been enacted like
this?
And then they started sayingstuff like, well, I think that
people should have been back atwork like three years ago.
And it's like, well, how comethey weren't?

Speaker 2 (36:47):
yeah we're figuring it out.

Speaker 8 (36:52):
It's like hello you guys were promoting this shit
for the last forever and all ofa sudden you guys have figured
out that you like it doesn'twork this doesn't work, and this
doesn't work, and we shouldn'twork, and this doesn't work, and
we shouldn't have been doingthis for the last three years.

Speaker 2 (37:07):
And who do we blame ourselves?
Yes.
So, chris, here is having oneof those.
Well, you didn't push againstit.
Listen, everybody gets a littlegrace.
You get the two week grace, theone month grace.

Speaker 8 (37:17):
I guess I forgot.
The most important part of thisstory is that they were all
trying to still blame this ontrump and it's like for the last
three years, for the last threeyears, it's been biden.
Yeah, it's been, but it was allbiden yeah, you dumb asses.

Speaker 2 (37:29):
Well, and trump didn't lock.
I mean he did the two weeks tostay home, flatten the curve,
and then the states kind of tookoff with it.
Certain states became maniacal.
It's funny.
I was talking to people out inmissouri like yeah, covet, it
was kind of kind of stunk andyou know yeah yeah, I get this
when I talk to my family it waslike a 50 50, you know, whereas
out here I'm like no, it waslike 99, it was total mass
compliance.

(37:49):
Like we went out to dinner onetime and you had a baby shirt on
.
It was full fascism here.
Yeah, this was full lot, it was.
Yeah, it was something else.
All right, let's continue onwith this.
So again, going back, while Ilooked, you weren't pushing back
at what was point, was it whenthe frontline doctors stood?
I mean, there's a turning pointfor everybody, right?
It's guys that are late to thegame now, like Chris Cuomo.

Speaker 8 (38:10):
Well, they're all late to the game, but they're
all pretending like that theywere on the side of right the
entire time, which is completefreaking nonsense.
No.

Speaker 2 (38:17):
The people that, and that's the other thing too.
I mean, these guys weresoldiers for the left soldiers.
Here's the other thing.
Benny was online.
Benny navigated that entiretime period without getting shut
down, canceled.
How did he do it?
He somehow skirted the line sohe couldn't speak out too much.
Those of us that did got ourshows canceled.
Yeah, we weren't available tobe heard.

(38:39):
We were stripped off spotify.
Stripped off spotify because ofour opinion, right.
So benny made it through that.
Can't fault him for it.
He did it.
Maybe he held back a little bit.
I don't know, he's a RonDeSantis supporter.
It's wishy-washy at best.
Oh, back here.
Maybe maybe we'll play.
All right, what are we at 36?

(39:00):
I do want to hear the end ofthis, so we're gonna wait a
second.

Speaker 1 (39:03):
Oh no, I'm married to a nurse and she informed me
what a coronavirus was and thatthis was the flu and that we
should actually not be lockingdown and living in fear.
And that's the way that I livedmy life.
I was was traveling through thewhole thing.
I hated the mask mandates.
I hated the lockdown.
Everybody hated them.

(39:24):
Who didn't hate them?
I moved my family and mybusiness away from Washington DC
because of how horrific theselockdowns were and how
antithetical they are to humanflourishing.

Speaker 17 (39:35):
I think you did all that once it became a cause.

Speaker 8 (39:38):
I would hazard a guess that you, but you didn't,
chris.
No, this guy was the guy thatwas promoting it all and pushing
it, and I'm so.

Speaker 2 (39:46):
I can't even listen to this guy I remember him and
his brother on tv where he'sholding up the big cotton swap.
Go get tested when it became acause.

Speaker 17 (39:53):
Dude, you were pushing the cause that we had to
fight against her wife, who's anurse, did not ignore the
protocols um for her place ofwork because they were really
worried, because a lot of thosefirst responders you know, like
your wife, were getting sick,really sick, and it's the flu.
You find a flu other than theone in 1918 that matches the

(40:16):
numbers of covid 19.
The answer is you won't.
It's not, not the flu, that's anonsense statement.

Speaker 1 (40:22):
I don't think we want to talk about inflated,
overinflated numbers or why someof those numbers, especially in
nursing homes, got so high.

Speaker 17 (40:30):
Why do you think they got high in nursing homes?
You had old people there.

Speaker 2 (40:34):
Because your brother was shoving ventilators down
their throats.
That's why it's because youwere shoving people with the flu
into old folks homes.
That's why they were dying atelevated rates.
And, by the way, everybodyknows, because of the leaks,
your brother got thrown out ofoffice on bogus sex assault
charges or allegations in orderto not impeach you and try you

(40:55):
for something else.
Yeah, exactly, that's exactlywhy we know that.
And chris did.
He did this, I know.
I know they cut a deal.
My own family cut a deal to getout of this thing.
Pray the rosary daily.
Welcome.
Welcome to the rumble chat, andI think it's time.
I think it's time for an adread.
Oh yeah, we're doing it.

(41:16):
So ron's going to be doing ourad read.
One of our hosts, ron, is ahost, by the way, just so
everybody knows.
So, ron, now it's a littledifferent.
Today.
There's going to be doing ourad read.
One of our hosts, ron, is ahost, by the way, just so
everybody knows.
So.
Ron now it's a little different.
Today there's going to be a QRcode on your screen.
If you are so good, please scanthe QR code, go visit the site
so they know that our show'sworking right.

Speaker 8 (41:31):
So quick ad read here All right, still haven't tried
1775 coffee.
Now it's your shot.
The 1775 coffee now it's yourshot.
The 1775 starter kit justdropped.
Only a thousand units.
You're getting the bold, darkroast that hits hard and the
smooth medium roast and thevitality mushroom coffee for

(41:52):
clean energy and laser focus.
No crash, all single origin,small batch, toxin free and mold
free.
Plus, you're also getting agold spoon clip because freedom
isn't scooped with plastic Afrother strong enough to stir up
your coffee and yourmother-in-law's opinions, and a

(42:14):
black 1775 tumbler.
$170 worth of coffee and gearYours for $99.
This is for the ones you'vebeen watching 1775 blow up on
rumble, wondering if it'sactually worth it.
Spoiler is it is.
Go to 1775 coffeecom slashstudio and grab your starter kit

(42:36):
before they're gone.
Bold beans, clean fuel and amorning routine that stands for
something just like Rumble does.

Speaker 2 (42:44):
Awesome.
You know what's great aboutthat is?
Ron's never had coffee, but Ienjoy a cup every morning, so
I'll be ordering my 1775 coffee.
And what I love about 1775 isthat's the year of angst.
That's the year that theAmerican colonies were like
we're done with this, freakingking, we're done with this.

(43:04):
And that led to, of course, ourfavorite year 1776 Live.
Don't forget to visit us at1776liveus, where we teach on
strategies, how to live in theprivate, how to get out of
public exposure and protect yourassets, so don't forget to join
us there.
That is not an ad read.
That's just a shameless plugfor what I do after the podcast

(43:30):
so 1776 5 leads to 1776 live.
So get your, get your morningbrew going, okay.
So let's jump into trump andthe fallout from the russia
alaska or the russia ussentiment held in alaska, which,
by the way, holding the summitin alaska was a huge point of
contention for putin.
He didn't want to come.
He's like we got to go to aneutral third party.
And trump's like, no, no, I'mthe king.
You're coming from my castle,by the way, I'm gonna fly a

(43:52):
bomber right over your head.
Alaska's neutral death, do you?
think that that it was a bigdeal it was a big deal to get
putin to come to america.
Oh yeah, right, it was a bigdeal.
It was a big deal to get Putinto come to America oh yeah, it
was a big deal.
That establishes dominance ofAmerica.
He's coming as a supplicant toask for help to resolve this war
.
The whole thing, the optics ofit, the B-52.
I think Trump did a good job ofvalidating him, but, at the

(44:15):
same time, the entire optics ofit.
That's what a supplicant does.
I would call putin a big man fordoing it, though I would say
too, I would think so too, andhe's got a lot of people think
you know putin, who runs hiscountry.
No, it's like what mark rubiosaid they have constituencies.
He's got hardliners in hisparty that are more hardline
than him, and he's got liberalsin the country, too, that he has

(44:37):
to accommodate.
For, like it's just like anyother country, there's diverse
political feelings, and thoughhe might have a lot of power,
and we might call him anauthoritarian dictator, he still
has to move the needle yeah,there's a lot of rich oligarchs
over there that probably havesomething to say yeah, you still
have to have some, some peopleto support you.

(44:57):
pb brown, utah scouts, welcome.
I always love it when you joinus.
Thank you for joining us.
Ok, so, talking about the Trumpor the Russia-Ukraine situation
, I actually don't know who thisgentleman is, but he's got a
good little breakdown of exactlykind of what led up to this and
the Democrats role in it.

Speaker 20 (45:15):
Trump was right about you.
Now the media is quietlyadmitting it.
Now the media is quietlyadmitting it.
Look, you don't have to likeTrump, you don't have to support
Putin.
But you may want to payattention for a moment, because
something massive just shiftedthe Hill.
One of the biggest politicaloutlets in DC just dropped an
article called sadly, trump isright on Ukraine.

(45:36):
That headline alone is enoughto make half the media scramble
for damage control, but what'sinside that article is even more
powerful.
They admit that the war inUkraine wasn't unprovoked.
That it was Ukrainianright-wing militants who ignited
the conflict back in 2014, longbefore Russia took Crimea.
That Zelensky, far from being ahero of peace, rejected
multiple peace agreements,pushed for NATO military

(45:58):
involvement and amped upaggression in the Donbass region
, keep banned opposition parties, shut down the media outlets
and then begged for more weaponsto defend democracy in the West
.
They didn't just let it happen,they funded it, they armed it
and they sold you a one-sidedstory on every major network,
day and night.
For years.
They told you this war startedin 2022, that Russia attacked

(46:20):
unprovokedoked.
That selensky was the last manstanding between freedom and
tyranny.
That was a script.
If you questioned it, you werelabeled a traitor, a putin
puppet or even worse.
But now even the hill isadmitting.
It's not that simple, andhere's what they're not saying
out loud.

Speaker 2 (46:36):
Trump said all this he said nato expansion the hill
newspaper is a rhino publicationbut they're a serious newspaper
.
So when they publish somethingeven the Democrats are kind of
pay attention to it, so it makessense.
Like WAPO you can almost ignore, new York Times you can almost
ignore.
But the Hill is like there'ssome meat on that bone Might

(46:57):
have.
It's not conservative, it's nota Republican publication.
It kind of is that rhino centerright wall street journal area
but they pride themselves onlike doing real reporting.
So the fact that they reportedon this is kind of like okay,
this is the now, this is the newfact pattern was reckless.

Speaker 20 (47:13):
He said west was playing games in ukraine.
He said we were headed for awar we didn't need.
And now the same media thatmocked him is quietly
backpedaling.
So why now?
Because the narrative iscracking, because independent
journalists, alternative mediaand everyday people like us kept
pushing for the truth, becausemainstream media knows people
are waking up.
The same people who lied to usin Iraq and Afghanistan have

(47:36):
been lying about Ukraine, andnow they're getting caught.
So no, I'm not a pro-Russia, I'mnot a pro-Zelensky person.
I'm pro-truth, pro-reality andpro-peace.
And here's the thing you don'thave to pick a side to see
what's going on.
You just need to pause, zoomout and do a little bit of
digging, because once you stepoutside the media filter, the
picture changes.
You start to see how much we'vebeen manipulated, not just into

(47:59):
war, but into turning on eachother.
The elites thrive ondistraction, on outrage, on fear
, but now?
So before you start replyingwith hateful words, take a
moment.
You have the chance to thinkfor yourself, question why
you're so angry and look at whatis being presented in front of
you.
I challenge you to do it, notfor Trump, not for Putin, not
for a flag.
Do it for the truth, do it forpeace.

Speaker 2 (48:22):
So share this, because war thrives on lies and
peace starts with waking up Iremember when the ukraine
russian war first started and wewere off the air at this point
and I had a discussion with afamily member oh you can't
invade a sovereign country andI'm like, oh my gosh, you should
have been looking at the mirror20 years ago and we invaded a
sovereign country, you know whatI mean like okay, onto the

(48:45):
youtube comments weed and boys.
Ron, you sold me a, you sold meI'm a coffee drinker, I'll grab
some.
Yes, go weed them boys.
Alan mongrel van cleave definerepublican.
You can't sifting sand beneathyour feet.
It cannot be defined.
It changes from year to yearfrom leading politician to

(49:06):
leading politician.
You also cannot define theDemocrats unless you just define
them as idiots.
Okay so, there isn't really,it's the uniparty, the political
powers.
You can go back and in seasonthree of the Peasants
Perspective on the audio version, so you have to go in where you
can separate by season.
You can go see Common SenseApplied Today.

(49:27):
You can also go toPeasantsPerspectivecom and you
can go into the.
There's a link there for CommonSense Applied Today where I go
over Thomas Paine's Common SenseApplied Today and in that I
make the comparison that whenThomas Paine is talking about
the crown and its interests andstuff like that, I make the
comparison that what we've doneis we've done the same thing
that people did to the crown.
They gave it the keys to thekingdom.

(49:48):
We've done that to the twopolitical parties.
Collectively.
They hold the keys of thekingdom.
They select who is allowed tobe our leaders, who's allowed to
be selected.
They are the real power brokersBetween the two of them.
They hold everything.
They could they put?

(50:09):
all the uh they put.
They put all the options on thetable, and it's their options.
Does that make sense?
So the republican party issimply the other side of the
coin of the democrat party it's.

Speaker 8 (50:14):
It's where all the people come from that we get to
pick from in our primary exactly.

Speaker 2 (50:19):
So by giving it two separate names, the uniparty
basically can march us intowhatever they want to march us
into they use?
They use hegelian dialectic,they use machiavellian tactics
one party causes the problem,the other one brings the
solution, and vice and back andforth.
We march over hill and delluntil we're in some foreign land
fighting for a banker's war andall these r&d people.

(50:39):
They all came from the sameplace so, just like we were
watching, was with, uh, markelias talking.
Well, you worked for jeb bushand I worked for hillary clinton
.
Why are you guys talking?
I thought we were supposed tobe mortal enemies.
You're right, like why?
Why would you have someone whoworks directly with hillary
clinton talking with someone whoworks with directly with jeb?
Well, well, we all just have toget along.

(51:00):
No, we don't do the Victor, gothe spoils.
Clearly, the RepublicanDemocrat party collectively have
been the victors of whateverthere was to win and we, the
people, have been left tillingour gardens, going to work,
doing basic stuff.
Meanwhile, our interestshaven't been met, end of story.
So define Republican partyhaven't been met, end of story

(51:24):
so define Republican Party, alan?
I don't know the red team.
Like, honestly, alan and I kindof made mention of this in the
speech I gave this weekend butwhat are we conserving?
You know, when people get upthere and they claim to be
Republicans, they're like weshould get the county to do this
on property rights, and weshould.
I'm like you're just imposingon private property rights.
I want freedom.
I want people to do whateverthey want on their property.
How about we talk abouteliminating the entire permit
system altogether?

(51:44):
Yeah, that's what a Republicanshould be arguing.
All right, what are youconserving?
Are we picking a date and going?
Well, we want to return to.
You know 2009, republican Partyvalues.
You know where the statecreates a giant, enormous bill
called no Child behind behindthat functionally neuters the
state and the parents and theschool boards in directing what

(52:06):
their children learn at school?
Yeah, I want to conserve thatrepublican party.
Yeah, exactly.
So what are you?
What are you trying to conserve?
I'm trying to conserve theintelligence apparatus that
tells us there's weapons of massdestruction in iraq.
Yellow cake, yellow cake.
What are we trying to conserve?
Freak, if I know, 1775 coffee.

(52:28):
That's what I'm trying topreserve.
Yeah, just get off my lawn.
Just get off my lawn.
It's all fun and games untilsomeone goes to jail and then
it's serious and we have to do apodcast about it.
That's right.
So trump was heaped with praise.
Yesterday, all these europeanleaders showed up in washington
dc and the thing about this isit's okay.

(52:50):
The left is like oh, they camein, you know, zielinski bought,
brought back up and they'regoing to try to talk trump into
isolating putin.
Blah, blah, blah.
But that's not really what cameout of these meetings.

Speaker 4 (53:01):
Instead, we heard things like this Maloney of
Italy, who's a really greatleader and an inspiration which,
by the way, we're going to showa couple of clips of Maloney
today.

Speaker 2 (53:10):
She's the Italian prime minister, total, total.
Trying to pick my words thatdon't come back and bite me
later, but she's a very uh,powerful woman.
Okay, very powerful woman.
Her, she's Italian, veryexpressive, you can see it.
She's got no poker face.
She does not hide.

(53:30):
Is that her right there?
That's her right there, andlook at the way she looks at
Trump.
There are pictures like thisall the time, where she'll like
lean over and look acrossemmanuel marcon and have this
like glowing look towards donaldtrump.
It's really fun to watch.
So, anyways, she has a littlesomething to say over there.

Speaker 4 (53:46):
She's she's served now, even though she's a very
young person.
She's served there for a longperiod of time relative to
others.
They don't.
They don't last very long.
You've lasted a long time.
You're going to be there a longtime, please, sergio.

Speaker 13 (54:06):
Well, thank you very much, Donald, mr President, for
hosting us today in thisimportant meeting, and I think
it is an important day, a newphase, after three years and a
half that we didn't see any kindof sign from the Russian side
that there was a willing fordialogue.
So something is changing.
Something has changed thanks toyou, thanks also to the
standing in the battlefield,which was achieved with the

(54:30):
bravery of Ukrainians and withthe unity that we all provided
to Ukraine, and the reason why Imention it is that we also have
to remind that if we want toreach peace and if we want to
guarantee justice, we have to doit united.
So that's why it's a very goodday, the one we are in.

(54:54):
You can obviously count onItaly, as it was from the
beginning.
We are on the side of Ukraineand we absolutely support your
efforts towards peace.
We will talk about manyimportant topics.
The first one is securityguarantees how to be sure that

(55:15):
it won't happen again, which isa precondition of every kind of
peace.
I'm happy that we will discussabout that.
I'm happy that we will beginfrom a proposal which is the,
let's say, article 5 model,which was Italian at the
beginning.
So we are always ready to bringour proposals for peace for

(55:36):
dialogue.
It's something we have to buildtogether to guarantee peace and
to defend the security of ournation.
So thank you, mr president, forhosting us.

Speaker 2 (55:46):
Thank you very much so basically in three and a half
years, the russians have donenothing.
They've not wanted to be talkedto.
They've not basically engagedwith europe directly.
They've didn't.
I know biden didn't engage himdirectly.
It was just all support ukraine, throw money and weapons at him
and, you know, let him settleit on the battlefield.
One of the things that'shappened on the battlefield is

(56:07):
it's become world war, onetrench warfare.
They're not moving and it'sbecome completely mechanized.
This is an interview from aukrainian medic and he's like I
don't know when.
The last time I treated abullet wound was it's all drone
shrapnel.
This is a war.
They said.
Robotic wars aren't coming,they're here.
This is a robotic war.
We are not fighting the enemy,we're fighting the drones, we're

(56:30):
fighting, you know, the techand that's what's doing all the
damage.
I thought that was prettyinteresting.
Like, okay, we're here, aoi orai wars.
John in alabama, it's time, man,he starts.
Got to start testing the, thestrength of various metals.
I gotta go like, print that offand frame it.

(56:52):
His little monologue there, uhpray.
The rosary daily says put theqr code back up and I'll check
it out.
If we can, we will.
I don't know we can't.
I don't think we can justrandomly put it back up in.
But if we do another ad read wewill well, you can go back in.

Speaker 8 (57:07):
You can go back in time in the show.

Speaker 2 (57:10):
Yeah, you'll have to do that.
Yeah, but 1775 coffee, yeah,and the qr code would be great,
because then I think it likelinks to us.
I don't think it doesn't matter, we're not gonna.
We're not here for the money,we're here for the, to spread
the ideas and the information.
The money just pays for thehosting, which is surprisingly
expensive.

Speaker 9 (57:25):
Okay, so this is, uh, the the nato secretary general
talking too I really want tothank you, uh, president of the
united states, dear donald, forthe fact that you, as I said
before, broke the deadlockbasically with president putin
by starting that dialogue, and Ithink it was in february that
you had first a phone call, andfrom there we are now where we

(57:48):
are today, and that is, uh, Ithink, if we play this well, we
could end this.
And we have to end this.
We have to stop the killing, wehave to stop the destruction of
ukraine's infrastructure.
That is a terrible war, um, soI'm really excited and let's
make the best out of today andmake sure that, from today
onwards, we get this thing to anend as soon as possible.

(58:09):
I really want to thank you foryour leadership.
What you are doing for Lodomir,but of course, also all the
European colleagues, it isreally crucial, and the fact
that you have said I'm willingto participate in security
guarantees is a big step.
It's really a breakthrough andit makes all the difference.
So also thank you for that.

Speaker 2 (58:27):
Now this whole thing started when Ukraine was
basically pushed along the lineof getting NATO membership.
Well, Article 5 of NATO says ifany member of NATO is attacked,
it's an attack on all and ittriggers everybody into having
to do something.
But one of the things you cando is you can just simply make a
statement that says we're nowmonitoring the situation.
So that is an appropriateresponse for an Article five.

(58:49):
For an attack on an Articlefive country, the countries can
just say we're monitoring thesituation and that's enough.
Ok, security guarantees areactually a step farther.
That's saying we will actuallyengage, Right.
So this is another one of thoseinstances.
Trump is going to get rid ofthe thing that Russia doesn't
want with just NATO membership,which also comes with other

(59:10):
strings attached.
But they're willing to toleratea security guarantee which is a
direct military support ofUkraine itself.

Speaker 8 (59:20):
Yes, I have a problem with this as well.
Um, yesterday on my drive homeI was listening to some
reporters talk about this, andthey were, and I was like damn
you know, this is exactly thekind of slipperiness that gets
american boots on the ground andthen all of a sudden it's world
war.
Yes, I'm like this is sodangerous.

Speaker 2 (59:42):
Now George Washington , going all the way back to his
last speech as president, hetalked about foreign
entanglements and he said wedon't want to go out and create
these alliances, but we can goout and do commerce.
We want to have commerce.
So Trump is trying to createthese commercial agreements
where everything's win--win,where everybody wins when we

(01:00:03):
have peace because the money'sflowing.
You guys can handle yourdomestic conflicts, we'll handle
our domestic conflicts, but ifthe money's flowing and the
international rules-based orderis being maintained, everybody's
happy right.

Speaker 8 (01:00:13):
So what I'm saying is the appetite for boots on the
ground in ukraine has been zeroin our country oh yeah, but this
is somehow going to get bootson the ground it could.

Speaker 2 (01:00:27):
I'm like, yeah, so I don't know.
I mean, I I have the attitudeof sit back and watch.
I don't want to be a part ofthis, yeah, but it's going to
affect future generations, it'sgoing to affect my dinner table,
it's going to affect my gasprices, like so we watch?
Yep, we watch, and as peasants,we try to.
You know, look onto the horizona little bit, see what's coming
, see what time of season it is.

(01:00:48):
Are the oak leaves falling?
As the bible says?
Because if you do, no one hasto tell you what time it is you
know, exactly okay, so uh andwho was that dude that was
talking last?
that was the, the UN, the NATOsecretary general.

Speaker 8 (01:01:04):
OK, definitely a guy that never got any dirt under
his fingernails.

Speaker 2 (01:01:09):
Probably not, probably.
Didn't.
Climb up through the ranks,from private to corporal to
sergeant, probably not.
Yeah, no, no.
This is an EU bureaucrat ifwe've ever seen one, yeah right.
And this whole table which, bythe way, seeing this table with
these european leaders there,this is, there's a lot of might
at this table.

Speaker 8 (01:01:27):
You know I I wanted to say something a little bit
snide, but as I was looking atthis table, I'm thinking to
myself this is like a momentthat gets put in the history
books.
I mean, these are world leaderscoming together for for some
kind of a weird summit.
I don't know what.
You call it a very impromptusummit, yeah, and this is a big

(01:01:48):
deal and I think the mediadoesn't know how to take it.

Speaker 2 (01:01:51):
Do we go full tds?
Do we support you know thatmaybe the potential end of the
war?
Do we criticize the outcomesand want to be on the side of
continuing the war?
They don't really know how tocover this All right.

Speaker 8 (01:02:01):
I mean I'm seeing very Well, some of these world
leaders sitting at the tabledon't even know what to say.
Trump, thank you.

Speaker 2 (01:02:08):
Yeah, that's what they're saying.
Trump, thank you, we supportyou.
So the chancellor of Germanystarts talking and Milani is
sitting next to Trump with thisexpressive Italian face.

Speaker 10 (01:02:22):
We don't really care what he's saying, but look at
her facial expressions, let'stry to put pressure on Russia,
because the credibility of theseefforts, these efforts we are
undertaking today, are dependingon at least a ceasefire from
the beginning of the seriousnegotiations, from the next step
on.
So I would like to emphasizethis aspect and would like to
see a ceasefire from the meeting, which should be a trilateral

(01:02:47):
meeting I don't know wherever ittakes place well, probably just
the look she gets when she'sthinking hard that's the look of
disdain, man.

Speaker 2 (01:02:53):
That's totally a look at the stain.
Don't tell me anything otherthan that.
That is a look of disdain.
So there was a uh okay.
So there was a moment, as thisimpromptu summit wrapped up,
that I found to be very, veryfunny, but also very endearing
and warming.
So trump closes out the meetingand, of course, as soon as you

(01:03:14):
close out the meeting, the presscameras go crazy.
Questions start getting yelledin this digital age.
We still got the shutters yepand there's a little uh hot mic
moment here.
All right, uh, sapphire patricksays she is getting decorating
ideas.
She's getting ideas lookingaround the white house yeah
that's a woman's perspective.

(01:03:35):
Maybe that's exactly what she'sdoing.
She's like, you know, thegolden here does the room well,
okay.
So this is a hot mic momentafter the after the meeting's
over.

Speaker 4 (01:03:44):
That's all we ask for is fairness with the media.
Thank you all very much.
We appreciate it.
Thank you very much.

Speaker 2 (01:03:54):
So the audio doesn't come through to you, but there's
lots of chatter, lots ofchatter.
So the media is.
You can't hear it because ofthe way we do this, but the
media, just like aftereverything Trump does cameras,
Trump, trump, trump, trump,trump, trump, trump, trump,
trump, trump, trump, trump,trump, trump, trump, trump,
trump, trump, trump, trump,trump.

(01:04:16):
When Putin was there and heactually turned to the media, in
English goes enough.

Speaker 13 (01:04:22):
No, thank you for being so fair.
Thank you, donald, but he lovesit.
He loves it, he never wants tospeak with Mike.

Speaker 19 (01:04:37):
He's a very good guy .

Speaker 13 (01:04:40):
He went to college.
But he says he to college.

Speaker 2 (01:04:42):
So she was saying that you go through this every
day.
Like they control their media,they don't get that media,
doesn't get access to them likethat.
And trump's just got this gaggleof people screaming at him.
And she's like you, you the,the guy across the table, you go
through this every day.
And milani's like, he likes it,he likes it, you like it, right
, I don't.

(01:05:02):
And she goes.
I don't ever want to talk to mymedia like this, like trump
just does it.
I thought that was kind ofendearing.
And again, trump you know, ifthere's anything that he can be
accused of, it's not beingunavailable to the media at all.
So, after they had this thing,do we need to do another read?

Speaker 8 (01:05:19):
are we not yet, not yet okay.

Speaker 2 (01:05:21):
So after he had the gaggle he went and met with
zielinski in the white house andhe gave zielinski a little bit
of a hard time, which I thoughtwas totally appropriate legal so
you say during, during the waryou?
can't.
So the question was ifzielinski was going to hold
elections, because remember, youknow we got to support
democracy but he's completelycanceled all elections in his

(01:05:42):
nation because they're at war,so can't have an election Right,
a little bit of an interestingcarrot and a stick, so you can't
really resolve the war, eitherbecause the polling shows that
you'd be run out, probablyexiled, like the last two
presidents.

Speaker 8 (01:05:54):
That's a perfect pause moment.
Why Look at his?

Speaker 2 (01:05:56):
eyes.
So Trump has given him a littlebit of a hard time here,
because the question is aboutelections.

Speaker 4 (01:06:03):
You say during the war you can't have elections.
So let me just say three and ahalf years.
So you mean, if we happen to bein a war with somebody, no more
elections.
Oh, that's good.
I wonder what the?
Oh elections, oh that's good.
I wonder what the?

Speaker 2 (01:06:22):
I wonder what the value likes is oh do you see
what trump just did there yeahtrump is a magician.
He really is a wizard.
For again, love him or hate him, I tend to like him, but this
is the kind of stuff.
Oh, so you're saying if we, inthree and a half years, had a
war, I could just cancelelections?
And the left who's like Trumpis a king, but you got to

(01:06:43):
support the King Zelensky, who'scanceled his elections.

Speaker 8 (01:06:47):
Who just said oh, trump likes that idea Exactly.

Speaker 17 (01:06:52):
Oh, hurry up and hold elections.

Speaker 2 (01:06:54):
Do you see how Trump will just kind of flip around
things on people?
Oh so if you're in war, war, noelections maybe we should go to
war.
Is there any chance you've putoff settlement because you know
there might be accountabilityfor all that money that's
missing and all those yachts inmorocco?
And I mean, it's not like thisstuff isn't out there, you know,
it's not like there's just thisweird smattering of new

(01:07:16):
multi-millionaire ukrainiansshowing up in random ports
around europe with nice newboats just recently purchased
from oil sheiks in saudi arabia.
You know what?
I mean it's like hello man, someof this stuff.
It's just so patently obvious.
And trump is just the king of,uh, he's just the king of
captain, he's just captainobvious you know oh well, should

(01:07:39):
we?
Should we just cancel ourelections?
I don't know about that.
So Trump also confirmed that hehad a call with Putin.

Speaker 4 (01:07:46):
We just spoke to.
I was just telling thepresident.
I just spoke to President Putinindirectly and we're going to
have a phone call right afterthese meetings today and we may
or may not have a trilat.
If we don't have a trilat, thenthe fighting continues, and if
we do, we have a good chance.
I think if we have a trilatthere's a good chance of maybe
ending it.
But he's expecting my call whenwe're finished with this

(01:08:10):
meeting.

Speaker 2 (01:08:14):
We just spoke to.
I was just telling all thepress he did end up having a
call with Putin and it lookslike they're moving forward to
scheduling a trilat.
That's good news.
This is a big deal.

Speaker 8 (01:08:26):
And trilat is trilateral agreement.
Is that what that stands for?

Speaker 2 (01:08:31):
So they're just trilateral meeting.
So this is a really big deal.
All the conflicts that Trumphas settled so far, with the
exception of Israel-Hamas,that's a very embedded problem,
you know.
That's like almost betterdescribed as a civil war, you
know, because it's inside of onenation's sovereign territory,

(01:08:53):
kind of thing going on there.
But this Ukraine-Russia war hasall kinds of complications.
Ukraine's a major I mean Russiais a major world player.
Like I said, they have thelargest nuclear arsenal.
They're not away.
They have complete detente.
No one's taken over russia.
It's not going anywhere.
Surprise couldn't even get.
Even when the soviet union fell, you still couldn't get rid of
russia.
You know why?

(01:09:13):
Because somebody went andgrabbed the nuke button and said
I got it, I captured the flag,we're it.
They're not going anywhere.
Ukraine, however, is de-armed.
Ukraine is a fodder nation andit's been treated like a
laundromat.
So is, you know, but that's agreat way to say it.

(01:09:35):
It's been the laundromat forall of Europe and the American
elites, for all of Europe andthe American elites.
There's no insignificance tothe fact that you have Mitt
Romney's chief of staff sittingon the same Burisma board that
Hunter Biden is sitting on.
Just wrap your brain aroundthat for a minute.
Wrap your brain around that fora minute.
How do we define Republican?

(01:09:56):
Again, I can't remember.
So this has been a problem fora long time.
That's just been working andit's out of sight, out of mind.
Why does the united statessponsor 27 bio labs in ukraine?
Tulsa gabbert talked about this.
Victoria newland confirmed it.
Had you ever heard of that?

(01:10:18):
Nope, no.
So this ukraine russia conflicthas huge, has an escalatory
ladder that ends with all of usin heaven.
Okay, so so this is a huge deal.
This is why everybody showed upthe table.
Not everybody showed up at thetable for an azerbaijan, armenia

(01:10:39):
.
You know treaty, they didn'tshow up for that, but they're
going to show up for thisbecause it's got huge, uh,
escalatory things.
Now, the other day, trump putout a truth social that said he
called for the end of the ofhamas and the annihilation of
hamas, and so they turned aroundand accepted a ceasefire.
What, yeah?
So trump put out a thing sayingit's time to completely

(01:11:01):
eliminate hamas like root andstem, and so they instantly said
oh, we're good fighting.
Hamas has accepted an updatedproposal for a ceasefire in gaza
presented by the qatari andegyptian mediators.
Two sources with knowledge ofthe talks, tell axios why it
matters.
This is part of a last-ditcheffort to reach a deal to avoid
major new Israel offensive tooccupy Gaza City.
A diplomatic source said thedeal Hamas accepted is 98%

(01:11:26):
similar to the last US-backedproposal Israel agreed to, but
talks broke down when Hamas didnot.
Israel officials said theystill haven't received a written
Hamas response and thereforecannot say whether they find it
acceptable.
The second source said theproposal Hamas accepted is a
partial deal for a 60 dayceasefire to release 10 life
hostages, 18 deceased hostagesand release Palestinian

(01:11:46):
prisoners.
The news comes just hours afterPresident Trump's.
Trump urged Israel to expandits attacks on Hamas, saying the
hostages would not be freeduntil Hamas was confronted and
destroyed.
So all of a sudden, they gotpretty pliable.
So, trump doing some good stuff?
I tell you, uh, there's thismeme that I saw that I thought
was fairly appropriate and Ithink it's just something that

(01:12:07):
you know.
We should all be aware of.
It's this in 2011, if you aretrue christians, open your
borders, right the syrianrefugee crisis, and now you have
europe will become islamic in2025.

Speaker 8 (01:12:19):
Just, you know nothing against the religion of
peace, but you know it's bakedinto the cake all right, it's
about that time here we go bigmoments okay, set your clocks,
mark your calendars and buckleup for the best nfl primetime
football action startingseptember 4th on Westwood One.

(01:12:43):
You can catch all thebone-crushing hits, last-second
heroics and edge-of-your-seataction that NFL Thursday, sunday
and Monday nights have to offer, whether you're tailgating,
driving or chilling at home.
Don't miss a single snap home.

(01:13:03):
Don't miss a single snap.
Listen on the nfl app, thewestwood one sports app at
westwood one sportscom.
Or just say alexa, openwestwood one sports.
If it's the nfl, it's onwestwood one that's big time.

Speaker 2 (01:13:17):
That's big time.
Oh, that's west yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:13:20):
Three and a half years.
A lot of people have died.

Speaker 2 (01:13:22):
So check out your NFL .
My wife actually came to melike a week ago and was like we
need a sport.
She's like we need a sport thatwe can just turn off everything
else and just enjoy thecamaraderie of a sports team.
And so she was like, should itbe football?
Should it be basketball?
And I probably she was like,should it be football should?

Speaker 8 (01:13:47):
it be basketball and I don't know I probably football
.
It's a shorter season, you knowthey hit harder and we have a
home team.

Speaker 2 (01:13:50):
You know I was like we'll probably do football.
I know, no basketball for us.
You know, I really did enjoyfootball in prison, well,
sitting on the hard.
Well, because the blacks arehilarious to watch watching a
sporting event.
It's like I actually wouldn'twatch the football, I was
watching the blacks, and I don'tmean that pejoratively, I've
been in prison, I can say itlike that.
Okay, so the blacks, they'rebetting.
You know they got their likelittle bet tapes and stuff going

(01:14:11):
on and you know if a kickermisses something then the other
half's like, yeah, I'm up 50steps.
You don't have these wholethings going on.
It was pretty hilarious towatch, so I did enjoy Kansas
city.
I was in Missouri for a goodpart of it and watch Kansas city
games, I will say this.
So I watched the super bowl inDC and it was Baltimore, and it

(01:14:32):
was Baltimore, it was Kansascity, and for the 49ers.
Now I don't root for the 49ers,okay, I'm not.
I wasn't a kansas city fanprior to this.
But there was this thing goingon because the last time trump
lost, kansas city won and sothey wanted was it that?
Was it the other way around?
I can't remember.
Either way.
They were working, they wererooting for 49ers because taylor
swift was, you know, boyfriendof kelsey, or whatever.

Speaker 8 (01:14:58):
Kansas city ended up with all this is lost on me, so
then the next.

Speaker 2 (01:15:02):
So then I ended up in philadelphia, home of the
eagles, and got to see the fanbase there, because most of them
are from the philadelphia area,and then also watching
philadelphia 76ers basketballgames.
I didn't know they had a fanbase.
I thought they sucked.
I really like the philadelphia76.
I thought they peaked withAllen Iverson.
I didn't realize that it wouldbe like a huge thing going on

(01:15:25):
there.
And then when I ended up inMissouri, it was all about
Kansas City, kansas City, kansasCity and then of course,
baseball's Cardinals and theRoyals.
It was pretty interesting.

Speaker 8 (01:15:36):
So here's an interesting tidbit about me
folks.
So I don't drink coffee.
I also don't give a crap aboutfootball, so for both of those
two ad reads are like, not nearand dear to me at all, but we
have listeners who love football.
Oh yeah, yeah yeah.
But it's just funny because,you know, I live in a town where
, you know, the seahawks didpretty well a few years ago and

(01:15:58):
they went to the super bowl.
I didn't even know we were inthe super bowl, I went to work
and everybody's like, and I waslike what we just won the super
bowl I didn't even watch it andthey they were my co-workers
were furious with me.

Speaker 2 (01:16:13):
That's so funny.
Anti-socialist league jumps inin the rumble chat nato
desperately trying to stayrelevant, which is why the show
of force became irrelevant yearsago.
Just a bunch of idiotsintentionally taking their own
countries.
They want to take us down withthem.
Yeah, I don't see thefunctional need for nato anymore
.
It was designed to counter thesoviet union.
Um, I think it be.
It's just another entanglement.

(01:16:33):
It's another layer ofbureaucracy.
It's supposed to unite the, theuh, different groups.
And I will say this it'sunlikely that any two natal
countries will go to war witheach other.
So to that extent, I guess it'sokay.
But yes, it creates thehomogenization effect.
When you're all under oneunified government, the
government's natural inclinationis to unify its population.

Speaker 8 (01:16:54):
And it can also be used.

Speaker 2 (01:16:55):
It wants everybody in on the Truman Show.

Speaker 8 (01:16:56):
And it can also be used kind of like a Hegelian
dialectic thing where you get tosmash each other if you're part
of the team and you're not partof the team Exactly.

Speaker 2 (01:17:07):
So Marco Rubio went on to Jesse Waters show to talk
about the inside theTrump-Zolinski meeting.
So let's take a look at that.
Listen to this.

Speaker 5 (01:17:15):
Well, I think the whole thing was a big moment,
unprecedented really, when youthink campaign leaders came here
, seven that were there, andthat included the head of NATO
and the head of the EU and theyall said the same thing, which
is this you know, after threeyears of sort of deadlock and no
talks and no change incircumstances, this is the first

(01:17:36):
time where there seems to besome movement.
Now, look, this is acomplicated war.
There's no doubt about it.
I mean, this has been going onfor three and a half years.
A lot of people have died, alot of territories exchanged
back and forth, so it's not aneasy thing to unwind.
But nothing was happening onthis war.
Literally, the only option thatwe were given under the
previous administration wascontinue to fund Ukraine for
however much they need, forhowever long it takes, and now

(01:17:58):
you have people actually talkingabout pathways towards ending
it.
Now it's going to take a littlebit more work and a little bit
more time, but we are makingprogress.
It's not me saying it, that is.
Virtually every leader theretoday said that in front of the
cameras.
And they're saying it for areason because it's true, and
they're witnessing it andthey've been a part of it.

Speaker 2 (01:18:17):
Well, I think the whole thing is really the amount
of death and dying that hasgone on almost unchecked.
And then to get now to thepoint where everybody's coming
to the table and at leasttalking.
I'm sure there's fighting goingon today, but there's, there's
at least a glimmer of hope onthe horizon, like the dawn is
breaking.
I hope.
I hope you know I say it allthe time I have low expectations

(01:18:38):
, but there was this video thatcame out.
These are monks.
But there was this video thatcame out.
These are monks.
I think these guys are fromCambodia.
Oh my gosh, I love it when Iresearch this and then I forget
when we go live.
But these guys are talkingabout the peace deal that Trump
just brokered between it was aCambodia and Indonesia.
Oh man, I hope that thatdoesn't sound right.
Either way, they're praisingTrump for what he's doing and

(01:19:01):
encouraging more the people ofboth nations.

Speaker 14 (01:19:45):
Your diplomatic engagement and visionary
intervention were critical inde-escalating tension and
facilitating a truth.
Your commitment to promotingpeace and stability for Cambodia
and Thailand is deeplycommendable.
The ceasefire which was activein recent talks in Kuala Lumpur,

(01:20:07):
malaysia, is a testament toyour extraordinary statements to
resolve conflict and preventingcatastrophic war between the
two nations.
It is our sincere hopes thatthis initial success will lay
the groundwork for a lasting andcomprehensive resolution to the
long-standing territorialdispute.

(01:20:28):
The people of both Thailand andCambodia deserve to live in
peace and without fear.
Your actions have provided apath for that goal and for that
we are profoundly grateful, andwe thank you for your leadership

(01:20:50):
and dedication to conflictresolution on the world states.

Speaker 2 (01:20:56):
So when I look at this group of people here, I
don't see an oligarch class, Idon't see a ruling class.
I see people.
Yeah, I see these.
These guys have chosen to livethe monk life, but these are the
people that end up being fodder.
These are the people that endup being these minority groups,
these faction groups, andthey're.
They see the peace.
The peace is the objective.

(01:21:18):
The end of the fighting is theobjective.
Like I have a feeling theseguys don't see a lot of
differentiation betweencambodian children and thailand
thailand children.
They understand and I think wehave the same attitude.
Like I have great sympathy andempathy for the russians and the
ukrainians.
The war is the problem andtrump's attitude of just settle

(01:21:39):
it.
Just settle it, start talkingand settle it.
Nobody wants bullets flying atthem.
It's just the most common sensething.
The oligarchs don't havebullets flying at them.
The ruling class are protected.
Say what of it you will.
Of course we want our publicleaders protected, but they

(01:22:01):
insulate themselves.
The people who pay the price,people live in those areas and
all that kind of stuff I loveseeing that it's kind of what my
comment about the guy with nodirt under his nails was all
about yeah, yeah, it's like youdon't know they're just removed
so the other thing too bill barrapparently got his day in the
hot seat in a closed meetingwith the house and so he came in

(01:22:25):
and did his first testimonythat you know talk about his
time as attorney general, and hesaid this was reported by Fox
News and then clandestine makesthis commentary before I read
the headline.
Former Bill Barr testifiedbefore the House Oversight
Committee today.
Behind closed doors.
Barr said he never saw anythingthat would implicate Trump in
Epstein's crimes and that Bidenadmin would have leaked it if it

(01:22:47):
existed.
The Dems MSN will ignore thisbecause it does not fit their
nonsense accusations.
But if Barr had some somethingdifferent, it would be front
page breaking news on everyoutlet in America.
Trump is not implicated inEpstein's crimes and everyone
knows it.
If he was, they would haveleaked it before Trump reached
the bottom of the escalator.
Bill, they would have leaked itbefore Trump reached the bottom
of the escalator.
Bill Barr testifies he didn'tsee info that would implicate
Trump in the Epstein case.

(01:23:07):
Comer says and this was comingfrom James Comer he said that he
has never seen anything thatwould implicate President Trump
in any of this and he believedthat had there been anything
pertaining to President Trumpwith respect to the Epstein list
that he felt like the Bidenadministration would have
probably leaked it out.
And of course he would havedirected them to leak it out
because he was working with theBiden administration, talking to
Fannie Willis and all theapparatchiks on the Democrat

(01:23:29):
side of the party.
Again back to Alan's thing.
Can you define Republican?
No, I can't, because Bill Barr,when worked with Fannie Willis
and I don't see anything similarin their ideology.
I'm not exactly sure the tiethat binds, but basically Bill
Barr is their ideology, so I'mnot exactly sure.
I'm not exactly sure the tiethat binds, okay, but basically
bull bar is admitting, uh, thedemocrats would have released it
and by tacit admission, sincehe was working with the

(01:23:50):
democrats, I would have releasedit well, and also, um, we're
not really, uh, carrying waterfor republicans either.
No, this just goes to showanything the democrats are
accused of and it's again, it'snot even just the democrats,
anybody in this elite crust yes,anything they're actually doing
.
They'll try to turn around andaccuse trump of doing it first.

(01:24:13):
Right, so it breaks the ice.
And then, when that's disproven, and then their stuff comes out
.
There's already this idea of ohyeah, political leaders get
accused of things all the time,but it never pans out.
You know all this russiag thing.
It didn't pan out, so now it'sRussiagate, hillary.
Oh, it's not going to pan out.

Speaker 8 (01:24:27):
You see what I'm saying.

Speaker 2 (01:24:28):
It's like this complete mind warp that we live
in.
So, yeah, I don't think Trumphad anything to do with Epstein.
It makes me wonder Elon Musk'swhole tack and thing.
But the smearing trump with theepstein crimes.
It not only potentiallyimplicates what they did, but

(01:24:49):
there's also a reason why theywant to create this subterfuge
that trump is a elite pedo andthat he's part of these rings
and he's been involved thiswhole time because,
simultaneously to the medianarrative, there's an actual
boots on the ground thing that'shappening here.

Speaker 12 (01:25:06):
As you know, half a million children trafficked over
a four year period in theUnited States.
This administration is going toinvestigate every instance of
child trafficking, labortrafficking, sex trafficking,
child smuggling and all theattendant crimes involved in
that, and our message toeveryone in the country is to
cooperate fully with immigrationand customs enforcement so that
we can end the scourge of childtrafficking and child abuse

(01:25:27):
that has been endemic these lastfour years.

Speaker 18 (01:25:29):
Something that you should have that you haven't
reported.
As you know, 300,000 childrenare missing right.
300,000, undivided.
We've already gotten back10,000 of those children and we
have a lot more planned to comeback.
We've already gotten back10,000 of those children and we
have a lot more planned to comeback.
We're getting back by thethousands, but 300,000.

(01:25:50):
And, as of this morning, over10,000 we've gotten back.

Speaker 2 (01:25:57):
So he put out this tweet.
Ursula von der Leyen, who's theEU president, or whatever they
call her, the distinguished andhighly respected president of
the European Union, europe couldhave just read the rest of the
sentence.
President of the europeancommission and I have been
discussing a massive worldwideproblem of missing children.
This likewise a big subject formy wife, melania.
It is a subject at the top ofall lists and the world will

(01:26:18):
work together to solve it,hopefully bringing them home to
their families.
It is a worldwide problem andthe trump administration is
actually doing something aboutit, not just talking about it.
But we know that they've brought10,000 of those kids home and
if you go back and listen towhat representative Clay Higgins
talks about, he says we aredeposing all of them.
We are asking them where theywent, who they were with, and

(01:26:41):
they're going after them.
I don't know what that lookslike.
You know, if you bring back10,000 kids to me, you should
bring back 10,000 captors.
You know there should be like aone to one.
Who were you with when we gotyou?
So I don't know.
I don't know where those peopleare.

Speaker 8 (01:26:55):
Even if it's a two to one or a three to one, there
should be hundreds and hundreds,yeah, but I'm glad to hear that
there's work on that.

Speaker 2 (01:27:02):
And again, this kind of laces in with the Epstein
scandal, whether directly or not.
I am uncertain if Epstein'sinvolved in mass.
I mean we're talking on thethousands scale of child
trafficking.
I believe he trafficked overthe years hundreds of teenage
girls to various locations andmost of them were kind of in
this, came off the streets.

(01:27:23):
I'll pay for your dance.
You know I'll pay for much morebelievable yeah, I don't know
that he's involved in the masstrafficking, but it gives you a
avatar to project all of thatangst about worldwide sex
trafficking.
Yes, onto one man who's dead,by the way right, right and so
well, who are his associates?

Speaker 8 (01:27:41):
they all have to go down so if you, if you got some
hate in your heart and you wantsomebody to punch, this is the
guy you can punch.

Speaker 2 (01:27:48):
You know, but he's already dead but he's already
dead, so we'll just punch hisfriends.

Speaker 8 (01:27:51):
Right.

Speaker 2 (01:27:51):
You know which?
Maybe they deserve it, I don'tknow, but the point is on the
scale.
It's HHS we're talking.
Alexander Mayorkas is theworld's leading child trafficker
.

Speaker 8 (01:28:04):
Well, we're not talking about numbers like 300,
000.
You need an industrial 500, 500, oh geez.

Speaker 2 (01:28:07):
Well, you need an industrial machine to be able to
move that kind of numbersexactly, which is where we have
the whistleblower saying we werecontracted millions 43 million
dollars to transport miners tohomes of unvetted uh, people.
I mean, it's every day.
There's these little reports.
I rarely touch on them becausethey're depressing as all get

(01:28:28):
out.
But, it's there, it's in thebackground.

Speaker 8 (01:28:32):
Well, we have covered a few of these stories where
you have couples that havesomehow gotten 30 or 40 kids
delivered to them.
It's like what the heckhappened to all these kids.

Speaker 2 (01:28:41):
I know.

Speaker 8 (01:28:42):
It's crazy.

Speaker 2 (01:28:44):
Okay, so we have reached the end of our public
show today and we are going tojump over to private.
Thank you guys so much forsticking through us.
We had big things happen today.
We had qr codes on the screen,we read some ads.
We are grown as a show and weabsolutely love it and we are so
happy to have all of you guysalong for the ride.
So thank you very much.
Do we have to do?

Speaker 8 (01:29:03):
Yeah, we got five minutes before we can do it,
okay.

Speaker 2 (01:29:07):
So we have to do one more?
Yeah, all right.
So are we sticking around forfive minutes?
Is that what you're telling me?
Yeah, slave driver.
Did we just get into a spotwhere now the ads run the show?
Has it just happened in realtime, in front of our dedicated
audience, that all of a sudden,we're like kowtowing to the
pennies literally pennies thatthey're throwing at us.

(01:29:29):
Is that what just happened here?
Six cents to read an ad oh mygoodness, we got to keep the
show going because we got toread an ad.
We got to get another sevencents.
We're going to be rich.
Ladies and gentlemen, this isthe takeover of our democracy.
You've got buymeacoffeecomforward, slash peasants, where

(01:29:49):
you can support the showdirectly.
You can subscribe on twitter.
You can subscribe on rumble topay direct.
There's multiple ways.
You can come join us over at1776 live, but this show has to
pay for itself.
This is not a non-profit fromthe comfort of your office, ron.
Okay, this is a.
We can't even do it.

(01:30:10):
We don't have enough people.
This is a passion project, butgive me a break.
I just got out of prison a fewmonths ago.
Okay, I don't have like deeppockets here, so so we gotta.
You know, some ads would be nice, but what just happened here?
I got wrong.
It doesn't drink coffee, doingcoffee ads and football ads.
It's great man.
This is awesome.

(01:30:30):
This is the best, and I don'teven know if we can do one,
because I think, okay, some ofour YouTube listeners, you need
to go over onto Rumble.
I need you to go over to Rumble, open the tab, establish
yourself as a viewer there sothat in about what three minutes
, ron, we can do our final adreads, so we can go over to

(01:30:52):
private and talk over there.
So in the meantime, I'm goingto play this video about AI, and
if anything tells you that thisshow is not an AI show, this
will demonstrate it.
These are some music producerswho used AI to create some music
.
Now I have used AI from time totime and I am blown away at its

(01:31:14):
processing capacity.
It hallucinates.
It's not great.
Yes, they're probably going todestroy mankind, but is this
Rick Beato?
I don't know who this is, but isthis Rick Beato.

Speaker 8 (01:31:24):
I don't know who this is, but it is yes, it is yes.

Speaker 2 (01:31:25):
So, but AI is an incredible tool and it makes
certain that.
I heard someone say I want a.
I think I might have read thison here, but it was like I want
AI to do the dishes and fold thelaundry so that I can do
writing and make art.
I don't want AI to do writingand make art so I can do the
dishes, and exactly so.
This is one of those instanceswhere ai is taking away the

(01:31:47):
things that used to bring us joyand passion yeah and it's,
frankly, doing it better than weare.
So while we play this it's onlya minute I need people that are
listening on youtube and I knowthere's a bunch of you to jump
over onto rumble so that we cando our last ad.
Read this this is incrediblyimportant for us.
Otherwise it kind of ruins thewhole day.
So while we watch this video,migrate over and and then, uh,

(01:32:11):
we'll talk on the other side ofthis.
So this is AI creating music.

Speaker 11 (01:32:14):
Here's my prompt create a square avatar of a
fictitious female alternativeslash indie singer and a name
for her Wow, sadie winners,sadie winners, okay, okay.
The song is about walking awayfrom someone who never really
saw her worth just going tocreate the song lyrics wait, how
many seconds was that?
That was like a video it'sfrozen I know it's broken did

(01:32:38):
you even see this?

Speaker 8 (01:32:39):
video.
What do you mean?
I've seen this video, I watchedit yesterday did we?

Speaker 2 (01:32:44):
we didn't watch it in here.

Speaker 8 (01:32:45):
No, I watched it.

Speaker 11 (01:32:47):
I watched it independently female alternative
slash indie singer and a namefor her wow, sadie winners,
sadie winners.
Okay, the song is about walkingaway from someone who never
really saw her worth just goingto create the song lyrics yeah,
wait, how many seconds was that?

Speaker 5 (01:33:04):
that was like more seconds God did you even read
any of these, or you don't careI?

Speaker 11 (01:33:11):
don't care, but my lyrics in the lyrics that happen
in four seconds, yes, and thenhit create.
Let's listen this is the worldpremiere.

Speaker 13 (01:33:20):
I was paper, you were scissors.
Cut me out Good singer, goodsinger.
Ooh, that's nice.

Speaker 17 (01:33:41):
Where are we, Rick?
Where have we found ourselves?

Speaker 11 (01:33:45):
I mean, it's pretty amazing.
Actually I hate to say it.

Speaker 2 (01:33:51):
Yeah, that kind of freaks me out a little bit,
because you make amazing music,that you search the world over
for a talent and instead inunder one minute it produced a
show, a hit.
It makes me wonder um how hardis taylor sift work ring there
was a rapper that was on sayingyeah, I used chat gp, gpt to

(01:34:13):
write my rap lyrics.
I did my whole last album on itand they were like what he's
like?
Yeah, no, it was sick, I justput in like a prompt and it
kicked out a whole thing and Ijust went with it and it's like
oh, okay I guess anybody can bea rap star all the.
You know it.
It changes the calculation.
You don't have to have thecreative talent, you just have
to have the vocals.

Speaker 8 (01:34:32):
The ai can be the creative lyric I don't think you
even need any of that.
You just need the look, becauseai and auto-tune can make you
sound anything you want to beexactly, it's incredible.

Speaker 2 (01:34:43):
All right, we good now.
Um, oh yes, all right, we'redoing it hold on, let me, I
gotta find one oh let's see Igotta say in my appreciate.
I really appreciate rumble andwhat they've done for us as a
show.
I appreciate them accepting usinto the creators program and,

(01:35:05):
uh, giving us a huge license,never had any free speech issues
with rumble whatsoever and uh,I absolutely think rumble is a
dynamite platform.
I think that it has keptyoutube in check.
I know it has a lot smallermarket share, but it has.
It has become the thing that ifyoutube censors and rumble does
not, it drives so much trafficto rumble that youtube basically

(01:35:29):
shot themselves in the foot.
They could have gone on foreveras a total monopoly for video
streaming, but because theychose to censor, there was the
rumble outlet, who, who didbetter than bit shoot and better
than uh, red pill and some ofthe other groups in basically
capturing the overflow market.

Speaker 8 (01:35:46):
Let's do a little bit here to promote Rumble, then
Great.
The countdown is over, therivalries are real and the road
to the championship begins.
On August 23rd, westwood OneSports brings you every
electrifying moment of NCAAfootball, from the first snap to
the final whistle top teams,big plays, unforgettable

(01:36:07):
Saturdays.
Don't miss a second of theaction.
Listen to NCAA football onrumblecom, the Westwood one
sports app, on Westwood onesportscom, via Westwood one
station streams or by askingAlexa to open Westwood One
Sports.
If it's sports, it's onWestwood One.

Speaker 2 (01:36:28):
Alexa open Westwood One Sports.

Speaker 8 (01:36:31):
Somebody out there is like Daniel Alexa, stop cancel.

Speaker 2 (01:36:35):
Stop Alexa, stop.
That's really cool Rumble doesNCAA?
I know we have NCAA fans here.
College football is like a cultthing, seriously, so definitely
very cool.
Glad they're getting into thesports market.
That is a huge market, Holy cow.
All right, guys, we are goingto jump over onto private.
Thank you for joining us forthe last ad read of the day

(01:36:56):
Again you love having the ads.
It's hilarious that in realtime our show just got literally
threw a nickel at us.

Speaker 8 (01:37:06):
Pretty soon it'll be brought to you by Pfizer.

Speaker 2 (01:37:08):
I got to tell you, if we do anything Pfizer related,
you can tune out, but they'reprobably not interested in us
until you know.
Whatever Guys you vote withyour eyes, your dollars and your
clicks.
There's a website that I haveneglected to promote.
That was a joint projectbetween myself and one of the
listeners from season one.
It's dollarsvoteloudercom.

(01:37:29):
And at that website.
You can go and you can findalternatives to your most
progressive things.
Right, that's links to PatriotMobile instead of using AT&T
Verizon.
There's links to Amazonalternatives and things like
that.
That's a place for you to goand find alternatives to the
companies that do not supportour needs.
You vote with your eyes, yourdollars and your clicks.
That's the only way we movethings.

(01:37:51):
Trust me, the elite care aboutwhat the peasants think.
Our pitchforks are sharp and wecontrol we do actually control
the vast amount of money in thiscountry.
You know you can get as good asyou want with AI, as good as
you want for the production, butif you don't have customers,
they don't have anything.
So I encourage you not to buyAI albums.
Continue to support real, rawshows like this.
We clearly are not AI and,anyways, we love you guys so

(01:38:17):
much.
We're going to jump over ontoprivate and we've got a little
video over there that we'regoing to listen to about
democracy versus the Republic.
So we'll talk to the rest ofyou guys again tomorrow those of
you on rumble premium.
We look forward to seeing youin just a minute.
Thank you so much.
And a sapphire patriot says yes, don't forget to smash that
like button y'all, it does helpthe show grow.

Speaker 8 (01:38:36):
Thank you, we closing yeah, old woman, man man sorry
what night lives in that castleover there.

Speaker 3 (01:38:55):
I'm 37 Old woman, man , man, sorry, what knight lives
in that castle over there?
I'm 37.
What I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.

(01:39:18):
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king, eh,very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going

(01:39:38):
to be any progress.
There is.
There's some lovely filth downhere.

Speaker 21 (01:39:41):
Oh how do you do?
How do you do?
Good lady, I am Arthur, king ofthe Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 3 (01:39:56):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes ohthere you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 21 (01:40:09):
If only people would Please please good people, I am
in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord we?

Speaker 3 (01:40:18):
don't have a lord what I told you.
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week, but all the decisionsof that officer have to be
ratified at a special bi-weeklymeeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet butby a two-thirds majority in the
case of more major.

(01:40:38):
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I am your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings?
Well, I can become king.
Then the lady of the lake, herarm clad in the purest,
shimmering samite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the
water, signifying, by divineprovidence, that I, arthur, was

(01:41:02):
to carry Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:41:23):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help help, I'm being repressed,bloody pe.

(01:41:43):
Violence inherent in the system.
Help help, I'm being repressed,bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Hey, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

Speaker 8 (01:41:58):
there, we are all right we're back, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:42:01):
You just said never get tired listening to the outro
with Bunny.
Python.
I don't either.
I don't, either.
I think it's like.
It's such a perfectencapsulation.
It is the most precisepolitical treaties acted out in
a skit.
Right, I mean, it's just Fromlike 40 years ago.

(01:42:22):
Supreme executive authorityderives from a mandate of the
masses, just because somefarcical aquatic being through a
scimitar does not make you aking.
I love.
It's like yes, yes, come, comesee the violence, the violence
inherent in the system.
Who are the brits?
We're all brits, we're allbrits.
Oh, anyways, I love it.

(01:42:45):
So this guy right here it saysup here at the top he dropped
this on us before he died AaronRusso, don't know anything about
him, but he says somethingthat's pretty, pretty
enlightening.
And you know, sometimes we beaton the dead horse when we talk
about the system and stuff likethat.
But you can't talk about itenough.
You can't talk about it enough,you can't Right.
Until everybody sees what it is, it will not change.

(01:43:05):
You can't change something thatis cloaked, obscure.
If you think the smoke monsteris real and has real power, then
you're going to constantly bein a prison of smoke, of nothing
.
Right, we are not captives, weare free beings.
The problem is we've run aprison in our own minds.

Speaker 8 (01:43:22):
Yeah, we're just trying to end the gaslighting
here, folks.

Speaker 2 (01:43:24):
Yes, and our forefathers granted us something
.
They gave us a republic, arepublic that allows you to be
free a minority of one, ifnecessary.
So let's listen to what he hasto say here.

Speaker 16 (01:43:36):
No.
If you ask 100 people on thestreet what kind of government
is America supposed to be,ninety 99% of them will tell you
a democracy.
But that's a lie.
The word democracy is notwritten into the Constitution at
one time.
It's not in the Bill of Rights.
It's not in the Declaration ofIndependence.
The founding fathers hated theidea of a democracy.

(01:43:57):
They thought it was the worstform of government there is.
And I agree with them, becausein a democracy, 51% of the
people control 49% of the people.
If you're part of the 49%,you're not free.
America was founded as aconstitutional republic and in
that constitutional republicthat we have, 99% of the people

(01:44:18):
can't take away the rights of 1%.
You have your rights becauseyou were born with them, human
rights that nobody can take awayfrom.
Rights because you were bornwith them human rights that
nobody can take away from you.
The government, the majority,no matter who they are.
I can't take away your rights,and that's what our founding
fathers gave us.
But the psychologicaloperations that they do to us,
they make us believe that we'rea democracy and that majority

(01:44:40):
rules.
You see, and they want you tobelieve that, because then they
tell you this poll says thismany want this and this many
want that and this many wantthis, and it doesn't have
anything to do with anything.
You hear George Bush sayingdemocracy means freedom.
No, democracy equals New WorldOrder.
Democracy equals slavery.
The word democracy is notsynonymous with freedom.

(01:45:02):
It's the opposite of freedom.
Democracy is the worst form ofgovernment.
You with freedom.
It's the opposite of freedom.
Democracy is the worst form ofgovernment.
You can have it's majority ruleand the government can tell you
exactly what they want to tellyou to do.
The majority wants it.
I don't care what the majoritywants.
I live my life as I choose andif I don't commit violence,
theft or fraud against anotherhuman being, I can live my life

(01:45:24):
as I wish.
That's my choice.
And if I'm allowed to makemistakes because when you make
mistakes you learn from them yougrow as a human being.
We're put on this earth tobecome the best individuals we
can be.
We're not here to put on thisearth so the government can tell
us how to live our lives andwhat we must do.
We put into these systems andthese paradigms no I think

(01:45:47):
that's really interestingbecause that dude is the
director for a bunch of moviesthat you've probably seen.

Speaker 8 (01:45:55):
The most important one that he did was one called
trading places with with uh uhtrading places.

Speaker 2 (01:46:04):
I know it took uh the black guy, what's his name?
And and eddie murphy and eddiemurphy and dan akroyd, yes.
And he switched places and onebecame a wall street executive,
the other guy became a bum andit was like he directed that
movie and they couldn't survivein each other's worlds.
That's right.
That's right.
Yes, that's interesting.
I didn't know again, you know,don't know who some people are.

Speaker 8 (01:46:25):
Ron's clearly got the 80s down pack he did some other
stuff too, but that wasprobably his best one but he's
exactly right.

Speaker 2 (01:46:33):
Right, and we've run into this position in our
country where a small minorityspecifically we're here, I'm
going to talk about the lgbtqplus I zxy movement it's a small
, tiny minority, one, fourpercent max if you extend out
the b right.
So how did they force my kidsto learn about things in school?

(01:46:57):
How did they do that?
Well, they leveraged thedemocracy.
They leveraged the democracy.
Their rights were protected.
You mean they leveraged thedemocracy.
Their rights were protected.
You want to cross-dress?
Ain't no one going to stop youUntil you infringe on someone
else's rights Going to a lady'srestroom?
You've got to deal with that.
That's an interpersonalconflict and you might be asked

(01:47:17):
to leave the restroom if someonemakes a complaint.
You know what I'm saying.

Speaker 8 (01:47:26):
But this idea that somehow the minority can
weaponize the majority to getthe barely not a majority to go
along with it, that's hell well,we do right, we do write our
own history books, and then weteach from those history books
what we want people to knowabout history so pony boy says
russo was a friend of therockefellers.

Speaker 2 (01:47:45):
You know, I have an interesting relationship with
the rockefellers because on onehand you've got a lot of
nefarious stuff attributed tothem, but I often wonder if it's
so much that they werenefarious in their day, or if
the result of what they did wasnefarious.
For example, I could make areally good case against Abraham
Lincoln that he was a tyrant,that he was a dictator, that he

(01:48:08):
shredded the Constitution, toquote unquote, save it Right.
Totally can't happen that way.
I could make a case that manyof the woes we feel today with
the interplay between the statesand the federal government is a
direct result of AbrahamLincoln's prosecuting the Civil
War in the way he did.
Right?
I think the same thing with theRockefellers.
If it weren't for theRockefellers, no national park

(01:48:29):
system.
If it weren't for theRockefellers, public education
would be something differentthan it is now Not necessarily
better.
Okay, so in their day theycreated mass education systems.
They created mass educationsystems.
They created mass transitsystems.
They created a park, theysupported a park system.

(01:48:49):
They did good things in theirmoment, right, not saying
everything they've done ever isgreat, but sometimes I wonder.

Speaker 8 (01:48:57):
Just think about what life was like before we had an
education system at all.

Speaker 2 (01:49:01):
Well, sometimes I think we look back and we don't
recognize that in the momentthat was the solution they
needed.
Like I mentioned.
At the beginning of the show,the woman got up.
I'm running for school board.
We need oh, I didn't mentionthis- oh.
OK, so someone gets up.
Support you know conservativeRepublican lover.
More power to her.

(01:49:22):
I want her to get elected.
She gets up in a meeting andgoes running for school board.
Scores are down, readingproficiencies of 54%.
Uh, science is at 27%.
Math is at 30%.
Failing our students, blah,blah, blah.
We're moving into this goldenage and we need factory workers.
These words came out of hermouth, mouth we need factory

(01:49:43):
workers and we needmanufacturers.
We need good, educated people togo get those jobs.
So we want I'm running forschool board to you know
indoctrinate the kids to be goodemployees and good factory
workers.
And I thought and in the nextbreath you'll blame the
rockefellers for but yet you'renow part of it, because in this
moment, guess what the need is.

(01:50:04):
We need factory workers, notartists.
Enough with the english litdegrees, let's get some
engineering and some stem.
That's what the rockefellerswere thinking in their moment
they were like enough with thephd, economists and stuff like
that.
I need someone that can dobasic engineering and work on an
assembly line put widgetstogether but put things together

(01:50:24):
, yes.
So I'm always very hesitant to.
I want to really look atsomething in its moment.
There's a, there's a verse inthe Bible where it goes Noah in
his day was good.
Noah was a bad dude.
If you use revisionist history,abraham warlord right.
David, polygamist, womanizingphilanderer, uh, uh gideon, uh,

(01:50:49):
also womanizing philanderer.
And, by the way, uh, terrorist,you know, taking down that ball
tower.
So you've got to judge them intheir day in the context with
what they're doing.
Thomas jefferson hero, slaveowner, you know what I mean.
You could call them all fascistsyou can call them all fascist,

(01:51:09):
communist, horrible people.
Revisionist history issometimes when we take our our
lens and our paradigm on ourvalues of the day and we look
back in time and we go, oh,these were bad dudes or these
were good dudes.
Projection no, no, no no yougot to judge them by the
standards of their day.
It's just otherwise.
You do end up just turning overhistory and over and over again
you get different results everytime when the reality is you

(01:51:31):
look around you what's builthere, the rockefellers.
When I'm driving throughnational park I'm thinking the
rockefellers, you know what Imean?
Do I think the outcome of thethings that they did, like the,
the medical school stuff and howthey just listen?
Medical maybe isn't a factory,you know?
I mean, if we're doing STEM,sure, factory workers, but

(01:51:51):
medical, independent thinking,critical thinking, absolute must
.
That's the kind.
Did the Rockefellers eliminatecritical thinking from medical?
Probably not.
But they made medical schoolavailable to the max amount of
people.
It's that people who don'tunderstand the greater vision of
things turned it into a factoryprogram.
Pharmaceuticals said we want tocreate internalists which
basically run hospitals andstandardize everything.

(01:52:13):
That's not a Rockefellercreation, that's a Rockefeller
outcome, not part of theirintent.
My belief right.
Again, I'm not pro Rockef,anti-rockefeller.
They were a part of them.
Things I believe they're partof uh, creature from jekyll
island and the fed reserve, nobueno, but that was even that
was created to solve a problemof bank liquidity and stuff like

(01:52:35):
that.
Again, we got to judge them intheir day.
We also judge the outcomes.
I don't like central banking.
Its entire premise doesn't workfor me.
I'd rather go broke and rebuildfrom zero than prop up a house
of cards that when it falls down, everybody starves, you know.
So, okay, that is it for theshow today.
Thank you for listening to meramble.
Sometimes I feel like when wego on these political things,

(01:52:55):
I'm so little nuanced in how tolook at it.
But I think it's important forus to look at people like the
Rockefellers and go.
You know, russo was a friend ofthe Rockefellers.
I don't know if that's good orbad, I don't know what that
means anymore.
I can only judge it from thelens of a peasant right now.
I think school is good Ifyou're doing STEM.
If you're not doing STEM andyou don't intend to work on a
factory your whole life, youtubeuniversity might be a way for

(01:53:18):
you to go.

Speaker 8 (01:53:18):
Probably wasting your time.

Speaker 2 (01:53:19):
You're probably wasting your time.
All right, guys, that's it.

Speaker 3 (01:53:22):
We'll talk to you again tomorrow so Old woman, man

(01:53:49):
, man, sorry, what knight livesin that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.

(01:54:09):
Well, I am king, oh, king, eh,very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh.

Speaker 21 (01:54:28):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 3 (01:54:44):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,A self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes ohthere you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 21 (01:54:54):
If only people would Please, please, good people I
am in haste who lives in thatcastle?
No one lives there.

Speaker 3 (01:55:02):
Then who is your lord ?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority ina case of more major, be quiet.

(01:55:24):
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings?
Well, I can become king.
Then the lady of the lake, herarm clad in the purest,
shimmering samite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the
water, signifying by divineprovidence that I, arthur, was

(01:55:47):
to carry Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power from a
mandate from the masses, notfrom some farcical aquatic
ceremony Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:56:08):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up Now?
We see the violence inherent inthe system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.

(01:56:29):
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Democracy vs. Republic: Understanding Our Constitutional Foundation

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Democracy vs. Republic: Understanding Our Constitutional Foundation

Stuff You Should Know