Exposing the Clinton Conspiracy While Our Border Burns

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
And when they went to the queen to tell her whose
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here you takethe bomb.

Speaker 3 (00:13):
We're getting screwed man, every time we turn around,
we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting, for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
The revolution is going to bethrough podcasting, for sure,
that's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's got to stop.

(00:35):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the Kings and
Kings walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
We're those people good morning, peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe peasants perspective.
It's monday and I noticed ouraudio listeners.

(00:57):
Hello, hello, you guys continueto download through the weekend
as we released episodes ofseason one.
Yeah, that's kind of fun.
So, yeah, absolutely, those ofyou that are video listeners,
please take a moment to find uson your favorite audio podcast
app and set it to automaticdownloads.
Yeah, yeah, we got all thesetricks.

(01:23):
That way, we get downloadcredits.
Anything we can do to grow theshow.
Anyways, we're having a goodtime, obviously, obviously,
otherwise we wouldn't be doingthis.

Speaker 5 (01:35):
This sucks, it's early in the morning.
If you watch those earlyepisodes you can really tell
we're not a uh, yeah, definitelyanyways, I'm just getting the
chats popped out, good morningjohn tax good morning, welcome,
welcome.

Speaker 3 (01:49):
I'm probably getting double feedback as I open up the
youtube and the rumble and pullthe chats off so okay, here we
go.

Speaker 5 (01:57):
I was wondering where that was coming from yeah, yeah
, it's me, it's me.

Speaker 3 (02:02):
Okay, let's jump into it this morning.
So over the weekend, as always,a bunch of stuff happens.
No way we're ever going tocatch up on all of it.
But this I think this isactually an old clip.
This is hillary clinton onsmirkomish and on cnn and she's
talking about section 230.
Do you know what?
Section 230?
is no it's the provision in thelaw.

(02:23):
It's called section 230.
I don't know what, what numberit is, but something you know.
Title something section 230.
Uh, section 230 allowsplatforms, for example, facebook
, x, twitter, myspace, etc.
Etc.
To be considered justintermediaries, like they don't

(02:43):
take publishing responsibility.
So if a lie gets published ontheir platform, youtube is not
responsible, x is notresponsible, the poster is
responsible.
So it indemnifies the platforms.
But of course this was underthe idea that they were
respecting free speech andpeople could post whatever they
want, right as soon as theystart curating and editing and
shadow banning.
Now, now they're in theeditorial business and now

(03:04):
they're a publisher, and sothere's a big conflict because
conservatives have been like,hey, you got to do something
about Section 230.
And Democrats were like, no, no, don't do anything about 230.
And then, as soon as kind ofthe zeitgeist switch, they're
like, ah, we got to get rid of230.
This is Hillary Clinton talkingabout that.

Speaker 11 (03:22):
We should be, in my view, repealing something called
Section 230, which gave, youknow, platforms on the Internet
immunity because they werethought to be just pass throughs
, that they shouldn't be judgedfor the content that is posted.
View that if the platforms,whether it's facebook or twitter

(03:44):
, x or uh, instagram or tiktok,whatever they are, if they don't
moderate uh and monitor thecontent uh, we lose total
control and it's not just thesocial and psychological effects
.

Speaker 3 (03:58):
It's real harm we lose total control right there
keyword we use who's we?
Who's we?
Is it the elusive they oh andthey just figured this out.

Speaker 5 (04:07):
They just figured this out, just figured this out
we lose total control,interesting, all right.

Speaker 3 (04:14):
so the total control narrative, that's what we're
going with here.
So here's an example thisweekend.
Uh, well, let's, I'm gonna savethis, let's talk about some
ways that they lose control.
So this this is Dan Bongino.
As you know, he's the deputydirector of the FBI, the number
two in charge, and he said this.
So this is in response to liketwo posts.

(04:35):
So Jonathan Lee Meyer said this.
He said he wrote with I thinkthis is New York Times.
The headline is Clinton planEmails were likely made by
Russian.
This is New York Times.
The headline is Clinton planplan Emails were likely made by
Russian spies.
New documents show so the NewYork Times is now running with
that Hillary was fooled by theRussians.

Speaker 9 (04:55):
Oh, this is all.
This is bigger, this is likeRussia.

Speaker 3 (04:58):
This is like double Russia makeup.
You know they made up theevidence and then the whole
Russiagate scam.
Is them trusting the evidencethat was made up by russia?
Okay, so they're trying toagain obfuscate the actual
responsibility.
So sean davis posted a responseto this.
But before we read that, let'sread what this sounds so dumb oh
my gosh.
Yeah, this weekend I had a verydear friend that was like well,

(05:21):
what about all this trump andepstein stuff?
And I was like.
I was like oh my gosh, it'ssuch a hoax.
He's like what do you mean?
Trump and epstein?
Or like trump and epstein's ahoax?
Epstein's not a hoax, he's amisdirection play, in my opinion
.
So I went off.
This sounds like a schoolyardspat, where it's like you're the
liar, no, you're the liar sodan bongino said this it's sad

(05:43):
that we have to constantly gothrough this exercise with media
figures obsessed with falsenarratives.
Yeah, sean, sean davis, whowe're going to read in a moment,
is correct as he lays out thefact pattern about the attempted
takedown of president trump.
I strongly all caps caution youagainst accepting media-driven
narratives about the collusionhoax, given their roles and

(06:04):
promoting the hoax in the firstplace, and the discovery of new
information since the directorand I took over.
John davis is kind ofcorrecting the record here, so
let's read this again.
We want to ingest as muchinformation about this as
possible so that we can make ajudgment, because if there's one
thing we know for sure, wecan't trust any of these guys,
including Dan Bongino and CashPatel, et cetera, et cetera.

(06:26):
At a certain point.
Yes, they get a little bit ofextra credence and will maybe
weight our opinion heavily ontheir opinions.
But at the end of the day,you've got to make up your own
decision.
You've got to live here.
You've got to survive totomorrow.

Speaker 5 (06:38):
Remember there's a lot of squirreliness and you
know Democrat, republican, youcan't trust either side listen,
hold a mirror up to yourself.

Speaker 3 (06:46):
All of us has been in some spot where a white lie
might get you out of it, andyou'll tell the white lie oh
yeah, especially to your kidsespecially your kids, yeah, or
your spouse.
You'll tell the white lie.
But then that white light kindof blows up because they're like
oh hey, turns out I knowdifferent, oh well, then the
gaslighting begins.
You, you don't believe yourlying eyes.
It's not what it shows at all.
The New York Times is straightup lying, says Sean Davis.

(07:09):
One the Durham annex neverstates at all the specific
intelligence was fabricated.
It says the opposite that hisoffice was never able to
determine definitively thepurported Clinton campaign plan
Intelligence was entirelygenuine, partly true.
Clinton campaign planintelligence was entirely
genuine, partly true.
A composite pulled frommultiple sources, exaggerated in
certain respects or fabricatedin its entirely.

(07:30):
Two at the time the intel whichBen Smith says was fake was
received.
John Brennan took it soseriously that he briefed Obama
about it, took notes about itand stashed the notes away in
his safe.
Three James Comey specificallywent under oath and cited the
Clinton plan intelligence as oneof the major reasons he chose

(07:50):
to unilaterally usurp authorityof Loretta Lynch and declare
that the US government would notcharge Hillary Clinton for her
use of an illegal private emailserver.
Four Comey told Congress thathe believed the Clinton plan
intelligence was genuine.
So far as quote so far as Ibelieved the Clinton pan
intelligence was genuine, so faras quote as quote.
So far as I knew at the timeand still think Comey testified

(08:10):
on December 7th 2018, thematerial itself was genuine.
Five FBI General Counsel JamesBaker, who went on to work at X
while they were releasing theTwitter files, said he was
greatly concerned about theintel and specifically I lost my
screen and specifically Lynch'sreaction when confronted with
it.

(08:31):
Durham's report said Baker didnot dismiss the credibility of
the intel reports.
Andrew McCabe likely said hewas struck.
Likewise said he was struck byLynch's odd reaction to the
allegations, as in she alreadyknew about him.
Six said he was struck bylynch's odd reaction to the
allegations, as in she alreadyknew about him.
Six everyone on earth knows theclinton campaign launched a
scheme to falsely claim thattrump clued with russia.
This new claim that somehow itwas a fabrication that the

(08:54):
clinton campaign ran an op tofalsely tie trump to russia is
beyond insane.

Speaker 5 (08:59):
It's sociopathic I think number six should be
number one yeah, well, that'sthe big but, All the other
things have to be false in orderfor this to work.

Speaker 3 (09:07):
Everyone on Earth knows the Clinton campaign
launched a scheme to falselyclaim that Trump colluded with
Russia.
This new claim, this is the newthing that the mainstream media
is running with is that somehowit was a fabrication that the
Clinton campaign ran an op tofalsely type Russia is beyond
insane, it's sociopathic.
Yes, so they're losing control.

Speaker 5 (09:31):
Yeah, they're losing control and there's a lot of
sociopaths out there.

Speaker 3 (09:36):
Yeah.
So here is another example justproving the point that they're
losing control.
They've not only lost controlof the media narrative at large,
but they've lost actual control.
The things that they promoted,that they did have not been
working, specifically the border.
And then, of course, anythingto try to divide Trump's base
seems to do the opposite effect.

Speaker 13 (09:57):
The Donald Trump administration is arguably the
most influential this centuryand probably as well, dating
back a good portion of the lastcentury as well.
Love it like it, lump it.
Trump is remaking in the unitedstates of america.
Let's talk about tariffs first.
Right, there's all this talkthat donald trump always
chickens out when it comes totariffs.
Uh-uh, no tacos for trump.

(10:17):
The effect of tariff rate getthis.
It's 18, the highest, thehighest since the fdr
administration in the 1930s upfrom.
Get this just two percent lastyear, from just two percent last
year.
We're talking about a level, aneffective tariff rate level.
Get this nine times as highthis year than last year.
But it's not just on tariffs,which of course, donald Trump

(10:39):
ran on, in which you're seeing atremendously influential
presidency.
What about immigration?
Of course Trump ran and hasalways run on a very hawkish
immigration platform.
Get this 2025 net migration inthe United States down at least
60% from last year.
In fact, we may be heading forthe first time in at least 50
years in which we have netnegative, net negative migration

(11:02):
into the United States.
And last year, of course, in2024, the net migration in the
US was two point eight million.
This year we might be talkingabout negative net migration, my
goodness gracious.
Now, of course, this is part ofthe larger story, as I was
mentioning.
We're talking about immigration, net migration, we're talking
about the effective tariff rate.
But get this how is DonaldTrump doing it?

(11:23):
Well, he is signing a ton ofexecutive orders.
Get this One hundred and eighty, the most in a year since
Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Oh, you have to go back to thefirst half of the 20th century,
the last century, and to make acomparison, joe Biden signed Get
this Just seventy seven duringhis entire first year, and we're

(11:44):
only a little bit in August sofar, and Donald Trump making
history with 180, 180 executiveorders signed so far this year.
So that's why I said that, inmy mind, donald Trump is the
most influential president ofthis century and probably dating
back a good portion of the lastcentury.
That is because he is remakingthe country in terms of tariffs.

(12:04):
He is remaking the country interms of tariffs, he is remaking
the country in terms of netmigration and he is remaking the
country in terms of how muchpolicy changes he's putting
through in executive orders.
As I said, it truly is historymaking.
Love it, like it or lump it.

Speaker 3 (12:18):
Now, if Hillary Clinton had her way, CNN would
not be able to run pieces likethat.
They wouldn't have this guy onat all fire one to make an
example of them as I waswondering how long this guy was
gonna last negative netmigration.
Yeah, more people might leavethe country than came into the
country.

Speaker 5 (12:37):
Yeah, the other thing I like is uh well, don't like,
but um noticed was that it seemslike every cycle the president
you know signs a huge number ofexecutive orders and it's like
more than the last, you know,several decades, and everybody
complains about it.
And then the very next cycle,the next president does even
more.
What the heck seems like?

(13:00):
We were complaining about thenumber of executive orders that
trump was doing the first termand then Biden did more and now
it's progressively more.

Speaker 3 (13:09):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (13:10):
And I think this is like saying something about the
executive branch here.

Speaker 3 (13:14):
Yeah, the executive branch definitely has a lot of
power and I think a lot of it, alot of these executive orders.
When you go look at them,they're they're saying we're
going to follow the law, yeah,we're going to undo the
exceptions that were made inprevious administrations and
stuff like right so, and some ofit is completely valid and some
of that is why the number keepsgrowing, because it's like yeah

(13:36):
, and then of course you've gotones like getting rid of
birthright citizenship, likethat's challenging a
constitutional understanding ofa policy that was never
legislated Right.
So there's some interestingthings that he's done with those
, but for the most part I justlook at that and I'm like I mean
, is what it is?
Legislature's deadlocked,government's got to move forward
.
Executive branch is typicallywhat we interface with.

(13:57):
So here's the other thing too.
Over the weekend, a couple ofthings.
Trump had some Supreme Courtdecision that is allowing him to
continue to fire more and morepeople.
So, uh, sloppidopolis, on abc,had an interview with an
economist because one of thethings that happened was drone
pal kept the rates high lastweek, right.
So just before uh rates go out,we get employment numbers that

(14:22):
are strong and then they getrevision downward to be pretty
much weak, kind of like a breakeven, and the revision downward
is like why is this happening?
Ok, what's going on here?
Well, we mentioned last weekthat the employment data is done
via survey.
Well, apparently there's alittle misunderstanding about
how impactful these surveys canbe.
So Papadopoulos had his experton TV because Trump fired the

(14:47):
lady that's part of the Bureauof Labor Statistics that
collects these surveys.
He said she's a Biden holdover.
She tried to help Biden byjuicing the numbers you know and
revising down on, basicallywhen it wasn't politically
hurtful for him.
And Jerome Powell, of course,used those numbers to base his
decisions on rates.
And now these numbers come outand then immediately, as soon as
rates stay, the same numberscome out to go down.

(15:09):
If Jerome Powell had known thatthe employment data was down,
he would have been forced tolower rates.
So, it's very convenient that itwas just before, just after
Jerome Powell cites it as one ofthe reasons why he keeps rates
high and then, all of a sudden,the underlying number changes.
So, it's like what's happeninghere?
So Donald Trump she, you knowtakes the door.

(15:29):
He's like, nah, this isn'thappening, she's playing
politics.
How is she still stickingaround so that crowds cause a
little bit of firestorm?
That merited some reactions.
So this was Papa.
Papa Lisses slop it.
Uh, this was his expert'sopinion on what was going on
there.

Speaker 8 (15:43):
We're joined now by former treasury secretary Larry
Summers.
Larry, thank you for joining us.
Uh, this morning.
I guess this spying of the BLS,commissioner.

Speaker 3 (15:51):
Okay, larry Summers, former treasury secretary.
I don't know who he wastreasury secretary for, I don't
remember.
I'm assuming it was a Democrat,but listen to how he explains
how the bureaucracy is justdoing its job category of
shocking but not surprising.

Speaker 14 (16:08):
Yeah, I mean this is way beyond anything that
Richard Nixon ever did.
I'm surprised that otherofficials have not responded by
resigning themselves, as tookplace when Richard Nixon fired
people lawlessly.
This is a preposterous charge.

(16:29):
These numbers are put togetherby teams of literally hundreds
of people following detailedprocedures that are in manuals.
There's no conceivable way thatthe head of the BLS could have
manipulated this number.
The numbers are in line withwhat we're seeing from all kinds

(16:50):
of private sector sources.
This is the stuff ofdemocracies giving way to
authoritarianism.
Firing statisticians goes withthreatening the heads of
newspapers.
It goes with launching assaultson universities.

(17:11):
It goes with launching assaultson law firms that defend
clients that the elected bossfinds uncongenial.
This is really scary stuff, andit can hardly be surprising
that, when the rule of law is abit in question, that there's a

(17:34):
big uncertainty premium in themarkets that is operating to
both make there be lessinvestment, which slows the
economy down, and also meansthere's less supply.
So now he's just more he's justcreating this.

Speaker 5 (17:52):
This is just bullshit .
String of words.

Speaker 3 (17:55):
You can tell they always do their job.

Speaker 5 (17:57):
It's perfectly designed, and statisticians they
would.
There's no way that they wouldunderstand how to manipulate
numbers.
Meanwhile, the first stat you'dlearn is 90% of stats are made
up.
Yeah, and statisticians theywould.

Speaker 3 (18:04):
there's no way that they would understand how to
manipulate numbers meanwhile,the first stat you'd learn is 90
of stats are made up.
Yeah, stupidest thing.
I know it's painful.
Pay the pray, the rosary dailyon the rumble chat.
I love that.
This cnn guy, harry hinton hisdelivery is so entertaining and
cnn can't get rid of him.
How they don't censor himawesome, just be killing the

(18:26):
higher ups.
Yeah, I'm sure they get.
I know that it comes up withthe people that sit around the
tables.
You know scott jennings will belike this network just reported
trump's ratings are the highestthey've ever been.
How do you?
How are you saying he's losinghis base?
So, uh, so that's oneperspective, right, trump firing
these people?
This is nixon-esque.

(18:47):
Of course, you always got to goback to the last disgraced
president, sure nixon-esque?
and uh that you know thesenumbers can't be manipulated and
it ties into the bigger factpattern of he's going after
newspapers and universities andlaw firms now remember take each
one of those things in a vacuum.
If Donald Trump was only goingafter the Harvard endowment,

(19:08):
right, we'd be like, ok, well, Ican see the political position.
If he only went after the headsof newspapers that he
successfully prevailed againstin court for slander and libel,
right, then we'd go, ok, in avacuum.
That looks like one thing, butwhen you stack it all up and you
see him going after everyeverything, that guy bullet
pointed he trump has gone afteruniversities, newspapers, law

(19:29):
firms, but then you go.
That's a very different factpattern right now.
Then, on the flip side, we learnabout this running cabal that's
using all of these instrumentsof power.
You go, huh, maybe, maybethey're just duking it out.
Yeah, all the battlefields.
You know what I mean.
There's more than we we usedfour years ago.
This is a multi front war.
This isn't just a front of theDepartment of Education against
Trump.

(19:49):
It's not just the IRSweaponized against conservatives
.
It's an all out effort on theirend to be weaponized against
conservatives and all thingsTrump.
So, yes, his battlefronts arenumerous.

Speaker 5 (20:00):
Right and we're just getting the spillover of the
level two gaslighting.

Speaker 3 (20:04):
Yes.
So this is Jeremy Siegel fromWharton.
He's talking about the BLS data, a little bit of a different
analysis, and he reveals what weknow.
The data might be bunk.

Speaker 7 (20:14):
Professor Emeritus of Finance at University of
Pennsylvania's Wharton School ofBusiness and chief economist at
Wisdom Tree.
I think you're, Jeremy,professor.
Your ship's coming in.
The economy has been weakerthan people thought, I think.

Speaker 16 (20:32):
Yeah, yeah, and first of all, I'm not going to
let the BOS off the hook.
I mean, you talk about how tofix it.
You don't make thesequestionnaires mandatory and
give them a time limit to fillit out, you know?
I mean, I think the responserate's down to 60%.

Speaker 3 (20:53):
So he's going straight at the BLS and he's
saying it's all done byquestionnaire.
So you know those thousands ofstaffers that are going through,
yeah, but it's all done byvoluntary survey and they have a
less than 60% response rate.

Speaker 16 (21:08):
Acceptable for the most important statistic that we
have.
It's almost like we're sendingthem out.
You know, fill it out when youcan.
We know you like to go to thebeach in the summer, so it might
be a little bit late.
You know, this is just notacceptable today.
We need to.
That response rate has to go up.
And when you make the biggestmistake in 50 years, why?

(21:32):
Why wasn't there an explanation?
I mean, who's reporting wrongand why?

Speaker 3 (21:38):
so this particular release was the biggest mistake
in 50 years, so hold on I thinkI'm missing something here.

Speaker 5 (21:43):
What is the response he's talking about?
What are these questionnaires?
Is this?

Speaker 3 (21:47):
so the bureau of labor statistics will come out
with a report.
This is the jobs report, thequarterly jobs increase or the
monthly jobs increase.
Sure, oh, we got.

Speaker 5 (21:55):
We gained 110 000 jobs in the last sure, and
that's uh accumulated by these,these surveys, surveys.
But who are the surveys gettingsent to Business owners?

Speaker 3 (22:05):
Just plural.

Speaker 5 (22:06):
So how are you going to make that mandatory?

Speaker 3 (22:09):
Well, you couldn't for one thing, ok, right, but
the point is is it's bad data?

Speaker 5 (22:14):
I know, but when he was talking about we should make
these mandatory, I thought thatthere were like some hook, like
they were sending it out tolike officials that needed to
respond and just weren't becausethey were on vacation is what
it sounded like.

Speaker 3 (22:25):
Well, that's yeah.
I mean, on their end they get asurvey and they're like, oh,
should I even fill it out?
Right?
Imagine if you got a mailerthat said, hey, can you report,
report your survey stuff.
And you're like it's a survey,so it's random.
It's like Gallup doesn't callyou every time they do a
presidential poll.
One time every handful of yearsyour phone might ring.

Speaker 5 (22:42):
But if I got one of those cards that said, hey, fill
out this survey, I would thinkthis is completely optional.

Speaker 3 (22:48):
Yeah, and it is it is .
But yet we're using that datato determine interest rates and
it becomes very much on thebureaucratic side.
It's like, well, just juice thenumbers and then when some of
those cards come in after thefact because I imagine if people
have less employment they'reless likely to fill the cards
in- OK, so I'm not missingsomething.

Speaker 5 (23:08):
This really is just a survey that they send out and
hope the cards come back.
Yes, OK so this talk aboutmaking it mandatory is just like
he's just saying you got tochange the way we're assessing
employment.

Speaker 3 (23:20):
It's just voluntary reporting.
Your data is garbage.

Speaker 5 (23:23):
Yes, I agree, so one guy's like you have to trust the
data.

Speaker 3 (23:26):
Bls wouldn't manipulate it and this guy's
going.
It's a postcard, yeah.

Speaker 16 (23:37):
Well, I'm saying that even if they got 100% of
the respondents, the data isprobably still a little bit
garbage.
You know there was no, you know, transparency there and I'm not
going to try to justify thefiring or not.
But in this world of theInternet and instantaneous
response, this idea of reportscoming in weeks late, I think is

(24:00):
just totally unacceptable.
And it changed monetary policy.
I mean, you know, I definitelythink there would have been a,
you know, a rate cut at the Julymeeting had we known the
numbers were as weak as it was.
And you know, I think you know,I mean I know one of your past.

(24:21):
You know we're talking aboutinversion of the term structure.

Speaker 3 (24:26):
He's like when you look at all the indicators, we
need a rate cut, except for thisemployment data, which was very
conveniently juiced rightbefore, and then the lowest
revision ever in 50 yearshappened Like wow, you could
manipulate that anyway.

Speaker 5 (24:42):
How come they can't collect this data some other way
?
Isn't there like hard datasomewhere?
Like doesn't the IRS know howmany jobs are out there?
Don't ever, doesn't everybodyfill out a W-2?

Speaker 3 (24:55):
Well, yes and no.
I think that's part of theproblem is employment's
classified differently.
And I even think, being a smallbusiness owner, if I got one of
those business cards like I'vedownsized our business while the
economy was booming, yeah,people around me were hiring if
I'd have got one of those cards,I'm like, yeah, we're down 90
by choice, you know, so I don'tknow.

(25:16):
In a capitalist.

Speaker 5 (25:17):
You know society.
You're going to make thosechoices that are in your
interest, regardless of what'shappening in the economy.
So yeah.

Speaker 3 (25:25):
So here's uh, in more of the, you lose control.
This is an interesting thingwyoming man in prison for
removing epa mandated filterseeks trump pardon.
So a 65 year old wyoming man isin federal prison for pulling
epa mandated emission systemsfrom ailing diesel engines.
As the trump administrationinches towards reversing those
mandates, troy Lake's family ispushing the president for a

(25:47):
pardon.
So this man right here, as youcan see, does he not look like
every mechanic you've ever met?
Yeah, pretty much Looks like mymechanic.
You're like, looks like mybrother actually.
Yeah, exactly Every mechanicyou've ever met.
The glasses hanging down on thebottom of the nose because
their hands are greasy, can'tpush them back up.
I hanging down on the bottom ofthe nose because their hands
are greasy, you can't push themback up.
I love it.
Oh yeah, I dealt with a ton ofthese guys.

Speaker 5 (26:07):
He doesn't have very much grease on him, though.
Oh well, he's posted thepicture.

Speaker 3 (26:10):
I'm sure it was like hey, go tuck in behind that nice
clean cat engine right there.
Like the engine itself is notvery greasy, it must be a motor
engine or something, kate, uh,crate engine.
Okay.
So because he removed emissioncontrols from diesel engines, a
65 Wyoming man is bracing for asix month in federal prison.
Troy Lake will also live outthe rest of his days as a

(26:31):
convicted felon unless hereceives a pardon for President
Donald Trump.
Lake's wife Holly and son TJboth hope the president does
just that.
Holly and others have beenwriting letters to US
Environmental Protection Agencyofficials urging them to
recommend Troy Lake forpresidential pardon.
Recent changes in theregulatory landscape fuel that
hope.
The president's administrationreleased a plan this week to
relax rules around tailpipeemissions, but tampering with US

(26:53):
Environmental Agency requiredemission systems remains a
federal felony.
Lake pled guilty to one count ofconspiring to violate the Clean
Air Act on June 12th 2024.
He was sentenced December 5th2024 to 12 months and one day in
prison, which, with First StepAct on that, he's like looking
to get out of prison any day nowand head to a halfway house.
He was sentenced.

(27:13):
You actually get more time inprison with a one-year sentence
than with one year and a day,because with one year and a day
you qualify for good time andthen, if you're nonviolent, you
qualify for first step.
If you're one year, none ofthose things happen.
You serve out 365 days.
There were a handful ofsituations where January 6th

(27:33):
judges gave out one yearsentences to misdemeanors, which
meant they couldn't qualify forany benefit and they served all
12 months in federal prison.
And then they would serve outone year and a day sentences to
certain individuals, eitherbecause they took a plea deal or
whatever, and then they'd begetting out of prison at six

(27:54):
months, going into a halfwayhouse for one or two and then
home confinement.

Speaker 5 (27:58):
I was not aware that removing a mission staff off of
a motor was a felony.

Speaker 3 (28:04):
Well, here's the thing Because of the
Loper-Bright decision last yearwhich said that the EPA and
other executive agents cannotmake the law.
So the Clean Air Act is likethe legislature says EPA, you're
in charge of making clean air,but EPA because of the Chevron
case back in 1984, you'reallowed to then make the rules
on how to get clean air.
So the EPA was making the rulesabout emissions and what can

(28:27):
and can't have and the DPFfilters and all those different
things.
They made those rules.
The legislature didn't vote onthat, the legislature just gave
like a directional mandate.
So the executive branch, afterLoperite, can't make these rules
.
But that decision, chevronBright, was cited 44 000 times
or 27 000 times.
It was the second most citedsupreme court case, next to

(28:51):
marbury versus madison, whichestablished judicial review.
So this is like the.
The executive branch has leanedon that decision to take
rulemaking, uh power over thesedifferent things and the epa has
been one of the leaders in this.
Most epa rules were not votedon, because you're not getting
republican senators fromtennessee and texas to vote on a

(29:15):
lot of this green energy stuff,but the epa has been able to
make their own rules.
How?

Speaker 5 (29:19):
is this not the same thing as like uh, was it the tea
party or the stamp act where weweren't getting?

Speaker 3 (29:25):
a representation.
That's exactly why it wasoverturned that loper bright
overturned that chevrondeference case.
But they didn't just overturnall the cases.
They said now if you've got aproblem with one of these
previous cases, you need to comeand litigate it.
But what it says is that thejudicial branch doesn't defer to
executive branch experts andexecutive branch definitions of

(29:46):
the law.
The judicial branch has theirdiscretion to make ruling and
the legislative branch has theability to make clarification.
So it put us back into thechecks and balance system.
Instead of the checks andbalances all approving of the
executive branch rulemaking, theexecutive branch got to decide
the definitions of everythingand the judicial branch had no

(30:09):
power to challenge theirdefinitions.
So it could be as it could be,as absurd as the executive
branch would define what harm is.
It's like.
Well, hold on, harm issomething that maybe a jury
should decide if you were harmedthe executive branch.
No, you have to take it as afact that we were harmed or that
makes like it extends to a lotof stuff.

(30:31):
So, anyways, basically he was,you know, helping people delete
emissions.
I drive a deleted truck,deleted before I touched it.
I've got nothing to do with it.
Anyways, it helps them breatheand it helps failing diesel
engines do better and itimproves gas mileage.
There is no reason why we havesome of the emission stuff we

(30:53):
have on our diesel trucks.
It's just ridiculous.
Anybody who knows anything cantell you that it's bad.
It's bad.
Yeah, you've probably heard anearful from your dad and brother
over the years about diesel ohsure, but um, you know, I've
also got some personalexperience with this.

Speaker 5 (31:10):
I've got a tractor, you know I bought a, a newer,
you know, model kubota.
It has the same crap on it, youknow they.
Oh, I know you know I.
I have a model that doesn'trequire the def but it still has
this, you know, every 50 hour,like heat cycle.
You got to run it through andit's just.

Speaker 3 (31:31):
Oh yeah, I got.
My excavators have interim tierfour engines in them, which
means they regen Right.

Speaker 16 (31:37):
Exactly.
Don't shut your engine off,we're regening.

Speaker 3 (31:39):
Exactly, and as they get older and older, those regen
cycles take days.
Yeah, like I can't run myexcavation Like I had a regen
cycle I just got through.
That took three days.

Speaker 5 (31:49):
Well, this is what I'm talking about and people
need to understand.
Like when it goes through oneof these regen cycles, it's
revving to the moon for hours.
It's like how is this good forthe environment?
We're blowing shit out the pipefor a couple hours.

Speaker 3 (32:05):
Any exhaust savings we had before, before we're now
getting rid of as we burn hotand burn the carbon, yeah, into
the atmosphere.
By the way.
Yeah, all the carbon wecaptured we just re-burned.
Exactly this is the stupidestthing I've ever.
Oh so, so as long as you're notin a regen cycle, you can pull
up and pass emission standards.
If you're in a regen cycle, I'msure you're still the road.
Oh yeah, it's bad, folks, it is, it's bad.

Speaker 5 (32:28):
When it goes through that regen cycle.
What you need to be thinkingabout is, like one of those
diesel drags that you see wherethey pull a trailer and it's
just blowing black smoke.

Speaker 3 (32:41):
In gas cars.
You call it the Italian tune-up.
Just go rev the heck out of it.
Yeah, just break all the carbonloose and just blow it out.
That's what.
That's what a regent cycle on atier four engine is.
It's just an italian tune-up.
And then it's like thank you,epa that's a farmer, in fact my
excavators.
They had to change the modelwith the new engine, because it

(33:01):
used to be the 121s and they hada tailpipe that was, you know,
down low coming out of the backend, and with the new engine,
because it used to be the 121sand they had a tailpipe that was
, you know, down low coming outof the back end.
And with the regen cycles nowthey had to put the tailpipe up
at the top coming out the topbecause it gets so hot.
They were worried it wouldcatch buildings on fire if you
were.

Speaker 5 (33:15):
Oh yeah, the field the field would catch fire, yeah
change the direction of thetailpipe.

Speaker 3 (33:19):
So now the tailpipe comes out right above your head,
kind of right because it has torun so damn hot that pipe is
glowing yes, I'm telling you,man you've got a little bit of a
tangent here yes.
Well, those of us who have beenregulated by people who've
never built anything, sometimesthe regulations are.
They're counterproductive.

(33:41):
They do the opposite.
To avoid a problem, we're goingto cause nine other problems.

Speaker 5 (33:45):
Yeah, you know it's yeah, and now I got new buttons
on my dash.

Speaker 3 (33:50):
More check engine sensors yeah.
Ok.
So this is a flashback toHillary Clinton back when she
was rolling out the Russia scam.
This is in the presidentialdebate with Donald Trump.
This is pre Clinton plan.
This is Clinton plan is now infull swing, okay, and this is
why it's important for us to goback.
They lied to you.

(34:11):
They gaslit you.
We now know hillary clintonknew she paid for fake
opposition research.

Speaker 5 (34:17):
They knew that they'd laundered it into the fbi to
get things started man, yousound like you're whining, just
like hillary was a few minutesago.

Speaker 3 (34:24):
They knew it we're gonna lose all control if we
can't tell them what lies topost.
We need to get rid of that sowe can put our thumb on these
tech companies and tell themwhat they can and can't post.
Yeah, all right.
So this is her setting thestage.
Imagine how depraved you haveto be to do this.

Speaker 11 (34:42):
The Russian government has engaged in
espionage against Americans.
They have hacked Americanwebsites, american accounts of
private people, of institutions.
Then they have given thatinformation to WikiLeaks for the
purpose of putting it on theInternet.

(35:03):
This has come from the highestlevels of the russian government
, clearly from putin himself.

Speaker 3 (35:08):
So what they posted and what it said and how damning
it was.
No discussion of that.
It's just the fact that theydid it right yeah this is like I
.
I had this philosophicalconversation in prison with
people about snitches getstitches right because I was
like they're like you can'tsnitch on nobody and you'd find
people that had taken this tolike a weird extreme like, and

(35:29):
where it came up was a sexoffenders we lovingly called
chomos.
A chomo was overheard sayingthat some someone who was
molested snitching was snitchinglike that.
That was you know theunpardonable offense.
Just like if you were tosnitching was snitching like
that, that was you know theunpardonable offense.
Just like if you were to snitchon your drug dealer you know
it's unpardonable that they didthat and I.

(35:51):
This conversation was overheardand it became kind of a
discussion because for the firsttime ever you have these
inmates that are now questioningthe morality of whether you
should snitch or not, becauseit's just a given if you're the
victim of a sexual assault.
Well, you get to snitch, youknow what I mean like, but if
you're a victim of a burglary,shut up, you know anyways.
So we were having thatdiscussion.

(36:11):
I was like you know, justsnitches really get stitches or
not, right, um, or should they?
Was the moral conundrum.

Speaker 11 (36:18):
So I don't know where I was going, hillary
Clinton here being like In aneffort, as 17 of our
intelligence agencies haveconfirmed to influence our
election.
So I actually think the mostimportant, oh, with the
WikiLeaks Right.

Speaker 3 (36:39):
Don't pay attention to the bad thing that you're
snitching on like that.
You're spying on Americans andstuff like that.
It's just the fact that theyhacked.

Speaker 11 (36:46):
Right, right of this evening, Chris, is.
Finally, will Donald Trumpadmit and condemn that the
Russians are doing this and makeit clear that he will not have
the help of Putin in thiselection, that he rejects
Russian espionage againstAmericans, which he actually

(37:09):
encouraged in the past?
Those are the questions we needneed answered.

Speaker 3 (37:12):
We've never had anything like this happen in any
of our elections before I feellike it kind of stands on its
own right, like it's just thatbad.
Let me uh, this is scott adams,and scott adams has an
interesting take on this.
Where is it so?
Because one of the thingsDonald Trump he's done this

(37:32):
twice now he posted this videothat has all the Clinton kill
list.
Have you heard of this Clintonkill list video?

Speaker 5 (37:40):
Uh-uh.

Speaker 3 (37:41):
So it's all the people that Hillary Clinton and
Bill Clinton have had killed?
Oh okay.

Speaker 5 (37:46):
Like Vince Foster and stuff like that.

Speaker 3 (37:54):
So Scott Adams, who really prides himself with being
like a down the middle of theroad commentator have we played
this before?
We haven't played this clipbefore we've played a little
scott adams.

Speaker 5 (38:00):
He's the author of dilbert the cartoon yeah, yeah,
yeah, totally no, but like thethe kill list video, have we
played it before?
I think we did I think it talksabout jfk jr right before like
yeah, I think so, and stuff.

Speaker 3 (38:10):
So you know, a lot of people have criticized the kill
list like yeah, there's somesuspicious deaths, but these
people meet a lot of people,they work with a lot of people.

Speaker 5 (38:17):
You know you're bound to have some random died
suddenlies here, there you know,yeah sure, suicide by shooting,
but they're all randomlyconnected to the clintons too,
yeah exactly so.

Speaker 3 (38:27):
trump's been putting these, this video out.
He's posted it twice, twice,and here's Scott Adams making
comment about it.
And keep in mind, in light ofthe bigger picture, like step
back a little bit and look atthe totality of these people's
careers, specifically theClintons, and take a listen.

Speaker 17 (38:43):
So, trump being Trump, he posted a meme on
social that made its way overnext, and it was a meme of all
the different people thatHillary has alleged to have
murdered.
Now you've probably seen it.
It's a very long list of peoplewho were close to the Clintons
and seemed to have mysteriouslydied, and many of them were in a
position that they could havehurt the Clintons and yet they

(39:04):
suspiciously died.
And that would include peoplelike Seth Rich and JFK Jr, who
went down on his plane Now andJFK Jr went down on his plane
Now.
It could be just a whole bunchof coincidences, because they
knew so many people.
If you know enough people, andthe Clintons probably knew like
a million people.
Some number of them are goingto be dying when they shouldn't
be dying, so maybe it's acoincidence.
However, now, having seen whatwe've seen from the Russia hoax,

(39:27):
the Russia hoax thing is as badas murdering dozens of people,
do you agree?
Because it's literally anattempt to overthrow the country
.
As horrible as it would be ifsomebody hypothetically had
murdered dozens of people, ifyou had to choose which one an
overthrow of the government orto prevent it you would know
that a few dozen people would bemurdered that didn't have it

(39:49):
coming.
You would probably choose a fewdozen people being murdered.
So my point is that the thingswe know that Hillary almost
certainly did, which is try tooverthrow the government, is
worse than the allegation thatshe may have murdered dozens of
people to get to her currentposition.
So I'm actually, as of today,I'm changing my opinion.
I believe that the Hillary killlist was just sort of a fun

(40:10):
political thing to talk aboutbecause it was funny.
I don't think that some numberof them were murdered.
I don't know which ones, Iwouldn't say necessarily all of
them but she's definitelycapable of murder.
So if you had any questionabout whether she'd be capable
and or she had a reason, I thinkthose are both answered.
She had a reason.
She's definitely capable andshe would have connections to

(40:31):
people who would be experts atdoing exactly that.
Because it's alleged that she'spart.
She partnered with the cia,brandon and others the cia were
pretty sure murdered a priorpresident and got away with it.
Is there any reason to believethat they wouldn't help her
murder a few more people?
No reason to believe it,because they know they can get
away with it.
They're experts at doing it andgetting away with it.

(40:51):
So I'm going to go on record assaying I don't know who she may
have killed, but it seemslikely that some of those
allocations real and I say thatentirely because now that you've
proven that she could dosomething that's far worse and
she did it's easy to believe shemay have done the lesser crime
of killing dozens of people.

Speaker 5 (41:11):
I think, that's pretty good I do think it is
very, um, not I don't know ifit's odd or interesting, but
when she comes out with theseher fact patterns, it's always
like, well, all of theintelligence community, all 17
branches, are saying this thing.
And it's like, well, how didyou have access to all those

(41:33):
people?
First of all, how do you knowthat?

Speaker 3 (41:35):
that's what they said , and um, well, she plays off
the public reporting.
That was the whole.
Like the 17 intel communitieshave all said, that was so
important for them to createconsensus.
Okay, yeah, all right.
So here's operation arctic fox.
Do you know operation arcticfox was?
This was jack smith's operationoperation arctic fox, the code

(41:59):
name for the criminal conspiracythat ultimately became jack
smith's elector case againstdonald trump.
Special prosecutor jack smithhas now been officially referred
to the department of justicefor prosecution.

Speaker 18 (42:12):
So this is a major, john Solomon.
You're taking a look at theletter right there, senator
Johnson.
Senator Grassi just sent thisto me a little bit ago while
we're on air.
It's a major development.
You're taking a look at aletter right there that was just
sent to the FBI Director, kashPatel, and the Attorney General,
pam Bondi.
What does it say?
It says that Congress hasobtained evidence that shows
that the Biden White House wasdirectly involved in trying to

(42:34):
help start a Jack Smithinvestigation on the January 6th
probe against president Trump,specifically at the white house
counsel's office, secretlyobtained president Trump uh,
president Trump's and vicepresident Mike Pence's former
phones and giving them to theprosecutors, basically sicking
the Justice Department on hisfuture competitor, their future

(42:55):
rival in the 2024 election, sothey could look for dirt for
possible crimes.
There's a lot more coming in.
There's a lot of other evidenceas well of the White House
involvement.
Remember, two years ago, wewere the first news agency,
radio Real America's Voice, toreport that a White House
counsel was directly involvedwith this investigation.
Now more details, includinggetting.
Imagine this you're thedemocrat president and you go

(43:17):
get the old republicans phone,uh for the your prior president
and send it to the justicedepartment.
That's what senators johnsonand grassy were able to confirm
tonight it's in that letter.
Keep an eye on justinnewscom.
We're going to get you up tospeed on that all throughout the
night.
A lot more development, senatorjohnson.

Speaker 3 (43:32):
Senator grassy just sent this to me a little bit ago
, criminal referrals sent to thedoj for john brennan, for
clapper, for monaco, for comey,for barack obama, for this one.
Here is jack smith.
How many criminal referrals gotsent to the doj over rushagate?

(43:55):
Did trump ever get referred forprosecution?
Did don jr ever get a criminalreferral?
I think a lot of this stuff wasinternally driven, like the fbi
was calling him in forinterviews and then the media
would report that they'd beeninterviewed.
So there was an ongoinginvestigation.
But I never heard aboutcriminal referrals where someone
said here's the law that theybroke.
You had Steve Bannon.

(44:15):
You had Peter Navarro, for nottestifying in Congress, got
referred for contempt for notshowing up to their subpoenas.
They went to prison for that.
Eric Holder got contempt, neverwent to prison for it.
Bill Barr, I don't think, washeld in contempt, but Mayorkas
was held in contempt.
Nothing less happened there.
So I don't know.

(44:36):
I mean, apparently lots ofcriminal referrals can go and
nothing happens to them.
But we also know that that'slike pretty serious because
they're saying here is thecriminal violation.
So it almost puts the JusticeDepartment on the other foot
where they have to openlydisprove the violation.
Devin Nunes sent his list of 13criminal referrals way back

(44:57):
when and we don't know who wason that list.
He kept it quiet, but he sentthat.
That's still sitting aroundsomewhere at the DOJ, so I don't
know.
I mean, as long as they don'tget rid of Section 230, we've
lost control.
Who knows what's happening.

Speaker 5 (45:14):
Yeah, we've been using this for years, but we
can't let the republicans use it.
Get rid of it quick yeah.

Speaker 3 (45:20):
So here is.
We're going to listen to acouple, a couple longer clips
here, because not super long,just three minutes.
You know, bad faux pas forradio, supposed to be under 60
seconds, but this is three clips.
Uh, this is a couple, a coupleof clips that are a little bit
longer.
So this is Donald Trump talkingto a finite affinity.
Finnerty was one of the morningmorning hosts that I used to

(45:40):
listen to in prison.
Boy, is this guy good.
He's good, okay, but now he'sgot a night show.

Speaker 4 (45:44):
He's got his own night show and he interviewed
Donald Trump and he's askingabout this whole coup plot, this
running coup that's beenhappening against him, mr
President, suggests essentiallythat Hillary Clinton personally
approved the Russia hoax withObama, with Barack Obama, and my
question is is she finallygoing to pay for what she did,
or does she get a pass again?

Speaker 10 (46:07):
So you know, we had her and I had her right under
the sights and I told the peoplelook, you can't do this to a
president's wife, anex-president, and she was
secretary of state, but youcan't do this to the wife of a
president.

Speaker 3 (46:22):
I remember right after Donald Trump got elected,
it was like in his acceptancespeech it was really quick and
there was lock her up, lock herup, he goes.
No, no, no, no, she's servedthis country, it's over, we're
gonna let her move on.
Like he was very magnanimousand just was like we're closing
the chapter of going after theclintons.

(46:44):
Like just let them go off andlive their legacy.
Like he had.
I remember watching it and Iwas disappointed.

Speaker 10 (46:51):
I was like, oh, I was, I was chanting lock her up
and, if you remember, if youwell, I'll tell you how I feel
about it in a sec.
If you remember, I was at arally and it was after the
election and they said lock herup, lock her up.
And I said no, no, no, look, wewon, just relax, and I didn't
do what other people would havedone, what they would have done.

(47:13):
And then they went after me andthey meant it.
I said you know, it's amazing,felt always felt that you
shouldn't be doing this stuff.
And I let Hillary off the hook.
I totally left her off the hook.
And then I let her off the hookyou know for what.
And then I come in and they didthe same thing to me.

(47:33):
The difference is they actuallymeant it and they drove, they
hurt a lot of people, a lot ofpeople, and it was all a hoax.
And now they have it in blackand white.
No, I think they should pay aprice.
By the way, it's a very bigprice.
It could be the biggest scandalin the history of our country,
but it continues onward and thatcontinues onward.

(47:54):
You know that scandal hascontinued from the beginning.
They have every.
Everything they do is a hoax.
They're no good at anythingother than some forms of nasty
politics.

Speaker 4 (48:05):
I think how much it hurt you in your first term, and
I think about these namesBrennan Comey, clapper, hillary
Clinton.

Speaker 10 (48:13):
How directly do you?
Think barack obama was involved.
He knew about it and then wehave it cold.
He has it in writing.
It's all he said.
He you could almost say that hewas almost more the mess of
mine.
He heard what she was doing andthen he approved it.
And when you take, and not onlyapproved it, he proved it and
pushed it.
And they knew it was fake.
They knew the Russia thing wasfake.

(48:34):
I'm not great with Russia.
I was tougher in Russia.
Don't forget the pipeline.
I was the one that ended theRussian pipeline.
Nobody ever even knew they werebuilding a pipeline.
I ended it.
So when Biden came in, by theway, one of the first thing he
did was approve it.
Had it ended Now?
One of the first thing he didwas approve it and it ended.
Now, that was the biggesteconomic development job they've

(48:55):
ever done.
That was going to all overEurope and I ended it.
No, I was the opposite and I'lltell you what.
For that to have gone on.
It's one of the great scandals,I think, in the history of our
country.
I know it is.

Speaker 4 (49:08):
Are you willing to take this all the way to
indictments?

Speaker 10 (49:11):
Well, it's up to Pam , who's doing a terrific job,
and she'll have to work with lawenforcement to see what she
wants to do, and I'm not givingher advice one way or the other.
I can tell you, though, I readlike you read, and I read things
that are unbelievable.
That just came out yesterday,yeah a lot going on.
Now, they've been coming outover the last number of months

(49:31):
right, but what came out overthe last few days is incredible
there is a lot of people outthere that have no idea what's
come out in the last few daysyeah, what has come out?

Speaker 3 (49:42):
well, we've been talking about it but, some of
these smoking gun documents andapparently there's more to come.
But what I've seen, I'm likeI'm surprised they haven't been
indicted already.
Yeah, you know, I mean I don'tknow it's like.

Speaker 5 (49:55):
What are we waiting for?

Speaker 3 (49:56):
yeah, what are we waiting for?
Seems like you got all thepaperwork you need no, I've
talked to many people, manypeople, including some of our
listeners, who've said you know,we just have to move on that
maybe we slap them on the wrist,you know, maybe an indictment,
then a pardon, right before theygo to prison, something,
something like that.
You know, we just got to prove apoint, but, but but we got to
move on.
We can't be doing thisvindictive back and forth thing.

(50:16):
That's under the premise thatsomehow Trump had done something
wrong and they werelegitimately coming after him
but went a little too far andnow they did something wrong.
That's under that premise.
That's not the case.

Speaker 5 (50:26):
That's truth there.

Speaker 3 (50:28):
There was no there there against donald trump.
It was fabricated from thebeginning.
They weren't pointing out asmall crime and making a
mountain out of a molehill.
They brought the wheelbarrowand put the mountain there you
know what I?
Mean like there wasn't anythingthere.
This wasn't, uh, just atit-for-tat subterfuge.
This is like full-onfabrication.

(50:49):
Tried to take over thegovernment and in many ways
succeeded.
And no one did it better thisweekend, to put it into context,
than Stephen Miller on MariaBartolomo's Sunday morning show.

Speaker 12 (50:58):
Moment for accountability so that we can
reclaim this democracy, Maria.

Speaker 20 (51:03):
Well, do you believe we will actually get
accountability?
We've been demandingaccountability now for a decade.
Our audience is well aware thatthis is the biggest political
scandal we have ever seen and aneffort to undermine and take
down a duly elected president.
But now we want to see thetricksters face the consequences

(51:24):
, will they?

Speaker 12 (51:27):
I have complete confidence in the Department of
Justice to follow these facts,to follow this new, further
avalanche of evidence and totake all the necessary legal
steps.
Sure, the wrongdoers, the coupplotters, the schemers and the
insurrectionists are held fullyaccountable under the laws and

(51:48):
Constitution of these UnitedStates.
Yes, maria, I believe that.

Speaker 20 (51:52):
Now, last weekend, John Ratcliffe, CIA director,
who is a former prosecutor,former DNI, told us that the
statute of limitations, thefive-year statute, does not
apply when it comes toconspiracy.
And he says the conspiracy isongoing because they still won't
admit it.
The conspiracy is stillhappening.

(52:15):
So what is your take on whatRatcliffe told us last week?

Speaker 12 (52:19):
Oh, he's completely right.
So several of the statutes Imentioned we have not even come
close to eclipsing the statuteof limitations.
But more than that, it is anongoing and continuing
conspiracy.
It continued through theentirety of President Trump's
first term, it continued throughthe entirety of President
Biden's term in office and itcontinues to this day.
There are still deep state coupplotters who are trying to

(52:41):
conceal and hide thisinformation on behalf of the
people they are protecting.
There are still staffers inDemocrat offices who know the
full truth, who are concealingthat truth.
So all of this behavior, all ofthis conduct, collectively
means the conspiracy hasn'tended, is ongoing.
Comey, in particular has,throughout the years, engaged in

(53:04):
conduct and lies, publicstatements and testimony in
front of Congress, falsetestimony, whose sole purpose
was to perpetuate and continuethe conspiracy.
So I have every hope andexpectation that the Department
of Justice, under the leadershipof our courageous Attorney
General, will follow these factsand follow the evidence and
deliver justice.

(53:24):
Because if we have a countrywhere we can continue to have
FBI careerists and CIAcareerists, deep staters who
will fabricate and doctorevidence, who will create and
produce fake material,fabricated material, phony
information to try to go aftertheir political enemies, up to
and including the president.
If we continue to create theimpression and the reality that

(53:48):
there is not a criminal, asevere criminal penalty for such
conduct, it will never stop, itwill never desist, it will keep
on going forever and we willcontinue to have a country that
is sabotaged endlessly by theproduction of fake documents,
fake material, fake plotsagainst democratically elected
officials.
We can't have that.

(54:08):
There must be consequences.

Speaker 20 (54:10):
Well, I mean it's just extraordinary to me that
the mainstream media hascompletely so our and the moment
for accountability so that wecan reclaim, scribe, some of the
horrors that were perpetratedon us.

Speaker 3 (54:24):
And we might go listen to his full video in the
private party afterwards.
But let's listen to whatstephen miller also said on sean
sean hannity, where he echoedthat and he even emphasizes that
this coup led to something evenmore nefarious yeah, so here's
another one for you, sean.

Speaker 12 (54:41):
on top of all of that, we now believe the true
number of missing children thatjoe biden trafficked into the
country, the democrats travelingthe country, the Democrats
traveling to the country it's450,000, not 320, 450.
The Democrats have committedcrimes to which they can never
be forgiven, sean, and DonaldTrump is cleaning it up.
Donald Trump is cleaning it up,right now.

Speaker 6 (55:03):
Let me say it again, stephen they have blood on their
hands.
They'll have more blood ontheir hands Every murder, every
rape, every violent crime.
And if there's ever one ofthese known terrorists we don't
know where they are that theylet into this country unvetted,
if there's an attack on ourhomeland, they'll have a lot
more blood on their hands.

Speaker 3 (55:23):
I hope and pray they will shut, yeah so that coup
plot led directly to the openborder crisis 450 children being
trafficked into the unitedstates, untold amounts of rape,
murder, horror, job loss,economic pressures on and on it
goes, and it's all directly tiedtogether.
The epstein thing is amisdirect from that.

(55:44):
Epstein 200 victims, hhs450,000.
Ah, the epstein files, theepstein files.
Trump's all over the files.
You know why?
Biden's all over the hss files.
My orcas is all over the hssfiles.
You know what I mean?
Like a total misdirect.
That's the real problem.
That's happening.
That's the result.
So, oh, we just need to slap onthe wrist.

(56:06):
No harm fat.
No, no harm done.
You know?
Okay, yeah, they put a fewJ6ers in jail, but you know it's
micro cause.
It's just tiny compared to thebigger.
No, no, no, no, no.
It's not just that, it's notjust this isolated.
The people on Trump's innercircle were persecuted and
picked on.
It's not that there are kidsright now chained up in an

(56:29):
underground Connex containerdungeon that are a direct result
of the biden administrationexisting, which is a direct
result of a running coup plot,which was a direct result of a
whole bunch of nefarious actorsdoing a whole bunch of nefarious
things that may not have beenthinking about their second,
third, fourth and fifth orderconsequences.

(56:49):
You know what I'm saying?
Oh, it's just a littlebioweapon.
We're just gonna try this fifthorder consequences.
You know what I'm saying oh,it's just a little bioweapon,
we're just gonna try this littlelockdown thing, and you know, I
mean it's just a little, it'sjust.
It's just, we're just lettingmail-in ballots for this
election cycle because there'semergency order, because there's
a worldwide pandemic, right,right, right pretty soon it'll
be.

Speaker 5 (57:07):
It's just a new little nuclear weapon.

Speaker 3 (57:08):
It's just a little nuclear weapon right right right
it's just a little calling ofthe herd, right, right exactly.
Just a little calling of theherd.
It's just a little calling ofthe herd, big deal.
Why everybody's so upset.
Uh, so uh.
John rackliff on maria barthat's why I've made the
referral that I have on.

(57:29):
So what I think?
Years and years now in fact, Iremember watching maria
bartolomeo show, as I was in ahotel room back when we were
doing season one and I had to dothe recording and then I had to
sit outside and upload itbecause that was the only place
I had an internet signal and ittook me a good solid hour to
upload the thing because it waslike some kind of dsl phone line

(57:49):
upload and you know, I'mwatching maria bartolome and
this was back then like this is,the election had happened and
ratcliffe had turned in hislittle reports and it was like
why aren't you doing more?

Speaker 20 (58:01):
well, he's back and now he's getting a chance to
finally, you know, make some ofthose criminal referrals that he
used to always talk about sowhat I think I hear you saying
is there is still an opportunityfor indictments, potential
prosecutions, accountabilityfrom those people who may have
lied under oath, like JohnBrennan, james Comey and perhaps

(58:22):
Hillary Clinton has madereferrals and why we're going to
continue to share theintelligence that that would
support the ability of ourdepartment of justice to make
fair and just uh bring fair andjust claims against those who
have perpetrated this hoax, uh,against the american people and
this stain on our countrydirector.

(58:44):
One other question on this tulsi, as well as president trump,
use the word, so what I think Ihear you saying is there is
still an opportunity forindictments.

Speaker 3 (58:56):
Use the word treason and he, I don't know what he
went on to say.
I'm pretty sure he went on tosay yep, OK so let's kind of All
right, we're going to play thatin the after show, definitely,
do that on the show, ok.
So last couple of things.
We're going to play that in theafter show.
Definitely do that one in theafter show, okay.
So last couple of things.
These are just kind of againupdates.

(59:18):
The Trump administration nodoubt about it has taken a
hammer to some of the thingsthat we hate.
Right, when we talk aboutvaccines, there's a lot to talk
about there and there's a lot ofstrings to pull you can have
the debate on.
You know, you can have anabsolutist debate.
No vaccines, yes vaccines.
Those debates usually go inphilosophy, right?

(59:41):
No vaccines because you can'tcontrol the ingredients.
So therefore, absolutist, allbad.
Then you've got.
Well, vaccines in concept couldbe really good.
I mean, look, we eradicatedsmallpox, right?
So okay, we just need to takeout some bad ingredients.
But vaccines are good.
Do you see how you end up onthis binary choice?
Sure.

(01:00:01):
And the devil's in the details.
You can both agree it's bad tobe poisoned, right?
The devil's in the mercury,exactly Well, apparently we've
just killed the devil then.
Oh, this is RFK making anannouncement.
Hi I'm Robert F Kennedy, which,by the way, for people that
have been in the pro-vaccinecamp and have been taking
vaccines intermittently flushots Well turns out there was a

(01:00:23):
life-threatening poison in allthose.
You're a.

Speaker 19 (01:00:26):
HHS secretary, I'm happy to report that last week
we closed the final chapter inthe long history of thimerosal
in the United States.
Thimerosal, of course, is amercury-based vaccine
preservative.
Its main component,ethylmercury, is a known and
very potent neurotoxin.
Until we withdrew therecommendation last week, flu

(01:00:48):
shots containing thimerosalastonishingly.
Last week flu shots containingthimerosal astonishingly were
still being administered tomillions of Americans, including
pregnant women and children.
Now I've taken a lot of flackfrom the vaccine industry and
from its allies in the pressabout my decision to ban it.
So I want to talk a little bitabout my reasons.

(01:01:09):
In early 2001, the director ofthe FDA Office of Vaccine
Research and Review, the lateWilliam Egan, admitted under
oath before Congress thatthimerosal safety had never been
studied in human beings.
Further, cdc has no existingguidelines for safe exposures to
Hadsall mercury.

(01:01:30):
It is therefore inexcusablethat these agencies allowed
neurotoxic mercury to beinjected into americans for so
long.
A quick search of the nationallibrary of medicine so that's
pretty much it.

Speaker 3 (01:01:45):
He goes on to explain more of the science.
But yeah, there was mercury inyour vaccines.
They never studied it.
They knew it was bad, theydidn't want to study it and they
still said roll up your sleeve,yep, that's it.
So hello tuskegee airmen we'reall airmen now.
We're all we're all just beingexperimented on we're all a band

(01:02:07):
of brothers.
We're all a band of brothersnow like they did it.
We used to think it was aracial thing.

Speaker 5 (01:02:12):
Turns out, no, they just hate us do you think it's
too much to ask for reparations?

Speaker 3 (01:02:18):
see, this is, this is where their binds go.
Risk management right.
If you know something's wrongand you do it, you open yourself
up to liability.
Okay, well, we got to get ridof liability.
1980s reagan right vaccines ofliability.
Okay, well, put the mercury init because it preserves them,
well, but it's also poison forthe humans.
Yeah, but they can't sue us forit.
There's, that's the end of yourlogic.
That's it.
You set up the carrots and thesticks in such a way, oh, no way

(01:02:39):
.
We go and everybody gets theflu shot and they feel like crap
.
Well, you might be inoculatedagainst the flu, but you have
mercury poisoning, right.
Well, good luck convincing yourdoctor of that, because he
doesn't recognize that thevaccine has mercury because it's
fda approved.
It can't be bad for you.

Speaker 5 (01:02:52):
Hopefully it's a low enough level that you won't get
the poison.
But you know, you know.

Speaker 3 (01:02:57):
You get the flu shot every year and it's mercury
builds up over time and itdoesn't go anywhere and I wasn't
gonna play this, but now I'mgoing to oh no, because
sometimes these things come upokay.
So this is a stand comedian.
I'm starting to love the comedythat's that's coming out.
That's more like making fun ofthe glaringly evident that we've

(01:03:20):
seen with the politicallycorrect culture.

Speaker 5 (01:03:22):
Are you going to play Jim Brewer?
No, okay, jim.

Speaker 3 (01:03:24):
Brewer is definitely leading the front on that.
Yeah, so no, there's other.
There's one comedian that'sactually a January 6th defendant
, named Karen Jones.

Speaker 5 (01:03:33):
OK.

Speaker 3 (01:03:34):
And she, she has some pretty funny stuff.
It's raunchy, it's raunchy, butit's pretty funny.
I was listening to one and likeit was a string of jokes that
in isolation each one of themwas like wow, but then in
totality I was laughing prettyhard.
I was like, yeah, that's prettyfunny.

(01:03:56):
Anyways, I recommend it.
She's been on Kill Tony andstuff like that.
She comments on my Twitter feedall the time and anyways.
So this is, I don't know thiscomedian.
I have no idea, but I foundthis joke to be kind of funny
and, again, it kind of goesalong with this.
The reality was, this washappening.

Speaker 15 (01:04:14):
Everybody wanted to deny it.
I've lost friends.
Truly, you guys should probablywatch it with me, right?

Speaker 5 (01:04:17):
Yeah, just put it on the I want to see Come on man, I
forget.

Speaker 3 (01:04:23):
I get to the end of the show and I just get in my
head and I'm like it's just forme.

Speaker 15 (01:04:32):
There we go, lost friends truly to like conspiracy
theories over the years andit's it's kind of scary to watch
, but like you can meet thesepeople where they're at you know
, I had, I had a friend who waslike you tell me one benefit of
getting your kid vaccinated?
Yeah, and I was like well,she's like 99 less likely to get
in a van with strangers becauseshe's autistic.

Speaker 5 (01:05:01):
It's too funny.
It takes a drink.
They don't like surprises.

Speaker 3 (01:05:12):
You know it's a horrible joke.

Speaker 5 (01:05:16):
It's a horrible joke, but it is like I was trying not
to laugh too much because I waswaiting for the next one.
That was it.

Speaker 3 (01:05:20):
That's the whole joke .
Maybe one benefit ofvaccinating your kids Less
likely to get in a van withstrangers because of the autism.
It's like, oh my gosh.

Speaker 5 (01:05:32):
Sounds like what's his name.

Speaker 3 (01:05:34):
Tim would say we've approached the point where some
of this comedy is so cringy,because I grew up in a
politically correct era right?
Well, it's not just cringy,it's dark it's dark, yeah, but
it's also like and that is oneof the most, it's one of the
actually really sad things ofthe post-coVID era.
For those of us that went downthe conspiracy trail is, every

(01:05:55):
time someone dies, we're likeare they vaccinated, do you know
?
You know what I mean?

Speaker 5 (01:06:00):
Well, we're all looking for more data points.

Speaker 3 (01:06:03):
Yeah, we're like do you know if they got vaccinated?
You know heart attack.
Did they pull out any clots?
Did they pull out any clots?
Yeah, I know, pull out anyquads.
Did they pull out any quads?
Yeah, I know I know exactlywhat you're saying.
It's really bad, like oh so andso's sick again.
Oh, they're always sick.
They got vaccinated or jabs youknow what I mean like
everything's, everything'sviewed through that lens and

(01:06:23):
it's really like demeaning anddamaging.
And I've constantly have toremind myself.
People have heart attacks likepeople get sick normally.
Not Not everybody who gotcancer post-2020 is because of
some super cancer.
People get cancer.
Recti 47 did a number on us.
It's a misdirect.
There were cancer coming fromeverywhere.
California knows this.

(01:06:44):
Everything's labeled as acancer product.
You can't just blame the jab.

Speaker 5 (01:06:50):
He died.
With COVID he died with COVID.

Speaker 3 (01:06:52):
We all die with COVID .
That blame the jab.
He died with COVID.
He died with COVID.
We all die with COVID.
That's the secret.
We all have the cat parasite.
You can't blame all yourbehavior on the cat parasite.
You know it's like oh okay, oh,let's see.
Oh, there's just one more thingthat I wanted to share here
today.
Well, there's two things.
First is this, and this is thisis again another flashback to

(01:07:16):
donald trump, just because hementioned january sixers, and
this is old from months ago now.
But just to remind everybodywho assaulted who?

Speaker 2 (01:07:24):
you're going to honor first responders today, but you
pardon hundreds of people whoassaulted first responders.
Why did you do that?
Who we're going to meet withfirst responders today?
Yeah, but you pardoned peoplewho assaulted first responders
no.
I pardoned people that wereassaulted themselves.
They were assaulted by ourgovernment.

(01:07:45):
I pardoned J6 people who wereassaulted by our government,
that's, who assaulted, and theywere treated unfairly.
There's never been a group ofpeople in this country outside
of maybe one instance that I canthink of, but I won't get into
it that were treated morehorribly than the people of J6.

(01:08:06):
So, no, I didn't assault, theydidn't assault.
They were assaulted and what Idid was a great thing for
humanity.
They were treated very, veryunfairly.
There's never been an incidentlike it.

Speaker 3 (01:08:19):
I still, man, he's totally got your back.
I know, I know I'm like that'sright, they assaulted us.
The the thing that blows mymind.
Right, you're sitting in trialand they're like look at this
property damage.
I'm like, do you know how manywindows you guys broke with
flashbang grenades coming to ourhouses, how many doors you
kicked in?
I could give you donald smith'sphone number.
It took him two years to gethim to fix the door and they

(01:08:40):
never fixed it.
You know, like they just lefthis door hanging on its hinges.
He got braided for misdemeanorcharges and they ultimately
dropped his case.
You know, like so manysituations like that.
Oh, they disrupted commercebecause safeway had less gas
cells.
I've talked about this.
Like you, my business, youdeepened me.
Like you shot a completelyviable my.

(01:09:02):
Our company's gross revenue wasequivalent to the damage on the
capital.
You know, I mean you just shutit down.
Uh, this weekend I went to arepublican event and it was a
limit liberty eliminate event.
It was a fundraiser for somelocal candidates and I started
talking to some.
It turns out like these peopleare on my street and it's no
idea that the insurrectionistwas on their street.
You know, and uh, reallyhilarious.

(01:09:25):
Just again, we hardly know ourneighbors in our modern day and
age.

Speaker 5 (01:09:28):
I love it when those type of dudes just start talking
out their ass, yes, and thenthey find out who you are.

Speaker 3 (01:09:35):
They're like well, they were supportive.
They'd actually been to like ourweb page and stuff it was like,
yeah, it was a house that wasfor sale for all last years.
Like, yeah, that was us.
Like it's crazy that we'restill here.
So anyways, uh, talking to them, they're just completely
unaware of what happened.
Oh, when I start talking aboutbeing debunked, that's most

(01:09:56):
americans having the irs comeafter us and you know they were
like, really, all that happened.
I'm like, yeah, like this wasweaponized, like and then I and
I went a step further and I waslike, and guess what?
In four years I didn't hear boofrom you guys.
Yeah, the republicans, and nowyou want us to come speak.
And do you want to run foroffice?
Where were you a year ago?
You guys are the most fickle asthey get.

(01:10:16):
Like, anyways, it was.
I'm like I'm gonna influenceyou guys.
I'm not.
You know, you guys, this is nota two way street here.

Speaker 5 (01:10:25):
It hasn't been really fickle slash somehow uninformed
, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:10:30):
So Debbie B on YouTube comments, she says I do
that.
I wonder if they got the jab.

Speaker 5 (01:10:37):
We all do that.

Speaker 3 (01:10:38):
We all do that a little bit.
Yeah, it's, it's pretty bad.
It's pretty bad.
Yeah, all right, guys, that'spretty much all we've got for
today.
We're going to jump over toprivate and on private we're
going to watch this longer clipof Stephen Miller.
It is a really good clip.
It's totally worth watching.
So if you can join us over onthe rumble premium side on the

(01:10:58):
private, and we'll be streamingthere for a couple more minutes,
we've got to do five hours ofthat per month.
So if you feel like you needmore peasants perspective, go
join rumble premium and you canget that extra five hours a
month of streaming.
And then, of course, over onthe audio side on all of your
favorite podcast apps from fromuh apple podcast.

(01:11:19):
We even are back on spotify atthe moment.
You can go and downloadepisodes.
They're they're being releasedevery morning at 6 am pacific.
It's episodes from season one.
So if you want to hear, kind ofwhere we came from and how we
got here and how, frankly, we'restill saying the same dang
thing and beating on the same.
They're all you can see thatconsistency is key.
We've been doing this for overfour years.
We're well up over 300 plusepisodes if you combine all

(01:11:42):
those together.
So eventually they'll all becataloged over in the audio side
.

Speaker 5 (01:11:47):
So find your favorite audio player and they are being
uploaded, including we wouldhave had a thousand episodes if
you didn't have to go to jailfor a minute, if the government
hadn't assaulted us.

Speaker 3 (01:11:56):
Yeah, yeah, we'd be good.
So we're gonna play our greatoutro, because we know some of
y'all love it, and then we'll beback on the private side.

Speaker 1 (01:12:03):
Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that

(01:12:31):
castle over there.
I'm 37.
What I'm 37.
What I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
You automatically treat me likean inferior.
Well, I am king, oh, king, eh,very nice.

(01:12:52):
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere.
Oh, how do you do?
How do you do?
Good, lady, I'm Arthur, king ofthe Britons.
Whose castle is that?

(01:13:14):
King of the?
Who?
The Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy

(01:13:34):
in which the working classes oh,there you go bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified

(01:13:58):
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major.
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings?
Well, I can become king.
Then the lady of the lake, herarm clad in the purest,

(01:14:18):
shimmering samite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the
water, signifying by divineprovidence that I, arthur, was
to carry Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,

(01:14:40):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
watery tart threw a sword at you, shut up.
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.

(01:15:02):
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that giveaway?
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that.
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

Speaker 3 (01:15:38):
pow, hello, party people.
Okay, I love that outro.
Excuse me, woman, man, oh man.
Oh, I'm sorry, where is it?
My name is Dennis 37 orwhatever.

Speaker 5 (01:15:57):
I love it when it's all.
That's what I'm all about.

Speaker 3 (01:16:00):
That's what I'm all about.
Help, help.
You can see the repression ofthe system, a big repressed.
Did you see that?
Oh, there's some great filthdown here?
Oh, I did one.
They had the baby talk with thebabies.

(01:16:20):
I had one with the babies doingit and we've never played it,
but I posted it in the telegramchat.
All right, so let's take alisten to the full form of
stephen miller talking with marBartolomo.
There's a couple minute overlapfrom what we played earlier,
but I want to listen to thewhole eight minutes because
Stephen Miller just puts thistogether really well.

Speaker 20 (01:16:38):
Your reaction to what was released this week.

Speaker 12 (01:16:44):
The Russia collusion hoax against President Trump
remains the single greatest hoaxand the greatest assault on our
democracy in the history ofthis country.
There's no comparison, there'sno parallel to anything else.
It was a coup, and I'm usingthat term literally.
It was a coup to overthrow ademocratically buffering a coup

(01:17:08):
carried out by the intelligenceapparatus of this country, by
the deep state, by HillaryClinton and the Democrat Party.
The new information that hasbeen revealed by the director of
national intelligence and bythe FBI eliminates any scintilla
of doubt about the intention,the premeditation, the planning

(01:17:30):
and orchestration of thisconspiracy.
It meets all of the criminalelements of a seditious
conspiracy against the UnitedStates.
It meets the criminal elementsof an insurrection.
It meets the criminal elementsof a conspiracy against the
government and the criminalelements of a conspiracy to
deprive citizens of their civilrights under color of law, one

(01:17:51):
egregious felony after another.
And because it is a conspiracy,as demonstrated by the
forethought of realizing anddocumenting that they understood
that this was fake from thebeginning, meeting the Menzreya
standard in law.
Because of that, because it isa conspiracy, every single
individual actor is now part ofthat conspiracy.

(01:18:13):
So that includes Brennan andClapper and Comey and Hillary
and Schiff and everybody elsewho knowingly and willfully
perpetrated this plot, this coup, this conspiracy, this scheme
against President Trump and thegovernment of the United States.
And now is the time and thehour and the moment for
accountability so that we canreclaim this democracy, maria

(01:18:36):
Well, do you believe?

Speaker 20 (01:18:37):
we will actually get accountability.
We've been demandingaccountability now for a decade.
Our audience is well aware thatthis is the biggest political
scandal we have ever seen and aneffort to undermine and take
down a duly elected president,but now we want to see the
tricksters face the consequences.
Will they?

Speaker 12 (01:19:00):
I have complete confidence in the Department of
Justice to follow these facts,to follow this new, further
avalanche of evidence and totake all the necessary legal
steps to ensure that thewrongdoers, the coup plotters,
the schemers and theinsurrectionists are held fully
accountable under the laws andconstitution of these United

(01:19:23):
States.
Yes, maria, I believe that.

Speaker 20 (01:19:25):
Now, last weekend, john Ratcliffe, cia director,
who is a former prosecutor,former DNI, told us that the
statute of limitations, the fiveyear statute, does not apply
when it comes to conspiracy.
And he says the conspiracy isongoing because they still won't
admit it.

(01:19:45):
The conspiracy is stillhappening.
So what is your take on whatRatcliffe told us last week?

Speaker 12 (01:19:52):
Oh, he's completely right.
So several of the statutes Imentioned we have not even come
close to eclipsing the statuteof limitations.
But more than that, it is anongoing and continuing
conspiracy.
It continued through theentirety of President Trump's
first term, it continued throughthe entirety of President
Biden's term in office and itcontinues to this day.
There are still deep state coupplotters who are trying to

(01:20:18):
conceal and hide thisinformation on behalf of the
people they are protecting.
There are still staffers inDemocrat offices who know the
full truth, who are concealingthat truth.
So all of this behavior, all ofthis conduct, collectively
means the conspiracy hasn'tended, is ongoing.
Comey, in particular, has,throughout the years, engaged in
conduct and lies, publicstatements and testimony in

(01:20:40):
front of Congress of ourcourageous attorney general will
follow these facts and followthe evidence and deliver justice
.
Because if we have a countrywhere we can continue to have

(01:21:02):
FBI careerists and CIAcareerists, deep staters who
will fabricate and doctorevidence, who will create and
produce fake material,fabricated material, phony
information to try to go aftertheir political enemies, up to
and including the president, ifwe continue to create the
impression and the reality thatthere is not a criminal, a

(01:21:22):
severe criminal penalty for suchconduct.
It will never stop, it willnever desist, it will keep on
going forever and we willcontinue to have a country that
is sabotaged endlessly by theproduction of fake documents,
fake material, fake plotsagainst democratically elected
officials.
We can't have that.
There must be consequences.

Speaker 20 (01:21:43):
Well, I mean, it's just extraordinary to me that
the mainstream media hascompletely ignored this story
and they obviously werecomplicit from day one, being
the quote-unquote useful idiotsof the cabal to spread this
nonsense across the world.
But the Russia collusion liehad such an incredible impact.

(01:22:03):
People went to jail.
They should not have.
People were raided.
They raided Mar-a-Lago,President Trump's home, looking
for these documents, accordingto Devin Nunes Correct, by the
way.
That's a great point.

Speaker 12 (01:22:15):
The Mar-a-Lago raid was a perpetuation and
continuation of this sameconspiracy.
They went in search and inhopes of trying to recover the
documents that would implicatetheir own criminal conduct.
That's right.
The entire raid was aperpetuation of the same
criminal scheme as you mentioned, and so many innocent people

(01:22:35):
suffered irreparable harm.
Paul Manafort was left to rotin a prison cell because of this
ridiculous investigation, thiswitch hunt that is carried out.
How many homes were raided, howmany documents were taken,
emails were taken against theinnocent, against people whose
only crime was working forPresident Trump.
And everything that hashappened including, I would

(01:22:56):
argue, I would argue all of theinterference in 2024 that took
place and in 2020 that tookplace, all the dirty tricks that
kept taking place againstPresident Trump were all part of
a desire to keep him fromgetting back into the Oval
Office, to uncover and exposeand and share with the world the
full truth of what happened, aswe are seeing now.

Speaker 20 (01:23:18):
Maria they also set up General Mike Flynn.
Let's not forget about that.
There was so many implicationsof this lie, but even more so
let's talk about the impact tothe American people.
Because while Adam Schiff wasgoing on the Sunday political
shows and he was the chairman ofthe Intelligence Committee for
a time say there's collusion inplain sight when you have that

(01:23:40):
kind of a title.
You're the chairman of theIntelligence Committee and you
say there's collusion in plainsight.
We believe you, you've got thejob.
You must have seen more thanwe've seen.
So to outwardly lie like thatbecause you have that title.
Same thing with former directorof CIA John Brennan.
He's got that title, we believehim because he says it.
So all of this when they wererunning around Russia, russia,

(01:24:03):
russia how much did they miss?
How much did they leave on thecutting room floor, for example,
right now we are dependent onChina for 90 percent of the
underlying components for ourprescription drugs.
We saw Russia invade Ukrainemore territory.
We saw Iran continue to buildup nuclear weaponry.
All of the things that actuallymatter to the American people

(01:24:27):
were not the focus.

Speaker 12 (01:24:28):
The cost is incalculable.
People were not the focus for10 years.
The cost is incalculable.
The cost is incalculable ofhaving the entire security
apparatus of this countryfocusing on the hoax instead of
the real national securitythreats facing America.
Lie after lie after lie thatwas told to the American people,
preventing us from actuallysolving our relationship with

(01:24:52):
Russia, preventing us fromactually developing security and
independence from all of ouradversaries around the world.
Dealing with these biggeopolitical questions.
Instead, we were consumedendlessly by the same hoax, the
same lie, and the charlatansthat engage in this conduct are
beneath contempt.

(01:25:13):
They are without dignity andthey are beyond redemption.
What they have done, you can'teven measure the harm that it
inflicted.

Speaker 3 (01:25:23):
Can't even measure the harm they inflicted.
You have to connect things likeHHS letting 450,000 kids across
the border unaccompanied anddropping them off in random
places.
You have to include that in theharm.

Speaker 5 (01:25:36):
Yeah, I think you also have to include Anthony
Fauci.

Speaker 3 (01:25:41):
Anthony Fauci Nungri.
I mean the individuals who hadmothers that were raped and
murdered and daughters that weretaken, the sons that were
killed in different things, thefentanyl activity that was.
It's just an ever increasingscale Right.
All of that ties to this.
The the phone.
I was sitting here andwondering around to a halt as

(01:26:03):
far as benefiting the US, thepeople, yeah.
Multiple wars broke out aroundthe country because America
became weak and a laughing stock, brought to you by Pfizerizer,
brought to you by pfizer andbrought to you by the hunter
biden laptop and by burisma yeah, exactly, and I was sitting
here wondering I wonder how muchusd id money got funneled into
like advertisement campaigns fordrugs oh, how about this

(01:26:27):
advertisement campaign for drugs?
How about this?
How about just straight upgiving it to canada?
Right, this is this.
This is the epa lit.

Speaker 8 (01:26:34):
I'll give you one more really quickly.
There was 160 million dollarsthat went to a canadian electric
vehicle bus manufacturer.
They, the biden administration,sent all of the money.
Now you might say, hey, he'sproduced a school bus.

Speaker 3 (01:26:46):
You know it's jb pritzker car company, right?
So pop that up on the screen.
Jb pritzker's lion electric,which is j Pritzker's car
company, right?
So pop that up on the screen.
Jb Pritzker's Lion Electric,which is JB Pritzker.
The governor of Illinois has aCanadian company that makes
electric buses.
That got $160 million from theEPA.

Speaker 8 (01:27:01):
Oh my God, they took $160 million that went to a
Canadian electric vehicle busmanufacturer.
The Biden administration sentall of the money.
Now you might say, hey, justproduce the school bus and then
we'll pay you, or if you needsome partial payments along the
way, we'll give some money.
That makes sense.
They gave all the money upfront.
Well, guess what?
They just declared bankruptcy.
They still haven't declared.
They still haven't provided $95million worth of school buses

(01:27:24):
to 55 school districts.
It's the American taxpayer thatgets screwed.

Speaker 3 (01:27:43):
I'll give you what.
So?
And the money went to canada.
What the hell are we doing?
Pay your taxes, ron, hurry up,I know, get that extension in.
You know me, I'm just favoriteto check out, I'm out, I'm amish
, I got my hat, my beard I'm.

Speaker 5 (01:27:51):
I didn't know we were building all of our buses in
canada.
First of all, it's like whatthe hell's going?

Speaker 3 (01:27:58):
on.
So I like this.
This is just a secret of life,so we'll wrap up our private
with this.
I have a secret to share afterthe first two to three millions,
a paid off home and a good car.
There is no difference inquality of life between you and
jeff bezos.
Both of you have limited amountof time on earth.
You have twice, if not more,than Jeff, so you are richer
than him.
A cheeseburger is acheeseburger, whether a

(01:28:19):
billionaire eats it or you.
Money is nothing but a piece ofpaper or a number in your app.
Real life is outdoors.
Become financially independentthat's usually two to 3 million.
Have a good food, enjoy therelations, work out and enjoy
sex.
Sleep well, call your parents.
That's all there is to life.
Greed has no end.
Repeat.
After me, time is the currencyof life.
Money is not.
Sooner you figure this out, thehappier you will be.

(01:28:41):
Absolutely, absolutely Allright.
That's the end of the showtoday.
Check us out at 17 Liveus.
Great things are happeningevery day over there.
Honestly, it's just becoming.
I'm becoming so passionateabout what we're doing and
leftbehindwithoutorgpeasantsperspectivecom all the
fun stuff.
We'll talk to you guys againtomorrow, old woman.

Speaker 1 (01:29:11):
Man.
Man, sorry, what knight livesin that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.

(01:29:31):
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
They automatically treat melike an inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated

(01:29:53):
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere.
Oh, how do you do?
How do you do?
Good lady, I am Arthur, king ofthe Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.

(01:30:14):
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?

(01:30:36):
No one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet butby a two-thirds majority in the

(01:30:58):
case of more major.
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet, allright, who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,

(01:31:19):
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.

(01:31:40):
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.

(01:32:02):
Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh,

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Exposing the Clinton Conspiracy While Our Border Burns

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Exposing the Clinton Conspiracy While Our Border Burns

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce