From Corrupt Courts to Wasted Billions: America's System is Failing Its Citizens

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
EarthStream EarthStream.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
And when they went to the queen to tell her her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.

Speaker 3 (00:22):
You take the bomb, we're getting screwed man Every
time we turn around.

Speaker 4 (00:24):
Let them eat cake.
Here you take the bomb.
We're getting screwed, man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's gotta stop.

(00:47):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasants Perspective.
We made it.
Everything is like perfect thismorning.

(01:08):
It's awesome.
It's so awesome.
This is going to be anabsolutely awesome episode.
I'm glad you guys are joiningus here today.
I'm still getting my littlewindows all set up so I can see
the chat and also see the show.
Gotta kind of monitor that aswe go.
Yes, glad everybody made it.
P it.
Pony boy, glad you're here.

(01:28):
John attack is glad you're here.
So awesome.
All right, okay.
So driving in this morning Iwas like the northwest is so
pretty when you don't have towork outside and some days the
traffic is better than others.
Yes, it wasn't bad today, sothere was a while back actually.

(01:49):
No, this was while I was inprison.
While I was in prison thelatest installment of yeah,
while when I was in prison,there was this news story that
was really weird.
It came out of kentucky andwhat happened was a sheriff went
into a judge's chambers andshot the judge cold.
Oh yeah, I remember this.

Speaker 6 (02:10):
Yeah, yeah.
So and I thought to myself whoa, what is going on here?
Either somebody is crazy orsomebody is doing some vigilante
justice that they thoughtcouldn't be done any other way.

Speaker 4 (02:24):
Ok, so there was a video I had teed up yesterday
that we didn't play because wehad a really long show and it
was a.
It was a police chief thatstumbled onto one of his
officers one of his you know,officers of the law on a DUI
arrest.

Speaker 1 (02:39):
Okay.

Speaker 4 (02:40):
Comes up to him and he's like officer, you know your
Jack, what's on your jacket?
He was wearing a jacket.
I guess it wasn't in compliancewith the uniform.
What?
The letters aren't right orsomething.
Ok, take off your jacket.
He's like I'm in the middle ofa DUI.
Can I finish this?
Take off your jacket.
Police chief was drunk andwalked up and then he ended up,

(03:01):
basically while the guy wastrying to make the arrest.
Like touches him, and so thethe cop turns around, slams the
police chief on the hood of thecar.
He's like don't touch me.
He's like you are interferingwith business.
I am going to arrest you if youdon't stop.
I am, you are interfering withit.
You know, an investigation.
This is like 101 obstruction,you know.
Yeah, so anyways.

(03:22):
Then the police chief gets upand relieves him of duty demands
a ride home and the officer'slike no, I've been relieved.
Like takes off his badge andlike I'm going by himself.
So he goes back to the policestation, drops off the car,
leaves the police chief on theside of the road drunk anyways,
I had it all teed up to play thepolice chief.
They did a little investigation, you know, because he couldn't
back this thing, kind of turnedinto and it's all on body camera

(03:44):
, of course, and the police, the, the officer gets reinstated,
like a couple days later policechief gets investigated,
eventually gets fired.
But he has a history of thisabusing his power and it's like
his files full of this stuff ohgreat.
But yet he's promoted, promoted,promoted, promoted, promoted,
promoted.
Well, this judge out inkentucky you know, police chief,
that's the executive branch.

(04:04):
This judge out in kentucky, youknow, police chief, that's the
executive branch.
This judge out in kentuckyfound himself in the middle of a
child sex brothel in chambers.
So new york post broke thisstory when it happened.
Uh, and journalists like tracybeans were hearing from people
on the ground and they're likeoh, there was a whole situation
with kids on probation and likea bunch of stuff and this there

(04:25):
was a sheriff's deputy who had akid involved and then that led
to the sheriff being involvedand blah, blah, blah, blah.
Anyways, apparently he feltlike he couldn't get justice.
Kentucky judge, killed bysheriff, ran courthouse like a
brothel and traded sex forfavors at a twisted, at twisted
parties.
A victim says so.
There's the video of this yeah,that's the one I saw rural

(04:46):
kentucky judge gunned down hisown chambers last year ran a
twisted sex ring where youngwomen were coaxed into forming
sexual favors just to get out oftrouble.
One of the alleged victimsclaims taya.
Adams alleged she was amongthose caught up in judge kevin
mullen's apparent sex for favorscheme that saw him and others
in a tiny town of whitesburgdemand sex in exchange for cash
or to get off offenders off thehook.

(05:07):
Adams told nations news,nations bainfield, that mullins,
who was shot execution style inhis elector chain county
chambers, allegedly by hislongtime sheriff pal sean steins
last september, had warned herto keep quiet of the so-called
depaved rings.
We would do sex parties,perform shows and have sex with
them for money Things like that.
Adam's alleged it wasconsensual but it was the things

(05:27):
that.
The thing was that we were soyoung and when they use it
against us to destroy our liveslater Adam said she felt forced
to go along with the judge'sscheme because she feared child
protective services wouldsomehow get involved in up into
her life.
They would make sure to make youfeel small and degraded and
belittled as possible to takeyour power away.
Adams said it wasn'tintermittently clear if the

(05:47):
woman had any prior run-ins withthe law or if she was on CPS's
radar at the time, she wanted tosay it was just a given, she
would keep her mouth shut aboutthe apparent depravity,
insisting who would believe itanyways, because the whole town
was doing it.
Nobody cares, they're allswingers, it's all a big party
to them.
It was all just so normalseparately.
Sarah davis, a former deputyjailer, electric county lockup,
told the outlet that she'd heardabout the nasty and sickening

(06:08):
stories to come out of theparties because of course, in
the prison, in the jails,they're talking about it pretty
much everybody nobody believes acriminal right.
Pretty much everybody in thecounty knows, she said, but it
was confirmed to me afterworking in the county jail,
especially after being invitedto a party myself.
She claims the only only to addto disturbing allegations that
have merged in the wake ofMullen's caught in camera
slaying last year, including theslain judge had been seen

(06:30):
running his courthouse like abrothel.
It hasn't been since beenrevealed that that one woman's,
sabrina Adkins, threw Mullen'sname into the mix during the
2022 criminal investigation intous Lecter County sheriff, who
was later jailed for rape andsodomy of a female inmate at
adkins, who claimed he wascoerced by then.
So they locked up an inmate fordoing a sexual crime while they

(06:50):
themselves were doing a sexualcrime.
Adkins, who claimed she wascoerced by then deputy sheriff
ben fields to perform sexualfavors in exchange for staying
under house arrest, alleged thejudge was on the long-standing
sextortion racket.
I've seen judge Mullen's havesex with a girl in the judge's
chamber Jack and told police.
In our interview at the timeshe added that fields, who was
fired in the wake of the probe,also had some videotapes of some

(07:13):
stuff in the judge's chambers,just with the girl's sexual
stuff.
It is unclear if the allegedsextortion scheme had anything
to do with Mullen shooting.
Authorities had previouslyrefused to rule out if a
possible sex scandal was themotive behind the bloodshed.
The judge had been decades longfriends with the accused killer
, who was spotted having lunchwith him just hours before he
was gunned down on september18th.
Chilling surveillance footagealleged capture the sheriff

(07:34):
stepping into the pal's officeand making multiple calls to his
daughter before opening fire.
His daughter was involved inthis his daughter had gotten
into some trouble and, oh youknow, we could make this go away
.
The sheriff's attorney laterdescribed the execution style
shooting as a crime of passiondue to an extreme emotional
disturbance.
Stein's, who is running dayslater after the shooting is

(07:55):
being held in eastern kentuckyjail without bond, has pleaded
not guilty to a charge of murderof a public official.
That is horrifying yeah and youknow, yesterday we played a
video about weaponization ofgovernment and it's and this
always, I always go back to thisconversation I had with this
fbi agent in the summer of 2020and we went on a walk and he's

(08:18):
like put your phone down, let'sgo for a walk looking in
hindsight, I have a lot ofquestions about this guy.
Okay, either way he I asked thequestion, you know, with russia
gate, you know about comey.
He's like listen, I'm an agent,I can't just go start an
investigation, right, I have tohave probable cause and that
investigation is going to getapproved, it's going to get

(08:40):
looked at.
He's like I can't just open aninvestigation on my boss, I
can't just open an investigationon seventh floor of the FBI.
He's like you know, it's achain of command stuff.
This is not how it works, andso he's like I know that they're
doing bad things.

Speaker 6 (08:54):
Hold on.
What's the chain of command?

Speaker 4 (08:58):
I'm just saying, like you know, there's no, there's
no way for him to do anything.
So in a situation where it'slike well, oh, hey, maybe I
should file suit in this court.
Hey, maybe we should take it tothe federal court.

Speaker 6 (09:12):
Have you seen what's going on there?
So remember when I said there'stwo possibilities.
This is the second possibilityand it's everything.
I hoped it wasn't and I don'tknow what to do about these
situations.

Speaker 4 (09:26):
Public corruption is as old as time.
Yeah, this is not something new.
It's not like oh hey, this isthe first time there's been a
corrupt public official, right?
This is why the foundingfathers wanted to diffuse power.
If the king is of integrity andcan just, you know, go around
and slay dragons all the time,and we wouldn't have these
problems.
But that's not how it works.
But if the whole town knowsit's happening, what the hell's
going on in your town.

Speaker 6 (09:46):
Yeah, what do you do about it?

Speaker 4 (09:50):
then these are the kind of things where it's like
who's running this place?
Yeah Right, well, it's we, thepeople we consent to allow this
to continue.
I mean, I'm sure there will, Idon't know.
I mean, again, the inmates knowthe people involved in the snow
, they're talking, but againit's that powerlessness, like
who cares what the peasantry aresaying?
You know, let them eat cake,whatever, until one day the

(10:13):
sheriff's kid gets involved.
And then all of a sudden it'slike All right, patrick Byrne
one time was asking somebodyelse that was deep in government
about the corruption and hegoes there's an old Hindu myth
about the earth being on theback of a turtle and a turtle.
And it's like so the Hindu guruis like so you know where's the

(10:35):
beginning?
It's like turtles all the waydown.
It's just a turtles is like anew creation, a new creation, a
new.
It's their origin myth.
And so he's like when it comesto corruption in government,
it's turtles all the way down.
I mean, again, just looking atit, big picture, pull yourself
away for a moment.
Take away all the patriotismand all the glory that the flag

(10:59):
and everything that's associatedwith all of the pride of our
nation and our country, andjuxtapose that with Obama and
basically being a traitoragainst everything that flag
stands for Right, and actuallystarting an investigation to
obstruct in an electedpresident's administration and

(11:24):
try to put him in jail andpossibly shoot him in the head.
This is a big deal, allegedly.
How do you separate the tworight?
How do you go?
Hey, I'm gonna go spread somedemocracy and fight overseas and
defend our rights, butmeanwhile the judge that it's
back home, that doesn't have toget drafted, that had bone spurs

(11:47):
when he was you know what I'msaying is doing that kind of
stuff.
It's, it's turtles all the waydown, man, yup, it's turtles.
So we just look at it and kindof laugh and go, huh, all the
more reason to go.
All the more reason to putyourself in a position in life
where you're not dependent on it.
Because, again, we're peasants.
We have to live here.
Like, no matter what happens,we have to live here.

Speaker 6 (12:09):
How do we feel about the sheriff?

Speaker 4 (12:16):
Yeah, I'm not going to sit here, I'm not casting
stones.
Listen when we're talkingvigilante.
Right, I've been grouped intothis so I get to speak with some
authority on being someonewho's like hey, you can't just
go riot, can't just take the lawin your hand.
Just take the law in your ownhands and go riot.
Yeah, you're right, there'sconsequences for that.

(12:37):
I find myself going that's aperfect situation where you got
to get a really good jury.
You got to get a really goodjury.
You got to get a really goodjury because, you know, maybe
there's a justification and, asthe sheriff I don't know man
like this is an unbelievablylike.
You walked in and shot a guy incold blood yeah, no bond, you

(13:00):
know what I mean.
Like he's clearly already held.
I don't know what they're goingto do.
The system wants to protectitself.
You got to remember the peoplethat are interested in this case
might be running other similarcourtrooms that want this case
to go away, that want this guyto not be vindicated.
They're doing that.

(13:26):
I gotta do something.
You know this isn't that.
Yeah, this isn't a situationwhere you're gonna see true
fairness.
For me, if I was that sheriff,I'd be like I need a jury and
the entire case revolves aroundvaudeville or whatever they call
it.

Speaker 6 (13:35):
It's jury idea body area.

Speaker 4 (13:37):
The whole case revolves around jury selection
because that's system's going toprotect itself.
You know, the trumpadministration has a january
sixer that's still sitting injail because he threatened fbi
agents after he was arrested andraided and all that kind of
stuff.
Threatened fbi agents and he'sserving a life sentence now for
for threatening the life of fbiagents.

(13:58):
So this administration isn'texactly like oh, hey, yeah, you
know mea culpa, like no, you'restill responsible for all of
your choices.
This is Ron DeSantis, he's onwith Jesse Waters and this goes.
I'm sorry to start to show outwith that dour topic.
I guess it's again.
It's another one of thesethings.
There's this constant theme youcannot let them weaponize our

(14:19):
virtue against us.
They don't share the samevirtue.
Just like that woman was sayingthe whole town's a bunch of
swingers, like all thesereturnees, and they go golfing
and they've just got this.
Whatever that is going on there, that's not how us peasants
live.
Okay, it's not the way it works.
So this is ron desantis, onwith jesse waters and he's

(14:40):
talking about that cL driverfrom India, the asylum seeker
you know because apparently justmade a mistake, apparently in
India.
he was feeling threatened so wewere granting asylums.
Vacation in India.
I thought we grant asylum tocountries like Cuba, where it's
like you know.
No, not India, it's a democracy.

(15:00):
I don't understand.
They have a functioning lawsystem.
I don't understand.
That's a democracy.
I don't understand.
They have a functioning lawsystem.
I don't understand.
Anyways, he comes here, can'tspeak English, ends up getting
his licenses and CDLs in somecombination of Washington State,
california and New Mexico.
Turns out he can't freakingspeak English and killed three
people trying to make a U-turnin a semi truck on the
interstate.

Speaker 12 (15:21):
We had an issue where you had an illegal alien
truck driver that got acommercial driver's license in
the state of California,employed by a California company
, kill three people in Florida.
This guy didn't even speakEnglish.
We're bringing him up oncharges.
He's going to face a lot and Ican announce, jesse, that I said

(15:41):
initially the company needs tobe held accountable and we've
been working with the federalgovernment and they are pulling
that company's license to dobusiness because you cannot
employ somebody who cannot readthe road signs.

Speaker 4 (15:54):
So one thing even with all these public corruption
stories and how sad they are.
We have to recognize that weknow about it.
Yeah, it's significant that weknow about it.
Like we have to celebratebecause now you're not ignorant,
now you can put these things in, you know, in your cap and you
can go oh, this might explainsome funny behavior out of the
court.
Why is it that things don'thappen reasonably?

(16:16):
Now?
That doesn't mean we alwaysjump to the conclusion that
everybody's a baby eater,pedophile.
I've been?

Speaker 6 (16:20):
are we gonna play some clips from our governor?
Our governor is a freakingmoron when it comes to this
stuff and you just don't knowwhat's going on behind the
scenes, man.

Speaker 4 (16:29):
Okay, so this is the fox news breakdown when we
started to find out the detailsright after the show broke
yesterday, uh, this this wasannounced about this particular
driver and his actual ability toread and speak english dana, 28
year old harjinderjinder Singhis expected back in Florida
later this week to face statecharges of vehicular homicide.

Speaker 9 (16:48):
He's currently being held in California without bond.
He appeared in court yesterdaywith the help of an interpreter.
He agreed to sign paperwork forhis extradition and Florida
authorities must pick him up byAugust 27.
Singh was driving on Florida'sTurnpike last week when
authorities say he attempted anillegal U-turn blocking oncoming
traffic.
A minivan slammed into thetrailer, killing three Florida

(17:11):
residents inside.
Following the wreck,investigators with the US DOT
gave Singh an English-languageproficiency test.
According to a DOT pressrelease, the driver failed the
assessment, providing correctresponses to just two of 12
verbal questions and onlyaccurately identifying one of
four highway traffic signs.
Because Singh, who entered theUS from Mexico in 2018, is an

(17:35):
asylum seeker from India, theDOT says Washington state
violated federal guidelines byissuing him a full term
commercial driver's license in2023.
By issuing him a full-termcommercial driver's license in
2023.
And they believe New MexicoState Police may have failed to
assess his English skills duringa roadside inspection.
Additionally, the DOT says it'sinvestigating whether

(17:59):
California acted within federalguidelines when it issued Singh
a limited-term CDL in 2024.

Speaker 4 (18:03):
So California issued him his first CDdl.
Then washington state issuedhim as permanent one we're so
dumb up here so ronda santa saysthe federal government is
pulling that truck truckingcompany's license because they
hired someone who couldn't speakenglish yeah, and now this
guy's going to get a world tour.

Speaker 6 (18:21):
He he's in California .
They're going to extradite himto Florida.
I mean, is this guy reallycan't speak English, or is he
just scared?

Speaker 4 (18:32):
Oh no, he can't speak English.

Speaker 1 (18:34):
Okay.

Speaker 4 (18:34):
I'm certain of it.

Speaker 6 (18:36):
Yeah, I'm certain.
So what are we doing?

Speaker 4 (18:38):
What are we doing?
Giving them licenses?

Speaker 6 (18:40):
Yeah, what are we doing here?

Speaker 4 (18:43):
You know there is no quote national language there's.
There's like kind of reasonsfor that.
You know a lot of that had todo with the Amish again speaking
German or whatever theirdialect was.
We have no national languagebut our signs are all in English
, except for around here some ofthem are in Indian.

Speaker 1 (19:03):
I don't know, or whatever.

Speaker 4 (19:05):
Indian, as in Native American, I should say, but I
don't know.
Man Like this is extremelydangerous.
It's extremely dangerous thefact that this guy thought he
could make a U-turn on the roadso he did his CDL.
Did he take his hours of?

Speaker 6 (19:21):
class.
Well, when you look at his,look at the footage of him
making the turn in the vanslamming into the car, he's
looking so confused he's like,well, I'm making a turn here,
what's going on?

Speaker 4 (19:32):
You know, in other countries they drive differently
.

Speaker 6 (19:34):
Right.

Speaker 4 (19:35):
And it makes me wonder, like did you take the
school?
How did?
You get through the school?
Did they give it to you in inyour native or did you?
Did you take the test?
Did you do the walk around onthe cdl?

Speaker 6 (19:50):
test like I've taken this test.

Speaker 4 (19:51):
I've done it.
I don't understand how you canget through it.
I don't either who are theinstructors in your native
language to ask you about theair brake and, you know, ask you
, like all the little questionsthey have to ask you.
I don't get it I don't knoweither.

Speaker 6 (20:01):
I mean he must have had, like some indian friend,
that like helped him and coachedhim through.

Speaker 4 (20:05):
There's a failure at like every level of this yeah
like every, every level of this.
Somebody could have said youmight not be safe.
Every level that someone couldhave said you can't read the
stuff in your truck, so you knowlike you can't read you know
what I mean.

Speaker 6 (20:19):
How about you failed?
Come back when you can read.
Come back when you can read.

Speaker 4 (20:23):
Come back when you can read yeah, yikes, in DC
they're going through a hugeeffort to clean up and Stephen
Miller was kind of interviewedon the fly.
They've got the troops in.
This is Pete Hegseth standingbehind him here and outside of
this little I don't knowconvention center.
They're in, there's protestersand Stephen Miller makes some

(20:48):
interesting comments about this.
But one of the says you got abunch of 90 year old white
people out there protesting.
That's the same thing my wifecomments.
When they had the no kingsprotest up at the street corner
by my house and there was 60 70people out there.
All of them are over the age of60.
White hair, like every singleone of them, male and female,
are basically boomers, likecompletely.

Speaker 6 (21:06):
Just about a week ago we had that same crowd standing
over by the Viking and you knowthey're all holding retarded
signs like stop the dictator,yeah.

Speaker 4 (21:16):
Putin and Trump are friends, Exactly, and it's all
old people.
It's all old people.
My wife is like I don'tunderstand Like these are
supposed to be like the mentorsto grandparents and stuff.
And it's all old people, it'sall people.
My wife is like I don'tunderstand Like these are
supposed to be like the mentorsto grandparents and stuff.
And they're out there, no king.
It's like.

Speaker 6 (21:29):
And I'm like either these people are part of the
plan or they're part of thegroup that my grandfather would
fall into, that are completely,just mentally, captured by the
party.
Yeah, yeah.
And they don't realize that theparty has gone astray.

Speaker 4 (21:52):
That's the thing.
It's like they've been kind ofpsyoped.
Yeah and listen.
You know you could look at theRepublicans.
We have our own group of peoplethat are psyoped.

Speaker 6 (22:01):
And I think that these people really are, and
when drive by them I actuallyfeel really bad.

Speaker 4 (22:07):
I'm like look at those poor old folks out there I
hold the mirror up so hard onmyself.
I'm like I was that guy.
I went to a protest, yeah, youknow.
And I'm like, did I?

Speaker 6 (22:17):
it was I've victim and but to take time out of your
day to go stand on a corner andsay, honk, if you hate the
dictator, I mean dude, you'recommitted to something that I'm
not sure you understand he, hedoesn't, he doesn't support the
dictator in ukraine.

Speaker 4 (22:37):
I'm gonna be elected.
I mean the suspendedconstitution.
I mean we can't have anelection because we're at war.
I love trump's like.

Speaker 6 (22:43):
So in like three and a half years, and the media is
like I think they're the samepeople that have, you know, all
the colorful hair and they'refree in palestine.

Speaker 4 (22:54):
Yeah, like oh boy, steven miller, talking about the
dynamic of dc, and the peoplethat are protesting have no
connection to this, for too long.

Speaker 5 (23:04):
99 of this city has been terrorized by one percent
of this city and the voice thatyou hear out there, those crazy
communists.
They have no roots, they have noconnection to the city, they
have no families they areraising this city they have no
one that they are sending toschool in this city, they have
no jobs in this city, they haveno connections to this community

(23:24):
at all.
But they're the ones who'vebeen advocating for the 1%, the
criminals, the killers, therapists, the drug dealers, and
I'm glad they're here today,because me, pete and the vice
president are all going to leavehere and inspired by them.
We're going to add thousandsmore resources to this city to
get the criminals and the gangmembers out of here.
We're going to add thousandsmore resources to this city to
get the criminals and the gangmembers out of here.
We're going to dismantle thosenetworks and we're going to

(23:46):
prove that a city can serve forthe law-abiding citizens who
live there.
We are not going to let thecommunists destroy a great
American city, let alone thenation's capital.
And let's just also address oneother thing.
All these demonstrators thatyou've seen out here in recent
days, all of these elderly whitehippies, they're not part of

(24:07):
the city and never have been.
And, by the way, most of thecitizens who live in.
Washington DC are black.
This is not a city that has hadany safety for its black
citizens for generations, andPresident Trump is the one who
is fixing that, with the supportof the Metropolitan Police
Department, the support of theNational Guard and our federal

(24:28):
law enforcement officers.
So we're going to ignore thesestupid white hippies, who all
need to go home and take a napbecause they're all over 90
years old, and we're going toget back to the business of
protecting the American peopleand the citizens of Washington
DC, these stupid white cockpitswho are all over 90 years old.

Speaker 4 (24:47):
It's the same group of people out here.
By the way, they must havetraveled to dc, yeah that is,
they got some of that act bluemoney yeah, so a couple days ago
they found out.
You know again more paidprotesting, bringing people into
dc to kind of staff, thisconstant protest that's going on
against ice and all this kindof stuff yeah, what was?

Speaker 6 (25:05):
what was stacy abrams going to do with all that two
billion dollars?
Oh, she's going to come up hereagain here in a couple minutes
oh, we're going to get directlyto stacy abrams in fact.

Speaker 4 (25:14):
uh, she's, she's uh, going to be next on the.
Let me see what's next.
Yes, she's going to be next onthe docket here.
So we're going to listen to twovideos from lee zeldin talking
about the epa and what they'vedone there to recover all those
quote unquote gold bars that gotthrown off the titanic.
As that undercover video showed, he was tasked with going out

(25:35):
and recovering those gold bars.
So between the two interviewswe're going to listen here he's
going to explain what they'vedone and what they found Right.
So, again, this shows thepeasants perspective, like we're
the peasants, right, and we'rethe little guy, we're the guy
that's just got to go to worktomorrow, take care of the
family.
Like we understand what's realand what's important.
We live on the land, we're apart of our local communities.

(25:58):
We go to churches, weparticipate in local scouting
like we're on the ground.
Dc is the flyover state.
You know what I mean.
Dc is that thing that'sdisconnected from us but yet has
the power to rule and regulateus, and it trickles down through
the states.
Trump is using those levers topull back funding and try to
return power to the people,which is basically get

(26:18):
government just to serve thepeople instead of serve itself.
Right, but Lee Zeldin istalking about the EPA.
The EPA is one of the worstagencies when it comes to
infringement on your rights.
I mean, these guys create rule.
If anybody has ever dealt withwetland issues, if you've ever
dealt with water right issues,if you've ever dealt with

(26:39):
forestry issues, if you've everdealt with fishery issues.

Speaker 6 (26:43):
Any kind of quote, unquote, critical area any kind
of quote, unquote, critical area.

Speaker 4 (26:47):
If you've ever dealt with floodplains, if, if you've
ever dealt with migratory birdshunting licenses, what FEMA
certs?
Fema certs stormwaterregulations when you're building
new construction, um, npdespermits, it goes on.
And on the degree at which theepa has the ability to come in

(27:09):
and say that has something to dowith the environment either,
there came from the environment,it's going to go back into the
environment, it's on theenvironment, it's around the
environment.
Your property rights be damned.
Your property rights be damned.
Exactly.
They're the ones who started tointerpret wetlands in grandma's
backyard that are just little,literally just wet spots in the
yard, and declared themnavigable waterways and put

(27:30):
federal jurisdiction over it.

Speaker 6 (27:32):
And then get this they claim that wetlands are the
cleaners of the world.
You know, it's where all thepollutants get captured, but
guess what?
You're not allowed to send apollutant to them.
Yeah, exactly, get captured,but guess what?
You're not allowed to send apollutant to them.
So so do their job yeah, sowe're not, we're not allowing
them to do their job so they'redying because they're being
starved of food yes, this is epais insanity.

Speaker 4 (27:55):
So to have someone like lee zeldin there, I really
hope they can peel it apart.
Epa had the West Virginiaversus EPA case and then there
was the Loper Bright case.
That both had to do with EPAcases when they overstepped
their bounds based on theChevron doctrine case, which was
back in 1984.
They had basically thegovernment.

(28:15):
The legislature, said EPA, wewant clean water, go do it.
And then they delegated the lawmaking and rule making capacity
to the epa.
So the epa came in and startedmaking rules, enforce them like
loss find people, put people inprison over violation of things
that were never voted on by alegislature.
They just had a go, get usclean water, there's a direction

(28:37):
, and they just went crazy.

Speaker 6 (28:39):
And all those rules are based on best available
science.
Well, guess what?
Whatever science you have todayis the best that's available
they just make it up.

Speaker 4 (28:49):
They just make it up, yeah, so.
So this is what he was doingthese two interviews.
We're going to get a prettygood picture of this when I was
going through the confirmationprocess.

Speaker 13 (28:56):
This video come through projectitas but it was
of a Biden EPA employee who wastalking about how the agency was
tossing gold bars off theTitanic, rushing to get billions
of dollars out the door beforeInauguration Day.
He was also talking about thedesire to get themselves jobs at

(29:18):
the recipient NGOs and andthese members of the Senate it
was coming from SenateRepublicans who were saying,
asking, demanding if confirmed,would you please make it a top
priority to quickly get to thebottom of it?
Absolutely, was my response,with great enthusiasm and

(29:39):
eagerness, and our team quicklywas able to trace down so much.
Basically, every time weoverturned a rock, we found
something under it that waseither filled with self-dealing
and conflicts of interest,unqualified recipients or
reduced agency oversight.
And when Democrats had oneparty rule in Washington DC,

(30:01):
they passed this bill called theInflation Reduction Act that
had tens of billions of dollarsto go out through EPA.
Well, epa didn't know how tospend tens of billions of
dollars, so they decided to park$20 billion at an outside bank
and to have that bank send themoney through eight pass-through
entities.
Money through eightpass-through entities, all these

(30:26):
NGOs, pass-through entitiesthat were riddled with
self-dealing and conflicts ofinterest former Obama and Biden
officials, democratic donors, asyou pointed out, and the EPA
was a party to the accountcontrol agreement with those
prime recipients.
But here's the thing when themoney goes through the prime
recipients to others in manycases also pass-throughs EPA no

(30:47):
longer is a party of the accountcontrol agreement.
Epa is a losing oversight bydesign.
Intentionally, these grantagreements, these arrangements
were set up to tie EPA's handsbehind its back.
I could sit here with you.
You could ask me 10, 15, 20 ofthe first most important
questions that come to mind asfar as where the money was going

(31:10):
after it leaves the pastorentities, and the crazy thing is
how little I would be able toanswer even today, this far
after inauguration day.
That is by design.
The DOJ has been investigating,the inspector general's office
has been investigating.
I terminated all of it.
Is there any way of getting themoney back?
Absolutely, this has been goingthrough a litigation process.

(31:33):
It's at an appeals court rightnow in the federal court system
and we are basically at the endof a closeout period now.
We are basically at the end ofa closeout period now because
when these grants get terminated, there's a 120-day closeout
period and this money should berecovered for the American
public and I'm proud to be ableto do my part with this great

(31:56):
team here to figure out onewhere the money went.
They tossed the gold bars offthe Titanic.
I was told to go out and findthe gold bars bars.
We found the gold bars andwe're bringing them back on
board and we're doing that forthe american public and we're
proud of it so the money startsfunneling around.

Speaker 4 (32:16):
they've recovered a bunch of it they have, are
trying to get a bunch back andthey're in court trying to get
it.
This is $29 billion, $29billion.
So here's more of thisconversation with even more
detail.
So far, you've scaled back thereach of this place.

Speaker 14 (32:34):
You talk about saving a lot of money.
What is that number?

Speaker 13 (32:38):
Over $29 billion of grants have canceled $29 billion
of grants.
Our operating budget annually isabout $10 billion.
We've canceled over $29 billion.
$27 billion of it was theGreenhouse Gas Reduction Fund,
part of the Inflation ReductionAct, when President Biden had
one-party control of Congress,and it was filled with
self-dealing and conflicts ofinterest, unqualified recipients

(33:01):
, reduced agency oversight,money going through
pass-throughs, throughpass-throughs, through
pass-throughs, the dollargetting diluted and if the
argument is going to be madethat a dollar should get spent
to remediate an environmentalissue, then spend it on
remediating an environmentalissue.
Instead, they're giving it totheir friends, former Biden and
Obama officials and Democraticdonors former Biden and Obama
officials and Democratic donors.

(33:22):
President Trump talks aboutStacey Abrams, this one linked
NGO to her that received $2billion.
Is that true?
Yes, in 2023.
And it was going out the door.
Yes, in 2023, that NGO received$100.
In 2024, they got $2 billionfrom the Biden EPA.
They had to complete training.

(33:43):
In their grant agreement, page7, that says they have 90 days
to complete training, called howto develop a budget, Yet in the
first 21 days they can startspending the money Billions of
dollars.
Now you could ask all sorts ofgreat questions about where the
money goes once it goes throughpass-throughs, and deliberately,
by design, I won't have answersto basic questions.

Speaker 14 (34:06):
So this pass-throughs?
I mean you have to be almost aninvestigator to see the bank
shots of where this money goesright.
I mean that's part of whatyou're trying to find out.
Have you been shocked by whatyou've found?
Stunning.

Speaker 13 (34:20):
And in one case, for example in the Solo for All
program, a $7 billion programthat's been canceled.
We found examples where therewere four pastors and they're
all getting a VIG.
So it's not like the dollargoes from an appropriation of
Congress to a dollar that getsused for some good reason on the
back end.
Think of how much that dollargets diluted when you have four

(34:44):
each taking their 15 pluspercent yeah, I guess it gets
less money.

Speaker 4 (34:53):
It is not going to help environment drug dealers
understand this.
Yeah, exactly dude this again.
I I'm never shocked, butsometimes I'm in awe of how
brazen these people are.
Yeah, having orgies in thejudges chambers, getting drunk

(35:18):
when you're off duty andapproaching your officers and
relieving them of duty, throwinggold bars off the back of the
EPA to be recovered by yourfriends and associates you know
the Obama administrators, theBiden administrators, stacey
Abrams there was an example withthe Stacey Abrams one in 2023,
that NGO that got $2 billionfrom the EPA, had $100.

(35:41):
And then in 2023, got $2billion from the EPA, had $100.
And then in 2023, got $2billion and as part of that,
they had to take a 100-daytraining on how to make a budget
.

Speaker 6 (35:53):
I know, if you give me half that I could spend the
money after 21 days.
I'll promise to do double thetraining for half the money
after the 21 days.
I'll promise to do double thetraining for half the money.

Speaker 4 (36:04):
You know when you talk about like capitalism and
seed capital and you know by thetime you've got two billion
dollars.
Like the budget thing isn'treally a conversation when one
ceo says to another ceo how doyour budgets look?
There's not like so.
Do you use like gaps accounting, like you know what I mean.
Like use excel.
Are you you use yeah, so no,it's just like you got your

(36:26):
books.
Like you're not getting atraining course and by the way
who's offering that trainingcourse?
because if anybody's everthrough been through like
government standardized training, it's like you don't even get
trained on things that arerelevant, like when you become a
realtor.

Speaker 6 (36:40):
All the training has nothing to do with being a
realtor they don't even teachmoney or civics in high school,
I think it's impossible for themto do it all right.

Speaker 4 (36:49):
On a lighter note, aside from just lost billions
and government corruption,mormon women can now wear sacred
undergarments.
Some wonder, uh, mormon womencan now wear new sacred
undergarments.
Some some wonder why now?
So apparently the mormon churchhas changed its uh undergarment
requirements for women,allowing them to wear sleeveless

(37:10):
shirts.

Speaker 6 (37:11):
Oh, I did not notice those of us that grew up in the
mormon church with this is a bigdeal as a big deal.

Speaker 4 (37:16):
Yeah, there's a lot of frustration in the church
that it is not acknowledging thefixation that it had on women's
bodies.
They and they're really prettysad.
This is some member that'scommenting on this.
The church's focus on modestyfor girls and women reset,
became extreme in the late 1990sand early 2000s.
As an example, she pointed to achurch periodical taking an
angel depiction and addingsleeves to it.
A part-time legal assistant,rachel Gerber, remembers wearing

(37:40):
a tankini swimming suit to achurch activity when she was 14,
but a leader told her it wasinappropriate and she had to go
cover up I got like pissed.
It was super upset and someonewas like rachel, you have to
wear it or go home.
She would.
Gerber is a mom of two, runs asocial media account called lds
change makers promote genderequality within the church's
current policies.
She believes modesty andgarments represent larger
inequality in the church andthere are new temple

(38:01):
undergarments for men as well.
But gerber says it's alwaysbeen much easier for men to wear
fashionable clothing withgarments.
It controls my life much morethan it controls my husband.
She said I can't wear basic, hecan wear basically whatever he
wants.
The sleeve change is somethingmany women have wanted for at
least 15 years, but the churchhasn't acknowledged it.
It declined to comment for thestory and didn't respond to
npr's interview request.
A short church statement fromwhen the news broke first says

(38:23):
some members live in hot, humidareas and the garment changes to
bless them and others who mightbenefit.
At the end of the day, gerbercalls the sleeveless garment a
win and a good step forward.
I don't think leaders of thechurch hate women.
I just think they are withinthe patriarchal system, trying
to best to function within it.
But there's definitely more wecan do.
She said this change, thischange signals that church
leaders are listening.

(38:44):
The new garment styles will beavailable in the US later this
year.
Apparently, apparently they'remaking international orders to
get these things shipped in.
I just think that was kind offun.
You know a little light, butapparently you're going to see a
lot more shoulders if you're inMormon country.

Speaker 6 (39:01):
Well, you know, I don't know why they can't do
this for the men too.

Speaker 4 (39:04):
I've been wanting to wear wife beater forever so you
know what's funny, the wholewife beater thing, right.
So I grew up in california, orI spent some time in california,
I grew up all over the place,but when I was in california a
lot of people would wear wifebeaters right, and it was kind
of was like actually a real bigthing among the hispanics.

(39:25):
That was like the height ofthat jinko pants and wife
beaters and uh.
So I always kind of associatedit with um kind of more of the
the cholo yeah, you're kind ofthing right, or just super red
trash deep.

Speaker 6 (39:40):
Yeah, you know, this is kind of wasn't and wasn't
really my thing, you know it'smostly a joke for me, but also
you know these, these women thatwere like oh, we have it.
So bad dude, the guys don'tlike wearing this stuff either.
You're wearing two t-shirts.
It's 90 degrees out.
I'm sweating my balls off.
It's not fun yeah.

Speaker 4 (40:07):
Anyway.
So in prison, though, you canbuy wife beaters, right, so
that's like everybody's got tonsof wife beaters.
And in Missouri, where it was100 and thousand million degrees
and we were in a brick ovenwithout AC Literally, I was in
no AC and I had a broken window,so it was like sleeping outside
.

Speaker 6 (40:20):
Yeah, when I say I want to wear a wife beater, it
was in my room.

Speaker 4 (40:27):
When I say I want to wear it was in my room.
When I say I want to wear awife beater, really I just want
to go shirtless.
John attaca says hate the name.
Call them tank tops.
Sure they have white beads onit.
They're white beaters,sometimes mispronounced wife
beaters because of the peoplewho wear them.
It's white beaded shirts, okay,tank tops, we just mispronounce
it sometimes.
I've never heard that that'swhat they are.

(40:49):
They're white beaded shirts.
That's the way the fabric is.
It's a little white bead sewingthing, or whatever anyways.
So I come home and my boys havediscovered these white bead tank
tops okay and I'm, I'm in likelittle junior prison, you know
gym shorts mini inmates littlemini inmates running around.

Speaker 6 (41:13):
Oh, it's fun Anyways it's just things that trigger,
you know there are funny thingsthat trigger me orange.

Speaker 4 (41:19):
When I saw the guy in his orange jumpsuit I remember
thinking will never wear orangeagain.
And now I kind of feel that wayabout khaki.
It was orange in jail, khaki inprison, khaki same thing with
those khaki pants that they mademe wear, like not cool man, not
cool dickies pants, kind of allright.

(41:40):
So this is on with.
Oh, I can't remember his name hewas in the trump administration
, larry cudlow yep, he's on withlarry cudlow and he's talking
about the grand conspiracy andtalking about taking out people
inside of the department ofjustice and doj that were
involved in it but oh, whoa,you're, you're there now the

(42:04):
leader.
Another story have in prison.
You see, see, here fox businesshas a ticker.
Yeah, bottom right, this is thechiron and it's got dow and s&p
and all this stuff yeah, okay sosome of the guys would put it
on c put the news on cnn becauseit had a ticker because, people
just walk into the tv room kindof look for a few minutes and
they're reading the ticker andthen they'd walk out.

(42:24):
So fox news doesn't run aticker well, hold on.

Speaker 6 (42:29):
Why are they checking the ticker?

Speaker 4 (42:30):
they like doing stock trades not this ticker the
chiron okay like on cnn, it'lljust have news headlines on the
bottom kind of running along thewhole time.
Oh, fox used to do that yearsago.
They stopped doing it.
So, like in the morning whenpeople are kind of coming in and
out of the tv room, that theindependents, the neutrals, the
muslims basically they werethey'd leave the tv on cnn only

(42:52):
because it had the chiron okaybecause you could read the news.
So I was like put it on newsmax,who says a chiron.
But they did like abbreviatedhighlights so it wasn't as much
context.
News point is fox loses peoplebecause they can't just have the
tv on silently with theheadlines running okay.
So sometimes fox news businesswould be on and you had the
ticker on the bottom here withthe stocks, not just news

(43:14):
headlines.
And so, uh, there was a groupof blacks one time that were in
the sports section with theirchairs turned around to watch
the white tv whole story.
I'm gonna have to do like alayout of the tv room sometime,
because it was like a convertedoffice space, sunroom thing,
okay.
So they're turned around,they're watching the news and
I've got the remote control andI'm sitting by myself in the

(43:35):
white section with all theblacks behind me.
Okay, I didn't make the rules,but I walked in late and I got
control of the remote becauseI'm white on the white tv.
So put it on fox news.
And the guys are back theretalking and they like chatting
it up with me a lot.
So they're like hey, hey, j6,j6, so they'd call me j6.

(43:56):
Uh, what, what's that on thebottom there?
Okay, they didn't know what dowwas.
They didn't know what s&p 500was, they didn't know what
nasdaq was, any of that at all.
They're like what is, what arethose numbers?
Like, that's not.
They know sports scores.
We don't recognize any sportsteams.
They'd occasionally see a wordlike apple that would drive by.
That they would know and theyknow it was money.

(44:17):
What team is that?
So I had to explain.
I'm like, oh, that's the stockmarket prices and that's like
you know, like the dow jones andwho's the dow jones?
So I had to explain.
I'm like, oh, that's the stockmarket prices and that's like
you know, like the dow jones andwho's the dow jones.
So I got a handful of thosequestions like what's the dow
jones?
And all these are stock prices.
Well, what are stocks?
Well, you know the stock marketand like one would know and the
other wouldn't know, and thenthey'd start informing each
other freaking hilarious.
I wish I could have recordedthat.

(44:38):
I could be like it's like manon the street in the ultimate
version.
Like what are those numbers?

Speaker 6 (44:45):
uh, stock market this sounds like a start of an snl
skit.

Speaker 4 (44:47):
How do you even start to explain that I don't know,
that's how I felt.
I was like I just want to watchthe news guys.
I want to see if I'm gettingpardoned today.

Speaker 8 (44:56):
All right, the old leaders who assigned this and
directed this operation.
Have they been dismissed fromthe FBI?

Speaker 7 (45:05):
Every single person that has been found to have
weaponized or participated inthat process has been removed
from leadership positions.
And if and when we find anyothers that are involved in this
as you know, this is a37,000-person agency we are
going to take swift action, justlike we have, and just look at
the record of the people thathave been dismissed for their
actions and what they're sayingwhen they get out there about

(45:28):
how they personally opined aboutthe weaponization of this place
, just like one of PeterStrzok's friends did recently,
this past week Right, that's howwe know we're finding the right
folks and we're going to keepdoing it.
It's not done yet, but we'regoing to stay on it.
All right, I get it.

Speaker 8 (45:45):
Thank you for that answer.
I mean you're going as far asyou can go.
Another question why wasMar-a-Lago invaded?
What were they looking for?
This is speculation.
No one knows to this day.
I mean, it happened to whyseveral years ago.
We'll probably be talking aboutthis for years ahead.
The subject of Russia came upat the Alaska meeting of the two

(46:06):
leaders, russia and the UnitedStates, putin and Trump.
What were they doing there?
Cash, does anybody have anyidea?
Why was the FBI?
What was the FBI looking for?

Speaker 7 (46:17):
creating a crime where one did not exist.
The answer has been definitivethere was no crime, there was no
predicate to go and invadeDonald Trump's home.
We have answered thatdefinitively.
Now you know me workingbackwards from that point.
We are going to hold peopleaccountable who weaponize that
system of justice for thefollowing reason we, the FBI,

(46:38):
must restore accountability andcredibility to the American
public so we can arrest more top10 predators, so we can go
after more terrorists, so we canfind the other people involved
in Abbey Gate.
These are the cases that matterto the FBI and the distractions,
to put it mildly, from theprior leadership regime are what
thwarted the American public'sbelief and credibility in the

(46:58):
FBI.
And so when they do raids likeMar-a-Lago now, the American
public knows it was made up, itwas completely false, it was
completely unconstitutionalpursuant to our judicial courts
and we are working into thosematters to say why did you do it
?
We know there was no reason.
Now it's time foraccountability and that's who
we're talking to.
And, by the way, Larry, I'dlike to announce on your show if

(47:19):
you got nothing to hide and youwere DOJ and FBI before, you're
welcome to come talk to the FBIat any time.
And if you don't want to cometalk to us, we're going to come
find you and we're going to putyou in an investigative position
and posture that will make youfeel very uncomfortable, kind of
like you did when youweaponized the government.
The only difference is we'regoing to be doing it on a
factual, legal andconstitutional basis to do so

(47:42):
there any doubt in your mindthat the progenitors of this
whole russiagate nonsense?

Speaker 4 (47:50):
was the administration.
Call me brock all those guys.
So them as big fighting wordslike you just accused public
officials of corruption and hedid say now there has to be
accountability.
You raided a man's houseregardless of what his former

(48:10):
status was.
You raided a man's housewithout any proper predicate and
you just basically like that'sa fact.
That's true.
This is the way.
There's nothing there.
You raided a man's house.
He went through his wife'sunderwear drawer.
You totally violated all of hisprivacy, regardless if he's a
president or not.
You did that.
Do you do that to normalamerican citizens?
If you can do it to thepresident, do you think they
have any compunction from doingit to you?

(48:31):
Right, a guy who's got half thecountry's got him under a
microscope all eyes on him andyou're just going to raid his
house without cause, totallymanufactured.
You're going to put, uh, thomasmackie in prison for posting a
meme with no injured party.
You're going to put me inprison when both the officer,
all the officers involved say Ididn't hurt, harm, injure or

(48:53):
threaten them and accepted myapology.
So there's really no claim madeagainst me.
You think you think in thatworld that you're going to go
get quote-unquote justice wherethe, where the judges are doing
who knows what in their chambers, and you've got the epa
spending money like crazy.
So, yeah, good luck reportingsome financial crime to the
financial criminals.
You know it's like they'll justuse it.
You can go read the atlas shrugbooks.

(49:14):
It describes it perfectly.
And we want you to break therules, because then we have you
under our thumb.
We don't want a nation oflaw-abiding citizens.
Then where's the control right?
Where's the levers?
The blackmail yeah, these arelike kind of stunning admissions
.
There has to be something done,and I, I guess, I guess we'll
just go to work today and, youknow, pay for food tomorrow,

(49:36):
because, regardless of whathappens, we kind of got to live
here, don't we?

Speaker 6 (49:39):
well, that, well, that's what happened to me 9-11.
I got up and I watched thetowers fall and then I went to
work.
Yeah, I was like what else am Igoing to do?
I guess we're under attack.
I'm going to work and.

Speaker 4 (49:50):
I went to school To try to prevent you know what I
mean.
Like just go about your livesand that's the Basics.
Happened and I was back at workas soon as I got flowed home.
I was back at work sitting inmy activator Definitely wasn't
thinking about the followthrough of overturning the
government.
I didn't have, you know, Ididn't even negotiate like what

(50:13):
seat of power I was going to getfor my role.
I just went and like overthrewthe government and just went
back to work.

Speaker 6 (50:18):
Obviously you were going to be president.

Speaker 4 (50:20):
I just went back to work.
I thought I was going to bepresident.
I just went back to work, youknow what I mean.
Like, I thought I was going tobe in charge of the epa, but
apparently not.
You know, he went on.
Shaman beat me to it.
He got to sit in the senate.
You know what I mean like it'sthe stupidest thing I've ever
heard of.
But yet this cabal of people.
They went from the obamaadministration, then, behind the
scenes, in the trumpadministration, they kept going

(50:41):
and going, and going and going.
Meanwhile I, I went and went,and then I went home well from
their perspective.

Speaker 6 (50:49):
If you can give all your friends a couple billion
dollars a cup every couple years, you definitely want to retain
those seats of power what youcan get accomplished.

Speaker 4 (50:58):
Yeah, if I had known I had billions of dollars on the
line.
I I thought I was doing it forking and country.
I didn't realize I was gonnahave done it for my pocketbook.
I'm joking, it's all hyperbolicrhetoric.
I don't want these words usedagainst me someday in some court
.
Clipped up.
I trying to overthrowgovernment failed.

(51:18):
Wanted.
Run epa.
They can make an ai videobetter than that became senator.

Speaker 6 (51:25):
You sound like brian williams doing the uh, what's
that?
The rap?

Speaker 4 (51:33):
all right, this is tulsa gabbard talking about cuts
she's making at the office ofdirector of national
intelligence odni fast forwardto where we are today.

Speaker 3 (51:41):
Odni is more than doubled in size, it is bloated
with bureaucracy, it is rifewith politicization,
weaponization the very thingthat it was created to try to
prevent and get after.
And unfortunately, it hasfailed to meet its mandate.
And so this launch today ofODNI 2.0, as you said, we will

(52:03):
save taxpayers more than $700million every year, cutting the
organization by over 40% andmaking sure that those who are
working at the Office of theDirector of National
Intelligence are aggressivelygetting after our core mission,
which is really ensuring thesafety, security and freedom of
the American people.
Fast forward to where we aretoday.

(52:24):
So that's good.

Speaker 4 (52:26):
Maybe prevent the next 9-11.

Speaker 6 (52:30):
That's nice.

Speaker 4 (52:32):
Again, it's just cuts .
I'm happy to see cuts all theway around.
Right, trim the government,things will be better.
I'm kind of even more and more.
I used to be reallyanti-privatization, but now I'm
like, actually, when it'sprivatized, I know I'm dealing
with a corporation.

Speaker 6 (52:48):
It's different.
You're dealing with acorporation that has to have
your outcomes in their interest.

Speaker 4 (52:57):
They also have to have your consent Right, like
I'm not forced to deal with acorporation at the same, like
they can provide a publicservice and they can be funded
and all that kind of stuff.
But it's really easy for me tosee X Y Z corp with a federal
contract and go, oh, I don'twant to do business with X Y Z
corp.

Speaker 6 (53:14):
Well, and also you can, if they're providing a
service, you can barter and sayyou know, I don't really like
your service with the government.

Speaker 4 (53:22):
They're just like yep , that's what you get yeah, and
their contract gets renewedoccasionally, so they may not
have the next contract.
Imagine if TSA was a privatecontractor.
It'd get better.
It'd get better.

Speaker 6 (53:34):
Well, apparently it is getting better with the new
facial and recognition andfingerprint scanners.
Yeah, I know, but they've beenrunning those ads here in
Washington like, oh, make sureyou get your facial ID, blah,
blah, blah, so you can go rightthrough.
Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 4 (53:51):
Go get a passport card.
Ok, this is JD Vance talkingabout the relationship with Elon
Musk and Donald Trump and kindof how he feels like they're
better together than separate,but they're still a little bit
cold to each other.
I do notice that Elon has likecompletely disappeared from any
major news cycle, like he's backto business and he's not making
many, many political commentsother than just to comment on

(54:11):
the budget from time to time.
And I don't know, I mean, Ithink that's just who he is.
He came in like a firestorminto politics, teamed up with
Trump, and then he just off inhis orbit and now he's not
popular.
It's crazy.

Speaker 6 (54:25):
I mean, you know, he's probably still on a
firestorm, we're just notwatching.

Speaker 4 (54:29):
Oh he's doing his business stuff, oh yeah.
Yeah, I mean, no doubt we'regoing to see, like you know,
we're going to see a tiny houseon the moon in like three weeks
and be like brought to you by xyeah, that was rockets.
Deport them here, okay.

Speaker 16 (54:43):
So this is jd vance commenting on all that he's
obviously got a complicatedrelationship right now with, uh,
with the trump white house.
So my argument to elon is likeyou're not going to be on the
left right, even if you wantedto be, and he doesn't, they're
not going to have you back.
That that that ship has sailed,and so I I really think it's a
mistake for him to try to breakfrom the president.

(55:05):
So my hope is that by the timeof the midterms he's kind of
come back in the fold.
But yeah, I don't know that hewould take my call right now
about anything.
Really I'm sure he would.
I kid, I'm sure he would takemy call.
But obviously the drama aroundhim and the him in the white
house over the last couple ofmonths again, my hope is that
just kind of cools down a littlebit, because he did help us a

(55:25):
lot in the election thepresident even said it was great
all this frustration.
Elon was a very critical partof the team last, last election
and so my hope is by themidterms things are kind of back
to normal right, yeah, that wasnice, I was gonna ask that
question Now I don't have to.
you know, knock on wood, I'malways.
My attitude is I try to be sortof been pretty big 10 about

(55:46):
this stuff, like if you'repatriotic, you're not trying to
stick your knife in the back ofthe president, you're not trying
to betray the movement.
I don't care about these likeminor little disagreements and
issues.
We have to kind of win with thewhole movement together and, um
, that's, that's kind of theattitude that I try to take.

Speaker 4 (56:04):
it he's not just getting a complicated
relationship right now with oneof the things we know about
trump is he focuses on, on, uh,foundational principles.
Why do we do this?
Why is it built this way?
Can we do it better?
Right, and he's like and I'vethought this too it's like, you
know, if we're just arguing overrates, we're in a pretty good
place as a country, but whenwe're like arguing over

(56:25):
existential things like, are youa man or a woman, and you know,
should we or should we notpunish crime, the tax rate
becomes kind of nebulous,doesn't it?
You know what I'm saying.
Like we're talking aboutexistential things here.
Let's stay big tent, bigpicture.
We're talking about existentialthings here.
Let's stay big tent, bigpicture.

(56:45):
The challenge I see with ElonMusk and Donald Trump is Elon
Musk called Donald Trump apedophile.
That's hard to come back fromIn prison.
There's two words you nevercall someone.
There's the B word and there'spunk, and I watched a situation
where somebody thought he wasmaybe playfully calling someone
uh, both of those words anddidn't turn into a fight, but it
turned into a.
We're not playing triviatogether anymore, buddy.

(57:07):
That was between a pakistanial-qaeda member and a kansas
city gang member and a j6 orterrorist.
We were playing trivia together, barry just set it off I
remember thinking when I was inprison.
I remember thinking I have theweirdest network like this you

(57:28):
know you make friends like youknow you spend, you live with
these people like it's.
You use the bathroom together,you shower together, you eat
together, you fight together.
You, you hide your contrabandtogether.
You, you look the other waywhen they're hiding their
contraband.
Like you're in it with thesepeople, like at a certain level
it's like this is all we have,Like it's us versus the guards,

(57:50):
Like we have to protectourselves from them.

Speaker 6 (57:51):
Sometimes yes, comrade.

Speaker 4 (57:53):
It's.
It's weird.
Okay, it's weird.
It was explained to me.
Like when I was in philadelphia, this one guy's like you're on
our sides of the track.
Now he's like what do you mean?
He's like you're an outlaw.
Like you don't go to them forhelp anymore.
You come to your local gang.
They'll help you out, you're anoutlaw.
Now he's like I'm like oh man,that's why I understand that my
gang is bigger than your gang.
Like yeah anyways, I'm not anoutlaw, I'm just saying, when

(58:15):
you're there, you're like justmaking observations here, yeah
and uh I've.
I've joked with my wife purejokes.
I'm like honey, money's not aproblem.
Like I got friends.
Like a couple bricks of whitebaking powder and a lot of being
bought, a boom, we're drivingthe land rover like make a
couple phone calls and few fedexes.

(58:36):
Next thing, you know, I'mwalking around in a okay barry
seals.
Yeah, exactly like this is justa phone call away.
Like I got friends, you know, Igot friends that got friends
that are still in the businessanyways.
It just, it just was like theweirdest thing that I could talk
to them.
And I sometimes wonder, becausemy role in on my prison block

(58:58):
was kind of like I could liaisona little bit with the guards
because I had the j6 thing goingon and you know they were
generally Trump supporters, andso I could walk into the guard
shack and talk to the guards forlike an hour and nobody really
was suspicious of it or anything, because they kind of knew.
And then I'd walk out and Icould liaison, I could get a get
a heads up on moves or upcomingshakedowns or you know, just

(59:21):
kind of like the information youpick up I could relay that and
I could also tone down the moodIf the guard was walking around
being real, banging on doors,shining lights in the walls when
it's not nighttime, you know,like they're kind of on one I
could go in and do if you listento any good podcasts lately,
like I just get to watch thenews If you listen to Steven

(59:41):
Crowder because you know there'sa little distraction.
Yes, I do that and just kind of,you know, tone the temperature
down when I knew that the Pisceswere making hooch.
Well, that's nice of you Wellyou got to do what you got to do
.
I really didn't get involved inany nonsense, but that was like
my value proposition in there,and I think that there's people

(01:00:04):
like Trump who, for whateverreason, is able to do that.
He's been in the business world, politics didn't matter.
Let's just get the deal done.
He understands win-losenegotiations and how to leverage
those types of negotiations tofind wins.

Speaker 6 (01:00:16):
He turned into a TV show.

Speaker 4 (01:00:18):
Yeah, I mean, he's really phenomenal at doing this
stuff.
Politicians are aboutbureaucracy, they're about
process, they're about rulemaking, they're about procedure
and all this kind of stuff trumpkind of cuts through that and
marco rubia talks about how thatis so significant when dealing
with putin and zelinski, andthese guys are not going to talk
to each other, but somehowtrump is able to be the bridge

(01:00:39):
and it's impressing even the way.

Speaker 11 (01:00:40):
President Trump is the only leader in the world
acknowledged by all theEuropeans.
The only leader in the worldthat can talk to both of them
and bring them both to a meetingis Donald J Trump, the
president of the United States.
He's the only one, and the factthat he's willing to do it is
something that every American,including Democrats, should be
happy that we have a peacepresident.
We should be proud that we havea president that's made peace a

(01:01:01):
priority in his administration.

Speaker 4 (01:01:03):
By the way, President Trump is the only leader, so
Trump is the only one that cancommunicate with both of them,
and you know what I think Trumpcould probably do.
I bet he could get Zelensky andPutin to sit down for a cup of
coffee together.

Speaker 6 (01:01:17):
I bet he could Still haven't tried 1775 coffee.
Now's your shot.
The 1775 starter kit justdropped.
Only 1000 units you're gettingto hold.
Oh, you're getting the bold,dark roast that hits hard and
smooth medium roast and thevitality mushroom copy for clean

(01:01:38):
energy and laser focus.
No crash, all single origin,small batch, toxin free and mold
free.
Plus, you're also getting agold spoon, because freedom
isn't scooped with plastic.
That's my favorite part.
A frother strong enough to stirup your coffee and your
mother-in-law's opinions yourmother-in-law's opinions and a

(01:02:07):
block, a black 1775 tumbler.
175, 170 dollars worth ofcoffee and gear yours for 99.
This is the one.
This is for the ones who'vebeen watching 1775 blow up on
rumble, wondering if it'sactually worth it.
Spoiler it is to 1775coffeecom.
Slash studio and grab yourstarter kit before they're gone.
Bold beans, clean fuel and amorning routine that stands for

(01:02:29):
something just like Rumble does.

Speaker 4 (01:02:31):
You know what's crazy about coffee and any other
addictive substance, right is,you buy it every day and you're
like, oh, it's just a cup, it'sjust $2 or whatever.
Or you buy one bag of coffee ata time.
It's kind of expensive, but youbuy it every day and you're
like, oh, it's just a cup, it'sjust $2 or whatever.
Or you buy one bag of coffee atime.
It's kind of expensive, but youdrink it every single day and
it kind of spreads out.
If you're a coffee drinker, 99bucks, you're going to spend it.
You're going to spend it.

(01:02:52):
So instead of buying it oneweek at a time or whatever, you
get a golden spoon.

Speaker 6 (01:03:00):
If you're buying a mocha a day, you're spending way
more than a hundred bucks amonth.

Speaker 4 (01:03:04):
You know, one of the most depressing things I saw was
this chart about likehomeownership.
And I was like.
Homeownership is higher amongstblack, black coffee drinkers
than latte drinkers.
Oh really, you know the extraeighteen hundred dollars a year
you spend on the milk and cream?
Yeah, it's pretty interesting.
All right, this is scott besanthe's talking about.

Speaker 1 (01:03:24):
Only trump can win the war and how he leverages
into these by using businesssince he got into the oval on
january 20th, president trumphas been talking about not
sending any more money toukraine.
We did this economicpartnership which, once this
conflict stops, could pay offbig for the American taxpayer.

(01:03:46):
We can recoup our investment.
If Ukraine does well, we dowell, the conflict stops, and
the conflict's got to stop forthe economic partnership to
really kick in.
We're going to start with someinvestments now.
So I I think president trump isvery vigilant.
Right now.
We are selling arms to theeuropeans, who are then selling

(01:04:07):
them on to the uh ukrainians,and president trump's taking a
10 markup on the arms.
So maybe that 10 will cover, uh, the cost of the air cover.

Speaker 4 (01:04:19):
Now you know what I love about donald trump is he
doesn't view the, the government, as a zero-sum non-profit,
where the whole point is tospend all the money and, you
know, never make anything.
He's like no, no, no, no, wegot debt to pay off.
Like we gotta, we're gonna markit up.
And he just tells everybodywe're marking it up, you're
gonna, you're gonna mark up.
Oh yeah, no, we'll help rebuildukraine, but you're going to

(01:04:40):
pay us.
Like he's turning things intomonetary assets that were major
liabilities.
If all he does is make it soour foreign wars are neutral,
holy cow, we'll probably fightforever, but anyways, it's
really interesting.
All right, guys.
That's pretty much it for themain body of the show.
Today we are going to jump overinto private, where we are

(01:05:00):
going to hear from Patrick Byrneand Emerald Robinson about some
of the new revelations comingabout about election integrity,
and we're going to be hearingabout some of the things that
are being done.
So good news there.
So with that, for those of youthat are on the public side, we
bid you adieu.
We recommend you get on toRumble Premium so you can join
us on the private, where we doan extra 15 or so minutes after

(01:05:23):
the show every day, and weappreciate having you guys all
here.
Don't forget to checkleftbehindwithoutorg.
Lots of kids out there needsome help and with that we'll
talk to you guys again tomorrow.
For those sticking around forprivate, we'll see you in just a
minute.
Boop, boop.
Are we private now?
And we're private.
We're private now.
Okay, we just got one videotoday for the private side.

(01:05:44):
I wanted to play this.
It's patrick burn with emeraldrobinson and they're talking
about the election integrity.
Now, if you've been with us awhile, we've covered this story
kind of continuously for fouryears, with a gap, but we've
kind of picked up.
We did the huge super episodeon patrick burn and emil
robinson which, by the way, ourshow flatlined after that again,

(01:06:04):
anytime these guys are on, itseems like the algorithm gets
you.
We're undeterred.
I just set it to private andthen all of a sudden we picked
up a little bit.
So I don't know how all thatworks.
But anyways, for those of youthat are here with us on private
, you can go back and listen tothat.
Listening.
It's the, the super thread onuh, narcos run our election
system or something like that.
So this is touching on thoseissues and uh, so let's take a

(01:06:26):
listen.

Speaker 10 (01:06:27):
I think Gabbard is a real standout star of late, and
people will soon understand why, won't they?

Speaker 15 (01:06:33):
They will and I can be.
I'll even go a little bitfarther.
And again, this is me notreading tea leaves but sort of
I'm, I'm, I'm distant, butthey're talking to a lot of
people I know and so I kind ofknow where they're going.
She's come under tremendouspressure to whitewash an aspect

(01:06:54):
of this and I am not going towhitewash it.
And in fact I've met you, you,you sent, you have those graphs.
You saw me talking about themon Alex Jones the other day, but
you already put them up, is myunderstanding.
I don't know, are they?

Speaker 10 (01:07:09):
Yeah, I'm not going to get to seeing them.
They're familiar with them.

Speaker 15 (01:07:13):
Yeah, what the big shock has been.
I've been seeing for four yearsdescribing this as a chain of
command.
That is where the mexicancartels, venezuela, which is a
cartel, the venezuela government, iran and china, and I thought
that was the the chain ofcommand.
What we're up against, in a way, it is, but on 2020, what

(01:07:33):
happened was the cia came in,the cia worked with venezuela
and hacked 2020 and, in fact,the CIA and the CIA.
They're in cahoots with China,I guess.
And even worse, while you wantto stop, you want to respond to
that before I give you the nextplay, the next card.

Speaker 10 (01:07:52):
Well, I was just going to say, and that's
included in this report, it was,it stayed in the report.

Speaker 15 (01:07:58):
Is it?
I don't know, I don't know.
Do you know what's in thereport?

Speaker 10 (01:08:02):
That's why I guess that's what remains to be seen
what.

Speaker 15 (01:08:05):
what happened was?
I heard they were going nuts.
I'm just going to tell you thetruth, and glenn told me don't
protect these people anymore.
So here it is.
The truth is, as those chartsshow, in july of 2009 the c
started funding and this allcame out Alex Jones was a little
confused in our conversationwas not a Doge report, but Elon.

(01:08:26):
One of the things Doge did wasit surfaced data that the public
can now come in and researchthemselves.
So we had a researcher go in.
Brother of a guy you know wentin, great researcher.
He went through this Doge dataand he found this remarkable
thing.
There's a company, an NGO inArlington, virginia Seps that
got to be a lot of focus on it.

(01:08:47):
It's been staffed forever byGeorge Soros and the Open
Society staffs it, and the moneycomes in from the USAID, which
we all know now is what?
What's the USAID?
It's a friend for the CIA, it'sall.
And they have, since July 09,been spreading these computer

(01:09:07):
systems in 26 nations and theycall it modernizing.
They go into countries fromEcuador to Estonia and say we're
gonna help you modernize yourelections.
No more of these silly paperelections.
Oh, that's so old fashioned.
We have these beautifulcomputers you can run your
elections on.
Billions of dollars we havespent putting Smartmatic in 26

(01:09:28):
nations and every nation withintwo or three years of that has
this left lurch in theirelections.
In other words, the CIA hasflipped 26 nations left.
A total of 72 nations have beenaffected.
The others were probably Chinaflipping them left, but our CIA
is deeply involved in this andthey were trying to get Tulsi to

(01:09:52):
take that out.
We're going to see if theysucceed.

Speaker 10 (01:09:56):
We'll see.
Lots remain to be seen.

Speaker 4 (01:09:58):
Wow, patrick, you just dropped a whole load of
information on so Tulsi and, Ithink, pam Bondi, both are under
immense pressure to try tocover up the CIA element of this
.
Yeah, go after the mail inballots, go after Venezuela, but
don't talk about the machines.
They're still not bad.
Do you see what they're doingthere?

Speaker 10 (01:10:24):
Because the CIA, since 2009, barack Obama has
been inserting these machinesall over the world and has
impacted their elections.
Yes, this is good news, so stepforward.
I have that report that you'rereferencing related to SEPs.
I'm going to get clearance torelease that on my SEP stack so
that everyone can come throughthat and familiarize themselves
with what you're talking about.

Speaker 15 (01:10:41):
You have the report already.
Yeah.

Speaker 10 (01:10:44):
Wow, no, not the report given to Tulsi, but the
open source information relatedto SEPs, with all those graphs.

Speaker 15 (01:10:51):
We should put that up and show people.
It's very clear.
It was SEPs.
You should focus on SEPs.
It's the creation of the people, of Soros, the money from the
CIA, USAID.
Then SEPs spread thistechnology everywhere.
It's sickening.

Speaker 10 (01:11:08):
That is sickening Serbia, seps and this report
that is very damning to our veryown agency.
Patrick Byrne, thank you somuch for pulling over.
I know you're traveling.
You pulled over.
I would have loved to have beenat the birthday of the great
ron paul.
I'm jealous.
I love the shirt.
Um, we will.
We'll cipher through this.
I've been through this, we'll.

(01:11:28):
We'll touch back this week.
Thank you so much, sir, forjumping in with us and and
literally stopping off from yourtraveling to do so to share
this very important exclusiveinformation.
Kelsey gabbard is a realstandout.

Speaker 4 (01:11:40):
I just love Patrick Byrne.
I think he's great.
I was going to look somethingup here.
Um, I'm cherry, okay.
So there's this website calledlame cherry dot blog spot and
you notice they mentioned Serbia.
So if you go back and you lookat, uh, when you win, when you
lose the war, rig threeelections.

(01:12:01):
So if you go back and you lookat, um, the history of
mentioning United Stateselections and Serbia, and when's
the first time you see aconnection there, it's this blog
.
It's lame cherryblogspotcom.
I have no idea who writes it.
He writes it in this reallykind of cryptic format and the

(01:12:23):
reason it was brought up wassomeone was doing a deep dive
and there was this mention ofSerbia, and so she was going
around and she found theearliest connection in this
talking was on this blog andshe's like I went through it.
It's got some crazy stuff inthere.
It sounds like an intelligencespook, okay.
So what happened in when I wentand found the mention of serbia
?
It was mentioning that,essentially, you've got these
computer systems in serbia andthis guy was like well, we know

(01:12:46):
that serbia runs this companythat runs this, that runs that,
and jared kushner went and metwith that company in 2016 and he
had all this like deep intel.
But he's the one who said afterjanuary 6, he's like start
working with your hands andtransacting cash.
So I've checked back in withthis blog from time to time to
see what it's got, but it is.

(01:13:06):
It's really fascinating.
Like never buying remingtonammo again another lame cherry
exclusive in this matteranti-matter.
I was attempting, like most inthis gun and ammunition shortage
scam, to purchase some 410shotgun shells.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.
Anyways, he goes through andhe's just got all these
different posts on um, you knowwhatever news.
Anyways, what's this all about?

(01:13:28):
It's not really prostitution,babe.
It's okay.
I haven't been here in a littlewhile anyways, oh, my goodness,
yeah, fascinating stuff.
So all right, guys.
That's it for the private sideof the show today.
Thanks for sticking around.
Those of you that did it lookslike we've got a.

(01:13:49):
We carried over a lot of our uhrumble audience into the
private you guys have beendropping off but who are
dedicated till the very lastminute.
Listeners.
Thank you so much and uh,appreciate having you guys and
we'll talk to you again tomorrow.
Thanks bye.

Speaker 2 (01:14:26):
Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that
castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an

(01:14:47):
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh, king, eh,very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere.
Oh, how do you do?

(01:15:07):
How do you do?
Good, lady, I am Arthur, kingof the Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy

(01:15:27):
in which the working classes oh,there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your Lord?
We don't have a Lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistCommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for

(01:15:49):
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by two-thirds majority.
In the case of more affairs, bequiet.
But by a two-thirds majority.
In the case of more major, bequiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.

(01:16:10):
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then the lady of the lake, herarm clad in the purest
shimmering semite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the
water, signifying, by divineprovidence, that I, arthur, was
to carry Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no

(01:16:33):
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me

(01:16:55):
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Now?
We see the violence inherent inthe system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
No-transcript.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}From Corrupt Courts to Wasted Billions: America's System is Failing Its Citizens

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

From Corrupt Courts to Wasted Billions: America's System is Failing Its Citizens

Stuff You Should Know