August 21, 2025 • 46 mins
The stark contrast between how political justice operates for different sides couldn't be more evident than in the Durham investigation versus the Mueller probe. While Mueller's team leaked constantly to friendly media outlets (spawning the infamous "walls are closing in" narrative), Durham maintains total silence as he methodically investigates the origins of the Russia collusion story.
Judge Sullivan's refusal to dismiss the General Flynn case despite both prosecution and defense agreeing it should end reveals just how desperate the establishment is to maintain their narrative. Each cache of newly unsealed documents from the case implicates higher officials, now reaching former President Obama and Vice President Biden directly. The longer Sullivan drags his feet, the more damaging information becomes public—an irony that underscores this entire saga.
Political capital explains much about the pace of justice. President Trump faces the challenge of addressing corruption while lacking institutional support in cities and establishment power centers. The DOJ cannot simply "walk and chew gum" because competing factions within government are aligned with different political interests. This explains why we see Roger Stone heading to prison while Flynn's case drags on despite evidence of his innocence being overwhelming.
Meanwhile, media hypocrisy continues unabated. Mayor de Blasio prohibits New Yorkers from gathering for concerts due to COVID concerns but explicitly endorses mass protests for Black Lives Matter as a "historic moment." Nancy Pelosi dismisses mob action with "people will do what they do" while suggesting some historical figures committed "treason"—a claim that goes unchallenged.
The language we use shapes our understanding of reality. America isn't socialist—it's communitarian. This distinction matters tremendously yet gets deliberately blurred by those pushing particular agendas. From rebranding quarantine (for sick people) as house arrest for healthy citizens to calling forced isolation "social distancing," the manipulation of language normalizes restrictions on liberty that would otherwise be rejected.
Ready to see beyond the manipulation? Subscribe now and join our community of critical thinkers who refuse to accept establishment narratives without questioning.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Let them eat cake.
Here, you take the bomb.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
(00:37):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Hey, good morning, peasants.
Glad to have you back with meanother day.
Okay, so you can find me.
Get this out of the way realquick.
(00:59):
You can find me on Twitter atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atThePeasantsPod or not the just
PeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atthe Peasants Pod, or not the
just Peasants Pod.
You can find me on Facebook atthe Peasants Perspective, and
you can email me at peasantspodat gmailcom.
Look forward to hearing fromyou, as always.
So today, on our Friday show,we've got a couple cool things
happening out there.
So one thing that is startingto happen is we're starting to
(01:23):
kind of hear some chatter on theDurham report, or the Durham
John Durham, who is who isinvestigating, essentially,
crossfire Hurricane, and he's,he's, he's looking into the
Obamagate issue, the entireObamagate issue, and we're
starting to see some chatterfrom the right and the left, and
the chatter okay.
(01:44):
So, unlike the Mueller team,the special counsel, they leaked
like a sieve.
They were leaking all the time,pretty much everything you
watched on CNN, msnbc.
Every time you heard thepundits say the walls are
closing in, the walls areclosing in, the walls are
closing.
In fact, it sounded a littlebit something like this, didn't
it?
Do you think?
Speaker 4 (02:03):
these attacks are becoming so much more frequent
now.
It's not surprising that DonaldTrump is increasing his attacks
.
The walls are closing in on him.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
The walls are closing in on him.
Don't just stand there, try andbrace it with something.
Speaker 5 (02:17):
It feels like the walls are closing in on the
White House.
Speaker 4 (02:21):
It feels as if the walls are closing in here.
Speaker 6 (02:24):
I think the walls of justice are closing in on the
White House.
It feels as if the walls areclosing in here.
I think the walls of justiceare closing in on President
Trump.
Speaker 5 (02:28):
Increasingly desperate, feeling like the
walls are closing in.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
The president clearly feels all the walls closing in
on him.
In terms of the Russiainvestigation, the walls are
closing in.
Speaker 4 (02:39):
I think at this point the walls are spinning.
Speaker 5 (02:41):
It does feel like the walls are closing in.
I think that the administrationat this point can start to see
the walls closing in.
Speaker 6 (02:47):
He feels the walls closing in on him.
Everybody he talks to says thewalls are closing in.
This is another potential wallclosing in.
Speaker 4 (02:55):
This president is feeling the walls are closing in
.
The walls, meanwhile, areclosing in on the president of
the United States.
I think he's feeling the Russiainvestigation.
I think he's feeling the Russiainvestigation.
I think he's feeling the wheels, the walls closing in on him.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
He knows that the walls are closing in.
The walls may be closing inhigher up at the White House.
Speaker 4 (03:11):
The president apparently believes that the
walls are closing in on him.
Speaker 6 (03:14):
The walls are closing in on the president right now
Donald Trump feels the wallsclosing in.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Feeling like the walls are closing in around him.
Speaker 4 (03:20):
Yes, Does it seem like the walls could be closing
in on this?
President Feels like we arefinally at a tipping point.
The walls are closing in onPresident.
Speaker 5 (03:29):
Trump Feels like the president is sitting in the
White House.
The walls are closing in aroundhim.
Speaker 6 (03:33):
And that's why there's this sense of the walls
closing in, as it appears, thewalls are closing in in terms of
the Mueller investigation.
The walls are closing in.
Speaker 5 (03:43):
The walls are closing in.
I do feel that he feels thewalls closing in on him.
Legal walls are closing in onDonald Trump tonight.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
From a Democratic perspective, this is the
president who feels like thewalls are closing in as he feels
the walls are closing in, anyindication that, legally
speaking, the walls are closingin on the president he?
Speaker 1 (03:59):
feels some of the walls closing in on him.
Speaker 4 (04:01):
He feels that the walls are closing in on
President Trump.
The Some of the walls closingin on him.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
The walls are closing in on President Trump.
The walls are closing in on thepresident.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
So those were all newscasts, with the exception of
a little bit of Star Wars, alittle bit of Chewie and Luke
getting stuck in that trashcompactor.
The walls are closing in.
That was what we heard foryears and years.
So all of that the walls areclosing in garbage all of that
nonsense, all of the leaks andthings that we got the selective
leaks, by the way, andsometimes redacted leaks where
(04:39):
they leak something, say itmeant one thing, and then we'd
find the redacted version 12months later and the redacted
version completely was theopposite of what everybody
thought it was, because, youknow, they just covered things
up.
So the special counsel leaked,leaked, leaked, leaked.
And the other day on the show,remember, we read the two
separate conservative treehousereports that basically showed
(05:00):
that the special counsel, one ofits main purposes, was to
predetermine the outcome of aleak investigation that was
already going on.
That would have implicated thespecial, the members of the
special counsel, and this wasthe whole Dana Buente thing.
So, anyways, the specialcounsel was leaking, leaking,
leaking.
Now the Durham probe is oftenbeen called it's really just the
(05:21):
Durham investigation.
He has not been leaking.
I mean, we have gotten verylittle to just almost nothing
out of John Durham and this hasactually caused quite a bit of a
frustration on the left and theright.
The left obviously wants thisthing just to disappear.
They would like to see a reportcome out.
So this is, let me give you alittle bit of a legend or a
(05:44):
keystone as to how to kind ofunderstand what it is.
Each side says so if you wantDurham to generate a report, so
if you say things like theDurham report which now you know
, sometimes you get caught up.
If you listen to enough news,you'll hear it enough.
You start thinking this way.
But the Durham report Muellerproduced a report and that
(06:07):
report in a normal circumstancewould have ended up being
indictments.
But because there was no charge, he ended up producing a report
which served as far as theHouse was concerned.
Served as indictments Becausethe House just took that report
and they used it to try to mockup impeachment, which they ended
up using the roadmap of theobstruction of justice that
(06:31):
Mueller did.
But then they just took outeverything Russia and put in the
word Ukraine, because Trump wasalso chasing down Ukraine.
So Mueller was always leaking.
Durham doesn't seem to leak.
We don't get anything out ofDurham.
People who want him to generatea report usually want him to
generate a report because theydon't want anybody to go to jail
(06:51):
.
They just want a report so theycan have hearings, they can
slap some people on the wristand some people's reputations
will be supposedly quote-unquoteruined, even though that never
really happens, and then you endup with no prosecutions and
maybe just a few low-level guysin jail.
That's the Durham report model.
I don't think there's going tobe a Durham report at all.
Bill Barr said if Durhamproduces a report, it's
(07:14):
essentially just a byproduct ofthe whole thing.
It's not going to be maybe tiea couple cases together or
something, but he's notproducing a report.
He's there to see if the lawwas violated and if the law was
violated, he's going toprosecute.
I have some serious concernsabout you know what we're going
to see prosecution wise at thispoint.
Um, I've got a couple ofthoughts about it and let me let
(07:37):
me tell you first of all whatwhat Tom Fitton thinks about it.
So Tom Fitton here speaking ona Fox News.
He's a little bit more drab.
Now remember who Tom Fitton is.
Tom Fitton is the president ofJudicial Watch.
Judicial Watch is the country'slargest organization that deals
(07:57):
with mostly Freedom ofInformation Act lawsuits.
They also do a lot of electionfraud lawsuits and things like
that, but their whole purpose isto basically just hold the
government accountable.
Right Work through the legalsystem of the courts to hold the
government accountable.
It is Judicial Watch thatexposed the Benghazi scandal
with Hillary Clinton.
(08:17):
It was Judicial Watch that didthat.
No one else did that.
Once Judicial Watch gotdocuments released from the
government on order of the courtthat spurred the Benghazi
hearings and things like that,benghazi was just about ready to
be swept under the rug.
You remember Susan Rice wentout and did a bunch of
appearances and lied about thecause of it and then Judicial
Watch found out that wasn't thecase and then Susan Rice got
essentially set aside and thenHillary Clinton had to go to
(08:39):
Congress to testify.
And that's where you hear thefamous what does it matter
anymore?
Like, what does it matter thatLibya was overturned and Gaddafi
died?
And what does it matter thatour consulate was overrun and
that three agents died and anambassador?
Like what does it matteranymore?
And you know the obvious answeris that well, it matters
(08:59):
because ISIS is on the rise, andISIS is on the rise because of
all that stuff.
But this is Tom Fitt and no onewas held accountable for it,
mind you.
Not a single person was heldaccountable for Benghazi.
In fact, the main perpetratorof it went on to run for
president.
Hillary Clinton, you can goback and listen to my Libya.
It all started in Libya,episode one, to get kind of a
(09:19):
history of what happened inLibya.
So let's go back.
This is what Tom Fitton saysabout Obamagate, and he's got a
point.
Speaker 6 (09:26):
Justice Department has zero interest in figuring
out what went on at the highestlevels.
I'm sure someone else will beprosecuted at the lower level,
but Obama in the least needs tobe questioned under oath about
Obamagate.
And the fact that he isn't tome is an indictment of the
Justice Department's to datefailed investigation.
Justice Department has zeroSoment of the Justice
Department's to date failedinvestigation.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
Justice Department has zero.
So one of the challenges thatTom Fitton has is he believes
that the government should beable to walk and chew gum at the
same time.
And while that should be thecase, right, durham is a
separate prosecutor than anyoneelse, so Durham, in theory,
should be going at it if he seesa crime, send the indictment.
Well, in a normal world thatworks.
(10:06):
Except we just got off thespecial counsel and we just
found out that the upper levelsof the DOJ and the FBI colluded
to oust, to remove a dulyelected president.
So it's not business as usualanymore.
Okay, in order for thepresident to stay in power, what
does he have to have?
You go through this littlechecklist in your mind.
Okay, he's the president of theUnited States, but he's got to
(10:28):
get people to follow his orders.
If you've ever done a littlebit of a study of American
history, you'll often find that,more often than not, the
military wags the dog when itcomes to the president.
The military tells thepresident what's up, and the
president gets put in positionswhere the only information he
has is being fed to him from hisyou know, from government
intelligence sources that havebeen around long before the
(10:48):
president was because he's onlyjust been elected.
No, the president not beenaround longer than seven years,
right, and that's if he's at theend of his second term.
So he doesn't have nearly asmuch experience as some of these
generals who've spent 35 or 40years working with their
co-patriots.
So a lot of times presidents,especially with military stuff,
get left more in the dark thanyou would think.
(11:09):
A great example of this, whereyou get to get behind the
curtain and see how it reallyworks, is the Cuban Missile
Crisis.
Dan Carlin with HardcoreHistory has the best, the best
podcast on the Cuban MissileCrisis.
I highly recommend going andlisten to it.
It's a couple hours long but itis complete.
It is a complete documentationand recanting of the Cuban
(11:31):
Missile Crisis from multipleangles.
I love it.
But one of the things you'llsee there is you've got the
generals essentially staging theassassination, removal coup of
the president because thepresident won't give him the
green light.
They've got so much power andthings are so in motion with the
military that it tookeverything everything John
Kennedy had and MichelleGorbachev Khrushchev had in
(11:54):
Russia to stop the militariesfrom going head to head.
It was like two freight trainshad been pushed down a hill
heading towards each other, andit took those men to pull them
back.
But you'll see, there, you knowthe record, like, uh, john f
kennedy was recording all of hisconferences, there's meetings
with his generals, and so he'sgot a lot.
There's a lot of video, audiorecordings of like after john f
(12:14):
kennedy leaves the room or afterrobert kennedy leaves the room,
and then the generals are likewe should just knock him off now
.
This is just silly.
Yeah, you guys gonna get thewhole united states up.
We should just preemptivelystrike and just tell him that he
either fesses up to approvingit or we'll just take him out.
You know, I mean justunbelievable stuff that you
would hear from these generals,these four-star generals, chiefs
(12:35):
of staff.
In fact, some of them areAmerican heroes.
I think McNamara was in there.
Mcnamara, that guy can go tohell.
That's all I got to say abouthim.
America, that guy can go tohell.
That's all I got to say abouthim.
I do not have the Kung flu.
(12:56):
That guy is an unsavorycharacter, but he's looked upon
in Air Force history like he'ssome kind of amazing soldier and
that guy just about costhumanity.
That guy just about cost all ofhumanity.
Sometimes we have to put thesepeople's decisions into a little
bit of context, right?
I mean, that guy just aboutstarted the nuclear winter, but
anyway.
So you see behind the curtain,you realize the president is
often, you know, the tail wagsthe dog when it comes to the
generals and the president inmany cases.
(13:17):
And so, knowing that, knowingthat that same can happen with
the DOJ and any other branch,president Trump is a very strong
personality, and I agree withwhat Rush Limbaugh said.
It has been months and monthsnow, but he basically said what
Bill Barr and John Durham areworking on is so big, it's so
big and it's going to take outso many people that they've had
(13:38):
to operate in secrecy.
It's going to take the timeit's going to take because they
have to do it by the book,because none of these
prosecutions are going to goeasy.
No one's going to just admittheir guilt, especially at the
political level.
So back to why the JusticeDepartment can't walk and chew
gum at the same time.
Why can't it wrap up theMueller investigation, which is
still ongoing?
Remember General Flynn, hiscase has not been dismissed yet
(14:01):
why can't they prosecute at thesame time?
Well, let me tell you why.
First and foremost, you've gotdifferent factions within the
DOJ.
You truly have a faction thatis committed to truth and reason
, right in the AmericanConstitution.
Then you have a faction that'smore committed to an ideology or
to cronyism or mercantilism.
I mean they're in it for otherreasons other than love of
(14:22):
country and love of neighbor,and so that faction is still
preceded with these prosecutions.
I think they've been mostly runout of DOJ, main in the fact
that you know DOJ has come outand you know to lessen Roger
Stone's sentencing he's come outin the writ of mandamus for the
Sidney Powell filed for GeneralFlynn.
They came out and supported herin that effort rigorously, by
(14:44):
the way, and the reason I'mbringing all this up is there's
some news on the General Flynncase.
So, anyways, as long as GeneralFlynn and Roger Stone are in
the course of justice, so aslong as they're like, roger
Stone is due to report to jailany day I mean any day.
He's begging for clemency,begging for a pardon, begging
for a commutation of hissentence while he goes through
(15:05):
the appeals process.
I don't think Trump's going togive it to him and the reason I
don't think that is Trump hasnot given a pardon or a
commutation to anybody involvedin the Crossfire Hurricane case,
and the reason is because anypardons or anything he did, he
would be accused of obstructionof justice.
And this comes to the politicalcapital.
Politicians operate with acurrency called political
(15:26):
capital.
It's essentially goodwill.
So if you get an overwhelmingmajority from the electorate,
then then other politicians lookat you and say, okay, you have
an or a mandate to rule.
Right, you have an overwhelmingmandate to rule.
You've got 60% of thepopulation voted you in, which
basically means you know you'vegot the big stick.
Now, if you barely won yourelection off some kind of
(15:46):
recount, right, like theWashington governor did, by 133
votes, you barely have a mandateto rule.
I mean you literally you gotelected on a technicality,
essentially, and that means thatyou're going to not be able to
just get what you want.
You're going to have tocompromise, you're going to have
to build coalitions, you'regoing to have to work, and so in
(16:08):
the DOJ it's kind of the sameand it works out the same.
President Trump has a lot ofpolitical capital with the
electorate.
He's got a lot of politicalcapital.
When you look at an electoralcollege map, he doesn't have a
lot of political capital, say inthe city of New York or say in
the city of Los Angeles or thecity of San Francisco, he's got
almost no political capital.
And the way the politicalcapital is distributed around
(16:29):
the country right now is it'sprimarily concentrated in the
inner cities.
And that's why, you see, withthese riots, I mean look at how
it's covered the mainstream newsbut yet it's been a very small
percentage, small portion of thecountry that's having issues.
Most of the country, you know Imean 98% of the country is the
same as it was before the GeorgeFloyd riots.
Nothing's really changed.
That could change really quick,by the way.
(16:49):
I mean, oh my gosh, the SupremeCourt decision on Oklahoma
yesterday.
Wow, we'll talk about that injust a minute.
So, anyways, obama needs to bequestioned about Obamagate, but
it's not going to happen untilthe Flynn case is done.
So the news yesterday wasno-transcript honor the DOJ's
(17:18):
request to drop the case.
He won't do that because Flynnhad already pled guilty and
really he's just playing games.
It makes no sense.
So he waited.
So that happened a couple weeksago and there was a justice
that dissented on the appellatecourt and what the judge
Sullivan wanted was if thatjustice dissented, that justice
could say, hey, before weofficially rule on this case,
(17:41):
because the case hadn't beenheard right and it hadn't been
heard by Sullivan or theappellate court.
But they're ruling on themotions, and so what the judge
Sullivan was waiting for was hewas waiting for the district
court, one of the dissentingjudge, to request to hear the
case.
So actually have the case gothrough a trial before they
(18:04):
executed their writ of mandamus.
And normally in a case of likean appeal, if a situation like
this, the dissenting judge isthe one who, it devolves upon
them to request the trial be,you know, hashed out before they
make a final decision, andsometimes they'll go with that,
sometimes they won't.
Well, the dissenting judgedidn't do that.
Why didn't the dissenting judgedo that?
There's no case to be had.
(18:24):
The evidence that's been exposed, that's been let out, that's
been unsealed since JudgeSullivan didn't drop the case
has gone right to the top ofBarack Obama and Vice President
Biden, right to the top thedocuments that were unsealed
only because Judge Sullivan wasdragging this out.
Jensen, the prosecutor out ofMissouri that came to DC that
(18:44):
was assigned to look into theorigins of this case, has been
giving documents to SidneyPowell, who they go in under
seal and then they get unsealeda few days later.
He's gone two caches ofdocuments.
The first cache of documentsimplicated Barack Obama and Vice
President Biden.
The second cache implicatedthem as well.
It was the Peter Strzok notes.
And so we've got essentiallyBarack Obama and Vice President
(19:08):
Biden almost dead to rights.
I mean, the smoking gun wasreleased in this case.
Well, judge Sullivan's waitingfor the case to be reheard.
The appellate court judges havenot requested to hear the case.
So yesterday, in the mostscrewy oddball move ever, judge
Sullivan, he requests that thecase be reheard.
This is super awkward.
Okay, this is like a wildlyawkward thing for the judge who
(19:32):
hasn't heard the case, who'sbeen told to rule on the case,
to dismiss it because there's noparty being injured.
Flynn says he's innocent.
The DOJ says Flynn is innocent.
So what is there to investigate?
So he did that.
It's probably going to getrejected.
I mean, there's an outsidepossibility it gets dragged on.
But basically it seems likeJudge Sullivan is doing
(19:53):
everything he can to drag onthis case, to not let Judge
General Flynn be a free man, tonot let the cloud of suspicion
come out from under him.
Same thing with Roger Stone.
Okay, roger Stone has gotten.
He had a horrible jury.
I mean, the atrocitiescommitted against these men from
the judicial system or from thejustice system is staggering
(20:15):
and astonishing and beyond thescope of just what I'm saying
here.
But I don't think Roger Stoneor General Flynn or Paul
Manafort or Michael Cohen orGeorge Papadopoulos or any of
those people is going to get anyhelp from President Trump until
it's over.
When General Flynn has run thecourse of justice and is
released, when Roger Stoneserves his sentence or is
(20:40):
sitting in jail, they won'tcommute it.
But once General Flynn isacquitted, that is, if there was
no crime to go after GeneralFlynn, then the entire premise,
the entire premise of goingafter Donald Trump and calling
him a Russian agent, isofficially in the toilet.
I mean, it's been in the toiletfor a long time for anybody who
pays attention.
But for the MSNBC years, theCNNers, you know, the people who
(21:02):
watch ABC and CBS news, theones who just have not even been
exposed to the truth, therewill be nothing left.
They will cry judicial foul,they will call it, cry all these
, you know, but they will havenothing to point to.
They will have no moment in thecase where the Justice
Department did anything wrongother than when Van Graak was
prosecuting, they will find noreason why General Flynn should
(21:25):
have been prosecuted.
They will find no favors beingpulled from a political level as
far as getting judges todismiss it or judges to vote one
way or another.
You will find none of that.
They will have nothing toaccuse him of Now.
Once that's over, once PresidentTrump is officially out of the
crosshairs and his surrogates,then I think he will have not
(21:47):
only the political capital buthe will have so thoroughly
defeated the other side's legalarguments against him that I
think at that point Durham cango after whoever he wants.
I think once General Flynn isofficially free and Judge
Sullivan has to admit thatGeneral Flynn is free, then I
think you open the door to whereyou could possibly even go
(22:07):
after Barack Obama himself.
That's my thought on it.
I don't know if it's going tonecessarily happen.
There's a lot of people whodon't think it will happen that
way.
Fox News is running a headlinethat Durham is so close to the
election that he's probably justgoing to punt until after the
election, which I'll tell you.
If that's the case, I don'teven know.
I don't even know.
I have no words.
I have no words to express myfrustration.
(22:32):
I mean, it reminds me of whenRobert Mueller was saying that
he was going to get a report,you know, get everything done
before the midterms in 2018, andthen he didn't.
I mean it was like dragging onand on and then the midterms
came and went, and then it cameand went again and it took
another four months it took BillBarr getting put in as Attorney
General and confirmed tofinally go.
Hey, robert Mueller, what yougot?
You got nothing.
(22:52):
Wrap it up.
I mean, that's really trulywhat happened.
You got nothing.
Wrap it up, write a report.
And he took the better part ofthe summer to write a report.
So with the Durham probe, Imean, it's possible.
What they have is so big.
They're waiting for, quiteliterally, the stars to align,
which they did.
By the way, on July 4th, thestars aligned the planetary
alignment.
It's kind of interesting.
(23:14):
Another thing with the JudgeSullivan case because Judge
Sullivan has been dragging thisalong, jensen has been giving
these document dumps to SidneyPowell.
Now, once the case is dismissed, there will be no reason, there
will be no reason for Jensen togive documents to Sidney Powell
, she will have no reason toreceive them.
She's not entitled to them, andneither will be General Flynn.
So it's kind of a byproductgood news of Judge Sullivan not
(23:36):
dismissing this case, which,trust me, he's not not
dismissing it because he'swanting these documents released
.
This is not the case at all.
This entire ordeal, for him, isa career ender.
It is the end of his functionalcareer.
I mean, I wouldn't be surprisedif he gets removed from the
bench when everything is saidand done.
The way he's doing thesepolitical maneuvers is causing
(23:56):
even the most, you know, adeptlegal analysts to have a hard
time to understand exactlywhat's going on.
I mean, here's a case righthere.
Here's Alan Dershowitz, who youknow Alan.
Dershowitz seems to be in themiddle of everything.
Alan Dershowitz might be aMossad hack.
Alan Dershowitz went to OrgyIsland with General Epstein, but
(24:17):
he also worked on the Trumpimpeachment committee.
Epstein, but he also worked onthe Trump impeachment committee.
I mean, he's a far left Harvardlaw professor who is as
probably good a civil rights ordefense attorney as there is.
If I ever got in trouble and Ihad the money, I'd hire Alan
Dershowitz to represent me Nowas a defense attorney.
He might life through his teethon my behalf but nonetheless,
at least he understands law.
But here's what he says aboutthis Flynn case.
Speaker 4 (24:38):
A bar to throw this out, and if this judge has the
gall to not throw this out, heought to be impeached.
Remember that judges only havejurisdiction for cases and
controversies.
There's no controversy here.
Both sides agree, the casewould be dismissed.
This judge has no power to doanything else, and if he asserts
(24:59):
that power, he has violated theConstitution.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
All right.
So that's Alan Dershowitz'sopinion on Judge Sullivan.
So we'll see.
I mean, we'll see, we'lldefinitely see.
I want to touch on just acouple other things.
I just want to highlight somemore hypocrisy in my media
hypocrisy segment.
I should come up with somelittle catch tunes like media
hypocrisy, or I should havelittle segments, because
(25:25):
sometimes it's fun to do that.
I might think about that.
Send me a note if you thinkthat's a good idea or not.
Okay, so this is Wolf Blitzerand Bill de Blasio.
Bill de Blasio is the mayor ofNew York City, which I mean.
Yesterday they were out infront of Trump Tower painting
Black Lives Matter on the road.
(25:46):
New York is a mess man.
It is so it's astonishing.
So you know New York's still ona lockdown.
New York has got, I mean,what's not happening in New York
.
It's got the most deaths.
They've got the most genocidalgovernor who sent sick people
into nursing homes.
He got his own littlecommission to say that.
(26:07):
He got the Cuomo commission tosay that Cuomo's innocent after
just a few days, even thougheverybody can obviously see he's
not.
I mean, it's a mess, butnonetheless, mayor Bill de
Blasio is even more of adisaster, and listen to how he
talks about the differencebetween you know just listen to
(26:29):
it.
Speaker 5 (26:29):
Just listen to it.
Outdoor concerts, and it meansthings like outdoor concerts and
it means things like parades.
You know, things here in thecity can mean not just thousands
, tens of thousands, hundreds ofthousands of people.
It's just not time for that.
Now what?
About protests If people wantto march down.
Speaker 4 (26:44):
Fifth Avenue.
Are they going to be allowed todo so?
Speaker 5 (26:46):
Look, wolf, this is always an area of real
sensitivity.
If you're just talking abouthealth, we would always say hey,
folks, you know, stay home ifyou can.
But we understand.
At this moment in history,people are talking about the
need for historic changes.
I mean today in New York City,you know, recognizing the power
and the meaning of the messageBlack Lives Matter, which we did
in front of Trump Tower today.
(27:07):
This is a historic moment ofchange.
We have to respect that butalso say to people the kinds of
gatherings we're used to theparades, the fairs we just can't
have that while we're focusingon health right now.
What about the us open?
I'm curious.
Uh, I love going to the us open.
I love tennis, big outdoorconcerts isn't that interesting.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
So no more outdoor concerts, no more outdoor
gatherings, but but protestingBlack Lives Matter, although
it's different, because it's ahistoric moment in time and we
want people to participate inthat.
What a joke, what a stinkingjoke, man.
I mean, it's just what a joke.
Here's another one.
(27:49):
This is one of those Sorosprosecutors.
This is an old video, I won'tshow it.
It's the New York City attorneywho's talking about we're going
to take Donald Trump.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
They haven't done anything yet.
Speaker 3 (27:59):
They're not going to get anything done.
Here's Nancy Pelosi in anotherastonishing anti-American
episode.
Here Listen to her talk aboutstatues.
Speaker 5 (28:10):
I mean, just listen to this Respectfully.
Shouldn't that be done by acommission or the city council,
not a mob in the middle of thenight throwing it into the
harbor.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
People do what they do.
I do think that from a safetystandpoint, it would be a good
idea to have it taken down.
If the community doesn't wantit I don't know that it has to
be a commission.
Speaker 3 (28:30):
Okay, from a safety standpoint, it would be a good
idea to take down these standingstatues.
What kind of safety, I mean,you've got to ask yourself.
These are politicians, powerfulpeople in the world, talking.
What kind of safety are theytalking about?
Safety of toppling the statue?
Safety of coronavirus?
Mental health safety?
What kind of safety?
Speaker 2 (28:48):
But it just could be a community view and sometimes
it's something that's been there, that view has been there for a
while.
But's just say I always say toyoung people who come, children,
who come to the capitol, whenyou look around you see statues
to people and washingtonmonuments and the rest, who, uh
(29:11):
who we respect washington,jefferson, lincoln, you know
heroes they would want us to betalking about the future, your
future.
So everything we do here isabout you.
It's not necessarily they wouldwant it to be about looking
(29:33):
forward, not looking back.
So let's just think about whatare the values, the vision, the
perspective that we enshrine andhow that benefits our children,
rather than having a big fightabout was somebody worth it?
We know they're not worth it ifthey committed treason against
the United States.
Thank you all very much.
(29:53):
We know they're not worth it ifthey committed treason against
the United States.
Thank you all very much.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
We know they're not worth it if they committed
treason against the UnitedStates.
I'm trying to understand whoshe's talking about.
Christopher Columbus, frederickDouglass, thomas Jefferson,
john Adams, george Washingtonwhich one of these people
committed treason against theUnited States?
I'm super confused by that.
Is she referring to DonaldTrump?
That none of them are worth itif they committed treason?
(30:20):
And then she's saying DonaldTrump committed treason?
Or she's saying that we'renever going to make a statue of
Barack Obama because hecommitted treason?
Is that just a throwaway line?
Just throw a big word out there, make people think and question
who.
It is okay.
Next thing you know they want usto look into the future, not
the past.
Okay, that's true, that'scalled a platitude.
Platitudes are things that yousay that have meaning but mean
nothing, right?
(30:41):
Because like, hey, have a goodday.
Like, do you really want me tohave a good day?
You're going to do anythingabout having a good day?
It's just a platitude.
You throw them around there allthe time.
Or you know another platitudeis the golden rule.
(31:01):
And then she said theprinciples, but we don't need
the monuments.
I mean these people are justtalking at this point.
I mean they're just talking andthey've been talking for years.
But unfortunately there's thisrunning narrative and as this
narrative goes it hits walls.
Right?
You can't continue to sayGeneral Flynn was colluding with
the Russians when you see inplain writing an FBI agent
(31:23):
writing saying he wasn'tcolluding with the Russians.
Is our goal just to get him tolose his job, to try him or get
him to confess, right?
So you can't say GeneralFlynn's a Russian agent when you
have the smoking gun documentthat says it's a setup.
So all of a sudden, right atthe beginning, all the walls are
closing in.
The walls are closing in people.
How do you think they'refeeling right now?
(31:44):
There were never any walls.
It was false sources and falseleaks.
These people's entire reputation, their entire life has been
tied up and going after DonaldTrump.
And Donald Trump is the mostclean political figure in US
history.
He was a private citizen upuntil just a few years ago,
which meant he was beinginvestigated by every local
jurisdiction around.
(32:05):
I've heard someone say DonaldTrump is the most vetted
president in US history.
I mean, they have been diggingand digging and digging, looking
for anything they can hold outover his head, and they have
nothing.
They have nothing.
So they have nothing.
They have nothing, so they havespent their political capital.
The Democrats have spent theirpolitical capital investigating.
(32:26):
They've spent their politicalcapital making accusations that
haven't been true and eventually, every time they withdraw from
that bank account, you get downto the point now where I don't
think they have a lot ofpolitical capital left.
They've still got a base.
They're always going to havetheir MSN CNN base whoever
watches those channels.
But I think most people arestarting to kind of figure it
out.
They're starting to especiallywith the coronavirus scandal is
(32:47):
people are starting to figure itout.
One of the things that I've beenalso kind of harping on with
people in my local circle and Ithink it's important for us to
think about this as peasants isa lot of times we forget how
important words are and howwords matter.
I want to show you a difference.
One of the things you'll hear alot of people say is they'll
say well, america is already asocialist country, we already
(33:07):
have socialism.
Okay, that's false, it's a lie,it's a total lie.
Let me explain two simpledefinitions that are different.
Socialism, it's a noun, it's apolitical and economic theory of
social organization whichadvocates the means of
production, so the ability tomake things, the ability to
distribute things, owning thetrucks and delivery systems and
(33:29):
exchange the actual storesshould be owned or regulated by
the community as a whole.
So the community gets together,has an entity community as a
whole.
So the community gets together,has an entity.
That entity then tells themeans of production,
distribution and exchange whatto do.
Okay, so, but it's thecommunity.
Notice how the last word there,you know regulated by the
community.
(33:50):
Well, how do you regulatesomething by a community?
How big of a community are wetalking about 10,000 people?
We're talking about 360 millionpeople.
The bigger the community, thesmaller the pool of people that
can actually make decisions onbehalf of the community.
You see how this ends up beingkind of a pyramid, right, you
still have that top-down powerstructure where things are being
decided by the community, butyou're going to have to endow or
empower people.
It becomes a mess.
Then you throw in democratic inthere, and that's the idea that
(34:11):
, well, we'll vote on everything.
Okay, well, you got threepeople, two wolves and a lamb,
and they're going to vote to seewhat's for lunch.
Obviously it's going to be atwo-to-one vote to have lamb for
lunch.
That's how true democracy works.
It's mob rule.
That's not great.
What we do like is what's calledcommunitarianism.
Most people, when they sayAmerica is socialist, what they
(34:37):
mean to say is they're acommunitarian society.
Communitarianism is a theory orsystem of social organization
based on small, self-governingcommunities.
So the idea that in our localcommunities, you know, we can
handle things.
This is churches orcommunitarianism.
It's an ideology whichemphasizes the responsibility of
the individual to the communityand the social importance of
(34:58):
the family unit.
So it's not an economic theorylike socialism where the economy
is controlled.
It's an idea.
It's communitarianism where, asan individual, you become
taught and aware of your role ingreater society.
This is the idea that you drivethe speed limit because if
everybody drives the speed limit, the roads are safer.
That's a communitarian point ofview.
(35:18):
That's what America is.
America has always beencommunitarianism, a
communitarian society.
It's not been socialism.
These words matter, the wordplaymatters.
So I'm starting to correctpeople in my sphere.
When people just get it wrong,it's not because I necessarily
want to be correcting everybody,it's because it's important to
(35:39):
understand how these words theyjust need to be correct.
I want to play a little bit ofan audio link.
This is from the Icon podcastand this is just a video he did
and he posted on his Instagram.
I got this sent to me, but Ithink he does a really good job
of going through terms and justgoing through things that are
happening right now, so I'm justgoing to let him kind of finish
(36:01):
things off for me.
Speaker 7 (36:02):
What we're actually seeing is the systematic
implementation of the fall ofthe republic and the rise of the
corporation of the UnitedStates.
Every major event is a step inthe ladder to achieve that end.
Covid is just another rung inthe ladder, which is why there's
a deliberate mixing of all thewordplay.
Right, I mean, we should stopcalling it.
You know, quarantine.
(36:23):
That's a term designated forpeople that are verified sick.
This is a house arrest mandatedby the state.
You should stop calling it.
You know social distancing.
There's nothing social aboutforced isolation.
We should stop saying safer athome when millions of Americans
don't have basic necessitiesadequate to fit their needs.
It assumes that everybody'shome is equally as safe as the
(36:44):
people that are making thestatements.
We should stop saying you know,this is for the greater good.
Right, when you close theeconomy, killing millions of
businesses that families haveworked generations to establish,
that's anything but good.
We should stop saying this isthe new normal.
That's just blatantmind-control drivel.
There's nothing normal aboutforced isolation.
(37:06):
Treating your neighbor likethey have the plague, breathing
your own bodily waste, wearingmasks, living in constant fear
of contamination that's normal,I mean.
After all, if the virus is sodeadly, why hasn't it wiped out
the homeless who don't socialdistance, wash themselves
regularly, let alone, you know,live in or have access to a
sterile environment?
(37:26):
Last year, 1.5 million peopledied of tuberculosis.
Why were you not wearing a maskduring the tuberculosis
pandemic?
You were endangering, you know,public health and safety, along
with billions of other peoplearound the globe, so why don't
you wear a mask?
I'll tell you why.
Because the mainstream mediadidn't tell you to wear a mask.
(37:48):
Right?
Because, though 1.5 millionpeople died from tuberculosis,
there was no tuberculosispandemic, any more than there's
a coronavirus pandemic.
What you're reallyparticipating in is a beta test
for AI systems and facialrecognition.
(38:09):
See, these cameras work bestwhen people are, you know,
distanced apart.
Now they're actually testing,through machine learning, how to
recognize, you know, a facethat's partially covered.
It's also a way to easilydetermine who's compliant, who's
not, who does the propagandawork on and who it doesn't?
(38:29):
Now get this.
You know, there's some ironiesthat are here, right?
So a society that killsmillions of babies a year for
convenience has shut itself downto prevent adults from dying.
People that, on the one hand,slaughter babies in the womb by
the millions, are now preachingto the masses about the sanctity
of human life.
It's double speak, double talk.
(38:51):
It's the two doctrine policyOne for the initiated, one for
the uninitiated, one for theinner circle, another for the
initiated, one for theuninitiated, one for the inner
circle, another for the masses.
It's like saying if I violatethe stay-at-home order I can be
arrested, but you're lettingconvicted criminals out of
prison so they don't getcoronavirus Thesis, antithesis,
(39:12):
synthesis.
If there's a real pandemic, doesit require faulty virus models,
rigged test results 81% falsepositives, inaccurate news
reporting, staged hospitaloverruns, manipulated death
certificates Nope.
When the government shuts downmillions of small businesses but
(39:35):
doesn't lay off any governmentemployees, it's not about the
health.
When the state bans dentistsfrom practicing but deems it
necessary for abortion clinicsto stay open, it's not about
your health.
When the state prevents youfrom buying seeds for your
garden but allows you topurchase lottery tickets, it's
(39:56):
not about your health.
An institution that has theability to destroy all of earth
through alleged nuclear warfareshould not regulate personal
self-defense.
An institution that's caughttrafficking drugs shouldn't be
able to regulate plants.
An institution that's racked up$23 trillion prior to
(40:17):
coronavirus in debt shouldn't beallowed to manage the
retirement fund.
An institution that was caughtspreading STDs should not be
allowed to run health care.
If people are really concernedabout public health and safety,
you know in general.
(40:38):
But you know they don't care.
If people you know eat garbage,drink poison, smoke, cancer and
take prescription drugs butthink that toilet paper hand
sanitizer masks are going toprotect them from the boogeyman
coronavirus, you know this is aspecial kind of stupid that I
can't address here.
You should ask yourself acouple of basic questions can't
(41:00):
address here.
You should ask yourself acouple of basic questions when
did you consent from you knowyou creating a government to
serve you to you serving thegovernment ruling over you?
If you want to know, you knowwho's in charge.
Just think about who you canand can't criticize.
Speaker 3 (41:13):
What a great, what a great assessment analysis.
I love that he took the time toput all that together, because
it really is the case, right?
It's thesis, antithesis,synthesis, and we're watching
people literally have mentalrelapses right in front of us.
I mean, you know, people whocan't see the silly hypocrisy
(41:33):
that's around them.
And I have someone to blame.
I have someone to blame forthis.
I blame the boomers for ourcurrent problem, because the
boomers, out of necessity bytheir grandparents who fought or
their parents who fought inWorld War II, have a keep your
mouth shut, get along, you know,just don't cause a scene, don't
say anything controversial,just get along attitude.
(41:54):
And that attitude is why weallow our politicians to be held
unaccountable.
We don't speak up, we don't getin their faces when they make
silly mistakes, we just go.
Well, they've got more infothan we do.
They know more than we do.
I heard someone say one timethat once the internet came
about, that the population ofthe United States was far ahead
(42:14):
of the president in intelligence, because we can get information
raw on the internet.
He has to get it throughfilters and so sometimes we're
way ahead of the president onwhat we know, what's going on
around the world and I believethat today I honestly believe
that today, I think thepresident cannot be on top of
things like it's just someonewho's surfing Twitter could be
there's.
You can't be, and you're goingto get just as much real
(42:36):
information on Twitter as asthey get.
In fact, 80% of intelligencegathering is open source.
Yeah, did you know that?
It means 80% of what ourintelligence agencies work with
they're just getting off theinternet themselves.
So we can be the judges here,right?
We can't let the double speakrule the day.
Boomers, that can hear me now.
(42:56):
We need you to speak up.
We need you with your wisdom,your knowledge, your life
experience, to speak up and helptake a stand for the
millennials and Gen Z who havebeen bombarded by false
indoctrination, marxist thinking, right Double like calling
things like communitarianismsocialism to make people think
it's a good thing BecauseAmerica is very communitarianism
(43:16):
.
When you've got a communitariansociety, that's a good society.
Don't call it socialist.
That's something totallydifferent.
You can't find a socialistcountry where the economy is now
controlled by the community,which basically means the elite
within the community that doeswell.
I mean Venezuela.
We could go through a wholelist of things, but the double
speak.
Stand up.
Boomers, older people who'venormally just consented, who've
(43:39):
complied with whatever oddballrule.
It's time for you to speak up.
It's time for you to draw aline in the sand, too, to help
the younger generation to giveus a shot.
I'm serious.
Okay, I don't have anything elsefor today.
It was great talking to you.
I'm expecting some documentsout today in the Flynn case.
I'm expecting Jensen gaveSidney Powell some documents on
(43:59):
Monday and usually it takes acouple days to unseal those.
So I'm expecting some breakingnews later today.
So hopefully we'll get to talkabout that in our next episode.
All right, peasants Podcastsigning off.
You can find me at PeasantsPod,at Twitter at PeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Facebook, atthe Peasants Perspective, and
you can find me on Gmail atpeasantspod, at gmailcom.
(44:20):
Thanks a lot, bye.
Speaker 1 (44:25):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
(44:46):
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week, yes, but all thedecisions of that officer have
to be ratified at a specialbi-weekly meeting.
(45:06):
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest shimmering
(45:28):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying, by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
(45:50):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
(46:11):
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
That's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Let them eat cake.
Here, you take the bomb.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
(00:37):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Hey, good morning, peasants.
Glad to have you back with meanother day.
Okay, so you can find me.
Get this out of the way realquick.
(00:59):
You can find me on Twitter atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atThePeasantsPod or not the just
PeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atthe Peasants Pod, or not the
just Peasants Pod.
You can find me on Facebook atthe Peasants Perspective, and
you can email me at peasantspodat gmailcom.
Look forward to hearing fromyou, as always.
So today, on our Friday show,we've got a couple cool things
happening out there.
So one thing that is startingto happen is we're starting to
(01:23):
kind of hear some chatter on theDurham report, or the Durham
John Durham, who is who isinvestigating, essentially,
crossfire Hurricane, and he's,he's, he's looking into the
Obamagate issue, the entireObamagate issue, and we're
starting to see some chatterfrom the right and the left, and
the chatter okay.
(01:44):
So, unlike the Mueller team,the special counsel, they leaked
like a sieve.
They were leaking all the time,pretty much everything you
watched on CNN, msnbc.
Every time you heard thepundits say the walls are
closing in, the walls areclosing in, the walls are
closing.
In fact, it sounded a littlebit something like this, didn't
it?
Do you think?
Speaker 4 (02:03):
these attacks are becoming so much more frequent
now.
It's not surprising that DonaldTrump is increasing his attacks
.
The walls are closing in on him.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
The walls are closing in on him.
Don't just stand there, try andbrace it with something.
Speaker 5 (02:17):
It feels like the walls are closing in on the
White House.
Speaker 4 (02:21):
It feels as if the walls are closing in here.
Speaker 6 (02:24):
I think the walls of justice are closing in on the
White House.
It feels as if the walls areclosing in here.
I think the walls of justiceare closing in on President
Trump.
Speaker 5 (02:28):
Increasingly desperate, feeling like the
walls are closing in.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
The president clearly feels all the walls closing in
on him.
In terms of the Russiainvestigation, the walls are
closing in.
Speaker 4 (02:39):
I think at this point the walls are spinning.
Speaker 5 (02:41):
It does feel like the walls are closing in.
I think that the administrationat this point can start to see
the walls closing in.
Speaker 6 (02:47):
He feels the walls closing in on him.
Everybody he talks to says thewalls are closing in.
This is another potential wallclosing in.
Speaker 4 (02:55):
This president is feeling the walls are closing in
.
The walls, meanwhile, areclosing in on the president of
the United States.
I think he's feeling the Russiainvestigation.
I think he's feeling the Russiainvestigation.
I think he's feeling the wheels, the walls closing in on him.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
He knows that the walls are closing in.
The walls may be closing inhigher up at the White House.
Speaker 4 (03:11):
The president apparently believes that the
walls are closing in on him.
Speaker 6 (03:14):
The walls are closing in on the president right now
Donald Trump feels the wallsclosing in.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Feeling like the walls are closing in around him.
Speaker 4 (03:20):
Yes, Does it seem like the walls could be closing
in on this?
President Feels like we arefinally at a tipping point.
The walls are closing in onPresident.
Speaker 5 (03:29):
Trump Feels like the president is sitting in the
White House.
The walls are closing in aroundhim.
Speaker 6 (03:33):
And that's why there's this sense of the walls
closing in, as it appears, thewalls are closing in in terms of
the Mueller investigation.
The walls are closing in.
Speaker 5 (03:43):
The walls are closing in.
I do feel that he feels thewalls closing in on him.
Legal walls are closing in onDonald Trump tonight.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
From a Democratic perspective, this is the
president who feels like thewalls are closing in as he feels
the walls are closing in, anyindication that, legally
speaking, the walls are closingin on the president he?
Speaker 1 (03:59):
feels some of the walls closing in on him.
Speaker 4 (04:01):
He feels that the walls are closing in on
President Trump.
The Some of the walls closingin on him.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
The walls are closing in on President Trump.
The walls are closing in on thepresident.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
So those were all newscasts, with the exception of
a little bit of Star Wars, alittle bit of Chewie and Luke
getting stuck in that trashcompactor.
The walls are closing in.
That was what we heard foryears and years.
So all of that the walls areclosing in garbage all of that
nonsense, all of the leaks andthings that we got the selective
leaks, by the way, andsometimes redacted leaks where
(04:39):
they leak something, say itmeant one thing, and then we'd
find the redacted version 12months later and the redacted
version completely was theopposite of what everybody
thought it was, because, youknow, they just covered things
up.
So the special counsel leaked,leaked, leaked, leaked.
And the other day on the show,remember, we read the two
separate conservative treehousereports that basically showed
(05:00):
that the special counsel, one ofits main purposes, was to
predetermine the outcome of aleak investigation that was
already going on.
That would have implicated thespecial, the members of the
special counsel, and this wasthe whole Dana Buente thing.
So, anyways, the specialcounsel was leaking, leaking,
leaking.
Now the Durham probe is oftenbeen called it's really just the
(05:21):
Durham investigation.
He has not been leaking.
I mean, we have gotten verylittle to just almost nothing
out of John Durham and this hasactually caused quite a bit of a
frustration on the left and theright.
The left obviously wants thisthing just to disappear.
They would like to see a reportcome out.
So this is, let me give you alittle bit of a legend or a
(05:44):
keystone as to how to kind ofunderstand what it is.
Each side says so if you wantDurham to generate a report, so
if you say things like theDurham report which now you know
, sometimes you get caught up.
If you listen to enough news,you'll hear it enough.
You start thinking this way.
But the Durham report Muellerproduced a report and that
(06:07):
report in a normal circumstancewould have ended up being
indictments.
But because there was no charge, he ended up producing a report
which served as far as theHouse was concerned.
Served as indictments Becausethe House just took that report
and they used it to try to mockup impeachment, which they ended
up using the roadmap of theobstruction of justice that
(06:31):
Mueller did.
But then they just took outeverything Russia and put in the
word Ukraine, because Trump wasalso chasing down Ukraine.
So Mueller was always leaking.
Durham doesn't seem to leak.
We don't get anything out ofDurham.
People who want him to generatea report usually want him to
generate a report because theydon't want anybody to go to jail
(06:51):
.
They just want a report so theycan have hearings, they can
slap some people on the wristand some people's reputations
will be supposedly quote-unquoteruined, even though that never
really happens, and then you endup with no prosecutions and
maybe just a few low-level guysin jail.
That's the Durham report model.
I don't think there's going tobe a Durham report at all.
Bill Barr said if Durhamproduces a report, it's
(07:14):
essentially just a byproduct ofthe whole thing.
It's not going to be maybe tiea couple cases together or
something, but he's notproducing a report.
He's there to see if the lawwas violated and if the law was
violated, he's going toprosecute.
I have some serious concernsabout you know what we're going
to see prosecution wise at thispoint.
Um, I've got a couple ofthoughts about it and let me let
(07:37):
me tell you first of all whatwhat Tom Fitton thinks about it.
So Tom Fitton here speaking ona Fox News.
He's a little bit more drab.
Now remember who Tom Fitton is.
Tom Fitton is the president ofJudicial Watch.
Judicial Watch is the country'slargest organization that deals
(07:57):
with mostly Freedom ofInformation Act lawsuits.
They also do a lot of electionfraud lawsuits and things like
that, but their whole purpose isto basically just hold the
government accountable.
Right Work through the legalsystem of the courts to hold the
government accountable.
It is Judicial Watch thatexposed the Benghazi scandal
with Hillary Clinton.
(08:17):
It was Judicial Watch that didthat.
No one else did that.
Once Judicial Watch gotdocuments released from the
government on order of the courtthat spurred the Benghazi
hearings and things like that,benghazi was just about ready to
be swept under the rug.
You remember Susan Rice wentout and did a bunch of
appearances and lied about thecause of it and then Judicial
Watch found out that wasn't thecase and then Susan Rice got
essentially set aside and thenHillary Clinton had to go to
(08:39):
Congress to testify.
And that's where you hear thefamous what does it matter
anymore?
Like, what does it matter thatLibya was overturned and Gaddafi
died?
And what does it matter thatour consulate was overrun and
that three agents died and anambassador?
Like what does it matteranymore?
And you know the obvious answeris that well, it matters
(08:59):
because ISIS is on the rise, andISIS is on the rise because of
all that stuff.
But this is Tom Fitt and no onewas held accountable for it,
mind you.
Not a single person was heldaccountable for Benghazi.
In fact, the main perpetratorof it went on to run for
president.
Hillary Clinton, you can goback and listen to my Libya.
It all started in Libya,episode one, to get kind of a
(09:19):
history of what happened inLibya.
So let's go back.
This is what Tom Fitton saysabout Obamagate, and he's got a
point.
Speaker 6 (09:26):
Justice Department has zero interest in figuring
out what went on at the highestlevels.
I'm sure someone else will beprosecuted at the lower level,
but Obama in the least needs tobe questioned under oath about
Obamagate.
And the fact that he isn't tome is an indictment of the
Justice Department's to datefailed investigation.
Justice Department has zeroSoment of the Justice
Department's to date failedinvestigation.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
Justice Department has zero.
So one of the challenges thatTom Fitton has is he believes
that the government should beable to walk and chew gum at the
same time.
And while that should be thecase, right, durham is a
separate prosecutor than anyoneelse, so Durham, in theory,
should be going at it if he seesa crime, send the indictment.
Well, in a normal world thatworks.
(10:06):
Except we just got off thespecial counsel and we just
found out that the upper levelsof the DOJ and the FBI colluded
to oust, to remove a dulyelected president.
So it's not business as usualanymore.
Okay, in order for thepresident to stay in power, what
does he have to have?
You go through this littlechecklist in your mind.
Okay, he's the president of theUnited States, but he's got to
(10:28):
get people to follow his orders.
If you've ever done a littlebit of a study of American
history, you'll often find that,more often than not, the
military wags the dog when itcomes to the president.
The military tells thepresident what's up, and the
president gets put in positionswhere the only information he
has is being fed to him from hisyou know, from government
intelligence sources that havebeen around long before the
(10:48):
president was because he's onlyjust been elected.
No, the president not beenaround longer than seven years,
right, and that's if he's at theend of his second term.
So he doesn't have nearly asmuch experience as some of these
generals who've spent 35 or 40years working with their
co-patriots.
So a lot of times presidents,especially with military stuff,
get left more in the dark thanyou would think.
(11:09):
A great example of this, whereyou get to get behind the
curtain and see how it reallyworks, is the Cuban Missile
Crisis.
Dan Carlin with HardcoreHistory has the best, the best
podcast on the Cuban MissileCrisis.
I highly recommend going andlisten to it.
It's a couple hours long but itis complete.
It is a complete documentationand recanting of the Cuban
(11:31):
Missile Crisis from multipleangles.
I love it.
But one of the things you'llsee there is you've got the
generals essentially staging theassassination, removal coup of
the president because thepresident won't give him the
green light.
They've got so much power andthings are so in motion with the
military that it tookeverything everything John
Kennedy had and MichelleGorbachev Khrushchev had in
(11:54):
Russia to stop the militariesfrom going head to head.
It was like two freight trainshad been pushed down a hill
heading towards each other, andit took those men to pull them
back.
But you'll see, there, you knowthe record, like, uh, john f
kennedy was recording all of hisconferences, there's meetings
with his generals, and so he'sgot a lot.
There's a lot of video, audiorecordings of like after john f
(12:14):
kennedy leaves the room or afterrobert kennedy leaves the room,
and then the generals are likewe should just knock him off now
.
This is just silly.
Yeah, you guys gonna get thewhole united states up.
We should just preemptivelystrike and just tell him that he
either fesses up to approvingit or we'll just take him out.
You know, I mean justunbelievable stuff that you
would hear from these generals,these four-star generals, chiefs
(12:35):
of staff.
In fact, some of them areAmerican heroes.
I think McNamara was in there.
Mcnamara, that guy can go tohell.
That's all I got to say abouthim.
America, that guy can go tohell.
That's all I got to say abouthim.
I do not have the Kung flu.
(12:56):
That guy is an unsavorycharacter, but he's looked upon
in Air Force history like he'ssome kind of amazing soldier and
that guy just about costhumanity.
That guy just about cost all ofhumanity.
Sometimes we have to put thesepeople's decisions into a little
bit of context, right?
I mean, that guy just aboutstarted the nuclear winter, but
anyway.
So you see behind the curtain,you realize the president is
often, you know, the tail wagsthe dog when it comes to the
generals and the president inmany cases.
(13:17):
And so, knowing that, knowingthat that same can happen with
the DOJ and any other branch,president Trump is a very strong
personality, and I agree withwhat Rush Limbaugh said.
It has been months and monthsnow, but he basically said what
Bill Barr and John Durham areworking on is so big, it's so
big and it's going to take outso many people that they've had
(13:38):
to operate in secrecy.
It's going to take the timeit's going to take because they
have to do it by the book,because none of these
prosecutions are going to goeasy.
No one's going to just admittheir guilt, especially at the
political level.
So back to why the JusticeDepartment can't walk and chew
gum at the same time.
Why can't it wrap up theMueller investigation, which is
still ongoing?
Remember General Flynn, hiscase has not been dismissed yet
(14:01):
why can't they prosecute at thesame time?
Well, let me tell you why.
First and foremost, you've gotdifferent factions within the
DOJ.
You truly have a faction thatis committed to truth and reason
, right in the AmericanConstitution.
Then you have a faction that'smore committed to an ideology or
to cronyism or mercantilism.
I mean they're in it for otherreasons other than love of
(14:22):
country and love of neighbor,and so that faction is still
preceded with these prosecutions.
I think they've been mostly runout of DOJ, main in the fact
that you know DOJ has come outand you know to lessen Roger
Stone's sentencing he's come outin the writ of mandamus for the
Sidney Powell filed for GeneralFlynn.
They came out and supported herin that effort rigorously, by
(14:44):
the way, and the reason I'mbringing all this up is there's
some news on the General Flynncase.
So, anyways, as long as GeneralFlynn and Roger Stone are in
the course of justice, so aslong as they're like, roger
Stone is due to report to jailany day I mean any day.
He's begging for clemency,begging for a pardon, begging
for a commutation of hissentence while he goes through
(15:05):
the appeals process.
I don't think Trump's going togive it to him and the reason I
don't think that is Trump hasnot given a pardon or a
commutation to anybody involvedin the Crossfire Hurricane case,
and the reason is because anypardons or anything he did, he
would be accused of obstructionof justice.
And this comes to the politicalcapital.
Politicians operate with acurrency called political
(15:26):
capital.
It's essentially goodwill.
So if you get an overwhelmingmajority from the electorate,
then then other politicians lookat you and say, okay, you have
an or a mandate to rule.
Right, you have an overwhelmingmandate to rule.
You've got 60% of thepopulation voted you in, which
basically means you know you'vegot the big stick.
Now, if you barely won yourelection off some kind of
(15:46):
recount, right, like theWashington governor did, by 133
votes, you barely have a mandateto rule.
I mean you literally you gotelected on a technicality,
essentially, and that means thatyou're going to not be able to
just get what you want.
You're going to have tocompromise, you're going to have
to build coalitions, you'regoing to have to work, and so in
(16:08):
the DOJ it's kind of the sameand it works out the same.
President Trump has a lot ofpolitical capital with the
electorate.
He's got a lot of politicalcapital.
When you look at an electoralcollege map, he doesn't have a
lot of political capital, say inthe city of New York or say in
the city of Los Angeles or thecity of San Francisco, he's got
almost no political capital.
And the way the politicalcapital is distributed around
(16:29):
the country right now is it'sprimarily concentrated in the
inner cities.
And that's why, you see, withthese riots, I mean look at how
it's covered the mainstream newsbut yet it's been a very small
percentage, small portion of thecountry that's having issues.
Most of the country, you know Imean 98% of the country is the
same as it was before the GeorgeFloyd riots.
Nothing's really changed.
That could change really quick,by the way.
(16:49):
I mean, oh my gosh, the SupremeCourt decision on Oklahoma
yesterday.
Wow, we'll talk about that injust a minute.
So, anyways, obama needs to bequestioned about Obamagate, but
it's not going to happen untilthe Flynn case is done.
So the news yesterday wasno-transcript honor the DOJ's
(17:18):
request to drop the case.
He won't do that because Flynnhad already pled guilty and
really he's just playing games.
It makes no sense.
So he waited.
So that happened a couple weeksago and there was a justice
that dissented on the appellatecourt and what the judge
Sullivan wanted was if thatjustice dissented, that justice
could say, hey, before weofficially rule on this case,
(17:41):
because the case hadn't beenheard right and it hadn't been
heard by Sullivan or theappellate court.
But they're ruling on themotions, and so what the judge
Sullivan was waiting for was hewas waiting for the district
court, one of the dissentingjudge, to request to hear the
case.
So actually have the case gothrough a trial before they
(18:04):
executed their writ of mandamus.
And normally in a case of likean appeal, if a situation like
this, the dissenting judge isthe one who, it devolves upon
them to request the trial be,you know, hashed out before they
make a final decision, andsometimes they'll go with that,
sometimes they won't.
Well, the dissenting judgedidn't do that.
Why didn't the dissenting judgedo that?
There's no case to be had.
(18:24):
The evidence that's been exposed, that's been let out, that's
been unsealed since JudgeSullivan didn't drop the case
has gone right to the top ofBarack Obama and Vice President
Biden, right to the top thedocuments that were unsealed
only because Judge Sullivan wasdragging this out.
Jensen, the prosecutor out ofMissouri that came to DC that
(18:44):
was assigned to look into theorigins of this case, has been
giving documents to SidneyPowell, who they go in under
seal and then they get unsealeda few days later.
He's gone two caches ofdocuments.
The first cache of documentsimplicated Barack Obama and Vice
President Biden.
The second cache implicatedthem as well.
It was the Peter Strzok notes.
And so we've got essentiallyBarack Obama and Vice President
(19:08):
Biden almost dead to rights.
I mean, the smoking gun wasreleased in this case.
Well, judge Sullivan's waitingfor the case to be reheard.
The appellate court judges havenot requested to hear the case.
So yesterday, in the mostscrewy oddball move ever, judge
Sullivan, he requests that thecase be reheard.
This is super awkward.
Okay, this is like a wildlyawkward thing for the judge who
(19:32):
hasn't heard the case, who'sbeen told to rule on the case,
to dismiss it because there's noparty being injured.
Flynn says he's innocent.
The DOJ says Flynn is innocent.
So what is there to investigate?
So he did that.
It's probably going to getrejected.
I mean, there's an outsidepossibility it gets dragged on.
But basically it seems likeJudge Sullivan is doing
(19:53):
everything he can to drag onthis case, to not let Judge
General Flynn be a free man, tonot let the cloud of suspicion
come out from under him.
Same thing with Roger Stone.
Okay, roger Stone has gotten.
He had a horrible jury.
I mean, the atrocitiescommitted against these men from
the judicial system or from thejustice system is staggering
(20:15):
and astonishing and beyond thescope of just what I'm saying
here.
But I don't think Roger Stoneor General Flynn or Paul
Manafort or Michael Cohen orGeorge Papadopoulos or any of
those people is going to get anyhelp from President Trump until
it's over.
When General Flynn has run thecourse of justice and is
released, when Roger Stoneserves his sentence or is
(20:40):
sitting in jail, they won'tcommute it.
But once General Flynn isacquitted, that is, if there was
no crime to go after GeneralFlynn, then the entire premise,
the entire premise of goingafter Donald Trump and calling
him a Russian agent, isofficially in the toilet.
I mean, it's been in the toiletfor a long time for anybody who
pays attention.
But for the MSNBC years, theCNNers, you know, the people who
(21:02):
watch ABC and CBS news, theones who just have not even been
exposed to the truth, therewill be nothing left.
They will cry judicial foul,they will call it, cry all these
, you know, but they will havenothing to point to.
They will have no moment in thecase where the Justice
Department did anything wrongother than when Van Graak was
prosecuting, they will find noreason why General Flynn should
(21:25):
have been prosecuted.
They will find no favors beingpulled from a political level as
far as getting judges todismiss it or judges to vote one
way or another.
You will find none of that.
They will have nothing toaccuse him of Now.
Once that's over, once PresidentTrump is officially out of the
crosshairs and his surrogates,then I think he will have not
(21:47):
only the political capital buthe will have so thoroughly
defeated the other side's legalarguments against him that I
think at that point Durham cango after whoever he wants.
I think once General Flynn isofficially free and Judge
Sullivan has to admit thatGeneral Flynn is free, then I
think you open the door to whereyou could possibly even go
(22:07):
after Barack Obama himself.
That's my thought on it.
I don't know if it's going tonecessarily happen.
There's a lot of people whodon't think it will happen that
way.
Fox News is running a headlinethat Durham is so close to the
election that he's probably justgoing to punt until after the
election, which I'll tell you.
If that's the case, I don'teven know.
I don't even know.
I have no words.
I have no words to express myfrustration.
(22:32):
I mean, it reminds me of whenRobert Mueller was saying that
he was going to get a report,you know, get everything done
before the midterms in 2018, andthen he didn't.
I mean it was like dragging onand on and then the midterms
came and went, and then it cameand went again and it took
another four months it took BillBarr getting put in as Attorney
General and confirmed tofinally go.
Hey, robert Mueller, what yougot?
You got nothing.
(22:52):
Wrap it up.
I mean, that's really trulywhat happened.
You got nothing.
Wrap it up, write a report.
And he took the better part ofthe summer to write a report.
So with the Durham probe, Imean, it's possible.
What they have is so big.
They're waiting for, quiteliterally, the stars to align,
which they did.
By the way, on July 4th, thestars aligned the planetary
alignment.
It's kind of interesting.
(23:14):
Another thing with the JudgeSullivan case because Judge
Sullivan has been dragging thisalong, jensen has been giving
these document dumps to SidneyPowell.
Now, once the case is dismissed, there will be no reason, there
will be no reason for Jensen togive documents to Sidney Powell
, she will have no reason toreceive them.
She's not entitled to them, andneither will be General Flynn.
So it's kind of a byproductgood news of Judge Sullivan not
(23:36):
dismissing this case, which,trust me, he's not not
dismissing it because he'swanting these documents released
.
This is not the case at all.
This entire ordeal, for him, isa career ender.
It is the end of his functionalcareer.
I mean, I wouldn't be surprisedif he gets removed from the
bench when everything is saidand done.
The way he's doing thesepolitical maneuvers is causing
(23:56):
even the most, you know, adeptlegal analysts to have a hard
time to understand exactlywhat's going on.
I mean, here's a case righthere.
Here's Alan Dershowitz, who youknow Alan.
Dershowitz seems to be in themiddle of everything.
Alan Dershowitz might be aMossad hack.
Alan Dershowitz went to OrgyIsland with General Epstein, but
(24:17):
he also worked on the Trumpimpeachment committee.
Epstein, but he also worked onthe Trump impeachment committee.
I mean, he's a far left Harvardlaw professor who is as
probably good a civil rights ordefense attorney as there is.
If I ever got in trouble and Ihad the money, I'd hire Alan
Dershowitz to represent me Nowas a defense attorney.
He might life through his teethon my behalf but nonetheless,
at least he understands law.
But here's what he says aboutthis Flynn case.
Speaker 4 (24:38):
A bar to throw this out, and if this judge has the
gall to not throw this out, heought to be impeached.
Remember that judges only havejurisdiction for cases and
controversies.
There's no controversy here.
Both sides agree, the casewould be dismissed.
This judge has no power to doanything else, and if he asserts
(24:59):
that power, he has violated theConstitution.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
All right.
So that's Alan Dershowitz'sopinion on Judge Sullivan.
So we'll see.
I mean, we'll see, we'lldefinitely see.
I want to touch on just acouple other things.
I just want to highlight somemore hypocrisy in my media
hypocrisy segment.
I should come up with somelittle catch tunes like media
hypocrisy, or I should havelittle segments, because
(25:25):
sometimes it's fun to do that.
I might think about that.
Send me a note if you thinkthat's a good idea or not.
Okay, so this is Wolf Blitzerand Bill de Blasio.
Bill de Blasio is the mayor ofNew York City, which I mean.
Yesterday they were out infront of Trump Tower painting
Black Lives Matter on the road.
(25:46):
New York is a mess man.
It is so it's astonishing.
So you know New York's still ona lockdown.
New York has got, I mean,what's not happening in New York
.
It's got the most deaths.
They've got the most genocidalgovernor who sent sick people
into nursing homes.
He got his own littlecommission to say that.
(26:07):
He got the Cuomo commission tosay that Cuomo's innocent after
just a few days, even thougheverybody can obviously see he's
not.
I mean, it's a mess, butnonetheless, mayor Bill de
Blasio is even more of adisaster, and listen to how he
talks about the differencebetween you know just listen to
(26:29):
it.
Speaker 5 (26:29):
Just listen to it.
Outdoor concerts, and it meansthings like outdoor concerts and
it means things like parades.
You know, things here in thecity can mean not just thousands
, tens of thousands, hundreds ofthousands of people.
It's just not time for that.
Now what?
About protests If people wantto march down.
Speaker 4 (26:44):
Fifth Avenue.
Are they going to be allowed todo so?
Speaker 5 (26:46):
Look, wolf, this is always an area of real
sensitivity.
If you're just talking abouthealth, we would always say hey,
folks, you know, stay home ifyou can.
But we understand.
At this moment in history,people are talking about the
need for historic changes.
I mean today in New York City,you know, recognizing the power
and the meaning of the messageBlack Lives Matter, which we did
in front of Trump Tower today.
(27:07):
This is a historic moment ofchange.
We have to respect that butalso say to people the kinds of
gatherings we're used to theparades, the fairs we just can't
have that while we're focusingon health right now.
What about the us open?
I'm curious.
Uh, I love going to the us open.
I love tennis, big outdoorconcerts isn't that interesting.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
So no more outdoor concerts, no more outdoor
gatherings, but but protestingBlack Lives Matter, although
it's different, because it's ahistoric moment in time and we
want people to participate inthat.
What a joke, what a stinkingjoke, man.
I mean, it's just what a joke.
Here's another one.
(27:49):
This is one of those Sorosprosecutors.
This is an old video, I won'tshow it.
It's the New York City attorneywho's talking about we're going
to take Donald Trump.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
They haven't done anything yet.
Speaker 3 (27:59):
They're not going to get anything done.
Here's Nancy Pelosi in anotherastonishing anti-American
episode.
Here Listen to her talk aboutstatues.
Speaker 5 (28:10):
I mean, just listen to this Respectfully.
Shouldn't that be done by acommission or the city council,
not a mob in the middle of thenight throwing it into the
harbor.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
People do what they do.
I do think that from a safetystandpoint, it would be a good
idea to have it taken down.
If the community doesn't wantit I don't know that it has to
be a commission.
Speaker 3 (28:30):
Okay, from a safety standpoint, it would be a good
idea to take down these standingstatues.
What kind of safety, I mean,you've got to ask yourself.
These are politicians, powerfulpeople in the world, talking.
What kind of safety are theytalking about?
Safety of toppling the statue?
Safety of coronavirus?
Mental health safety?
What kind of safety?
Speaker 2 (28:48):
But it just could be a community view and sometimes
it's something that's been there, that view has been there for a
while.
But's just say I always say toyoung people who come, children,
who come to the capitol, whenyou look around you see statues
to people and washingtonmonuments and the rest, who, uh
(29:11):
who we respect washington,jefferson, lincoln, you know
heroes they would want us to betalking about the future, your
future.
So everything we do here isabout you.
It's not necessarily they wouldwant it to be about looking
(29:33):
forward, not looking back.
So let's just think about whatare the values, the vision, the
perspective that we enshrine andhow that benefits our children,
rather than having a big fightabout was somebody worth it?
We know they're not worth it ifthey committed treason against
the United States.
Thank you all very much.
(29:53):
We know they're not worth it ifthey committed treason against
the United States.
Thank you all very much.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
We know they're not worth it if they committed
treason against the UnitedStates.
I'm trying to understand whoshe's talking about.
Christopher Columbus, frederickDouglass, thomas Jefferson,
john Adams, george Washingtonwhich one of these people
committed treason against theUnited States?
I'm super confused by that.
Is she referring to DonaldTrump?
That none of them are worth itif they committed treason?
(30:20):
And then she's saying DonaldTrump committed treason?
Or she's saying that we'renever going to make a statue of
Barack Obama because hecommitted treason?
Is that just a throwaway line?
Just throw a big word out there, make people think and question
who.
It is okay.
Next thing you know they want usto look into the future, not
the past.
Okay, that's true, that'scalled a platitude.
Platitudes are things that yousay that have meaning but mean
nothing, right?
(30:41):
Because like, hey, have a goodday.
Like, do you really want me tohave a good day?
You're going to do anythingabout having a good day?
It's just a platitude.
You throw them around there allthe time.
Or you know another platitudeis the golden rule.
(31:01):
And then she said theprinciples, but we don't need
the monuments.
I mean these people are justtalking at this point.
I mean they're just talking andthey've been talking for years.
But unfortunately there's thisrunning narrative and as this
narrative goes it hits walls.
Right?
You can't continue to sayGeneral Flynn was colluding with
the Russians when you see inplain writing an FBI agent
(31:23):
writing saying he wasn'tcolluding with the Russians.
Is our goal just to get him tolose his job, to try him or get
him to confess, right?
So you can't say GeneralFlynn's a Russian agent when you
have the smoking gun documentthat says it's a setup.
So all of a sudden, right atthe beginning, all the walls are
closing in.
The walls are closing in people.
How do you think they'refeeling right now?
(31:44):
There were never any walls.
It was false sources and falseleaks.
These people's entire reputation, their entire life has been
tied up and going after DonaldTrump.
And Donald Trump is the mostclean political figure in US
history.
He was a private citizen upuntil just a few years ago,
which meant he was beinginvestigated by every local
jurisdiction around.
(32:05):
I've heard someone say DonaldTrump is the most vetted
president in US history.
I mean, they have been diggingand digging and digging, looking
for anything they can hold outover his head, and they have
nothing.
They have nothing.
So they have nothing.
They have nothing, so they havespent their political capital.
The Democrats have spent theirpolitical capital investigating.
(32:26):
They've spent their politicalcapital making accusations that
haven't been true and eventually, every time they withdraw from
that bank account, you get downto the point now where I don't
think they have a lot ofpolitical capital left.
They've still got a base.
They're always going to havetheir MSN CNN base whoever
watches those channels.
But I think most people arestarting to kind of figure it
out.
They're starting to especiallywith the coronavirus scandal is
(32:47):
people are starting to figure itout.
One of the things that I've beenalso kind of harping on with
people in my local circle and Ithink it's important for us to
think about this as peasants isa lot of times we forget how
important words are and howwords matter.
I want to show you a difference.
One of the things you'll hear alot of people say is they'll
say well, america is already asocialist country, we already
(33:07):
have socialism.
Okay, that's false, it's a lie,it's a total lie.
Let me explain two simpledefinitions that are different.
Socialism, it's a noun, it's apolitical and economic theory of
social organization whichadvocates the means of
production, so the ability tomake things, the ability to
distribute things, owning thetrucks and delivery systems and
(33:29):
exchange the actual storesshould be owned or regulated by
the community as a whole.
So the community gets together,has an entity community as a
whole.
So the community gets together,has an entity.
That entity then tells themeans of production,
distribution and exchange whatto do.
Okay, so, but it's thecommunity.
Notice how the last word there,you know regulated by the
community.
(33:50):
Well, how do you regulatesomething by a community?
How big of a community are wetalking about 10,000 people?
We're talking about 360 millionpeople.
The bigger the community, thesmaller the pool of people that
can actually make decisions onbehalf of the community.
You see how this ends up beingkind of a pyramid, right, you
still have that top-down powerstructure where things are being
decided by the community, butyou're going to have to endow or
empower people.
It becomes a mess.
Then you throw in democratic inthere, and that's the idea that
(34:11):
, well, we'll vote on everything.
Okay, well, you got threepeople, two wolves and a lamb,
and they're going to vote to seewhat's for lunch.
Obviously it's going to be atwo-to-one vote to have lamb for
lunch.
That's how true democracy works.
It's mob rule.
That's not great.
What we do like is what's calledcommunitarianism.
Most people, when they sayAmerica is socialist, what they
(34:37):
mean to say is they're acommunitarian society.
Communitarianism is a theory orsystem of social organization
based on small, self-governingcommunities.
So the idea that in our localcommunities, you know, we can
handle things.
This is churches orcommunitarianism.
It's an ideology whichemphasizes the responsibility of
the individual to the communityand the social importance of
(34:58):
the family unit.
So it's not an economic theorylike socialism where the economy
is controlled.
It's an idea.
It's communitarianism where, asan individual, you become
taught and aware of your role ingreater society.
This is the idea that you drivethe speed limit because if
everybody drives the speed limit, the roads are safer.
That's a communitarian point ofview.
(35:18):
That's what America is.
America has always beencommunitarianism, a
communitarian society.
It's not been socialism.
These words matter, the wordplaymatters.
So I'm starting to correctpeople in my sphere.
When people just get it wrong,it's not because I necessarily
want to be correcting everybody,it's because it's important to
(35:39):
understand how these words theyjust need to be correct.
I want to play a little bit ofan audio link.
This is from the Icon podcastand this is just a video he did
and he posted on his Instagram.
I got this sent to me, but Ithink he does a really good job
of going through terms and justgoing through things that are
happening right now, so I'm justgoing to let him kind of finish
(36:01):
things off for me.
Speaker 7 (36:02):
What we're actually seeing is the systematic
implementation of the fall ofthe republic and the rise of the
corporation of the UnitedStates.
Every major event is a step inthe ladder to achieve that end.
Covid is just another rung inthe ladder, which is why there's
a deliberate mixing of all thewordplay.
Right, I mean, we should stopcalling it.
You know, quarantine.
(36:23):
That's a term designated forpeople that are verified sick.
This is a house arrest mandatedby the state.
You should stop calling it.
You know social distancing.
There's nothing social aboutforced isolation.
We should stop saying safer athome when millions of Americans
don't have basic necessitiesadequate to fit their needs.
It assumes that everybody'shome is equally as safe as the
(36:44):
people that are making thestatements.
We should stop saying you know,this is for the greater good.
Right, when you close theeconomy, killing millions of
businesses that families haveworked generations to establish,
that's anything but good.
We should stop saying this isthe new normal.
That's just blatantmind-control drivel.
There's nothing normal aboutforced isolation.
(37:06):
Treating your neighbor likethey have the plague, breathing
your own bodily waste, wearingmasks, living in constant fear
of contamination that's normal,I mean.
After all, if the virus is sodeadly, why hasn't it wiped out
the homeless who don't socialdistance, wash themselves
regularly, let alone, you know,live in or have access to a
sterile environment?
(37:26):
Last year, 1.5 million peopledied of tuberculosis.
Why were you not wearing a maskduring the tuberculosis
pandemic?
You were endangering, you know,public health and safety, along
with billions of other peoplearound the globe, so why don't
you wear a mask?
I'll tell you why.
Because the mainstream mediadidn't tell you to wear a mask.
(37:48):
Right?
Because, though 1.5 millionpeople died from tuberculosis,
there was no tuberculosispandemic, any more than there's
a coronavirus pandemic.
What you're reallyparticipating in is a beta test
for AI systems and facialrecognition.
(38:09):
See, these cameras work bestwhen people are, you know,
distanced apart.
Now they're actually testing,through machine learning, how to
recognize, you know, a facethat's partially covered.
It's also a way to easilydetermine who's compliant, who's
not, who does the propagandawork on and who it doesn't?
(38:29):
Now get this.
You know, there's some ironiesthat are here, right?
So a society that killsmillions of babies a year for
convenience has shut itself downto prevent adults from dying.
People that, on the one hand,slaughter babies in the womb by
the millions, are now preachingto the masses about the sanctity
of human life.
It's double speak, double talk.
(38:51):
It's the two doctrine policyOne for the initiated, one for
the uninitiated, one for theinner circle, another for the
initiated, one for theuninitiated, one for the inner
circle, another for the masses.
It's like saying if I violatethe stay-at-home order I can be
arrested, but you're lettingconvicted criminals out of
prison so they don't getcoronavirus Thesis, antithesis,
(39:12):
synthesis.
If there's a real pandemic, doesit require faulty virus models,
rigged test results 81% falsepositives, inaccurate news
reporting, staged hospitaloverruns, manipulated death
certificates Nope.
When the government shuts downmillions of small businesses but
(39:35):
doesn't lay off any governmentemployees, it's not about the
health.
When the state bans dentistsfrom practicing but deems it
necessary for abortion clinicsto stay open, it's not about
your health.
When the state prevents youfrom buying seeds for your
garden but allows you topurchase lottery tickets, it's
(39:56):
not about your health.
An institution that has theability to destroy all of earth
through alleged nuclear warfareshould not regulate personal
self-defense.
An institution that's caughttrafficking drugs shouldn't be
able to regulate plants.
An institution that's racked up$23 trillion prior to
(40:17):
coronavirus in debt shouldn't beallowed to manage the
retirement fund.
An institution that was caughtspreading STDs should not be
allowed to run health care.
If people are really concernedabout public health and safety,
you know in general.
(40:38):
But you know they don't care.
If people you know eat garbage,drink poison, smoke, cancer and
take prescription drugs butthink that toilet paper hand
sanitizer masks are going toprotect them from the boogeyman
coronavirus, you know this is aspecial kind of stupid that I
can't address here.
You should ask yourself acouple of basic questions can't
(41:00):
address here.
You should ask yourself acouple of basic questions when
did you consent from you knowyou creating a government to
serve you to you serving thegovernment ruling over you?
If you want to know, you knowwho's in charge.
Just think about who you canand can't criticize.
Speaker 3 (41:13):
What a great, what a great assessment analysis.
I love that he took the time toput all that together, because
it really is the case, right?
It's thesis, antithesis,synthesis, and we're watching
people literally have mentalrelapses right in front of us.
I mean, you know, people whocan't see the silly hypocrisy
(41:33):
that's around them.
And I have someone to blame.
I have someone to blame forthis.
I blame the boomers for ourcurrent problem, because the
boomers, out of necessity bytheir grandparents who fought or
their parents who fought inWorld War II, have a keep your
mouth shut, get along, you know,just don't cause a scene, don't
say anything controversial,just get along attitude.
(41:54):
And that attitude is why weallow our politicians to be held
unaccountable.
We don't speak up, we don't getin their faces when they make
silly mistakes, we just go.
Well, they've got more infothan we do.
They know more than we do.
I heard someone say one timethat once the internet came
about, that the population ofthe United States was far ahead
(42:14):
of the president in intelligence, because we can get information
raw on the internet.
He has to get it throughfilters and so sometimes we're
way ahead of the president onwhat we know, what's going on
around the world and I believethat today I honestly believe
that today, I think thepresident cannot be on top of
things like it's just someonewho's surfing Twitter could be
there's.
You can't be, and you're goingto get just as much real
(42:36):
information on Twitter as asthey get.
In fact, 80% of intelligencegathering is open source.
Yeah, did you know that?
It means 80% of what ourintelligence agencies work with
they're just getting off theinternet themselves.
So we can be the judges here,right?
We can't let the double speakrule the day.
Boomers, that can hear me now.
(42:56):
We need you to speak up.
We need you with your wisdom,your knowledge, your life
experience, to speak up and helptake a stand for the
millennials and Gen Z who havebeen bombarded by false
indoctrination, marxist thinking, right Double like calling
things like communitarianismsocialism to make people think
it's a good thing BecauseAmerica is very communitarianism
(43:16):
.
When you've got a communitariansociety, that's a good society.
Don't call it socialist.
That's something totallydifferent.
You can't find a socialistcountry where the economy is now
controlled by the community,which basically means the elite
within the community that doeswell.
I mean Venezuela.
We could go through a wholelist of things, but the double
speak.
Stand up.
Boomers, older people who'venormally just consented, who've
(43:39):
complied with whatever oddballrule.
It's time for you to speak up.
It's time for you to draw aline in the sand, too, to help
the younger generation to giveus a shot.
I'm serious.
Okay, I don't have anything elsefor today.
It was great talking to you.
I'm expecting some documentsout today in the Flynn case.
I'm expecting Jensen gaveSidney Powell some documents on
(43:59):
Monday and usually it takes acouple days to unseal those.
So I'm expecting some breakingnews later today.
So hopefully we'll get to talkabout that in our next episode.
All right, peasants Podcastsigning off.
You can find me at PeasantsPod,at Twitter at PeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Facebook, atthe Peasants Perspective, and
you can find me on Gmail atpeasantspod, at gmailcom.
(44:20):
Thanks a lot, bye.
Speaker 1 (44:25):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
(44:46):
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week, yes, but all thedecisions of that officer have
to be ratified at a specialbi-weekly meeting.
(45:06):
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest shimmering
(45:28):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying, by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
(45:50):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
(46:11):
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
That's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.