From Russia Hoax to J6: Exposing Government Weaponization

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
And when they went to the queen to tell her her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
We're getting screwed man.

Speaker 3 (00:28):
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's going tobe through podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's got gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.

(00:51):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.

Speaker 5 (01:03):
Good morning.
Looks like we're startingwithout the host, shoot Taylor.
Where are you?
Oh no, where are you, shoot?
I guess we'll pause for asecond you good morning is it

(02:12):
time?

Speaker 3 (02:12):
yeah, we're on live.
I went ahead and opened it goodmorning peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe peasants perspective.
We are rocking and rolling.
Is there a little bit of?

Speaker 5 (02:26):
feedback or is that?
No, I had my mic turned off.
Okay, I can.
It was feeding through your mic.
Okay, I can hear something.
Oh, I don't know what it?
Is.
I have electronic feedback,something going on your end I
don't know.
Your fancy microphone.

Speaker 3 (02:47):
I can't use my fancy microphone, that wouldn't be
nice.
No, could just be it might justbe turned up.
It's our way to turn my volumedown?
Probably not all right, well,welcome to another episode.
Not ai, this show is not aistill still, although we're
working on it.
We've got some projects in themaking.

(03:08):
Oh wow, we got a good goodshowing this morning.
Wow, you think I'd be a littlemore prepped.
Look, we've got people in thechats.
Holy cow, how long is this going?
Good morning, john, attack us.
Really nice to see you, carlitz.
Good morning from houston forasia.
You can do it, ron, we havefull faith in you.
Good morning, that's the best.
You guys are awesome, all right.

(03:29):
Well, let's go ahead and jumpinto it today.
Steve Bannon had this to sayyesterday you get a couple of
things rearranged, ok.
So when you think about what'sgoing on out there, you've got
the sanctuary city crackdown.
I still am getting some type oflike metallic electronic
feedback.
All right, well, if you guysare having issues in the sound,

(03:52):
just mention it in the chats andthen we'll figure it out, okay.
So Steve Bannon yesterday onwar room was talking about just
all the things that are going on.
You've got ice agents in thestreets.
Fbi, DOJ, atf, marshall's,every other law enforcement has
basically, you know, made apresence on the streets.
Dc is literally being overrunby cops and federal agents.

(04:14):
It's quite the show.
As you go down like the littlerabbit holes and watch all the
little videos, I mean these guysare marching in the streets,
these guys are deploying copsfrom all over the place is.
I was seeing a video yesterdayof federal officers in their cop
cars.
So these are white marked copcars, you know, just with
federal jurisdiction.
Okay, driving into dc, likecrossing the bridge, and someone

(04:35):
was filming from an apartment,just a hundred, I mean it was
like no, really, this is a 10square mile city.
I'm pretty sure this place isgoing to be something else.
Okay, when I was in DC thefirst time on January 6th, as I
was leaving the Capitol andmaking my way through the
streets trying to figure outwhere I could catch an Uber,

(04:57):
because they'd created like ano-go zone, and I'm walking
around and I walk by this fireextinguisher and it's a brass
fire extinguisher.
Right, like you mean like ahydrant, it's a fire hydrant.
Yes, I said fire extinguisher,fire hydrant.
It's a fire hydrant, but it'sbrass, brass, brass, brass, Like
polished, bright, chromeylooking.

(05:18):
You know, brass is brass.
Never seen that before, I know.
And this, never seen thatbefore I know.
And this guy walking next to me, or you know, kind of coming up
from my behind, he says to hiswife look at that, but look at
that fire extinguisher.
Yeah, we got fire extinguisherslike that out where we live.
No, we don't.
We have cast iron suckerspainted yellow or red right,
yeah and I was like that brassfire hydrant it's's not cheap.

(05:43):
No, not cheap at all, and thosekind of things are like it was
something.
You talk about a gilded city.
When you're in DC, you can hearthe sucking noise of tax
dollars coming in and nothingbut rules and regulations coming
out.
There are no factories in theDistrict of Columbia.
They don't make things in DC,they make policy.
They make policy Exactly so.

(06:05):
The idea that they would haveall this extra money and that
they could have a brass firehydrant.
But you know those of us out inthe hinterlands, us peasants,
we don't get a brass firehydrant.
If you get one at all, if youget one at all, yeah, exactly.
Anyways.
So the Democrats are starting toreally see the writing on the
wall.
You deporting people.
People are self-deporting.

(06:25):
You've got this executive ordercoming dealing with ballots and
mail-in ballots.
You've got lawsuits goingagainst ice.
Media matters is under attack.
There's no more censorshipcoming out of the, the
government.
They're not getting talkingorders, marching orders.
All the mainstream medias aresettling with trump.
Cbs, mbc is sold.

(06:45):
Now it's going to be ms space dand they're going to keep the
same name, but it's going to beuh something, some stupid name
right the whole zeitgeist ofwhat they have people like stacy
abrams are losing their piggybanks yes, the whole zeitgeist
that they have is kind of likecrumbling and they're looking at

(07:06):
what's upcoming.
They don't have any leadershipand Bannon just points out the
super obvious.
This is legitimate.

Speaker 10 (07:12):
Okay, here's some point.
That guy who's a writer put upa tweet that said oh my gosh,
and cutting away mail-in ballots, they're going to force people
actually go to polling placesand vote and then they're going
to have ICE agents there.
And they're going to have iceagents there and they're going
to put the word out ice agentsso that people be intimidated.
Well, hey, if you're a citizen,what you're not intimidated by
an ice agent?
Uh, an ice agent is looked atas protector to get an illegal

(07:35):
alien out of the country.
You damn right, we're gonnahave ice agents out.
If you're not, if you'reillegal alien, you're going home
and you're certainly not goingto vote.
Look at those people rightthere.
If they, I keep telling you, ifthey can't cheat, they can't
win.
And now they're just freakingout because we've had enough of

(07:55):
this nonsense, we've had enoughof crap from guys like abbott.
Down in texas, the grassroots isstepping up and saying no, we
need to do these redistricting.
President trump's coming andsaid we're going to do a new
census and we're going to cutthe illegal aliens and they're
going to stop the mail inballots.
John Lott and the reason theDemocrats and Rachel Maddow

(08:15):
sitting there this isauthoritarian is they cannot
exist unless they have phonyvoters, unless they steal
elections.
Let's be blunt they can't win.
They know that and that's whythey're going.
Oh, the guy tweets out this isterrible.
Trump's going to take awaymail-in ballots.
It means people actually haveto go to vote in person and

(08:35):
they're going to put the wordout.
They're going to have ICEagents.
So people are going to beintimidated.
Hey yo, if you're a citizen,you ain't intimidated.
Ice agents looked at as asomeone that is protecting your
rights as a citizen to getillegal aliens out of here.
But Rachel and your writerfriend, you damn right that
they're going to be people there.
And if illegal aliens arecoming up there, boom, throw

(08:58):
them in the back of the paddywagon and shipping the hell out
of the country.

Speaker 3 (09:02):
If you show up to vote, there's ice agents there.
You're dumb enough to getthrown in the back of the
country.
If you show up to vote, there'sice agents there.
You're dumb enough to getthrown in the back of the paddy
wagon, pretty much.
Oh my goodness for asia onrumble says, reported in new
york post illegal immigrantcaught working as police officer
in maine agrees to voluntarilyself-deport.

Speaker 5 (09:17):
What an illegal immigrant is working as a police
officer.
Officer of the law.

Speaker 3 (09:26):
Dude, not even surprised.
When I was in D, half theguards were foreign born.
Half the guards were there onsome type of I just assumed like
work visa there's not acheckbox on the application that
says I'm not a resident, I'mnot a citizen.

Speaker 5 (09:49):
Racist to ask.
Oh, I'm sorry, racist to askwas this like a sanctuary city,
maine?

Speaker 3 (09:52):
they're going full retard.
Oh, my goodness, no gosh.
So the democrat party isfunctionally dead, yeah, which
begs the question why is it?
At my local gop meeting theyare talking about how they can't
win elections and how there'sjust this overwhelming.
You know the hate Republicans.
What's going on?
If the Democrat Party is dead,why is it not dead at the base?

(10:17):
Here's what I would say theDemocrat Party has been a top
down party.
It's missing right now aneffective upper crust.
It's missing the power playersthat say what to do.
The power players that haveexisted the clintons, the bidens
, the obamas, you know, andtheir apparatchiks, their little
groups, are all under themicroscope right now.

(10:38):
They're all potentially facingcriminal indictment.
So the message they're pushingdown to their base is tds, all
the way trump does it.
We hate it, right?
Tds?
It's that, like I explained indebate, it's that nuke card.
If you give trump power, he'sgonna end up going and, you know
, causing nuclear war, but he'sstriking peace.
That's bad for businesseverywhere he goes you see that

(11:00):
trump is bad for business.
So this is chris cuomo and he'stalking to, uh, benny johnson.
He's talking about the democratparty, okay not again again
yeah we're gonna listen to it.
Okay, again, these things are,this is.

Speaker 5 (11:15):
These are the people who literally persecuted us I
know that's why I get tired oflistening to I know, and now
he's kind of doing this miaculpa thing.

Speaker 3 (11:22):
Now he doesn't have his big paycheck coming from CNN
Right, but he's making someadmissions about the Democrat
Party and then at the end we seethe disingenuity of it and we
see how he still has TDS.

Speaker 12 (11:34):
My brother's a Democrat.
I don't know why, but he is.
My father was a Democrat.
I know exactly why he was, buthis party doesn't exist anymore.

Speaker 3 (11:47):
And while I had disagreements with my father
brothers like screw you, chris,all right, we got to refresh
this because it was plenty.

Speaker 5 (11:51):
That was enough of a clip.
I don't know why he is mybrother's a Democrat.
I have no idea why.

Speaker 12 (11:59):
I don't know why, but he is.
My father was a Democrat.
I know exactly why he was, buthis party doesn't exist anymore,
and while I had disagreementswith my father about different
issues, I knew what principleswere guiding him.

Speaker 13 (12:13):
Can you unpack something for me that you just
said that I please onfascinating.
You said that my father'sDemocrat party and your father
ran for president as a Democrat.
This is correct, and he led thestate of New York as governor
yes, three terms.
He was a.
You know he was Mr Democrat.
Yes, right, and he was aniconic class for them.
He was an iconic class for theDemocrat Party.

(12:34):
You can't go anywhere in NewYork without finding Cuomo on
the name of a bridge or a road.
Must be nice.
And so you say that his partydoesn't exist anymore, like a
water poster.

Speaker 3 (12:45):
You know, what's funny is the bridges get named
after him.
But you know, developers do thesame thing.
They name streets after theirkids and stuff like that.
Only the developer knows.
You know what I mean.
Like Trump Tower, Trump Tower,yeah.

Speaker 12 (13:10):
At least he owned it , you know.
But there's somethingcompletely different than being
a politician and getting abridge named after you, than
being a developer and paying forit to be named after you.
So my father's battle wasagainst trickle down economics
and Reagan republicanism.
Ok, the Democratic Party thathe fought for and the Republican
Party that he fought againstneither exists anymore.
My father's party was take careof the little guy, take care of
the little guy, take care ofthe little guy, take care of the
little guy, by the way.

Speaker 3 (13:27):
Trickle down economics.
The basic premise of that islet money flow where it needs to
flow.
So there's going to beaccumulations of capital who
people sell to people who sellthe right widgets or people who
have the right services.
And then the idea is, as theyget rich, they'll go out and buy
second homes and vacationproperties and yachts and boats
or open new businesses.
Or open new businesses and plowback the investment into their

(13:47):
business and hire more employees.
So the idea is let the marketdemand, you know supply and
demand merit based economydictate where capital flows.
And then you can, you know, hityour wagon to someone's rising
star.
You want to go work for Trumpbecause he's got stuff going on,
lots of opportunity there.
He's plowing back into hisbusiness, right?
So that's trickle downeconomics.

(14:08):
Yes, you're going to have somemovers and shakers.
You're going to have somemarket makers, some industry men
, and they are going to look onpaper like they're super rich.
But what makes them rich isthey're employing thousands of
people, right, it's.

(14:32):
What makes them rich is whenthey buy a yacht 700 people
worked in a factory to make thatyacht for a year.
Right?
That's the trickle-down idea.
Is that, yes, a rich guy?
His duty to society is to buystuff right and keep spending
the money.
Keep the flow going, right?
That's the whole idea.
What the democrats proposed inthe 80s was this bottom up,
let's stimulate the body.
Let's give them, the poorpeople, money to buy things, and
then they'll go stimulate thebody, let's give them, the poor
people, money to buy things, andthen they'll go to the grocery
store and buy things and themoney will work its way up.
Ok, fair enough.
It's kind of two sides of thesame coin.

(14:53):
If you give the bottom rungenough money, they'll naturally
go out and place that money intothe things that they want.
And need.
OK, same concept.
That makes sense, except thatde-incentivize work.
So strike one.
Okay.
In the first model, top-downeconomics, if someone isn't
working, someone's down on theirluck.
Bad news bears no skill sets,low IQ, et cetera right, they

(15:15):
kind of get left behind.
In this model, you give the lowIQ people, but they go spend
their money on video games,whereas in the other model,
video games might not be theprofitable industry.
But in this one you're payingsomeone essentially to spend
their money on video gamesbecause they don't have to work
to see how that changes themarket.
And then, on top of that, onceyou're paying the bottom people

(15:35):
because you own the money andyou can dictate where that money
goes.
You can do things like oh, ifyou're getting food stamps, you
have to buy these products, andthat's how craft ends up
benefiting specifically and only.
But the organic food growerdoesn't benefit because he's
excluded from having his goodspurchased by the bottom down

(15:55):
economic model.
Wow, that's tricky theincentives, or hey, we're going
to give you money for housingfor section 8, but you can only
live in in specified low incomeprojects that have paid huge
application fees and have solarpanels.
So there, you created a marketfor solar panels in order to get
the gravy train of the freerent, but the solar panels have

(16:16):
to be subsidized.
Do you see how, all of a sudden, you create so many carrots and
sticks and so many incentivepoints and so many moments of
grift when you go bottom down?
yeah, but when it's top down,you just let the market roll.
Do people get left out?

Speaker 5 (16:28):
yeah, some people do and sometimes the money piles up
in weird places, but you knowyeah, whatever, yeah, whatever,
okay, so let's keep listeningout of our bedroom.

Speaker 12 (16:38):
Oh yeah, stay out of my heart, okay.
Um, just do all the governmentwe need, but, but only the
government we need, and we're asecular society, don't put
anything else on me.
That's who they were.
Republicans at that time wereTeaching to the top for the top,
about the top.

(16:59):
Everybody should be the cityworld through the eyes of the
top and everything else is greatbecause the top has it great.
That was the conflict.
Now it's the left arguing for acultural elite.
This is how you will talk aboutpeople, benny.
This is how you will raise yourkids.
This is what you will tell themis okay.

(17:19):
This is what, uh, you know youwill say and not say.
And the Republicans are.
This system sucks.
All the little people aregetting squashed.
These elites are killing usAnti.
Everything they flipped interms of their operative animus
and their constituencies out ofconvenience and time.

(17:40):
So my father's party is no more.

Speaker 3 (17:44):
OK, so he goes on to describe.
My father would have called uptrump and said don't make fun of
islam.
My father would have called uptrump and done all these
different things right,defending the little guy.
We don't just put big labels onbig groups.
We're from queens, we don't dothat right, that kind of thing.
But then at the end he gets tothis.

Speaker 5 (17:59):
Let me get to this part here I don't really trust
his analysis, by the way oh no,his analysis.

Speaker 3 (18:05):
I mean, there's a grain of truth in there.

Speaker 5 (18:08):
The country club republicans, they're a real
thing he skirts around sometruths, but with more lies.

Speaker 12 (18:14):
Yeah okay, so let's uh, germans, the trumps, you
know, everybody had their littlebucket for a while, until they
assimilated.
And today it's all provocativebullshit all the time.
No responsibility, noaccountability.
You just move on to the nextand it gets us views, it gets us

(18:36):
clicks, but it's not getting usto a better place, and that's
true.

Speaker 3 (18:41):
Well, he's going on to criticize Trump.
I guess I kind of skipped overthe whole part where Chris, my
dad, would have called him upand said this and it's like yeah
, ok, so you're not really onboard with the agenda.
You see that the Democrat Partyhas completely like lost its
mojo, so to speak, but they'restill so pervasive, right, and
in my opinion, in the last sixmonths, right Since I've been

(19:03):
home and Trump has officiallytaken power and he's just taken
a sledgehammer to the everythingUSAID Doge, you know, epa just
goes on and on and on.
He's just completely coming inand he's not afraid to take a
scalpel or a sledgehammer,depending on what tool is needed
, right.
So it's just, it's not that itcaught him off guard.

(19:26):
I think they're stunned at hispace and his ability to
multitask.
On one day he's negotiatingpeace at the same time they're
painting the border wall black,at the same time that he signs
an executive order for mail-inballots.
And it's like, ah, norm, isom'sgot to be sitting back there,
like I need more paralegals.
So this is patrick david bett,and he's on there talking about

(19:49):
dems, are allergic to the goldenage and just how they oppose
everything what he's on withjesse waters.

Speaker 4 (19:54):
If we get this deal done with ukraine, what's going
to happen to the democrat party?

Speaker 16 (20:01):
they'll one lose their minds.
They will not celebrate.
Although if you look at what'sgoing on with polls CNN, harry
Enten they can't help themselves.
They have to give the polls ofwhat their own people are saying
on how this guy is winning.
What happened with Russia?
The way he got Putin to go toRussia.
Then he's got EU, all theleaders from NATO, showing up
with Zelensky to the White House.
Now they're talking about thefollow-up meeting that putin

(20:24):
wants to have in uae or moscow.
Trump wants to do it in in uh,alaska again as a follow-up.
If they, if they get thesethings going and then besson on
the other end is doing thetariffs behind closed doors and
they're getting china to realizeyou can't go after taiwan.
What else do you want to talkabout?
What else is going to be yourargument?
It's going to be a very painful26 and a painful 28.

Speaker 4 (20:44):
What is Patrick Beck.
David's philosophy on vacation.
It's August, everyone's off.
Dvd You're not off, you'renever off.
Do you ever take vacation?

Speaker 16 (20:56):
I just love the game .
I literally love.
If you love what you're doing,man, every day, it's a vacation
to you.
I knew you were going to answerit like that.

Speaker 3 (21:04):
All right, one man every day, it's a vacation to
you.
I knew you were going to answerit like that.
All right, last night I waslike I just was talking about
1776 live and uh, which we'vegot some amazing things going on
over there.
By the way, if you haven't beento one of our ignite
presentations on thursday at 430 pm pacific so I believe
that's 5, 6, 7, 30 PM Eastern Uh, we do the ignite presentation

(21:25):
at four 30.
You can go to 1776 liveus.
Just go right there and you'llsee a webinar registration
register.
Get the link and everything uhover there, right?
We've built this incredibleplatform, teaches people
incredible strategies on how tolive in the private and stuff
like that.
And my wife and I were talkingabout it last night and I was
like oh, I just recreated it, itwas just a figment of my

(21:46):
imagination, we just recreatedit.
And she's like and now it's acreation and I was like I know
it's awesome and I've enjoyedevery minute of it.
It's been true recreation.
Anyways, nietzsche says this.
Right, this is.
Nietzsche is one of my favoritephilosophers.
Everybody's got some favorites.
I don't agree with every singlething he's ever written, clearly
.
I've got my own opinions, Ihave my own show, but he says

(22:09):
this there's a point in historyof society when it becomes so
pathologically soft and tenderthat, among other things, it
sides even with those who harmit Criminals and does this quite
seriously and honestly.
Punishing somehow seems unfairto it, and it is certain that
imagining punishment and beingsupposed to punish hurts.

(22:29):
It, arouses fear in it.
Is it not enough to render himundangerous?
Why still punish?
Punishing itself is terrible.
With this question, herdmorality, the morality of
timidity, draws the ultimateconsequence.
That is what the Democrat partyhas become.
When Rush Limbaugh used to talkabout bleeding heart Liberals,

(22:50):
soft heart liberals, this isexactly what he's talking about.
You've gotten so hard Soft.
You don't know how to punish aCriminal right.
You fell on, victim to the con.
You have Let your virtue yourvirtue of not wanting to judge,
not wanting to do harm to othersbe weaponized against you, to
where the, the criminal whostruck you says strike not,

(23:11):
otherwise you'll be an heir andyou go.
Uh okay, you know what I mean.
Turn the other cheek.
Let me hit you again.
It's too much.
There's a point in history ofsociety when it becomes so
pathologically soft and tenderthat, among other things, it
sides even with those who harmit Criminals.
It does this quite seriouslyand honestly.
That's what the Democrat Partyhas become and that's why they

(23:32):
cannot comprehend why peoplewould support ICE and
deportations.
I don't.
I don't like incarceration.
I didn't particularly enjoy it.
I don't know that.
I would really want to belifted off the street and you
know taking thousands of milesback home where I was trying to
get away from in the first place.

Speaker 5 (23:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (23:51):
But I cannot imagine a scenario or a world where I
just moved to Brazil withoutasking, or just go to Canada and
, just you know, start abusiness and decide to be a, a
canadian royal mountie withouthaving proper documentation.
It's not gonna happen.
So yeah, you can pick yourchoices, but you don't get to

(24:13):
pick your consequences over inthe chat, carlis said, javier
mele said it best fiera fueraout.
I know portuguese, I don't knowspanish.
Sometimes I have to think aboutthose words fora, it means out
fuera.
Okay, another thing thathappened yesterday, pretty
amazing tulsi gabbard went aheadand polled the security

(24:36):
clearance of 37 intelligenceofficials.
So this letter here says the usgovernment security clearance
system exists to protectclassified national security
information and to ensure thatthose entrusted with access to
our nation's most sensitiveinformation uphold the highest
standards of integrity,objectivity and stewardship.

(24:56):
So it goes on to say it is thedetermination of this office,
the director of nationalintelligence, that certain
individuals have engaged in someor all of the following conduct
undermining those standards, toinclude politicization or
weaponization of intelligence.
To advance personal, partisanor non-objective agendas
inconsistent with nationalsecurity priorities.
Failure to safeguard classifiedinformation in accordance with

(25:18):
applicable laws, regulations andagency policies, failure to
adhere to professional analytictradecraft standards and other
conduct detrimental to the trustand confidence required for
continued access to nationalsecurity information.
It's kind of boilerplate, butit's also pretty damning.
You guys were messing aroundand here's the list of people 37
people.
I've never heard of a singleone of them.

(25:41):
Really Never heard of a singleone of them.
Andrew Seder, andrew P Miller,benjamin Cooper, beth Sainer,
brett Holmgren, charles Kupchan,christopher Senter, kareem Gaff
, diplet Sidhu, edward Gistaro,emily Holm, harry Hanna, heather
Gutierrez, jamie Jowers,jeffrey Prescott, joel Meyer,
joel Willett, john Ficken, meyer, joel Willett, john Ficken,

(26:08):
julia Guranus, julia Santucci,lauren DeJong, shulman, lake
Hartig, mayor Bittar, markFeirstein, mary Beth Goodman,
megan F Doherty, michael PDempsey, perry J Blastein,
richard H Leggett, samanthaVingrad, sarah Farnsworth, selby
pearson, stephaniel sullivan,thomas west, zin nguyen, william
tuttle and yale estonate and Ihope I pronounced every one of

(26:32):
your names wrong go ahead andcomplain, I'm weaponizing my
funky jaw against you.
Okay, it's taking a while towork out some of these weird
vowel, and I wonder what theoffices that these people held
were.

Speaker 5 (26:47):
I don't know, but the fact that I've never heard of
these people and I'm as deep asanybody in the news Hold on,
though I think that this is bydesign, because I think that you
run the first cattle throughand you don't want to know who
they are because it makes iteasier.
And you don't want to know whothey are because it makes it
easier.
There's less friction If youhave named people, like if Obama

(27:08):
was on the list, oh brother,there would be a hail storm.

Speaker 3 (27:11):
They've already pulled, like John Brennan
Clapper.
They've already pulled the toppeople, the people we knew their
names.
They've already pulled theirsecurity clearance.
That was like week one.
So these people, they're stillin the intelligence community.
That was part of this.
I don't think they were allpreviously fired.
Maybe some of them were.
I haven't seen any indicationsone way or the other.

Speaker 5 (27:34):
Well, we haven't seen their names before, but these
are the people that did the work.

Speaker 3 (27:38):
Clapper just said do it.
These people wrote it.
They got down in the weeds withit.
They looked at the doss dossierand said how can we convert
this to something we can launderinto the fbi or whatever other
elements and parts they had toplay with it.
So tulsi gabbard got on to seanhannity last night to explain
this, because apparently thissent some shock waves around dc.

(27:59):
You know 37 people.
Uh, these these people havekids on your kids' soccer team
and, oh my gosh, they're gettingcome after.
I thought they were the onestelling me all these years that,
oh, they've seen.
The goods Trump's a Russianasset or whatever it is.
There's probably a buzz goingaround.
You know these are the peoplethat would go meet with.
My imagination is these arealso some of your intermediaries

(28:21):
.
Clappers like hey, I needsomething to be said on CNN, so
go talk to your people.
These are the contact points,Yep.
So Tulsi Gabbard explainsherself.

Speaker 14 (28:30):
So thank you for having me on.
It's great to see you.
The intelligence communityassessed in the months leading
up to that November 2016election that, yes, Russia was
trying to interfere in ourelection by sowing discord and
chaos, but stating over and overagain that Russia did not
appear to have any preferencefor one candidate over the other

(28:52):
.
They viewed both as equally badfor Russia's interest.
The big shift that happenedaround what is now commonly
known as Russiagate was afterthe election.
In early December, PresidentObama called a meeting of his
National Security Councilleadership.
From that meeting there wasdirective that was delivered
from President Obama to thenObama's DNI, James Clapper, to

(29:18):
then CIA Director, John Brennan,to come up with a new
intelligence communityassessment that contradicted the
ones that had been producedpreviously by the intelligence
community.
This new one said that RussiaPutin, did try to interfere in
the election because he wantedTrump to win.
They did this using shoddyintelligence little pieces of

(29:43):
intelligence gathered fromplaces that intelligence
professionals refused toreference previously because
they knew it was substandard anddid not meet the quality and
the credibility that is expectedof them as intelligence
professionals, and they used theSteele dossier, knowing John
Brennan knew James Clapper, knewothers within the intelligence

(30:03):
community knew that the Steeledossier was a political
manufactured document intendedto be weaponized against then
candidate Donald Trump.
Well, Donald Trump won theelection.
The American people voted forDonald Trump in 2016.
So these intelligence leadersand John Brennan and James
Clapper and James Comey, thendirector of the FBI, then used

(30:26):
this Steele dossier as a sourcefor this.
Obama directed new intelligenceassessment, again stating and
alleging that Putin, Russiatried to help Trump win the
election, clearly showing apreference for Donald Trump.
Now, if you go to ODNIgov,people who say, well, Tulsi,

(30:47):
this is just your view or yourinterpretation no, it's all in
hundreds of pages of documentsthat I've declassified and
released that show, point bypoint, exactly what happened
through this timeline thatshowed this very dangerous thing
that occurred in the creationof Russiagate the creation of
this manufactured intelligenceassessment that essentially had

(31:11):
the intent of undermining thevoices and votes of the American
people who elected Donald Trump.
They were not happy with theoutcome of that election, and so
they created this politicized,weaponized piece of fake
intelligence that, as youmentioned, then went on to serve
as a foundation for everythingthat came after the multiple
investigations, the years longMueller investigation to

(31:33):
congressional impeachments.
This action singularlyundermined the integrity of our
Democratic Republic, what tospeak of the fact that some of
those folks, in those 37individuals that we revoked,

(31:56):
directed the revocation ofsecurity clearances from today
by under the direction ofPresident Trump.
They aided and abetted in thisaction, this seditious
conspiracy that undermined ourdemocracy, undermined our
republic and broke that sacredtrust that every one of these
professionals is supposed tohave from the American people.

Speaker 4 (32:20):
We have deep state actors that are trying to
influence our presidentialelections.
Is that what we're concludinghere?

Speaker 14 (32:29):
yes, we have people within the intelligence
community again when you look at.
Oh, so it wasn't russia, itwasn't russia trying to
influence the election.

Speaker 3 (32:37):
It was actual deep state intelligence actors yes
and I just read poorly a name of37 of them include in, in
addition to the ones we see ontv all the time.
I just put a poll in the rumblechat.
Let's take a poll.
Who thinks that shift will getprosecuted and who thinks that
leticia j James will getprosecuted?

Speaker 14 (32:55):
while we finish listening to Tulsi Gabbard,
careerists within theintelligence community, who did
not object to their manipulationand manufacturing of

(33:16):
intelligence and actually helpedthem get there, all moving
towards their partisan interests, that they were not happy with
the outcome this election andthey were willing to do whatever
it took in order to try toundermine President Trump's
administration during his firstterm in office.
These are bad actors that haveto be rooted out.

(33:38):
Our national security dependson it.
The ability for the Americanpeople's trust to be earned back
depends on exposing the badactors and holding them
accountable, and that's whatPresident Trump is determined to
do Exposing the bad actors andholding them accountable.

Speaker 3 (33:52):
And it's encouraging words Trump is determined to do,
Exposing the bad actors andholding them accountable.
And it's encouraging words Igot to say.
Now, sometimes you just got totake a seat.
Sometimes you just got to takea seat and look at the world
around you and just appreciateits beauty.
But also just let things playout and relax a little bit.
Ron, if you just need to take aseat for a minute because of

(34:12):
all the exciting things in thenews, who?
Where would you get that seat?

Speaker 5 (34:16):
well, let me tell you look.
Looking for a comfortable butunique option for your gaming
setup, check outtechnosportusacom.
With a wide range of ergonomicchairs and an array of colors
that will definitely bring yoursetup to the next level.
Always comfy, never boring.

(34:39):
Technosport use code rumble for10 off entire order.

Speaker 3 (34:46):
I know that when I'm thinking about people getting
prosecuted if and when anindictment ever comes out I'm
going to be looking for mytechnosport chair to sit down in
absolutely all right.
So so we're keep.
We keep it coming in.
We've got our answer to ourquestion will leticia james get
prosecuted?
Will adam shift get prosecuted?

(35:07):
John attackis says wish both,but expect neither for razor.
Yeah, both should especiallyshift.
Yeah, no kidding, you know, asI was doing a deep dive on shift
one time I ran into this guynamed john here to help he.
His real name was jonathanmcgrievey.
He ended up running for senatein baltimore and john here to

(35:28):
help that rings a super belltwitter handle.

Speaker 5 (35:31):
Yeah, yeah, yeah I think we played a lot of him in
our first yes, because he workedunder the bush administration.

Speaker 3 (35:35):
He worked to infiltrate the muslim
brotherhood and then when obamacame around, he kind of got on
the outs and then he started youknow, it's kind of one of those
things you know spies be spyingand when he couldn't spy for
the administration anymore, hebasically started spying on the
administration.
But he was debt, he was taskedwith he, he, he was employed,
ish contracted through thedepartment of Homeland security,

(35:58):
if I'm not mistaken and he gotpaired up with a guy named Sean
bridges who was a secret servicecyber agent by Rod Rosenstein,
who was the attorney inBaltimore.
The DO in baltimore tasks themto go to cheryl atkins house to
tap their internet.
Okay, sean bridges gotprosecuted for some type of

(36:20):
fraud where he maintained like a2400 million dollar bitcoin
wallet wouldn't turn it over tothe government, right, and he
ended up spending time in prisonfor it but never turned over
the bitcoin.
So you know, profitable fewyears, okay, and then uh, but he
did get indicted and prosecutedand put in prison for that.
And Sean, uh, jonathan McGreevyis the one who told Cheryl

(36:42):
Atkinson about the some of theplanting and how the child
pornography got on her husband'scomputer, cause he was the one
tasked to go out and literallyput the clamps and a new little
router box on the outside oftheir house.
They came in a van looking likethey were the cable company,
okay, and Atkinson's were likewhat's this extra thing over
here?
And he admitted all of it,court filings and everything.

(37:02):
Anyways, the reason I wasmentioning that was, I don't
remember, oh, deep dives on AdamSchiff.
So as I was kind of goingthrough adam schiff, I ran into
him, kind of heard his story.
He does have some credibility,but some things are pretty out
there as well.
Um, but he was talking abouthow adam schiff was basically
involved in a very untowardactivity with a young minor in a

(37:24):
hotel and anthony bourdain wasthere and saw it and anthony
bourdain, you know, later wastaken out in france and this
whole like ugly connection okay.
So ed martin writes a letter toadd a letitia james lawyer.
So apparently you know, letitiajames's lawyer wrote a letter

(37:48):
to pam bondy basically sayingyou need to drop any
investigation into letitia James.
You know this is silly.
You know this mortgage fraudthing's not a big deal.
Blah, blah, blah, blah blah.
So Ed Martin, who is taskedwith investigating Letitia James
not the person, but the crimesshe's committed allegedly says
this Dear sir, this is writtento Abe David Lowell Esquire, who

(38:13):
is representing Letitia James.
Does that name ring a bell?
Oh man.
No, abe Lowell was HunterBiden's attorney no, and Abe
Lowell is the attorney thatloaned Hunter Biden $2 million
to pay off his IRS debt to tryto avoid IRS prosecution no, yes
.
To pay off his IRS debt to tryto avoid IRS prosecution no, yes

(38:36):
.
I'm dead serious.
Oh my God, I'm dead serious.
So this Abe Lowell guy is kindof implicated in some stuff,
okay, and here he isrepresenting Letitia James, new
York State's top prosecutor.
She couldn't get AlanDershowitz to defend her, you
know what I mean.

(38:56):
I imagine you were notified,mortified, to read online and
publicly your recent letter toUS Attorney General Pam Bondi.
It got leaked.
On page four you makeadmissions about your client
Letitia James conduct that arestunning to me.
I am special attorneyinvestigating many matters,
including the criminal referralto which you refer in the Bondi
letter.
I believe your admissionregarding Letitia James' conduct

(39:17):
indicates that she is seriousabout addressing the problems
presented in the referral.
After all, her approval of yourletter includes admission,
although she likely did notexpect it to be published At
this time.
Letitia would be best to servethe quote good of the state and
nation by resigning from officeto address the issues in the
referral.

(39:37):
Her resignation from officewould give the people of New
York and America more peace thanproceeding.
I would take this as an act ingood faith.
Because of your reputation forusing the media to argue your
points, I prefer that wecommunicate by letter.
I find leaks like your Bondiletter professionally
unacceptable and personallyinsulting.
To that end, I specifically askthat you redouble your efforts
not to leak this confidentialletter.

(39:59):
I prefer not to have to move itforward to stop your client from
leaking.
Thank you for considering thisand alerting your client to this
matter.
All the best, Edward R MartinJr.

Speaker 5 (40:10):
And it got leaked, apparently because we're reading
it.

Speaker 3 (40:16):
Yeah, martin jr, and it got leaked apparently because
we're reading it, yeah, and Ididn't go into look, but I did
find that kind of fun.
I guess the letter got leaked,definitely out of tish
attorney's office.
Okay, back to our poll.
Anybody else pray?
The rosary dealer says I hopeboth, I hope both.
Okay, okay, we'll see, we'llsee.
So on that, there was anotherhuge uh thing that happened.

(40:38):
The usaa federal housing fhafaalleges a criminal alleges in a
criminal referral to thedepartment of justice that
federal federal reserve governor, lisa d cook, committed
mortgage fraud by designatingout her out-of-state condo as
her primary residence, just twoweeks after taking a loan on her

(40:58):
Michigan home where shedeclared it as her primary
residence.
When someone commits mortgagefraud, they undermine the faith
and the integrity of our system.
It does not matter who you are.
No one is above the law.
We have sent a criminalreferral to the Department of
Justice with regard to theallegations.
Mrs Cook and doj should shouldfollow the facts wherever they
lead.
So, basically, this woman righthere sitting next to jerome
powell too late pal committedmortgage fraud.

(41:19):
Wow, ten days apart, she boughttwo houses and look at that
matching signature primaryresidence, primary residence,
criminal referral.
Now, who is she?
Lisa d cook is a member of theboard of governors of the
federal reserve system,appointed in may.
Picture ever 23rd.
Now she's a federal reserve,but that was the picture you got

(41:40):
, buddy.
Okay, she's a black lady tofill an unexpired term ending in
31 2024 and reappointedseptember 13th 2023, obviously
by joe biden, for a term endingin january 31 2038.
What you get?
A 15-year appointment to theboard of governors a 15-year
appointment to the board ofgovernors.

(42:00):
Holy smokes.
She is the firstafrican-american woman and the
first woman of color to serve onthe board.
Rut row, rut row.
Seriously, like our first blackpresident's, a treasonous
traitor.
And now the first black womanon the board of governors is a
mortgage fraudster.

(42:21):
Oh man, you guys are not doingvery well at this.
Oh for two.
Oh for two.
I listened.
No, we're just fun in here yeah, no racism, no no racism we're
just like don't care, sorry, butthere's.
There's a, there's an element of.
Was this a dei hire?
Now that we understand whatthat was all about can we never

(42:46):
do that again.
We never do that again yeah,and I'm not saying we're not
hiring black people.
I'm just saying let's not hiredeis yeah, this is no bueno so
she sat on the board, the boardof governors, and apparently
doesn't respect financial laws.
It's pretty freaky.
So pulte said this about it.
And remember leticia james.
Now her and adam schiff are allunder the under the gun for

(43:08):
mortgage.

Speaker 12 (43:09):
It doesn't matter whether you're a politician, it
doesn't matter whether you're alawyer.
It doesn't matter whetheryou're a politician, it doesn't
matter whether you're a lawyer,it doesn't matter whether you're
somebody famous.
If you commit mortgage fraud,we are going to go after you.
It doesn't matter whetheryou're a politician.

Speaker 3 (43:19):
If you have a mortgage that you committed
mortgage fraud, I highlyrecommend refinancing out of it
right now.

Speaker 5 (43:28):
It might be too late.
I mean, the record's alreadythere, yeah.

Speaker 3 (43:32):
You know, here's the thing the United States
government was weaponizedagainst the people.
Right, they absolutely wouldprosecute you for mortgage fraud
, Ron.

Speaker 5 (43:42):
They wouldn't even hesitate one second If they got
wind of it, they'd done, whichmakes it funny to me why these
people all thought you know, hey, I got a great idea, we can all
do this and save a few bucks.

Speaker 3 (43:54):
Silicon Bank when you know hey, I got a great idea,
we can all do this and save afew bucks.
Silicon bank, when theycollapsed, had a bank ratio of 1
to 263.
1 to 10 is the limit.
They should have shut down at 1to 11.
They got to 1 into 263.
And then scott besant is likeoh, and, by the way, the
president of silicon bank alsosat on the san francisco board
of you know, uh, central bankboard or whatever it is Fed
Reserve Board and they're theregulators of the bank.

(44:20):
So he was his own regulator.
So they just think they'reabove it.
I mean, if you're on the boardof governors and you're making
mortgages, you don't care, getwhatever you want.
Right, it doesn't even matter.
It's actually stunning to me ina certain way that these people
even have mortgages, to becompletely honest with you.
Yeah, but they understand thatdebtors win and savers lose, so
maybe they're just leveragingout their wealth.
That's fine, whatever, ok.
So this is Ed Martin talking toMatt Gates and he's talking
about kind of everything, right,he's the weaponization of

(44:43):
government US attorney and hemakes some really interesting
admissions about January 6th andI want to talk about those.
Are you confident with whatyou're able to get access to and
assess that you're going to beable to very thoroughly make
your prosecutorial judgments?

Speaker 19 (45:01):
Well, look, you know , I've been involved with our
mutual friend, Tulsi Gabbard atDNI and she has gone, and I hope
people have tracked what I callthe birthday of the Russia hoax
which was revealed by Tulsi.
It actually was born on Friday,december 9th 2016.
And it was.
It was done by the Obama WhiteHouse in a special meeting aided

(45:24):
by the Washington Post.
This is in the record.
This is in indisputable.
This is not like me and youdebating and what we go forward
from there and you say that wasa Russia hoax.
It was used to almost cripplethe Trump administration by
design.
Then you go forward to 2020 andyou say what happened on
January 6th and afterwards and,to your point, matt, what they
did with this.

Speaker 3 (45:44):
Ok, he's making the connection.
The Russia hoax thing leads toJanuary 6th.
Duh, well, you and me, but formost americans these are
separate issues.
How, how are they separate?
I don't even understand howthey could be separate.
They're separate issues.
In the mind of them, this wastrump and his gang.

(46:06):
You know the democrats hadnothing to do with january 6th.
That's all republicans.
And now right, listen to thiselect committee was.

Speaker 19 (46:14):
They weaponized the power of congress.
They were aided by the mediaand they were often aided by the
article three courts and theprosecutors and they, they took
the hoax and they pounded out amessage and, frankly, they
brainwashed 40 of the country,50 of the country.
There's still.
People are still sick with itbecause they were lying.
So what is our goal?

(46:34):
One is to hold people that dothings that are destructive and
against the law accountable.
I want to do that, we're goingto do that, I promise you.
But we're also trying to get tothe truth, and so when you have
a Tulsi Gabbard who can sayhere was some of the truth, I
can tell you we've been goingthrough the records, emails of
this Department of Justice fromthe Biden era and we're seeing
who was doing what.

(46:54):
I'll give you a quick examplethey put everybody on January
6th that was arrested minusmaybe 100, onto the terrorism
watch list.
And when you said, wait asecond, you're on the terrorism
watch list why You're supposedto be a terrorist or a member of
a terrorist group or anothercriteria, the other criteria was
we just wanted to put you on.
And when you were pardoned byDonald Trump, the other criteria
was we just wanted to put youon, and when you were pardoned

(47:14):
by Donald Trump, all 1500 pluswent off the terrorism watch
list.
Well, that just proves itwasn't a terrorism watch list.
It's a list to punish you whenyou go to the airport, and
that's what they did.
We have a number, we havenumbers that the IRS were
auditing day six targets in ahigher percentage than in, and
then other groups.
This is all the use ofgovernment against the people

(47:35):
and and I'll just finish withthis man, okay, I lived through
that yeah, I was on that no-flylist.

Speaker 3 (47:41):
I was on that terrorism watch list I.

Speaker 5 (47:43):
I feel like we're still living through this to a
certain extent.
I hope it's over, right.

Speaker 3 (47:49):
I mean, yeah, me too I haven't been on a plane
successfully without being onthe watch list since, hoping to
take my first trip sometime soon.
But I was on that watch list.
I was on the terrorism watchlist.
I had my bank account closed.
I got the letter saying getyour money out.
You cannot bank here anymore.
At wells fargo a bank I'dbanked at since I was 14 I'd had
an account there since I was 14years old can't bank here

(48:09):
anymore.
I had all digital accounts sentme little letters saying can't,
can't have an account, can'thave an account, have an account
.
Lift on and on.
Okay, and I got.
I don't know if audit is theright word, but I got a proctal
exam by the irs.
It was not as soon as we shutthis show down, I got into it
with the irs.
In fact, just so you understandwhat it meant to me, these are

(48:37):
my dealings with the IRS.
Okay, post-january 6th hundredsof communications with the IRS
I had to deal with.
I don't hardly ever talk aboutthis.
This year I was targeted.

Speaker 5 (48:49):
Absolutely.
I was targeted.
This was not an audit.

Speaker 3 (48:51):
I didn't just have to deal with a misdemeanor
trespass, didn't just have todeal with a misdemeanor trespass
charge.
I had to deal with the irs.
I had to deal with thedepartment of homeland security
and air marshals and tsa.
I had to deal with bankingofficials and you were debanked.
I was debanked, yeah okay, andguess what, there were lots of
people that had sympathy, but Idon't know that anyone, while we

(49:12):
were going through it, reallycomprehended how much was going
on.

Speaker 5 (49:15):
I didn't.

Speaker 3 (49:16):
And I'm right next to you.
I kept my head down.
I went to work every day.
I limited my social mediapresence.
I studied and did what I had todo to deal with my case
directly, deal with the IRSdirectly, deal with all of that.
And meanwhile I had closefamily members that are like did
you get your vaccine?

Speaker 5 (49:33):
And meanwhile I had close family members that are
like did you get your vaccine?
And I'm like I'm sorry forlaughing, taylor, but the same
experience really.
I mean I wasn't going throughwhat you were going through
specifically, but dude, thegaslighting and the brainwashed
family members, it's a lot to gothrough, dude.

Speaker 3 (49:55):
And I'm sitting here going.
I feel like the government'sweaponized against me, I mean,
and people are just like I mean,you know?
I mean this is the UnitedStates of America, I'm sure
it'll all work out, and it'slike I don't think you guys know
what time of day it is Likewe're.

Speaker 5 (50:10):
The next step is up against the wall, sir time of
day, it is like we're the nextstep is up against the wall, sir
.
Well, yeah, and then I wouldreport to you some days.
Like you know, I think I had aguy following me yesterday again
and you'd be like, oh, come on,nobody's following you today.
Nobody's following you, ron,and I'm like, bro, they, they
were talking about details thatnobody should know meanwhile,
I'm just out there, I'm justlike.

Speaker 3 (50:30):
Whatever last words I said to the fbi was I live my
life in the light, right?
There's nothing about my lifethat I'm not going to have to
stand before my maker and answerfor.
So whatever you know, my momalways used to teach me
happiness is a choice.
But she also taught me veryclearly you can you have the
agency to make whatever choicesyou want, but you don't always
get to choose your consequences.
Right, I chose to supportDonald Trump.

(50:52):
I chose to go to January 6th.
I chose to bring a bullhorn.
I chose to do what I did.
I got to suffer theconsequences.
The idea was to do it withdignity and integrity and not
compromise who I am, not take adeal.
Not lie, not continue to doubledown on my own mistakes.
But Ed Martin is saying issaying looks, that list of

(51:13):
misdemeanor trespass people andpeople who supported donald
trump made its way to the irsand they started opening your
files.
It made it way to dhs and theyput you on a terror watch list.
Like these are not normalthings.
When I got debanked and I toldthe my defense attorney at the
time he was like what I mean?
I've defended major fraudsters.
They don't even take away theirbank account.
They might freeze the funds,you know what I mean?

(51:36):
They might monitor it, but theydon't tell them to close it
down.
Right, that's unheard.
He's like I have no rapists andmurderers get bank accounts.
Yeah, I mean, how do you thinkfundraising works when you don't
have a bank to deposit thingsinto?

Speaker 19 (51:49):
it just goes on and on you've've seen this, you know
this, you've been aware of it,but we've never seen what
happened in the Bidenadministration the use of
government against the Americanpeople.
We've never seen it in ourhistory.
And so am I confident we'regoing to get to the bottom of it
?
Yes, because I got to get up inthe morning early and work hard

(52:09):
all day.
But it is a fight, and it is afight because people have
deleted, they disappeared, theymoved on.
They tried to say don't talkabout it, get on with it.
President Trump has said we'regoing to get to the bottom of it
.
I'm also involved in the 2020election and the 2016 election.
To get to the bottom of whathappened, we're going to have

(52:30):
grand juries, we're going topull people in.
And the one thing I'll say overand over again Matt, it won't
surprise you it's the samepeople that were at the Russia
hoax birthday party.
It's the same peopleoverlapping over and over again.
And what Rudy Giuliani saidonce and he knows better than
anybody in our American historywhen you put these people
together and they're alwaysworking together that's called

(52:52):
an enterprise, that's called acriminal enterprise, and you're
in territory where everybody'sheld accountable for the whole
of it, and that's what we'reseeing.

Speaker 5 (53:01):
Yeah, some people might call them conspiring men.

Speaker 3 (53:06):
Gadianton robbers.
Yeah, exactly, you know, I'mjust continually stunned by it.
I am, and I and I lived throughit and sometimes I look back
and I just think how did we makeit?
I mean, any an IRS audit cantake people out right.
Being on a on a no fly list,that can knock people out All

(53:30):
these.
It's funny.
I had a J six, or call me uprandomly out of the blue the
other day.
Have you been able to get a job?
We don't talk that much.
I was like I made my own I waslike I, I know, I, I, I know how
the job thing goes, like I'mnot doing that and uh, he's like
I cannot find a job.
We've been out seven months, isthat right?
So february, march, april, may,june, j yeah, we've been out

(53:51):
seven months.
Seven months today.

Speaker 5 (53:53):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (53:54):
Today's my seven-month anniversary of
freedom.
Can you guys believe that?
So we've been out seven months.
He still can't find a job.
You know, if you Google my name, don't recommend it.
It's not good.
If you're a family member ofmine, don't Google your name.

Speaker 5 (54:07):
I'm going to come up Well, well, plus, every time you
Google it, it gets tracked,gets trafficked.

Speaker 3 (54:13):
You don't want to be associated with a terrorist.
You don't know when the listcomes back.
So one of the things I can'tplay this video because it's got
the buffering wheel of deathhere.
But Kristi Noem goes down tothe border wall, does a little
thing and she goes we'repainting the border wall black.
Make it even hotter in thesummer so that it burns your
hands when you try to climb it.
She literally said that they'repainting the wall black.

(54:36):
Quote the black paint will gethot with the sun, which will
burn people's hands if they tryto climb it.
Oh jeez, and next month they'regoing to electrify it.

Speaker 5 (54:50):
Don't wring your hands, so much don't wring your
hands so much I gotta say.

Speaker 3 (54:59):
In 2016, when trump was going around doing rallies
and you know, build the wall,build the wall.
I said what an iconic thought.
You know, through digitalsurveillance and just through
tighter border policies, we aregoing to build a hypothetical
wall.
You know, we're really gonnaenforce that border.
Dude, he was serious, he builta wall I wonder how many.

(55:22):
It's not a metaphorical thing.
I always think of that asiancomic when he's like he goes
through and explains in detailand then he goes.
But you don't have thevocabulary and don't read enough
.
So it comes out let's go,brandon.
Yeah, I think there was a lotof people like me that were like
let's build a wall.
Was the let's go brandon?
I'm trying to say this bigthing.
You know, border policies arereally broken and when you let
the illegal immigrants come inand build the wall we just don't

(55:45):
rise and you get individualswho get stuck in a career path
with a ceiling because you'reconstantly introducing low,
cheap labor and some of themactually come with significant
experience in other countries,which also means that they'll
promote through the systemfaster and they compete with you
.
It also takes away entry-leveljobs from you know other things,
and then it creates anincreasing level of crime
because these people havealready been introduced into the

(56:06):
country and the first step intothe country was a criminal act
and so it's no big deal toshoplift or whatever, because
they have a sense of entitlementand, at the end of the day,
just build the wall brought toyou by micro machines build the
wall.
He did it and now they'repainting it black.
I just dude.
When I saw that I just had tochuckle.
I wish you guys I could playthe video.
She's standing there.

(56:26):
We're gonna paint the wallblack because it'll burn your
hands, suckers, okay.
So julie kelly was on war roomand she was talking about that.
Yes, it does it.
Oh, and I got to slow down itbecause I listened to everything
at two times speed alvin andthe chipmunks, yeah.
So julie kelly was on war roomtalking about the grand juries
and kind of all the differentthings that are happening, as
well as andrew bailey comingover to the fbi.

(56:46):
So she's another one of thesepeople.
She's well connected.
I sat with her in the hallwayof the DC courtroom.
She sat in my courtroom for mysentencing and various parts of
my trial.
Really nice lady, verysympathetic.
And you know it's funny insideof any organization there's
always kind of infightingthere's.
You know, there's the JulieKelly's a fed crowd and then
there's Julie Kelly who's likeignore those guys, they're just

(57:07):
spinning up narrative right.
I don't, I don't really care.
I'm, as you guys can tell, onthis show.
I just kind of take everybodyat surface value.
So I take her surface value,and here's what I do know about
her she's connected, sodovetailing with that.

Speaker 20 (57:20):
Yes, it does appear, uh, that the doj and fbi
ramping up their investigations.
It appears that they areopening up grand jury
proceedings hopefully not inwashington for some of the
perpetrators of the Russiagatehoax, and now we have the
announcement that Andrew Bailey,the Missouri Attorney General,
who has a long historybackground in state prosecutions

(57:43):
, will be the co-deputy director, alongside Dan Bongino, of
course, working for Kash Pateland AJ Pambandi, to start moving
forward and advancing some ofthese cases.

Speaker 18 (57:57):
So you take this more as a sign of strength and
perhaps more of a focus ororientation around prosecutions
as opposed to chaos inside theFBI.
That's obviously how the legacymedia has tried to spin it.
You think that this is actuallypotentially a good sign for
real accountability in the formof, you know, working it through

(58:17):
the courts, going after thesepeople from a prosecutorial
perspective.

Speaker 20 (58:22):
I absolutely do.
And look, there is chaos withinthe FBI because you still have
this systemically corrupt bureauunder a systemically corrupt
Department of Justice.
The FBI is underneath theDepartment of Justice and they
don't know who to trust.
And they have found out thehard way and the good way by

(58:44):
exposing a lot of the bad actorsearly on firing J6 prosecutors,
firing prosecutors,investigators and agents who are
involved playing the Mar-a-Lagoraid and investigation.
But they don't know who theycan trust.
And we just saw the firing ofBrian Driscoll, who had been the
acting deputy for a while, asthey were awaiting confirmation

(59:08):
and placement, of Dan Bonginoand, of course, stephen Jensen,
who also is the acting chief ofthe washington fbi field office,
both of those gentlemen giventheir walking papers a week or
so ago.
So, in terms of leadership,natalie, cash and dan need to
know who they can trust andthey're not just going to pull

(59:29):
some you, you know assistantchief, whatever the ASAC from
random field office to workalongside of them, because the
trust factor within the bureauis is nil.
So I take this as a verypositive sign politically

(59:55):
motivated or politically naturedinvestigations into Russiagate
in January 6th and theMar-a-Lago raid, adam Schiff,
letitia James, et cetera, butalso really fighting crime and
reassigning, redirecting theresources and focus of the FBI
to domestic law enforcement, toprotecting the homeland,
protecting cities, protectingthe border, and so, yes, I

(01:00:15):
definitely take this as a goodsign, but I would not write off
the chaos that is still going on, not necessarily the leadership
level, but certainly the rankand file.

Speaker 3 (01:00:26):
So there's still chaos at the rank and file level
.

Speaker 5 (01:00:33):
Does that mean there's still problem people?

Speaker 3 (01:00:37):
Probably you know there was a complete 180.
You know, I mean, think aboutthis January Sixers are domestic
terrorists, january Sixers areheroes.
I mean it's complete 180, right, total 180.
When the FBI came to my houseto return property, I wasn't
there but my wife spoke with himfor a short minute and the new

(01:00:58):
FBI agent replacing the old FBIagent that was told to transfer
because she was going to hit thefan.
So you know, get out of town.
So he transferred all the wayacross the country.
Literally when, when, when, edMartin was saying they've
deleted things, they've toldpeople to move on.
That's exactly what they did.
You know, separate the agentfrom his files.
So you can come look at thefiles, but the agent can't be
interviewed.
Make it hard, make it difficult, that creates a slowdown.

(01:01:21):
Clearly that FBI agent wasinvolved in bad things and
clearly they wanted to get himaway from that office so it
wouldn't be very convenient todig into that.
You know archive to dig intothat.
You know archive files.
Oh, former employee, yeah, hisstuff's in the archives, it's.
You know, on the microfichefilm.
But the new agent that wasreplacing was like well, your
husband did try to overthrow thegovernment.
I'm a pardon man.

(01:01:43):
Hello, your did try tooverthrow the government, did I
excuse me?
Like, uh, no, not what happened.
So, yeah, there's chaos at thelower level because they
probably look at trump as theusurper, because that's what
they've been told by theiremployers, who allegedly have
the cloak of authority.

(01:02:03):
You know what I'm saying.
Like it's a big problem.
So, yeah, I can see why they'dbring in an outsider to come in
and try to clean things up alittle bit or be a partner,
partner in justice.
I hate to things up a littlebit.
Or be a partner, partner injustice.
I hate to say partner in crime,but you know, a partner in
justice on the thing.
But wows us All.
Right On the economic front.
Peter Navarro, who is I don'tknow his official title now is

(01:02:25):
whatever he's right in the WhiteHouse dealing with economic
policy.
He is talking about how theUnited States is the product.
Our market is the product thatother countries are don't just
want to sell to, but are totallydependent on selling to.
And this is key as to why thetariffs have not caused price
increases is because thecountries and the exporters are

(01:02:46):
eating up the costs, becausethat's how strategic and
important our market is to themand and that's what's creating
the leverage the foreigners theexporters who are heavily
dependent on this market, and wesee this clearly in the data.

Speaker 15 (01:03:01):
We saw it clearly from the first term.
And think about it now.
We've collected over $100billion in tariffs already.
We've had zero inflation fromthat and what happens is look,
it's like if Germany or China orIndia is heavily, heavily
dependent on the US market andtariffs go on.

(01:03:25):
They've got a choice theyeither can't sell here if they
raise prices or sell less, orthey they got to eat it, and
that's what they do theforeigners the exporters who
have no one else to sell it to.

Speaker 3 (01:03:41):
You're a billion people in India.
Who are you going to sell tomozambique?
You know what I mean?
They're totally addicted toforeign money and that's the
source of capital and we have aprime position as the you know
prime reserve currency and theywant dollars.
So they got to sell here.
Okay, on to the chat to finishup our poll question uh, uh,

(01:04:03):
pray.
The rosary daily says,ironically, mortgage frauds in
and of themselves are fraud, andI replied yes, in the way the
system is, all loans are rootedin a fraudulent uh position
because there's no gold orsilver.
You can go listen to thatwarner podcast with tucker
carlson, where he talksspecifically about this.
Uh, cam razel on your questionshift should be in jail.
Leticia should be publiclyshamed.

(01:04:23):
She should be in jail too.
They both use their politicalpositions as blunt weapons.
They should have a mom like methat is, that would take a stick
and switch me each time I slowdown to go and apologize that

(01:04:47):
would teach them.
Oh dude, I had so funny.
I had a guard one time.
Told me he goes the bopbelieves in capital punishment
he should get the switch.

Speaker 5 (01:04:56):
I remember when I was , my dad's initials were not bop
I got uh.

Speaker 3 (01:05:02):
I remember when I was a kid there was that uh person
in singapore who's an americancitizen that did graffiti on a
car.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The guy got caved.
He got caved yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:05:13):
I remember that.

Speaker 1 (01:05:14):
He got spanked.

Speaker 5 (01:05:16):
Well, it's a little harder than spanking.
You know what I got to tell?

Speaker 3 (01:05:19):
you, I would have traded a thousand, not maybe not
a thousand.
I'd have traded a hundredlashings to not have to serve 14
months in prison.

Speaker 5 (01:05:30):
You could have caned me black, I would have been okay
.
Oh man, it would have been nojoke.
Though, don't, don't do thekids.
Yeah, no joke okay, so I?

Speaker 3 (01:05:39):
my answer to this poll question is I think schiff
and leticia james will both goto jail.
From what I've seen on themortgage fraud thing, I think
that that is like the easiestlow hanging fruit Yep, easiest
low hanging fruit.
So other countries are totallydependent on us.
For the bulk of their marketshare they depend on export
exports.
Their companies have becomebigger than their capacity to

(01:06:01):
sell just to the United States.
I wonder a company like Apple,what is their United States
market cap versus their foreignmarket cap.
Can Apple survive without therest of the world?
Like apple?
What is their united statesmarket cap versus their foreign
market cap?
Can the can apple survivewithout the rest of the world?

Speaker 5 (01:06:13):
uh, so it used to be.
The answer would be yes, I'mnot sure anymore, but, um, to
your point, there are a lot ofcompanies that want to open up
new markets like china, andyou'll see um stories now and
then for, for example, an actorwho will do a bunch of stuff
over in China to try to buildhis rep, or whatever.

(01:06:35):
Well, you find out that theyhave a movie or something that
they made in America and thatthey want to then market in a
secondary market, what they calla secondary market market, what
they call a secondary market,and that market is china, which
ends up being a market that'sbigger than america, and they

(01:06:56):
end up make some of these actorsmake more money in secondary
markets like china than they doin america.
So, like, think of guys likejohn cena, and, and how come he
can speak mandarin chinese?
Yeah, why, why?
Well, that's why he wants theyeah, so these markets are huge.

Speaker 3 (01:07:10):
And how come he can speak Mandarin Chinese?
Yeah, why?
Well, that's why he wants themarket share.

Speaker 5 (01:07:12):
Yeah, so these markets are huge.

Speaker 3 (01:07:14):
He wants to be in China.
What Arnold Schwarzenegger wasto children of the 80s, he wants
to be that to children in China.
Yes, and he can make hundreds ofmillions of dollars in China,
where inica, he made a, you know, let's say a hundred trump did
sign an executive order sayingfilms now have to be made here

(01:07:35):
because he's like that's fine ifyou want to sell them there.
But you got to have the jobshere because the trend was make
the films overseas or up inbritish columbia, right, sell it
overseas and make your primarymarket there, and the only thing
that comes back home if any ofthe money repatriates, it just
goes to a movie studio.
That's basically just a handfulof warehouses in Hollywood.
Now you know very little isdone in the U S in those films

(01:07:57):
and I don't know.
I mean it's a percentage game.
I'm sure people in Hollywoodthat are in the business while
I'm working today, yeah, butwhen you think of the whole
universe of film production andhow much of the percentage of
that used to be based out ofHollywood versus now they're
spread out to kingdom come, andit's not just onsite shooting,
it's all of it is being doneoverseas.

Speaker 5 (01:08:15):
So when you talk about a company like Apple,
there's a similar crossover, butit's different.
So I don't know that Applecould exist with only a U?
S market anymore, but in theforeign and secondary markets
they also have to compete with abunch of um counterfeited goods
, yeah so.
And it's harder to sell, youknow um, a multi-thousand dollar

(01:08:38):
iphone in china than it isanywhere else.

Speaker 3 (01:08:43):
Yeah so a set of callaway golf clubs.
Right, yeah, exactly, okay.
So scott beson also talks abouthow india, russia and china
have created basically a uh oilracketeering scheme cartel
something going on let's go backand look at the history.

Speaker 8 (01:08:58):
though becky and china importing it is suboptimal
, but if you go back and lookPre-22, pre-invasion, 13% of
China's oil was already comingfrom Russia.
Now it's 16.
So China has a diversifiedinput of their oil.

(01:09:18):
If you go back and look now, Ibelieve India had less than 1%
of their oil 1%, and now Ibelieve it's up to 42.
So India is just profiteering.
They are just profiteering.
They are reselling.
They've made 16 billion inexcess profits some of the

(01:09:40):
richest families in India.
So this is a completelydifferent thing.
Like this, this Indian what Iwould call the Indian arbitrage
buying cheap Russian oil,reselling it as product, has
just sprung up during the war,which is unacceptable.

Speaker 3 (01:09:57):
He just called India on the carpet and some rich
Indian families.
So India has a huge populistgroundswell and they have an
actual communist party, right,because a lot of times populism
and communism look the sameuntil they take power.
So what?

Speaker 5 (01:10:12):
was he saying there?

Speaker 3 (01:10:12):
they're not allowed to buy oil on the market and
resell basically russia's, likeyou know, not supposed to be
selling oil pretty much toanybody, and china was buying 13
.
Now they're up to 16.
But what's really been going onis india, since the war has
started, has become themiddleman because china's like,
well, we don't want more tariffs, and russia's, like you know.
So let's ship it down to india,which kind of has its own you

(01:10:34):
know grace with the unitedstates, because we're not an
active enemy, we're kind of inthere, I don't know the pseudo
ally of some sort.
Not quite sure exactly sothey're funding the oil through
india to avoid some causticencourage instance yes, and
probably more political thananything else okay and then, and
then india is basically takingout this is our oil, and then
they're selling it to chinabecause they can sell to china.

(01:10:57):
China and russia can't reallysell to each other without us
being like can't do that okay,so china is inserting themselves
in this and that's being calledout, which is pretty good.
And, if you remember, trumpcalled this out in a truth post
a couple weeks ago, where he'slike hey, india, more tariffs
because you're doing this oilthing.

Speaker 5 (01:11:17):
Right.
So they're not really buyinglegitimate oil, no, on an open
market.

Speaker 3 (01:11:22):
No, they're totally.
They're totally basicallylaundering the oil into the
international market.

Speaker 5 (01:11:27):
They're kind of acting like a.

Speaker 3 (01:11:28):
Venezuela.

Speaker 5 (01:11:28):
Yeah, basically laundering the oil into the
international got it.

Speaker 3 (01:11:30):
They're kind of acting like a president laser
folks.
Yeah, so here the other thingtoo that's that's happening,
that's pretty significant isscott besant and trump are
really aggressively trying topay down the debt president
trump and I are laser focused onpaying down the debt.

Speaker 8 (01:11:44):
So I I've been saying that tariff revenue could be
$300 billion this year.
I'm going to have to revisethat up substantially, so I
think we're going to bring downthe deficit to GDP.
We'll start paying down debtand then, at a point that can be
used as an offset to theAmerican people.

Speaker 5 (01:12:07):
So please explain that a little bit, because I
know this is going to be a superconfusing thing for most people
.
So can we pay off the nationaldebt?
Is that a thing that you can do?

Speaker 3 (01:12:19):
okay.
So the answer is yes, you canpay off the bonds, but you can't
pay off the debt okay okay,okay, so you're making me more
confusing.

Speaker 5 (01:12:28):
okay, I was.
I was trying to simplify it sothis is man 1776.

Speaker 3 (01:12:33):
We kind of laid this all out.
It's 1776, live.
We lay this all out.
I feel like it's a little bittoo much to go into because you
kind of have to set the stagefor this.
But every ledger has a debitand a credit side yes, and you
also have a public side and aprivate side yes.
So it's almost like your ledgerhas four things going on.
So the dollar bill itself is adebt note.

(01:12:58):
It says Federal Reserve note onit.
So it is a debt note.
It is considered tender, whichmeans it's a completed debt note
.
So when you exchange it, it'sit's discharge cash cash cash
cash, completed debt note.
So when you exchange it, it'sit's discharge cash cash cash is
discharge.

Speaker 5 (01:13:17):
So that debt, the dollar bill, cannot be paid off,
right?
So that's an important point.
So all of the cash that is incirculation cannot be paid off,
cannot be paid off.

Speaker 3 (01:13:21):
And that number is somewhere north of $350 trillion
.
Okay, okay, it's not redeemable.
There's no gold or silverattached to that.
It's just literally thecumulative total of printed and
digitized dollars in circulation.
Yes, now everybody borrows that.
That $350 trillion includes themoney that was created when you
got your mortgage.

(01:13:42):
It includes the money that wascreated when you applied for a
credit card.
It includes the money that wascreated when you got an auto
loan.
All of that money makes it inthe marketplace and there's 350
trillion dollars washing allover the world, flowing around
as currency like the current ofa river.
It's floating around.
Okay, that can't be paid off.
When that goes away, we go backto barter.

Speaker 5 (01:14:06):
So what is scott besant talking about when he's
talking about paying down debt?

Speaker 3 (01:14:10):
States, just like you with your mortgage.
So now take that macro view andshrink it down to micro.
The United States is yoursimple house, is a simple
household.
So, irregardless of the factthat money's not real, it's not
based in real value, there's nogold or silver to redeem it for.
Irregardless of that, you havea bond bond.
You have a contract thatrequires an interest payment of
these debt notes.
So those bonds, our governmentis in hawk to the federal

(01:14:35):
reserve who, by the way, createdall of that 350 trillion
dollars for 337 trillion dollarsworth, at an interest rate of
four to whatever percent.
So your tax payment goes to paythe interest.
We don't make enough money inrevenue via taxes, fees, tariffs
, et cetera, et cetera, to paythe credit card bill, to pay the

(01:14:55):
bill due the bonds that are due.
Okay, so what he's saying isthrough the tariff revenue, we
can get our budget down to thepoint to where we're not in the
red every year and every monthFor debt service, for debt
service.
Correct and then, once you dothat, you can take the extra to
start paying down the debt,which then lowers the amount of
interest due, which then you canstart paying down some

(01:15:17):
principal.
And there's that cycle.
It's paying extra on themortgage every month.
You start to pay off thatmortgage.
Sooner those bonds sooner itdoesn't pay off the overall debt
.
It pays off the United Statesgovernment's debt it's like the
operating capital it's theoperating capital.
And then at some point he saysthen that can be turned around
and offset the american.
What does he mean by offset?
Offset your personal taxliability, your individual

(01:15:40):
contribution to those bondpayments?
Because when that's what you'repaying through your irs is the
bond payments, but we can't payoff the debt.
Because here's the thing, allthat money is redeemable by us.
So it's like oh, you've got.
So basically you're going tomake us work harder to pay
ourselves off faster, when wecould just write it off.

(01:16:03):
Yeah you see what I'm saying.
They're still keeping you inthe slave model and, as trump
says, is to too late.
Powell, it's just a paper thing.
It's just a thing.
Okay, but they have to keep theillusion of it alive.
It's just the way it is.
I accept it on its face.
It's just the way it is.
It's a house of cards.
Eventually, rome will fall andI plan to be on my farm, okay,

(01:16:25):
so we are at the time where weprobably need to be switching
over to private.
So we're going to do that, andI have so much stinking stuff
left here.
I do want to play one otherthing before we go private,
which we'll have to do here in aminute.
This is Daniel Turner talkingabout a electric vehicle car
company called the Rivian.
You've probably seen thesearound, I know I see them all

(01:16:47):
the time.
Apparently, rivian had a littlebit of a precarious business.

Speaker 21 (01:16:50):
I want to transition to this, because Rivian is
saying it's facing a $100million hole after Trump rolled
back fuel economy standards.
Rivian, I've driven one.
It's a good product, but boy,financially they've got some
real question marks.

Speaker 9 (01:17:06):
It's a fantastic car, it's really cool.
I haven't driven one, I can'tafford one.
They're incredibly expensive,but God bless the people who can
afford one.
Right, but poor Rivian, their,their, their model was based on
government mandates that weregoing to outlaw the combustion
engine.
Tax incentives that were, thatwere subsidizing your purchase
of an electric vehicle.

(01:17:27):
And then also these exuberance,these crazy standards coming
out of the Biden EPA, of cafestandards, of tailpipe emission
standards that were punishingtheir competition.
So if your business model isbased on the power of government
coercion to get rid of yourcompetition, then you don't
really have a product right.
What you have is force.
And so no offense to Rivian.

(01:17:49):
But now that you have tocompete in the free world and
the free market and you're notas profitable, that's not the
fault of the Trumpadministration, it's the fault
of a lousy business model thatdepended upon government to kick
your enemies to the curb.

Speaker 7 (01:18:01):
Yeah, you built your business model on the sky high
dreams of a bunch of liberalidiots.

Speaker 14 (01:18:11):
So they're eventually going to get voted
out, so good luck, no bailout.

Speaker 3 (01:18:16):
Daniel turner, great to see you, no I like thank you
this guy's a bunch of liberalidiots amen business model based
on government mandates andforce.
Oh my, oh my, you know, cry mea river deeper.
Yeah, for real.
Okay, so last thing before wego.

(01:18:37):
Well, let me just run throughhere and make sure it can be the
last thing, yes, last thingbefore we go private.
Uh, when we go private, we'regonna go deep.
We're gonna go deep into someputin stuff.

Speaker 5 (01:18:45):
Hold on before we go private.
Hold on, oh oh oh.
Big moment, big moment, feelingit, there we go.
All right, outdoor crew.
If you're into fishing, campingor getting off the grid, meet
your new best friend, the HunterOrange 25-quart cooler from

(01:19:06):
Caddysports.
This isn't your average cooler,are you kidding me?
None of these things areaverage.
It's roto molded for maxdurability, bear proof and 20
lighter than other brands.
It's so so it's easy to haul.
Whether you're deep in thebackcountry or just setting up

(01:19:27):
at the dock.
You'll get up to three days ofice retention.
Wow, thanks to thick, highperformance insulation.
That means cold drinks, freshfood and fewer ice runs, whether
you're chasing muttons offshoreor posting up at a campsite.
Best part, it's 40 to 50percent cheaper than the big
name coolers, but still built toperform season after season.

(01:19:50):
And like all cat of sports namebrand gear, it's proudly made
in the USA.
Use code rumble at checkout for10% off your order today.
That's cat of sportscom.
Go grab the hunter orange 25court cooler and keep your next
adventure Ice cold.

Speaker 3 (01:20:08):
Now I got to say something.
Ron and I got to know eachother really well for the first
time, like intimately on a, on ahike down the washington coast.
We hiked from the top leftcorner, nia bay, all the way
down to oil city.
It was like 70 miles or so.
68 miles took us.
Did we do it in seven days ornine days?

Speaker 5 (01:20:24):
I've done it twice uh , I think we did it in like five
or six it was seven, sevenmaybe.
Anyways, huge hike, tons ofwalking, holy cow, okay it was
beautiful, though right alongpeople that are like doing the
math, like, oh, 70 miles inseven days, that's only 10 miles
a day, dude, it's like one milean hour you're up and down the
the heads and then you've alsogot the sand, and the tide rules

(01:20:46):
your hike.

Speaker 3 (01:20:47):
you know every.
It's slow going rocks.
It's slow going Beautiful.
To my knowledge, it's thelongest place where you can
contiguously walk the shoreline.

Speaker 5 (01:20:56):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:20:56):
Right.
So it's national forest all theway down the coast, pretty much
on the watch.
So we we did that hike and itwas required that we have bear
cans for our food.
Yep, and what we found out wasit's really not bears, you're
worried about, it's raccoons.
That's why you have the bearcans.
And not all bear cans, thoughthey're bear proof, are not
raccoon proof.

(01:21:16):
So we need to ask these guys iftheir coolers are raccoon proof
.
That's the real test get aroundthose little squiggly five digit
hands with opposable thumbs.
That's what you really want toknow.
It's one thing if you can avoidthe blunt force of claws and
teeth, it's the opposable,little wily raccoon hands that
you've got to be really carefulof.
Okay, so Trump was on with.

(01:21:37):
He did a phone interview withFox in the morning and he was
asked about what his real goalis in all of this.
And this was kind of beautiful.

Speaker 6 (01:21:45):
I just want to end it .
I and this was kind ofbeautiful I just want to end it.
I want to end it.
You know we're not losingAmerican lives.
We're not losing Americansoldiers.
We're losing Russian andUkrainian mostly soldiers, some
people as missiles hit wrongspots or get lobbed into cities
like Kiev and towns.
But you know, if I can save7,000 people a week from being

(01:22:05):
killed, I think that's a pretty—.
I want to try and get to heavenif possible.
I'm hearing I'm not doing well,I am really at the bottom of
the totem pole, but if I can getto heaven, this will be one of
the reasons.
Well, I think I saved a lot oflives with India, pakistan.
They were going at it.
The planes were being shot down.
That was going to be maybe anuclear war.

(01:22:26):
If I let that go and I did thatto trade I was just want to end
it.
I want to end it.
You know we're not losingamerican lives we're not losing
american soldiers I, so I'venever heard that one before.

Speaker 3 (01:22:36):
I really hit the bottom of the totem pole,
self-deprecating right, like thewhole world's like horrible
he's not with porn stars, blah,blah, blah.
Sure I've just never heard thatone I'm not doing so well in the
heaven department, but I want,want to go to heaven, so I'm
trying to save some lives.
I actually really appreciatethat.
He just says it like that, likeyeah, there is something
greater than us and I'm lookingto be to go to heaven, whatever

(01:22:59):
that means.
It means I got to do good.
So he's out there doing good,you know, and sometimes want to
be with the right vibration.

Speaker 5 (01:23:07):
You got to send out the right vibes.

Speaker 3 (01:23:12):
Sometimes doing good means chasing Adam Schiff with a
sweat, with a switch.
All right, guys, I think it'sprobably time to head over to
private.
So we will go over there, andthose of you who stick around
with us, we appreciate it.
Thank you for joining the showtoday.
You guys are always so amazing,and should we skip the outro?
Thank you so much for hangingout on rumble chat.
Yeah, we're just skip the outro.
We'll go straight to private,all right.
All right, guys.

(01:23:32):
We'll talk to you guys againtomorrow and if you're in
private, you'll get to hear theoutro at the end of that.

Speaker 1 (01:23:37):
I know some of you love it?

Speaker 3 (01:23:39):
all right, are we private?
Yes, okay, let's talk about thedirty truth of ukraine.
This is so.
This is general flynn talkingabout the centrality of Ukraine.
This is pretty scary stuff here.
So this is General Flynntalking about the centrality of
Ukraine in worldwide horriblethings.

Speaker 7 (01:23:55):
What we're seeing in Ukraine is we're seeing a
country that is and everybodyknows this.
Now there's no more hiding this.
So why is Ukraine so important?
Well, it's a hub for humantrafficking.
It's a hub specifically forchild trafficking.
It's a hub for narcoticstrafficking.
It's a hub for humantrafficking.
It's a hub specifically forchild trafficking.
It's a hub for narcoticstrafficking.
It's a hub for weaponstrafficking.
We now know about our bio labsbecause Victoria Nuland said we

(01:24:18):
had them there.
I mean, we've always known that, but that's stated now publicly
.
And there's a lot of money justflowing into this country.
And you say to yourself whereis this money going?
Is it money laundering?
Is it money laundering?
I mean money laundering, youname it.
You know just this week and itmay not have come up on your
screen, but I know you payattention a lot.

(01:24:38):
I mean, there's a couple ofpeople I think one of them is
like somebody in the Ministry ofDefense there, and it might be
the Minister of Defense or maybesomebody in his orbit they're
buying these now, these gigantichomes for, you know, millions
and millions of dollars.
And you say to yourself, how isthis the case?

Speaker 3 (01:24:57):
how is that possible?
Money laundering, war moneytrafficking, children
specifically calls that out.
It's the center of all thebaddies.
All the baddies hang out there.
This is my contention from thebeginning.
Well, maybe Russia should takeover all of Ukraine.
Put them in that totalitarianstate.
Let's see if we can clean it up.

(01:25:17):
This was Putin.
This was a little while ago.
He was being interviewed and hewas asking about the West and
kind of our rot.
Now, keep in mind, russia is asovereign country.
To my knowledge, russia I meanrussia is the soviet era.
They were kind of trying toexpand the soviet curtain, blah,
blah, blah blah.
But for the most part therussians have never been
colonists.
The russians have always hadmore resources domestically than

(01:25:39):
they could handle.
They've had a hard timeconquering their own peasants.
So they've never been likeforeign explorers with colonies
all over the planet.
Not at all.
So listen to the way hedescribes the west and the
decadency, and even some of thewords he uses to describe the
elite leaders.

Speaker 11 (01:25:57):
But the gist of it is different.
The gist of it is that theso-called golden billion for
centuries, for 500 years, theyhave practically lived off of
other peoples.
They were ripping apart thesepoor peoples, poor nations of

(01:26:20):
Africa.
They exploited Latin America,they exploited the countries of
Asia and, of course, no oneforgets this.

Speaker 3 (01:26:32):
Okay, so he's talking about these european leaders,
these elites, and he kind ofloops the america into this.
They grew fat and richexploiting other countries.
They didn't grow wealthybecause they created great
widgets and sold them to theirown people.
They went to other countriesand took their resources and
brought them home.
Does that make sense?
Yeah and they exploited thoseother countries.
And he's like nobody forgetsthis, like it wasn't that long

(01:26:53):
ago.

Speaker 11 (01:26:53):
It's still going on and I have a feeling that it's
not even about the leaders ofthis country.
So, even though it is a veryimportant thing, but the common
people of these countries, intheir heart, they can feel
what's happening.
They can see our struggle forour independence, for our true

(01:27:14):
sovereignty, and they see thisconnection with their
aspirations to be trulyindependent, which is
exacerbated by the fact that inthe Western elites there is a

(01:27:34):
strong desire to freeze thecurrent unfair state of things
in international affairs.
In international affairs, forcenturies they've been stuffing

(01:27:55):
their stomachs with human fleshand they've been stuffing their
pockets with money.
But they must realize that thisball of vampires is about to
end.

Speaker 3 (01:28:05):
He says this ball of vampires is about to.
Endal of vampires is about toend.
For centuries, western elitesgrew accustomed to filling their
stomachs with human flesh.
They've been stuffing theirpockets with money, but they
must realize the cabal ofvampires is about to end.
In Atlas shrug, it talks aboutthe second handers, the looters.
Right that?
They're literally cannibals.
They eat, they eat ourselvesfrom within.

(01:28:25):
They create nothing new, theyjust consume.
They accumulate the createmoney and create value as a
foreign concept to them.
They steal value, they stealmoney.
They view the earth as a piethat can only be cut up.
It cannot be expanded.
Right, and he says this cabal,they consume human flesh.
They take your life resources,they take your entire essence

(01:28:45):
and they employ it in theirpurposes.
They come down to the Congo andthey get the natives to harvest
rubber, something that'sessentially useless for them.
Right, they're spending alltheir time harvesting rubber to
sell back to europe, to maketires and all these kind of
things, and we're like, oh, howgreat is this?
You know, we got rubber tiresfor our cars on the backs of
human flesh.
You know, you've, they'revampires.

(01:29:07):
That system is coming to an endAgain.
Top down economics.
Going back to the beginningwith Chris Cuomo.
If you let natural marketforces happen, then people have
a place in the labor.
They have a place to bartertheir what they want.
If you do bottom and you haveto incentivize spending, that's
where you end up incentivizingone thing or another and you
create these disparities, youcreate these slave systems where

(01:29:30):
we go to overseas for cheaplabor that is exploited.
Oh, it's cheaper.
Yeah Well, you're directing it,you're not letting it just
happen.

Speaker 5 (01:29:37):
Yeah, but we could all drive Rivians.

Speaker 3 (01:29:41):
Sure, we can.
All right, guys, I've got onelast video and this is the left.
Actually, I have two lastvideos and this is the left's,
or actually have two last videos.

Speaker 17 (01:29:49):
This is the left's response to Trump and his
negotiation with Putin, andthey're just flabbergasted that
Trump would owe Putin a phonecall the fact that he feels he's
got to check in with Putinright away and that just as this
meeting is taking place, we getnews that Putin is saying by
the way, no NATO troops on theground in Ukraine.
That is unacceptable.

(01:30:10):
Still feels like Trump needsPutin's approval in a way.
That's got to be verydisturbing to Zelensky sitting
there, but of course, zelenskywas a good actor.
He's playing it cool.
He's not biting on any of thequestions he got.
Not biting on any of thequestions he got and hopefully

(01:30:31):
what's going to happen isthey're going to go into this
meeting with European officialsand the Europeans are saying we
need to put these troops on theground inside Ukraine and it's
not Vladimir Putin's business.

Speaker 5 (01:30:48):
The fact is this woman.

Speaker 3 (01:30:49):
I don't know who she is.
I'm surprised you didn't say,because clearly Trump's a
Russian asset Again, crazy.
But Carolyn Leavitt makes itvery clear the United States
position in all of this and thisis what we're going to end the
show with today.
We are done with.

Speaker 22 (01:31:02):
We'll take your questions today here in our new
media seat.
Today we have Jack Posobiec,who joined us in Anchorage,
alaska, last week.
Jack, thanks for being here.
Why don't you kick us off?

Speaker 23 (01:31:10):
Caroline.
Thanks so much.
So a couple of questionsregarding the status of these
peace talks.
Obviously, we saw the presidentand President Putin there in
Anchorage.
We saw the world leaders hereyesterday with this summit.
We've heard phrases likecoalition of the willing.
We've also heard Article 5-likeguarantees.
When it comes to the securityguarantees, what is the current

(01:31:31):
status of that?
I know the president earliertoday mentioned boots on the
ground would be UK, france,germany possibly, but
unequivocally said no US troopson the ground, but US
coordination.
Can you elaborate on that andwhat would the red lines?

Speaker 22 (01:31:45):
be Sure.
Well, you got to the heart ofwhat I was going to say to all
of you today on securityguarantees, which is the
president has definitivelystated US boots will not be on
the ground in Ukraine, but wecan certainly help in the
coordination and perhaps provideother means of security
guarantees to our Europeanallies.
The president understandssecurity guarantees are
crucially important to ensure alasting peace and he has

(01:32:10):
directed his national securityteam to coordinate with our
friends in Europe and also tocontinue to cooperate and
discuss these matters withUkraine and Russia as well.

Speaker 23 (01:32:17):
Now?
Have the Russians responded atall?
I know he spoke with PresidentPutin last night.
What has been their response?
Because we've heard somereports from the Kremlin and
others saying they'reunequivocally against NATO
troops on the ground.

Speaker 22 (01:32:28):
Well, look, the president continues to have
these conversations with bothleaders.
Those conversations took placein Anchorage, alaska, again
yesterday with the Europeans andPresident Zelensky, and he has
directed his team to come upwith a framework for these
security guarantees that can beacceptable to help ensure a
lasting peace and end this war.

Speaker 23 (01:32:46):
And then just last question, real quick on this,
Regarding some of the funding.
We're hearing questions aboutanother round of weapon sales,
possibly a round of US purchasesof Ukrainian drones.
Will that money be funded bythe US taxpayers?
Are we finally going to see anend to the US taxpayer-funded
seemingly endless mandate forthese foreign wars?

Speaker 22 (01:33:07):
Well, the president is very sensitive to the needs
of the American taxpayer andimmediately upon entering office
back in January, he made itvery clear that we're not going
to continue writing blank checksto fund a war very far away,
which is why he came up with avery creative solution to have
NATO purchase American weaponry,because it is the best in the
world, and then to backfill theneeds of the ukrainian army and

(01:33:30):
the ukrainian people and theirmilitary.
So that's the solution thepresident has came up with.
We'll continue to see thatforward.
As for any additional sales,I'll have to defer you to the
department of defense so this isgreat news.

Speaker 5 (01:33:41):
It's great news.
You know.
This is actually addressing theone thing that I was really
scared about.
Um, I think we mentionedyesterday.
I mentioned that, uh man, mycamera angle is really off but,
uh, there you go, watch it falloff again.

(01:34:03):
Um, so yesterday, when we weretalking about this, I was like
you know, this is a reallyslippery slope where, if you
could get boots on the groundand then all of a sudden,
american lives are in danger.
And then.
So this is addressing thatspecifically and I'm glad to
hear that we're not going tohave boots on the ground yeah,
yeah, there was another video Iwanted to play today.

Speaker 3 (01:34:22):
Democrat, dear lawfare democrats, lawyer up,
justice is coming.
Nobody's above the law.
It's a five minute minute videoon MSNBC Morning Joe where
they're just lamenting all thelawfare Democrats and how tough
it's going to be and howgovernment's now being
weaponized against them.
Oh, boo hoo, we won't watch ittoday.
I'll try to play it tomorrow.
But yeah, no, I think that youknow we're pulling back.
This morning on the radio itwas like Trump's putting out

(01:34:45):
messages, basically like this isthe last conflict to resolve
around the world.
This is the last hot work.
Can you imagine there might bea moment.
Can you imagine nation statesare in open conflict with each
other?
There might be, a moment.
I know you talk about worldpeace.
I mean, he was the MissUniverse pageant owner for a
while, and how many of thosegirls got up there?

(01:35:05):
My goal is world peace.
He's making it happen for allthose young ladies.
He's going to secure his placein heaven.
World peace by making thepageant queen's wish come true.
World peace, it's delivered.
We're on the precipice.
It's pretty incredible.
Don't forget to visitleftbehindandwithoutorg.
They are running low on fundsand they've got kids that are

(01:35:45):
constantly wanting things to do.

Speaker 1 (01:35:47):
So please take a look at that.
And, of course, don't forget tovisit peasants perspectivecom
and we'll talk to you againtomorrow.
Bye guys, old woman, man, man,sorry, what knight lives in that
castle over there?
I'm 37.
What, I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.

(01:36:08):
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers.
By exploiting the workers, byhanging on to outdated

(01:36:29):
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere.
Oh, how do you do?
How do you do?
Good, lady, I am Arthur, kingof the Britons.
Whose castle is that King of thewho, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.

(01:36:50):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would realize.
Please, please, good people, Iam in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.

(01:37:11):
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you we're ananarcho-syndicalist commune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, have to be ratified at aspecial bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs Be quiet but bya two-thirds majority in the

(01:37:32):
case of more major.
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings?
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The Lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,

(01:37:53):
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.

(01:38:13):
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.

(01:38:35):
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}From Russia Hoax to J6: Exposing Government Weaponization

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

From Russia Hoax to J6: Exposing Government Weaponization

Stuff You Should Know