Ghislaine Maxwell's Arrest: Justice Served or Half Measure?

Send us a text

The mechanisms of power and control are becoming increasingly evident as we examine recent events surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest and the ongoing pandemic response. What appears at first glance as justice served quickly reveals itself as a carefully orchestrated half-measure designed to placate public demand while protecting powerful interests.

Maxwell's arrest comes with peculiar timing – just one day after a federal judge ordered the destruction of evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, and eight days following the firing of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman who reportedly wanted to pursue the case aggressively. Even more telling, Maxwell faces no sex crime charges despite specific abuse incidents being described in her indictment, and the prosecutor handling the case is Maureen Comey, daughter of former FBI Director James Comey. These aren't coincidences but calculated moves in a system that protects its own.

Meanwhile, everyday Americans – the modern peasants – face increasing restrictions on their freedoms under the guise of public health concerns. States are mandating masks and canceling Independence Day celebrations while simultaneously allowing protests, exposing the hypocrisy at work. The data itself is being manipulated, with health departments changing definitions of "cases" to include not just confirmed positives but also "probable" cases based on contact tracing, artificially inflating numbers while death rates continue to decline.

The bright spot remains the economic recovery, with 4.8 million jobs added last month – news that visibly displeased many mainstream media anchors who seemed disappointed to report positive developments. This reaction further illustrates the narrative control happening across our information landscape.

What's at stake is far more than individual cases or policies – it's about whether we as citizens will continue accepting half-measures and partial truths from institutions meant to serve justice equally. As surveillance capabilities grow and freedoms shrink, the question becomes not just where your personal line is drawn, but whether enough of us will stand together when that line is crossed.

Support the show

https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective

www.PeasantsPerspective.com

www.LeftBehindandWithout.org

www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ

www.DollarsVoteLouder.com

buymeacoffee.com/peasant

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.

(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasants Podcast.
Glad to have you with me.
Had a really long night lastnight.

(01:00):
Gosh, you know Ghislaine Maxwellwas arrested yesterday and you
know you were born with a silverspoon.
When your name has multiplesilent letters in it, right?
So Ghislaine Maxwell wasarrested yesterday.
And, gosh, the more I look intoit, the less and less excited I
am about it.
The more and more I feel likethis was just a slapstick
indictment and that they werejust trying to come up with

(01:21):
something to put her away,mainly because of that Netflix
documentary, which I'll talkabout a little bit more as we
get going here.
So what happens a lot of timesin the news is the narrative is
obviously being controlledwithin the news.
So if you're watchingmainstream news, so if you're
watching MSNBC, fox News, all ofthe cable news, mainstream news

(01:45):
, or if you're watching evenyour local news, that's
controlled by the bigconglomerates like Bonneville or
things like that.
There's a kind of a narrative.
So they'll pick and choose fromthe actual events around the
country in the stories that fittheir narrative and lead the
country the direction they wantto go.
A lot of people you know it'sfunny, because sometimes I say
things like that to people andthey're like no, I mean the news
is the news and it's like oh,you haven't read the CIA files,

(02:10):
project Mockingbird.
They tell you what to believeover such like oh, you don't,
you don't get.
The.
Anderson Cooper is actually aCIA operative and it's open,
like he's acknowledged the factthat his first job was in the
CIA.
And then, on another hand, wesay, oh, once in the CIA, always
in the CIA.

(02:30):
Unless you go to CNN, then you,then you're not in the CIA.
Come on, guys, once you're readin at the high levels and
things like CIA, you knowintelligence, things like that,
you're always, always inintelligence and that's super
clear.
Like, for example, carter Page,who was pursued by the Mueller
investigation.
He was a CIA spook.
He would turn over informationto the CIA.
Well, once you do that, you'reon their radar.
Don't ever think about being adouble agent, because they got

(02:51):
you and so, once CIA, always CIA, once FBI, always FBI.
It's kind of the way you thinkabout that.
And so when those institutionsget corrupt or being run by
corrupt people, obviouslysometimes you just get actions
that you can't quite explain.
That just don't seem rational.
I mentioned talking to mybrother-in-law a lot.
We spent a lot of time,obviously, working together and

(03:13):
yesterday we were having lunchand we were just talking about
the events of the day and allthe things that were going on
and again I he I found him, youknow, asking that question like
well, it's not reasonable, whyare they doing this?
What are they doing?
And I just looked at him.
I said you keep asking thatquestion.
They don't have to be rational,they don't have to do things
that are in the best interest ofthe country.

(03:33):
Just because elected officialsgot elected by the people
doesn't mean they want anythingto do with the people.
Put this in perspective forjust a minute.
You get elected to Congress,senate, whatever, it doesn't
matter Mayor, city council,whatever it is.
Now you're sitting behind thebench right, you're sitting
behind the counter and you'refacing the unwashed masses.
So these people who voted foryou right, come up to the

(03:55):
counter and they want thingsthat you know you can't do.
They're constantly complaining.
I mean, go listen to podcastswith senators and congressmen on
it.
Listen to their voicemails.
Sometimes when they play them,the slander, the slurs Over time
.
Right, if you're a senator andyou've been in for 18 years,
three terms.
You don't go to Applebee's.
When was the last time you wentout in public?
You don't go out in publicbecause all it takes is one

(04:16):
dum-dum screaming at the top ofhis lungs to completely ruin the
experience for everybody in therestaurant.
So pretty soon, what you startto do is you start to go to the
more exclusive or more privateplaces.
You don't ever go to publicbeaches.
You don't go to 4th of Julyceremonies and sit out in the
grass with your neighbors.
You don't do that when you'rean elected official.
You're constantly behind thecounter, you're separated from

(04:38):
the people and give enough timeand you start to see the people
on the other side of the counteras, somehow, others.
This is where you get HillaryClinton saying things like the
deplorables, the unredeemables.
How could you possibly say thatabout your constituents?
How could you possibly say thatabout Americans?
Right To just wipe off half ofthe population as deplorables
and unredeemables?

(04:59):
Well, it's because you haven'tassociated with them.
In 30, 40 years.
You haven't gone to a picnic,you haven't gone to a barbecue,
and you know what.
We see the same thing too withour local, local departments.
My, my little town has has hadthe longest running 4th of July
parade since ever at West of theMississippi, so it's the
longest continuously running.

(05:19):
They had the 4th of July duringworld war one.
They had the 4th of July duringworld war two, the great
depression.
They've always had this littlecute 4th of July parade.
It's canceled this year forCOVID.
What's frustrating about thatis you know it's all a scam,
right?
You know that there's no reasonwhy we couldn't have the 4th of
July parade.
Nobody said boo where I liveabout the protests.

(05:41):
We had hundreds and hundreds ofpeople at least as many people
show up to the Black LivesMatter protest in the little
town where I live as will showup at the parade.
But yet we can't do the parade.
They want to cancel it.
The hypocrisy is justunbelievable, and I actually
don't.
It's so Okay.
So I was saying with the newscycle, let me back up again with

(06:02):
the news cycle.
So the news right now ispicking and choosing some
narratives, but there's way morenews than you're ever going to
get on the news and I reallycan't cover it all here.
But what's happening right nowis we've got what I consider
another foundation dump, sowe're moving into a new phase of
the news.
The news cycle is now going tohave to address everything that
has happened over the last 48hours and it will take them a

(06:24):
couple months to do it.
This is really typically whathappens when you get a huge
shift in the actual facts ofreality, when reality cannot be
ignored, then you have to shapethe narrative to absorb that
reality.
I hope you understand what I'msaying there.
So facts happen, events happen,things happen that can't be

(06:45):
changed.
Both sides of the aisle have tolook at it and say, for example
, ghislaine Maxwell is incustody.
Okay, what are theramifications of that?
What do we do?
How do we craft our message?
How do we spin our story?
Both sides of the aisle rightnow are doing this rapidly.
They're doing as much researchas they can.
They're developing talkingpoints that they can distribute
to their surrogates to try toget their narrative and their

(07:07):
message out there.
I don't know what thosenarratives and messages are.
I've got some good guesses, butI've got a feeling they're
going to kind of be, they'regoing to change, and there's a
couple, there's a lot of reasonsfor that.
So let me start with a couplethings that are not Maxwell
related.
So yesterday we had a bunch ofexcuse me, yesterday we had a

(07:30):
bunch of financial news thatcame out as well, so let's take
a minute and look at that.
So the jobs report came out andwe added a ton of jobs back
into the economy.
Now, when I shared this withsomeone yesterday, they said is
that new jobs like newmanufacturing?
And I was like, no, no, theseare probably 90% just people
going back to work.
But you have to remember thesepeople were laid off, they

(07:51):
weren't working.
So the fact that people aregoing back to work is a big deal
because the gravy train ofunemployment runs out.
So listen to this video.
This is Rachel Maddow.
Starts out this video and onWednesday night on her show,
which she's in prime time, Ithink she's across from Hannity
on MSN, msn, msnbc, yeah,whatever it is.
Anyways, I can't stand her.

(08:11):
People call her Moscow Maddowor conspiracy theorist Maddow.
She is one of the biggestpundits that was pushing the
Russiagate hoax.
I mean, she just the walls arecaving in.
The walls are caving inconstantly.
It's actually quite astonishingto me that she's still on the
air.
The currency that journalistswork with is truthfulness, trust

(08:31):
.
I don't consider myself ajournalist.
I can throw something out there.
That's not true, you know.
I mean because I'm just workingthrough this.
I'm a peasant.
I'm just like you, right?
I don't have insiderinformation.
I'm not sitting in the seats ofpower, I'm just watching it
across the internet and I'm veryconcerned with what I'm seeing.
So I'm going to talk about it.
So this is Moscow Maddow andshe's uh, she's, she's talking
about the jobs numbers and shemust've got a bad tip.

(08:53):
I mean, these people do get, doget tips.
They are connected, uh, thatyou know they absolutely could
get an insider tip so they knowhow to craft their story and
break news and things like that.
I think she got a bad tip.
I personally think she got abad tip.
I think somebody on the insidewas either screwing with her or
they had something happen.
She had a bad tip.
Anyways, she starts out.
This was Wednesday night thatshe starts out, and then
everything else is yesterdaymorning as the jobless numbers

(09:14):
came out.
So just take a look at this.
It's kind of fun For June,brace yourself, it's going to be
absolutely terrible.

Speaker 3 (09:26):
Blockbuster jobs report.
4.8 million jobs were addedlast month.
4.8 million nearly 5 millionjobs in june.
People are hiring 4.8 millionnew jobs.
4.8 million jobs were addedlast month.
It actually beat estimates by awide margin, is way more than
the 3 million economistsexpected, and it speaks to the

(09:46):
strength of the economy.
This is news to celebrate.
It is unequivocally good news.
So it's a big positive to seethis much higher.
I see a number to be celebratedAdding 404,000 jobs for African
Americans, 1.5 million forHispanics, 3 million for women,
and it was the biggest jump onrecord.
We built the greatest economyin the history of the world and

(10:10):
we are now doing it again.

Speaker 2 (10:14):
All right, that's a fun that Donald Trump tweeted
that out.
It's going to be.
Probably it's a campaign ad ofhis, I'm sure.
So I've commented where I'veseen this video out there.
It's so funny because a lot ofthe anchors that are talking are
on, you know, msnbc, cnn, abc,things like that, and it's like
it's like they're they're eatingtheir Ipecac.
You know they're.
They're reading the news like,uh, job numbers are at 4.8 and

(10:37):
they look up at the camera andthey have that droopy look on
their face where their theirmouth doesn't is completely,
completely relaxed and they'rejust like crap.
It's a V-shaped recovery Crap.
There's no job numbers weregood.
Crap is kind of you.
Look at their faces.
It's really funny.
I like Kramer in there.
People are hiring.
I love it.

(10:57):
Anyways, it's great news.
People, you gotta love it.
You gotta love that people aregoing back to work.
That was big news yesterday.
Um, that's nice, you know, andagain, these are just people
going back to work.
But this is good.
People need to go back to work.
People that are working don'twrite and protest.
People that are working can paytheir bills.
People that are working cankeep.
You know, there's just goodstuff all the way around.

(11:19):
So definitely, definitely wantto watch that.
There was a couple things thathappened yesterday that I
thought were absolutely I wantedto mention.
So you got to remember, donaldTrump is the leader of the free
world, he is the president ofthe United States and typically,
you know, the things that theysay carry a lot of weight.
And one of the things that Ihave really appreciated with

(11:40):
Donald Trump is he backs up hiswords.
When he says something onTwitter, he means it.
I mean, shoot for goodnesssakes, he fired Rex Tillerson,
the Secretary of State, when hewas on an overseas trip in
Africa.
Through Twitter, he justtweeted out Rex Tillerson,
you're an idiot, you're gone,fired.
And Rick Tillerson was like oh,okay.
So I like the fact that DonaldTrump says things.
One of the other things, too, isDonald Trump's tweets are

(12:01):
incredibly accurate.
The media constantly, you know,says that it's not and uh.
That's really quite frustratingbecause he's kind of proven to
always end up being correct.
Um, but you know it doesn'tmatter what if he's correct or
not, people are just going to becranky about it.
So yesterday Donald Trumptweeted out quite a bit with uh,
with one specific uh.

(12:22):
He was retweeting an account andthis account was America First
account.
Let me, I'm trying to find ithere.
He tweeted a lot yesterday.
Okay, so it was Act for America.
So ACT for America was anaccount he retweeted and he
retweeted out a handful ofthings.
He tweeted out a picture.
It says here it's a picture ofJoe Biden hanging his head and

(12:43):
it says, fast and FuriousBenghazi, irs targeting,
operation Chokepoint, spying onjournalists, va waiting list,
cash payments to Iran, clintonemails, unmasking of political
rivals, crossfire, hurricane,slash Russia hoax, crossfire
razor, slash General Flynn.
So those are the scandals thatBiden was directly involved with
in the Obama administration.
So Trump tweeted that out.
I love it.
I mean, he constantly calls theObama administration out on

(13:05):
their crap.
Here's another tweet from himthat he retweeted Imagine if the
left was focused on coronavirusinstead of impeachment back in
January, oh burn.
There's another one heretweeted Barack Obama and Joe
Biden left federal stockpilesempty and exposed our country,
so referring to the PPEs country.
So, referring to the PPEs um,if you love our freedom, stand
with Donald Trump, retreat that.

(13:29):
Now, this is the one that I justI've been I've been laughing at
.
When he tweeted this out, Ijust thought, folks, if you are
a Trump fan.
Okay, if you are a Trump fan,he is signaling to you.
He is telling you what is goingto come.
He is absolutely purposelydoing what he's doing.
This is from his Twitter.

(13:49):
It's a Twitter poll.
Now, this Twitter poll when Isaw it was closed, most likely
it was closed either before hetweeted it.
No, I don't think it was closedbefore he tweeted it.
It probably got closed when hetweeted it.
I'm sure Twitter shut it downif I had to guess, but
nonetheless, it doesn't have alot of votes.
It's only 2,800 votes.
If Trump had put it out therewith an open poll, I'm sure it'd
have millions of votes.

(14:09):
But here's the question who doyou trust most?
And the two questions PresidentTrump, dr Fauci.
So President Trump retweets apoll saying who do you trust
more, president Trump or DrFauci?
Oh, my goodness.
Now the poll is 90.2% DonaldTrump and 9.8% Dr Fauci.

(14:33):
Now it's only got 2,800respondents, so it's Twitter
poll, but nonetheless, oh man,what is Donald Trump trying to
tell us Really, truly, what ishe trying to tell us?
Do you think he's trying totell us that Fauci's full of
crap, that Fauci shouldn't betrusted?
Really, truly, people, thepresident of the United States

(14:55):
is tweeting out a poll with hugefavor to him against his
director of infectious disease,okay, who has been basically
spearheading the coronavirushoax.
Oh man, this is good.
This is rich.
This is one for the ages.
I love that.
I love it.

(15:15):
So, anything that you're beingasked to do by a medical
professional that's quoting DrFauci, just remind them that Dr
Fauci does not have DonaldTrump's back.
Donald Trump does not have DrFauci's back.
I just, I can't.
It just makes me laugh so much.
Another thing I mentioned ityesterday, but the USMCA is now
live.
That's a really big deal.
That's going to havewide-ranging economic impacts.

(15:37):
I am actually really excited tosee.
You know, donald Trump saidthird and fourth quarter we're
going to be good this year,probably because you know you've
got the USMCA going and you'vegot, overall, most of the
countries opening up.
Now, as far as masks go, Icannot believe like Idaho is
mandating masks starting on the4th of July.
Folks, there's a meme floatingaround and I believe it's so

(15:58):
true.
If you're being told that youcan't celebrate the 4th of July
or you have to wear a mask,you've completely missed the
point of Independence Day.
You've completely missed thepoint.

(16:19):
Republicans, who have soldtheir souls are asking you to
wear masks, to limit your publicgatherings, to limit your
parties, to cancel parades andpublic activities.
On July 4th Keep in mind thepresident is holding a rally at
Mount Rushmore, so thepresident's not bothered by a
crowd.
Why are we?

(16:43):
We've got to ask ourselvesthese questions.
We've got to ask who it is thatwe're entrusting to tell us
what to do and why we're doingit.
Here's what my great fear is InWashington State, jay Inslee has
just changed the mandate formasks.
At first it was just okay, yougot to wear masks.
It's a misdemeanor, a littlefine, but we're not going to
force it.
We're not going to force it,but we want people to peer
pressure each other.
I know he really meant it.
He wants to instigate peerpressure amongst his population.

(17:07):
That's unbelievably egregiousto me.
I mean, it's just egregious.
We tell people you know bullieswho use peer pressure.
We tell them not to do it, butyet here you are being a bully,
mr Jay Inslee.
Seriously, like by everydefinition of the word, you're
encouraging bullying and it'sgoing to get people hurt.
People are going to get hurtover these mask dictates Because

(17:28):
some people are so passionateabout quote unquote health, that
they completely forget the factthat give me liberty or give me
death.
There are people out there thatbelieve that, including myself.
If you're going to push me thatfar, eventually I'm going to
fight back with everything I got, and there's a lot of Americans
that are going to start feelingthe same way.

(17:49):
You're starting to see it.
You're starting to see thevideos pop up of anti-maskers
people who don't want to wearmasks, just losing it at stores
and things like that.
It's going to get worse beforeit gets better.
There has to be a tipping pointwhere the government, who's
telling people to have theserules, says it's not worth it,
and that only is going to happenwith the masses just taking off
the mask, literally.

(18:09):
So, anyways, what Jay Insleehas done is he has now mandated
that businesses enforce therules.
So he's using businesses andthreatening their business
licensing, threatening them withclosure in order to enforce
these mask rules.
So, essentially, you've got Ialways think of the parable of
the 10 virgins in the Bibleright.
You got the 10 virgins.
Some of them have their oil,some of them don't have their

(18:29):
oil, and then the bridegroomscomes late at night and those
that don't have enough oil tomake it through the night, have
to rush out to those that buyand sell, but those that buy and
sell are closed and so theycan't get enough and then they
show up late to the party.
I always think of that in thissituation.
Here we have a situation wherewe're essentially in waiting,
right, we're in waiting forsalvation, and I'm not saying
we're waiting for the secondcoming.
I'm saying we're just waitingfor November 4th.
We're waiting for the economyto pick up.

(18:52):
We're waiting for salvation.
We're at a point right now wherewe need people who are elected,
who have power and control thelevers of influence, and control
and influence of levers ofpower actually work in our
interest.
Control and influence of leversof power actually work in our
interest.
If that doesn't happen, what's?
You know?
We're stuck, we're sittingducks, we're peasants.

(19:12):
In my intro I have the phraseyou know.
You watch those videos with thekings and queens, except they
accidentally say kings and kings, I think.
But the kings and queens ridingaround and they've making all
these decisions about theirpeople.
Well, you know who we are.
We're the blacksmith that's inthe background just banging away
on the on the on the anvil dayafter day.
We're the farmer out in thefield just picking hay every day
, day after day.
That's us.
That's us.
We have to live under whateverregime sits in those seats of

(19:34):
power and has power, and we'regetting to a point where,
technologically, we'll never beable to retake the state.
I mean, they've got satellites,like if you go to the city of
Baltimore, they have a satellitethat has a camera focused on
the entire metropolitan ofBaltimore that takes one single
photograph at a megapixel.

(19:54):
That's like 40 billionmegapixels or some crazy, crazy
quality picture, and it takes apicture every second.
And what that allows them to dois track every single thing
that happens in a city.
You want to drive a car frompoint A to point B If you rob a
store, and then you go make yourgetaway and you're like, oh,
the helicopters aren't followingme, these aren't following me.
They have an eye in the sky, apermanent eye in the sky.

(20:15):
In Baltimore they couldeliminate all crime overnight.
Because they're such a policestate they choose not to do it.
They're running thoseexperiments, their control
experiments, and Baltimore wasone of the cities to do it.
So you think about that in termsof the Second Amendment.
The Second Amendment will saveyou from the mob.
The Second Amendment will saveyou from an assaulter.
The Second Amendment will notsave you from the state.
The Second Amendment won't saveyou from the state unless we

(20:38):
team up, band together, formcoalitions.
But then you got to rememberthe fact they're not letting you
gather in groups of more than10.
They're not letting you gatherin your civic organizations.
They're limiting all of that.
I know I'm kind of going on atangent, but we're going down a
slippery slope.
Donald Trump trust Donald Trump, don't trust Dr Fauci.
These medical people are justout of their minds.

(20:59):
Here's another little video.
We're going to jump onto thisvideo before I get back into
some of this Epstein stuff.
I don't want to spend.
The Epstein stuff is heavy.
It's so heavy because it well,as I'll talk about later it
makes me feel that maybe justiceis not quite being served, that
we're going to get a littlehalf measure of justice,

(21:20):
something to just placate themasses, and that really just
makes me sad.
I don't know what else to sayabout it.
So let me jump over here to thecoronavirus situation with the
rising numbers.
So we keep hearing thecoronavirus cases are going up
and more people are getting itand it's funny, you notice.

(21:40):
No one's talking about the factthat the death rate is
plummeting, right?
No one's dying from coronavirusanymore, they're just getting
it and that's a result of thetesting.
Now we've talked about the factthat the CDC admitted that they
made a mistake on the antibodytesting and the virus testing.
They were counting people twice.
Then we got another report thatthey confirmed that people who
have been tested multiple timesso let's say you do get
coronavirus and you're put inthe hospital.

(22:01):
Every single time theyadminister you a test it's
considered a new case.
So in some cases you're gettingtested every day.
Two, three days.
You're in the hospital for twoweeks.
You are now seven new cases.
So that was something that cameup.
And what's happening is, as thevirus spreads to rural hospitals
where they don't maybe have astight a control over the minds

(22:22):
of the doctors and the nurseswhat you nurses They'll have one
single case of coronavirus.
But then they realize that theyare reporting seven cases
because they're having to testthat person over and over again
and they're going hey, we don'thave seven new cases, we have
one person that still has it,and so you see how these numbers
start to multiply.
Then you've got the contacttracing.
Where they start doing acontact, they count the people

(22:43):
that potentially could becontact tracing.
So this is a little video thatwe're going to watch and there's
graphics that go with it, but Ithink she walks through it
pretty well.
So this is that they'rechanging the goal, they're
moving the goalposts, they'rechanging the rules on us.
Again, listen to how sheexplains this.

Speaker 3 (23:00):
New definitions for designating COVID-19 cases has
been distributed by theDepartment of State Health
Services in Texas.
In this document you'll seethat we have current case
definitions and, prior to thenew case status definition, a
person must have a positiveresult for COVID-19.
So therefore, this is sort ofthe person with COVID-19.
All these people are not markedas COVID-19.

Speaker 2 (23:22):
So the original definition you had to actually
have a test that came positivefor COVID-19 in order to be
confirmed.
So she's pointing out of thingstotal cases, one confirmed, and
then everybody in the contacttracing sphere wasn't counted as
a case.

Speaker 3 (23:34):
One confirmed case.
They do a new case definitionwhere they include people with
close contact or confirmprobable cases, and then you go
down to sort of how they aredefining probable cases.
It can be people that are inclose contact and have symptoms.
So basically there are now 15different options for a person
to be classified as a probablecase and the new probable case

(23:56):
definition basically has thisperson as well as all of these
other people.
So total cases 17.
One confirmed, 16 probable.
Are public health agenciesdeliberately manipulating data
to inflate cases and causehysteria?
It sure seems that way.

Speaker 2 (24:12):
So she was on the Department of Health for the
state of Texas's website goingthrough their flow chart on
explaining it, and because theychanged the definition, you went
from a situation where you hadto have a confirmed positive
case in order to report to.
They changed the definition ofa case to a probable case, which
means all the numbers thatyou're seeing are probable cases

(24:32):
.
And then they're probable caseswhere they add on the contact
tracing.
So every one case that doesn'teven have to be test confirmed
if you go to the doctor with thesniffles, they can then trigger
the contact tracing count andthey can count you as a probable
case even though you haven'thad a test.
And then they can count up to16 people in your sphere or

(24:53):
people in your household.
They can just start addingpeople to the list.
That is why you're seeing aquote-unquote spike and a surge
in all kinds of random placesacross the country.
It's because they're changingthe rules.
They're changing the way wecount these cases and the other
thing too is they're completelychanging the way we look at this
.
Remember we started out asflatten the curve.
We can't forget this, folks.

(25:14):
It was just a few months ago.
They were talking aboutflattening the curve.
We were worried aboutoverwhelming our hospital
systems and I was completely onboard with that, looking at what
I was seeing in Italy and Iranand Wuhan, china.
Yeah, I don't want that in mybackyard.
I don't want our hospitals tobe overrun.
But the moment we realized thatour hospitals didn't need to be
overrun, that we didn't needall those ventilators, that the

(25:35):
people mainly dying were inthese nursing homes and you
could isolate those nursinghomes, we should have just
opened this economy back up andgone for it.
It's really been hard to watchwhat's been happening.
I see a lot of people gettingfrustrated.
I see a lot of people wantingto take action, but, more than
anything, I see a lot of peoplegiving in and being complacent.

(25:56):
It breaks my heart when I seepeople in stores with a face
mask, especially people I knowand I'm close to that, I know
support the cause of freedom andliberty, because it's almost
like you're just giving them thepower you're giving in.
I don't know where your line is.
I don't know if you're going tostand beside me and and and be
there for me when, when Ichallenge the state right, when
I say no, I won't put that maskon, or when I say no, I won't do

(26:19):
this, or or no, I'm not goingto let my kids get a vaccine.
I don't know the people who areclose to me who, I think, love
liberty and freedom.
I don't know if they're goingto have my back because they
don't have their own back.
It's very concerning.
I mean, it's just something toconsider and think about.
Right, it's something toconsider and think about.
Okay, so enough on the COVIDfor now.

(26:41):
All right, let's jump into this,ghislaine Maxwell's case.
So let's go through a littlebit of a timeline here.
So Epstein was arrested in like2013.
He was arrested.
He got like 14 months ofsentencing.
It was a joke.
I think I don't really want tocover exactly what happened

(27:03):
there.
It was just kind of a joke.
He basically had a really easysentence, especially compared to
the sexual crimes he had done,the trafficking, all the things
that he was involved with.
All of his co-conspirators gotoff.
In that case.
There were a lot ofco-conspirators that were named.
No one else was charged.
No one else was charged.
Now I have to say I want to playthis.
There is going to be anarrative that's put out there

(27:26):
as Ghislaine Maxwell continuesto have pressure put on her and
as the Epstein case continues togo forward.
Obviously Epstein is deeplyinvolved with the Clintons and
I'm going to show you somethinghere in a second that's going to
make your mind kind of blow alittle bit.
But people are trying toconnect Trump with Epstein and
there is something to that.
Trump and Epstein are connected.

(27:46):
Let me explain how theseconnections go.
Trump's a baller.
Trump's a big player.
He's a big spender.
He's got nice properties, allthat kind of stuff.
So is Epstein.
Trump has made his money.
Epstein was pretty much givenhis money.
Epstein didn't really doanything to earn it.
I think that's pretty apparentin the Netflix documentary that
they put out there on him.
So at one point Donald Trumpwas pretty cash poor.

(28:09):
He was asset rich but cash poor, which is not unusual for real
estate tycoons.
I mean, really think about that.
They've got assets but theydon't always have a lot of cash
on hand because it takes a lotof capital to actually build and
make those assets.
And at one point the Mar-a-Lagoestate was either up for sale or
there was an adjoining propertyto Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.
I'm not super clear on thedetails, they don't matter, but

(28:30):
essentially Trump and Epsteingot into a real estate squabble.
So Epstein was trying to buythis parcel out from under
Donald Trump because DonaldTrump didn't have the cash to
buy it and Epstein was basicallyjust flaunting his cash, I
think it was.
He was trying to buy anadjoining property to Donald
Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate andDonald Trump ended up getting
the money to buy the land fromDeutsche Bank.

(28:52):
So when you hear about, youknow, oh, we want Deutsche Bank
records and things like that.
A lot of that has to do withtrying to figure out how Donald
Trump was able to get this landout from under Jeffrey Epstein
In this same time frame.
Jeffrey Epstein, who was amember of the Mar-a-Lago club or
was allowed in I don't know ifhe was an official member or
just allowed in, because healways let a billionaire through
the front door he assaulted a14-year-old daughter of one of

(29:16):
the staff members at the club.
Donald Trump found out aboutthis.
Donald Trump banned him forlife from Mar-a-Lago.
And also that is right then,where you hear Donald Trump and
there's that quote where DonaldTrump says, yeah, I know Jeffrey
Epstein, he's a lot like me, helikes the ladies, but I hear he
likes them a little youngerPeople don't understand that
statement.
Billionaires, don't call outother billionaires, they don't

(29:37):
do that.
Every billionaire's gotskeletons, things they've done
that they shouldn't have done.
You know the power corrupts,let's just put it that way so
you don't hear a lot ofbillionaires out there saying,
oh, so-and-so committed taxfraud or you know, throwing each
other's stuff out there,because usually you know one
finger points at them, threefingers point back at you kind
of situation.
So when Donald Trump said, oh,he likes him younger, that was

(29:59):
like a big deal that sentshockwaves in the community
Epstein was in, because that wasthe first time that somebody
had publicly stated that JeffreyEpstein was into young girls,
like literally into minors.
And you can't take thatstatement and say, oh, this is
Donald Trump endorsing it orlaughing about it.
That was Donald Trump being abelligerent asshole to Jeffrey

(30:20):
Epstein.
That's what that was.
That was not a nicety,something that was cutesy not at
all.
Now there's other videos ofDonald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
, kind of at some kind of partyget together.
It doesn't matter, the shoe hasto fit on both feet.
Just because you have a pictureof Jeffrey Epstein and some
famous person doesn'tnecessarily mean they are
entangled in anything nefarious.

(30:42):
Obviously, bad people walkamongst us.
You probably have associatedwith bad people too and had no
idea they were bad.
It doesn't make you bad, so wehave to be a little bit careful.
Just because someone flew onEpstein's plane doesn't mean
that they're bad.
Right, you've got to find someother supporting evidence.
The fact that they flew on hisplane fits nicely in the
narrative when you start findingother evidence, just but the

(31:04):
sheer fact that he flew on theirplane doesn't matter.
Another thing Donald Trump didfly on Jeffrey Epstein's plane.
Jeffrey Epstein owns two planes.
Jeffrey Epstein took a flightfrom Daytona beach back to New
York city with Jeffrey Epstein'sson, not with Jeffrey Epstein.
Now I explained to you beforeabout uh flights previously,
cause I had a friend who had apersonal jet and when they fly,
a lot of times they rent out theflies.

(31:25):
A lot of times these guys willhitch rides.
I mean, it's very expensive tofly a jet.
So even if you own a jet, likeDonald Trump, for whatever
reason, he was in Daytona Beachwithout his jet, so he caught a
ride back with a fellow jetsetter.
Not really a big deal, you know, it's not really a big deal,
but the shoe has to fit on bothfeet.
So remember that Just becausesomeone was on his flight
doesn't necessarily make itnefarious.

(31:46):
Now, if they've got noconnections, I think it's kind
of a big deal that John Robertsremember the names.
Who's that?
If you don't recognize it yet,you need to.
He's the Chief Justice of theSupreme Court.
It does bother me that JohnRoberts was on his Lolita
Express plane going down to hisisland.

(32:08):
Yeah, that makes me want to asksome questions.
So how do you ask the ChiefJustice those questions?
That's the question that wepeasants have to ask is how do
we ask him that question?
Feels like Bill Barr needs tostep up to the plate for that.
So here's another little video,and this was an attorney for
Virginia Goofrey, who basicallywas the one who got Epstein

(32:29):
indicted and put in jail thefirst time.
And this is what he said aboutDonald Trump specifically.
But also take a note, I've seenthe long form of this interview
no one else that he subpoenaedresponded.
No one else.
He had to go fight forstatements.
Donald Trump volunteers.
But hear it in his own wordsthis is the attorney for the

(32:50):
victim of Epstein, who waspursuing civil suits after this.

Speaker 4 (32:55):
Without it being totally authentic?

Speaker 5 (32:56):
Yeah, absolutely.
Now just one more question onthat document, and this goes to
the more salacious rumors, but Iwould like you to just whatever
you can say on it.
Obviously, our currentpresident has had relationships
with Epstein in the past, andthere are those Katie Johnson
and maybe other victims who haveaccused Trump of being involved
in things like this.
In my experience, Okay, katieJohnson.

Speaker 2 (33:16):
Katie Johnson, in 2016, said that Epstein and
Trump raped her when she was a13 or 14-year-old child, or
whatever it was, and she filed acivil suit to do this.
First of all, she wasn'toutside of the statute of
limitations.
She absolutely could have fileda criminal complaint.
She chose not to.
She hired an attorney who's aknown Trump hater, who then
filed this complaint.
Then the dates didn't line upwith certain things and they

(33:38):
actually ended up dropping thecomplaint.
It was a complaint.
It was purely for politicalpurposes.
It would never have been filedif Donald Trump wasn't running
for president.
It was purely something to tryto tie Donald Trump to Jeffrey
Epstein in court documents.
It really is a sad abuse ofjust the way the judicial system
works just getting it submittedinto court, so it's submitted,

(34:01):
and then turning around anddropping it because you have no
supporting evidence.
I mean, it's, it's really bad,but that's what happened.
So that's what he's referencing.

Speaker 5 (34:10):
Trump supporters will not listen to anything along
those lines.
Obviously, we're not a court oflaw here right now, but are
those claims of those?
Though?
That case was dropped.
It was dropped before it wentto court.
In your opinion as a lawyer andyour experience, is there
anything you can say as to thevalidity of those claims or
whether or not there will be anymore about that?

Speaker 4 (34:29):
Nothing at all.
The only thing that I can sayabout President Trump is that he
is the only person who, in 2009, when I served a lot of
subpoenas on a lot of people orat least gave notice to some
pretty connected people that Iwas going, that I wanted to talk
to them, he is the only personwho picked up the phone and said

(34:52):
let's just talk.
I'll give you as much time asyou want.
I'll tell you what you need toknow and was very helpful in the
information that he gave, andgave no indication whatsoever
that he was involved in anythinguntoward whatsoever, but had
good information that checkedout and that helped us, and that
we didn't have to take adeposition of him.

(35:12):
And that was in 2009?
That was in 2009.

Speaker 5 (35:15):
Do you know if there's any truth to James
Patterson's claims that Trumpkicked Epstein out of the
Mar-a-Lago?
I've definitely heard that.

Speaker 4 (35:21):
I definitely heard that.
I don't know that it was Trumphimself, as opposed to a manager
there Trump's club.
So, yeah, trump.
I've heard the rumor thatEpstein was kicked out of there
for allegedly trying to pick upsomebody's daughter or something
like that, but I think I didchase that down as far as I
could and never was able toconfirm it, but I heard I'm on

(35:43):
the same same boat with that.

Speaker 2 (35:46):
So that's Donald Trump and Epstein in a nutshell.
Right, there's going to bepictures of Donald Trump,
because you got to remember therich and powerful.
They go together, they takepictures.
The shoes got to fit on bothfeet.
You can't look at a Democratand say, oh, you went to a
fundraiser with so-and-so, no,no, no.
That by itself is not enough.
It's just part of the story.

(36:08):
So the fact that Trump knewEpstein, of course they both
lived in Florida and they'reboth billionaires.
Right, like you kind of knowthe ballers in your neighborhood
, you know, it's just the way itgoes.
So it's really no surprise thatTrump and Epstein knew each
other.
Now let me go through a coupleother things here.
Let me contrast that with, say,the Clintons.
So this is really interesting.

(36:29):
I love this little deal here.
So these are headlines justripped right out of the news
over a series of years, andthey're assembled by Mike Bravo.
So hat tip to Mike Bravo onTwitter.
I really like this thread, butthis is the thread and these are
again.
These are headlines, these are.
I'm going to read the networkor the news source and then I'm
going to read the headline Okay,newspunchcom.

(36:53):
And all of these headlines youwill find multiple reports on
the same story.
Because news happens, everybodybreaks it.
So these are just kind of asmattering of headlines, but
they're all accredited.
Journalists Like these are allyou know.
They make a living doingjournalism, so they're not going
to be.
They're not.
They're not a salacious pie inthe sky.
Tabloids Although tabloids goshman.
They seem to get a lot morecredible as time goes on.

(37:14):
Okay, newspunchcom BillClinton's pal arrested for child
sex trafficking.
One of Bill Clinton's friends, amega donor to Clinton
Foundation, keith Raniere, hasbeen arrested on child sex
trafficking charges.
Wow, okay.
So now we come over here and wego.
That really stinks, that'sreally not cool.
And we go down a little furtherand we go.
Oh, here's New York Post,another headline.

(37:37):
New York Post says Bill Clintonspent time on Jeffrey Epstein's
Orgy Island.
Netflix doc says it's like weknew he went down there for
years and years, but until thedocumentary it wasn't confirmed.
So the Netflix doc went down toorgy island.
A new witness claims BillClinton spent time with
pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein atthe financier's notorious orgy
island.
Okay, well, that's pretty crazy.

(37:59):
So he knows the Rainiers fromNext VM, the sex cult, and Good
Friend right, good Friend is inthe headline.
And then here you go, one ofBill Friend's, clint's and mega
donor Clinton Foundation.
Oh, sorry, that was the sameheadline.
That was the Keith Rainier one.
So that was New York Post.
Then we come down here CNBCthis is a good one.
Cnbc this is yesterday.

(38:19):
Jeffrey Epstein, friendGhislaine Maxwell, arrested on
child sex abuse, conspiracy andperjury charges.
Actually, she wasn't arrestedon child sex abuse and that's
something I'm going to talkabout later.
Actually, I'll just talk aboutit right now, just in case I
forget it, because sometimes Iget going and I forget a little
point that I need to make.
There's a specific incident ofsex abuse cited in her

(38:41):
indictment, but she's notcharged with any sex crimes, I
know right.
So they're putting a sex crimein the indictment but no charges
for sex crimes, which means shewill do a max of 10 years in
jail for the crimes that she'sbeen accused of.
Maybe they can pile on thecharges and run them all

(39:02):
concurrently or run them back toback, so she does spend the
rest of her life in jail, butthe reality is she's probably
not going to get more than 10years because there's no sex
crimes that she's being chargedwith.
They can add them later.
They can add them later.
She is in custody.
They can keep going as they dodiscovery and uncover evidence,
but that's going to be a problem, as I'm going to point out here
in just a minute.
So Jeffrey Epstein, tied toGhislaine Maxwell and Epstein.
Okay, here's another headlineripped right from the news here.

(39:23):
This is a govbanknoteswordpresscom, so this
is actually a Kosovo website.
This is out of Kosovo.
But check this out.
Kosovo indictment proves BillClinton's Serbian atrocity, so
this is actually a different one.
Bill Clinton's favorite freedomfighter just got indicted for
mass murder, torture, kidnappingand other crimes against
humanity.

(39:43):
This was Bill Clinton's buddyand this was the Kosovo
president, hashim Fassi.
He was arrested on war crimes.
Okay, well, that's good companyto keep, okay.
So then we come to one moreheadline that you'll recognize
this name.
This is from TimeMagazinecom,so Timecom is from time

(40:07):
magazinecom, so timecom.
Harvey Weinstein alleged uh uh.
Harvey Weinstein arrested forcharges of rape, sex abuse and
more disgraced, movie producerHarvey Weinstein was arrested in
New York Friday on uh chargesof rape.
Who's a known friend of theClintons man?
You know, you start my dad.
I think I told the story beforeone time when I was a kid I was
on a bus and we had a substituteteacher and I was.
I was a good kid.
I was a really good kid inelementary school.

(40:29):
I remember one time, like in mysecond or third grade class, I
had two different times where Ihad the same teachers for two
grades.
So sometimes I can't know if II don't know who was in the
class to remember what grade Iwas in.
Second, third and fourth andfifth I had the same teacher.
I had second, third, I had thesame teachers.
Fourth, fifth, I had the sameteachers, different schools.

(40:49):
But in third and fourth grade Iremember we were sitting around
and we were getting grades.
You don't get A Bs and Cs, youget, like you know, other
letters.
So an E was excellent and youget an E if you're excellent at
something.
And there was a.
One of the grades was likeclass behavior or something like
that.
She's like who in the class?
My teacher just asked who inthe class has the best behavior

(41:09):
and almost simultaneously thewhole class said Taylor, I was a
pretty kind little kid.
I wasn't mean to people.
I wasn't a bully ever.
I never, ever picked on anybody.
I moved so much.
I went to 16 schools by thetime I graduated high school.
So I couldn't be a bully.
If I was a bully I wasn't goingto have friends.
I had to be a nice guy.
I had to learn how to makefriends every single year, um,
you know, all the time on afrequent basis.

(41:29):
So I was just never.
I was never a bully.
I was nice to every singleperson I ever met until I became
an adult, and now I can kind ofgo off on people, but
especially people close to me.
So anyways, uh, that okay.
So I was in second or thirdgrade.
No, I was in fourth grade.
Dang it, man, wrong grade.
Anyways, I was in fourth grade.
But the point of the otherstory was I was a good kid, so I

(41:52):
was in my fourth grade class.
It was fourth grade, so I wasin my fourth grade class and I
got on.
So I was like 10, 11, somewherein that age range Got on a bus,
sitting on the back of the busand the kids at the very back of
the bus, like the the back tworows, were yelling, fighting,
playing whatever.
They were throwing stuff backand forth across the aisle and
it was making the substituteteacher on the bus driver driver

(42:14):
really annoyed and nervous.
So they started kind of gettingupset and they said you know,
they, they.
They told the guys in the backof the bus, everybody on the
back of the bus, you're going toget in trouble, so got off the
bus.
Everybody gets up, we walk outof the bus and she stops the
back.
I think I was on the bench bymyself, it wasn't a super full
bus, anyways, she stopseverybody in the back and me.

(42:35):
So I wasn't involved in any ofthe activity that was going on.
I was just kind of in my ownlittle world and she stopped me,
lined us up against the bus.
She berated us, told us we wereall going to get in trouble and
called our parents, called herparents.
My dad was super upset.
That I was, you know, giventhis teacher a hard time and I
think part of it was I startedtalking back once they started
accusing me of of being involvedor I was trying to deny it.

(42:58):
It doesn't matter.
The point is I got grounded fora whole month.
A whole month.
It was like, are you kidding me?
I got grounded for a wholemonth.
And uh, my dad said and it wasthe first time I heard it, I
heard it many, many times againthe rest of my life guilty by
association, taylor, you'reguilty by association.
Don't associate with peoplethat are doing things that you

(43:19):
don't want to get wrapped up in.
And that's what I think of whenI think of this Bill Clinton
situation.
You're guilty by association,you know.
Look at all these people.
These aren't little cases,these are big cases Human war
crimes.
You've got human traffickingand child sex abuse, all of them
.
I mean.
Look at the company that BillClinton has been keeping and

(43:41):
this is intimate company, thisis over and over again that he's
with these people.
It's really quite incredible.
Okay, so that's kind of the twoshoes, right, you've got to
look at both shoes.
Look at the difference betweenDonald Trump's interactions with
Bill Clinton, or with JeffreyEpstein and Ghislaine Maxwell,
and look at the Bill Clinton andhis involvement with not only

(44:02):
Epstein but Weinstein, keithRainier, and there's others too.
There's others that are still,that have been arrested, that
are not necessarily like the bigname American ringleaders.
So, okay, so that's, that'sgoing on Now.
Now let me point something elseout that's quite freaky.
Let me look at the time, thisrecent timeline of events that

(44:24):
have happened I've covered onthis podcast, jeff Berman,
jeffrey Berman, who was firedfrom the Southern District of
New York.
He was appointed by judges to bethe district attorney for the
Southern District of New York.
Now I've heard mixed reports,but I'm starting to think that
the reports land on the latter.
I've heard reports that hedidn't want to prosecute any

(44:44):
Epstein cases, he didn't want togo after the Clinton Foundation
.
He's been sitting on the Wienerlaptop, that he just did not
want to pursue these cases.
However, now we're gettingreport that seemed fairly
credible that Berman actuallywanted to throw the book at
these people, that he wanted topursue these cases but was being
stopped by the Department ofJustice in Washington DC.

(45:06):
Who was stopping him?
I don't know.
I don't know if it was as highas Barr or who it is, but
usually cases aren't going tomake it up to Barr until they're
ready to do charging and reallythese district attorneys have
all the power.
I mean he can bring the charges.
So the fact that he's beingstopped, somebody was stopping
him.
He was fired.
His deputy has moved up intohis position, so his deputy, who

(45:30):
was also probably sitting onthese cases or whatever, has
moved up.
Now this happened on Wednesday,so on July 1st.
This is a headline from BigLeague Politics and you can find
this similar headline on prettymuch all the news sources, but
it's not being very reportedbecause it's again.

(45:50):
There's no conspiracies, butthere's also no coincidences.
So nine days ago Berman getsfired.
Supposedly Berman wants tothrow the book at Ghislaine
Maxwell, the Clinton Foundation,everybody else.
Supposedly he's being told notto do that.
He gets fired.
Okay, he gets fired.
Now you've got this federaljudge.

(46:13):
So this was on Wednesday.
The headline Federal judgeorders Epstein victims' lawyers
to destroy court docs related toGhislaine Maxwell.
The judge is ordering thedocuments that are in the
possession of the attorneys inthe Southern District of New

(46:35):
York who brought charges againstJeffrey Epstein to destroy all
documents related to GhislaineMaxwell.
Federal judges ordered theattorneys of Jeffrey Epstein
victims of Virginia Goofery todestroy documents related to
Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epsteinconfidant who has been
frequently named as his formercollaborator in sex child
trafficking.
A senior US District Judge,loretta Preska.
Remember the name?
We're going to have to rememberthat name.
Now we're going to have to findout a little bit about who she

(46:58):
is, what she's all about.
Who appointed her?
Because she has made aninteresting decision here.
Who appointed her because shehas made an interesting decision
here.
This is kind of like JudgeSullivan, who now we know is a
totally corrupt criminal and itmakes total sense now why he's
completely ruining the Flynncase, right.
It makes sense when youunderstand how corrupt he is and
his connections.
Then you see why he's willingto go out on a limb and do

(47:19):
something that just doesn't makeany sense from a legal
perspective.
So here we go, judge LorettaPreska we're going to have to
start remembering her name,watching for her to pop up in
the news.
She made the determination inlawsuits Gufri and her attorneys
Cooper and Kirk have filedagainst Maxwell and former
Epstein attorney Alan Dershowitz.
Preska rejected Dershowitz'sattempt to change a protective

(47:40):
order to receive documents forhis defense in the defamation
case, while ordering Gufri'sattorneys to destroy documents
from a previously settled caseinvolving Maxwell.
So Dershowitz has been accusedof sex crimes.
Dershowitz was Alan Dershowitz.
He was on Trump's legal defenseteam during impeachment.
He's a real, true, deep liberal, but he does believe in the US

(48:04):
Constitution.
He's a huge civil rightsdefense attorney.
He's a professor at Harvard, sohe's kind of one of those guys
where the shoe does fit on bothfeet with him.
He does look at thingsrationally.
I do think that Dershowitz hasa good legal mind.
However, it doesn't mean thatAlan Dershowitz isn't going to
try to protect his own personalinterests, which is something
that we've seen on multipleoccasions.
Nonetheless, his own personalinterests which is something

(48:25):
that we've seen on multipleoccasions.
Nonetheless, alan Dershowitz didgo down to Epstein's Island
with his wife and Dershowitzclaims that nothing ever
happened.
He never saw anything, which isvery possible.
It's very possible thatDershowitz went down there and
it was kind of like a show, likelet me show you the island, let
me show you that nothing badhappens here.
It could be that I'm justputting a story out there.
I'm not saying it's true orthat I have evidence of it.
I'm just saying I can easilysee how Dershowitz as an

(48:46):
individual might not be guiltyof crimes.
I don't know if that'snecessarily the case, but it's
very possible.
So, anyways, he wants to getinformation from this case
because he thinks it will showthat he's innocent, that there
might be an email betweensomebody that says that
Dershowitz didn't participate orwe don't have blackmail on him,
whatever it could have beenanything.
So he wants the case.
So Prescott wrote in herdecision that discovery

(49:08):
materials designatedconfidential cannot be disclosed
or used outside the confines ofthe Maxwell action, that the
property designated discoverymaterials may only be disclosed
to specific groups orindividuals, including attorneys
actively working on the Maxwelllitigation.
Prescott believes that Gufrey'sattorneys do not meet that
standard, so what that means isthey're not going to allow

(49:29):
anyone access to this.
As a practical matter.
The court would be surprisedshocked, even if Cooper and Kirk
was not in some sense quoteusing the Maxwell discovery as
its representation of Ms Goofreyin her action against Mr
Dershowitz.
Prescott speculated, even if itwas not doing so.
Cooper and Kirk is not activelyworking on the Maxwell matter,
such as the disclosure ofdiscovery materials, so it would

(49:52):
be permissible under the plainterms of the protective order.
This is getting complicated,okay, not the first time the
courts have covered for Epsteinand his collaborators.
Maxwell is living in the lap ofluxury in Paris right now,
which she wasn't.
She was actually in the US,believe it or not.
She was supposedly spotted inParis, but somehow she made it
back to the US right now withoutso much as even being
questioned by authorities forher alleged role in a child rape

(50:15):
network.
So it goes through here andbasically it says they have to
destroy all the evidence.
So the evidence that wasalready collected on Jeffrey
Epstein is not going to be usedagainst Ghislaine Maxwell.
Hold on a second here.
All the raids on the townhouses, the island, the New Mexico

(50:38):
ranch, his Florida estates, hisparents, all of that is going to
be destroyed by order of ajudge.
Do you see how confusing thisis for me as a peasant?
I mean, we're talking aboutmajor sex crimes and a judge is
going to stand in the way oftrying to get to the bottom of
it by ordering things destroyedsomething that seems outrageous.

(51:02):
And so at the same time she'sdenying one motion while
proactively ordering documentsdestroyed.
What this sounds like to me isa coverup.
The reason they want thedocuments destroyed?
Why not just put them in afiling cabinet somewhere in some
office?
I mean, we've got warehousesfull of old evidence, just.
I mean you can go pull up coldcase files from the 1940s and

(51:22):
you still have baggies full ofevidence.
So we're destroying thisevidence.
This is so, so confusing, soconfusing why they're doing this
.
This happened on Wednesday at8.30 am.
The next day, thursday morning,they go arrest Ghislaine
Maxwell.
Now here's where it gets reallycomplicated with the Ghislaine

(51:43):
Maxwell case.
The Ghislaine Maxwell case isan old crime.
They say it's a precursor tothe Jeffrey Epstein saga.
They're charging her for crimesfrom 1994 to 1997.
These, which means thetestimony that they're using,
the sworn testimony that theyare using in this case the

(52:05):
Department of Justice has beenin possession of for almost 24
years.
So for 24 years they have saton this file, this evidence,
these victims.
For 24 years they've sat onthese files and now they're
charging her.
Jeffrey Epstein was alreadyconvicted once and she was named

(52:26):
as a co-conspirator.
Jeffrey Epstein was arrestedagain and she was named as a
co-conspirator.
But because of that judge'sactions, all of that stuff is
tied up in civil litigation nowbecause the victims want to get
compensation, and because ofthat the judge is saying none of
that evidence can now be usedin Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal
trial.

(52:48):
This is astonishing to me.
There's no conspiracies, butthere's also no coincidences.
How do we get to the point thata judge, the day before they
charge Ghislaine Maxwell, eightdays after, they fire Berman who
wants to go full bore on thiscase, right?
So now Berman wants to go fullbore, berman gets fired.
Eight days later a judge saysall the Epstein, evidence can't

(53:11):
be used.
And then the next day they goarrest Ghislaine Maxwell on
24-year-old charges, with no sexcrimes being named in the
indictment.
There's a sex act described inthe indictment which would count
as a sex crime, but they don'tcharge her for it, man.
So here's a couple things thatwe want to pay attention to.

(53:32):
Remember the names.
Remember the names.
Did you notice the pressconference that the acting
attorney, audrey Strauss, who'stook over for Berman, thanked,
thanked this?
This my, my eyes went wide.
I kind of knew that this personwas working on this case, but I
didn't know that it was goingto be this intimate.
Did you know?
Did you pay?

(53:52):
Did um?
U S attorney Audrey Straussthanked career prosecutor
prosecutor Maureen Comey.
Now, one of those names probablysounds familiar to you it's the
last name Comey.
Who's her dad?
Her dad is James Comey.
Ah, james Comey, the corruptFBI director who was part of the

(54:13):
coup plot against the presidentof the United States.
The Mr P Dossier himself is herdad, her dad's facing charges
of treason and she's prosecutingthe Gouffrey case, the Glink,
the Maxwell case.
Oh man guys, now again I got togive the benefit of the doubt.

(54:34):
I don't know her.
I don't know a lot of details.
Maybe she's a patriot, maybeshe doesn't like what her dad
did.
Maybe she's a patriot and she'sgot a chip on her shoulder and
she's going to extract justiceno matter the cost.
Maybe Probably not, though oh,how inconvenient.
So James Comey's entire familythere's a picture here marching
to protest Trump's election overHillary Clinton.

(54:56):
I there's a picture heremarching to protest Trump's
election over Hillary Clinton.
I can't believe that.
The FBI director went to amarch, a protest march over
Trump's election.
And guess who's in the picturewith him at the anti-Trump march
, the resistance march?
Maureen Comey.
So, if you recall, comeyclaimed to be a Republican, but
he was always a deep statesleeper as an agent protecting

(55:20):
sedition of Hillary Clinton.
I mean, it's so obvious.
He let her off the hook overand over again.
I'm looking at a picture hereof Maureen Comey.
She's in a little group Science, stand for Women, girl Power
the Future is Female.
Respect Existence or ExpectResistance, girl Power.
She's kind of part of the pinkhat brigade, if you know what
I'm talking about.

(55:40):
Okay, next, rod Rosenstein,who's also involved here,
covertly protected Bill andHillary Clinton.
Rosenstein was on Ken Starr'slegal team Recall.
Bill was not guilty and Hillarywalked on Whitewater too.
Our opinion, marine will protectthe Clintons again and will
attack Trump.
And here's I'm looking at apicture here of Ken Starr on the

(56:01):
right row.
Here's Rod Rosenstein.
I mean, this is a cabal.
And then you'll recall too,rosenstein wrote the memo that
led to the firing of Comey, andRosenstein also is the one who
forced Sessions to recusehimself so promptly, and then he
immediately appointed Muellerto the council to investigate
Trump for obstruction for firingComey.
Marine will continue the legacyof deception and protection.

(56:22):
That's what I think is going to.
I think that that's what'sgoing to happen here.
I think that Marine Comey isgoing to keep the charges light.
She's going to keep sex chargesout of it.
She's going to.
They're going to.
They're going to finagle thisthing in such a way that they're
going to get her in like 10years in a low max.
You know some kind of deal.
And that's even reinforced bythe fact that you've got this

(56:43):
statement here, which is fromthe attorneys, for this is from
Spencer Coven, the attorney fora number of Jeffrey Epstein's
alleged victims.
So this is one of the peoplewho's trying to come after.
The estate of Jeffrey Epsteinrepresents the victims.
This is really sad to me.
Okay, this, this case is notgoing to resolve based on what

(57:05):
they've gotten the indictmentand the people involved here.
I mean, we know Prince Andrew'sinvolved, I know Bill Clinton's
involved.
We've got a whole list ofcelebrities and people Some of
them have already gone down thatwere involved with Epstein.
Check this out.
Quote as we have consistentlysaid, we are hopeful that the US
Attorney's Office would holdall conspirators accountable for
their actions in the Epsteinconspiracy.
So they want allco-conspirators accountable.

(57:28):
With the arrest of GhislaineMaxwell, this welcome news will
hopefully be the first of manyco-conspirators I hope so too to
face the consequences for hishorrific crimes.
While the fund Epstein's VictimCompensation Fund was the first
page of the last chapter inthis sad and terrible saga, the
prosecution of Epstein'sco-conspirators, including Ms
Maxwell, will signal theconclusion of this final chapter

(57:50):
.
The arrest and successfulprosecution of Ms Maxwell and
other co-conspirators bringsthis sad story full circle to a
close.
We are proud of the FBI and thestate's attorney's office for
the voracious investigation, andthe victims are again hopeful
that the justice system willhold these people accountable.
We will now wait to see if thisholds true.
This is a misdirect, so firsthe's got the language in here

(58:12):
that this is going to bringthings to a close.
Guys, if you think that we'relike bringing things to a close
and there's not an indictmentthat has the last name Clinton
on it, we are not close toclosing up this case, we are
just closing up a couple ofloose ends.
That's really what it feelslike here.
To me it feels like, if we canget Ghislaine Maxwell is
featured in that Netflixdocumentary and that Netflix,

(58:33):
this entire case seems to justbe what's in the Netflix
documentary.
And what did I say to you justyesterday about the Netflix
documentary?
Like 50% of it's true.
The other 50% is whitewashed,ignoring blatant evidence and
ties.
It's not a great documentarythat documents things that
really were going on.
It really tries to just isolateJeffrey Epstein and not make it

(58:54):
a bigger thing.
Jeffrey Epstein was almostcertainly Mossad intelligence.
Almost certainly Mossadintelligence.
I read through his deposition.
When he was arrested the firsttime and they asked him over and
over again, I refused to answer, refused to answer, refused to
answer about his ties tointelligence.
Why would he refuse to answer?
He could have just said no.
He refused to answer becausethe Fifth Amendment would

(59:14):
implicate himself.
So I feel like this is one ofthose things where it's like
they're prepping us, they'reneuro-linguistically programming
us, to have this be theconclusion that somehow this
undercharging of GhislaineMaxwell will, quote wrap things
up.
And you know, I mean, there'sother things have been, you know

(59:36):
, you know, I mean there's otherother things have been, uh, you
know, wrapped up.
So I like it, but it's kind offrustrating.
Okay, so the the Southerndistrict of New York has had
that Weiner laptop since 2016.
None of that evidence is goinginto this case.
The guy who had the uh, the guywho had the laptop, weiner is
sitting in jail, but none of thecriminals that are featured in
the laptop Marine, call me isthe daughter of James Comey, is

(59:59):
the actual prosecutor workingthis case.
They're sitting on 24-year-oldevidence, 24-year-old statements
that they're including in theindictment, which means what
have you been doing for the last24 years?
Bringing this case full circle?
Are you kidding me?
We're not even scratching thesurface of this thing and she's
not charged for any sexualcrimes, and everything comes out

(01:00:24):
the day after the judge ordersthe destruction of all the
Epstein evidence.
There's no conspiracies here,but there's no coincidences.
We're being led down a pathwhere we're going to get half of
what we want.
We're going to get a little bitof justice, but not all of it.
When I talk about how you seeour institutions and how they're
failing, this is exactly whatI'm talking about.
The door's still open forjustice here and on tomorrow's
episode I want to go into a deepdive on all the things that

(01:00:45):
have happened.
I've got.
Do you know how many cartelsand human trafficking rings and
pedophile rings have been rolledup in the last two years?
Since Donald Trump took office?
There has been a concertedworldwide effort to roll up
these criminal networks and onone hand, I'm deeply disturbed
by this Epstein case.

(01:01:06):
I'm deeply disturbed byGhislaine Maxwell's arrest, her
indictment and kind ofeverything around it.
But on the other hand, tomorrowwhen I go through the podcast
but on the other hand, tomorrowwhen I go through the podcast,
you will see and it's veryappropriate for Independence Day
there are people fighting forour independence.
There are people fighting towrap up the criminal networks.

(01:01:28):
And just to tease for tomorrow,I'll probably play this video
tomorrow too.
But just to tease you fortomorrow, I want you to hear one
of the breaking news reportsthat also broke yesterday while
this Epstein case was going down.
I want you to hear this otherevent that happened over in
Europe and this is reallysignificant because it happens

(01:01:50):
on the same day that GufriMaxwell is arrested and listen
to the things they're talkingabout.
I'm going to get into it in alot more detail tomorrow on
independence day, but but justlisten to this.
Okay, so the B, the camerafootage on this, the B roll as
they call it, is a lot of.
This is a SWAT team breakinginto a house.

(01:02:11):
So you'll hear some of thisbackground noise as they roll
the B roll, but but anyways,they're breaking into houses.
You see them.
You know it's typical SWAT teamtype stuff breaking in hey,
hands down, that kind of stuff.

Speaker 7 (01:02:21):
So just just so you know, the background noise is
just mostly police officersarresting people thought they
were untouchable until thepolice hacked their ultra secret
phones used to organize the gunand drug deals.
This raid in Magala, merseyside, is one of 93 arrests so far in
the northwest, with firearms,grenades and hundreds of rounds

(01:02:42):
of ammunition seized and overthree and a half million pounds
in cash.
This was a joint operation bypolice, regional crime squads
and international teams, withFrench investigators shutting
down the phone server today.
So we are basically one armyfighting serious organized crime
and for the public.
You know the public out there,particularly in the northwest,

(01:03:05):
they need to know that we areworking together, you know, to
try and achieve to protect them.
The National Crime Agency hasdescribed this infiltration as
like having someone on theinside listening in to the Mr
Biggs.
Those were the flashy cars andflashy houses organizing
executions and turf wars, andthe police were seeing it all,

(01:03:27):
the Mr Biggs.

Speaker 2 (01:03:27):
So the Mr Biggs would be the Epsteins, the Clintons,
even low-level drug dealers likeEl Chapo, things like that.
Notice how I said low-leveldrug dealers like El Chapo.
That's right, el Chapo was justa district manager for the drug
trade.
The real drug traders aresitting in seats of power, like
the president of Venezuela andHonduras and things like that.
So anyways, but nonetheless,wow, that's pretty cool.

(01:03:50):
Okay, it keeps going.

Speaker 7 (01:03:53):
These £3,000 phones have been used for years in the
execution of Salford's Mr Big,paul Massey, and gangland fixer
John Kinsella from Liverpool.
They were programmed to wipeany incriminating material at
the touch of a button called theKill Pill.
Police say more than 200 murderplots have now been thwarted.

Speaker 6 (01:04:14):
There's a business empire and an illegal business
empire that deals in the miseryin our communities and the sheer
wealth that these people get.
These people sit behind gatedcommunities in nice houses while
the burglars, the robberiesthat take place.
They are corrosive to oursocieties.

Speaker 7 (01:04:37):
This man was arrested on suspicion of importing
firearms.
Police say this is just thestart and the now not-so-secret
messages will be used inevidence.
Elaine Wilcox, itv NewsLiverpool.

Speaker 2 (01:04:51):
If you knew the scale of what they were listening in
on.
If you knew the scale of whatthey were listening in on.
If you knew the scale of whatthey were listening in on which
I will get into tomorrow.
So I'm teasing hard fortomorrow's episode if you knew
the scale of what they werelistening on, you might get kind
of excited.
I'm going to dig into thatnetwork tomorrow.
That network has been listenedto since about 2014.

(01:05:11):
Canada Canada was the one whocracked the encryption and
they've been gathering evidencesince 2014.
But until the election ofDonald Trump they couldn't do
anything with it.
And tomorrow I'm going to godown through the timeline of
events the cartels, the criminalnetworks, the child trafficking
rings that have been taken downand almost nothing has been in

(01:05:35):
the news Almost nothing.
When I go through the cartelsand the networks that have been
taken down and almost nothinghas been in the news Almost
nothing.
When I go through the cartelsand the networks that have been
taken down and how they weretaken down, I hope that you have
a lot of excitement about whatthe future can hold for the
world, not just for America, butfor the world.
Could you imagine a world wherethe big criminal cartels are

(01:05:56):
all gone.
We're heading there.
We're heading there.
And, just as an example of this, remember when Trump got
elected?
Ms-13?
It's all over the country,right, all over the country.
When was the last time youheard about MS-13?
Yeah, they were one of thefirst ones wrapped up in this
with this surveillance network.
Okay, tomorrow I look forward toseeing you guys.
Please share the show.
I feel like these shows aregood.

(01:06:16):
I like them, I enjoy doing themand the more listeners, the
merrier.
I'd love to do live showssomeday.
I'd put together a really goodpeasants presentation and travel
and do these shows.
So if you think you've got avenue or you think you've got an
audience that might want tolisten to me, even if it's a
smaller audience, I'm definitelyinterested in coming out and
doing a presentation.
I'd like to do something likethat.
So reach out to me if you'reinterested in maybe helping

(01:06:40):
organize that or helping dosomething like that, and we can
go over some of the details.
You can find me on Twitter atPeasantsPod.
You can find me on Parler atPeasantsPod as well.
You can also find me onFacebook at the Peasants
Perspective, and you can emailme at peasantspod at gmailcom.
Thanks for joining me and Ilook forward to seeing you
tomorrow.

Speaker 1 (01:07:02):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would, please,please, good people.

(01:07:22):
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.

(01:07:43):
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the waves he think he is,what raves he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering

(01:08:05):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,

(01:08:26):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.

(01:08:48):
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
You saw it, didn't you?