If Self-Government Is Real, Why Do The Rich Decide?

Send us a text

A storm outside sets the mood for a bigger tempest: who actually makes the decisions that shape our lives? We start with wonder—a comet spitting colossal jets—then move straight into the machinery of influence, from a small set of global stakeholders to prosecutors who admit they’re venue shopping. The throughline is uncomfortable but clear: when laws are flexible for the powerful and rigid for everyone else, trust collapses and the system begins to look like theater.

We unpack January 6 without slogans, contrasting loud narratives with quiet cases where misdemeanors still meant raids, ruined finances, and reputations. From there we ask how operations—political, media, legal—become governance by other means. The conversation widens to Venezuela’s cartelized state, a record tanker seizure, and why starving illicit revenue can be more decisive than speeches. Along the way we examine coalition fractures at home—like MTG’s CodePink moment—and what “building bridges” means when those bridges carry disinformation or foreign influence.

Public health and agriculture bring rare bright spots. Mercury’s exit from vaccines and tighter guardrails on gain‑of‑function research signal a belated turn toward precaution and transparency. Support for regenerative farming offers an off‑ramp from brittle, chemical‑dependent inputs. At the local level, we confront how ranchers maintaining long‑standing stock ponds can suddenly be treated as violators, and why the real fight is over who interprets and enforces the rules. Economics aren’t abstract either: deportations and self‑departures ripple through housing and used‑goods markets, reminding us that policy has a people timeline.

If self‑government is to mean anything, enforcement must be principled, not convenient; funding must reinforce public well‑being, not pressure points; and we need to stop pretending outcomes are accidents. Listen, think it through with us, and decide where you stand. If this resonates, follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a review—what lever of power do you think matters most right now?

Support the show

https://1776live.us

www.PeasantsPerspective.com

www.LeftBehindandWithout.org

www.DollarsVoteLouder.com

buymeacoffee.com/peasant

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_03 (00:59):
What are those people?
What are those people?
Good morning, peasants.
Welcome to the best episode ofthe Peasants Perspective Ever.
So glad to have you here with ustoday.
Best ever.
Best ever.
Yeah, it's raining.
Washington's getting sweptclean.

(01:21):
We are uh what taking out thetrash with the rain?
Is that how you could say it?
Right on.
Actually, I really apologize toanybody whose house has been
devastated by the ShadowsphereRiver.
There's like some serious raingoing on right now.

SPEAKER_08 (01:33):
There is.
There is some serious rain,serious flooding.
There's a lot of people that areevacuating some certain areas
around here.

SPEAKER_03 (01:39):
Yeah, it's pretty wild.
Now, up in our neck of thewoods, it's just kind of
raining.
We're not really a flood area.
No.
We don't have rivers and stufflike that.
We're not we're not prone tothat.
Our county, I should say.
Our county is like small man andcreek creeks.
Nothing gets to build up to be ariver here because we're a
peninsula.
We're surrounded by water.
So it's like half a mile thatdirection, half mile that
direction, you're gonna hit theocean.

(02:01):
Yeah.
So, anyways, pretty cool.
Well, this is a good episodetoday, and we're gonna try to
make it short.
So we're gonna roll through thisthing.
John Attackis, it's it's a greatmorning.
Yes, it is.
Glad you guys are here.
Okay, so something that we havetalked about, I haven't talked
about for a few weeks, though,is that comet that's flying
through our galaxy right now.
Apparently, it's doing somefunky stuff.

SPEAKER_24 (02:22):
We have no explanation of phenomena like
this.
Yeah, look at that.
So these are interesting.
Avi Loa, among other people,have taken some of these images
and they've drawn these vectors.

SPEAKER_15 (02:35):
Yeah, okay.

SPEAKER_24 (02:37):
So you have up to five here in this image, but
seven different apparent jetscoming off of three eye atlas
post-perihelia.
What's wild about these ismassive, massive, twenty-three
thousand kilometers long, someof these jets.

(02:58):
How is it that we have thesewhat appear to be somewhat
discrete jets coming off ofthree eye atlas?
It's not common to see tens ofthousands of kilometer jets
coming off of these things.

SPEAKER_03 (03:12):
So here's what I think that the conspiracy space
theorists have decided that thisis a foreign body that is
exploring our galaxy and it'signoring Earth.
Apparently, it's doing like aflyby of like Saturn, Mercury,
Venus, like all these otherplanets it's gonna get really
close observations of, but it'sgonna miss the Earth.
But it's doing all kinds ofweird stuff out there.

(03:34):
So, anyways, I'm just saying,you know, Elon Musk said there's
no evidence of aliens, butthere's always the three-eye
atlas.
Anyways, I just find it reallyfunny.
Apparently, it's not gonnadestroy Earth.
We were all concerned it wasgonna take like a hard right and
hit Earth.
Uh, one of the things thatTucker Carlson had to say on the
uh what's his name?
It's this comedian.

(03:54):
Uh Theo Vaughn.
Theo Vaughn's podcast was he wastalking about who really rules
the world.
Now, Tucker Carlson is theoriginator of one of the
catchphrases I use all the time.
We have to live here, right?
We have to live here.
Your policies affect us.
He's just pumping up, filling upthe gas tank this morning at
$4.07 a gallon for the cheapunleaded.
And I thought, gosh, I wish Ilived in Missouri.

SPEAKER_08 (04:15):
You should have done one of those uh reply to those
TikToks for the two dollar gas.

SPEAKER_03 (04:19):
Oh gosh.
I know.
Well, it just look at that andyou're like, my state just took,
you know, I filled up a smallvehicle.
I'm like, my state just took$35in taxes for you know, half of
my gas tank went to WashingtonState for what?
I don't know.
I have no idea.

SPEAKER_08 (04:33):
Giving the Eagles driver's licenses.
Oh, that's another great thing.
That$2 a gallon gas, that'sabout how much we pay in taxes.

SPEAKER_03 (04:40):
That is what we pay in taxes, man.
It's brutal.
It's brutal.
We're the I think we're thehighest gas tax state in the
world.

SPEAKER_08 (04:46):
We're always buying for it.
It's either us or California.

SPEAKER_03 (04:49):
Yeah.
So Tucker Carlson is theoriginator of the we have to
live here phrase.
And he g he gives this littleexplanation here about who rules
the world.
And listen, this is it.
I endorse this.
This is my working premise of onwhat's really going on.
I've said this many times.
You go back to season one,before I was ever involved in
J6, I was like, there's athousand people that run the

(05:09):
world.
They have differentaffiliations, different
nationalities, completelydifferent, but there's a
thousand people that reallycontrol influence and levers of
power, have the rightpoliticians, bot, et cetera, et
cetera.
And we don't really know whothose people are.
Yep.
You know, I mean, I assumeDonald Trump's in the category.
He clearly has some control ofsome things, right?
I assume there's probably acouple senators out there that

(05:30):
control huge swaths of influencecampaigns and whatever.
I'm sure there's some sheiks andwhatever, but it's not a
homogenous group.
It's just an elite group ofstakeholders.

SPEAKER_23 (05:38):
And I think at this point that if all the
information on all thesedifferent threads, whatever it
is, especially the murders, notjust the recent murders, but the
or attempted murders, but theum, you know, the more
historical ones.
If all the relevant informationcame out tomorrow, would we be
surprised?
No, we wouldn't.
We we we know what's upactually.

(05:59):
And there's enough evidence, butalso our instincts tell us just
by watching, like, what is this?
And I agree with you completely,it's not just about Israel, this
country, it's about whether ornot self-government actually
exists.
Like, do any of these countrieshave a system where the people
decide who their leaders are andwhat the country should do

(06:22):
collectively?
Or or it's more complex thanthat.
Yes, I think elections are tosome extent real and all that,
but in the end, the bigdecisions are made not by
nations or kings or presidentsor whatever we imagine they're
made by you know, the world'srichest people.

(06:43):
And I d no, I don't think that'san ethnic group.
It's not code language for theJews.
It's it's what it seems to be.
It's the people with the biggeststake in this who have the most
to gain and the most to lose,are never gonna leave the big
decisions to like three zipcodes in Pennsylvania.
Like, come on now, come on now.
Come on, son.

(07:03):
Like, you know that that's true.
And I'm not saying, by the way,I'm not claiming, you know, the
all elections are totally riggedor whatever, the source code
belongs to Maduro.
I'm not making any specificclaims like that because I don't
know if they're true or not.
But I know the big picture if wewe know that Kennedy was pushing
up against some forbiddenthings, and that's why he was
killed.
And who killed him?

(07:24):
Well, it's not it's too easy tosay it was this group or that
group or this group.
It was all those groups actingin concert, or parts of those
groups acting in concert.
Of course.
That's all of what this is,right?
Do you feel that?
I I I like what you said aboutuh if all the peace and I agree.

SPEAKER_08 (07:42):
I think at this point that if all the people
were there, I was just smilinghow they cut Theo off.

SPEAKER_03 (07:47):
I disagree.
Yeah, exactly.
But I agree with that.
It's it's the rich, it's theelite, and they're not
necessarily all allied with eachother.
Some of them probably have huge,you know, competition with each
other or whatever.

SPEAKER_08 (07:59):
I I got on a they could be pulling levers that
oppose each other at certaintimes, you know.

SPEAKER_03 (08:05):
I don't know what I was thinking yesterday, but I
got on a two-hour-long spacestalking about J6 and talking
about, you know, some allegedsettlement, some alleged
settlement, or we're workingwith attorneys to get the
settlement, right?
But they were basically sayingnobody should ever get paid
because it sets bad precedent.
Uh, this was a huge operation.
You guys have to acknowledgeyour role in the operation.
America was injured by this, notyou guys, you're not victims,

(08:27):
blah, blah, blah.
You know, just like a lot ofkind of like hate coming from
the conservative side.
But I've I've realized there'sthis swath of middle grounders,
right?
And maybe sometimes I kind offlirt with this line.
But you've got your people whoplay team play on teams far
right, far left, red, blue,Republican, Democrat.
And it's kind of like my teamcan do no harm, right?

(08:47):
And you don't really want topolice your own team very much.
You know, you only want topolice people who really hurt
the party.
But if their crime involvesgoing against the enemy, you
ignore it.
Does that make sense?
That seems to be like the teamplay.

SPEAKER_08 (09:00):
Sounds like you're no good cops argument.

SPEAKER_03 (09:02):
Yeah.
So there's people that are like,everybody at J6 was a hero
because they were standing upagainst a stolen election.
Those are the team play guys.
Okay.
It's like, well, hold on.
There's some individualaccountability.

SPEAKER_06 (09:11):
Okay.

SPEAKER_03 (09:11):
And then you've got the other, so those are the team
play that you find on both theleft and right.
And then in the middle, you findthis weird swath of people that
I call ideological purists.
Pam Bonnie needs to be fired.
Well, who should we put in?
Some other person that I cancomplain about.
Some other person that won't begood enough for me.
Right.
Now, I'm telling you, I flirtwith this line all the time.

(09:32):
Maybe I am sitting in the middleof this camp, right?
Like, no one's ever good enough.
But the purity test, right?
Oh, you can't hire that attorneybecause 15 years ago he was
involved in some other thing.
And it's like, have you everconsidered that the reason I
hired him is because he wasinvolved with that and I felt
like the system was weaponizedagainst him and he understood
what we were up against betterthan others?
You know what I mean?
Like, like, and but this thepremise of a few of these

(09:54):
arguers on this spaces was thiswas an operation.
Duh.
We all agree.

SPEAKER_06 (10:00):
Okay.

SPEAKER_03 (10:00):
But then it was honing in on individual J6
defendants as in their part ofthe operation, right?
People like me comparing me toRay Epps, and somehow I'm like,
no, I reacted independently.
That's why my show's only got 12people on it right now.
Otherwise, I'd have thousands ofpeople because I'd have a team
behind me to promote my show,right?
And they were like, well, lookat all these influencers who got

(10:21):
caught up in this.
And look, you know, they're partof some paid operation.
I'm like, yeah?
Listen, there's nothing wrongwith an op.
That's what political partiesdo.
They create narratives, theycreate ops.
There's good ops.
If I'm running an influenceoperation, I might happen to go
and put my name on a protestpermit because I want to
influence Congress.
Does that make sense?

SPEAKER_19 (10:40):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (10:40):
So I'm like, you've got a lot of operations
happening.
Every single person who pulled apermit, every group who pulled a
permit, they all had their ownreasons and motivation, most of
which did not includeoverthrowing the United States
on January 6th, right?
It appears to me the group thatwas most trying to overthrow the
government was embedded in thegovernment itself and sending

(11:02):
feelers out into a few of theselittle groups to, you know, turn
things or create differentnarratives.
And so I just found it reallyinteresting because I'm like,
you guys, you know, yeah, wewant to get to the truth, but at
the same time, I was personallyinjured, right?
I could go make my claim andsay, hey, the system was
weaponized against me, etcetera, et cetera.
And and it was just baffling tome who these guys are like, now,

(11:24):
you know, and they keptmentioning the same four or five
prominent J6ers who are stillout there kind of causing a lot
of noise.
And I'm like, but there's 1,580of us, and you're ignoring, you
know, all of them.
And even if you carve out thepeople that were Antifa
affiliated that got wrapped upin J6, you're talking about like
a hundred-ish, 140, somethingless than that.
I'm like, you're still talkingabout a big mass of people.

(11:46):
We're talking four or five,seven forty-sevens of people,
you know what I mean, that werehad that system weaponized
against them.
I'm like, you guys use someprominent example of someone who
went overboard on January 6th,but what about my buddy Scott
out in Puallop that gotmisdemeanor charges and had his
house raided, and his daughterhad to address and undress in
front of agents and you know,misdemeanors, yeah,

(12:08):
misdemeanors.
What about the guys who sat injail for misdemeanor charges?
You know what I mean?
Part of an op.
They're getting we can't, wecan't pay people that are part
of an op.
Hold on.
You're blurring all this linehere, right?
The J6 thing, obviously, withthe pipe bomb arrest, still
hasn't gone away.
They just postponed his nextappearance in court.
The prosecution and the defenseagreed to postpone it.

(12:29):
I'm hoping this is a door wherethey're like, hey, we got the
wrong guy.
Yeah.
Hoping that that's like thelet's pump the brakes before we
get too far down the roadsituation.
Let's expose something.
But I have my doubts.
They're probably just, you know,working out an early plea deal
or something like that.
Ray Epps did the same thing.
He got arrested, one misdemeanorcharge.
30 days later, you know, twomonths later, extremely fast in

(12:51):
the federal system.
He's taking his plea deal infront of Judge Bosberg, getting
no jail time.
One year unsupervised release,because your wife's already been
ruined enough.

SPEAKER_19 (12:58):
He was the initial breach.

SPEAKER_03 (13:00):
He put the sign up with the people, right?
Meanwhile, Kamala Jayapal here,our, you know, Washington state
representative.
Oh boy.
He wrote to the downtrodden anduh savior of the immigrant.
Donald Trump incited thedeadliest attack in our Capitol
since World War, since the Warof 1812.
There must be accountability.
My lawsuit against Trump is ourlast chance in the courts to

(13:21):
make sure that Trump faces theconsequences of his actions.
We won't stop fighting.
This is it, the last chance tohold Trump accountable for J6.
Several lawmakers.
Really?
Is this the last chance?
No one forgets the most shamefulday in U.S.
history and they're playing thelong game.
Makes me a little nervous, bythe way, whether they're playing
the long game, because I'm gonnabe here for a while.

SPEAKER_08 (13:43):
Yeah, me too.

SPEAKER_03 (13:44):
But they kind of shot themselves in the foot.
Earlier this year, they passed abill.
It wasn't this year, it was uh alittle while ago.
They passed a bill that was,let's see, it's uh it's public
law 117-103.
And what it was supposed to dowas it was supposed to
memorialize, let's see,memorialize the injured officers

(14:04):
and other officers anddifferent, you know, government
officials that uh participatedin defense of the Capitol on
January 6th.
Well, this plaque has not beenposted yet, and that's a problem
for Harry Dunn, who's suing thehurry up and get this plaque
posted in the Capitol.
Well, the architect of theCapitol replied to this lawsuit
and said, Yeah, we got a list ofnames of all the agents and law

(14:26):
enforcement officers that areinvolved in J6 to make this this
plaque, and we haven't done ityet.
Do you know how many agents aregoing to be on this plaque?
Yeah.
3,648 names got submitted to thearchitect of the capital for
responders that need to behonored for January 6th.

SPEAKER_08 (14:47):
Is Ray Epps on the honored?

SPEAKER_03 (14:52):
This is wild.
This is wild, okay.
I don't know what their cutoffline is, I don't know what it
meant to be on this plaque, butyou're talking about 3,000.
Like these guys are supposed tobe honored for their defense of
the 3,000.

SPEAKER_08 (15:09):
I can't wait to honor them.
Huh?
I can't wait to honor them.
Let's let's get the list.

SPEAKER_03 (15:15):
No wonder they haven't made the plaque.
A, it'll be a big plaque.
B, it's gonna have a lot ofpeople on it that probably don't
watch recognition.
Holy smokes! Right now,government is in the business of
protecting government.
This is in Michigan.
This is a um, I can't rememberwhat this guy's name is, uh, but

(15:36):
he's testifying to the house,and he's talking, they have a
recording of a high-rankingattorney general employee caught
on take admitting toweaponization of government.
Here's the full clip.

SPEAKER_04 (15:46):
That's I read the text.
I'm gonna play a quick cliphere.
This clip uh involves uh umcriminal bureau chief Danielle
Hageman Clark.
You'll hear her speak.
It also involves a detectivesergeant from the Michigan State
Police, and this is a discussionthat's gonna be had after a
proffer has been proposed to anindividual, and the individual

(16:08):
leaves the room.
And the only individuals left inthe room are, as I mentioned, uh
Ms.
Hageman Clark, uh, a couple ofstate police, uh detective
sergeants, another staff memberfrom the attorney general's
office, uh, as well as twospecial agents that both work
for and directly to the attorneygeneral's office.

SPEAKER_03 (16:29):
Okay.
These are all cops.
Every single person left in thisroom has a gun, a badge, or
arrest and prosecution power.
Every single person in thisroom, when you're in their
presence, your rights areimperil.
Okay.
Every single person in this roomfalls under the umbrella of cop,
law enforcer.

(16:50):
Okay.
I often say there are no laws,there are only cops.
And it's because of shit likethis.
Okay.
This, every trooper in the room,every dep, every person in the
room should have turned on eachother and said, you're under
arrest for violation of civilrights.

SPEAKER_04 (17:12):
So this is them discussing what they're going to
do in regard to a case againstan individual prior to choosing
the venue.

SPEAKER_24 (17:33):
There might be stuff after we break it down, but I'm
good for right now.

SPEAKER_22 (17:39):
I like a money.
Yeah, I to me it seems like, anduh, you know, we can do whatever
however you guys want to dothis, but if we can prosecute
anybody in Oakland County versusRoss Common County, love you
guys step up there.
I'm not down with trying to pickno Russian common jury.

(18:03):
I really like Mary BB.
I think she's a great prosecutorup there, but I don't want to be
picking a jury of her peers upthere on this kind of crap.

SPEAKER_05 (18:11):
Did you hear those words?
Did you hear those words?

SPEAKER_04 (18:17):
I'm gonna I'm gonna reiterate a couple of the
sentences that were in here.
I'm not down with trying to pickno Rascommon jury.

SPEAKER_03 (18:29):
Now, our founding fathers felt like you shouldn't
have a choice as the prosecutorwhere to put a jury.
It's where the crime wascommitted.
They're venue shopping.
The prosecution is venueshopping.
Openly.
Oh yeah.

SPEAKER_04 (18:42):
Well, he'll explain it.
I think she's a great prosecutorup there.
But I don't want to be taking ajury of her peers up there on
this kind of crap.
It was crap.

SPEAKER_03 (18:53):
The charges they had were crap.

SPEAKER_04 (18:59):
That's the bureau the criminal bureau chief of the
attorney general's office.

SPEAKER_03 (19:22):
Violating the very preferences of our constitution.

SPEAKER_04 (19:29):
Item D.
Engaging in conduct that isprejudicial to the
administration of the justice.
We just heard the number onecriminal attorney from the
attorney general's officearticulate the fact that they
knew that there would be a biasagainst them if they tried a

(19:51):
case in Roscommon County.
You want to tell me there's nota weaponization going on in the
Attorney General?
Any attorney sitting on thispanel, for that matter, in our
legislature, should be filing agrievance on this.

(20:11):
It's a complete and utterviolation.

SPEAKER_03 (20:14):
Filing a grievance with the people who caused the
grievance.
This was the problem we had inprison.
Oh, I'm gonna file a grievanceon you.
You want to be popular?
I get punished while youinvestigate.

SPEAKER_08 (20:28):
You're gonna be popular really fast.

SPEAKER_03 (20:30):
That's all the there are no laws, they're only cops
now.
You know, at least it's beingexposed.
That's the beauty of America,right?
But that's what we're up againstas peasants, as people, right?
You you cross power, and it'slike you can have a law that
says, Thou shalt not weaponizegovernment, and they're like,
Great.

SPEAKER_08 (20:49):
Well, and we heard them point it out, but we
haven't heard what are theygonna do about it?

SPEAKER_03 (20:54):
Yeah, what are you gonna do about it?

SPEAKER_08 (20:56):
I don't know.

SPEAKER_03 (20:57):
The solution here is impeachment, but how do you
impeach someone when you havelegislatures that are very
bought off?

SPEAKER_08 (21:08):
Again, that's why you get a bunch of inaction, I
guess.

SPEAKER_03 (21:11):
Totally, it's wild.
MTG did something yesterday thatreally was bad.
Really bad.

SPEAKER_08 (21:21):
What'd she do?

SPEAKER_03 (21:21):
Aside from her media darling tour and going out and
being like, you know, I was sohyperbolic and rhetoric, and I
use such strong language, andnow I've learned to reach out
across the aisle.
Yesterday she did somethingabsolutely stupid.
Before we talk about that,though, we're gonna listen to
Matt Schlap, who's who uh runsCPAC, and he's explaining

(21:42):
exactly why MTG is on the outsand why you just can't do what
she did.
Think about it.
Just look at it on its face.

SPEAKER_00 (21:49):
And we'll start with you and you get your pick.
Which do you want to talk about?
Henry Quayer or do you want totalk about Marjorie Taylor
Green?

SPEAKER_11 (21:56):
I want to grab both, but I'll start with Marjorie
Taylor Green since that's myside.
But um, look, nobody kissed apresident's posterior like
Marjorie Taylor Green did inGeorgia to become his friend and
to get accepted by Trump and tospeak at his rallies.
And, you know, when it was allgood for her, she thought he was
great.
And uh, and then she made thisfalse comparison.

(22:20):
Uh, as somehow, uh, if you standwith Trump, you're not for young
girls being prevented from beingraped.

SPEAKER_00 (22:27):
And I think or is she for transparency saying that
let's get the record downEpstein?

SPEAKER_11 (22:33):
Is it that's a different statement, right?
Between the idea about how muchtransparency you have in
government and somehow DonaldTrump is okay with little girls
being raped.
Did she say that, or did she saythe record should be released?
She said on standing up for14-year-old girls, and that got
me in trouble with thepresident.
And I really think that is wherethere is a big problem here,
which is you can disagree withsomeone politically.

(22:54):
And if she's going to disagreewith Donald Trump, don't accuse
him of being someone that's forthe rape of young girls.
That's outrageous.
That's the trope that the leftalways said about Donald Trump,
right?
They had all these falseallegations they're always
pushing on him.
And this is the problem with allthis, which is she makes it
sound like she's a victim.
She makes it sound like she'sgetting death threats because
she took on Donald Trump when alot of us has have faced that

(23:17):
because we stood with DonaldTrump.
And when did it get be sopoisonous to be with Donald
Trump?
You might disagree with him onthe Epstein files, but nobody
should then, if you like theman, should then say somehow
that he's aiding and abetting uhyoung girls being raped.
I have five kids, I'm offendedby her doing that.

SPEAKER_03 (23:35):
And that, I believe, is where her influencer
personality got the better ofher.
I can get a lot of clicks, I canget a lot of attention, but it's
coming from the wrong people.
Oops, which then goes to showyesterday this is the truly
abhorrent thing she did.
Look at this picture here.
So this is code pink.
Okay, code pink.

SPEAKER_08 (23:55):
Wonderful.

SPEAKER_03 (23:56):
I love Palestinian liberation.

SPEAKER_08 (23:58):
Oh my god.

SPEAKER_03 (23:58):
Now, this gets pretty scary.
So this is what she posted.
I'm America first and fullyagainst funding foreign wars and
support peace, because that'sgood for everyone, especially
the most innocent people andchildren.
Well boy.
I have enjoyed a friendship withmedia, uh Medea for a few years
now, even though politics saysthat's not allowed.
For a few years now?
This is Code Pink funded byNeville and Soros.

(24:21):
Okay, for a few years you'vebeen friends.
I've learned to find bridgeswith others, and that's how we
all win and ultimately leads topeace.
So self-admitted, self-admittedsnake in the grass.
So you went from, you went fromyou're they're with us or
against us.
We're either gonna drain theswamp or not, to we need to
build bridges across the swamp.

(24:42):
Please don't drain it.
I have my entire retirement planinvested in the weeds.
You know what I mean?
In the lilies.
Well, let's find out exactly whoshe is.
We go to Data Republican, smallR.
Thread, the history of MedeaBenjamin, the co-founder of Code
Pink.
Jody Evans gets the most of theattention as the co-founder of

(25:04):
Code Pink, and Neville Singman'swife, Neville Singman, who's he?
He's the uh American billionairethat lives in um Shanghai, who
made all of his money basicallyspreading CCP propaganda.
Totally a CCP person, right?
He and his wife.
While creating the linked threadbelow, I dived into Medea uh Ben
uh Bijaman uh briefly, who hadan interesting history of

(25:27):
speaking to Chinese media.
She co-founded Global Exchangewith her husband, Kevin Don
Hair, which goes on a number ofreality trips to various closed
countries like Cuba, Venezuela,among others.
You followed me long enough, youknow that's a big red flag.
So then she goes on.
She received a notice from CodePink where they're like, hey,
just FYI.
We are writing to formallyaddress the uh and correct

(25:48):
faults and defamatory statementsmade by your social media claims
regarding Code Pink.
These claims, which falselyallege the organization is
funded by China, the ChineseCommunist Party, CCP, or any
foreign government at all, areentirely baseless, faults, and
libel.
So then she goes through toexplain Code Pink, 25%, funded
by Neville Singman, who isliving in Shanghai and got rich
off spreading CCP propaganda,and is under investigation by

(26:09):
Congress for FARA violations.
AKA, he's funneling money.
He's a foreign representative.
Code Pink is running a campaigncalled China Is Not Our Enemy,
which promotes pro-Chinamessaging, including denial of
the weaken genocide and atrocityaffirmed by the U.S.
Department of State.
Founder of Code Pink's JodyEvans is married to the
aforementioned Neville Singham.

SPEAKER_08 (26:29):
Anyways, it goes through and she just for the
no-spin option.

SPEAKER_03 (26:34):
This is a non-starter for a Republican.
Yeah.
It's a non-starter.
It's it's like well, that's it.
What's the problem with MargieShirley Green?
That right there.
She built bridges over theswamp.
Instead of draining it, she justmade pedestrian traffic easy.
You know what I mean?
Like, like she didn't doanything.
That's how she got rich.
She built these bridges.

(26:55):
You know, she planted her hergarden in the swamp.
And why would you go on and say,well, Trump's defending, you
know, rapists?
It's like, yeah, because youdon't want to drain the swamp.
You know, you did thecounter-narrative thing.
Anyways, now, you know, it's notlike here in Washington we're
foreign to um Republicans kindof being idiots.

(27:16):
Uh, a bill titled An Act Relatedto Foreign National
Participation in WashingtonState Elections has been
pre-filed by DemocratRepresentative Joe Fitzabant.
Now, I'm not even surprised,right?
Of course, you know, theDemocrats, they just want
foreign money.
Absolutely, yes.
If we can't get local donations,let's get foreign donations.
Act Blue's been doing it foryears, but it was co-sponsored
by Republican RepresentativeChris Corey.

(27:39):
That would allow foreignnationals to fund political
campaigns.
Why?
Why?
Why do we have a Republicanco-sponsoring this?
It's a non-starter.
It's it's it can't happen,right?
No more bridges.
No more bridges, okay?
Drain the swamp once and forall.
Good gravy.
Again, there are no laws.

(27:59):
There seem to only be cops here.
There's only that thousandpeople really running the world.
The rest of it feels like aTruman show illusion.
For example, here's this guy,uh, Charles Johnson.
Charles Johnson is underindictment for, or excuse me,
Charles Johnson.
So who's Charles Johnson?
Charles Johnson is a far right,you know, far right wing blogger
and former Clearview AIco-founder, often referred to as

(28:20):
Charles Johnson.
He's currently in jail inJohnson County, Texas.
And right now, he he had a civilracketeering case.
Okay.
So he had a civil racketeeringcase for whatever his companies
were doing, and he was foundliable for up to$71 million in
one ruling.
Okay.
So some huge civil libel case.
Now, I hate these things, right?
Because it's so hard for us aspeasants to really know what's

(28:42):
going on.
Because we've watched a train ofpeople get chewed up in civil
litigation that's nonsense.
Alex Jones, Donald Trump.
Uh, you can go on and on and on.
This civil litigation, right?
And I mean Ruby Freeman and RudyGiuliani, that whole thing,
like, so it I don't even knowwhat this means.

SPEAKER_08 (29:00):
Yeah, that's kind of why I go, all right.

SPEAKER_03 (29:02):
Okay, yeah, all right.
So, anyways, as a result ofthose charges, he didn't produce
some documentation, probablytrying to, you know, stand on
his rights or something likethat.
And so he's being held incriminal contempt in a court in
Texas.
However, in the court in Texas,where he's being, or the jail in
Texas, where he's been held 18days now, okay, without a

(29:23):
hearing or anything like that,is under indictment, uh, is is
uh in a prison where the sheriffis under indictment for witness
retaliation, sexual harassment,and aggravated perjury.
So the sheriff of King, uhSheriff, Johnson County Sheriff
Adam King was arrested by hisown deputies in August and
booked into his own jail asafter Texas Rangers' investigate

(29:45):
investigation accused him ofharassing multiple female
employees and threatening staffwho reported him.
Basically, he's just a creepslime ball inside the office,
okay, doing highly inappropriatethings with the women.
So he gets arrested, and nowhe's got some deal.
He can only come into the officelike three days a week, and he
can't contact like seven ofthese witnesses that he was
trying to influence after he wasarrested, the whole thing,
right?
But he is holding thiswhistleblower guy, because I

(30:07):
guess he's also whistleblowerwith the whole AI thing.
You know, they're trying tocontrol us with the control
grid, right?
So they're he's it calls intoquestion how you can put someone
under the supervision of someoneelse that clearly is in the
category of someone who wouldretaliate against someone that
you've gotten incarcerated.
And has someone who's been anincarcerated, you have stripped

(30:30):
them of all of their ability todefend themselves and to fight
back and to speak and to haveall of their rights.
Okay.
I don't know if this guy shouldbe in jail for contempt.
That's one thing.
But the judges or whoever doesthis, they've got to have a
brain, man.
You've got to have a brain.
Okay.
The appearance of conflict likethat is tricky.

(30:51):
Uh, one of the things, too, withweaponization of government,
Donald Trump, as you know,pardoned the representative from
Texas.
And a lot of people accused himof did you make a deal or
something like that?
That's not what happened at all.
In fact, Donald Trump is prettyupset that this guy's running
again and he's running as aDemocrat.
I think probably Donald Trumphoped he would have flipped
sides.
But here he is going back to thevery party that tried to put him

(31:15):
and his wife in prison and tookout money from the government to
offer him as a bribe, which herefused, and then they put the
money back, and then theycharged him with a conspiracy to
accept a bribe or somethingstupid like that, right?
But yet he went right back tothe body.

SPEAKER_11 (31:29):
If he had secured an agreement from Congressman
Quayar to not run again or torun as a republican, that would
have been the legal problem.
President Trump didn't leveragethe pardon.
He gave him the pardon becausehe thought he got screwed by a
woke prosecution team.
And that is Trump on these typesof questions.
He's a lot of heart, and hereally uh he really commiserates

(31:52):
with those people who arevictims of lawfare.
And he did it here, and he'sshocked that the congressman
doesn't say, why would I stand aparty that was trying to put me
in prison?

SPEAKER_03 (32:02):
That's the real question.
And these guys are horrible.
They'll put presidents ofnations in prison.
This is the Honduran presidentwho was convicted of, you know,
drug trafficking, all byhimself, by the way, purely
based off the testimony of twopreviously convicted drug
traffickers who got out ofprison after they provided
testimony.
So he's been recently pardoned.
He was on Matt Gates' showexplaining this weaponization

(32:24):
and why they targeted him.
Talked about this law fair, Mr.
President.
Which, by the way, the reasonthey came after the
representative was because hewas like, hey, no, you got to
close the border.
I'm in a border town.
Right?
He opposed he opposed the Bidenregime specifically on the topic
of immigration.
Not abortion, not transgender,not any of that stuff,
specifically immigration.
Because you know, it actuallydoes affect the people in his
constituency.

SPEAKER_09 (32:44):
Talked about this law fair, Mr.
President.
What role do you believe theBiden administration played in
pushing for your conviction?
And what do you believe theirmotives were?

SPEAKER_20 (32:55):
Well, it is a fact that when I started to work side
by side with President Trump,when we signed the third country
agreement with Honduras, butalso I went to talk to several
uh presidents in Central Americato do the same, it started right

(33:15):
there.
And you can follow the posts andthe expressions of people who
were in the in the in the Bidencampaign and uh attacking me uh
because of that.

SPEAKER_09 (33:29):
Uh so you believe that they were targeting you
because you took positions onmigration that would not have
allowed for uh open borders andpeople just moving through
Honduras and Nicaragua, ElSalvador, and Guatemala uh
unchecked.
You think it was a consequenceof your border policies?

SPEAKER_20 (33:50):
For sure, for sure.
It was like that.

SPEAKER_03 (33:55):
When I see this guy, I'm like huge drug trafficker.
If his brother got indicted fordrug trafficking and he was
asked by Gates in this sameinterview, he says, you know,
what about your brother?
He says, Listen, I told theauthorities, the feds, who came
down to Honduras, if mybrother's trafficking drugs,
I'll deliver him to you.
Right?
So do your investigation.
But they, you know, they got himfirst and they got the brother,

(34:16):
I don't know what order, itdoesn't even matter.
And now that he's out and he'slooked at his brother's case,
he's like, Yeah, I'm gonna fightfor his freedom too, because
they set him up.
This is and you know, we arewatching things come out like
this, and we're seeing behindthe curtain on the weaponization
of government.
This is an existential threat towe the people.

SPEAKER_08 (34:33):
Yes.

SPEAKER_03 (34:34):
It's an excess, you know, and you can't have a a
take on this when you becomeinformed that it's like, yeah, I
don't know whose side is who,but I know that if it's against
we the people, we've got toresist us.
We've got to resist, you know.
Now, this stuff going on asVenezuela.
Clearly, I'm in the camp thatVenezuela was involved in
rigging elections around theworld.
You know, they're they'rethey're you know, a cartel,

(34:56):
basically, you know, everythingthat we allege that they are.

SPEAKER_08 (35:00):
And but there's like they might be doing a bunch of
other stuff too, but that's thestuff that's most important to
us at this moment.

SPEAKER_03 (35:07):
Yes, which is odd because you know, we haven't
really thought of Venezuelaever.
You know, oh yeah, Trendiagua, abunch of gang members coming up
from Venezuela.
No, it's more than that.
That's an invasion force.
You know what I mean?
It's like you gotta see it forwhat it is.
Um, years and years and yearsand years ago, I remember saying
what was happening at the borderwas an invasion.
This was still under like theObama administration.
Some guy online is like, it'snot an invasion.
I'm like, No, it's an invasion.

(35:27):
And I promise you, now that I'vebeen to prison and met some of
these people, like I was inprison with Trend de Agua.
They lived in the dorm, like I'mstill trying to wrap my head
around.
And I had to wait in line withthem to take a shower.

SPEAKER_08 (35:36):
You know, I'm still trying to wrap my head around.
I can't believe that we're eventalking about Venezuela when it
comes to our election process atall.
It's like, why are we talkingabout machines that are in some
other country when they shouldbe in Pennsylvania or Ohio or
you know?

SPEAKER_03 (35:51):
And that's even conceding that we shouldn't
should have machines.
Right, exactly.
So Maria Machado, who was therecent Nobel Peace Prize winner
from Venezuela that got theNobel Peace Prize over Trump,
but then praised Trump.
I haven't heard a lot from her.
I didn't know too much about hersituation, but she's now the
second person that's beenelected in Venezuela that they
have said, no, Maduro woninstead, right?

(36:12):
So she was asked, because somebig things happened around
Venezuela yesterday.
We confiscated a huge oiltanker.
We'll talk about that in asecond.
And so she's being asked, areyou afraid of a U.S.
invasion?
Are you afraid of, you know,boots on the ground and what the
U.S.
is doing?
She fled Venezuela yesterday andmade it to Switzerland, by the
way.
So she's in Switzerland giving aseries of interviews.

(36:32):
And in the interest of time,we're gonna have to skip some of
the other stuff.
But this one was reallyinteresting.
This is the woman who just wonthe Nobel Peace Prize, is likely
going to be put in charge ofVenezuela or at least return
there so that she can uh do hermagic.
And I listened to her and I waslike, oh, oh, uh, I understand
why you won a Nobel Peace Prize.
Uh I get it.
She's a truth speaker.
That's all that's all she'sdoing.

(36:53):
She's grandma, just saying whatit is.
She was asked, what do you thinkabout the US invading Venezuela?

SPEAKER_17 (37:00):
Um yesterday uh the US seized uh a ship outside of
the coast of Venezuela.
Would you welcome a US militaryintervention uh in Venezuela?

SPEAKER_00 (37:13):
Look at that.
Some people talk about invasionin Venezuela, uh the threat of
an invasion in Venezuela, and Ianswered Venezuela was has been
already invaded.
We have the Russian agents, uh,we have the Iranian agents, we
have terrorist groups such asHezbollah, Hamas operating
freely in accordance with theregime.

(37:34):
We have the Colombian guerrilla,the drug cartels that have taken
over 60% of our populations, andnot only involving drug
trafficking, but in humantrafficking in networks of
prostitution.
Uh so this has turned Venezuelainto the criminal hub of the
Americas.
And what sustained the regime isa very powerful and funded,

(37:56):
strongly funded repressionsystem.
Where does that fund come from?
Well, from drug trafficking,from the black market of oil,
from arms trafficking for humantrafficking.
We need to cut those flows.
And once it happens andrepression uh is uh weakened,
it's over because that's theonly thing the regime has left

(38:19):
violence and terror.
So we ask the internationalcommunity to cut those sources
because uh the other regimesthat support Maduro and the
criminal structure are veryactive and had turned Venezuela
into the into the safe heavenfor their operations into the
rest of Latin America.

SPEAKER_03 (38:40):
That makes sense.
Wow, yeah.
We've already been invaded.
What are you talking about?
That's how I felt on that J6call last night.
I'm like, We're there.
We need to pick a side now.
It's a zero-sum game.

SPEAKER_04 (38:53):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (38:53):
Somebody has to win and somebody has to lose.
You're either gonna have to hateyour white skin in your old age,
or you can just be a white guy.
You can either embracetransgenderism and the
disintegration of the nuclearfamily, or you can take a stand
for it.
You can support free and fairelections and a Republican form
of government, or you cansupport democracy and mobocracy.

(39:15):
Right?
You can support the rights ofthe individual to stand against
the nation with parity and withequal justice under the law, or
communist.
You can just have cops and nolaws.
You know what I mean?
She's like, we're alreadyinvaded.
This harkens back to when inAurora, Colorado, two apartment
complexes were completely takenover by the Trendai Agua gang

(39:36):
and they were being run.
Cops could no respond, you know,that's theirs.
And Martha on the news is like,well, it's just two apartments.
Well, wouldn't you like to stopthe invasion when the first guy
crosses the border rather thanthe millionth guy?
You know, how many apartments istoo many?
Should we just give them Aurora?
Should we just, you know, do asiege on Aurora and let the

(39:57):
people who just have to livethere?
Suffer?
We're already invaded.
We already have the highestpercentage of foreign-born
population in the United States.
We already have the amount, 50million illegal immigrants with
the vast majority of them onpublic charge.

SPEAKER_08 (40:18):
It wasn't that long ago, and 50 million was our
entire population.

SPEAKER_03 (40:22):
Yeah, it was like turn of the century not that
long ago.
Okay.
It is stunning.
Right now, they took over thisboat, and here's what Trump had
to said about say about it.

SPEAKER_16 (40:45):
No, I haven't really thought too much about him.
He's been fairly hostile to theUnited States.
I haven't given a lot.

SPEAKER_03 (40:52):
Excuse me, this is about the president of Colombia.
He's next on the list.
Okay.

SPEAKER_16 (40:56):
He's uh he's gonna have himself some big problems
if he doesn't wise up.
Colombia is producing a lot ofdrugs, they have cocaine
factories that they makecocaine, as you know, and they
sell it right into the UnitedStates.
So he better wise up.
Or he'll be next.
He'll be next, too.
I hope he's listening.

(41:17):
He's gonna be next.

SPEAKER_03 (41:20):
What's interesting about that is Venezuela is
involved in the actual riggingof elections.
That's the thing.
Yep, that's the you can nolonger exist, you can't have
safe haven.
You try you overthrew mycountry.
Okay.
So that is the acute Venezuelathat has to stop.
And I think obviously you needto go scorched earth and our

(41:42):
local election systems and getrid of machines and all that
kind of stuff, because that cannever be put at risk again.
Colombia is a drug partner toVenezuela.
Does that make sense?
Yeah.
So they're next, but then youknow, we've ignored the drugs
forever.
Because at the end of the day,it is just cocaine, right?
So he's next, but Venezuela'sthe target mainly because of the

(42:04):
election.
So after yesterday, when theyseized that tanker, which here's
some footage of that big tankerbeing seized, I actually watched
this and I thought, you know,it's like a big deal to take
over one of these boats, man.
Like it's you can see the BlackHawk helicopters, guys are.
I got to do that one time in theROTC, go down the road.
Um, these guys are going in.
I thought, you know, when you'rewhen like building clearing is

(42:26):
one of the most challengingthings you can do.
Oh my goodness.
I saw a video of practice versusreal life for clearing
buildings.
And in practice, right, they'relike clear, they're doing like
room sweeps, clear, you know,they're not shooting, they're
clearing each room.
And then it said real life, andit's just guys putting their
guns around the corner.
Yeah.

(42:47):
Clear it's like buildingclearing looks like in real
life.

SPEAKER_08 (42:50):
I've I've seen one of those too where they go into
a building to clear it, and thengunfire erupts and they just
start blasting through all thewalls, and then they're like
clear.

SPEAKER_03 (42:59):
Yeah.
Anyways, going into a ship likethat, all the tight little
hallways and things.
There's a lot of little hidingspots that poke up on you.

SPEAKER_08 (43:08):
Yeah, those boats are huge.

SPEAKER_03 (43:10):
Yeah.
And they took one.
Apparently, this is one of thebiggest ones, one of these ghost
boats, and it was heading toIran.
I'm all in.
I'm all in.
I'm all in.

SPEAKER_08 (43:20):
I know you're gonna put the clip of uh what are they
gonna do with the boat, right?

SPEAKER_03 (43:23):
And then Trump's like, I was gonna, yeah.

SPEAKER_08 (43:26):
I hope they we just keep it.
And I was thinking, what whatwould they what would he say if
they say, uh, what are you gonnado with all the drug boats?
Well, I hope we just keep them.

SPEAKER_16 (43:37):
Sell the cocaine back in an interesting day from
the standpoint of news.
As you probably know, we've justuh seized a tanker on the coast
of Venezuela, large tanker, verylarge.
Largest one ever seized,actually.

(43:58):
And uh other things arehappening, so you'll be seeing
that later, and you'll betalking about that later with
some other people.

SPEAKER_03 (44:07):
I don't know how many tankers have been coming
and going, but my suspicion hasbeen since they've kind of
locked down the coast ofVenezuela, they've been holding
back.
They can't get drugs out, theycan't get stuff out, and you
know, to subject a country thesize of Venezuela, because you
know, tax revenue doesn't getyou very far, they have to sell
those dru drugs and things tocreate the funding.

(44:28):
So you know, I don't know howdry their coffers are getting.
My my my guess is they've gotbillions to burn, but that's a
huge hit.
Yeah, that's a huge hit, andit's significant.
That normally would be viewed asa total outright hostile act of
war.

SPEAKER_08 (44:42):
Yeah, the other the other thing I was thinking about
was no, do we not recognize themto be able to do it?
No, I know that they want to getthe oil to cut off the oil
supply and the funding and allthat, but what if it's not just
oil on that boat?

SPEAKER_03 (44:52):
Oh, certainly.
There's almost no chance there'snot other things on the boat as
well, right?
It is probably mainly oil, but Imean, even if you just say in
small quantities, you know whatI mean?
Yeah, there's a pound of coke onthe boat.
Well, there shouldn't be anycoke on the high seas.
Well, there's green plugs.

SPEAKER_08 (45:09):
You could probably hide a hundred tons of coke.

SPEAKER_03 (45:12):
I know, but I'm just saying, like, it's like, you
know, you know what I mean.

SPEAKER_08 (45:17):
Yeah, you know what I'm saying.

SPEAKER_03 (45:19):
Yeah, guaranteed they found drugs.
Quantity, you can debate.
Now, Marco Rubio reminds the uhpeople of the world that Maduro
isn't actually a legitimateregime.
So when you're like, oh, you'reattacking Venezuela, are we?

SPEAKER_01 (45:31):
Not only do we not recognize him, 50-something
countries around the world donot recognize Nicolas Maduro as
the rightful president.
He's not the president ofVenezuela.
That's a title he's givenhimself.
And that's not just us sayingit.
That was the, by the way, thatwas the policy of the Biden
administration.
And that was the policy of thefirst Trump administration, and
that's the policy of50-something countries,
including multiple countries inthe region, do not recognize him

(45:51):
as the president of thatcountry.
What he is, is someone who'sempowered himself of some of the
instruments of government andare using that to operate a drug
cartel from Venezuelanterritory.

SPEAKER_03 (46:01):
He empowered himself to use some of the instruments
of government.
He captured the instruments ofgovernment.
If you're ideologically capturedand you become, say, the um lead
criminal prosecutor in the stateof Michigan, what would it look
like to capture some of thetools of power?
Is that not what it looks like?

(46:21):
Is what the Biden regime didwith opening the borders with
Alejandro Majorcus not capturingthe tools of power and you know,
hitting the open button on thegarage door?
You know what I mean?
Like that's what that's what atakeover looks like.
This is what an invasion withouta shot fired looks like.
An influence campaign, whichthen leads to elections with who

(46:44):
knows what going on, right?
Which then leads to taking overthe tools of power and ignoring
the law as written.
That is what has happened.
I guarantee you, Venezuela hasall the laws on the books to
prevent all the horrible thingsthat are going on down there.
They're just not being enforced.
Because there aren't really anylaws.
There are only cops, the peoplewho enforce them.
A law is only as good as aperson who's willing to enforce

(47:05):
it.
Ask any parent who's raised aterrible two-year-old.
We have immigration laws too.
As a parent, you get to see inyour own home how life really
works.
Right?
When you see have a little childand you give them a boundary or
give them a rule, a threat, andyou don't follow through.
Did you really give them athreat or anything?
Or you just negotiated withthem?

(47:26):
You know what I'm saying?
That that's that's yeah.

SPEAKER_01 (47:28):
Much of that drug's aimed at reaching the United
States.
So we're not going to have acartel operating or just
masquerading as a governmentoperating in our own hemisphere.
He's indicted, he's a fugitiveof American justice.
There's a reward out for hiscapture.
And by the way, related to that,the president of the United
States made clear that he's notgoing to allow cartels, that
cartel or any other cartel, tooperate with impunity in our

(47:50):
hemisphere and send drugstowards the United States.
And he's going to use the U.S.
military and all the elements ofAmerican power to target cartels
who are targeting America.

SPEAKER_03 (48:00):
Because my gang is bigger than your gang.
That's the message.
Okay.
So let's let's listen to somepretty good news.
This is really interesting.
This is a foreclosure guy, oneof these guys that posts note
notices of for for notices offoreclosure.
And uh the last couple of years,and I used to be real big into
foreclosures, flipped like 250houses.

(48:20):
And the last, you know, whatstarted to happen, the reason I
got out of it was because theNew York REIT showed up at the
local auctions and they werelike paying full price for
stuff.
And it really pushed out a lotof investors here.
And but then what started tohappen was the housing market
got caught back up, right?
And we've had very lowinventory, very low levels of
foreclosure, because for themost part, if you put a for sale
sign in the yard, even if youbought your house last year, you

(48:41):
had enough equity to sell it,right?
So not a lot of people weregoing to foreclosure.
Most foreclosures happen withinlike the first five to six years
of someone buying a house.
So he's doing postingforeclosures.
Good news, Ron.

SPEAKER_12 (48:54):
This week I started doing foreclosures on
undocumented properties.
Properties that the people hadto leave in a hurry.
I just left one, pizza boxesopen, pizza was still there, all
the food was still in thepantry.
They grabbed whatever valuablesthey could left everything else
behind.

(49:14):
These are foreclosures, so theseare homes that were bought using
FHA.
Guaranteed by the government forundocumented people.
Last month, two over 252,000people were deported in Texas
alone.

(49:35):
So all of a sudden, we'restarting to see the effects now.
I did another one yesterday.
They come tagged as possibleundocumented immigrant.
Furniture's there, fish tank,dead fish.
They left in a hurry.
If you want to see that content,I put that content on my wife's

(49:58):
page or on my YouTube page.
My wife's page is Ants and Liz.
Or Ants underscore Liz or AntsInc.
on YouTube.
They all go there too.
I don't flood them on this page.
But it looks like that'sbecoming different.

SPEAKER_03 (50:14):
The used car market, the used furniture market, the
thrift stores are gonna blow up.
The used furniture market andthe foreclosure market, right?
Like that's a big 250,000immigrants in the state of uh
Texas have deported or beenself-deported.
Yeah, I predicted this,obviously.
You know, these people areliving somewhere, they're in a

(50:34):
house.
JD Vance keeps emphasizing thissame point.
If we get rid of them, thishouse will come on the market.
And yeah, you know, and if weget enough of them on the
market, prices will fly.
They could even go down.
Sorry, boomers.
Okay.

SPEAKER_08 (50:46):
I wonder how long it's a bigger.

SPEAKER_03 (50:47):
The price was artificially held high by the
Mexicans in the neighborhood.
Sorry.

SPEAKER_08 (50:50):
I wonder how long it's gonna take for that to iron
out into the in the market.

SPEAKER_03 (50:55):
Trump's entire presidency.

SPEAKER_08 (50:56):
Okay.

SPEAKER_03 (50:57):
Because it's gonna amp up 50 million, Ron.
50 million.
We're at two million.
50 million.
We're at two million.

SPEAKER_08 (51:04):
We got a little ways to go.

SPEAKER_03 (51:05):
We've got a ways to go.
We got a ways to go.
There's a lot of hope.
Another thing that happenedyesterday, or in the recent
days, was RFK announced, guesswhat?
No more mercury in vaccines.
No human being should sufferfrom exposure to mercury.
Feels obvious.
No human being should have tosuffer from exposure to mercury.
Feels obvious.
Feels like feels like thatshould be enough.

(51:26):
Okay.

SPEAKER_13 (51:31):
And I'm looking forward to continued progress.
Article 4 of the conventioncalls on parties to cut mercury
use by phasing out listedmercury-added products.
But in 2010, as the treaty tookshape, negotiators made a major
exception by marisol-containingvaccines were carved out of the

(51:52):
regulation.
The same treaty that began tophase out mercury in lamps and
cosmetics chose to leave it inproducts injected into babies,
pregnant women, and the mostvulnerable among us.
We have to ask why.
Why do we hold a double standardfor mercury?
Why do we call it dangerous inbatteries, in over-the-counter

(52:13):
medications and makeup, butacceptable in vaccines and
deaths?
Because we're idiots.
Hundreds of peer-reviewedstudies identify it as a potent
neurotoxin, a mutagen, acarcinogen, and an endocrine
disruptor.

(52:33):
But I just hear Democrats saythat all the science has been
done.
There is not a single study thatproves it safe.
That's why in July of this year,the United States closed the
final chapter on the use ofthimerosol as a vaccine
preservative, something thatshould have happened.

SPEAKER_03 (52:53):
So we can finally take mercury out of our
batteries and our cosmetics andour vaccines.
For all, you know, all thoseanti-vaxxers.
Why were you anti-vaxx?
Because I don't want to putmercury in my body.
It's not dangerous.
There's not been one spec, noteven one study broached the
topic.
You just assumed it was safe andokay.

(53:15):
The other thing RFK hadinvolvement in with yesterday
was this.
Guess what?
No more game of function.

SPEAKER_10 (53:23):
Gain of function research is a type of biomedical
research where pathogens areadulterated, viruses are
adulterated to make them morepotent or to change the way that
they function.
Many people believe that gain offunction research was one of the
key causes of the COVID pandemicthat struck us in the last

(53:43):
decade.
What this executive order does,first of all, it provides
powerful new tools to enforcethe ban on federal funding for
gain of function researchabroad.
It also strengthens otheroversight mechanisms related to
that issue and creates anoverarching strategy to ensure
that biomedical research ingeneral is being conducted

(54:06):
safely and in a way thatultimately protects human health
more.

SPEAKER_16 (54:11):
It's a big deal.
Could have been that we wouldn'thave had the problem we had.

SPEAKER_10 (54:14):
A lot of people say that, sir.

SPEAKER_03 (54:17):
A lot of people say that, sir.
You know, Obama banned gain offunction, and then Fauci and uh
Eco Health Alliance just took itover to China.
Right?
They made a little carve out forthemselves and took it over to
China.
So that's no more.
The other thing uh SecretaryKennedy was involved in was
this.

SPEAKER_13 (54:32):
This is the fulfillment of a promise that we
made in the Maha report.
The Maha report, which wereleased two and a half months
ago.

SPEAKER_03 (54:41):
That's 120.
Oh, this audio is horrible.
Okay, so this is what he said.
He said, This is the fulfillmentof a promise we made in the Maha
report to give them an off-ramp.
Who farmers?
Farmers who are dependent onchemical fertilizer inputs to
give them an off-ramp where theycan transition to a model that
emphasizes soil health.
Farmers have been prevented fromdoing regenerative agriculture

(55:03):
because they're locked intothese chemical, like they have
contracts and regulations thatyou must use these chemicals if
you want to sell in the store.

SPEAKER_08 (55:10):
Oh yeah.
And if they don't, they will getsued.

SPEAKER_03 (55:14):
And this has been a huge cause of issues.
And so now it's over.
I feel like RFK behind thescenes has just been like
kicking butt and taking me.
Oh, yeah.
He's killing it.
I mean, I think he's I think hedeserves a reward for all of
what he's doing to help reallysave our future.

SPEAKER_21 (55:29):
RFK Jr.
has got to go.
What?
AI introduced articles ofimpeachment for the movie from
office.
RFK Jr.
has turned his back on science.

SPEAKER_03 (55:38):
Oh we, the scientists told us not to study
Mercury, Ron! Don't question it.

SPEAKER_21 (55:44):
Public help and the American people.
Under his watch, families areless safe.
Healthcare costs areskyrocketing.
Uh not his problem.
And life-saving research,including right here in
Michigan, is being gutted.
Oh, there's RFP Jr.

SPEAKER_03 (55:59):
Michigan sounds like a grey state to be in.

SPEAKER_21 (56:01):
The biggest self-created threat to our
health and safety.
I cannot and I will not stand bywhile one man dismantles decades
of medical progress.

SPEAKER_03 (56:13):
Just like Bill Gates said, we've been trying to kill
you with these vaccines.
If we can get enough vaccines,we can get the population down.
What I thought it was supposedto save lives.
What are you talking about?
Who is this and why are welistening?
A representative in Mich it arepres uh representative from
Michigan to DC.

SPEAKER_21 (56:29):
Enough is enough.
And that is why I'm pushing toimpeach RFK Jr.
to hold him accountable and toprotect the health and safety
and future of every Michigander.

SPEAKER_06 (56:40):
Okay.

SPEAKER_21 (56:41):
Because our health, our science, and our future are
worth fighting for.

SPEAKER_08 (56:46):
Better start working out.
You got to push a little harder.

SPEAKER_03 (56:50):
RFK's gotta go.
What do you mean, nofertilizers?
What do you mean, no mercury?
I just invested in a mercuryfactory.
Washington State is being istargeting a ranching family that
has been tending to their landand livestock for decades.
This comes from Secretary BrookeRollins.
So they've intervened inWashington State because there's
a family, the King family, whowho uh runs cattle on public

(57:12):
land.
Okay.
And one of the things withpeople who run cattle on public
land is they maintain wateringholes.

SPEAKER_08 (57:16):
Yep.

SPEAKER_03 (57:16):
Cattle watering holes are explicitly excluded
from wetland considerations andcritical waterways and stuff
like that.
And they're allowed to bemaintained on federal lands.

SPEAKER_08 (57:25):
Yeah, because they're needed and necessary for
life.

SPEAKER_03 (57:28):
Yes.
The state of Washington cameafter this family simply because
they were hand shoveling out apond on, you know, out in this
area that they've maintained fordecades as a family.
And Washington State broughtthem into lawsuits, gave them
$250,000 fines.
And so Brooke Rollins wrotethis.
It is common knowledge,especially in the West, the
access to water is preeminentlyimportant in raising cattle.

(57:48):
The creation and maintenance ofstock water ponds is one of the
primary ways to ranchers ensurethat livestock have access to
water.
For over 60 years, the KingRanch has had farm ponds on the
property they own and lease.
These man-made structureseventually start filling back up
with sediment and need to becleaned out.
However, the state is nowclaiming farm ponds are
wetlands.

SPEAKER_08 (58:08):
Nope.

SPEAKER_03 (58:09):
And is attempting to bring the hammer down on the
ranch simply for doing what theyhave always done, steward their
land and livestock.
Targeting a ranch, activelymaintaining a man-made farm pond
is the own is not only wrong,but impermissible under state
and federal law.
There are no laws, they're onlycops.
They brought the hammer down ina civil lawsuit against the own

(58:30):
our own state and laws andfederal laws.
It doesn't matter what laws youhave on the books if you don't
have people that will follow andabide by them that are in the
seats of power.
There are laws that say youcan't give a CDL to an illegal
immigrant, but Washington gaveover 700.
And other states gave tens ofthousands.
Okay.
In July, uh target uh impossibleman-made farm is not only wrong

(58:55):
but impermissible under stateand federal law, and the Trump
administration will not sit idlyby in the face of this
injustice.
Targeted law fair againstAmerican agriculture producers
and the weaponization ofgovernment agencies is a clear
assault on those who feed, fuel,and clothe the American people.
In July, the developmentdepartment sent a letter to
Kings clarifying that there wasno evidence of any activity that
would constitute a conversion ofa wetland pursuant to USDA

(59:15):
authorities.
We also are aware of athird-party review of the farm
ponds in question and determinedthey do not constitute wetland
pursuant to the Clean Water Act.
USDA is reviewing funding itprovides to the state of
Washington and any institutionswithin it that may be weaponized
against farmers and ranchers asthe Kings.
Defending farmers and ranchersfor the weaponization of laws is
a top priority.
From the weaponization of law isthe top priority for this

(59:35):
administration.
When it says law, it doesn'tmean the written law.
It means law enforcement agents.
The aforementioned governmentaloverreach threatens the
existence of the King Ranch inWashington and would be
dangerous precedent for ranchfamilies across the state.

SPEAKER_08 (59:47):
Absolutely.

SPEAKER_03 (59:49):
They have to cut the funding.
Just like you seize the oil boatin the middle of the Caribbean,
just like you stopped the drugboats, you have to stop the
funding.
Cut the programs.
I don't care.
I live here in Washington.
We've Got potholes, we'll do itfor a few more years.
Right?
We get it.
I get it.
Please cut the funding to thesecommunists.
That's all I got.
We're paying$2 a gallon of gas.

(01:00:10):
Make it obvious.
Make us pay six or seven.
Right?
Make it obvious that they'rerobbing us blind.
Stop acting like Venezuela.
Yes.
They're robbing us blind.
They're taken from every cornerwhile at the same time not
following the constitutions ofthe state and the federal
government at all levels.
From transportation to theDepartment of Justice to coming

(01:00:34):
after ranchers that are justtrying to feed the cattle that,
you know, we put on our tables.

SPEAKER_06 (01:00:38):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 (01:00:40):
It has to stop.
And other good news, the SupremeCourt struck down the ruling
that forced parents to vaccinatechildren without exception.
So in uh New York, the Amishpeople that live in New York
brought suit because they theygot rid of the religious
exemptions for vaccination ofkids.
They brought suit and theSupreme Court was like, haha,
can't do that.
You cannot force anybody to takea vaccine.
Can't make it a condition onpublic benefit, et cetera, et

(01:01:02):
cetera, et cetera.
That's excellent.
It's gonna be harder and harderfor them to do that again.
Now, Washington State wasbasically made it so the state's
like, yeah, I mean, the nextpandemic, you guys are all just
gonna go right into the camps.
I've got to leave your house.
I'm going to these camps.
We've got out the middle of thedesert.
Like, of course we're gonna dothat.
Hopefully the funding gets cutand we can get some new people
in there and change that.
I heard another thing yesterdaythat Act Blue is uh raised like

(01:01:25):
a gajillion dollars.
And I'm like, is Act Blue stillin operation?
I don't understand.
They were smurfing, they wereunder investigation in like nine
states and by the feds.
Why are they raising all thismoney?
Give guys like this, JamesCarville, a little bit of too
much confidence.
Understand it.

SPEAKER_15 (01:01:42):
People are seeing this, and people are voting on
this.
Understand that.
He's not getting away with it.
He's caught on to.
He's not getting away with it.
He's paying for it, and he'sgonna continue to pay for it.
And we gotta stop looking at himas some kind of political

(01:02:03):
symbolia or political dignity oranything like that.
He's done.
We just got to butter this toastand slice it immediately.
He's done.
He's done in Florida, it's donein Pennsylvania, it's done in
New Jersey, it was done inVirginia, it was done everywhere
in Mississippi, it was done inGeorgia, he's done.

(01:02:24):
It's over.
You're a loser, dude.
You're losing everywhere, andyou're gonna lose more because
you, my friend, are a loser.

SPEAKER_03 (01:02:32):
I think there's something in James Carville's
past that's I don't I don't knowwhy I would think that, but you
got a lot of entry all for he'sgot some baggage.
Yeah, he's got some package.
That's something he's a littleafraid of, you know what I'm
saying?
Like, that's the whole extreme.
He's like, you know, it'sextreme there.
Now, you know, on the polaropposite, the richest man in the
world actually kind of admiresTrump because he's funny.

SPEAKER_21 (01:02:54):
He's the funniest person you know in my life.

SPEAKER_07 (01:02:57):
President Trump is very funny.

SPEAKER_19 (01:03:01):
President Trump is very funny.

SPEAKER_07 (01:03:03):
Very funny.
It's like naturally funny.
Uh it's somewhat efforteffortless.
I mean, um, when we just hadEdmundani in the office, and uh
the ask her if I still thoughtthe president was fascist.
And the president said just sayyes, it's easier that way.
Yeah.

(01:03:23):
Don't worry about it.
Just say yes.

SPEAKER_03 (01:03:37):
That's it for us today, you guys.
Donald Trump is hilarious.
Yeah, I'm a fascist.
So we're on to you.
Yeah, I'm a fascist.
I'm gonna clean this place up.
We're going to law and order.
Sorry, guys.
You've been in charge way toolong.
All right, guys, that's it forus today.
We gotta jump out early.
No private private side today.
Thank you so much for joiningus.
We'll talk to you againtomorrow.
Bye.

SPEAKER_14 (01:04:22):
What the mic lives in that castle over there?
I'm 37.
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind, you
don't subject to it.
They automatically treat me likean inferior.
Well, I am king.

(01:04:43):
Oh, king, eh?
Very nice.
How'd you get that, eh?
By exploiting the workers, byhanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
Is there ever gonna be anyprogress?
How'd you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I'm Arthur, King of the Britons.

(01:05:05):
Whose castle is that?
The Britons! Who are theBritons?
We all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.

SPEAKER_19 (01:05:14):
No, we have a king! I thought we were an autonomous
collective!

SPEAKER_14 (01:05:17):
You're fooling yourself! We're living in a
dictatorship, aself-perpetuating autocracy in
which the working classes.
How there you go! Winningclasses with a game! That's what
it's all about.
Only people, please, goodpeople.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What?

(01:05:37):
I told you! We're in anarco-syndicalist commune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.

SPEAKER_24 (01:05:44):
Yes.

SPEAKER_14 (01:05:44):
But all the decisions of that officer have
to be ratified at a specialbi-weekly meeting by a civil
majority in the case of purelyinternal affairs.
Be quiet or by a two-thirdsmajority in the case of quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order! I'm your king! You don'tvote for kings?

(01:06:07):
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I ask was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds, distributing swords is no

(01:06:27):
basis for a system ofgovernment.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up! I mean, if I went roundsaying I was an emperor, just
because some moistened bitch hadlocked a scimitar at me, they

(01:06:49):
put me away! Shut up, will you?
Shut up! Now we see the violenceinherited in the system! Shut
up! Have we seen a violenceinheriting the system?
Help, help! I'm being repressed!Bloody peasant! Oh, what a
giveaway! Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
That's what I'm on about.

SPEAKER_05 (01:07:05):
Do you see it repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?