Inside Weaponization, Fraud, And A Country On Edge

Send us a text

Start with the receipts, not the rhetoric. A Supreme Court exchange reveals a state investigation launched without a single consumer complaint, and that moment becomes our lens on a bigger pattern: institutions flex power first and explain later. From Arctic Frost fights on Capitol Hill to targeted probes of political and religious groups, we track how “safeguards” morph into shortcuts that erode trust.

We dig into the Stefanik–Johnson clash over disclosure rules, cabinet updates on dropped prosecutions and enforcement numbers, and a courtroom tug-of-war over Planned Parenthood funding that keeps returning despite legislative votes. On the ground, organized fraud rings, a visa-overstayed cop back on duty, and state noncompliance with SNAP data requests show how systems miss the obvious while pursuing political sideshows. It’s not abstract. It’s your taxes, your safety, your confidence in the rules.

The war on drugs segment raises the hardest questions: lethal strikes against narco-terrorists, legal authority, and the cost of doing nothing in the face of mass overdose deaths. We weigh oversight against deterrence and press for clear rules of engagement. Then we tackle the FBI’s legitimacy gap: headline metrics on arrests and child rescues versus a long memory of mission creep and politicized cases. Real reform means narrow scope, transparent audits, and accountability that doesn’t depend on who holds power. Finally, we confront election integrity claims and the vacuum created by underinvestigated fraud, pointing to standardized audits, open data, and strict chain-of-custody as the practical path to trust.

It’s a dense tour through courts, Congress, border policy, and law enforcement, told in plain language, with clips that let the principals make (or break) their own case. If you care about government accountability, election integrity, border security, and real oversight, this one is for you. Listen, share with a friend who loves receipts more than spin, and leave a review with the one reform you think can’t wait.

Support the show

https://1776live.us

www.PeasantsPerspective.com

www.LeftBehindandWithout.org

www.DollarsVoteLouder.com

buymeacoffee.com/peasant

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_07 (00:59):
You see the peasants in the background with the kings
and kings walking around?
Where are those people?
Where are those people?
Good morning, peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofThe Peasants Perspective.
So glad to have you guys heretoday.
It's a great Tuesday.
Yesterday, Donald Trump had acabinet meeting, kind of set the

(01:20):
world on fire.
It's Wednesday.
Is today Wednesday?
Yeah.
Today Wednesday.
Week is flying by.
So I saw this little clip.
This is an old clip back from uhthe campaign days.
And it's just funny.
This is Gavin Newsom.
And I'm only showing this justso we can look at his hands.

SPEAKER_09 (01:40):
Just look at his hands.
We've had I've been on a journeylike this before, feeling great,
feeling stressed, feelingdoubtful.
The last two days, I don't knowwhat it is.
I think it's for maybe the dustsat line for the master.
This is like a new martial art.
Have a roller coaster.
Something's happened the lastfew days.
We're telling you that DesMoines registered poll.
I mean, I don't know.

SPEAKER_06 (02:00):
I don't expect out for that one-inch punch.

SPEAKER_09 (02:05):
Column.
But it says something to me thatis of outsized importance
potentially in terms of theoutcome of this race.
So I'm feeling it's much betterthan I was even 24 hours ago.
Are you selling a supplement?
It just I think the biggestchallenge for if I was Trump,

(02:27):
the reason I wouldn't want to beTrump right now is since Jobs,
we've outperformed never muchsignificantly.
I'm talking about ColoradoSprings.
It's not just the 2022.
Um it doesn't stop.
That's the crazy thing.
There's no respite for hishands.
Every spring, every syllable'sgot a move.

(02:47):
Which is significant.

SPEAKER_06 (02:50):
It'd be like flip it, rub it down.
So much time.
Let's see, go, go.
And I think suburban.
Massage that sausage.

SPEAKER_09 (03:03):
There's something going on.
And uh there's something goingon.

SPEAKER_07 (03:08):
All right.
No point to that clip other thanGavin Newsom has a hand problem.
Oh my goodness, that'shilarious.
Carlitz, good morning.
Taking a break from a three-hourNasera documentary popped into
my YouTube.
Would be amazing if true.
Yes, keep waiting for your gold,buddy.
I don't know what the name does.

(03:29):
Oh, Nasera is like a it's atheory that they're gonna like
redo the entire banking systemand they're finally gonna pay
Americans back all their gold.
And we're gonna get like, youknow, thousands of dollars, so
everybody will be rich.

SPEAKER_06 (03:41):
I basically find here I go.

SPEAKER_07 (03:46):
Hold my breath.
Yeah, hold your breath.
Uh it's it's uh, I mean, there'slots of we can all do this.
You can look at everything, ohlook what they're doing.
I kind of think you get what youget, you know, they they kind of
tell you what they're doing.
They're they're revamping thingswith stable coins and stuff like
that.
They want you to be more of aslave, not less of one.

(04:07):
I just don't see it happening.
But uh it's been around for awhile, and there's been a couple
deadlines that have come and go.
So, do you know who GeorgeConway is?
No.
So George Conway was KellyanneConway's wife, or Freudian slip
husband.
Kellyanne Silbow.
She was kind of Trump'sright-hand gal during the 26th

(04:30):
campaign, and then she was inthe cabinet.
I can't remember exactly whather position was.
I remember the name KellyanneConway.
Yeah, well, her husband became areal Trump hater.
Okay.
She was in his cabinet.
He would get on TV.
That makes really goodThanksgiving.
Well, they ended up getting adivorce towards the end of
Trump's thing.
But he, you know, he still goesaround.
Now he's good friends with JohnBolton.

(04:51):
Like when John Bolton's housegot raided, guess who showed up?
George Conway.
You know, he shows up with hislittle camera.
So George Conway's.

SPEAKER_06 (05:00):
Now I know loser.
Yeah, total loser.

SPEAKER_07 (05:02):
But he is one of those guys that he's behind the
scenes, he's talk working withthe rhinos, he's working with
Lincoln Project, all thesedifferent anti-Trump groups.
And uh he had this to say.

SPEAKER_05 (05:11):
I mean, the most important thing is we have a
president who is not a crew.
That is the absolutely mostimportant thing.
Other than that, I think Okay,so we got rid of Biden.
Is that what you're talkingabout?
I think what we have to do isfigure out what safeguards, and
I think this is really, reallyimportant for people who are
going to be in Congress over thenext two to four years.
And I've been thinking aboutthat a lot for some reason.
First of all, there has to beaccountability of this

(05:33):
administration and the badactors around it.
You know, so what we needaccountability for, George, is
the way you dress.

SPEAKER_07 (05:38):
That's what we're looking for.
You look like you'retransitioning, like you just had
top surgery.
If you go look like I got manboobs, but this guy's got man D
cups, okay?
And apparently, all reports arethat when he goes to all these
dinner parties that they haveconstantly, he's the guy who
dresses up like he thinks he's aslick 21-year-old, like right
out of the club.
Like he'll wear a leatherjacket, like a black shirt, and

(06:00):
like a chain, you know, and likehe looks all slick, but he's
like completely dad botted out,you know, doughboy, like totally
unaware.
Like he's as unaware of hisstyle as I am of my haircut
right now.

SPEAKER_05 (06:11):
Okay.
DEG this whole Whitcock thing ofme.
What the hell?
Um, and then there has to bekind of a reconstruction year.
And this is a critical part ofthe reconstruction.

SPEAKER_07 (06:22):
That's when we get our re-education camps wrong.
But they'll be online this time,so don't worry.

SPEAKER_06 (06:27):
No, I think that you're exactly right.
I think that's exactly what he'stalking about, because the next
generation of congressmen won'thave all the dirt on them that
they've got right now.
So that's gonna be tough.

SPEAKER_05 (06:38):
Yeah, lawyers are gonna have to figure out
mechanisms that areconstitutional and draft
statutes that you know preventsome of this shit from ever
happening again, including, youknow, electing a crazy
president.
One of the things I want to doif I were ever moved to Congress
would be to, you know, create abody under the 25th Amendment,
Section 4, that would decide thepresident's capacity separate

(07:03):
from the cabinet, which you cando that.
I mean, Nancy Pelosi suggestedthat a few years ago.
Sounds like DOJ reform isessential.
And I think we need to take avery, very close look.
And in Congress, ultimately,when we have reached a stage
where we can approach normalcy,we have ideas and statutes that

(07:27):
are going to put limitations onhow the president interacts with
the attorney general.

SPEAKER_07 (07:32):
How the president interacts with the attorney
general, she's not his cabinet,that's the fourth branch of
government, and we control itfirmly.
That's a that's uh you know,George Conway is just another
one of these skeezy guys that'sconstantly committing sedition.
Yeah, I don't know how else toexplain it.
You know, I mean I've read thedefinition of sedition.
They charged a bunch of ProudBoys with it, a couple
oathkeepers, like apparentlyit's on the table, you know.

(07:55):
So there was a little bit of aspat going on between Elisa
Fonics, who who I have apolitical crush on.
She's like my favorite uhcongressman, period.
I don't know why, don't ask me.
So I think it's because shestepped up and defended Trump in
the first election, and it kindof put her on the map for me.
And ever since then, I've alwaysbeen I've always been really
impressed with her rhetoric andjust the way she operates.

(08:16):
She was um supposed to be the UNambassador, but there was a
couple hits that right whenTrump was elected, like Matt
Gates resigned from Congress andstuff like that.
So she ended up getting suckedback into Congress instead of
getting her cabinet seat.
Um, and but now she's runningfor governor of New York.
But she had a little blow-upwith Mike Johnson yesterday.
So according to Lee Stephonic,Mike Johnson allowed an

(08:37):
amendment to get stuck in thebill that would prevent any kind
of accountability for the Arcticfrost stuff that went on.
The spying on Congress, spyingon all the Republican, literally
like the entire Republicanapparatus.
Uh, so she like lit him up.
Republicans have the House,Senate, and White House, yet the
deep state is alive and wellwith the speaker getting rolled
by House Democrats attempting toblock my provision to require

(08:59):
congressional disclosure whenthe FBI opens
counterintelligenceinvestigations into Congress,
the Senate, or basically anyother elected officials.
So this spat went on.
She goes, My provision willstrengthen accountabilities and
transparency to deter theillegal weaponization.
It and it passed out of theHouse Intelligence Committee in
this Congress and previous ones,yet House Republicans continue

(09:20):
to get rolled by the deep statedue to opposition by Jamie
Raskin.
If Republicans can't deliveraccountability and legislative
fixtures to arguably the biggestillegal corruption and
government weaponization issueof all time, then what are we
even doing?
This language is even moreessential in light of the
continued weaponization of thefederal government.
Unless the provision is addedback into the bill to prevent
illegal political weaponizationof the intelligence community in

(09:42):
our elections, I am a hard no.
I have always voted in supportof the defense and intelligence
authoration bills, but no more.
It is a scandalous disgrace thatRepublicans are allowing
themselves to be rolled by Demsand the deep state on this.
Now she was the whip for alittle while.
I don't know if she still is,but she was in Republican
leadership.
No, she wasn't the whip.
I think she was just inleadership.

(10:03):
So um apparently this has beenshe walked out of a briefing
essentially confirming that.
Uh Mike Johnson tried to play itoff.
And he's like, Well, I don'tknow.
She didn't call me.
It's not even on my desk, youknow.
I haven't even looked at it.
So it was a spat.
I saw a little clip thismorning, which I didn't save,
unfortunately, that maybe thisis going to be resolved.
It'll be back in the bill.

(10:24):
But, you know, this is sad tome.
It's like, why is it this alwayshappen?
Why do we have the House, theSenate, and the presidency?
We could push any bill we wantedto right now, and they just
don't submit anything.
You know, it's like you've gotthis whole sitting on their
hands.
Yeah, Arctic frost.
People need to be in jail.
You know, you guys are out herelike trying to get

(10:46):
accountability.
It almost feels like theCongress is aiming for ratings.
Like, rather than wait for thesepeople to get arrested, let's
investigate them and see if wecan't stir up, yeah, pump up
some campaign donations andstuff and essentially monetize
the uh investigations, just likethe Democrats did.
They monetized all theseinvestigations into Trump.
So I'd rather just see, youknow, handcuffs, but it's

(11:11):
ridiculous.
The other thing that happenedtoo was uh yesterday in
Minnesota, obviously with the uhwell, hold on just a second
here.
Okay, so yesterday, not inminute, we're gonna talk about
that in a second.
So yesterday in the SupremeCourt, they had some oral
arguments.
And these oral arguments wereover a uh over an investigation

(11:35):
that was launched into anabortion, a preventative like
one of these uh anti-plannedparenthood groups, you know,
that like instead of abortingyour baby, come here and we'll
help you get resources.

SPEAKER_06 (11:46):
So it's like a planned parenthood alternative.

SPEAKER_07 (11:48):
Yes, I can't remember what it's called.
It's uh it's a pro-lifepregnancy center.
Okay.
Okay.
So they were investigated overfor various things, right?
For misleading donors and blah,blah, blah.
Well, Justin Clarence Thomas sawstraight through this.
So we're gonna listen to this.
This is Justin Clarence ClarenceThomas cross-examining the
government here who broughtthese charges and civil

(12:10):
complaints against this pro-lifepregnancy center.

SPEAKER_18 (12:13):
Uh did you have complaints that formed the uh
basis of your concern about uhuh the fundraising activities
here?

SPEAKER_23 (12:23):
We certainly had complaints about crisis
pregnancy centers thatpetitions.
No, about this crisis pregnancycenter.

SPEAKER_07 (12:30):
So I think Okay.
So we've got this whole ArcticFrost investigation, the
weaponization of governmentcoming after political
apparatus, that's bad.
But then we have also thegovernment coming after
conservative groups at large.

SPEAKER_23 (12:45):
Yep.
How are they doing this?
We've been clear from the outsetthat we haven't had complaints
about this specific.

SPEAKER_07 (12:51):
So you had no then why are they in court?

SPEAKER_23 (12:54):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 (12:55):
If you haven't had complaints about this pregnancy
center, why are we in theSupreme Court?

SPEAKER_23 (13:04):
I I I don't think uh I don't think that's correct,
Your Honor.
I think we had carefullycanvassed all of the public
information that is provided onthe website uh uh of First
Choice in making a determinationthat we wanted to um initiate an
investigation.
But you had no factual basis.
I I don't think that's true,Your Honor.
I think, for example, you couldtake a look at uh a comparison

(13:27):
between the donation page forfirst choice that we have carved
out from the very beginning.
So you had no complaints.
We had no complaints, but thestate governments, federal
government initiateinvestigations all the time in
the absence of complaints, wherethey have a reason to suspect
that there could be potentialissues of legal compliance.

SPEAKER_07 (13:47):
And look, it's where we have to suspect there could
be potential compliance issues.
We've re okay.
Is there a complaint?

SPEAKER_18 (14:13):
But you said earlier that uh you uh did not agree
with their characterization ofwhy they were being put to this.
Uh and it would seem that theobvious way to uh refute that
was to say we had a hundredcomplaints.
But you say you have nocomplaints, but rather you

(14:36):
looked at the website and theirmaterials and you think it could
have been misleading.
So why is your characterizationany better than theirs?

SPEAKER_23 (14:45):
So, Your Honor, I point you to the Turner
Declaration, which is at pages400 to 401 of the joint
appendix, which lays out thepredicate for the state's
investigation of first choice,and we had concerns in four
buckets.

SPEAKER_07 (14:58):
We had Okay, we had concerns.
The state had concerns, they hadno complaints, they had no
evidence, they perused thewebsite.
Okay, it's confusing, if that,right?
I mean, that's perspective.
They made a statement, they thethe uh first choice made a
statement.
It's like, well, you know, Imean, just two statements
floating in the air.
Are there any complaints?

SPEAKER_06 (15:18):
No concerns about potentially at best.

SPEAKER_07 (15:20):
So so then he goes on to say, Well, this is what we
were concerned about.
Listen to this, okay, this isimportant.
Weaponization of government.

SPEAKER_23 (15:28):
We had concerns about potentially misleading
donors, we had concerns aboutthe unlicensed practice of
medicine, we had concerns aboutpatient privacy practices, and
we had concerns about uhpotentially misleading or untrue
medical statements.
So I think we have those arestandard.

SPEAKER_07 (15:42):
I have concerns about that for everybody.
Like Ron, I have concerns aboutthat with your civil engineering
company.
I mean, how do I know you're notdoing the work?
Has anybody complained?
No, but give me all yourrecords.

unknown (15:54):
You know what?

SPEAKER_07 (15:55):
Where's the burden of probable cause here?
Okay, when you pull me over, thecop at least has to bust my tell
light before he gets to my frontwindow.
You know what I mean?
Like, there has to be something,some reason why you're asking me
to disclose private informationand dragging me into court.

SPEAKER_23 (16:12):
A more than ample basis to initiate this in the
world.
We have no complaints, but Ithink that, Your Honor, that
goes at most to the merits.
That doesn't go to the it goes,it goes to the merits, not the
standing.

SPEAKER_07 (16:26):
Well, of course, you have standing to sue everybody
in the country.
That's a given.
You're the government, but thestanding isn't really your
problem.

SPEAKER_06 (16:34):
That is the weakest weasel words ever, Buddy.

SPEAKER_07 (16:37):
They're in the Supreme Court, and there's no
complaints, no one's ever beendissatisfied with their service.
Thanks for wasting our time.
They hunted down this group totie up all those precious
resources.
Oh, we're afraid your donormoney isn't going to do what you

(16:57):
say, so let's redirect it tolegal work and lawfare.

SPEAKER_06 (17:02):
I happen to have the same belief about Planned
Parenthood.
So what should we do?
Let's hey, we can even do itright.

SPEAKER_07 (17:10):
We could file a complaint, Ron.
Oh.
Activists.
Activists inside the government.
If you want to file complaints,get out of the government and go
file complaints.
Don't be in the government andgo, well, we've got concerns.
Those are all the laws they'reregulated by.
That's those are standingconcerns for crumble cookie down
the corner.
Right?
Of course we have concerns thatevery business could possibly be

(17:32):
doing something.
Is there a complaint?
So Pam Bondi, in the cabinetmeeting that she had with Trump,
this is Trump's ninth cabinetmeeting in 10 months.
You know how many cabinetmeetings Biden had in four
years?
Nine.
But one of them he didn't showup to.
Joe Biden sat at the head.
Okay.
And uh Ferrazier, I don't have ahat this morning because I don't
have.
But apparently that is not thecase.

(17:54):
You get you get a haircut andyou get so much hate.
I know, man.
I haven't had a haircut for twoyears.
I finally get one and nobodylikes it.
What are we supposed to do?
I had a mop on my head.
Uh Pray the Rosary Daily, ahappy Wednesday to you.
Uh yeah, Gavin Sherman's BradleyCooper, Vampire Fallen.
I just think he's a robot.
That's my personal opinion.

(18:15):
Okay, so Pam Bondi gave a reporton basically what she's been
busy doing as an attorneygeneral.

SPEAKER_12 (18:23):
Our attorneys are working on terrorism, TDA,
MS-13, Antifa, President Trump.
We've charged more than 500defendants with assault on
federal officers, thanks to yourdirective.
And also, we have droppedcountless cases against
Americans that were prosecutedunder the Biden administration,

(18:44):
including J6, COVID, Face Act,and more.

SPEAKER_07 (18:50):
COVID, Face Act, and J6, of course.

SPEAKER_06 (18:53):
But the COVID- So I know I know that it's a state
thing, but don't forget TinaPeters people.

SPEAKER_07 (18:59):
Yeah, Tina Peters, yeah, but they've dropped
countless cases.
There are many cases we weren'taware of, like this case, right?
And like many other cases wherethe government sat back and
went, let's target some people.
That's the whole point of ArcticFrost was to go target the
political apparatus.
But there's been other things,like I told you, I knew people

(19:19):
that were targeted as quote,espionage.
They created this prosecutionfunnel to entrap people.
They went and found doctors andsurgeons who preside prescribed
oxycotton.
The doctors and surgeons got tospend time in jail.
But the people who actually madethe drug, marketed the drug,
sold the drug, oh, they just paysome civil penalties.
Sacklers.
Yeah, the sacklers.

(19:40):
They pay some civil penalties.
But I know one surgeon, he'sspending 12 years in prison, and
he swears he never didn't followthe prescription directions from
the sales rep.
Right.
You know what I mean?
He's like, never once did Iprescribe medication that I
didn't think completelycomported with exactly how they
were telling us to prescribe it.
But yet he's sitting in prison.
Now, I doubt his case has beendismissed because you got to

(20:02):
make some noise to let him knowyou were targeted, right?
But how many other Americanswere targeted just because you
ended up on a list?

SPEAKER_06 (20:10):
Well, and how come because this feels like it's
political targeting, but thetargets aren't political.
They're more like, hmm,religious, Christian.
What's up with that?

SPEAKER_07 (20:20):
It is political targeting.
It's because their politicsdon't encompass those types of
things.
I mean, they they fully they'rethey uh in the big beautiful
bill, they eliminated governmentfunding for planned parenthood.
The hard thing to do, right?
Couldn't get it done for decadesand decades.
Planned parenthood funding gotsnuck into all different places.

(20:42):
They had the Byrd Amendment thatprevented it, but the Bird
Amendment wouldn't get attachedto everything, you know what I
mean?
So they finally, finally, withoverwhelming Republican
majorities, eliminated allfederal funding for Planned
Parenthood.
A judge just blocked it.
Jeez.
So every time that they wouldtry to eliminate Planned
Parenthood through executiveorder or through anything like

(21:02):
that, the judges would come inand be like, well, you have to
have an act of Congress todefund Planned Parenthood
because they've appropriatedfunds.
Well, now we didn't appropriatefunds, and now a judge is
saying, Well, get out yourcheckbook, find a way to spend
the money.
Right?
So it'll get overturned almostcertainly.
But again, activist judges,activist prosecutors, scary.

(21:23):
In Seattle, the uh police chief,uh, let's see, is he the former
police chief?
Yes.
Let's see who it is.
His name is uh former policechief of Seattle tells me almost
all the organized fraud heinvestigated was committed by
illegal alien groups.
Great investigative reporting,but you scratch the surface.
From my insider perspective, ifsomeone who has investigated

(21:43):
fraud in Seattle for 20 years,nearly all high reward, low-risk
fraud is done by foreigners whoare illegally in the country.
Here are a few examples.

Examples (21:50):
the Irish traveler roofing scam, Irish brothers
sentenced to prison in Seattlefor scamming the elderly.
Romanian fraud crews, especiallyprolific, stealing credit cards
from fitness club lockers andmaking big purchases.
They will have a laptop andprinter in their car to
instantly make fake IDs tosupport the stolen cars.
There's some of the reports.
Chinese elder fraud crews,Chinese national facing charges

(22:11):
for posing as federal agent todefraud a bell uh Belleville
senior United States SecretService.
These types of crimes often gounreported, are difficult to
solve.
The suspects are difficult tofind once you ID them, and they
usually don't get much timebecause it's nonviolent.
Right.
Uh foreigners kind of screwingup the country.

(22:32):
Oh, think about that.
So uh Brooke Rollins, Secretaryof Agriculture, who is in charge
of all the SNAP benefits, foodstamps, in the cabinet meeting,
she reported a major reductionin recipients.

SPEAKER_01 (22:59):
But when you have so much rampant fraud in a program
that 42 million Americansparticipate in, now a big good
piece of news that I hope iswritten about since you became
president, about 800,000 ofthose 42 million have moved off
of food stamps, which ishopefully the plan with better
jobs, higher wages, et cetera.
But still, when we found 186,000dead people or dead people's

(23:23):
social security numbers beingused, 500,000 people receiving
benefits more than twice.
We had a couple of peoplereceiving benefits in six days.
In February of this year, weasked for all the states for the
first time to turn over theirdata to the federal government
to let the USDA partner withthem to root out this fraud to

(23:44):
make sure that those who reallyneed food stamps are getting
them, but also to ensure thatthe American taxpayer is
protected.

SPEAKER_07 (23:51):
Now, the Democrat states did not provide their
information.
So what she's saying there,500,000 double doubles, 180,000
dead people, that's only theRepublican states.
So imagine what we're probablygoing to find when we throw the
Democrat states in there whereit's truly been enabled even at
the state level.
Um there's been a lot of focuson Minnesota this last week,

(24:14):
right?
With the Somalis being there,the scam artists, the um tons of
fraud that was going on.
Now, if you remember a couplemonths ago, there was a
political assassination inMinnesota.
Do you remember this?
Guy dressed up as a policeofficer, shows up at the House
Speaker's house, shoots herdead, goes to another person's
house.
Like it was a you remember this?

SPEAKER_08 (24:34):
No.

SPEAKER_07 (24:36):
You don't remember this?
No.
Oh my goodness.
Okay, so the guy, some whiteguy, right, goes and pops off
this uh congresswoman inMinnesota, state state
congresswoman, who had justvoted to get rid to basically
eliminate giving all thesebenefits to illegals in their
Medicaid system.
Okay.
Week later, she gets killed.

(24:58):
The guy who kills her writes amanifesto and says Tim Waltz
sent her to do it.
And he also wanted he hadKlobuchar on the list because
Tim Waltz wanted her seat andall this stuff.
So he pinned it on Tim Waltz.
So then that came out, that'shis manifesto.
And then he and he says he wastrained by Tim Waltz to
basically be secret security,blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
He had the whole year.
He had a police car andeverything.

(25:18):
Okay.
In fact, when he in fact, thefirst time he was confronted
when the call came in and thecop showed up, the cops let him
leave because he thought he wasa cop.

SPEAKER_22 (25:26):
Jeez.

SPEAKER_07 (25:26):
Okay.
So that guy pended on Waltz, butthe media dragged out his
roommate.
He's married, not living withhis wife, some fat roommate
that's like, oh, he was a MAGAfan.

SPEAKER_06 (25:38):
Oh, yeah, sure.

SPEAKER_07 (25:40):
Okay.
So in Minnesota, Trump hasannounced, you know, he's gotten
rid of the TPS status forSomalis.
They're sending uh a hundred ICEagents into Minnesota to start
rounding some of these peopleup.
And so the mayor of Minneapolisand the police chief of
Minneapolis had a pressconference yesterday because
they're really concerned abouttheir community.
Listen to the police chief.

SPEAKER_02 (26:02):
Folks that are masked, that they're not sure if
they're law enforcement, uh,that they're they may be
kidnapping people.
Like we have had thosemovements.
Um I want to be clear to thecommunity.

SPEAKER_07 (26:14):
No, and fair enough.
If you have masked ice agents inkind of plain clothes with vests
on, sure, pulling up and rippingpeople off.
I've known a couple criminalswho dressed up as cops to do
their lick, right?
To go to their lick and gettheir score.
Sure.
So it is possible.
You could have people dressingup and just ripping people off
the street, and people be like,that's ice, when really it's

(26:36):
cartel or you know, sure.
It's Guido trying to get hisdrug debts, right?
Possible.

SPEAKER_06 (26:41):
How often has this happened?

SPEAKER_02 (26:44):
Community should know that if you see something
like that that is legitimate,that you don't know if someone
is law enforcement, you shouldcall 911.
Uh uh.
And you should provide as muchinformation as possible, because
let's not forget we veryrecently had tragedy in this
state by someone who is who ispurporting to be law
enforcement.
So this is the shooter.
This is what he's talking about.

(27:05):
Let's be clear.
That's something everyone shouldreport and that we will
immediately respond to and wewill document.
Whether it's somebody's not sureif there's a kidnapping
happening, somebody's not surethat there's law enforcement uh
present or not.
And that's something else that'sadditional policy requirements
that we are we are implementing.

SPEAKER_06 (27:22):
So glad you're good at documentation.

SPEAKER_07 (27:26):
Well, you know, if the Democrats win, they're gonna
prosecute all these people.
You're gonna have you're gonnahave like former ICE employee
prison camps, is what you'regonna end up with.
They've hired 10,000 new ICEagents.
So ramp up.
Now, this was on the PBD podcastwhen they were talking about
that lady that was assassinatedand kind of the whole deal.
This was one week before she waskilled.

(27:48):
Now keep in mind, imagine if youhave built a grift empire where
you've got money coming in frompublic services, housing, care
for autism, Medicaid fraud, youknow, you're getting a little
cut on what's getting over sentoverseas to Al-Sabab and
Somalia.
Imagine all of that built aroundessentially all the loopholes

(28:10):
and open ends where illegals andpeople who shouldn't be getting
money get money, and all of asudden there's a piece of
legislation that goes againstthat.

SPEAKER_20 (28:17):
Melissa, she's she comes out of the vote, and this
is her, and then she was killedshortly after this.
Look at her.

SPEAKER_15 (28:29):
We worked very hard to try to get a budget deal that
wouldn't include that provision.

SPEAKER_20 (28:37):
She was she was she was in Congress.
Unfortunately killed by thatguy, right?
She's a representative forrepresentative for that.
But Patrick, mind you, Democratcrying because she feels bad
that these illegals aren't gonnaget their Medicaid, but it's the
Americans deserve it.
So you know what they said?
You're going against the grain.
She's a Democrat.
She's a Democrat that went theonly one that went against 67

(28:59):
votes that said keep the moneymoney.
After crying, did she getkilled?
I think how long, Rob?
Was it a day or was it it wasRob Pat, it had to be that week.
It had to be that week where shewas shot and killed.

SPEAKER_07 (29:08):
Yeah, it was that week.
And the shooter said Tim Waltzput her up to put him up to it.
And yet, nah, that's justunreal.
That can't be happening.
Josh Hawley's talking about atthe federal level, right?
The Democrats are just freakingout.
You'd think they were on thepayroll, the cartels, the way
they're acting.
Like, how dare you kill drugdealers?
What are you talking about?
Like, do you realize the untoldcost of drug dealers?

(29:30):
Incarceration, broken homes,crime, insurance, like the
amount of money that goes in toclean up after a drug dealer
once he gets to his, I'mstealing your copper face.
You know what I mean?
Like, it's a really big deal.
How is it that these people aredefending it?

SPEAKER_17 (29:46):
Do you think some people in this country don't
want us to fight the war ondrugs?
Not because they like to dodrugs, but for other reasons.

SPEAKER_13 (29:55):
It is interesting the amount of money that is
involved here in this drug tradeand the drug.
Trafficking, the President Trumpis not the first president to
declare war on drugs, but he isthe president who's taking it
very seriously and actuallydoing something about it.
And I would just say it's alwaysgood to follow the money.
I mean, for the people all of asudden who are like, wait, let's
not get too serious about thewar on drugs.

(30:15):
It does make you wonder whereare the profits here?
But I will just say at the endof the day, Jesse, I'm glad to
have a president who isdefending the people of my
state, who is defending thepeople of every state in this
country and putting them first,as opposed to foreign adventure
somewhere else or the agenda ofthe deep state.
He's actually trying to protectAmerican communities.

SPEAKER_07 (30:35):
It seems so obvious, right?
It seems so obvious.
Like, like shoot your localheroin dealer.
You know what I mean?
Like, what are we doing here?

SPEAKER_06 (30:42):
Well, the Democrats would mourn.

SPEAKER_07 (30:45):
Yeah, exactly.
They'd go, they'd go take a kneefor St.
Floyd, the fentanyl.
It's a fentanyl addict.
It really, like you've got apolice chief saying, hey, these
masked raiders are coming in andkidnapping people, so call us
with your reports.
It's like, okay.

SPEAKER_06 (31:02):
Make sure you describe them as MAGA.

SPEAKER_07 (31:04):
Yeah, make sure you describe them as MAGA.
And make sure you uh throw insome slurs they say, you know,
it's like good gravy.
And it's all based aroundprotecting fraud.
These ill, first of all, they'realready in the country illegal.
My heart goes out to them.
Like there's no issue with you,me, human being, human being,
but I can't even imagine movingto Japan and living in the

(31:25):
underground.
Like, I can't even fathom beinglike, well, I'm just gonna hang
out in Moscow, you know, in thespeakeasies and in the back
rooms.
I'm just I'm just gonna beillegal.
I said, what are you talkingabout?
That's the most ridiculousthing.
Like, you need a visa, you needa green card, like you you
belong here.
You can just walk around here ifyou're born here, okay?

(31:45):
But if you're not born here, yougotta come through the port.
You know what I mean?
Like port of entry.
It's just it and so then whenyou find out the majority of you
know high, high reward, low costcrime in Seattle, these crime
rings are foreigners.
Well, of course they are.
Of course they are.
They've already created thefirst crime when you come in,
right?

(32:05):
Um, Mike Johnson from Wisconsin,next door to Minnesota, is
talking about basicallyinvestigating all of this.

SPEAKER_03 (32:13):
There are four different organs of the Trump
administration that are nowinvestigating.
Will we see a Senateinvestigation?

SPEAKER_21 (32:21):
Yes.
Uh, but again, I think you'reright.
The strategy should be to fullyexpose you know, one instance
where we see massive consumerfraud.
Once we have all that exposed,understand, okay, here's their
game plan, and this is how theydo it.
Then you start lookingcountrywide and try and uncover
those rest of those schemes.
So I think it's perfectlylegitimate.

(32:42):
You know, one of my concerns ishow much money we flow into, for
example, non-governmentorganizations that then filter
that money down to eventuallyprobably uh these vans that show
up at these peace for protestswith riot gear or fund all these
legal organizations, you know,people like Mark Elias and other
other folks that are engaged inthe law fair against ordinary

(33:03):
Americans.
But 38 Wisconsinites who just,you know, some of them were the
alternate electors.
They tried to destroy theirlives to these legal foundations
and these legal firms, and wheredo they get the money from?
A lot of it comes to Americantaxpayer funneled through
non-government organizations.
So again, this is this ismassive.
That's what I'm saying.
This is just the tip of theiceberg of what the radical left
is doing, it's literallydestroying this country.

SPEAKER_07 (33:26):
It's amazing how much money flows into these law
firms as donations, allegedlydonations.
Like, you know, you you getJanuary Sixers who struggle,
struggle to raise a few thousanddollars, you know, for for some
legal thing or a few thousanddollars for their legal defense
fund.
Yeah, but yet these theseleftist funds who's got an extra

(33:49):
four million dollars to donateto a law firm that's just gonna
piss it away.
Piss it away.
Like what you could build anelementary school, you know what
I mean?
It's like it clearly it'sunattached.
Clearly, this is house money.
You know what I mean?
Clearly, it seems to be comingfrom sources where there's not a
lot of work or investmentinvolved because it's freely

(34:10):
received, freely given.
You know what I mean?
It feels that way a hundredpercent.
And the Americans pay the price.
All these law firm programs thattarget Americans, these
different programs and billsthat open the doors and let
people in the country.
JD Vance talked about it when itcomes to housing.
You know, you want to know whyyoung people can't afford a
housing?
Look at the border.

SPEAKER_11 (34:29):
Very clearly is that we are fixing the problem that
Joe Biden and the Democratscreated in the last
administration.
If you look at everyaffordability crisis that's
confronting the American peopletoday, it is traceable directly
to a problem caused by Joe Bidenand congressional Democrats.
Why did homes get sounaffordable?
Because we had 20 millionillegal aliens in this country

(34:52):
taking homes that ought by rightto go to American citizens.
Why did tax bills get sounaffordable?
Because Democrats were raisingtaxes while congressional
Republicans, under thepresident's leadership, were now
cutting taxes.
Why did food get so expensive?
Because we printed trillions ofdollars and threw it into green
scams that made our agriculturaleconomy suffer while Americans

(35:14):
were paying higher prices forfood.
Very clearly is that we arefixing the government.

SPEAKER_07 (35:26):
Yep.
Right?
Every single thing.
Tulsi Gabbard at the samecabinet meeting kind of unloaded
on the deep state and said,We're doing we've got two
missions over at DNI huntIslamic terrorists and root out
corruption in the government,the deep state.

SPEAKER_15 (35:41):
Uh, to help support you in delivering on the
promises that you made to theAmerican people.
Um you came in with a very clearmandate of taking on the rampant
weaponization, politicization ofthe intelligence community and
federal law enforcement, uh,experiencing yourself the deep
state abusing their power asthey have against you, your

(36:02):
family, and so many of theAmerican people, bring out
accountability truly for thosewho have abused their power,
making sure that theintelligence community is
supporting your efforts andkeeping the American people
safe, secure, and free, uh, andbeing the president of peace.
I'm grateful to be in thisposition as your director of
national intelligence to supportyou in these efforts, and I'll

(36:24):
cover very briefly what we'vedone over the last year of your
leadership and what we lookforward to continuing to focus
on uh next year.
Uh first of all, in yourleadership again, we've taken on
a historic effort fortransparency, declassification,
and exposing these abuses ofpower by these deep state
actors.

(36:45):
We declassified over half amillion documents, many of which
had never been seen before bythe American people, to put them
online to bring about this levelof transparency.
Reformed a weaponization workinggroup again today for a lot of
these abuses of power that havenever seen the light of day to
support the accountability thatuh under Pam Bonnie's

(37:06):
leadership, the Department ofJustice is coming about.
Uh secondly, bring about reformto the intelligence community to
make sure that we have the mosteffective and efficient and
focused workforce that is reallyworking on bringing about the
priorities that you have laidout in ensuring our country's
security.
Uh and lastly, Mr.
President, working with many ofour partners here around the

(37:27):
table to going after thesedomestic threats.
Uh we have threats coming fromboth Islamist ideology as well
as Islamist terrorists, foreignterrorist organizations, and
those who seek to be hard to theAmerican people, many of whom
were led in under the previousadministration.
We are focused on these tasksand this imperative for the

(37:50):
American people.
And just appreciate yourleadership, Mr.
President, uh in empowering us.

SPEAKER_07 (37:55):
She was really a complimentary of President
Trump.
But yeah, she's going after thethe one of the big things that
she says there is domestic.
DNI, Department of National UhIntelligence, they are the
synthesis of FBI intelligence,DEA, military, CIA.
They all kind of answer to DNI,right?

(38:16):
So she has a worldwide scopethat she's looking at.
Unlike CNA, CIA was supposed tolook outside, FBI looks inside.
You know, the CIA and FBI areessentially the same
organization.
It's just domesticinternational, allegedly.
Okay.
But there's a whole lot of likePeter Strzok was CIA FBI, right?
It's like, okay, just put on adifferent badge when you're on

(38:38):
American soil, I guess.
Um, Pete Hegseth talked aboutthe Venezuelan scandal.
So this Venezuelan scandal, thedouble tap, right?
Shoot the boat and then shootthe survivors.
It's like very controversial,apparently.
You know, you've even got JudgeDe Politano on Newsmax being
like, these are war crimes.
These people are gonna have tobe prosecuted.

(38:59):
So there's my my feed wasflooded with a bunch of
ex-soldiers showing videofootage of double taps, right?
Where you shoot him with thedrone.
He's still crawling.
Light him up again.
There was one uh pilot that Iknew that told me how he did a
bombing run and killed a coupleguys, and when he looked back,

(39:20):
they were still crawling.
So he turned around and he usedhis incendiaries or what it was
the flare markers and torchedit.
Okay, and when he got back andreported it, the person was
like, you know, that's a warcrime.
And he goes, I was highlightingthe field of whatever, and
that's what I needed to hear.
Anyways, you know, this is youknow, war is a zero-sum game.

(39:44):
People die, you know.
You probably aren't gonna end upin a concentration camp or in a
prison camp.

SPEAKER_19 (39:49):
The the order is lethal strike.
We lost last year, I think itwas more than that, but you
know, people don't like sayingit because I always said
100,000, 115,000 numbers we'vebeen hearing for years.
So we lost last year more than200,000 people, dead people,
ruined families beyond the200,000.
And those 200,000, that familywill never be the same.

(40:11):
But these people have killedover 200,000 people, actually
killed over 200,000 people thisyear.
And uh those numbers are down.
Those numbers are down, they'reway down, and they're down
because we're doing thesestrikes, and we're gonna start
doing those strikes on land too.
You know, the land is mucheasier, much easier.
And we know the routes theytake, we know everything about

(40:34):
them.
We know where they live, we knowwhere the bad ones live, and
we're gonna start that very soontoo.
Thank you so much, Mr.
Fred.
You know what?
Why we start that?
We're gonna drag those studentsdown so low.
And then you're gonna havefamilies be able to live without
the fear of their son ordaughter just having a pill to
have a little fun and ending updying within a period of 60

(40:58):
seconds, right?
Yeah, we're not gonna let thathappen.
We're not gonna let it continueto happen.
What Biden did to this countryby allowing all these people,
and I I call them animals inmany cases, I think they're
animals, to come into ourcountry and destroy our country
and let all those drugs pour in.
Let people just walk across theborder like it was nothing.
You look at a lot of them, youknow, and you say, Oh, let's not

(41:21):
discriminate.
I'm not talking about color, I'mjust talking about you look into
the eyes of some of these peoplewho're smart, and you see a
killer.
Come on in, just come on in.
11,888 murderers, many of themcommitted more than one murder.
He allowed them into ourcountry, totally unvented,
totally unchecked.

(41:41):
But he also allowed drugs tocome in at record numbers, and
hundreds of thousands of peoplea year died.

SPEAKER_07 (41:48):
So I actually thought that was a different
clip, but it was a good clip.
Um Pete Pete Heggseth was askedabout, you know, well, what
about the double tap?
And he was like, Listen, I gavean order for a lethal strike.
I came in, I saw the firststrike, I walked out because I
have meetings all day.
There's like a two-hour windowthat they sit and watch the boat
sink, you know, and he's like, Ididn't leave.
I guess the admiral in charge ofthe whole thing ordered the

(42:09):
second strike, totally in thechain of command.
And he's like, Look, that isappropriate.
We're back behind it, there'sgonna be no consequences on our
end.
Of course, you know, in Congressand the Senate, they're like,
Oh, we're gonna have toinvestigate this.
We can't, we can't be having uhuh American military killing
drug dealers.
That just can't be happening.
I am exhausted by it.
Eric Schmidt is also exhaustedby it.

(42:30):
He was asked, you know, hey, uhthe Republicans, are they gonna
hold hearings and and oversightover the military for the for
for killing terrorists?

SPEAKER_10 (42:41):
There's not gonna be that's not gonna happen.
That's not gonna happen.
Um there's gonna be there'sgonna be oversight like we've
had, but this Democrat dream ofsome sort of like hearing when
Pete Heggseth and PresidentTrump, well within their
artists' powers, to take outnarco-terrorists for poisoning
100,000 Americans every year,it's not gonna happen.
So we're gonna have oversight.

(43:02):
We always have oversight, butthis desire by the Democrats to
try to find some new thing, andI just want to put this they're
talking about prosecutingservicemen and women.
So it's not enough that theycensored Americans, it's not
enough that they prosecutedtheir political opponent to try
to keep them from getting backin the White House.
This is really, really dangerousroad to go down.

(43:24):
This isn't the language of we'llbeat him in the next election,
or um, you know, we're gonnahave the debate in the public
and let the public weigh in.
This is the language of colorrevolution.

SPEAKER_14 (43:35):
So it's your assessment after seeing the
video that the Trumpadministration acted within its
legal authority.

SPEAKER_10 (43:41):
100%.
100%.

SPEAKER_14 (43:43):
And did you learn that the or is that your
assessment at all?

SPEAKER_10 (43:46):
From everything that I've seen, absolutely 100%.
And then try to portray it assomething otherwise, again, like
I said, is incredibly dangerous.
NASA administrator JaredIsaacman, if we have an
appearance on RI, what do youmake of this nomination and how
do you think I think he's gonnabe great?
I really do.
I think NASA needs um a sort ofsteady leadership.
We're in a real competition uhfrom a commercial uh space
perspective with China.

(44:07):
I think he understands that.

SPEAKER_07 (44:08):
Um and we need so he's clear, you know, he sees
this as just a part of the colorrevolution.
They're trying to take out theSecretary of Defense, they're
trying to hamstring thepresident, and a lot of it comes
from anonymous sources.

SPEAKER_06 (44:20):
Can you imagine if the Democrats were taking out
narco boats?
Can you imagine it at all?
You know I mean, what would theuh pushback be then?
Hmm.

SPEAKER_07 (44:32):
I mean the Democrats would be like, oh, I guess that
I guess that narco-terrorist wasnot with the program, you know.
Like, I don't know what theywould your boat was like.
It's like, yeah, can you imaginea Democrat being law and order
and like, hey, we're gonna putpeople in prison for doing bad
things?
No, we end up with the Democratslike the mayor in Seattle.
I mean, if they've committedlike 1900 felonies, I start to

(44:55):
ask myself, were they abused asa kid?
You know, they got some creditfor early life.
Right.

SPEAKER_06 (45:00):
We played that clip yesterday.

SPEAKER_07 (45:02):
What are we talking about?
Yeah, exactly.
Who knows?
Now, Cash Patel, who's someonewho's kind of getting under my
skin just a little bit, uh, andreally truly, like Cash Patel.
Is it the in action or the look?
It's not the I could care lessabout the look.
It's the the FBI needs to beburnt to the ground.

(45:24):
Okay, there was never a moment,there's never a moment that the
FBI was an upstandingorganization.
There is a reason why they donot have a law enforcement
charter and act under the DOJ.
The Senate would not give it tothem because in their petition
to get one and create the needto get one in a very

(45:44):
Machiavellian act, they poisoned10,000 Americans by poisoning
the moonshine liquor to createthe necessity for their
organization to go prevent theguys who were making dirty
moonshine.
Okay.
And a senator was like, uh-uh,you guys are killers.
You're not getting a badge andgun.
And so every time the FBI showsup in your county or in your

(46:05):
town, they have to borrow anoffice and a laptop from the
local sheriff or police chiefand borrow his jurisdiction.
Okay.
They are not a legitimate lawenforcement agency.
They are not.
They don't have a charter.
They operate under the DOJ.
Which, why do the attorneys haveguns and badges?
I thought they were supposed toprosecute paperwork.

(46:26):
It it starts to go, this is nothow it was designed to be.
We don't need the FBI.
You need marshals.
You need marshals.
They operate off court ordersand warrants.
The FBI just you know spypolitical adversaries like you
know, Martin Luther King for 12years.

(46:47):
And then they kill him, and thenthey're like, holiday.
Right?
The original guy, the you know,J.
Edgar Hoover was a cross dresserback when it wasn't cool to be a
cross-dresser.
Right.
This was before, you know,crossdresser story hour.
Right.
This is back when cross-dressingwas enough to be the to walk
into a building with J.
Edgar Hoover's name on it.

(47:08):
You know, why don't we just callit the uh Caitlyn Jenner Office
of Investigation?
You know what I mean?
Like, why not?
So I get sick of the FBI ingeneral.
I don't want them going out andcatching kidnappers because I
don't think they do it.
I they couldn't even, you know,I don't want them.
I think they shouldn't exist.

SPEAKER_06 (47:26):
Okay.

SPEAKER_07 (47:26):
I think they shouldn't exist.
That's a strong position.

SPEAKER_06 (47:29):
Okay, I'm gonna be able to do that.

SPEAKER_07 (47:34):
We're gonna make the FBI office building a mausoleum,
a museum to the deep state, andhow we obliterated them.
But now he's so proud becauselook, now we're finally
arresting bad guys and drugdealers, and you know, now we're
doing our job.
Okay, great.
And there's been all these, youknow, anonymous sources trying
to knock them down.

(47:55):
I get that.
But the problem is, Cash, you'vebeen caught trying to cover your
butt using anonymous sourcereporting.
So when you get on and you run athing like this, it makes you
seem really disingenuous.

SPEAKER_04 (48:09):
Yeah, look, anonymous sources always lie,
results don't.
I'll get to the results in asecond.

SPEAKER_07 (48:13):
So, what about the anonymous sources you send out
to public review?

SPEAKER_04 (48:16):
These anonymous sources were individuals from
the Comey Ray era thatweaponized the Department of
Justice and cratered the publictrust in the FBI to something
that was at levels that hasnever been seen.
35% public trust in the FBI whenwe came in 10 months ago.
And now we're to believe thatthese anonymous sources are the
ones accusing this FBI, the mostsuccessful in history, of being
rudderless.

(48:37):
Let's just look at the results.
If we were so rudderless, well,there's a limping Capitol Hill
police officer out there.

SPEAKER_07 (48:44):
And that's kind of what this the anonymous sourcing
is about.
Miranda Devine, who broke theHunter Biden lap stop laptop
story, who used to be praised byDan Bongino and Cash Patel, she
broke a story basically sayingthese guys aren't doing anything
about deep state prosecutions ornothing.
And now they're like, How dareyou, Miranda Devine?
How dare you, you deep stateshitle.

SPEAKER_04 (49:05):
And it's like, she's the only reason you're in that.

SPEAKER_07 (49:08):
She's the only reason you're in there.
Exactly.
You know?

SPEAKER_04 (49:11):
We sent our mission out into the country and around
the world.
How would we have arrested25,000 violent felons this year
alone?
That's twice as many as lastyear alone.
How would we have arrested 35%more spies from Russia, China,
and Iran?

SPEAKER_07 (49:26):
Okay, well, unfortunately, I've met some of
the spies that were arrestedbefore.
So I don't these mean nothing tome.
They mean nothing to me.
Because I've seen, you know, oh,10,000 people's a tragedy.
Or what is it?
Like one person is a tragedy, amillion people is a statistic.
So, okay, great.
You've taken all the spies offthe street.
Have you ever drilled down andlooked at each individual spy?

(49:48):
Because I know one, John Rowe,and he was not a spy.
Have you done anything to changethe FBI?
Oh, we fired a handful ofpeople.
5,000 FBI agents went out andinvestigated J6ers for no good
reason.
Have you ever considered all theagents you've got out investing
spies are just bringing you ahead on a platter that they
entrapped?
Have you ever thought of that?

SPEAKER_06 (50:09):
Every time.

SPEAKER_04 (50:10):
Last year alone.
How would we have found 6,000children and identified them?
That's up 20%.
That's a big deal.
22% from last year alone.
We have taken down criminalnetworks and those that wish to
do harm to our children.
We have arrested in the 764category, the Neilist Violet
Extremist Network, a 590%increase on those who wish to So

(50:31):
he just goes on to basicallysay, look at all the things the
FBI is doing.

SPEAKER_07 (50:34):
And I would just say you mean local law enforcement.
Because you're not doing any ofit.
You're still using local lawenforcement.
You give them some extra tools.
You might give them some tipsbecause you're
cross-jurisdictions.
But at the end of the day, thatstuff should have happened
anyways.
The sheriff's in charge of thatstuff.
The police chiefs are in chargeof that stuff.
The marshals are in charge ofthat stuff.

(50:56):
Do you know anything about 764?
764 is a satanic group thatbasically grooms kids online and
gets them to self-harm and hurtthemselves.

SPEAKER_06 (51:03):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 (51:04):
I mean, they're horrible.

SPEAKER_06 (51:05):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 (51:05):
Horrible.
And you know, if all the FBIever did was focus on stuff like
that, I mean, maybe that's wheretheir charter should be.
But the reality is they've spenta whole lot of time
investigating Jim Jordan's phonecalls and, you know, all hacking
into my cell phone and stufflike that.
So I'm kind of like, I don'treally buy the whole too late

(51:25):
for the party thing.
Like, oh, look at what we'redoing now.
Now we're we're on top of it.
Okay, well, how about goingafter James Comey and Letitia
James and all these guys?
Apparently, they're about to bereindicted.

SPEAKER_00 (51:37):
Director James Comey and New York Attorney General
Letitia James to a grand jury.
According to people familiarwith the situation inside the
Justice Department, it isexpected to happen quickly,
perhaps within a week.
The court tossed out both theComey and James cases.
The judge found interim U.S.
attorney Lindsay Halligan didnot have the legal authority of
a prosecutor when the two wereindicted.

(52:01):
Joining us now.

SPEAKER_07 (52:02):
How do you how do you go through life where every
single photo ever taken of you,Lindsay Halligan, looks like
some bombshell like SVU or uhlaw and order episode?
She's always got black shadeson.
She's always dressed to theninth.
And I'm like, are there anypictures of you in pajamas or
just without glasses?
Like, she looks like this, likeuh every picture you see of her

(52:23):
that even CNN puts up is likeshe's not even an attorney.
She's like a movie star, youknow.
Okay, so do you remember how wekind of covered the police
officers that were illegalaliens that got badges and guns?
And there was one guy that wasthat was rounding.

SPEAKER_06 (52:38):
Immigration judge released Bajovic on 25 dune.

SPEAKER_07 (52:41):
Okay, well, turns out there's the story has an odd
twist.

SPEAKER_22 (52:47):
News it's a WGN investigates update.
This suburban police officerarrested by ICE for allegedly
overstaying his visa, is back onduty.
Immigration agents arrestedHanover Park police officer
Radul Bojovic in October andsaid he overstayed a tourist
visa by a decade.
He's a native of Montenegro.
An immigration judge releasedBajovic on a$2,500 bond two

(53:10):
weeks after his arrest.
WGN investigates, obtained bodycamera footage of his time on
the job showing him on patrol.
He previously reported thatvillage records, we previously
reported that village recordsshowed he had a work
authorization card issued byHomeland Security, and that he
passed an FBI and otherbackground checks.
Hanover Park officials sayBojovic remains authorized to

(53:33):
work by the federal government,so he returned to the job
yesterday.

SPEAKER_07 (53:39):
He got back pay.
So he's arrested because heoverstayed his visa by a decade
and passed a background checkfrom the FBI.
Did I just get done talkingabout how the FBI is useless?
Did I do that?
What good is the FBI if theycan't identify somebody has

(53:59):
overstayed a visa by 10 years?
Oh, he has work authorization.
Who authorizes work to someonethat is here illegally?
I don't understand.
I don't understand.
But yet you're gonna targetfirst pregnancy center or
whatever because you suspectthey've misadvertised on their

(54:20):
website, but you're gonna give agun to a guy who's not
authorized to have one when he'soff duty and he's also not
authorized to be in there.
He's on fucking blood right nowfor immigration charges.
This, you know, Seattle firedpolice officers for attending
the J6 rally, right?

(54:42):
Right?

SPEAKER_06 (54:42):
Yes.

SPEAKER_07 (54:43):
So this guy isn't allowed to own a gun when he's
out in the wild.
He's not even supposed to be onour soil.
Somebody authorized him to work.
Somehow he passed an FBIbackground check despite all
that.
For some reason, an immigrationjudge granted him a bond while
he goes through this whatever.
Could he still be deported?

SPEAKER_08 (55:02):
Like bra.

SPEAKER_07 (55:09):
So Donald Trump was asked about who's gonna run for
2028.
I think I'm gonna get myself aTrump 2028 hat just because I
think it's so fun.
But he's basically saying it'snot gonna be me, but it's gonna
be someone here.

SPEAKER_19 (55:20):
Because I want to run against it, uh, whether it's
uh it's not gonna be me.
It's gonna be somebody that'sgonna probably sit at this
table.
Could be a couple of peoplesitting at this table, could be
a couple of people runningtogether sitting at this table.
You know, but uh I want them towin because we've done a great
job for this country and I wantthat to be carried forward.

(55:41):
Uh and you know, I think we haveI think we have a tremendous
bench, really a tremendousbench.
But uh, I I think that waltz isa grossly incompetent man.

SPEAKER_07 (55:53):
I love how we always bring it right back to Waltz.
Waltz is a grossly incompetentman.
Tick time had to laugh aboutthis, or we will go crazy.
That is true.
You know, tragedy and comedy arejust right next door to each
other.
You can choose to laugh or crysometimes.
Carlitz, I don't think I couldbrush my teeth properly without
President Trump's leadership.
Apparently, Tulsi got on the hotseat because she gave a couple
reports where the CIO would helpsome info and Trump called her

(56:15):
out on it, and she had to goback to the drawing board and
blow some people up.
Why didn't you tell me they werestealing our elections?
Trump already knows.
Okay, Carlitz, when we had anaccident in January 2023 here in
Houston, our cops startedtalking to me in Spanish.
When I told them we wereAmericans, speak English, we
quickly found he barely speakethEnglish.
Dude, when I was in prison and Ihad foreign guards in DC, I

(56:39):
couldn't believe it.
I couldn't believe it.
I just, I mean, havingmercenaries watch over American
prisoners just was beyond thepale for me.
Beyond the pale.
Some of them barely have Englishcompetency either.
It's stunning.
But the crazy thing is theAfrican immigrants, they have a
work ethic, whereas the Americanblacks don't.

(56:59):
So the Africans hated the blankinward, the inward blacks, they
called them that, because that'swhat they referred to as the
American blacks, because youknow, they were late for shift,
they would never go overtime,they'd never double shift.
Whereas I had guards who wouldliterally pull, uh, they worked
uh they worked, were they12-hour shifts there?
Eight-hour shifts.
Probably, anyways, I uh multipletimes we had guards from sunup

(57:23):
to sundown because they werepulling double shifts.
And uh they were Muslim too, sothey'd have to go back and do in
the prayer closet five times aday.
That was really interesting.
You know, here we are beingguarded by a guard who
disappears randomly to go to hisprayers and leaves us like okay,
cool.
All right, my uh uh uh SenatorRon Johnson again is talking

(57:45):
about elections.
Yes, it'd be great if we ran aVance Rubio ticket or you know,
something like that in 2028.
How cool would it be if we sawlike a Vance Rubio ticket and
like a Gabbard, um a Lee Zeldonticket, like if we had a couple
of them and they were like powerteams, you know, and it's like
no matter what, you're gettingMAGA.
You know, what if you floodedout, like you iced out DeSantis

(58:07):
and anybody else, you know, MikePence, if he decides to run
again, you iced him out becausewe have to know these top-notch
cabinet members.
But either way, it doesn'tmatter because it all comes down
to the election.

SPEAKER_21 (58:16):
There's massive fraud.
I mean, I I'm listening toapparently a former CIA
operative talking about how theyshave votes, not in Democrat
counties.
They'll shave a few percentusing the machines in Republican
counties where people aren'treally suspecting it, where the
vote total should have been 60%,but it's only 58%.
Again, I don't know how they doit uh exactly, uh, but I do know

(58:36):
that we don't even come close toinvestigate voter fraud or
welfare fraud.
We don't put anywhere um nearthe amount of effort that we
should be putting into this.

SPEAKER_03 (58:46):
Senator, you just uh broke some huge news there.

SPEAKER_07 (58:48):
You're listening to a do you have a CIA
whistleblower that is Youliterally just read Emerald
Robinson's tweets out on air.
That's the whistleblower.
Gary Bernstein every day.
He they're going on in uhthey're going on Lindell TV, the
absolute truth with EmeraldRobinson, they're going on
InfoWars every day.

(59:10):
Those are InfoWars is thelargest distributed news
platform in the United States.
Okay, they are syndicated on AMFand radios.
There, they he's got the he'sbroadcast out on ham radios, C B
channels.
Like it is out there, okay?
So Benny Johnson, this I Ididn't even realize I was gonna

(59:31):
go off on a tangent.
That makes me sick, Ben.
Oh, you're breaking news, you'relistening.

SPEAKER_21 (59:34):
So are you, Benny?
And again, is this true?
You can you hear all thesethings?
This is on a podcast, you know,some apparently CIA operative
who's but let's face it, Ibelieve the CIA has doctored
elections in other countries.
I that's probably indisputable.
Yeah, uh those same types ofoperations, do those occur here
in America?

(59:55):
My guess is they do.
Do I have hard evidence?
No, but again, we just don'tinvest.
The people, you know, we're allharmed by it, but the uh for
example, the losing candidates,they don't have the funds, we
don't have the time yet tocertify these elections.
So election fraud goes largelyuninvestigated.
We we uncover again in this inyour uh earlier segment 500 you
know phony registrations.

(01:00:17):
It's just the tip of theiceberg.

SPEAKER_07 (01:00:19):
Just the tip of the iceberg.
So maybe the FBI couldinvestigate that.
Uh I don't know.
What do you think, Ron?

SPEAKER_06 (01:00:26):
Maybe you can get that New York uh AG to go after
it.
They don't have any evidence.
We'll find it when we lookaround.

SPEAKER_07 (01:00:35):
Didn't hold up your predecessor.
Right.
I don't have any complaints.
Wasn't a problem for thembefore.
You know what I mean?
Hey, that uh I think PlannedParenthood is rigging elections.
Well, let's go investigate.
Like, yeah, evidence never heldyou back before from behind the
curtain.
What's the FBI doing?

(01:00:56):
Not that.
Right.
Not that.
Oh, are they there to preservethe Republic?
Apparently not.
But you know, they'll stop someonline crime and, you know, take
credit for arresting TylerRobinson when they had nothing
to do with it.
Okay.
Now, we're gonna leave on a highnote.
We got a short show today.
We gotta wrap it up herebasically right now.
But just pour some hopiumstraight into the vein.

SPEAKER_19 (01:01:17):
Next year is projected to be the largest tax
refund season ever, and we'regonna be giving back refunds out
of the tariffs because we'retaking in literally trillions of
dollars, and we're gonna begiving uh a nice uh dividend to
the people, in addition toreducing debt.
Yes, you know, I inherit a lotof debt, but uh it's peanuts

(01:01:40):
compared to the kind of numberswe're talking about.
So we're gonna be making adividend to the people, and uh
additionally, we're gonna beable to reduce debt, and as time
goes by over the next two,three, four years, those numbers
are gonna go up, and I believethat at some point in the not
too distant future you won'teven have income tax to pay

(01:02:01):
because the money we're takingin is so great, it's so
enormous, that you're not gonnahave income tax to pay.
Whether you get rid of it orjust keep it around for fun or
have it really low, much lowerthan it is now, but you won't be
paying income tax.
We've slashed one trilliondollars.

SPEAKER_07 (01:02:24):
And we're gonna be giving back tax, no IRS, let's
do it! I promise you this.
You'll still have to file.
You might not pay, but they willbe accounting for every dollar.
This is the control grid beingimplemented, by the way.
We'll cover that more in thefuture.
All right, guys, that's it fortoday.
Apologize for the short show, ormaybe it's a good thing for
those of you that like it nice.

(01:02:45):
But uh, we'll talk to you againtomorrow.
Oh, and by the way, now the newthing that Rumble Studio wants
us to do is they want us to havechat raids.
So take our chat room and wehave to go to other podcasts and
we have to raid their chat.
So I'd like to do that at like 7a.m.
and I think it's just a coupleminutes that we do it.
So those of you that are in thechat, those of you that want to
participate in the channel,let's go raid.

(01:03:05):
This could be the best thing tohelp us grow.
Because the studio, the rumblestudio creator program is
supposed to help us grow.
So by us going out to othershows, you guys subscribe, they
subscribe to us, and then whenyou retweet, it pushes out to
their cross-pollination.
Yeah, some cross-pollination.
For those of you that care aboutthe peasants' perspective and
want to see us grow, please bearound for those chat rates.
We've got to do five this month.

(01:03:26):
We gotta figure out how to dothem.
So, all right, guys, thanks somuch for joining us, and we'll
talk to you again tomorrow.
No private chat today.
Bye.
Bye.

SPEAKER_16 (01:03:59):
What knight lives in that castle over there?
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37, I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call youma'am, you could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind, you're
not what I object to is youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king.

(01:04:20):
Oh king, inferior.
How do you get that, eh?
By exploiting the workers orhanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
There's never gonna be anyproblem.
How do you do, good lady?
I'm Arthur, King of the Britons.

(01:04:44):
The Britons.
We all are, we are all Britons.
I am your king.
You're doing yourself.
We're living in a dictatorshipof self-perpetuating autocracy
and which the working class is.

(01:05:08):
Who lives in that country?
And who is your Lord?
We can't have it.
What?
I told you we're in a narcosyndicalist commune.
We take it in turn to act asauthority executive officer.
But all the decisions of thatofficer have to be ratified at
the special by a civil majorityin the case of Julian.

(01:05:44):
The lady of the lake.
That is why I'm talking.
Listen, strange women, lineimportant distributed swords is
no basis for a system ofgovernment.

(01:06:06):
Supreme executive power derivedfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some classical aquaticceremony.
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tartaroussword is all around saying I was
an emperor.
Just because some poisoned bitchlocked a cimitar at me, they put

(01:06:26):
me away.
Shut up! Will you shut up?
Now we see the violenceinherited in the system.
Shut up! Now we see the violenceinheriting the system! Help!
Help! I'm being repressed! Ohwhat a giveaway! You hear that?
You hear that?
I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it in you.