Narrative Control: How Yesterday's Conspiracy Becomes Today's Accepted Truth

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
good morning peasants .
Welcome to another episode ofthe peasants perspective they're
gonna get you right now waitwhat's happening.
We're not ai, just so you know.
This is not an ai broadcastwent wrong.

Speaker 3 (00:17):
Try again later.
Studio is already streaming.
Oh well, it doesn't say that itis.

Speaker 1 (00:26):
See my hair for the first time this morning.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
Let me refresh maybe oh, are we streaming?
Yeah, we've been restreamingfor 20 some seconds, okay.

Speaker 1 (00:35):
I love this business so much.

Speaker 3 (00:37):
We're back in, and we're the only ones there.

Speaker 1 (00:41):
Okay great.
Good, no one saw the beginning.
Oh my goodness, somebody did,rejoined yet are we streaming?

Speaker 3 (00:51):
yeah, we've been restreaming for 20 some seconds.

Speaker 1 (00:54):
That's here, okay I love this business so much all
right, and we're the only onesthere okay, great.
Good, no one's on YouTube.
You know it's become like ajoke every morning.

Speaker 3 (01:09):
Okay, people are filtering back in.
Okay, great.

Speaker 1 (01:13):
We're live.
We're doing it live, billO'Reilly style.
Good morning.
We got a chat before we had tostop the stream and start the
stream again, so sorry.
Some people got the intro onRumble, some Before.
We had to stop the stream andstart the stream again, so sorry
.
Some people got the intro onrumble, some people did not.
Uh, yep, yep Is what it is.
Good morning everybody.
Yes, good morning.
Yeah, all right.

(01:35):
I'm just seeing my hair in thefeedback thing here.
All right, all right.
Okay, you came in this morningseven minutes ago I didn't watch
the news much, but there's alot of stuff happening.
What did you see this week?
What were some of the thingsthat just popped out to you?

Speaker 3 (01:55):
okay, this is uh, there's not going to be anything
that makes any sense.
But I saw donald trump poppingup in feeds.
I saw dan bongino.
For some reason I was like whatis he saying?
Oh, another kind of crypticstatement about trust me, it's
coming out.
It's coming out, trust me,trust me.
It's like, oh okay, yeah, assoon as I see it I'll trust you.

(02:16):
But it's he sounded uh, hesounded positive, you know, like
he was coming up with someinformation.
It wasn't just blown smoke.
Um, no real information toshare, just lots of little drips
that I saw just kind of on theperiphery as I was super busy

(02:38):
this weekend.
We got the roof is 90 done yeah, yeah, is that like?
flashing is all that's left yeah, so we're short two pieces
because I can't measure, so I'mnot sure how we're gonna solve
that.
So run to the store three times.
Well, the metal is fabricatedin spokane.

(03:01):
Measure once, cut twice.
Run the store three times.

Speaker 1 (03:04):
Measure twice, cut thrice you're always gonna be
cutting one extra.
Yeah, well, a couple couplethings happened this weekend.
One of the big things thathappened this weekend is billy
long, who was just confirmed ascommissioner for the IRS, simply
two months ago got fired.

(03:26):
No Slash got nominated to bethe ambassador to Iceland.
What that feels like going toSiberia, I don't know, man, yeah
, I don't know.
I mean Iceland's important, Ithink, but Billy Long was a
representative that submittedmultiple bills to abolish the
IRS and he was a big, bigproponent of doing that.

(03:49):
So he goes over to the IRS andwhat the rumor is, politico
reported I think it was Politico.
If it wasn't, it was someoneelse.
That is rumor mill paper atthis point and they said that he
was outed because he wouldn'tgive Department of Homeland
Security, irs information onpotential illegal aliens and
there was some type of blow upwhere he told Trump you know,
I'm not going to provide thatinformation.

(04:11):
And then hours later he was out.

Speaker 3 (04:13):
Bye, bye.

Speaker 1 (04:15):
Director of the IRS.
I don't really buy that story.
First of all, I think if Trumpwanted it and he could give it,
he would give it.
It's possible.
He said hey, you know, theattorneys have looked at this.
We're not actually supposed tobe able to give that data, so
there needs to be an executiveorder or a fix in law.
I could understand thathappening.
I don't see Trump being likewell, you're out then if you

(04:36):
won't break the law.
I feel like that's an oldnarrative where Trump is asking
officials to break the law allthe time.
You know what I mean.
Yeah, and I don't think thatthat's ever really borne any
fruit.

Speaker 3 (04:45):
I think that that's the story that the news media
wants, because of the angle theywant to shoot at.

Speaker 1 (04:51):
That's what I mean.
Like they want to run thisnarrative that Billy Long
refused to break the law.
Now he's out of the IRS, youknow that kind of thing, and now
he's banished to be anambassador.
I think if Trump was going tofire him because of some hostile
blow up, he wouldn't beimmediately nominated to be an
ambassador to Iraq.
Now something else happenedthat was pretty interesting
along with that.
So Billy Long's out IRS has hadsix directors this year.

(05:15):
Whoa, really A lot.
Dang yes, doge got in there.
That's like what a month Didsome stuff Right.
They're bringing in morerevenue.
Like revenues are up right,like it's bringing like the
first time, and for a long timethey're shaking the bushes, for
sure.
Yeah, they're shaking the bushes.
They're collecting more revenue.
Well now IRS, which is undertreasury.

(05:38):
Scott Bessa is now the actingdirector.
I'd say the director,commissioner, I don't know, it
doesn't matter, it doesn'tmatter, but he's now in that
position.
Now there's a pattern that'shappening here State department
would take over one of itssubsidiaries as they eliminated
it, and Trump has been talkingabout eliminating the IRS.

(05:58):
I've gotten this question quitea few times from people I've
been talking to the last littlebit about what happens if Trump
loses the IRS.
I've been doubtful that it'sgoing to happen.

Speaker 3 (06:08):
But me as well, just because there are so many levers
, you know.

Speaker 1 (06:13):
Yeah, but a couple of things have been going on.
So this is Howard Legnicktalking about Trump's campaign
promises.

Speaker 9 (06:20):
Donald Trump- announces the external revenue
service and his goal is verysimple oh dang.
His goal is to abolish theinternal revenue service and let
all the outsiders pay.
Do you believe?

Speaker 11 (06:35):
at some point in time we could find a way.
Once the country's back on itsfeet and getting enough revenue
and paid off our debt, do youthink it's possible to find a
way to eliminate federal taxes?
There is a way.
There is a way.

Speaker 10 (06:46):
There is a way, I mean, if what I'm planning comes
out.
It's a great question.
By the way, Everyone couldagree.

Speaker 12 (06:52):
You're pretty sophisticated and yeah, I have a
real shot we're taking intremendous amounts of money.
The answer is yeah, I thinkthere's a real shot.
I actually say there's a shot.
You know, we have the InternalRevenue Service.
We could use the ExternalRevenue Service and we wouldn't
even need the Internal RevenueService.

Speaker 10 (07:11):
Can we reform taxes to eliminate the need to file?
Well, it's possible.
You know, if the tariffs workout really well, you wouldn't
need income tax.
You know that If tariffs workout well, our country at its
richest was during from 1870 to1913.
That was the richest and thatwas.

Speaker 12 (07:30):
We were an all-tariff nation and it's
possible, we'll do a completetax cut, because I think the
tariffs will be enough to cutall of the income tax so we are
staged up right now.

Speaker 1 (07:42):
With billy long out and with scott besant taking it
over under the treasury, I couldpossibly see the stage being
set on this one.
I think it could happen.

Speaker 3 (07:51):
But you know, especially if they're creating
this external residency servicewhere they could retain some of
the levers that were maybeuseful from the irs and here's
the thing trump is doing allkinds of things to get the
corporation of the united statesof america paid.

Speaker 1 (08:08):
He views it as a business.
He views it as a businesspartner.
Okay, all these publiccorporations that are using the
united states government as thecheck exchange and, uh, the
bullied protection money?
Okay, he's like, okay, we'repartners in this.
So Financial Times this morningran NVIDIA and AMD to pay 15%

(08:28):
of China chip sale revenue to USgovernment.
Chip makers agreed on anunusual agreement to secure
export licenses from Trumpadministration.
Nvidia and AMD have agreed togive the United States
government 15% of the revenuesfrom chip sales in China as part
of an unusual arrangement withthe Trump administration to
obtain export licenses for thesemiconductors.

(08:48):
So Trump is monetizing so manylittle things, so many things.
Right, he's monetizing theimport game.
If people are importing things,the seller has to pay to get it
across the border.
Now does the price get passedon?
Of course, but so doeseverything else.
So export licenses new.

(09:10):
No, they have export licensesfor sure but instead of it just
being, like you know, anapplication fee and a review
process, he's saying the cut.
We're getting a cut.
Yeah, we're getting a cut.
Okay, yeah, we're getting a cut.
Okay, you're selling to ourenemy.
We're getting a cut.
Yes, it's pretty unique.
The US official said NVIDIAagreed to pay 15% share in the

(09:32):
revenues from H2O chip sales toChina, and AMD will provide the
same percentage from MI308 chiprevenues Two people familiar
with their region.

Speaker 3 (09:40):
I wonder if they're doing this because it puts
pressure on the importer somehowthat they couldn't get the
pressure on before.

Speaker 1 (09:48):
Well, these are American companies that make the
chips still overseas for themost part.
So it's not just an exportlicense, it's an intellectual
property.
I'm sure there's probably a lotof that.
Actually, maybe they are madedomestically, I don't know Right
there's probably a lot of that.

Speaker 3 (10:03):
Actually, maybe they are made domestically, I don't
know Right.
But regardless of where thechips are made, if the chips
cost more than the products theygo into, we're going to be
affected somehow on price.
Yeah, and I wonder if there's alever there.

Speaker 1 (10:16):
Well, here's the criticism.
In April, the Trumpadministration said it would
also ban H2O exports to China.
However, trump reversed thecourse in Juneune after meeting
huang at the white house.
Over the following weeks,nvidia became concerned because
the bureau of industry andsecurity, bis, the arm of the
commerce department that runsexport controls, had not issued
any licenses.
Huang raised the issue withtrump on wednesday.
According to people familiarwith the exchange h2o revenue

(10:39):
deal comes as nvidia and thetrump administration face
criticism over the decision tosell the chip to china.
Us security exports say the H2Ohelped the Chinese military to
undermine US strength inartificial intelligence.
Beijing must be gloating to seeWashington turn export licenses
into revenue streams.
Liz Tobin, a China expert whoserved on the National Security
Council in the first Trumpadministration, now at the

(11:00):
Jamestown Foundation what's next?
Letting Lockheed Martin sell F35 to China for 15% commission?
The BIS officials have alsoexpressed concerns about the
reversal.
So these are like China Hawksthat wants just to cut them off
completely.
I don't know.
I don't know either.
I think there are situationswhere you're like you can't not
export because that's like anact of war, and so well, let's

(11:23):
monetize it, let's make itexpensive.
You know, oh, they're justgoing to get ahead in the ai
race.
Well, it's going to pay us todo it so maybe that's the lever
I don't know, I don't know yeah,trump uses tariffs as a tool.
Right, we know this.
Scott besant talks about thisquite a bit.
It's not just a tool forrevenue, but it's also a tool
for uh, compliance yeah, that'swhy I call it a lever.

Speaker 3 (11:43):
I just don't really understand, maybe, what the
levers are doing.

Speaker 1 (11:46):
He's using it in conjunction with sanctions.
Sanctions have kind of runtheir course now, and the other
thing too is there's escapevalves for sanctions.
You can buy up gold, you canbuy up Bitcoin, you can buy up
resources, and people are doingit.
So Russia figured out how tojust basically detach themselves
and they exchange directly withother countries.
So the sanctions only go so far.

(12:07):
Probably work really greatagainst ghana, but they don't
work any more against russiaright.

Speaker 7 (12:13):
Alexander hamilton, who was the original tariff man.
Uh used terrorists for tworeasons one, to form, to fund
the government, two, to protectus industry.
And now president trump isusing tariffs as an instrument
of foreign policy and he isputting secondary tariffs on
india for buying russian oil.

Speaker 1 (12:35):
Alexander hamilton, who is the original tariff man
and they've kind of just skirtedaround the rules.
And then india will get someoil from iran and they've kind
of been a middle man for some ofthis.
Well, india's a big country andyou don't have a lot of
leverage there.
So what trump did was hebasically said, hey, I'm going

(12:56):
to apply the secondary sanctionswhich he has threatened.
But it's like sending a hugeshock, because countries can't
decouple and it has down, it hasa domino effect.
So secondary tariffs affectanother country and another
country you know what I mean andso it starts to like kind of
have a cascade, and trump hasproven to stand strong on this

(13:17):
tariff thing and he's collectingthe money well, that's
precisely why I call thesethings levers.

Speaker 3 (13:22):
But we don't really know exactly what they're doing.
Because I'm not smart enough toknow what the secondary and
tertiary impacts are to thesethings, it's hard to know.

Speaker 1 (13:31):
Well, for example, when he goes, hey, we're going
to, we're going to up tariffs onexports from India, or imports
from India, ok, great.
So now we're at 40, 50 percent.
Well, ok, the guys that profitfrom illegally collecting the
oil, or whatever, I mean that'smeasured in billions, I'm sure.

(13:51):
well, all of a sudden you startlooking at all the other exports
, like, I don't know, silk anduh, cocoa, whatever, whatever,
yeah, like all of a sudden,every other industry is affected
and they're like hey, our goodsare no longer, they're no
longer competitive on the marketbecause of the markups.
And that's happening becauseyou guys are offloading dirty

(14:13):
oil and we can't have thatanymore you know, what I mean.
So that's what I mean.
Like it creates a cascadeeffect because all of a sudden,
some stockbroker in new york islike whoa, you know, a huge part
of my mutual fund portfolio issome company that's got
manufacturing in india and, ohmy goodness, all of a sudden my
algorithm is going bonkers.
My algorithm is going crazy.

(14:34):
I've gotten in the, I've gottenin the red, you know, and it's
like sell, sell, sell.
And so it creates these realcascade effects every time.
That's why you know they don'tlike donald trump to be flippant
about these things, because itdoes create.
You know.
You've got all the analysisthat are why are we buying all?

Speaker 3 (14:49):
these tranches of housing securities.
What's going on?

Speaker 1 (14:53):
yeah, changes things anyways.
So that's that's prettyinteresting it's and I guess
india ran silent like theydidn't respond for a couple days
and trump pointed that out.
He's like, hey, you better geton this or it's gonna get worse.
So india's like kind ofprobably in the background doing
the math and the calculations.
Over in the youtube chat we gota couple people talking.

(15:13):
John attack is having adisagreement with the irs.
It would not hurt my feelingsif it was fixed gone.
Yes, that'd be nice.
We don't, boys.
Good morning, it's gettinggetting ready for your doctor's
appointment.
Good luck with that.
Hopefully you don't have cancer.
Just kidding, I have no ideawhat it's for.
Hopefully it's not a cancercheckup.
Howdy from.
Texas, tiffany and Carlito andwe don't boys Howdy from West

(15:34):
Texas.
Oh, and then over on rumble,john attack is checked in there
as well.
Thank you very much.
If you have a choice and it'spossible for you, please watch
this on rumble.
We get more credit for it.
Over there we stream to youtubebecause we know sometimes it's
a better stream or whatever.
Whatever, people have differentand we're trying to grow the
channel and we're trying to growthe channel, but we do get more

(15:56):
credit if you're over on rumbleand, of course, at the end of
the show today we're going to betalking about.
By credit we mean cash.
Yeah, we're at the end of theshow in private and I'm teasing
this out early, so you have timeto go sign up for rumble
premium if you want to do thatagain you know it's a shameless
plug, but I got asked this weekwhy we stream on rumble.
No, do you remember why?

Speaker 3 (16:18):
well, I remember getting kicked off of spotify.
I remember getting kicked off.

Speaker 1 (16:24):
Yeah, we stream on Rumble because we realized
pretty quick we were, you know,well, we're a hot potato, a hot
potato and we really needed tolike, stay streaming somewhere.

Speaker 4 (16:35):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (16:35):
And so Rumble was pretty new and YouTube was just,
I mean, you couldn't say we'repromising some freedom, you
couldn't say hardly anything.
So we just went straight toRumbleble.
So rumble's always been ourhome, like since the very
beginning.
Yeah and uh, youtube, we, wejust stream there, like we
upload there now because theyseem to let it happen.
But I just honestly, I'vealready dealt with a couple

(16:56):
strikes or whatever.
I just expect one day the wholething will disappear yeah,
youtube could disappear someday,yeah okay.
So I took some notes as I wasdriving in this morning because
I wanted to keep this in in mind, because this show right now is
we're in the mainstream andwe're talking about stuff that's
not even scary.
There are two.
There is the story as ithappens right right.

(17:19):
As things break, chunks ofinformation leak out and people
can piece it together.
There's the story as it happens, this is dangerous.
The truth is dangerous,especially when you're dealing
with corruption, et cetera, etcetera, et cetera.
The truth is very dangerous.
Then there's the story as it'sreleased.
This is the narrative, right?
This is where okay, now, it'sokay to talk about this, and it

(17:40):
can go one direction or anotherthe necessary cover-up things
have been covered up and, forthe most part, you know, you
kind of flood the zone withinformation and the law.
This is when the media isposting the official narrative
the media is posting the fashionnarrative and what happens is
the law of primacy takes overthe, whatever way it's released
and its new rendition right, notas it's breaking, but as its

(18:03):
new rendition.
That tends to be what sticksright.
It's the law of primacy, law offirst impression.
So as the story's released,it's with a purpose, the story
is safe and one of the sides ofthe Hegelian dialectic supports
it.
So some of the stories that youcan talk about now because I
noticed this, because some ofthe people that I pay attention

(18:25):
to that are like we're in theintelligence world and you hear
these little tidbits, like theother day we heard Devin Nunes
talk about a fusion.
Gps was one of these companiesthat stirs up a media story, it
leaks it out over time and itcreates this narrative.
So then when you come in withthe okay, this is now the
official line, you have all thepieces to put together.

(18:45):
It's been seeded right andthat's what the Fusion GPS does.
They create the seed materialto go out and spread the fertile
ground.
When Devin Nunes says he's likeone of many of these companies
that's doing it, it's like, okay, so this is a thing.
So these deep intelligencepeople that are like yeah, we
create the narrative.
And they do?

(19:10):
they plant the seeds and theyhire the consultants to create
the buzz or the the little poststhat are dated now.
It's the fertile ground.
You know you?
You leak something now on someobscure twitter site just to
retweet it later and make itfamous.
You know what I'm saying?

Speaker 3 (19:18):
so they kind of seed the ground and that adds
legitimacy because it's got allthis, all these roots exactly.

Speaker 1 (19:24):
so I paid attention to this because those people,
right as stuff is happening withtrump and epstein and you know,
like four or five things arehappening, all of a sudden
you've got tucker carlson doinga big interview with a lady
talking about the oklahoma citybombing, and then now she's on
john solomon, and now she'smaking the rounds in kind of
what you would consider to conink or the conservative

(19:44):
ecosystem, and it's like, oh, sonow it's OK to talk about.

Speaker 3 (19:48):
Yeah, 30 years later.

Speaker 1 (19:50):
Oh, it's like the Russian Whitmer kidnapping hoax,
where there's a whole lot ofagents and people who have been
now blacked out and redactedRight.
We're involved, but no, it wasa lone wolf operation, I mean.
So it's like like, oh, so nowthis is okay to talk about.

(20:11):
Like I personally know someonewho was the investigator hired
by the families of the childrento investigate it and he gave up
his bar card and now livescompletely on gold on a farm
somewhere in texas, off grid offgrid like he's out.
I got out, okay, I talked to himand he basically was telling
about the j6.
He's well, good luck whenyou're done, bounce buddy.
So I was like, wow.

(20:32):
So all of a sudden, now it'sokay to talk about some other
stories that are now okay totalk about COVID and everything
dealing with that.
We can be really critical aboutit now and not worry about
literally losing our entirechannel or getting a strike on
YouTube.
Uh, jfk assassination.
We can openly talk about it,possibly having the government
involved.
We now have documents.

(20:53):
It's, it's in the mainstream,it's back right, it's no longer
relegated to just dark channels.
Cnn's running whole series,series on it.
You've got russiagate right.
We can say charmella, charmella, eric, charmella, and did our
stream drop?
Nope, no, we're good, couldn'tdo that before.

(21:13):
We would have dropped thestream.
We can talk about the riggedelection openly.
Trump has made sure that we canstill say that.
I mean we're gonna show a minutewe're gonna show a clip later
today that now they targetedpeople who talked about the rig
election.
For sure they, the, they, thesmoke monster.
You talk about Biden's health.
That was couldn't really talkabout that for the last four
years.
No, ok, you can talk aboutarresting public officials.

(21:37):
That's become now a thing,right, I mean that kind of the
seal got broken by actuallydoing it with arresting Donald
Trump.
But that's what those are.
Things are now part of thenarrative as it's released.
There's a reason why now we'retalking about the Oklahoma City
bombing.
Now we're talking aboutweaponization of government and
how it's weaponized against thecitizens to get them to do

(21:58):
things they wouldn't otherwisenormally do.

Speaker 2 (22:00):
You see what I'm saying.
This goes to it goes in.

Speaker 1 (22:01):
Do you see what I'm saying?
This goes to, it goes in.
There's this larger narrativethat's being curated so that
when they come and this is myopinion this is going to
culminate with coming down onthe hammer on the Russiagate
thing, and you're going to saylook, these people are the
weaponizers.
That's my, that's my opinion,that's why that stuff's coming
out.
And for people who follow thesestories early on, as they broke

(22:28):
, look what happened to them.
A couple of them got othered acouple of them are now running
the fbi.
So I mean you stick with thetruth and eventually it wins.
Here's a little story, too,talking about government
corruption, and this is why Imean we have such a big problem.
It goes all the way down to the, to the bottom ranks.
So, uh, steve tompkins was asheriff who was recently elected

(22:49):
in suffolk county, uh, suffolkcounty, uh, massachusetts, and
he was arrested this last, orbasically, I think, friday.
From the very first day ofsuffolk county, sheriff stephen
tompkins sought to portrayhimself as a man of the people,
a principal public servant, areformer devoted to the cause of
justice.
That's why it's beyonddisappointing that he's now
accused of gaming a systeminstituted in the interest of

(23:10):
public safety.
The FBI took Sheriff Tompkinsinto custody for allegedly
extorting $50,000 from the ownerof a national cannabis retailer
seeking to do business inBoston.
We believe the sheriff saw.
What the sheriff saw was aneasy way to make a quick buck.
On the end on the sly is clearcut corruption under federal law
.
The citizens of Suffolk Countydeserve better, not a man who is

(23:31):
accused of trading his positionto bankroll his own political
and financial future.
Public servants must be held tothe highest ethical standards,
and those falling shall berooted out.
So days after he was sworn inas sheriff, he was already
shaken down a cannabisdealership in exchange for a
license.

Speaker 3 (23:46):
He's 50 grand wild where did he learn to do that?

Speaker 1 (23:51):
gee, I don't know that's bad.
I was in prison with a guy whothey made a a hbo documentary
about him.
He was he's a corrupt policechief in uh, maryland, baltimore
, and uh, you know, he and hisgang of cops would basically vie
for territory against druggangs and rob the drug gangs,

(24:13):
you know under a raid and takethe money and the drugs and
arrest the guys for petty stuffand run them through the system.
Oh man, it was bad one day.
So, yeah, so one day I'mwalking around, I'm walking
around the track with this guyand he and I were having a
pretty deep conversation and itwas about I asked him he'd gone

(24:35):
to the hole for like four orfive months for drug use in
prison and I was like, dude, wasit worth it?
And he was like, well, yeah, itwas worth it.
And he had to think about it fora whole day he got back to me
with the questions.
That was what he came.
He came up to me on the trackhe goes hey, I've been thinking
about that question you asked meand he's like it is, it was
worth it and here's why.
And he explained to me why he'slike it's because I was hooked

(24:56):
in the hole.
Get sober, think about it.
And I haven't touched it sinceand I think better of myself.
And he's like so if that's whatit took for me to finally like
decide not to use it cause it'severywhere, and he's like but
now I can say no, but I had togo through that.
So, that's how he justified it.

(25:18):
Was it worth it?
Yes, because he learned hislesson.
So he's you, you know, he'sbeing reflective, so this was a
good conversation.
It's like, okay, you'relearning from you know, and
you're recognizing thatsometimes, you know, people
discipline you so that you canlearn, and that's I thought he
was gonna say it was worth itand it was like, oh my gosh no,
it was worth it.
Like my, my thing is like yougo to the hole for six months.

(25:40):
Was the high really worth itexactly?

Speaker 3 (25:42):
that's what.
And then, if he says yes, I'dbe like really right the quick
answer should be no, but histhing was.

Speaker 1 (25:48):
I was so addicted like I needed to go to the hole
so he thought through thequestion which was all right,
really good, so we've had wewere having this deep discussion
he also has 13 kids, 11 moms.
He's got 13 kids.
It's idiocracy on big time forsure.
Now, when I watched thebeginning of that movie with the

(26:10):
he's with all the strings andconnections oh, my goodness, the
great guy, one of the good guys.
You know one of the good guys inprison.
You know the burglars, thearsons, the assaulters, the drug
dealers, the good guys, thenon-child molester, yeah, the
non-pedos.
So he had some great tattoo inktoo that he'd all gotten in

(26:33):
prison, even at color work.
So we're walking around thetrack and there's the former
sheriff or a former policeofficer, police um captain or
whatever it was, and he'ssitting up against the bench and
he waves us over and so we goover to him and he's up, he's in
there.
He's got like stomach cancer orsomething like that, so he's
not doing great.

(26:53):
But uh, we go in there and wewalk over and the guy's like,
hey, he works in, commissary,and you can pay him a bribe to
get your food first and ty wouldpay the bribe.
So he's like hey, ty, I haven'tbeen feeling great.
I'm probably not gonna beworking there much longer, so
I'm gonna stop taking tickets.
That's what he called.
I'm gonna stop taking ticketsand he's like ty's like okay, I

(27:16):
get it, that's cool, and likethere's kind of like this
detente like like the sexoffenders work in laundry.
So if you want your laundrydone and folded and returned,
you have to do business with thesex offenders work in laundry.
So if you want your laundrydone and folded and returned,
you have to do business with thesex offender.
So there's a couple of spotswhere you're just kind of stuck
doing business with whoeverworks there.
So, normally this guy would bepersona non grata, but because
he's got the job in commissary,people want to be in front of

(27:37):
the line, so they're going to,they're going to do the business
with them, so anyways, so soanyways.
So ty is like okay, that's cool.
So guys like, all right, coolputs us right hand out to dab
him now dabbing in prison's abig deal.
It's like the fist bump.
And in fact ty I know I'm goinga couple places with the story
it all ties together.
Ty taught me the dab becausecoming down the hallway he'd,

(28:00):
he'd, and you know he'd put his,he'd put his hand out.
Well, you know we're coming ateach other right and left lane
and he puts his right hand outand I pop him with my left hand,
like that, and he like spinsaround and watches me walk away,
like what was that Walking on?
So he comes up to me at thechow hall the next day, throws
his tape up.
What the was that manLeft-handed?

(28:22):
I was like what, what?
He's like you dab me with yourleft hand.
He's like yeah, I'm left-handed.
He's like dude, right hand,only left hand dirty.
You reach across the body butit's always the right hand.
So he like got me schooled upwithout a fight, so that was
nice so he, the cop, puts outhis right hand to to get a dab.
You know conversations over dab, walk away.
And so ty reaches out and dabshim and then we walk away and ty

(28:48):
is just ticked.
Had we not just had like thisdeep, reflective conversation,
it might have turned intosomething.
I was looking at his right.
He's like I just dabbed thatdirty cop he's a cop.
He's still a dirty cop to bootyou.
You know he's like the least.
Oh, he was so bad he couldn'tlet it go.

(29:08):
We had to walk like a whole lapbefore he finally let it go.
He's like.

Speaker 2 (29:11):
I feel like I should go defend my honor or something
I can't believe he took me in adab at him.

Speaker 1 (29:17):
Anyways, all right, so dabbing.
So those are the things thatare now safe to talk about that
are now safe to talk about, okay.
All right.
So this is Michael Cohentalking about specifically
arresting public officials.
So a couple of things.
Ed Martin has been on theweaponization working group has

(29:37):
been officially tasked withlooking into the mortgage fraud
for both Letitia James and forAdam shift.
Oh, big deal.
So this is Michael Cohen's takeon that.

Speaker 8 (29:47):
Look at what he's doing right now, for example,
with Tish James.
Look at what he's doing withAdam Schiff, and I'm going to
make another bold predictionhere on the show.
A lot of predictions at 8o'clock in the morning.

Speaker 18 (29:58):
There's a lot of predictions.

Speaker 8 (29:59):
Take these notes because mark my words
politically, they're both doomed.
All right, I'm telling youright off the bat this is a
political suicide for both TishJames and Adam Schiff, more of a
political homicide.

Speaker 1 (30:12):
Well, yeah, but how are they going to?

Speaker 16 (30:13):
be?
How are they politically doomedif Senator Schiff comes from a
blue state, attorney GeneralPitch James is here in a blue
state.
They are elected by the people.

Speaker 8 (30:24):
How are they doomed politically?
It'll be gerrymander.

Speaker 5 (30:31):
It will end up being somehow they will end up being
held.
Yes, but they will also be heldaccountable.

Speaker 8 (30:36):
Mark my words they will be held accountable for the
crimes that, for the crimesthat they are now looking at.
That's Ed Martin who's lookingat him, and I know so many
people are going to say, oh myGod, Michael Cohen is like
bending the knee to Trump.
No, what I'm doing is I'mactually telling you the reality
.
We can talk to each other allday long and we can say, oh, we

(30:56):
have, I have a million followers, you have a million followers.
It's the same million followers.
Seventy seven million Americansended up voting for Trump.
Mark my words, Ed Martin, theDepartment of Justice, Pam Bondi
they will figure out exactlyhow to go after Adam Schiff, how
to go after Tish James forthese mortgage violations and

(31:19):
they will be alleged correct andthey will be held accountable.
That's my next prediction hereon your show, and I know that
I'm right because if there is asigning of a box which is wrong
wrong and, trust me, I know Iwent to prison.
One of my charges was on myHELOC.
I had a low mortgage onto it,80% equity.

(31:40):
They held me accountable for aHELOC violation.
Theirs is much worse and restassured.
Allegedly Right.
So let's go one step evenfurther here.
When you have the courts onyour side as well, what chance
do you have of success?
It's why I turn around and Isay doomed.
Yeah, I love it, they're doomed.

Speaker 1 (32:04):
He has the right perspective.
Man, when you're in theircrosshairs, I mean you're
fighting for your life.
Yeah, and it's the littlethings, yes, the checked you're
fighting for your life.

Speaker 3 (32:12):
Yeah, and it's the little things.
Yes, the checked box.
I don't know who those twodudes were that?

Speaker 1 (32:15):
one guy looked like a baller, the big hair, yeah,
yeah, no kidding.
So this was jd vance.
He was on with maria bartolomoon sunday morning and he gave a
great interview.
In fact, I have a couple clipsfrom the show, but he talked
about accountability for thewhole russiagate thing.
So there's michael cohen,former attorney for the
president.
That you know, I don't know.
Man like lost his mind.

Speaker 3 (32:34):
I know something about this.
There's a couple of things thatwent on.

Speaker 1 (32:37):
The first thing was, as soon as Trump got elected,
companies like AT&T paid MichaelCohen two hundred and fifty
thousand dollars for access,basically Like can we call you
to call the president?
And Michael Cohen wanted aposition somewhere in the White
House and didn't get one.
All this kind of scandal wasbreaking simultaneously.
By the way, boris um, borisepstein kind of had the same

(32:59):
problem.
There was a little bit ofself-dealing going on, allegedly
who knows right, but he didn't.
I don't think he has anofficial position in the white
house and he was kind of attrump's side this whole time.
So michael co kind of playedthat part right, kind of turned
on the president when he didn'tget what he wanted and, I don't
know, maybe saw he would besuccessful at the left.
But they came after him prettyhard too.

(33:21):
They pinched him forinformation and they got him and
he spent some time in prison.
Um, it wasn't that bad and Imean he was like in for a a
couple months and then he gotout with an ankle monitor and
then they tried to revoke hisbail because he went to coffee
with somebody.
Anyways.
Point is he paid the price forchecking a box on a mortgage
application with leticia jamesand shift, or accused of, is a

(33:43):
little bit more and he's likethey're coming yeah, he knows
something about it.

Speaker 3 (33:47):
They're coming.
They're coming for you.
I like how he calls her tishtish.

Speaker 1 (33:51):
Yeah, they're coming for you.
I like how he calls her TishTish.
Yeah, they're coming for him.
Now you've got the Russiagatesituation, so this is what JD
Vance talks about that.

Speaker 8 (33:58):
Do you want to see indictments?

Speaker 16 (34:00):
I absolutely want to see indictments, maria.
Look, of course you've got tohave the law, follow the facts
here.
You don't just indict people toindict people.
You indict people because theybroke the law.
You indict people because theybroke the law.

(34:21):
But if you look at what Tulsiand Kash Patel have revealed in
the last couple of weeks, Idon't know how anybody can look
at that and say that therewasn't aggressive violations of
the law.
What they basically did is theydefrauded the American people
in order to take HillaryClinton's presidential campaign
talking points and turn theminto intelligence.
By defrauding the Americanpeople, defrauding the
intelligence agencies, lyingabout what the intel said, they
would take something thatsupported a Hillary Clinton
campaign talking point and theywould overemphasize it and

(34:43):
exaggerate it.
They took anything thatactually contradicted that
narrative and they buried itdeep and through that they
actually laundered HillaryClinton's presidential campaign
talking points through theAmerican intelligence services.
That's a violation of thepeople's trust.
That's a violation of what ourintelligence services should be
doing, and I absolutely thinkthey broke the law.

(35:04):
You're going to see a lot ofpeople get indicted for that.
Here's the thing that shouldreally bother the American
people.
What do you want ourintelligence community to be
doing.
I want them to be catching badguys.
I want them to be making surethat terrorists aren't going to
kill innocent American civilians.
I don't want them launderingHillary Clinton's campaign
talking points into the Americanmedia and giving them this air

(35:24):
of legitimacy.
It is sick and it's disgusting.
It hurt the intelligencecommunity, it hurt the American
people and it hurt the firstTrump administration.
We've got to have consequencesfor it or we're just going to
see the same play repeated again.
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (35:40):
JD Vance is so good at his communication.
Yes, if you, when I read hisbook, he'll be the elegy Very
impressed, and I look at someonelike that.
Someone who knew him when hewas a teenager is probably blown
away at how far he's made it inlife but, he just kept learning
from every experience.
I mean really impressive.
Pony boy says uh, uh, carlitsays this.

(36:02):
He says good morning.
Rumble made the switch.
Yes, he made the switch.
Thank you for coming over.
Cohen admitted that they allhave the same 1 million chatbot
farm followers.
Yeah, that's right.
I like that.
I've got a million followers.
He's got a million followers.
They're all the same followers.
He's got 77 million.
Yeah, no kidding.
Good morning.
Pray the rosary daily, welcome,welcome, okay.

(36:23):
So that's all good news.
Check out this.
This got I can't remember thiswas newly okay.
This is newly revealed.
Uh, communications obtained bysenator grassley proved biden's
doj dc, us matthew graves andwashington fbi brass coordinated
to fast track the indictmentand arrest of peter navarro in
2022.

(36:44):
So what this email is this isfrom tibo tibo timothy tibo, I
believe, is how he says his name.
It's like the football playerkind of reply.
Contempt of Congress caseupdate.
So this is everybody involvedin this and it goes.
I just spoke with DC UnitedStates Attorney's Office.
So that would be MerrickGarland.
After consultation with MaineJustice, they are not intending

(37:06):
to prosecute Meadows or Scavino.
That's Mark Meadows, who is thechief of staff, and dan,
because cavino, who's liketrump's personal caddy.
This decision is based on theirwhite house positions prior and
prior doj opinion.
So those executive branchintercourse circle people have
the executive branch immunitymolly asked for you to call if

(37:29):
you have any questions orconcerns.
We have been told to cease workon those cases.
They would like to charge.
So this is coming from top tobottom.
They would like to chargeNavarro in the next two weeks.
However, here is what we need toaccomplish Locate him, sam, can
you assist with this?
Get subpoena returned fromVerizon for his phone Subpoena
served about 10 days ago.

(37:49):
Issue preservance letter toApple.
Prepare phone subpoena servedabout 10 days ago.
Issue preserver preservanceletter to apple.
Prepare search warrant for hisphone and icloud account.
Conduct a knock and talkinterview and serve phone search
warrant at conclusion ofinterview.
Best regards, walter.
So they were targeting.
It wasn't based on observationor information.
It was a top-down target uh-huhthat's what it was.

(38:11):
All those guys didn't want totestify, but they had to target
the two.
They kind of let off on theothers.
They had their little legalreasoning for that, but, dude,
totally targeted.
Now that doesn't even surpriseme, because if you look at
Andrew McCabe, who was basicallyin Dan Bongino's spot as the
deputy director of the FBI, hesaid this and just you know,

(38:34):
flashback, Remember when he likeopenly said this, the deputy
attorney general offered to weara wire into the White House.
He said I never get searched,the deputy attorney general is
was Rod Rosenstein.

Speaker 11 (38:46):
When I go into the White House.
I could easily wear a recordingdevice.
They wouldn't know it was there.
Now, he was not joking, he wasabsolutely serious and in fact
he brought it up in the nextmeeting we had.
I did discuss it with mygeneral counsel and my
leadership team.
Constitution allows the vicepresident and a majority of the

(39:15):
cabinet to remove the president.
The discussion of the 25thAmendment was simply.
Rod raised the issue anddiscussed it with me in the
context of thinking about howmany other cabinet officials
might support such an effort.

Speaker 6 (39:33):
Rosenstein was actually openly talking about
whether there was a majority ofthe cabinet who would vote to
remove the president.
That's correct Counting votes.
What seemed to be coursingthrough the mind of the deputy
attorney general was getting ridof the president of the United
States.
Well, one way or another, thedeputy attorney general was

(39:55):
getting rid of the president ofthe united states.

Speaker 1 (39:56):
Well, one way or another, the deputy attorney
general.

Speaker 3 (39:57):
So, and that came out in 2019 I mean, that's what it
sounds like again.

Speaker 1 (40:01):
So you know, I was one of those people 2019.
I was just watching this fromthe seat of my excavator.
What are you guys talking aboutpeople?
People hear what they're saying, like you hear what they're
saying.
Here's another one where he'sbeing interviewed.

Speaker 13 (40:13):
Uh, on msn or on nbc on our intelligence
investigation into the presidentI did.
Is that tantamount to sayingyou felt there was reason to
suspect that he was a nationalsecurity threat?
Is that what?

Speaker 11 (40:28):
that means it is saying that we had information
that led us to believe.

Speaker 1 (40:33):
And now we know that information was fake and we know
that they knew that thatinformation was fake.
We know that that is beyonddispute.
At this point there's no morenarrative.
You know hustling or anything.

Speaker 11 (40:44):
It's beyond dispute that there might be a threat to
national security in this case,that the president himself might
in fact be a threat to theUnited States national security
and, in particular, was it yoursuspicion and the reason that
you opened this investigationthat you thought the president
might actually be working onbehalf of Russia we had a number
of very concerning things thatwe were considering at the time.

(41:06):
One of them was the fact thatthe president, in our view, had
gone to extreme measures topotentially impact negatively
impact, possibly turn off ourinvestigation of Russian
meddling into the election andRussian coordination.

Speaker 1 (41:20):
The one that was used to target him himself, that was
opened by them for the specificpurpose to ruin his president,
to tank him, to ruin hispresident.
And it wasn't quite, and we wereafraid he would not let it
happen because he's too cozywith russia, which is how we

(41:40):
premised this whole thing in thefirst place.
Wow, nation.
By the way, they paid him amillion dollars, or I think it
was one or two million dollars,because, uh, you know, they
fired him over this and he losthis pension.
So he sued him and got hispension back and a couple
million bucks.
This guy yeah.

Speaker 11 (42:03):
With his campaign.

Speaker 13 (42:04):
So that goes to his potential motive.
But when you're opening thisparticular kind of investigation
counterintelligence Did yoususpect the president might
actually be working for Russia?

Speaker 11 (42:14):
We thought that might be possible.
Yes, we thought it might bepossible.
Now, remember Savannah, we'reat the beginning of an
investigation.
We don't draw conclusions.
We simply look at the facts andthe information we have and
begin investigations.

Speaker 13 (42:26):
But, as you point out in your book, the FBI does
not start any investigationwilly-nilly.
In your book, the FBI does notstart any investigation
willy-nilly.
What were the predicate facts?
Lay them out here.
What were the facts thatsuggested the president may be a
national security threat andmay in fact be working on behalf
of a foreign adversary, russia?

Speaker 11 (42:45):
Okay, so, sabini, we have to go back to the
investigation of potentialcollusion between the campaign
and Russia.
I said through the fall fall.
These are topics we've beenlooking at.
During that time, the presidenthas been publicly undermining
the investigative efforts.

Speaker 16 (42:58):
He's talking about it as a witch now that we know
about it as a hoax he's nothappy with what we're doing also
taylor.

Speaker 3 (43:06):
How many of these stories are you covering?

Speaker 1 (43:07):
willy-nilly dude they did this to us, like these
people ruined so much good.
Like, yeah, the government'sbeen corrupt, but it's a good,
it's our corrupt government areyou saying there was something
there?

Speaker 3 (43:24):
well, we were concerned.

Speaker 1 (43:26):
We were concerned that he might actually be
working with russia, because hemight shut down the
investigation into Russianmeddling in the election, which
is targeted.

Speaker 3 (43:33):
I mean, he did say might quite a few times.

Speaker 1 (43:36):
Oh my.

Speaker 11 (43:38):
Let's finish it.
During that time, the presidentapproaches the director of the
FBI and asks him to stopinvestigating Michael Flynn, a
part of our investigation intoRussian interference.
Asks him to turn off thatinvestigation.

Speaker 13 (43:51):
investigation into Russian interference, asks him
to turn off that investigation.
Why isn't that just the normalobstruction of justice?
Criminal inquiry, which issubstantial enough on its own,
but what takes it to this nextlevel, where there's a suspicion
that he's working for a foreigngovernment?

Speaker 11 (44:02):
I mean, this is extraordinary Because you have
to ask yourself, Savannah, ifyou believe that the president
might have obstructed justicefor the purpose of ending our
investigation into Russiaussia.
You have to ask yourself why.
Why would any president of theunited states not want the fbi
to get to the bottom of russianinterference in our election?

Speaker 1 (44:20):
I know that's joe so here's what happened, going back
with my little notes I madethis morning.
So there's the story.
As it happens, we found out whyis andrew mccabe giving this
interview where he's kind offessing up to some pretty
serious things, but then he'sgot all the justifications and
the interviewer is perfectlyasking it.
Well, but I mean for you, youdon't just open it Web

(44:42):
investigation Nilly.
So what was your predicate?
Right, you see?
How she's setting it up.
So, as the story broke, we out,mccabe actually started the
investigation into trump.
He did it right after themeeting at the white house.
We knew that the informationcame from hillary clinton and
that they knew the informationhad come from hillary clinton,
right?
So all those things had broke acouple weeks, week or two

(45:06):
before that, right, you've gotthe peter struck lisa page text
messages that are constantlyreferencing meeting with McCabe
and Comey, and the White Houseis running this and we have a
plan, blah, blah, blah.
So that's the story as itbreaks.
That's coming out in thesejumbled parts Text messages here
.
A warrant application, that's.
That's Freedom of InformationAct over here.

(45:27):
A little leak into John Solomonover here, and we can kind of
put it together.
Here's the events as theyunfolded.
Well, then here's andrew mccabe, who has to acknowledge the
legitimate opening of theinvestigation.
So he's the guy somehow so nowyou've got to.
You've got to craft thenarrative again as it's being
released.
It's the narrative, it's thestory as it's released.

(45:47):
He's now releasing this news,so the vast majority of
Americans are hearing about thisas Savannah this hard hitting,
so you started the investigationinto Trump.
Yes, I did start theinvestigation of Trump, but the
vast majority of Americansthat's the first time they're
hearing it and connecting McCabeto the warrant.
You know, maybe on social mediathey saw the paper, but they
didn't connect it to the personand the story.

(46:09):
So that's where SavannahGuthrie comes in and tells the
story through the question.
It's brilliant, this isOperation Mockingbird, perfect.
And so he acknowledges thestuff that the conspiracy
theorists were just a minute ago.
Like what are you crazy?
Yeah, right, he acknowledges it.
But then he puts his well, it'sall predicated and process and

(46:31):
serious concerns.

Speaker 3 (46:33):
And we can't be ignoring and keep in mind the
25th.

Speaker 1 (46:35):
Amendment.
These companies that create thenews story buzzer out there.
Trump's crazy.
Trump's going off the hingeinside the White House.
Trump's yelling look, he firedRex Tillerson over a tweet.

Speaker 3 (46:47):
And his claims are legitimate, because otherwise
the president wouldn't want toshut down the investigation,
exactly, and he's a desperateman.
The walls are closing in he'slike a cornered wall.

Speaker 1 (46:58):
They're closing in 25th amendment.
He's completely incompetent.
Look, he misspelled a word, youknow, and so.
So then he's like well, rodrosenstein said what about the
25th amendment?
Well, where are these storiespercolating from?
Are they representing realityor are they being generated to
give an air of legitimacy forthe operation that these guys
are like?
Hey, step one, impeachment.
Step two 25th Amendment.

(47:19):
Step three a bullet.
They've got the plan worked out.

Speaker 3 (47:24):
The insurance policy, step five.
We're full commie Step five.

Speaker 1 (47:29):
We're full commie.
Oh my gosh, it's perfect.
Looking back back, you can seeit well.
Now you know, like I mentioned,we're hearing all kinds of
other stuff.
Here's this again in this ideaof this, all the sins of this
last couple years.
This was the whistleblower frombrazil and this is the end of
that interview she did, whereshe's talking about, uh, the

(47:51):
meetings and the targeting.
So this was bill barr meetingwith fannie willis along with
this other williams guy that wasa conservative influencer,
apparently hates trump.
If you go look at his twitter,it's pretty wild.
He's mr tariffs are going tocause that.
He's like plays the rhino lineto a t.
So this is her notes, taken,contemporaneously, validated and

(48:12):
verified.
She worked with months withproject veritas for this and
this information has been givento the doj at this point like
one of the first meetings that Ihad about this plan.

Speaker 19 (48:23):
They had to go after everyone who works or support.
That was back in September 13of 2021.
So in this meeting was me,armstrong Shermichael and Bill
Barr by phone and they spokeabout January 6th committee.

(48:46):
They authorized the committeeto investigate the events about
January 6th.
We started like with some names.
They also gave a lot of names.
Here we have Michael Flynn,steve Bannon, roddy Giuliani,
jeffrey Clark, oath Keepers,proud Boy People.

(49:10):
Proud Boy Group.

Speaker 1 (49:18):
Scott Perry, jim Jordan a group called stop they
steal.
That's me, right there.
Stop the steal.
I hashtag stop the steal oneverything leading up to january
6th for a month.
Right, that's the whole.
Stop the steal hashtag.
Hashtag hash tons of tweetsstop the steal hashtag.
Hashtag.
Hashtag tons of tweets stop thesteal, stop the steal.
Those came up.
He's part of the stop the stealmovement to stop the steal.
They came intentionally to stopwhat they perceived as a stolen

(49:41):
election.
They didn't even go that far.
They were trying to steal theelection, Right, but that's what
it was.
Right there.
Look, it was a targeted group.
That was a permitted protestprotest name.
That was a group that wasstarted for the purpose of
organizing that event.
They got a ticket or they got apermit from DC for that event.
It was run by Ali Alexander,who somehow testified the

(50:04):
January 6th committee andescaped prosecution.
Total again, deep dive on himBrings up scary results, but
that was that right there stopthe spiel um brad again.

Speaker 19 (50:19):
Um half half is buried shamos, ruby freeman,
patrice c poloni, alex johns,nick fuents and we have some
target people which is like thepeople they want to target more
and that was like Stuart Rhodesand Henrique Tarrio and Roger

(50:42):
Stone, and here I have a quoteit was like Bart and Cheney once
folks at Roger Stone, rhodes,ontario and Bannon and also in
Kimberly Guilford who is closeto Trump.
Armstrong goes on TV or he goeson social media or he goes over

(51:05):
his Twitter account or Xaccount and he claims he's
Republican.

Speaker 1 (51:10):
He owns the Baltimore Sun.
He's a broadcast owner andphilanthropist.

Speaker 19 (51:15):
America first.
He's this person who is like,extremely patriotic, he loved
his country and everything, butat the same time he was lunch
meetings with Bill Barr to planagainst Trump and against people
involved in january 6th huh,huh, that's all I got to say

(51:40):
about that.

Speaker 1 (51:41):
Huh that's pretty huh so I'm like glad not to see my
name, but I mean, I'm Iabsolutely believe they targeted
the stop the steal and theycould just simply go on x and or
twitter and hashtag stop thesteal and see everybody who
tweeted it yeah, it would notsurprise me if your name is in
there somewhere, just on somenotebook somewhere or the

(52:04):
podcast I was I was seditionhunters first turn in.
I would be super curious if.
Did they pull up a stream?
Were they following me already?
Did they get sent?
Hey, look up this guy, or thisis who it is, I'm sure they got
a list of names and you wereprobably at the top.
I would be really curious to seehow they found me, like not
just we built our facialrecognition software OK well,

(52:25):
but how did you get the firstvideo, like?
Who sent it to you?
Did you get a batch?
You know anonymous email?
Who sent it to you?
Did you get a batch?
You know anonymous email?
Look at these people first.

Speaker 3 (52:33):
They got it off your phone.

Speaker 1 (52:34):
Yeah, so the other thing that's now we can talk
about, because both sides havereleased their narrative Epstein
.
So here's JD Vance, kind ofcorrecting the record on the
they're going to meet aboutEpstein and how to deal with it.
And again, we're dealing withmedia narratives and we'll just
take JD Vance at his word here.

Speaker 13 (52:52):
Can you give us some clarity on this meeting that is
reportedly happening orhappened last night at the White
House, about the Epstein filesand how you're communicating the
Epstein story?

Speaker 16 (53:02):
So I've seen so many different fake reports about
this.
Let me set the record straightthere was no meeting at my house
last night.
There just wasn't.
Was there a meeting at theWhite House?
We did meet at the White Houseyesterday, but not at the time
that they said that we weregoing to meet and not about the
subject that they said that wewere going to meet about.
We have a great FBI directorand a great Department of
Justice lead Attorney General,Pam Bondi, and we met to talk

(53:24):
about how to ensure we havejustice for the American people.
We actually didn't talk aboutthe Epstein issue at all.
That was never meant to be thesubject of the meeting and it's
one of those things where Iguess somebody leaked a calendar
entry maybe, and then peopleassumed that it must have been
about Epstein, even though ithad nothing to do with Epstein.
On the Epstein issue, what thepresident has said very clearly
because we've had other meetingsabout that is that he wants us

(53:46):
to be fully transparent and hewants the credible information
out there.
So we're working to compile thethousands and thousands of
documents that are out there forfull transparency.
But I have to say, Maria, Ilaugh at the Democrats who are
now all of a sudden sointerested in the Epstein files.
For four years, Joe Biden andthe Democrats did absolutely
nothing about this story.

(54:06):
We know that Jeffrey Epsteinhad a lot of connections with
left wing politicians and leftwing billionaires.
And now President Trump hasdemanded full transparency from
this, and yet somehow theDemocrats are attacking him and
not the Biden administration,which did nothing for four years
.
Was it the right move for Comerto send subpoenas to the

(54:27):
Clintons?
It absolutely was.
It drives home how, while theDemocrats have tried to make
this Epstein thing aboutanything but the fact that
Democrat billionaires andDemocrat political leaders went
to Epstein Island all the time,who knows what they did?
But it's totally reasonable toask these questions.
What you saw in the Housesubpoena is they are trying to
investigate all of the thingsrelated to this particular case.

(54:49):
I know a lot of Americans wantanswers.
I certainly want answers and Ithink James Comer and the team
of the House they're doing theright thing.
And of course, we know thatClinton or allegedly he, went to
the island 26 times, 28 times.
Totally appropriate for Comerto be asking what was going on
at that island.

Speaker 13 (55:04):
Let me get your quick take on growth and this
moment in time that we're at Allright.

Speaker 3 (55:10):
All right.
The only problem I have withthat clip is there.
They have a really big carveout for republicans.
What do you mean by that?
Well, they've talked about howdemocrats went to the island and
democrats this and democratthat.
Well, there's a lot ofrepublicans with dirt on their
hands too, and they just kind ofignored all that yeah,
potentially yes, that's what I'mtalking about.

Speaker 1 (55:30):
So james comer was carving out safe space for
republicans james comer wastalking to john solomon about
what to expect from thesehearings and he's like, oh yeah,
well, they're going to beasking a lot of questions about
epstein, but I'm going to beasking about the russia this and
I was like, oh wow, they've,they've conflated the two things
.
They are related, because someof these people are related the

(55:50):
Clintons, russiagate, andClintons and Epstein.
That's one conversation.
When you're talking about theClintons, right, I don't know
Obama's relationship with theClintons.
I don't know Eric or, excuse me, I don't know Eric Holder's
relationship with Epstein, butEric Holder is going to have
more to do with weaponization ofgovernment in general.

(56:10):
So these hearings, I think, aregoing to be they're going to be
a lot of drama.
There's going to be a lot ofpadding on the back and I can't
believe the Republicans aremaking you come in here, mr
Clinton, blah, blah, blah, andthen there's going to be so
what'd you do at the island?
Did you get a massage from anunderage woman?
And then you know, do you know?
edition of is is after all theseyears.
Mr clinton, right, there'sgoing to be a light.

(56:32):
There's a pattern here.
You have a tendency to lieunder oath, so I don't know
what's going to come of it, butwhat kind of cigars they got
down there yeah, it's going tobe pretty interesting to watch
six attorney generals all kindsof people coming on that one.
Wow.
So john bolton gets on cnnbecause trump has a peace

(56:52):
meeting, a peace summit, comingup in alaska in the next couple
days.
Oh, I can't remember exactlywhich day, but that all got set
up this weekend and, of course,john bolton's just first term
who knows?

Speaker 11 (57:01):
both of these to be tied very well and, ambassador
bolton, it's great to have tohave you here.
I mean, you were in the room in2018 in helsinki when, when
this happened, uh, what do youmake of the fact that Putin has
now been invited to Alaska?

Speaker 17 (57:16):
Well, it's very gracious of Putin to come to
former Russian America for thissummit.
This is not quite as bad asTrump inviting the Taliban to
Camp David to talk about thepeace negotiations in
Afghanistan, but it certainlyreminds one of that.
The only better place for Putinthan Alaska would be if the

(57:38):
summit were being held in Moscow.
So the initial setup, I think,is a great victory for Putin.
He's a rogue leader of a pariahstate and he's going to be
welcomed into the United States.
Second, I have a feeling thisis sliding very quickly in
russia's direction.
Uh, we're not quite back.

(57:59):
Uh, at february the 28th, inthe oval office, when trump told
zelensky uh, you don't have anycards that's all we need to
listen to the whole thing islike it's too much conciliatory
action to russia.

Speaker 1 (58:15):
Anything shy of hitting the nuclear button just
isn't enough.
Former coming to alaska, formerrussia man, that decision was
made a long time ago, I thinkyou know.
I mean we're not talking likerussian speaking population of
ukraine that's only beendetached for 20 years.
We're talking like no, nobodyin alaska speaks russian.
They're not russian.

(58:35):
We're done with that.

Speaker 3 (58:36):
Like this taliban reference that you came up with.
You're the only one thatremembers that, bro.

Speaker 1 (58:41):
Nobody else remembers that meanwhile, trump,
everywhere he has a summit,seems to be brokering peace.
He brokered peace between arand Azerbaijan.
The President of the Republicof.

Speaker 5 (59:03):
Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of the Republic
of Armenia will now sign a jointdeclaration on the outcomes of
the Trump Route forInternational Peace and
Prosperity Summit.
They will sign three copies inEnglish the President of the
united states signs as a witnessto the president of the
republic of azerbaijan just letthem do the signing in the
background.

Speaker 1 (59:20):
They, they all sign it.
So these guys.
What's really impressive aboutthis is because russia's been
focused on ukraine, there's beenthese tensions that have been
breaking out more and more inazerbaijan and armenia, and so
for trump to broker this peacedeal and not putin, right in
their backyard, in their sphereof influence yeah, this was one
of the stories that I saw and itwas.

Speaker 3 (59:41):
It was curious to me because I also get uh, what is
that the white house updatething that gets sent to my email
?
Uh-huh, and when I got thatemail, it had a list of like
boom, boom, boom, peace talks,peace, brokered peace, and it
was like, oh okay, the messageis going to be this is the
present of peace, yeah, and Ithink it's been that way the

(01:00:03):
whole time.
But now he's, he's racking upthese, you know bullet points
that he can put together for youknow his six months, his year
long, and you know when he getsto the end of his term he's
going to be look at this peace,peace, peace, peace, peace peace
.

Speaker 1 (01:00:19):
Yeah uh, I saw the same chart too.
I was just looking to see if Icould find it.
It's like it's like all thecountries that he's brokered
these deals with, and it's it'san impressive little list, I
know especially when youcontrast it with the uh prior.
You know presidencies I don'tremember peace deals breaking
out no it was always warbreaking out yeah, I'm trying to

(01:00:43):
see if I can find it here realquick.
I can't even count them all, Imean, and some of them they're.
Yeah, like did I know there wasa huge conflict in armenia and
azure?
Yeah, actually I did, but butnot, you know, I'm not.
I don't know any details aboutit, but me is a typical american
, not so much it's one of thoselong-running ones, you know,
that's what I know about it?

Speaker 3 (01:01:04):
well, it's it's.
That's why we don't know aboutit, because it's so long-running
.
It's just background noise thatnobody cares about anymore yeah
, so it's a pretty big deal.

Speaker 1 (01:01:14):
Peace deals broken under trump.
Us, north korea, kosovo, serbia, us taliban, afghanistan,
israel, uae, israel, bahrain,israel, sudan, israel, morocco,
rwanda and democratic republicof congo.
India, pakistan ceasefireisrael, iran currently
facilitating into the gaza warand expanding the abraham
accords wow, yeah, I mean that'sa lot going on in the first

(01:01:36):
eight months or whatever yeah,no, it's really impressive.
Oh my gosh, look at thispicture.
This is lindsey graham.
I just ran across this.
That is perfect, that isperfect, that is perfect.

Speaker 3 (01:01:53):
It looks like a Liberace outfit.

Speaker 1 (01:01:57):
If Lindsey Graham could, he would wear that
Absolutely.
I could, absolutely my South.

Speaker 3 (01:02:01):
Carolina.
Hey man, it's America, you doyou.

Speaker 1 (01:02:05):
The Rosary Daily, multitasking While I listened to
this morning.
One comment relative to CohenClinton's McCabe they never
thought she would lose.
Yes, that McCabe.
They never thought she wouldlose.
Yes, that is true, they neverthought she would lose.
This all went to crap when shelost.
Okay.
So JD Bantz is talking aboutthe Ukrainian war.
This is again Trump.
Scott Adams points this out.
Trump is monetizing all theproblems.

(01:02:27):
If he can't fix it, hemonetizes it Right.
So then the problems?
If he can't fix it, hemonetizes it right.
So then, as long as it's aproblem, at least it's
generating revenue.
I mean it's it's like hereverses the bleeding, like this
trump.
Ukraine war has bled us.
If you can't resolve it andit's bleeding us, well then
let's monetize it.
We're going to monetize ourblood.
If you're going to need bombs,bullets, planes, you have to pay
for them now, in cash, up front, and that's what he's got

(01:02:50):
europe paying for it.
He's got nato up to fivepercent, because why, oh you
guys are free to sell stuff.
Well, it's brilliant because itputs the onus on everybody else
to make to take some action hisattitude is you guys are free to
give these weapons to ukraine,but you're going to buy them
from us, yes, and we are notgoing to be giving them to
ukraine anymore.

Speaker 16 (01:03:07):
So this is jd vance, articulating this point to your
point about weapons, what wesaid to the europeans is simply
first of all, this is in yourneck of the woods, this is in
your back door.
You guys have got to step upand take a big see if I get this
, the video to catch up.

Speaker 1 (01:03:25):
Oh, sometimes you get a little late in.
The show needs a little refresh.
Things have been sittingstagnant for a minute a little
stale a little stale, a littledigital stale.

Speaker 16 (01:03:41):
You guys have got to step up weapons.
What we said to the Europeansis simply first of all, this is
in your neck of the woods, thisis in your back door.
You guys have got to step upand take a bigger role in this
thing.
And if you care so much aboutthis conflict, you should be
willing to play a more directand a more substantial way in
funding this war yourself.

(01:04:02):
I think the president and Icertainly think that America
we're done with the funding ofthe Ukraine war business.
We want to bring about apeaceful settlement to this
thing.
We want to stop the killing,but Americans, I think, are sick
of continuing to send theirmoney, their tax dollars, to
this particular conflict.
But if the Europeans want tostep up and actually buy the
weapons from American producers,we're okay with that, but we're

(01:04:25):
not going to fund it ourselvesanymore.
To your point about weapons,what we said to the Europeans
is-.

Speaker 1 (01:04:29):
They got it, they nailed it.
They more to your point aboutweapons.
What we said to the europeansis they got it, they nailed it,
they got it figured out.
That's exactly what needs tohappen.
Look, you guys want to keepfighting, whatever.
I mean what you're going to do.
Another thing that happened,too is last week trump ordered
the census to be redone a newcensus.
So it's a little early becausewe usually do them on the decade
, but he's like nope, it's gotto be redone.
Well, cnn, of course, had acouple people on that had a fit,
and then they had their littleexpert on and he had this to say

(01:04:51):
and turns out, the census, theBureau of Labor Statistics or
whatever, came out and basicallycondemned their own census.
Already One of the big thingsis.

Speaker 11 (01:04:59):
It helps decide congressional maps.

Speaker 14 (01:05:03):
Does this have everything to do with
redistricting?
Well, it does, in fact, we knowthe 2020 census.
The errors were almost alwaysto the detriment of red states,
blue states like Rhode Island.
We do know that the CensusBureau's own audit of its work
has proven that blue states likeRhode Island were overcounted.
Rhode Island, then doesn't,didn't lose a seat.
Red states like Alabama wereundercounted.
Listen, that's.
This is just a fact.
It wasn't all red blue, but itwas disproportionately red.

Speaker 11 (01:05:25):
One of the big things is it helps so.

Speaker 1 (01:05:28):
I don't get hung up so much.
I mean, we do get hung up on alittle side stories here and
there, but I'm always kind oflooking for the stuff that's
gonna have some impact, likeit's gonna come back around on
us.
Free speech stories, um, youknow, obviously everything doing
with the covid, the russia gatething, like the weaponization
of government, it's a littlepersonal.

Speaker 3 (01:05:45):
Well, this is impactful because it deals with
representation it deals withrepresentation, exactly.

Speaker 1 (01:05:51):
So, while it's this kind of you know it's kind of
nitty-gritty and gerrymanderingand what's that and we'll look
at this district, look how itstretches across the whole state
, does this even make sense?
You know it's, it becomes kindof an in the weeds topic, but
it's like the whole ball game.
Yeah, it's everything.
You want to win, you want tochange the agenda.
You know how hard it was to getgirls out of boy sports.

(01:06:11):
I mean, you had to basicallywin the presidency.
Part of the part of the reasonis that is because everything's
so gerrymandered.
You just don't have the rightrepresentation, you.
It's my contention that we havea true republican majority in
this country.
Oh yeah, we have a trueconservative majority in this
country.
In washington state, I thinkthere's way more conservatives
and Republican voters than showsin the election.

(01:06:33):
I agree, I think we're lulledinto pacification, thinking our
vote doesn't matter.
I think that the zeitgeistleans left and there's a few
there's enough weirdos thatexpress themselves.

Speaker 3 (01:06:42):
That we, we, you know well, the zeitgeist only leans
left because the media has beenplaying it that way for the last
30 to 40, 50 years.

Speaker 1 (01:06:49):
And here are the left .
It feels safe acting violent.
Yes, like you can I see bumperstickers that are openly.
I just saw one that their wholecar was painted up with kill
trump and it was like unreal.
I'm like.
Dude is calling for publicassassination is in chalk on
their car.

Speaker 3 (01:07:03):
Yeah, you know, car paint, car chalk and they're the
kind of people that are proudof it yeah, so they.

Speaker 1 (01:07:08):
They get this ability to just kind of walk amongst us
as if they have a socialvalidation.
Meanwhile, we're all sideliningthem, knowing that they'll hit
us in the head with a sock and ain a, with a lock in a sock.
You know what I mean, like theandy, no treatment and so but
it'll probably be gaslit aboutit, but they're not the majority
right, but they're kind of likeliving on this lower tier of
society, probably gettingfunding through some usa id out,

(01:07:30):
you know, some kind of act,blue money that's laundered to
them.
And so it does.
It's just this weird, but we'rethe majority.
Why don't we win elections?
We don't have control over ourvoting apparatus in this state
and a lot of states probablyfeel that way and we don't even
know how we're being cheated.
We just know we're beingcheated.
Yeah, absolutely.
The danger.
The danger is for Republicansis to let the narrative that the
election is stolen not alignwith the facts.

(01:07:53):
It's got to align with thefacts, like come with the
evidence, and I think that'swhere more and more of that
evidence is coming, where youcan almost make a blanket
statement using dominionmachines, they're compromised.
Well, this election compromisedoesn't matter.
Right, doesn't matter.
I don't even know.
It doesn't matter.
You can't prove it.

(01:08:16):
I can't prove it.
They got dual sim chips in thethings.
Do you know what you're lookingat when you look at that little
green board with a bunch ofthings no, dodes and niodes and
flat things do you know how tocode?
Do you know if, then statementsad nauseum?
You know what I mean like no no, I can't verify.
Not the earth flat around, Idon't freaking know.

Speaker 3 (01:08:27):
Yeah, it looks this was my hot topic.
The entire time on the podcasthere was like I want fair and
free elections and I wantsomebody to demonstrate to me
that they are fair.
Somehow is there a way to dothat?

Speaker 1 (01:08:42):
that's the thing it's like when, when chat gpt can
tell you that there's a fortythousand dollar problem in your
forty thousand vote problem inyour local county, you should
probably figure that out andeverybody acknowledges there's a
problem.
But then I go to the Republicanmeetings and they're like our
assessor here is so transparent,they'll let you like, just
totally come in and watch othercounties this is where it goes

(01:09:03):
Other counties they won't letthe Republicans in the watch the
ballots.
I'm like do you hear yourself,do you?
You, this county should besuing those counties for robbing
your votes here because theycan't run their elections clean.
I guess that I guess the boardof commissioners here or the
election board in this countyjust had to pay it like a sixty
thousand dollar recount feebecause they chose to not follow

(01:09:26):
the law.
And when the judgment came backfrom the judge, they're like
you chose to not follow the law.
And when the judgment came backfrom the judge, they're like
you chose to not follow the law.
And one of the council memberthat voted against it was like
you, we have to pay this nowbecause you guys chose to not
follow the law.
And it said I told you that andyou guys voted that.
You chose to ignore the plainblack and white law and now we
have to pay for a recount out ofour pocket because it's our

(01:09:50):
fault.
This is happening and yetwhat's like.
Why can't we win elections?
Well, we're just not aggressiveenough.
There's a lot of reasons andthat's one of them, but part of
it is you know how you got toshake up the system.
You got to get the peasantsinvolved.
The system will change based onwhat they know you won't
tolerate.
They know the math.

(01:10:11):
So redistricting and things likethat, fixing the illusion it's
a big deal Democrats havecreated, not only through the
media but through the way theygerrymander elections, this
illusion that a state like NewHampshire is solid blue.
It's not.
There's a lot of Republicans inNew Hampshire.
They're completelygerrymandered out of
representation.
But if you had it right, theywould have at least one or two

(01:10:33):
or three or four congressionalseats, because the country is
full of republicans.
It's like here, like there'sreally doesn't make sense why
this is a republican district.
It's geographically mostlyrural.
It's that whole left-hand sideof that map, right there.
You know it makes no sense whyit's, why it's republican, but
there's a zeitgeist about it andthere's not a lot of political

(01:10:54):
activity and so people, it's alow turnout vote, a lot of
concentrated voted in a littleneighborhood around bremerton
where there happens to be acollege yeah, you know, it feels
to me like this county's beenrolling over for decades it's
jerry-rigged because it pulls inbremerton.
Bremerton and bainbridge shouldbe like their own thing yeah you
know what I mean.
But instead we tie in all thisrural landscape and they can

(01:11:18):
counterbalance it with a littleneighborhood in one city that is
on the fringe of it that couldbe, absorbed into seattle, even
if they wanted to.
You know what I mean, yeah.
So again it's jerry-riggedagainst the republicans instead
of for the republicans.
So the republicans are fightingback.
So jd vance is openlyacknowledging part of the agenda
is a the census, which willshift the the map to florida,

(01:11:41):
away from new york, away fromcalifornia.
Idaho probably get another seat.
I think utah gets another one,you know.
Basically, a bunch of red seatsare going to get more seats,
bunch of blue seats are going tolose.
So redoing the census correctlycould even be more dramatic
from that.
If they actually get nocitizens counted in it or no
non-citizens, illegals, countedin it, it could be even more
significant.
Yeah, california.

Speaker 3 (01:12:01):
So the errors?

Speaker 1 (01:12:02):
they saw were already big enough, and that was
without taking into effect thatthey counted illegal aliens in
the last census.
So this could be absolutelydevastating to the, the raw
electoral possibility for theDemocrats.
So JD Vance is addressing thisbecause basically he's like look
, we're done rolling over andletting the Democrats do all the
gerrymandering while we don't.

Speaker 16 (01:12:23):
Yeah.
So another crazy thing that Ihad no idea about but everybody,
even Democrats, actually admitthis that the census in 2020 had
a major statistical error, andwhat that meant is that you
actually undercounted a fewstates that are Republican, like
Florida and Ohio.
You overcounted some blue states, and so what I understand, if
you actually did the census anewright now, you would have 10

(01:12:47):
additional Republican seats andnine fewer Democrat seats 10
additional Republican seats andnine fewer Democrat seats and
really what we're living with,maria, is the consequence of 40
years of institutional controlin the Democratic Party.
These guys have fought verydirty for a very long time, and
they haven't just won electionsand enacted laws that we may not
agree with.
They have tried to rig the gamefor Democrats and against

(01:13:07):
Republicans, and thankfully,under President Trump's
leadership, you finally see somespine.
You finally see some backbonein the Republican Party to fight
back against these veryaggressive Democratic dirty
tricks.
But the only way for us to doit is to actually go and do the
hard work to reset the scales alittle bit.
What we want to do is redo thecensus, but importantly, we want

(01:13:27):
to redistrict some of these redstates and we want to make the
congressional apportionment fairin this country.
Again, you cannot do it unlessRepublicans actually take some
very decisive action in themonths to come.
We think they will and we'reobviously supporting them every
step of the way.

Speaker 13 (01:13:42):
But do you worry that, as Republicans do, that
the Democrat blue states aregoing to do the same thing, and
then you'll have redistrictingin California, new Jersey and so
on?

Speaker 16 (01:13:54):
You know.
There's just not a whole lot ofjuice left out of that limit.
The Democrats have already goneas far as they possibly can.
Let me give you a crazystatistic.
So I believe that it's in NewJersey, illinois, new York,
california and there's one otherDemocrat state.
Where you take those fivestates, you have a large number
of Democrat representatives.
But here's the crazy statisticPresident Trump won 43 percent

(01:14:15):
of those five states andDemocrats have something like 85
percent of the representativesout of those states.
You cannot gerrymander thesefar left states anymore, and
that's the whole point.
We have unilaterally disarmed inthe Republican Party.
We have said to the Democratsif you want to rig the game in
your favor in blue states, goahead.
We're going to do nothing tofight back against it.

(01:14:37):
That's crazy.
It makes it harder for us topass our agenda, it makes it
harder for us to win electionsand, most importantly, it gives
Democrats this ability to runroughshod over the country
without any pushback from theAmerican people.
To run roughshod over thecountry without any pushback
from the American people.
The democratic system in thiscountry is broken, because who

(01:15:00):
you vote for doesn't necessarilyget reflected in who your
representatives are.
We're just trying to rebalancethe scales and frankly push back
against a very unfair systemcreated by the Democrats.
I know yes, so brilliant.

Speaker 3 (01:15:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:15:09):
Like these guys are reshaping the whole board about
time.
Whoa, it's so much stuff.
Here's another one.
Again.
It's stuff that you can't talkabout.
Right, can't, gotta bepolitically correct, can't,
can't, can't point out someone'simmigration status or the fact
that can't speak English.
Well, the Trump administration,a couple of months ago,
implemented the rule whereno-transcript.

(01:15:36):
How important is it for truckdrivers to speak?

Speaker 11 (01:15:39):
English in this country.
Listen, it's wild.

Speaker 1 (01:15:44):
Ok, that's too hard.
That's like is a I For thoseaudio listeners it was a very
garbage digital.
English in this country.

Speaker 2 (01:15:58):
Listen, it's wildly important because this has been
on the American books fordecades, because if you're
pulled over, if you have a crashand you can't communicate with
law enforcement or with firstresponders, it's a truly safety
issue.
Barack Obama, what he did is hetook the teeth out of this rule
of English.
Only we brought those teethback to the pre-Obama era to go,

(01:16:21):
we're going to put you out ofservice.
We've taken 1,500 trucks out ofservice off the roads because
the drivers couldn't speakEnglish, and I think that's what
the American people expect fromus.
English is the language of theUnited States of America and if
you're going to get in, that ispretty impressive.

Speaker 1 (01:16:38):
Fifteen hundred trucks off the road because they
can't speak English.

Speaker 3 (01:16:42):
Thanks, Max Headroom.

Speaker 1 (01:16:44):
Thanks, Max Headroom.
What do you mean, oh?

Speaker 3 (01:16:48):
oh, that's an old reference, sorry, is it 80s?

Speaker 1 (01:16:50):
OK, anyways that's an old reference, sorry, from the
80s.
Okay, anyways, that's prettyimpressive.
I like to see that kind ofenforcement.
Here's another one Things thatwe used to not be able to talk
about that we can talk about isRFK is really again going after
this vaccine stuff, andsometimes we talk about the
internal logic of something orthe carrots and sticks, and he
addresses the vaccine industry,with pediatricians and doctors

(01:17:14):
getting paid to do it hi, I'mrobert f kennedy jr.

Speaker 4 (01:17:18):
You're hh as a secretary.
Let me ask you something dodoctors make decisions based
upon what's best for theirpatients or based upon what
makes them the most money?
It's not a tough question, butwe've inherited a healthcare
system that constantly pushesdoctors toward the latter.
It rewards certain treatmentsnot because they're better for

(01:17:41):
the patient, but because someoneprofits.
Take what happened during COVID.
Hospitals were paid to reportstaff vaccination rates.
Those numbers were fed into theNational Healthcare Safety
Network, then published on theCDC website to shame any
hospital that refused to becomean enforcer of federal vaccine

(01:18:02):
mandates.
Today, I'm proud to announcewe've eliminated that policy by
repealing a dangerous Biden-eraprovision in the CMS inpatient
payment rule.
And we're not stopping there.
We're scanning every corner ofthe health care system for
hidden incentives at corruptmedical judgment.
What we're finding is alarming.

(01:18:22):
Doctors are being paid tovaccine, not to evaluate.
They're pressured to follow themoney, not the science.
We've recently uncovered thatmore than 36,000 doctors had
their Medicare reimbursementsaltered based upon childhood
vaccination rates.
That's not medicine, that'scoercion.
It's immoral.

(01:18:43):
It has no place in aconstitutional democracy or in a
system that claims to protectchildren.
Medical decisions should bemade based upon one thing and
one thing only the well-being ofthe patient, never on a
financial bonus or a governmentmandate.
Patients deserve honest,uncorrupted advice from their

(01:19:05):
doctors.
Doctors deserve the freedom touse their training and to follow
the science and speak the truthwithout fear of punishment.
Doctors should be guided bymedical judgment and their
Hippocratic oath, not byfinancial incentives or
government mandates.
That's what this policy changeis about, and it's just the
beginning.

(01:19:25):
Thank you very much.

Speaker 1 (01:19:27):
Dude, we're only seven months into this.

Speaker 3 (01:19:31):
Those are all the right words but they haven't
been said.

Speaker 1 (01:19:35):
I know it's all the right words, but okay, the way
the government works right,feels so good.
President says one little thingand it sets off like we should
really be looking at thesesocial media companies to see if
, uh, you know, there's aproblem.

Speaker 3 (01:19:48):
Boom mark zuckerberg's getting hit with a
bunch of subpoenas it's all theright words, and it's all the
right alignment too, so it feelsgood so now that he said it, we
can say it yes right when this,when the surgeon general came
out and said that somethingabout transgender, whatever,
okay, now everybody can say this.

Speaker 1 (01:20:03):
right.
Well, now this is we can saythis now, look, the doctors were
getting paid to vaccinate yourkids, regardless if your kids
have it or not.
There's another talk he gavewhere he gave an example of mom
has three kids that hadpreexisting conditions that when
they got that shot theyliterally had massive reactions,
epileptic seizures, and are onthe spectrum now and we know 100
percent it came from the shotand the doctor's like you should

(01:20:24):
definitely give your fourth kidthe shot.

Speaker 3 (01:20:26):
Yeah.
A year ago and then you got astrike and kicked off Spotify
and thrown in jail.

Speaker 1 (01:20:33):
Yeah, so it's like the incentives are pretty
incredible.
This is awesome, like awesome.
In fact it's so awesomeEverything that's been happening
.
Even Frank once, who is no fanof Donald Trump by any stretch
of the imagination, but he's oneof these conservative you know,
right wing lincoln projectslash rhino uh, pollster

(01:20:55):
analyzer guys he's got a reallife mock-up of the white house
in his of the oval office in hishouse.
Did you know this?
Yeah, and he was also sharing aroom.
He and um mccarthy fromcalifornia when he was speaker
of the house.
He was, they were roommates indc together.
So this guy's pretty wellconnected.
Kind of has the inside buzz onthe we hate Trump crowd from the
right and he was on CNN and hewas just breaking it to him

(01:21:18):
straight up.
Like they cannot figure out whyTrump just cannot go down in
the polls.
And they can say all they want,he's down in the poll numbers
but he's really not.
Over and over and over againand over and over and over again
, and Frank Lynch just explainsit to him.

Speaker 9 (01:21:30):
If you voted for Donald Trump, this is exactly,
almost to the letter, what youwanted.
He didn't mind about the anger,he didn't mind the conflict
between the Republicans and theDemocrats.
What you wanted was to make aborder safe and secure, which
they've done.
What you wanted were tax cuts,which he's done.
What you wanted was cuts tospending, which he's done, which

(01:21:50):
you want to wear.
Cuts to spending, which he'sdone.
Element after element, hedelivered exactly what he said
he was going to do, and that'swhy his own voters believe that
this has been an incrediblysuccessful presidency.

Speaker 1 (01:22:02):
If you voted for Donald Trump, I would say it's
going pretty well myself.
I don't even know what I wouldsay you could improve, because I
understand the landscape istough.
So it's like, oh, he could havedone this on day three or not.
You can do it the right way orthe wrong way, and it's
interesting.
I'm kind of in my heart.
I'm thinking I got lowexpectations, but I'm feeling

(01:22:24):
like springtime we might seesome indictments on this grand
conspiracy case.
I feel like all this stuff'sgoing to play out in the house
and then we're going to havesome new revelations and then
they're going to build some morenarrative and then they're
going to arrest McCabe orsomething like that.

Speaker 3 (01:22:38):
I hope it doesn't take that long?

Speaker 1 (01:22:40):
I hope not either, but it is Okay.
It is I just got a gut feeling.
My expectations are low, so I'mputting it out there a little
bit, okay.
So I'm putting it out there alittle bit, okay.
Now we are going to head overinto private, so we'll do the
outro, since we kind of cut youshort on the intro.
We listened to it and then onlystreamed for like a minute
because YouTube wasn't streaming.
So we're going to listen to theoutro and then we're going to
jump over to private rumble andwe are going to be talking about

(01:23:02):
how the physicist in Los Alamossurvived when they were being
hunted and we're going to talkabout how that is going to be
the way of the future.
What?
Yeah, it's going to be fun.
So if you can join us over onthe rumble premium, that'd be
awesome.
If not, we'll talk to you againtomorrow.

Speaker 18 (01:23:42):
Old woman, man, man, sorry, what night.
Lived in that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an

(01:24:03):
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh how do you do?

Speaker 21 (01:24:24):
How do you do, good lady, I'm Arthur, king of the
Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who the Britons?
Who are the Britons?

Speaker 18 (01:24:35):
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.
Didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 21 (01:24:49):
If only people would Please, please good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your?

Speaker 18 (01:24:57):
lord.
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be

(01:25:18):
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.

Speaker 15 (01:25:28):
Well, I can become king then the lady of the lake,
her arm clad in the purest,shimmering samite, held aloft
Excalibur from the bosom of thewater, signifying, by divine
providence, that I, arthur, wasto carry Excalibur, that is why
I'm your king.

Speaker 18 (01:25:45):
Listen strange women lying in ponds distributing
swords is no basis for a systemof government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.

(01:26:05):
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?

(01:26:25):
Eh, that's what I'm on about.

Speaker 1 (01:26:40):
Did you about?
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
There you go.
All right, welcome to privaterumble.
The party is rolling.
We are on it.
Now we can say anything we want.
Whoa careful, all right, we'regoing to talk about owning real
things here.
So this little clip is talkingis referencing back to when we
used to own real things, asopposed to now where we just
kind of borrow them.

Speaker 20 (01:27:01):
Remember when we used to own things.
Your music lived in your CDcase, your photos were printed,
your car, your movies, yoursuffer, yours.
Now you don't own, you access,you subscribe, rent.
Even your creativity runs onborrowed platforms.
They call it the convenienceera, but let's be real, it's the
control era, because when youdon't own something, you don't

(01:27:24):
make the rules, miss a payment,it's gone.
Change the terms too bad.
Your tools freeze your files,vanish your account resets.
You think you're the user.
No, you're the product andthey're selling you back to
yourself.
That's what, in business, inbrand, in life, ownership
matters.
Own your email list, own yoursystems, own your ideas, because

(01:27:48):
if you don't, someone else will.

Speaker 1 (01:27:51):
That is something we're dealing with over at 1776
live is we're migratingeverything into the private
servers.

Speaker 3 (01:27:59):
I kind of experienced this a little bit of this
yesterday.
So yesterday our Internet wentdown at our house.
It was like this wasdevastating for my daughter.
It's like, oh, we can't watchTV, you know, yeah.
And she's like well, we can'twatch TV, you know, yeah.
And she's like, well, let'sjust play a video game.
It's like, well, we can't playvideo games either.
And it's like well, I'm likewell, let's play some solitaire,

(01:28:23):
because you can play solitaireon your computer, right?
Yeah, well, I turned onsolitaire.
Can't play it without linebeing online.

Speaker 1 (01:28:30):
What, yeah, I was like so it's just another way to
be online being tracked.

Speaker 3 (01:28:35):
Wow, we can't even play solitaire anymore.

Speaker 1 (01:28:38):
They probably have some algorithm where they figure
out your eye movements as youfollow the cards.
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:28:43):
Wow, but it couldn't play anything until we got our
online back.
Until we were back online.

Speaker 1 (01:28:54):
So I guess we're fully plugged in now.
It's amazing with smart tvs,like yeah, you don't have a
cable anymore, it's justinternet and everything streamed
and you know you buy a movie.
We do a lot of amazon primebecause we don't, you know, buy
a movie on amazon prime and rentit or whatever it's like.
But we do have a lot of likehard copy dvds and we still kind
of keep that alive.

Speaker 3 (01:29:12):
We ended up watching a dvd movie and it was a movie
I'd never heard of.
It turned out being okay.
It was something about, uh, myfriend totoro or something like
that.

Speaker 1 (01:29:24):
Yeah, it's interesting to me because you
know I've got, um, you know,different music things that you
download.
You to buy the music back whenapple music.
You could buy the music thingsthat you down.
You to buy the music back whenApple music.
You could buy the music andthen you can download it.
So it's like I've got thesealbums that are on my Apple
music but I can't really do like, I can't put them on a CD
because they're in their speciallittle algorithm thing that
it's not, you know,transportable, it's.
I basically have to be an Applemusic to listen to them.

Speaker 3 (01:29:46):
It's probably in a format that doesn't translate
anywhere to exactly.

Speaker 1 (01:29:50):
You know what do you own.
You've got to pay forsubscriptions, you've got to
have access.
I'm more and more an advocateof just pay the price to have it
on, have it do the hard work toown it yourself.
Even with like the online, likeDropbox and Mega and all these
different Well, kids these daysdon't don't understand the pain
of owning music.

Speaker 3 (01:30:10):
I mean remember when a cd was 18 bucks oh yeah, you
know, today the kids are likewell, that's like a whole hours
of work, I would never pay forthat.

Speaker 1 (01:30:20):
And it's like bro, that's what's like five hours of
work when we're kids that albumwas something, but just keeping
stuff on it like a, an externalhard drive instead of on cloud
storage, right, like they said,don't pay your bill.
Poof files are gone.
Yeah, can't log in, can'ttwo-step verify poof it's all
gone, yeah.
So, yeah, it's something we'retalking about over at 1776 live

(01:30:42):
a lot about owning owning yourown stuff, you know, owning your
email list, not not havingeverything in a cloud server
somewhere.
Uh.
The other thing, too is elonmusk posted this and this is
this is uh.
So this harkens back to, duringworld war ii, the los alamos
labs down in california.
Right, you've got spies fromall over the place japanese
spies, russian spies, germanspies, who knows what?

(01:31:02):
Spies from everywhere and so inorder to protect the activity
which I think at los alamos iswhere a lot of the manhattan
project.

Speaker 3 (01:31:08):
there are several labs, and Los Alamos is one of
them.
It's definitely not inCalifornia.
There is a lab in California,that's Livermore Lab.
Yes, lawrence, livermore is inCalifornia.
Los Alamos is in New Mexico.

Speaker 1 (01:31:19):
All right.

Speaker 3 (01:31:19):
I'm confusing them, okay.

Speaker 1 (01:31:21):
So, anyways, los Alamos is in New Mexico.
Yes, yes, I was confusing them.
Same crowd, well.
Well, it can be back and forth,yes, anyways.
Uh, elon musk posted this.
He says this is the way and inthe context of a totalitarian
government of any stripe, leftor right, boot come from the
left or right, doesn't matter,still the boot of my neck.

(01:31:42):
They're going to analyzeinformation.
That's the whole game.
Intelligence the more thingintelligence they can gather,
the more they know, the morethey know they can cut you off
influence, etc.

Speaker 3 (01:31:52):
Etc and I've talked to some of these dudes at los
angeles and they are smartcookies.

Speaker 1 (01:31:57):
Yes, I had a scout leader that worked out there
when I was a kid yes, very smartcookie, so my father-in-law
worked there, yeah so anonymityprevailed.
This is what it said.
Famous names were disguised andoccupations were not mentioned.
Enrico Fermi became HenryFarmer.
Nails Bohr became NicholasBaker.
The word physicist wasforbidden.

(01:32:18):
Everyone was an engineer.
Driver's licenses, autoregistration, bank accounts,
income tax returns, food andgasoline rations and insurance
policies were issued to numbers.
Outgoing mail was censored andlong distance calls were
monitored.
No one was permitted to mentionnames or occupations of fellow
residents, to give distances ornames of nearby places, or even

(01:32:39):
to describe a beautiful view.
To give distances or names ofnearby places, or even to
describe a beautiful view, lestthe location be pinpointed,
incoming mail was addressedsimply to po box 1663, santa fe,
new mexico, an obscurity thatcloaked the existence of the los
alamos during the entire war sothey did things very.
It was a secret city yeah, andanonymously in the world of ai.

(01:33:02):
I think that that when he saysthis is the way you know,
everyone's an engineer, nobodyis special.
It makes it makes it not.
It's a target rich environment,but you know who's the
physicist, who's the engineer.
A little little difference invalue.
You see what I'm saying.
Yeah, everybody becomes apeasant.
Everybody just kind of goes tothe lowest common denominator

(01:33:23):
Everybody, when we're, you knowyou can distinguish a real human
being from AI.
Ai gives a specific answer.
Human being gives a nice bigdescription from ai.
Ai gives a specific answer.
Human being gives a nice bigdescription.
That kind of alludes to things.
This is kind of howchristianity survived in the
first centuries with the fish.
Right, you know, just scratch aline in the sand and someone
else that they came andcompleted it made a fish.
You knew you were talking aboutthe christian right.

(01:33:44):
So we're going to be talking alot more through symbolism and
things like that.
It's an interesting future.
It's an interesting future.
I think that's why a lot ofhistory's wisdom is stored in
parable myth and legend it'sbecause it stores the
information without ai beingable to go.

Speaker 3 (01:34:00):
Oh well, it also stores it out in the open.
So if you understand it, yousee it.
If you don't understand it, youmiss it it's a parable.

Speaker 1 (01:34:07):
Yeah, exactly right, it's just a story.
It's just a bedtime story.
Oh, no, this is an idea, andideas that which.
That's what changes the world.
Uh, carlitz trump is liveannouncing deployment of the
national guard to dc.
Yes, so that's been going onthis week.
Obviously, dc is a crime-riddenhellhole and having spent four
months in their dungeon, Iabsolutely understand that.

(01:34:29):
That place is a bleeping mess.
It wasn't safe around dc.
It wasn't safe around thecapitol.
You can see the crime out inthe open.
Everybody's affected by it.
It's just this absolute majorproblem.
Um, they keep, they keep thecapitol mall clean, but even
there you can see a lot ofdistraction going on.
And uh, so I am.

(01:34:51):
Every morning we'd wake up inthe morning news.
It was another drive byshooting, another shooting, you
know, and people were beingbrought in all night long into
the into the jail.
You could see their entrancefrom our windows, so that jail
was just packed with people andthey were getting cycled in and
out of there, a lot of themtaking chintzy plea deals.
That place is a mess.
So I am not surprised Trump isgoing to do the clean up the

(01:35:13):
town thing.
He's going to arrest a billionpeople, a bunch of people, are
going to get the heck out ofDodge.
They're going to clean up thehomeless encampments and send
them somewhere else.
I have no doubt that in like 30days, dc is going to be a very
nice tourist destination.
But yeah, like he's going to bedeploying the national guard,
it's going to be crazy.
And you know what they did itfor January 6th.
I mean, he's the seal has beenbroken, the Rubicon has been

(01:35:34):
crossed on that and Trumpdeployed them into Los Angeles.
Some people say they didn't doanything.
Some people say their presenceenough was enough to threaten
the entire existence of theriots down there.
I say the investigations intothe money is probably what
stopped that in my opinion.
Into the money is probably whatstopped that in my opinion.
But either way, yeah, that'llbe interesting.
So we're not.
We haven't covered it becauseit's happening right now, but

(01:35:54):
that was something that wascoming up this weekend.
Okay, that's it.
That's all I got for theprivate chat.
We got a couple different newsstories in there, but yeah, we
got to think of some likepeasant terms where we can talk
about something that's just likean elusive term and see if we
can't get it to stick in thebook Atlas shrugged you know who
is John Galt becomes like thissimple phrase that's like well,

(01:36:16):
I don't know who's in charge ofthis, you know, I don't know
Like.
It becomes this, this, thisphrase that brings this whole
idea that applies to thesituation.
And we got to find somethinglike that, got to find some
peasant perspective phrase thatreally puts it out there.
All right, guys, don't forgetto visit.
Left behind, withoutorg Didn'tmention that in the last time,
so you guys get to hear it now.

(01:36:37):
And, of course, businessperspective.
And 1776 livecom orus.
Oh, my goodness, 1776 liveus.
All right, we'll talk to youguys again tomorrow.

Speaker 18 (01:36:47):
Bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives

(01:37:15):
in that castle over there?
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
You automatically treat me likean inferior.
Well, I am king, oh, king.

(01:37:35):
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there's.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh.

Speaker 21 (01:37:53):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady, I amArthur, king of the Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.

Speaker 18 (01:38:05):
We are all Britons and I am your king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 21 (01:38:19):
If only people would Please, please good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No-one lives there, then who isyour?

Speaker 18 (01:38:27):
lord.
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be

(01:38:48):
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then the lady of the lake.

Speaker 15 (01:39:01):
her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held
aloft Excalibur from the bosomof the water, signifying by
divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur, that
is why I'm your king.

Speaker 18 (01:39:15):
Listen strange women lying in ponds distributing
swords is no basis for a systemof government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just cuz
some watery tart through asword at you.
Shut up.

(01:39:35):
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they put me away
.
Shut up, will you shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?

(01:39:55):
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
You, you, you.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Narrative Control: How Yesterday's Conspiracy Becomes Today's Accepted Truth

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Narrative Control: How Yesterday's Conspiracy Becomes Today's Accepted Truth

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce