Raid My House, I'll Raid Yours: America's New Political Reality

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth
Bunchik had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
We're getting screwed, man.

Speaker 4 (00:24):
Every time we turn around we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's going tobe through podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's got to stop.

(00:45):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning, peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasant's Perspective.
Hold on, oh no, of course.
Every morning without Phil,there's always something.
Man.
Peasants, welcome to anotherepisode of the peasants

(01:05):
perspective.
Hold on, oh no, of course.
Every morning without phil,there's always something.
Man, there's always something II'm glad you guys are joining
us sharp, bright and early at 630.
Don't forget to set your clocksback nine minutes so you can be
on.
Peasant time.
Rod got it.

(01:27):
Ron and I grew up in a churchthat is chronic, full of
chronically late people.
They used to call it mormonstandard time, which was 15
minutes late yeah, well, with myfamily it's about an hour you
got one family member who showsup when they're setting breaking
down the chairs exactly.
Anyways, all right guys.
Big news this morning, can youbelieve?
It.
Remember who shows up whenthey're breaking down the chairs
?
Yeah, exactly.
Anyways, all right guys, bignews this morning.

(01:48):
Can you believe it?
What we have breaking news, ron, it has started.
Oh, hold on, before we get theanticipation, let's change the
sound over.
Definitely not AI.
This is not an AI-generatedshow.

Speaker 7 (02:09):
This is how you drop breaking news.

Speaker 9 (02:12):
Yes, like this Breaking news that just crossed
just moments ago.
Government sources justconfirming to Fox News that
federal agents raided theMaryland home of Ambassador John
Bolton this morning.
One source says that agents arelooking for potential
classified documents theybelieve are in his possession.
Fbi Director Kash Pateltweeting earlier this morning no

(02:36):
one is above the law FBI agentson mission.
The FBI is not commenting rightnow on the raid itself.
We can confirm Bolton is notunder arrest right now.
The target this morning was thehome.
We're going to bring you thelatest details as soon as we get
those into.

Speaker 4 (02:52):
The target was Melania's panty drawer in
Miralago, but don't worry,trump's not under arrest.
So, wow, we got a raid on JohnBolton.
So let's check into Fox Newshere, because this is literally
kind of just breaking anddeveloping this morning.

Speaker 10 (03:10):
The FBI agents have raided the Maryland home of
former Trump National SecurityAdvisor, john Bolton.
It happened at 7 am thismorning.

Speaker 11 (03:19):
Shortly after the raid began, fbi Director Kash
Patel posting on X quote no oneis above the law.
Fbi agents on a mission.

Speaker 12 (03:27):
David Spunt joins us now with more on this breaking
news.

Speaker 13 (03:30):
Hey David, hey guys, not much we can say at this
point, but information willcontinue to develop.
As you mentioned, about seveno'clock this morning, fbi agents
raided Ambassador Bolton's home.
Notable were being told by twogovernment sources that they are
looking for classifieddocuments as part of a potential
leak investigation.

(03:52):
We're told that AmbassadorBolton is not in custody, he's
not under arrest, but it isnotable they are at his Maryland
home right now.
We don't know how many agentsare there.
We're waiting to get a pictureof the scene coming in right now
, but we're told how many agentsare there.
We're waiting to get a pictureof the scene coming in right now
, but we're told AmbassadorBolton, who was just on TV on
another network a couple of daysago talking about the Russia

(04:13):
Putin Trump summit, is now underFBI investigation.
Now I want to be clear.
These are long and we'relooking at some live photographs
right now in Bethesda.
That's clearly the road whereAmbassador Bolton lives and you
can see some police cars outsidethere.
But you know this is going tobe a long process.
We saw the raid of former Trumpadviser Roger Stone's home down

(04:37):
in Florida several years ago.
Eventually he went to trial.
We saw famously in August of2022.
Exactly.
Three years ago ago, a littlebit more than three years ago,
the raid on mar-a-lago.

Speaker 4 (04:49):
Uh, that still has.

Speaker 13 (04:50):
The whole world can't even keep his fence a
little bit of a differentsituation as it was a former
president, but it deals withclassified documents imagine
being able to build an app withyour name on it.

Speaker 4 (05:01):
You do that we got our own ads.
Now john attack is good morning, pony boy good morning.
And weed and boys same person.
Good morning sapphire patriot.
Good morning.
John attack has said rated at 7am friday morning, yes, it was,
and he frere asia says cnn iswalking all over themselves this
morning.
I know, listen to this.
This is hilarious.

Speaker 6 (05:22):
This is now msnbc's official line with fbi
weaponization my suspicion isthis looks performative and that
is highly concerning.

Speaker 4 (05:34):
The fbi should not be used I know, I know, when they
performatively threw me insolitary confinement I was like,
all right, great, where's the?
Is it, is it?

Speaker 7 (05:44):
that was right after the judge sent me my response to
my letter of support, You'relike oh, this is performative.
Yeah, where he was like well,we do need to make an example
out of him, Like, oh, is thatwhat we're doing?

Speaker 4 (05:56):
Yeah.
So you know, yeah, this isprobably just performative.

Speaker 6 (06:00):
As a tool to go after political enemies.
I just want to repeat that.

Speaker 4 (06:05):
What's your position?
Political enemies?
Wait, hold on Again.
Be used as a tool.
I got to get the full sentence.

Speaker 6 (06:10):
The FBI should not be used as a tool to go after
political enemies, and if that'sI'm glad we can agree.

Speaker 4 (06:18):
You're a little late to the party, though, so
pendulum is going to swing backand pop you in the forehead at
least once we're moving.

Speaker 6 (06:25):
It should alarm all Americans because the FBI has
incredible capabilities andpowers and you would not want to
see the FBI transformed into aspecial police.
You know the type of thingwe've seen in the past in Soviet
bloc countries or knowdictatorships across the middle
east and other places.
We don't want it to be a mohawkor something like that, so it's

(06:50):
really concerning.
Hopefully that's not the case.

Speaker 4 (06:53):
My suspicion is this looks, you know, like we
basically have kind of like amystery science theater, okay
that little thing at the end.

Speaker 7 (07:01):
That's just like confirmed.
This guy's a total douchebag.

Speaker 4 (07:05):
You know what I mean this is like mystery science
theater where we sit.
We just like take fun of these,like I wonder if this guy doing
this hit who's totally serious.
We don't want the fbi to becomesome kind of gestapo kgb like
nusa fafa or whatever we don'twant him to be and we're like
kgb got its lessons from the fbiare you?

(07:26):
kidding cia trained us on.
Yeah, we don't want, we don'twant our police to be part of,
like some kind of politicalthing.
Martin luther king jr.
Hello, we have credibleinformation that the cia killed
a cynic president.
We don't want, we don't wantintelligence services weaponized
.
That's theized.
That's the whole point.

(07:46):
That's the whole point.
Like, we want to set up aSteven Crowder like, prove me
wrong, right Again, one of thethings that I'm I constantly
keep in mind as a theme is wedon't want to become the things
we hate.
So here's I'm clapping, youknow, bolton getting raided,
like yeah, go get Bolton,finally, somebody part of.
That's a little hurt feelingsfor me and my friends all kind

(08:06):
of happen to deal with this forthe last four years, right, but
at the same time, we don't wantto become the things we hate,
right.

Speaker 7 (08:13):
It's also not even the same thing.

Speaker 4 (08:15):
They're not the same, just like these two people here
don't think that they're thesame thing.
So, in fairness to the peasants, because we're going to see
this today remember, when youempower the government with
awesome, powerful tools, youcan't always control how they
use that power in the end.
Okay, the greatest trick thedemocrats ever pulled was

(08:36):
convincing black people to selfsegregate, and we've.
We are now seeing in oursociety the full circle of
racist to woke and woke toracist.

Speaker 15 (08:47):
When me and Brad first met I didn't think we'd
get along.
But it turns out we kind ofagree on everything, your racial
identity is the most importantthing Everything should be
looked at through the lens ofrace.

Speaker 4 (08:54):
Thanks, you owe me a Coke.
Okay, so for the audiolisteners here, what you're
looking at is you've got onegentleman with a shirt that says
woke and another gentleman witha shirt that says racist
gentleman with a shirt that sayswoke and another gentleman with
a shirt that says racist, andthey just happen to agree on
everything.

Speaker 15 (09:07):
I have a lot of opinions about people of color,
even though we barely know any.
I say colored people, but aslong as we're classifying them,
we both think minorities are aunited group.
We think the same and act thesame, and both the same.
You don't want to lose yourblack card sorry, I don't know.

Speaker 16 (09:18):
I just think we should roll back discrimination
law.
So we can hire based on raceagain now.

Speaker 15 (09:22):
Now you owe me a Coke.
Hey, tell them what you told meyesterday White actors should
only do voices for white cartooncharacters.
I've been saying that for years.
Stick to your own Us whitepeople.
We have so much privilege.
I agree it is a privilege to bewhite.
Ask him about interracialdating.
All I said is that black menwho date white women have
internalized racism and whitemen that date ethnic women
Staticizing them.
Guys against interracial dating.
Now, Like, am I being pranked?

(09:43):
Did Boomer put you up to this?
Ugh, you know that taco placeis white-owned.
White people should be makingwhite foods like crab, macaroni
and cheese.
No seasoning, not even salt.
It's like he's a mind reader.
I mean, I've been pushing forsegregation forever and my man
does what.
I created an improv comedy showexclusively for ethnic people.
Guy segreg, white people need tostop wearing dreadlocks and
stop appropriating blackpeople's music Shaved heads and

(10:05):
country music the way Godintended.
You know all white people areracist.
I'm listening.
Even if you have a black wifeor a black friend group, you're
still really racist.
You know we just kicked a guyout of the organization for
having a black girlfriend, butif you can promise me he's still
really racist, we'll considerletting him back in.
Black people should only shop atblack businesses.
I guess the only thing wereally disagree about is I think
white people are the root ofall evil.
But what did I tell you, though?

(10:25):
If we can narrow that down to acertain group of tiny-headed
white people, I think we cancome to an understanding.
Technically, I don't considerjewish people white, neither do
I okay, so that's that waspretty.

Speaker 4 (10:45):
I remember when there was a university that had like
a petition from black studentsthat wanted their own spaces and
I'm like, hold on, I feel likethey just like slowly convince
you to self segregate.
You know what I mean?
All this fighting overdesegregation and all of a
sudden you're like we want ourown space.
It's like you had that.
You had your own drinkingfountains, for sake.
I'm just kidding.

(11:08):
Everybody knows I'm not racist,okay, but the hypocrisy in it
all is hilarious and we areseeing some of that now and we
are seeing there's going to bethe accusations on oh now you're
weaponizing government, yourweapon, look.
This is why we have to look ateach individual situation and
look at the evidence and decidefor ourselves.
Right, fair enough, yeah, sowe're going to go through some

(11:29):
pretty fun stuff today.

Speaker 7 (11:35):
Now you're going to be like here's one of the worst
examples possible.

Speaker 4 (11:39):
Well, it's kind of one of those things where it's
just the measuring stick bywhich you measure is the one by
which you'll be judged, ok, so alot of these people, where
we're going to be clapping aspeasants, where we're going to
clap the loudest for justice iswhen a hypocrite gets brought to
justice.

Speaker 15 (11:56):
For example.

Speaker 4 (11:56):
John Bolton's getting his house raided right now,
right, and he's this is the wokeracist thing, right?
He's like oh, that guy's racist.
Yeah, well, you're doing thething that you're claiming the
racist is doing.
Mr Woke man, you know what I'msaying.
Yeah, so John Bolton here,who's like, oh Trump, he's
taking classified documents.
That's interesting.
Seems to be maybe the reasonyour house is being raided this

(12:17):
morning.

Speaker 3 (12:19):
But I don't think he cared about the classification
system.
I don't think he appreciatedthe sensitivity of this
information and he didn'tappreciate the sensitivity of
how it was often acquired theso-called sources and methods.
So this had been briefed to himbefore I arrived.
It was repeated frequently.
I think it simply had no impacton him whatever.

Speaker 8 (12:42):
There's a couple of different ways that people think
about this, and people who arenot friendly to the president
who think about what's happenedhere, and one of them is, you
know, donald Trump, master thief, you know, criminal, running
some kind of elaborateconspiracy to bring things out
of the White House and keep themsecret for, potentially for
political or financial gain.
There are other people who had.
Its attitude is Trump ischaotic, he's careless, he's not

(13:05):
that smart, he just he wants.
He took these things almost bymistake and now he's basically
stamping his feet and sayingthey're mine.
I don't want to give them up.
Give me a sense of where youthink the truth lies with
respect to Trump's intelligence,carelessness and the degree to
which he might've brought motiveto bear on taking these
documents out of the White Houseand keeping them for this long

(13:25):
at Mar-a-Lago.

Speaker 3 (13:30):
Well, I don't I.
It's very hard to speculate onmotive other than that he liked
cool things.
He saw things that he so hewanted to take them, and he was
pretty much able to take them,and not just on classified
information matters, on allkinds of things that crossed his
desk.
Some days he liked to eat a lotof French fries.
Some days he took classifieddocuments.

(13:51):
He wanted them.
Why did he want them?
Because he could get them.

Speaker 4 (13:55):
I love how he acts like Bolton's, like these
classified documents are justshiny things and he just likes
to collect shiny things.
Why do I have a feeling that'sJohn Bolton's problem?
It's like, hey, here's aclassified document of you know,
uh, something that happenedoverseas, and I got a rack, a
rack above my rack, the yellowcake.
I got the yellow cake.
I'm gonna keep that for forluck.
You know, like I have a feelingthat was a moment of projection

(14:18):
where he's like I just likethese fancy cardstock documents
with classified stamped all over, makes me feel important.
He's probably got him in hishouse he's probably got
paperweights and the hilariousthing about the whole donald
trump mar-a-lago rage, which welearned yesterday definitively
out of cash patel's mouth, isthere was no predicate for that
raid.
Now, oddly enough, the fbi ishaving a real problem with staff

(14:40):
because the guy who actuallyled the mar-a-lago raid was
flying Kash Patel around in theFBI jet.
So you know he's.

Speaker 7 (14:48):
Don't forget that part.

Speaker 4 (14:49):
Yeah, so you know he's there for all the private
conversations.
He's got to take his littlepilot break and go sits in the
back with Kash Patel.
Here's about what they're doing.
Kash Patel apparently wascompletely oblivious to the fact
that his pilot and his FBI jetjust did a little stint as a
field agent raiding DonaldTrump's house.
Now they did fire him when thiscame to light, but you know,

(15:10):
only after six months of beingin on all the secrets.
Yeah, Like the FBI is anintelligence organization.
The FBI is clearly weaponizedand the FBI, it doesn't work for
the left, it doesn't work forthe right, it works for the FBI,
it doesn't work for the left.

Speaker 7 (15:25):
It doesn't work for the right, it works for the FBI.
It makes me wonder how manyother people surrounding you
know the president's men are FBI.
You know, like the waiter.

Speaker 4 (15:34):
So here's the thing with this.
Laura Loomer is out there on amission trying to find all these
old Biden admin and Obama adminand find him in the staff.
They're everywhere, she's theone and Kyle Serafin shout out
to him too I think it was acombination of him and there's a
handful of these outside actorsthat are looking at personnel
decisions in the White House andkind of raising the flag, and
it has led to a lot of firings,people randomly getting let go.

(15:57):
But there's also been a coupleof moments of entrenchment.
For example, there was a guy Ican't remember, it was Jenkins
Jennings.
There was an FBI agent that wastotally involved in all the J6
things.
A lot of J6ers who dealt withhim directly felt like he was,
you know, animanistic and very,you know, mean about it.
Well, somehow he kept his joband Dan Bongino and Cash both

(16:18):
gave the excuse.
Well, you know, he knows wherethe bodies are buried and he was
just doing his job and hepushed back up into a limit.
Well, now he's fired becauseturns out, you know, we probably
didn't show him where thebodies were buried and he
probably wasn't really just, youknow, doing his job for the j6
thing, he was really into it.
So they did end up ultimatelyfiring him, but this isn't until
they made him like third incharge of the fbi, while they're

(16:38):
trying to clean up the fbi, bythe way which you know.
If we know anything about howthat goes down, it doesn't
really.

Speaker 18 (16:44):
Let's get a little grace.

Speaker 5 (16:45):
So yeah, give a little grace yeah.

Speaker 4 (16:48):
You can have 14 months of grace in federal
prison while we figure thingsout how about that.

Speaker 7 (16:53):
I'm OK with that.

Speaker 4 (16:54):
All right.
So this is John Solomon,breaking again the cascade of
things that are beingdeclassified, little tidbits of
information we're getting hereand there.

Speaker 17 (17:05):
it's filling in the picture all right, three fbi
offices look at the foundationfor corruption, they get shut
down.
In fact, the actual line in thefbi notes about this is the
deputy attorney general told usto quote shut it down.
Then, uh, three years later, uh, the irs criminal agents start
to develop a tax criminal caseagainst the foundation and the

(17:26):
same thing happens Shut it down.
And then the excuses are wedon't have any resources at the
IRS to look at whether afoundation was violating its tax
obligations.

Speaker 4 (17:35):
Did you hear that the IRS's reason for shutting down
the investigation in the ClintonFoundation was we don't have
the resources to investigate?
It Shut up.
Yeah, they wrote that down down.
Oh, they're too big.
They're too big to beinvestigated.
If we pull the plug on that one, the whole bathtub might drain

(17:55):
what if we hired, say, 80,000?
You think we could take on?
the clinton foundation maybe, Iknow, and it's just one
foundation, you know they wentafter like 1,600 January 6th
defendants, you know, and youfigure every raid takes times,
10, times 20 agents involved inthose cases.

Speaker 7 (18:15):
Oh, sorry, we're busy .
That's one of the stupidestthings I've ever heard, ever
heard, I know Again.

Speaker 4 (18:22):
we're just going to measure by the standard by which
they measure.
Okay is that possible?

Speaker 17 (18:26):
that the irs didn't have resources?

Speaker 14 (18:28):
man, I wish it was because we got audited after
sheldon, whitehouse from rhodeisland sent a letter to the, the
irs, to say audit conservativegroup.
So I don't know.

Speaker 17 (18:37):
I can personally tell you they've got resources
to to audit non-profits becausewe were on the fuzzy end of that
lollipop a couple years ago solook, this is just nonsense.

Speaker 16 (18:46):
The internal revenue service and the deep state that
runs the place is just rottento the core.
It's staffed by left-wingideologues, whether it's in the
in the c-suite within the agencyor within the bowels of the
agency the folks that do thework day in, day out.
It is just a rotten agencystaffed by rotten people, and
until someone kind of grabsthese folks by the lapel, shakes

(19:07):
them and runs them out the door, we're not going to get any
change there.
It's, unfortunately, an agencythat thrives off of the process
of punishing activists, peoplewho are engaged in political
speech, and using the tools thatthey have at the IRS of audits
and lawsuits to kind of beatthese folks into submission, and
it's shameful.
It's been going on for decadesand it doesn't seem to be

(19:30):
changing.

Speaker 4 (19:31):
Yeah, I know.
One of the things that you knowwe talked about on the show a
couple of days ago is it wasofficially revealed by Ed Martin
.
Yeah, so the IRS in fact wasauditing gentler censors at a
disproportionate rate.
I know I've been including thatin my elevator speech for four
years now.
Yeah, thank you for thecognition.
Sometimes I felt like a few ofus were the crazy ones, like did

(19:53):
you get IRS issues?
Yeah, I did.
Did you get IRS?
I did.
Did you get your letter fromthe IRS Seems thematic, your
weekly letter.
Did you get your bank account?

Speaker 5 (20:01):
closed down.

Speaker 4 (20:02):
Yeah, I did Okay.
So Laura Loomer, speaking ofthe IRS, Hold on.
Hold on.

Speaker 7 (20:06):
What's the fuzzy end of a lollipop?

Speaker 4 (20:09):
I don't know.
I've never heard that before.
I heard that just like okayfuzzy end of that lollipop.
Laura Loomer has a scoop here.
She says the three IRSofficials identified as Lois
Lerner's henchmen whoparticipated in the
weaponization of the IRS but arestill somehow working inside
the Trump administration.
You guys, this is going back tothe Obama administration.
We've gone we was the secondtime Trump's been in charge and

(20:35):
hasn't cleaned out.
The people that went after theTea Party associations have all
been placed on administrativeleave.
So finally they've been placedon administrative leave by Scott
Besson.
Irs sources tell me threeofficials placed on
administrative leave came as adirect result of my
investigative reporting.
They also told me the Trumpadministration appreciates my
efforts in helping to dismantlethe weaponization of the federal
government.
The three officials placed onadministrative leave are Holly

(20:56):
Paz, robert Coy and ElizabethKastenberg.
I can also confirm that thefourth IRS official, radical
leftist, anthony Sacco, anattorney at the IRS's Office of
Chief Counsel, has also beenplaced on administrative leave
as of last night.
Holly Paz is an Obama donor whohelped run Lewis Lerner's
targeting operation ofconservative nonprofits and GOP
donors and now oversees auditingpass-through businesses.

(21:16):
Robert Coy, the Democrat helped, which, by the way.
What's significant about that?
Auditing pass-throughbusinesses?
The Bidens had 27 of them.
Began about that.
Auditing pastor businesses uh,the biden's had 27 of them.
So how do you get past thepeople like this?

Speaker 7 (21:31):
who are like oh, this pass-through entity, grandma
property.

Speaker 4 (21:33):
This one's getting audited, but hunter biden and
his 24 shell agencies let it go.
We don't have the resources tolook at all that yeah rob uh.
Robert coy helped down theoriginal crackdown on
conservative nonprofits and nowruns the entire division where
it all happened and live in.
Elizabeth kassenberg, an actingdirector of the irs, who
admitted tag targeting waspurely political.

(21:54):
I have a feeling these namesright here are going to be like
robert coy.
Being in charge of thatdivision probably had my file
run through it.
Sources at the ir IRS have alsoconfirmed to me that at least
three more high level IRSofficials have also been placed
on administrative leave.
Those officials are KarenHoward, executive director of
the office of online services atIRS, bridget Roberts, chief
director direct file at IRS, andElizabeth Askey, chief of IRS

(22:18):
independent office of appeals.
I can also exclusively reportthat Scott Besson, who is at the
current acting commissioner ofthe current acting commissioner
of the IRS, was at the IRSheadquarters today when he had a
meeting with IRS leadership.
The meeting focused onimplementation of OBBB and the
de-weaponization of the IRS,which is being led by Joe
Ziegler and Gary Shapley.
Those are the two investigatorsthat went after Hunter Biden

(22:40):
and then were basically fired or, you know, tortured by the IRS
For doing that.
One is a gay man and the otheris a Democrat.
I think they're both Democratsand one happens to be gay.
This is Besson's second visitto the IRS this week alone.
Hopefully the administrationTurns into full-blown
terminations.
We can't afford to play games.
So interesting thing about thisIs Laura Lu Loomer's not too
happy with Scott Besson beforethis, but week before this she

(23:04):
said despite what the fake newskeeps peddling, I had nothing to
do with Billy Long's firingfrom the IRS.
That was the handiwork of Sorosdisciple Scott Besson, likely
done to shield his old boss andthe Democrat machine he's been
serving his entire career.
I have it on good authoritythat Billy Long was ready to
implement massive personnelchanges in the IRS in the coming
weeks by removing Obama andidenoperatives who weaponized the
irs.
On the lowest learnal, lauricelearner, if secretary besant

(23:26):
actually respected the will ofthe voters, he'd be.
He'd be cleaning the house ofthe irs, not protecting the same
obama biden loyalists whoweaponize it against them.
So, anyways, she's not too bigfan of of scott besant, but
scott besant did come in andended up putting those people on
administrative leave.
And laura loomer's like why putthem on administrative leave
and why not just fire themoutright?
Fuzzy end of the lollipop, asaying that is right up there

(23:49):
with when I was in prison when Igot the fuzzy end of that
lollipop.
I think that's like.
It just reminds me of like anold lollipop that's been in your
pocket without the wrapper andit's like here okay, okay, I get
that so that's good news, okay.
So then we had other breakingnews yesterday, which was a huge

(24:09):
deal.
Cnn was super excited to reporton this one well, I'm not wolf.

Speaker 12 (24:14):
I have been skeptical of the attorney
general's case for a long time.
I'm on record saying that thisis a huge win for donald trump,
any way you cut it, and this isa stinging rebuke to the
attorney general.

Speaker 4 (24:30):
Letitia James.
So what happened yesterday wasthe New York appeals court
overturned the five hundredmillion dollar judgment against
Donald Trump based onovervaluing his mortgages, and
you know where the banks came in, they're like no, we didn't
lose a dollar, we did greatbusiness with them and we'd love
to do more.
And they're like you're avictim, so he just beat that
case.

Speaker 12 (24:46):
Finding here is the financial fine part of it, a
long, complicated ruling, butthe bottom line is, while the
finding of liability againstDonald Trump can stand, for now
at least, the damages award,which started at $350 million
with interest, gets up close to$500 million.
That is thrown out, and the corereason for that ruling,

(25:07):
according to the judges, isessentially that there was not
enough of a showing here thatthere were actual victims.
And just to refresh people'smemories, this is the civil
fraud lawsuit brought by theattorney general.
The core allegation is thatDonald Trump habitually
overvalued his own assets whenhe was trying to get bank loans
from banks and other lenders,and essentially the argument

(25:28):
that Donald Trump made belowthat has now had resonance in
the appeals court is you'retalking about very sophisticated
quote unquote victims.
These are billion dollar banksthat made the loans, got repaid
on the loans by Donald Trumpwith interest and actually
profited to the tune of millionsof dollars.
So it's not the typical type offraud case where you have

(25:51):
somebody stealing money fromother people or ripping off
unknowing consumers.
So this ruling by the appealscourt is monumental.
It was also very unusual inthat it took them nearly a year
to reach this decision.
As Caitlin Polanski just said,the next step is going to be to
go up to the highest court inthe state, the court of appeals
in new york state is wolf gonnasay anything?

Speaker 4 (26:11):
shit so I got a little something to say about
this because, you know, wolf,like a year or two ago was like
breaking news trump is guilty.
And now he's like go ahead.

Speaker 7 (26:24):
So this story kind of highlights something to me.
You know you have a year longwhatever, and then you have
these, this case that getsoverturned.
Well, there was so much, somuch noise and so many people
making so much noise about thiscase that it had to go before
the court, right.

(26:44):
So much noise about this casethat it had to go before the
court, right?
And then when it gets thrownout, it gets thrown up because
they can't find anybody who'sinjured, no victim, no victim
anywhere anywhere.

Speaker 4 (26:53):
This is why I believe my transcripts were altered.
Did I hurt, harm, injure,threaten you?
No, okay, well, can we strikethe assault?

Speaker 7 (27:02):
It just points to me how much of this is just Kabuki
theater.
Yeah, it's just so much kabukitheater.

Speaker 4 (27:09):
My wife and I were having this discussion yesterday
.
She was in court and she waslike it's like they're just
reading a script.
I'm like I know, and AtlasShrugged and Ayn Rand, right,
this is written in the 1940s and50s and so there's no, there's
no, no fault divorce.
So divorce is a big deal andtwo of the characters get a
divorce in this book and youknow, the wealthy magnate,
howard Hank Reardon ends uppaying his lawyer to pay the

(27:37):
judge and to pay off the othercouncil to basically get this
divorce granted, right.
And so they show up into courtand these lawyers got their
suits and the judges take itvery serious and they read the
script and they say their magicwords and their incantations and
their spells and they all lookat each other like we good did,
we get all the things needed onthe record, and then the judge
grants the divorce and they allwalk out and they look like we

(27:58):
just did something official andlegal.
He's like I paid you, I bribedyou, you guys act like.
And then they want me like I'mcomplicit because you know, oh,
we did it legally Right, nobodydid this, I'm lawful.
And he's like no, I bribed you.
He's like you guys want me tolike, like, vindicate this
behavior, and I'm like I onlydid this because you're

(28:18):
disgusting.
You know what I mean.
Like, so that's kind of how itfeels.
It's like, yeah, they wentthrough the motions and they got
their conviction with noevidence.
Well then, what were we doing?
Why did we even need the trial?
Why don't you just declare himguilty on day one?
It's the same thing with theMackey case for posting a meme
no victims, no victims.

Speaker 7 (28:37):
You know, and sometimes this Kabuki theater
it's, it's played by bothparties.

Speaker 4 (28:42):
Oh yeah.

Speaker 7 (28:46):
So why I put the woke race and I didn't just mean, uh
, both r and d parties, I meanjust both parties to the suit or
the whatever's going on in the,in the uh, in the courtroom.
And you know, sometimes trumpwill lean into these things, you
know to, in order to have, um,his side of the story come out
better, you know.

Speaker 4 (29:04):
Yeah no, he plays the game.
Oh yeah, my my, that's what I'mtrying to say.
My tack was I wasn't playingthe game, I wasn't given an inch
.
I'm just.
I'm not even going toparticipate by filing motions.
I'm not even going toparticipate by defending myself.

Speaker 7 (29:15):
Right.
So when I, when I call thisKabuki theater, I'm not trying
to exonerate any, any party ofit, like everybody's guilty in
this thing oh yeah, everybodywho touched it.

Speaker 4 (29:27):
So mike davis has this little warning for leticia
james, because this is frombefore, okay, but you know she
was threatening that oh, trump'scoming in, but we're still
gonna prosecute and persecutehim, of course.

Speaker 20 (29:37):
Now she's in the hot seat let me just say this to
big tish james, the new yorkattorney general I, you, I dare
you to try to continue yourlawfare against President Trump
in his second term, becauselisten here, sweetheart, we're
not messing around this time andwe will put your fat ass in
prison for conspiracy againstrights, and I promise you that.

(29:59):
So think long and hard beforeyou want to violate President
Trump's.
So think long and hard beforeyou want to violate President
Trump's constitutional rights,or any other Americans
constitutional rights.
We, it's not going to happenagain.

Speaker 15 (30:11):
We've been warning people on the show Mike, this
isn't the same Trumpadministration.
Stop messing around.
Don't rig elections, don'tillegally vote, don't try the
funny business, because we knowthe team this time and they are
not effing around.

Speaker 4 (30:26):
Let me just say this I hope they're not.
I mean, we're seven months inand we're just getting around to
John Bolton as the starter.
I mean really.

Speaker 7 (30:35):
And some other staff.

Speaker 4 (30:36):
I was kind of hoping.
Maybe you'd like go for lowhanging fruit like Hillary
Clinton first, you know like Ithought maybe opening raid
Hillary Clinton.
Yes, we're off to the races.
Instead it was john bolton.
It's like you took out therhino republican kind of guy
like I mean.
I know he's not like colonelsanders.
Yeah, he's kind of persona nongrata in the republican and

(30:56):
democrat party, but seriously,like we went for john bolton
first.
Meanwhile, the lawfare in whatreally truly is a coordinated
effort is still continue againstTrump and his admin and the
people to help facilitate hisreturn to government, including
Alina Abba, who is Trump'sattorney up in New Jersey.
So the drama with that was shegets appointed as the attorney.

(31:18):
120 days runs up and for somereason, the mechanism means now
the court can either confirm herto continue going on or replace
her.
They chose to not confirm herand replace her with the first
assistant, who's some Democrat.
So then Babadi came in andfired the Democrat and then
reinstated Alina Abba, as now ina recess appointment or interim
appointment.
Well, now a court in New Jerseysome appeals court, which has

(31:42):
17 judges on on it, 15 of whomwere appointed by obama and
biden then has just confirmedthat she has no authority.
She's not the us attorney andanybody prosecuting under her
has potentially no authority,which would then potentially
overturn all the cases in newjersey now hold on.

Speaker 7 (31:58):
I'm a little bit confused.
So the first, the first bitthat she was in, it was like a
temporary status, right, right.

Speaker 4 (32:03):
Yes, acting.

Speaker 7 (32:04):
Okay, and then if they have 120 days that she can
be in that status, and then theyeither have to confirm or kick
her out.

Speaker 4 (32:13):
Yeah, or extend it through some type of recess
appointment.
But the court apparently hassome say in it and they booed
her and the Democrats tried topull like a quote-unquote fast
one, yes and slip in a Democrat.
Well, pamp Bondi just fired theDemocrat and then put, and put
Alina Abbott as the first seatand then, when they fired the
Democrat, alina Abbott wentright back to the top.

Speaker 7 (32:32):
So she's like ha ha, so I think she's there
legitimately then, isn't she?

Speaker 4 (32:36):
Well, she was, but now this court yesterday came
out and ruled that she's notthere legitimately and it
violates some you know hookstipulation and some statue
somewhere and so now she's kindof out.
Well, elena abba was on tv lastnight because the whole problem
centers around this blue slipthing.
New jersey has got corey bookerand I can't remember the other

(32:58):
one, the other senator andtypically you know, when you do
the us attorneys and judges,they have to be you know, even
if it's from the other partylike if you're a Republican and
president you're appointingRepublicans, you get the New
Jersey senators who areDemocrats to give what's called
the blue slip, which is like,okay, there's a Republican, but
they're moderate enough, we'lllet it through.
So it's like you always havethe home senators get the veto

(33:18):
vote, a single veto vote.
It's a tradition, it's a Senatething.
It's a tradition, it's a Senatething, it's not a law.
And Trump is like get rid ofthat nonsense.
That's how we end up neverbeing able to change.
These blue states is becausethe senators have this like
pocket veto and that's whatthey're doing with Alina Abba.
Corey Booker and the other NewJersey senator will not meet
with her, honoring the totallytreasonous, traitorous this is

(33:50):
my spartacus moment cory bookerand not allowing alina abba to
go to the floor for aconfirmation vote.

Speaker 11 (33:53):
Sean, it's been real in new jersey.
Uh, I will tell you this.
Number one I was the nominee tobecome the us attorney, and
cory booker and andy kim, who Ihave never to this day spoken to
in my life, despite my attemptsto meet them, have truly, truly
done us a disservice and,frankly, same with Senator
Grassley by holding up atraditional blue slip, not a law

(34:15):
, and not allowing a lot of thepresident's picks to go through
and be voted on by Senate.
I didn't even get to that point.
Then, fast forward.
It goes to the judges 17federal judges in the state of
New Jersey, 15 of which areObama and Biden appointed, that,
just like, frankly, we saw withTish James, tried to use their
seat for political motivation.
I am the pick of the president,I am the pick of Pam Bondi, our

(34:38):
attorney general, and I willserve this country like I have
for the last several years inany capacity.
This country like I have forthe last several years in any
capacity.
You might try and change mytitle, you might try and fight
me, but, just like today withNew York, we will win.
We always do.
It just takes time.
But it's disturbing what we'reseeing.
It's not surprising, but it'sdisturbing.
They think they have a voicefor five minutes.
They try and be activists andPam Bondi called it like it is.

(35:00):
The attorney general said ittoday today we will not fall to
rogue judges.
We will not fall to peopletrying to be political when they
should just be doing their jobrespecting the president.
And you can't get rid of thepresident.
Almost 100 million people votedfor him and he is still and
will be forever the 45th and47th president of the united
states wait what?

Speaker 4 (35:21):
what did she just say ?
Did you catch the last sentence?

Speaker 7 (35:25):
No, how many people voted for Donald Trump?
I don't know.
Replay it.

Speaker 4 (35:30):
All right, we're going to grok on this one.
Grok.
How many um jeez when Icapitalize it.
People in the us voted fordonald.
Was that a shooting star?
Oh yeah donald trump in the2024 election.

(35:53):
I don't think it was 100million no but I'm wondering if
maybe they know the vote totalsnow.
Like wouldn't that be crazythat would be crazy, like yeah,
we thought we were squabbling 77million.
So you know she's only 23million shy.
I feel like we don't call three, four, we don't say when you

(36:18):
have three quarters, we don'tsay you have a hole, you know
like right it's 77 million.
It's not a hundred million, ordid she say over a hundred
million people voted?

Speaker 7 (36:28):
I don't know let's just.

Speaker 4 (36:29):
Let's just put that on the.
We're gonna wait to see as theelection stuff comes out.
If we start to find out, thesealgorithms might have switched
more votes than we think yeahthe man on the street interviews
jimmy phala.
One of the things that gave me alot of confidence when I was in
prison, the show that I enjoyedlistening to the most, that

(36:50):
gave me the most sense of reliefand sense that some form of
sanity might return to us.
Believe it or not, it was JimmyFela's show, fox Across America
.
It would come on at nineo'clock at night.
So nine o'clock at night, sonine o'clock at night was
basically when was it nine oreight, didn't matter, it was
basically we had count.
Was this jimmy fallon?

(37:11):
Jimmy fela I don't know whothat is.
I know nobody does.
He's the funniest man on tv.
I'm telling you he's hilarious.
So, jimmy fela, he does likeone saturday show for fox and
then he does a radio show, buthe's a comedian.
He's a standup comedian andhe's a taxi driver from New York
.
So he's hilarious.
He is a peasant, so he's got alot of material.

(37:31):
He's got a lot of material.
He's a peasant though, like hiswhole thing is.
He's like I'm giving you theinside scoop Like they took me
out of a taxi cab and gave me aradio show Now and gave me a
radio show, and now I get to goto the bar where CNN and MSNBC.
They're totally fake anddisingenuous you know, and he's
just got a really funny showCause it's a comedy show.
So I'd listened to Jimmy Phelan.
He's the one who's like listen,the media is trying to tell you

(37:53):
this, but that's not the truth.
And he'd go out and do his cabdriving Okay, times Square or
whatever.
And he interviewed 87 people.
And he's like I interviewed 87people and there were two Biden
supporters.
He's like where in New York,where are the Biden supporters?
Like they don't walk on thestreets, they only stay in the

(38:16):
high rise.
You know, he's like there'ssomething going on.
So when I would listen to hisshow, it always gave me a big
respite because I felt like hewas cutting through the noise.
When I listen to Sean Hannity,I'm like OK, what is his deep
state handler telling him to sayRight and trying to pick
through it with Jimmy Fela?
I was like the handlers hadn'tquite gotten to him yet.
You know, if you watch BlackMirror, there's an episode where

(38:38):
some guy gets all upset at thesystem and he ends up like
lashing out and what the system?
And he ends up like lashing outand what the system does is it
takes it and they gives them anhour long show where he can lash
out and that gets other peopleriled up, but then when the show
ends, they just keep doingtheir little.
You know nine to five thing, oh, that sounds like real life.
It's like Alex Jones, it's apressure outlet, like if a
trucker can just listen to acouple hours of Alex Jones every

(38:58):
day, he can get through the day, right.
But if you don't have an AlexJones outlet, then eventually
the trucker himself is going tostart, right, right.
So that's the thing with JimmyFallon.
I was like, well, maybe he'sjust the outlet, right, the rage

(39:19):
sink.
Yes, so John Solomon was on, butI loved listening to a show.
It came on at night night.
We would do count.
And that's when, you know, I'dalready called my wife and it
was time to wrap it up and go tobed.
And, you know, avoid thenighttime shenanigans that
happen in a prison.
So get to your nice safe placeand I'd put my headphone in and
I'd, you know, go to sleep andI'd listen to jimmy faila and it
was.
It was very relaxing.
So I have a special spot in myheart for him because I'd look

(39:40):
forward to his show every day.
I hated the weekends when hisshow wasn't on.
You know what?
I had to listen to on theweekends in the same time slot
law enforcement radio.
Do you know how depressing itis to be in prison and listen to
a bunch of cops complain aboutputting people in prison their
whole lives?
It was so messed up.

(40:00):
We have ptsd, so do why thatwas frustrating.

Speaker 7 (40:06):
It helps you identify with the guards like oh they
have it so rough I've alwaysthought they should.

Speaker 4 (40:13):
They have to watch us .
They should really have like aprison broadcast radio.
Like I, I really think theyshould run uh prisons more like
a university campus, right, andyou should have like the paper
editor and all this stuff.
Like I think there's a lot Idon't know how, what he's doing
down there.
I think he's just holding themokay, but like I could see the
prison where I was at, where ifyou had like a couple guys that

(40:35):
were good writers, that wouldhave like a newspaper editorial
staff, yeah, that'd be cool,that would be like real world
thing.

Speaker 7 (40:41):
They had had like workshops where you could go
work and learn life skills.
I'm 100% sure that place is asweatshop.

Speaker 4 (40:48):
Oh, dude, in prison it's called Unicor.
So Unicor is the privatecompany that comes in and the
prisoners make all the militaryuniforms.
Prisoners make all the.
All the cots that are in prisonare made by prisoners and they
do.
There's tons of stuff that theydo.
They do food packaging and likeit's something like some
unbelievably ridiculous amountof food in the grocery store is

(41:10):
packaged by federal prisoners.
Wow, yeah, people don't knowthis.
So companies like ramen willpay the prisoners to package
ramen noodles okay they don'tmake the ramen noodles, they
just package them or whatever.
I don't know if ramen is one ofthose brands, but there's stuff
like that.
I know that there was a Chinese.
There's a Chinese inmate whosued the United States of

(41:30):
America because he was forced tomake Milwaukee gloves work
gloves like Milwaukee, the brandthat competes with DeWalt.

Speaker 7 (41:37):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (41:37):
When he was in prison in China, they were making
Milwaukee gloves, which is funnybecause American inmates were
making some other glove brandthat was being shipped to china.
So we were trading each otherprisoner inmates with a name
brand.
Okay, so he was suing americaand milwaukee for essentially
engaging in slave labor in chinato make the gloves that we're
buying here.
And it was like I got news foryou, buddy, we're doing the same

(42:00):
thing.
You know, our shinto gloves aregetting shipped to you Same
patterns.
I'm being dead serious aboutthis.
But you go into Unicorn, it'sthese huge warehouses.

Speaker 7 (42:13):
Well, when you call it slave labor, I'm not sure
what you can call it anythingelse.

Speaker 4 (42:18):
It's 13th Amendment.
It literally says slavery isoutlawed unless you're convicted
of a crime.
I would tell the guard when Ishow up at the woodshop slavery
is outlawed unless you'reconvicted of a crime.
What?
Here we are.
I would tell the guard when Ishow up at the woodshop.
I'm here to start my 13thAmendment assignment.

Speaker 7 (42:32):
It's so funny.

Speaker 4 (42:33):
It's not I know, but the way that you approach it is
so funny oh yeah, dude, if youdon't look at it with humor, you
can only look at it with tears.
You know, I mean.
Tragedy and comedy are likekissing cousins, you know, take
your pick which one you're gonnalook at but if I was the guard
and you came in and said that Icouldn't help but smile?
oh dude, this guard was fun.

(42:55):
In fact I don't know if he'sallowed to have contact with me
because I don't know, butsomeday I'm gonna try to reach
out to him.
But he was a huge supporter,okay, huge MAGA guy, and the
election happened.
So you know they call theelection at night, so he's
always asking you know, do youthink you guys will get pardons?
So at this point I was noworderly over all the facilities.

(43:17):
So I'm like the inmate that'sin charge of all of the
facilities carpentry, hvac,welding, plumbing uh, I don't
know, there's probably someother, you know, general
maintenance, like.

Speaker 7 (43:27):
So this is so funny, taylor you're like in charge of
the freaking I was I was theinmate that was in charge of all
the facilities.
You sound like a character fromsome hollywood movie.

Speaker 4 (43:37):
No, I'm just taylor, I know I just he dropped me into
prison.
I'm gonna run the place I waslike I was one step away from
basically replacing the Aryanbrotherhood in there, just
kidding so.
But I was in charge offacilities, I was the orderly,
and so I I could walk into thedirector's office Like I'm the

(43:59):
one who had to go change hisgarbage, I'm the one who had to
make his copies, I'm the one whohad to do data entry for him,
and so I was constantly.
Actually they didn't really letme touch the computers very
much, but I was the one who wasconstantly like in their
business, like does that?
make sense, like I made coffeefor the director, the, the guy
who's like in charge of theentire building and answers only

(44:20):
to the warden.
I was his b word yeah so, butthat did, yeah, so anyway.
So I was running facilities.
So the election happens and Icome into the wood shop, which
is part of facilities and it'swhere I had started working.
And I come into the wood shopsand the guard that I really
liked is in his office withthree or four other guards and,

(44:41):
like all these other people, andI'm walking pretty hot because
I'm like I'm just one so Iwalked down into into the wood
shop and he's sitting there.
He's got this red hair, he'ssitting there with these other
guards and I just like poke mylike I I walk into his door
frame and I poke my head in,like this with a huge smile and

(45:02):
he just looks up at me and juststarts giggling and laughing in
front of all these other guards.
And then I just retreat and walkback and go do my job totally
unspoken, like I'm going home,buddy, okay.
So anyways, this is johnsolomon talking about a smoking
gun that they had releasedyesterday.

Speaker 12 (45:25):
Is this the smoking gun?

Speaker 17 (45:28):
Well it is.
It's something pretty hot.
I'll say that, Listen, you havenow the former general counsel,
the former chief lawyer, toJames Comey saying I leaked
classified information.
He tells a federal agents andprosecutors.
He tells federal agents andprosecutors and I did so at the
instruction of James Comey'schief of staff who told me James
Comey authorized me to go dothis no-transcript, which makes

(46:15):
this october 2016 leak that thefbi was able to, that the
investigators and prosecutorsable to confirm still
prosecutable until next Octoberof 2026.
Pam Bondi said I just heard whatshe said.
She said, in the short say noone should be allowed to
jeopardize national security.
There will be accountability.
Kash Patel saying that this wasa stain on the FBI and one that

(46:37):
now has to be fully transposed.
When you look at theinvestigation, Sean which, by
the way, occurred a lot of itoccurred during Trump's first
term in office really weak workby prosecutors and people
working on this.
They had a chance to go getemails that would show what
Comey and his people weretalking about.
They didn't go, secure them.
They didn't bring a lot ofpeople before the grand jury.

(46:58):
There is room for Pam Bondi andKash Patel right now to open a
criminal investigation, get newevidence and help the American
people see just how bad thismight have been.

Speaker 11 (47:09):
Is this part two, because there was the issue of
the Columbia professor.
Was that classified material aswell?

Speaker 17 (47:15):
Sure, yeah, listen, I want to credit Attorney
General Bondi and Director KashPatel, because I made a request
to have this informationunredacted.
It was redacted in the firstproduction.
We saw the stuff about MrRichmond.
We saw the stuff about AdamSchiff.
We know that's the other personwho was identified as likely
authorizing illegal nationalsecurity leaks, but this was

(47:39):
originally redacted and theattorney general went to the mat
for us to go get thisinformation so we can see it.
And when you see it now, yousee its significance.
Remember james comey wasquestioned astutely by senator
chuck grassy and the judiciarycommittee, may 3rd 2017.
Did you ever, were you ever,anonymous source?
No, did you ever ask someone tobe anonymous source?
No.
Did you ever, uh, authorize aleak, a classified information

(48:03):
or declassify something so itcould go to a reporter?
Never know.
Those words are now going topotentially be looked at as a
potential obstruction ofCongress and this statute of
limitations and the possibilityof a conspiracy case.
James Comey faces a potentiallyvery serious matter right now,
faces a potentially very seriousmatter right now Congress.

Speaker 4 (48:25):
The obstruction of Congress charge that he would be
charged with in this case isUSC 181512.
The charge I was charged withobstructing an investigation of
Congress by destroying adocument, tapering with a
witness or withholdinginformation.
Hello, these people are goingto be measured with the stick by
which they measured.

(48:46):
They threw that charge aroundwhile they themselves were
guilty of it over and over again.
Man, now he mentioned JamesBaker.
James Baker was the conduit forthe leaking and James Baker was
like well, I did the illegalleaking because I was told to by
James Comey.
So who's James Baker?
He's a key figure in all ofthis.
James Baker is often referred toas Jim Baker has an extensive

(49:08):
career, primarily in lawenforcement, national security,
intelligence policy and relatedfields, spanning government,
private sector, academia andmedia roles.
Below is a comprehensivechronological list of all of his
professional provisions.
He started out as a federalprosecutor, fraud section,
criminal division, us Departmentof Justice, 1990 to 96.
Attorney staff member Office ofIntelligence Policy and Review

(49:30):
96 to 2001.
Counsel for Intelligence Policyand the head of Office of
Intelligence Policy and Review2001 to 2007.
Then he became a fellow at theInstitute of Politics John
Kennedy School of Government atHarvard.
Then he became a lecturer atthe Institute of Politics, john
Kennedy School of Government atHarvard.
Then he became a lecturer atHarvard same time in 2007.
Then he became assistantgeneral counsel for national

(49:51):
security at Verizon Business2008 to 2009.
Then he became the associatedeputy attorney general focusing
on national cybersecurity inthe US from 2009 to 2011.
Then the associate generalcounsel at bridgewater
associates 2012 to 2013.
Then he became the associatecounsel at the fbi from 2014 to

(50:12):
2018.
Then, when he was fired fromthe fbi, he became a visiting
fellow at governance studies atthe brookings institute.
Now some of these names harvard, brookings, um, some of these
other agencies these are allagencies that deal with
censorship, that deal withgathering up your information,
and you know this is this guy isa free speech, something anti

(50:37):
or pro, hard to know.
So he became general counsel ofthe federal bureau of
investigations 2014 to 2018.
Uh, fellow at brookings,distinguished visiting fellow at
the Lawfare Institute,projection much Lecturer of law
at Harvard again.
Then national director ofnational security and
cybersecurity at the R StreetInstitute.
Then a legal analyst at CNN.

(50:58):
Then deputy general counsel forvice president of policy at
Twitter, but he was fired fromthat position amid controversies
related to content moderationand internal document releases.
So basically, what you'resaying here is from the time he
left being a criminal prosecutorfor the fraud section of
criminal division.
He then immediately went intointelligence and it took 20

(51:21):
years for it to catch up to him.
You think when he was atTwitter that's the first time he
didn't release information.
You think when he was atTwitter that was the first time
that he asked for certain voicesto be silenced on social media.
You think that was the firsttime he did that?
I have a feeling he was hiredat Twitter because he was
well-equipped for that job.

(51:42):
But don't worry, he's no longerworking for major corporations
now, he's just a contributingeditor at lawfare.

Speaker 7 (51:49):
Okay, when you say jim baker, I can't help but
think about jim and tammy fayeit's james baker.

Speaker 4 (51:59):
Jim baker, I'll never forget it was Matt Taibbi, and
I can't remember who the female.
I might have been MollyHemingway, I could be wrong on
that, but it was the two of themthat were getting documents and
neither one of them are hugeTrump fans.
Like, in fact, they're reallynot considered Republicans at
all.
These, you know Matt Taibbi iskind of more in the Edward

(52:19):
Snowden camp side of politicalpolitics, but they were getting
these documents and they're like, well, it's mentioning other
documents, but we're not seeingthe other documents and there's
like some black holes, like justmissing whole tranches of what
they thought they needed to putthe dots together.
So they're like everythingstill feels really
circumstantial.
Like you know, the tree fell inthe woods, but did anybody cut

(52:44):
it down or did it just naturallyfall?
Like we know the tree fell.
Like we know millions of peoplegot taken off of twitter that
all seem to have some type ofconservative leaning, but who
initiated that?
You know?
Like it just happened what,what?
well, jim baker was sitting onthose docks and so she's looking
at it and she's like jamesbaker.
James baker, is that jim looksit up?

(53:08):
Oh my gosh, the leaker forcomey is working at twitter, and
that's when they let elon know.
Hey, the guy that's sending usall this information that you
say is going to be so revelatoryis literally the guy that did
the things with facebook thatnow he's covering up.

(53:29):
He's the one who told twitterto censor and cover up when he
was general counsel at the fbi.
And now he's general counselhere and he's like oh, you can't
know who at the FBI toldTwitter to do the censoring.
Do you see what I'm saying?
I don't want to.
I exercise my right to notself-incriminate.

(53:51):
So totally wild Again.
This cabal of people.
And you look at that resume.
He's just hopping from oneintelligence spot to another.
He's an apparatchik, he's auseful piece in their game that
they're playing, and he's beendoing it for years and years,
and years it's a good soldier Irefuse to look at a situation

(54:11):
like that, looking at his resume, and say, oh, he was probably
like a completely clean whistletill 2016.
You know what I mean?
Like no way.
I don't believe it for onesecond.
Here's pam bondy talking aboutcleaning up the streets of dc,
because this is, you know, likein a week they haven't had a
murder.
It's pretty incredible.
I'm telling you, when I was indc, every single morning we

(54:32):
would wake up in jail.
That tv would be on onto theirlocal news channel and it was
drive-bys, it was carjackings,it was murders.
It was some club had someincident.
Now, it was nonstop.
It was nonstop.

Speaker 7 (54:48):
Nonstop gunfire.

Speaker 4 (54:49):
Nonstop.

Speaker 14 (54:51):
And last night we seized 10 guns.
There were 77 arrests.
But you're right, homicide'snot been a homicide in a week
because of the presence of lawenforcement.
President Trump being out theretoday was an incredible
inspiration to all of those menand women state, local and
federal working hand in hand.
It was remarkable.

(55:11):
They were so happy to see thepresident.
They are working so hard.
I know so many of them now on afirst name basis because I've
been out there almost everynight with them.
The president was giving themburgers and pizzas and they
loved it, thanking them becauseno one in this country will love
our law enforcement more thanDonald Trump.
They see that they respect it,they appreciate it.

Speaker 4 (55:34):
And nothing says love like burgers and pizza.
Well, yeah.

Speaker 7 (55:39):
I mean hot dog and pizza party is pretty popular.

Speaker 4 (55:41):
No, I could be wrong when I said this, but the way I
understood he said he's, youknow, he's feeding all the cops
and taking pictures.
And I I had to.
I had the white house make theburgers, the burgers, they're
great.
But then I said we got to havesome pizza, but not pizza from
the white house.
We have to have the best pizza.
So we ordered it from genos orwhatever, and some pizza there

(56:03):
anyways.
So he, he fed the uh, the firstresponders being mostly cops,
marshals dei, fbi, atf, all thepersonnel national guard.
You know all the guys that arein there preventing crime in dc
right now, which is, oh listen,man, it's pretty impressive.
When I was in prison, when Igot to dc, the topic always came
up because of course we'respeculating, are we ever going

(56:24):
to get out of this place?
And and it was like, well,trump's going to get elected,
and what if he doesn't getelected?
And can he get elected?
And we all were very schooledon voter fraud and how that
worked and some people wereblackmailed.
They're like they're nevergoing to let him win again.
They've already got the fight.
People got to fight.
We got to continue to raiseawareness.

(56:44):
So there was kind of thisconstant tug and pull on what is
the right path for JanuarySixers and I was often in there.
I'm like, listen, as far as I'mconcerned, the elections are
totally rigged.
There's one solution to thisDonald Trump has to have a
Julius Caesar moment.
He's got to cross the Rubicon.
He's got to assume and takethat authority, just like Biden
basically did.
And then he's got a clean house.

(57:04):
He's got an absolutely cleanhouse, but he's got to pay off
the plebs.
He's got to pay off thepeasants.
How do you do that you come intoa city like DC and you make the
streets clean.
That's going to make the blackpeople in that community like
him.
That's going to take away theinstant ability to bring people
to protest.
Every little thing Right.
You're going to have peoplethat are simpatico with Donald

(57:25):
Trump because he got rid of thecrime on the streets, like he's
doing the things that a dictatorwould need to do to get the
buy-in of the people, while atthe same time trying to show the
people that he's all aboutjustice and he's not just going
to be more cronyism from before,but he's going to use all the
same tools that they used topreviously persecute.
So I was like a big advocatethat Donald Trump has to have

(57:45):
this Julius Caesar moment.
That is what I'm seeing.

Speaker 7 (57:50):
Yeah, he got rid of the paid protests and he's
making sure that they don'tcreate a vacuum for real
protests.
Yes, exactly.

Speaker 4 (58:00):
He's upping services, he's dropping crime, he's taken
riffraff off the streets andhe's doing it in this grandiose
way that nobody can stop.
In fact it's so grandiose thatthey're having to bring in extra
prosecutors to go after themisdemeanor charges.

Speaker 13 (58:14):
And we also found out, jillian, just recently that
US Attorney Jeanine Pirro hasauthorized 20 JAG officers,
military prosecutors, toprosecute misdemeanors here on
the streets of DC as part ofthis surge.
So you're seeing a lot ofcooperation between the Pentagon
with the National Guard, theFBI, which is under the
Department of Justice, butthat's notable, 20 JAG officials

(58:37):
, which are military lawyersprosecuting, being able to
prosecute misdemeanors as partof this operation.
Jillian.

Speaker 4 (58:46):
Okay.

Speaker 7 (58:48):
What.

Speaker 4 (58:53):
The Q folks will tell you the military is the way.
The military is the only wayyou got to bring the military
into the civil courts or getpeople into military tribunals.
Did I just hear that right?
20 JAG officers are going tocome do misdemeanor charges.
I wonder if the good civilattorneys and criminal attorneys
are maybe going to be busy withI don't know, the clinton
foundation.
Let the jag guys do themisdemeanors.

(59:13):
I thought it would be the otherway around.
I thought they'd be bringing 20jag officers in to look at the
clinton foundation, right, butyou're bringing them in either
way.
This is a julius caesar moment.
This is using every ounce ofauthority you can to exercise
law and order to have thathappen.
I'm left giggly, smiley, happyto see hypocrisy starting to

(59:40):
come to an end.
I can't tell you the emotions Ihave knowing that John Bolton's
house right now is a whole bunchof papers thrown around the
front room.

Speaker 7 (59:48):
The fuzzy end of a lollipop.
The fuzzy end of a lollipop.

Speaker 4 (59:51):
Yeah, I can't tell you I'm struggling with certain
emotions of sympathy and empathybut at the same time I'm super
happy and giddy because you'regetting what you've been dishing
out there's.
You're getting what you've beendishing out right.

Speaker 7 (01:00:10):
There's a certain element of all of that, so I
have to kind of check myselfhere.
But how do I feel about themilitary coming in and
prosecuting misdemeanors?
Well, I think it's a betterlook than having them come in to
prosecute the you know, theprime offenders, because then it
looks more like a military justjust process them in and out.

Speaker 4 (01:00:21):
These are just misdemeanors, no big deal,
nobody cares.
Maybe, rather than bring in thejag crew for the big dogs or
something you know I don't know,but it definitely is is
interesting, are they beingdeputized like there's some
mechanisms there that makes youkind of curious now it might
work in dc, because dc is afederal property and so there's

(01:00:41):
like better overlap than verse.
You know, jag officers comingto the streets of seattle to
prosecute things like I mean Ithink that there is something to
that.

Speaker 7 (01:00:51):
Because of dc status.

Speaker 4 (01:00:53):
There must be something there now I'm always
the one who brings this up andsometimes what happens is I get
painted in the quarter becauseI'm kind of a contrary.
You know, when it's when it'slaw and order time, I'm like, oh
, let off the gloves.
And then when it's, you know,relax the gloves time, I'm like,
nah, bring the law and order.
Like.
I'm always trying to find thebalance of the nuance.
Here's what I'm worried about.
Okay, I have a low level oftrust for law enforcement.

(01:01:16):
I've been at the fuzzy end ofthat, that lollipop.
Okay, I've been at the fuzzyend of the lollipop.
I've been the guy that wassitting in prison, that didn't
think he belonged there, thatthought he was totally innocent.
I've been the guy.
I've been this guy standing onthe side of the road.
I have been this guy wherethey're like you're drunk and
I'm like, no, I'm not, no, I'mnot.

(01:01:37):
And you know they arrest meanyways.
No, I'm not.
See, this is proof.
Sometimes I just misspeak.
So this gentleman right hereapparently has a hard time
talking, and look at whathappens to this officer.
This is why I worry about theexpansion of law enforcement
without some checks on that howmuch had to drink today?

Speaker 6 (01:01:58):
how much is not very much you right now.

Speaker 5 (01:02:00):
How much did you have ?

Speaker 6 (01:02:01):
to drink today, not enough.
Well, you're unsteady on yourfeet getting out of the vehicle.
Are you going to consent tofield sobriety exercises?
Absolutely not.
I'll do a breathalyzer.

Speaker 11 (01:02:10):
He's a hundred percent disabled.

Speaker 6 (01:02:12):
We don't drink, talking like you have a thick
tongue, slurring words, becauseI'm old, you're not going to
consent to doing any fieldsobriety field.

Speaker 4 (01:02:21):
Sobriety is a trap.
By the way, this this officer'salready determined he's not
filled sober right, there's nopoint in doing any of this.
So this guy's like I'm notdoing any of that.
Look, I'm already old, I'mshaky, I'm throwing my speed
I've had a stroke.
Right right, he's not doing it,but he goes.
I'll take a breathalyzer, putit in my mouth, I'll blow.

(01:02:42):
Right, take a breathalyzer, copdoesn't care, my mouth, I'll
blow, I'll take a breathalyzer.

Speaker 1 (01:02:45):
Cop doesn't care.

Speaker 6 (01:02:47):
He said he didn't have anything to drink, or
anything like that Chance tofind a backer under arrest for
DUI.
What did you give me?
A breathalyzer we're going to.
When you get to the hospitalshe's saying you never drink,
you don't drink.
So what did you drink to?

Speaker 5 (01:02:59):
A cup.
I have water.
No, give me a damn breath ofleisure.
You're going to jail anyway.
How much?

Speaker 6 (01:03:04):
had to drink for that .
That's what I'm worried about.
How much is not very much?
That's what I'm worried about.

Speaker 4 (01:03:08):
Jag officers coming in to prosecute misdemeanors.
Yeah, this happens every day.
I want our streets to be safe.
I don't know how to bridge thegap.
You know what I mean, like I.
You know what I mean, like I.
I don't know what's happeninghere.
There are millions of peoplethat interact with law

(01:03:28):
enforcement and most of it isjust normally totally fine, but
that cop decided to arrest thatguy who, by the way, the story
continues on no alcohol in hisblood, no alcohol on his breast.

Speaker 7 (01:03:37):
He slurs his speech yeah, so what the jag officers?
Aren't they just going to be?
You know, work in courtrooms.

Speaker 4 (01:03:44):
I hope, but my point is this when you give people
power, how do you check it Right?
How do you check it?
We're just good, we'redestroying your day.
We're taking you into prison.
You're going to post a bond.
You'll probably have tointeract with an attorney,
you're going to come have to dothe judge thing.
The whole thing is like becausewhy?
So?
I just point this out.

(01:04:04):
Okay, I don't want to be aracist that's cloaked as someone
that's woke okay I don't wantto look at this.
I'm a peasant.
I want to look at fairness,every instance we want to look
at fairness.
Did john bolton keep classifiedinformation?
Let's get that information outfast.
Let's not drag out his trialvery long.

(01:04:25):
You've got 70 days.
Get an indictment, get thatthing going, do it the right way
, right.
When you drag it out for yearsand years and years and then you
know three, four years aftertrump gets a judgment, we find
out oh, they had no evidencewell, when you drag it out for
years, all you do is you feedthe kabuki theater machine feed
the kabuki theater exactly so.

Speaker 7 (01:04:45):
It's my understanding you know hearing the story
about the the jag guys is thatthey just have a high workload
now in dc because they areprosecuting these misdemeanors
and so they're bringing anyextra help.
That's all, that's how I readit that's how I read it too okay
but I'm saying you've nowcracked the seal okay

Speaker 4 (01:05:06):
you see what I'm saying.
You've cracked the seal and myassumption is jag attorneys are
going to follow directionsbetter than a prosecutor.
That's, you know, kind of stillthinks he's an independent
person.
So it becomes a little morechain of commandy and I'm just
expressing, like I'm raising myflag of concern, because there's

(01:05:29):
also this simultaneously goingon yes, they're doing it in DC.
Yes, dc is one of the highestcrime rates in the world.
Yes, dc is going to requireextraordinary measures to clean
it up.

Speaker 11 (01:05:41):
But President Trump also indicated that federal
action might be coming to otherparts of the country.

Speaker 10 (01:05:48):
We're not playing games.
We're going to make it safe andwe're going to then go on to
other places and more of thismay be coming to a city near you
.

Speaker 18 (01:05:56):
We have focused on Washington DC because it's a
federal city under ourjurisdiction, but we certainly
hope that whether it's Atlantaor anywhere else, people are
going to look around and say wedon't have to live like this.

Speaker 4 (01:06:12):
I agree also 100.
We don't have to live like this.
I really want us, the people,to be the solution.
I don't want to always berelying on some high office
elected savior to come in and dothe saving.
I would like to see the atlantapolice chief have a little find
jesus moment and do some ofthis themselves.
I'd rather it work through thenormal republic mechanisms
instead of through a juliuscaesar dictator that, yes, he's

(01:06:34):
getting the job done, but juliuscaesar kind of enabled the
empire of rome that eventuallygave us nero and caligula.
Do you know?
Know what I mean?
And I'm like ah, I know thatthe United States is probably in
this transition from Republicto empire.
Are we seeing the same thing?
And again, we write our ownhistory?

(01:06:55):
But just knowing the patterns,it's like I don't know how I
feel about federal lawenforcement on domestic streets.
Brown shirts coming to a townnear you.
Now, I'm not giving into theleft's narrative that ISIS,
gestapo, blah.
No, I'm like the best thing iswhen all the rules make sense
and they're enforced equally oneverybody.

(01:07:17):
Yeah, we all have.
We're all playing on the sameset of rules.
I don't see that.
I don't see that.

Speaker 7 (01:07:22):
Well, I don't see that in cities that have a
sanctuary status either.

Speaker 4 (01:07:27):
I have a broken part of my brain where I'm like we're
either equal or we're not.
So if it's a rule, it has to bea rule for everybody.
If even one person breaks it,I'll break it too.
I'll break it second.
I won't break it first.
I will not be the first personto break rule.
It's not in my nature.
But if somebody else breaks arule and it goes unpunished or
enforced, that's not a ruleanymore.

(01:07:48):
Yeah, it's to me.
That's how my brain works.
I'm hardwired that way.
You know, if, if we're in afenced area and someone breaks
out the fence and they'reimmediately punished, I never
leave in the fence.
If they broke out, came back,then they go out again, I'm

(01:08:11):
going out too.
You know, like, if a rule isnot enforceable, it's not a rule
and it has to be enforceable oneveryone, or it shouldn't be
enforced on anyone.
That is how I believe it.
Eric smith, senator frommissouri, used to be the
attorney general and he's theone who went out and discovered
the missouri v biden case, whichgot to the kind of exposed
through discovery how thefederal government was utilizing
the social media companies todo the censoring everybody saw
in 2021 and 2022.

Speaker 18 (01:08:31):
This was called a conspiracy theory, that that
conservatives were being, youknow, throttled or deplatformed.
And we had seen enough that jensaki's at the podium talking
about flagging things forfacebook.
They floated this ridiculousidea of a disinformation
governance board Remember whatthat?
Uh, uh, the Mary Poppins likefigure who was going to be the
head of it.
And so we said you know what?
There is something here, Likethere's, there's something here.

(01:08:53):
So we filed a lawsuit in May of2022, Missouri versus Biden.
And we named not the big techcompanies, we named the
government agencies, we namedBiden, we named the FBI.
We named all these agencies wethought were a part of it, and
we did something kind ofstrategic we talk about it in
the book, Steve.
We didn't seek the injunction,which is to get the government
to stop the bad behavior rightaway.
We sought discovery first, andthat ended up being a key

(01:09:15):
decision.
So what did that mean?
We got thousands and thousandsand thousands of pages of emails
, text messages.
We found out there were secretportals between high-ranking
government officials andhigh-ranking executives at
Twitter and Facebookcoordinating their efforts.
The collusion that washappening, the coercion that was
happening.
We took the deposition ofAnthony Fauci and you can read

(01:09:37):
about that in the book which waswild.
We took the deposition,interestingly, of Elvis Chan,
who was the FBI agent inNorthern California who was
pre-bunking the Hunter Bidenlaptop story.
Turns out he was having weeklymeetings, monthly meetings, then
weekly meetings, telling themto look out for a Russian hack
and leak operation in October.
And Yul Roth, who's like thisintegrity guy at Twitter, who's

(01:09:58):
left-leaning, even had anaffidavit saying he was talking
specifically about Hunter Biden.
So the Roth that existed.
Cisa, which is an agency mostpeople have never really heard
of.
We took the deposition of BrianScully, who was talking about
yeah, they turned that againstthe American people to flag they
were outsourcing to Stanford,into the University of
Washington.
So the punchline here is weuncovered this leviathan of

(01:10:20):
agencies that were set againstthe American people to censor
their speech.
The First Amendment doesn'tallow the government to do it
and you shouldn't be able tooutsource that either to these
big tech behemoths, which isexactly what they were doing,
and I think it's the mostimportant free speech case in
the history of our country.
We talk about it in the bookand we can't let this stuff ever
happen again and I think thelesson here is.

(01:10:42):
The playbook is, if you got theguts and you fight back and you
got a hunch, we ought to usethe court system to expose this
corruption.
And that's what we were able todo.

Speaker 4 (01:10:50):
Yeah, to the extent that the court system functions.
Debbie B on YouTube says knowthe patterns.
If you don't know history, youmay, may well, repeat it.
Yes, yes, I am not against.
There's nothing that Trump'sdone that I'm like.
I'm anti that.
I just am recognizing these aretools.
We're empowering our governmentwith certain tools.

(01:11:12):
They have certain tools thatthey were empowered with
previously, like the Patriot Actand stuff like that.
Are they going to repeal them?
Are they going to continueusing those tools?
You've got clearly thegovernment had an ability to
censor speech and coordinatewith the social media companies.
Are they still doing it or arethey not?
Did Trump look at that and go,oh, that's a nice pretty tool, I
think I'll do it Right.

(01:11:32):
Or did he go, no, I that Ireject that in principle, on its
face.
Do you?
see what.
I'm saying I don't know, Idon't know, but I do know that
my kids have to live here and Ido know that I've got a lot of
life left.
So I've been on that fuzzy endof the lollipop I just want to
see with clear eyes.
Here's tulsi gabbard confirmingagain.

(01:11:53):
So not only in missouri biden,he said, with thousands of pages
.
This collusion wasn't like acouple times.
Anthony fauci reached out totwitter and was like hey, rfk jr
said something about vaccines.
Do?

Speaker 7 (01:12:04):
you know, it sounds like they had like a team's
portal set up exactly and theywere down to.

Speaker 4 (01:12:09):
In fact, there was one email that I remember, back
when these were all being dumped.
It was like some high-rankingfbi official was like I need you
to take out mj truth q now, andit was like he had 300
followers, right, and it waslike what?
You're deleting a retweetaccount of some obscure, no name

(01:12:35):
.
We must go, you know it's likethey were that peculiar
high-ranking people.
They weren't just looking ataccounts with hundreds of
thousands of followers in.
In fact, there's a lot ofpeople that say if you get over
a hundred thousand followers,you're almost guaranteed to be
an asset of some sort, right?
A lot of people believe thatI'm not.
I wouldn't say otherwise.
You know kind of the come outof nowhere guys.

(01:12:56):
We're out here broadcasting anhour and a half to two hours
almost every day.
Think about this for a second,ron.
I'm'm gonna feed yourconspiracy theory.
Okay, we broadcast five days aweek, an hour and a half plus
every single day.
Yep, we cross post on multipleplatforms.
Oh, yeah we're consistent.
We do it between eight and eightor, excuse me, six and 639.

(01:13:19):
Every morning, typically closerto 630, today, 638 639.
We're consistent in how we goout and yet our audience, while
it's growing, is relatively flat.
Yes, if I would say this, ifyou took all of our episodes,
started a ghost channel that hadno association with my laptop

(01:13:41):
or your IP address or ourpersonal names, and you posted
all these videos, I think ouraudience would be much, much
larger I think it would be inthe algorithm at a much more
normal rate we would be in thealgorithm, we would be in it.
There is, there are channels outthere that produce a fraction
of the volume of content we donow 10, 10 episodes, 20 episodes

(01:14:04):
, 50 episodes.
You can kind of forgive theshow being smaller, but at this
point it's like we're not evenin the algorithm.
You know we're picking offlisteners, one at a time at the
coffee shop and you know what Imean.
Like half the listeners of theshow know us.
Personally, I love it.
I invite all of you guys here,but I am fairly confident, and

(01:14:24):
you're extremely confident, thatwe are limited in our reach
because of this.
Yes, right, that we are notbeing pushed.
So again it comes upon you, thelistener.
You share the show.
We're peasants.
I recognize that they don'twant our voice heard.
Why?

Speaker 7 (01:14:38):
Because potentially we might, you know judge
hypocrisy and we're trying tobreak through that algorithm
just based on volume and justconsistency and really isn't
working well, and you know wecan tweak this and tweak that
and do this.

Speaker 4 (01:14:52):
And you know, if anybody wants to volunteer to
help the show, make clips,whatever, just contact us.
We need help.
Like we're, we're a two manshow here and we're trying to do
the best we can.
We're ai, clearly, but that'swhat's going on.
Like they've been puppetingthese social media companies for
years and years and you know,oh, now elon's in charge at x
and now trump said that there'sno more censorship.

(01:15:13):
And well, really, was it thatquick?
Or you just flip a switch?
Or are these people embedded?
Because, you know, james bakerwent from the fbi to the to
twitter and we thought, oh greatthat elon, that Elon bought
Twitter.
He's still got James Bakerhanging around.
How many more people like thatthat?
We don't know their names?
Tulsi just pulled the securityclearances of 37 people that are
involved in the grandconspiracy.

(01:15:34):
I'd never heard of a one ofthem, right, and I've been
reading this stuff daily for 10years.
I'd never heard of a one ofthem.
Yeah, imagine how many peopleare involved in these companies
that are still censoring andstill just know whether anybody
tells me or not.
Conservatives, ghost, you know,or shadow ban.

Speaker 2 (01:16:00):
So this is Tulsi Gabbard confirming more of kind
of what we know, but also addinga little bit more to it.
First and important to tell thetruth.
First and important to tell thetruth.
We see in too many cases, notonly in ODNI but across the
intelligence community that thatis not the case, what?
Let's go back to the beginning.
This is the first and importantstep that we took yesterday in

(01:16:20):
announcing what I've called ODNI2.0.
Announcing what I've calledodni 2.0.
This organization that I leadwas created in the wake of the
egregious intelligence failuresaround the islamist terrorist
attack on 9-11.
It was created around recognizenew the islamist terrorist
attack on 9-11.

Speaker 4 (01:16:39):
That's a new phrase yeah, it is that's coming right
at the religion of peace.
Yeah, do you know the scandalaround that whole?
Islam is a religion of peace.
Do you know when bush said thatit is?
It was a huge scandal.
Okay, so bush, in order toplacate the islamic world after
9-11, goes islam is a religionof peace, and they're like we
are literally at war with islam.

(01:17:00):
You should call it not the waron terror, but the war on islam.
Like the hawks were like thisisn't a war on terror, this is
the war on Islam.
Like the Hawks were like thisisn't a war on terror, this is a
war on Islam itself.
Yeah, right, so, it'sinteresting that they've done
this little change.
I mean, this is kind of animportant thing.

Speaker 2 (01:17:15):
The Islamic radical attack on nine, 11 in hindsight,
what happened with thatmanufacturing, by the way good
authority.

Speaker 4 (01:17:22):
Many people have said it John Brennan converted to
islam when he was based over inuh, qatar, like full-on became
islamic.
Like has been to mecca, whichthey don't allow foreigners to
go to.
He was taken there by the houseof sod to go visit it.
So john brennan, yes, now whoa,yeah, okay, yeah, we, you know

(01:17:45):
we don't always mentionsomeone's religion because we
kind of think that that's yourpersonal, private business and
it is.
But I'm not the only one sayingthat about john brennan.
Like it's kind of like thiswell-known thing that mike ben's
to many others have said johnbrennan's like really into islam

(01:18:20):
, like converted kind of.

Speaker 2 (01:18:21):
Like Obama, the left hand is talking to the right
hand and, ultimately, that thepresident of the United States
is getting intelligence productsthat are timely, that are
relevant and that are apoliticaland objective, were very

(01:18:47):
entrenched and were politicizingtheir centers or their
positions either against theAmerican people, using their
authorities to force censorshipon Americans, for example under
the Biden administration, whodissented with Biden's policies,
or those who essentially werein positions where they're
creating intelligence productsand inserting their own partisan
political opinions and views inthe intelligence documents.

(01:19:09):
It's very simple the mandatethe intelligence community has
is to find the truth and to tellthe truth.
We see in too many cases, notonly in ODNI but across the
intelligence community, thatthat is not the case.

Speaker 4 (01:19:23):
So they're lying to us.
Did you know the intelligenceagencies lie.

Speaker 7 (01:19:27):
Confirmed.

Speaker 4 (01:19:30):
I think it's in the mission statement of the CIA.
You're professional lying liars.
Ok, that checks.
So this is a little bit of adifferent topic.
But Judge Gorsuch joined amajority opinion yesterday.
There was a Supreme Courtdecision that allowed Trump to
continue to terminate grants andemployees and blah, blah, blah.
It's another one of theseinjunctions to prevent Trump

(01:19:51):
from doing what he's clearlyallowed to do under his Article
2 authorities.
So Gorsuch jumped in on thisdecision to write a additional
decision here.
Before we say that John Attackshad a wonderful visit with
Taylor, with Tiny Taylor thisweek raced F1 cars open and
closed water park, state fairand ice cream every night.
Too bad, we can't do the samewith our favorite politicians.

(01:20:11):
When he says tiny Taylor,that's my dad, he has my son,
he's got my son on an eight yearold trips, what they're doing
anyways, ok.
So Justice Gorsuch says thisand he joined this majority
decision rather than just, youknow, make his vote, because
he's really slapping down thelower court for the reasons.
For these reasons, I concur inthe court's decision to stay the

(01:20:33):
district court's judgmentvacating the grant terminations.
If the district court's failureto abide by California, which is
the name of another case, werea one off, perhaps it would not
be worth writing to address it.
But two months ago anotherdistrict court tried to compel
compliance with a differentorder that this court had stayed
Department of Homeland Securityversus DVD.

(01:20:56):
Still, another district courtrecently diverged from one of
this court's decisions, eventhough the case at hand did not
differ in any pertinent respectfrom one this court had decided.
So this is now the third timein a matter of weeks this court,
the Supreme Court, has had tointercede in a case squarely

(01:21:16):
controlled by one of itsprecedents.
All these interventions shouldhave been unnecessary, but
together they underscore a basictenet of our judicial system.
Unnecessary, but together theyunderscore a basic tenet of our
judicial system.
Whatever their own views,judges are duty bound to respect
the hierarchy of the federalcourt system created by the
constitution.
In congress, he's basicallytelling the, the lower courts

(01:21:36):
stop injecting your politics.
We've clearly decided thesematters.
The article 2 is extremelyclear and we're not going to
deviate from our decisionbecause, oh, this time it's
about immigrants, or this timeit's about usaid employees, or
this time it's about friends ofthe court not doing it.
That's a slap down right there.
I don't care what your politicsare, get in line.

(01:21:58):
Follow the precedent.
You don't have discretion.
These are not novel issues here.
I thought that's pretty good.
Yeah Right.
The other thing too with thatis I looked at that and I
immediately thought do you knowhow many times lower courts go
against precedent?
I've talked to at this pointprobably close to 100 people
involved in serious criminalmatters that have Supreme Court

(01:22:20):
or even appeals court precedentthat clearly sides with them.

Speaker 7 (01:22:25):
And in some case, would exonerate the person
completely.

Speaker 4 (01:22:28):
Yeah, habeas corpus decisions, all litigated.
Okay, if your habeas corpus isviolated, you get out for jail
free court.
You know you've got time frameson how long certain things
should take.
Those have all been decided bythe supreme court your right to
privacy, your right to not tohave compelled search and
seizure.
Fruit of of the poisonous tree.
There's a January Sixer that'ssitting in prison right now,

(01:22:49):
named Dan Wilson.
I call on anybody and everybodyto raise your voice heard.
He needs to be let out.
Here's what happened.
He lived in Chicago in 2020,allegedly because of the
violence in the streets, becauseof the lack of law and order.
He armed himself.
He had felons from the.
He's a felon from the 1990s.
He's now much older than that.
Okay, he armed himself in 2020and inside of his home there

(01:23:13):
were some guns.
Okay, I'll be completely honestwith you.
There's multiple cases workingtheir way from the courts to
decide if felons are evenactually able to be barred from
owning guns.
Amy Coney Barrett herself wrotea dissent one time, essentially
saying that there is no worldin which a felon can be
prevented from self-defense,including owning a gun.

(01:23:34):
Right, so this is not like thisnovel thing.
So he has a gun in his home.
He gets raided for January 6th.
They find the guns, goes toprison for January 6th, but then
he gets this extra gun charge,felon, in possession of a gun.
There were many other J Sixerswho got this, by the way many I
know a couple of them personally.
They had guns in their homesand they had prior convictions

(01:23:54):
and they shouldn't have had guns.
They all got pardoned.
They're all sitting at hometoday.
But Dan Wilson because thejudge that decided it was not
one of the DC judges thatfinally let everybody out Some
other judge they're calling himthe wicked judge of the West or
whatever decided Dan had to goback to prison on the gun charge
.
So Dan sitting in prison on thegun charge.
That only existed.

(01:24:16):
Now.
Whether you think it's right orwrong that he owned or didn't
own a gun, that's for you todecide, but I'll tell you this
they entered his home underfalse pretenses that he was an
insurrectionist and he wastrying to overthrow the
government.
It broke down his door, theyraided his house and they found
those guns.
That whole thing has beenquashed.
It was pardoned.

(01:24:37):
It was lawfare, it was aninappropriate use of authority
and power, and so, therefore,everything downstream of that
should be fruit of the poisonoustree.
It's that simple.
Your warrant's not accurateDoesn't matter what you found
Now.
You're even more screwed youcan't use it.
He should be let go immediately.
Fruit of the poisonous tree.
Nobody cares that he had gunsin his house.

(01:24:59):
Do you know how many otherpeople get caught on the street
with guns that are felons andjust get let go because you know
too much paperwork or justbecause it's DC and everybody's
got a gun?
I mean.

Speaker 7 (01:25:15):
I think the felon with the gun stuff.
We got to take a look at thatas a society.
So you know, I will say onething about this the argument
that you're proposing and youput forward it's the same
argument that I think democratsand and left-leaning people
would say that is being used forice right now to round up
illegals.

(01:25:35):
Okay, explain that.
Uh, well, you go to home depotto arrest somebody there and in
that roundup gets caught up abunch of other people that end
up being having illegal statusand then they get deported.

Speaker 4 (01:25:51):
But they weren't the targets but they were illegal
right correct, so they were thetarget correct.

Speaker 7 (01:25:57):
But but they weren't there to round up illegals.
They were there because of, youknow, some shoplifting or
whatever, but they end up, youknow, deporting some guys that
get rounded up because of theywere looking for something else,
but they are guilty thoughright, sure, sure, sure, sure.
But so is this guy.
He's guilty of having guns whenhe's not supposed to have them.

Speaker 4 (01:26:19):
I look at it this way If it's a properly executed
warrant and everything's fair,then yeah, it's not proof of the
poison's tree.
A properly executed warrant andeverything's fair, then yeah,
it's not proof of the poisonoustree.
It came into your house andthen they saw guns and that's a
problem, that's.
I don't have any problem withthat, and I talked to a couple
guys.

Speaker 7 (01:26:30):
I'm like, dude, you knew there's there are a lot of
people that are saying thatthese these roundups where
they're going to arrest the guyor look for the guy at the, at
the costco or the hub depot,they're saying that that's a
trumped up charge, just so theycan get in there, so that they
can find the illegals, so thatthey can deport them well, yeah,
that's what I'm saying.

Speaker 4 (01:26:51):
I'm saying the same thing, okay I know that's what
I'm saying.

Speaker 7 (01:26:55):
You're saying the same thing.

Speaker 4 (01:26:56):
I'm saying the same thing, right, like I don't have
a problem with how the how thelaw is supposed to function okay
but the thing is is you can'tcherry pick.
So okay, you're arrested, you'rea terrorist, you've got guns,
you've got prior charges, youstack all the charges, you go
through the process, but then wefind out we get pardoned.
So for one thing, that quashesall of it anyways.

(01:27:17):
The second thing is then wefind out all the information
we're finding out abouttargeting and dot it out of that
.
It's like this is all clearlyan incorrect warrant in the
first place.
It's all fruit of the poisonoustree.
And here's the crazy thing theprecedent has been set.
I could rattle off, but simplynot to make their cases a
highlight.
I could rattle off a minimum ofthree people I know personally

(01:27:40):
who were not allowed to possessguns, that had guns on the day
their houses were raided andthey are at home right now with
their families, and dan is notokay.
So the precedent was alreadyset.
Why is dan being treateddifferently?
I don't know if they were all in, then it'd be like oh man, that
sucks, right.
But in this case dan is beingtreated separately, so I don't

(01:28:01):
have any reason for that.
But all right, I think that ifyou're going to enforce rules,
you enforce them uniformly.
That's my idea, and we shouldhave the least amount of rules
possible.
That's the other thing too.
It's not like we want to make abunch of rules and live in a
totalitarian state, but whatever.
So Bill Pulte was on with LauraIngraham and he's talking about
the Adam Schiff scandal alongwith these other Letitia James

(01:28:23):
and all this Cook lady on theFederal Reserve Board.
I love how we're learning allthese new people's names right
and how they've been involved inmortgage fraud and hypocrisy.

Speaker 21 (01:28:31):
It seems like this is a contagious disease.
Ok, because now the FederalReserve Governor, lisa Cook, is
under pressure to resign due toallegations that she may have
engaged in mortgage fraud.
Bill, tell us about this.
I mean someone who has a say inthe Fed rate and what that's

(01:28:52):
doing to mortgages across thecountry.
I mean this is crazy stuff shecould be potentially abusing no
one's guilty until proven.

Speaker 10 (01:29:01):
I'll tell you she has a very big problem.
She has a situation where sheclaimed primary residency on a
condo that she bought in Atlanta.
I mean, this is supposed to besomebody who's entrusted with
the public good, who's supposedto be looking after interest
rates.
And I believe it's.
I believe it's blatant andmassive mortgage fraud.
I believe that there will be acriminal investigation.
I'll leave that to the DOJwhether they do that or not, but

(01:29:22):
I would anticipate Singer beprosecuted and criminally
charged for mortgage fraud, justbased on what I've seen.
You know I refer people everyday to the Department of Justice
and the Department of Justiceprosecutes cases like this all
the time.
Laura, and whether it's theSchiff case or the Letitia James
case or this case or all theother cases that we refer, this
Cook one is not going away andshe can laugh all she wants, but

(01:29:44):
the law will catch up with her.

Speaker 21 (01:29:46):
Yeah, she responded to this today saying she doesn't
have any intention of beingquote bullied to step down from
her position because of somequestions raised in a tweet.
I do intend, she said, to takeany questions about my financial
history seriously and I'mgathering accurate info to
provide the facts.
She also mentioned that thisall occurred before she was a

(01:30:07):
member of the Board of Governorsat the Federal Reserve.
Would the timing matter?

Speaker 10 (01:30:15):
No, it wouldn't matter.
First of all, she's within thestatute of limitations.
Second of all, she received abenefit while she's been on the
Federal Reserve Board and Iwould actually argue that her
statement tonight, you know, Ithink that that's going to be a
big problem for her criminally.
This is just my view.
She lied in my view in herstatement this tonight because
she said that the first time sheheard about it was through my
tweet.
She didn't hear about it frommy tweet.

(01:30:37):
There's no way she doesn'tfollow me on Twitter.
And last night Bloombergcontacted, according to their
story, her and me for comment.
So I think this lady is aprofessional liar.
She shouldn't be at the FederalReserve.
She's going to resign, in myview, and if she doesn't resign,
I do believe that the presidenthas caused a fire her, and that
will be up to the presidentwhether he decides to do that or
not.

Speaker 21 (01:30:56):
Now the president has the authority to fire anyone
he wants to in the executivebranch.
Unelected officials shouldn'thave this much say and power
over the lives of the americanpeople.
I think it's so amen.

Speaker 4 (01:31:08):
So she's in charge of setting rates for mortgages,
but she lied on mortgageapplications twice to get a
lower rate.
Leticia, james, is doing thesame thing.
She prosecuted donald trump foruh, overvaluing his real estate
I didn't know who lisa cook was, but I was.

Speaker 7 (01:31:26):
When we had her picture I thought it was leticia
james.

Speaker 4 (01:31:29):
No, no, I was like you're gonna have a side by side
here, then you've got adamshift doing the same thing so
you know mortgage, listen, I wasin prison with some people that
had were had mortgage fraudchecked off on their list of
accomplishments.
So yeah, I think that themortgage fraud thing it's kind
of like al capone with taxes,like I think it's gonna be what

(01:31:51):
takes them down, I think in alot of other areas it's gonna be
a hook for there's noprosecutorial immunity for
leticia james on your personalmortgage.
You can't go well.
I was trying to act in the bestinterest of the state of new
york.
You can't do that right.
I think adam schiff can't belike it's classified, it's in a
skit.
He can't hide behind hisimmunity as a legislature for

(01:32:13):
free speech to lie and say whathe wants.
When you lied on a mortgageapplication like and I have a
feeling this is probably alittle more prevalent than you
think this guy right here is theuh, the kansas city fed press
schmidt.
So this is kansas city federalreserve president and he was

(01:32:35):
asked to comment on this cooksituation.

Speaker 19 (01:32:38):
Kind of had an interesting response we have
responsibilitiesresponsibilities as, as, uh,
professionals inside the federal.
I'm sure she'll handle mattersas she needs to handle them.
Is that a serious thing to doto write primary residence on
two different mortgages?
Let me say this it's definitelypart of the application.

(01:32:58):
But I also would say, if youthink about how huge that
application is, maybe we couldstart thinking about how do we
make it less paperwork intensive?
Uh, as we go forward, do youworry?

Speaker 4 (01:33:12):
so pulte tweets out.
What a weird response yeah oh,she was overwhelmed with all the
boxes to check and she had towrite her name like eight or
nine times oh man you realizelike everyday americans have to
navigate through fha mortgagesand via these freaking
complicated forms ohoverwhelming if we could just

(01:33:32):
real id we could use.
We could use ai to scanyourself.
Just use my eye scan.
Come in pre-approved, like youdon't have to fill out anything.
We'll just know what kind ofloan you qualify for, like.
Why complicate things before?

Speaker 7 (01:33:44):
they send you the money oh yeah, you'll find the
funds in your account thesepeople are dirty.

Speaker 4 (01:33:50):
Check his mortgages right now.
Check his mortgages he needs.
These forms are complicated.
What check his mortgages?

Speaker 7 (01:33:56):
what a weird response .
Oh, I'm sure I checked a box.

Speaker 4 (01:33:58):
I shouldn't have dude these people are in trouble.
Well, if, if the forms are socomplicated, maybe we should get
rid of them.
You sound like Taylor Johnattack us.
Don't make rules you canenforce.
Don't put a box on there unlessit's important to do now by
operating.
My mode of operation now is Idon't fill out forms.
I don't fill out governmentforms.

(01:34:19):
I mean 1776 live.
I talk about this.
It's almost humors.
I don't fill out forms.
Can I talk to the person who'sgoing to receive this form?
They're free to fill it outwith my verbal things.
I don't put information inboxes if I don't feel like I
want to disclose thatinformation like this is.
The hilarious thing is this isbecause there's a spot for you
to put your social doesn't meanyou have to write it in there.

(01:34:40):
Did you know it's?
It's against the law for anyoneto request your social from you
.
Did you know that?
No, I did not, it is a felonyoffense for me to ask you for
your social and for me to putanything contingent upon you
giving me your social in orderto render services.
It's a felony offense.
So when I put it on anapplication and I'm like, oh, I
can't let you into the doctor'soffice, or I can't let you do

(01:35:00):
this, or I can't do anythingwith you without your social,
it's a felony offense for you todemand it.
But yet people do it all thetime.
No stop.
Now there are certain instanceswhere a social is required for
those services, but they can'tdemand it of you.
In fact, there's this wholething with in mortgages where

(01:35:20):
the mortgage broker who's askingfor your social isn't actually
entitled to it.
You're supposed to be able togo through the whole application
process and then onlyvoluntarily provide the social
security number to theunderwriter, who's essentially
working directly with the lender, since they're the ones you're
in contract with.
You can avoid giving yourmortgage broker your social
security completely and forcethem to process the application

(01:35:42):
to underwriting without it, andthen you can call and secretly
give it to underwriting.
Right, that's how it's supposedto be.
Good luck getting your mortgagebroker broker to buy off on
that, because, well, thesoftware won't even.
I can't even hit enter andcalculate until you give it.
It's a required field.
It's a required field, yeah, inyour software, not by law, right
?
All right, it's time for us tojump over to private.

(01:36:03):
We've got two more videos.
We're going to be talking aboutBiden and his mental health
cover up, the auto pens and thepardons.
Some information brokeyesterday on that and we're
going to be sharing that.
There's a big day.
Yesterday, trump won a lawsuitTrump.
This morning, john Bolton wasgetting raided.
We've already moved on becauseJohn Bolton's like that little

(01:36:24):
of importance, like who cares,by 10 am today, like no one's
going to care about John Boltonanymore.
All right, so with that, we'lltalk to you guys again tomorrow.
And Ponyboy, you said, yeah, wehad viewers, no ads.
Yes, today was brought to youad, free, by left behind and
withoutorg, so don't forget togo and visit them.
All right, and we're going tojump over to private.

(01:36:50):
Talk to our great rumblelisteners there for a few more
minutes and then we'll talk toeverybody again tomorrow.
Bye, okay, are we in privatenow?
yes okay, so we just got acouple videos we're going to
play here.
This one right here is I thinkthis is ben howell, is it ben
howell?
Yes, howell, and he's talkingabout the auto pin and just some
of the stuff that they'vediscovered and and I'm curious

(01:37:10):
if they're going to end upcanceling all these pardons and
stuff that biden did I actuallyknow people that he muted
sentences that were in prisonand I'm like do you round them
back up?

Speaker 5 (01:37:20):
that'd be tragic and we put out some bombshell
documents and they were producedto us by ed martin quickly on
him.
You know, I know a lot of theposse have been frustrated at
the pace and the lack ofaccountability in this
administration, but so long asEd Martin is there there is a
fighting chance, whether it'sLetitia, james, adam Schiff and
now the auto pen.
And so basically the auto penhas been at a little bit of a

(01:37:42):
standstill.
There's been theseannouncements of government
investigations but no realprogress.
But then walks in Ed Martin,who is the pardon officer and
has access to these documentsand produces to the Oversight
Project an email from one ofMerrick Garland's top, if not
the tippy-toppest careerofficial in the Department of
Justice, who the day after JoeBiden issued these sweeping

(01:38:03):
pardons to what he was sayingwere nonviolent criminals.
This lawyer on a Saturdaymorning.

Speaker 4 (01:38:09):
All right, I want to look at this here.
Whoa.
So the highlighted I think thelanguage offense is described to
the Department of Justice inthe warrant is highly
problematic.
In order to resolve its meaningappropriately and consistent
with the president's intent, wewill need a statement or
direction from the president asto how to interpret the language
.
I can think of fourpossibilities, only the last of
which is satisfying one.
The commutation applies to allfederal offenses for which the

(01:38:30):
inmate is under sentence.
It is our practice not to lookbeyond the four corners of the
warrant, but there is nothing inthe warrant to give meaning to
that language.
I understand bop is likely touse this interpretation, absent
other direction, and is going toto do now as they work to
process the commutations.
This is unsatisfying because itrenders the language
superfluous, which couldn't bethe intent.
It is also likely to result incommutations and circumstances,

(01:38:52):
including for crimes of violence.
That was not intended.
It did happen.
By the way the offense isdescribed in the department
refers to the US SentencingCommission spreadsheet.
I have not seen the spreadsheetso I do not know if this is a
reasonable interpretation, nordo I know if it is a limiting
factor.
Did the spreadsheets onlyinclude drug offenses, for
example.
A significant problem with thisinterpretation is that it is a
guess as to what is meant by thewarrant language and goes

(01:39:13):
beyond the four corners of thewarrant, something we do not
normally do.
Because no offenses have beendescribed to the department, to
the department from thepresident, the commutations do
not take effect.
In essence, describing offensesto the department is a
condition precedent to thecommutations being effective,
and without a description theydo not take effect.
I have no idea whatinterpretation the incoming
administration will give to thewarrant, but they may find this

(01:39:34):
interpretation attractive, as itgives effect to the language
but does not go beyond the fourcorners of the warrant.
Four there is yet to come cleardirection from the president
giving meaning to the languagefor the offenses described to
the department of justice.
Ideally, this would be a listof each inmate listing the
offenses that are covered by thecommutation by far is the
clearest and least problematicoffensive.
Given the above, I think it isbest we receive a statement or

(01:39:56):
direction from the president asto the meaning of the warrant
language.
This will allow us to give thefull effect of the commutation
warrant in the matter intendedby the president.
In the absence of such suchstatement or direction, I am
concerned option three abovewill be the only interpretation
that is given to the warrant.
While this is logicalconstruction, legally I can't
possibly what the presidentintended.
Basically, we're going topardon a bunch of people but
nobody gets pardoned.

Speaker 5 (01:40:17):
Hold the fire alarm, Issue this lengthy email saying
this whole thing is bogus.
It can't work for all thesedifferent legal reasons.
The president, not an auto penneeds to actually weigh in and
answer these things.
And oh, by the way, you shouldstop saying that these are
nonviolent criminals, because,guess what?
They're some of the worstviolent criminals that you're

(01:40:37):
actually releasing.
So that's a document we put up.
This breaks the thing wide openagain, and I think the Trump
administration is poised foraction now because they have
guess what?
The Biden administrationagreeing with them in their own
DOJ.

Speaker 4 (01:40:52):
Biden didn't pardon any of those people and, by the
way, they were violent.
They were violent, they werenot just gun charges or drug
charges, it was gun charges ordrug charges and everything else
that came with it.
So it wasn't in any way a cleanprocess and a lot of those

(01:41:14):
people are out on the street now.
James Comer also mentions this.
So, in regards to Biden'shealth, every time Biden's
health was brought up his presssecretary would come out not
Saki and not John Pierre, buthis one of the other you know
communication press secretarieswould come out and be like, oh,
he's doing great.

(01:41:34):
My last conversation with him,he was sharp as a tack, blah,
blah, blah.
Turns out he maybe shouldn'thave been saying that.

Speaker 22 (01:41:41):
I mean I can't say this enough.
I want to say this one moretime.
I mean I can't say this enough.
I want to say this one moretime so everyone understands.
Ian Sams, who was the WhiteHouse spokesperson for a
significant amount of JoeBiden's time as president,
interacted with him two times,two times.

(01:42:02):
So you know we're going tocontinue to bring people in.
And again this, this person,Ian Sams, is the one that would
would counter everything RobertHerr or anytime anyone would
suggest that Joe Biden wasn'tmentally fit, he would say no,
he's at the top of his game.
Every time he tweeted outseveral times he gave interviews
on MSNBC.
Every time I've interacted withthe president, he was sharp.

(01:42:27):
He asked great questions inthere under oath.
He interacted with presidenttwo times, the entire time, the
entire time he worked in thewhite house.
That's astonishing.
Any questions?
That's how you keep.
I mean I can't he's doing greatwhen I saw him back in 98,.

Speaker 4 (01:42:45):
Awesome Sharp as a tack Sharp as a tack.
He was at the top of his game.

Speaker 7 (01:42:50):
They won't let him see me anymore.
I might have to say somethingelse about his status if I saw
him once.

Speaker 4 (01:42:58):
These people are hypocrites.
I feel bad.
I'm saying this to the privatelisteners.
I say it to the publiclisteners too, but I don't want
to pick a side in anything.
I'm clearly in trump's camp.
I'm clearly aligned with himideologically and politically.
Clearly today thank you for thepardon.
You know I don't have anycriticism to say about what he's
doing.
I recognize the behemoth he'staking on.

(01:43:19):
There's lots of moving pieces,lots of people, all kinds of
stuff.
Um, I am very happy with what'sgoing on and just little things
like this right coveringbiden's dementia, that plays
into the auto and it plays intothe entire war on domestic
terrorists.
Like who was leading the showhere?
Somebody was pulling the levers.
This, this, absolutely you know.

(01:43:42):
These, these things happen fora reason and the best thing that
can happen is the measure bywhich these people measured is
the standard they have to beheld against.
You want to come after Trumpfor some bookkeeping errors?
Let's look at your mortgages.
You want to use your, you know,you want to use your power and
do prosecutorial misconduct andovercharging, et cetera, et

(01:44:02):
cetera.
Well, we're just going to findsomething in your life and take
it to the max, like it.
To me, it feels like balance.

Speaker 7 (01:44:08):
We've got some JAG officers that want to talk to
you.
Yeah, I've got some.

Speaker 4 (01:44:11):
JAG officers that want to talk to you Exactly.
There is, however, an elementhere where things can ramp up
pretty aggressively and shouldwe lose Donald Trump in the
white house or get someone inthere with maybe not the same
principles, we're watching ourgovernment arm up.
You know, when you're bringingin jag officers to prosecute

(01:44:31):
misdemeanors, gone are the daysof you know no more officers on
domestic soil, like when you'rebringing in the attorneys and
you've had troops marching in laand troops marching in dc doing
law enforcement activities.
You know we're on the precipiceof something Hopefully
greatness and a golden age as weclean up the neighborhood.
Right, hopefully, that's wherewe're headed.
But you know, power is powerand it does things to people.

(01:44:54):
So all right, guys.
That's it for the show today.
Thank you so much for stickingaround with us for a few minutes
on private chat and we willtalk to you again on Monday.
Don't forget to share the show.
Thanks, guys.
Bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that

(01:45:18):
castle over there.

Speaker 1 (01:45:20):
I'm 37.
What I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?

(01:45:46):
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There is, there's some lovelyfilth down here.

(01:46:08):
Oh, how do you do?
How do you do?
Good lady, I'm Arthur, king ofthe Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,

(01:46:31):
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would, please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then, in that castle, no onelives there.
Then?
Who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for

(01:46:53):
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affair, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.

(01:47:13):
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no

(01:47:36):
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me

(01:47:59):
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up Now?
We see the violence inherent inthe system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Raid My House, I'll Raid Yours: America's New Political Reality

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Raid My House, I'll Raid Yours: America's New Political Reality

Stuff You Should Know