August 19, 2025 • 59 mins
The carefully constructed narrative around the FBI's investigation of President Trump is crumbling, revealing a scandal of staggering proportions. Through meticulous analysis of recently revealed documents, we uncover how FBI officials manipulated the Justice Department's chain of command following Attorney General Jeff Sessions' recusal – a recusal recommended by officials who themselves had conflicts of interest related to the Clinton investigation.
Most shocking is how President Trump unknowingly authorized his own surveillance by signing Executive Order 13775, which elevated Dana Buente in the DOJ succession line. This allowed Buente to approve the renewal of a FISA warrant against Carter Page in April 2017 – despite the FBI knowing months earlier that the Steele dossier lacked validity. Through the "two-hop rule," this surveillance effectively gave investigators access to virtually all White House communications.
The corruption doesn't end there. Dana Buente later became the legal advisor to FBI Director Christopher Wray while the Mueller investigation was ongoing – a blatant conflict of interest that explains why Wray has seemed so disconnected from reform efforts. Even more concerning, Michael Atkinson – the Intelligence Community Inspector General who facilitated the Ukraine whistleblower complaint leading to Trump's impeachment – was previously Buente's legal counsel during this surveillance operation.
Beyond domestic corruption, we examine FBI Director Wray's alarming warnings about China's massive theft of American intellectual property and personal data. With the FBI opening a new China-related counterintelligence case every 10 hours, and nearly half of all active counterintelligence cases relating to China, the threat cannot be overstated.
We also spotlight radical elected officials like Seattle Councilwoman Kashama Sawant and Representative Ilhan Omar, who openly call for dismantling American systems of government and economics. Their rhetoric, combined with the admission by climate activist Michael Schlenberger that environmental alarmism has "misled the public," reveals a coordinated effort to undermine our institutions from within.
Join me as we connect these critical dots and explore what they mean for America's future. The threats we face – both internal and external – demand our attention and understanding.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Hey, welcome to another episodeof Peasants Perspective.
And just real quick to get itout of the way, you can find me
on Twitter, at PeasantsPodParler, at PeasantsPod Facebook,
(01:01):
at the Peasants Perspectiveemail, at peasantspod at
gmailcom.
I love hearing from you.
I love your criticism.
Well, I don't really love yourcriticism unless it's
constructive.
I love your feedback, all thatkind of fun stuff.
Anyways, let's jump on in here.
I've got a couple differentstories today that I want to
cover Big, massive, breakingnews.
So yesterday, let's go to theSpygate case, russiagate,
(01:23):
obamagate.
You know, I think from here onout I'm probably just going to
go ahead and call it Obamagate.
For the most part, I thinkObamagate encompasses the
entirety of the coup scandalagainst Donald Trump and really,
in all honesty, the entireObama presidency was just a big
scandal.
Not only is he one of the mosta big scandal, not only is he
(01:49):
one of the most.
Let's put it this way BarackObama brags about having a
scandal-free presidency Towardsthe end of his term.
He bragged about that on TV insome interview and a lot of
Republicans were like, well,what about Benghazi, what about
this?
And he kind of pretends likethat's not a scandal because to
half of America, half of Americathat watches left-wing news
sources, they don't think thosewere scandals.
They think those were totallyjustified actions taken for
(02:09):
whatever random reasons, right.
But the reality is you can gothrough a pretty long list IRS
targeting Fast and FuriousBenghazi.
The Iran nuclear deal is ascandal in and of itself.
Look at everything Joe Bidendid.
Look at all the money JoeBiden's running off with from
around the world.
So his whole entire presidencywas just filled with scandal.
But what we're going to findhere and what we've been
(02:30):
discovering, and the whole pointof Spygate and Russiagate, is
the fact that the reason thatObama was scandal free was
because who was going toprosecute?
He had the entire DOJ and FBIupper echelons wrapped around
his little finger.
They weren't going to doanything.
So let's just jump into thefirst case.
(02:50):
This comes from theconservative treehouse and I
really like these guys.
The last refuge here reallygood, really good article that's
titled this the FBI corruptionis far worse than we currently
imagine.
President Trump authorized hisown surveillance.
So what happened was right.
When Donald Trump got intooffice, donald Trump signed an
executive order that changed thechain of command at the DOJ and
(03:10):
the FBI, and the reason forthis was multiple reasons, but
basically you had Loretta Lynch,who, when Barack Obama left
office, left office as well, andSally Yates jumped up into her
spot.
Well, sally Yates, who was theassistant attorney general, she
refused to enforce Trump'stravel ban.
A lot of people call it theMuslim travel ban.
(03:32):
It wasn't the Muslim travel banbecause you've got countries
like Venezuela included on there.
It basically Trump did a travelban against countries that
refused to participate inbackground checks and vetting of
visa requests, and so when youlook at that list, you look at,
one of the common things you'llsee is these are very third
world countries, with theexception of, like Iran.
They do not do backgroundchecks, they don't have good
(03:55):
public records to know who thecriminals are or not, and so,
just real simple, we're just notgoing to take these people
wholesale into our country.
Lots of good reasons for that.
Anyways, sally Yates refused toenforce it, so Sally Yates was
dismissed and that caused DanaBuente to step up into her spot.
Dana Buente was running thedistrict of Virginia FBI and he
(04:18):
was essentially a stand-in atthe DOJ because Jeff Sessions
had recused himself.
Rod Rosenstein couldn'tsupervise it.
Anyways, rod Rosenstein, thiswhole long thing, so long story.
Dana Buente gets put in Well.
On January 30th 2017, sallyYates was fired for refusing to
defend Trump travel ban fromextremist countries and Yates
(04:40):
was replaced on January 31st byUS attorney from the Eastern
District of Virginia, danaBuente.
Remember the names?
This wasn't an existing AGbecause Loretta Lynch had left.
As of Yates' exit and DanaBuente's entry Buente was acting
Deputy Attorney General incharge of Jess Sessions was
confirmed February 8th 2017.
(05:01):
On February 9th 2017, trumpissued Executive Order 13775,
changing the line of DOJsuccession, moving the EDVA the
Eastern District of Virginiaattorney, so that would be Dana
Buente up, granting Buente thefull legal authority to carry
out the duties of the DeputyAttorney General until a
permanent replacement wasconfirmed.
(05:23):
When Jeff Sessions becameAttorney General, dana Buente
acting Deputy AG a role Buentewould retain until Rod
Rosenstein was confirmed onApril 25th.
Okay, keep these names in yourbrain, float them around.
Rod Rosenstein was confirmed onApril 25th.
On March 2nd 2017, dana Buentewas one of a small group who
(05:43):
participated in a conversationthat led to the recusal of Jeff
Sessions from anything relatedto the 2016 election.
This recusal included theongoing FBI counterintelligence
investigation known as CrossfireHurricane, which was later
picked up by Robert Mueller.
So let's think about this for asecond.
(06:04):
So Jeff Sessions, who'sappointed the Attorney General
by Donald Trump?
And supposedly, jeff Sessionshas flown on Trump plane and
he's been talking about howthey're going to take down the
swamp, which they think is verythin.
Just a few people at the top,mainly Hillary Clinton and John
Kerry, and they're fullyintended on coming in closing
down the southern border,building a wall, fixing
(06:25):
immigration I mean, really goingafter a lot of our issues that
the DOJ needs to be involvedwith.
So Sessions is going to beTrump's right-hand man, and
Sessions is one of the fewpeople in all of Congress that
has no skeletons in his closet.
Okay, there are two people inall of Congress that were
considered unimpeachable, twopeople that were scandal-free
(06:45):
Mike Pence and Jeff Sessions.
Those are the two people thatwere supposedly the cleanest,
best members of Congress.
Both of those guys are nowsurrounding Donald Trump in key
positions a vice president andthe attorney general.
Now, other attendees at thismeeting for the recusal of Jeff
Sessions are Jody Hunt, acriminal chief in the US
(07:06):
Attorney's Office for Districtof Maryland.
Jim Crowell, deputy AssistantGeneral DAAG in the Department
of Justice, national SecurityDivision.
Tosh Gower, fisa lawyer andAssociate Deputy General, scott
Schools Note Tasha Gardner was alawyer for the Clinton case and
Scott Schools was part ofdrafting the Clinton exoneration
(07:27):
letter.
So the people who are conveningto talk about Jeff Sessions'
recusal have themselves aconflict of interest on the
things that they're going to getJeff Sessions to recuse himself
from.
So, essentially, someone whoshould have recused themselves
is telling someone else whodoesn't need to recuse himself
that they should recuse himselffrom.
So, essentially, someone whoshould have recused themselves
(07:47):
is telling someone else whodoesn't need to recuse himself
that they should recusethemselves.
This is like really critical tounderstand here, because to
understand the story of JeffSessions and Donald Trump,
you've got to understand this.
The entire Q plan almost hangson this one interaction here.
Okay, the whole idea of trustsessions, trust sessions.
Okay, so a couple things.
I need to do a whole episode onQ.
(08:08):
I don't believe Q is somemaster plan.
I believe Q is General Flynnand his digital army.
I think they serve a valuablerole.
I think they are the news.
I think right now they drivethe narrative, especially on the
right side, which they claim.
But a lot of the things theysaid and this is much to the
chagrin of Q followers, and I'dask any one of them to come and
talk to me and explain some ofthe things that I have found is
(08:31):
they're extremely immersed inthe news.
I myself, who am immersed inthe news, oftentimes go, oh, I
find something.
I connect some dots and then Iread it on Q and I go, oh, q got
this too.
And I look at the timestamplike, oh, the article came out
before the cue post, which meansif they read it, they could
have connected the dots too.
The more organized you are, theeasier this thing is to crack
right.
Remember the names, rememberthe places, remember who they're
(08:55):
married to.
You always see thoseinvestigators with a wall with
pictures of people and stringstouching them.
I need that in my office here,because that's essentially what
you have to do to be able tocrack this, because you've got
to remember who all these peopleare.
That's an investigativetechnique.
You've got to remember whothey're related to.
You've got to remember whothey've worked with in years
past.
Think about some of the bestrelationships you have are just
shared over lunch.
I've got a close friend of minewho was friends for years.
(09:15):
I haven't seen him for 15 years.
His name is Schuyler, or, assome people call him, schweiler,
and I haven't talked to himforever.
I mean, I think it's probablybeen I guess not 15 years,
probably more like eight years.
But if I called him up todayand I asked a favor, I'd
probably get it right, becausewe have a longstanding
relationship that goes back towhen we're really young.
One of our listeners same thing.
He and I have a longstandingrelationship back to when I was
(09:38):
14 and he was 21.
Now he's like 65 or somethinglike that.
I'm just kidding, he's not thatold, but nonetheless.
You know, you develop theserelationships with people and
then years later you reconnectand it's like you didn't miss a
beat.
So it's important to know whopeople worked with, what
departments they've worked on,cases they've worked on together
, especially cases that are long.
You got to remember.
You know, if you worked on theWatergate case, those guys were
(10:01):
locked in an office together andthey couldn't talk to anybody
other than the people in thatoffice for years and years and
years.
So they investigated theClintons for multiple years
basically Clinton's entire firstterm he was under investigation
and they ended up not comingwith the complicated financial
case that the Clintons wereabsolutely guilty of, often
called it's not Watergate, it'sWhitewater, the Whitewater
(10:22):
investigation.
But they ended up uncoveringthe Monica Lewinsky scandal in
the process and they got theirscope memo changed, which the
Democrats did right along backto Trump, which is honestly
where Stormy Daniels comes in.
Stormy Daniels was supposed tobe the Monica Lewinsky for
Donald Trump, because the timeframe from which Stormy Daniels
and Donald Trump supposedly hadallegedly had an affair was when
(10:45):
Melania was pregnant withBarron.
So that would have been prettyscandalous.
That would have been prettylame for the president of Dunn.
I personally don't think it wasthe president.
I think it was Donald Trump Jrwho had an affair with Stormy
Daniels.
And the time frame works upbecause his marriage essentially
fell apart right when Trump gotelected, right when the Stormy
(11:06):
Daniels.
And the time frame works up,because his marriage essentially
fell apart right when Trump gotelected, right when the Stormy
Daniels stuff came up.
However, there was also a fakeanthrax attack on the entire
Trump family, which also mighthave prompted Don Jr's wife to
run.
Remember, don Jr has five kidswith his wife, his former wife.
Now he's dating KimberlyGarfoyle, who is on the Trump
campaign.
It's kind of weird actually,the whole Kimberly Garfoyle,
(11:27):
donald Trump Jr.
They're a good couple though,whatever.
Okay, so back to this.
So now the attendees so JodyHunt, jim Crowell, tasha Gower
and Scott Schools are the senior.
These people are appointed tobasically look at ethical
violations and recommend ifpeople should or should not
(11:48):
recuse themselves.
So Sessions recused himselfbecause at one point he had met
with the ambassador during thecampaign.
So now he's a suspect.
The ambassador from Russiaduring the campaign.
So now he's a suspect.
So they tell him to recusehimself.
And he does A drop of hat, boom, recuses himself.
He doesn't say, hey, let melook at this case first and let
me see if there's actually aconflict.
Let me see if the people you'reinvestigating actually I
(12:09):
shouldn't be working with.
The only person that probablywould have caused that recusal
to be necessary would have beenGeneral Flynn, because General
Flynn and Jeff Sessions probablytalked and worked together
prior, but nonetheless he wasrecused from everything having
to do with the Trump campaign,russia, everything.
So they convinced Jeff Sessionshe must recuse himself.
(12:34):
In hindsight, each of the peoplegiving Jeff Sessions advice was
connected to previously corruptactivity within Maine justice.
That included the ClintonSpygate operations.
Not knowing each conflict eachadvisor was carrying, sessions
took their advice and recusedhimself.
A big mistake, with JeffSessions recused from anything
involving the 2016 election,which included the Russia
(12:55):
investigation.
Effective the evening of March2, 2017, fbi director now
reported to acting AG DanaBoente director now reported to
acting AG Dana Buente.
Technically, at this point inMarch 2017, buente is still US
Attorney for the EasternDistrict of Virginia and is only
(13:15):
acting as Deputy AG WithSessions recused.
Buente would be needed when theCarter-Page FISA would be up
for renewal 2017.
With Sessions recused from theRussia investigation without any
confirmed Deputy AttorneyGeneral able to authorize all of
the material the FBIinvestigators needed for Maine
justice would have to flowthrough Dana Buente.
Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein wasnot confirmed until April 25th,
(13:37):
the January 12th FISA renewalwas going to expire April 12th
2017.
90 days from its issuance, theyrenewed this thing four times.
And remember there's what'scalled a two-hop rule and when
they get a FISA warrant they'reable to look at everybody you
called or emailed and thenyou're able to jump two times.
So let's say, carter Pageemails George Papadopoulos was
(14:01):
also being investigated.
But say Carter Page emailsassistant number one.
Say Carter Page emailsassistant number one.
Assistant number one emailsassistant number two.
Assistant number two emailsDonald Trump, or assistant
number one let's do this alittle bit more realistic
Assistant number one.
So Carter Page emails assistantnumber one, who then emails the
(14:21):
chief of staff, who then emailswho at the time would have been
John Kelly, who then emailsDonald Trump.
So now the FBI, robert Muellerand his 17 team of Democrats and
40 FBI agents who arehandpicked according to Trump or
according to Obama get thequote right people on this, as
in, people who are going to goafter Donald Trump hard are now
(14:45):
have access to the president'semails, all of them, all of his
phone calls, everything Becauseof the two-hop rule.
That's how FISA works.
That's pretty amazing.
So anybody two people away fromDonald Trump who emailed
someone who emailed Donald Trump, they've got his emails,
they've got his chief of staff,all the cabinet members.
They have everything.
They're completely, totallyspying on everything Donald
(15:11):
Trump is doing.
That means every policy, everyconsideration.
Think about all the leaks thatwere coming out of the White
House.
Where could these leaks becoming from?
They were probably coming rightout of the special counsel's
office.
So we discover handwrittennotes.
So we got a bunch ofhandwritten notes that were
released by Rachel Maddow a longtime ago, that were released by
the SSI, and what they weretrying to do.
(15:31):
So keep going here.
In hindsight, the subject matteralmost certainly relates to the
issue of Russia investigation,the sensitivity of the
administration.
So the notes that Comey let out, which read things like I told
AG before recusal I cannot bespeaking with the president
alone keep coming back, makingit hard, too difficult for the
(15:52):
country.
We will work well, referring tothe investigators.
What can I do to relieve thecloud?
That's a question that's posedto Comey.
Anyways, he's not willing to doit.
So, with Jeff Sessions recusedand Dana Buente is now the
acting AG, approving whateverJames Comey needs from Maine
Justice, james Comey wantsCarter Page extended, Jeff
(16:13):
Sessions is recused and capableand after February 9th,
executive order initiating thechange of DOJ succession was
signed, dana Buente can nowofficially sign the Carter Page
FISA application renewal, whichis exactly what happens.
A week after their March 3rdcall with James Comey and Dana
Buente signed the admittedlyfraudulent FISA warrant.
(16:38):
Wow, so get that.
Donald Trump signed anexecutive order after Jeff
Sessions recused himself.
Being advised by people whoshould have themselves recused
themselves from even suggestingthe rec with James Comey became
evidence for Mueller's expandedobstruction.
And if you pay attention to thedates, this one's April 10th
(17:10):
they turned over these notes.
And so, to recap, this is wherewe're at here the acting
Attorney General, dana Buente,advised Jeff Sessions to recuse
himself March 2nd 2017.
Then acting Director DavidBuente and FBI Director Comey
signed a renewal for thefraudulent Carter-Flaes page
application.
(17:30):
This is well into Trump'spresidency, permitting the FBI
to continue surveillance on theTrump administration.
Keep in mind Inspector Generaloutlined that in January 2017,
shortly after the applicationwas first renewed the FBI knew
the Steele dossier, which is thebasis of all of these
fraudulent FISA applications.
(17:50):
Right, they knew in January,but they renewed the FISA
warrant with this corruptedchain of command into April,
which then extends 90 daysbeyond that.
Wow, and they knew.
The whole thing was false.
The whole thing.
There's absolutely no doubt.
The FBI knew in January 2017the dossier was not valid.
The dossier was paid for byHillary Clinton through Perkins
(18:12):
Coie.
It went to Glenn Simpson atFusion GPS.
Fusion GPS had an employee,nellie Orr, who was the wife of
Bruce Orr, who worked at the DOJand was the number four person
in charge of the DOJ who workedat the DOJ and was the number
four person in charge of the DOJ.
So all this Steele dossierinformation was being funneled
into the DOJ through thisback-channel source, which is
(18:33):
exempt from certain prosecutionsbecause of their marital
relationship.
How convenient is that?
Right?
It's almost like maybe theyplanned it and then they leaked
it to other people, like JohnMcCain, who then showed it to
Lindsey Graham and his staff,and then they turned it to other
people like John McCain, whothen showed it to Lindsey Graham
and his staff, and then theyturned it into the FBI and then
it went to the FBI through HarryReid.
So you got a Republican, aprominent Republican and a
prominent Democrat all turningit into the FBI, on top of the
(18:54):
fact that the FBI already hasthis.
So they're laundering theinformation back into the FBI.
They've got a corrupt group ofguys that are telling Jeff
Sessions to recuse himself.
And yeah, this is pretty much atotal setup, right?
So when the FBI director came,james Comey is making contact
with acting DAG, so DeputyAttorney General, dana Buente,
(19:16):
on March 30, 2017, for issuesrelating to the need for a FISA
renewal.
In April 2017, the FBI wasabsolutely certain there was no
validity to the underlyingevidence within the FISA
application.
Yet the FBI team was sodetermined to get the fraudulent
FISA reauthorized.
They ignored all of theevidence that undermined their
objective.
(19:36):
Think about the scale of deceitand corruption involved.
But it doesn't end.
It gets worse.
On April 25th 2017, rodRosenstein is confirmed.
Rosenstein now takes overresponsibilities held by acting
DAG, dana Buenti.
This includes the FBIcounterintelligence probe.
So now Rosenstein's involved.
Fbi Director James Comey isfired FBI Director Andrew McCabe
.
So they're running thisinvestigation without the
(19:57):
special counsel up till thismoment.
On May 10th, the day after JamesComey is fired, andrew McCabe,
who has now been fired, opens acriminal obstruction of justice
investigation into PresidentTrump.
Because Trump is beinginvestigated, but he was told by
James Comey he was not thesubject of the investigation.
So how can someone who's notthe subject of the investigation
doesn't know necessarily whothe targets are, except for
(20:19):
General Flynn then be accused ofobstruction of justice because
he fired James Comey and thefiring was authorized or
recommended by Rod Rosenstein.
Oh my gosh, see, this is just amess.
No wonder, in the moment of allthis happening, they're getting
papers complicated things.
They don't know who thesepeople are.
They don't know their previousconnections and ties, because no
(20:40):
one in justice that is relatedto the Trump administration can
look at any of these files orany of these cases and see what
the heck is going on.
On April 10th, fbi directoropens the criminal obstruction
investigation into Trump andthen Dana Buente now becomes the
assistant attorney general tohead the DOJ National Security
Division, simultaneouslyretaining the role as US
(21:00):
attorney for the EasternDistrict of VA.
So he's holding these twopositions, which is kind of
messed up At the moment.
Guess who Dana Buenti's legalcounsel is?
Remember Michael Atkinson?
Remember the name?
Who's Michael Atkinson, asidefrom being my old boss in a
low-voltage electric company?
Different person, of course.
Michael Atkinson is the sameMichael Atkinson who's the
current intelligence communityattorney, ig investigative
(21:26):
general, who facilitated thewhistleblower complaint and was
senior counsel to legal Buentewhen he headed the DOJ.
The whistleblower complaintwhat was the whistleblower
complaint, the whistleblowercomplaint that led to
impeachment.
That's right.
So now you see the tie in here.
So they tried to impeach Trumpbecause Trump.
Eventually they figure out thisis all scam, right, a hoax, as
(21:54):
Trump lovingly called it.
And Michael Atkinson was thelegal advisor to Dana Buente.
So Michael Atkinson must knoweverything Dana Buente is doing,
because anytime Dana Buentemakes a decision, who's, he got
to call up His assigned attorneyto run it by the attorney, who
is Michael Atkinson.
So Michael Atkinson is nowimplicated in the entire Spygate
scandal, russiagate scandal,and that is the same Michael
Atkinson who brought forward anillegal whistleblower that does
(22:18):
not meet any of the terms ofbeing a whistleblower that Adam
Schiff and Nancy Pelosi used toimpeach the president On May 16,
2017, rosenstein takes RobertMueller to the White House to
meet President Trump on May 17,.
So the next day, rosensteinappoints Mueller to the special
counsel Rod Rosenstein and orbecame reauthorized the same
fraudulent FISA application.
(22:39):
That was the fourth time forthis Robert Mueller and corrupt
team of 19 special prosecutorsand now 40 FBI agents to
continue to exploit.
Dana Buenti is head of DOJ NSDfrom May 11th through the end of
October 2017, then officiallyannounced his intent to retire,
but wait.
On January 3rd 2018, fbidirector Christopher Wray
announces Dana Buente hasshifted over to the FBI to be
(23:01):
chief legal counsel, replacingJames Baker, who's under
investigation for a leak.
Oh my goodness.
So the DOJ, or the DC, is aswamp.
See how he moves from DOJ toFBI.
He's still involved in thisentire thing, and so we think
he's being moved, but he's not.
You know, we think he's beingmoved out of the picture.
(23:22):
He's not.
He's being moved to be in thepicture even tighter.
Yes, that's correct.
Mueller is using 19 lawyers, 40investigators.
Buente now becomes legaladvisor to Christopher Wray
inside the FBI.
So think about that.
The FBI director now has one ofthe main culprits in this
entire scandal as his legaladvisor inside the FBI while
Mueller probe is going on.
(23:43):
Oh, and you can see from hisparticipation with Mueller, dana
Buente is now a fact witness tothe Mueller investigation.
It gets better.
Who do you think is in chargeof the 40 FBI agents now
conducting the third yearfraudulent Mueller investigation
?
Dana Buente.
This is staggeringly unreal.
It's no wonder the FBI director, christopher Wray, who we've
(24:03):
all called for his resignation,appears detached, disconnected
and completely unfazed by thescale and scope of the corrupt
enterprise he is in charge of.
His own legal counsel was a keyplayer in the operation to
remove the president.
It always seemed odd that WhiteHouse counsel Don McGahn left
in 2018 until you look at thebigger picture.
So the Carter Page applicationwas officially declassified and
(24:26):
made public in 2018.
No doubt, as McCann looked atthe FISA issues from the unique
perspective, he likely realizedin hindsight how FISA issues
crossed over.
So Don McGahn was thepresident's White House attorney
.
Basically, every department haslike a series of attorneys that
just review everything right,make sure they're all legal and
follow the law and whateverevery single order, so that the
(24:48):
things don't get termedunconstitutional later.
And so that's his role and herealizes what's going on.
This is when they got caught.
This is probably the momentwhen they got caught.
Trump knew that they had beenspying on him during his
campaign Everybody remembersthat from late 2016.
But this point, this isprobably where they realized
this whole thing is a completesetup and this is when they
(25:10):
realized everybody's messed upand they released the FISA
application.
There are almost no documents,except for documents that prove
the existence of aliens, thatare probably more classified
than these FISA applications.
This is the first and only onethat has ever in the history of
the United States FISA courtsbeen released.
It was obviously released forthis very reason.
(25:33):
Now, well, not this reason.
It was released Don McGahn left.
And then we get to anotherarticle by the same people,
conservative Treehouse and thisone identifies that when that
was released it kind of goesthrough everybody that was there
.
So this article was written onthe 8th and this is the basic
(25:58):
gist of it here.
Considering all the documentsthat would have been easiest not
to release because of its topsecret classified intelligence
product, and considering thedenial of FOIA, the Freedom of
Information Request would haveeasily withstood all the
judicial challenge because ofthe nature of its content.
All of a sudden, here you go.
Here's the most classifieddocument the government's ever
really have foreign intelligencesurveillance court application.
(26:20):
It's never made sense why thatwas released and other things
weren't released Things likenotes, things like the charging
documents, the scope memos, allthose other things that were
officially declassified but theywere being stonewalled.
In the article he says I alwaysthought Robert Mueller was a
false front, a semi-cogent facefor a team of 17 lawyers that
moved in to take over mainjustice.
I was not wrong about Mueller.
He was exactly that ahand-selected name to give
(26:41):
credibility to a team assemblyand a man who would acquiesce to
the smart, familiar and legalminds that were really running
the resistance operation, whichwas the lawyers.
Where I was wrong was thinkingRosenstein was a countermeasure
to those who took over mainjustice.
Q says if Rosenstein good,mueller good, Rosenstein bad,
(27:02):
mueller bad.
I think that that's true.
It's very obviously aconnection.
I think Rosenstein is dirty asthey get.
I think he was involveddirectly in this coup plot
against Donald Trump, which Iread earlier.
There are supposedly tapes outthere.
I've got that Twitter threadpinned on my Twitter profile.
You have to scroll down a waysto find it.
I'm sure from John here to help.
(27:23):
He wasn't.
Rod Rosenstein wasn't there tobe a countermeasure.
Rod Rosenstein was doing exactlythe same as Mueller,
acquiescing to every request,instruction and demand by the 17
legal squatters who took overMaine Justice.
Rod Rosenstein recentlytestified before the Senate
Judiciary Committee.
He never once questioned thespecial counsel about any
request, demand or instructionand he never once challenged
(27:44):
their motives for requests theymade as Deputy AG and AG
Sessions recused.
Rod Rosenstein would have beenon top of the special counsel,
but he wasn't.
He intentionally wasn't.
The entire time the specialcounsel was operating, 17
assembled members of the Trumpresistance were running the show
inside the US Department ofJustice.
They controlled everything.
Jeff Sessions was firewalled.
He saw nothing and he had noinput into anything.
(28:05):
That was the first step in theresistance operation.
The second step was to instructRosenstein that every request
made by the team was part oftheir investigation.
Regardless of how it might seemdisconnected, it was all part
of their investigative process.
That's how they steamrolledRosenstein into sitting in a
corner and waiting for documentsto sign, authorities to grant
scope memos, etc.
Remember he signed a scope memothat named people and then said
(28:25):
go look for a crime.
Rather than hey, here's a crime, go prosecute a person,
indictments to approve andrequests to be fulfilled Okay.
When the FISA application wasreleased in June 2018, it was
released by the special counselteam.
Technically, rosensteinreleased it.
However, unofficially, it wasreleased by the demand of the
resistance operators under theauspices that it was part of
(28:47):
their investigative technique.
Except that wasn't the realmotive.
The real motive for releasingthe FISA application under the
auspices of granting a FOIArequest was because the
resistance knew the New YorkTimes already had obtained it
illegally.
It had been leaked to the NewYork Times.
In fact, the New York Times hadthe FISA application since
March 17, 2017.
The New York Times had the FISAapplication since March 17,
(29:10):
2017.
That's right.
When the Special CounselSecurity Director, james Wolfe,
operating under instructionsfrom the SSCI Resistance
Coordinator, mark Warner, tookpictures of each page of the
FISA application and sent themto a journalist, allie Watkins,
at BuzzFeed BuzzFeed isultimately the one who released
it.
Ms Watkins then shared the FISAwith the fellow resistance
allies at the Washington Postand the New York Times to cover
her tracks.
Ms Watkins did not immediatelywrite about the FISA application
(29:31):
and I suspect the editors ofBud Fies may have not known.
In exchange for her pre-plannedrole, the New York Times then
hired Watkins and, under thelegal tutelage of the New York
Times, watkins based herreporting on the Trump-Russian
narrative from there, however.
(29:54):
There, however, in March 17,what Watkins, wolfe, media and
Mark Warner did not Mark Warner,who's a senator, okay did not
immediately know was that theFBI was conducting a leak
investigation a genuine leakinvestigation and the SSCI was
suspected.
So, on outside of the specialcounsel, this leak investigation
got started because they knewthat this FISA warrant was out
there.
The FISA application picked upby James Wolfe and delivered to
the SSCI contained a leak tracer, a trap.
When the tracer showed up inmedia reports, the FBI knew it
(30:14):
leaked from the SSCI.
So what they'll do on thesedocuments?
Sometimes they'll change a date, they'll change a specific spot
where things are redacted,they'll change one of the code
numbers, they'll do any handfulof small things so that they can
say, hey, if this document evershows up, we know it came from
this place, and then they'reable to kind of trace back the
(30:35):
link.
So that's just something theydo and they do it on a regular
basis and if you're good, youfigure out what you know.
You can't just leak the rawdata because of these tracers.
Unfortunately, what the FBI didnot know was that the SSCI Vice
Chairman, mark Warner, wasinside the resistance operative
giving Wolf instructions on howto proceed.
I might be wrong on Mark Warner.
(30:55):
Maybe he's not the senator.
It's Burr that's the senator.
In May 2017, fbi informed ViceChair Warner and Chairman
Richard Burr.
Chairman Richard Burr was incharge of the Senate
Intelligence Committee.
He's the senator that someonein the SSCI leaked the FISA
application.
In essence, the FBIinvestigators just told the
(31:17):
culprit who leaked.
They were investigating a leakhe created.
Think about the ramifications.
As part of the overallinvestigation to locate the
specific leaker, all of the SSCIwas subject to review in quiet
investigation as the FBI workedthrough a process of elimination
.
That's when the FBI discoveredthe Mark Warner text messages to
Adam Waldman, the lawyer forChris Steele.
Not coincidentally, the Warnertext messages ended May 2017,
(31:42):
exactly when he was firstnotified by the FBI about the
specifics of the leak hunt.
What also started in May 2017?
The special counsel.
One important aspect ofcoordinated demand and incessant
drumbeat by the media forspecial counsel was need to
control the outcome of the leakinvestigation Total control.
This was all connected.
(32:03):
The resistance took over MaineJustice with the appointment of
the special counsel.
All connected the resistancetook over Maine Justice with the
appointment of the specialcounsel.
One of their priorities was tostop anyone from A finding out
the FISA application had leaked.
B blocking anyone from findingout how it was leaked.
And C to block any independentFBI activity surrounding the
leak Takeaways.
17 members of the specialcounsel were intentionally
(32:25):
brought to Maine Justice toorganize the resistance.
The DOJ was running theresistance operation.
Ag Jeff sessions was firewalledand clueless.
Rod Rosenstein was justapproving anything he put in
front of him because he was sold.
It was part of theinvestigative process.
Regardless of the FBIinvestigation, the DOJ
resistance operation heldultimate control.
Some of the FBI were not happynot all, we're not happy, not
(32:48):
happy.
Not all were not happy, nothappy at all but in a position
to do nothing about MaineJustice, patting them on the
head and telling them to runalong.
Now there's so much more, somuch more.
That's just an appetizer.
You also have the Gang of Eightin Congress involved, the DOJ,
the ICIG All of these people areinvolved.
The wheels are coming off thebus, man.
The wheels are coming off thebus.
(33:09):
So that's our update on spygate.
Let's jump into one other thinghere.
So the real issue that we havefacing our country is china.
I got asked the questionyesterday are you worried about
an invasion or a civil war?
I said, well, I'm kind ofworried about both and and he
said, uh, and I said but thecivil war?
I said either way, it's causedby foreigners and my opinion is
(33:29):
it's all caused by China.
This is Chris Wray, the directorof the FBI.
This was yesterday.
This was a press conference heput out specifically talking
about China.
So now Chris Wray is in alittle bit different light for
me, knowing that Chris Wray,just like Rod Rosenstein,
probably never knew any of thedetails of this investigation,
because anything that he washearing, any briefs he was
(33:49):
getting, were being blocked byhis legal counsel.
So Dana Buente right.
So I got a feeling that thisthing is, now that this is all
out there, conservative Reviewis a well-read publication.
This thing is going to continueto roll downhill on these
investigators, so let's leavethe topic of Russia for now,
though, and focus on China.
(34:10):
Let's hear what Chris Wray hasto say about it.
Speaker 4 (34:14):
But if you think these issues are just an
intelligence issue or agovernment problem or a nuisance
largely just for bigcorporations who can largely
take care of themselves, youcould not be more wrong.
It's the people of the UnitedStates who are the victims of
what amounts to Chinese theft ona scale so massive that it
(34:35):
represents one of the largesttransfers of wealth in human
history.
Speaker 2 (34:42):
I need you to think about that phrase the transfers
of wealth.
A lot of people don'tunderstand what that means.
The Marshall Plan, when werebuilt Europe after World War
II, that was a transfer ofwealth.
That was the American middleclass going to work, buying cars
, buying gasoline, spendingtheir hard-earned money and
paying a huge chunk of it intaxes.
They then took those taxes andthey shuffled them overseas to
(35:05):
Europe and literally rebuiltEurope.
Taxes and they shuffled themoverseas to Europe and literally
rebuilt Europe.
I mean, it wasn't cheap to flyplane after plane in forever
during the Berlin airlift right,that's all part of this
transfer of wealth to Europe.
We've had a transfer of wealthto South America, a transfer of
wealth to Canada, althoughCanada does produce its own
wealth.
But we're talking about China,the largest transfer of wealth
(35:27):
in human history to China.
Speaker 4 (35:30):
For an American adult , it is more likely than not
that China has stolen yourpersonal data.
In 2017, the Chinese militaryconspired to hack Equifax and
made off with the sensitivepersonal information of 150
million Americans we're talkingnearly half of the American
(35:52):
population and most Americanadults and, as I'll discuss in a
few moments, this was hardly astandalone incident.
Our data isn't the only thingat stake here.
So are our health, ourlivelihoods and our security.
We've now reached the pointwhere the FBI is opening a new
(36:13):
China-relatedcounterintelligence case about
every 10 hours.
Of the nearly 5,000 active FBIcounterintelligence cases
currently underway across thecountry currently underway
across the country, almost halfare all related to China and at
this very moment, china isworking to compromise American
(36:34):
healthcare organizations,pharmaceutical companies and
academic institutions conductingessential COVID-19 research.
Speaker 2 (36:43):
So China is a huge problem.
Okay, they're spying on useverywhere.
They're in our phones, they'rein our home, listening.
You know our Alexas and ourApple HomePods and things like
that.
They're hoovering up all thatdata and they're doing it in a
lot of different ways.
So one of the big ways rightnow for the youth of America is
TikTok.
I've been a huge TikTok app fan.
(37:04):
I've used TikTok.
I've made some funny videosGood chance.
If you follow me on socialmedia, you've probably seen a
few of them.
I deleted it completely from myphone.
There was a little study thatcame out that talked about they
literally will grab pretty muchall your data.
I mean everything you put onyour clipboard your pictures,
your location data.
They can access all of itthrough TikTok.
So delete it off your phone ifyou have it.
(37:25):
All of it through TikTok, sodelete it off your phone if you
have it.
The State Department isprobably going and I played this
clip yesterday but the StateDepartment is probably going to
make it so that no one can haveTikTok in the United States.
India has done that and a fewother countries are following
suit.
It's a big deal.
I mean China's hacking networks, China's hacking the credit
unions and a lot of times wethink, well, what are they going
(37:47):
to do with it?
Right, it's China.
What can they do?
Well, with online, they couldbuy things.
They could take your moneyright out of your bank account
and you know, good luck gettingit back if it gets transferred
to a Hong Kong account.
Right, I mean, there's so manyimplications on what they could
do.
The national security law thatthey just passed that's become a
big deal in Hong Kong.
The national security law, theway it's written is any person
(38:15):
in the world who says negativethings about the CCP so me,
right here right now on thispodcast they could detain me for
life.
They have no.
The way their national securitylaw is written, there's no
jurisdiction.
They could go after Mike Pompeo, donald Trump.
They could go after anyone,anyone, and if they get control,
they will.
If the Democrats win, they will.
I mean there's no doubt there'sgoing to be retribution on
conservatives.
Think about that for just asecond.
(38:35):
Anytime in world history whereyou've had a time where a
population is so divided like we, are so polarized, and
especially when one side is soemotional about it specifically
the left they're so emotionalabout the quote-unquote
injustices of our history andthings like that that they will
hurt you If they gain power.
They will hurt you, they willsend you to a gulag, they will
(38:59):
do horrible things to you andyou don't believe it, but it's
true.
There's this old phrase it'swhen a politician tells you
something that's you know,believe them.
Especially when they're crazy,like when they're off the norm,
it means they really believe it.
Here is city councilwomanKashama Sawant, so I've talked
about her quite a bit inrelation to Chaz.
(39:21):
She's from India, she's animmigrant, she was part of the
Maoist Communist Party there.
She's a devout communist,basically a Marxist or Maoist.
And they just passed a specialtax in the city of Seattle that
really goes after the wealthy,specifically Amazon.
I mean, this is a huge tax onAmazon and they got it passed
(39:42):
and typically when somethinglike this happens in the city of
Seattle, jeff Bezos, who baseshis company Amazon right out of
Seattle, flexes his muscle,throws some money around, throws
some campaigns around and getsthese things overturned.
We've had things like headtaxes be protested by
construction workers.
Amazon discontinued allconstruction and remodeling on
all of their buildings for atime period until they revoke
(40:03):
the head tax.
So there's been a constantstring between Jeff Bezos and
the Seattle City Council becausethey basically are trying to
punish Jeff Bezos for beingwealthy.
And listen to what CouncilwomanKashama Sawant is saying about
basically everything.
This is pretty incredible.
The audio is not great, butthis is during a council meeting
(40:26):
, so this is actually comingfrom the city of Seattle.
This is their recording andthis is relating to CB 119810,
an ordinance relating totaxation.
So these are CouncilwomanKashama's words on that, or
words to Jeff Bezos.
Speaker 3 (40:42):
I have a message for Jeff Bezos and his class.
If you attempt again tooverturn the Notice how she says
his class right.
Speaker 2 (40:52):
She's Marxist, so she's doing the class warfare
thing.
It's the dictatorship of theproletariat, the workers right.
They want to overthrow thebourgeoisie, the elite.
So she's using the language ofMarxism a ton here.
Speaker 3 (41:18):
Amazon tax Working people will go all language of
Marxism a ton here.
And if you, jeff Bezos, want todrive that process forward by
lashing out against us in ourmodest demands, then so be it,
because we are coming for youand your rotten system.
We are coming to dismantle thisdeeply oppressive, racist,
(41:38):
sexist, violent, utterlybankrupt system of capitalism,
this police state.
We cannot and will not stopuntil we overthrow it and
replace it with a world basedinstead on solidarity, genuine
democracy and equality, asocialist world.
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (41:59):
You got to take them kind of serious.
I mean, she was a politicalleader of Chaz, an autonomous
zone that caused tons ofproperty damage, tons of murder.
She's got, obviously, thousandsof working people will rise up
and take it.
Is that the rioters?
Right, I mean, she's talkingabout laying the groundwork for
(42:21):
a new world.
How'd she get elected to citycouncil?
This kind of goes to my biggertheme.
Right, you got to know whothese people are.
We elect people and we look at,like a national ticket, right,
the down ballot voting.
If you're going to vote forDonald Trump, you just vote for
everybody with an R in front oftheir name.
If you're going to vote forBarack Obama, you vote for
(42:43):
everybody with a D in front ofyour name.
This is one of the challengesof having a popularity contest
as our national elections,because the down ballot becomes
scary, right, I mean, whenBarack Obama's getting elected,
look at who's getting elected onthe down ballots.
I mean you've got women likethis councilwoman, kashama
Sawant.
Look, I live in Seattle.
(43:05):
There's a lot of Bernie bros,there's a lot of, like you know,
socialists, but I don'tpersonally know anyone that's
not off their rocker, that wantsto burn down the system, that
wants to get rid of the Bill ofRights, that wants to get rid of
the Constitution, that wants toget rid of capitalism.
I mean, let's just listen to itagain.
It's a minute.
Speaker 3 (43:27):
It's a minute.
It's a minute.
Listen to it again.
I have a message for Jeff Bezosand his class If you attempt
again to overturn the Amazon tax, working people will go all out
in the thousands to defeat youand we will not stop there,
because, you see, we arefighting for far more than this
tax.
We are preparing the ground fora different kind of society,
and if you, jeff Bezos, want todrive that process forward by
(43:51):
lashing out against us in ourmodest demands, then so be it,
because we are coming for youand your rotten system.
We are coming to dismantle thisdeeply oppressive, racist,
sexist, violent, utterlybankrupt system of capitalism,
this police state.
We cannot and will not stopuntil we overthrow it and
(44:14):
replace it with a world basedinstead on solidarity, genuine
democracy and equality, asocialist world.
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (44:24):
It's so hard for me to listen to that stuff because
I just can't always figure outexactly what it's like.
Man, this racist system, thishorrible system that you
immigrated to.
I mean, you can go back toIndia anytime you want, right?
It's really something else.
Here's another one.
This is Rep Ilhan Omar.
Now, again, she's elected,she's actually in office, she
(44:45):
actually has a base.
She got there, right, she gotthere.
How'd she get there?
Listen to this.
This is, again, unbelievable.
Speaker 6 (44:56):
As long as our economy and political systems
prioritize profit withoutconsidering who is profiting,
who is being shut out?
Speaker 2 (45:08):
we will perpetuate.
I missed the beginning of thevideo, so I'm going to go back
to the beginning here.
Actually, no, I didn't, Ishould have just let it play.
It's not a long video.
Speaker 6 (45:17):
As long as our economy and political systems
prioritize profit withoutconsidering who is profiting,
who is being shut out, we willperpetuate this inequality.
So we cannot stop at criminaljustice system.
We must begin the work ofdismantling the whole system of
(45:40):
oppression, wherever we find it.
Speaker 2 (45:44):
They want to dismantle the whole system of
oppression which is the UnitedStates.
Now, in fairness, in fairness,in the last 15, basically since
9-11, the United States has notbeen great around the world, I
mean especially in the MiddleEast.
So it's kind of one of thosefunny deals.
The actual peasants of theMiddle East love America because
(46:05):
we defended them against ISIS,but the elites and the upper
middle class of the Middle Easthate America.
Why?
Because they're educated andthey know that we were there
under false pretenses.
Pretenses, it's kind of not awhole lot different than the DOJ
going after the president.
Shouldn't have been there inthe first place, right?
You're going to charge him withobstruction of justice.
(46:25):
Shouldn't have been looking athim in the first place.
There shouldn't have been therein the first place, right,
You're going to charge them withobstruction of justice.
Shouldn't have been looking atthem in the first place.
There shouldn't have beenanything to obstruct.
Well, it's the same thing.
We shouldn't be in the MiddleEast.
We shouldn't have bombed theirschools and their bridges and
their water treatment facilitiesand their power plants and all
those things, right, In thebeginning of 2001 to 2005, when
we were just bomb crazy, weshouldn't have done that,
(46:46):
Shouldn't have done it.
It was all false pretenses andthe smart people in the Middle
East know that, and so they'veorganized against us.
Now the peasants might love usbecause they view us as
liberators.
But again, different worldviews, right, Different paradigms.
Ilhan Omar has been convincedby the elites who have
bankrolled her people from Qatar.
She's considered the jewel ofQatar, even though she's from
Somalia.
(47:07):
They got a Muslim who'sdedicated to overthrowing the US
government into government.
She married her brother.
She committed illegalimmigration fraud.
She married her campaign person.
She paid her campaign personover $868,000.
She should be arrested.
She should be in jail.
She should be in jail.
(47:27):
But you know political capital,son of a gun.
Once you got it, it's hard forpeople to go against you.
Okay, George Soros, let's touchon him again.
You may remember this as alittle video.
They painted Black Lives Matteron the road in California, in
Costa County, California.
The Costa County Californiadistrict attorney.
(47:48):
Her name is Deanna Beck-Con-Ton.
Now, keep in mind.
Black Lives Matter came in.
They painted the road.
I don't know if they had apermit or not who the frick
knows?
Probably not but they did.
They painted Black Lives Matteron the road and some concerned
citizen came by and painted overthe permit, painted over Black
(48:08):
Lives Matter.
Oh, they did have a permit tosupport this.
They painted over Black LivesMatter.
Obviously, Black Lives Matter ispretty bad.
I mean, you're starting to seeit.
Terry Crews yesterday or twodays ago on CNN talked about it.
Anybody who looks into itreally quickly realizes it's
totally a Marxist setup, right?
Anyways, this district attorneyis now charging this woman and
(48:32):
how convenient.
She just happens to be anotherone of these George Soros-backed
DAs.
This is so deep.
She is a county districtattorney and she is funded by
George Soros.
And she's now charging thiswoman with a hate crime for
painting over Black Lives Matter.
You know, it just makes youwonder, right, it just makes you
(48:54):
question things.
Another thing that came up and Itweeted this out last night.
I put Mom, you were right.
When I used to drive around asa kid, my mom would listen to
Rush Limbaugh, sometimes onclimate change.
It was an up-and-coming topic.
It had been around for a longtime.
It had been around.
When my mom was a kid it hadbeen debunked.
When she was a kid, it wasmostly about population control.
When she was younger, she usedto tell me the world is always
(49:16):
going through weather phases,climate phases it's always
changing.
She told me climate change isjust a big scam, and she was
right.
In fact, here you have MichaelSchlenberger, who wrote a book
about it.
He's been a climate activistfor years and years.
So this is a news report out ofNew Zealand, and New Zealand is
part of the Five Eyes Network.
(49:38):
The Five Eyes Network are theAnglophone countries, so
Australia, Canada, Britain, USAand New Zealand.
All of us are native Englishspeakers, and after World War II
, we saw the damage that thecommunists were doing in Russia.
We never didn't defeat them.
We saw what Mao was starting todo in China.
We saw the imperialistenterprise of Japan.
(49:58):
We saw fascism in Europe and inItaly, and so we decided those
five countries all come from youknow democratic backgrounds,
they all are Christian, and sowe decided we have to stick
together.
And so we created a spy networkcalled the Five Eyes and we
share intelligence at thehighest levels and essentially,
if Australia spies on you, theUS spied on you.
(50:19):
I mean, we share intelligencehighly.
So New Zealand has people whoare really about liberty, and
it's pretty interesting, Anyways.
So listen to this.
This is on Sky News and this isa little bit of a book review
about this climate activistwho's basically come clean.
Speaker 5 (50:38):
I haven't heard one single apology following the
story last week by MichaelSchellenberger.
He admitted he wanted to quoteformally apologise for the
climate scare we created that'senvironmentalists over the past
30 years.
He said I've been a climateactivist for 20 years and an
environmentalist for 30.
Of climate change, he said, Iquote, it's not even our most
(51:00):
serious environmental problem.
And he said I feel anobligation to apologise for how
badly we environmentalists havemisled the public.
He said climate change is notmaking natural disasters worse.
He said the build-up of woodfuel and more houses near
forests, not climate change,explains why there are more and
(51:21):
more dangerous fires inAustralia and California.
He said wood fuel is far worsefor people and wildlife than
fossil fuels.
Schellenberger wrote, and Iquote until last year I mostly
avoided speaking out against theclimate scare, partly because I
was embarrassed, but mostly Iwas scared.
He said I remained quiet aboutthe climate disinformation
(51:44):
campaign because I was afraid oflosing friends and funding.
So he's written a bookApocalypse Never why.
Environmental Alarmism Hurts UsAll.
And he writes reality bites.
Once you realise how badlymisinformed we've been, often by
people with plainly unsavourymotivations, it's hard not to
feel duped.
(52:04):
And he says the evidence isoverwhelming that our
high-energy civilisation isbetter motivations.
It's hard not to feel duped.
And he says the evidence isoverwhelming that our high
energy civilization is betterfor people and nature than the
low energy civilization thatclimate alarmists would return
us to.
And tellingly, he writes I hopeyou'll accept my apology.
Speaker 2 (52:22):
So that was one of the leading climate activists
over the last 20 years who haswritten this tell-all book and
said, yeah, it's all a scam.
And not only is it all a scam,we know it's a scam.
The religion of climate changeis ending.
Think about all the Green NewDeal.
Think about Ocasio-Cortez andIlhan Omar and the squad and
think about the push for theGreen New Deal and what that is.
(52:45):
Remember when the Green NewDeal came out, republicans
quickly picked it apart and saidthis isn't about the
environment.
This is about changing theeconomy.
This is about upturningcapitalism.
It's coming from the samepeople now that are telling us
to defund our police and teardown the system.
Believe them when they tell usthey're going to do those
extreme things.
Believe Council Member Sawant.
Believe Ilhan Omar.
(53:08):
They are working from inside.
They are working from without.
Foreign entities arebankrolling this and organizing
it Internally.
These mobs that are runningaround.
These are shock troopers forthese socialists.
Guys, it's in our faces.
On one hand, we've got greatnews coming out of the DOJ.
Conservative Treehouse brokethis case wide open.
(53:30):
They've showed the collusionwithin the DOJ.
I mean dozens and dozens ofpeople need to go to jail in the
DOJ and the FBI for their rolesin spying on the Trump
administration for the coup plot.
It goes on and on.
George Soros funding peopleeven at the low county levels to
prevent criminals from gettinglocked up to get bail.
(53:52):
Reforms to create some type ofutopic society where there's no
police, which just means he whohas the gun and is willing to
pull the trigger rules the world.
This is scary, and we're in anuclear world too.
We can't have kinetic wars.
Kinetic wars will be disastrous.
If you live near a major city,good chance you're going to get
(54:14):
nuked, good chance there's goingto be an EMP.
That's another thing.
I don't know if I've read that,but there's serious threat of
an EMP from China.
That was pretty much ignoreduntil Donald Trump started to
reinforce our infrastructure.
But there's been a fightbetween the utilities and the
government as to who's going topay for reinforcing our
infrastructure to survivethrough an EMP attack.
Man, crazy stuff.
(54:37):
Another thing that came outyesterday is we found out John
Roberts was hospitalized lastmonth, which really was only
like a week ago.
Was hospitalized last monthbecause he fell while working
out.
Now, back a handful of yearsago, john Roberts had a couple
seizures that caused a fall, buthe hasn't had any seizures
since then.
They say that this fall wasn'tcaused by seizures.
He just essentially tripped,but it required a couple sutures
(54:58):
and he stayed overnight in thehospital.
When I saw this, I thought tomyself you know what this is?
John Roberts' exit ramp.
Ghislaine Maxwell's in jail.
John Roberts flew on the LolitaExpress and went down to
Epstein's Island in theCaribbean.
That's right, the Supreme CourtJustice of the United States,
where the buck stops.
The sovereign, the leader ofthe independent branch of the
(55:18):
judiciary, right the sameSupreme Court who decided a
presidential election when itcame down to a recount.
That Supreme Court justice,justice John Roberts, is
compromised by this Epsteinstuff.
He should at minimum recusehimself with anything to do with
Epstein, anything to do witheven Donald Trump, really.
But he won't.
(55:42):
But this might be an off-rampfor him.
This might be the precursor toinjuries that cause him to leave
.
Maybe another fall.
Any number of things couldhappen here.
So I look at this as apotential off-ramp for Justice
Roberts.
I don't think it's a coincidencethat we're getting the news
reporting on it now.
The Supreme Court basically hasto fess up to these kind of
things, but we'll see how itshakes out.
(56:05):
I mean, if he leaves, that's areally good thing in many
regards.
Another thing that just brokethis morning the Supreme Court
decided on the case with theCatholic nuns that they can this
is an Obamacare case that theycan basically be exempt from
Obamacare because they don'twant to do the contraceptive
requirements of Obamacarebecause of their religious
(56:27):
beliefs.
The Supreme Court upheld theirright to basically opt out.
So that's actually really goodnews.
So that's good.
All right, guys, that's ourshow today Lots of stuff
happening, lots of good stuff,and I appreciate your time.
We'll talk to you againtomorrow, don't forget.
You can reach out to me at thePeasants, at PeasantsPod on
Twitter, at PeasantsPod onParler, at the Peasants
(56:49):
Perspective on Facebook, and youcan email me at thepeasantspod
at gmailcom or peasantspod atgmailcom.
All right, I look forward totalking to you tomorrow who are
the britons?
Speaker 1 (57:07):
we all are.
We are all britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we're an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only only people would,please, please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
(57:30):
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of pure internalaffairs, be quiet.
(57:51):
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet, allright, who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become the king.
Who are you to become king then?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
(58:13):
signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
(58:34):
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistenistened bint had logged ascimitar at me, they put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
(58:55):
Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Hey, welcome to another episodeof Peasants Perspective.
And just real quick to get itout of the way, you can find me
on Twitter, at PeasantsPodParler, at PeasantsPod Facebook,
(01:01):
at the Peasants Perspectiveemail, at peasantspod at
gmailcom.
I love hearing from you.
I love your criticism.
Well, I don't really love yourcriticism unless it's
constructive.
I love your feedback, all thatkind of fun stuff.
Anyways, let's jump on in here.
I've got a couple differentstories today that I want to
cover Big, massive, breakingnews.
So yesterday, let's go to theSpygate case, russiagate,
(01:23):
obamagate.
You know, I think from here onout I'm probably just going to
go ahead and call it Obamagate.
For the most part, I thinkObamagate encompasses the
entirety of the coup scandalagainst Donald Trump and really,
in all honesty, the entireObama presidency was just a big
scandal.
Not only is he one of the mosta big scandal, not only is he
(01:49):
one of the most.
Let's put it this way BarackObama brags about having a
scandal-free presidency Towardsthe end of his term.
He bragged about that on TV insome interview and a lot of
Republicans were like, well,what about Benghazi, what about
this?
And he kind of pretends likethat's not a scandal because to
half of America, half of Americathat watches left-wing news
sources, they don't think thosewere scandals.
They think those were totallyjustified actions taken for
(02:09):
whatever random reasons, right.
But the reality is you can gothrough a pretty long list IRS
targeting Fast and FuriousBenghazi.
The Iran nuclear deal is ascandal in and of itself.
Look at everything Joe Bidendid.
Look at all the money JoeBiden's running off with from
around the world.
So his whole entire presidencywas just filled with scandal.
But what we're going to findhere and what we've been
(02:30):
discovering, and the whole pointof Spygate and Russiagate, is
the fact that the reason thatObama was scandal free was
because who was going toprosecute?
He had the entire DOJ and FBIupper echelons wrapped around
his little finger.
They weren't going to doanything.
So let's just jump into thefirst case.
(02:50):
This comes from theconservative treehouse and I
really like these guys.
The last refuge here reallygood, really good article that's
titled this the FBI corruptionis far worse than we currently
imagine.
President Trump authorized hisown surveillance.
So what happened was right.
When Donald Trump got intooffice, donald Trump signed an
executive order that changed thechain of command at the DOJ and
(03:10):
the FBI, and the reason forthis was multiple reasons, but
basically you had Loretta Lynch,who, when Barack Obama left
office, left office as well, andSally Yates jumped up into her
spot.
Well, sally Yates, who was theassistant attorney general, she
refused to enforce Trump'stravel ban.
A lot of people call it theMuslim travel ban.
(03:32):
It wasn't the Muslim travel banbecause you've got countries
like Venezuela included on there.
It basically Trump did a travelban against countries that
refused to participate inbackground checks and vetting of
visa requests, and so when youlook at that list, you look at,
one of the common things you'llsee is these are very third
world countries, with theexception of, like Iran.
They do not do backgroundchecks, they don't have good
(03:55):
public records to know who thecriminals are or not, and so,
just real simple, we're just notgoing to take these people
wholesale into our country.
Lots of good reasons for that.
Anyways, sally Yates refused toenforce it, so Sally Yates was
dismissed and that caused DanaBuente to step up into her spot.
Dana Buente was running thedistrict of Virginia FBI and he
(04:18):
was essentially a stand-in atthe DOJ because Jeff Sessions
had recused himself.
Rod Rosenstein couldn'tsupervise it.
Anyways, rod Rosenstein, thiswhole long thing, so long story.
Dana Buente gets put in Well.
On January 30th 2017, sallyYates was fired for refusing to
defend Trump travel ban fromextremist countries and Yates
(04:40):
was replaced on January 31st byUS attorney from the Eastern
District of Virginia, danaBuente.
Remember the names?
This wasn't an existing AGbecause Loretta Lynch had left.
As of Yates' exit and DanaBuente's entry Buente was acting
Deputy Attorney General incharge of Jess Sessions was
confirmed February 8th 2017.
(05:01):
On February 9th 2017, trumpissued Executive Order 13775,
changing the line of DOJsuccession, moving the EDVA the
Eastern District of Virginiaattorney, so that would be Dana
Buente up, granting Buente thefull legal authority to carry
out the duties of the DeputyAttorney General until a
permanent replacement wasconfirmed.
(05:23):
When Jeff Sessions becameAttorney General, dana Buente
acting Deputy AG a role Buentewould retain until Rod
Rosenstein was confirmed onApril 25th.
Okay, keep these names in yourbrain, float them around.
Rod Rosenstein was confirmed onApril 25th.
On March 2nd 2017, dana Buentewas one of a small group who
(05:43):
participated in a conversationthat led to the recusal of Jeff
Sessions from anything relatedto the 2016 election.
This recusal included theongoing FBI counterintelligence
investigation known as CrossfireHurricane, which was later
picked up by Robert Mueller.
So let's think about this for asecond.
(06:04):
So Jeff Sessions, who'sappointed the Attorney General
by Donald Trump?
And supposedly, jeff Sessionshas flown on Trump plane and
he's been talking about howthey're going to take down the
swamp, which they think is verythin.
Just a few people at the top,mainly Hillary Clinton and John
Kerry, and they're fullyintended on coming in closing
down the southern border,building a wall, fixing
(06:25):
immigration I mean, really goingafter a lot of our issues that
the DOJ needs to be involvedwith.
So Sessions is going to beTrump's right-hand man, and
Sessions is one of the fewpeople in all of Congress that
has no skeletons in his closet.
Okay, there are two people inall of Congress that were
considered unimpeachable, twopeople that were scandal-free
(06:45):
Mike Pence and Jeff Sessions.
Those are the two people thatwere supposedly the cleanest,
best members of Congress.
Both of those guys are nowsurrounding Donald Trump in key
positions a vice president andthe attorney general.
Now, other attendees at thismeeting for the recusal of Jeff
Sessions are Jody Hunt, acriminal chief in the US
(07:06):
Attorney's Office for Districtof Maryland.
Jim Crowell, deputy AssistantGeneral DAAG in the Department
of Justice, national SecurityDivision.
Tosh Gower, fisa lawyer andAssociate Deputy General, scott
Schools Note Tasha Gardner was alawyer for the Clinton case and
Scott Schools was part ofdrafting the Clinton exoneration
(07:27):
letter.
So the people who are conveningto talk about Jeff Sessions'
recusal have themselves aconflict of interest on the
things that they're going to getJeff Sessions to recuse himself
from.
So, essentially, someone whoshould have recused themselves
is telling someone else whodoesn't need to recuse himself
that they should recuse himselffrom.
So, essentially, someone whoshould have recused themselves
(07:47):
is telling someone else whodoesn't need to recuse himself
that they should recusethemselves.
This is like really critical tounderstand here, because to
understand the story of JeffSessions and Donald Trump,
you've got to understand this.
The entire Q plan almost hangson this one interaction here.
Okay, the whole idea of trustsessions, trust sessions.
Okay, so a couple things.
I need to do a whole episode onQ.
(08:08):
I don't believe Q is somemaster plan.
I believe Q is General Flynnand his digital army.
I think they serve a valuablerole.
I think they are the news.
I think right now they drivethe narrative, especially on the
right side, which they claim.
But a lot of the things theysaid and this is much to the
chagrin of Q followers, and I'dask any one of them to come and
talk to me and explain some ofthe things that I have found is
(08:31):
they're extremely immersed inthe news.
I myself, who am immersed inthe news, oftentimes go, oh, I
find something.
I connect some dots and then Iread it on Q and I go, oh, q got
this too.
And I look at the timestamplike, oh, the article came out
before the cue post, which meansif they read it, they could
have connected the dots too.
The more organized you are, theeasier this thing is to crack
right.
Remember the names, rememberthe places, remember who they're
(08:55):
married to.
You always see thoseinvestigators with a wall with
pictures of people and stringstouching them.
I need that in my office here,because that's essentially what
you have to do to be able tocrack this, because you've got
to remember who all these peopleare.
That's an investigativetechnique.
You've got to remember whothey're related to.
You've got to remember whothey've worked with in years
past.
Think about some of the bestrelationships you have are just
shared over lunch.
I've got a close friend of minewho was friends for years.
(09:15):
I haven't seen him for 15 years.
His name is Schuyler, or, assome people call him, schweiler,
and I haven't talked to himforever.
I mean, I think it's probablybeen I guess not 15 years,
probably more like eight years.
But if I called him up todayand I asked a favor, I'd
probably get it right, becausewe have a longstanding
relationship that goes back towhen we're really young.
One of our listeners same thing.
He and I have a longstandingrelationship back to when I was
(09:38):
14 and he was 21.
Now he's like 65 or somethinglike that.
I'm just kidding, he's not thatold, but nonetheless.
You know, you develop theserelationships with people and
then years later you reconnectand it's like you didn't miss a
beat.
So it's important to know whopeople worked with, what
departments they've worked on,cases they've worked on together
, especially cases that are long.
You got to remember.
You know, if you worked on theWatergate case, those guys were
(10:01):
locked in an office together andthey couldn't talk to anybody
other than the people in thatoffice for years and years and
years.
So they investigated theClintons for multiple years
basically Clinton's entire firstterm he was under investigation
and they ended up not comingwith the complicated financial
case that the Clintons wereabsolutely guilty of, often
called it's not Watergate, it'sWhitewater, the Whitewater
(10:22):
investigation.
But they ended up uncoveringthe Monica Lewinsky scandal in
the process and they got theirscope memo changed, which the
Democrats did right along backto Trump, which is honestly
where Stormy Daniels comes in.
Stormy Daniels was supposed tobe the Monica Lewinsky for
Donald Trump, because the timeframe from which Stormy Daniels
and Donald Trump supposedly hadallegedly had an affair was when
(10:45):
Melania was pregnant withBarron.
So that would have been prettyscandalous.
That would have been prettylame for the president of Dunn.
I personally don't think it wasthe president.
I think it was Donald Trump Jrwho had an affair with Stormy
Daniels.
And the time frame works upbecause his marriage essentially
fell apart right when Trump gotelected, right when the Stormy
(11:06):
Daniels.
And the time frame works up,because his marriage essentially
fell apart right when Trump gotelected, right when the Stormy
Daniels stuff came up.
However, there was also a fakeanthrax attack on the entire
Trump family, which also mighthave prompted Don Jr's wife to
run.
Remember, don Jr has five kidswith his wife, his former wife.
Now he's dating KimberlyGarfoyle, who is on the Trump
campaign.
It's kind of weird actually,the whole Kimberly Garfoyle,
(11:27):
donald Trump Jr.
They're a good couple though,whatever.
Okay, so back to this.
So now the attendees so JodyHunt, jim Crowell, tasha Gower
and Scott Schools are the senior.
These people are appointed tobasically look at ethical
violations and recommend ifpeople should or should not
(11:48):
recuse themselves.
So Sessions recused himselfbecause at one point he had met
with the ambassador during thecampaign.
So now he's a suspect.
The ambassador from Russiaduring the campaign.
So now he's a suspect.
So they tell him to recusehimself.
And he does A drop of hat, boom, recuses himself.
He doesn't say, hey, let melook at this case first and let
me see if there's actually aconflict.
Let me see if the people you'reinvestigating actually I
(12:09):
shouldn't be working with.
The only person that probablywould have caused that recusal
to be necessary would have beenGeneral Flynn, because General
Flynn and Jeff Sessions probablytalked and worked together
prior, but nonetheless he wasrecused from everything having
to do with the Trump campaign,russia, everything.
So they convinced Jeff Sessionshe must recuse himself.
(12:34):
In hindsight, each of the peoplegiving Jeff Sessions advice was
connected to previously corruptactivity within Maine justice.
That included the ClintonSpygate operations.
Not knowing each conflict eachadvisor was carrying, sessions
took their advice and recusedhimself.
A big mistake, with JeffSessions recused from anything
involving the 2016 election,which included the Russia
(12:55):
investigation.
Effective the evening of March2, 2017, fbi director now
reported to acting AG DanaBoente director now reported to
acting AG Dana Buente.
Technically, at this point inMarch 2017, buente is still US
Attorney for the EasternDistrict of Virginia and is only
(13:15):
acting as Deputy AG WithSessions recused.
Buente would be needed when theCarter-Page FISA would be up
for renewal 2017.
With Sessions recused from theRussia investigation without any
confirmed Deputy AttorneyGeneral able to authorize all of
the material the FBIinvestigators needed for Maine
justice would have to flowthrough Dana Buente.
Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein wasnot confirmed until April 25th,
(13:37):
the January 12th FISA renewalwas going to expire April 12th
2017.
90 days from its issuance, theyrenewed this thing four times.
And remember there's what'scalled a two-hop rule and when
they get a FISA warrant they'reable to look at everybody you
called or emailed and thenyou're able to jump two times.
So let's say, carter Pageemails George Papadopoulos was
(14:01):
also being investigated.
But say Carter Page emailsassistant number one.
Say Carter Page emailsassistant number one.
Assistant number one emailsassistant number two.
Assistant number two emailsDonald Trump, or assistant
number one let's do this alittle bit more realistic
Assistant number one.
So Carter Page emails assistantnumber one, who then emails the
(14:21):
chief of staff, who then emailswho at the time would have been
John Kelly, who then emailsDonald Trump.
So now the FBI, robert Muellerand his 17 team of Democrats and
40 FBI agents who arehandpicked according to Trump or
according to Obama get thequote right people on this, as
in, people who are going to goafter Donald Trump hard are now
(14:45):
have access to the president'semails, all of them, all of his
phone calls, everything Becauseof the two-hop rule.
That's how FISA works.
That's pretty amazing.
So anybody two people away fromDonald Trump who emailed
someone who emailed Donald Trump, they've got his emails,
they've got his chief of staff,all the cabinet members.
They have everything.
They're completely, totallyspying on everything Donald
(15:11):
Trump is doing.
That means every policy, everyconsideration.
Think about all the leaks thatwere coming out of the White
House.
Where could these leaks becoming from?
They were probably coming rightout of the special counsel's
office.
So we discover handwrittennotes.
So we got a bunch ofhandwritten notes that were
released by Rachel Maddow a longtime ago, that were released by
the SSI, and what they weretrying to do.
(15:31):
So keep going here.
In hindsight, the subject matteralmost certainly relates to the
issue of Russia investigation,the sensitivity of the
administration.
So the notes that Comey let out, which read things like I told
AG before recusal I cannot bespeaking with the president
alone keep coming back, makingit hard, too difficult for the
(15:52):
country.
We will work well, referring tothe investigators.
What can I do to relieve thecloud?
That's a question that's posedto Comey.
Anyways, he's not willing to doit.
So, with Jeff Sessions recusedand Dana Buente is now the
acting AG, approving whateverJames Comey needs from Maine
Justice, james Comey wantsCarter Page extended, Jeff
(16:13):
Sessions is recused and capableand after February 9th,
executive order initiating thechange of DOJ succession was
signed, dana Buente can nowofficially sign the Carter Page
FISA application renewal, whichis exactly what happens.
A week after their March 3rdcall with James Comey and Dana
Buente signed the admittedlyfraudulent FISA warrant.
(16:38):
Wow, so get that.
Donald Trump signed anexecutive order after Jeff
Sessions recused himself.
Being advised by people whoshould have themselves recused
themselves from even suggestingthe rec with James Comey became
evidence for Mueller's expandedobstruction.
And if you pay attention to thedates, this one's April 10th
(17:10):
they turned over these notes.
And so, to recap, this is wherewe're at here the acting
Attorney General, dana Buente,advised Jeff Sessions to recuse
himself March 2nd 2017.
Then acting Director DavidBuente and FBI Director Comey
signed a renewal for thefraudulent Carter-Flaes page
application.
(17:30):
This is well into Trump'spresidency, permitting the FBI
to continue surveillance on theTrump administration.
Keep in mind Inspector Generaloutlined that in January 2017,
shortly after the applicationwas first renewed the FBI knew
the Steele dossier, which is thebasis of all of these
fraudulent FISA applications.
(17:50):
Right, they knew in January,but they renewed the FISA
warrant with this corruptedchain of command into April,
which then extends 90 daysbeyond that.
Wow, and they knew.
The whole thing was false.
The whole thing.
There's absolutely no doubt.
The FBI knew in January 2017the dossier was not valid.
The dossier was paid for byHillary Clinton through Perkins
(18:12):
Coie.
It went to Glenn Simpson atFusion GPS.
Fusion GPS had an employee,nellie Orr, who was the wife of
Bruce Orr, who worked at the DOJand was the number four person
in charge of the DOJ who workedat the DOJ and was the number
four person in charge of the DOJ.
So all this Steele dossierinformation was being funneled
into the DOJ through thisback-channel source, which is
(18:33):
exempt from certain prosecutionsbecause of their marital
relationship.
How convenient is that?
Right?
It's almost like maybe theyplanned it and then they leaked
it to other people, like JohnMcCain, who then showed it to
Lindsey Graham and his staff,and then they turned it to other
people like John McCain, whothen showed it to Lindsey Graham
and his staff, and then theyturned it into the FBI and then
it went to the FBI through HarryReid.
So you got a Republican, aprominent Republican and a
prominent Democrat all turningit into the FBI, on top of the
(18:54):
fact that the FBI already hasthis.
So they're laundering theinformation back into the FBI.
They've got a corrupt group ofguys that are telling Jeff
Sessions to recuse himself.
And yeah, this is pretty much atotal setup, right?
So when the FBI director came,james Comey is making contact
with acting DAG, so DeputyAttorney General, dana Buente,
(19:16):
on March 30, 2017, for issuesrelating to the need for a FISA
renewal.
In April 2017, the FBI wasabsolutely certain there was no
validity to the underlyingevidence within the FISA
application.
Yet the FBI team was sodetermined to get the fraudulent
FISA reauthorized.
They ignored all of theevidence that undermined their
objective.
(19:36):
Think about the scale of deceitand corruption involved.
But it doesn't end.
It gets worse.
On April 25th 2017, rodRosenstein is confirmed.
Rosenstein now takes overresponsibilities held by acting
DAG, dana Buenti.
This includes the FBIcounterintelligence probe.
So now Rosenstein's involved.
Fbi Director James Comey isfired FBI Director Andrew McCabe
.
So they're running thisinvestigation without the
(19:57):
special counsel up till thismoment.
On May 10th, the day after JamesComey is fired, andrew McCabe,
who has now been fired, opens acriminal obstruction of justice
investigation into PresidentTrump.
Because Trump is beinginvestigated, but he was told by
James Comey he was not thesubject of the investigation.
So how can someone who's notthe subject of the investigation
doesn't know necessarily whothe targets are, except for
(20:19):
General Flynn then be accused ofobstruction of justice because
he fired James Comey and thefiring was authorized or
recommended by Rod Rosenstein.
Oh my gosh, see, this is just amess.
No wonder, in the moment of allthis happening, they're getting
papers complicated things.
They don't know who thesepeople are.
They don't know their previousconnections and ties, because no
(20:40):
one in justice that is relatedto the Trump administration can
look at any of these files orany of these cases and see what
the heck is going on.
On April 10th, fbi directoropens the criminal obstruction
investigation into Trump andthen Dana Buente now becomes the
assistant attorney general tohead the DOJ National Security
Division, simultaneouslyretaining the role as US
(21:00):
attorney for the EasternDistrict of VA.
So he's holding these twopositions, which is kind of
messed up At the moment.
Guess who Dana Buenti's legalcounsel is?
Remember Michael Atkinson?
Remember the name?
Who's Michael Atkinson, asidefrom being my old boss in a
low-voltage electric company?
Different person, of course.
Michael Atkinson is the sameMichael Atkinson who's the
current intelligence communityattorney, ig investigative
(21:26):
general, who facilitated thewhistleblower complaint and was
senior counsel to legal Buentewhen he headed the DOJ.
The whistleblower complaintwhat was the whistleblower
complaint, the whistleblowercomplaint that led to
impeachment.
That's right.
So now you see the tie in here.
So they tried to impeach Trumpbecause Trump.
Eventually they figure out thisis all scam, right, a hoax, as
(21:54):
Trump lovingly called it.
And Michael Atkinson was thelegal advisor to Dana Buente.
So Michael Atkinson must knoweverything Dana Buente is doing,
because anytime Dana Buentemakes a decision, who's, he got
to call up His assigned attorneyto run it by the attorney, who
is Michael Atkinson.
So Michael Atkinson is nowimplicated in the entire Spygate
scandal, russiagate scandal,and that is the same Michael
Atkinson who brought forward anillegal whistleblower that does
(22:18):
not meet any of the terms ofbeing a whistleblower that Adam
Schiff and Nancy Pelosi used toimpeach the president On May 16,
2017, rosenstein takes RobertMueller to the White House to
meet President Trump on May 17,.
So the next day, rosensteinappoints Mueller to the special
counsel Rod Rosenstein and orbecame reauthorized the same
fraudulent FISA application.
(22:39):
That was the fourth time forthis Robert Mueller and corrupt
team of 19 special prosecutorsand now 40 FBI agents to
continue to exploit.
Dana Buenti is head of DOJ NSDfrom May 11th through the end of
October 2017, then officiallyannounced his intent to retire,
but wait.
On January 3rd 2018, fbidirector Christopher Wray
announces Dana Buente hasshifted over to the FBI to be
(23:01):
chief legal counsel, replacingJames Baker, who's under
investigation for a leak.
Oh my goodness.
So the DOJ, or the DC, is aswamp.
See how he moves from DOJ toFBI.
He's still involved in thisentire thing, and so we think
he's being moved, but he's not.
You know, we think he's beingmoved out of the picture.
(23:22):
He's not.
He's being moved to be in thepicture even tighter.
Yes, that's correct.
Mueller is using 19 lawyers, 40investigators.
Buente now becomes legaladvisor to Christopher Wray
inside the FBI.
So think about that.
The FBI director now has one ofthe main culprits in this
entire scandal as his legaladvisor inside the FBI while
Mueller probe is going on.
(23:43):
Oh, and you can see from hisparticipation with Mueller, dana
Buente is now a fact witness tothe Mueller investigation.
It gets better.
Who do you think is in chargeof the 40 FBI agents now
conducting the third yearfraudulent Mueller investigation
?
Dana Buente.
This is staggeringly unreal.
It's no wonder the FBI director, christopher Wray, who we've
(24:03):
all called for his resignation,appears detached, disconnected
and completely unfazed by thescale and scope of the corrupt
enterprise he is in charge of.
His own legal counsel was a keyplayer in the operation to
remove the president.
It always seemed odd that WhiteHouse counsel Don McGahn left
in 2018 until you look at thebigger picture.
So the Carter Page applicationwas officially declassified and
(24:26):
made public in 2018.
No doubt, as McCann looked atthe FISA issues from the unique
perspective, he likely realizedin hindsight how FISA issues
crossed over.
So Don McGahn was thepresident's White House attorney
.
Basically, every department haslike a series of attorneys that
just review everything right,make sure they're all legal and
follow the law and whateverevery single order, so that the
(24:48):
things don't get termedunconstitutional later.
And so that's his role and herealizes what's going on.
This is when they got caught.
This is probably the momentwhen they got caught.
Trump knew that they had beenspying on him during his
campaign Everybody remembersthat from late 2016.
But this point, this isprobably where they realized
this whole thing is a completesetup and this is when they
(25:10):
realized everybody's messed upand they released the FISA
application.
There are almost no documents,except for documents that prove
the existence of aliens, thatare probably more classified
than these FISA applications.
This is the first and only onethat has ever in the history of
the United States FISA courtsbeen released.
It was obviously released forthis very reason.
(25:33):
Now, well, not this reason.
It was released Don McGahn left.
And then we get to anotherarticle by the same people,
conservative Treehouse and thisone identifies that when that
was released it kind of goesthrough everybody that was there
.
So this article was written onthe 8th and this is the basic
(25:58):
gist of it here.
Considering all the documentsthat would have been easiest not
to release because of its topsecret classified intelligence
product, and considering thedenial of FOIA, the Freedom of
Information Request would haveeasily withstood all the
judicial challenge because ofthe nature of its content.
All of a sudden, here you go.
Here's the most classifieddocument the government's ever
really have foreign intelligencesurveillance court application.
(26:20):
It's never made sense why thatwas released and other things
weren't released Things likenotes, things like the charging
documents, the scope memos, allthose other things that were
officially declassified but theywere being stonewalled.
In the article he says I alwaysthought Robert Mueller was a
false front, a semi-cogent facefor a team of 17 lawyers that
moved in to take over mainjustice.
I was not wrong about Mueller.
He was exactly that ahand-selected name to give
(26:41):
credibility to a team assemblyand a man who would acquiesce to
the smart, familiar and legalminds that were really running
the resistance operation, whichwas the lawyers.
Where I was wrong was thinkingRosenstein was a countermeasure
to those who took over mainjustice.
Q says if Rosenstein good,mueller good, Rosenstein bad,
(27:02):
mueller bad.
I think that that's true.
It's very obviously aconnection.
I think Rosenstein is dirty asthey get.
I think he was involveddirectly in this coup plot
against Donald Trump, which Iread earlier.
There are supposedly tapes outthere.
I've got that Twitter threadpinned on my Twitter profile.
You have to scroll down a waysto find it.
I'm sure from John here to help.
(27:23):
He wasn't.
Rod Rosenstein wasn't there tobe a countermeasure.
Rod Rosenstein was doing exactlythe same as Mueller,
acquiescing to every request,instruction and demand by the 17
legal squatters who took overMaine Justice.
Rod Rosenstein recentlytestified before the Senate
Judiciary Committee.
He never once questioned thespecial counsel about any
request, demand or instructionand he never once challenged
(27:44):
their motives for requests theymade as Deputy AG and AG
Sessions recused.
Rod Rosenstein would have beenon top of the special counsel,
but he wasn't.
He intentionally wasn't.
The entire time the specialcounsel was operating, 17
assembled members of the Trumpresistance were running the show
inside the US Department ofJustice.
They controlled everything.
Jeff Sessions was firewalled.
He saw nothing and he had noinput into anything.
(28:05):
That was the first step in theresistance operation.
The second step was to instructRosenstein that every request
made by the team was part oftheir investigation.
Regardless of how it might seemdisconnected, it was all part
of their investigative process.
That's how they steamrolledRosenstein into sitting in a
corner and waiting for documentsto sign, authorities to grant
scope memos, etc.
Remember he signed a scope memothat named people and then said
(28:25):
go look for a crime.
Rather than hey, here's a crime, go prosecute a person,
indictments to approve andrequests to be fulfilled Okay.
When the FISA application wasreleased in June 2018, it was
released by the special counselteam.
Technically, rosensteinreleased it.
However, unofficially, it wasreleased by the demand of the
resistance operators under theauspices that it was part of
(28:47):
their investigative technique.
Except that wasn't the realmotive.
The real motive for releasingthe FISA application under the
auspices of granting a FOIArequest was because the
resistance knew the New YorkTimes already had obtained it
illegally.
It had been leaked to the NewYork Times.
In fact, the New York Times hadthe FISA application since
March 17, 2017.
The New York Times had the FISAapplication since March 17,
(29:10):
2017.
That's right.
When the Special CounselSecurity Director, james Wolfe,
operating under instructionsfrom the SSCI Resistance
Coordinator, mark Warner, tookpictures of each page of the
FISA application and sent themto a journalist, allie Watkins,
at BuzzFeed BuzzFeed isultimately the one who released
it.
Ms Watkins then shared the FISAwith the fellow resistance
allies at the Washington Postand the New York Times to cover
her tracks.
Ms Watkins did not immediatelywrite about the FISA application
(29:31):
and I suspect the editors ofBud Fies may have not known.
In exchange for her pre-plannedrole, the New York Times then
hired Watkins and, under thelegal tutelage of the New York
Times, watkins based herreporting on the Trump-Russian
narrative from there, however.
(29:54):
There, however, in March 17,what Watkins, wolfe, media and
Mark Warner did not Mark Warner,who's a senator, okay did not
immediately know was that theFBI was conducting a leak
investigation a genuine leakinvestigation and the SSCI was
suspected.
So, on outside of the specialcounsel, this leak investigation
got started because they knewthat this FISA warrant was out
there.
The FISA application picked upby James Wolfe and delivered to
the SSCI contained a leak tracer, a trap.
When the tracer showed up inmedia reports, the FBI knew it
(30:14):
leaked from the SSCI.
So what they'll do on thesedocuments?
Sometimes they'll change a date, they'll change a specific spot
where things are redacted,they'll change one of the code
numbers, they'll do any handfulof small things so that they can
say, hey, if this document evershows up, we know it came from
this place, and then they'reable to kind of trace back the
(30:35):
link.
So that's just something theydo and they do it on a regular
basis and if you're good, youfigure out what you know.
You can't just leak the rawdata because of these tracers.
Unfortunately, what the FBI didnot know was that the SSCI Vice
Chairman, mark Warner, wasinside the resistance operative
giving Wolf instructions on howto proceed.
I might be wrong on Mark Warner.
(30:55):
Maybe he's not the senator.
It's Burr that's the senator.
In May 2017, fbi informed ViceChair Warner and Chairman
Richard Burr.
Chairman Richard Burr was incharge of the Senate
Intelligence Committee.
He's the senator that someonein the SSCI leaked the FISA
application.
In essence, the FBIinvestigators just told the
(31:17):
culprit who leaked.
They were investigating a leakhe created.
Think about the ramifications.
As part of the overallinvestigation to locate the
specific leaker, all of the SSCIwas subject to review in quiet
investigation as the FBI workedthrough a process of elimination
.
That's when the FBI discoveredthe Mark Warner text messages to
Adam Waldman, the lawyer forChris Steele.
Not coincidentally, the Warnertext messages ended May 2017,
(31:42):
exactly when he was firstnotified by the FBI about the
specifics of the leak hunt.
What also started in May 2017?
The special counsel.
One important aspect ofcoordinated demand and incessant
drumbeat by the media forspecial counsel was need to
control the outcome of the leakinvestigation Total control.
This was all connected.
(32:03):
The resistance took over MaineJustice with the appointment of
the special counsel.
All connected the resistancetook over Maine Justice with the
appointment of the specialcounsel.
One of their priorities was tostop anyone from A finding out
the FISA application had leaked.
B blocking anyone from findingout how it was leaked.
And C to block any independentFBI activity surrounding the
leak Takeaways.
17 members of the specialcounsel were intentionally
(32:25):
brought to Maine Justice toorganize the resistance.
The DOJ was running theresistance operation.
Ag Jeff sessions was firewalledand clueless.
Rod Rosenstein was justapproving anything he put in
front of him because he was sold.
It was part of theinvestigative process.
Regardless of the FBIinvestigation, the DOJ
resistance operation heldultimate control.
Some of the FBI were not happynot all, we're not happy, not
(32:48):
happy.
Not all were not happy, nothappy at all but in a position
to do nothing about MaineJustice, patting them on the
head and telling them to runalong.
Now there's so much more, somuch more.
That's just an appetizer.
You also have the Gang of Eightin Congress involved, the DOJ,
the ICIG All of these people areinvolved.
The wheels are coming off thebus, man.
The wheels are coming off thebus.
(33:09):
So that's our update on spygate.
Let's jump into one other thinghere.
So the real issue that we havefacing our country is china.
I got asked the questionyesterday are you worried about
an invasion or a civil war?
I said, well, I'm kind ofworried about both and and he
said, uh, and I said but thecivil war?
I said either way, it's causedby foreigners and my opinion is
(33:29):
it's all caused by China.
This is Chris Wray, the directorof the FBI.
This was yesterday.
This was a press conference heput out specifically talking
about China.
So now Chris Wray is in alittle bit different light for
me, knowing that Chris Wray,just like Rod Rosenstein,
probably never knew any of thedetails of this investigation,
because anything that he washearing, any briefs he was
(33:49):
getting, were being blocked byhis legal counsel.
So Dana Buente right.
So I got a feeling that thisthing is, now that this is all
out there, conservative Reviewis a well-read publication.
This thing is going to continueto roll downhill on these
investigators, so let's leavethe topic of Russia for now,
though, and focus on China.
(34:10):
Let's hear what Chris Wray hasto say about it.
Speaker 4 (34:14):
But if you think these issues are just an
intelligence issue or agovernment problem or a nuisance
largely just for bigcorporations who can largely
take care of themselves, youcould not be more wrong.
It's the people of the UnitedStates who are the victims of
what amounts to Chinese theft ona scale so massive that it
(34:35):
represents one of the largesttransfers of wealth in human
history.
Speaker 2 (34:42):
I need you to think about that phrase the transfers
of wealth.
A lot of people don'tunderstand what that means.
The Marshall Plan, when werebuilt Europe after World War
II, that was a transfer ofwealth.
That was the American middleclass going to work, buying cars
, buying gasoline, spendingtheir hard-earned money and
paying a huge chunk of it intaxes.
They then took those taxes andthey shuffled them overseas to
(35:05):
Europe and literally rebuiltEurope.
Taxes and they shuffled themoverseas to Europe and literally
rebuilt Europe.
I mean, it wasn't cheap to flyplane after plane in forever
during the Berlin airlift right,that's all part of this
transfer of wealth to Europe.
We've had a transfer of wealthto South America, a transfer of
wealth to Canada, althoughCanada does produce its own
wealth.
But we're talking about China,the largest transfer of wealth
(35:27):
in human history to China.
Speaker 4 (35:30):
For an American adult , it is more likely than not
that China has stolen yourpersonal data.
In 2017, the Chinese militaryconspired to hack Equifax and
made off with the sensitivepersonal information of 150
million Americans we're talkingnearly half of the American
(35:52):
population and most Americanadults and, as I'll discuss in a
few moments, this was hardly astandalone incident.
Our data isn't the only thingat stake here.
So are our health, ourlivelihoods and our security.
We've now reached the pointwhere the FBI is opening a new
(36:13):
China-relatedcounterintelligence case about
every 10 hours.
Of the nearly 5,000 active FBIcounterintelligence cases
currently underway across thecountry currently underway
across the country, almost halfare all related to China and at
this very moment, china isworking to compromise American
(36:34):
healthcare organizations,pharmaceutical companies and
academic institutions conductingessential COVID-19 research.
Speaker 2 (36:43):
So China is a huge problem.
Okay, they're spying on useverywhere.
They're in our phones, they'rein our home, listening.
You know our Alexas and ourApple HomePods and things like
that.
They're hoovering up all thatdata and they're doing it in a
lot of different ways.
So one of the big ways rightnow for the youth of America is
TikTok.
I've been a huge TikTok app fan.
(37:04):
I've used TikTok.
I've made some funny videosGood chance.
If you follow me on socialmedia, you've probably seen a
few of them.
I deleted it completely from myphone.
There was a little study thatcame out that talked about they
literally will grab pretty muchall your data.
I mean everything you put onyour clipboard your pictures,
your location data.
They can access all of itthrough TikTok.
So delete it off your phone ifyou have it.
(37:25):
All of it through TikTok, sodelete it off your phone if you
have it.
The State Department isprobably going and I played this
clip yesterday but the StateDepartment is probably going to
make it so that no one can haveTikTok in the United States.
India has done that and a fewother countries are following
suit.
It's a big deal.
I mean China's hacking networks, China's hacking the credit
unions and a lot of times wethink, well, what are they going
(37:47):
to do with it?
Right, it's China.
What can they do?
Well, with online, they couldbuy things.
They could take your moneyright out of your bank account
and you know, good luck gettingit back if it gets transferred
to a Hong Kong account.
Right, I mean, there's so manyimplications on what they could
do.
The national security law thatthey just passed that's become a
big deal in Hong Kong.
The national security law, theway it's written is any person
(38:15):
in the world who says negativethings about the CCP so me,
right here right now on thispodcast they could detain me for
life.
They have no.
The way their national securitylaw is written, there's no
jurisdiction.
They could go after Mike Pompeo, donald Trump.
They could go after anyone,anyone, and if they get control,
they will.
If the Democrats win, they will.
I mean there's no doubt there'sgoing to be retribution on
conservatives.
Think about that for just asecond.
(38:35):
Anytime in world history whereyou've had a time where a
population is so divided like we, are so polarized, and
especially when one side is soemotional about it specifically
the left they're so emotionalabout the quote-unquote
injustices of our history andthings like that that they will
hurt you If they gain power.
They will hurt you, they willsend you to a gulag, they will
(38:59):
do horrible things to you andyou don't believe it, but it's
true.
There's this old phrase it'swhen a politician tells you
something that's you know,believe them.
Especially when they're crazy,like when they're off the norm,
it means they really believe it.
Here is city councilwomanKashama Sawant, so I've talked
about her quite a bit inrelation to Chaz.
(39:21):
She's from India, she's animmigrant, she was part of the
Maoist Communist Party there.
She's a devout communist,basically a Marxist or Maoist.
And they just passed a specialtax in the city of Seattle that
really goes after the wealthy,specifically Amazon.
I mean, this is a huge tax onAmazon and they got it passed
(39:42):
and typically when somethinglike this happens in the city of
Seattle, jeff Bezos, who baseshis company Amazon right out of
Seattle, flexes his muscle,throws some money around, throws
some campaigns around and getsthese things overturned.
We've had things like headtaxes be protested by
construction workers.
Amazon discontinued allconstruction and remodeling on
all of their buildings for atime period until they revoke
(40:03):
the head tax.
So there's been a constantstring between Jeff Bezos and
the Seattle City Council becausethey basically are trying to
punish Jeff Bezos for beingwealthy.
And listen to what CouncilwomanKashama Sawant is saying about
basically everything.
This is pretty incredible.
The audio is not great, butthis is during a council meeting
(40:26):
, so this is actually comingfrom the city of Seattle.
This is their recording andthis is relating to CB 119810,
an ordinance relating totaxation.
So these are CouncilwomanKashama's words on that, or
words to Jeff Bezos.
Speaker 3 (40:42):
I have a message for Jeff Bezos and his class.
If you attempt again tooverturn the Notice how she says
his class right.
Speaker 2 (40:52):
She's Marxist, so she's doing the class warfare
thing.
It's the dictatorship of theproletariat, the workers right.
They want to overthrow thebourgeoisie, the elite.
So she's using the language ofMarxism a ton here.
Speaker 3 (41:18):
Amazon tax Working people will go all language of
Marxism a ton here.
And if you, jeff Bezos, want todrive that process forward by
lashing out against us in ourmodest demands, then so be it,
because we are coming for youand your rotten system.
We are coming to dismantle thisdeeply oppressive, racist,
(41:38):
sexist, violent, utterlybankrupt system of capitalism,
this police state.
We cannot and will not stopuntil we overthrow it and
replace it with a world basedinstead on solidarity, genuine
democracy and equality, asocialist world.
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (41:59):
You got to take them kind of serious.
I mean, she was a politicalleader of Chaz, an autonomous
zone that caused tons ofproperty damage, tons of murder.
She's got, obviously, thousandsof working people will rise up
and take it.
Is that the rioters?
Right, I mean, she's talkingabout laying the groundwork for
(42:21):
a new world.
How'd she get elected to citycouncil?
This kind of goes to my biggertheme.
Right, you got to know whothese people are.
We elect people and we look at,like a national ticket, right,
the down ballot voting.
If you're going to vote forDonald Trump, you just vote for
everybody with an R in front oftheir name.
If you're going to vote forBarack Obama, you vote for
(42:43):
everybody with a D in front ofyour name.
This is one of the challengesof having a popularity contest
as our national elections,because the down ballot becomes
scary, right, I mean, whenBarack Obama's getting elected,
look at who's getting elected onthe down ballots.
I mean you've got women likethis councilwoman, kashama
Sawant.
Look, I live in Seattle.
(43:05):
There's a lot of Bernie bros,there's a lot of, like you know,
socialists, but I don'tpersonally know anyone that's
not off their rocker, that wantsto burn down the system, that
wants to get rid of the Bill ofRights, that wants to get rid of
the Constitution, that wants toget rid of capitalism.
I mean, let's just listen to itagain.
It's a minute.
Speaker 3 (43:27):
It's a minute.
It's a minute.
Listen to it again.
I have a message for Jeff Bezosand his class If you attempt
again to overturn the Amazon tax, working people will go all out
in the thousands to defeat youand we will not stop there,
because, you see, we arefighting for far more than this
tax.
We are preparing the ground fora different kind of society,
and if you, jeff Bezos, want todrive that process forward by
(43:51):
lashing out against us in ourmodest demands, then so be it,
because we are coming for youand your rotten system.
We are coming to dismantle thisdeeply oppressive, racist,
sexist, violent, utterlybankrupt system of capitalism,
this police state.
We cannot and will not stopuntil we overthrow it and
(44:14):
replace it with a world basedinstead on solidarity, genuine
democracy and equality, asocialist world.
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (44:24):
It's so hard for me to listen to that stuff because
I just can't always figure outexactly what it's like.
Man, this racist system, thishorrible system that you
immigrated to.
I mean, you can go back toIndia anytime you want, right?
It's really something else.
Here's another one.
This is Rep Ilhan Omar.
Now, again, she's elected,she's actually in office, she
(44:45):
actually has a base.
She got there, right, she gotthere.
How'd she get there?
Listen to this.
This is, again, unbelievable.
Speaker 6 (44:56):
As long as our economy and political systems
prioritize profit withoutconsidering who is profiting,
who is being shut out?
Speaker 2 (45:08):
we will perpetuate.
I missed the beginning of thevideo, so I'm going to go back
to the beginning here.
Actually, no, I didn't, Ishould have just let it play.
It's not a long video.
Speaker 6 (45:17):
As long as our economy and political systems
prioritize profit withoutconsidering who is profiting,
who is being shut out, we willperpetuate this inequality.
So we cannot stop at criminaljustice system.
We must begin the work ofdismantling the whole system of
(45:40):
oppression, wherever we find it.
Speaker 2 (45:44):
They want to dismantle the whole system of
oppression which is the UnitedStates.
Now, in fairness, in fairness,in the last 15, basically since
9-11, the United States has notbeen great around the world, I
mean especially in the MiddleEast.
So it's kind of one of thosefunny deals.
The actual peasants of theMiddle East love America because
(46:05):
we defended them against ISIS,but the elites and the upper
middle class of the Middle Easthate America.
Why?
Because they're educated andthey know that we were there
under false pretenses.
Pretenses, it's kind of not awhole lot different than the DOJ
going after the president.
Shouldn't have been there inthe first place, right?
You're going to charge him withobstruction of justice.
(46:25):
Shouldn't have been looking athim in the first place.
There shouldn't have been therein the first place, right,
You're going to charge them withobstruction of justice.
Shouldn't have been looking atthem in the first place.
There shouldn't have beenanything to obstruct.
Well, it's the same thing.
We shouldn't be in the MiddleEast.
We shouldn't have bombed theirschools and their bridges and
their water treatment facilitiesand their power plants and all
those things, right, In thebeginning of 2001 to 2005, when
we were just bomb crazy, weshouldn't have done that,
(46:46):
Shouldn't have done it.
It was all false pretenses andthe smart people in the Middle
East know that, and so they'veorganized against us.
Now the peasants might love usbecause they view us as
liberators.
But again, different worldviews, right, Different paradigms.
Ilhan Omar has been convincedby the elites who have
bankrolled her people from Qatar.
She's considered the jewel ofQatar, even though she's from
Somalia.
(47:07):
They got a Muslim who'sdedicated to overthrowing the US
government into government.
She married her brother.
She committed illegalimmigration fraud.
She married her campaign person.
She paid her campaign personover $868,000.
She should be arrested.
She should be in jail.
She should be in jail.
(47:27):
But you know political capital,son of a gun.
Once you got it, it's hard forpeople to go against you.
Okay, George Soros, let's touchon him again.
You may remember this as alittle video.
They painted Black Lives Matteron the road in California, in
Costa County, California.
The Costa County Californiadistrict attorney.
(47:48):
Her name is Deanna Beck-Con-Ton.
Now, keep in mind.
Black Lives Matter came in.
They painted the road.
I don't know if they had apermit or not who the frick
knows?
Probably not but they did.
They painted Black Lives Matteron the road and some concerned
citizen came by and painted overthe permit, painted over Black
(48:08):
Lives Matter.
Oh, they did have a permit tosupport this.
They painted over Black LivesMatter.
Obviously, Black Lives Matter ispretty bad.
I mean, you're starting to seeit.
Terry Crews yesterday or twodays ago on CNN talked about it.
Anybody who looks into itreally quickly realizes it's
totally a Marxist setup, right?
Anyways, this district attorneyis now charging this woman and
(48:32):
how convenient.
She just happens to be anotherone of these George Soros-backed
DAs.
This is so deep.
She is a county districtattorney and she is funded by
George Soros.
And she's now charging thiswoman with a hate crime for
painting over Black Lives Matter.
You know, it just makes youwonder, right, it just makes you
(48:54):
question things.
Another thing that came up and Itweeted this out last night.
I put Mom, you were right.
When I used to drive around asa kid, my mom would listen to
Rush Limbaugh, sometimes onclimate change.
It was an up-and-coming topic.
It had been around for a longtime.
It had been around.
When my mom was a kid it hadbeen debunked.
When she was a kid, it wasmostly about population control.
When she was younger, she usedto tell me the world is always
(49:16):
going through weather phases,climate phases it's always
changing.
She told me climate change isjust a big scam, and she was
right.
In fact, here you have MichaelSchlenberger, who wrote a book
about it.
He's been a climate activistfor years and years.
So this is a news report out ofNew Zealand, and New Zealand is
part of the Five Eyes Network.
(49:38):
The Five Eyes Network are theAnglophone countries, so
Australia, Canada, Britain, USAand New Zealand.
All of us are native Englishspeakers, and after World War II
, we saw the damage that thecommunists were doing in Russia.
We never didn't defeat them.
We saw what Mao was starting todo in China.
We saw the imperialistenterprise of Japan.
(49:58):
We saw fascism in Europe and inItaly, and so we decided those
five countries all come from youknow democratic backgrounds,
they all are Christian, and sowe decided we have to stick
together.
And so we created a spy networkcalled the Five Eyes and we
share intelligence at thehighest levels and essentially,
if Australia spies on you, theUS spied on you.
(50:19):
I mean, we share intelligencehighly.
So New Zealand has people whoare really about liberty, and
it's pretty interesting, Anyways.
So listen to this.
This is on Sky News and this isa little bit of a book review
about this climate activistwho's basically come clean.
Speaker 5 (50:38):
I haven't heard one single apology following the
story last week by MichaelSchellenberger.
He admitted he wanted to quoteformally apologise for the
climate scare we created that'senvironmentalists over the past
30 years.
He said I've been a climateactivist for 20 years and an
environmentalist for 30.
Of climate change, he said, Iquote, it's not even our most
(51:00):
serious environmental problem.
And he said I feel anobligation to apologise for how
badly we environmentalists havemisled the public.
He said climate change is notmaking natural disasters worse.
He said the build-up of woodfuel and more houses near
forests, not climate change,explains why there are more and
(51:21):
more dangerous fires inAustralia and California.
He said wood fuel is far worsefor people and wildlife than
fossil fuels.
Schellenberger wrote, and Iquote until last year I mostly
avoided speaking out against theclimate scare, partly because I
was embarrassed, but mostly Iwas scared.
He said I remained quiet aboutthe climate disinformation
(51:44):
campaign because I was afraid oflosing friends and funding.
So he's written a bookApocalypse Never why.
Environmental Alarmism Hurts UsAll.
And he writes reality bites.
Once you realise how badlymisinformed we've been, often by
people with plainly unsavourymotivations, it's hard not to
feel duped.
(52:04):
And he says the evidence isoverwhelming that our
high-energy civilisation isbetter motivations.
It's hard not to feel duped.
And he says the evidence isoverwhelming that our high
energy civilization is betterfor people and nature than the
low energy civilization thatclimate alarmists would return
us to.
And tellingly, he writes I hopeyou'll accept my apology.
Speaker 2 (52:22):
So that was one of the leading climate activists
over the last 20 years who haswritten this tell-all book and
said, yeah, it's all a scam.
And not only is it all a scam,we know it's a scam.
The religion of climate changeis ending.
Think about all the Green NewDeal.
Think about Ocasio-Cortez andIlhan Omar and the squad and
think about the push for theGreen New Deal and what that is.
(52:45):
Remember when the Green NewDeal came out, republicans
quickly picked it apart and saidthis isn't about the
environment.
This is about changing theeconomy.
This is about upturningcapitalism.
It's coming from the samepeople now that are telling us
to defund our police and teardown the system.
Believe them when they tell usthey're going to do those
extreme things.
Believe Council Member Sawant.
Believe Ilhan Omar.
(53:08):
They are working from inside.
They are working from without.
Foreign entities arebankrolling this and organizing
it Internally.
These mobs that are runningaround.
These are shock troopers forthese socialists.
Guys, it's in our faces.
On one hand, we've got greatnews coming out of the DOJ.
Conservative Treehouse brokethis case wide open.
(53:30):
They've showed the collusionwithin the DOJ.
I mean dozens and dozens ofpeople need to go to jail in the
DOJ and the FBI for their rolesin spying on the Trump
administration for the coup plot.
It goes on and on.
George Soros funding peopleeven at the low county levels to
prevent criminals from gettinglocked up to get bail.
(53:52):
Reforms to create some type ofutopic society where there's no
police, which just means he whohas the gun and is willing to
pull the trigger rules the world.
This is scary, and we're in anuclear world too.
We can't have kinetic wars.
Kinetic wars will be disastrous.
If you live near a major city,good chance you're going to get
(54:14):
nuked, good chance there's goingto be an EMP.
That's another thing.
I don't know if I've read that,but there's serious threat of
an EMP from China.
That was pretty much ignoreduntil Donald Trump started to
reinforce our infrastructure.
But there's been a fightbetween the utilities and the
government as to who's going topay for reinforcing our
infrastructure to survivethrough an EMP attack.
Man, crazy stuff.
(54:37):
Another thing that came outyesterday is we found out John
Roberts was hospitalized lastmonth, which really was only
like a week ago.
Was hospitalized last monthbecause he fell while working
out.
Now, back a handful of yearsago, john Roberts had a couple
seizures that caused a fall, buthe hasn't had any seizures
since then.
They say that this fall wasn'tcaused by seizures.
He just essentially tripped,but it required a couple sutures
(54:58):
and he stayed overnight in thehospital.
When I saw this, I thought tomyself you know what this is?
John Roberts' exit ramp.
Ghislaine Maxwell's in jail.
John Roberts flew on the LolitaExpress and went down to
Epstein's Island in theCaribbean.
That's right, the Supreme CourtJustice of the United States,
where the buck stops.
The sovereign, the leader ofthe independent branch of the
(55:18):
judiciary, right the sameSupreme Court who decided a
presidential election when itcame down to a recount.
That Supreme Court justice,justice John Roberts, is
compromised by this Epsteinstuff.
He should at minimum recusehimself with anything to do with
Epstein, anything to do witheven Donald Trump, really.
But he won't.
(55:42):
But this might be an off-rampfor him.
This might be the precursor toinjuries that cause him to leave
.
Maybe another fall.
Any number of things couldhappen here.
So I look at this as apotential off-ramp for Justice
Roberts.
I don't think it's a coincidencethat we're getting the news
reporting on it now.
The Supreme Court basically hasto fess up to these kind of
things, but we'll see how itshakes out.
(56:05):
I mean, if he leaves, that's areally good thing in many
regards.
Another thing that just brokethis morning the Supreme Court
decided on the case with theCatholic nuns that they can this
is an Obamacare case that theycan basically be exempt from
Obamacare because they don'twant to do the contraceptive
requirements of Obamacarebecause of their religious
(56:27):
beliefs.
The Supreme Court upheld theirright to basically opt out.
So that's actually really goodnews.
So that's good.
All right, guys, that's ourshow today Lots of stuff
happening, lots of good stuff,and I appreciate your time.
We'll talk to you againtomorrow, don't forget.
You can reach out to me at thePeasants, at PeasantsPod on
Twitter, at PeasantsPod onParler, at the Peasants
(56:49):
Perspective on Facebook, and youcan email me at thepeasantspod
at gmailcom or peasantspod atgmailcom.
All right, I look forward totalking to you tomorrow who are
the britons?
Speaker 1 (57:07):
we all are.
We are all britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we're an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only only people would,please, please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
(57:30):
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of pure internalaffairs, be quiet.
(57:51):
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet, allright, who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become the king.
Who are you to become king then?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
(58:13):
signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
(58:34):
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistenistened bint had logged ascimitar at me, they put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
(58:55):
Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.