The Common Man's Guide to Understanding Political Corruption

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.

(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Hello peasants, welcome toanother episode of Peasants
Perspective.
You can find me on Twitter, atPeasantsPod, at
PeasantsPodOnParlor.
At Facebook, you can find me atthe Peasants Perspective and

(01:01):
you can email me at PeasantsPodat gmailcom.
Feel free to leave a review.
Hey, whoever left that one-starreview without telling me why?
One star?
Come on, man, was the audio bad?
What's going on?
Anyways, if you'd like to goleave a review, four and five
stars, please come on.
I put a lot of effort into thisthing.
It's like really early in themorning.
I'm even wearing my cowboy hattoday, which it's not a nobody

(01:26):
gets the pleasure of seeing it.
Okay, on to the show today.
Yesterday we talked aboutGhislaine Maxwell and we talked
about Wayfair.
Now I don't want to.
One thing that is kind of easyto do is to try to get.
You know, get off into theweeds, get off into the going
out and trying to find everylink and going out and trying to
find every little connectionand stuff like that.
I don't particularly like toget out into the weeds.
I like to research something,especially when it's salacious,
like Pizzagate or, you know,pedovores, things like that.

(01:49):
I try not to get into thedetails and all the sword
pictures and the just.
There's a dark, horrible sideof this that will repel any
decent person quickly to notwant to continue looking and
make you angry and make youresolute to vote for anyone
who's willing to fight againstthis above all other causes.
But but at the same time it canbe a rabbit hole and there is

(02:10):
disinformation abounding.
So that's another thing too.
One of the things us peasantsfall victim to is disinformation
.
Since I've started doing theshow, I get sent a lot of links,
a lot of little videos, a lotof memes, a lot, of, a lot of
different things, and not all ofthem, but there's been a
handful of things, stuff that Ihave even fallen for.
I've even forwarded on a few, afew things that I've had to go

(02:32):
back and say, hey, it turns outthat was fake.
I've even been called out onTwitter once or twice for for
you know, retweeting somethingthat was essentially fake or
doctored or something like that.
So it's always good to go checkand, as peasants, when we're
wrong we only have theinformation that's in front of
us.
When we're wrong, we getcorrected and we just need to
adjust our paradigm and move on.
I was talking to my wife lastnight.
One of the great positions thatI'm in right now as a human

(02:54):
being is I don't have to defendanybody, like no one else.
Being a good person or a badperson makes any difference to
me If Bill and Hillary Clintonare completely falsely accused
and it's just been a 40-yearpsyop against them from their
political opposition, which iswhat they would like you to
believe.
If that proves to be true, Idon't know how they would prove
it at this point, but if thatproved to be true, forgive them

(03:16):
and move on is what it is, right.
I mean there's lots ofcharacters in history that get
demonized.
It's like what's the differencebetween a terrorist and a
founding father?
Well, it's whether they won ornot, right.
I mean, that's really the wayyou look at it.
I mean, look at England theystill talk about the you know,
the Revolutionary War.
What do they call it?
The War of Rebellion.

(03:36):
No, that's what they call theSouth, I can't remember, but
they have a different name forit in Britain the Revolutionary
War.
Right, because they viewed usas traitors, they viewed us as
seditious, they viewed us, asyou know, wrong.
I mean, it's just the way itworks.
So, anyways, as peasants, wegot to get fact-checked from
time to time.
Now the fact-checkers onFacebook are horrible.
Don't trust them at all.
They're horrible.

(03:57):
They're just blatantly wrong.
So again we're back into thiscircle where we have to to just
conglomerate information.
One time I think I mentionedthis once before on the podcast,
but I heard Rod Rosenstein, whoI do not admire, say that he
gave his daughter some adviceabout information and he said

(04:17):
read broadly, get as much of theinformation as possible, and
then you can usually triangulateto the truth when the DOJ leaks
, for example, the FBI leaks.
One of the things we've seen asa Russiagate has unfolded is
they would take information andthey would break it up, and then
they would leak a little bit tothe Wall Street Journal, a
little bit to the WashingtonPost, a little bit to the New
York Times and then between thethree stories you could kind of
pull together whatever it wasthat was leaked or, you know,
figure out who the source was,whatever.

(04:38):
But that was Rod Rosenstein'sadvice and I have found that
advice for me to work very well.
The other thing is to informyourself with history.
History repeats itself if wedon't learn from it.
I mean, we are going through aMaoist revolution, we're going
through a 1930s domestically,like with Hitler and the brown
shirts, and I would actuallyventure to say that, as far as

(04:59):
like historical context, we'reprobably close to 1943,
somewhere between 1939 and 1943.
As far as world aggression,we're not in a hot war, but we
are around the world.
We're in a lot of proxy wars,believe it or not.
Okay, so let's jump in.
I want to cover a couple thingsdealing with Wayfarer Galene
Maxwell, and then I want tointroduce another character to
this story.
Now remember one of the thingsyou can always ask yourself, and

(05:23):
this is a little bit of like aQ-ism.
So now, remember one of thethings you can always ask
yourself, and this is a littlebit of like a Q-ism, which you
know, I do not believe in Q, I'mnot going to defend Q.
I have a strong opinion aboutwhat Q is, who Q is, and I think
I that are sending these peopleto Gitmo.

(05:44):
I don't believe it for a second.
I don't believe it.
Sorry, if they're on TV andtalking, they're alive, they're
real.
It's just the way I believe it.
I don't think that you can putbody doubles out there and
things like that and get awaywith it.
I think that doesn't servejustice and if we administer
justice that way in secret, thenwe are a third world country.

(06:07):
I mean, we're there, we're done.
Even if Trump's doing it, itdoesn't matter, it's over.
I mean, the next time a liberalgets in office or someone
that's not of your ideology,look out, look out.
There's going to be retributionif this isn't done by the book
and done correctly.
So I have real concerns withsome of the stuff, the
conspiracies or some of thethings that are thrown out there

(06:27):
.
I think they're just outrightfaults.
Okay, let me read you somethinghere.
So well, actually we're goingto watch this video.
So this is a video thatsomebody dug up yesterday and
this is an old video.
This has been around for alittle while and this group that
posted this was trying to getthis to the attention of

(06:50):
somebody because it just seemedwrong.
It seemed awkward, and when yougo look, there's a lot of other
interesting video fromsuspected people that's very
similar.
You've got a John Podesta videothat's real similar to this.
Anyways, let's listen to thisvideo.
So what this is, this is alittle girl and she's just, you
know, little girl.
She's in a house, there's alittle baby doll on a sectional
sofa and she starts out standingbehind like a bookshelf kind of

(07:13):
thing, and she's kind of beingguided by her parent and then
she's quoting a poem that's kindof an adult poem.
Okay, so just listen to this.

Speaker 4 (07:25):
Button, nose hang on hey, not button.
I don't have a button nose, doI?

Speaker 5 (07:32):
Stand very still.
I'm going to try and get all ofyou in.

Speaker 2 (07:35):
So she's describing her body right, I don't have a
button nose and then the camerabacks up and it shows her.
She's wearing cute littlecoverall shorts, little green
shirt.

Speaker 5 (07:45):
Ready.
She's wearing cute littlecoverall overall coverall short
overall shorts.
Little green shirt, ready,ready to play Go ahead.

Speaker 2 (07:50):
Now she jumps over on the couch, does a little
cartwheel.
Now she picks up this littlebaby and she feeds it a toy
bottle.
She can't get the bottle in thebaby's mouth a.

Speaker 5 (08:05):
Fine example of true opulence.
But surely the price on thisRegency-style sofa can't be
correct.

Speaker 4 (08:16):
With Wayfair, it can.

Speaker 2 (08:19):
Okay, did you catch that With this Regency-style
sofa right?
And then the girl puts her armsout wide and says with Wayfair,
it can.
This isn't a Wayfair commercial.
What is this?
What is this Right, given theaccusation against Wayfair that
they're packing kids up in theselockers, or even if they're not
, okay?
You've got this British womanbehind the camera having this

(08:44):
girl right prance around andthen do a little baby act on the
couch, and then they quote thispoem and then girl puts her arm
out and says with Wayfair, youcan.
So you've got this interestingBritish woman talking to a child
mentioning Wayfair Don't reallylove that, right.

(09:04):
And so let's listen toGhislaine Maxwell's voice, just
so we can have a little bit of acomparison here.
I think it's worth it.
So here's a quick recording ofGhislaine Maxwell.
Okay, so this is just hertalking about being a submarine
pilot, basically at the UN,Started when I was a little girl
.

Speaker 5 (09:21):
I grew up watching Jacques Cousteau on TV and
became mesmerized with theoceans.
It led to me was a little girl.
I grew up watching JacquesCousteau on TV and became
mesmerized with the oceans.
It led to me becoming a deepworker, submersible pilot and
ultimately, on one of my firstdives, when I went down expect.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
Okay.
So the only reason I playedthat was I just wanted you to
hear her voice for a second.
So she's just got a Britishvoice.
No big deal, not a big deal atall, right, I mean, you can only
read in so far if you want to,but that's interesting.
So British woman talking to alittle girl advertising a sofa
says the name of the sofa.
The little girl says you know,only at Wayfair.

(09:54):
So that's kind of interesting.
Okay, so we're connectingGhislaine to Wayfair and then a
little.
Another piece of supportingevidence is I've got right,
ghislaine Maxwell, who isstanding next to in a photo.
No big deal again, becausephotos are just photos, right?
I mean, if you go to a bigparty or get together with a
bunch of mucky mucks and who todo's, group photos are common.

(10:14):
So just because you see a groupphoto with someone, it doesn't
necessarily mean they're linkedup or they're in business
together.
It just means they attended afundraiser or dinner or a party
or whatever.
Okay, but nonetheless it doesmean that there's an affiliation
, they've crossed paths.
They probably know people incommon.
So here's just an interestingpicture, a candid picture of
Bill Hutcherson.
Now, who's Bill Hutcherson?

(10:35):
Remember the names?
He is the president ofoperations at Wayfair standing
next to Ghislaine Maxwell.
So here we have another littleconnection.
You've got Ghislaine Maxwellconnected with Wayfair.
You've got this problematicvideo that looks like it may be,
you know, one of the anadvertisement for one of these
high priced pieces of furniturewith a kid associated with it.
I mean very odd.

(10:56):
The kid, by the way, was couldnot have been more than six or
seven years old.
I mean right in that age groupfive to seven, somewhere in that
age group.
Okay, so there's that.
Now let's talk a little bitmore about Wayfair and Ghislaine
Maxwell.
So they're connected, right, wesee some affiliation there and
I think there's some otherevidence floating around that
I've seen that.
I just didn't drag up for thisparticular podcast.

(11:18):
But here we have another littleinteresting thing Now.
This comes from motherjonescom.
Now, mother Jones is a it'sabout as far left as Breitbart
is far right.
So if you read Breitbart news,then there's a good chance.
If you were on the left, you'dprobably read Mother Jones.
I mean it's.
I wouldn't put it in thecategory of like, salacious or
extreme, I would just put it inthe category of left.
Well, this particular articlecomes all the way back into 2012

(11:41):
.
So 2012,.
What was happening in 2012?
In 2012, mitt Romney wasrunning for president against
then President Barack Obama, andso, of course, as a
presidential candidate, peopleare going to go dig it into his
background.
And something that happenedaround that time frame I don't
know the exact time frame, butthis little thing called the
Panama Papers were released.

(12:02):
The Panama Papers essentiallydisclosed a lot of the banking
that was going on in Panama.
As you know, panama has a lotof international banking and the
main reason for that is theydon't do any extradition.
So when countries don't do anyextradition whatsoever, they
generally do that to appeasetheir bankers, because bankers
don't want to be.
If they need to run forreprieve or they want to hide

(12:22):
their money, they do it inPanama, because Panama just
doesn't participate with othercountries when it comes to law
enforcement of pretty muchanything.
There's a couple of othercountries like that, right, you
got the Cayman Islands, you gotyou know there's a handful of
spots where you're going to getmoney, international money
accumulating, because it's taxshelter, tax haven, easy to hide
a lot of reasons.

(12:45):
So, anyways, the Panama Paperskind of disclosed a lot of the
people who had money in Panamaand during that investigation,
mother Jones dug into Romney.
So let me read you a little bitof this.
So some of the sorts of shadyclients have been a part of
Romney's portfolio at Bain.
Nicholas Shaxson has written oneof the most comprehensive
stories about Romney's offshoreinvestments in a lengthy article

(13:05):
in the August issue of VanityFair.
So on Vanity Fair this ismentioned and I'm, of course,
reading it out of Mother Jones.
It explored the name of some.
It explored the nature of someof Romney's early Bain investors
.
So why does it matter that welook at his early Bain investors
?
Being someone who's started afew businesses as well as bought
a business, I can tell you thisyou need investors, and those

(13:26):
investors that go in with youearly that are investing capital
into someone that's untrustedor a new business venture you
know them personally.
This is not a situation whereyou just go out and apply for
some kind of blanket line ofcredit at your local Wells Fargo
.
That's not what this is.
This is going out and findingaccredited investors, giving
them a sales pitch, meeting withthem, you know, determining how

(13:47):
much money they're going toinvest, all that kind of stuff.
So initial investors,especially in something like a
hedge fund.
These people are personallyinvolved, so it matters.
This isn't.
You know, this isn't DonaldTrump being invested in HQC,
where he has $15,000 invested ina mutual fund which is then
divested into another mutualfund that then has, you know, 15
cents of shares in HQC.
And then people accuse DonaldTrump of promoting

(14:09):
hydroxychloroquine because hehas a financial interest in the
drug company.
It's just kind of like beyondbelief.
So you're telling me over 15cents worth of potential shares
in this company that makes HQC.
Donald Trump is corrupt andit's through two layers of
mutual funds and nobody knowswhat mutual funds invest in,
except for the guys thatactually make the investments.
So that's kind of unreasonable,right?
But we're not talking aboutthat.

(14:29):
We're talking about actualinvestors in your investment
company, bain Capital.
So who are these people?
They included late Czech bornBritish media tycoon.
Okay, I hope you're sittingdown.
I hope you're sitting down.
Who could this late Czech-bornBritish media tycoon be?
Who could it possibly be?
His name was Robert Maxwell.

(14:52):
Oh, who's Robert Maxwell?
He's the father of GhislaineMaxwell.
Robert Maxwell was a Mossad,which is Israel's CIA was a
Mossad agent.
He's buried on the Mount ofOlives After he suspiciously
died.
He drowned off the coast ofEngland.
Off his yacht he was taken byIsrael and given a state burial.

(15:15):
Essentially, nobody knew he wasMossad until after he died.
What would he possibly havebeen doing?
He was a rich financier, mediamogul and he was an agent of
Israel.
A lot of people think thatEpstein was just the construct
for the Maxwells, that GhislaineMaxwell kept on with her
father's business.
A lot of exposés and thingslike to paint Ghislaine Maxwell

(15:38):
as lost after her father's death, not knowing what to do, you
know, running around for a fewyears until she finally linked
up with Epstein.
I don't think that's true.
I don't think that's true.
I think, more than anythingelse, ghislaine Maxwell
continued on in her father'sbusiness.
You know, it seems a littleunreasonable to me.
What she got involved withlater in life didn't stem from

(15:59):
what she was involved withearlier with her father.
It's possible she was a victimherself.
I mean, who knows?
But nonetheless, here you havedirect connection between
Ghislaine Maxwell's father,robert Maxwell, and the article
continues a fraudster, notorioustax evader, who put $2 million
into one of Romney's first Bainfunds, as well as a trio of

(16:19):
anonymous corporations fromother notorious tax haven,
panama.
So he invested not only in BainCapital two million directly.
He also invested in a trio ofother corporations that Romney
had in Panama.
Other early investors,according to numerous new
accounts, were members of thewealthy Salvadorian oligarchy
with ties to right-wing deathsquads.
Romney has credited Salvadorianinvestors for helping him get

(16:41):
his company off the ground.
A significant amount of Romney'spersonal wealth is sequestered
in his deeply opaque financialsystem that not only caters to
the global uber rich, but isalso a leading cause of global
inequality.
The amount of money siphonedout of the US alone via tax
havens is staggering.
America corporations have nowestimated $1.7 trillion in
foreign profits stashed offshoreand beyond the reach of the IRS

(17:04):
.
According to various governmentestimates, america
multinational companies now keepat least 60% of their cash
offshore to avoid paying UStaxes.
That's all companies togetherAccording to.
So you know someone like MittRomney.
Mittens he might have a lotmore percentage of his money
held offshore.
According to a recent Senatereport, the Senate Permanent
Subcommittee on Investigationsfound that some companies, such

(17:25):
as Hewlett Packard and thepharmaceutical companies Johnson
Johnson, keep almost all theirmoney offshore and rely on
dubious methods to bring it backto the US without paying taxes.
Hp, according to the committee,uses an endless series of
short-term loans from itsoffshore accounts to its parent,
a move that has saved thecompany billions in taxes.
Romney, who has decried the 40years old, anyways, interesting,

(17:47):
right.
So you always ask yourself,like, why do people hate Donald
Trump so much?
Why do they go to such lengthsto impeach him, such lengths to
slander and smear him?
Right, and you go.
Well, it could be this.
They could just hate himideologically.
Come on, hate him ideologically.
They just got to wait anotherfour years, wait another eight
years.
Donald Trump could make somemistakes, right, you could

(18:08):
probably attack Donald Trumpdirectly on his policies, but
you can't attack him directly onhis policies when you've been
pushing, you know, policies thatdon't work for one for years
and years.
But also, when, how are yougoing to work with the guy who's
essentially trying to put yourentire organization out of
business?
So we approach this situationwith Mitt Romney, who has been,

(18:28):
you know, as far as a Republicangoes.
Him and Justin Amash and Toomeyare the biggest critics of
Donald Trump.
In fact, justin Amash left, oressentially was kicked out of
the Republican Party.
Justin Amash is involved in alot of foreign investments with
China, and Mitt Romney voted oneof his votes was against Donald
Trump to remove him from office, which you know.

(18:49):
Had he had a couple moredefectors on the Republican side
, they would have removed thepresident from office, which,
keep in mind, they were goingafter Ukraine.
I just want to mention Ukrainereal quick because we're going
to touch on that a little bitlater.
So again, mitt Romney, directlyinvolved with Ghislaine
Maxwell's father as an investorand directly involved with

(19:11):
Wayfair.
How was he involved in Wayfair?
Well, that brings me to my nexttopic.
So Wayfair has a nice littleoffice in LA.
It has a couple offices around,but it has this particular
office is down in LA and thisoffice is surrounded is a is a
Wayfair office.
Hold on, I got to find it herereal quick, okay, so this has a

(19:32):
Wayfair building, one of theircorporate buildings, okay, and
it was financed by a companycalled Bain Capital.
So Bain Capital holds themortgage on this Wayfair
building.
So now Bain Capital, which is,was founded by Mitt Romney.
I'm not sure if he runs it oris divested from it.
I'm not 100% sure, but thisobviously predated him running
for office again and gettingelected.
So he probably did control thisinvestment or at least have

(19:53):
some say.
And they also have a officenext door.
Wow, okay, again, theseconnections are getting closer
and closer and closer.
Bain Capital was funded byGhislaine's father.
Ghislaine is involved inWayfair.
Wayfair has created at leastone mortgage for one building,
for one Wayfair center with aoperation next door.

(20:14):
And then next door to both ofthose offices are a couple
different children's hospitals.
Again, now we're getting closeto kids.
I don't think this thing'sdebunked.
I mean, depending on who youlook at on social media, you
know you almost goes right intothe narrative, right, if you're
hardcore left, then you thinkthat you're.

(20:34):
You know this is all justinnocent nothingness.
And if you're a little bit moreinclined to believe in the
pizza gate type of things, thenyou know evidence just lines up
a little too close in my opinion.
Okay, one other thing.
So last night in BothellWashington there was a police,
there was a shooting, and thisis actually quite sad.

(20:56):
I don't really love that thishappened.
But Bothell's north of Seattle,it's a little bit north east of
Seattle, it's across the LakeWashington which is Washington's
biggest bridge.
So last night an officer wentto do a traffic stop, just a
normal traffic stop, and therewas a small pursuit.
So I'll just, I'll let, I'lllet, I'll let, I'll let the

(21:18):
police officer kind of tell it.
Tell the story and then I'll,I'll, we'll listen to a reporter
this morning, after it's kindof wrapped up.
Tell the story and then I'll,I'll, we'll listen to a reporter
this morning after it's kind ofwrapped up.

Speaker 8 (21:26):
Thank you everybody for coming tonight.
Uh, I'm captain mike johnsonfrom the both police department
and I want to let let everybodyknow that the police activity
behind us is response to anofficer-involved shooting.
I can confirm one of ourofficers has been hit and is at
harbor view being treated andanother officer is deceased.
At time we're not identifyingthat officer.
The suspect is still at large.

(21:47):
He is armed and dangerous.
We're asking anyone with anyinformation to please call 911.
If you see something, saysomething.
The suspect is described as ablack male wearing a gray tank
top, baggy sweatpants, and awitness described his hair as
large afro.

Speaker 2 (22:05):
Okay, so you have a description of the suspect.
So last night.
There's a couple things I wantto touch on.
This is sad, this is tragic.
I I back the blue.
This is.
This is a horrible situationand the suspect has been caught.
So I'll jump ahead and talk alittle bit about the suspect.
He is one of these adamantblack lives matter protesters.

(22:25):
He's from all of the picturesthat have been surfacing of the
actual suspect.
He looks like a thug.
You know he's got pictures withhim with guns, pictures with
him with big wads of cash, Justwhat I would attribute to like
gang member type affiliation.
On top of the fact that theBlack Lives Matter stuff
Wouldn't be surprised if he wasinvolved in Chaz.
None of that would surprise meat all.
This is all very, very close.

(22:45):
I call it same side of thewater.
I live on the other side of thePuget Sound, so I call this the
same side of the water.
You can drive around by car allday long.
Get from Seattle to Bothell,From where Chaz was located to
Bothell at two in the morning isprobably only a 15-minute drive
through city, so you neverleave the city to go from
Seattle to Bothell.
This is sad.
So a little bit later this didresolve.

(23:07):
They did find the suspect.
He was actually hiding out on aroof.
So this is Denise Whitaker.
She's a local reporter for ComoNews and she's just kind of
wrapping up the story for usthis morning.

Speaker 7 (23:19):
Good morning, it is Tuesday.
I am in Bothell, right here atBothell Way, at the intersection
of 522, where police do havethings roped off after a tragic
shooting overnight.
Last night about 940 Bothellpolice officers were trying to
make a traffic stop.
There was an exchange ofgunfire after a short chase and
in the end one Bothell policeofficer is dead, another is in

(23:41):
the hospital and a person just acivilian on the sidewalk was
also hit by the man who wasaccused of shooting those police
officers as well.
The manhunt for that man wenton all night long and eventually
they were able to capture himhere in downtown Bothell
overnight.
He had been hiding all night,apparently on the rooftop of a

(24:01):
building, but he is now inpolice custody and the
investigation continues again,so tragic overnight, good
morning.

Speaker 2 (24:08):
So we've had a whole slew of things going on in
Seattle.
We had Chaz, we had shootingsin Chaz, we had rapes in Chaz,
we had all kinds of propertydamage and extortion and things
like that.
Jenny Durkin is being sued in aclass action lawsuit.
There's calls for her to resignon the right and left.
Some big advancement in thatthere was a court case that was
petitioned to a court in orderto recall Jenny Durkan.

(24:31):
That has been allowed toproceed, so she's able to be
recalled.
If they gather up, I think, 25%of the necessary signatures,
then there'll be an election.
So they need about 50,000signatures in the city of
Seattle to recall Jenny Durkinand I think they'll get it.
I think they'll get it becausepeople on the left are fed up
because she uses tear gas tostop protesters, which to me is

(24:52):
like.
But then on the other side, youknow there's there's the
conservative side that's likehey, you didn't protect the city
, so they're going to get those50,000 signatures.
I wouldn't be surprised if JennyDurkin gets ousted sometime
this year.
It just wouldn't surprise me atall.
People are really unhappy withher and she did not handle this
year well.
Now it's culminated in agunfight with a police officer.

(25:16):
You've got a police officerdead.
Now we're going to see if thestate and Bothell is going to
back the blue here if they'regoing to go after this guy and
throw the book at him.
Not only did he shoot a policeofficer, he shot a second police
officer and wounded him, who'sfighting for his life at the
hospital, and then additionallyshot a third person who was just
a bystander, someone walking,and who apparently is underage

(25:39):
because they're calling it achild.
So this is this is tragic.
I mean, it's just tragic.
And in light of all this, I'vehad to really go back and think
about some things and I'vetalked to a few of my friends
who are Democrats and liberalsand I've got this one guy that I
know he's a black guy and Iasked him just point Blake.

(25:59):
I said dude, who are you votingfor?
His response just caught me sooff guard.

Speaker 9 (26:03):
This is what he said I'm voting for Joe Biden because
he was Barack Obama's vicepresident.
I'm voting for Joe Bidenbecause he likes to walk up
behind women and grab them bythe neck and shoulders.
I'm voting for Joe Bidenbecause he likes to sniff little

(26:24):
girls' hair.
I'm voting for Joe BidenBecause he likes to sniff Little
girls hair.
I'm voting for Joe BidenBecause he's been in office For
over 43 years and ain't done adamn thing.
I'm voting for Joe BidenBecause he don't know the
difference Between his wife andhis sister.
I'm voting for Joe Biden Becausehe has no damn clue where he is

(26:48):
half the time.
I'm also voting for Joe Bidenbecause he cannot remember his
own name.
Oh, I'm also going to vote forJoe Biden because he supports

(27:12):
Black Lives Matter, thecommunists, the communist
organization.
I'm voting for Joe Bidenbecause he's going to make
everybody in his family rich andain't got to do a damn thing to
do it.
Mm, hmm, mm, hmm, mm, hmm.
And I'm voting for Joe Bidenbecause I think Donald Trump is

(27:40):
going to kick his ass.
Going to kick his ass.
Biden, biden, 2020.

Speaker 2 (27:55):
Okay, I'm just kidding, that's not my friend,
that's just a random video Ifound, but it's so true.
Everything he said is so true,right, every single person who's
supporting the liberals, theDemocrats right now.
I mean that's why they'revoting for Joe Biden.
There's all those reasons thatcould only be the.
I've never heard a guy speak somuch truth.
Basically, we're rallyingaround our guy.

(28:15):
I've seen so many of my leftfriends on social media post
things like vote blue, no matterwho Guys, vote blue, no matter
who is how we got here inAmerica.
It's how our inner cities havedecayed and crumbled and fallen.
Combine that with all theglobalists sending all of this
foreign aid money overseas andcondoning tax shelters all over

(28:35):
the planet.
I mean, gosh, you want to talkabout the draining of wealth?
What if we would have electedMitt Romney?
Would it have been anydifferent than Barack Obama?
Has Mitt Romney ever shown thedesire to create one single
American job?
Has he?
I mean, really, sure, sure,he's employed people, but the
real name of the game is justbuild a business and tear it

(28:56):
down.
Joe Biden, he never run abusiness.
He's never created anything inhis life.
He's never created anything butcorruption.
Which brings me to my nextthing.
So Joe Biden okay, joe Biden,it just gets old.
You know, joe Biden's just oneof those guys.
It's like I constantly askmyself like how did we get here?

(29:18):
How did we elect this guy as asenator over and over again?
And then how did we elect himas a vice president?
It just doesn't make any sense.
Now that the Biden-Bamapresidency is over, we're
starting to find out a lot ofthings.
Last night I had someone cometo my house and we had a real

(29:40):
long political talk over thedinner table and she mentioned a
lot of different things andshe's had her own issues with
some of the local government andsome of the oppressive rules
and things they have, and so wehad a long session just
complaining about localgovernance.
And then we started talkingabout Joe Biden and I started
mentioning what he had done inUkraine.

(30:02):
She had no idea what Joe Bidenhad done in Ukraine, and because
it's being totally unreportedby the media In fact, I've even
seen some things trying todebunk this, but it's not the
case.
So let me give you a very quickrundown.
I'm not going to get out intothe weeds and all the details,
but essentially here's what'sgoing on in Ukraine.
So Ukraine is known as one ofthe most corrupt countries on
earth, and so it attracts a lotof foreign investment.

(30:24):
Because corruption seems toattract foreign money.
Because when there's corruptionit means you can't track the
foreign money.
So Ukraine is constantlygetting foreign investors.
It's got a lot of foreignbusinesses that work in Eastern
Europe and Russia.
They're all staged out ofUkraine, including a company
called Burisma.
So Burisma is a natural gascompany, and the president,

(30:45):
owner, founder of Burisma,whatever you want to call it ran
for a political office inUkraine or was appointed.
I'm not exactly sure how he gotthere, but he got into a
political office where it washis job to issue natural gas
drilling licenses.
So, on behalf of the people ofUkraine, that resource that they
have, that's under their feetnatural gas the government gives
out permits to drill into thatnatural gas Not very different

(31:06):
than most of the Western worldwhere law and order rules,
except for the fact that youhave an owner of a natural gas
company running that department.
And what does he proceed to do?
He proceeds to give himself,his own company, a whole bunch
of natural gas permits,including.
So they gave him a whole bunchof natural gas permits.
So then they take it a stepfarther.
They get the president ofUkraine In order for this to

(31:26):
happen.
You know, they've got thepresident involved and the
president of Ukraine's name isPoroshenko.
So Poroshenko gets involved andhe basically allows this to
happen.
Simultaneously with this,poroshenkoko, along with his
American counterparts,specifically Joe Biden scheme to
nationalize a bank in Ukraine.

(31:46):
The bank is called Privat Bank,private bank as we would say it
in English.
So Privat Bank.
So Privat Bank, which isprivate bank, is a privately
owned bank.
It's a private bank that servesthe citizens of Ukraine, no
different than Wells Fargo KeyBank, bank of America U Key Bank
, bank of America US Bank.
A lot of the banks that we havein this country are private.
They're not nationalized banks,they're private banks.
So their policy, their savings,everything is determined by a

(32:10):
board of directors that'sappointed.
They have to respond to marketconditions.
Obviously, they're regulated,but they're private.
In Ukraine, with the help of JoeBiden and all the levers of
power that the president ofUkraine had, as well as the vice
president of America, theymanipulated the system in order
to nationalize Przhevot Bank.

(32:30):
So they nationalized it.
They took it from privateownership to national ownership.
This was opposed in Ukraine,but they did it for national
security reasons, to endcorruption, blah, blah, blah,
blah.
Well, what did they do?
So now Burisma's got this nicefancy gas lease license and what
they did was they charged asales tax on the gas, so all of

(32:53):
the gasoline in Ukraine, becauseof these gas licenses.
They started and theyprivatized this bank.
So they start taking all thesales tax from all the gas
licenses.
They started and theyprivatized this bank.
So they start taking all thesales tax from all the gas that
they're selling around Ukrainefor heating, for cars.
All the gas is getting throughBurisma, not just natural gas.
I guess they create this littlesales tax.
You know, a couple pennies onthe dollar, no big deal, right?
Well, it ends up putting over abillion and a half dollars in

(33:17):
Privat Bank that has just beennationalized, which means now
it's under nationalized control,government control, which meant
that Poroshenko was able to puthis people on the board.
And wouldn't you know it, therewas an accountant there that
was grifting off the sales taxand it funneled $1.5 billion
into Joe Biden and Poroshenko'shands dollars into Joe Biden and

(33:41):
Poroshenko's hands.
This got caught because in theprocess of doing this.
They wired the money throughCyprus and a few other places
and Cyprus is a known hub formoney laundering and for these
illegal internationaltransactions.
So they're kind of hip to thegig.
They've got a whole lawenforcement department just
looking at these financialtransfers.
And so Cyprus notified Ukraine,as well as US authorities
including.
They reached out to RudyGiuliani finally, because they

(34:01):
couldn't get the US to act on itand they said look, there's
obvious corruption with thismoney coming out of Pryvot Bank.
So they sent that back toUkraine.
And then you've got thisUkrainian prosecutor gets a hold
of it.
Ukrainian prosecutor looks atit, goes oh, this looks bad.
So he prepares a bunch ofsubpoenas for people at Burisma,
including Hunter Biden, joeBiden's son.
Why Hunter Biden?

(34:22):
Hunter Biden sits on the boardof Burisma Energy.
So Hunter Biden sitting on theboard of Burisma Energy, who's
getting illegal I got to gothrough this illegal permits
from the owner of Burisma who isa government employee now
granting himself these gascontracts.
And then you've got thepresident of Ukraine, in
collusion with Hunter Biden'sfather, joe Biden, the sitting

(34:44):
vice president of the UnitedStates, helping Poroshenko
nationalize a bank, create anaccount in that bank where they
grift off some of the sales taxmoney to the tune of 1.5 billion
, stolen straight out of thepocketbooks of Ukrainians who
worked for that money to put gasin their homes and gas in their
fuel tanks.
The prosecutor said this isn'tcool, so he initiated an

(35:05):
investigation towards themid-end of 2016.
The US found out about this.
The US starts calling Joe Biden, specifically starts calling
Poroshenko, and they startfiguring out how to make this
prosecutor go away.
There's no charge of corruption.
Prosecutor go away.
There's no charge of corruptionfor this prosecutor.
There's no reason why he shouldleave.
He's got the support ofparliament.
He's got the support of theUkrainian people.

(35:25):
In a recorded phone call,poroshenko reports back to Biden
that, as he was instructed, hepersonally went over to the
prosecutor and asked himpersonally to resign,
essentially demanded he resign,and he agreed to resign and he
did, and then he had to flee outof the country because there
were attempts on his life.
This is where that recording ofJoe Biden sitting at the

(35:46):
Atlantic Council saying oh, Itold him to fire the prosecutor
and in an hour, by golly, theydid it right.
You can call the president.
So the president was in on this.
Joe Biden implicates thepresident, so this was all
happening.
Then Donald Trump gets elected.
There's some recordings of JoeBiden and Poroshenko talking
about the election of DonaldTrump and what would happen
post-election, and how Joe Bidenwanted to hurry up and get

(36:06):
funneled through Privat Bank.
Of that billion dollar loan,which was given, by the way, 700
million of it got siphoned offinto different people, corrupt
people who took that money.

(36:26):
So the International MonetaryFund gave a loan to the people
of Ukraine, backed by theAmerican signatures, as in our
full faith and credit, as in, weco-signed on this loan that
then went to Privat Bank.
That then 700 of million of itgot funneled off for reasons
that it wasn't given for.
Okay, wow.
So Donald Trump gets electedand then all of a sudden, we

(36:48):
have an existential threatbecause you've got billions of
dollars in corruption in onespot in Ukraine, one spot in
Ukraine.
This isn't anything about the$1.5 billion housing contract
that Joe Biden's brother got inIraq.
If you've ever watched ArrestedDevelopment, that entire show
is based off Joe Biden's brother.
The entire basis of that showis you know, get this contract
to build houses in Iraq and thendidn't build any.

(37:08):
Okay, so that's Joe Biden'sbrother.
We're not even talking aboutthat.
We're just talking aboutUkraine and his son, hunter
Biden, and nationalizing a bankand foreign control over a
foreign sovereign country,specifically Ukraine, by, as the
Ukrainians call it, theirpuppet master, joe Biden.
Okay, so Donald Trump getselected, donald Trump makes a
nice little and then, at thesame time or in 2017, ukraine

(37:32):
votes out Poroshenko becausehe's corrupt.
He's corrupt.
So they vote out Poroshenko andthey vote a new guy who's never
run for politics before, who'sa comedian.
So they elect their own realitystar.
Just like we elected DonaldTrump.
Just like, down in Brazil, theyerected Bolsonaro.
Just like in Poland, they justelected their guy.
Right, there's a populist wavesweeping across the world right

(37:53):
now.
So, anyways, they elected thecomedian, donald Trump.
The comedian spoke and this iswhere you get the impeachment
and Donald Trump mentionsBurisma, hunter Biden and
CrowdStrike, which CrowdStrikewe'll have to get to at another
time.
Crowdstrike was the firm thatinvestigated the Democratic
National Convention hack and isthe entire basis of spying on

(38:13):
Donald Trump, and we'll find out.
Well, I'll just tell you nowCrowdStrike is partially owned
by George Soros, and you knowthat name, so he's everywhere,
and he's also involved inBurisma, so he's involved in
this foreign corruption as well.
So you get to this point, rightwith Ukraine, and it's just like
wow.
I'm just giving you a reallysimple rundown.

(38:33):
I'm not even getting into thedetails.
I've watched over four and ahalf hours now of the actual
Ukrainian prosecutors going overthis case.
They are right nowinvestigating and putting on
trial their former presidentPoroshenko, okay, and they would
like to extradite Joe Biden,but he won't get extradited, at
least until after the election.
Right, hopefully, assuming he'snot president.

(38:55):
Voter fraud, huge issue, hashtagOkay.
So there's that Now.
Once Donald Trump gets elected,then it becomes okay.
We got to get this guy out ofoffice because if he gets
sniffing around, everybody'sdeals are going to be messed up.
Oh, by the way, mitt Romney'schief of staff sat on this same
Burisma board as Hunter Biden.
Just keep Mitt Romney in theconversation here, okay, all

(39:19):
right.
So this is a phone call between,uh, joseph Biden, joe Biden and
president Poroshenko, and whatthey're going to be talking
about is Paul Manafort.
Who's Paul Manafort?
Paul Manafort, for a very shortperiod of time, was president
Trump's uh president of hiscampaign, and Paul Manafort had
been involved in a lot ofinternational business, a lot of
international stuff, and youknow he was a pretty good

(39:39):
tactician.
He was a really good politicaloperative, and so you know he
was a huge value to the Trumpcampaign.
Media wouldn't make you believethat.
They'd make you believe thisguy's a criminal everywhere from
Sunday, but he's not Okay.
They actually had to set him upto even create the
investigation, which is whatwe're about to listen to now,
and another things it's just ajoke we released the.

(40:04):
Okay, this is Poroshenko talkingin Biden.
You'll recognize the two voices.
Poroshenko's talking in Englishand what they're talking about
is Paul Manafort, and they'retalking about the Black Ledger
book and in other things.

Speaker 10 (40:17):
It's just a joke.
We released the the importantdocuments from the former
regents party.
As far as I understand, one ofthe key advisors for mr trump so
what's significant about this?

Speaker 2 (40:37):
the black ledger was proven in court to be a total,
total fraud.
What's significant about theparty of regions?
A party of regions is the partyin Ukraine that earlier in this
trial is known as the partythat only knows the language of
corruption, as in they can't youcan't get anything done with
them on an ideological basis,because their entire party
platform is based on corruption.

(40:58):
That's the former party ofregents, okay, which the entire
anti-corruption stuff was tobreak up the party of regents,
which here you can see, theyactually use to release a fake
ledger that is supposedly thesepayments.
It was found in some locker, itwas delivered to the FBI and
they used it to investigateManafort.
In court it was proven to be atotal fraud.
So here's Poroshenko sayingthat through the party of

(41:20):
regents, they got that out.

Speaker 10 (41:24):
As far as I understand, one of the key
advisors of Mr Trump, paulManafort.
He resigned today.

Speaker 11 (41:37):
Yeah, I think he's going back to Russia.

Speaker 10 (41:38):
I don't know and I think he's going back to Russia,
I don't know, and I think thiswas a bad idea to take the
Yudukovich advisor to the Trumpteam.

Speaker 11 (41:51):
I think so too, but there's a lot of bad decisions
he's making.
All right, I'll talk to you atthe beginning of the week, all
right?

Speaker 10 (41:58):
Good Joe.
Thank you very much and let meknow about after meeting with
the after lunch with Obama, andI can share with you the
information from Berlin.
Maybe we can do that tomorrowor up to you, whenever you would
be ready.
Just let me know about that.

Speaker 11 (42:16):
All right Okay.

Speaker 10 (42:18):
Stay safe, goodbye.
Goodbye, joe, thank you.

Speaker 2 (42:22):
All right, these guys are on a first-name basis.
They talk on a regular basis.
There's probably a couple hoursof these phone calls and every
one of them every one of them islike wait, what?
So this is August 19th 2016.
This is before the election.
So this is August 19th 2016.

(42:45):
This is before the election.
They released a fake ledgersaying that Paul Manafort,
president of his campaign,president of Trump's Trump
campaign that Paul Manafort wasreceiving illegal payments
through all these corruptoligarchs and things like that.
Via this black ledger that wasreleased by who?
By Poroshenko, through theparty of regents, at whose
behest Joe Biden, who interferedwith the 2016 election?
Joe Biden did.

(43:06):
Joe Biden and the DemocraticParty.
I mean, this is smoking gunevidence here.
Smoking gun.
Why is this not on everyheadline in America?
This has been out for months.
I watched this months ago.
I don't understand.
Why are you voting for Joe Biden?
Is it because he touches kids?
Are you voting for Joe Bidenbecause he he mistakes his wife

(43:28):
or his sister?
Are you voting for Joe BidenCause he thinks he's running for
us Senate?
Are you voting for BidenBecause he believes in the?
The?
The?
You know we were all createdequal in the name of the.
You know what I'm talking about.
This is Joe Biden, the mostcorrupt politician our country
may have ever seen ever.
These are the smoking gunthings.

(43:49):
He got the prosecutor fired.
He nationalized a bank.
He grifted off sales tax moneyfor gas.
He's the entire corruptiondepartment in Ukraine that they
created.
He put his people on itessentially to protect his
corruption and eliminate all theother people.
This is as bad as it gets folks.
It's as bad as it gets.

(44:09):
The rest of the thing is inUkrainian and you have to listen
to it and read the subtitle, soit becomes a little bit
daunting to just kind of sit.
And because I can't play it on,here is this is this is a man
who's got nothing going on.
He's fighting for his life.
Why is a man with dementiabeing allowed to run for
president?

(44:29):
Why?
Because while he's running forpresident, this stuff won't come
out, because it'll look bad.
It'll look like we're trying toinfluence the election, and
that's not the case.
It's not the case.
These guys are actually goingto trial.
I pulled that off of Nabu.
Okay, that video came off ofNabu, which is the Ukrainian
anti-corruption investigationforce that's running this
investigation in Ukraine.
These are these are their phonecalls.

(44:51):
They keep their phone callsrecorded.
So every time Joe Biden calledover there, they captured the
phone call and a lot of these.
At the beginning of the phonecall you hear the White House
operator you know hold for JoeBiden.
You get that.
What you would, exactly whatyou would expect from a phone
call White House to anothersovereign nation state house.
I mean it's.
This is too much.
Here's a video of Joe Bidenwith George Ramos doing an

(45:15):
interview talking about theborder and talking about the
unaccompanied kids.
So again, we're still talkingabout human trafficking and
we're still going to be talkingabout Joe Biden.
What's going on in the southernborder?
There's a ton of humantrafficking going on.
Look at how Joe Biden answersthis question about kids in
cages.
Just listen to the way heanswers this.

Speaker 6 (45:32):
At the debate in Houston.
You said that during theObama-Biden administration, and
I quote, we didn't lock peoplein cages, but you actually did.
I didn't say numbers in theTrump administration, but you
did.
We found a picture of aneight-year-old boy from Honduras
.

Speaker 11 (45:50):
Yes, and what this was, did you know?

Speaker 6 (45:53):
It was taken in 2014 in a detention center in McAllen
Texas.
I spoke with the photographer,John Morrow.

Speaker 2 (46:02):
So, just for context here, when Trump got into office
, one of the things they endedwas the catch and release right,
that you would catch thesepeople that crossed the border,
take their names and then givethem a little thing and say,
okay, show back up in court atthis date, and then they would
release them out into the public.
If they were minors, theywouldn't just let them go
walking on, they would detainthem, put them in a detention
center and then they would finda place for them.

(46:23):
Donald Trump ended that policy.
He said, nope, we're going todetain them until they're
hearing, because less than 2% ofpeople come back to their
hearing and we've just got thisflood of people coming over the
border.
So I'm assuming you're mostlyfamiliar with the border crisis
that is being resolved as wespeak with the building of a
border wall and then, I think,27,000 or 14,000 Mexican troops
patrolling the southern border,which I let you listen to.

(46:46):
The president of Mexico praiseDonald Trump about how they've
respected Mexico's sovereignty,and I think a lot of that has to
do with the fact that Trumpsaid you got to take care of
this, or I will, and put it onMexico as a sovereign nation to
clean themselves up and soundslike they're making a serious
effort.
So remember that it's Trumpthat stopped the policy of the
catch and release, which is whythe numbers swelled.

(47:06):
It's not that the immigrationswelled, it's that the numbers
swelled.
But listen to Joe Biden'sjustification here.

Speaker 11 (47:10):
All the unaccompanied children were
coming across the border.
We tried to get them out.
We kept them safe and get themout of the detention centers
essentially that center that arerun by Homeland Security and
get them into communities asquickly as we can.
Many people would say therewere cages.
Well, look, you know you're nottelling the truth here about

(47:32):
the comparison of the two things.

Speaker 6 (47:34):
I'm saying that the numbers in your administration
were not the same as the oneswe're seeing right now with the
Trump administration, wellbeyond that but look how quickly
we got them out and got themback to families.

Speaker 11 (47:43):
Look how we didn't engage and we sought the
relatives here.
We sought to get them into safecommunities.
We sought to get them out ofthe control of Homeland Security
, to get them safe, but theycame unaccompanied,
unaccompanied.
Them safe, but they cameunaccompanied, unaccompanied.
And, by the way, one of thethings we should be doing and
you may recall, I'm the only guythat got it done was to provide

(48:04):
for $750 million so peopledidn't want to leave in the
first place, by going down toHonduras and Guatemala and El
Salvador and making sure that wein fact change the
circumstances which is causingthem to flee.
To begin with, you may remember, I spent hundreds of.
Well, no, they didn't.
They dropped off extensively,extensively.

Speaker 6 (48:26):
And then there was another wave of Central American
immigrants coming.

Speaker 11 (48:29):
Yeah, and what happened?
Because they stopped funding it.
This administration, threeyears ago, stopped spending the
money.
They stopped going after thegangs.
They stopped the streetlighting.
They stopped building Boys andGirls Clubs.
They stopped going after thegangs.
They stopped the streetlighting.
They stopped building boys andgirls clubs.

Speaker 2 (48:41):
They stopped the.
So Joe Biden's lying.
So let me go through a couplethings.
First of all, unaccompanied itwas just the unaccompanied
minors.
That's false.
That's false.
You always separated theparents from their kids, because
the parents are now criminalsfor crossing the border
illegally.
You didn't necessarily chargethe kids, but you detained them,
okay.
Next thing yes, there are somethat were genuinely
unaccompanied and, yeah, youwould expect them to go.

(49:01):
But here's the thing what arethey doing on the back end?
They're not sending them backto where they came from, the
country of origin.
No, no, no, no.
They're housing them in fosterhomes, essentially, or they
didn't track down family, let'sbe honest.
Okay, then they would send themto the family.
There are thousands andthousands of these kids crossing

(49:23):
the border every year duringthe Obama administration,
thousands, and you're justsending them out into the
community, placing them withfamilies.
Guys, if the government wantsto insert itself at any point to
pick up these kids, theseunaccompanied minors, this is
the moment.
You look at what Germany wasdoing.
Germany, they're using theirCPS, their Child Protective

(49:45):
Services, their foster careprogram and their adoption
programs.
They were all government-runagencies and those were being
run by pedophiles who were usingthose agencies to find kids to
then place in homes of otherabusers for a fee.
This was happening in Germany.
This was government-sponsoredpedophile rings, essentially.
Now they're out looking for30,000 of these pedophiles who

(50:09):
abused these children that wereplaced in their homes by the
government.
There's a lot of accusationsfloating around our country
about child protective servicesand the foster care program.
I've read firsthand accounts ofpeople whose children were
trafficked from them you know,taken from them for stupid
reasons, and then they can't getthem back for years and years
and their kids end up finallycoming back with horror stories

(50:32):
about being trafficked andthat's assuming the parents got
them back.
I've heard a lot of stories.
I've got dozens of people Ifollow on Twitter that are still
fighting to get their kids back.
You know what would seem likenormal, competent parents that
had their kids taken away forall kinds of crazy reasons and
they can't find them.
Okay, this is real, this reallyhappens in our country.
And here you've got Joe Bidensaying oh no, we just we placed

(50:52):
them with homes in the US.
What homes?
Who?
I don't know anybody that'sharboring a foreign child that's
being placed in their homewhile they wait for an asylum
hearing.
I don't know anyone.
I don't know a single person.
So where are these kids going?
Okay, next question.
Next thing 90% of the kids thatcross the border with an adult

(51:14):
are with an adult that's nottheir parent.
So Joe Biden makes it soundlike you know, it was like a
small problem.
It was just the unaccompaniedkids.
No one of the things that Trumpfound out, and one of the
reasons why we don't hearanything about the crisis at the
southern border, was Trumpinstituted a policy of DNA
testing.
So, because they're walkingacross the border without
driver's license, birthcertificates, documentation of

(51:34):
really any kind, you can't.
You got some guy with a 10 yearold there and he says, well,
this is my kid.
Well, he just beat the kid 20minutes ago, saying you better
agree that it's that I'm yourdad.
When the border patrol shows upbecause he's going to get
caught and released, walk rightacross the border and grab
another kid.
The kid's going to go todetention center and then he's
going to get put out, put outinto the, into the U S right for

(51:56):
free.
Why free?
Why would the coyote cross theborder with a kid that's not his
, knowing that they're going tobe separated?
Guys, it's a racket.
They know that this ishappening.
So when Trump instituted theDNA policy, you had to test the
adult and the kid to see if theywere a match, to keep them
together or not, or determinehow you were going to deal with
the situation.
90% of the kids coming acrossthe border with an adult were

(52:20):
coming with an adult that wasnot biologically related to them
.
90, 90, nine zero percent.
This wasn't a small problem.
Next thing, he talks aboutsending money down to Central
America and Mexico to stop themfrom coming.
We all know that's a lie.
We all know that the numberswent up and up and up.
Joe Biden's lying through histeeth about any kind of decrease

(52:41):
in numbers.
It's a flat out lie.
We know what happens to foreignaid money.
They weren't building boys andgirls clubs in Mexico City or in
Honduras, like Joe Biden says.
That's a fault flat out lie.
Okay, all that money went tocorrupt NGOs like George Soros,
who's got an NGO that promotesopen borders?
And all that foreign aid moneywasn't going to keep them from

(53:02):
traveling.
It was going to help themtravel.
The whole thing is a mess, guys.
Why are you voting for JoeBiden?
Got to ask yourself thatquestion.
Why are people voting for JoeBiden.
They're so dogmaticallyentrenched it's unbelievable.
What is it exactly that theyhave done, that Joe Biden has
done for the last 40 years?
If you follow Joe Biden, followthe money, follow his family,

(53:25):
you'll find nothing.
Nothing but just criminalenterprise.
Nothing but criminal enterprise.
There shouldn't be any.
They're running this guy as apresidential candidate.
He's a criminal.
And you wonder why our streetsare ablaze.
You wonder why there's aMarxist movement across the
country?
Because Joe Biden has dementiaand they're getting behind him,

(53:46):
because he won't stop him,because no sane person would
take endorsement from BlackLives Matter.
They're communist.
It takes two seconds to figurethat out on the internet, right?
There are no conspiracies, butthere are no coincidences either
.
We have known that Mitt Romneygot money from Ghislaine

(54:06):
Maxwell's father as far back as2012.
We've known it since then.
He got it a lot earlier thanthat, but we've known about it
since 2012.
I didn't have to make a newtheory on that.
I didn't have to make a newconnection.
Nope, 2012.
And I even pulled it from theliberal rag Mother Jones.
This is real stuff, guys.
This is real stuff.

(54:27):
This really affects us.
Why are our taxes so high?
Why are our roads crumbling?
Why are our inner cities beingburnt to the ground?
Why is George Soros moneyspread all over, including
locally?
Isn't it unbelievable?
You follow these local DAs thatare charging people for
defending their homes, chargingofficers who defended themselves

(54:48):
.
In the case of Rashard Brooks,I saw a video of two people
being arrested for not wearing amask.
I don't know the whole contextaround that, but the DA in that
area is a Soros DA.
You know, I go to Seattle and Isee streetwalkers every time I
go, whores and hookers on thestreet.
They're not going after them.
They're not going after any ofthat.
It's unreal.

(55:10):
So let me just wrap this up.
I got to bring this home.
There's a national crisis here,but it's being manifest at a
very local level.
Okay, there's two things I wantto show here.
Here's a quick video and I justgot to cover it.
It's made its rounds, but Iwant to make sure I include it
in this show because, again,this just goes to the
gaslighting.
This goes to all the sillystuff that's going on there.

(55:33):
So listen to this.
This is AOC.
She's a thought leader in theDemocrat Party, and listen to
what she says about where thecrime is coming from, because
keep in mind all the innercities where there's been all
this writing New York City,atlanta, st Louis, kansas City,
chicago, seattle, la have allhad huge upticks in major
violent crime.
But listen to how AOC playsthis off to her base.

Speaker 4 (55:56):
I think there's something about this uptick in
crime.
Let me make something superclear for everyone here having
this question the New York CityPolice Department has not been
defunded, even with thesebudgetary changes that were
proposed in city council.

(56:17):
A they're not fully enacted.
B they aren't a real $1 billionin cuts.
Um and see, it's not reallylike.
These cuts aren't really realand again, they haven't even
happened yet.

Speaker 2 (56:28):
Okay.
So the only thing she saidthat's real is that they haven't
happened yet.
Everything else she said isreal, so she's playing off the
fact that.
Oh, don't worry about the vote,it was largely symbolic, even
though we're marching down thisroad and we're putting it on the
record and we actually wantthis done, and we've got a
complicit mayor and governor deBlasio.
No, don't look at that.
Don't pay attention to the lackof police funding or the

(56:49):
billionaires.
It hasn't actually happened yet.

Speaker 4 (56:56):
We've just proposed it Literally have not even
happened yet.
So keep in mind that thisuptick in crime that's happening
right now is with a $6 billionNew York City Police Department
budget, so our $6 billion up to$11 billion.

Speaker 2 (57:07):
So she's basically the increase in crime hasn't
happened because of the policecuts.
Okay, that's fine, but you knowhow people react when they know
that no one's going to enforcerules.
Right, I mean, are we going toconsider that at all?

Speaker 4 (57:21):
Our $6 billion budget has not prevented this uptick
in crime.

Speaker 2 (57:26):
Because De Blasio's got handcuffs on the cops.

Speaker 4 (57:29):
We have funded more and more.
We have shoved more and moreand more money every single year
into the nypd six billiondollars because you don't let
them actually do law enforcementnot prevented this uptick in
crime.
So why?

Speaker 2 (57:44):
because that's a policy issue.

Speaker 4 (57:46):
Why is this uptick in crime happening?
Yes, why, let's really thinkabout it.
Well, this uptick in crime, you, you know, the NYPD themselves,
have told a story that'sdisproven by their own data.
At first, the NYPD they wentout and they said, ok, this
uptick in crime is happeningbecause of bail reform, because

(58:07):
of all of these reforms that wehad.

Speaker 2 (58:09):
Now Wait, but they just so bail reform is the idea
that you know when they arrestyou for turn turnstile jumping
you go to, you go and thenthere's a thousand dollar bail.
So you got to put a hundreddollars down, get a bail
bondsman who's then going totrace you down if you don't go
to court.
Or you have to put a thousanddollars and then just walk away
from it.
But now you have a warrant outfor your arrest.

(58:31):
So bail becomes reallyproblematic for petty criminals
because a they don't want tohave to actually deal with the
consequences of their choiceswhile they wait for trial, you
know, by being out on bail andall that kind of stuff.
So they have this bail reform.
So essentially, they book you,they tell you what you did, they
give you a little ticket thatsays come back on this date and
then they let you walk out onthe street.
No costs, no collateral, noreason to ever actually show up

(58:52):
to your court case.
So you know that's a real causefor an uptick in crime,
especially petty crime, becauseof bail reform.
So the police are saying that.
They've been saying that sincethose policies were enacted.
Again, it's not about the moneyat this point when you're
putting handcuffs on the cops.
So bail reform.
That's one reason that thepolice have cited for an uptick
in crime.

Speaker 4 (59:10):
Police data a couple of weeks ago that showed that
out of almost all the people whohave been found to have kind of
committed crimes etc.
Almost none have beenre-released due to the bail
reform.

Speaker 2 (59:26):
Why is that?
Well, because of the uptick inpetty crime.
That's massive rooting, rioting, lighting, vandalism, graffiti.
We've pretty much stopped evenarresting them, because it is a
turnstile, it's a revolving door.
That's the story the New Yorkpolice officers are telling you.
So it's not that the crime hasdropped, it's just that they
don't enforce anything.
They don't enforce anythingbecause of the bail reform,
because it's pointless to take acop off the street for three

(59:46):
hours while he books a guy andthen, by the time, maybe that's
why there's been a drop in pettycrime.
Uh, because they've had thislong tick of this long, uh,
policy of bail reform and nobail, and so, yeah, cops just
aren't enforcing those rules.
So, yeah, the numbers do showthat now, but they didn't show
that a couple months ago.
Right once these riots brokeout, they stopped going after

(01:00:09):
the turnstile jumpers actualcrime.

Speaker 4 (01:00:12):
Data from the nypd, not even independent data,
disproves what they're saying.
So why is this uptick in crimehappening?
Well, let's think about it.
Do we think this has to do withthe fact that there's record
unemployment in the UnitedStates?

Speaker 2 (01:00:26):
One thing she's going to neglect, which is what the
NYPD has said the uptick inviolent crime has been, is the
fact that there were 5,000violent criminals let out into
New York City.
In fact the police chief saidwhich I don't have the video so
you have to trust me on this butthe police chief said he can
trace all up to the 379% uptickin shootings last week.
He can trace it all back to thecriminals that were released

(01:00:48):
from prison due to COVID.
So that's the real reason whythe uptick in the crime numbers.
Now AOC just got done tellingyou that it's not petty crimes,
it's not because of the bailreform.
So what she's about to proposeto you would fall under the
category of the bail reform typecrimes.
So the crimes that arehappening are ones that they're
not getting out on bail reform.
Why?

Speaker 4 (01:01:06):
Because they're violent, because they're
rearresting these criminals thatthey've let out right now, the
fact that people are at a levelof economic desperation that we
have not seen since the GreatRecession.
Maybe this has to do with thefact that people aren't paying
their rent and are scared to paytheir rent, and so they go out

(01:01:26):
and they need to feed theirchild and they don't have money,
so you maybe have to.
They're put in a position wherethey feel like they either need
to shoplift some bread or gohungry that night.
Maybe it's the fact thatunemployment provisions have not
been given to everyone.

Speaker 2 (01:01:44):
Maybe it's because the Okay, did you get that?
So bail reform means thatthey're not arresting low-level
offenders because it's pointless.
There's been an uptick in crime.
She's saying, well, it's notbecause of bail reform, because
those people aren't even beingarrested.
It's because they're goinghungry and they're stealing
bread.
Well, hold on, wouldn'tstealing bread and those petty
crimes fall under the bailreform category?

(01:02:05):
So there, you just told usthey're not getting arrested.
So this uptick in crimepercentages is violent crimes,
which is what the statisticsactually told.
She's lying to her constituents,she's lying through her teeth
and she's doing it in such asmooth way.
But people who are uninformed,who think she's a rock star,
they listen to this and theybelieve it.
It's false, it's false.
Okay, here's a little morelocal for me.

(01:02:30):
This is Jenny Durkin, again themayor of Seattle, and she's
talking about what's happeningin Seattle and solutions.
Now, when I listen to this, Ihave to ask myself this question
she's going to get asked aquestion, but she's going to
answer a different question.
So let's figure out what thatother question is and then let's
figure out how we would answerit as peasants.

Speaker 3 (01:02:49):
I think the more we have people in Seattle in a room
to talk to the mayor and citycouncil and demand and hold us
accountable, the better it is.
And I think again, this goesback to what we're saying.
I think Judge Robart recognizedit today Policing in Seattle is
a tough job right now and ourpolice are doing a very good job
on trying to get it right.
But we need a lot of resourceson the table that aren't police.

(01:03:13):
We are not going to solve theissues related to homelessness
by policing.
As the judge said today, weneed to have a whole range of
tools.
I said it last night, I'll sayit again Real public safety
starts with strong and resilientcommunities.
It means good health care, goodeducation opportunity.
Kids know that they have afuture for themselves.

(01:03:34):
If you have all those things inplace, the need for police goes
down.
And when we need police, wewant them to be exercising the
best constitutional policing andcommunity policing possible,
and I think that's what thechief has instilled in this
department.
Thank you very much okay.

Speaker 2 (01:03:47):
So she answered a question about today police we
need to have, and she didn'treally answer anything, right,
because she said, oh, we needthings outside of the police.
So so what's the question sheasked?
She's talking to herconstituents, citizens of
Seattle.
A lot of the people that aregoing to be paying attention to
this are going to be in themiddle class to upper middle
class, because politics isgenerally a middle class to
upper middle class problem.
You know a lot of lower classpeople.
They're just worried aboutputting food on the table, right

(01:04:09):
, like AOC had mentioned.
And so what's the questionJenny's being asked?
How do we fix this problem sothat everything's not on the
police department to go enforceall these rules?
Well, a lot of these pettycrimes do stem out of the
desperation of being hungry,quote-unquote even though it's
not really hunger in America.
It's more just desperation ingeneral.
So here's what I would answer,instead of saying these are the

(01:04:31):
things we need, because thoseare the results we need.
Now the answer isn't what arethe results?
We all agree on the results.
We need safer communities, weneed more resilient communities,
we need less street crime andhomeless Everybody.
Yeah, all right, that's theanswer to the question how do we
make it safer so that we don'tneed to have a heavy-handed
police department?

(01:04:51):
All right?
Well, yeah, that would workgreat if we gave the kids all
the opportunities.
So here's what I propose Ahere's how we actually do that.
First and foremost, schoolchoice and school vouchers Allow
kids in the city of Seattle andall across the country really,
but we'll just focus on Seattle,okay, mrs Durkin.
So in the city of Seattle, giveevery single student a voucher
for the amount of tax money thatthey're allocated per head.

(01:05:12):
So every kid in the county orin the city gets a certain
amount of education money thatgoes to the public schools to
pay for them.
Kids in private education donot get that money.
Their parents have to pay notonly property taxes that goes to
public education, but then theyalso have to pay private
tuition.
So let's break that cycle,because what that does is it
makes private education a better.

(01:05:32):
Education generally only in thehands of the rich.
So let's break educationgenerally only in the hands of
the rich.
So let's break it and put moneyin the hands of everybody for
their kid's education.
Everybody who's got a kid givethem the five, 6,000, 8,000,
10,000 bucks, whatever it isthat that kid is allocated for
education and then allow them totake that money and shop with
it.
What's that going to mean?
It's going to mean privateschools are going to be really
elite for a year or two.

(01:05:52):
It's just the way it is becausethey're going to be looking at
kids who can A pay Now,everybody can pay, so now
they're going to look at testscores.
Even some of the private kidswon't get into the schools
anymore.
Okay, so now you've got richparents sending their kids to
public schools because theyreally don't have any other
choice.
Their kids aren't smart enoughto get into the private schools.
And so it also means that theschool administrators know that

(01:06:16):
the moment a spot opens up in aprivate school, those parents or
another school a private schoolopens up because this will
bring in competition.
Right that they're going tolose those kids if the education
results are not on par.
So they're going to focus onimproving outcomes of education
rather than just trying to takethe kids in and babysit them for
eight hours, which is how weget high illiteracy rates in

(01:06:36):
poor neighborhoods.
So by giving parents the powerto choose, it introduces the
market into education.
It gives parents the ability toshop for education where
education outcomes will be thehighest.
This will.
This will, in turn, create amore inclusive community, a
better educated community.
There'll be less subject tomind viruses like communism.
It's better all the way around.
So that's my proposal on how wecreate a more resilient, strong

(01:06:57):
community.
Second, broken windows theory oflaw enforcement.
Take the gloves off the policedepartment.
Let them go after the turnstilejumpers.
Let them go after thejaywalkers.
Let them go after the guyssmoking marijuana in public.
Let them go after the guysdefecating in public.
Let them go after the vagrants.
Let public Let them go afterthe vagrants.
Let them go after the low-levelcrimes, because what we found
in New York City under RudyGiuliani is, when you take out
the turnstile jumper, it's theturnstile jumpers that have no

(01:07:19):
respect for the law that arealso raping people.
It's that simple.
So you get them off the streets.
You get them off the streets,crime drops.
Those people go spend sixmonths a year in jail.
If they hit rock bottom, theyreform.
If not, they end up in a cyclecoming back into the system.
That sucks, but why did ithappen?
It happened in the first placebecause our communities were not
resilient.
They weren't well-educated.

(01:07:39):
Next thing, c.
So that's A school choice,school vouchers, b, broken
windows, theory of lawenforcement.
And C less regulation acrossthe board will create a vibrant
middle class to develop, whichis currently a barrier of entry
in the city of Seattle.
Seattle has some of the highestbusiness fees, has the highest
licensing fees, it has some ofthe highest building you know to
get building permits and thingslike that.

(01:08:01):
It creates a high barrier ofentry.
So someone who's just startingout, wants to start a business,
wants to develop a property,whatever the case, is the
barrier of entry just to getthrough the city aspect of it,
the permitting aspect of it, isso high.
People in lower classes, lowerincome brackets, just can't do
anything in the city of Seattle.
So take away the regulation andyou'll see the middle class

(01:08:22):
bounce back Because right nowSeattle's splitting.
You've got an upper class andyou have a homeless class.
Those are really the twoclasses that are developing in
Seattle.
That has to stop before it getsworse.
I mean it gets much worse thanit is now.
Oh, my goodness, it's going tobe bad.
The only way to bring businessand investment back to Seattle
is to dump the regulation.
It's that simple.
Those are my three ways on howyou actually achieve what

(01:08:44):
everybody knows we need toachieve in our city, and that's
why I should run for mayorsomewhere.
Somebody find me a place whereI can run for mayor as a
carpetbagger.
Okay, that's it for me today atPeasants Perspective, you can
find me on Twitter at thePeasants Pod Parler, at the
Peasants Pod, facebook at thePeasants Perspective, and you
can email me at peasantspod atgmailcom.
I appreciate you taking thetime to listen to me today.
If you enjoyed what I have tosay, if you like the connections

(01:09:05):
I make and the history I bring,show grow.
And, of course, go give me afive-star review on iTunes, if
you could, or whatever podcastapp you're listening to that
allows you to give rankings.
None of this one-star stuff.
Come on, guys, I do better thanthat.
All right, thanks, talk to youagain tomorrow.

Speaker 1 (01:09:27):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britain and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.

(01:09:47):
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then that castle?
No one lives there.
Then.
Who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.

(01:10:08):
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of pure
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority ina case of more measures, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet, allright.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering

(01:10:30):
semite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,

(01:10:51):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
Now?
We see the violence inherent inthe system.

(01:11:13):
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed.
Bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
© transcript Emily Beynon.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Common Man's Guide to Understanding Political Corruption

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

The Common Man's Guide to Understanding Political Corruption

Stuff You Should Know