August 17, 2025 • 56 mins
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. The little guys always take the brunt of everything while the elites walk free. This raw, unfiltered look at current events peels back layers of deception surrounding some of today's most controversial topics.
The Ghislaine Maxwell arrest should be front-page news, yet media attention is already fading. Why? Perhaps because the judge overseeing her case is an Obama appointee who served as his special assistant, while one of the prosecutors is James Comey's daughter. These connections matter in a justice system increasingly split between political insiders and everyone else. From selective prosecution to judicial overreach, the Maxwell case represents another test of whether accountability exists for the powerful.
COVID-19 reporting has become a statistical shell game. Minnesota Senator Scott Jensen reveals how health departments instructed doctors to list COVID-19 as cause of death without testing or confirmation – contradicting standard medical practice. His reward for speaking out? A medical board investigation threatening his license. Meanwhile, a Texas county judge exposed new guidelines classifying anyone with common symptoms like headache and fever as "probable cases," artificially inflating numbers. No wonder different states show wildly different statistics – they're literally counting cases differently.
Most disturbing are the connections between government contractors, intelligence agencies, and potential bioweapon development. The Moderna vaccine – literally standing for "modification RNA" – represents a fundamental shift from traditional vaccines by instructing human DNA to create antibodies rather than introducing inactivated viruses. Is this current pandemic merely a test run to gauge population compliance before something more sinister?
The surveillance state extends beyond our borders. Chinese apps like TikTok collect extensive personal data from users' phones, transmitting it directly to Chinese authorities. Secretary Pompeo's warning was clear: only download TikTok "if you want your private information in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party."
Want to protect yourself? Start questioning official narratives, guard your digital privacy, and remember – peasants have always needed to look out for each other when kings claim divine right to rule.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Alright, welcome to anotherepisode of Peasants Perspective.
Welcome, peasants.
As always, you can find me aton Twitter, at PeasantsPod, on
(01:00):
Parler, at PeasantsPod, onFacebook, at the Peasants
Perspective.
And email.
You can email me at peasantspodat gmailcom.
We have so much stuff happeningin the news right now, but yet
it's a slow news cycle.
It's actually extremely painful, I don't know.
I mean it gets like this everynow and then, where there's just
these big bombshells, butthey're kind of like on due day
two or three of their news cycleand so they're kind of starting
(01:22):
to fade away and there's justnothing quite exciting replacing
it.
But the things that are thereare huge.
The Ghislaine Maxwell arrest ishuge.
We should still be talkingabout it.
We should be trying to get tomore of the bottom around the
circumstances.
There's a lot of things inquestion.
So I'm just going to go througha couple of the highlight news
(01:42):
stories, a couple of things thatare affecting me, and we're
going to talk about COVID again.
I really don't like talkingabout COVID.
I'm kind of done with it.
I'm going to show you a videofrom Greg Gutfeld today that
describes things very well.
Let's just put it that way.
Let's jump into the GhislaineMaxwell story here.
I think the way I'm going toapproach this story on this show
(02:03):
is I'm mainly going to do itfrom a perspective of updates,
because the story is prettydifficult to tell and I don't
know if it's a story that Ireally want to tell on this show
.
All the details and graphicdetails but justice in the case
of Ghislaine Maxwell is kind oflike critical.
I mean, if we don't get justicein the Ghislaine Maxwell case,
(02:24):
then we're not likely going toget justice on a lot of other
things.
I think the Ghislaine Maxwellcase, the Epstein case, ties
into a lot of the nightmaresthat we go through as a country
and a lot of the things that weseem to just not be able to get
right.
So let me just look at one thinghere.
Another set of news or anotherchange of events.
That's kind of unique.
(02:44):
This is the judge in charge ofGhislaine Maxwell case is an
Obama appointee who used to behis Barack Obama's special
assistant, and one of theprosecutors is James Comey's
daughter.
And then the question that'sposed here is how does this keep
happening?
That's a really good question.
So, all right, what's myperspective on this?
(03:05):
My perspective has been thatObama did not appoint judges
that seem to care about ourConstitution.
Everything I have experiencedthus far, every single case that
has gone through an Obama judgethat has been even remotely
controversial, almost withoutexception.
They have sided on the side ofactivism, on the side of
judicial review, on the side ofjudicial overreach.
(03:28):
They really haven't beenconstitutional judges by any
stretch of the imagination.
Now they're all individuals andwho knows right?
I mean, obama did nominate alot of judges, so there's a lot
of judges that could be good,but this is another one of those
things that's kind ofconcerning.
Now, I'm pretty sure they don'tget.
I think you have some abilityto choose judges, but not a lot.
(03:51):
I think that you kind of put itinto the court that you want to
go and it shows up on thedocket.
So I'm not sure if this was arandomly subjected judge or not,
but I will say this in theMueller investigation every
single judge that was used soAmy Berman, jackson, judge
Sullivan.
Amy Berman had a couple of thecases.
They were horrible judges,horrible judges.
(04:12):
They made extrajudicialdecisions.
They did things out of normalprocedure.
I mean, in one case, the JudgeSullivan case, it's so egregious
.
It went to an appellate courtand they granted a writ of
mandamus and have ordered JudgeSullivan to dismiss the case
against General Flynn becausethe judge refuses to dismiss the
case.
So when we're talking aboutjudicial judges and who they're
(04:35):
appointed by, it apparently ispretty important.
I mean, the Mueller team soughtout or got only Obama judges
and frankly, those judges had alot of malpractice in their
courts.
In the case of the Roger Stonecase with Amy Berman-Jaxman, she
put a gag order on Roger Stone,which I think was an egregious
abuse of power.
She really just didn't want himtalking politically.
(04:57):
I mean there was really nothinghe could say.
What his case was about waslying to Congress about
immaterial statements made tothe Mueller team as opposed to
made to Congress.
There was no.
There was nothing.
I mean the whole premise of whyhe was being talked to.
The entire premise on what hewas being asked about the Trump
(05:19):
campaign's connection toWikiLeaks had no factual basis.
It was all false.
But yet he lied or misled ormisstated something in between
Congress and his to the FBI, andwhat he misstated was not
material to the fact that Trumpcampaign had or had not colluded
(05:39):
and worked with WikiLeaks.
So you've got another situationhere where, with this judge,
she's put a gag order on him forsomething that you should be
able to talk about.
I mean, these are not highcrimes, these are not state
secrets.
There was no confidential orclassified information involved.
This was a pretty simple case oflying to Congress, something
(06:00):
that seems like everybody justdoes, seems like it's really no
big deal.
Just for the record, rogerStone is now the first person to
be held accountable for lyingto Congress in 15 years, 20
years.
I mean the problem is so badand there's been so little lack
of enforcement on the statutesof lying to Congress.
(06:21):
I mean people talk about it allthe time.
I think it's just a politicalpunishment.
You know, the Congress makes areferral to the Department of
Justice and then the Departmentof Justice proceeds and, just
for the record, congress doesmake a lot of referrals.
I mean, they held Eric Holderin contempt of Congress for
lying to Congress and failure todisclose documents, and then,
(06:43):
of of course, that led to Barrbeing held in contempt, and then
you've got a whole handful ofother people who have been held
in contempt.
But it seems like anytime lyingto Congress comes up, only if
you're a Republican is there anyconsequence for that.
So you know, I don't know.
I don't know what's going on.
Another thing about this casetoo, just to keep everybody up
on the same page, this case isbeing tried by the office.
(07:03):
Just to keep everybody up onthe same page, this case is
being tried by the office,handled by the office's public
corruption unit.
Assistant US Attorney AlexRosemiller, allison Moe and
Maureen Comey are in charge ofthe prosecution.
So we're going to rememberthose names Alex Rosemiller,
allison Moe and Maureen Comey.
Those three attorneys rightthere hold the fate of whether
(07:26):
there's a two-tier justicesystem or not in their hands.
I mean this case right here.
Epstein killed himself.
Epstein got away.
He got the cowards out with allthe horror that he had caused
on people, including murder.
By the way, I mean, thosecharges of murder have not been
brought up.
(07:46):
You need a body with a birthcertificate usually to be
convicted of murder.
But what we're going to findand I've already played on this
podcast multiple times about thebodies, the children that are
trafficked without birthcertificates, that are used in
satanic cults or satanic ritualswhich Epstein Island is a
temple is a satanic temple.
(08:07):
When you look at the floor plan, the blueprints, when you look
at the side view and how theywent into the mountain and under
the mountain with the submarinelanding, I mean it looks eerily
like the layout of a pyramid inisland form.
If you subsurface the island,it's really quite disturbing,
quite disturbing.
So Alex Rosemiller, alison Moeand Maureen Comey are in charge
(08:29):
of the prosecution.
It bothers me, it reallybothers me, that Maureen Comey
is on that, on that, on thatlist.
And you know, I think her dadneeds to be tried for treason
and I think he deserves to beexecuted as a prisoner of the
state and for crimes against thecitizens of the United States.
And I say that very seriously,like I think James Comey is a
(08:52):
traitor to our nation and wedon't hold children accountable
for the sins of their father.
But I think that Maureen Comeyhas a.
She's going to have a spotlighton her and I'm definitely going
to put a spotlight on her asfar as I can and keeping an eye
on her, because that is that isatrocious.
That is, she should just recuseherself if for no other reason
(09:14):
than the fact that her name isComey and her dad had let the
Clintons off the hook over andover and over again, and her dad
, on his watch, had these casesin his uh possession.
He had the Wiener laptop.
He had uh Epstein's uh wasEpstein's first arrest Mayor may
not have been on his watch itprobably wasn't on his watch,
but either way, um, it's quiteastonishing.
(09:37):
I don't, again, don't have a lotof words on how to quite get
where we're at here.
Here's another thing too.
This is Prince Andrew.
I just want to play this here.
This is an actual admission ofguilt and I want you to pay
attention to the way he does.
Now, prince Andrew is the son ofthe queen.
He's not really in line for thecrown.
(09:59):
For the crown to come to him,it'd have to leave the normal
line of succession.
Basically, what it'd have tomean is some people who should
get the crown would have to die,and so it would have to pass
over to him, but nonethelesshe's a royal figure.
He has been dismissed from hisroyal duties because of this
specific scandal, because of theEpstein involvement with
Epstein, pictures have surfacedwhere, obviously, prince Andrew
(10:22):
took Kevin Spacey and GhislaineMaxwell on a tour of Buckingham
Palace and they actually sat onthe throne.
Yeah, that picture's floatingaround there and that's a pretty
devastating picture as far asthe crown is concerned, because
no one should be sitting onthose thrones except for the
king and queen, and you've gotGhislaine Maxwell, a child
predator, and Kevin Spacey, alsoa predator, sitting on the
(10:43):
palace thrones.
I mean, that is in the monarchyway.
That is a mockery to God, ifyou were to put it that way.
So, anyways, this is PrinceAndrew in a BBC interview, and
notice the way that he confirmshis involvement with Jeffrey
Epstein.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
The problem was the fact that once he had been
convicted, you stayed with him,I stayed with him, and that's
the bit that, as it were, I kickmyself for on a daily basis,
because it was not somethingthat was becoming of a member of
the royal family, and we tryand uphold the highest standards
and practices and I let theside down.
Simple as that.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
So that's a good little admission that he hung
around with Epstein.
He's admitting the fact that hewas with him.
Now the fact that you knowbasically what that means is
there's no more deniability,there's no possibility of oh,
those pictures aren't me,they're photoshopped.
All those things have beenfloated around and it's not
going to happen anymore.
Okay, let's move on to thecoronavirus.
So there's this video floatingaround with it's not really just
(11:47):
floating around with Dr ScottJensen.
Who is Dr Scott Jensen?
Well, you might know him asSenator Scott Jensen.
So Senator Scott Jensen is oneof the senators from the state
of Minnesota and he put out avideo yesterday that is really
fascinating.
Now, it's a little too long toplay, it's actually 11 or 12
minutes in total, but here'swhat has happened Dr Johnson is
(12:11):
being investigated by theMinnesota Board of Health and
this is quite shocking andfrustrating to Scott Johnson,
and they've listed two reasonswhy they're investigating him.
One, for making inappropriateconnections between coronavirus
and the flu.
So basically comparing them,just simply.
You know, this is how many fludeaths, this is how many
coronavirus deaths is similar,or this is similar symptoms.
(12:33):
Basically just making thecomparison to from coronavirus
to the flu.
And then the second thing wasmaking reference to.
Let's see, there was MakingReference to Coronavirus and
Misleading the Public on gosh.
What was it, hi Senator ScottJensen?
Speaker 5 (12:55):
I represent Carver County.
This is one of the mostimportant videos of the Family
Doc for 40 years.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
I'm skipping through it until I find it.
Speaker 5 (13:02):
For the flu, for COVID-19.
We've had some 35, 40,000 casesof COVID-19 in Minnesota thus
far, According to the Departmentof Health people.
That might translate into 10times that many, and if it does
translate into 10 times, I meanthat's 350,000 cases.
But in 2018, we had more than ahalf a million Minnesotans with
(13:23):
the flu.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Did you catch that?
So this is a long video and Ijust jumped to that specific
part, so I wasn't looking for itspecifically.
But basically he's saying we'vehad 350,000 cases on a max.
Like if you take the 35,000that have tested, times it by 10
, 350,000.
But yet.
We had a half a million flucases, but yet we have no flu
cases this year in Minnesota.
We had a half a million flucases, but yet we have no flu
cases this year in Minnesota.
Speaker 5 (13:45):
That's basically what he's saying.
Say that Am I recklessly givingyou advice?
Regarding COVID-19 and the flu,dr Anthony Fauci has come out
and compared them all the timeDr Mike Osterholm has.
In terms of the deathcertificates.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
On April 3rd I got an email from the Department of
Health that said very clearlythat we should report COVID-19
on death certificates if it isassumed to have caused or
contributed.
Well, that's not how we do.
Death certificates, theofficial ICD-10 coding, okay.
So I want to put somesignificance in here.
So Dr Scott Scottson at thebeginning of this video goes
through his credentials 40 yearsin practice he's run hospitals,
he's done house calls.
Basically he's done it all.
You know he's a competentdoctor and he is a sitting US
(14:44):
senator okay, someone who's nowin charge of legislation around
medical.
He sits on the committees thatdeal with medical regulation and
things like that, and so he'svery, very up to date on
everything.
So when he's saying this, thisis a.
In a certain sense, this is anuclear bomb going off in the
medical community.
(15:04):
In a certain sense, this is anuclear bomb going off in the
medical community.
Speaker 5 (15:14):
Because here's the senator who essentially has
power to take power from theactual health department in
Minnesota.
That's investigating him andhe's calling foul.
If the provider documentssuspected possible, probable or
inconclusive COVID-19, do notassign U07.1, which is COVID-19
disease.
It says.
Assign a code explaining thereason for the encounter, such
(15:36):
as fever or a cough or shortnessof breath.
That's what the officialinstructions say.
So I get this on April 3rd.
I end up inadvertently, sort ofaccidentally, running it up the
flagpole with Chris Berg onApril 7th.
And what happens?
The Department of Health a fewdays later comes out with a
(15:58):
clarification and then a fewweeks later they come out with
another clarification.
And I appreciate it.
The fact of the matter is I'mproud of the Department of
Health in Minnesota for sayingwe are not going to list
non-confirmed cases as deaths inMinnesota.
We are going to put an asteriskby them and we'll follow up on
those later.
But that's not what Pennsylvaniawas doing.
(16:19):
That's why they had to subtract200 patients from their
COVID-19 death count.
Colorado did the same thing.
New York went the otherdirection.
New York said we're having moredeaths in a certain period than
we normally have, so thosedeaths must be COVID-19.
We just didn't pick them up.
So, nevermind the testing,we're adding 3,700 to our total,
(16:40):
and well, that does increaseour total by 50%.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
So one of the things that happened in New York is.
So what he's talking about is,basically, he is making the
connection and a directconnection between the policies
that the state healthdepartments are putting out and
how we're counting COVID deaths,covid cases, et cetera, et
cetera.
So this is why this is anuclear bomb.
This is a sitting Senator.
Okay, this is a sitting senatorwho sits on the committee and
(17:06):
he's going to examine andinvestigate this stuff.
He's getting directives as asitting medical doctor, a
medical doctor who has a licensein the state of Minnesota.
He's getting guidance andguidelines from his local health
department, his state healthdepartment, telling him how to
count the deaths.
He runs it up the flagpole,gets it corrected in the state
of Minnesota and, as you can see, he's saying, hey, at least
(17:27):
Minnesota is doing this right,they're not just going to count
anybody as COVID death.
But that's not what Pennsylvaniahas done, that's not what New
York did.
In fact, new York went so farthe opposite direction and the
story behind that is in New York, when they did the lockdown, a
lot of people died in theirhomes Because, remember, you
can't go to the hospital, youcan't go to the ER, you're only
supposed to go out for certainthings.
So there's a lot of heartattack victims, there were a lot
(17:48):
of stroke victims, there were alot of people that let small or
minor medical thingsessentially build up and so they
started having people dying inhomes, and they normally do.
In a huge city like the size ofNew York.
They'll retrieve like 50 bodiesa day out of homes in New York,
which, when you do it by thepercentage, isn't super crazy.
People die in their homes allthe time.
(18:10):
But that number shot up, itquadrupled, and what they were
doing was they were countingevery single home death, every
single home death, as a COVIDdeath, because you know it was
caused by COVID, because COVIDcaused the lockdowns.
I mean it was.
It was ridiculous.
It was caused by COVID, becauseCOVID caused the lockdowns.
I mean it was ridiculous.
Speaker 5 (18:30):
So our count is off.
So I'm in the position where Ihave to explain that I wasn't
spreading misinformation and I'mnot being reckless when I talk
about COVID-19 and the influenceof both, being single-stranded
RNA viruses that are respiratoryin nature, with similar
symptoms and can be spreadthrough particulate matter and
aerosol transmission.
I've got an eight-page documentthat I put together for the
(18:54):
Board of Medical Practice andlet me be clear, they do
important work and I'm going tofully cooperate with them.
I also have some 70 pages ofattachments and in the
attachments I've got thePennsylvania Department of
Health slashing their numbers by201.
I've got the Department ofHealth in Illinois where one of
(19:20):
the directors says that justbecause we put COVID-19 down on
the death certificate as causeof death, that doesn't mean the
patient died of COVID-19.
She said that.
Dr Fauci, when he talks aboutinfluenza, he was the lead
article in this New EnglandJournal article and he said this
(19:42):
If one assumes that the numberof asymptomatic or minimally
symptomatic cases for COVID-19is several times as high as the
number of reported cases, thecase fatality rate may be
considerably less than 1%.
This suggests that the overallclinical consequences of
COVID-19 may ultimately be moreakin to those of a severe
seasonal influenza.
That was Dr Fauci.
(20:05):
And oh, by the way, one of thecontributing authors was those
of a severe seasonal influenza.
That was Dr Fauci.
And oh, by the way, one of thecontributing authors was Dr
Robert Redfield, the head of theCDC.
Dr Osterholm is a well-regardedepidemiologist and he was saying
this in the middle of March.
He said the flu has become apandemic more than once and has
(20:26):
killed millions of people.
It still exists today,unfortunately.
We now have on our handssomething else, but it's caused
by coronavirus, which is actingvery much like influenza.
Folks, do I feel targeted?
Yeah, I do.
Do I know who my accusers are?
(20:48):
No, I don't get to know.
Could I be disciplined by theBoard of Medical Practice?
Well, sure I could.
There's two allegations there.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
So someone made an anonymous complaint against him
to the Minnesota Board of Health, and so he did a little
research.
In the beginning of the videothat I clipped off, he talked
about how it's a one-pagecomplaint.
It goes in it's a one-pagecomplaint.
You don't put your name on it,the health department doesn't
know who you are.
But this entire investigationis being launched because
(21:18):
somebody put a one-pagecomplaint in which with pretty
much unfounded complaints, andso the government is now being
used as a political tool to comeagainst a sitting senator and
create this investigation.
It's going to cost money, it'sgoing to cost time, it's going
to cost resources to go afterthis and it potentially could
end up in the loss of thissenator's medical license.
(21:42):
In a normal world this would beloss of income, loss of revenue
, loss of livelihood.
He's not able to face hisaccuser, he's not able to go
through an appeals court.
I mean, this is like tyranny.
This is objective tyranny andthis is how you can use the
government as a police state.
I have a neighbor who does this.
By the way, every time I starta fire he calls the fire
department to find out if I havea burning permit.
(22:04):
Every time I clear the front ofmy property that's full of
blackberries.
He says I'm clearing in awetland and I have to deal with
the building department and geta stop work order and go through
a rigmarole.
He's cost me money, time, butevery time he makes these
anonymous tips right, thinkingthat it won't come back to him.
Obviously it always comes backto time to figure it out.
He'd probably made four or fivecomplaints before I finally
(22:25):
figured it out.
It was all coming from him butyou know, county couldn't tell
me that I had to finally deduceit and confront him about it.
So here's Scott Johnson,senator Scott Johnson.
He's got to confront his healthdepartment.
Can't face his actual accuser,can't just on its surface say,
hey, these claims are nonsense.
He's got to go through thiswhole process.
Speaker 5 (22:56):
If I have been spreading misinformation, then
what about Governor Walz and theDepartment of Health memo that
talked about the purpose of, ifyou will, some of the measures
that we'd be taking to dampen,delay and decrease the peak to
allow the accumulation of PPEand make sure that our hospital
(23:18):
capacities weren't beingoverwhelmed?
In that memo they say whateffective measures are cover
your mouth.
Don't go out if you have coughor fever.
Avoid touching your face, youreyes or mouth.
Cover your mouth if you cough.
Wash your hands frequently.
Minimize outings sociallydistance.
But what did they say were noteffective measures?
(23:39):
They said wearing masks is noteffective, taking antibiotics is
not effective.
A month later Governor Walzcomes out, talks about 74,000
Minnesotans dying.
Later on he went back to 29,000.
And right around then I put adifferent video saying just the
facts and I said I'm not buying74,000 Minnesotans dying, I'm
not buying 29,000.
(24:00):
And then this one came out amonth later, right around May
1st.
This is a model that they'reusing and it says on here
Minnesotans model projectsnearly 1,000 deaths a day in
mid-July.
Well, folks, that's next week.
So far we have less than rightaround 1,500, of which all but
300 of them have occurred inpeople in long-term care
(24:21):
facilities, in large partbecause the department of health
participated in decisions thatput people with active covid19
disease in the nursing homes youhear that he's laying the feet
of two-thirds of their deathsdirectly at the health
department.
Speaker 2 (24:37):
You put sick people back in nursing homes, and
that's minnesota.
We haven't even talked aboutnew york, right?
What governor cuomo did is atangent amount to genocide,
right or elder side I mean.
What he did was atrocious.
6,900 people died becauseAndrew Cuomo put sick
coronavirus patients back intonursing homes with non-sick
(25:00):
patients sick patients.
So here's the senator layingtwo-thirds of their deaths in
Minnesota at their feet, callingtheir lies on projected deaths.
Because here we are in mid-Julyand they haven't even had 1,500
total deaths, let alone 1,000deaths a day.
This is pretty stark.
This is pretty serious.
Speaker 5 (25:19):
And I'm spreading misinformation?
Of course I am.
I don't know what to tell you.
I just know this is wrong.
We're in a bad place.
My wife asked me the other day,scott, why did 9-1-1 pull us
(25:41):
together as Americans so much,and why is COVID-19 breaking us
apart?
I think physicians are part toblame.
Scientists are.
We've become so darn political.
Physicians and scientists inthe past are supposed to be
above the fray.
They're not.
(26:02):
I have this odd set of hats I'mwearing because I'm the vice
chair of the Health and HumanServices Committee in the Senate
and I'm involved in policydiscussions and involved in
bills that deal with providingrelief for COVID-19.
And, on the other hand, I'vebeen a physician in the trenches
for 35 years.
So I try to connect the dots.
I don't try to present myselfto be something I'm not.
(26:22):
I'm not an epidemiologist, butyes, I've taken epidemiology
classes.
I'm not an infectious diseasedoctor, but I take care of
infectious disease every day.
I just want to leave you with acouple of questions you could
maybe ask yourself.
Do we think it's okay forphysicians to certify on death
certificates that someone diedof COVID-19, even if there was
(26:47):
never a COVID-19 positive testobtained, even if there was
never a COVID-19 test done, evenif a COVID-19 test hadn't even
been considered and maybe theworst, even if, even if the
family had no clue that thedeath certificate they received
(27:10):
for their loved one was going tosay COVID-19.
What do we want to be doingthere In Minnesota?
I think the Department ofHealth is taking care of
business.
Those are important questions.
I'm sure there are naysayers outthere that think that I'm
getting exactly what I deserve.
Fine, if it can happen to me.
(27:33):
I think, frankly, that it couldhappen to anybody.
It feels ugly.
It feels like some of thepeople that disagree with me
don't want to have aconversation.
I've asked many of you to haveconversations and you've not
been interested.
So reckless advice regardingcomparisons between COVID-19 and
(27:57):
the flu, spreadingmisinformation.
Because I cried foul when Ireceived a memorandum from the
Department of Health on April3rd which directed me to a CDC
link which says clearly that youcould have a patient suffering
from other medical problemswheelchair-bound severe stroke
(28:22):
within the preceding year or two, no COVID-19 test ever done or
ordered, and when that patientdies of pneumonia, it's a
COVID-19 death.
I cried foul and I'm gratefulthat the Department of Health a
(28:43):
week later tried to clarifythings and and a month later
clarified it further.
But I'll say it again theofficial people who write the
coding Bible in this countrysaid if the provider documents
suspected possible, probable orinconclusive, do not assign
COVID-19.
Thanks for listening.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
We better all stay engaged we better all stay
engaged, because they are tryingto take your freedoms.
Take your freedoms.
So this is a uh.
This, this one right here is auh judge.
So this is chris hill uh, froma collin county judge in in tex.
And take a listen to this onehere.
Speaker 7 (29:31):
This has informed public health departments that
they have adopted a reviseddefinition for COVID-19 probable
cases.
Speaker 2 (29:35):
This was May 18th 2020.
So this is we're coming up ontwo months ago.
So keep in mind, as this timepasses and cases happen, they're
counting cases based on theguidelines they have at that
moment.
So you could see a spike incases just based off the way
they do these guidelines.
Speaker 8 (29:55):
So for confirmed case it stays the same.
You still just need PCR.
But now they've added aprobable case definition so that
still gets counted towards thecase count.
It's different, it's notconfirmed, it's probable but
it's still a case.
So at the end of thisdefinition there are 50 probable
, as in.
Speaker 2 (30:15):
I was on a cruise boat and one person got sick, so
we have 5,000 probable cases.
Speaker 8 (30:20):
So that's how you end up from one case to 5,000 cases
15 different options on how youcould be classified as a
probable case Based on thisdiagram and what they report.
There's a total of 17 cases now.
One is still only confirmedbecause that was that original
index case.
(30:40):
Who then had all these contactsunderneath in orange?
And all the rest of them becameprobable.
But they are still considered acase.
Speaker 7 (30:49):
It has the potential to be a very significant event
for us here in Texas and here inCollin County, as the state now
has elected to adopt this newprobable definition.
If you have a subjective feverand you have a headache and you
live in Collin County, you nowmeet the qualifications to be a
probable COVID patient.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
If you have a fever and a headache in Collin County,
you're a COVID patient.
A fever and a headache.
A fever and a headache the twomost common symptoms.
You get a headache from notdrinking enough caffeine in the
day.
My mom taught me that when Iwas 10 because she drank so much
Dr Pepper.
Right, if she didn't get enoughDr Pepper she got a headache.
(31:30):
So if we lived in Collin County, my mom would be a coronavirus
patient because she didn't haveenough caffeine in the day.
That's how ridiculous this gets.
Oh, you have a low-grade fever.
Why do you have a fever?
Oh, I don't know, maybe I justgot done working out?
Oh, I don't know, maybe I justam sick.
I had some bad food, had somebacteria on it.
My body's kicked up thetemperature.
The burn off the bacteriacoronavirus.
(31:52):
That's not how this works, guys.
This is a joke.
Speaker 7 (31:56):
It is remarkable how low the standard is now.
If you have one of the majorsymptoms you have a cough or you
have shortness of breath andyou live in Collin County then
you can satisfy the definitionfor a probable COVID case.
But I'm very concerned that weabsolutely could see the numbers
jump very rapidly in a way thatactually is not indicative of
(32:21):
what we're seeing here in thecommunity in the public health
department is not indicative ofwhat we're seeing here in the
community, in the public healthdepartment.
Speaker 2 (32:28):
So that is a Collins County judge talking in a
commissioner's court and withthe health department and going
over the guidelines and he'scalling it.
He says we're going to have ahuge spike in cases because now
everybody has a case.
In fact, let me check myforehead right now I might have
a case of coronavirus right nowI'm a little hot.
So this right here is a.
This is another one of thesemeetings here.
(32:49):
Let me I got to get the thingout of the way.
Speaker 9 (32:51):
The CDC a couple of weeks ago did a study where they
looked at every single.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
Okay, so this is another one of those county
meetings and this is this is ahealth personnel who is speaking
and she's just got like acouple minutes, so she's kind of
running through this as good.
Speaker 9 (33:06):
Other study in the entire world on face mask
wearing and this is what theyfound.
The CDC found quote noreduction in viral transmission
with the use of face masks.
There is absolutely zero pointin putting face masks on healthy
or asymptomatic carriers.
They do not work to stop thevirus and what they do do is cut
the oxygen hypoxically low.
(33:27):
Let me explain to you whathappens when people go down due
to loss of oxygen.
They don't break their fall byputting a hand out like an
average person does when they'reheaded south.
What they do is they drop likea ton of bricks.
Their skull hits first.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
It's interesting listening to that because that's
what we were seeing in Iran andin China was the skulls hitting
first popping down?
I want to play.
This is Greg Gutfeld.
This is a little clip from theFive and he was responding to
something Juan Williams had andGreg's just had it and I think a
lot of people in media havekind of just had it, especially
if you're on the conservativeside, because you feel like
(34:04):
you're talking into this emptyecosystem, right, Like facts
don't matter, Nothing matters,it's just opinion smearing.
It's a really interesting worldon the left side of politics.
I mean, there's no consistency.
It's hypocritical to theumpteenth degree.
Nobody stands on any principle.
They're flailing in the windall the time.
(34:24):
It's obvious.
I mean it's just obvious, andso this is Greg Gutfeld's kind
of take.
I love it.
Speaker 10 (34:31):
About the political strategy here.
How does the strategy ofnormalizing the coronavirus help
the Trump campaign?
I mean, obviously people aredying.
This is no common cold and Ithink that's evident to
everybody.
Speaker 2 (34:45):
Okay.
So this is no common cold.
That's evidence to everybody.
Think about what I just playedyou sitting Senator who's going
through it, essentially sayingthis is the common flu, and
we're jacking up our numbers,we're messing up our reporting.
How could we possibly trustanything?
You've got that judge downthere going well, you got a
headache and a cough.
I guess Washington's gotanother coronavirus case.
(35:06):
Apparently I got thecoronavirus.
You heard it there.
Folks Live cough and you knowI'm symptomatic.
Now I got a cough.
I must have coronavirus.
Count me up.
So anyways, it's all based onan incorrect premise.
So Greg Gutfeld's got thisstrained.
Look on his face and just Ilove it.
Speaker 11 (35:27):
That's the craziest question you've ever done.
Nobody's normalizing a virusokay.
But, by the way, no one shouldtake anybody in the media
seriously in their questioningof process if they haven't
actually made a correct piece ofadvice.
Okay, let's face it.
Number one they politicizedhydroxy.
(35:49):
Remember that they were sohappy to find that one bad study
that said it didn't work.
Now they go strangely silentwhen you hear that it might work
.
And in fact we all kind of knewthat it might work.
In terms of a strategy, it waswell-tolerated among people.
We knew that there was promise,but the media didn't like that.
Two the rest home debts.
(36:10):
The media bent over backward tocover up for the Cuomos right.
They didn't want that to be abig story, but that was a big
story, okay.
So they covered up the resthome stuff.
They bashed a drug that hadpotential.
They refused to cite the mostimportant data on earth, which
is the reduction in death rates.
That is the important thing,but you can't talk about the
(36:31):
fact that that's plummeting.
And then let's not forget thetravel ban right, which many in
the media won, said that wasstupid and said that it was
racist, but that probably did alarge part in preventing a lot
of death.
So the media and those whopoliticize this need to be
ignored, all right.
Speaker 2 (36:52):
That's it.
They need to be ignored.
I think they so, and it goes,it goes, it goes.
It got Russiagate.
You've got now COVID.
You've got scam after scamafter scam after scam.
He's exactly right They've gotto be ignored.
Now, I have said for a long timethat there is a uh oh.
I've got the who video herewhere she says things can't be
(37:12):
spread asymptomatically.
I'll skip that.
It's made the rounds.
I think you guys get the point.
Now, what is it that we'rereally dealing with?
What is coronavirus?
Why would Donald Trump right?
Isn't Donald Trump supposed tobe like our hero?
Isn't he supposed to be likekeeping an eye out for us and
(37:45):
helping us out?
Well, he is, but he's got somethings that he's up against.
I want you to listen to thisvideo.
So this is a contractor forDynCorp.
Dyncorp was involved with theDNC and then they were hired by
Congress by the Democrats inCongress, so the Democratic
caucus to do their servers.
They got arrested.
This was kind of during theMueller time.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz wasinvolved with this because she's
the one who procured thecontract when she was the head
(38:07):
of the DNC.
They were suspected of someWikiLeaks collaboration, which
turned out to be nothing.
Then we found out they werecollaborating with CrowdStrike
and anyways, these guys ended upgetting tried, got a quick
little sentence and they'rebasically put away short period
of time.
Not really tried for theircrimes, tried for, you know,
process crimes around the crime,just to get them locked up and
(38:29):
out of the public eye.
It was a huge cover-up.
All One Brothers, a-w-a-n.
All one brothers.
They were IT professionals forthe Democrat party, so this
contractor was involved withthem.
Now he's going to put out areally dire warning and he's
going to connect some dots, sowe're just going to go through
it here.
Speaker 12 (38:44):
Uh, along came a spy team.
Speaker 2 (38:47):
Okay, so he's, I'm I'm jumping into the story
because, again, it's a longervideo and uh, but he's kind of
explains himself, so I'll stopit if I have to go back and
explain something that heskipped over.
But he's talking about how hegot involved with the whole case
on on capitol hill by the nameof the awans.
Speaker 12 (39:03):
I immediately put the two together.
I put their blackberries,encrypted networks together.
We said that dying core slowlycached weapons over a period of
time to replace police forces,un police forces, with UN
peacekeepers.
Speaker 2 (39:17):
Okay, so remember when I reported that in 2015,
loretta Lynch and Joe, there'sno conspiracies, but there's no
coincidences.
Folk, this put on your thinkingcaps.
Right now, a lot of dots aregoing to start connecting A lot
of dots.
Maybe I've undersold this videojust a little bit.
This is a critical video.
This is going to startconnecting A lot of dots.
Maybe I've undersold this videojust a little bit.
This is a critical video.
This is going to connect majordots.
You want to know why, even onthe right side of the aisle,
(39:40):
some people get a littlepanicked.
This is why, okay, we're goingto connect some dots here.
So sorry if I undersold thisvideo.
We're going to connect somedots here.
Everything from weapons so UNpeacekeeping troops being
brought here.
That was 2015 UN resolution.
Biden and Loretta Lynch wentand signed on it, minnesota
being the key ground for that.
There's been lots of groundworklaid in Minnesota for this, so
(40:03):
here we go.
Speaker 12 (40:04):
We said they slowly cached weapons.
They use things like biologicalweapons and chemical weapons.
We talk about DynCorp sprayingin Central America, spraying in
Kosovo, spraying in Bosnia,spraying in conflict areas all
over Central America, stoppingat nothing, spraying all kinds
of weapons, using all kinds ofmachinations and leading no
(40:28):
holds barred to overthrowingcountries and overthrowing their
police departments.
That's what we said three and ahalf years ago.
Back then it was conspiracytheory.
Back then didn't seem to betaken too seriously.
Until we found the AwanBlackberries, until we found the
(40:49):
Pride hard drives, until wefound the same Blacks that had
planned all these coups theLibya, syria, sudan, yemen.
The coup probably in.
Speaker 2 (40:58):
You remember yesterday's episode that was a
little bit rough and choppy.
Well, remember the BlackBerry,the encrypted network.
These are the guys who broke it.
Speaker 12 (41:07):
The coups in Central America, again for DynCorp and
other companies as well thatcame in and followed DynCorp
like Blackwater.
We talked about the chemicalweapons and biological weapons
partnerships, dyncorp.
Speaker 2 (41:19):
Who is Blackwater?
Blackwater is owned by EricPrince, who's the sister of
Betsy DeVos, the secretary ofeducation.
Blackwater is the one who toldthe world about the Wienergate
laptop at the Southern Districtof New York.
Remember, it's not the SouthernDistrict of New York that
exposed what was on it.
It was leaked to Blackwater,who then leaked it to the world.
So Blackwater's involved indomestic law enforcement.
Speaker 12 (41:43):
We had with a company called DynPort.
It's happening right now inyour US city.
We said there was 45 AwanBlackberry carriers.
These are 45 representatives.
We said that they were therepresentatives in the areas
that had the big cities, thelarge black populations, where
they had safe congressionaldistricts.
We said the Awans were takingmoney that we were sending to
(42:06):
stop Osama Bin Laden, to stopterrorism, and it only spending
a couple of days on the dockswhere Imran was in Karachi and
then being turned right backaround because the soldiers they
were going to, the soldiersthey were going to in
Afghanistan, were actually ghostsoldiers.
The technology that we weresending there to support were
(42:27):
ghost.
It was ghost technology.
It was actually turned rightback around and being cashed
right back here for technologyand weapons against the people
in the United States.
We also looked at a link to awoman who was married to Imran
Awan's invisible brother, abid,named Natalia Sovia.
(42:54):
Background and her connectionswith Nancy Pelosi, her
connections with other people onCapitol Hill in terms of
Ukrainian intelligence topurchase chemical weapons and
biological weapons that could beused against the United States
population.
Isn't that exactly whatCOVID-19 is?
We are seeing more and moreevidence now every day that this
was a NATO simulation in 2019during the World NATO Games,
completely synchronized with theEvent 201 to simulate a world
(43:19):
event with a weak virus.
And we are now more convincedthan ever that a stronger
version of the virus the bindingaffinity, remember, of the S
protein can be now controlledthrough using the CRISPR to
create as lethal of a virus aspossible.
(43:39):
There's the four HIV inserts inthere.
If they want to go and crank itall the way up to the most
lethal form, they can crank uphow virile and contagious it is,
and also the payload can bemixed with a whole sort of
different pathogens, not justAIDS, but also Ebola and other
(44:02):
very virulent pathogens.
Speaker 2 (44:04):
This is so when you go in and you look at the virus
and you look at the vaccine,specifically Moderna, which is
mode RNA.
Moderna, which stands formodification RNA, so change your
RNA, which then your RNA is theduplicator of your DNA.
So, by modifying your RNA, youtherefore modify your DNA.
(44:27):
So they're going to try to tellyour body to print the antibody
, to make the antibody to thevirus.
So they're not going to giveyou a dead virus and then let
your body create an antibody.
They're going to tell your DNAto print the antibody, to make
the antibody to the virus.
So they're not going to giveyou a dead virus and then let
your body create antibody.
They're going to tell your DNAto create the antibody.
Moderna modify your RNA.
Okay.
So now he's talking about theycan use CRISPR, which is James,
the DNA code.
(44:47):
They can crank up the virus sothey could tell your body to
create Ebola, and then nowyou're the carrier for Ebola.
And they can do that throughelectronic signals, because the
Moderna vaccine usesnanotechnology, which is
activated by electronic pulses.
Folks, folks, this is whyPresident Trump shut down the
economy.
(45:07):
This is why he closed theborders, because this is the
intel he has, the virus that'sfloating around the United
States is not a high-risk virus.
It's a simulation.
It's a test run to see how werespond.
And how are we responding?
We're giving away our libertiesand our rights, the very thing
we should be defending.
We're not demandingtruthfulness from our
(45:27):
politicians and our leaders.
We're letting them run politicswith policy instead of smart
decisions.
We should not be doing whatwe're doing now until the real
virus hits.
Speaker 12 (45:40):
Exactly what we warned three and a half years
ago.
Back then we had all kinds oftime.
Now we have a wand minutes tomidnight.
Now we have very little time120 days.
But who knows when the secondwave will happen.
I say it's the October, the19th, just because I'm going on.
How the defense departmentworks, how NATO works, how
(46:01):
military, larger militaryorganizations train and plan,
but who's to say that it won'tbe moved forward to Jacksonville
now in July?
Uh, in Florida with theRepublican convention, with the
DynCorp attack?
We just don't know.
And the longer we wait toexpose the network, the more we
put ourselves at risk.
Speaker 2 (46:23):
The go out today and so one of the things as peasants
is, all we get to do is hearthe information.
We get the propaganda alongwith the info and we've got to
sort it out.
So we get to sort this out.
You've got real bad people outthere that want to do real bad
things at a real big scale, itis true, and some of those
(46:47):
people are people we see on TVevery day, and some of those
people we will never know theirnames on TV every day, and some
of those people we will neverknow their names.
And this is why it is soimportant that we have a society
and a culture that valuesindividual life.
It is so important that we havea culture and a society that
believes that there's karma,that there's just punishment for
(47:09):
those who are bad actors,whether in quote this life or
the next, because to holdsociety together, you have to be
able to eliminate the peoplethat want to commit genocide.
Oh man, it's crazy.
There are no conspiracies, butthere's no coincidences, right?
I mean, I've spent I don't knowa lot of episodes.
(47:32):
Now I feel like I've been doingthis show for a long time and
everything just ties in togetherall the time so nicely.
Remember the names, rememberthe people remember where they
work, remember what they do,remember who they're married to.
I haven't confirmed this, but Iheard that Ghislaine Epstein's
sister is married to Dr Fauci.
(47:54):
Now, the source I got that fromwas credible enough that it
gave me pause.
So I got to do a little diggingand confirm it like
definitively.
But gosh, wouldn't that just besomething right?
Again, no conspiracies, butthere's no coincidences.
The Awan brothers the way thattheir trial was just thrown
through we didn't really knowwhat it was all about.
We knew it was bad.
We knew it was bad.
Well, now we know just how badit was.
(48:14):
They were obviously part of,you know, planning COVID through
a NATO strike.
They were using that BlackBerryencrypted network which, again
yesterday the episode.
They've been rolling up allthese networks.
Does this man who's talkingknow that?
Does he know that they wereusing that information?
Maybe Trump is letting COVIDhappen so he can show us?
Doesn't Q always say he has toshow us how bad it is?
(48:37):
It's crazy To me.
The real good people, the realgood people, don't let innocent
people die.
Now, how does that fit inthings I read this thing the
other day about in World War II,they cracked the German U-boat
subcodes the decoder thing theyhad, but they wouldn't let the
(49:02):
Germans know.
So they literally sacrificedconvoys of boats so that they
weren't so successful instopping the U-boats all the
time.
I mean, eventually they wereable to stop them all the time,
but they had to make it looklike they were just randomly
finding these U-boats ratherthan reading their messages.
I thought how interesting thatthey would make the decision to
let those ships die in order notto tip their hand.
(49:23):
I don't know, it's a toughdecision, isn't it?
It's a tough decision, you know.
Does Trump let this thing go?
Let people's businesses suffer,let people, you know, get drug
addictions because they're outof work, and the rioting and
looting and all the things thatare a result of these lockdowns?
Does he let that happen inorder just to show us how evil
the Democrats are?
Is that what it takes?
I mean, maybe it is, maybethat's a form of warfare, maybe
(49:44):
that's.
You know, take the mask off andthere's a lot of suffering, but
there's going to be a lot ofsuffering anyways.
I mean, if these people won, wewould have an earth with half a
million people on.
I mean, really, that's trulywhat they want?
The Georgia guys don't say it,and that's exactly what they are
working for is a worldpopulation of about half a
million.
That's how many people theythink they need to create a
slave service economy.
(50:04):
They figure a half a millionpeople.
And they can with AI, they cankeep their rich and famous
lifestyle and the earth willrecover itself.
They really do believe that.
I mean, that's the agenda ofthe people pushing for
depopulation, the Bill Gates,the nihilists of the world.
That's what they want.
So just to leave you on a littlehigher note, let's go one more
last spot, and this has to dowith TikTok, which is an app
(50:27):
that I have loved.
By the way, I have used TikTokand thought it was really fun.
You've probably followed me onmy socials.
You've seen a few of my funnymedia as well.
I have deleted my TikTok appcompletely.
So what happened with TikTok?
Tiktok is a Chinese developedapp and it basically mimics
Instagram little 15 secondvideos.
Now they're up to a minute.
Little music video.
(50:48):
It's cute, tiktok's fun.
However, it's a spy app, so Ididn't know this, but obviously
China's got all my info.
Now, anything you got on yourphone, china's pretty much
getting, that's right,everything on TikTok, if you got
TikTok on your phone.
China has all your data yourpictures, your clipboards, your
messages, your location data,your health data, everything
(51:08):
your phone's got.
China's got Some tech guys.
So that was suspected eversince TikTok came out.
It used to be Musically, andthey bought out TikTok bought
them out to expand into the US,and so now it's just TikTok
Anyways.
So here's the point India, someengineers reverse engineered
TikTok and they were able todetermine all the information
(51:29):
that was going back to China andthey said no more.
So India has banned TikTok, aswell as a whole bunch of other
Chinese apps, and the US is faston its tail.
So here's Mike Pompeo.
Speaker 6 (51:40):
TikTok has about 30 million users in the United
States, but it's been banned nowby India, and Australia is
considering the same action,saying that TikTok was full of
mass surveillance and propaganda, and also that the app had the
ability to feed informationstraight to Beijing.
So kind of obvious question.
If all that's the case,shouldn't we be considering
(52:01):
right now, tonight, a ban onChinese social media apps,
especially TikTok?
Speaker 4 (52:07):
Laurie, your viewers should know we're taking this
very seriously.
We're certainly looking at it.
We've worked on this very issuefor a long time, whether it was
the problems of having Huaweitechnology in your
infrastructure.
We've gone all over the worldand we're making real progress
getting that out.
We declared ZTE a danger toAmerican national security.
We've done all of these thingswith respect to Chinese apps on
(52:28):
people's cell phones.
I can assure you the UnitedStates will get this one right
too.
Laura, I don't want to get outin front of the president, but
it's something we're looking at.
Speaker 6 (52:35):
Would you recommend that people download that up on
their phones tonight, tomorrow,anytime currently?
Speaker 4 (52:41):
Only if you want your private information in the
hands of the Chinese CommunistParty.
Speaker 6 (52:46):
Mr Secretary, it's great to see you, as always
tonight.
Thanks so much, thank you,laura?
Speaker 2 (52:50):
Okay, so only if you want China to have your
information.
Do you want to download TikTokor have it on your phone?
So, if you got it, downloadyour videos onto your phone,
save them if you want them andfor posterity sake, but delete
the app.
Get rid of TikTok.
Get rid of any other app thatyou know has a Chinese
background, and don't think thatthey're not coming for you.
Don't think they're not comingfor you.
They've that new nationalsecurity law.
(53:12):
We'll have to tie that in later, but they've got.
They claim to have jurisdictionover the whole world.
So if they want to come in,take you in the middle of the
night, put you on a helicopter,fly over to China and torture
you.
They think they have the rightto do that, and then it would be
upon our government to goretrieve you.
And you know, do you thinkyou're most valuable enough to
start a war?
So be careful.
What say about China?
Right?
That's literally the directionwe're headed.
So again, lots of crazy stuffhappening in the world.
(53:36):
Have a good day, peasants.
You can find me at PeasantsPod,on Twitter, on Parler at
PeasantsPod, facebook, thePeasants Perspective and email
at peasantspodcom.
Thanks a lot, guys.
I appreciate your time and Ilook forward to talking to you
again tomorrow and I lookforward to talking to you again
tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (53:55):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working class is ohthere you go bringing class
into it again.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
(54:16):
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
(54:37):
In the case of pure internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the waves he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest shimmering
(54:57):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
(55:19):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will I went roundsaying I was an emperor just
because some moistened bint hadlobbed a scimitar at me, they'd
put me away.
Shut up, will you?
Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
(55:40):
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed.
Bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys, thelittle guys that take the brunt
of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
(00:40):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Alright, welcome to anotherepisode of Peasants Perspective.
Welcome, peasants.
As always, you can find me aton Twitter, at PeasantsPod, on
(01:00):
Parler, at PeasantsPod, onFacebook, at the Peasants
Perspective.
And email.
You can email me at peasantspodat gmailcom.
We have so much stuff happeningin the news right now, but yet
it's a slow news cycle.
It's actually extremely painful, I don't know.
I mean it gets like this everynow and then, where there's just
these big bombshells, butthey're kind of like on due day
two or three of their news cycleand so they're kind of starting
(01:22):
to fade away and there's justnothing quite exciting replacing
it.
But the things that are thereare huge.
The Ghislaine Maxwell arrest ishuge.
We should still be talkingabout it.
We should be trying to get tomore of the bottom around the
circumstances.
There's a lot of things inquestion.
So I'm just going to go througha couple of the highlight news
(01:42):
stories, a couple of things thatare affecting me, and we're
going to talk about COVID again.
I really don't like talkingabout COVID.
I'm kind of done with it.
I'm going to show you a videofrom Greg Gutfeld today that
describes things very well.
Let's just put it that way.
Let's jump into the GhislaineMaxwell story here.
I think the way I'm going toapproach this story on this show
(02:03):
is I'm mainly going to do itfrom a perspective of updates,
because the story is prettydifficult to tell and I don't
know if it's a story that Ireally want to tell on this show
.
All the details and graphicdetails but justice in the case
of Ghislaine Maxwell is kind oflike critical.
I mean, if we don't get justicein the Ghislaine Maxwell case,
(02:24):
then we're not likely going toget justice on a lot of other
things.
I think the Ghislaine Maxwellcase, the Epstein case, ties
into a lot of the nightmaresthat we go through as a country
and a lot of the things that weseem to just not be able to get
right.
So let me just look at one thinghere.
Another set of news or anotherchange of events.
That's kind of unique.
(02:44):
This is the judge in charge ofGhislaine Maxwell case is an
Obama appointee who used to behis Barack Obama's special
assistant, and one of theprosecutors is James Comey's
daughter.
And then the question that'sposed here is how does this keep
happening?
That's a really good question.
So, all right, what's myperspective on this?
(03:05):
My perspective has been thatObama did not appoint judges
that seem to care about ourConstitution.
Everything I have experiencedthus far, every single case that
has gone through an Obama judgethat has been even remotely
controversial, almost withoutexception.
They have sided on the side ofactivism, on the side of
judicial review, on the side ofjudicial overreach.
(03:28):
They really haven't beenconstitutional judges by any
stretch of the imagination.
Now they're all individuals andwho knows right?
I mean, obama did nominate alot of judges, so there's a lot
of judges that could be good,but this is another one of those
things that's kind ofconcerning.
Now, I'm pretty sure they don'tget.
I think you have some abilityto choose judges, but not a lot.
(03:51):
I think that you kind of put itinto the court that you want to
go and it shows up on thedocket.
So I'm not sure if this was arandomly subjected judge or not,
but I will say this in theMueller investigation every
single judge that was used soAmy Berman, jackson, judge
Sullivan.
Amy Berman had a couple of thecases.
They were horrible judges,horrible judges.
(04:12):
They made extrajudicialdecisions.
They did things out of normalprocedure.
I mean, in one case, the JudgeSullivan case, it's so egregious
.
It went to an appellate courtand they granted a writ of
mandamus and have ordered JudgeSullivan to dismiss the case
against General Flynn becausethe judge refuses to dismiss the
case.
So when we're talking aboutjudicial judges and who they're
(04:35):
appointed by, it apparently ispretty important.
I mean, the Mueller team soughtout or got only Obama judges
and frankly, those judges had alot of malpractice in their
courts.
In the case of the Roger Stonecase with Amy Berman-Jaxman, she
put a gag order on Roger Stone,which I think was an egregious
abuse of power.
She really just didn't want himtalking politically.
(04:57):
I mean there was really nothinghe could say.
What his case was about waslying to Congress about
immaterial statements made tothe Mueller team as opposed to
made to Congress.
There was no.
There was nothing.
I mean the whole premise of whyhe was being talked to.
The entire premise on what hewas being asked about the Trump
(05:19):
campaign's connection toWikiLeaks had no factual basis.
It was all false.
But yet he lied or misled ormisstated something in between
Congress and his to the FBI, andwhat he misstated was not
material to the fact that Trumpcampaign had or had not colluded
(05:39):
and worked with WikiLeaks.
So you've got another situationhere where, with this judge,
she's put a gag order on him forsomething that you should be
able to talk about.
I mean, these are not highcrimes, these are not state
secrets.
There was no confidential orclassified information involved.
This was a pretty simple case oflying to Congress, something
(06:00):
that seems like everybody justdoes, seems like it's really no
big deal.
Just for the record, rogerStone is now the first person to
be held accountable for lyingto Congress in 15 years, 20
years.
I mean the problem is so badand there's been so little lack
of enforcement on the statutesof lying to Congress.
(06:21):
I mean people talk about it allthe time.
I think it's just a politicalpunishment.
You know, the Congress makes areferral to the Department of
Justice and then the Departmentof Justice proceeds and, just
for the record, congress doesmake a lot of referrals.
I mean, they held Eric Holderin contempt of Congress for
lying to Congress and failure todisclose documents, and then,
(06:43):
of of course, that led to Barrbeing held in contempt, and then
you've got a whole handful ofother people who have been held
in contempt.
But it seems like anytime lyingto Congress comes up, only if
you're a Republican is there anyconsequence for that.
So you know, I don't know.
I don't know what's going on.
Another thing about this casetoo, just to keep everybody up
on the same page, this case isbeing tried by the office.
(07:03):
Just to keep everybody up onthe same page, this case is
being tried by the office,handled by the office's public
corruption unit.
Assistant US Attorney AlexRosemiller, allison Moe and
Maureen Comey are in charge ofthe prosecution.
So we're going to rememberthose names Alex Rosemiller,
allison Moe and Maureen Comey.
Those three attorneys rightthere hold the fate of whether
(07:26):
there's a two-tier justicesystem or not in their hands.
I mean this case right here.
Epstein killed himself.
Epstein got away.
He got the cowards out with allthe horror that he had caused
on people, including murder.
By the way, I mean, thosecharges of murder have not been
brought up.
(07:46):
You need a body with a birthcertificate usually to be
convicted of murder.
But what we're going to findand I've already played on this
podcast multiple times about thebodies, the children that are
trafficked without birthcertificates, that are used in
satanic cults or satanic ritualswhich Epstein Island is a
temple is a satanic temple.
(08:07):
When you look at the floor plan, the blueprints, when you look
at the side view and how theywent into the mountain and under
the mountain with the submarinelanding, I mean it looks eerily
like the layout of a pyramid inisland form.
If you subsurface the island,it's really quite disturbing,
quite disturbing.
So Alex Rosemiller, alison Moeand Maureen Comey are in charge
(08:29):
of the prosecution.
It bothers me, it reallybothers me, that Maureen Comey
is on that, on that, on thatlist.
And you know, I think her dadneeds to be tried for treason
and I think he deserves to beexecuted as a prisoner of the
state and for crimes against thecitizens of the United States.
And I say that very seriously,like I think James Comey is a
(08:52):
traitor to our nation and wedon't hold children accountable
for the sins of their father.
But I think that Maureen Comeyhas a.
She's going to have a spotlighton her and I'm definitely going
to put a spotlight on her asfar as I can and keeping an eye
on her, because that is that isatrocious.
That is, she should just recuseherself if for no other reason
(09:14):
than the fact that her name isComey and her dad had let the
Clintons off the hook over andover and over again, and her dad
, on his watch, had these casesin his uh possession.
He had the Wiener laptop.
He had uh Epstein's uh wasEpstein's first arrest Mayor may
not have been on his watch itprobably wasn't on his watch,
but either way, um, it's quiteastonishing.
(09:37):
I don't, again, don't have a lotof words on how to quite get
where we're at here.
Here's another thing too.
This is Prince Andrew.
I just want to play this here.
This is an actual admission ofguilt and I want you to pay
attention to the way he does.
Now, prince Andrew is the son ofthe queen.
He's not really in line for thecrown.
(09:59):
For the crown to come to him,it'd have to leave the normal
line of succession.
Basically, what it'd have tomean is some people who should
get the crown would have to die,and so it would have to pass
over to him, but nonethelesshe's a royal figure.
He has been dismissed from hisroyal duties because of this
specific scandal, because of theEpstein involvement with
Epstein, pictures have surfacedwhere, obviously, prince Andrew
(10:22):
took Kevin Spacey and GhislaineMaxwell on a tour of Buckingham
Palace and they actually sat onthe throne.
Yeah, that picture's floatingaround there and that's a pretty
devastating picture as far asthe crown is concerned, because
no one should be sitting onthose thrones except for the
king and queen, and you've gotGhislaine Maxwell, a child
predator, and Kevin Spacey, alsoa predator, sitting on the
(10:43):
palace thrones.
I mean, that is in the monarchyway.
That is a mockery to God, ifyou were to put it that way.
So, anyways, this is PrinceAndrew in a BBC interview, and
notice the way that he confirmshis involvement with Jeffrey
Epstein.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
The problem was the fact that once he had been
convicted, you stayed with him,I stayed with him, and that's
the bit that, as it were, I kickmyself for on a daily basis,
because it was not somethingthat was becoming of a member of
the royal family, and we tryand uphold the highest standards
and practices and I let theside down.
Simple as that.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
So that's a good little admission that he hung
around with Epstein.
He's admitting the fact that hewas with him.
Now the fact that you knowbasically what that means is
there's no more deniability,there's no possibility of oh,
those pictures aren't me,they're photoshopped.
All those things have beenfloated around and it's not
going to happen anymore.
Okay, let's move on to thecoronavirus.
So there's this video floatingaround with it's not really just
(11:47):
floating around with Dr ScottJensen.
Who is Dr Scott Jensen?
Well, you might know him asSenator Scott Jensen.
So Senator Scott Jensen is oneof the senators from the state
of Minnesota and he put out avideo yesterday that is really
fascinating.
Now, it's a little too long toplay, it's actually 11 or 12
minutes in total, but here'swhat has happened Dr Johnson is
(12:11):
being investigated by theMinnesota Board of Health and
this is quite shocking andfrustrating to Scott Johnson,
and they've listed two reasonswhy they're investigating him.
One, for making inappropriateconnections between coronavirus
and the flu.
So basically comparing them,just simply.
You know, this is how many fludeaths, this is how many
coronavirus deaths is similar,or this is similar symptoms.
(12:33):
Basically just making thecomparison to from coronavirus
to the flu.
And then the second thing wasmaking reference to.
Let's see, there was MakingReference to Coronavirus and
Misleading the Public on gosh.
What was it, hi Senator ScottJensen?
Speaker 5 (12:55):
I represent Carver County.
This is one of the mostimportant videos of the Family
Doc for 40 years.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
I'm skipping through it until I find it.
Speaker 5 (13:02):
For the flu, for COVID-19.
We've had some 35, 40,000 casesof COVID-19 in Minnesota thus
far, According to the Departmentof Health people.
That might translate into 10times that many, and if it does
translate into 10 times, I meanthat's 350,000 cases.
But in 2018, we had more than ahalf a million Minnesotans with
(13:23):
the flu.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Did you catch that?
So this is a long video and Ijust jumped to that specific
part, so I wasn't looking for itspecifically.
But basically he's saying we'vehad 350,000 cases on a max.
Like if you take the 35,000that have tested, times it by 10
, 350,000.
But yet.
We had a half a million flucases, but yet we have no flu
cases this year in Minnesota.
We had a half a million flucases, but yet we have no flu
cases this year in Minnesota.
Speaker 5 (13:45):
That's basically what he's saying.
Say that Am I recklessly givingyou advice?
Regarding COVID-19 and the flu,dr Anthony Fauci has come out
and compared them all the timeDr Mike Osterholm has.
In terms of the deathcertificates.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
On April 3rd I got an email from the Department of
Health that said very clearlythat we should report COVID-19
on death certificates if it isassumed to have caused or
contributed.
Well, that's not how we do.
Death certificates, theofficial ICD-10 coding, okay.
So I want to put somesignificance in here.
So Dr Scott Scottson at thebeginning of this video goes
through his credentials 40 yearsin practice he's run hospitals,
he's done house calls.
Basically he's done it all.
You know he's a competentdoctor and he is a sitting US
(14:44):
senator okay, someone who's nowin charge of legislation around
medical.
He sits on the committees thatdeal with medical regulation and
things like that, and so he'svery, very up to date on
everything.
So when he's saying this, thisis a.
In a certain sense, this is anuclear bomb going off in the
medical community.
(15:04):
In a certain sense, this is anuclear bomb going off in the
medical community.
Speaker 5 (15:14):
Because here's the senator who essentially has
power to take power from theactual health department in
Minnesota.
That's investigating him andhe's calling foul.
If the provider documentssuspected possible, probable or
inconclusive COVID-19, do notassign U07.1, which is COVID-19
disease.
It says.
Assign a code explaining thereason for the encounter, such
(15:36):
as fever or a cough or shortnessof breath.
That's what the officialinstructions say.
So I get this on April 3rd.
I end up inadvertently, sort ofaccidentally, running it up the
flagpole with Chris Berg onApril 7th.
And what happens?
The Department of Health a fewdays later comes out with a
(15:58):
clarification and then a fewweeks later they come out with
another clarification.
And I appreciate it.
The fact of the matter is I'mproud of the Department of
Health in Minnesota for sayingwe are not going to list
non-confirmed cases as deaths inMinnesota.
We are going to put an asteriskby them and we'll follow up on
those later.
But that's not what Pennsylvaniawas doing.
(16:19):
That's why they had to subtract200 patients from their
COVID-19 death count.
Colorado did the same thing.
New York went the otherdirection.
New York said we're having moredeaths in a certain period than
we normally have, so thosedeaths must be COVID-19.
We just didn't pick them up.
So, nevermind the testing,we're adding 3,700 to our total,
(16:40):
and well, that does increaseour total by 50%.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
So one of the things that happened in New York is.
So what he's talking about is,basically, he is making the
connection and a directconnection between the policies
that the state healthdepartments are putting out and
how we're counting COVID deaths,covid cases, et cetera, et
cetera.
So this is why this is anuclear bomb.
This is a sitting Senator.
Okay, this is a sitting senatorwho sits on the committee and
(17:06):
he's going to examine andinvestigate this stuff.
He's getting directives as asitting medical doctor, a
medical doctor who has a licensein the state of Minnesota.
He's getting guidance andguidelines from his local health
department, his state healthdepartment, telling him how to
count the deaths.
He runs it up the flagpole,gets it corrected in the state
of Minnesota and, as you can see, he's saying, hey, at least
(17:27):
Minnesota is doing this right,they're not just going to count
anybody as COVID death.
But that's not what Pennsylvaniahas done, that's not what New
York did.
In fact, new York went so farthe opposite direction and the
story behind that is in New York, when they did the lockdown, a
lot of people died in theirhomes Because, remember, you
can't go to the hospital, youcan't go to the ER, you're only
supposed to go out for certainthings.
So there's a lot of heartattack victims, there were a lot
(17:48):
of stroke victims, there were alot of people that let small or
minor medical thingsessentially build up and so they
started having people dying inhomes, and they normally do.
In a huge city like the size ofNew York.
They'll retrieve like 50 bodiesa day out of homes in New York,
which, when you do it by thepercentage, isn't super crazy.
People die in their homes allthe time.
(18:10):
But that number shot up, itquadrupled, and what they were
doing was they were countingevery single home death, every
single home death, as a COVIDdeath, because you know it was
caused by COVID, because COVIDcaused the lockdowns.
I mean it was.
It was ridiculous.
It was caused by COVID, becauseCOVID caused the lockdowns.
I mean it was ridiculous.
Speaker 5 (18:30):
So our count is off.
So I'm in the position where Ihave to explain that I wasn't
spreading misinformation and I'mnot being reckless when I talk
about COVID-19 and the influenceof both, being single-stranded
RNA viruses that are respiratoryin nature, with similar
symptoms and can be spreadthrough particulate matter and
aerosol transmission.
I've got an eight-page documentthat I put together for the
(18:54):
Board of Medical Practice andlet me be clear, they do
important work and I'm going tofully cooperate with them.
I also have some 70 pages ofattachments and in the
attachments I've got thePennsylvania Department of
Health slashing their numbers by201.
I've got the Department ofHealth in Illinois where one of
(19:20):
the directors says that justbecause we put COVID-19 down on
the death certificate as causeof death, that doesn't mean the
patient died of COVID-19.
She said that.
Dr Fauci, when he talks aboutinfluenza, he was the lead
article in this New EnglandJournal article and he said this
(19:42):
If one assumes that the numberof asymptomatic or minimally
symptomatic cases for COVID-19is several times as high as the
number of reported cases, thecase fatality rate may be
considerably less than 1%.
This suggests that the overallclinical consequences of
COVID-19 may ultimately be moreakin to those of a severe
seasonal influenza.
That was Dr Fauci.
(20:05):
And oh, by the way, one of thecontributing authors was those
of a severe seasonal influenza.
That was Dr Fauci.
And oh, by the way, one of thecontributing authors was Dr
Robert Redfield, the head of theCDC.
Dr Osterholm is a well-regardedepidemiologist and he was saying
this in the middle of March.
He said the flu has become apandemic more than once and has
(20:26):
killed millions of people.
It still exists today,unfortunately.
We now have on our handssomething else, but it's caused
by coronavirus, which is actingvery much like influenza.
Folks, do I feel targeted?
Yeah, I do.
Do I know who my accusers are?
(20:48):
No, I don't get to know.
Could I be disciplined by theBoard of Medical Practice?
Well, sure I could.
There's two allegations there.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
So someone made an anonymous complaint against him
to the Minnesota Board of Health, and so he did a little
research.
In the beginning of the videothat I clipped off, he talked
about how it's a one-pagecomplaint.
It goes in it's a one-pagecomplaint.
You don't put your name on it,the health department doesn't
know who you are.
But this entire investigationis being launched because
(21:18):
somebody put a one-pagecomplaint in which with pretty
much unfounded complaints, andso the government is now being
used as a political tool to comeagainst a sitting senator and
create this investigation.
It's going to cost money, it'sgoing to cost time, it's going
to cost resources to go afterthis and it potentially could
end up in the loss of thissenator's medical license.
(21:42):
In a normal world this would beloss of income, loss of revenue
, loss of livelihood.
He's not able to face hisaccuser, he's not able to go
through an appeals court.
I mean, this is like tyranny.
This is objective tyranny andthis is how you can use the
government as a police state.
I have a neighbor who does this.
By the way, every time I starta fire he calls the fire
department to find out if I havea burning permit.
(22:04):
Every time I clear the front ofmy property that's full of
blackberries.
He says I'm clearing in awetland and I have to deal with
the building department and geta stop work order and go through
a rigmarole.
He's cost me money, time, butevery time he makes these
anonymous tips right, thinkingthat it won't come back to him.
Obviously it always comes backto time to figure it out.
He'd probably made four or fivecomplaints before I finally
(22:25):
figured it out.
It was all coming from him butyou know, county couldn't tell
me that I had to finally deduceit and confront him about it.
So here's Scott Johnson,senator Scott Johnson.
He's got to confront his healthdepartment.
Can't face his actual accuser,can't just on its surface say,
hey, these claims are nonsense.
He's got to go through thiswhole process.
Speaker 5 (22:56):
If I have been spreading misinformation, then
what about Governor Walz and theDepartment of Health memo that
talked about the purpose of, ifyou will, some of the measures
that we'd be taking to dampen,delay and decrease the peak to
allow the accumulation of PPEand make sure that our hospital
(23:18):
capacities weren't beingoverwhelmed?
In that memo they say whateffective measures are cover
your mouth.
Don't go out if you have coughor fever.
Avoid touching your face, youreyes or mouth.
Cover your mouth if you cough.
Wash your hands frequently.
Minimize outings sociallydistance.
But what did they say were noteffective measures?
(23:39):
They said wearing masks is noteffective, taking antibiotics is
not effective.
A month later Governor Walzcomes out, talks about 74,000
Minnesotans dying.
Later on he went back to 29,000.
And right around then I put adifferent video saying just the
facts and I said I'm not buying74,000 Minnesotans dying, I'm
not buying 29,000.
(24:00):
And then this one came out amonth later, right around May
1st.
This is a model that they'reusing and it says on here
Minnesotans model projectsnearly 1,000 deaths a day in
mid-July.
Well, folks, that's next week.
So far we have less than rightaround 1,500, of which all but
300 of them have occurred inpeople in long-term care
(24:21):
facilities, in large partbecause the department of health
participated in decisions thatput people with active covid19
disease in the nursing homes youhear that he's laying the feet
of two-thirds of their deathsdirectly at the health
department.
Speaker 2 (24:37):
You put sick people back in nursing homes, and
that's minnesota.
We haven't even talked aboutnew york, right?
What governor cuomo did is atangent amount to genocide,
right or elder side I mean.
What he did was atrocious.
6,900 people died becauseAndrew Cuomo put sick
coronavirus patients back intonursing homes with non-sick
(25:00):
patients sick patients.
So here's the senator layingtwo-thirds of their deaths in
Minnesota at their feet, callingtheir lies on projected deaths.
Because here we are in mid-Julyand they haven't even had 1,500
total deaths, let alone 1,000deaths a day.
This is pretty stark.
This is pretty serious.
Speaker 5 (25:19):
And I'm spreading misinformation?
Of course I am.
I don't know what to tell you.
I just know this is wrong.
We're in a bad place.
My wife asked me the other day,scott, why did 9-1-1 pull us
(25:41):
together as Americans so much,and why is COVID-19 breaking us
apart?
I think physicians are part toblame.
Scientists are.
We've become so darn political.
Physicians and scientists inthe past are supposed to be
above the fray.
They're not.
(26:02):
I have this odd set of hats I'mwearing because I'm the vice
chair of the Health and HumanServices Committee in the Senate
and I'm involved in policydiscussions and involved in
bills that deal with providingrelief for COVID-19.
And, on the other hand, I'vebeen a physician in the trenches
for 35 years.
So I try to connect the dots.
I don't try to present myselfto be something I'm not.
(26:22):
I'm not an epidemiologist, butyes, I've taken epidemiology
classes.
I'm not an infectious diseasedoctor, but I take care of
infectious disease every day.
I just want to leave you with acouple of questions you could
maybe ask yourself.
Do we think it's okay forphysicians to certify on death
certificates that someone diedof COVID-19, even if there was
(26:47):
never a COVID-19 positive testobtained, even if there was
never a COVID-19 test done, evenif a COVID-19 test hadn't even
been considered and maybe theworst, even if, even if the
family had no clue that thedeath certificate they received
(27:10):
for their loved one was going tosay COVID-19.
What do we want to be doingthere In Minnesota?
I think the Department ofHealth is taking care of
business.
Those are important questions.
I'm sure there are naysayers outthere that think that I'm
getting exactly what I deserve.
Fine, if it can happen to me.
(27:33):
I think, frankly, that it couldhappen to anybody.
It feels ugly.
It feels like some of thepeople that disagree with me
don't want to have aconversation.
I've asked many of you to haveconversations and you've not
been interested.
So reckless advice regardingcomparisons between COVID-19 and
(27:57):
the flu, spreadingmisinformation.
Because I cried foul when Ireceived a memorandum from the
Department of Health on April3rd which directed me to a CDC
link which says clearly that youcould have a patient suffering
from other medical problemswheelchair-bound severe stroke
(28:22):
within the preceding year or two, no COVID-19 test ever done or
ordered, and when that patientdies of pneumonia, it's a
COVID-19 death.
I cried foul and I'm gratefulthat the Department of Health a
(28:43):
week later tried to clarifythings and and a month later
clarified it further.
But I'll say it again theofficial people who write the
coding Bible in this countrysaid if the provider documents
suspected possible, probable orinconclusive, do not assign
COVID-19.
Thanks for listening.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
We better all stay engaged we better all stay
engaged, because they are tryingto take your freedoms.
Take your freedoms.
So this is a uh.
This, this one right here is auh judge.
So this is chris hill uh, froma collin county judge in in tex.
And take a listen to this onehere.
Speaker 7 (29:31):
This has informed public health departments that
they have adopted a reviseddefinition for COVID-19 probable
cases.
Speaker 2 (29:35):
This was May 18th 2020.
So this is we're coming up ontwo months ago.
So keep in mind, as this timepasses and cases happen, they're
counting cases based on theguidelines they have at that
moment.
So you could see a spike incases just based off the way
they do these guidelines.
Speaker 8 (29:55):
So for confirmed case it stays the same.
You still just need PCR.
But now they've added aprobable case definition so that
still gets counted towards thecase count.
It's different, it's notconfirmed, it's probable but
it's still a case.
So at the end of thisdefinition there are 50 probable
, as in.
Speaker 2 (30:15):
I was on a cruise boat and one person got sick, so
we have 5,000 probable cases.
Speaker 8 (30:20):
So that's how you end up from one case to 5,000 cases
15 different options on how youcould be classified as a
probable case Based on thisdiagram and what they report.
There's a total of 17 cases now.
One is still only confirmedbecause that was that original
index case.
(30:40):
Who then had all these contactsunderneath in orange?
And all the rest of them becameprobable.
But they are still considered acase.
Speaker 7 (30:49):
It has the potential to be a very significant event
for us here in Texas and here inCollin County, as the state now
has elected to adopt this newprobable definition.
If you have a subjective feverand you have a headache and you
live in Collin County, you nowmeet the qualifications to be a
probable COVID patient.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
If you have a fever and a headache in Collin County,
you're a COVID patient.
A fever and a headache.
A fever and a headache the twomost common symptoms.
You get a headache from notdrinking enough caffeine in the
day.
My mom taught me that when Iwas 10 because she drank so much
Dr Pepper.
Right, if she didn't get enoughDr Pepper she got a headache.
(31:30):
So if we lived in Collin County, my mom would be a coronavirus
patient because she didn't haveenough caffeine in the day.
That's how ridiculous this gets.
Oh, you have a low-grade fever.
Why do you have a fever?
Oh, I don't know, maybe I justgot done working out?
Oh, I don't know, maybe I justam sick.
I had some bad food, had somebacteria on it.
My body's kicked up thetemperature.
The burn off the bacteriacoronavirus.
(31:52):
That's not how this works, guys.
This is a joke.
Speaker 7 (31:56):
It is remarkable how low the standard is now.
If you have one of the majorsymptoms you have a cough or you
have shortness of breath andyou live in Collin County then
you can satisfy the definitionfor a probable COVID case.
But I'm very concerned that weabsolutely could see the numbers
jump very rapidly in a way thatactually is not indicative of
(32:21):
what we're seeing here in thecommunity in the public health
department is not indicative ofwhat we're seeing here in the
community, in the public healthdepartment.
Speaker 2 (32:28):
So that is a Collins County judge talking in a
commissioner's court and withthe health department and going
over the guidelines and he'scalling it.
He says we're going to have ahuge spike in cases because now
everybody has a case.
In fact, let me check myforehead right now I might have
a case of coronavirus right nowI'm a little hot.
So this right here is a.
This is another one of thesemeetings here.
(32:49):
Let me I got to get the thingout of the way.
Speaker 9 (32:51):
The CDC a couple of weeks ago did a study where they
looked at every single.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
Okay, so this is another one of those county
meetings and this is this is ahealth personnel who is speaking
and she's just got like acouple minutes, so she's kind of
running through this as good.
Speaker 9 (33:06):
Other study in the entire world on face mask
wearing and this is what theyfound.
The CDC found quote noreduction in viral transmission
with the use of face masks.
There is absolutely zero pointin putting face masks on healthy
or asymptomatic carriers.
They do not work to stop thevirus and what they do do is cut
the oxygen hypoxically low.
(33:27):
Let me explain to you whathappens when people go down due
to loss of oxygen.
They don't break their fall byputting a hand out like an
average person does when they'reheaded south.
What they do is they drop likea ton of bricks.
Their skull hits first.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
It's interesting listening to that because that's
what we were seeing in Iran andin China was the skulls hitting
first popping down?
I want to play.
This is Greg Gutfeld.
This is a little clip from theFive and he was responding to
something Juan Williams had andGreg's just had it and I think a
lot of people in media havekind of just had it, especially
if you're on the conservativeside, because you feel like
(34:04):
you're talking into this emptyecosystem, right, Like facts
don't matter, Nothing matters,it's just opinion smearing.
It's a really interesting worldon the left side of politics.
I mean, there's no consistency.
It's hypocritical to theumpteenth degree.
Nobody stands on any principle.
They're flailing in the windall the time.
(34:24):
It's obvious.
I mean it's just obvious, andso this is Greg Gutfeld's kind
of take.
I love it.
Speaker 10 (34:31):
About the political strategy here.
How does the strategy ofnormalizing the coronavirus help
the Trump campaign?
I mean, obviously people aredying.
This is no common cold and Ithink that's evident to
everybody.
Speaker 2 (34:45):
Okay.
So this is no common cold.
That's evidence to everybody.
Think about what I just playedyou sitting Senator who's going
through it, essentially sayingthis is the common flu, and
we're jacking up our numbers,we're messing up our reporting.
How could we possibly trustanything?
You've got that judge downthere going well, you got a
headache and a cough.
I guess Washington's gotanother coronavirus case.
(35:06):
Apparently I got thecoronavirus.
You heard it there.
Folks Live cough and you knowI'm symptomatic.
Now I got a cough.
I must have coronavirus.
Count me up.
So anyways, it's all based onan incorrect premise.
So Greg Gutfeld's got thisstrained.
Look on his face and just Ilove it.
Speaker 11 (35:27):
That's the craziest question you've ever done.
Nobody's normalizing a virusokay.
But, by the way, no one shouldtake anybody in the media
seriously in their questioningof process if they haven't
actually made a correct piece ofadvice.
Okay, let's face it.
Number one they politicizedhydroxy.
(35:49):
Remember that they were sohappy to find that one bad study
that said it didn't work.
Now they go strangely silentwhen you hear that it might work
.
And in fact we all kind of knewthat it might work.
In terms of a strategy, it waswell-tolerated among people.
We knew that there was promise,but the media didn't like that.
Two the rest home debts.
(36:10):
The media bent over backward tocover up for the Cuomos right.
They didn't want that to be abig story, but that was a big
story, okay.
So they covered up the resthome stuff.
They bashed a drug that hadpotential.
They refused to cite the mostimportant data on earth, which
is the reduction in death rates.
That is the important thing,but you can't talk about the
(36:31):
fact that that's plummeting.
And then let's not forget thetravel ban right, which many in
the media won, said that wasstupid and said that it was
racist, but that probably did alarge part in preventing a lot
of death.
So the media and those whopoliticize this need to be
ignored, all right.
Speaker 2 (36:52):
That's it.
They need to be ignored.
I think they so, and it goes,it goes, it goes.
It got Russiagate.
You've got now COVID.
You've got scam after scamafter scam after scam.
He's exactly right They've gotto be ignored.
Now, I have said for a long timethat there is a uh oh.
I've got the who video herewhere she says things can't be
(37:12):
spread asymptomatically.
I'll skip that.
It's made the rounds.
I think you guys get the point.
Now, what is it that we'rereally dealing with?
What is coronavirus?
Why would Donald Trump right?
Isn't Donald Trump supposed tobe like our hero?
Isn't he supposed to be likekeeping an eye out for us and
(37:45):
helping us out?
Well, he is, but he's got somethings that he's up against.
I want you to listen to thisvideo.
So this is a contractor forDynCorp.
Dyncorp was involved with theDNC and then they were hired by
Congress by the Democrats inCongress, so the Democratic
caucus to do their servers.
They got arrested.
This was kind of during theMueller time.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz wasinvolved with this because she's
the one who procured thecontract when she was the head
(38:07):
of the DNC.
They were suspected of someWikiLeaks collaboration, which
turned out to be nothing.
Then we found out they werecollaborating with CrowdStrike
and anyways, these guys ended upgetting tried, got a quick
little sentence and they'rebasically put away short period
of time.
Not really tried for theircrimes, tried for, you know,
process crimes around the crime,just to get them locked up and
(38:29):
out of the public eye.
It was a huge cover-up.
All One Brothers, a-w-a-n.
All one brothers.
They were IT professionals forthe Democrat party, so this
contractor was involved withthem.
Now he's going to put out areally dire warning and he's
going to connect some dots, sowe're just going to go through
it here.
Speaker 12 (38:44):
Uh, along came a spy team.
Speaker 2 (38:47):
Okay, so he's, I'm I'm jumping into the story
because, again, it's a longervideo and uh, but he's kind of
explains himself, so I'll stopit if I have to go back and
explain something that heskipped over.
But he's talking about how hegot involved with the whole case
on on capitol hill by the nameof the awans.
Speaker 12 (39:03):
I immediately put the two together.
I put their blackberries,encrypted networks together.
We said that dying core slowlycached weapons over a period of
time to replace police forces,un police forces, with UN
peacekeepers.
Speaker 2 (39:17):
Okay, so remember when I reported that in 2015,
loretta Lynch and Joe, there'sno conspiracies, but there's no
coincidences.
Folk, this put on your thinkingcaps.
Right now, a lot of dots aregoing to start connecting A lot
of dots.
Maybe I've undersold this videojust a little bit.
This is a critical video.
This is going to startconnecting A lot of dots.
Maybe I've undersold this videojust a little bit.
This is a critical video.
This is going to connect majordots.
You want to know why, even onthe right side of the aisle,
(39:40):
some people get a littlepanicked.
This is why, okay, we're goingto connect some dots here.
So sorry if I undersold thisvideo.
We're going to connect somedots here.
Everything from weapons so UNpeacekeeping troops being
brought here.
That was 2015 UN resolution.
Biden and Loretta Lynch wentand signed on it, minnesota
being the key ground for that.
There's been lots of groundworklaid in Minnesota for this, so
(40:03):
here we go.
Speaker 12 (40:04):
We said they slowly cached weapons.
They use things like biologicalweapons and chemical weapons.
We talk about DynCorp sprayingin Central America, spraying in
Kosovo, spraying in Bosnia,spraying in conflict areas all
over Central America, stoppingat nothing, spraying all kinds
of weapons, using all kinds ofmachinations and leading no
(40:28):
holds barred to overthrowingcountries and overthrowing their
police departments.
That's what we said three and ahalf years ago.
Back then it was conspiracytheory.
Back then didn't seem to betaken too seriously.
Until we found the AwanBlackberries, until we found the
(40:49):
Pride hard drives, until wefound the same Blacks that had
planned all these coups theLibya, syria, sudan, yemen.
The coup probably in.
Speaker 2 (40:58):
You remember yesterday's episode that was a
little bit rough and choppy.
Well, remember the BlackBerry,the encrypted network.
These are the guys who broke it.
Speaker 12 (41:07):
The coups in Central America, again for DynCorp and
other companies as well thatcame in and followed DynCorp
like Blackwater.
We talked about the chemicalweapons and biological weapons
partnerships, dyncorp.
Speaker 2 (41:19):
Who is Blackwater?
Blackwater is owned by EricPrince, who's the sister of
Betsy DeVos, the secretary ofeducation.
Blackwater is the one who toldthe world about the Wienergate
laptop at the Southern Districtof New York.
Remember, it's not the SouthernDistrict of New York that
exposed what was on it.
It was leaked to Blackwater,who then leaked it to the world.
So Blackwater's involved indomestic law enforcement.
Speaker 12 (41:43):
We had with a company called DynPort.
It's happening right now inyour US city.
We said there was 45 AwanBlackberry carriers.
These are 45 representatives.
We said that they were therepresentatives in the areas
that had the big cities, thelarge black populations, where
they had safe congressionaldistricts.
We said the Awans were takingmoney that we were sending to
(42:06):
stop Osama Bin Laden, to stopterrorism, and it only spending
a couple of days on the dockswhere Imran was in Karachi and
then being turned right backaround because the soldiers they
were going to, the soldiersthey were going to in
Afghanistan, were actually ghostsoldiers.
The technology that we weresending there to support were
(42:27):
ghost.
It was ghost technology.
It was actually turned rightback around and being cashed
right back here for technologyand weapons against the people
in the United States.
We also looked at a link to awoman who was married to Imran
Awan's invisible brother, abid,named Natalia Sovia.
(42:54):
Background and her connectionswith Nancy Pelosi, her
connections with other people onCapitol Hill in terms of
Ukrainian intelligence topurchase chemical weapons and
biological weapons that could beused against the United States
population.
Isn't that exactly whatCOVID-19 is?
We are seeing more and moreevidence now every day that this
was a NATO simulation in 2019during the World NATO Games,
completely synchronized with theEvent 201 to simulate a world
(43:19):
event with a weak virus.
And we are now more convincedthan ever that a stronger
version of the virus the bindingaffinity, remember, of the S
protein can be now controlledthrough using the CRISPR to
create as lethal of a virus aspossible.
(43:39):
There's the four HIV inserts inthere.
If they want to go and crank itall the way up to the most
lethal form, they can crank uphow virile and contagious it is,
and also the payload can bemixed with a whole sort of
different pathogens, not justAIDS, but also Ebola and other
(44:02):
very virulent pathogens.
Speaker 2 (44:04):
This is so when you go in and you look at the virus
and you look at the vaccine,specifically Moderna, which is
mode RNA.
Moderna, which stands formodification RNA, so change your
RNA, which then your RNA is theduplicator of your DNA.
So, by modifying your RNA, youtherefore modify your DNA.
(44:27):
So they're going to try to tellyour body to print the antibody
, to make the antibody to thevirus.
So they're not going to giveyou a dead virus and then let
your body create an antibody.
They're going to tell your DNAto print the antibody, to make
the antibody to the virus.
So they're not going to giveyou a dead virus and then let
your body create antibody.
They're going to tell your DNAto create the antibody.
Moderna modify your RNA.
Okay.
So now he's talking about theycan use CRISPR, which is James,
the DNA code.
(44:47):
They can crank up the virus sothey could tell your body to
create Ebola, and then nowyou're the carrier for Ebola.
And they can do that throughelectronic signals, because the
Moderna vaccine usesnanotechnology, which is
activated by electronic pulses.
Folks, folks, this is whyPresident Trump shut down the
economy.
(45:07):
This is why he closed theborders, because this is the
intel he has, the virus that'sfloating around the United
States is not a high-risk virus.
It's a simulation.
It's a test run to see how werespond.
And how are we responding?
We're giving away our libertiesand our rights, the very thing
we should be defending.
We're not demandingtruthfulness from our
(45:27):
politicians and our leaders.
We're letting them run politicswith policy instead of smart
decisions.
We should not be doing whatwe're doing now until the real
virus hits.
Speaker 12 (45:40):
Exactly what we warned three and a half years
ago.
Back then we had all kinds oftime.
Now we have a wand minutes tomidnight.
Now we have very little time120 days.
But who knows when the secondwave will happen.
I say it's the October, the19th, just because I'm going on.
How the defense departmentworks, how NATO works, how
(46:01):
military, larger militaryorganizations train and plan,
but who's to say that it won'tbe moved forward to Jacksonville
now in July?
Uh, in Florida with theRepublican convention, with the
DynCorp attack?
We just don't know.
And the longer we wait toexpose the network, the more we
put ourselves at risk.
Speaker 2 (46:23):
The go out today and so one of the things as peasants
is, all we get to do is hearthe information.
We get the propaganda alongwith the info and we've got to
sort it out.
So we get to sort this out.
You've got real bad people outthere that want to do real bad
things at a real big scale, itis true, and some of those
(46:47):
people are people we see on TVevery day, and some of those
people we will never know theirnames on TV every day, and some
of those people we will neverknow their names.
And this is why it is soimportant that we have a society
and a culture that valuesindividual life.
It is so important that we havea culture and a society that
believes that there's karma,that there's just punishment for
(47:09):
those who are bad actors,whether in quote this life or
the next, because to holdsociety together, you have to be
able to eliminate the peoplethat want to commit genocide.
Oh man, it's crazy.
There are no conspiracies, butthere's no coincidences, right?
I mean, I've spent I don't knowa lot of episodes.
(47:32):
Now I feel like I've been doingthis show for a long time and
everything just ties in togetherall the time so nicely.
Remember the names, rememberthe people remember where they
work, remember what they do,remember who they're married to.
I haven't confirmed this, but Iheard that Ghislaine Epstein's
sister is married to Dr Fauci.
(47:54):
Now, the source I got that fromwas credible enough that it
gave me pause.
So I got to do a little diggingand confirm it like
definitively.
But gosh, wouldn't that just besomething right?
Again, no conspiracies, butthere's no coincidences.
The Awan brothers the way thattheir trial was just thrown
through we didn't really knowwhat it was all about.
We knew it was bad.
We knew it was bad.
Well, now we know just how badit was.
(48:14):
They were obviously part of,you know, planning COVID through
a NATO strike.
They were using that BlackBerryencrypted network which, again
yesterday the episode.
They've been rolling up allthese networks.
Does this man who's talkingknow that?
Does he know that they wereusing that information?
Maybe Trump is letting COVIDhappen so he can show us?
Doesn't Q always say he has toshow us how bad it is?
(48:37):
It's crazy To me.
The real good people, the realgood people, don't let innocent
people die.
Now, how does that fit inthings I read this thing the
other day about in World War II,they cracked the German U-boat
subcodes the decoder thing theyhad, but they wouldn't let the
(49:02):
Germans know.
So they literally sacrificedconvoys of boats so that they
weren't so successful instopping the U-boats all the
time.
I mean, eventually they wereable to stop them all the time,
but they had to make it looklike they were just randomly
finding these U-boats ratherthan reading their messages.
I thought how interesting thatthey would make the decision to
let those ships die in order notto tip their hand.
(49:23):
I don't know, it's a toughdecision, isn't it?
It's a tough decision, you know.
Does Trump let this thing go?
Let people's businesses suffer,let people, you know, get drug
addictions because they're outof work, and the rioting and
looting and all the things thatare a result of these lockdowns?
Does he let that happen inorder just to show us how evil
the Democrats are?
Is that what it takes?
I mean, maybe it is, maybethat's a form of warfare, maybe
(49:44):
that's.
You know, take the mask off andthere's a lot of suffering, but
there's going to be a lot ofsuffering anyways.
I mean, if these people won, wewould have an earth with half a
million people on.
I mean, really, that's trulywhat they want?
The Georgia guys don't say it,and that's exactly what they are
working for is a worldpopulation of about half a
million.
That's how many people theythink they need to create a
slave service economy.
(50:04):
They figure a half a millionpeople.
And they can with AI, they cankeep their rich and famous
lifestyle and the earth willrecover itself.
They really do believe that.
I mean, that's the agenda ofthe people pushing for
depopulation, the Bill Gates,the nihilists of the world.
That's what they want.
So just to leave you on a littlehigher note, let's go one more
last spot, and this has to dowith TikTok, which is an app
(50:27):
that I have loved.
By the way, I have used TikTokand thought it was really fun.
You've probably followed me onmy socials.
You've seen a few of my funnymedia as well.
I have deleted my TikTok appcompletely.
So what happened with TikTok?
Tiktok is a Chinese developedapp and it basically mimics
Instagram little 15 secondvideos.
Now they're up to a minute.
Little music video.
(50:48):
It's cute, tiktok's fun.
However, it's a spy app, so Ididn't know this, but obviously
China's got all my info.
Now, anything you got on yourphone, china's pretty much
getting, that's right,everything on TikTok, if you got
TikTok on your phone.
China has all your data yourpictures, your clipboards, your
messages, your location data,your health data, everything
(51:08):
your phone's got.
China's got Some tech guys.
So that was suspected eversince TikTok came out.
It used to be Musically, andthey bought out TikTok bought
them out to expand into the US,and so now it's just TikTok
Anyways.
So here's the point India, someengineers reverse engineered
TikTok and they were able todetermine all the information
(51:29):
that was going back to China andthey said no more.
So India has banned TikTok, aswell as a whole bunch of other
Chinese apps, and the US is faston its tail.
So here's Mike Pompeo.
Speaker 6 (51:40):
TikTok has about 30 million users in the United
States, but it's been banned nowby India, and Australia is
considering the same action,saying that TikTok was full of
mass surveillance and propaganda, and also that the app had the
ability to feed informationstraight to Beijing.
So kind of obvious question.
If all that's the case,shouldn't we be considering
(52:01):
right now, tonight, a ban onChinese social media apps,
especially TikTok?
Speaker 4 (52:07):
Laurie, your viewers should know we're taking this
very seriously.
We're certainly looking at it.
We've worked on this very issuefor a long time, whether it was
the problems of having Huaweitechnology in your
infrastructure.
We've gone all over the worldand we're making real progress
getting that out.
We declared ZTE a danger toAmerican national security.
We've done all of these thingswith respect to Chinese apps on
(52:28):
people's cell phones.
I can assure you the UnitedStates will get this one right
too.
Laura, I don't want to get outin front of the president, but
it's something we're looking at.
Speaker 6 (52:35):
Would you recommend that people download that up on
their phones tonight, tomorrow,anytime currently?
Speaker 4 (52:41):
Only if you want your private information in the
hands of the Chinese CommunistParty.
Speaker 6 (52:46):
Mr Secretary, it's great to see you, as always
tonight.
Thanks so much, thank you,laura?
Speaker 2 (52:50):
Okay, so only if you want China to have your
information.
Do you want to download TikTokor have it on your phone?
So, if you got it, downloadyour videos onto your phone,
save them if you want them andfor posterity sake, but delete
the app.
Get rid of TikTok.
Get rid of any other app thatyou know has a Chinese
background, and don't think thatthey're not coming for you.
Don't think they're not comingfor you.
They've that new nationalsecurity law.
(53:12):
We'll have to tie that in later, but they've got.
They claim to have jurisdictionover the whole world.
So if they want to come in,take you in the middle of the
night, put you on a helicopter,fly over to China and torture
you.
They think they have the rightto do that, and then it would be
upon our government to goretrieve you.
And you know, do you thinkyou're most valuable enough to
start a war?
So be careful.
What say about China?
Right?
That's literally the directionwe're headed.
So again, lots of crazy stuffhappening in the world.
(53:36):
Have a good day, peasants.
You can find me at PeasantsPod,on Twitter, on Parler at
PeasantsPod, facebook, thePeasants Perspective and email
at peasantspodcom.
Thanks a lot, guys.
I appreciate your time and Ilook forward to talking to you
again tomorrow and I lookforward to talking to you again
tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (53:55):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working class is ohthere you go bringing class
into it again.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
(54:16):
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
(54:37):
In the case of pure internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the waves he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest shimmering
(54:57):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
(55:19):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will I went roundsaying I was an emperor just
because some moistened bint hadlobbed a scimitar at me, they'd
put me away.
Shut up, will you?
Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
(55:40):
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed.
Bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
Popular Podcasts
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!