The Walls Are Closing In: Inside the Justice Department's Grand Jury Investigation

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, I'm going to try this a different way, using
the Brembo Studio bit.
See, if that works better.
Sigmund Freud Start stream.

(00:23):
Please try again againsomething went wrong.
Studios already streaming.

Speaker 5 (00:31):
No, we're not I see it here really on rumble.
Second one and look, there I amsecond one and look, there I am

(00:53):
.

Speaker 1 (00:53):
I guess we're, we're live.
I guess I don't even know howit's working now.
What the heck?
Oh my god, yeah, we're live onyoutube and rumble.
My screen still says startstream session.

Speaker 5 (01:02):
Zero, zero we them, boys is like, there you are okay
, I'm not gonna touch anything,then all right well, we're here.
We don't know how, uh, we'regonna go ahead and get started,
I guess.
I feel like I need a weirdmorning, not ai, not, I can tell

(01:23):
you that.

Speaker 1 (01:24):
Maybe all of our CIA handlers are effing up our
street.

Speaker 5 (01:30):
I got made a precinct captain yesterday in the
Republican Party, so I probablygot assigned to Chinese handlers
what it is you know.
Okay, so we're here.
Good morning peasants, pray therosary daily and rumble perfect

(01:51):
, yeah, I got.
I was getting messages frompeople like where you at?
Oh look, we're live on, uh, onx2, great, okay, what a cluster
for real, all right.

Speaker 1 (02:01):
Well, okay, let's go.
All right, we right, we're on,we're on.

Speaker 5 (02:03):
We'll do it live.
First story, bill O'Reillystyle.
Okay, so check this out this.
In fact, I'm going to go back.
I was going to start with onevideo, but I'm starting with
another video Because it's worthit.
Okay, this is a littleflashback.
If you've been not hiding undera rock for the last couple of
years the last decade really youprobably heard a lot of this.

(02:25):
The walls feel like they areclosing in.

Speaker 8 (02:28):
It is the walls closing around the president.
Donald Trump feels the wallsclosing in.

Speaker 11 (02:34):
I think, this is a guy who feels like the walls are
closing in.
The walls are closing in on himbecause the walls are closing
in, the walls are closing in onthe president.

Speaker 10 (02:40):
Now the walls appear to be closing in Really kind of
the walls closing in on him.

Speaker 8 (02:44):
The walls are closing in, because the walls are
indeed closing in.

Speaker 12 (02:48):
I think at this point the walls are spinning.

Speaker 14 (02:54):
The legal walls are closing in.

Speaker 15 (02:55):
The walls are closing in on President Trump.
The walls, meanwhile, areclosing in on the president of
the United States.
The walls closing in onPresident Donald Trump.

Speaker 17 (03:00):
It appears that the walls are closing in on this
president.
Feels that the walls areclosing in on him.

Speaker 13 (03:04):
The walls closing in on him.
The walls are closing in.
And the walls are closing in.

Speaker 19 (03:13):
That the walls are closing in on the president.
Are the walls closing in thewalls?
Are closing in on thepresidency.
That is, the walls.

Speaker 5 (03:19):
At least three people that appear on here that are
saying the walls are closing in,that are currently in prison.
Yeah, that's the part I waslike.
Hey, that was avanadi avanadiyeah, there's avanadi.

Speaker 9 (03:32):
There's uh senator mendez.
Around him, the political wallsclosing in on him there's a
president that feels the wallsclosing in.

Speaker 11 (03:37):
The walls are closing in on donald trump I
think the walls are finallyclosing in the walls, the walls,
the walls, the walls, the walls, the walls, the walls, the
walls are finally closing in thewalls, the walls, the walls,
the walls the walls, the walls,the walls, the walls the walls,
the walls are closing.

Speaker 13 (03:48):
Closing in closing.
Closing in closing in closing.
In on closing in.

Speaker 24 (03:52):
The walls are closing in on President Donald
Trump.

Speaker 20 (03:55):
He's not looking forward to any of it.
He's horrified.
He's just talking big.
The walls are closing in, ashas been said before.

Speaker 5 (04:06):
I'll tell you what.
When I was in prison we'd getup in the morning and watch the
news, right and obviously overon the neutral TV.
Oftentimes they'd put on CNNand MSNBC and of course we'd
flip over there from time totime.
The morning Joe was on.
I'll tell you there is not aworse TV couple than Mika and
Joe.
Mika looks like she hates Joe.

(04:27):
She's constantly like, rollsher eyes.
She'll make a point.
He'll be like, ah, that's notright.
It's like clearly a very mutedrelationship for TV.
You know what?
I mean, but as soon as they'recut she's probably like could

(04:47):
just tell they're not, she turnsher age and get me out of here
exactly get me out of here.
So the reason I played thatflashback is because, for once,
the walls are closing in on thedemocrats yesterday, huge
announcement, monumentalannouncement.
Well, we're going to be withyou.
This is coming out.
Democrats yesterday, hugeannouncement, monumental
announcement.

Speaker 25 (05:05):
Well, we're going to be with you.
This is coming out of theJustice Department.
Fox News can confirm thatAttorney General Pam Bondi today
signed an order directing anunnamed US federal prosecutor to
take evidence to a grand juryrelating to an alleged
conspiracy to tie then 2016candidate Donald Trump to the
country of Russia.
Now Fox News reviewed theone-page order just hours ago

(05:28):
signed by the attorney general.
A source familiar with theprobe confirms this as well.
While a DOJ spokespersondeclined to comment on this
report of an investigation, foxis told Attorney General Bondi
is taking the referrals fromDirector of National
Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard quotevery seriously.
The spokesperson says thatBondi believes there is quote

(05:50):
clear cause for deep concern,end quote and a need for the
next steps.
Now this move will comes just acouple of weeks after the
Director of NationalIntelligence you see her right
there Tulsi Gabbard sent acriminal referral to the Justice
Department regarding what shesays proves there was a
conspiracy to undermine Trump'scandidacy and later his first

(06:10):
term in office.
Now, to be clear, today, thereare no charges that have been
filed, no indictments.
This is incredibly early in theprocess.
What we have here is takingevidence.
The Justice Department believesit has to a grand jury to
secure an eventual indictment orindictments.
We don't know exactly where thegrand jury will meet.

(06:31):
We don't know who will gobefore the grand jury, and
that's by design, because grandjuries determine if there's
enough evidence to indict andgrand juries are secretive in
the American legal system, soit's normal not to know all of
the answers.
Again, the DOJ declining on anycomment regarding this
investigation.
But Will big news this wassigned by the Attorney General,

(06:51):
pam Bondi today to take thisevidence of an alleged
conspiracy to a grand jury withthe hope to get an indictment or
multiple indictments?
Will?

Speaker 5 (07:02):
You might think that that's pretty straight reporting
.
Let's hear exactly how msnbcreported this, because it wasn't
quite so chipper and they had alot first reported by fox news.

Speaker 26 (07:12):
These are unsubstantiated some more news
to tell you about.
Attorney general pam bondy hasordered a grand jury
investigation into the so-calledrussia gate conspiracy
allegations made by the directorof national intelligence, Tulsi
Gabbard.
The senior Trump administrationofficial confirms to NBC News
that investigation was firstreported by Fox News.

(07:35):
These are unsubstantiated andlargely debunked allegations by
the Trump administration thatformer President Barack Obama
and his aides in theintelligence community ordered a
probe into the 2016 trumpcampaign's connections to russia
to ruin his chances of becomingpresident.
The source tells nbc news thata letter signed by pam bondi

(07:56):
instructs an unnamed federalprosecutor to begin presenting
evidence to secure potentialindictments, although it is
unclear what the charges wouldbe and exactly who the grand
jury will be targeting.
So stay on top of that story.
Thank you for letting us intoyour homes.
We are always so grateful to bewith Ari Mel.

Speaker 1 (08:15):
So much gratitude.

Speaker 5 (08:17):
The walls are closing in.
We'll have John Brennan on hereshortly to preempt his grand
jury testimony.

Speaker 1 (08:23):
Yeah and to display as much gratitude as we can to
come into your homes the grandjury.

Speaker 5 (08:30):
I've heard of grand juries lasting like we know.
Grand jury was open for a yearand they renewed it.
I was indicted on january 7th bya grand jury so within 24 hours
they had a grand jury convenedand wet ink on an indictment.
I don't know how long it'sgoing to take, but it's a big
step.
It's definitely a big step.

(08:50):
We're beyond the investigationstage.
If you remember, with donaldtrump, indictments didn't happen
until 2023, starting in 2017when they opened the mueller
investigation.
You know there was like themanafort indictment and
pompadopolis and a couple out ofthe gate, but they were pretty
minor.
You know, they were just a lotof lawfare.
So it'll be interesting to seeif we get some like staffer that

(09:11):
we've never heard of that getsindicted, and that's probably a
sure sign that they flipped.
You know they're getting a deal.
So they've got the indictmentto kind of make it real.
But I don't know, we'll see.
Right, big steps, big, big, bigsteps.
So this was kind of interesting.
This is a replay clip from acouple of years ago and last

(09:35):
night I went to the RepublicanParty thing and I got up and
gave a little speech and I waslike I quoted Nietzsche where he
says when you go huntingmonsters, be careful that you
don't become the monster youhunt when you stare into the
abyss.
The abyss stares back Right.
Become the monster you hunt.
When you stare into the abyss,the abyss stares back right.
And so this, this idea thatlike, yes, there's going to be
what looks like retribution, butit's really just justice.
You know, the first go-round,the lawfare, what happened
during the russia gate andeverything that was the unjust

(09:57):
use of power, now is the justuse of power.
But to the untrained eye you'regoing to look at and go, oh,
what's just one president foranother.
We just indicting presidents?
Now, not really, that's notreally what's happening here.
Ok, now keep in mind, let's goback.
This is CNN, jake Tapperhimself, the guy who woke up one
day and realized that Joe Bidenwas senile after the election.

(10:19):
This is them talking aboutHunter taking money from Ukraine
and China.

Speaker 9 (10:24):
Trump was right I mean, he did make a fortune from
China and Joe Biden was wrong$4 million in income in 2017 and
$2.2 million in income in 2018,most of which came from Chinese
or Ukrainian interests, andthis directly goes against what
Joe Biden said in the debate in2020 with Donald Trump.

Speaker 16 (10:44):
Take a listen my son has not made money in terms of
this thing.
About what are you talking?
About china, what?

Speaker 18 (10:53):
you know, he made a fortune in ukraine, in china, in
moscow.
That is simply various otherplaces.

Speaker 9 (11:01):
So it's from two different debates.
But I mean trump was right, Imean he did make a fortune from
china, and joe biden was wrongokay, he wasn't wrong, he was
lying his ass off he was lying.

Speaker 5 (11:16):
Yes, so he took money from ukraine, china and russia.
And who are our big adversaries?
China and russia.
And what's going on?
Ukraine, a war?
Oh no, biden's one of the best,most, he's most docile, nicest
you know genuine men ever,whatever holy smokes, but my
wife.

Speaker 1 (11:36):
Oh, his whole senility was all an act.
He's like he's just, yeah, he'sjust doing it as an act, as
cover for all the bs oh, I thinkhe's really senile.

Speaker 5 (11:46):
Well, he probably.
I think he probably is too.
Yeah, I think he's reallysenile.

Speaker 1 (11:50):
I think it was a feature, though.

Speaker 5 (11:51):
Like what made joe biden great, was other people
got to be president?
Yeah, you know what I mean.
Yeah, you can hide behind joe.
Oh he's.
He's got immunity, he's got oldman, he's got grandpa
forgiveness, you know what Imean.
Oh, grandpa, I know you didn'tmean to do that.
You didn't mean to send diversto destroy the nordstrom
pipeline.

Speaker 1 (12:11):
That that wasn't but that clip that you just played
was so funny because he's likeuh, we didn't make any, my son
didn't get any money from whatdo you call it?
China like oh my gosh dude,you're worse at law you're worse
at lying than my four-year-oldhe wasn't wrong.

Speaker 5 (12:30):
I know he was committing treason.
You guys talk about trump andsome collusion with russia.
It's right here, like righthere, all right.
This is devon nunez talkingabout.
One of the big questions withthat letter that went out
yesterday is we don't know whatattorney is doing the grand jury
and we don't know whatjurisdiction.

(12:50):
Obviously, if you're a Democrat, you want it in DC because
you're the highest of getting anacquittal or whatever.

Speaker 1 (12:56):
But if you are a Democrat, you're probably making
the case right now.
Well, they shouldn't have itanywhere except for DC.

Speaker 5 (13:02):
That's where it should be, yeah exactly Okay,
okay, but what they're lookingat here is anywhere where the
crime was committed, this grandconspiracy, and it clearly
extends outside of the yeah, soFlorida.
That's what Devin Nunes isreferring to here.
Do, do, do, do do.
Buffering.
Yeah, we'll get there.

(13:23):
They had too many fits andstarts this morning.
That's probably why All thepages are going to want to
buffer.

Speaker 6 (13:29):
Then there's something else that is important
that I think you already knowabout the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
So this continues Same peopledoing the same nonsense,
continue this hoax and raidMar-a-Lago, which I believe we
need to see.
What were they actually lookingfor tomorrow?
I think that's an important keyand and that the statute of

(13:52):
limitations has not run out on,and maybe because maybe it was
russia collusion evidence myguess is is that it was that's
my, that's a guess.
Yeah, we don't know.
But all related.
All the same people.
They raid Mar-a-Lagounprecedented on the home of a
former president at the time.

(14:13):
They raid Mar-a-Lago samepeople, same hoaxes, same
everything, but with the powerof the Justice Department, with
a fake special counsel, this guy, jack Smith, yeah, all retired.
So there's all there's.
There's all of that that has tobe, that needs to be looked at

(14:34):
and, and hopefully, justice willprevail.

Speaker 5 (14:38):
So I don't know John Solomon's co-host here.
She's in a lot of these things,but I always, whenever I see
someone like this, I wonder like, what's the?

Speaker 1 (14:45):
she kind of has, like melania, cheek lines kind of.

Speaker 5 (14:48):
Yeah, she's beautiful woman, but what's the, what's
the like?
I rarely see her contributemuch other than uh-huh, yeah, oh
yeah, yes, like is she just?
Is she's just candy?
Is she just candy or is shelike a hard-hitting journalist
that's got some rewards orsomething that I don't know of
because there are.
I mean, admittedly, there'splenty of desk candy on tv, sure

(15:10):
, right like well, that clipthat we played a few seconds ago
.

Speaker 1 (15:13):
I was like, hey, jennifer love hugh, it's a news
reporter.

Speaker 5 (15:17):
What the heck yeah, anyways, no critique to her.
I mean, she's probably a greatreporter.
But I wonder, to balance out,john Solomon, yeah, you know,
let's put some eye candy nextyear.
Ron, we need a.
I need a new person, I needmyself a desk.

Speaker 1 (15:35):
I was thinking that their show's energy was a little
low.
They need to come on our show,okay.

Speaker 5 (15:42):
So then there's this.
This is pretty interesting too.
This is let's see what.
What is this one?
This is a.
This is a reporter, one of theWhite House correspondent
reporters, that is reporting onthe breaking order about this
grand jury.
And again, just listen to thislanguage the.
It's already been debunked.
What are they doing here?

Speaker 27 (16:03):
a couple of weeks ago, hallie, when really the
headlines were dominated by thejeffrey epstein controversy and
then the president was sort oftrying to change the topic very
obviously and, in many differentvenues, was trying to break the
epstein, but he tried to changethe time one day.

Speaker 5 (16:19):
You got the jump on him by one day.
The headline wasn't epstein,the headline was treason.
But you got the jump on him byone day.
The headline wasn't epstein,the headline was treason.

Speaker 27 (16:25):
But you got the jump on him by one day by releasing
some stupid sketch in the wallstreet journal bring up these
unsubstantiated claims about therole he argues former president
obama had in the 2016 election,and trying to suppress some
information that he says wouldhave been damaging if it had
come to light.
And so then you have thedirector of national

(16:46):
intelligence, tulsi Gabbard,come to the White House briefing
room, come to the podium andtry to share some of this
alleged new evidence.
Well, now you have the attorneygeneral saying that they're
going to try to take thatinformation which remember they
had announced a strike force tolook into what they call this
new evidence and try to evaluateit to see if there could be any
potential criminal indictmentsthat they would follow.

(17:09):
And the thing that matters hereis that this is basically a
grand jury investigation that'sbeing launched, but that will
happen in secret.
This is behind closed doors andit's completely unclear whether
it will yield anything new.
It's unclear that we will everlearn anything new about it
because it could be under seal,but it really does bear
repeating.
This is looking into somethingfor which there is no evidence

(17:30):
to back it up, and it's really,it seems, a politically
motivated move to keep the focuson one of the president's clear
political foes and talk aboutbasically anything else so here
is the you know I love how theycan talk out of their ass when
they don't know anything.

Speaker 1 (17:45):
No, evidence.

Speaker 5 (17:46):
There's no evidence, you don't know that joe biden
and hunter biden didn't takemoney from china and ukraine,
turns out they did, but therewas no evidence when we reported
it oh yeah there was.
There was, in fact, there was awhole interview with bobolinsky
on fox news right before.
You may or may not have seen it.

Speaker 1 (18:02):
Remember Bobulinski.
Anybody remember Bobulinski?

Speaker 5 (18:05):
We remember Tony Bobulinski, so this is Van Jones
Again.
The commentary yesterday washilarious.
Going through these clips I waslike, oh my goodness, these
people are just.
They know, they know what'scoming, they know the potential
crow they can have.
Yeah, and you know goingthrough.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
That's why they're circle talking so hard out their
ass with no information dudegoing through that clip.

Speaker 5 (18:27):
The walls are closing .
It's like three of them are inprison, all right.
So this is van jones actinglike again.

Speaker 30 (18:34):
Oh, I can't believe we're going after political
enemies, well half the countrybelieves a lot of dumb stuff,
including a lot of dumb stuffthat comes from republicans, but
nobody's trying to put anybodyin prison over it.
Listen, we live in a they triedto put Donald Trump in jail man
.

Speaker 5 (18:49):
They tried to put Donald Trump in jail.
You put me in jail.
I, taylor, went to jail becauseI believed in some crazy stuff,
that apparently I'm not socrazy anymore.

Speaker 1 (18:57):
What are you talking about, Taylor?
What?

Speaker 30 (18:58):
are you talking about Willis?
Hold on a second they tried toput donald trump in jail over
stuff that he actually gotindicted for.
Oh, okay.

Speaker 5 (19:10):
Beforehand, when the Republicans were like, what are
you doing?
You're breaking the seal onthis.
We don't go after formerpresidents, no matter how bad
they are right, like come on, no, no, donald trump did those
things.
Those 34 misdemeanors increasedto felonies as 34 separate
entries for the same expensepaid to an attorney registered
as legal fees.
Whoa, that guy's got to die injail now.

Speaker 30 (19:34):
Country went ahead and reelected him anyway.
Look, my point is this.
It is in fact the case thatpeople believe a lot of wacky
stuff.
In my party and in your partythat is very different from the
Department of.

Speaker 5 (19:44):
Justice, wacky stuff like Joe Biden's all there.
He's the best Joe Biden we'veever had.

Speaker 1 (19:49):
Yeah, we're your cats .
Lighting the hell out of us.
He's going to beat.

Speaker 5 (19:50):
Donald Trump like a drum.

Speaker 30 (19:52):
Then they're going to put somebody in prison over
it.
That's a different world.
We've not been in a worldbefore.
Listen, you served in the WhiteHouse, I served in.
You're going to somehow now goto jail because people
misinterpreted what you did inthere.
I think this is very, veryscary stuff.

Speaker 5 (20:07):
Paul Manafort, Papadopoulos, Peter Navarro,
Steve Bannon.

Speaker 30 (20:11):
Well, half the country believes a lot of dumb
stuff, including the last dumbstuff that comes from
Republicans, but nobody.

Speaker 5 (20:17):
Yeah, we believe stupid stuff all the time, like
you know.
Like Joe Biden took money fromChina no crazy stuff.
This is totally unsubstantiated.
Like has no gas experience andhe's on a board of a natural gas
company.
And in ukraine, like we, youknow, we believe all kinds of
dumb things.
Yeah, jeez louise.
Or like trump's a russian asset, you know?
Like, of course.

(20:37):
I mean, it just makes perfectsense the steel dossier is real
still dossier is real.
Yeah, trump totally pees onhookers.
I love, I love, uh, I lovecomey, uh.
Trump's response to comey.
When comey tells him you know,there's this compromising
information like potentiallypeeing on, do I look like
someone who needs prostitutes?
Trump's response like what doyou think I am you?

Speaker 1 (21:00):
coming in here acting like I need a prostitute like
and if he wanted somebody to peeon him, all he'd have to do is
ask some democrat to be.
They'd be.
They'd happily oblige funnyentertainment.

Speaker 5 (21:14):
You see, notice anything new today I got.
I got a new shiny yes reviewsare really good.
Is my audio quality better?
Oh, yes, someone's gonna haveto note in the chat do I sound
better?
Do I sound smoother?
Yeah, I had a, like I had acough drop, just yep.
Yeah, I feel like you'refilling me full of it here.
Okay, all right.

(21:37):
So this is another reallyinteresting thing.
I said when donald trump gotshot by thomas crooks that the
most we ever really going toknow is a crook shot Trump Right
.

Speaker 25 (21:45):
That's it.

Speaker 5 (21:46):
Everything else is subterfuge.
It's going to be buried behindnational security means and
methods.
We don't want anybody to breachthe security again and realize
how weak it was.
We don't want people to get anybright ideas, et cetera, et
cetera.
Well, Mike Benz was on withMatt Gaetz and he's talking
about some interestingconnections between Thomas
Crooks and the government, andthere's also a lot of

(22:08):
connections between Ryan Ruthand the government.
It's pretty interesting.
What do we actually know aboutCrooks?

Speaker 29 (22:14):
Well, we're told this is a kind of OPSEC child
prodigy, who was a disturbed kidwho managed to have better
operational security than mostspecial forces folks.
We're told that he had three orfour encrypted chat apps on his
phone, which is the reason thatthe FBI seems unable to break
those and disclose what is inthose texts Maybe sidebar.

(22:37):
I'd love to know what thoseapps are, because if they are so
good that even the FBI can'tcrack them, you wonder why are
they not standard use?
Why were they?

Speaker 5 (22:47):
Yeah.

Speaker 29 (22:47):
Why is that not our next hoothy group chat?

Speaker 13 (22:50):
in whatever Crooks was using.

Speaker 5 (22:52):
I've wondered the same thing.
I want those apps.
Ryan Ruth's got apps that theycan't hack.
Crooks got apps that they can't.
He's a high schooler, he's 18.
He's got apps that the FBI andthe CIA can't dump into what?
He's got apps that the FBI andthe CIA can't jump into.
What are they?
I want them.
That's my new platform.
You can find me on whateverthose apps are, I'll be there.

Speaker 29 (23:11):
Holy cow, because we're told that they were based
in foreign countries.
One was an app based in Brussels, and also the others were
offshore as well, so they're notable to be subpoenaed by a
court shore as well, so they'renot able to be subpoenaed by a
court.
But the fact is is what we knowis that the gun range that
Crooks trained at was the sameone used by DHS HSI, homeland

(23:31):
Security Investigations.
They even planned an event DHSthere one day after the 40-some
times that Crooks was reportedgoing to that exact gun range.
If they had known if, forexample, crooks was target
shooting a picture of DonaldTrump or he had said something

(23:52):
to an agent, the whole thingcould have been kept in-house.
We have whistleblower testimonythat Secret Service agents that
day were replaced by HSI agentsbecause Secret Service was torn
between the NATO summit andJill Biden's trip abroad, and so
HSI happens to be the exactpart of DHS that played a very,
very strange role in January 6thas well, recruiting undercover

(24:14):
feds.
It is now known that there weremore than twice as many HSI
agents from DHS involved onJanuary 6th, embedded in the
crowd.
Then there were FBI.

Speaker 5 (24:26):
So if when you're saying HSI, you're talking about
Homeland Securityinvestigations, but the roof was
sloped.

Speaker 1 (24:34):
I know every time I see that so that's pretty
interesting it's like how dothey get up there?
Oh my good yeah, the lift maybewe should take a picture of my
roof no, never mind.

Speaker 5 (24:47):
I can handle this slope.
This high schooler could,though.

Speaker 1 (24:50):
Yeah, so oh, I saw a comedian do a bit about this and
it was so good.
He's like um, you know how theroof was sloped?
It was so sloped that when theyshot crook he didn't roll off,
he just laid there.
It's like uh, there's.

Speaker 5 (25:14):
So I remember when that happened I was walking down
to the chow hall and someone'slike trump just got shot.
And you're like, oh, dang it.
And I'm like what?
And it was.
I can't remember what day itwas, but I couldn't skip the
meal.
It was too good.
Yeah, I went in there.
I'm like is he alive?
And they're like I think so.
I was like okay.
So then I went and chowed downand people kept coming.
I think I saw trump got shotand you know there was blood

(25:36):
everywhere there's blood, and sothe story kept growing.
And finally, when I got back tomy housing unit and went into
the tv room and they wereplaying replays of it and I was
like wow, we were just like twocentimeters away from like 2030
being my release date, 2033being my off probation.
You know what I mean?
It was like wow, really quick.
But I realized quickly, likewe're never going to learn

(25:57):
anything about that.
Yeah, you know, it could havebeen a lone gunman, because
that's what they want you tothink.
But, yet the connections are toostrong, because that's what
they want you to think.
But yet the connections are toostrong.
Same thing with Ruth.
Connections are way too strongwith, you know, recruiting for
Ukraine, and the whole thing isjust Remind me who that is
because, he's the one that wasat Palm Springs, that was
fighting in the bushes with theAK-47.
Yep, so this is Mike Davistalking about the criminal

(26:21):
referrals.

Speaker 12 (26:21):
Well, we have particular vulnerability, do we
not, for John Brennan, whotestified before Congress.
The allegations come from, youknow, well-placed individuals
that he could have committedperjury, along with others who
testified before Congress.
Do you see that as one of themain charges that could come out

(26:43):
of this grand jury?

Speaker 2 (26:47):
that as one of the main charges that could come out
of this grand jury that's oneof the charges is perjury.
Another charge that I think ismost likely is a conspiracy
charge, maybe conspiracy againstrights under 18 USC section 241
.
And remember, when you have anongoing conspiracy, when you are
covering up that conspiracy,the statute of limitations does
not begin to start tolling andso this is an ongoing criminal

(27:10):
conspiracy.

Speaker 12 (27:11):
The people who are perpetuating this conspiracy are
still covering it up, and soagain, I would say to these
lawfare Democrats lawyer out,because justice is definitely
coming yeah, weaponizing theintel community against a
candidate or an incoming, uhpresident, uh, we've never seen
anything like that before inamerican history, if that's what

(27:32):
the fact end up showing, mikelaura ingram is an interesting
person.

Speaker 5 (27:38):
I've never been quite able to figure her out, like
where her real politicalinterests lie.
She's got some of the bestopening monologues and stuff,
but I don't know I don't know ifshe's rhino or not.
I haven't quite figured her out.
She's never done anything thatI thought was like offensive or
anything, but sometimes she doesthe.
It's time to move online.
I'm like, okay, dude, how coolis it that they're opening a

(28:02):
grand jury?
I honestly thought this wouldhave happened like post-election
2020.

Speaker 1 (28:09):
Just don't count your eggs too quick here.

Speaker 5 (28:13):
And it just goes to show, politically they really
neutered Trump because he knewall of this stuff, like he knew
that Obama had set it up.
They'd figured this all out.
I remember one time he wassaying, as soon as we came in
and I fired james comey, it waslike rats, he said.
It was like everybody wascoming forward with testimony
and whistleblower and statementsand nobody wanted to be the guy
that was involved with j, thatwent down with james comey.

(28:35):
But somehow they tightened thatthing up like rod rosenstein
and christopher ray came in andthey just suppressed everything.
So wow, there's, there's this.
This broke after.
Uh, let's see, when was it thatthis broke?
I'm trying to think of theexact timing of this news story.
I remember when it came out,joe biden's own justice
department, just hours after hewas dethroned by his own party,

(28:57):
confirmed beyond a shout of adoubt treason.
Okay.
So right after joe bidenstepped down from running in
july of year, this came acrossFox.

Speaker 11 (29:06):
Hunter Biden, back in the news with the DOJ now
argues a criminal oligarch paidoff the first son to try and
influence US policy whilePresident Biden was serving as
VP.
Some new documents out thereand Chad Pergram seen them.
He is live in Capitol Hill totake us through this story.
What now in the chapter ofHunter Biden, chad?

Speaker 31 (29:25):
Bill, good morning.
It's possible this could be theclosest anyone has come to
showing a transfer of money fromoverseas in exchange for
potential influence over USpolicy with Hunter Biden.
Now we've heard about HunterBiden's ties to the Ukrainian
energy firm Burisma Houseinvestigators have probed that
for months.
But how about potential linksto Romania?

(29:46):
Now prosecutors and HunterBiden's tax case say he worked
for Gabriel Papavichu.
He is a Romanian businessmagnate.
Now the allegation is thatHunter Biden and his business
colleagues took three milliondollars in payments.
Papavichu faces a criminalinvestigation in Romania over a

(30:07):
land deal.
Special Counsel David Weissmakes that very case in his
filing in California.
Weiss alleges they structuredthe deal for Hunter so, it quote
, concealed the true nature ofthe work he was performing.
Now prosecutors say there wereconcerns about ramifications for
President Biden.
Papa Vichu is expected totestify at Hunter Biden's tax

(30:29):
evasion trial in Los Angelesthat starts September 5th.
He's charged with failing topay one point four million
dollars in taxes over a fouryear period.
The House's impeachment inquiryremains open.
Republicans claim Hunter Bidensold his father as the brand and
used the president for accessbill.

Speaker 5 (30:48):
You know, there's really no wonder why hunter
biden got a pardon.
The crazy thing is is thesenews stories would surface.
Hunter biden confirmed havetaken money from china, ukraine,
romania, kazakhstan plays inthere at some point like like a
european world tour yeah, he'staken money all over the place.
It's confirmed.

Speaker 1 (31:07):
There's black and white accounting records, but we
don't know the nature of hiswork.

Speaker 5 (31:12):
The special prosecutor is actually charging
him for these crimes through thetax side of things, in open
court, presenting evidence, andyet it makes a 15 minute news
blurb, no commentary.
Maybe Jesse Waters does anopening monologue, casting some
shade, and they move on.
They just move on Like hello.

(31:34):
We couldn't move on from EugeneCarroll and that ridiculous
nonsense.
We couldn't move on from StormyDaniels and that ridiculous
nonsense.
We couldn't move on from thedossier and that ridiculous
nonsense.
Just nonstop smearing.
But yet Joe Biden, who actuallyhas black and white financial I
mean all the effort they wentto try to figure out if the

(31:56):
Alpha Bank server was peeingTrump Tower, you know.
And here we are like well, herewe have some tax records and
Nancy Mace gets up and goes.
We went over to the treasury tolook at the flagged
transactions.
They were also humantraffickers.
He was playing pimps that areinvolved in human trafficking
and sex trade in Eastern Europe.
Well, that answers that Nothingto see here.

(32:17):
And then on his laptop he's gotPetrova from Ukraine.
That's in New York, that's athis townhouse and he's beating
her you know what I mean.

Speaker 1 (32:27):
It's like the receipts yeah, here you go.

Speaker 5 (32:29):
Oh, that's russian disinfo.
You know, I mean anythingnegative against a democrat is
clearly russian disinfo.
Oh yeah, wow.
I think that's the hardestthing for conservatives.
Is we value our freedom so muchthat we're hesitant to want to
get involved?
Or like cast judgment?
I see this last, last night inthe republican party.

(32:51):
They're like the democrats arelike dictators.
They force their precinctcaptains to do certain things.
They're like you will do this,you will do this, you must do
this.
They don't ask for volunteers.
They say you're, if you're partof the party, you're assigned
to show up at this lemonade partthing, or you're assigned to
show up at the fair and run abooth.
And then our Republican leaderfor the county was like we don't

(33:12):
do that, I'm begging forvolunteers, I'm begging for
people to help.
She's like we are justvoluntary.
It is a different mechanism andI think that the Democrats have
figured out how to weaponize it.
Every dictator figures out howto weaponize it.
That's the soft underbelly oforganizations like militancy and
whatever yeah.
Their militancy, their, their,their ability to be efficient

(33:34):
Right Overwhelms the ability oftheir ability to be effective,
overwhelms the efficiency of,say, christianity or where we're
all dealing in the marketplaceof ideas, where it's the most
efficient at getting to thetruth.
They don't care about that,they want to be effective in
their action and it's top down.

(33:54):
I mean it's you know, onestrong federal government versus
a whole bunch of strong localcounties and cities.
That's the Republicans,democrats want.
Well, we just consolidate allthis power, very different
mentalities, and it shows in thereporting, it shows in the fact
that republicans have just beensmashed, smashed, smashed.

(34:15):
Scandal from the other side,scandal from the other side, and
we just quick report, move on,quick report, move on, quick
report.
Remove one and yeah,mockingbird media maybe maybe
yes, that's the thing republicanthat's the thing that blows me.

Speaker 1 (34:28):
The way is that I still have family members that
will go well.
Didn't you just read the news?
It's like come on, people,you're still believing the news,
yeah you still believe the newsexactly.

Speaker 5 (34:44):
So this is john solomon on with steve bannon on
war room and steve bannon's takeon this.
He is absolutely crystal clearon what has to happen, how do we
get maniacally focused onmaking sure something happens
here?

Speaker 19 (34:56):
because I'll tell you, if we don't stick the
landing on this and what I meanlanding?
I mean some indictments, right,and some perp walks you're
going to lose five, 5% to 10% ofthe hardest core of the MAGA
base, and I'm talking about thepeople that canvass, that walk
these districts, that knock ondoors, the Scott Pressler crowd,
right.
You're going to lose them.
And if we lose them, I don'tcare if we've redished it 12

(35:18):
seats, we're going to have atough time hanging on because
people on this one, they thinkit's egregious enough and they
agree with you and they agreewith the president of the united
states.

Speaker 7 (35:30):
This is the greatest political crime in the history
of the nation, sir.
Yeah, well, listen, I think itall rests with making sure that
the justice department sticksthis and it resources it right
to get the right people in here.
The great thing about thestrike force you don't need to
have Senate-confirmed people ona strike force.
Get the best prosecutors, thebest agents they can find.
The roadmap has already beenbuilt.
Kash Patel wrote the roadmap,the grand conspiracy case but

(35:54):
there's lots and lots of workthat has to happen very quickly.
For instance, if you're goingto bring the case in Florida,
like what some people have beenthinking about, you've got to
research work to see was jacksmith looking for russia
collusion documents when he wentto mar-a-lago?
Everybody says that, includingdevon noon as a cash patel?
But you got to find thosedocuments and put them out there

(36:14):
.
You've got to assign a grandjury.

Speaker 5 (36:17):
You got to start bringing I think my favorite
thing is all of his bowlingtrophies in the background
people in.

Speaker 7 (36:22):
You've got to do like what Jerry Dunleavy did this
morning, which is all right.
Hillary Clinton's out there thelast five days on a propaganda
thing.
This is Russian disinformation.
I never approved any plan.
She admitted to proving a plan.
Go through her book, go throughher speeches, go through the
op-eds.
Or staff wrote they were soproud of what they did back in
2017.
They bragged about it.
That is impeachable material.

(36:45):
That takes time to do.
We have an 8,000-word storytoday, basically the signed
confession of all of the Clintonteam admitting they did this,
even though now they're claimingthey didn't.
But that's what prosecutorsalso have to do.
We have to demand that PamBondi give us regular updates so
that we can not just hear thata strike force has been named,
but who's on it?
Where's it being worked?
Where are the first subpoenas?

(37:06):
If we don't see action, itisn't just losing 5% to 10% of
the MAGA base.
Short term which I agree withyou you might even lose more
than that, steve.
But long term, if we don'tpunish the behavior that we now
know exists out there in itsmost extenuous form, the
temptation to do this the nexttime democrats are in power is
going to be enormous.

(37:26):
You are going to handicap thefuture of this country and
destined it to be a bananarepublic because the democrats
got away with it this time,that's.

Speaker 5 (37:34):
That's, the stakes are even higher than losing the
maga base I think that's thereality we are facing on making
potential for whiplash, like ifthere's no justice, a lesson
isn't taught and the regimechanges hands again to be a
left-wing regime.
I'm out like I'm.

(37:54):
We probably would just stopbroadcasting the next, the day
after the election, and we're inthe wind.
Yep, like I see the.
I see the seriousness.
That serious, yeah, like likethis is the one shot we got four
years.
Make your voice heard.
We're training AI right now byspeaking on this platform.
I mean it's like you've got todo what you can do, but know

(38:16):
what time it is.
You know what I mean as Jesussays when the leaves start to
fall, it doesn't take a rocketscientist to know that winter's
coming.
You know what I mean.
That sounds kind of crazy, butit's like get out while you can
get self-secure, get stable.
I'm not saying run, no, now isthe time to fight.
Now is the time when yourstrokes matter.

(38:37):
Now is the time when raisingyour voice counts.
Now is when we can actuallyturn the tide back.
But if it doesn't, this isn'tgonna get better because, like
you said, they're gonna go.
Oh, it worked.
Yeah, let's do it again oh, itworked, let's do it again let's
run it again yeah, it's prettyscary, like legitimately scary.

(38:58):
Uh, I keep clipping over here onmy my bookmarks and it's on my
profile and it shows usstreaming on x.
It's crystal clear, man, it'slike crystal clear stream.
Yeah, it looks really good on x.
I wonder what it looks like onthe other ones.
I don't watch them as we'redoing them.
Okay, trump was on with uh,cnbc and I don't know who this

(39:19):
news host is.
I I don't know his name, butyou know he's on n's, on NBC,
cnbc, so I just assume he's leftand I think they are kind of
left.
This is the finance guys, buthe's, he seems to.
He's made multiple jabs toanti-Trump people you were never
Trump or you were, you know.
So I think he's kind of eithera fence rider or maybe even a
little bit in the conservativecamp.

(39:40):
He was talking to Donald Trumpon the phone and again the topic
of fact checking comes up.
Oh geez, this is what the mediadoes to Donald Trump.
But yet when the Republican orthe Democrats like Joe Biden
saying I didn't take money fromChina, Right and all like no
fact checking.
Remember during the debate whenthey were doing, you know, real

(40:06):
time fact checks and JoeBiden's fact that we're just
like, oh, everything's good,yeah, oh no, that never tells a
lie, yeah, yeah totally.
This is the response rate overthe last 10 so he's addressing
the bureau of labor statisticsand the response rate that
they've gotten over the yearsand you can see it's getting
worse and worse.
So the labor statistics bydefault, given less and less
response, is going to get worseand worse 12 years.
The labor statistics by default, given less and less response
is going to get worse and worse.

Speaker 14 (40:26):
Twelve years for the BLS, the household survey.
It's dropped from 90 percent orso on time down to 60 and
sometimes even lower.
It's arguably the mostimportant number we get about
the economy.
Yesterday we had Whartonprofessor Jeremy Siegel.

Speaker 5 (40:45):
Given everything we know, if you can track
employment, that's like the onlybarometer that really matters,
because money's not real.
There's no gold or silver, soit's all about the flow.
So if people have a job,they're in the flow, so it's
like the most important thing.
As long as people are in theflow of money, then at least
they have some money to barterand exchange.
Ok, so the fact that thatnumber is slipping the

(41:08):
credibility we don't knowanything that's going on in our
economy.

Speaker 14 (41:12):
Just bear with me, mr President, listen to this.
I know you're familiar withWharton, but unsolicited.
This is what Jeremy Siegel saidyesterday about the numbers.

Speaker 22 (41:22):
I'm not going to let the BOS off the hook.
I mean, you know you talk abouthow to fix it.
You don't make thesequestionnaires mandatory and
give them a time limit to fillit out.
You know, I mean, I think theresponse rate's down to 60%.
I mean that's unacceptable forthe most important statistic

(41:44):
that we have.
It's almost like we're sendingthem out.
You know, fill it out when youcan.
We know you like to go to thebeach in the summer, so it might
be a little bit late.
You know this is just notacceptable.
Today we need it.
That response rate has to go up.
And when you make the biggestmistake in 50 years, why?
Why wasn't there an explanation?

Speaker 14 (42:07):
It's 258,000 less in two months.
That was the biggest revisionsince 1968,.
Mr President, so we're in theinternet age.
We still can't get any instantdata.
We're still using snail mail toget the responses back.
It is the government, after all.
Antiquated, no doubt, andcertainly not certainly

(42:30):
suboptimal and we didn't gettrump's response.

Speaker 5 (42:36):
He'd hardly even know he was on that interview.
Okay, I must have listened to alonger form one earlier.
Let's see if I've got the otherhalf of that here, uh do you
know?

Speaker 1 (42:46):
I think I got one of these surveys once in my
business and I had to fill itout like for three years, every
every year for three years, andit was the most nonsense
questions ever.
It was kind of like well, howdo you think your business is
doing now?
How do you think your businessis going to do in six months?

(43:07):
It's like, come on man, how isanybody supposed to know any of
this?

Speaker 5 (43:11):
your feelings yeah, it was all about feelings it was
like, oh geez, again, thesemetrics are nonsense.
I remember when trump came intooffice the first time my
business partner, who'scompletely unaware about
anything, goes, man, when trumpgot elected it was like someone
flipped a light switch.
You could feel the energy inour market.
You could feel it.
It was.
It was palpable.

(43:31):
Our schedule filled up.
It was like wow.
Whatever he did, whatevercarrots and sticks he set up, it
was instantly different yeah,either that or it's just.

Speaker 1 (43:40):
Perception equals reality and people perceive a
better economy and, I think, alot of people.

Speaker 5 (43:45):
Well, when your economy is based in nothing, it
is just a belief in it.
Yeah, like that is the backboneof our economy.
It's the belief in it, becauseyou're not exchanging anything
of value, exactly.
So your faith in the system isit?
That's why Trump is the chiefmagistrate, magistrate being a
synonym for magician.
He's casting the spell.
Everything's great.

(44:05):
I'm in office.
Tariffs are good.
I'm in office.
Tariffs are great, I'm inoffice.
Tariffs don't cause inflation.
I'm in office.
Don't raise your prices.
That's un-American.
He's casting the spell.

Speaker 1 (44:17):
Well, and he promotes America really well.

Speaker 5 (44:19):
Yeah, as Scott Adams says, when he talks, eagles and
flags fly out of his head.
Yeah, Okay.
So this is some more of thatinterview.
You know somebody gave a good.
They get onto the topic ofredistricting.

Speaker 16 (44:36):
Example in Massachusetts I got, I think, 41
of the vote it's a very, youknow, blue say and yet it's got
a hundred percent of congress,hundred percent.
So I got 40, 41 percent orsomething, and yet a hundred
percent of congress inmassachusetts.
No, it shouldn't be that way.
I should have, we should have acouple of congress people, but
we have none.
And think of this.
A hundred percent.
In illinois we have probablythe dumbest of all governors,

(44:57):
illinois.
That guy's really sending, Imean, the business is flowing
out of his state.
It's terrible.
It's a terrible thing thatPritzker is doing.
You know he was the black sheepof the family.
They threw him out of thebusiness, but in Illinois.

Speaker 5 (45:09):
So Trump does this masterful thing.
I got to just look at this.
Speaks in, in in picture yeah,right so he just in three
seconds.
There just all the dirt, allthe opposition research you
could do on pritzker.
You know he's the black sheepof the family.
They threw him out of thebusiness right that's all he has

(45:30):
to say, that's all he has tosay they threw him out of the
business, the black sheep of thefamily.
You know it's chris christie.
You know he's just.
He eats a say.
They threw him out of thebusiness.
He's a black sheep of thefamily.
You know it's Chris Christie.
You know he eats a lot.
He's a big guy.
All of a sudden all you can see, is this fat Chris Christie.
Like he does such a good.
This is the magician in him.
He's a wizard and apparentlyhe's well-trained, like that.

(45:53):
Like he spent some timelearning how to use this
language.
He's good.

Speaker 16 (45:57):
What's happened is is terrible what they're doing
and they, you notice they go toIllinois for safety, but that's
all gerrymandered.
California's gerrymandered.
We should have many more seatsin Congress in California.
It's all gerrymandered.
And we have an opportunity inTexas to pick up five seats.
We have a really good governorand we have good people in Texas

(46:18):
and I won Texas.
I got the highest vote in thehistory of Texas, as you
probably know, and we areentitled to five more seats.

Speaker 14 (46:28):
I don't know.
I have to check on that and youknow they expect to check it.
Why don't?
You check it, Brian you knowthe factcheckers expect us to
check everything you say on thephone.

Speaker 16 (46:37):
I want you to check it, but for four years the
fact-checkers didn't fact-checkanything that was said about.

Speaker 14 (46:44):
We don't need to relitigate that.

Speaker 5 (46:47):
Listen to what just happened here.
Listen, this is important.
You talk about mocking burdenmedia.
Who's calling the shots?
So Trump makes a claim Got morevotes in Texas.

Speaker 14 (46:57):
Expect us to check everything you say on the phone.
You know they expect.

Speaker 16 (47:03):
I don't know.

Speaker 5 (47:04):
I have to check on.
He's getting talked to in hisear, yeah, I don't know, he's
like I don't know.

Speaker 14 (47:10):
You know, they expect.
Why don't you check?

Speaker 16 (47:13):
it.

Speaker 14 (47:13):
Brian, the fact checkers expect us to check
everything you say on the phone.

Speaker 16 (47:18):
I want you to check it.
I don't care anything.

Speaker 14 (47:20):
The fact checkers didn't fact check anything that
was said about.
We don't need to relitigatethat either.

Speaker 16 (47:28):
But why don't you check it?
Ok, because I'd like you to.
I got the highest vote in thehistory of Texas.
Ok, by a lot.

Speaker 1 (47:36):
You, I'd like you to.
I got the highest vote in thehistory of Texas okay, by a lot.
Do you see how he was blockingthe light, the studio light,
from his eyes when he held hishand up?

Speaker 5 (47:40):
He's trying to see the people that are talking to
him on his phone.

Speaker 1 (47:42):
Yes, that's exactly what was going on.
Knock it off, yeah.

Speaker 5 (47:45):
The fact checkers.
They were quiet for four years.
They were just stuffing thedonuts in their face.
Meanwhile, joe Biden's liketrump's a russian scooch and my
guys are the new isis.

Speaker 1 (47:58):
Yeah, it's like fact check.

Speaker 5 (47:59):
He was definitely looking back there to like get
somebody's eyes, some produceror something like, hey, man, get
me out of this he's like Idon't know that, I don't know,
you know, you see him in hisearpiece.
Wow again, the bias inmainstream news is unbelievable.
Even with the president on,they won't just let him talk.
It's wild.
So Trump had coined a termwhich is pretty good, and it's

(48:23):
called being a panicking.
But before we do that, I'mgoing to play one more little
clip here, and this is Trumptalking about being debanked.

Speaker 20 (48:32):
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that you're
prepping an order that they saywould punish banks that
discriminate againstconservatives, including,
potentially, bank of america.

Speaker 5 (48:41):
I'm going to be uh, okay I got arrested and within a
week or two I got a letter fromwells fargo, where I had banked
since I was 14 years old.
They said take your money outof her account.
We had like one or two weeks todrain the account and they were
going to close it.
And it was unilateral no appeal, no discussion.
You're considered a nationalsecurity arrest.
Close your account, just likethat, just little old peasant me

(49:04):
.
And it closed my businessaccount.
Wow, who, technically, at thatmoment there's some details here
that matter, but I wasn't onthe business, I was.
I had a debt, we had twobusinesses, we were merging them
and so I was on one, he was onthe other, and you know what I
mean.
We were in the merger when wewere leaving, you know, yeah,
yeah, yeah, so I'm, I'm not onthe corporate docs, I'm just an
employee of.
At that moment they closed hisaccount.

(49:26):
Wow, and he's like looking atto add you to the business, like
I can't, I can't reincorporateif you have a business and you
take their banking away, youdon't have a business so you're
like deep being depersoned ohyeah, oh yeah.
Like that was, that was.
That was where, like when I wasdoing the calculation on should
we end the show or not, I waslike I can't at that moment,

(49:47):
it's like I can't even receivepayment, like I'm, like I'm.
There are so many things I haveto worry about, like not just
can I pay my bills, but like theactual mechanism of how do I
pay my bills.
Like you, you have tounderstand it wasn't a problem
of earning money.
It was a problem of how do Iget the money I've earned into

(50:07):
my possession anywhere and thenhow do I get it to my mortgage?
yeah, you see what I'm saying.
Like I don't have a checkingaccount to send a check, I don't
have an account to do an onlinebill.
Your ability to and my bankdoesn't accept wads of cash.

Speaker 1 (50:20):
So your ability to process transactions of all
kinds was just hampered.

Speaker 5 (50:25):
Gone yeah Like your bank account is closed, what
comes next?
My credit cards.
You know what I'm saying?
Yeah, like.
So this?
Right here we're craftingexecutive order to go after the
banks that go afterconservatives.
This isn't hyperbole, thishappened, it happened to me.
I sent the letter to my defenseattorney at the time and he's
like, I've represented murderersthat didn't have their accounts

(50:46):
closed.
He's like even in likefinancial fraud cases, they just
seize the money.
They don't close the account.
You usually can open a sideaccount and, you know, put some
money in there and theprosecution just kind of keeps a
side eye on it.
He's like this this justclosing your account was like
what unilateral decision.
You don't have a right tobanking, it is a privilege and
they can yank it away from youon any second.

(51:06):
So when they're setting up, butwhen they decide to do, that
for political purposes?

Speaker 1 (51:11):
what the hell and again.

Speaker 5 (51:14):
Well, he was justified as national security,
was it?
Uh, was it you know?
I mean, you had jeffrey epsteinbanking at chase.
You had all kinds of getclassified as a terrorist.
Yeah, look at hsbc.
They were.
They got fined for moneylaundering, for the cartels.
They're still open.
They're still accepting newaccount holders.
Look at what los fargo did.
I wouldn't be surprised if theyopened accounts in my name

(51:36):
without me knowing it to createall that account fraud.
They did.
Right, that was like a bigscandal with Wells Fargo.
No, I'm the risk.
You close your account.
So when he says this, like whenthey again out in the zeitgeist,
there's this idea that theseare all novel things Trump's
doing.
Now Trump's attacking theuniversities.
The universities have beenattacking us for decades.
Trump's going after the banksthat target conservatives.

(51:59):
Yeah, they've been doing that.
Are you unaware?
Oh, the irs.
You know they're trying to.
They're trying to clean houseover there.
Are you not aware of goingafter the tea party people,
people that were affiliated withthat?
Are you not aware that finson,which is financial intelligence
or whatever, was getting fromthe treasury all the hits of
maga?
So like if you went on amazonand put in maga like you're

(52:20):
looking for some maga gear ortrump.
You're on a list.
You're on a list to bemonitored for your finances.
They're tracking who's sellingmaga hats.

Speaker 20 (52:29):
It's that extreme I'll be talking to brian
morningham here later today.
Can you tell us about thatexecutive order?
What's in that and what do youthink the banks have done?

Speaker 16 (52:40):
Well, they did discriminate.
I had JP Morgan Chase.
I had hundreds of millions ofdollars in cash.
I could see if they want to.
You know if they want to dosomething bad because you don't
have any money and you'redeported.
They took people out, but I'llgive you me as an example.
I had hundreds of millions.
I had many, many accountsloaded up with cash.

(53:01):
I was loaded up with cash andthey told me I'm sorry, sir, we
can't have you.
You have 20 days to get out.
I said you gotta be kidding.
I've been with you for 35, 40years.

Speaker 5 (53:14):
They said I think right after J6 is when that
happened to him.
It's when it happened to us.
It was an operation, it was anop.

Speaker 16 (53:24):
I had all this, I didn't know what to do with it.
And I went to and you could askhim.
Maybe he's not going to admitit.
So I said I was informed by mypeople that we have to get out
of Chase Manhattan that's Jamieand JPMorgan Chase.
So I said I can't believe it.
Well, I was never in thissituation before.

(53:45):
I've never had anything like it.
And it's not like gee.
You defaulted on a loan.
You know, geez, if I couldunderstand that.
That's different.
But there's no default.
I mean, there's nothing butcash.
It's a really good.
I have a really great company.
And then what happens is I calla Bank of America routinely
because when I was presidentthis was after I got out, by the
way I call a Bank of Americaroutinely and I speak to him and

(54:07):
I speak to a couple of peopleand they have zero interest.
Brian was kissing my ass when Iwas president and when I called
him after I was president todeposit a billion dollars plus
and a lot of other things, moreimportantly, to open accounts,
which banks always like.
They like accounts because theyget interest free.

(54:28):
You know the overnights andthings, a lot of reasons for it
but they like accounts.
I had hundreds of accounts andhe said, uh, we can't do it.
No, we can't do it.
So I went to another one,another, one, another one.
I ended up going to small banksall over the place.
I mean I was putting $10million here, $10 million there,
$5 million, $10 million, $12million.

(54:48):
I have them all over the place.
The craziest thing and it'slucky, I even had them they were
doing me a favor and that'sbecause the banks discriminated
against me very badly and I wasvery good to the banks.
I had the greatest economy inthe history of our country when
I was president and, by the way,our economy now will blow that

(55:09):
away and you see it happening.
But our economy now, becausewe're a rich country again,
because of our trade deals,we've become a rich country
again.
But no, they totallydiscriminate against I think me
maybe even more but theydiscriminate against many
conservatives.
You know I told that story andsitting around tables with other
people that were conservativeor Trump supporters I think the
word might be Trump supportersmore than conservative and I

(55:31):
believe what they did is theywent to the regulators.
You know, banks are not afraidof anything but a regulator.
They're regulators and theirwives.
They're more afraid of theirwives than the regulators.
But the group they're reallyafraid of is bank regulators,

(55:51):
and I believe that Biden orKamala and I don't think they're
smart enough to do it but thepeople that are surrounding the
beautiful, resolute desk youknow the high IQ people that are
radical left.
I believe they told the bankingcommission, the bankers, that
the banking regulators doeverything you can to destroy
Trump, and that's what they did,and guess what?
I'm president.

(56:12):
How did that happen?

Speaker 5 (56:19):
what I'm president.
How did that happen?
The walter journals arepresident.
Big issue, yeah, big issueagain.
The pendulum it's not swingingback.
They're the ones who pulled itone direction.
You know I don't see trumpshutting down people's bank
accounts, but I absolutely seehim punishing the banks for
participating.
You know, at a certain pointyou have to say no, I'm not
doing that.
No, I took an oath of office tothe constitution that clearly
violates my, my perspective onthe constitution.

(56:39):
You have to be willing to step.

Speaker 1 (56:42):
You know as a bureaucrat system works best
when the bureaucrats say no andyou could just imagine a
scenario where he's like youknow, all this money that nancy
pelosi made was illegitimate andwe should take it away from her
.
I mean, you could see thathappening, but it's not
happening.

Speaker 5 (57:00):
It's not happening Exactly, but it would be totally
legit.
This is the quiet.

Speaker 1 (57:05):
So just cool your jets peeps.

Speaker 5 (57:07):
This is the quietest the chats have ever been.
Oh, I mean, it's really quietover there.
I have no idea.
For all I know, we're streamingto dead air.
It's very quiet.
We could be, who knows.
We're having a good time,though, okay.
So this is trump talking aboutpanikins.
This is a good little clip here.

Speaker 17 (57:27):
I see this phrase out there.
I think you you developed thisword panikins right, like no
panikins.
Can you define panikins for us?
Like no panikins.
Can you define panikins for us?
What is a panikin?

Speaker 18 (57:41):
And why should we not follow that?
Well, in some cases they'regood people that really have the
best and they want you knowthey want to do things.
But I call them panikinsbecause maybe they're not smart,
because they're playing rightinto the enemy's camp.
And in other cases they reallyare people that panic, they
can't handle pressure and youknow both are sort of dangerous
I see this phrase out there.

Speaker 17 (58:01):
I think you can develop this word panicking,
turn off the auto.

Speaker 5 (58:05):
Repeat, don't know how to do that.
Panikins.
I like that, yes, so rumbleslighting up now for asia
enjoying the show, now that youhave video.
Lol.
He says, yes, we're here.
The rosary dealer is still here.
Awesome guys, excellent, great.
We're not talking into nothing.
Former chief counsel chiefcounsel for the dems has a

(58:25):
little bit something, sayingthat his party has dropped down
a mineshaft.
And keep in mind, this is ademocrat who's died, true, in
the wool blue and blue right,and he's talking about what's
happening to the Democrat Party.
This is all happeningsimultaneously.
Trump is back in power.
Trump's on his revenge tour, soto speak.

(58:47):
Right, the Democrats have lostpower, probably lost funding.
If we believe the US you knowTim Burkhart's theory of the
case where money goes out toforeign aid and comes back to
the politicians' pockets They'veprobably lost a lot of funding.
Usaid has been shut down.
Different institutions are nowon lockdown.
A lot of these law firms thathave taken pro bono political
cases have basically been put onnotice.

(59:08):
Settled fees, probably nottaking cases anymore.
They're not going to golitigate boys and girls,
bathrooms and stuff like that.
Right, that's not going to bewhat they're.
They don't want to show up onHarmeet Dhillon's radar for the
moment.
So he's making a great analysisof what's happened to the
Democrat Party and how they'vegone full fascist.

Speaker 12 (59:27):
And Julian Epstein, Democratic strategist.
Look, Julian, left is nevergoing to be enough left for them
.
They are insatiable.

Speaker 8 (59:35):
Well, it's a suicide march, Harris.
You know, I remember a day whenDemocrats insisted that the
Republican Party severed tieswith David Duke because of his
association with the Klan.
Well, now the Democrats, largeparts of the Democratic Party on
the left, are associated with aterrorist Nazi movement
masquerading as a liberationmovement, and it's largely
because the leadership doesn'thave the spine to stand up and

(59:56):
say this is wrong.
They just don't have the moralclarity.
You know the word Nazi, whichwe've heard a lot of, harris,
means the National SocialistParty, the National Socialist
Workers Party of Germany in the1930s.
The socialist movement has hada long history of anti-Semitism
and either these useful idiotswho are demanding, you know, and

(01:00:19):
sort of parroting the language,the rhetoric of Hamas, either
don't understand the issue orthey are in many cases funded by
foreign sources and it istaking the party to a very
dangerous place where I think itcould mean the death of the
party.

Speaker 1 (01:00:40):
That's the former party, Absolutely.
That's exactly what's happening.
I'm predicting death of theparty too.

Speaker 5 (01:00:46):
Yeah, it's going to go the way of the Whigs?
Yep, I think so.
I think it's possible too.
It's funny because last nightin the Republican Party meeting
they're like why aren't wewinning elections?
And I'm like, because you'renot talking to anybody.
That's the only reason why I'mlike you're.
You've missed the mark on whothe basis.
And this is evident because oneof the leaders there says

(01:01:07):
things like well, trump saysthings I don't like.
I'm like stop saying that, stopsaying that.
That's why you don't have,that's why you don't have,
that's why you don't know whoyour base is, because Trump's
base and the Republican baselove the things Trump says.

Speaker 1 (01:01:18):
Yeah, and you're alienating people.

Speaker 5 (01:01:20):
One of the weirdest things that happened when I was
in prison is you're there withblacks and Mexicans mostly,
right, it was only the whiteguys that were Democrats.
The blacks love Trump, love him.
Even the blacks that had BLMtattooed across their shoulders
in big block letters lovedDonald Trump.

(01:01:40):
He's one of them, right, theyget it, the gold building.
They love it.
He speaks their language.
He's the American dream.
The Mexicans love Trump.
Why?
Because they like strongmasculine figures.
I remember talking to one guythat he's got tattoos all over
his body, his face right, andhe's walking and he speaks
pretty good English, speaksSpanish, and we're walking on

(01:02:03):
the track and I'm making asurvey.
You know, would you vote forTrump or or Clint, or Kamala?
And I asked this guy and he'sMexican and I know he's cartel
and I expect him to say Kamala,and he goes Trump.
And.
I was like's cartel and I expecthim to say Kamala, and he goes
Trump.
And I was like, oh really.
And he's like yeah, I was likewhy?
He's like you can't let a womanlead you he was just like.
It was like it was black andwhite, like I don't care about

(01:02:24):
there, they're just going to.
You know they do them like the.
They really like trump, becausehe wasn't kamala harris so this
was a cultural thing for thecultural thing he was, wasn't.
You know, biden representedweakness to them and what was
hilarious to me was I'm likeokay, and he got deported two
days later.
It was like, and I even askedhim.

(01:02:46):
I said even being going to bedeported, you don't care, he's
like.
Well, no, I mean, I'm hereillegally.

Speaker 13 (01:02:54):
I didn't expect anybody to keep me here if I got
caught, he's like I'm acriminal look at me

Speaker 5 (01:02:58):
he's like it's okay, I'll be back one thing about
criminals is they're usuallyclear-eyed about who they are
like yeah yeah, I got caught.
You got to go to time out, youknow like they don't have any
remorse about it.
Yeah, that's part of the game,but I've thought that and like
here I'm like.
You know there's plenty ofpeople in the inner city of
Bremerton that you just got togo talk to them.
Nobody's talking to them.
They're just kind of in thezeitgeist of we're supposed to

(01:03:18):
be a Democrat, but I really likeTrump.
They don't recognize that.
You know, there's a whole otherparty there of people that
support it.

Speaker 1 (01:03:24):
So that's one of the reasons I'm there is try to be
you know, maybe that's whythey're having a hard time
getting some responses fromtheir surveys yeah, well, we got
it.

Speaker 5 (01:03:33):
You got to change the outreach.
You know that's where trump andthe maga base.
They changed the outreach.
Charlie kirk started going tocollege campuses and you started
having the podcast world andyou had some penetration into
former areas that you know.
The, the traditional republicanparty just wants to go on fox
news, talk to the church goingsunday evangelicals and call it

(01:03:53):
good, but that's not where yourreal support is.
And here's an example of that.
This is a long, long call.
This is Charlemagne the God, asTrump says.
I can't believe they call himthe God right, I think he just
calls himself that.
Yeah Well, so he took a callerwho and he's talking about Trump
and again, listen tocharlemagne, and for our

(01:04:16):
listeners you can just see he'spretty uninformed.

Speaker 32 (01:04:18):
I mean yeah how do you read donald trump's second
term so far, sir?

Speaker 3 (01:04:24):
I feel like this is one of the first presidents to
actually be doing what they saidit was going to do.
Like most people go on, they um, on their, I'm going to do this
, I'm going to do this, I'mgoing to do this and they get in
office and they don't do noneof that.
Like you're doing everythingyou said you were going to do.

Speaker 32 (01:04:42):
Well, no, not necessarily, Because he said on
day one he was going to bringthe price of groceries down.
He said on day one he was goingto bring inflation down.
You know he said that he wonthe election on one word, which
was groceries.
I mean, clearly people aren'tfeeling that relief yet in their
pockets.
What do you do for a living,sir?

Speaker 3 (01:05:04):
I work for a bank, okay, but okay.
So you, everybody know in yourright mind there's no way
somebody could do somethinginstantly, but in terms of what
has happened in this happenedwithin this year it's crazy.
There's no way that you couldsee the last four years how
garbage it was and then look atjust this first half of the year

(01:05:27):
and think something's not goingin the positive direction.

Speaker 32 (01:05:32):
I'm holding my president accountable to the
things that he said he was goingto do.

Speaker 3 (01:05:38):
I got you.
He said he was going to bringstuff down instantly.

Speaker 32 (01:05:43):
He said he was going to end all the wars immediately
.
Day one he said he was going todo these things on day one.

Speaker 3 (01:05:47):
Got you, got you, got you.
So you want to be literal tothat sense?
Cool, I understand You're right.
He didn't do all of thesethings instantly, but I feel
like everything is going in theright direction.
Did you talk about the Europeandeal?
Did you talk about stuff thatis happening in the positive

(01:06:10):
direction?
I feel like the issue and I'venever considered myself to be a
Republican or anything like thatEverybody grew up as we're
supposed to be Democrats.
That's how everybody grew up.
I'm from Detroit, but when youget a little older, you actually

(01:06:31):
look at things that happen.
Look at things that people sayversus what they do.
I can't roll on the Democratictrain no more, like it's a bunch
of people saying stuff thatdon't even make sense.
But what has he done?

Speaker 15 (01:06:46):
You just got like what has he done then?
Like you know, the question wasyou know how would you rate his
presidency this far?
You know, give us some things.

Speaker 5 (01:06:56):
So this is really tricky because of course, people
are going to have a hard timearticulating long lists of
abstract things tariffs.
He mentions the trade deal withthe EU.
It's a big deal.
It's the biggest trade dealever signed in the history of
the planet.
I mean, it's pretty much gotmore gross domestic product
that's going to be exchangedthan the entire East India

(01:07:16):
trading company everaccomplished.
It's a big deal.
And he says it and then she'sstill like well, what has he
done?

Speaker 1 (01:07:22):
He's done a lot Completely discounting it.

Speaker 5 (01:07:24):
He's done a lot, but you guys are all well, what
hasn't he done?
Well, he hasn't fixed, you knowhe hasn't proven the existence
of God.

Speaker 29 (01:07:32):
He hasn't proven the existence of God.

Speaker 5 (01:07:34):
He hasn't you know he hasn't solved hunger in Papua
New Guinea.
Yet you know what I mean.
Like, yeah, there's plenty ofthings you haven't done.
The list would be limitless,but there is a finite list of
things he has done.
And this woman doesn't know anyof them either, right?
Because, well, he hasn't endedthe war in Ukraine.
Well, there's some other peopleinvolved in that, aren't there,

(01:07:58):
right?
And you know, one of the thingsscott adams points out is trump
has monetized the war in ukraine.
Great, can't settle it.
Well, now you're buyingequipment and you're paying for
it.
Now, it's not on loan, it'sbeing paid for.
Now he monetized it.
Like, if he can't, if he can'twin it, he monetizes it.
And that's one thing scottadams is like.
It's actually quite hilariousthe way he just completely will
flip something around.
It's like, okay, well, if youguys want to keep doing it, but
now you're going to pay.
So she's stuck in that thingwhere she's like, well, what has

(01:08:20):
he done?
And unfortunately, most peoplecan't rattle off a list either
way.
They might rattle off one ortwo things he hasn't, but then
it's the things he has and it'slike, well, trade deals, and you
, you know that's actually whatthis guy's out there working and
that actually is affecting yourdaily life more than whether or
not the war in Ukraine ends.

Speaker 1 (01:08:38):
Well, how about during the four years of Joe
Biden's presidency?
Which parts of whatever he diddid improved your life?

Speaker 15 (01:08:47):
you know and then shed light on it for us.
Yeah, you haven't told usnothing he's done.

Speaker 32 (01:08:51):
You said the European deal, the crazy thing
about the European deal thetariff last year was like 1.5%,
Now it was 15%.
So how does increased tariffshelp us?

Speaker 3 (01:08:59):
Okay, okay, so you think that other countries
should be able to tariff us, butwe don't tariff nobody else.
Like that make sense to you?

Speaker 32 (01:09:06):
I don't even know what you're talking about.
I have a low.

Speaker 3 (01:09:09):
IQ Exactly.
Okay.
Other countries have beenputting tariffs on our country,
but we have been giving peopleno tariffs.
This is the first time sincethe 30s that we're actually
bringing in billions of dollarsfrom tariffs Okay.
But you know, we fit the billfor that.
We, the people.

Speaker 5 (01:09:31):
So do all those freaking entitlement.
I couldn't almost hold it back.
So do all those Breaking intime.
I couldn't almost hold it back.
So do all those freakingentitlement programs that you're
acting like you deserve becauseof your blackness every day, I
foot the bill for that.
I foot the bill for that.
I foot the bill.
Charlemagne, charlemagne, dude,charlemagne.

Speaker 1 (01:09:51):
You're sounding like Charlemagne the retard when it's
convenient for me, we pay.

Speaker 5 (01:10:04):
But when it's convenient for me, we pay.
But when it's convenient foryou, I pay, no, we always pay.

Speaker 3 (01:10:06):
We always pay for everything, like it's all a tax
bro.
Oh my goodness, that's not trueeither.
I can't, I can't, I can't havelike, I can't have this, I can't
have this conversation with youif you're not gonna be honest,
sir, no, no no, no, I'm being100% honest.
So, if you look at the actualfacts, other people are
accounting for those tariffs inthe sense of those businesses
are.
They're not raising our price,they are taking the hit on them.

Speaker 15 (01:10:30):
Okay, and what else?
What else has has he done?
What else?

Speaker 3 (01:10:34):
You think a whole bunch of prices have been going
up.

Speaker 15 (01:10:37):
No, no, no you keep asking us questions.
No, shed the light on what hehas done.
What do you rate his presidency?
What is he doing for you, foryou?

Speaker 3 (01:10:49):
Okay.
So from an immigrationperspective, I actually like
that you put work requirementson certain social aid things,
because we all know that peoplesit at home, people steal their
EBT funds, people like she'slike, oh, now you're coming
after all people.

Speaker 5 (01:11:05):
Now you're talking my language, now you're coming
after all people, we all knowthere's EBT fraud.
She's like I got two EBT cardsin my pocket.

Speaker 1 (01:11:13):
Oh baby, I know what you're talking about.

Speaker 3 (01:11:15):
Yeah, I got two EBT cards in my pocket.
Baby, I know what you'retalking about.
Okay, you got work requirements.
Now that I got the positive foreverything, it hurts their
demographic.

Speaker 5 (01:11:23):
That's why she's like , he's like I work.
So you know now it's not moneyout of my pocket Again the
entitlement programs thatthey're entitled to we pay for.

Speaker 3 (01:11:32):
Everybody should go to work.
Go to work, you go to work, Igo to.
For Everybody should go to work.
Go to work, you go to work, Igo to work.
Everybody should go to work.
But you know it's people thatsit at home and don't do nothing
all day.
All right, sit on their porch.

Speaker 32 (01:11:43):
Thank you for calling that's your opinion.
I'm not mad at it.
I hope those things that hesaid is true.
I want the president to succeedamerican.
How do you read donald trump'ssecond?

Speaker 5 (01:11:53):
turn.
So it's just a just a littleteaser him off.
Pray the rosary daily.
God was on laura trump's showand he was completely uninformed
, inhaling his own exhaust toomuch, and she goes.
And this is a popular show.
I know right, I don't know.
We're probably like the redneckequivalent of charlotte sure.
We just sit here and talk aboutstuff we know nothing about
right, you can call me whateveryou want I prefer peasant

(01:12:17):
whatever.
So this is.
This is a clip from that tuckercarlson podcast.
What is actually about thisright here?
This one minute and eightsecond clip holds the key to 90
of what's wrong okay 90 ofwhat's wrong, economically,

(01:12:37):
politically, in our judicialsystem.
This is like the genesis of allof it.
This is the foundation of thehouse of cards.
It's the money.

Speaker 1 (01:12:47):
It's the money I watched this video the other day
and it freaked me out made yousick yeah okay, so it matters
what he's saying here.

Speaker 5 (01:12:56):
So it's a minute eight.
I'm going to play it.
We'll see if you pick up on it.

Speaker 28 (01:13:01):
Don't take deposits and banks don't lend money, and
there's rulings in Englishcourts.
What is actually a bank deposit?
Well, that is to confuse people.
At law, there's no such thingas a bank deposit, it's simply a
loan.
Well, hang on, a deposit is aloan.
Yes, it's a loan we give to thebank.
We give credit to the bank whenwe do what is called deposit

(01:13:22):
our money.
Yes, and that is the legalstatus.
So it's like the tables areturned.
So banks don't take deposits,we lend to them.

Speaker 5 (01:13:30):
The tables have turned Over at 1776 Live.
I talk exhaustively about howwe are the creditor.
This is how it works.
You loan the bank the money.
You're the creditor.

Speaker 28 (01:13:42):
And the deposit?
The bank deposit at lawactually is not privileged.
But surely banks lend money?
No, banks are in the businessof purchasing securities and
when you sign that loan contract, that's an IOU.

Speaker 5 (01:13:53):
So when you go to buy a house house, you fill out a
promissory note.
You then create, you created asecurity, you created a loan and
you give it to the bank andthey buy that security from you.
You've loaned it them, thatasset, and they then buy it from
you.
You created the money to buythe very house you're trying to
buy.
When you get a credit card, youfill out a loan application.

(01:14:14):
That is a security.
That is creating a negotiableinstrument that turns into a
bond with a committee on uniformsecurity identification
procedure number called a QSIP.
You create the money at thetime you apply for it or you
fill out the promissory note andthen the bank will then put it
in your account as new digitsand then they turn around and
lend it back to you at amortgage.

(01:14:34):
Why would you sign a promissorynote and a mortgage and a loan?
That's what's going on there.

Speaker 28 (01:14:40):
Instrument that you've issued and the bank will
buy it.
That's what's happening.
It can sell it.
Well, exactly, it can sell it.
And also you will point out oh,hang on, fine, these are
details.
This says I will get money, I'mborrowing money, so please give
me the money.
I don't care about the details.
And the banker will say you'llfind this in your account with
us.
They may carelessly say we'vetransferred it to your account,

(01:15:02):
which is incorrect, because notransfer happens.

Speaker 5 (01:15:05):
Your account will be credited.
We are the creditor.

Speaker 1 (01:15:09):
That misunderstanding of how money works and where
money's coming from is the baneof all of our existence, like it
seeps into everything my entirelife, until last week, I
misunderstood this and and Ithink that almost every american
understands this the same waythat I did- we have this

(01:15:31):
complete misunderstanding aboutwhat it means to be the debtor
and saving, and you know it'slike we don't comprehend our
real role.

Speaker 5 (01:15:42):
We say things like money is based on the good faith
and credit of the americanpeople.
The credit the credit thatmeans we're the creditor.
Uh, tax payment is, is apayment.
Who's a?
What's a payment?
A payment is from the debtor tothe creditor.
So when the irs sends you abill and it says the word
payment, you go a payment, apayment is from the debtor to
the creditor.
So when the IRS sends you abill and it says the word
payment, you go.
Look up the dictionary.
It's from the debtor to thecreditor.
The IRS is the debtor andyou're the creditor.

(01:16:02):
They're sending you a dividendpayment as the creditor, aka the
people.
But we completely don't evenunderstand the nature of money
at all.
They're keeping a ledger.
It's like made up and it's notaccounted for appropriately.
I mean, I've used examples ofyou know you'll go buy a house
and you create this new asset.
Sure, they fronted the money,they created the digits

(01:16:24):
prematurely, but it's allcollateralized by this future
business plan.
You know construction loan kindof thing, assets made.
You go to sell the house, nextperson comes in and they create
a new hundred thousand dollars.

Speaker 31 (01:16:38):
They sell the house, next person comes in and they
create a new hundred thousanddollars.

Speaker 5 (01:16:40):
They sell the house, someone creates a new hundred
thousand dollars.
So that's.
It was a revelation.
Asset just compounds over andover every time.
The value never changed, butthe amount of currency and
circulation grows exponentially.

Speaker 1 (01:16:47):
Yes, and then you put it.
This is the revelation to me,this is the new information,
that was a new understanding tome.
When I first watched this video, I was like, oh my gosh, this
is where a large percentage ofthe money expansion is happening
.
This is where a giant chunk ofinflation is coming from.

(01:17:08):
It's the inflation, yeah, andit's, and it's hidden from us.
And that's why, when theyreport inflation numbers, it's
like man, this just doesn'tsquare with what I'm feeling
square with national debt yesthat's just the government's
credit card, right, your creditcard.

Speaker 5 (01:17:24):
And then here's the thing you go put money in the
bank.
When I go make a one dollardeposit in the bank, I've lent
them a dollar.
It's my money, I loaned it tothem and then they could do
fractional reserves so they canexpand it by 10 times.
So a dollar in the bank isactually worth 10 cents because
they've they've done 10 timesexpansion on it.
A dollar in my pocket's adollar, a dollar in the bank is
10 cents.
You know, as far as, as far as.

(01:17:46):
Uh, because it gets instantlydeflated.
And if you go look at, like thatsilicone bank, a couple years
ago they'd expanded that to like263, not 10, 263 like whoa,
whoa, whoa, whoa, like I thoughtbanks are supposed to get shut
down to like 11 and 12 dollars.
Yeah, no, they got to 263.
Well, why is that?
Well, because the bankpresident also sat on the
central bank, california centralbank, san francisco federal

(01:18:07):
reserve board.
He was his own regulator.
That's how you know what I mean.
But it's like how many otherbanks are out there floating at
a hundred or 50, right, you know?
So a dollar in your pocket,take your, take your money out
of the banks.

Speaker 1 (01:18:18):
Well, hold on, hold on, hold on.
I mean, this is the return to anormal value, hold on.
This is exactly why it freakedme out, because that would be
people's normal inclination,like, hey, we need to take our
money out.
Well, that's exactly what wouldbreak our entire economy.
It's going to break our entireeconomy.

Speaker 5 (01:18:35):
Do it, anyways, do it anyways, you've got to end the
slave trade at some point.
You've got to end the slavetrade at some point.

Speaker 1 (01:18:40):
Do it, anyways, it's going to be so painful.
Do the right thing.

Speaker 5 (01:18:43):
Return to real value, return to real money.
Do the right thing.
Be the first one out.
Don't be the last one out.
The taxi drivers givinginvestment advice that
investment's no longer viableand I will admit that, that you
are correct.

Speaker 1 (01:18:58):
I will admit that you have the right.
Yeah, be the first one out.

Speaker 5 (01:19:00):
Don't be the last one out get your money out.
Now the house of cards has tofall.
It's not real, it's not basedon anything it can't go on.
It can't be re-monetized.
They're never going to returngold and silver to us.

Speaker 1 (01:19:11):
It's over and the only reason I say don't do it is
because I'm afraid of thatyou'll be last.

Speaker 5 (01:19:17):
You'll be the last one out.

Speaker 1 (01:19:18):
That's what you're, yeah well, no, no, no, no.
It's not because I want to be.
I don't want to be the last oneout.
It's because I know that it'sgoing to break the system and
I'm afraid of what is on theother side of a broken system.

Speaker 5 (01:19:29):
For our country it's just going to be really painful
but the thing is, is it's, youcan have a hard landing or a
soft landing.
You determine your landing.

Speaker 1 (01:19:36):
So I know this is like great depression type stuff
oh, this is more than that,this is like return to the stone
age type stuff like you talkabout these ai data centers like
good luck yeah, and that's whyI was completely freaked out
when I saw this video.
I was like, oh my gosh when youunderstand that.

Speaker 5 (01:19:50):
But there's an out 1776 live.
This is all we we talk about.
It's about moving into theprivate, getting out of the
liability of the public.
So, anyways, this man, this oldgentleman right here, he
understands the secrets of lifeand you know, this is really
what it's all about.
And it's a challenging worldwhen money's not real.

Speaker 7 (01:20:09):
We are to remind you that the only thing keeping you
from achieving all your dreamsand having all of the things
that you've ever wanted isprobably money.
That's it.
It's just lots of money.
So if you could just get lotsof money, you'd probably have

(01:20:35):
all that stuff that you wanted.
Yes, okay, let's go get a bunchof money somewhere.

Speaker 3 (01:20:46):
Okay, think about that for a while.
Have a super freaking awesomeday and stuff.

Speaker 14 (01:20:54):
Or you could just decide to be happy anyway and
don't need all that stuff it'sprobably keeping you from being
happy is lots of money.

Speaker 5 (01:21:03):
This is what the federal reserve thinks.
We just need lots of money, solet's go get it from somewhere
it's nowhere right.
It's what government's just adda couple zeros, print our own.
This money system is whatcauses subjugation around the
world.
You, you go to like SouthAfrica developing country they
want to get a loan.
So they go to Barclays inEngland and they give Barclays
the money to lend back tothemselves.
Why don't you just print it?
Why don't you just make ityourself?

Speaker 31 (01:21:25):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:21:26):
Well, we want there, we want.
Barclays got a lot.
A lot of people believe they'vegot.
Barclays has money to lend.
Oh, you know, it's like no, itdoesn't.
It doesn't have any money tolend, it's going to, it's going
to literally monetize what youagree to pay them, right?
So just one of you just printit yourself, like the guy in the
things, like the whole idea ofthe World Bank and IMF, when

(01:21:47):
they're not loaning anything andthey're just monetizing
securities, like you know,promissory notes.
Why would a country sign apromissory notes?
Why would a country sign apromissory note to a foreign
country?
and then you get debtcollateralization, you get
foreclosures on assets likeright, it's stupid, it's, we're
retarded yep the hardest thingto do is to explain to something
somebody the glaringly obvious,that glaringly evident that

(01:22:09):
everybody has decided not to see.
And ran said that and that'sthis.
It's like there's no money.
There's no gold or silver.
What is the money?
Well, it's your belief.
Okay, so I'm lending my beliefto the system, so I'm the
creditor.
There too, I'm always thecreditor.
As a creditor, if anybody knowsbanking, you got all the power,
all the power.
How do you step into that power?

(01:22:31):
Pretty interesting stuff.
Okay, we're going to jump overto private and we're going to
listen to katherine austin fitz,who is another expert on this.
So we're going to play theoutro and then we're going to
come back into private and we'llsee you guys over there.
And uh, yes, weed and boys,this guy we love, poppy trump,
and he, uh, this man ain't lying.
Money would make things a loteasier.

(01:22:53):
No, he's got it.
So we're going to play theoutro.
Then we're going to be on theprivate side of Rumble.
If you're a Rumble Premiumsubscriber, you can join us
there.
See you in just a minute.

Speaker 23 (01:23:27):
Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in
that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
You didn't bother to find out,did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an

(01:23:47):
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king, eh,very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, very nice.
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There's some lovely filth downhere oh.

Speaker 33 (01:24:07):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that King ofthe?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Whose castle is that King ofthe?
Who, the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 23 (01:24:20):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into it again.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No, one lives there, then who isyour lord?

(01:24:41):
We don't have a lord.
What I told you, we're ananarcho-syndicalist commune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major.

(01:25:02):
Be, quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings?
Well, I can become king then.

Speaker 33 (01:25:13):
The lady of the lake , her arm clad in the purest,
shimmering semite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the
water, signifying, by divineprovidence, that I, arthur, was
to carry Excalibur.

Speaker 23 (01:25:28):
That is why I'm your king, listen, strange women
lying in ponds distributingswords is no basis for a system
of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony Be quiet.
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.

(01:25:49):
Shut up, I mean, if I wentround saying I was an emperor
just because some moistened binthad lobbed a scimitar at me,
they put me away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?

(01:26:09):
Did you hear that?

Speaker 5 (01:26:10):
eh, that's what I'm on about boom, we are now in the
private now way so much morerelaxed in here.
It's the smokers lounge.
We get the cigars out, justkidding all right, so here's an

(01:26:34):
interesting clip and I saw thisand didn't really fit into the
main show, but you know, withthe nature of the show, we get
asked all the time.
You know who's they, who'srunning the world, who's this
cabal you're referring to?
And, uh, this guy.
I don't know who he is, but hetalks about the six types of, uh
, illuminati.

Speaker 21 (01:26:51):
Yeah, the illuminati there are only six types of
people who make the modern worldrun.
Number one owns messes.
They follow orders.
They are predictable.
They get sacrificed each game.
Number two the rope.
These are the 20% of people whodo 80% of the work, but they

(01:27:16):
get stuck when the routineschange and they are useless on
their own.
They need number three thenight.
Nobody can predict their past,their creativity.
They connect dots.
No one else connects RichardBranson, john McAfee, kanye.
Number four the bishop.

(01:27:38):
The bishop will protect you andhe is a quiet planner Edward
Snowden, jian Xing Wan,masayoshi, son Number five.
Number five Everyone is afraidof the queen, those who run the
suki agencies, those who run themilitary.
The rules and laws of the pawns, knights and bishops don't

(01:28:00):
apply to them.
So who are the kings of thisworld, herr Brücher?
The families that cannot benamed.
They have trillions but don'tshow up in the Forbes list.
Money does not matter to thembecause they print it.
Everyone is playing chess, butthey are the ones who provide
the board.
They decide how many fields theboard has and how long the game

(01:28:24):
will be played.

Speaker 1 (01:28:28):
I thought that was great.
I like his voice.

Speaker 5 (01:28:31):
Yeah, and he's got little tattoos too.
He spent some time in prison.
I'll tell you that.

Speaker 1 (01:28:36):
Do you know who that dude is?
No, who is he?

Speaker 5 (01:28:38):
I don't know, don't know, but the analysis stands on
its own.
I like that.
There's six types of people.
You've got the pawns.
They get sacrificed every game.
Don't know what's going on,just march forward, go to school
, get a good job, get goodgrades, contribute, pay your
taxes, right, you're a goodlittle slave, yeah.
And then you've got the, therooks, who, uh, do a little bit

(01:28:59):
better, but same thing.
When the rules change or thegame changes, they get left
behind.
The bishops, who areunpredictable.
No one can see their path rightand they'll protect you.
And he lists off a couplepeople.
You know the Kanye's, theRichard Branson's.
These are probably like yourentrepreneurs they change the
game.
You know, everything can kind ofbe laid out, but then the the
knight has a different pattern,a different set, and then you've

(01:29:21):
got the.
That's kind of how Trumpstarted out.
Yeah.
And then you've got the bishopsright, who are strategic.
They make long plays.
You usually don't get taken outby a bishop because you're
right next to it.
They come across the board.
And then you've got the queens.
The rules don't apply.
They can move anywhere Longmoves moves, diagonal moves,

(01:29:46):
front backwards the rules don'tapply.
That apply to everyone else.
That's your militaries.
You know the people who havemonopoly on force when no one
else is like pelosi pelosi'sprobably more like your.

Speaker 1 (01:29:54):
I know that she doesn't really technically fit
that class, but it was like therules don't apply.

Speaker 5 (01:29:59):
I was like, like Pelosi maybe, and then you've
got the Kings.
We don't know who they are.
Right.
These are the black nobilityand Pindar, the real runners of
the Rothschild Rothschilds whichI think are basically a red
meat for people.
So you don't know about theSimmons and the other big
families that are out there, theFreemans and the Simmons and
stuff like that, Right?
So, yeah, they're the ones whoset the money system and we play

(01:30:22):
.
You know they've set the board.
The board is fake money.
It's a huge problem.
Here's another thing too.
I wanted to play this.
This is a Project Veritas Oops,wrong one.
Now I got like multiple thingsopen.
Ok, so this is a ProjectVeritas whistleblower deal.
And this is.
It says this uh, it says this.

(01:30:48):
It says uh, hss whistleblower.
Terri lee wrote a sponsor of a16 year old, unaccompanied
migrant would pimp her out torepay the cartel ten thousand
dollar debt for smuggling heracross the border.
And then the hss whistleblowerwe don't get sued by child
traffickers.
So let's take a listen to thisand I'm going to tie it in here
with what Trump's doing thecontrol grid and just all that
stuff.

Speaker 10 (01:31:04):
The tax dollars of people who are listening are
paying to put children in thehands of criminals that I need
to make you aware.
And they said Tara, we don'tget sued by traffickers.

Speaker 13 (01:31:15):
A government whistleblower, stepped forward
to Project Veritas to detail herharrowing experience at the
Department of Health and HumanServices.
In 2021, this whistleblowervolunteered to assist HHS with
the placement of unaccompaniedminors and was deployed to the
migrant emergency intake site inPomona, california.
There she witnessed the agencyfailing these children, as she

(01:31:38):
puts it, doing the work of thecartels on your tax dollars.

Speaker 10 (01:31:43):
These vulnerable children, we care for them, we
clothe them, we feed them.
With your dollars and mydollars we fly that product
directly to the trafficker.
God forbid it's sex trafficking.

Speaker 13 (01:31:57):
Project Veritas embarked on a nine-month
investigation across the countryto corroborate our
whistleblower's claims.
So he attempted to trafficchildren and he's still at
address in Texas.

Speaker 10 (01:32:11):
Yes, we have 44 unaccompanied children at that
address.
We have 25 unaccompaniedchildren at that address.

Speaker 13 (01:32:17):
Project Veritas put boots on the ground, visiting
scores of addresses.
The whistleblower shared fromcase files she worked on.
What we found was shocking.

Speaker 12 (01:32:26):
I was forced to be with how many men?

Speaker 3 (01:32:28):
Well, with many.
I didn't like what they weretelling me.

Speaker 8 (01:32:43):
I was forced.

Speaker 17 (01:32:47):
Was she really your aunt or was it someone who she
knew?

Speaker 10 (01:32:49):
me since I was little, but I didn't know her.
The sponsor can hold up thatorder of deportation to that
child and say if you do not dowhat I say, I'm going to call
ICE on you myself.

Speaker 27 (01:33:03):
Ice, I escaped and at call ICE on you myself.

Speaker 10 (01:33:06):
I don't believe that this is something that HHS
wants people to know.
If you're a case manager andyou know this information, if
you really care about thechildren being safe.

Speaker 5 (01:33:22):
You need to come forward.
So we've known this, we'vetalked about this.
It's depraved.
The gravity of the situation isbeyond reason and when I hear
people talking about JeffreyEpstein I'm like that is red
meat.
That is the distraction.
That's the burglar coming intoyour home and giving the dog
some doggy treats as they go inand rob you blind 's.

(01:33:43):
Exactly what's going on here.
It's dhs and hhs that are doingthis, not epstein.
Epstein's not a factor inwhat's going on at the border.
That is untold horrors 44 kidsat one address I know it's
ridiculous.

Speaker 1 (01:33:57):
You see that neighborhood.

Speaker 5 (01:33:58):
You know one thing that really the neighborhood
where they had multiple pointsof multiple incidents.

Speaker 24 (01:34:04):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:34:06):
That's a prostitution zone.

Speaker 3 (01:34:08):
Right, how many men?

Speaker 5 (01:34:09):
have you been with A lot Many and they threatened to
deport us if we don't go withthe men and do the thing they
say.
Right there, it's on video, soyou just saw it.
Yeah, so Trump's dealing withthat.
You've got an open border.
You need to track these people.
We need to know who has a rightto be here, who doesn't have a
right to be here.
Enter real ID, right,machiavellian, machiavellian

(01:34:29):
problem solution.
So, on one hand, we're like allafraid of the tracking system.
On the other hand, we're likedeport them all.
We're like, hey, go help thesekids.
And they're like, ok, we'll getreal ID so we can sort the good
from the bad.

Speaker 1 (01:34:42):
You know I also really didn't like the way she
was referring to the kids asmoving the product but that's
what it is.
I know, but it was like dude,you're talking about people, not
?

Speaker 5 (01:34:53):
it's not a product but that's what it is Cause.

Speaker 1 (01:34:55):
I know.

Speaker 5 (01:35:02):
I know it goes back to this monetization when you
okay, so people don't realizethis when you get a court case,
the word indictment is a synonymfor information, it's a synonym
for invoice, it's a synonym forbill, it's a synonym for charge
, it's a synonym for claim.
So when you get an indictment,it's just a charge and they
monetize it and they put one ofthose q-sip numbers on it.
I found my, my, my bonds werebeing traded by goldman sachs
municipal fund, my court bonds,and by Americans American,

(01:35:24):
american uh something municipalbond fund was trading on my
court case.
My court case was all the moneyto put me in prison and
everything wasn't created by thetaxpayer.
It's not a line item on anappropriation, it's the actual
indictment itself.
They don't even requirejurisdiction because they half
the prison population is illegal.
They don't have social securitynumbers, they have indictments.

(01:35:46):
Those indictment is the bond.
When they come in and they getan order of asylum, there's a
registration number on there.
That registration number istied to a q-sip.
It creates the money, just likewhen you go get a home loan.
You're creating the money toget the home.
You're not borrowing it fromanywhere.
These aren't taxpayerallotments.
This is depleting the value ofyour money.
So you pay.
But it's not like a direct lineitem, which is how it becomes a

(01:36:08):
product, because there's simplya security and the kid's just
the collateral and he's also thecollateral for the cartel who
wants payment you know it's, andthis is also another hidden
expansion of our money.

Speaker 1 (01:36:19):
It's another hidden it's all part of it yeah there's
a lot.

Speaker 5 (01:36:22):
You know, when you get a medicaid account, that
medicaid account gets pre-funded.
It's not funded by yourdeposits coming out of your
paycheck, it's funded by theactual registration you're.
When a kid goes to school,their school id number is a
secured instrument.
It becomes a security, it getstraded, it creates the money to
pay the schools.
You know, yeah, they might filea levy or whatever, but usually

(01:36:44):
, if you look at that, itdoesn't go to the kids, it goes
to the facility, theinfrastructure, because that's
monetized Right.
So, catherine Austin Fitz, she'sall about getting from the
public into the private,protecting your assets, you know
, investing in the bank ofpeople, as in the real people,
the real source of credit, thepeople.
And she's giving the Trumpadministration a grade on moving

(01:37:05):
into the control grid.
Now, remember, trump is doingthis control grid stuff in order
to solve real problems that wewant solved.
Unfortunately, it's securingyou know thinking of us all as
product and pasture.
You know, livestock in apasture.
It's securing the pasture,making the fences a lot taller,
stronger.
You, you know, a lot harder toget in and out.

Speaker 24 (01:37:25):
So, which is why take your money out now I think
they put trump in to get thecontrol grid, and we have.
It's hilarious.
We have a collection that weupdate every week of all the
things the administration isdoing to build a control grid.
And I have to tell you, youknow, if I had chosen trump to
get the control grid and I wasgoing to grade him on his
performance to date, he gets ana plus plus plus.

(01:37:46):
He's done a fabulous job and Ican't imagine another politician
who could have done this much,this fast.
So, but if you look at whatthey've achieved, I don't think
they need trump anymore now.
That doesn't mean they're goingto get rid of him, but if they
want to get rid of him withepstein, they can.

Speaker 4 (01:38:03):
It will work yeah, I just don't price that like.
To me it's quite obvious thattrump is on the list because
they were besties.
But if he's on the list and heknows of course he would be on
the list why was he makingepstein so important during his
campaign?
Because of course it wouldbackfire at some point.
It's it doesn't seem logicalfor trump so to use, uh, epstein
as a as a trump card in in thecampaign so I don't know if he

(01:38:27):
was using a lot in the campaign.

Speaker 24 (01:38:29):
I think kash patel was using it a lot and I think
dan bagino was using it a lotwell, this is team was using it
right.

Speaker 4 (01:38:35):
So, and also all the supporters were vocal about it
and he didn't.
He didn't.
He could have stopped it backthen already, and now it's too
late to get the genie back inthe bottle so here's who pushed
it.

Speaker 24 (01:38:46):
And I didn't realize this until recently, because I
was very early on and saying q?
Anon was a hope porn andridiculous and not to pay any
attention to it.
But what I didn't understandwas QAnon made a very big deal
about Epstein and pedophilia andTrump secretly cleaning it all

(01:39:06):
up.
And you know, basically theDemocrats were engaged in
pedophilia and they were at theheart of Epstein and Trump was
going to secretly clean it allup.
So QAnon apparently made a hugedeal about Epstein and you know
, that is seriously in myopinion, and I say this because
I know many people trapped in it.

(01:39:27):
You know it's a cult, it's just, it's just a completely adult
fairy tale, but they believed it.
And so now that he's coming outand saying it was a hoax, you
know Epstein is a hoax, it fliescompletely in the face of the
cult.
So now, now we've got a reallybig problem and I I don't know

(01:39:48):
why he didn't put it back in thebox.

Speaker 4 (01:39:51):
I, I don't know why and it's too late now, I think,
especially since Musk is sayinghe's on the list.
To me it all seems like a trickto in the end get rid of trump
and then continue with fanswho's already part of the
volunteer and peter teal ganganyway if, if the if the people
who run the system want trumpout, they can use epstein to do

(01:40:14):
it.

Speaker 24 (01:40:14):
It will work and they can get them out by the end
of the year if they want Iquestion that.

Speaker 5 (01:40:20):
I don't know if that's the case yeah, with some
of the newer revelations thathave come out.
But either way, she's not right.
It's like the scandal in thebottle.
It's.
It's here's a scandal.
You got the bunsen burner andif trump's not a good boy,
they'll turn the heat on.
Or, once they've gotten outfrom him what they want to get
out and they want them to stopcoming after banks or
universities, you know they'llheat up that Epstein scandal
which I've talked to.

(01:40:41):
People who support Trump,support the whole movement, and
they they're still Trump's partof this Epstein thing.
No, he's not.
You know it's like again, thehoax has some legs, so we'll see
.
Anyways, pretty interesting.
Trump gets an A plus plus.
And so I think, it's thenecessary evil, it's the Patriot

(01:41:01):
Act.
Well, we got to do somethingabout these terrorists.
You know, it's the.
We got to do something aboutthe 40 million illegal
immigrants and the best thing todo is figure out who's supposed
to be here, implement real ID,implement AI tracking systems
across the country, tying in allthe state and local
jurisdictions together.
So, like my friend who gotreleased from prison in new
mexico with no id card, we wentto go get his license and we

(01:41:24):
just had to pay 30, 30 year oldtickets from 1995, you know, in
iowa, and he's trying to get alicense in new mexico.
He's only renewed his license,you know, 30 times.
But now, now the ai is involvedand doge has been tying all the
systems together, that stuff'snot going to fall through the
cracks.
It's the tracking system.
So, all right, that's it.

(01:41:45):
That's all I got for today.
That's our show.
We got a couple minutes onprivate.
That's awesome.
And uh, pony boy, thanks forjoining us.
The after party spark it up,smoke them if you got them.
That's what they always say tome.
That's what they say in thearmy when you're like okay, take
15, smoke them if you got them,so all right I think that's
what they say.

Speaker 1 (01:42:00):
Right before your plane goes down, smoke them if
you got them the last moments.

Speaker 5 (01:42:05):
All right, guys, we'll talk to you again tomorrow
.

Speaker 23 (01:42:33):
Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in
that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What, I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
You automatically treat me likean inferior.

(01:42:53):
Well, I am king, oh, king, eh,very nice.
Eh, by?
Eh?
By exploiting the workers, byhanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress?
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh how do you do?

Speaker 33 (01:43:14):
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.

Speaker 23 (01:43:25):
Didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into it again.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 33 (01:43:40):
If only people would Please, please, good people I
am in haste who lives in thatcastle.

Speaker 23 (01:43:45):
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.

(01:44:05):
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet, order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king then.

Speaker 33 (01:44:24):
The lady of the lake , her arm clad in the purest,
shimmering samite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the
water, signifying, by divineprovidence, that I, arthur, was
to carry Excalibur, that is whyI'm your king.

Speaker 23 (01:44:35):
Listen strange women lying in ponds distributing
swords is no basis for a systemof government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some

(01:44:58):
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?

(01:45:19):
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Walls Are Closing In: Inside the Justice Department's Grand Jury Investigation

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

24/7 News: The Latest

All Episodes

The Walls Are Closing In: Inside the Justice Department's Grand Jury Investigation

Stuff You Should Know