Truth Bombs and Paper Calculations: America's Political Shell Game

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth
Buncheck had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake.
We're getting screwed man.
Every time we turn, we'regetting screwed man.

Speaker 3 (00:26):
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's going tobe through podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
It's the little guys that takethe brunt of everything.
It's got to stop.
Peasants, man.
We're just peasants, Every oneof everything.

(00:46):
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man.
We're just peasants, Every oneof us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Oh, it was me.

(01:12):
Morning we were doing too badturned on, but the volume
weeding boys.
Let them eat cake.
Yes, I've got to actually dosome screen amending here.
I've got my screen in a weirdarrangement.
I've got two screens here and Igot to fix it.

Speaker 4 (01:25):
I mean, if they were eating that much cake, maybe
that was really good, I don'tknow.
Okay, okay, All right.

Speaker 3 (01:38):
It is Friday and thank goodness.
Friday, holy smokes.
This week has been a fast.
It's gone by fast.

Speaker 4 (01:44):
Yeah, it has.
I mean, the older you get.
What I've found is that timemoves a little faster.
Jeez, louise man.

Speaker 3 (01:51):
Take a blink and it's weeks over.

Speaker 4 (01:53):
Yeah, I mean, remember when you were a kid and
summer vacation went by like ohyeah, I do.
It feels like everyday summervacation yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:04):
It's too fast Speaking of funny things that
happened.
I thought this was pretty funny.
Let me show you this here.
I played this for you yesterday, ron, after the show, and I
wanted to play this for theaudience.
This is Deborah Birx, if youguys are Bricks.
If you remember her, she was onthe COVID task force.
She was the one that waswearing fancy scarves all the

(02:26):
time next to Dr Fauci, this lady.
So she went on a little tourand she's giving the speech as
to why, why, why people didn'tget vaccinated out in the
country and why they didn't getthe COVID help they needed and
why they, why they try to takethe ivermectin.

Speaker 7 (02:43):
And when I got pulled back for COVID, I was
devastated to see what happened.
Long before there was a vaccine, people were dying at higher
rates in rural areas than anyother counties in the United
States.
If you live in the CentralValley of California, your death
rate was three to four timeswhat the urbans were, and that's

(03:04):
because they didn't have thesame resources.
They didn't have testing, theydidn't have RendeSavir
Everything that you had in thecities they didn't have in rural
areas.
And I went rural community byrural community and then you
wonder why they used ivermectin.
Because there wasn't a doctorthere.
There was only a vet.
And that's how things happen.

Speaker 3 (03:33):
And we just, and then we're like, oh my god, and I'm
like yeah, oh my god, this is onus, this is on.
You're watching this stuff?

Speaker 4 (03:36):
you think, just because we live in the country,
we went to veterinarians forprimary medical care.

Speaker 3 (03:38):
Yeah, I'm that stupid dude, these people are just so
bad.
Man, this, this is like insanegaslighting.
They think so little of you.
It's insane gaslighting.
First of all, ivermectin is nothorse.
I mean, yes, you use it incattle and horses for deworming.
It is a Nobel Prize winningdrug that has an amazing amount

(03:58):
of things that it can do for you.
The idea that, oh, in the ruralareas people died more All
right, I don't know if that'sthe case or not, but definitely
something to look into.
Have you ever taken ivermectin?

Speaker 4 (04:09):
yeah, I haven't.
My cousin just started takingit because he had some parasite
problems, so he was taking itfor real, but it was, you know,
a human version from a doctoryeah, I'm just like do you think
joe rogan went to aveterinarian right?
And then what's up with thelike claiming like oh well, they

(04:30):
didn't have remdesivir yeah,the the drug that killed people.

Speaker 3 (04:34):
Yeah, bummer, they didn't have testing.
And if you were way better offliving in the cities, I'm like I
think so little of us.

Speaker 4 (04:41):
That's the only thing I could think of there well,
they also are like gaslightingthe people in the cities too,
claiming that all these elementswere like oh rem, desert was
just great, and make sure youget your third or fourth pcr
test, whatever that tells you,oh my goodness, it's so, it's so
.

Speaker 3 (04:59):
You know what I mean.
Yeah, so uh, last week we'vecovered patricia lelis, who's a
whistleblower who was workingwith bill barr.
Remember that was sitting in onmeetings with bill barr and
with um armstrong williams andhow they were going after
january sixers.
They were going after trump andbill barr was meeting with
fannie willis.
Well, if you look on my screenhere, she wrote a little note to

(05:23):
herself.
This was a message notes tomyself.
Call the FBI number.
She got the FBI number.
Agent Smith, I'm calling toreport.
So she's like a note to herself.
I'm calling to report.
Armstrong Williams, terry Giles, julian Reese.
Visa fraud sex partiesinvolving kids.
Fannie Willis, bill bar, marybar, clyde Vannel, sure Mingle,
singleton.

(05:43):
Kevin Harris, peter Reese,vivian Reese, dc mayor.
Turkish airline.
Bill barr, mary barr, clydevannell, sherman, goal singleton
.
Kevin harris, peter reese,vivian reese, dc mayor.
Turkish airline.
Qatar ambassador, new yorkadams, mayor armstrong, asking
me to destroy evidence.
So that was her bullet pointlist of things she wanted to
talk to the fbi.
Anything on that list pop outto you I can't read that.

Speaker 4 (06:02):
Maybe Maybe sex parties involving kids, Well
yeah, but I don't know, just thewhole thing.

Speaker 3 (06:10):
I'll take going to the vet over stuff like that man
.
I mean, if that's what comeswith city living, I'm out.
Yeah, there's a book by LouisL'Amour, or it's called like the
Wandering man or the Travelingman, but he talks about cities
being this black core that justrevolves around itself and I'm
like, yeah, that's pretty muchwhat it looks like to me.

(06:30):
I mean, you put too many peopletogether and you get bill bars
and who knows what else, his dadand his book on intergalactic
child sex trade or whatever.
Uh, this is a little flashback.
You might remember this.
Uh, this was back in the 2016campaign when hillary clinton
was just like, hey, I'm all goodman, I'm this email thing not a

(06:52):
problem.

Speaker 11 (06:52):
Well, there may be reports that come out, but
nothing has changed.
It's the same story.
Um, just like previoussecretaries of state, I used a
personal email.
Many people did.
It was not at all unprecedented.
I have turned over all myemails.
No one else can say that I havebeen incredibly open about

(07:13):
doing that.
I will continue to be open, andit's not an issue that is going
to affect either the campaignor my presidency that's the only
true thing.

Speaker 3 (07:22):
She said it's not an issue that's going to affect
things.
We've paid the people we needto pay met on the tarmac with
people we need to meet with.
We're good, we're good I turnedover all my emails that were
available that we didn't breakwith a hammer.
Meanwhile, john solomonyesterday did break that news
and we did cover it on the showbecause it broke early in the
morning about how they were justkept blocking any kind of

(07:44):
investigation into hillaryclinton.

Speaker 12 (07:46):
Tonight we're going to tell you about the other
clinton investigation, one thatwas running in three separate
fbi offices new york, washingtonand little rock.
It was a predicated criminalinvestigation that was examining
whether hillary clinton ran apay-to-play scheme that
delivered favors from herpurchased Secretary of State

(08:07):
while foreigners and others paidlarge sums of money to her
family foundation, the ClintonFoundation run by Bill Clinton
and their daughter, eventuallyChelsea Clinton.
Three separate agencies, threeseparate bureaus.
Offices of the FBI believe theyhad predicated evidence to
pursue that Every time theytried to move the ball down the
road inaus offices of the fbibelieve they had predicated
evidence to pursue that everytime they tried to move the ball

(08:28):
down the road in the shadows ofthe 2016 election, they got
shut down.
I mean, they got shut down atthe highest levels of their
agency andrew mccabe, the deputydirector, a man who potentially
had a conflict of interest withhillary clinton.
He his wife, got money fromHillary Clinton's former
campaign chair to run for aVirginia State Senate and, by

(08:48):
the way, mccabe attended themeeting where that assistance
was solicited.
He eventually was conflictedout, but not before he gave the
order to his agents that youwon't investigate or do anything
on this unless I approve itDownstream from them.
Four different US attorneys'offices under Barack Obama were

(09:08):
asked for help by the agents.
Agents need help.
We need a grand jury, we needto get evidence, we want to move
the case down the road.
All three of those four officestold the agents you're on your
own, we will not assist you inyour pursuit of criminal charges
against Hillary Clinton.
And then, perhaps the mostextraordinary statement in the
document that we are going toshow you on screen now they can

(09:30):
put it up as you're looking herethe deputy attorney general for
Barack Obama, sally Yates,explicitly told the FBI shut it
down, meaning the corruptionprobes of hillary clinton.
Think about this while donaldtrump was out on the campaign
trail chanting, lock her up.
Maybe there was a good reasonto lock up hillary clinton, he

(09:51):
would argue.
Every night, the obama justicedepartment was telling the fbi
agents, who also thought theremight be a reason to lock up
hillary clinton shut it down.
Remember those words.
We have a lot more up for you.
In a second we're going tobring in Senator Ron Johnson,
someone who's been instrumentalin exposing so much.
Shut it down.

Speaker 3 (10:09):
So yeah, hillary Clinton, yeah, she paid all the
right people Grammy on YouTubepost.
Project Veritas lost allcredibility when they pushed
James out.
I agree, project Veritas lostsome credibility there but their
whistleblowers didn'tnecessarily, and it's just like
everything know every time.
Every now and then we get newsfrom like msnbc.
But we're looking for contextand I have no reason not to

(10:32):
believe that assistant.
She has contemporaneous notesand she made multiple reports to
the fbi and they just didnothing.
So I don't know, doesn'tsurprise me too much.

Speaker 4 (10:41):
Yeah, um, what's his name?
From veritas, j was jameso'keefe.
Yeah, james o'keefe I saw avideo from him yesterday where
he was talking about his uhmovement out of veritas and his
claim in that video was thatsome of his partners had
products that they were sellingto outfits that were ending up

(11:01):
at pfizer.
Oh really, yeah, and there wasmoney connections there and
that's why he was out it doesn'tsurprise me at all at all, and
I know there was.

Speaker 3 (11:11):
There was basically a boardroom coup forum on there.

Speaker 14 (11:13):
Yes, pam bondy was on with uh sean hannity talking
about this potential grandconspiracy case, so let's hear
what she has to say I know youcan't talk about very specific
legal action that may beunderway or a grand jury that
may be impaneled, but we arereading that, in fact, a lot of
the information that TulsiGabbard has been able to to

(11:35):
share with the public and makepublic, and the same with John
Ratcliffe that in fact there arepeople purposely my
interpretation of it seeminglytrying to sabotage.
I'll give you one example theRussia Russia, russia hoax.
We had a career seniorintelligent assessment of the

(11:56):
2016 election.
Then there was an order to goout and get another one because
they didn't like the results ofthe first one.
Get another one because theydidn't like the results of the
first one.
We know that a Hillary Clintonbought and paid for Russian
disinformation dossier was usedfor not one but four FISA
warrants, and yet they knew veryearly on that it was debunked
and not true.

(12:16):
If you lie to a FISA court as amatter of law, don't you have
an obligation to go back andtell the court as soon as you
know that information youprovided that court was
inaccurate and not true?

Speaker 10 (12:29):
yeah, sean, I can't confirm or deny whether we have
a grand jury, an openinvestigation on anyone, but the
weaponization of our governmenthas ended, and tulsi gabbard,
john radcliffe, kash patel,they're doing a great job and no
one in this country is abovethe law.

Speaker 3 (12:50):
All right so it's ended.
Do you believe that?

Speaker 4 (12:58):
but uh, I did see, uh hannity's background there.
Where was he?
He's in alaska, that's what itlooked like to me.

Speaker 3 (13:06):
Trump's going to take Hannity with him anywhere he
goes.
Man, oh, I didn't know thatTook him to all the other
summits.
Yeah, no, hannity there up inAlaska, because they're getting
ready to meet with Putin today,which will be really interesting
.
Not a lot on the show todayabout that.
It's not a lot floating.
And then most conservativespeople that are supportive are
like well, we'll wait and see.

Speaker 4 (13:25):
Yeah, Be a walkout.
There's a lot of informationlike, well, they're meeting
today and so-and-so is not goingto be there, but there's no
real meat yet.
Well, they're meeting, meeting,no, no, no, I mean, there's no
meat to talk about, no, no, Icouldn't find anything that was
worth talking about.

Speaker 3 (13:40):
I mean, the only thought, the only thing that was
really worth talking about wastheir uh lazaroff, who's I can't
remember if he's there, if he'stheir ambassador, or if there's
their president.
I think he's the president ofrussia.
But lazaroff uh showed up inalaska wearing a cc ussr t-shirt

(14:01):
or sweater okay, I mean, allright, that'd be like me running
around wearing a uh, like youknow, 13 colony sweater or
something.
Yeah, you know I did.
I did hear that, uh, the ukrainepresident was not gonna be a
show I heard he wasn't gonna bethere, but then I heard he might
be there okay so he might makea special appearance to sign

(14:25):
over his land.
I don't know.
He's got signs of deeds, thewhole thing.
It's just such a tragedy.
The war in russia is just such atragedy because it's well
because of lives lost it waslies lost, but it was pretty
much unnecessary like yeah, ahundred percent anyways, cash
patel was on with sean hannityas well, and he had actually a

(14:45):
lot more to say but there's beena lot of talk and a lot written
about the investigation into agrand conspiracy.

Speaker 14 (14:54):
To the extent possible, what can you tell us
about that?
In other words, that this islong-standing?
If it is in fact a conspiracy,the statute of limitations would
be eliminated.
Is that what the investigationis about?

Speaker 15 (15:16):
Well, Sean, what we're doing is building a case
for the American public underthe Truth and Transparency and
Accountability Initiative, andwhat I mean by that is AG Bondi
brilliantly highlighted ourpartners, Director Ratcliffe at
the CIA and Director Gabbardover at the DNI, is Director
Ratcliffe at the CIA andDirector Gabbard over at the DNI
.
We are working with thembecause the documents that would
facilitate an investigation ofthis magnitude don't just rest
at the FBI and DOJ.
They're throughout theintelligence community and we,
the Russiagate guys like JohnnyRatcliffe and myself, who

(15:37):
investigated this and exposedthis, are trying to expose
documentation that we've knownexisted for years.
At the same time, we're findingnew material, so the best
approach is to release thisinformation with them and also
go to our colleagues in Congresswho have an oversight function
on the judiciary committees andoversight committees and demand

(15:57):
from us information anddocumentation that we can
publicize.
Things like the Durham Annex,which we've known have existed
this entire time but wereclassified for political reasons
.
We are educating the Americanpublic as we build through this
transparency initiative andwhere the investigation goes, I
can assure you of this we willmax accountability for the

(16:19):
American public.
We delivered before when we ranthe Russiagate investigation.
I now happen to be PresidentTrump's choice for FBI director
and I'm honored to lead thatcharge with our great partners
and Johnny Ratcliffe and ourgreat attorney general and the
prosecutors they have over there.
We're just as committed tojustice as everyone should be
blindly so.
We are going to de-weaponizethe FBI and get its credibility

(16:42):
back to the American people bydelivering the accountability
they need, by showing them whatwe're doing every step of the
way.
That has never been done before.
Here's the beauty of it.
Sean, you don't have to trust meor trust you.
That's all everything yourecited.
The summer you just gave isyears of excavating documents
that these deep state actorsheld and buried and documented

(17:04):
their own corruption becausethey were arrogant enough to
think no one would ever find it,that Donald Trump would never
become president and appoint acabinet that would go in and
investigate this matterthoroughly.
And when you start connectingthe dots, here's what I learned,
sean, when I ran the Russiagateinvestigation as bad as the
crime is, the corruption coverup from senior government

(17:24):
officials who are sworn touphold their duties and
accountability for the crime isthe corruption cover up from
senior government officials whoare sworn to uphold their duties
and accountability for theAmerican public.
They are the ones that violatedthat trust the most internally
and need to be held accountable.
So the people you've listed andthe names you're calling out
aren't surprises.
Their names are on thosedocuments.
Those documents are public.
The FISA is public.
The 302s are public.
The struck page texts arepublic.

(17:45):
Documents are being releasedweekly by Johnny Ratcliffe and
Tulsi making it public.
The burn bag information iscoming out.
The Durham annex is coming out.
The classified appendix iscoming out.
The American people are goingto see and hear the names
themselves and they can touchand feel it.
As far as what my investigatorsare going to do, these guys are

(18:09):
the best in the business andwe've assembled a team of
accountability and we're goingto deliver for the american
people like never before.

Speaker 3 (18:12):
Because that all right.
They're going to deliver likethey did last time yeah, rah,
rah, rah, rah, rah.

Speaker 4 (18:15):
Like which time?
I can't remember well where'sall the stuff?

Speaker 3 (18:20):
my expectations are low.
I I've said this many times myexpectations are low, but
they're definitely raising myexpectations.
Yeah, you know like.

Speaker 4 (18:30):
But I can't tell you how tired I am of hearing how
it's all going to be exposedeventually.

Speaker 3 (18:38):
It's a decade long.

Speaker 4 (18:41):
Dude, you know some of these verbs that they're
using.
They're not using themcorrectly.

Speaker 3 (18:49):
When John Durham indicted Kleinsmith and then
turn around and indicted MichaelSussman, I was like, oh,
there's something here, but I'venever heard assessment, I've
never heard of Kleinsmith.
And then Kleinsmith pled guiltyto a misdemeanor, got a year of
probation and got his lawlicense suspended for a year and
he's back practicing law rightnow.
And he changed an email in asecret surveillance court called

(19:11):
FISA to say that Carter Pagewas not a CIA operative, when
Carter Page was in fact a CIAasset.
So you know, I don't know,totally derailed the allegedly.
You know, without that changing, that warrant wouldn't have
been issued.
I don't know if, if that's thecase, but if he's willing to
change an email, there'sprobably other evidence that's
been manufactured.
I mean vis-a-vis what trump'sbeen saying about the epstein

(19:34):
stuff.
But yeah, years and years we'vekind of been building up to
this.
Granted, they've only hadcontrol of the doj and the fbi
for six months, seven months,and even that's argumentative
because, like the guy thatraided mar-a-lago, was flying
around cash patel up until lastweek.
So yeah, you know, theweaponization has ended, says

(19:54):
pam bonnie.

Speaker 4 (19:54):
I could just imagine though, because when you couple
that we've been waiting for sixmonths plus for the stuff that
was going to drop, day one right, and then you know it's a
continuous drip of words of theamerican people are going to get
touch and feel because we'regoing to show them everything.
It's like, okay, why don't youjust show us the damn stuff.

Speaker 3 (20:17):
Yeah, I mean, every 13 days they're making a big
drop and there's another bigdrop today.
It's supposed to be relevant toj6, so I don't know what it's
going to be, but the j6community is all up in a buzz
because they're like it's comingout today, all right, I don't
know, it'll probably be anotherone of those like oh yeah, this
tells us what we already knew.
But now we know it, know it,these people are corrupt.

(20:37):
So this is john solomon onmegan kelly's show.
A lot of john solomon today,but he describes the continual
rinse and repeat cover up byprojecting the Democrat sins
onto Trump, and I think this isa really important narrative for
people to understand.
When the Democrats blow up andstart accusing Trump of doing
something, they're almostcertainly doing it themselves.

Speaker 12 (20:59):
Listen the way you opened your show.
There's no better descriptionof what the conspiracy is.
It's a conspiracy to protectpotential of Democrats from
potential criminal prosecutionand then to violate the civil
liberties and privacy andreputations of innocent
Republicans to create analternate story to protect
political interest, meaningwhat's going to happen in the

(21:20):
election.
That's what it is.
It's not more complicated thanthat.
I know people say, oh, aconspiracy case is going to be
complicated.
No, it's really not.
We protected Democrats and thecycle is.
Hillary has two problems Email,now corruption.
We can prove that was active atthe time.
Hunter Biden's got corruptionand taxes and, by the way, the
first evidence of that comes inMarch, through May of 2016.

(21:43):
And then 2019, it's SenatorBiden, a lot more and so we
impeached the president and wehave the government actually
creating stories that I think wewill prove were false.
And then in 21, they find JoeBiden's classified documents at
UPenn office in Washington andhis garage and they got to make
Donald Trump look like he's theclassified guy first, before

(22:03):
they can let the cat out of thebag that Joe Biden has the same
problem.
It's a wash, rinse and repeatcycle and in the course of that,
two potential crimes areoccurring Obstruction of
legitimate investigations thoseare overt acts of a conspiracy
and then the violation ofinnocent people's civil
liberties to create a politicalruse.
That is where I believe thegrand conspiracy case is headed.

(22:25):
I now believe that there aremultiple grand juries that have
begun work around this countryin multiple jurisdictions
outside of Washington whereevidence is now being gathered.
You do.

Speaker 2 (22:36):
You can report that or you have reason to believe
that.

Speaker 12 (22:39):
Nope, I have confirmed witnesses who've had
contact with the grand jury.
So there are grand juries inmultiple locations.
Some of those are in Virginia.
I believe one is going to begin, based on early discussions, in
Pennsylvania.
There may be one in New York,and so the activity has begun.
And the question now is andthose are probably not going to
be the indicting locations Ithink the more likely thing is

(23:00):
you use multiple grand juriesjust to make it easy to gather
lots of information quickly.
That's the way strike forceswork and then you keep working
from there.
But there are multiplelocations where pieces of this
are being looked at and maybethe grand jurors don't even know
it's a grand conspiracy justlooking at some of the overt
acts in one of these chapters ofthis sad story.
But that is going on and Ithink it's going to be a process

(23:23):
.
Right, it's going to be aprocess.
Right, it's going to be a very Idon't know the reason yet.
I wish I knew.
I don't know the reason.
I mean, there's lots of.
It could be related to the 2020election.
Yeah, that's where my mind.
Yeah, yeah, so we don't know yet.
I just know that certainwitnesses have been contacted
about acceptance of grand jurysubpoenas and they're in
different locations.
So the process is beginning,but it's a long process and you

(23:51):
know, we won't know a lot aboutif the justice department does
the right thing, unlike theObama and Biden justice
departments that leaked anything.
The grand jury process will beunbelievably secret and will be
masked from it, because that'sthe way the process is supposed
to work.
In the meantime, we have anopportunity, through the Freedom
of Information Act and throughour purchase as reporters, to go
out and try to get the storyfor the American people so they

(24:11):
can understand why this is goingon.
The Democrats, who didn't careabout going after our president
when it was the Republican, aregoing to start crying.
This is payback, this isretribution.
We need Americans to understand.
It's not payback andretribution.
There are legitimate legalquestions here.
It's not payback andretribution.

Speaker 3 (24:25):
There are legitimate legal questions here, unless the
way you opened your showthere's no better description of
what the conspiracy is that'swhy we're getting the releases
the way we're getting them,because these are damning
documents like these are reallydamning documents.
They're not.
It's not a small thing.
I mean, we're like, ah, noaccountability, but these people
are tainted, like they're done.
The democrats are calling foradam shift to resign, so we need

(24:45):
to just exercise a little.
It's not a small thing.

Speaker 4 (24:46):
I mean we're like, ah , no accountability.
But these people are taintedLike they're done.
The Democrats are calling forAdam Schiff to resign, so we
need to just exercise a littlemore patience, the grand jury
process is going to be sealed.

Speaker 3 (24:55):
I don't think we're going to find out grand jury
stuff, probably won't evenofficially find out the
locations necessarily.
But the evidence that's beingbrought before the grand jury, I
think they're showing it to us.
I don't think they're keepinganything secret.
I think I think that there's aparadigm shift that's happening
and you can hear it when youlisten to these guys talking.
Cash Patel is telling youyou're going to watch us do this
every step of the way.
We're not going to be able tohide anything because you're
going to see the evidence.

(25:16):
So if we come out and go, oh,grand jury won't release
anything.
It's not like when Comey gets upand go, you know we've looked
at everything and no reasonableprosecutor would prosecute this.
Well, did you really look ateverything?
Well, now we know he didn't,but we didn't know what they had
looked at.
We just assumed they had lookedat everything.
Well, now we're going to belike, oh, they saw this because

(25:36):
they released it to the public.
So if they don't indict Brennanor don't indict Clapper, then
we are going to point directlyat Kash Patel and Pam Bondi and
be like you covered up for them?
Who covered up for?

Speaker 4 (25:48):
Now we need to have a different kind of indictment.

Speaker 3 (25:55):
So now you're I mean, we already were at the point
where the institution of theDepartment of Justice and the
institution of the FBI have beenhighly put into question.
People have been called forabolishing the FBI specifically,
and so if they don't createaccountability, it's kind of
over.

Speaker 4 (26:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (26:09):
You know.
I mean, it becomes purely theirthugs.
That's it, my gang's biggerthan your gang.
It doesn't become any matter ofmoral justice or any kind of
anything like that.
It's just my gang's bigger thanyour gang.
Trump talks about the.
He talked about basically theeffect that all this russiagate
nonsense had on his elect, on onhim tulsi gabbard declassified

(26:31):
more documents last nightrelated to the russiagate folks
she's doing a great job.

Speaker 19 (26:35):
By the way, that was another fake story she's.
I'm very happy with the job.
She said.
That's right.
They declassified some terribledocuments talking about
democrats and what they didRadical left lunatics.

Speaker 18 (26:46):
It showed that DNI, james Clapper, sent out emails
to IC officials saying that itwould be a team sport to push
them to debunk the 2017 ICAreport and that it might need
them to compromise on theirnormal modalities.
What's your reaction to thelatest declassification?

Speaker 3 (27:02):
in his face.
What does real accountabilitylook like for the players?

Speaker 19 (27:06):
It's incredible what we're finding Absolute proof of
guilt, and we'll see whathappens.
But Clapper and Comey and thatwhole group of criminals they're
criminals and they made it verytough.
You know they did the fakeRussia, russia, russia witch
hunt that lasted for two yearsand I get totally exonerated.

(27:29):
There was no doubt about it.
They should have done it in oneday, not two years.
But it was a whole scheme totry and demean Trump so that I
couldn't win an election.
And that is a criminal group ofpeople.
They're sick people.
We've heard Trump say that many, many times.

Speaker 3 (27:48):
They're sick people and they should be taken care of
.
It really feels like things aregoing to happen.
Man, it sure does so.
Yesterday Gavin Newsom had alittle rally out in LA and
outside of this rally DonaldTrump said that know if donald
trump sent it?
But ice came outside of gavinnewsom's rally and was arresting

(28:10):
illegal aliens on the street.
So as people are filing intothe convention center, you've
got these guys out frontarresting illegal aliens, like
right there.
So clearly this causes allkinds of chaos and inside of the
rally you've got Kevin.

Speaker 17 (28:28):
Right outside, at this exact moment, are dozens
and dozens of ICE agents.
Donald Trump, you think it'scoincidental?
Donald Trump and his minions,Tom Holman, tough guy, totally

(28:49):
decided coincidentally or notthat this was a location to
advance ICE arrests and rightnow, coincidentally or not
decided this is the informationto post icers.

Speaker 3 (29:02):
So karen bass has another video where she's like
this is not acceptable.

Speaker 6 (29:06):
How dare he do this when we're having a?

Speaker 3 (29:07):
meeting.
This is just a big bully andI'm like I don't even know what
to think.
You guys are such a joke.
The american people arecompletely on board on the
positive side at plus one point.

Speaker 21 (29:22):
Americans view trump far more favorably now on crime
than they did a year ago.
Donald trump is like ericjordan, towering over joe biden
when it comes to their handlingof crime.
Look in 2024.
Look at where biden's netapprover was on crime way
underwater there, at minus 26points.
It was one of biden's worstissues.
Granted, pretty much everyissue was one of Biden's worst
issues.

(29:42):
And again look at where DonaldTrump is way, way, way above Joe
Biden.
What is that?
That's 27 points.
So Americans vastly preferDonald Trump's approach to crime
than they did to Joe Biden In2023, republicans were favored
by 13 points.
Look at where they were in Mayof this year.
Republicans were actuallyfavored by 60 points.
Look at where they were in mayof this year republicans were

(30:03):
actually favored by 60 months.
They actually gained ground oncrime.
They were maintaining theiredge and actually add a little
bit to it man.

Speaker 4 (30:10):
He should be on our channel oh dude, I love that I
can't believe we're watching cnn.

Speaker 3 (30:14):
Every time I see one of his clips granted every,
every issue of Biden's issue wasa bad issue.

Speaker 4 (30:20):
Yeah, I can't believe his producer's like hey, hey,
knock it off.

Speaker 3 (30:26):
Yeah, so another thing that happened was somebody
sent Gavin Newsom a Trump 2028hat, and so there were memes all
over the place.
There was one of Trump like inhis closet and he puts a 2028
hat on the shelf, and theysuperimposed gavin newsom giving
this speech.
Trump puts the hat on his headand there's there's another one

(30:46):
where he's just giving thespeech, but the hat's on his
head.

Speaker 17 (30:49):
so this is this is gavin newsom just freaking out
about trump 2020, fact thatwe're affirming uh, our
independent commission, andwe're calling for a national
independent commission as wellwell, I think it's pretty sick
and pathetic and it just saideverything you need to know the
setting that we're under, thatthey chose the time, manner and

(31:09):
place to send their districtdirector outside, right when
we're about to have this pressconference.
Everything you know aboutdonald trump's america and that
was top down you know that for afact.
They'll deny it, I'm sure Maybethey won't deny it.
Everything you know about theauthoritarian tendencies of the
President of the United States Isaid in a moment ago wake up,

(31:31):
america, wake up.
You will not have a country ifhe rigs this election.
You will have a president whowill be, running for a third
term.
Mark my word.
I wasn't exaggerating when Isaid that I received in the mail
a Trump 2028 hat from one ofhis biggest supporters.
These guys are not screwingaround.
The rules do not apply to them.
The most corrupt president inhistory Doesn't believe in free

(31:56):
enterprise, crony capitalism.
He is wrecking this country,wrecking the economy.

Speaker 3 (32:06):
He's a's a lawless president, wake up, america,
wake up to what's going on.
I think we can definitively say, I think we can definitively
say the democrats will projectonto donald trump everything
they do.
I mean, and it's just, we justbullet pointed at john solomon,
then you know, you got.
You got covering up for hillaryclinton and her involvement
with Uranium 1 and Russia Gates.
Pen it on Trump Biden's gotclassified documents.
Pen it on Trump Biden's gotproblems with Ukraine, with his

(32:29):
son.
Impeach Trump over Ukraine.
It's just thing after thingafter thing.

Speaker 4 (32:34):
He looks like such a clown.

Speaker 3 (32:35):
He's the most.
What is the most lawlesspresidency Pretty sure we just
lived through Obama and Biden,which appeared to be utterly
lawless, utterly lawless.
Have you read any of thesereleases?
Gavin Newsom?
Like listen, the Americanpublic I promise they're going
to do polling on Trump 2028, andit's going to be like 42 to 47
percent are like yeah, let himrun.

(32:56):
What a good job he got punkedbro.

Speaker 4 (32:58):
He got punked and he's just all mad about it.
Oh, I can't believe he wouldsend me a hat.

Speaker 3 (33:05):
Yeah, now Gavin Newsom.
Today's episode is greatbecause you can see every day in
the news.
This is a narrative.
It's these people talking toeach other.
These are the people that holdlevers of power and influence,
but he gets a hat in the mailand he's like these guys are
serious so he freaks out andthen.
But then he also drops.

(33:25):
If we let donald trump rig thiselection, what is he talking
about?

Speaker 6 (33:28):
rig the election, I know right, push the 2020 data,
account for the miscounts, theover counts, the under counts
which, by the way, oh, likeacross the board, helped the
left.
In 2020, the 20.
The census bureau admitted thatthey got it really wrong.
It was the worst census in ourlifetimes.
I believe the 1991 was notgreat either, but this one, I
think, by far outstrips it.

(33:49):
In 2010, they were off by36,000.
In 2020, in Texas alone, theywere off by 560,000.
So it was just a terribly runcensus.
And if you account for all ofthose corrections, if you
account for swings and votertendencies, especially amongst
Hispanics, if you account forthe illegal population, and then
you republish those maps andthen mandate purposes of

(34:11):
redistricting, it pushespolitical power into rural red
areas, because the vast majorityof these illegal populations,
especially now that's prettydangerous for America because we
can't hardly be trusted.

Speaker 3 (34:31):
Even with our primary medical care we go to
veterinarians.
So you know.
I mean, this is pretty scaryfor the Democrats.

Speaker 6 (34:37):
Blue states are in major cities or suburbs of major
cities, so it makes it harderfor Gavin Newsom and the left to
write these maps, because thepopulation the weighted
population moves out from thecity slightly or significantly
in the case of California, soit's just harder for them to
write a map that accounts forall of that that benefits them.

(34:57):
It's it's a much harder roadfor them to do that and if they
republish the census and thenmandate reapportionment, it
takes the ball out of GavinNewsom's hand and he's sure you
can go ahead and redistrict, butgood luck doing that.
You know they might actuallyend up with fewer Democrat seats
if you republish the 2020census and they still try to

(35:17):
redistrict.

Speaker 3 (35:18):
So if you read in response to.
Texas doing their redistricting,which they've completely
screwed the pooch on that thing.
They've let those Democrats beup in Illinois.
They're not going to get them.
They're making threats, notfollowing through there.
Whatever, we're going to gainlike five seats in Texas when,
it's all said and done, shouldhave gained nine, ok, but it's.
There's a uniparty problem inTexas.
But you know, trump's riggingthe election.

(35:39):
You guys have rigged how manyelections now in a row?
You're dead to rights, man.
You're dead to rights.
In an ultimate act ofprojection, gavin Newsom will
become the avatar of Democratstupidity.
He is going to embody Obama andBiden and Clinton and he just

(35:59):
has a fancier face.
But he is, he is.
He represents nothing as ahuman being.
He is, he represents nothing.
He has spent a life in politics.
He's a shell I listened to himon the sean ryan show.
The guy can talk, but he's alla shell.
Too many f words, too many this.
Why?
Because he's trying to looktough.
Why?
Because he's not tough?
Because people who are toughdon't have to act that way.

(36:21):
They either are that way orthey're not.
But there's, there's, they'reauthentic, gavin's not authentic
.
But he's saying there, that's apanicked man.
Oh, they top down, they.
They meant to do this and, andyou know what I mean, how many
times have you rubbed trump'snose in something?
I got a hat in the mail.
Do you know how serious thesepeople are?

(36:42):
You know, and meanwhile, youknow, speaking of rigging
elections, this is Donald Trump,yesterday signing a executive
order that dealt with bothillegal immigrants and people
over 120 years old on SocialSecurity Benefits.

Speaker 19 (36:57):
We've already kicked nearly 275,000 illegal aliens
off of the Social Securitysystem.
These are people, many of themhave already left the country,
and yet we were sending themchecks all the time.
And 275,000, and that number isnow even larger than that.
Frank, it's an unbelievable job, and what that's doing is

(37:19):
making the system uh strong.

Speaker 3 (37:22):
It's making it strong benefits we've already is with
people that are on medicaid 225000 illegal immigrants.
I would suspect they're using100 of their benefits, yeah,
whereas normal americans a lotof people have medicaid.
Don't use it.
They're on it, but they're.
They're healthy.
But if you're an illegalimmigrant and you're on it,
you're probably using it forprimary health care purposes.

(37:42):
So that might be a significantboon and there's probably more
people.
Jesse Waters talked aboutanother scandal that happened
over at USAID dealing withKamala Harris and being the
border czar.
This is pretty interesting.

Speaker 23 (37:57):
That hombre in the third world knows we're not
spread eagle anymore.
They love Joe and his bordersare Kamala.
She was never really interestedin building a wall, she just
wanted to find root causes.

Speaker 22 (38:10):
We want to work with you to address both the acute
causes as well as the rootcauses.
We are focused on addressingboth the acute factors and the
root causes, not only the rootcauses but the acute causes.
To look at the root causes andthe acute causes, my trip to

(38:30):
Guatemala and Mexico was aboutaddressing the root causes,
addressing the root causes ofirregular migration.

Speaker 23 (38:36):
For the past three years, I have led our
administration's efforts toaddress the root causes of
migration and we're learning nowthat she did what Joe did and
tried to pass that work off ontosomeone else, using USAID.
They wrote up a contract worthup to eight hundred million
dollars for consultants to findthe root causes for them.

(38:58):
To find the root causes forthem.
But here's the problem.
Walter Barnes III, the man whofounded one of these companies
that got the cash, was a knowncon man.
He just pled guilty to adecade-long USAID bribery scheme
and the government knew he wasshady for years, even before

(39:26):
they gave him all the money.
In 2023, the USAID inspectorgeneral said Barnes lacked
honesty and integrity, but onthe same day he was awarded an
$800 million contract.
They had good reason to besuspicious.
Over the years, Barnes securedbig money deals by bribing USAID
employee with pricey basketballsuites, a trip to the vineyard

(39:46):
and even a down payment on ahouse.
Isn't that nice?
And once he got paid, Barnesburned through pallets of cash
doing everything, but what wepaid him to do we reached out to
.
Walter never got back to us.

Speaker 3 (40:00):
We reached out to Walter, never got back to us.
So meanwhile, while they'regetting to the root causes,
they're just dumping $800million on the sky.
Holy almost a billion dollarsto research the cause of root
migration.
It's called an open border.

Speaker 4 (40:19):
There's something about that number 800 million,
you know it just kind of ringsnice, isn't that the same number
they gave to that other chick?

Speaker 3 (40:28):
usa id uh stacy abrams yes same damn number, I
think it was more.
I think hers was like a billionor something.
Oh, that's right, it was.
1.8 is 1.8.
Yeah, that's right.
What I find?
It's almost a billion dollars.
What I find it.
I just keep thinking of thatasian comedian where he's like

(40:49):
this is so big.
Every where we look, you guysare deburring money, stealing
money, covering up crimes.
I lack the vocabulary.
One of the things that, for mepersonally, is a little bit
disturbing is seeing thefederalized police force walking
around the country.

(41:10):
It bugs me a little bit.
This is a video that danscavino put out my eyes so cold.

Speaker 9 (41:14):
I think I'm done with ice birds.
If I leave her, she gonna bedone with life.
Okay, I put it up with no knife, because I bring guns to fights
.
They got this sack, I got thissack, but ain't no one to mine
my little one.
I say I'm like I don't evenlike to mine.
All right, I look like withoutall this money, I look like how
I'm coming.
Yeah, I look like without allthis money, I look like having
all these.

Speaker 3 (41:48):
When I crack a smile.
That's real.
What?
That's real.
That was posted by dan scavino,or no?
It was posted by dhsgov, whoposted originally dude, these
are hilarious.
America needs you.
They're.
It's such a propaganda page.
Oh geez, it's such a yeah, seehere, look at these.
Got the videos.

(42:08):
Fancy.
Again, they're making it cool.

Speaker 17 (42:14):
We're bringing sexy back.

Speaker 8 (42:15):
Oh, this is the governor and many of our other
elected officials were having apress conference here to talk
about redistricting and theydecided they were going to come
and come their nose in front ofthe governor's face.
Why would you do that?
That is unbelievablydisrespectful.
It's a provocative act.

(42:37):
They're talking about disorderin Los Angeles and they are the
source of the disorder in losangeles right now.

Speaker 3 (42:44):
This is just completely oh yeah yeah, okay I
know, like I'm not like praisingcops every day.
Okay, I mean, I've been inprison like I I know what side
of the tracks that they put meon you know what I mean like I'm
an outlaw end story.
So I don't.
I don't seek comfort in thepolice now doing my dirty work,

(43:04):
because the same police thesearen't new federal employees.
These are the same people thatraided my friend's houses and
transported me to prison Rightand all of a sudden, oh now
they're the good guys becauseTrump's their boss.
Yeah, I don't buy it.
I don't buy it, okay, I don'tbuy it.
The same power that they'reputting on the streets today to
go after illegals could becoming after mormons next year.

(43:27):
It's that there's no emergencybreaks for these people.
The best thing you can do istake the power from them.
I would rather they not haveuzis when they're patrolling the
streets.
You know what I'm saying.
Like I would prefer they nothave heavily armored vehicles in
residential neighborhoods.
But you forced our hands.
You machiavellians right.

(43:49):
You created such a crisis byletting 20, 30, 40 million who
knows?
Illegals across the border thatat this point I'm like battle
rattle round them up.
Medical care is too expensive,housing's too much, food prices
are too high, my schools aren'tsafe.
I mean, these people have nopolitical agenda other than just

(44:09):
getting theirs round them upand then, when they're all
rounded up, we're going to livein a world where it's like show
me your papers.
You know, that's right.
You can't win, you can't, youcan't win.
You can't win, you can't.
Well, let's check the chatshere.
So we got Joe Moore.
Joe, welcome over to.
The District of Columbia isalready a federal zone.
It's been.
The district has been federalsince 1801.

(44:32):
And it was the act of 1871created the District of Columbia
as a corporation.
It actually used to just becalled the City of Washington.
Yeah, washington.
I have a feeling they've gotsomething up their sleeve for
him to run again.
Yeah, it'd be interesting.
Uh, joe moore, everybody don'tforget, we still need a couple
chatters over on rumble.
We're not, we're like not toour goal of chatters every month

(44:54):
.
So, youtube, you guys are onfire today it's like a chat game
.
Yeah, you guys are definitely init there.
I love, love that.
But don't forget at some point.
At least one time this month,go over to Rumble and chat so we
get credit for you.
Okay, moving on to somefinancial topics, this is Scott
Bessant talking about tariffsand how they're just exceeding
expectations, which is kind ofinteresting.

(45:16):
I'm going to show you a couplethings today.

Speaker 5 (45:19):
The president's tariff plan brought in more than
$28 billion in July, a freshmonthly high Tariffs are
becoming the third largestsource of income for government,
and the last time you were withme, you told me that you would
expect $300 billion in tariffrevenue.
But I think you are increasingthat expectation right now,
aren't you?

Speaker 16 (45:39):
I am.
So I think August September isgoing to be a very good test.
I've been saying that I thinkwe can take in 300 billion and,
as the Treasury Secretary, Ilike to be conservative, but
there is a chance that I'm goingto have to substantially
upgrade that number.
And, maria, the way to thinkabout it for your viewers is

(46:02):
every $300 billion is 1% of GDP.
We were left with a mess.
The deficit to GDP 6.5, 6.7%,highest when we were not in a
recession, not at war.
So just the tariff revenue canbring that down into the fives,
which fits with thisadministration's plan of getting

(46:23):
the deficit to GDP back intothe threes, the long-term
average before President Trumpleaves office.

Speaker 3 (46:31):
So I think that's excellent, sounds good, but then
this little report came outtoday that made me not smile so
much.
This is the current federal,the current federal debt and
deficit.
So a couple of weeks ago wereported how there was a surplus
.
We actually had a budgetsurplus for the first time in
forever.
Well, that didn't last verylong, as you can see, they've

(46:53):
been running big deficits 291billion federal budget deficit
in year 2025.
Federal deficit for 2024.
So we're actually outpacing JoeBiden's spending in 2024.
No bueno, $1.6 trillion deficitso far this year, as opposed to
last year, $1.5 trillion.
So yeah, apparently that big,beautiful bill wasn't all that
beautiful.

(47:13):
I don't know.
I mean people who participatein the 1776 live side of things.
You know my opinion on money.
To me, this is just likenonsense.
Anyways, sapphire Patriot saysTaylor, my latest shared video
shows both sides of immigrationraids Very interesting.
And it says message redacted.
You've been censored.

(47:36):
Unless you redacted that, or isit your video on your channel?
I'll have to go check it out.

Speaker 16 (47:45):
So another thing Scott Bessant was pushing
yesterday, which I think I thinkwould be a good addition to the
rules and criminal statutesGoing against senators and
represent I am going to startpushing for its single stock
trading ban, because it is thecredibility of the House and the
Senate that you look at some ofthese eye popping returns

(48:07):
whether it's RepresentativePelosi, senator Wyden every
hedge fund would be jealous ofthem and the American people
deserve better than this.
People, people, people don't.
Shouldn't come to Washington toget rich.
They should come to serve theAmerican people.
And it brings down trust in thesystem, because I can tell you

(48:28):
that if any private citizentraded this way, the SEC would
be knocking on their door 100%.

Speaker 3 (48:35):
You don't go to Washington to get rich.
You go to New York, you go toLA to chase your dreams and you
go to Kansas to eat corn.
Everybody knows this.
I think that's pretty good.
Uh, donald trump was.
We're just kind of blowingthrough videos today.
It's kind of fun.
Donald trump was talking aboutdropping the national or the

(48:56):
interest rate, and hisreasoning's pretty.

Speaker 19 (48:58):
So they've got a long way to go and I think it's
just grossly incompetent, butnot quite as incompetent as his
decision not to do interestrates.
Take down interest ratesbecause, just like they
shouldn't have taken, think ofthat $360 billion for one point

(49:25):
and we should be down at 1%because we're the leader of the
world.
We were always the lowestinterest rate until like a
certain time ago decade couplebut we were always because we
were the United States ofAmerica.
So even if the country was runbadly, we were considered like
to be super prime.
And now he's got us in a badplace.

(49:46):
So we're paying $360 billion ayear for each point.
Now I believe we should bethree or four points lower.
So that's over a trilliondollars we pay every year in
interest, and it's really just apaper calculation.

Speaker 3 (50:00):
You hear that Are you hearing this wrong?

Speaker 4 (50:04):
He sounds like you.
It's just a paper calculation.

Speaker 3 (50:07):
Dude, I want to replay this.
This is like, ladies andgentlemen money is not real.
Okay, it is not real.
What you think is money is notreal or four points lower.

Speaker 19 (50:22):
So that's over a trillion dollars.
We pay every year in interestand it's really just a paper
calculation.
You sign a document and yousave almost a trillion dollars
because that number equates verymuch to the bonds that we have
to buy.
But despite that we're poweringthrough it and we have the
greatest economy maybe we'veever had.

(50:44):
But the housing sector peoplearen't able to get good
mortgages.
They're paying too much becauseof Jerome too late pal.
He's truly incompetent andwe'll be making another.
We put a very good man intemporarily in the one spot
because one of the people thatwas uh appointed by the
democrats left early, and Iheard left because that person

(51:07):
uh wanted lower interest ratesand heard quit.
But I have no idea.
I'm sure she won't say thatit's just a paper calculation.

Speaker 4 (51:16):
I want to save a trillion dollars.
Can you flip the switch?
It's just a paper.

Speaker 3 (51:19):
Can you flip the switch?
Can I flip the switch?
Can you sign it?
I'd be happy to Thank you.

Speaker 4 (51:25):
I'd be happy to sign it, I want to save a trillion
dollars.
It's a paper calculation.

Speaker 3 (51:29):
There's no money.
It's a freaking fraud.
The whole thing's a joke.
Look over there, creature fromJek.
I mean it's not the bestwritten, but I mean it'll make
your skin crawl off.
It's not real.
What are we doing here?
We're chasing nothing.
Oh man, let's see, check thecheck the chats again.
Oh, nothing new.

(51:49):
Ok, so I, I almost, I almostdon't want to.
Well, let's just do this, let'sOK.
So Scott B besant posted thishe goes bitcoin.
Bitcoin that has been final,finally forfeited, so it doesn't
have any more appeals to thefederal government will be the
foundation of a strategicbitcoin reserve that president

(52:11):
trump established in his marchexecutive order.
In addition, treasury iscommitted to exploring budget
neutral pathways to acquire morebitcoin, to expand the reserve
and to execute on thepresident's promise to make the
united states the bitcoinsuperpower of the world.
Get your Bitcoin now, boys andgirls.
Get your Bitcoin now.
These guys are gobbling up.
There's a limited supply ofBitcoin.
It'll max out at 21 million.
Those are the chess boards ofthe future, chess boards that

(52:34):
the game will be played in thefuture.
Get your Bitcoin now,definitely OK.
So let's do this, let's, let'sjump over.
Oh, we're gonna, we're gonna dothis and then we're gonna jump
over to private.
Okay, so this is presidenttrump drops a bombshell

(52:57):
directing the department ofjustice to investigate act blue.
Meanwhile, president trump isdirecting the Department of
Justice to investigate.

Speaker 2 (53:02):
Act Blue.
Meanwhile, president Trump isdirecting the Justice Department
to investigate Act Blue.
This is a Democratic donationplatform and the focus, as the
allegations about a illegalstraw, donors and foreign
contributions, mark Meredith islive in Washington with more.
This has been brewing for awhile, mark.
What do we need to know?

Speaker 13 (53:21):
Dana for years.
You're right about this, butthis is a big development.
The White House is directingthe attorney general to
investigate the DemocraticParty's top fundraising platform
.
It's called ActBlue and thepresident says he wants to know
if foreign money is beingdonated to the group and then
utilized to sway elections.
Democrats are calling thisprobe a dangerous abuse of power
.
Actblue is an enormousoperation in Democratic politics

(53:42):
.
It's raised more than $16billion since 2004.
You may have seen the text popup from candidates saying please
donate, go to the ActBluewebsite.
Republicans use somethingsimilar called WinRed.
There was a new memo signed onThursday directing the Attorney
General to investigate ifforeign nationals are using the
ActBlue platform to bypasscampaign finance laws.

Speaker 3 (54:03):
Trump wants a report out in six months oh, looks like
we're gonna have to go checkout, uh, enrique antario's.
Enrique antario's uh web pageor page.
Look at it here real quickwhat's going on?

Speaker 4 (54:20):
okay, let's see here, enrique should we go ahead and
go private while we're doingthat?

Speaker 3 (54:28):
no, let's play this one for the public.
This is public consumption here, says he posted a video of one
of them, um you're gonna have tobend your statements.

Speaker 25 (54:42):
Help us frame this here we go they're like you
can't outright lie, but you'regonna have to bend your
statements.
Help us frame this story.
We're not using plan this was aj6 to me, 25 years.
The weight of the federalgovernment on your shoulders is
a pretty big threat.

(55:03):
Those guys are my friends, thatyou know.
They pressed me to turn on.
I loved them.
Those guys ran us into thosecharges that they got.
First of all, they didn't raidmy home.
It was my girlfriend's home,which I had a separate residence
, but I guess they hadsurveilled me going there, so
that's why they raided thathouse.
They followed me to work and Iwas sitting there waiting to

(55:26):
have a meeting and all of asudden I got a knock on the door
.
A masked man with a SWAT veston or whatever, came up, popped
open my door and snatched myphone out of my hand.
They grabbed me out, put me inthe back of a black pickup truck
.
They're like well, this isabout January 6th and I had been
stabbed about three weeksbefore that.
I was at home on the day ofJanuary 6th in bed on pain pills

(55:49):
and had 150 staples in my body.
They let me go that day.
They continued the raid at mygirlfriend's house and they, you
know, they had her and my 80year old father outside for, I
think, 14 or 15 hours in therain and the cold.
They told me I couldn't go backto the house.
They said don't go back there.
They took my phone.
I went to my mom's, grabbedanother phone and went to my

(56:10):
house.
So their warrant was only forelectronics.
I went home and then Iimmediately found an attorney.
I went and met with him and hearranged a proffer.
Basically, they said thatanything I said couldn't, I
couldn't.
Anything I said in therecouldn't be used against me.
I couldn't be charged withanything.
The second proffer I went to.
I went there wholeheartedlyexpecting that if I told them

(56:34):
the truth this is what's whathappened that they would be like
oh well, you guys didn't plananything.
They were pressing pretty hard,saying that they knew that it
was planned.
Nicole Miller brought out the1776 document and told me that
Enrique had wrote it and the wayshe presented it it looked
pretty damning.
Come to find out later he did.
He had nothing to do withwriting it, but she said it was

(56:55):
in his possession.
It was.
You know he had it.
Shortly after that the firstproffer concluded and they said
1776 was written by the feds andthen distributed.

Speaker 3 (57:05):
So Enrique had it in his email inbox or on his
telegram channel, but he didn'twrite it.
Somebody posted it.

Speaker 25 (57:11):
They would let me know if they wanted to talk to
me again.
I spoke with my attorney acouple of times in between then
and the next proffer and he wasbasically like they want you to
play ball or they're going totry to charge you with something
serious.
The second proffer they cutshort 30 minutes.
Maybe I don't think it wasgoing the way they wanted it to
go.
Then they reached out to myattorney again and kind of let

(57:32):
him know hey, this is what'sgoing on.
These guys are dealing with bigcharges right now Because I
think Enrique at that point hadbumped his charges to seditious
conspiracy or something likethat.
My attorney and the fbi agentsbasically started showing me
what the sentencing guidelineswere for that and then I believe
it was the third proffer iswhen they told me what the
charges were going to be.

(57:53):
They were the gun charges andseditious conspiracy.
So all along they were playingit along like we're not going to
charge you, we just need you tohelp us frame the story this
way.
That's when they put thepressure on.
We're like, hey, you're eithergoing to play ball or you know
you're looking at 25 years.
They they're like you can'toutright lie and tell me that
something happened that didn'thappen.

(58:13):
But you know you're going tohave to bend your statements,
basically help us frame thisstory the way it needs to be
framed.
And they said that withoutsaying that directly to me.
It was kind of communicatedthrough my attorneys like hey,
you know we're not using thesewords for this.
You know we're not using plan,we're using goal.
These were the things that werecommunicated to me, with the

(58:34):
things that I had to say I wouldgive an answer and then they
would ask the question in adifferent way and be like, okay,
well, what if I ask you this?
Basically, yes, I had to framemy answers to help build the
story.
After the charges and after Ihad to take my plea deal, I flew
to DC to the prosecutor'soffice.
They flew me up there.
They met me in person.

(58:54):
I had everybody there JocelynBallantyne was there, jason
McCullough was there.
I mean, the whole room was fullof people.
When I flew up there that wasone of the coaching sessions
there was they practicedcross-examining me.
They'd send feedback to myattorney, like, hey, this was
said, but this is not what wewant, so we need to mold him to
say it this way, that was prettycoached.

(59:19):
You know, if I had gone out andcommitted a crime, if you say
these guys got and I gottogether and we went and robbed
a bank, we got caught, I'd belike, okay, you know what I did
a crime you got the right tocome down on me.
We didn't do a crime, I didn'tdo anything.
Look what they did to Enrique.
You know, 22 years and hewasn't even at the Capitol, you
know.
And so that just proves thatthey were not just threatening,
they were going to do it.
You know, those guys are myfriends that they pressed me to

(59:41):
turn on.
I love them, and watching themget convicted and sentenced to
these outrageous sentences forthings that they didn't do broke
my heart, broke America's heartthat was standing by and
watching and I hope that maybewe can bring some change to the
way the legal system works.
But yeah, those guys raninnocent of those charges that

(01:00:04):
they got.

Speaker 4 (01:00:07):
Are those dudes still in jail?

Speaker 3 (01:00:09):
No, but they did not get pardoned.
Enrique did, but the rest ofthat list did not get pardoned.
They got commuted.
Well, that was a last-minute ad.
I hadn't watched that prior, sowe all watched it together,
live.
But basically the guy turned onhis friends.
It's tough in the streets.
I just got stabbed.
But you know, yeah, no, I'll sayit the way you want me to say

(01:00:30):
it Nothing gets under my skinmore than that man.
It just all you have is yourname and all you have is your
integrity, and nobody will judgeyou but your maker.
That's it.
I.
I just I cannot wrap my headaround this life being it and I
just can't move into the nextlife being like I just I

(01:00:54):
couldn't do it, like I didn'teven.
I didn't even play ball withthese guys with regards to
myself, let alone with regardsto co-defendants or you know, I
don't know, I just people.
The thing that I never can quitewrap my head around was when
people now, in an act ofbraggadocio, who have become

(01:01:17):
famous because of January six,took plea deals and now they say
I was coerced into a lie insigning a plea deal.
That was a lie.
You signed a lie and you knewit was a lie when you signed it.
That is not what someone whowould say wish that I had one
life to give for my country ashe's going to the gallows would

(01:01:37):
do.
Stand up, you stood up onJanuary 6th.
You're all tough then, but butall of a sudden, when it's
paperwork and you can't tell thetruth, tell the truth at all
costs.
Our whole society depends on it.
The future depends on it.
Everything depends on the truthcoming forward.
If two plus two is not four, wecannot survive as a species.

(01:02:00):
We may as well just revert backto warlordism.
Might makes right every timeand I that.
It's one of those things I willnever.
I just don't have it in me.
It's not a matter of compromise.
Compromise is one thing, lyingis another.
Signing a lie is another.
Getting up in a frudge andsaying I understand, I

(01:02:20):
understand, I understand, overand over and over again, as they
, multiple times, are trying toconfirm that what you are now
telling me is a lie was accurateand truthful and a
non-perjurious, sworn statementat that time.
It's just it.
I don't understand it, man.
I, I don't have the dna in me.
I can't the individuals, andI'm always very careful not to

(01:02:47):
call out J6ers.
But if you took a plea deal,shut the fuck up about oh, I was
coerced to lie.
You knew you were lying whenyou did it.
You get no clout for havingdone it.
Shut up, own it.
Don't say, oh, they coerced me,you did it.
You get no clout for havingdone it.
Shut up, own it.
Don't say oh, they coerced me,you did it.
You had party to that.

(01:03:08):
Some of us didn't do that.
Some of us went through trial.
Some of us could have gotten alot better benefit and a lot
less time.
I had five kids at home.
You think I wasn't tempted.
The truth is I never really was.
But it cost me and my familyand we were going to pay the
cost because all I have is myname and my integrity and my

(01:03:31):
standing before my maker.
That's all I have.
It doesn't.
When I was in DC they had a showthat we could watch.
That was about those Salemwitch trials and I can't
remember the guy's name, but itwas the first guy that said if
you sign on this paper that sayyou're a witch, we won't burn
you and we won't kill yourfamily, and he's like you know,
you can just live off your life.

(01:03:52):
But you got to sign a papersaying so-and-so's a witch and
you're a witch too, and he'slike I didn't.
And and this is like after ayear that they kept him in a
dungeon and he's basicallythey're about to hang him.
They're like here's the paperyou can go free to sign it.
Say you're a witch and he'slike I have but a name.
I can't give my children thisname and know that I lied and
gave away my integrity and toldyou I was a witch.

(01:04:14):
You know he's like that.
That would be starting mychildren off with a bad name,
right, and that with a bad name,right, and that's.
I watched that video as I can'tbelieve they're letting people
in prison watch this.
I'm like this is the wholepoint.
And in the end of the videoit's like they hung him and then
they hung like two other peopleand then they didn't hang any
more.
People put an end to thesandwich trials.
You know why?
Because he got up and he saidjust that.

(01:04:35):
He said I'm innocent, I didn'tdo it, so hang me.
And they hung him and thecommunity went oh, everyone else
that you've hung or punished.
They like signed a thing sayingthat they were witches or you
know what I mean like it createdbut he just wouldn't bend.
And it it ended the fever ofthe salem witch trials.
And that's how I felt, like ifevery single j6 defendant just

(01:04:57):
said no, I'm just going to trial, I'm not going to say a word,
you just put me through trialand you got to impanel a grand
jury.
You got to impanel a jury andyou're gonna have to go through
the whole thing.
It would have broke the system.
They were to the point to where, as a person took a plea deal,
they indicted a new person.
How would you, how would youfeel if you're like, hey, you
could play for time and uh,maybe someone else can stay free
?

Speaker 4 (01:05:17):
they really needed everybody to take plea deals so
they could process everybody andget them in jail.
Otherwise they wouldn't be ableto process everybody.

Speaker 3 (01:05:24):
Yes, I'm very careful .
I don't like.
Everybody's got their ownjourney.
Everybody's got to do their ownthing.
The pressure was immense, butdon't go clout seeking.
If you bent at that moment, youare not someone I want to lean

(01:05:45):
on.
And I love some of these peopleI mean, these are some bosom
buddies but I have told them totheir faces.
And if there's other J Sixersthat listen to this, if you took
a plea deal and we've talked, Ihave probably told you this to
your face because I am notashamed to say it You're the
reason why this continued tohappen.
That's the consent they needed.

(01:06:07):
They needed your virtue to beweaponized against yourself.
Right, and I just, anyways, Iam.
Some J sixers might hate me forhaving said that, but it blows
me away.
Some of the biggest influencersout there that use J six clout
are people who took plea deals.
I just I don't know.

(01:06:27):
Uh, frasier said Taylor wouldbe a pad politician.
That is a good thing, right,yeah.
You know it's funny.
I get asked pretty frequentlyabout going into politics and my
wife and I were both like Iasked somebody once if I would
make a good politician.

Speaker 4 (01:06:38):
Then they said I asked somebody once if I would
make a good politician.
Then they said no, you shouldnot go into politics.
Well, why not?
And they were, and they were.
This is what they said.
You're too honest.
Yeah, that was it.
Yeah, You'll never make it.

Speaker 3 (01:06:54):
I'll tell you what the thing I love about Donald
Trump is he has metal.
He also will not bend, he willnot break.
This is what I know, and thisis all I know.
And he just is not going.
I mean, we can compromise onthis if we want to talk tax
rates and percentages and,woo-hoo you know, should we get
a bond to build a park orwhatever, all day long?
That's politics, that'scompromise, that's trying to get

(01:07:16):
win-win solutions.
But when we're talking abouttruth or falsity, you know here,
sign here.
Two plus two equals five.
No, it doesn't, it just doesn't.
I'm sorry, you know.
In fact, I take my disdain sofar.
I refuse to participate withhim in the freaking court.
I didn't call witnesses, Ididn't file motions, I made
special appearance, the wholething because my disdain for the

(01:07:38):
entire system.
It's corrupt from top to bottom.
So what am I going to go Plead?
I'm going to go bend down andask forgiveness from the
freaking guy in the black robethat needs help getting up out
of his chair.
That's been for 37 years, thatsat on the FISA court during
9-11?
You think I respect him?
No, not at all.

(01:07:58):
I respect the guy digging aseptic tank.
I respect the guy that'sframing a house, that's working
with this.
That's who I respect.
I don't respect some guy thatsits up in a freaking glorified
giant cubicle in the sky, youknow, four feet above you, that
wears a black robe, that fallsasleep during critical elements
of testimony.
I don't respect that stuff.

(01:08:18):
Oh, but they were pressuring me.
Yeah, I don't respect thatstuff.
Oh, but they were pressuring me.
Yeah, you know what?
People have gone to prison forshitty reasons for many, many
times.
You think we're unique?
What do you think the blackcommunity's been barking about
for 50 years?
Take your medicine.
Who is this?
A trump cult channel?
Couldn't tell.
Should we go private?

Speaker 4 (01:08:36):
now Is this a Trump cult title?
Oh, that's pretty fun.

Speaker 3 (01:08:54):
AR Random Independent .
Oh, we haven't seen you in thechats before.
I don't think we are I actuallyam relatively critical from
time to time, explain yourself.
Yeah, we're actually kind oftelling people other things, but
anyways, uh, I am not criticalof donald trump.
To me he's.
He's a as far as politics go,I'm a populist.
This the end of story.

(01:09:15):
Does he make mistakes?

Speaker 4 (01:09:17):
he talks about um trump running for a third term
up in the chat a little bithigher up okay, where is, where
is that at there?

Speaker 3 (01:09:23):
LOL going, lol is going off this tramp.
She should be able to run athird term, because I'm actually
president of first term.
Yes, I would agree with that.
I can't.
I came across that don't stokethe fire is great.

(01:09:44):
We are peasants who just livefree and want to be left alone,
not indoctrinated by falsenarratives.
Yeah, not, not a trump cultchannel.
We're just freedom lovers.
We're peasants, literally likewe have to live here.
If trump's in office or biden'sin office or obama's in office
or jd vance is in office, wehave to live here.
We have to go to work tomorrow.
So know, to the extent thatthere's a connection from the
president's desk to my gas tankand my dinner table, I really

(01:10:06):
care who the president is.
Beyond that, I don't give a.
What you do in your space.
Like, yes, libertarian peasants, I think politics is stupid.
It's a necessary evil, as ourfounding father said.
Okay, good point on Trump incourt, I always wondered why he
didn't walk by their specialappearance under his trust.
He didn't matter.

(01:10:28):
Trump knowing Carlitz, I knowwhat you're referring to.
It doesn't matter if he knowsit or not.
You can't defeat tyranny.
Tyranny is the warlord'sdilemma, right?
It's force on force.
That's what you're dealing withhere.
So it's a masterful game thatTrump played politically to put
the pressure on them so thatthey couldn't railroad him.
They were going to railroad himanyways, but they had to.

(01:10:48):
You know he played a masterfulgame, but, yeah, you can't just
come in there and be like youknow all the bells and whistles.
No, they went in and played thegame, so saying you want to be
left alone and not indoctrinatedby false nail murders and then
supporting Trump.
As a contradiction, maybe, butyou know, I spent years
listening to Barack Obama andworked my way out of that one
too.
So, all right, guys, let's headon over to private and we'll

(01:11:11):
get a couple of minutes in there.
You guys on YouTube, I hate tosee you go.
You guys are so busy chattingin there today and AR random
independent.
Welcome to the peasants.
And hopefully, over time, youdo not believe that we are trump
sycophants in fact we, you know.
But I do owe a lot to him andhe did give me a pardon, so I'm
not gonna be super critical ofthe guy.

Speaker 4 (01:11:30):
But if you haven't been watching our show for a
minute, we are we.
We give donald trump plenty ofside eye yeah, plenty of side.

Speaker 3 (01:11:37):
I don't like what's going on with palantir.
I already in this show Imentioned.
I don't like what's going onwith the homeland security.
Like, yeah, my gang is biggerthan your gang.
These are the same people thatwere persecuting me and my
friends six months ago and now,all of a sudden, we're supposed
to be like do I want illegalimmigrants to go?
Yeah, it just has nothing to dowith donald trump.
I've wanted that since obama.
Yeah, when I had an illegalimmigrant working for me to beat

(01:11:58):
a man and I called ICE and theyput him in the ICE facility in
Tacoma and then they gave him agreen card and I was like what
the heck?
So, no, I'm completely yeah, heneeds more side.
Yeah, no, we're.
We are supportive of Trump.
Like you know what's theclassic line we want the
president to be successful.
Because we're American, ofcourse I want Trump to be
successful.
I want him to vanquish his foesand enemies, absolutely Do.

(01:12:19):
I want accountability andjustice, but at the same time, I
understand that the boot thatyou put on the left foot, if you
put it on the right foot, it'sstill a boot on my neck right.
I oppose government power andoppression in all of its forms
and formats.
And if Donald Trump does thatand he is doing that to some
people, right, I don't oppose, Ioppose that as well.
So, anyways, all, anyways, allright.

(01:12:41):
Guys, we're going to get goingand head on over to rumble
private chat for the rumbleprivate streaming for the last
little bit, and we've got a clipthat we're going to be playing
from weinstein talking aboutcovid and myocarditis.
He does something terrible andit's just like, yeah, that was
bad, but and it does somethingneutral, maybe slightly
beneficial, like like his secondcoming of christ.
I mean, there does somethingterrible.

(01:13:03):
It's like, yeah, yeah, I meanyeah there's that, vince mcmahon
.
This is politics as usual.
So you can't, you're not goingto get perfection from them and
I, and I refuse, I, I refuse tolet better be the enemy of good.
Sometimes, all you get is good.
You're never going to get thebest, you're just going to get
good, especially when you'redealing with politics.
And that that's how I feltabout the big, beautiful bill.
I don't like it.
I don't like it at all.
But when you talk aboutgovernment spending, I'm like

(01:13:26):
double middle fingers to you.
You don't even know what moneyis you know what I mean it's
just a freaking bookkeepingentry, Like it's the stupidest
thing.
Oh, we got to go private.

Speaker 4 (01:13:44):
We'll talk to you guys again tomorrow.

Speaker 3 (01:13:45):
Bye, are we private now?
Yes, okay, we're private now.
That was a good discussion overthere.
It's not about perfection.
I'm still reading youtube chats.
Not about perfection, it'smoving goalpost broski.
Sure they'll be back tomorrow.
My mom used to say in therumble chat, my mom used to say
why do you always, uh, why doyou always have to say something
?
My reply how can you not?
You have to stand up and speakout.

(01:14:05):
Do not bend the knee.
That is very true.
You have to spin out.
Birkin burkin, be being freedom.
Yes, absolutely okay.
So this was pretty interesting.
Before we get to eric weinstein, we're going to listen to
donald trump talk about 12.4million people that they have
confirmed are over the age of120 on Social Security 12.4

(01:14:28):
million names listed in theSocial Security database that
were over 120 years of age,meaning you were breaking
records because I've never heardof anybody at 125.

Speaker 19 (01:14:40):
because I've never heard of anybody at 125.
There were nearly 135,000people listed who were over 160
years old and, in some cases,getting payments.
So somebody's getting thosepayments and we're after that.

Speaker 3 (01:14:53):
Well, somebody was getting those payments 160 years
old.
This one came out with the Dogestuff and people didn't want to
believe it and they went andconfirmed it.

Speaker 4 (01:15:02):
All it really was was happening does your payment go
up the older you get, or does itstay the same?
I have no idea how that works.

Speaker 3 (01:15:09):
I don't either I just assume it's not going to be
there for us yeah, you know whatI mean of course like.
I just assume we're never goingto see any of it.
I've had it okay.
So this, this is a fascinatinginterview, oh boy.
So this is.
This is brett weinstein withpierce morgan.
I don't know who this other guyis, but pierce morgan has been
a huge covid person.

(01:15:31):
You know, he's like pushed themass, he's pushed the lockdowns,
he's pushed, believing that thegovernment is he's pushing all
kinds of right he's he's notbeen like, uh, you know, stephen
colbert pushed the vaccine, butpretty close, yeah.
So to have Brett Weinstein onand talk about this and to have
Pierce Morgan, he's beat downman.
Some of these people that pushthe shot and got on board with

(01:15:52):
the narrative and criticize allyour independent libertarians
and want to.
You know society and you knowhe was one of those guys and but
they've been beat.

Speaker 4 (01:16:00):
But now he's going to have one on.

Speaker 3 (01:16:02):
They've been beat down.
Well, they've been beat downbecause every time a piece of
good information comes out, it'santi-COVID, it's anti-vaccines.
So, having Brett Weinstein onhere and explaining exactly what
was going on here, Stunning.

Speaker 20 (01:16:16):
Now I have to say that independently I've had a
very, very top experiencedoncologist in the UK in London
one of the best in the countrywho's expressed exactly the same
concerns to me for a longperiod of time about the mRNA
vaccine so they weren't all mRNA, but the ones that were.
He's been very concerned aboutthat.

(01:16:37):
What do you feel about thatparticular issue?

Speaker 24 (01:16:47):
that.
What do you feel about thatparticular issue?
Unfortunately, the mRNAplatform, though it is brilliant
in its conception, is fatallyflawed, and although there are
arguably applications where itmight be useful something like
the treatment of a deadly cancerit is not appropriate to
vaccinate against a relativelymundane disease like COVID.

(01:17:09):
The reason that it isn't isthat the platform itself carries
hazards at its core that at themoment we have no technological
fix for.
So the myocarditis andpericarditis that showed up as a
result of COVID vaccinationsare inherent to the platform,

(01:17:32):
not to the messenger RNA thatwas delivered inside these shots
.
It would, in my opinion, bealmost certain to show up,
irrespective of what foreignprotein was encoded by the
vaccine in question, and itwould be no service to the
public if we were to allowvaccines that have this flaw to

(01:17:55):
be deployed only to discoveryears later that people had been
injured and died because ofthem years later that people had
been injured and died becauseof them.

Speaker 20 (01:18:11):
In simple, layman's terms, is the issue with mRNA
that, in an effort to provideimmunity against COVID-19, it
damages and reduces your generalimmunity in many people?

Speaker 24 (01:18:19):
No, I would say it's actually much worse than that.
That's true, but the problem isthat the design of this
platform is to induce your owncells to make a foreign protein
which gets displayed on thesurface of those cells.
That's as intended, but becausethere's no targeting mechanism

(01:18:40):
to lead it to happen only incertain tissues, it can happen
haphazardly around the body,including in places like your
heart.
And Pierce Morgan.
He's just like he's.
he knows he's hearing the truthhere like what that triggers is

(01:19:02):
your own immune system to seethose foreign proteins and
conclude the only thing they can, which is that those cells have
been virally infected.
And the right response, theresponse, the natural response
of the body is to take virallyinfected cells and destroy them.
So the the idea that we getmyocarditis from the covid shots

(01:19:24):
is really standing in for amuch starker reality, which is
that inflammation, myocarditisis the symptom of damage to the
heart done by our own immunesystems in response to the cells
in the heart producing aforeign protein and triggering
our immune system to attack themnod at the end by piers

(01:19:48):
morgan's like oh, now I get itoh, booster up baby.

Speaker 3 (01:19:56):
Oh man I.
I listened to another guy today.
He was like the damage isuncalculable.
He says we're just finding iteverywhere.
We're finding it everywhere.
We're finding.
Every metric is ticking up.
You know, one or 2% more forthis disease.
One or two or 3% more for thisdisease.
This one's off the chart 20%increase on a rare disease we'd
never seen he's like it's.
I mean red dye 47.

(01:20:18):
I mean it's's.
You know, nobody wants to admitthat.
It's just this instant onset ofissues.
And you know, same thing withthe autism this instant onset of
a generation of autism but itwas pretty hard to ignore the
soccer players falling down onpitch.
But you know the video, thesupercut they played.
There was one guy that diedbefore covet, so you know the

(01:20:39):
whole thing was debunked.
Oh, yeah, because they got onevideo in there that was, you
know, in a wrong timeline.
That's how it always is, man,that's how it always is.
But I just the mrna vaccine isactually the problem itself.
Like, yeah, even if the, thespike protein or whatever what
they were doing with the covidside of things he says might be
really effective on cancer.

(01:20:59):
You know, you either die or youlive and maybe end up with a
little myocarditis.
Okay, you know what I mean.
You make you chemo, youbasically kill everything and
hopefully you outlast the cancer.
All right, I, I get it.
But to just use it for a commonrespiratory virus and and like
we played in a video the otherday, this platform that was

(01:21:19):
instant.
They could just scheme up an AIthing and plug it into their
platform and, you know, everyfreaking sickness we would be
getting vaccines for andboosters for.
It would just be a greatbusiness model for humanity.
So, all right, that's all Ihave for today.
Thank you for joining us.
We got through a lot of videosand it all connected.
I mean, these guys are talkingto each other and they're

(01:21:41):
playing the game of politics andit affects us.
So go out and enjoy your day,enjoy your life, just trust Kash
Patel, but take care ofyourself.
We're just peasants, remember,no matter what they do or don't
do we still have to live hereWith that?
We'll talk to you guys againtomorrow.

Speaker 1 (01:22:20):
Old Woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that
castle over there.
I'm 37.
What, I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.

(01:22:41):
They automatically treat melike an inferior.
Well, I am king, oh, king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh how do you do?

Speaker 26 (01:23:03):
How do you do, good lady?
I'm Arthur, king of the Britons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 1 (01:23:15):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living living in adictatorship, a
self-perpetuating autocracy inwhich the working class is oh,
there you go, bringing classinto the game.
That's what it's all about.
If only people.

Speaker 3 (01:23:30):
Mac carter yes, I can go to the page.
Puget sound patriots picnictomorrow.
Get with me on telegram atpeasants peasant pod on telegram
.
Get me the information if Idon't have it.
But mac carter 60 yes, I wouldlike to go to that.
Just get me the info.

(01:23:51):
Go ahead and go back to thevideo all right old woman, man,
man, sorry, what night.

Speaker 1 (01:24:18):
lived in that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
You automatically treat me likean inferior.

(01:24:40):
Well, I am king, oh, king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh.

Speaker 26 (01:24:59):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 1 (01:25:12):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,A self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes ohthere you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 26 (01:25:25):
If only people would Please, please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?

Speaker 1 (01:25:33):
We don't have a lord.
What I told you.
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet butby a two-thirds majority in the
case of more major.

(01:25:54):
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,

(01:26:16):
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:26:39):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.

(01:27:00):
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Truth Bombs and Paper Calculations: America's Political Shell Game

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Truth Bombs and Paper Calculations: America's Political Shell Game

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce