We Are The Peasants: How Trump's Battle Against The Establishment Affects Us All

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
Hello, hello Scream.

Speaker 4 (00:19):
And when they went to the queen to tell her her
subject had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
We're getting screwed man, every time we turn around,
we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's going tobe through podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.

(00:57):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people with thekings and queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning, peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasant's Perspective.
It looks like at this momentwe're streaming to ourselves.
Yes, yes, we are, but we areconsistent.

(01:19):
We're doing it anyways.
It must be a Monday, even ifit's just for the audio
listeners.
All right, guys, we are happyto be here today and we have to
make sure that we get 10 viewersat one moment and we're going
to do ad reads.
Wake up, we are going to layout with ad reads today.
We have to do so many ad readsfor the month because you know

(01:39):
we're in that Rumble Creatorsprogram and it's awesome, right.

Speaker 1 (01:46):
They're helping us grow the channel and everything
that's okay though.

Speaker 2 (01:48):
I mean, I'm used to talking to myself.
Uh yeah, for those of you thatare listening, please share the
show with others.
We obviously want to grow.
Oh, here we go, pony boy.
Good morning peasants.
You know, maybe this morningthe problem was I actually had
the chats open when we startedthe show.
Usually I'm still kind offiddling around with them, so
it's good to good to haveeverybody here today.

(02:08):
So, good morning pony boy.
Welcome to the rumble chat.
Appreciate it very much.
So we had a really epic weekendthis week, did?

Speaker 1 (02:16):
you see about it oh my goodness.

Speaker 2 (02:19):
So trump went and met with putin in russia was this
friday yeah, it was friday, yeah, it started friday it was
started friday.
So there was this iconic momentwhen donald trump and vladimir
putin are walking, they'rewalking across.
Let me uh, oh, I'm sitting herelet me change my volume, not ai

(02:39):
, ai would have totally had thevolume switched over earlier,
okay.
So there's this iconic momentwhere trump's got red carpet
coming from air force one andvladimir putin comes across the
red carpet and they meettogether and of course, trump
grabs his hand and pulls it intight so vladimir putin gets off
balance, so it's the wholedominance thing.
And then, as they're walking tothe red carpet, here comes a

(03:03):
stealth bomber and, I'm guessing, four F-35s in an escort
formation doing a flyby.
Now you have to understand whois on this tarmac.
This is Donald Trump andeverything that we know.
With Air Force One and F-35escorts and clearing airspace.

(03:24):
Russians do the same thing.
Yeah, they have at least thesame protocols.
And Putin is a wanted man,right?
He's got the whole war crimething in that report of whatever
.
So technically, we're supposedto arrest him the moment he hits
American soil.
So the whole like thing of this, the fact that they did a flyby

(03:47):
who knows if they askedpermission?
Who knows if they informed them?
Who knows if russia had alltheir radar tech up and is like
monitoring the airspace becauseyou know their guy, who's in an
active war and an activeconflict, has just stepped foot
on the territory of the peoplewho are paying for this war and
this conflict.

Speaker 1 (04:07):
I think, in the same way that they probably stood
down just because of themomentum and the momentous of
this event where they're meeting, they probably probably let
their hair down just a littlebit.

Speaker 2 (04:23):
See who knows, we're not.
We're probably not going to knowthis, for a little while, right
, if this was a surprise flyby,like no risk I mean, I'm sure
there's no bombs in thesebombers, right.
But if this was a surpriseflyby and the russian
intelligence and military islike holy smokes.
Holy smokes like they don'tusually fly b2s over russia, so

(04:44):
we don't really encounter thesea lot, right?
No, like holy smokes, or it waspre-staged either way, putin
looks over like oh my gosh, andthen, and then he gets, you know
, aligned again and trump jabshim exactly.

Speaker 1 (04:59):
I think it's the same feeling as me watching those
chinese boats hit each other forthe first time.
I was like whoa whoa, yeah.

Speaker 2 (05:06):
So here you go, here they come.
Oh, oh the video.
Oh, the video reaction.
All right, we'll refresh ithere.
Give me a moment.
It's a live show.
Folks, we put it together as wego.
As one listener said oh, evenworse come off the screen.

Speaker 1 (05:27):
Let me find it.
It's like mud your eye.

Speaker 2 (05:31):
It's all teed up, ready to go look at this great
moment.
Oh, no, we're not watching it.
There's a lot of good stuff tohave this weekend.
We're definitely not going tobe able to get to it all at all
so many, I gotta take you offthat screen.

Speaker 1 (05:45):
You're doom scrolling no, I said don't show the
screen.

Speaker 2 (05:50):
Okay, so first thing putin did when he landed by the
way, he went and laid a wreathin the world right here, so it
looks that camera angle didn'tcatch it camera didn't angle,

(06:14):
didn't really.

Speaker 1 (06:15):
There's another angle where he's like oh yeah, he's
whoa.

Speaker 2 (06:19):
Let's see if yeah, anyways, it was pretty fun.
I got tweeted out john mcameron.
Shout out to him john rockshomes, one of the j6s, taylor,
taylor, john, attack us at gonefor months.
You can find me on x at gone,that's you was charged with
assault with a deadly weapon, afirearm.
When you look up the firearminfo, it's a bike rack.

(06:41):
He was pushed.
I wasn't pushed into a bikerack, but either way he's
pushing the bikes back.
There's been years in prisonfor it.
God bless the j6ers.
This was in response to the dojofficials who threw a subway
sandwich at federal office,charged with the 111a.
I expect, seven years man, thatthat subway sand was just full
of gmos and who knows what otherkind of toxins yeah, deadly

(07:02):
weapon, deadly weapon right,we're at eight viewers.
Can you guys believe it?
Listen, when we get to 10, weread an ad.

Speaker 7 (07:09):
So you've got to hang around for the ad.

Speaker 2 (07:12):
You guys are the dedicated show listeners.
It's your friends.
You show up every day.
This is so pitiful.
Eight live viewers it's sofunny.
We have an actually decentaudience, but this is an early
morning show and people catch up, so it's kind of fun.
Those of you that show up everyday and get your names read out
in the chats You'll be here forthe first ad read ever.

(07:32):
First ad read ever.

Speaker 1 (07:34):
Yeah, yeah, it'll be so sad if we can't get to 10.

Speaker 2 (07:38):
Okay, so I saw this video.
This actually came up thismorning in my feed.
This is an old video.
It circulates anytime.
Donald Trump does anythingamazing.
But, it's like the iconic.
This is the Trump campaign.
This is the MAGA movement.
This is the thing that we alllatched onto and said this is
why we support this man.
All the picadillos, all theweird tweets, all the potential

(08:01):
drama and hoaxes surroundingthis man and nightmare, it
surrounding this man andnightmare it's this that
ultimately gets us.
You know, as one commenter saidlast week, the trump cult show.

Speaker 5 (08:12):
I don't want to be a trump cult show, but I really
like this speed about replacinga failed and corrupt political
establishment with a newgovernment controlled by you,
the American people.
The Washington establishmentand the financial and media
corporations that fund it existfor only one reason to protect

(08:33):
and enrich itself.
The establishment has trillionsof dollars at stake in this
election For those who controlthe levers of power in
Washington and for the globalspecial interest they partner
with.
These people that don't haveyour good in mind, our campaign
represents a true existentialthreat like they haven't seen

(08:57):
before.
This is not simply anotherfour-year election.
This is a crossroads in thehistory of our civilization that
will determine whether or notwe, the people, reclaim control
over our government.
The political establishment thatis trying to stop us is the

(09:18):
same group responsible for ourdisastrous trade deals.
For our disastrous trade deals,massive illegal immigration and
economic and foreign policiesthat have bled our country dry.
The political establishment hasbrought about the destruction

(09:40):
of our factories and our jobs,as they flee to Mexico, china
and other countries all aroundthe world.
It's a global power structurethat is responsible for the
economic decisions that haverobbed our working class,
stripped our country of itswealth and put that money into
the pockets of a handful oflarge corporations and political
entities.
This is a struggle for thesurvival of our nation, and this

(10:06):
will be our last chance to saveit.
This election will determinewhether we're a free nation or
whether we have only theillusion of democracy, but are
in fact controlled by a smallhandful of global special
interests.
Rigging the system, and oursystem is rigged.
This is reality.
You know itged.

(10:27):
This is reality.
You know it, they know it, Iknow it and pretty much the
whole world knows it.

Speaker 2 (10:32):
Dude do you remember when this speech came out?
No, oh, my goodness, this is.
This is the maggot movementright here, like this speech to
finally goes on for a couplemore minutes.
But that's the big thing.
This is an existential threat.
Bankers and special interests,the Clinton cash machine he just
like boom, boom, boom, boom,boom and this is why we're doing
it.
I knew this day would come.

Speaker 1 (10:53):
I agreed with everything you said.
I just I've never seen itbefore, oh my goodness, yeah,
it's a good one here.

Speaker 5 (11:00):
We'll listen to a couple more minutes of it.
The Clinton machine is at thecenter of this power stunt.
We've seen this firsthand inthe WikiLeaks documents, in
which Hillary Clinton meets insecret with international banks
to plot the destruction of USsovereignty in order to enrich
these global financial powers,her special interest friends and

(11:23):
her donors.
Honestly, she should be lockedup.
The most powerful weapondeployed by the Clintons is the
corporate media, the press.
Let's be clear on one thing thecorporate media in our country
is no longer involved injournalism.
They're a political specialinterest no different than any

(11:46):
lobbyist or other financialentity with a total political
agenda.
And the agenda is not for you,it's for themselves and he's
dude, he's ripping over.

Speaker 2 (11:58):
All right, ron, I see 10.

Speaker 1 (12:00):
I see 10 in the I know I'm on there, I'm trying to
figure out how to make it work,all All right.
Well, we'll figure it out.

Speaker 2 (12:05):
We'll figure it out.
Those of you that are onYouTube welcome.
Welcome, tiffany and CarlitoCarlitz on Rumble.
Tiffany and Carlito on YouTube.
Welcome, sapphire Patriot, goodto have you today.
And, of course, john Attacusand Farazier speech.
He's like coming after theclint.
Honestly, she should be lockedup.

Speaker 5 (12:23):
Okay, then he continues the one who challenges
their control is deemed asexist, a racist, a xenophobe.
They will lie, lie, lie andthen again they will do worse
than that.
They will do whatever isnecessary.

(12:43):
The Clintons are criminals.
Remember that.
This is well documented, andthe establishment that protects
them has engaged in a massivecover-up of widespread criminal
activity at the State Departmentand the Clinton Foundation in
order to keep the Clintons.

(13:04):
They knew they would throwevery lie they could have made
at my family and my loved ones.
They knew they would stop atnothing to try to stop them.
Nevertheless, I take all ofthese slings and arrows gladly
for you.
I take them for our movement,so that we can have our country

(13:25):
back.
I knew this day would arrive.
It's only a question of when,and I knew the American people
would rise above it and vote forthe future they deserve.
The only thing that can stopthis corrupt machine is you.
The only force strong enough tosave our country is us.

(13:45):
The only people brave enough tovote out this corrupt
establishment is you, theAmerican people.
Our great civilization has comeupon a moment of reckoning.
I didn't need to do this.
I built a great company and Ihad a wonderful life.
I could have enjoyed the fruitsand benefits of years of

(14:06):
successful business deals andbusinesses for myself and my
family, instead of going throughthis absolute horror show of
lies, deceptions, maliciousattacks.
Who would have thought?
I'm doing it because thiscountry has given me so much?
It because this country hasgiven me so much and I feel so

(14:31):
strongly that it's my turn togive back to the country that I
love.
I'm doing this for the peopleand for the movement and we will
take back this country for youand we will make america great
again so some people say that'sthe speech that won him the
presidency.

Speaker 2 (14:49):
Oh amen, I'll tell you what.
If there's an argument to bemade that he inoculated his
followers from everything thatwas going to happen for the next
10 years, that was it.
He basically laid it out.
We're still dealing with thesame corrupt machine trying to
cover up for the Clintons.
All right, did we figure out?
I think so.
You want me to read an ad?
All right, guys.
This is it Big moment.

(15:10):
This is a big moment for theshow.
This is our first ad.
Read who is the first ad.

Speaker 1 (15:16):
Oh well, let's just find out If you haven't already.
Make sure you download theRumble app.
It's free, simple to use andthe best way to stay connected
to the content you want.
Once you've got it, search formy channel and hit follow.
That way, you'll get anotification every time you go
live.
No missed shows, no extra steps.

(15:36):
You can have it right now usingthe link in the description or
the pinned live chat.
Download it to your phone andyou're ready to go.
And, if you prefer, watching iton the big screen, rumble is
available on all major streamingdevices and smart TVs.
Just search for Rumble, followthe channel and be part of the
action.

Speaker 2 (15:56):
Oh, my goodness, I almost teared up right there.
Rumble is amazing.
We're fighting the man.
The revolution will bepodcasted.
And here we are just yes,rubble premium, everybody go get
.
It's wonderful.
Yes, rubble's actually beenreally good to us, right?
I think they've been reallygood to us.
Uh, when we first started going, if we were streaming on

(16:19):
youtube, oh my goodness, wewouldn't have lasted hardly an
episode, and you can actuallyfind the old episodes back from
2020 and 2021 okay, here's howit works.

Speaker 1 (16:30):
You can, as soon as we finish an ad, it gives me a
timer before I can do another ad.

Speaker 2 (16:35):
Okay, so we've got like 20 minutes everybody's got
to stick around, then we onlyhave to do five of these this
month.
So if we can get them all donetoday and tomorrow, we're good,
we'll be here till midnight,we'll get all five out.
We'll just rock and roll.
Okay, thank you guys.
So much, all right.
So back to this video withlocker up, right, he?

(16:58):
This is the, the video that thespeech that trump gave, that a
lot of people say, reallysolidified the mega movement.
That describes the megamovement.
This is about the people takingback the power from the banks,
the corrupt politicians, thespecial interests, the NGOs.
He, george Soros, he kind ofrattles off all of them.
And when he talks about theClintons being criminals, I mean
everybody's got a string topull on that thread.

(17:19):
I mean there's a dozen ways youcan look at and go, oh, they're
criminals, yep.
Well, here was a big one thatwas had kind of been occurring,
and this is one that mostAmericans are not aware of, and
that's the issue with HillaryClinton and Bill Clinton and the
Clinton Foundation and acompany called Uranium One,
which was a Canadian miningcompany that had interests in
American uranium.

(17:40):
They ended up selling that toRussia.
What?

Speaker 1 (17:44):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (17:48):
Yes, who's a russian asset now?
Yes, exactly so.
In the ongoing theme of theypaint trump with the sins of the
democrats, this is again why,right?
Why would you sell something toyour mortal enemy?
You're the double agent.

Speaker 15 (17:59):
Well, let's accuse our political rival for
congressional investigators didhillary clinton give 20 percent
of the united states supply ofuranium to russia for donations
to the clinton foundation, andit flows out of the sale in 2010
of this company, uranium one,which controlled about a fifth
of america's uranium, to arussian firm called rosatom.

(18:20):
By law, even though Uranium Onewas a Canadian firm, the US
part of this deal had to beapproved by the Committee on
Foreign Investment in the US,which is comprised of nine
agencies, including the StateDepartment, and at that time,
hillary Clinton was the bossthere, anderson.
So I mean, a lot of this waslooked at during the campaign.

(18:41):
Why is it coming up back nowagain?
I mean, there were also all thedonations to the Clinton
Foundation.
Yeah, absolutely, we've alltalked about it before, but the
Hill newspaper, which reports ona lot of things with the
government here, came out with areport showing the FBI was
investigating a subsidiary ofRosatom for possible
racketeering, money laundering,bribes, all aimed at giving the

(19:03):
Russian government moreinfluence over the US nuclear
industry while this deal wasbeing approved.
So some members of Congresswant to know why they weren't
told about all of this.
And furthermore, the Hill saysthe Russians were channeling
millions of dollars to theClinton Foundation, at the same
time raising the question to theClinton Foundation, at the same

(19:23):
time raising the question,especially for some Republicans
did Hillary Clinton help thisdeal along in any fashion?

Speaker 1 (19:32):
Oh, I don't know.
What do you think?
I don't know, I have no idea.

Speaker 2 (19:35):
I don't know.
I wonder what WikiLeaks has tosay about it.

Speaker 1 (19:40):
Oh, that's all half.
You can't trust that stuff.
I wonder how Nancy Pelosi'shusband makes her decisions.
I have no idea, geez, I don'tknow.
All right, and then andersoncooper.
Well, I wonder why this iscoming out now.
It's like because you nevercovered it when you should have.

Speaker 2 (19:55):
Dummy you know none investigate dense.
That's why.
All right, so I was getting thecircle of death on this next
video, so I had to refresh it.
Now I have to go find it backin the course.
Find it here, okay, so this isa couple, a couple of different
clips from the meeting withbetween Putin and Trump.
Oh man, it's like.
It's like the deep statedoesn't want us to see it, or

(20:17):
something.
Man, what is going on here here?
This is crazy.
Literally, these clips will notplay.
Oh no, that's not.
That sometimes does happen, butusually a quick refresh will
fix that problem.
No issues, but for some reason,not these ones all right.

(20:45):
Well, clandestine says thisthere's no way to describe today
other than an absolute victoryfor trump.
Putin confirmed there would beno escalation if trump was potus
in the last four years.
Today trump proved he is farsuperior than biden and the dems
, and there's no denying it.
Yeah, so at one point putindoes say he goes.
You know, I have to say what hesays about the.
We wouldn't have invadedUkraine if he was respected.

(21:08):
I can confirm positive, that istrue, it's like.
So, of course, you know some ofthe critics are like see, see,
they're friends, they're friends, whatever.
So then there was another one.
When Trump was talking, hebrought up the Russiagate hoax
and basically said we've hadpoor relations because the
Russiagate hoax has made italmost impossible for me to do

(21:30):
anything with Russia, becauseyou're always accused of being a
friend or too weak or whateverthe slander of the day is.
So can't play these videos.
They are not happening, sowe'll just move on.
I saw this too.
This is again.
We dodged a bullet, ladies andgentlemen.
Oh, imagine if this was ourpresident.

(21:51):
Just imagine.

Speaker 3 (21:52):
And we're going to actually listen to what she says
they're cheating they're, theywant to change the current
system to make it bend towardthe outcome they want.
And so, you know, if youbelieve the public reporting,
they get a call that says, hey,redo your lines, even though the

(22:16):
fallout is going to includeexactly what you said, which is,
you know, taking the franchise,the vote, away from specific
communities and, in the case ofTexas, away from specific
communities and, in the case ofTexas, latino and black voters
yeah, and diluting their votes.
Oh, and this is not a censusyear, yeah, but this is a year

(22:37):
with the big, beautiful bill andthe unpopularity of it.
And so they want to bend therules.
And I, and I have to say thatyou know those texas, those
texan legislators, this is realgood for them.
You know that.
Here's how I think about it.

(22:57):
I think you're right in termsof the effect.

Speaker 2 (23:00):
Okay so, oh, gag, so they want to cheat, they want oh
, those guys are such cheatersthe outcome that they want.
And meanwhile new york times onfriday runs this headline oh,
new york times, opinion,interesting times.
Abolish the senate and theelectoral college and pack the
court.
Why the left can't win't a newthing both parties gerrymander

(23:32):
like let's just be realisticabout it.
It's annoying for us asconstituents but, you know, for
the life of the political partyit's like their whole purpose.
So they've been gerrymanderingfor years.
The republicans are just they.
There's a section in the historybooks about it yeah, the
republicans have their virtueweaponized very much like, well,
don't do it, it's not going tobe fair.

(23:53):
They're like, okay, we won't doit.
And then when democrats aredoing it and republicans are
like it's not fair, they're like, well, to the victors go the
spoils, and that's fair.
You know, oh, whoops, you kindof scary mandering again when
the democrats are in theminority, like the minority's
supposed to have a vote, yeah,so how else are we supposed to
get our say?

(24:14):
so again, in a classical senseof projection, here they are
projecting onto the republicans.
Oh, when they they cheat to gettheir way, they'll change the
rules.
You're talking about gettingrid of a constitution and giving
up with a new one, abolishingthe Senate.
I mean, we've gone way pastabolishing the filibuster.
You're abolishing the Senate.

Speaker 1 (24:35):
Right and I like the open pack.
The court statement.

Speaker 2 (24:39):
And notice as a theme here, the Democrats want
demagoguery.
They want that majority, thattrue democracy.
You know why?
Because they're good at psyops,they're good at persuasion,
they're good at manipulation,they're good at controlling the
media.
You live in a Truman show.
They know that they controleverything.
They don't control reality, butthey control your perception of

(25:02):
it.

Speaker 1 (25:02):
And yesterday it was making me feel a little bit like
a slave.
I was to be honest.
Why is that?
It just felt like our entiresystem is built and designed to
keep us constrained in some way.
And as I'm feeding the chickens, I'm like, hmm, I guess I'm
just in a really big chickencalled America.

(25:23):
That's what it felt like for asecond yeah, yeah, do you
remember this?

Speaker 2 (25:28):
this was in minnesota , tim waltz was governor and
they deployed the national guardalong with the police forces to
enforce a lockdown.
This was over covet, okay.
So when they talk about trumpbeing a totalitarian and he's
actually going after criminals,people that have committed
alleged crimes that are going tothen go to trial and or be
administratively processedthrough deportation or something

(25:50):
like that like they're actuallygoing after real criminals well
, I mean, here's that same power, that same tool that trump's
using that same tool, those sameexecutive orders was be was
used by tim waltz to do this inMinnesota.

Speaker 15 (26:03):
Look, at this.
They just keep coming.
Oh, oh, oh, it's time Getinside.

Speaker 10 (26:17):
Get inside, get inside, get in your hood, let's
go get in, get in, get in, getin, get in, get in what's that
all about?

Speaker 2 (26:43):
whatever that was.
Yeah, this really happened,like that was a real story.
It's back, by the way, in thearchives.
We covered this in real time,yeah, so you know, like you know
, trump's an authoritarian.
Yeah, well, he's going aftercriminals.
You were, you were shootingpeople to get back inside their

(27:03):
houses.

Speaker 1 (27:03):
Yeah, you were just shooting at us there's troops on
the street.

Speaker 2 (27:07):
Yeah, yeah, our troops.
The whole genesis of the showwas looking at that being like
this is unacceptable.
Yeah, for real, this isunacceptable.
Uh, the democrats were like no,this is totally fine, you guys
are criminals.

Speaker 1 (27:22):
It's like yeah, this is like having the brown shirts
come through your neighborhood.

Speaker 2 (27:26):
That's exactly the way we compared it.
I mean it was like I don't know, I don't have another, there's
nothing else to you wouldn't dothis if there was what else
would you compare it to?
You know, if there was a, ifthere was a tornado coming, you
wouldn't deploy the nationalgarden.
Tell me to you know like.
This is how this works like ifthere's a pandemic and people
are dying, I'll stay off thestreets myself, yeah.

Speaker 1 (27:47):
You don't need somebody to tell me.

Speaker 2 (27:48):
No convincing necessary.
You know what I mean.
Okay, so here, kristen, I thinkthis Kristen Welker yeah,
kristen Welker is talking toMarco Rubio about the
negotiations and everything thatwas going on, and Marco Rubio,
I'll tell you what you, what heand jd vance are just nailing it
on the messaging and standingtheir ground and defending their

(28:08):
positions, nailing it.
So we're going to listen to acouple of these clips, because
they made the sunday morningshows.
You know, sunday kind of setsthe tone for the week.
So as I was watching this comeout, I was like, okay, I can
tell what, where this this weekis going to head.
The democrats and the left havenothing here.
Trump has done a good enough jobexplaining that the war in
ukraine is about death okay sothey know, if they kind of come

(28:32):
at this a little bit too pro,let's continue the thing and we
need to fund ukraine.
That the what are yousupporting?
Continuing death?
It's an unwinnable warencounter, right.
So they're they're like kind ofcareful about that.
But then so they play a littlebit with the geopolitics.
Well, are you?
Are we capitulating to putin?
When I was in debate in highschool, we would have topics
like school vouchers or we wouldhave topics I can't remember

(28:55):
there's some other environmentaltopic we had at the time we had
.
The way policy debate works isthere's like four or five topics
that everybody picks foroffense and then you develop
your defense around these fouror five topics.
So when you get up in a debatecompetition, the people pull out
and they're going to talk aboutschool vouchers.
So you're like, okay, I knowthe topic.
Now they get to format theirline of attack on why they want

(29:15):
school vouchers, the pass, andthen your job is to come up with
why you don't want it to pass.
But it's like real time.
So while one at the past, butit's like real time.
So while I knew there was goingto be five policy topics, I had
no idea how they were going toapproach those topics.
So we would prepare a defensethat was all over the board.
You know you're going to defenda school, you're going to be

(29:35):
pro school choice with a but itcreates bad outcomes thing.
So you like concede the premisebut then argue the outcome, or
you just go.
You know you can't have schoolchoice, take a full communist
route.
Everybody's got to have thesame education, equal protection
under the law.
So you have these differentlike ways and point is you don't
believe any of it.
We had this one card.
It was called the nuke card andwhat it was was at the time

(29:56):
george bush was in office and onthe topic of school vouchers,
it was a winning debate likecurrently, now more and more
states are starting to usevouchers, but at the time this
was like a Milwaukee schooldistrict and a couple of the
school districts that were usingit to great success.
Left behind was a big debatetalking point at the time that

(30:26):
if he got school vouchers passed, that he would gain political
capital and by gaining thatpolitical capital he would then
have the political freedom to uh, indulge in his most fever
fantasy dreams and we would endup in nuclear war with russia or
china are you like dry running,like pulling talking points for
the president?

(30:46):
this is cool yeah, basicallythat's the policy debate is and
you're running a whole lot, allof their questions.
Yes, yeah, you're debating apolicy right okay so this was.

Speaker 1 (30:55):
We called it the nuke card I'm just wondering how
much the presidency um paysattention to that and then
incorporates into their ownposition well, this is how it
works.

Speaker 2 (31:06):
This is politics like this is the laid out debate of
politics is you have to thinkthrough.
You know all these steps.
So then, on the offense, wewould have a defense for the new
card and be like this isridiculous, right, or we would
have some real thing like no,because there's other checks and
balances and there's otherissues that he'll fill
politically.
So you can go on to the weedson it.
But the point is we had thisnew card where we would

(31:28):
literally get up and say if, ifGeorge Bush gets this minor
little win and he gainspolitical capital, that will
snowball to the point that we'rebombing Russia because he'll be
too popular.
So we should oppose everythingfor the sake of world peace.
Okay, that was basically theargument and it was a high

(31:49):
school thing, but it was allconnected with article quotes
and this it was a debate thinganybody want to object, anybody
want nuclear war?
come on so what's happened hereis trump has played the, but
people are dying card enough.
And the but people are dyingcard enough is the trump card.
It's the new card too well, butputin's too strong.

(32:09):
And then you just go well,russia's russian, they do their
thing.
So rubio and vance areexcellent debaters, and a lot of
these tv personalities are too,believe it or not, which is why
sometimes they go a littleweird, but that's because
they're kind of doing this.
They, they want to make surethey control it.
So as we listen to these clips,keep that in mind.
They're basically playing cardsback and forth.

Speaker 14 (32:31):
Terry, I want to play something you said about
President Putin.
This was right after theinvasion in March of 2022.
Take a look this guy lies.

Speaker 7 (32:40):
He literally lies.
He's never kept a deal he'sever signed and he lies all the
time and I don't know why.
But he plays us like a, like aviolin in the west, because the
west wants to believe that youcan cut a deal with everybody.
You can't cut a deal with guyslike this.

Speaker 14 (32:53):
He's a professional, experienced liar mr secretary,
given that, what makes you thinkthat, if you are able to reach
a deal with president putin,that he would stick to it, based
on, as you just said, he's aliar?

Speaker 7 (33:10):
Well, that's the point.
That's why the deal has to haveenforceable mechanisms in it.
That's why the deal has to havethings like security guarantees
.
That's the point I was making afew minutes ago when you were
asking me about looking someonein the eye.
What's important here isactions, not words, not paper
documents.
Those are all important.
Those are elements of a deal,but they have to be enforceable,
they have to be verifiable,they have to be enduring.
There's no point here insigning a deal that's going to

(33:32):
be violated in three or fourmonths.
There's no point in doing that.
It actually would make thingsworse.
So that's why this is such adifficult thing.
Not only do you need a deal,you need a deal that's
verifiable, that's enforceableand that's enduring.
If you don't achieve that, thenI think you could have a
ceasefire for a few months, afew weeks, and then the war will
start again and more peoplewill die.
That's not the outcome we'reinterested in.

(33:52):
That's not the outcome anyonewants.
So that's why this is sodifficult.
All right.
Secretary of State.
Marco.
Rubio, thank you so much forjoining us.

Speaker 2 (34:01):
I feel like we need one of those Joe Rogan moments
at the UFC where it's like ohGotcha, I feel like if there's a
case for a reptilian journalist, this is it right here.
I feel like it's just.
I feel like she's going toblink this way.
Whatever she was a sororitysister of Kamala Harris, I have

(34:22):
no doubt Hosting the debatePretty sketchy, okay, okay.
So here's another one withmarco rubio on with um.
This is martha and this is whojd vance.
She's like it's just a coupleapartments.
He's like do you hear yourself.
A couple apartments in aurora,colorado, have been taken over
by a foreign gang.
How many is too many?

(34:42):
You know how many?
At what point is it too much?
Like a couple in america.
So this is her.

Speaker 11 (34:49):
She's on with rubio, critics of president trump will
say the pomp and circumstanceslike pomp and circumstance, the
red carpet, the warm handshakethat president trump simply lost
that and putin gained therejust by being on the world stage
and walking down a red carpetwith the president.
Your reaction to that?

Speaker 7 (35:08):
Well, I mean, critics of President Trump are always
going to find something tocriticize.
You don't pay attention to itanymore.
But I will tell you this Putinis already on the world stage.
He's already on the world stage.
The guy's conducting a fullscale war in Ukraine.
He has the world's largesttactical nuclear arsenal in the
world and the second largeststrategic nuclear arsenal in the
world.

(35:29):
When I hear people say that, oh, it elevates him.
Well, all we do is talk aboutPutin all the time.
All the media has done is talkabout Putin all the time for the
last four or five years.
That doesn't mean he's rightabout the war.
That doesn't mean he'sjustified about the war.
Put all that aside.
It means you're not going tohave a peace agreement between
Russia and Ukraine.
You're not going to end a warbetween Russia and Ukraine
without dealing with Putin.

(35:49):
That's not.
That's just common sense.
I shouldn't have to say it sopeople can say whatever they
want.
Ultimately, at the end of theday, we have to get the Russian
side to agree to things thatthey don't want to agree to if
we're going to have peace.
If not, there'll just be a war.
They'll keep killing each otherand life will go on in America
and in the rest of the world,but not for Ukraine.
So the president has invested alot of time in trying to bring

(36:11):
an end to this war.
He deserves credit for doingthat.
He gets criticism for doingthat.
He could have just let this wargo on.
The president could have justsaid this is Biden's war.
It started under him.
We'll do what we can forUkraine, but we're going to
focus on other things.
He could have easily said that.

Speaker 11 (36:25):
But he's the only leader in the world that can get
.

Speaker 7 (36:27):
Putin to a meeting to talk about serious things.

Speaker 1 (36:31):
Shut up, martha.
So you know, I was talking tomy wife last night about
something else, and here, takemy hand.
Oh, it went through my hair,right, yeah.
And then what is supposed tohappen after that?
What's supposed to happen?
You're supposed to sock me inthe shoulder, like you know,

(36:51):
okay.
Well, what are you supposed todo if you meet with somebody?
Not shake their hand?
I mean, this is so dumb oh, Iknow the.
I mean, can you imagine donaldtrump being like oh gotcha,
there is a.

Speaker 2 (37:07):
There is a school of thought in american politics
that has to do with the nobility.
These are the elites.
Like the king didn't do his ownnegotiation.
He sent his envoy, he, he, hetold them what to do.
He didn't get involved in thenitty-gritty.
I mean, you're lucky if theywrote a letter.
So there's this idea that the,they're untouched, they walk

(37:29):
around and you just touch myhands and just touch my hands.
This real thing.
Right, like joe biden didn'tcall up other world leaders.
He claimed to call up otherworld leaders.
Right, and talk to him.
Really, he's probably strong armon him, but the in the public
perception is they don't talk.
You know what I mean?
Like everything is very formal,very red carpet.

(37:49):
They only talk when the deal isdone, and there might be some
truth to that, just because youhave executives.
But Trump looks at it like no,this is a business.
I got to get down in thetrenches.
Negotiation is my one and onlyjob.
It's the thing I can do.
I can bind the company with mysignature.
Like I have to be involved.
It's different than thataristocratic like send the

(38:10):
envoys and then those peoplehave clout and they have their
own little fiefdoms of power andyou know, like the king's never
man, I think if you're meetingface to face, that's way more
powerful yeah, trump's the otherway around.
He's like no, I'll pick up thephone, I'll call them hell yeah,
and negotiate directly, andI'll be involved in the
nitty-gritty details.
And I'll call the primeminister and I'll be like, hey,
all right, this 13 on beef justisn't going to cut it for us.

(38:31):
If we don't have it down to11.2, I I don't know this thing
pencils out, we might have tojump your tariffs to 99 000.
I don't know.
You know like he gets reallyinto it.
Same thing with this, uh, peacedeal.
You know trump was saying theother day well, putin's been tap
, tap, tapping me along, so nowputin's on notice.
If you keep tap, tap, tappingme along, stuff's gonna happen.
So here again is marco rubio.

Speaker 10 (38:53):
Uh, on with face the nation you know there is
concern from the europeans thatpresident zelinski is going to
be bullied into signingsomething away.
That's why you have theseeurope European leaders coming
as backup tomorrow.

Speaker 7 (39:06):
Can you reassure them ?
No, it isn't.
That's not why they're comingas backup.
That's not true.
But that's not true.
They're not coming heretomorrow to keep Zelensky from
being bullied.
They're not coming as backup.

Speaker 10 (39:15):
That's February Oval Office meeting in front of
television cameras wherePresident Zelensky was dressed
down.

Speaker 7 (39:20):
Do you know how many meetings you've had since then?

Speaker 10 (39:22):
oh no, I I know, and I was just up in alaska
watching the one with vladimirputin, where red carpet rolls no
, but we've had more meetings.

Speaker 7 (39:29):
We've had, we've had.
We've had one meeting withputin and like a dozen meetings
with zelinski, so that.
But that's not true.
They're not coming heretomorrow to keep zelinski from
being bullied.
They're coming here tomorrowbecause we've been working with
the europeans.
We talked to them last week.
There were meetings in the UKover the fall of the previous
weekend.
And they said the president isgoing to demand a ceasefire as
early as Thursday, but you saidthat they're coming here

(39:51):
tomorrow to keep Zelensky forbeing bullied.
They're not coming heretomorrow.
This is such a stupid medianarrative that they're coming
here tomorrow because Trump isgoing to bully Zelensky into a
bad deal.
We've been working with thesepeople for weeks, for weeks on
this stuff.
They're coming here tomorrowbecause they chose to come here
tomorrow.
We invited them to come.
We invited them to come.

Speaker 10 (40:11):
The president invited them to come, but the
president told those Europeanleaders last week that he wanted
to cease fire.
The president went ontelevision, said he would walk
out of the meeting if VladimirPutin didn't agree with on.
He said there would be severeconsequences if he didn't agree
to one.
He said he'd walk out in twominutes.
He spent three hours talking tovladimir putin and he did not
get one.
So there's obviously something.

Speaker 7 (40:30):
Things happened during that meeting.
Well, because obviously thingslook.
Our goal here is not to stagesome production for the world to
say, oh, how dramatic he walkedout.
Our goal here is to have apeace agreement to end this war.
Okay, and obviously we felt,and I agreed, that there was
enough progress not a lot ofprogress, but enough progress
made in those talks to allow usto move to the next phase.
If not, we wouldn't be havingZelensky flying all the way over

(40:52):
here, we wouldn't be having allthe Europeans coming all the
way over here.
Now, understand and take with agrain of salt.
I'm not saying we're on theverge of a peace deal, but I am
saying that we saw movement,enough movement to justify a
follow-up meeting with Zelenskyand the Europeans.
Enough movement for us todedicate even more time to this.
You talk about the sanctions.
Look at the end of the day, ifpeace is not going to be
possible here and this is justgoing to continue on as a war,

(41:15):
people will continue to die bythe thousands.
The president has that optionto then come in and impose new
sanctions.
But if he did this now, themoment the president puts those
additional sanctions, that's theend of the talks.
You've basically locked in atleast another year to year and a
half of war and death anddestruction.
We may unfortunately wind upthere, but we don't want to wind
up there.
We want to wind up with a peacedeal that ends this war so

(41:37):
Ukraine can go on with the restof their lives and rebuild their
country and be assured thatthis is never going to happen
again.
That's the goal here.
We're going to do everythingpossible to make that happen.
If it's doable, it will requireboth sides to make concessions.
It will require both sides toget things they're asking for.
That's how these deals are made, whether we like it or not.

Speaker 2 (41:54):
You know there's concern from the Europe.
So we're foregoing an imaginaryceasefire for an imaginary
peace deal.

Speaker 1 (42:09):
I don't understand what the journalistic um, what
is the journalistic point to thequestion?
The line of questions that shehas where it's like she wants to
promote this, the bad angle tothe story, like, oh, he needs to
walk out, why are youcontinuing the talks?
I mean we need to get thisthing shut down.
They want it so bad to go badlyit is.

Speaker 2 (42:27):
It is actually really phenomenal.
It's a good question, but whythe motive right?
What?
What dog do you have in thisfight?
Well, we got to supportdemocracy and liberty over all
over.

Speaker 1 (42:39):
Abolish the senate so why are you sad that we're
continuing the talks?

Speaker 2 (42:43):
is the point it's like okay, well, we can't talk
to a dictator, Okay, well, Imean how is she?
Supposed to get it done?
How is she supposed to get itdone?
You know they got guns too.
I can't believe they're shakinghands.
I can't believe they're shakinghands.

Speaker 1 (42:56):
Oh, I mean, you guys said you'd storm out in two
minutes and you're still talking.
Why are you still talking?

Speaker 2 (43:02):
Come on, get out of there, you didn't get a
ceasefire in two minutes.
Well, there's no point in aceasefire if no one's going to
honor it.
Duh.

Speaker 1 (43:12):
I mean there's just so many duhs to all these
questions.
It just makes you wonder whythey ask them.

Speaker 2 (43:17):
So, as far as Ukraine is concerned, the big thing
they want is protection.
I mean, they'd love to get alltheir land and territory back.
It's probably not going tohappen, but what they really
want is protection.
They are the underdog in thisfight and they are fighting with
technology.
If it weren't for drones, theywould have already probably been
rolled over.

(43:42):
But drones it's introductions ofdrones into the battlefield is
the equivalent of theintroduction of machine guns to
the battlefield in world war one.
It has.
It has stalled russia to acrawl because they can't advance
anything because this littlecomes flying in.
So then they do jammers to jamthe radio signals okay, that's
great.
They detach thousand yard fiberoptic strings and they run them
through fiber optic strings noradio signals to jam, right.

(44:06):
And then now they've got themcompletely autonomous.
Where they're not radiofrequency or talking at all, ai
takes them, finds a target,detonates no communication back
to base, right.
This is the equivalent ofadding machine guns to trench
warfare in world war one.
You took the, you tooknapoleonic wars and those
tactics added a machine gun.
It was devastating.
That's what's going on inRussia and Ukraine right now in

(44:29):
their skirmish is.
It's a drone war.

Speaker 1 (44:32):
And maybe, maybe, what these guys need is the
Nevada fishing float tube.
All right, anglers, you'reready to fish remote lakes or
quiet rivers in total stealthmode?
Check out Nevada fishing floatTube from Catasports.
This U-shaped beast is builtfor serious fishing missions
ultra stable, super maneuverableand tough as nails.

(44:54):
Thanks to heavy-duty ripstopmaterial and double-stitched
seams.
You've got a padded backrest,oversized seat, two large gear
pockets, rod holder, strippingapron and even a dry fly patch
Everything you need to staylocked in and ready when the
bite is on.
Fluorescent accents keep youvisible out on the water, and
carry handles make it easy tohaul in and out.

(45:15):
Whether you're chasing bass inthe shallows or hiking into
alpine trout lakes, the Nevadafloat tube is built for the job.
Use code Rumble at checkout for10% off your order today.
That's caddisforcecom.
Get out there and stay light.

Speaker 2 (45:30):
catch the big one you left the camera on me the whole
time.
Sorry, it's a background ad.
I mean a float tube probablykeep you safe from the drone or
make you a real obvious target.
You know, I thought one of thefunniest things I ever heard was
Joe Rogan say you know, if themissile comes, I want it to hit

(45:52):
me in the head.
I don't want to be around forthe aftermath.
Yeah, be on a float tube, getthe job done.
That's too perfect.
I'm probably going to come backand be like like you didn't
switch the camera over.
Oh man, yes, yes phrase.
Your second ad prime time istrue.

(46:12):
We're gonna knock these thingsout.
Oh, let's see.
Uh, are you referring toukraine allen, sapphire patriot?
Who?
What are you talking aboutthere?
Ukraine allen, ukraine allen?
I don't know who ukraine allenis.
Okay, let's listen to stevewickoff.
Uh, he's going to talk aboutwhat trump and putin said to
each other in the meeting, aswell as the security guarantees

(46:34):
that ukraine needs to basically,you know, decide to stop
fighting in terms of ukrainiansecurity guarantees.

Speaker 17 (46:42):
You you mentioned, uh, the article 5 guarantee of
nato.
An attack on one and it's anattack on all Russia would allow
that to happen.
That any further incursionsinto Ukraine Russia would
understand would be seen as anattack on all NATO members.

Speaker 8 (47:20):
No, Jake, that's not what I said.
No, Jake, that's not what Isaid.
What I said is that we got toan assuming that that held,
assuming that the Ukrainianscould agree to that and could
live with that, and everythingis going to be is going to be

(47:42):
about what the Ukrainians canlive with, but assuming they
could.
We were able to win thefollowing concession that the
United States could offerArticle 5-like protection, which
is one of the real reasons whyUkraine wants to be in NATO.
We sort of were able to bypassthat and get an agreement that
the United States could offerArticle 5 protection, which was

(48:06):
the first time we had ever heardthe Russians agree to that.

Speaker 2 (48:10):
That's pretty good.
That's actually a really bigdeal because think about it,
this whole war, when you go backand you trace the origins of
kind of how this conflictstarted.
It started with Ukraine beingadded to the list of potential
NATO countries and with thepresident's directive that we
were going to march thatdirection that was a stated
bright line by putin himselfover and over and over.

(48:31):
Yes over and over yes, exactlyso all of a sudden we are
marching to assimilation, whichis essentially the nato march to
military assimilation, over toukraine and russia's like.
We ain't having any of that.
That would literally be likethe soviet union, just you know,
having mexico join the sovietsyou know not happening you know

(48:52):
like gonna be a problem and so,uh, that has been a red line.
But apparently this is the bigshift.
Russia has kind of had thisattitude that nat, nato
membership or any type ofsecurity guarantees that are
equivalent to NATO, is one inthe same.
So this is where they're sayingit can be separated, like you
can have some securityguarantees based on your mineral

(49:14):
rights and maybe whateveryou've got, but not so far as
joining NATO itself, becausewith NATO comes other things.
With NATO comes PSYOPs, comes awhole bunch of other stuff,
comes other things.
With nato comes psyops, comes awhole bunch of other stuff with
commercial, with with umprotection guarantees.
That's like we're going toprotect our contractors, we're
going to protect our americancorporations, right it's

(49:35):
financial streams yeah, it's alittle bit different versus
we're going to get you guys tolive in our truman show where
you know, nato, nato, nato,they've got their whole human
rights religion thing going on.
If nato, if you know, if thesemilitary organizations weren't
involved in like the climatechange and all that kind of
stuff, you could say that, butthat's, they've got their own

(49:56):
little human rights liberalreligion agenda thing going on
and that's what they.
You know, when you join nato,you're kind of joining this
global warming cult.
I don't know how else todescribe it.
So this is another one stevewickoff, after trump and putin
met, he uh was this newsmax, Ithink it was, and we were on.

(50:16):
No, he was on fox sunday withuh shannon bream and he said the
phone with president zelensky.

Speaker 8 (50:23):
moments after this, the uh alaska summit ended and I
I can tell you that I spoke tohim personally gave him my view.
The president obviously wasmaking the presentation and
everybody recognized on thattelephone call and there were
various European leaders howmuch progress we had made in

(50:44):
demonstrating that the RussianFederation was going to make
significant accommodations, wellbeyond what we thought before
that summit started.
So it was absolutelyacknowledged as a win.
Now, that being said, there aredetails.
That's what happens in anegotiation you try to move one
side towards the middle, thenyou try to move the other side

(51:06):
towards the middle.
The president achieved that.
Move the other side towards themiddle.
The president achieved that.
Certainly in my view and in theview of many others as well,
but I was sitting right therethe president achieved that
beyond what everyone'sexpectations were, and now we're
immediately moving to a meetingwith the Ukrainians, with the
Europeans, and hopefully we cannarrow the issues down even

(51:28):
further and get ourselves wellalong the way towards the
codification of a peace deal.

Speaker 2 (51:35):
I'll be honest with you, and I mean this sincerely I
want to live in a world where Ican take my family and visit
Moscow.
Yeah, that'd be cool and feelsafe about it, yeah.
I want to live in a world wherewe have full commercial
arrangements with Russia, nosymbol dissimilar than we do
with India or Japan or anythingelse, where the only thing we

(51:58):
got to overcome is the languagebarrier and then we're free to
do business Right.
I want to live in that world Ihave.
When I look at Russiansians, Isee nothing that is offensive to
me nothing in fact, I see apeople that have overcome
communism, which makes me feel akinship to them.

Speaker 1 (52:15):
Yeah, I mean I got a couple of youtube channels I
watch that are just russiandudes.
Like one guy is a beekeeper, Ilove watching his stuff I don't
feel any different thanukrainian.

Speaker 2 (52:24):
No, I mean I to me, your cousins, like I don't you
know you just Ukrainian.
No, I mean I to me, yourcousins, like I don't you know,
you, just speak a differentlanguage, I, and I feel that way
about all countries.
There's no country that I lookat in intrinsically in my soul,
as a peasant who just works,thinks you repulse me, there's
none right.
I can obviously look in someand say your uniform looks
different, your skin's different, but even that is immediately

(52:46):
overcome by things like religion.
You know, oh, you're aChristian, oh, I'm a Christian
too.
Ok, great, you see what I'msaying.
Like there's these layers ofunity that we can have.
There's nothing about Russia orRussian culture.
To me, that is repulsive.
Do they lean a little bit moreauthoritarian through history?
Yeah, they do.

(53:07):
Do Americans lean a little bitmore authoritarian through the
through history?
Yeah, they do.
Do americans lean a little bitmore democratic?
Yeah, we do.
Part of it is the nature ofthis is a new land and it's.
We've only been here 200 and400 years.
You know, slow, really, aroundwhere we live.
We've only been here like 100years.
Yeah, I mean, I'll be honestwith you.
I mean yep, yeah.
So in fact we very much, verymuch are in the tradition of
frontiersmen in the pacificnorthwest.

Speaker 1 (53:29):
Yeah, as we well, I mean our county was um
established in 1857, I think, soit's like only 150 years eight
people in it.

Speaker 2 (53:41):
Yeah, I know, and we had the you.
Basically it was just a loggingoutpost.

Speaker 9 (53:45):
Yes, you know, but yeah, it's we're really not that
old, yeah, so.

Speaker 2 (53:51):
Russia has a much longer, deeper tradition, much
more familial, that kind ofthing.
Anyways, point being nothingrepulsive, even Hillary Clinton,
I think, ultimately feels thisway.
I mean, she sold a bunch ofuranium to Russia, gave a lot of
hypersonic secrets to theskokavo uh situation, so I mean,
it's not like she probablydoesn't feel this way too, and

(54:12):
she even is seeing ultimatelythat if trump can get some peace
, he's doing pretty well.
Listen to some shockingadmissions from.

Speaker 12 (54:20):
I actually was encouraged um by the events of
the last several months.
First of all, the NATOcommitment by individual member
states to increase their defensespending is very welcome.
It's something that prioradministrations have certainly
sought, and I think it's greatthat we are seeing these

(54:41):
commitments that now have to befollowed through.
On the willingness of Europeancountries to support Ukraine,
and, by doing so, by Americanweapons in order to provide them
to the Ukrainians.
I think all of that is a verygood signal that there is
beginning to be a betterunderstanding, both by the

(55:02):
president and the people aroundhim, as well as by the leaders
of our european uh allies, thatthere can be uh common ground uh
amongst us and the kind ofdismissiveness that okay, I
gotta say because, remember, shesimultaneously has dnc servers
in ukraine yeah you've got thebiden family on the burisma

(55:23):
board.

Speaker 2 (55:24):
They have their massive entanglements in ukraine
through george soros and thosenetworks.
Simultaneously they're sellingstuff to russia.
So for them they're playingboth sides oh yeah sides.
They would love for ukraine tohave some defense, to keep the
setup separate from russia, butthey don't mind having
commercial business with russia.
Just like I said, the world Iwant to live in we can do
business.
Like you know, business is goodin russia for the clintons, so

(55:47):
what do you call it?
So she's like you guys are kindof doing both.
You're going to defend ukrainewhile at the same time open up
russia so that I'm lessscrutinized for having done
business there.
This is the most self-servingpraise of donald trump I've ever
seen.
I'm glad he's finally comingaround to the conclusion we came
to oh, yeah, yeah with russiaand and backdoor with ukraine.

Speaker 1 (56:09):
Like I'm glad that you guys have finally come
around to our point of view like, I'm so glad you're able to
make the deals that we weretrying so hard to make for the
last decade.
It's like so much bullshitexactly.

Speaker 12 (56:22):
I can't even take it anymore, and the first Trump
administration has been replacedby a much more obvious working
relationship to the good ofEuropean security, transatlantic
security and, hopefully,ukrainian security.
So I'm actually encouraged.
So that's pretty.

Speaker 1 (56:44):
What do you call it when somebody tries to usurp
somebody else's goodwill likethis?
Grifting.

Speaker 2 (56:51):
Yeah, there you go.
In the Bible they call themface dealers, game stealers.
Yeah, so Trump has this reallymastermind plan of coming hard
and fast.
We can't cover the Trumpadministration like we're kind
of covering some bigger themesand the stuff that's, you know,
the russiagate, collusion andjustice and yeah there's so much

(57:14):
is dripping off and fallingthrough the cracks that we
dismiss oh, totally.
You know, every now and then,epa thing will come out and be
like that's a big deal, likewe're getting rid of all
emission standards, all yeah,that's a whole.

Speaker 1 (57:25):
Hey, farmers, you don't have to buy any more debt.

Speaker 2 (57:27):
Yeah, yeah, that's a huge deal those freaking egr
filters off right now.
So I'm waiting to see for thatto officially go through.
But either way, trump and hisadministration, their idea is
you've got to attack, attack,attack.
This is political war.
The speech we played at thebeginning, with what trump was
saying like this is the lastchance to reshape.
At the beginning, with whattrump was saying like this is

(57:48):
the last chance to reshape thegovernment, to be something for
we, the people, by the people,for the people.
And he's the avatar of that.
Like, whether you like him ornot, whether you want to praise
him or not, he is the lincoln ofour day, he is the washington
of our day.

Speaker 1 (58:03):
There's no one else close which maybe is why we
sound like Trump cultists, butwe're not.
We're not, we just want to takeadvantage of this moment
because once it's gone, we'regoing to be back into this
washing machine and theDemocrats are going to recycle
all the old bullshit and we'regoing to be back under control,
and then we'll never have achance to get out of this again.

Speaker 2 (58:22):
Things are being changed and I know for a fact
the administration has an openear.
Yeah, we are feeding by doingthis show day after day.
We are feeding the AI withsomething to be a counterpoint
to world economic forum nonsenseor whatever else is out there.
Right, we are feeding thealgorithm.
We are feeding AI with ourhuman thought to a counter.

(58:44):
Right, try to bring thependulum back to the middle.
Yeah, trump is coming at this asan absolute attack dog.
He's attacking every vector oftheir power.
Act blues under investigation.
The democrats who came aftertrump using lawfare techniques
are all under investigation.
It's alleged that brennan isliving in austria and has zero
plans to ever return to theunited states.
He's doing all of his media.

(59:05):
It's from a remote studio,right?
Um call me has gone, basicallyradio silent, putting nothing
out but the most encryptedthings.
Clappard's lawyered up.
Stop going on tv.
You still have a handful ofthem that are going on and
defending it.
They're still in the collusion,they're still in the conspiracy
, but some of them it soundslike from what people are saying
have started the flip right.

(59:25):
So there's pressure on there.
Trump's coming after epa and allthe gold bars dropped off the
back of the titanic, like theysaid.
He's going after theregulations that created the
ability for bureaucrats tocontrol.
He's got the irs in an absolutetizzy and a fit right now.
I mean, they've got multipledirectors.
Now it's under the treasury.
They're doing stuff.

(59:46):
Treasury's getting rid of theirmagic money printers.
They're not just approvingevery payment that goes out the
door anymore.
You've got pressure on thefederal reserve.
You've got pressure on thehouse and the senate.
You've got, you know,deportations happening.
Whether people like it or not,it's super popular in polling,
wildly unpopular in politics,okay, and so you've got all
these things happening.

(01:00:06):
And then trump comes out thismorning and he goes.
I'm going to lead a movement toget rid of mail-in ballots, so
oh wait, I thought we weretalking about russia.

Speaker 1 (01:00:15):
We're talking about, about today, buddy you know, for
the people that want to call usa trump death cult or whatever,
I I would prefer that you callus something else, and that's
because, once trump leavesoffice, we will no longer be
talking about Trump, we'll betalking about whoever the next
guy is to lead this continuationof, you know, the reformed

(01:00:37):
America forward.
And we'll, you know, call us afreedom cult.
How about that?
We're a freedom cult.

Speaker 2 (01:00:47):
Alan Mongrel Von cleve says this.
He says will the pendulum stopat the center?
And I'm replying not as long asnew energy is added.
Physics says you can't add,otherwise eventually, yes, okay.
So einrand and atlas, shruggedthrough the character Francisco
D'Anconio, says to defeat avicious fraud, comply with it

(01:01:09):
literally, adding nothing ofyour own to disguise its very
nature.
So the whole point is youcomply with it literally to show
it's broken.
You don't add any input, youdon't try to fix anything, you
just let it run its course andthe laws of entropy, no matter
what, will cause it to stopgoing.
So the only way is to removeyourself from the system, alan.
We had a discussion over theweekend.

(01:01:31):
This is the be Amish.
Get out of the system, stopparticipating, stop adding your
energy and your virtue to it byacknowledging the premise of its
legitimacy.
Right In the New Testament,bible is encouraging the saints
who at this time are trying tofree themselves from rome and
the various tribes and different, you know, warlord type

(01:01:53):
subjugation that they were under, and he's like stop going to
their courts, the secular courts.
Nobody wins when you do that.
Settle things amongstyourselves, right?
This is the whole idea ofrender to caesar with caesar and
then you're free.
Stop dealing with his coins andthen he'll stop having his hand
in your pocket.
That's the whole idea here.
So that's when we stop addingenergy, then the pendulum stops,

(01:02:16):
but then we just move theenergy somewhere else, because
we, the people, are nothing butenergy, if anything else.
Okay, so Donald Trump is cominghead-to-head with the election
apparatus.
I'm going to lead a movement toget rid of all of mail
imbalance.
This is a big deal for us inwashington state, because we are
exclusively mail imbalance andalso, while we're at it, the

(01:02:36):
highly inaccurate, veryexpensive and seriously
controversial voting machines,which cost 10 times more than
than accurate and sophisticatedwatermark paper, which is faster
and leaves no doubt at the endof the evening as to who won and
who lost the election.
In Washington state, we usemail in ballots and we count
them on Dominion voting machines, so we got the double whammy

(01:02:59):
band.
I'm pretty sure everybody'sdoing that.
Even if you're voting in person, they're still getting counted
on the machines.
Yep, there is nothing goodabout these machines I'm going
to jump ahead here.
Here was a video that was putout this weekend, which is not a
brand new video, but this isthem actually hacking the voter
machines in real time, and I'mjust going to show you here that
, basically, it's completelyeasy for them.

Speaker 9 (01:03:21):
Here's the ballot, and the printed ballot doesn't
print the question.
All it says is proposition oneyes or no.
Someone says yes or no.
You look at the ballot.
It says what you want it to say, but it's the opposite of what
your intent was.
So we're going to do it anyways.
They go through here.
How they they actually are ableto hack the ballot and

(01:03:43):
manipulate the vote in real timeand go to review, and it wasn't
even that hard for them to doso anyways.

Speaker 2 (01:03:50):
So trump back to this .
Leave no doubt at the end.
Who won?
Leave no doubt at the end ofone and lost.
We are now the only country inthe world that uses mail-in
voting.
I don't know if it's the onlycountry, but it wouldn't be
surprised me.
I don't know.
All others gave it up becauseof the massive voter fraud
encountered.
We will begin this effort, whichwill be strongly opposed by the

(01:04:10):
Democrats, because they cheatat levels never before seen
before.
There's that inoculation.
They're going to screech Right.
What did Kamala Harris say?
They're trying to change therules of the game for the state
Trying to cheat.
Yeah, if you've got so manygreat black and Latino voters,
just get them to the polls.
Good luck by signing anexecutive order to help bring

(01:04:31):
honesty to the 2026 midterms.
So they're not letting theopportunity pass.
They're not going to let theHouse flip.
Is basically what he's.
This is what this tells methey're going to put the
pressure on.
Remember, the states are merelyan agent for the federal
government in counting andtabulating the votes.
Oh, alan, you heard that Statesare just agents of the feds.

(01:04:52):
The United States isn't.
It's not the United States ofAmerica, it's the United States
is America.
Yes, they must do what thefederal government, as
represented by the president ofthe United States, tells them.
There's that dictator.
Talk again for the good of ourcountry to do, which, by the way
, I mean the most efficientcountry.
You know the most efficientleadership is the benevolent

(01:05:12):
dictator with their horribleradical left policies like open
borders, men playing in sports,transgender and woke for
everyone, and so much more so.
He's connecting the voting tothese other 90 10 issues,
because, really, truly, it's a90 10 issue, right?
Democrats are virtuallyunelectable without using this
completely disproven mail-inscam.

(01:05:32):
Elections can never be honestwith mail and ballots voting,
and everybody, in particular thedemocrats, know this, and I and
the republican party will fightlike hell to bring honesty and
integrity back to our elections.
The mail-in ballot hoax usingvoting machines that are
complete and total disaster mustend now.
Remember, without fair andhonest elections and strong and
powerful borders, you don't evenhave a semblance of a country.

(01:05:54):
Thank you for your attention tothis matter.
Donald j jump, president of theunited states of america,
apparently, when he puts in thethank you for your attention to
this matter, that's him tellinghis staff and anybody that's
relevant and involved is thatyou need to jump on this ASAP
and basically, this is a papalbull.
I've wanted to see that tweetfor four and a half years.

(01:06:19):
I have wanted to see that tweetfor four and a half years.

Speaker 1 (01:06:22):
Hey, there's almost nothing more important right now
than voting in America.

Speaker 2 (01:06:27):
If there's any way that you can be blackpilled,
it's looking into the electionsystem and you know.
At that point you realizeyou're fighting.
You're fighting an informationwar.
You're trying to fight thezeitgeist and change the
zeitgeist.

Speaker 1 (01:06:39):
You also realize that you are fighting for your life.

Speaker 2 (01:06:42):
You're fighting for your life.
Yes, you don't realize.
You know the votes.
That's not a reliablemethodology.
When it's all mail in and all,all machines, there's too many
points.
And it doesn't matter howhonest your assessors are.
You could put Mother Teresa inas your election official.

Speaker 1 (01:06:59):
But when you've got dual SIM cards and multiple
Wi-Fi routers and listen, whenit comes to elections, the only
person I'm trusting to countthat correctly is Jesus.

Speaker 2 (01:07:09):
Ninety nine percent of people cannot read code,
don't understand how to secure aWi-Fi router.
I don't Right.
I mean, I'm completely uselessat stuff like that.
Now I can get your septicsystem unclogged, which a lot of
those coders don't know how todo off, which a lot of those
coders don't know how to do.
yeah, I do believe in thedivision of labor, but at the

(01:07:30):
same time you're looking at aforeign language with, with
space tech.
You know, when you're lookingat these voting machines, a
paper goes in and then justtabulates all these numbers.
You have no idea what it'sdoing and you don't.
You don't have any hand countcapacity.
When you look at what they didat the cyber symposium with

(01:07:50):
cyber ninjas down in Arizona,where they had the table set up
with the wheels to count, likeif you're not in the business of
hand counting ballots, youdon't know how to hand count
ballots and then you factor inlike why are we counting
photocopies?
You know hand counting ballotsis the only way to go in person
voting small local precincts anddistricts.

(01:08:10):
You should vote at your localelementary school, your local
fire station, your local policestation, your local sheriff's
department, your local KiwanisClub.
You know anything, I don't care.
You should be voting everywhere, and it should be.
You know tabulation centersshould have a thousand vote

(01:08:33):
ballots to count.
So even if that tabulationcenter decides to go hog wild
and go thousand to one, it's notgoing to throw off the margin
in an entire state.
But when you have a votingcenter like they did, the big,
huge, mega voting centers, likethey did in 2020, which they've
continued.
Yeah, you're processinghundreds of thousands of ballots
.
You can swing 50,000 ballotsone direction and it's all in
your, under your control.
Very, very, very fair, veryfrustrating.

(01:08:54):
So I'm super excited to seethat Trump's doing that.
And, and if you're the Democratsright now, if you're the Mark
Elias, is Norm Isom's, the guysthat are running this lawfare.
Think about how many frontsTrump has you fighting on
running this lawfare.
Think about how many frontsTrump has you fighting on.
I mean, you might win a littlebattle over here and slow down
the deportation You're nevergoing to stop it, but you might
slow it down a little bit forone class of people.

(01:09:18):
And then you've got theelection stuff.
Okay, you might, might preservesome gerrymandering in one
state, but you have another onewhere you lose.
And then you've got thiselection thing and he's got the
power of the purse.
He's telling the states I won'tpay if you don't get rid of the
machines.
And you know, I I talked to ahouse of representatives member
here for the state of washingtonthis weekend and I asked him
point blank you know, iswashington salvageable?

(01:09:38):
And he was.
He gave me the.
That's the question I don'twant to answer.
Look oh you know, and I was Iwas like, is it salvageable?
And he's like, basically not,until we get into the majority
and how we get there.
It's a tough road with theelection system and that's what
he said Says the only way wesave Washington is if the feds
cut the money, he says, whichthey sent a letter, pam Bondi

(01:09:59):
did.
They're going to cut $11billion shortfall and so we
might comply with some of theseexecutive orders because of
sanctuary cities and stuff likethat, because of the money.

Speaker 1 (01:10:11):
And the deadline for that compliance is coming up.
It's like on the 19th.

Speaker 2 (01:10:15):
Yeah.
So that was the only thing hethought could really make a
difference is we need help fromthe feds.
One of the things he told methat I was unaware of is the
entire United States usesRobert's rules of of order,
which gives the minority a voicein parliamentary procedure.
Washington state uses readsrules of order, which completely
is power-sided to the majority,so in the minority they can't

(01:10:36):
force a vote, stop a vote, likethey're just almost passive
watchers in the thing alanmongol says now you're talking,
it has to burn to the ground tobe fixed.
Yeah, hold on alan this is thepublic side.
We don't, we don't use thoseincendiary words.
This is a family show.
This is a family show we're nottalking about burning nothing

(01:10:57):
down.
This is a peaceful protest.
You know we're.
It's gonna burn down on its own,we don't have to throw anything
into no logs you know it'sfunny because a little uh and
alan, I love the comment, but Itweeted out a fire emoji emoji
on a lynn wood tweet talkingabout burned it down.
Yeah, I lit out a fire emojithat tweet.

(01:11:19):
The fire emoji showed up.
Of the five or six tweets theyhad on me that I had said
something incendiary, one ofthem was the fire emoji,
followed by light them up as aas a retweet of someone else's
tweet talking about dc burningdown, and I put light them up.
They showed up in a federalcourt trial showing my intent to

(01:11:41):
go to dc and do violence.

Speaker 1 (01:11:43):
Yeah, so just careful .

Speaker 2 (01:11:45):
Careful in the chats.
The public show.
We saved that for the privateside, just kidding.
Uh, honestly, everything ishyperbolic rhetoric.
We're just sitting behind adesk, okay.
Another funny thing thathappens.
Remember the laura loomerincident?
Or a deposition on the mayortrial about marjorie taylor

(01:12:05):
green taking uh arby's in herpocket?
So so apparently these twoladies don't love each other
very much.
Over the weekend, las vegasmetropolitan arrested eight
child sex predators.
These were people that weretrying to solicit minors.
One of those arrested was thistom artiem alexandrovich.

(01:12:27):
Turns out he is the.
He is the.
What's his job?
He is the national cybersecurity authority.
Israel.
He's their national cybersecurity order, the.
He's their head.
So he's the head of the cybernational cyber security
authority.
He was in las vegas on vacationand he solicited a minor for

(01:12:49):
sex and got arrested by him.
So today they netanyahu's officeissued a statement denying that
the point in question had evenbeen arrested.
A state employee who traveledto the us for professional
matters was questioned by theamerican authorities during his
stay.
The prime minister office saidthe employee, who does not hold
a diplomatic visa, was notarrested and returned to israel
as scheduled.
So, huh, we are either lookingat gas lighting yeah, or looking

(01:13:12):
at a cover-up yeah, because heabsolutely was arrested, he
absolutely got mug shotted.
And now they're saying these isnot the droids you're looking
for.
So we're gonna watch this one.
Marjorie taylor tweets out this.
She goes did our governmentrelease a child sex predator
from Israel who works directlyunder prime minister of Israel?
How did?

(01:13:33):
And now Netanyahu is lying andcompletely denying it.
Why isn't Mark Levine pissing,pitching a hissy fit over this?
Why isn't Laura Laura Loomerrage, posting about this and
claiming she broke the story andOK.
Yeah, story and uh, okay, yeahupdate.
Prime minister benjaminnetanyahu is lying, claiming.
The executive order director ofisrael national cyber security

(01:13:54):
cyber dictatorate, tom alexdronovich, was not arrested,
according to a statementreleased to mediate.
The las vegas metro policedepartment's press release,
which is still live on theirsite, clearly states he was an
in a sting targeting child sexpredators.
Also should be noted that theisrael national cyber
directorate is located innetanyahu's office.
That's how closely his teamworks with net wow, wow yeah I

(01:14:20):
don't have an ad read for thatone.
Okay, how are we doing here?
We're doing pretty good, okay.
So we've got a couple more.
We got one more thing here,okay.
So this is something that Ihave had this discussion with

(01:14:42):
multiple people about illegalimmigration and I've shared my
story before.
I used to hire illegalimmigrants out of home depot
parking lots and I had a crew ofthem that I worked with for
well over a year.
Hard workers didn't think therewas any problem with them.

Speaker 1 (01:14:55):
Paid them cash, sometimes paid them a check,
they just go cash them well,they were kind of like day
laborers, but they just stuckaround for a while laborers that
I had work every day, right,right.

Speaker 2 (01:15:03):
That's essentially what it amounted to, and one day
one of them beat someone elseand so, long story short, the
guy ended up getting called thetacoma police department.
Police department didn't wantto do anything.
Moment I said he was illegal, Ithought they would like oh,
just that alone, we'll come pickhim up why did you?
say so.
We're like call ice.
Oh, he's using a gun in acommission of a crime.

(01:15:23):
Call ice, we don't want nothingto do with it, okay.
So I call ice.
Ice picks him up, he goes tothe detention center for two
months.
After two months he gets out.
He'd already been deportedtwice before, by the way.
I found out in his life thirdtime's a charm, though, they
gave him a green card.
So now?
So he should have been sittingin prison for 10 to 15 for
assault with a deadly weapon.
Instead they got a green cardafter two months of processing.

(01:15:46):
So to me I'm like, if you this,who's illegal and who's legal,
and who has paperwork and whodoesn't have paperwork this is a
minefield because you havelayers of jurisdiction and
there's multiple weak entrypoints into the system.
So if you have states that arewilling to give residents a

(01:16:06):
driver's license, but toestablish residency you just
need a utility bill, and theutility bill doesn't require ID
to create the name, and you cantake utility bill down to the
DMV and get a license, and thenthat license gets the
presumption of citizenship orlegality.
You start climbing this ladderto where, pretty soon, you have
like a commercial driver'slicense and you've got a job

(01:16:28):
with a, with an internationalcarrier, and you're just off to
the races.
So that's what happened withthis gentleman right here okay
this gentleman right heresitting in the driver's seat of
this semi-truck along with hisco-driver.

Speaker 1 (01:16:40):
This is a very tragic situation.

Speaker 2 (01:16:42):
But he decided to flip a ue on the interstate and
in order to do this, he wentinto the far left, far right
lane, yep.
And then he cut all the wayacross the two lanes to take the
emergency vehicle turnout.
You know the old sign that saysemergency vehicles.
Only you know that one it's.
It's for cops he was gonna flipa ue on the interstate in a semi

(01:17:02):
truck.
So as he's casually doing this,you know he makes his turn.
Now he's fully t-boned on theyou know crossing the interstate
, just casually does this.
Then suddenly you can see inhis camera footage here, which
it froze in a perfect momentbecause I guess we didn't want
to show that but a minivan aminivan full of three people

(01:17:24):
slams into it, all dead.
Yeah, so he has now beenarrested for homicide.
Right, because that's he'sgonna spend some time.
Yeah, it's very unfortunate.
This man crossed the southernborder in 2018 illegally.
He made his way to californiawhere they issued a driver's
license.
Then he was able to get hiscommercial driver's license and

(01:17:45):
get on with one of these fleets.

Speaker 1 (01:17:47):
At no point was he ever legal and he's on our roads
apparently with no instructionof any kind, and he maybe he
didn't even know that this wasan illegal maneuver, because
wherever he's from, theyprobably do it all the time who
knows.

Speaker 2 (01:18:03):
And then, right after this happened, they caught
someone up in in canada doingthe same thing, crossing over
the median in a semi-truck,right right, but it's just
another that the cleanup of this, like cleanup aisle nine.
I mean it is going to take aminute for them to figure out.
This is why they wantedinformation from the irs and

(01:18:24):
stuff like that is because thereare so many back doors that
people can become quote legaland get some papers right.
I'm in the constructionindustry.
I'm highly sensitive to itbecause I'm like you know, if
it's so hard to get here legallyand have all the proper
paperwork, you'd think you'dspeak English by the time you
got here, or you think you.
Like it's very difficult.

(01:18:45):
I've been the foreigner in aforeign land.
I lived in Japan for four years.
I lived in Brazil for fouryears.
I speak Portuguese fluentlybecause, as a courtesy to the
people living there, I thoughtit might be nice to be able to
ask them where the restroom was,rather than pee my pants.
So I thought I might learntheir language.
Like I've been the foreigner inanother land, it's inconceivable

(01:19:06):
to me that I would come toanother land and tell people how
to live their lives or how toor to be there illegally.
Like it's inconceivable to me,having been someone who spent
six years living abroad.
So how is it that they thinkit's justifiable to do here?
What mentality, whatconditioning have they been
taught?
And is it just the systemvalidates them by constantly

(01:19:29):
giving them the right piece ofpaper they need for the next
step in their journey?
I mean, it's wild Contra contra.
Juxtapose that with my friendEarl, who's down in New Mexico,
who is a U S citizen right, whogot kicked out of the prison
system, pre-trial, no convictionor anything, with no
documentation.
He's having a heck of a time.
He's having a heck of a timegetting help, getting assistance

(01:19:50):
, trying to get an id.
You know it's amazing to methat someone can walk across the
southern border and in a numberof years, probably be making
six figures driving truck.
I can't even get my friend toroll a bus ticket to get out of
albuquerque, because I can't.
Like because he can't get onthe bus, because he doesn't have
id.
Turns out you could be anillegal immigrant.

(01:20:11):
You can drive the bus, but Ican't get my friend earl on the
bus anyways, all right, guys,it's about that time.
It's time for us to jump overto private hold on hold on we
got one more coming I got onemore.

Speaker 1 (01:20:24):
Let's do it, okay.
You've probably noticed rumbleis growing fast and it's not
slowing down oh yeah they'rebuilding a real alternative to
big tech that puts creatorsfirst and actually protects free
speech.
And now there's rumble premium,an easy way to upgrade your
experience.
With premium, you get ad-freeviewing across the platform.

(01:20:47):
No pre-rolls, no interruptions,just the content you came for.
Plus, premium members unlockexclusive content like bonus
videos, like behind the scenedrops and more from your
favorite creators.
Right now, rumble is offeringten dollars off on an annual
subscription.
Just go to rumblecom slashpremium and use the promo code

(01:21:07):
studio at checkout.
That's rumblescom slash premiumpromo code studio no ads, more
freedom and content you actuallycare about.

Speaker 2 (01:21:17):
That's the deal yes, rumble, and we are going to go
over to rumble private.
We are going to watch ahilarious, oh sweet, a hilarious
, yet historically true historyof the democrat party.
And we are also going to watchan ed martin interview with
maria bartolomo that is full ofnuggets.
Remember, he's on the dojweaponization group, he's a

(01:21:39):
pardon attorney, he's goingafter all these guys and he was
spotted in manhattan outside ofleticia, james leticia, james's
house.
So that is pretty awesome.
We're going to be watching thatvideo.
So with that we'll run ourlittle outro and then we'll jump
over into private and we'll seeyou guys there.
Thank you so much.
Big day for us today.
Three ad reads, and they weren'tthat bad rumble, premium tubes.

(01:22:02):
So go get yourself a float tube.
If anybody out there I love flyfishing, by the way, it's like
probably one of my favoriteoutdoor sports, outdoor
activities, and I don't get togo enough.
Like I don't get to go enough,I need your secret spot.
So if anybody out there knowsgood fly fishing spots and wants

(01:22:23):
to invite me geez, cuts me off,I'd probably make a trip out of
it.
So, just saying, love to fishyour secret spots, I'll bring my
float tube.

Speaker 4 (01:22:34):
Old woman, man, man, sorry what night.

(01:23:02):
Lived in that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I, I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king, eh,very nice.

(01:23:24):
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there's some lovely
filth down here oh.

Speaker 18 (01:23:40):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 4 (01:23:52):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 18 (01:24:06):
If only people would Please, please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No-one lives there.

Speaker 4 (01:24:13):
Then who is your lord ?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be

(01:24:35):
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry

(01:24:59):
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:25:20):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor, just because some
moistened bint had lobbedscimitar at me, they put me away
.
Shut up, will you shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.

(01:25:41):
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
That's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

Speaker 2 (01:25:48):
all right, welcome private listeners.
We're still not private.
Uh, welcome public listeners,hanging out till we actually go
private.
Now we're private.
All right, now we're private.
All right, welcome privatelisteners.
Rumble premium listeners, youguys are the best.
Thank you for joining us today.
Okay, we are going to jumpright into this and we are going
to watch.
This is a longer interview.
I wanted to save it for theprivate side.
I apologize if you caught ityesterday on morning with

(01:26:09):
maria's but ed martin, who isreally the I don't know of an
attorney at the doj.
He's the most prominentaggressive attorney and he's on
the weaponization group, so heinterviewed with maria.
We're going to let this play.
We'll probably stop it a coupletimes times and talk about it,
but it's a nine minute interviewbut it's pretty golden.

(01:26:30):
He's kind of laying out thedirection he's going and the
accountability they want to havehappen.
So let's parse it together.

Speaker 19 (01:26:36):
Authorized leaks of classified information to damage
President Trump during hisfirst term.
The whistleblower, a longtimeDemocrat staffer on the House
Intelligence Committee, saidSchiff was upset because he
expected to be the CIA directorin a Hillary Clinton presidency.
In a statement to Fox News, aspokesperson for Schiff said
this Kash Patel's latest smearagainst Senator Schiff is

(01:26:59):
absolutely and categoricallyfalse and is the latest in a
series of defamatory attacksfrom the president and his
allies meant to distract fromtheir plummeting polls and the
Epstein-Files scandal.
Joining me now in the SundayMorning Futures exclusive is the
director of the DOJWeaponization Working Group, Ed
Martin.
He's investigating theweaponization of government,

(01:27:21):
including Adam Schiff, New YorkAttorney General Letitia James,
for mortgage fraud and theJanuary 6th probe, among others.
Ed Martin, great to have youthis morning.
Thanks very much for being here.

Speaker 6 (01:27:32):
Always a pleasure, Maria.

Speaker 19 (01:27:33):
And Ed, it has really truly been a decade of
dirty tricks and that's beingkind about it against Donald
Trump, beginning with the Russiahoax to the impeachments, to
the indictments, to the HunterBiden laptop.
Assess for us the last 10 yearsin your view, and you have
criminal referrals right now onAdam Schiff, letitia James,

(01:27:57):
among others.
What is the status?

Speaker 6 (01:28:01):
Well, first of all, thanks for asking about the last
10 years.
I mean, you know, when DonaldTrump came into office as
president, he signed anexecutive order saying go and
find out how government wasweaponized against the citizens.
When Attorney General Bondicame into office, she put a memo
, put more specifics to it andsaid get to the bottom of this.
She gave a specific, specificlist and a broad charge and I

(01:28:21):
have to tell you for yourviewers, we have the Attorney
General Bondi has that, thatDepartment of Justice spinning
like a top.
We've got more stuff going on.
A lot of it we can't talk aboutbecause of the nature of it,
but it's going like crazy.
And one of them was we were in agroup we're still in it working
on the Russia hoax and TulsiGabbard declassified what
happened and she sent it over tous to DOJ as a criminal

(01:28:44):
referral and that's ongoing now.
But what that was and, maria,you're one of the earliest I
think you might be the onlyperson, the only journalist, who
said early on this is a Russiahoax.
And, and you know, brett hadPresident Trump on an interview
on that flight to Alaska and inthe interview President Trump
said the Russia hoax was meantto destroy the relationship with
Russia, make it impossible toget things under control, get a

(01:29:08):
reset like Hillary said shewanted.
Wanted so what we have in thedepartment of justice.
So I'm curious I'm curious.

Speaker 2 (01:29:13):
He talks about pam bondy having it running like a
top.
I'm curious.
I take ed martin to be prettyauthentic and genuine.
He's a fast talker but he'salso like a bullet point guy,
like he's saying these thingsbecause these are happening.
He doesn't have his, he doesn'thave like, uh, he doesn't have
to keep the story straight inhis head, so it makes sense.
So he jumps around a little bitbecause he's just, he's not

(01:29:36):
lying, he's not lying, so justkind of talk about whatever he's
saying.
So he says he has the justicedepartment running like a top.
They've obviously dumped quitea few people, so I'm super
curious as to like this is a bigorganization.
Did you just take all the peoplethat were kind of just like,
well, I'm just here because I'ma good attorney and I'll do what
my supervisor says.
I don't have to think too muchabout the agenda, I just

(01:29:57):
prosecute the crime, right?
If all of a sudden you're leftwith that pool of people that
are like, yeah, we're willing togo hard on illegals, go hard
gun crime, you just, you justtell us we can and we will.
Like how much of the top crustwas able to tell the lowest
prosecutor drop that gun charge.
Or you know what I mean createa series of policies where the

(01:30:18):
prosecutor's like well, lookslike I gotta charge him as a
minor, no bail and no prisontime.
You know what I'm saying?
So when he's like it's runninglike a top, that could really
yield some fruit.
I kind of know the awesomepower of the government and it
can definitely put some seriouspressure on people.

Speaker 6 (01:30:37):
This now is a weaponization working group and
the backing of our leadership togo and find this stuff.
And so the Russia hoax.
We know the birthday of theRussia hoax it's December 8th
8th 2016 where the obamaadministration, including obama,
said don't put the truth out,lie and ask the media to help us
.
And the washington post andothers jumped right in.

Speaker 2 (01:30:59):
And then we had the russia hoax that went on for 10
everything we have seen leadingup to that date was the
intelligence groups doing theirjob.
What looked like correctly.
This looks like bad info.
It's full of hearsay.
It doesn't predicate aninvestigation.
This is a political dirty trick.
This is just Hillary's thing.

(01:31:19):
Beware, beware, beware, rightthe whole thing.
And then all of a sudden, thatdate happens, they have their
little working group or whatever, and everything becomes.
Don't beware team sport.
That's our story.
We're sticking to it.

Speaker 1 (01:31:34):
And we rewrite the president's daily brief to say
something that's a lie.

Speaker 2 (01:31:39):
That's where it started.
Yes, right so up until thatpoint there's enough opposition
and enough clear eyes looking atthings that this is a dead upon
arrival dossier.
But after that date it startsto get legs of its own years.

Speaker 6 (01:31:54):
And every time they get in trouble meaning the deep
state and others they throwanother hoax out.
And all we're doing at DOJ andall we're doing across the
government is saying get thetruth out.
And then, by the way, let'shold people accountable.
And that's exactly what's goingon.
So when Bill Pulte sends acriminal referral over to us and
he says, letitia James and AdamSchiff and, by the way, both

(01:32:15):
their lawyers have come out andtalked publicly about that
criminal referral, so you cantalk to them about the specifics
, because I'm going to tell youwhat we're going to do is we're
going to follow the facts.
Every American has a more thathas a mortgage or has other
documents they sign has tofollow the law.
We're going to go to the verybottom of the facts and if
somebody did something wrong,we're not only going to hold

(01:32:36):
them accountable, we're alsogoing to look at everything else
that they've been doing.
Because when you're a liar, youlie not just on one thing.
When you're a cheater, youcheat not just on one thing.
When you're a cheater, youcheat not just on one thing.
When you're doing corruption,you generally don't just do it
on one thing.
So we have, that's our.
That's our, what we're asked todo as prosecutors, and that's
what we're doing well, we areall waiting for accountability

(01:32:58):
here.

Speaker 19 (01:32:58):
Adam ship went on sunday morning programs and so
what that looks like.

Speaker 2 (01:33:03):
If they did it the way I would want them to do it,
they would go ahead and arrestLetitia and Adam for this
mortgage fraud thing and thenthey would just start adding
charges, just start addingcharges and at some point
they'll probably take a pleadeal on the mortgage fraud to
make the charges stop gettingadded.
You know you'll go mortgagefraud.
You can go to jail for 15 years.
Or we can add in this additioncharge there's another 15 or 20.

(01:33:25):
Or we can also add in thispublic corruption charge and we
can also have this solicitationof a bribe charge.
You know what I'm saying.
And so pretty soon it's like Idid mortgage corruption.
I did.
It Could be the way they go ornot, We'll see.
Or they can spend the next fouryears gathering information and
then not have time to prosecuteand dump it on the next

(01:33:47):
president, who may or may not besomeone we like and there was
although if they get rid ofthose mail-in balances, I have a
feeling it will be someone welike.
But then we have to factor inthe the ultimate fear factor
that all the man on the streetinterviews of uneducated people
would be our downfall how, howwould how would you uh feel
about adam schiff as ciadirector?

Speaker 19 (01:34:07):
that's where we were headed in plain sight and he
was the chairman of theintelligence committee, so he
had to know better that therewas no evidence of any collusion
in plain sight.
So are you saying that thiscriminal referral is about
something completely different,about mortgage fraud?
Are you looking to get him onsomething other than Russia

(01:34:29):
collusion?

Speaker 6 (01:34:32):
Well, I'm saying that there's a referral from the,
from Bill Pulte, about amortgage fraud, about Adam
Schiff.
That's publicly discussed.
His own lawyers have been outthere.
Now there's more on Adam Schiffand all we're going to do again
is get to the facts of this anduse all the tools that we have
in our system.
What we've discovered and Iknow you want to ask me about
some of this in theweaponization is that Joe
Biden's Justice Departmentactively targeted American

(01:34:55):
citizens Catholics who went tomass, parents who went to school
boards, people who wereinvolved in the Russia.
You know, I hear from CarterPage every now and then.
Carter Page was destroyed bythe Russia hoax and we're
sitting around and pretendingit's OK to say that.
You know there was a secretmeeting on December 9th 2016 in
the Situation Room where theyplotted the Russia hoax and then

(01:35:17):
we're going to say, oh, thatwas really bad.
No, it wasn't really bad.
It needs to be held accountablein every way we can.

Speaker 19 (01:35:23):
Well, you went to Letitia James's home.
This week you were in New York.

Speaker 6 (01:35:30):
Yeah, look, I'm a prosecutor and when I do these
cases I was in New York actuallyNew Jersey for some meetings
and I went over to New York foranother meeting and I went by
there.
One of the referrals is aboutthat property that she has.
It's a very prominentneighborhood in Brooklyn and I
wanted to lay eyes on it.
I think most people if you'reprosecuting something, you're

(01:35:50):
careful.
I didn't go there and announceit.
Some woman came storming up andshooting video and talking to
me, but I wanted to see theproperty and there's a number of
other aspects of these caseswhere you've got to get a sense
of what is actually at stake.

Speaker 19 (01:36:03):
Do you have a grand jury in these cases?

Speaker 6 (01:36:08):
Let me say, when you get a criminal referral, one of
the tools you have is a grandjury, and I'll leave it to you
to infer what I mean.
But, uh, these referrals arecriminal referrals significant
enough that, um, that they wouldwarrant using all the tools,
and the tools include subpoenasand witnesses.
Uh, and that's the that is inour system.
That is the system.
I'm not like jack smith.

Speaker 2 (01:36:26):
Jack smith like to talk about how he did think dude
, they're going down, bro,they're going down, bro, they're
going down.
They're going down for mortgagefraud.
I'm just saying he shows up onsite.
You got to take a look atwhat's at risk here.
What is what's the actual thingthat they were refining?
You know, is this a realpersonal residence, dude?
And I got all the tools.

Speaker 6 (01:36:50):
You can infer what you want and what he did and
brag about Leticia James did.
By the way, as a prosecutor,she liked to come out and hold
press conferences.
I'll just tell you when you geta criminal referral and her own
lawyer made the commentspublicly, you can infer what you
need to.

Speaker 19 (01:37:00):
Well, let's talk about January 6th, because you
are also investigating January6th, which was also part of this
.
10 years of scandals what haveyou learned?

Speaker 6 (01:37:10):
Well, again, attorney General Pam Bondi, let us loose
on this.
And there's a group of usworking on January 6th.
What we've learned is that thefederal government, the
Department of Justice, but otheraspects targeted these citizens
.
They basically turnedgovernment on to make the hoax
work.
So I'm not talking aboutsomebody that pushes a cop.
That's a charge you can look atin charge.
I'm talking about that.
The FBI and others were puttingAmerican citizens on terrorism

(01:37:33):
watch lists.
They were auditing their IRStax returns.
They were targeting theAmerican people.
They were taking massiveamounts of resources and moving
them from fighting you know,child trafficking and fighting.

Speaker 2 (01:37:47):
My first prosecutor was a sex crime prosecutor.
Moved over to charge January6th.

Speaker 6 (01:37:51):
Real corruption and saying we have to move everybody
to look at the capital siege.
It was a political hoax thatwas driven by garland, lisa
monaco and others, and what,again, attorney general bonnie
has said is get to the bottom ofit.
Some of it may not be illegal,but it's some of the worst you
know in in in federal prosecutorworld.
We think about the importanceof that role.

(01:38:12):
This guy named ro, guy namedRobert Jackson, who is the
prosecutor guy.
What you see is Lisa Monaco'sJustice Department acting in
ways we've never seen before,and when we show all that and
we're writing reports regularlyon it, it's not one aspect.
The federal court system wasused in a way.
The jails were used in a way topunish people.

(01:38:35):
It's foreign.
They didn't do this to theterrorists after 9-11, and they
were doing it to Americancitizens.
So that's a fulsomeinvestigation on January 6th and
it will make clear the hoax,which is really the 2020
election hoax.
We were told we couldn't talkabout it because of January 6th
and the whole thing has fallenapart Maria, and it's going to

(01:38:55):
get to the bottom and theplayers are always the same.
It's always the same, the samepeople.
On December 9th 2016, in theSituation Room in Obama's White
House are playing the same gameall these years.

Speaker 19 (01:39:07):
That's unbelievable, Real quick.
What about the January 6thcommittee?
Did they destroy evidence?

Speaker 6 (01:39:13):
Is there criminality there Of course, we're all in
that too and, trust me, a lot ofpeople did not get a pardon
that were involved in the selectcommittee, and they ought to be
keeping an eye on their mailboxbecause there's a lot to be
asked about and the pardons thatwere given out were done by an
auto pen.

Speaker 19 (01:39:30):
Are they legitimate?

Speaker 6 (01:39:35):
Well, I'm the pardon attorney, so I have, I'm in that
too.
I can tell you we'reinvestigating how the pardons
were granted.
It was not like anything in thehistory of America what Joe
Biden not Joe Biden his staffersdid not just with the auto pen,
but with faking him out on thememos.
More to come, maria.
I'm telling you, pam Bondi haslet us loose, and when this
comes out, it'll take the wholeof these people's hoaxes down.

(01:39:55):
And we're doing it bit by bit,and it's fantastic, it's a great
privilege.

Speaker 2 (01:39:59):
Unbelievable and I, at this point, trust Ed Martin.
He might get stopped, he mightget big footed.
At some point they might shuthim down, but as of right now
he's connecting all the dots.

Speaker 1 (01:40:12):
I love it, the right word.

Speaker 2 (01:40:14):
Yeah, Saying the right words.
January 6th was a hoax.
It was a cover up of the 2020.
Yes, I know, I know.
And Lisa Monaco he brings upthat name again.
That's the name I brought up.
Like this name has beenconnected, you know, all the way
from being Obama's fixer tobeing in that meeting to being
literally on the leadership teamthat was deciding whether or
not I got remanded.

(01:40:34):
That's a?
that's a big deal, man.
It's personal.
All right, last video, and thenwe're going to wrap it up.
This is the Democrat Party asfounded by Andrew Jackson, who,
by the way, not a bad dude.

Speaker 16 (01:40:48):
What up America?
It's Andrew Jackson, that guyyou roll up to hit some powder.
I founded the Democrat Partyand chose the jackass as our
mascot.
Now, as you can probably tell,times have changed a bit.
From the party back in my dayand present day Democrats will
come to hate me, but that's yourproblem.
Jackson started the DemocratParty to appeal to the common
man.
Democrats today sometimes givehim credit for that, but only

(01:41:09):
after calling him an evil whitebigot.
Needless to say, the partystarted off pretty sketchy by
today's standards.
We were by far the pro-slaveryparty all the way through the
Civil War.
After the war we cleaned up ouract and supported the North's
reconstruction efforts, totallykidding.
We doubled down on racism andbecame the party of the Klan.
But seriously, we didn't havemuch of a platform after the war

(01:41:30):
except Jim Crow.
But that was until our boy camein hot on his rollerblades.
Then came the depression.
People lost trust in markets,so I wheeled in to drastically
expand communism across thecountry and democrats been
hooked ever since.

Speaker 13 (01:41:42):
Up until this point, blacks had always voted
republican, as they were theparty that freed the slaves.
But after fdr's new deal,blacks swung 75 democrat.
This was a complete realignment, not because of civil rights
but because of economics, allwhile the democrats were still
the party of the.

Speaker 16 (01:41:55):
Klan, and their stronghold was the South.
We pushed segregationthroughout the South and
filibustered the 1964 CivilRights Act for 75 days.
It wasn't until Republicansstepped up and found even more
votes to pass the bill.
So ask yourself, how areDemocrats seen as the party of
the civil rights?

Speaker 10 (01:42:11):
Well, it's because Democrats are very persuasive,
but again it ultimately boilsdown to economic.
Once Democrats realize thepower of government spending and
handouts, you can appeal to anyvoter group and lock them in
One, two three Games forPalestine.
Good luck with that.

Speaker 16 (01:42:31):
So, anyway, to sum it all up, my party has changed
a shit ton, but it's not becauseof the mythical party switch.
Democrats controlled the Southall the way through the 1990s,
but they did adopt new policieslike massive social spending and
welfare programs that allowedthem to appeal to more diverse
voting groups.

Speaker 2 (01:42:49):
I just thought that was pretty funny.
I was like that's a pretty goodbreakdown.
I just thought that was prettyfunny.
I was like that's a pretty goodbreakdown.
One of the things there was aphone call between Robert
Kennedy and Martin Luther King'sdad.
When Martin Luther King gotthrown in prison he'd become a
real champion of blacks andrights and he was constantly

(01:43:11):
getting thrown in prison orthrown in jail and one time when
he was in jail, rfk or call RFKsenior called Martin Luther
King's dad and said what can Ido for you?
Anything we can do.
And that changed the vote forblacks from Republican to
Democrat.
It was that thing alone.
It was RFK reaching out.
Which RFK and JFK were not yournormal traditional Democrats.
They were to the Democrat Party, what trump is to the

(01:43:35):
republican party?
Right, right they were.
they were disruptors they weredemocrats, but they were not
those democrats.
Also why they were killed.
Yes, that's a great analogy.
The kennedys were to thedemocrat party what trump is to
the republican party.
He was a disruptor, he wasgoing to change the trajectory
of the party and that is why thevote switched because the

(01:44:00):
democrats were willing tosupport martin luther king in
order to win elections right,and probably because I think rfk
and jfk sympathized very muchwith the cause.
But at at this.
But the party used it for votes.
It's that simple.
And then that just becamebenefits, right, paying for jobs
, paying for votes, that kind ofthing.

(01:44:21):
I remember sitting in prison onetime and I was waiting for some
type of doctor's visit that Ihad to do.
So I was sitting in this littleyou know cell waiting room and
there were two other black guysthere, and this was pre-election
.
So, of course, the news is onin the TV and this was kind of a
cool little waiting room.
It had an aquarium and a TV andbars.
Keep us in bars, but give usglass and entertainment.

(01:44:44):
This is awesome.
So we're watching the news andit's you know, campaign stuff.
Kamala said this, trump saidthat, blah, blah, blah.
And the two guys are sittingthere.
Like you know, always votedDemocrat, I've always voted
Democrat.
My mom told me, you know, theDemocrats gave us civil rights
and gave us the right to votewhich was not accurate, but
whatever and so we owed him thatvote and he just, even if you

(01:45:07):
got a thumb your nose, you gotto vote Democrat.
He's saying this I'moverhearing this very clearly
and then he goes.
But you know, it's just, thingshave changed and sometimes you
just you just got to make adecision, man, and I don't know,
I think a lot of brothers aregoing to be making a decision to
vote for Trump.
That was, that was aconversation.
He didn't say he was going to.
He didn't say anything likethat, but he was just looking at
it like I think a lot of peopleare changing their mind and I
could definitely, and thepopulation generally supports

(01:45:31):
Donald Trump minorities included.
So all right, guys.
That's it for the show today.
Thank you for joining us,especially those of you who
stuck around to the very end ofRumble Private.
So that's awesome.
Thank you so much and we willtalk to you guys again tomorrow.

Speaker 4 (01:45:43):
Bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in

(01:46:11):
that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
We didn't bother to find out,did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked what?
I object to it.
They automatically treat melike an inferior.
Well, I am King, oh King, Ivery nice.

(01:46:32):
How king, eh Very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There's some lovely filth downhere.
Oh, how do?

Speaker 18 (01:46:48):
you do.
How do you do, good lady?
I'm Arthur, king of the Britons.
Whose castle is that King ofthe who?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that King ofthe who?
The Britons, who are theBritons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.

Speaker 4 (01:47:01):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,A self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes ohthere you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 18 (01:47:15):
If only people would Please, please good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your?

Speaker 4 (01:47:22):
lord.
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simple majorityin the case of purely internal
affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be

(01:47:43):
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how did you become kingthen?
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,

(01:48:03):
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:48:28):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed.
Bloody peasant.

(01:48:49):
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
Bang, no-transcript.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}We Are The Peasants: How Trump's Battle Against The Establishment Affects Us All

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

We Are The Peasants: How Trump's Battle Against The Establishment Affects Us All

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce