When Authority Lies: From Food Pyramids to Vaccine Narratives

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I was tax evaded.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth
Dubjik had no bread.
Do you know what she said?
Let them eat cake.
Here you take the bomb.
We're getting screwed man.

Speaker 6 (00:17):
Every time we turn around we're getting screwed.
Here's a minute.
Hold the red again.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Ruth
Bunchick had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.

Speaker 6 (00:37):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around,we're getting screwed.
Cheers again oh, therevolution's gonna be through
podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's got to stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.

(01:02):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe peasants perspective.
Does that sound weird?
Is that me, is it?
No, I know what?

Speaker 9 (01:21):
no, no, my microphone swung over I know what it is?

Speaker 6 (01:23):
ah, you're doubled up .
I got that.
Know what it is?
Ah, you doubled up.
I got that thing plugged intopower.
I got a new microphone a coupledays ago.
I don't know if you got tonotice it's white.
It kind of matches mypersonality.
I took Ron's white chair,commandeered it, commandeered it
.
I need that white chair.
I remember when I was gettingstuff for the podcast studio
last time around and we werebuying chairs and I bought these

(01:46):
white swivel chairs and Chrisat the time was working with me
and he's like man, those boldchairs, this bold podcast.

Speaker 9 (01:55):
Well, when you're in construction, if there's a white
chair, it ain't staying white,and that's exactly right.

Speaker 6 (02:01):
Those going to make it through the grease stains.
I'm like no, it's funny becausenow my kids use those chairs at
home.
Right, here we go.
I'm just getting all the chatspopped out here so I can keep up
with the great chat community.
Don't forget we're coming up onhalfway through the month and
I'm halfway to the goals of livechatters, so we haven't been

(02:21):
pimping for chats this wholetime of live chatters.
So we haven't been pimping forchats this this whole time.
But we do need you to go chatspecifically on rumble.
We have to accrue some chatsthere.
So make sure you guys go doyour one time a month chat over
there.

Speaker 9 (02:32):
If you're a rumble or x listener, we pretty much stop
streaming on facebook yeah, ifyou can grow the show a little
bit more, then we won't have topimp so much.
Yeah, we'll just get thechatters.

Speaker 6 (02:41):
Yeah, it'll be more organic instead of begging,
please go go leave your mark.
Oh, I actually have been reallyimpressed with rumble's uh
little creator program.
They basically just set littlebenchmarks that you have to meet
and they force your show togrow.
Yeah, it's kind of weird.
It's like hey, here's theequation get people to come to
your channel.
Oh, by the way, we're gonnastart reading ads here soon.

(03:03):
We have to do so many ads thismonth.
I say have to, we get to.

Speaker 9 (03:07):
Privilege We've been prompted to.

Speaker 6 (03:10):
So, whatever we sell, buy, buy, buy, buy, buy.
I'll just tell you, I'm sure weget click-through credits.
Okay, Now I need to change myaudio.
I need to change my audio.
Well, you know, it is reallyfascinating how much technology
has made this possible and howmuch it drives us.

Speaker 9 (03:30):
Yeah, all right.

Speaker 11 (03:46):
So we're going to start out this morning watching
a little video about blindobedience for a traditional
event.
And then a man who herds goatsbegins to walk his flock around
the fire once, twice, thrice,and then he steps away.
But the goats keep going roundand round.
They go.
No leader, no destination, justmovement for the sake of
movement, blindly following theone ahead.
And suddenly it's not just acircle, it's a cycle, a vicious,

(04:07):
self-perpetuating loop.
It reminded me of what we oftensee around us in religion, in
politics, in society.
So many follow without question, without clarity, without
understanding the true intent ofthe one they're following, not
because they believe, butbecause they're conditioned,
because stepping out of thecircle takes courage.

(04:28):
The fire in the middle may bereal or imagined, but the fear,
the motion, the blindness, alltoo real.
Ask yourself are you thinkingor are you following?
Are you chasing purpose or areyou circling the flame?
If this made you pause,subscribe, share it to someone
who needs to hear this.
Yes, share the show.

Speaker 6 (04:50):
India so I saw that video last night.
I was like that is fascinating.
Right, we just flock mentality,but people are just like that.
Movement for movement's sake,just get in line.
Everybody walk their own wayright.
And I'm a big advocate ofbreaking sacred cows and getting
outside the box.
It's nice out here You're notrunning around a fire.
There are so many things inlife where people just follow

(05:15):
the norms.
One of those areas is whenyou're being told something by
authoritative figures, peoplewho've been certified, people
who have a nice little diplomaon the wall Right the experts.
People who've been certified.
People who have a nice littlediploma on the wall right, the
experts.

Speaker 9 (05:26):
Well, there's a lot of people who don't smoke
because Surgeon General toldthem so.

Speaker 6 (05:30):
And there's a lot of people who did smoke, because
everybody's doing it and theSurgeon.
General said it was fine.

Speaker 9 (05:37):
I like lucky strikes.
There was a time before theSurgeon General said don't smoke
that he said smoke.

Speaker 6 (05:45):
Yeah, exactly, so I had this interesting discussion
with family members this lastweek about vaccinations.

Speaker 9 (05:54):
Those are always fun.

Speaker 6 (05:55):
It's a sensitive subject.
A lot of people got vaccinated.
A lot of people did theirresearch and got vaccinated.
They researched which companiesvaccine they were going to use.
They bought into a lot of hype.
I mean, it is what it is.
We could have been wrong, wecould have died of COVID.
Maybe the vaccine could havesaved you.
Turned out, history kind ofwent the other direction.
Like every other time, most ofus like to go.

Speaker 9 (06:16):
oh, hindsight, we were so smart.
Well, at the time there werejust lots of questions and I,
there were just lots ofquestions and I think that that
was a driver for this podcastespecially.

Speaker 6 (06:29):
it was like why can't we ask questions?
Why can't we ask, why are wenot on youtube?
Because you can't ask questionsover there.
You can only make authoritativestatements in line with the
narrative, right?
So this is dr steve kirsch, andhe's been one of these people
who's really, since covid, comeout against not against
vaccinations, but taking a freshlook at it, like hey, I think
there's a lot of politicsinvolved here and the numbers

(06:51):
kind of result in that.

Speaker 12 (06:53):
How many children or people are totally unvaccinated
?
Is that like?
Where do you find?
Is it just the parents thatstepped up and said I would
think that's a very smallpercentage, because so many of
us blindly followed, you know,the recommendations to vaccinate
children.

Speaker 13 (07:09):
Yeah, it's less than 1% of the public.
So the Amish are a perfectexample of a large group of
people who are largelyunvaccinated.
And there is no.
We can't find an autistic kidwho was unvaccinated.
It's very, very rare in theamish community, very, very rare

(07:31):
.
You won't find kids with add,with autoimmune disease, with
panda pans, with epilepsy.
You just don't find any ofthese chronic diseases in the
amish.
And you know the us governmenthas been studying the Amish for
decades but there's never been areport out to the public.

(07:52):
The reason, of course, is itwould show that, oh, if you
don't follow our guidelines,you're going to end up healthier
.
That's why there's no report.
After decades of studying theAmish.
There's no report because thereport would be devastating to
the narrative.
It would show that thec hasbeen harming the public for
decades and saying nothing andburying all the data so in this
discussion we had about vaccinesare like oh, but the polio

(08:12):
vaccine no way well, let me

Speaker 9 (08:15):
tell you a story yeah , the polio vaccine.

Speaker 6 (08:19):
In fact let me see if I can find it here really quick
, because it came up and I waslike, well, polio was kind of
cured before the vaccine cameout yeah, people started washing
their hands and stuff well, andI read this book called the
body by bill uh bryson when Iwas in prison, and one of the
things he talked about in therewas, uh, many times we get these

(08:39):
great you know cures fordisease right as the disease
disappears from humanity andwe're like, oh, we solved it,
and it's like, no, you didn'tsolve it.
Um, let's see right, it wasjust a very super sweet
coincidence yeah, so polio wasone of those ones where, by the
time the vaccine came out, poliohad almost self-eradicated

(09:02):
exactly um, and then here's thisthe definition of polio has
changed in the last six or sevenyears.
This is a long time ago.
Several diseases which wereoften diagnosed as polio are now
diagnosed as aseptic meningitisor illness caused by one of the
cox, coxical echo viruses.
The number of polio cases in1961 cannot accurately could be
compared with those in, say,1952, because the criteria for

(09:24):
diagnosis had changed.
So that was another thing too,was you know?
Epilepsy was considered polio,right, oh, everybody dies.
They never get better.
Well, that's not polio, it'snot the same disease uh, yeah.
And then the other thing nowwild polio is almost
non-existent, but all the poliocases are vaccine induced.

(09:44):
So anyways, it was justpointing this, this I'm looking
for a better chart here butbasically the vaccine was
introduced a couple years afterthe polio had slowed down and,
of course, was being diagnosedcorrectly as other diseases,
right, but then the vaccine tookcredit for it.

Speaker 9 (10:01):
Took credit for it, yeah, which happens so many of
these things, right, well, it'sreally good for marketing.

Speaker 6 (10:04):
Yeah, it Took credit for it.
Yeah, which happens in so manyof these things, right?
Well, it's really good formarketing.
Yeah, it's really good formarketing.
So again, you know the foodpyramid.
I genuinely believe mygeneration, and specifically my
parents, were massively harmedby the food pyramid.
I remember I was right in thatpocket.
I remember my mom doingjazzercise, working so hard to

(10:26):
stay fit, and then going andhaving her low-fat, high-carb,
processed snack bar.
You know what I mean.
It's like no meat.
I'm on a diet.
I'm eating nothing but butprocessed.
You know, fat free.
Have you ever seen mean girls?
Huh, no oh my god.

Speaker 9 (10:45):
So one of the chick this is a bunch of mean girls in
high school.
One of the chicks in this movieplays a trick on another girl
by getting you to eat uh, these,uh, low-fat carb bars that she
borks out.

Speaker 6 (10:58):
It's so funny so there's that seinfeld episode
where they're having the uhlow-fat yogurt and craver, buy
some stock in it and you know,seinfeld gains five pounds and
elaine gains a couple pounds.
It's the low-fat yogurt.
Leads into this whole thingwhere rudy giuliani has high
cholesterol because the bloodtest gets messed up and he's

(11:19):
like it's the low-fat yogurt.
There's definitely.
You know, I feel like the foodpyramid.
It's flipped upside down.
I mean, it is precisely theopposite.
You should have more fats, moreprotein, right?
No carbs.
You know, it's like it'scompletely upside down.
I lived my entire life.
We had days where we ate verylittle meat.
Probably an affordability thingwas part of it, but a lot of it

(11:42):
was.
It was not maybe the healthiestthing you got to avoid a heart
attack and too much red meat badfor you right and the bottom of
that pair moved.

Speaker 9 (11:49):
It's full of grains, so you're eating plenty of bread
, oatmeal farmers are like welove this.

Speaker 6 (11:56):
Yeah, subsidize the corn.
So I remember there's adocumentary called food inc.
Which is controversial in andof itself the opening premise is
the guy is walking through astory.

Speaker 9 (12:06):
He's like everything ties back to a cornfield in iowa
, like everything like he's likehe goes through every product
corn, corn, corn, corn, corn,corn corn well, don't forget,
all of the grains were enrichedwith vitamin b12 or folic acid
like acid and stripped of anynutrient.

Speaker 6 (12:23):
Yeah, that again.
Goats running in a circlemovement for movement's sake.
This is what everybody's doing,let's do it.
You know, there's always thatcontrarian that's like I don't
think that's right and it's thenature.
It was um, um.
It was Henry David Thoreau.
Let me find this quote HenryDavid, you know my my judge was

(12:47):
so upset about the comparisonsof me to Henry David Thoreau and
Martin Luther King.

Speaker 9 (12:56):
You were getting those kind of comparisons he
made those comparisons.

Speaker 6 (12:59):
He made that comparison specifically Wow,
henry David Thoreau.
In his essay called civildisobedience.
He says this it's going to takeme a second to find it
practically have to read this.
Oh, this thing is just so fullof gold.
Here there are people that aregenerations ahead of their time

(13:22):
and he's one of those people.
He's not really generations outof his time.
He was a man of his time.
You know, he's civil war era,basically trying to be like you
guys really gonna go march offover hill and dell and fight for
these people.
He was in the north and he waslike if we can't abolish slavery
in massachusetts, good luckdoing it in south carolina.
Okay, so he goes.

(13:46):
I made a quote like this in oneof my essays and it made it into
my sentencing memorandum, whichthen made it to the judge
making comment about it,basically saying there's a
proper place for civildisobedience.
But this was not it.
I'm like, yes, so said theofficers who sent both those men
to jail as well.
Right, I'm not seeing if I do a, let's see.

(14:15):
Sorry for the delay, guys, Iknow it's boring, live air it
sure is.

Speaker 9 (14:33):
Oh, here's 648 folks.
Let's check traffic.
Let's check traffic cut totraffic.

Speaker 6 (14:40):
Go ahead and read the campaign.
Let's read one of the ads.
Oh, there's this beautiful linein here.
Okay, here he goes.
This is what it says.
He says men generally seeunjust laws.
Unjust laws exist.
Shall we be content to obeythem or shall we endeavor to
amend them and obey them till wehave succeeded?
This is the debate.
Do we just get rid of them, ordo we work within and change it

(15:02):
from within, or shall wetransgress them all at once?
Men generally under such agovernment as this think that
they ought to wait until theyhave persuaded the majority to
alter them.
They think that if they shouldresist, the remedy would be
worse than the evil.
We can't break the system.
What if everybody pulled theirmoney out of the bank?
I mean, we know it's a fraudand it's bumping up human
trafficking and drug smugglingand old tonsil matter of human

(15:22):
carnage.
But, but, but my pension.

Speaker 9 (15:25):
Right, I'm probably guilty of that.
Yeah, of course, that's why youneed to read more Thoreau.

Speaker 6 (15:29):
I think that if they should resist, the remedy would
be worse than the evil.
But it is the fault of thegovernment itself that the
remedy is worse than the evil.
It makes it worse.
Why is it not more apt toanticipate and provide for
reform?
Why does it not cherish itswise minority?
Why does it cry and resistbefore it is hurt?

(15:49):
Why does it not encouragecitizens to be alert to points
and point out its faults and dobetter than it would have them?
Why does it always this is thepoint government.
Why does it always crucifyChrist and excommunicate
Copernicus and Luther andpronounce Washington and
Franklin rebels?
One would think that thedeliberate and practical denial

(16:11):
of its authority was the onlyoff offense never contemplated
by government.
Else, why is it not assignedits definite, its suitable and
proportionate penalty?
If a man who has no propertyrefuses but wants to earn nine
shillings for the state, he isput in prison for a period of
unlimited, by any law that Iknow and determined only by the
discretion of those who placedhim there.
If he should steal, but if heshould steal 90 times nine

(16:34):
shillings from the state, he issoon permitted to go at large
again.
This is not a new problem folks, this is what I learned when I
studied political science I gota little black pilled.
Yeah, y'all humans effed up.
You don't think straight.
You're like a bunch of goatsrunning around a fire and every
goat who wants to step out ofline there's another goat trying

(16:55):
to pull them back in.
It's the crabs in the bucketthing, right?

Speaker 9 (16:59):
I love this, my favorite line okay, peel your
face off and reveal yourreptilian self.

Speaker 6 (17:04):
My favorite line why does it always crucify Christ
and excommunicate Copernicus andLuther and pronounce Washington
and Franklin rebels?
So yeah, that they yeah.
So my judge pointed out youknow Martin Luther King and
Henry David Thoreau.
They had right reasons to toprotest.
The reasons they wrote are thesame reasons I'm citing.

(17:26):
You haven't changed.
You still go after the outlawwho's simply pointing out your
outlawish behavior and you'releaning into it.
You're leaning into it.
Okay.
So over in the South China Sea,the Philippines were out on
patrol yesterday and the chinesedecided they were going to do a
little show of force.

(17:46):
Unfortunately, there's acertain level of incompetency in
the chinese navy.
So, ron, you'll appreciate this, being a man of ships oh, no on
here.
So the chinese right here.
This boat that's in chase is inhot pursuit, ramming speed.
I mean this is very close forbig boats in open ocean, just
all in a right.

Speaker 8 (18:06):
So they're going along, oh jeez what?

Speaker 2 (18:10):
oh my god, the chinese ran into their own boat
oh man, oh man, that's so foraudio listeners.

Speaker 6 (18:23):
We're looking at huge , two huge destroyers that just
t-boned each other as the philipeal boat just took off.
So look at the damage on theside of that boat.

Speaker 9 (18:35):
Yeah, whoa, damn, they just got rocked.

Speaker 6 (18:41):
Yeah, take a picture so I I look at that and I wonder
, would american boats ever havethat happen to them?
I mean, I guess they could.
We had one just burned down acouple years.
Look at that oh, my goodness,isn't that wild.
Those are their navy, that'stheir, that's the chinese navy.
Right there they're just.

(19:01):
They're just a hot of people,they're trying to Absolutely
crazy.
So I think about the communistcommand structure and it makes
me think, hey, we're about tohit that other boat.

(19:22):
Hey, we're on a bad trajectory.
Don't say that.
The party leader will be mad bemad.

Speaker 9 (19:27):
Yeah exactly.

Speaker 6 (19:28):
The captain told us to go this way.
All right, hang on tight, it'shis neck anyways.
I thought you'd appreciate.
I saw that and I was like Igotta show that to ron.
He's gonna appreciate that.
Now I don't want to close this.
Uh, henry david thoreau tab,keep it up.
Henry david thoreau's, keep itopen david throws good, he's
really good.
So here's another thing.
This morning cpi numbers cameout.

(19:48):
Depending on what news channelyou watch, they're either lower
or higher than projected by atenth of a point, but either way
they're under three percent orright around there.
Yeah, and you know, people arenow calling for jerome powell to
drop the rates.
Drop the rates.
You know, not only did the jobmarket go down, but now the
inflation thing and she got todrop the rates.
Then I'm hearing other peoplegoing we don't need lower rates,
we need higher rates.

(20:09):
We were dropping rates when itwas 1.5 percent, trying to spur
growth, and now we need to droprates and slow down growth.
It's like, oh, again it's allwe gotta slow down growth, yeah.
so this this guy yeah, that'sexactly right, slow down growth
trump's in office.
We, this guy yeah, that'sexactly right, slow down growth.
Trump's in office we can't beletting him have any of this
credit we're going to be likeBarack Obama.

(20:30):
You guys need to getcomfortable with 2% Right, 2%.

Speaker 9 (20:34):
Okay, comfortable communists.

Speaker 6 (20:35):
So I actually don't know who this is talking.
He's from battle banks.
What his t-shirt says says, andhe says something that I agree
with wholeheartedly when youobserve money, just observe
money and what you can actuallydo with it, the loss in your
spending power is not beingcalculated by any government
agency.
Again going back to that whole,because then they would expose

(20:58):
that they've been lying thewhole time.

Speaker 19 (21:00):
First of all, cpi is a CP lie.
You understand it as a factoid,a metric that, while it isn't
true, impacts popular sentimentand to the extent that you
understand that before yourcompetitors in investing, do you
have an advantage, a ruefuladvantage, but an advantage
nonetheless that thedepreciation in the US dollar,

(21:25):
which is a different way ofsaying the depreciation in the
purchasing power of your savingsis more like 7.5% or 8% a year.
Then the rest of the economycomes into perspective.
If you believe in the CPI, ifyou're getting paid 4.5%, 4.6%
on a 10-year treasury, you'redoing okay.
You're getting a 200 basispoint real yield.
If, however, you believe thatthe purchasing power of your

(21:47):
savings is declining at 7.5%,then the arithmetic around the
US 10-year treasury becomes verydifferent.
You're not making 2%, you'relosing 3%.
If you do that, 3% a year,every year, for 10 years, at the
end of 10 years holding arisk-free asset, you've lost a
30-year purchasing power.

Speaker 6 (22:09):
There's a principle called the time value of money
and everybody would be wise tolearn this.
The dollar today is morevaluable than the dollar
tomorrow period.
So who do you want to have thatdollar?
You should keep that dollartoday.
You should put off everythingfor everybody else till tomorrow
.
It's cheaper for you to paytomorrow than it is for you to
pay today.
Simple principle and it can bepretty drastic.
Just a couple of years ago theyreported the CPI at 9%.

(22:31):
What do you think realinflation was?
20?
.
I don't know.
Like the CPI numbers are rigged,just like the job numbers are
rigged, just like the crimestatistics are rigged.

Speaker 9 (22:44):
Yeah, you can't believe any of the numbers, so
it's really hard to deduceanything that's real or
meaningful you can't believeanything at all.

Speaker 6 (22:52):
The uh.
I remember I have a friendwho's a police police officer in
the boise police department andhe's been there for a long time
and he was talking about when anew mayor came to boise.
It was a liberal progressiveand they had six gang units.
So they had six, you know, twoman teams that just did nothing
but gang crime, nothing but game, game, game, crime.

(23:12):
Well, this guy came in and hewas going to be tough on crime
Democrat, and so his firstaction to get tough on crime was
to fire five of the gang units.
So then he, almost immediately,as soon as this guy's new tough
on crime policies took place,crime dropped significantly,
like over half.
I mean it was prettysignificant crime just dropped

(23:34):
off the planet.
Less arrests, less convictionsI mean clearly there's less
crime happening, right, wow?
Right, it's amazing right.
So he juiced the numbers by justchanging the way it was
reported.
And easiest way to do that is,you know, satisfy the far left,
keep on the police crowd, getrid of those guys.
And then go to the right and belike look at my low crime stats

(23:55):
wow, there's no way this oneteam can hit the six team
numbers that's exactly, and hewatched it happen in real time.
He's like yeah, so not a safercity, even though they're
running ads in other Statestelling people to move here
Cause we're safer you know whatI mean, Like I don't know about

(24:16):
that.
That's the thing.
The police chief for themetropolitan police department
in the district of Columbia justgot fired because of just that
faking the numbers.
I remember waking up in the dcgulag in jail.
Every morning we'd wake up andthe guard down at the desk had

(24:36):
already turned on the tv to thelocal news channel right, the dc
local morning news, and morningafter morning it was last night
there were three drive-byshootings last night was another
drive-by shooting.
Last night someone else gotcarjacked and was shot in the
head.
Every single day, every singleday.
Now I also saw this up closeand personal, my first week in

(25:00):
solitary confinement.
The guy that was in solitaryconfinement in the cell next to
me.
I was like what are you in herefor?
And he's like I'm in here formurder.
I'll never forget the way hesaid it Murder.
I was like murder, first degree, premeditated.
Oh, ok, but it's going to be OK, though I'm pretty sure I'm
going to get a plea at likeeight to 15.
I'm like OK, but I.

(25:21):
I'm like okay, but I just beat.
I'm probably I might beat thiscase too, cause I just beat two
attempted murder cases.
I was juvie and I beat those andthey dropped them.
And I was like what am I doinghere?
This guy's thinking he's goingto get eight years, I just got
seven.
We're pushing a gate and I'm inthe same place he is, but the

(25:41):
depths of hell.
It was horrible.
And then he comes back and hegoes to, like some you know,
arraignment hearing or whatever,and he comes back in.
He's like I'm so mad they'rethey wouldn't grant me bond.
The judge was like you know you,you're an animal.
He's like I'm not an animal,I'm a human being.
I got feelings too, man.
I got feelings.
And then he's like I believethey called me an animal.
And then they they're going tobring up the other uh charges

(26:02):
that they already dropped, butthey're only going to charge me
as an adult.
That's bulge, man.
I'm looking at like 15 to 30now like two attempted murders
and a first degree premeditatedmurder.
You're like you're lucky you'renot getting the electric chair.
Yeah, animals have feelings.
And he was a boy, he was 18.
He's like I came in here a boy,I'm going to leave here, a man.

(26:26):
And I'm like, yeah, you thinkyou're gonna leave here.
That was my like I don'tunderstand this game, so dc.
And then there was another timewhere I was sitting in I got
taken to a legal call and theydidn't take me to the call.
I was supposed to meet do mypre-sentence investigation thing
.
They, they took me in limbo mystuff.
They transferred me out of onejail into another jail's long
story there but shut all myphones down.
All my stuff moved me to gotake this call and they put me

(26:49):
in a holding cell with somebodyhad used their prison underwear
as toilet paper because therewasn't any toilet paper in there
and it was sitting there and itwas just completely filthy cell
.
I found a little spot for me tosit and I'm sitting there
forever six hours.
They just left me sitting inthe cell.
I missed the legal call, missedeverything.
Probation was on the phone,attorney's on the phone.
They're asking him to come getme.

(27:10):
We'll go get him.
Finally the guy comes to get meand he goes to take me back to
the other jail and I'm like, hey, I never had my call and I have
no access to.
I have no time.
For all I know, I've been here45 minutes.
Right, there's no clocks,guards aren't asking, telling
you what time it is, I don'tknow.
Six hours, 45 minutes.
You sit in a dank cell and tellme if you can calculate time.
You know, you know time justbecomes like are the lights on

(27:34):
or not?
Am I tired to sleep or not,like?
So I'm sitting there six hours.
Honestly, you could have toldme it was 45 minutes and I just
been like I was a slow 45 sixhours.
In the meantime guy across theway from me, we're yelling at
each other through our glasswalls like, hey, you know where
are you from, I'm from here, dc.
I'm getting home.
And he wasn't wearing oranges,he's wearing grays.

(27:55):
It's like what are you, whatare you doing wearing grays?
Like I'm going home today?
Oh, yeah, you're going home.
Yeah, I'm just waiting for himto take me out, get my stuff and
family's in the parking lot.
You're gonna pick me up.
Oh, that's awesome, man, whereyou been?
I've been in beaumont for fiveyears.
Okay, this is dc.
Every everybody there.
They go into the federal system, right.
So he he dc resident, dc crimewent to beaumont, texas, to
serve his time.

(28:16):
It's like oh, and he's like,yeah, I got five more years of
probation.
Oh, it's five and five.
Okay.
So do you mind if I ask likewhat that would?
Would what put you down?
And he's like murder.
I was like five years formurder, like what?
And you're going home today?
Yeah, it's been a long time.
I got seven years of like maybeit was like negligent, like

(28:42):
third degree felonious mopery,you know negligent, something
like probably not, it's probablycarjacking.
You know, it's just light lighton crime, jeez, so big balls.
The doge member got got beat upand he was trying to prevent a
woman from being assaulted andthat was the last straw.
The president has had enough,so yesterday he declared it

(29:02):
liberationation Day for DC.

Speaker 10 (29:03):
I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our
nation's capital from crime,bloodshed, bedlam and squalor
and worse.
This is Liberation Day in DCand we're going to take our
capital back.
We're taking it back Under theauthorities vested in me as the

(29:24):
president of the United States.
I'm officially invoking Section740 of the District of Columbia
Home Rule Act you know whatthat is and placing the DC
Metropolitan Police Departmentunder direct federal control,
and you'll be meeting the peoplethat will be directly involved
with that.
Very good people, but they'retough and they know what's

(29:49):
happening and they've done itbefore.
In addition, I'm deploying theNational Guard to help
reestablish law order of publicsafety in Washington DC, and
they're going to be allowed todo their job properly.
I'm announcing a historicaction to going to be allowed to
do their job properly.

Speaker 6 (30:06):
I'm announcing a historic action to.
So he has now taken over the dcpolice department, exercising,
I think, what they call homerule or something like that.
And uh, this is thejustification for it.
It's pretty simple somefather's wisdom city.

Speaker 10 (30:21):
you know, my father always used to tell me I had a
wonderful father, very smart,and he used to say son, when you
walk into a restaurant and yousee a dirty front door, don't go
in, because if the front dooris dirty, the kitchen is dirty
also, same thing with thecapital.
If our capital's dirty, ourwhole country is dirty and they

(30:45):
don't respect us.
So it's a very good questionactually simple stuff, right,
simple stuff.

Speaker 6 (30:55):
I think it's pretty good.
I didn't spend any time on theeast coast growing up.
I'm a clearly a child of theinner mountain west and the
pacificountain West and thePacific Northwest specifically,
and out here it's all about.
You know, you look around andyou just see space.
The views are grand and there'sbig mountains in the background
with snow-capped hills.
You've got the ocean.
The mountains come down andtouch the ocean.

Speaker 9 (31:16):
Tree-covered foothills.

Speaker 6 (31:18):
Tree-covered foothills.
You drive further into theIntermountain West and you just
see vast landscapes of openness.
You see plains and vistas as youdrive across the interstate
that could house a millionpeople and there's not even a
cedar tree.
You know, I mean just space.
You drive for hours betweencities.
So much opportunity, so muchresource, so much room to grow.

(31:39):
There's no shortage of sunlightto grow food or to raise cattle
Like's just no lack of nothing.
You go over to the east coastit's crammed in.
Dc to new york is a sea ofpeople.
There's hardly a scrap ofground that hasn't been built on
and demolished and built onfive times.
You've got segregatedneighborhoods.
You have this weird bifurcatedsociety.

(32:01):
Because people can't create andmake things there, you have to
just kind of manipulate theexisting, and the existing is
owned by somebody.

Speaker 9 (32:09):
The first ghetto I ever saw was in Pennsylvania.

Speaker 6 (32:12):
Yeah, I was blown away.
In fact I got to be honest Iwas a little bit discouraged
about the shape of America.
Spending the small amount oftime I did on the East Coast,
spending the small amount oftime I did on the East coast
just just commuting from NewYork to DC and doing that
stretch a couple of times andkind of getting to see
Philadelphia, newark and, youknow, baltimore and spend a
little time driving around allthat kind of stuff Not cool, not

(32:36):
cool.
You drive South right and youget down to, like some of the
open space in Virginia and youget down by Monticello Gorgeous,
beautiful, reminds me of theWest.

Speaker 9 (32:44):
Little breathing room little breathing room.

Speaker 6 (32:45):
But that chunk of I don't know 30, 40 million people
that all live in a three hourstretch, get out of there.
You're ruining it for the restof us.
You're trampling the grass.
Gets it, you know.
Stop walking on the same trails, man.
You're making it hard forpeople to get off trail.
I understand you.

(33:06):
Over there it's like yeah, anelectric car 300 miles.
Who drives 300 miles?
You know how many Walmarts youdrive past with 300 miles?
Out here you're like one.
You drive by one If you'relucky.
If you're lucky.
Where's the nearest Costco fromthis Costco?
900 miles?
Five tanks of gas, not one.

(33:28):
Not like I've never.
It always blows my mind outhere people who are like oh,
electric cars, I'm like dude, Idrive 120 miles to work one way.
I'm 240 miles a day.

Speaker 9 (33:35):
You think I'm gonna get an electric charge on that
it's funny that you mentionedcostco, because anytime that I
consider moving to a, I alwayslook for how far away is the
nearest Costco and it alwayskills the deal.

Speaker 6 (33:50):
It's so funny because we're 20 minutes away from
Walmart.
That's pretty far actually.
Most of the world is fiveminutes away from Walmart.
We're 20 minutes away from milkand we don't even really think
we're really in the country.
Necessarily, right, it is vastin the West for the listeners in
the West.
You're like, probably neverthought about it.

(34:11):
It's just the way it is.
If you're one of thoselisteners that we have over on
the East Coast, you know exactlywhat I'm talking about.
Just this last week I went intodowntown Seattle or last Friday
.
I just have no love for it.
It's just dirty and there's notthe right kind of energy for me
there.

Speaker 9 (34:30):
Yeah, that's kind of funny that you say that.
I think we're very similar inthis vein, because I don't want
to go anywhere east of theMississippi, really.
Yeah, it's just not interestingto me.
Yeah, it's the other thing Iwas just thinking about.
I have no data to back this up,but I'm guessing that people on
the East Coast spend way moretime in their car.

(34:50):
But people on the West Coast goway farther.

Speaker 6 (34:53):
Oh yeah, oh yeah, way more mileage On the West Coast.
The car dealerships like to goto the East Coast to buy cars
from the auction because at90,000 miles they're beat to
crap.
They've been in stop and gotraffic falling apart 90 000
miles on a car that's like abrand new car.
It's like, dude, you just brokeit in.

(35:13):
Yeah, you know, like you justgot the heat seal off.

Speaker 9 (35:14):
You know, we don't even have to clean out the cup
holders I've gone 55 60 000miles in a year.

Speaker 6 (35:20):
You know I'm driving a diesel truck right now with
300 000 miles on it.
I got 200 000 miles to go forthe next oil change, you know
yeah when you're putting highwaymiles on everywhere you go.
But yeah, go to the east coast.

Speaker 9 (35:30):
It's stop and go, stop and go stop yeah, and some
of the turnpikes, oh my gosh,they'll shake your car apart.
You know, you guys know whatI'm talking about.
And then they're like pay it.
It's like what?

Speaker 6 (35:44):
Pay for what?
Dude my shocks?
I need new struts after thisyeah.
All right.
So CNN reacted to Donald Trumpinvoking a home rule, and you
can imagine how they and it justas we go to break.

Speaker 15 (35:58):
I should note that the most violent moment in
recent history in DC was January6th and it was an attack on the
United States Capitol by a lotof people who were doing it in
the name of Donald Trump, and itincluded the people who were
hurt, included members of lawenforcement.

Speaker 6 (36:16):
And it just as we go to.
That was very matter of fact.
So the crazy thing about this.
Julie Kelly does this thing.
There's no evidence that 170cops were injured 170 cops yeah,
they say 170 cops were injured.
She says there's no, there's noevidence.
I've never even heard thatbefore.
Yeah, it's like 170 cops gotinjured.

Speaker 9 (36:34):
It's like there's no evidence of all I've ever heard
was well, there was a guy thatgot smashed with a, you know a
fire extinguisher or somethinglike that, but they, they didn't
, and that actually didn'thappen.

Speaker 6 (36:43):
Yeah, exactly so in my case, they made this big deal
where you hurt.
Yeah, I got hit in my leg and Ithought maybe I'd broken my leg
, did you?
Did you return to duty?
Yeah, like one minute later.
Okay, did you seek medicalattention?

Speaker 9 (36:57):
No, no, it was all cool, bro.

Speaker 6 (36:59):
You thought you might have broken your leg for 15
seconds.
That initial smack oh, I'm good, okay, yeah, exactly.
Did you return to duty?
Yeah, okay, serious injuries,all right.
So Hillary Clinton posted thistoday because she's a great
follow on X if you're notfollowing her.

(37:20):
Violent crime in DC here it's 30year low and this is from
January 3rd 2025.
So you know, just got to makesure right out the door.
Washington total violent crimein 2024 in the District of
Columbia is down 35% from 2023.
And it's and is the lowest ithas been in over 30 years,
according to data collected bythe Metropolitan Police
Department and announced by theUnited States Attorney, matthew
Graves.
By the way, I have in dishonorand he owes me something.

(37:43):
A breakdown of the data isavailable In addition to overall
violent crime reductionhomicides are down 32 percent.
Robberies are down 39 percent.
Armed carjackings are down 53percent.
Assault and dangerous weaponsare down 27 percent when cops
compared with 2023 levels andwith district reporting the
fewest assaults in dangerousweapons and burglaries in over
30 years.
You know, reductions in crimelike that are only possible with

(38:09):
deep cuts to staff, just likeBoise.
Yeah, you can only achieve a35% drop by eliminating the law
enforcement that would bedealing with that.
It's almost unbelievable thatlevel of drop in crime, unless
you can correlate it with somecampaign or something.
And guess what?
Nothing they've been doingwould lead to a drop in crime,

(38:31):
except for handcuffing theirstaff, clearly.
So Hillary wants to juxtaposethat again Narrative over facts,
cpi over reality.
Ok, food pyramid over commonsense.
Washington dc trump said we'llbe liberated today.
Crime, savagery, filth and scumwill disappear.
I will make our capital greatagain.

(38:52):
The day of ruthlessly killingor hurting innocent people are
over.
I quickly fixed the border zeroillegals in the last three
months.
Dc is next.
Thank you for all the attentionyour attention to this matter.
President donald j trump.
One of the scary things aboutdictators and tyrants is when
what they do works.
Yeah.
Because then you want more of itBecause you want more of it.
Yes, kelly, down in El Salvadoris a dictator Now.

(39:15):
Maybe he's a benevolentdictator, maybe he's one of
those wise philosopher kingsAristotle was pitching us on
Right but he's been absolutelydictatorial and, by the way,
just passed a law where now hecan be president for life.
So, dictators are going todictator.
The people want more of it.
Keep giving me more of it.
Hit me harder, daddy.
So you know, we'll see how thisreally goes in 2028.

(39:37):
If Trump files to run again,we'll see.
If he, if he, goes to repealthat amendment, then you know,
dictators be dictatoring.
I'm just kidding, but it is oneof those things, right, violent
crime.
It's machiavellian.
Here's a problem, here's asolution.
I think that our current deepstate just thought that they'd
get to provide the solutioninstead of donald trump yeah but

(40:01):
it was setting up for that.
So, uh, this was a.
This is from clandestine, andclandestine says hear me out.
Now keep in mind, this accountis one of those accounts that's
worth following.
It's one of those accounts thatconsistently and reliably calls
his shots consistently.
Okay, I think it's clandestine,because either a it's a deep

(40:23):
researcher or could be somebodythat's got some clandestine
thoughts.
There was a January 6th uhprisoner that I roomed next to.
His name was Matt Great guy.
He was in military intelligence, worked at the CIA, nsa,
alongside Snowden for a periodof time and his he and I, when
we would go on walks in the gym,had great discussions and he
would tell me kind of howintelligence works and how it

(40:47):
operates and how it's.
You know, it's a different wayof thinking.
We peasants don't oftentimes.
We don't have God complexesright.
We're not trying to manipulatethe world around us, we're just
trying to be in it, just survive.
You know circadic rhythm orjust season to season, day to
day.
But they're not like that atall.
They have long-term plans.
They'll build someone up justto rip them down to create

(41:09):
leverage.
Oh, you don't want to get ridof this lifestyle Now?
It's time to stop reporting thenews and start reporting the
narrative right.
By the way, we've got those adreads coming up here pretty soon
.
I'm just kidding.
So this is what clandestinesays.
Hear me out.
The trump administration, thetrump admin, released a series

(41:29):
of documents showinginconvertible evidence that the
obama regime, the intelligencecommunity, the mainstream media
and the, the democrat nationalconvention, etc.
Are still engaging in a coup tooverthrow trump absolutely.
And now the us military isbeing deployed to dc and
potentially other cities toquell crime and violence in
these democratic run strongholds.
And all of this is happeningwhile grand juries are being

(41:53):
impaneled for the russiagateconspiracy and while trump and
his admin have been warning usthat accountability is coming
for this treasonous all.
While the trump admin and hisall.
While trump and his admin havebeen warning us that
accountability is coming forthis treasonous all.
While the trump admin and hisall, while trump and his admin
have been warning us thataccountability is coming for
this treasonous plot.
This sounds very similar to howlincoln used the insurrection
act in the civil war to addressthe succession of the south,

(42:14):
restore federal order, quelluprisings and the eventual
suspension of habeas corpus andmilitary arrests.
Based on the documents shown bytul Tulsi and us witnessing in
the last 10 years of the Trumpwitch hunt.
Is it wrong to suggest that weare sort of in a quasi-cold
civil war?
Is it wrong to suggest theDems' coup against Trump meets
the criteria of an actualinsurrection?

(42:35):
I think there is much moregoing on than meets the eye.
Trump is preparing forsomething very big, I think.
Technically, we're at war withthe domestic threat.
We are at war with the quoteenemy from within, which is what
trump has said many more, many,many times.
Interesting, interesting.
Meanwhile, the irs has beenbrought under the treasury and

(42:57):
the epstein story is quietlystarting to not make waves I?

Speaker 17 (43:03):
I would say that this is, from at least a
political point of view, quicklyturning into a dud of a story.
What am I talking about here?
Which is wild.
Which is wild?
Where this has been for threeweeks Exactly.
Take a look here Googlesearches for Epstein, down 89%
versus just three weeks ago.
Falling through the floor, itis no longer the top term

(43:24):
searched alongside DonaldTrump's name.
That's been trading off betweenTaros and Vladimir Putin, with,
obviously, the meeting comingup later this week, but at this
particular point, the Americanpeople's interest in this story.
It's quickly becoming somethingof a nothing burger.

Speaker 5 (43:37):
So out of sight, out of mind maybe is applying here a
little bit but has it impacted?
Have you seen numbers that haveimpacted?

Speaker 17 (43:46):
this has impacted Trump's popularity favorability
Anything?
No, not really.
I mean.
Take a look here.
Let's take a look at theoverall numbers.
Trump's approval rating in Julyof 2025, it was 45 percent.
It's still well within thatmargin of error here at 44
percent, and you compare that towhere he was in his first term.
At this point he was at 37percent.
So he's seven points higher,very much in a different
political universe now.
Significantly higher in termsof his overall approval rating

(44:07):
than he was at this point in hisfirst term, and more than that,
among Republicans his approvalrating is near a record high,
hovering right at about that 90percent mark.
So, no, he hasn't lost any ofthat base and when it comes to
that center of the electorate,he's basically holding on there
and his overall approval rating44 percent is pretty gosh darn
good for him, considering wherehe was at this point in term.

Speaker 5 (44:27):
Number one what do you think is behind it?
Why there hasn't been moremovement?

Speaker 17 (44:32):
Yeah.
Why hasn't there been moremovement?
I think this is pretty simple.
Take a look here.
Nation's top issue is theEpstein case.
This is the number ofrespondents.
This isn't the percentage ofrespondents.
This is the number ofrespondents In our last CNN poll
look at this.
Zero respondents said that theEpstein case was the top issue.
How about among independents?
Zero independents said that,and among Republicans, and
therefore overall, just a singleone.

(44:54):
So, yes, there used to be a lotof interest in this story, but
the bottom line is that, evenamongst those who had high
interest in this story, itwasn't something that they
thought was all that importantand, as I said at the beginning,
the interest in this story hasfallen off the table.

Speaker 5 (45:11):
Which, also, when you look at this and you compare it
to just the attention thatCapitol Hill was giving it,
donald Trump supporters weregiving it, congressional
committees were giving it, it isincongruous.

Speaker 17 (45:16):
I would just say this Donald Trump has some of
the best political instincts ofany politician I've seen on this
particular issue.
You see it full well and clearbecause he has been saying you
know, this is not an issue andit turns out that a lot of the
american public actually seem toagree with him if you dream it,
it will become john you wish,if you dreamed of her become.

Speaker 6 (45:37):
Here's the problem that I got big dreams lady
here's the problem that theyhave they've lost their
effectiveness.
So the media can epstein,epstein, epstein, and they're
talking to this.
What cohen said I have amillion followers, you have a
million followers, and they'rethe same million.

Speaker 9 (45:52):
He has 77 million, right, totally different people
I would also uh say that there'ssome attrition here, because
people get tired of looking forinformation that doesn't exist
well, and the democrats?

Speaker 6 (46:06):
haven't been able to like provide on their end, like
where are the arrests happening?
When is trump going to jail?
And he didn't.
He became president, so they'rekind of you know it doesn't
matter like everybody's blackpilled on everything.
At this point, pick your team,the one that's going to do most
of the stuff you want, andyou're going to go with it and
Trump provides.
Like what Frank Luntz said Ifyou voted for Donald Trump,

(46:30):
you're getting everything youvoted for.
And he rattled off a whole listof things, and the Epstein
things becomes kind of aminutiae in the story.
It's kind of part of the largerstory, but it's not a deal
killer, because have you seenwhat they've been doing with
tariffs recently, have?
It's not a deal killer becausehave you seen what they've been
doing with tariffs recently?
Have you seen that the borderhas been locked down?
Have you noticed that there'sblack kids mowing lawns and
washing cars instead of theHispanic crews that used to be

(46:50):
out there?

Speaker 9 (46:51):
Yeah, I like all that , but have you noticed how the
roads are safer.

Speaker 6 (46:53):
They're like the drivers.

Speaker 9 (46:55):
I want some questions answered on the Epstein files
too.
Yeah, I do too.
I'm just like a typicalAmerican.
I I'm just like a typicalAmerican.
I want everything.
I want everything right now?

Speaker 6 (47:03):
Yeah, of course we do .
Now here's the thing themainstream media did it to
themselves by canceling people,by reporting on lies, by telling
us not to believe our lyingeyes.
And we're coming outside andit's like the sky is purple,
we're like it's clearly blue.
You know, Adam Schiff istotally credible, Are you sure?

Speaker 9 (47:21):
about that.
I mean, here's what I'm tryingto say when Americans we want
everything but we can't look ateverything all the time and give
all of our attention toeverything, so with limited
attention to give, eventuallystories like the Epstein get
less attention just becausethere's attention is being
diverted elsewhere, and so thenthese guys turn around report on

(47:43):
it as if nobody cares aboutanymore.
No, that's not.
That's not true.

Speaker 6 (47:48):
We still care about what happened on epstein island
we just don't care what you haveto say about it anymore I guess
, I think that's what it is.
the vast majority of maga hasbeen completely gotten
completely comfortable gettingtheir news independently,
totally comfortable gettingtheir news independently,
totally comfortable gettingtheir news independently.
So we no longer care what MAGAhas to say.

(48:09):
I don't really care whatAnderson Cooper has to say about
any given topic.
If anything, you're justconfirming that it's risen to
your attention level ofawareness.
We've been aware of thingsgoing on that you won't talk
about.
You know, like vaccine injuriesand autism epidemics, and the
food pyramid caused obesity tobe rampant among what would
normally be a healthy population, exactly, and so we just have

(48:30):
stopped caring.
And the people that do say thethings, not just that we want to
hear, but become validated overtime by reporting the truth and
being canceled, you make themfamous.

Speaker 9 (48:41):
And see, here's the deal is these news cycles.
They push these stories off theback end like they don't exist
anymore.
We'll never hear about Epsteinever again after this,
apparently Well, I don't wantthat to happen to all these
other topics either.
I want to continue to talkabout election integrity.

(49:01):
I want to continue to talkabout vaccine injuries I want to
continue to talk aboutvaccination schedules.
I want to continue to talk aboutthe food pyramid.
I want to continue to talkabout all of these issues until
they're resolved.
Until they're resolved, yeah,so, uh, not just well, looks
like amer Americans don't careabout this topic anymore.

Speaker 6 (49:23):
Next On the election.
Let me run this for comparison.
You've got MSNBC, cnn, fox News, cbs, abc, nbc.
I already said MSNBC.
Those are your newsbroadcasters and they have a
large audience.
You know ABC Nightly News isbroadcasting to like 30 million
people.
Cnn is running, you know, halfa million to a million people,

(49:44):
prime time-ish numbers.
I mean, these are.
Those are big numbers,especially if you're an
advertiser, you want access to amillion people and stuff like
that.
But these are dwarfed.
These are dwarfed by peoplelike alex jones, art bell, megan
kelly, dan bongino when he hadhis show war room.
They're doing bigger numbers.
Here's megan kelly talking abouther numbers and what she's able

(50:06):
to do.
And, by the way, she came fromthat world of narrative pushing.
Remember, she's the one whotried to take Donald Trump by
being you're mean to women andTrump came back only to Rosie on
Donald.
She's the one who went over toMSNBC after being at Fox News
just to be run out because shemade a comment about when she
was a kid.
She was in blackface and itwasn't that big of a deal.
And now, oh my gosh, you got toapologize and then the apology

(50:28):
didn't stick.
She got run out.

Speaker 4 (50:30):
Well, MSNBC's loss, I'm going to put that in the

(51:29):
chat?

Speaker 6 (51:29):
No, so one woman with one show is beating their
entire network streaming ratings.
What are we doing?
Wrong, wrong.
I think we need five moreproducers.
We should be making till theremake it till you make it, isn't
it?
That's?
That's the problem.
I don't have enough producersif I had more producers, clearly

(51:52):
I could do what?
no, no, no I mean, I'm just aspretty right like I could get
there.
I get some stylists to come inand figure out what works best,
get the right glass frames andstuff.
No, seriously though, massiveamounts of influence.
With the opening of the show,the revolution will be
podcasting.
Cnn can't make the epsteinstick.
You know why?
Because megan kelly moved on,because alex jones called it a

(52:13):
hoax.
Because that's why they can'tmake it stick.
Five, six years ago they couldrun with weapons of mass
destruction for a decade.
Ain't no one gonna them?
They can't get a platform right.
Look how hard Glenn Grinwaldand WikiLeaks, julian Assange,
the efforts they had to go topublish things on some obscure
website that nobody would cover.
Today they'd have a podcast.

(52:33):
Today they'd have a hugepodcast and they'd be doing the
rounds with John Solomon and DanBongino talking about the DNC
act right, but back then itwasn't that way.
Things about the dnc act right,but back then it wasn't, wasn't
that way.
Things are changing and it'sgoing to change even more.
The days of the 155 100 millionpeople in one, one show
audience.
That's a first commerceadvantage.
That's a something there.

(52:53):
There's more to it now.
The future will be podcastaudiences with a thousand
dedicated listeners.
Yeah right, it'll be a bite,it'll be it'll be local it'll be
localized, it'll be, uh, nicheoriented people who want to hear
my perspective, the peasantsperspective, on things.
It won't just be generalized asmuch.
So as time goes on those shows,they'll still be huge because

(53:15):
there'll be like anchor shows.
But you know, if we were reallydoing it right, we'd be
reporting on you on Megan Kellyclips, because she's making the
news every bit as much as CNN is.
She's definitely interpretingit for people Pray.
The rosary daily said that she,she goes, I love this guy.
And then I said are you talkingabout me?
She goes, henry, on CNN frownyface.

(53:36):
And she said I don't know if Itrust her.
She's talking about me andKelly.
Now, she just tried to takeTrump down during the debate
with the Rosie thing.
Now.
Now she's a Trump fan.
Yeah, she's a Trump fan and shehas openly said because he's
the best, you know, better thanBiden, better than what we got.
There's a lot of people andagain, this rhino right and it's
problem here in the local GOPWell, we don't like everything.
Trump say stop saying that.

(53:57):
Stop, we, we're not hedging ourbets here, we're all in.
He's the president Like getover here, son.
We don't like everything.
He says yes, we do, yes, we do.
This is the party here.
There's no independent.
This is the party line.
These are the people that arewilling to tow the party line.
You might be at the wrong party.

(54:17):
Yeah, you're in the wrong party.
Yeah, that's what Ro Khannasays.
I don't like everything Trumpsays, but he's got some good
populist policies.
Stop acting like the Democrats.
He's a hard guy.
Ok, so let's go a little back intime here.
This is Andrew McCabe talkingto Morning Joe and Mika the most
interesting marriage on TV andhe's discussing his book and how

(54:41):
the threat, how the FBIprotects America in the age of
terror and Trump.
So this is a little longer clip.
I'm sure we'll stop and talk afew times, but again we are in
the zone of accountability.
Let's flash back and remindourselves everything that has
been said up till now.
The bold face lies coming outof these people's mouths.

(55:01):
Now for those that are over onthe audio side of the podcast,
we've been uploading old seasonone episodes.
Every day, at 6 am, a newseason one episode loads up.
I very much appreciate thelisteners that are listening to
that.
They're doing double duty overthere.
They're getting an hour and ahalf of this and then they're
getting an hour of whateversomething from 2020, 2021.

(55:21):
So it's kind of fun, but it'sinteresting because it's as I'm
watching the episodes come out.
I'm like we will play clipsuh-huh almost four years.
I mean, this is a 2019 clip.
Right, we probably played thisbefore on the show.
We're seeing the names the samenames.
They're in the hot seat.
They're being grilled by thehouse.
We got this little tidbit ofinformation.

(55:42):
It puts the story together.
So now in, I'm telling you.
There might be a thing here orthere that we were getting wrong
, or maybe the narrative wasincorrect, but we were trending
in the right direction.
We were way out ahead of thisthing, I mean the only guys that
were farther ahead of us on itwere guys breaking news Bongino,
solomon, the guys that wereactually breaking the news.

(56:02):
We were, as far as analysisgoes, we nailed it.

Speaker 9 (56:06):
We were definitely on target.

Speaker 6 (56:12):
And if you go listen to some of the episodes, I'm
pretty much prophesying that ifthings keep going the way they
go, people like me are going toend up in prison.
You cash the checks.
You're right, folks.

Speaker 20 (56:22):
So all right, Andrew McCain, Not only the FBI and
you had concerns about DonaldTrump's ties to Russia, but that
you were investigating him.

Speaker 22 (56:31):
What can you tell us about that?
That's right, so you know, animportant part of that very
dramatic step of initiatinginvestigation, certainly getting
that recommendation from myteam considering it very closely
, approving it for the reasonsthat I've detailed, my team
considering it very closely,approving it for the reasons
that I've detailed.
And we had observable,observable facts that indicated
that a threat to nationalsecurity may exist, that a crime
may have been committed.
You were specific.

Speaker 20 (56:52):
We are investigating the president of the United
States because we are concernedthat there may be something,
something amiss regarding hisrelationship with Russia.
I was perfectly clear of that.

Speaker 6 (57:07):
I want you to pay attention to this because,
ultimately, andrew McCabe isgoing to talk about obstruction
of justice, but keep in mindwhat we know about the dossier,
the predicate of theinvestigation, everything like
this of the investigation oreverything like this, and what
they ultimately came to was theycan continue the entire
investigation because Trumpappeared to be obstructing their

(57:27):
investigation into it, whichequated to obstruction of
justice.
Perfectly clear to that point.

Speaker 22 (57:33):
The basis upon which we made that decision was
perfectly clear.
We were in possession of factsthat made it abundantly clear
that we had an articulable basisto believe that that threat
might exist and under thosecircumstances, the FBI is
obligated to open a case.
If we don't open a case becausethe subject happens to be the
president of the United States,we're not doing our job.

(57:53):
Can you tell?

Speaker 23 (57:54):
us what the facts were that led you to believe
that there should be aninvestigation?

Speaker 22 (57:58):
I can tell you, sure .
So some of those things thatwe're adding to that conclusion
were the very first mark.
The president had made itperfectly clear publicly, as you
said, joe, that he did not likewhat we were doing.
He'd been undermining the case,referring to it as a hoax, just
constantly communicatingthrough his Twitter feed that he
was not happy with theinvestigation we were pursuing.

(58:20):
He was aware of our concernsabout Russian involvement in not
just Russian involvement in theelection, but Russian support
to what we and the intelligencecommunity confidently believe
was support to his campaign,particularly when we briefed him
on the intelligence communityassessment that took place on
January 6th.
So was that for he was actuallyinaugurated?

(58:41):
I was confident, in May of 2017, that we had ample facts to
indicate that the president mayhave committed obstruction of
justice.

Speaker 6 (58:51):
That's the so by 2017 , trump's been shook down by
Comey.
Knows he didn't collude withRussia.
Knows everything was a hoaxcollude with russia.
Knows everything was a hoax.
And when he fired comey hadpeople running for the hills and
mccabe is sitting there goingby.
By that point we've pretty muchdetermined that, based on trump
trying to call off this nonsenseinvestigation, he's now

(59:13):
obstructing justice and that'senough.
Yeah, so a falsely predicatedinvestigation into the president
of the united states, as if thedoj is some sovereign entity
right with sovereignprosecutorial powers, is
investigating their own boss fornon-crimes of which they're
aware, they are aware arenon-existent, non-existent, but

(59:35):
trump's obstructing because he'snot happy with us.
So you know, that's a got tosmile.
Put on a smiley face.

Speaker 9 (59:42):
You know this is gaslighting America, for sure,
but it is the weakest thread,look how serious he is about it.

Speaker 22 (59:50):
We just decide when and what we investigate and we
do it not based on politics, notbecause we like the guy or we
don't like the guy, we thinkthis case would be interesting
or fun.
We do it because the facts wehave at the time and at that
time it was abundantly clear tome that we had enough facts to
indicate that that crime mayhave been committed does that
mean?

Speaker 16 (01:00:09):
you leave open the possibility that the president
united states was takingdirection from russia.
Absolutely what's your?

Speaker 6 (01:00:18):
so because he wants to get rid of the bullshit crime
or bullshit investigation.
And he's.
You're now deeming it asobstruction because you're
preventing you from executingyour insurance policy plan,
which is what you called it.
We have the text messages hey,you called it an insurance

(01:00:39):
policy because he's obstructingyou from cashing the insurance
policy check.
You're now like, oh, he'sguilty of obstruction and, ipso
de facto, is also a stooge forRussia.
You're a stooge for Russia.
As was said many times, Putincouldn't have got a better bang
for his buck if he'd have setthe whole KGB over here.

(01:01:00):
I mean just the illusion ofinterfering.
He's gotten so much street credfrom interfering in the
American election and he hadnothing to do with it.

Speaker 9 (01:01:10):
He didn't have to do a thing.

Speaker 16 (01:01:11):
He didn't have to do a thing.
Explanation for why PresidentTrump has seemed again and again
and again to lean toward theRussians to defend Vladimir
Putin in cases when no one elsewould.

Speaker 22 (01:01:23):
I wish I could explain that for you this
morning.
Right, that's something that Ithink anyone either involved in
this investigation or simplywatching the results of what
Director Mueller is doing, sitsback and scratches her head over
day to day.
The facts are, it doesn't takea surreptitious recording, it
doesn't take extremeinvestigative techniques.

(01:01:46):
All you have to do is watch thepresident, watch what he does,
listen to what he says, and youcan't help but escape those
questions.
We were grappling with theissue of what to do about a
president who you think may havecommitted a federal crime and
might present a nationalsecurity risk.

Speaker 6 (01:02:01):
A federal crime you set him up for.

Speaker 16 (01:02:10):
You created an obstruction trap.
This is not easy stuff.
Stop there.
What is the national securityrisk?
You believe the president posed.

Speaker 22 (01:02:13):
That relates to the counterintelligence case.
Right, we felt like if thepresident has obstructed justice
for the purpose of negativelyimpacting our ability to
investigate Russian interferencewith the campaign and Russian
potential connections with hisown campaign effort, why would
any president do that?
Why would a president not wantthe FBI to understand exactly

(01:02:36):
what the Russians have been upto in our political process?
I know how I served.
I know that I serve thiscountry honestly and with
integrity.
That is what I've tried torepresent in this book.

Speaker 6 (01:02:47):
I don't wait how do you feel about that, ron?

Speaker 9 (01:02:50):
well, I'll tell you so.
He talks just like a directorand also just like a con man.
I mean, he's a confidence manall the way, oh yeah, and he's
never been in the field either.

Speaker 6 (01:03:03):
He's always been a br , mean, he's a confidence man
all the way, oh yeah, and he'snever been in the field either.
He's always been a briefer.
He's always been the guy thatgoes and gives the briefing and
gets the head for it.
Dude, and his wife was takingmoney from Hillary Clinton, by
the way she was running foroffice.
So you know, I mean like no bigdeal there, but you know
Trump's obstructing in ourinvestigation into Russia's

(01:03:23):
meddling into his own campaign,which he knows is a complete,
the whole thing is so hard towatch.
It is so hard to watch.
They paid him a million dollars, man.
They paid him a million dollarsbecause he got fired early.
He got fired for.
Why is Trump upset?
Why would you want it?
Because you leaked to the mediathat this investigation is

(01:03:44):
happening.
If you just did it and came tome with a report and said
Papadopoulos and Manafortcolluded with Russians, great,
lock them up.

Speaker 21 (01:03:51):
You know what I mean .

Speaker 6 (01:03:52):
Like I got nothing to do with them, but instead they
wanted to tarnish him with it.
They obstructed his entirepresidency.
Have we considered otherpresidents that might have been
obstructed?
You know what I mean?
Like who really runs this place?
This was, uh, our favorite treygowdy, who I've already
expressed as being essentially acomplete wimp.

(01:04:16):
Not saying he's not tough in aas a prosecutor when he's got
the the you know vesture ofauthority or whatever, but he's
a wimp.
He had these guys in theircrosshairs and he backed off and
it's my opinion, because onceyou go to the doj, you never
leave the doj department of justus.
But he did get some stuff onthe record and revealed, which
again just goes to show how weakhe was for not capitalizing on

(01:04:38):
it, and even more again how weakhe is when just last week he's
like we should just name andshame him and let it go.
Really, you weren't soundingthat way a couple of years ago.

Speaker 7 (01:04:49):
Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the
Steele dossier?
I don't.
I don't?

Speaker 6 (01:04:58):
I don't.
You briefed Barack Obama on it.
We have your notes, we know youwent to Barackack obama and
said hillary clinton is doingthis thing, she's got russian
disinfo and she's going to tryto smear trump with it.
And then brock went hmm, that'sinteresting.
And then a few days later hegoes hey, what if we actually
made that real?
So it was a still dossierincluded, did you?

(01:05:21):
No, bold faced lie?
Bold faced lie right there.
I don't know how anybody cansay it's not.
What is going on with my I?

Speaker 7 (01:05:31):
don't know.
So, Director Brennan, do youknow who commissioned the Steele
dossier?
I don't.
Do you know if the FBI paid forany portion of the Steele
dossier?

Speaker 1 (01:05:47):
I don't know.
I know that there are pressreports related to that, but I
don't know.
I have no first-hand knowledgeof that.

Speaker 7 (01:05:54):
Do you know whether any of the underlying
allegations made in the Steeledossier were ever tested, probed
, examined, cross-examined,whether the sources were
examined for reliability,credibility?

Speaker 1 (01:06:09):
I know that there were efforts made by the Bureau
to try to understand whether ornot any of the information in
that was valid, but I just don'thave any firsthand knowledge of
it.

Speaker 7 (01:06:22):
Do you know if the Bureau ever relied on the Steele
dossier as part of any courtfilings applications, petitions,
pleadings?
I have no awareness.
Did the CIA rely on it?
No, why not?

Speaker 1 (01:06:40):
Because we didn't.
It wasn't part of the corpus ofintelligence, uh information
that we had.

Speaker 6 (01:06:47):
It was not in any later he went to describe as it
was part of a mosaic ofintelligence.
So it wasn't part of the corpus, but it was part of the mosaic.
So if you can parse throughthat language, what?
What is the deal?
I?

Speaker 1 (01:07:00):
don't know they used as a basis for the intelligence
community assessment that wasdone.
Uh, it was.

Speaker 7 (01:07:07):
It was not so, director brennan, do you know
who commissioned?

Speaker 6 (01:07:12):
basically he's just lying every pretty.
I mean, I'm no expert onperjury and I hate to be one
passing stones, but I feel likeevery answer was perjurous,
which is again really surprising.
Why trey gowdy would be like ah,whatever yeah I'd be,
personally offended I'd be,personally offended, okay, so
john solomon was on with hannityyesterday because we had some

(01:07:32):
breaking news and I'm going toshow you this here in a moment
what it is that we got on theleak out or what it is we got
from chuck grassley's officeabout adam's chef.
So let's hear John Solomondescribe it and then I'll show
you the documents.

Speaker 18 (01:07:46):
This is a big story and this is a Democratic
whistleblower, and there mightbe other Democrats implicated as
well, like Kinzinger yeah, well, uh, one of the guys that's in
here uh is eric swalwell.

Speaker 14 (01:07:59):
Now, that is secondhand information from the
whistleblower, but thewhistleblower actually attended
a meeting with adam ship andcorrected ranking member.

Speaker 18 (01:08:08):
Yeah, yeah, I stand corrected it was uh they both
hate trump, so I kind of mixthem up let them talk.

Speaker 14 (01:08:15):
Hey, sean, yeah, they're all merged together
these days.
Listen, this whistleblowerliterally sat in a meeting.
He says he tells the FBI whereAdam Schiff authorized the
leaking of classified secrets todirty up Donald Trump and to
try to build towards either aselect committee in Congress or
a special prosecutor.
This whistleblower was a careerintelligence officer.

(01:08:38):
He had worked for the HouseIntelligence Committee Democrat
staff for a dozen years when hecame forward to president to the
FBI, he gave four interviews.
He gave very specificinformation to the FBI and
nothing happened.
Why?
Because the Justice Departmentsimply decided to take a pass.
How many times have we sataround in the last decade and

(01:08:58):
heard we're going to get to thebottom of that classified leak
and then a few months later wecouldn't get to the bottom of
that classified leak?
In the case of Adam Schiff,they got to the bottom of some
classified leaks, but theJustice Department chose not to
act.
So tonight, attorney general,past attorney generals, people
like Merrick Garland and JeffSessions and Rod Rosenstein who

(01:09:18):
was acting on Russiagate they'vegot some serious questions
answered.
Did they know about this AdamSchiff stuff?
Why did they allow it to bepassed on, and will anything
happen in the current JusticeDepartment?

Speaker 18 (01:09:30):
My question wasn't it a hearsay so-called
whistleblower that led to theentire Ukrainian impeachment?
Just refreshing my memory, yeah.

Speaker 14 (01:09:40):
Yeah, exactly, and it turns out that what he
described in the call wasn'tactually an accurate description
of what happened In this caseeyewitness in the room with Adam
Schiff able to deliver to theFBI.
The good news is that KashPatel has gotten these documents
to Congress.
By the way, this is the firstof several major leak
investigations we're going tosee over the next several days.
You're going to see other majorpeople that were clearly

(01:10:03):
identified by the fbi's havingleaked classified secrets.
Their own staff turned them in.
When interviewed by the fbi,nothing again happened.
It's a common pattern.
The question now is in donaldtrump's justice department, does
that dynamic change?

Speaker 6 (01:10:17):
wow, yeah wow, in today's news that we already
knew.
So this is the document that iswas released.
So let's see, that's not a verygood view of it.
Okay, so it says when workingin the capacity, blank was
called to an all-staff meetingby schiff.
In this meeting, schiff statedthat the group would leak

(01:10:37):
classified information which wasderogatory to the president of
the united states, donald jSchiff stated that the group
would leak classifiedinformation which was derogatory
to the President of the UnitedStates, donald J Trump.
Schiff stated that theinformation would be used to
indict President Trump.
Stated this would be illegaland, upon hearing his concerns,
unnamed members of the meetingreassured Blank that they would
not be caught leaking classifiedinformation.
Blank was again approached aboutleaking classified information
in a separate meeting by unnamedindividuals.

(01:10:58):
Believe this activity to beunethical and treasonous.
Was concerned about thediscussion and, as a result,
reach out to contacts from hisprior employment in intelligence
for guidance on where to reportthis experience.
These discussions led to blankcontact with the fbi regarding
his concerns, had severalconversations with two unnamed
fbi agents related to the matterand was eventually invited to

(01:11:19):
attend a mock grand jury withthe united states department of
justice would advise was advisednot to bring his attorney to
this meeting, uh no.
However, invited the two fbiagents he worked with to attend
this event um, don't go in theroom with cops.

(01:11:39):
Was eventually informed thatthe issue would not be
investigated further by the doj.
As congress have immunity to allspeech and actions made on the
floor of the us house ofrepresentatives, blank did not
believe that the activity hewitnessed would be protected by
this legal provision.
It's like we weren't on thefloor of the senate and he was
committed treason.
You don't get immunity for that.
So this person right here, ericearly, whoever, that is a list

(01:12:01):
of potential adam schifffelonies that are brewing and
growing leaking classifiedinformation.
See the newly released document.
Violations of the espionage act,seditious conspiracy, election
interference, mortgage fraud,perjury and treason is not off
the table either yeah so adamschiff is in some deep doo-doo,
deep doo-doo, and here's adamschiff again talking about you

(01:12:23):
know, let's just go back and sheknows that same.

Speaker 9 (01:12:26):
Look on his face, I know.

Speaker 6 (01:12:31):
I guess it's his face so, my colleagues, here we got,
you got to hear him, becauseagain, this guy, when his lips
are moving, he's lying so mycolleagues made the statement
repeatedly that I had met withthe whistleblower that I know
the whistleblower is.

Speaker 24 (01:12:45):
It was false the first time they said it.
It was false the second through40th time they said it.
It will be false the last timethey say it so I'm like but it
was true the whole time.

Speaker 6 (01:12:55):
Yeah, it was true the whole time.
We know ericiaramella wasinvolved with that and what we
just read there was from adifferent leaking event.
Right here is Adam Schiff onwith Tucker Carlson and Tucker
Carlson is like his one news hiton Fox News.
Thought I'm going to go intothe lion's den.

Speaker 23 (01:13:12):
I got the goods Right Now let me ask you one
final question.
Can you look right into thecamera and say I know for a fact
the government of VladimirPutin was behind the hacks of
John Podesta's email?
Absolutely.

Speaker 24 (01:13:22):
The government of Vladimir Putin was behind the
hacks of our institution and thedumping of information Of John
Podesta's email, not only in theUnited States Of John Podesta's
email.

Speaker 23 (01:13:29):
But also in Europe.
Okay, you're not, you know whatyou're not.
And Tucker Look and say I knowthey did John.
And I think that Ronald.
Reagan will be rolling over thestage, ronald.
Reagan, you're carrying waterfor the Kremlin.
I'm not carrying water for theKremlin.
You're a sitting member ofCongress on the Insult Committee
and you can't say they hacked.
You're going to have to moveyour shoulder to RT.

(01:13:53):
Russian television, because thisis perfect.
This is so beneath your office,because it's so dumb and you're
being duplicitous.
I'm asking you did they hackPodesta's emails?
You can't say it.
Look in the camera and say theyhacked John Podesta's emails.
We know for a fact that Putin'sgovernment did that.
You can't, and you know youcan't and you're hiding behind
weasel words.

Speaker 6 (01:14:11):
Let me ask you one, tucker Carlson nailed him,
you're hiding behind weaselwords.
Adam Schiff would boldface lie,but he'd also abs'd, also
obfuscate a lot.
Did Russia hack the DNC emails?
Well, they hack stuff all thetime.
That's not what I asked.
Yeah, did you hit a home runlast night or not?

(01:14:32):
Well, I hit home runs all thetime in practice, but did you
hit one in the game?
You know what I mean.
Like when it matters.
This is from a while ago too.
This is back when rakulov wasstill in congress and he was
calling out schiff.
All the way back then wellagain.

Speaker 21 (01:14:50):
Uh, buffer about it this way, bill.
Uh, yesterday democrats passeda resolution to give Chairman
Schiff the most authority in theimpeachment process moving
forward.
Adam Schiff is someone who hastried to impeach the president
not once, not twice, but nowthree times.

(01:15:10):
The first time he accused thepresident of treason and said he
had evidence to supportcollusion with Russia.
That wasn't true.
Then he said we should impeachthe president because he
obstructed justice and promisedBob Mueller would breathe life
into that until Bob Muelleradmitted that his obstruction
analysis was under a legalstandard and burden of proof.
That didn't exist.
So now we're on to fakeimpeachment effort number three,

(01:15:33):
surrounded by a whistleblower,a whistleblower who first met
with yeah, that's right thestaff of Chairman Schiff.
The details of that haven'tbeen released.
Chairman Schiff won't releasethe inspector general's sworn
testimony, which will confirmthe contacts between Chairman
Schiff and the whistleblower.

(01:15:54):
It's like this, bill If we hada trial, the person who planted
fake evidence shouldn't be theone ruling on.
Uh, the person who planted fakeevidence shouldn't be the one
ruling on the admissibility offake evidence.

Speaker 6 (01:16:07):
It was all so apparent.
It was also apparent broadenyour news horizons, listen to a
little bit of everything andmake your own decisions, but
credibility matters, like someof these guys.
Ratcliffe has been talking forthe same amount of time as adam
schiff.
Devon nunez has been talkingthe same amount of time as as

(01:16:27):
adam schiff.
Adam schiff stands on siftingsand.
The story changes with each newleak and each new piece of
information that you find outthey've got to modify.
Well, we were going to sendsomeone in, to send a wire, but
we were joking, but it wastotally serious.
Oh well, it was totally seriousbecause we were afraid donald
trump had committed obstructionof justice.
Oh okay, obstruction of justicein the investigation that

(01:16:48):
wasn't properly predicated inthe first place.
Well, he didn't know, it wasn'tproperly predicated and he was
obstructing.
I mean, why would you want toobstruct if it benefits russia,
does it benefit russia?
Does it hurt america?
I feel like, what are youtalking about?

Speaker 9 (01:16:59):
I think we've had this exact same argument before.
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (01:17:04):
But you're watching them stand on sifting sand and
their story moves with each bitof information.
But you guys got Devin Nunescomes out and has he ever been
wrong?
Is there one thing he said thathe got wrong?
Is there one piece ofinformation he has shared that
hasn't ended up being comingessentially gospel truth,
supported by further and furtherevidence?
Is there one thing ratcliffehave said that wasn't correct?

(01:17:25):
Is there one thing donald trumphas shared that has proven to
be an outright pulled out ofnowhere light?
Sure, maybe a little rhetoric.
Sure, maybe some rounding up onsome decimal places or some.
You know, he took the 800 000and called it a million.
Sure, right, but has he beenwrong directionally on anything
at all?
They spied on my campaign.

(01:17:46):
No, we can't say that this is60 minutes.
We're a credible show.
No, you're not.
Not.
If you can't admit my campaignwas spied on, you know what I
mean.
You've lost all credibility.
Last night our uh war room wasplaying pbs frontline.
There's a whole documentaryabout trump coming over and
taking over.
Now he's the big bad man.

(01:18:07):
He knows all the pull thelevers of power.
January 6th is violentinsurrection, dude.
The narrative is out of control.
It doesn't match reality at all.
You know they're dude.
The narrative on russiagate isworse than the cpi.
It's worse.
All right, guys, we need tojump over to private, because I

(01:18:27):
have to do that.
We got to get a couple hours inevery month and it's easy to do
if we just do 10 or 15 minutesevery day.
So we are going to be jumpingover to private browsing and
then we will be continuing onwith this conversation and
you're going to hear what stevecascalese has to say about adam
schiff.
When adam schiff was spying,not only on the trump campaign
but on other members of congress, he actually had their phone

(01:18:51):
records.
Yeah, yeah.
So it's not like you know, hewas just going after trump.
It's almost like he's a partybulldog, except he looks like a
little rat terrier.
But either way, right, or a pugis probably a little closer.
I don't know.
I shouldn't be making fun ofwatermelon head.
I'll let Trump do that.
I'll just stick with Trump'snicknames.

(01:19:11):
So shifty, shift.
Anyways, we're going to behearing about that, and then
we're going to be hearing aboutwhat's been happening in
California with the rebuildingrate, and then we're going to
hear Donald Trump's mic dropmoment yesterday, because he had
a good one.
So let's go ahead and play theoutro and then we'll be right
back to.
To talk to those in Rumbleprivate, you have to be a Rumble
premium member to be there.
Other than that, don't forgetto go visit.

(01:19:33):
Left behind without dot org1776.
Live dot US.
We are starting our big trustcreation class today.
It's super exciting.
Feel free to go and learn moreby joining one of our ignite
presentations on Thursdayafternoon, late afternoon
evening, if you're on the Eastcoast, and with that we will
sign off.
Pray.
The rosary daily says I wantshift to be taken down.
Who is the arrest that willshock the nation?

(01:19:53):
There are so many Hillary,obama, clinton, clinton, etc.
Who will they?

Speaker 9 (01:20:01):
who would actually shock us?
I would be shocked.
Hillary obama and bill clinton,I would be shocked at shania.

Speaker 6 (01:20:04):
I'm not going to be shocked when brennan.
Not going to be shocked withany of the other people.
I'll be shocked if it's one ofthose three but okay, yeah, I
see what you're saying.
Yep, uh, anti-socialist leaguesaid peter struck, and lease and
lover lisa page were paid amillion dollar settlements
because their privacy wasviolated when their texts were
made public Texts that showedthey would do anything to stop
Trump.
You know what's funny aboutthat Texts being made public

(01:20:26):
thing?
A couple of us have been downthat road, so you'd think I'd
get a million bucks for my textsbeing made public and my
address being doxxed.

Speaker 9 (01:20:32):
Okay, before we go out, Taylor finish this.

Speaker 2 (01:21:02):
Finish this.
Bang, bang, bang, bang, bangbang.
Old woman, man, man.
Sorry, what knight lives inthat castle over there?
I'm 37.
What I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you

(01:21:23):
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how did you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere oh.

Speaker 3 (01:21:44):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 2 (01:22:00):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,A self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes ohthere you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would.

Speaker 3 (01:22:11):
Please, please good people I am in haste who lives
in that castle?
No one lives there.

Speaker 2 (01:22:17):
Then who is your lord ?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be

(01:22:39):
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry

(01:23:03):
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:23:24):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up Now?
We see the violence inherent inthe system.
Shut up.
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed.

(01:23:44):
Bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?

Speaker 9 (01:24:00):
You saw it, didn't you?

Speaker 6 (01:24:05):
Bam, now we're private, we're back.
Well, we never left.
Listen to the outro and we'reback, okay, so let's go ahead
and jump in here.
If you're still in with us onrumble premium, hit us up in the
chat, let us know you're here.
You'd like to know who we'retalking to, so, especially if
you're a long-time listener, youknow cater the show right to
you.
All right, this is SteveScalise talking about when Adam
Schiff had subpoenaed I believeit was AT&T and probably the

(01:24:25):
other phone companies as wellfor congressional phone records.

Speaker 8 (01:24:32):
But I'm very concerned about what the
chairman has done and I'll yieldin a moment.
But he selectively put in areport the names of members of
the press, of members ofCongress, who he has had
political disagreements with.
He didn't put the names ofeverybody else in there.
If he's got 3,500 pages ofreports, of phone records of

(01:24:55):
people he's been spying on, hewon't share all of those people
that he's spying on.
But he's selectively going toleak out names of members of the
press who've written articles,maybe that he disagrees with.
That's frightening, that wouldbe an abuse of power.
But we don't know because thechairman won't share the details
of what he's up to.

(01:25:15):
But he did selectively put someof that in a report that wasn't
even discussed in the hearingsand so, yes, it raises alarms,
it raises concerns and, and Iwould hope, we get to the bottom
of it.
But I'm very concerned aboutwhat the chairman has done and
that is so and I'll yield.

Speaker 6 (01:25:31):
So he took phone records of congressmen and was
looking at.
This guy is so crooked, socrooked it amazes me an elected
representative like that wouldbe so deeply involved with the
intelligence community liketruly.
Uh, scott adams describescertain, the designated liars

(01:25:58):
that are in the Democrat party.
You have certain you know whenthese people are talking
something is a miss.
And one of them let's see ifsomeone's driving to New Mexico.
Yay, pony boy, that sounds fun.
You should go pick up my friend, uh Earl, take him out of New
Mexico.
We need them out of New Mexicotrying to.
He's got to get his driver'slicense here in a day or two and
then we're putting them on abus and getting them out.
I don't care where he's got toget out of that, that

(01:26:19):
neighborhood he's been dealingwith.
But anyways, what was I saying?
Adam shift, designated liars.
So scott adams describescertain people as designated
liars jamie raskin, adam shift,designated liars.
Then you have your designatedidiots aoc, jasmine crockett,
maxine waters.
These are your designatedidiots.

(01:26:39):
When you just need someone togo up there, send those people.
They're incoherent, right, butthey're they're.
They're catchy and cute, bigbooties and whatever, right, but
all the important stuff forpolitics, important stuff.
But Raskin Schiff, durbin,these are your designated liars.

(01:27:00):
I look at the same thing with,like, lindsey Graham.
He's a Republican Partydesignated liar.
Like, if they need to push a,push a narrative and get the old
bull Republicans on board andmove it, you get Lindsey Graham
to be like oh, this is the sideof the issue I'm on.
And then half of the Republicancaucus in the Senate's like
yeah, us too, you know?
Yeah, chuck Schumer, he's aserious person, he's just

(01:27:23):
corrupt.
So it's easy to catch him in ainconsistency or a lie.
Uh, what was the?
He was doing a hearing andthey're like well, would you
like to talk?
We're not here to talk aboutthat, we're here to talk about
trump.
It's like the most badlyhypocritical thing.
Here's another throwback that Ididn't tease out earlier, but
this is is Rod Rosenstein beinginterviewed and this again came
up as a clip on one of the showsfrom 2020 that we played.

(01:27:46):
It was just a week ago.
Rod Rosenstein has his day inthe hot seat is the name of that
one, or that was the name of itbefore it got renamed when I
uploaded it again, but anyways,this is.
This was him being grilled byTed Cruz about the Russiagate
investigation.
Now Rod Rosenstein offered towear a wire to go meet with the
president.
He's in on it.

(01:28:06):
He's in on the insurance policy.
He's in on the obstructing theTrump campaign, but he's playing
this ground of trying topretend like he's a steady hand
at the till he Bill BarrSessions.
They all come in and they'relike oh, we're above this, we're
nonpartisan.
They maintain that aura, butthese are dirty, dirty people.

(01:28:27):
Rod Rosenstein's got dirty,dirty past when he was in
Baltimore, Not someone that youwant running the nation's law
enforcement and the DOJ.
Ok, you can go.
It goes back to the audio.
Listen to season one.
Follow the story.
We pull apart Rod Rosensteinand who he really was,
stretching back to Baltimore, soit's no surprise that he plays

(01:28:49):
this.
You know, I'm just a goodnonpartisan doing my duty thing,
Not that at all.

Speaker 25 (01:28:54):
The Obama Biden administration did in 2016 and
2017 makes everything RichardNixon even contemplated pale in
comparison, and Richard Nixonrightfully faced impeachment and
ultimately resigned as aconsequence of his misconduct.
The evidence that has been madepublic has made clear that the

(01:29:15):
Obama administration targetedhis political opponents,
targeted President Trump and hiscampaign, unleashed, weaponized
and politicized the Departmentof Justice, the FBI and the
intelligence community, and thatthe decision making to do so
went right up to the very top.

Speaker 6 (01:29:35):
We want to say this hearing Ted Cruz say this from
four years ago, or this is threeyears ago, something like that.
I remember when this happened.
I remember what job site I was,Cause I would live stream
C-SPAN when I was working Right,I just have it on and I could
listen to these hearings forhours and hours.
I've listened to tons ofhearings Cause you know that's
what I do.

Speaker 9 (01:29:55):
It's great background , Great background it's, but
it's great background, greatbackground, right, but I've
listened to this.

Speaker 6 (01:29:59):
And then, every once, while you're like, I remember
exactly where I wasn't over on ajob site in the swim area.
I remember having my head downin the septic tank.
I remember my phone being setup over there so wouldn't fall
into the septic tank.
I remember having dirty glovesand not being able to touch my
phone when you know it bufferedout or whatever it did, and I
had to go and you know you knowclean off so I could touch my.
I remember all of this.

(01:30:19):
I remember exactly where I wasseating many years ago.
When you hear Ted Cruz say this, it should be like oh my gosh,
stop everything, stop lookinginto Trump.
What's going on with theapparatus, weaponized government
?
Ted Cruz could give this samespeech today and we'd have the
same reaction, you know, andit's like so when is somebody
going to finally do something?

Speaker 25 (01:30:40):
so that on january 4th 2017, the fbi concluded, in
the document that has just beenreleased, that there that
general michael flynn was quoteno longer a viable candidate to
be part of this larger case.
Their investigation did notyield any information on which

(01:31:00):
to predicate furtherinvestigative efforts.
The FBI is closing thisinvestigation.
That was January 4th 2017.
The next day, james Comey, thedirector of the FBI, is sitting
in the Oval Office with BarackObama, with Joe Biden and James
Comey.

(01:31:20):
According to a memo from SusanRice one of the most remarkable
CYA memos written in Washington,written on her last day in
office, an email to herselfsaying by the way, this
investigation into the nationalsecurity advisor coming in to
the new office, the presidenthas said do it quote by the book
.
She says by the book threetimes.

(01:31:42):
James Comey tells the Presidentwe're investigating Michael
Flynn by the book.
Well, unless the book isRichard Nixon's Watergate the
day before the FBI said theywere closing the investigation.
And there's James Comey tellingBarack Obama we're going after

(01:32:03):
General Flynn, a decoratedthree-star general, the incoming
National Security Advisor tothe President, with Joe Biden
sitting right there noddingalong.
Joe Biden himself personallyunmasks Michael Flynn's name.
That's the world you came into,mr Rosenthal.
Unmasks Michael Flynn's name.
That's the world you came into,mr Rosenthal.

Speaker 6 (01:32:25):
That's the Department of Justice you came into.
That's the Department ofJustice Rod Rosenstein knew all
along.
He helped build it that way.
He's a part of that apparatusjust north in Baltimore, just
right up there, basically like asister city to DC.
I've been watching his eyes.
He's like you're close, this isthe world you walked into.

(01:32:46):
But you're a good guy, right,yeah, right, you're gonna clean
up this mess.
And rod rosenstein's like oh,yeah, sure, yeah.
By the way, I'm like deeplyinvolved in all of it where it
had been corrupted andpoliticized.

Speaker 25 (01:32:57):
You've read the inspector general report, Mr
Rosenstein.

Speaker 8 (01:33:00):
I've read most of it.
Yes, sir.

Speaker 25 (01:33:05):
You've read the 17 repeated material misstatements
documented within the InspectorGeneral report.

Speaker 8 (01:33:09):
I have read that.
Yes, sir.

Speaker 25 (01:33:10):
You're aware, one of those is a lawyer, fraudulently
altering an email, creatingcounterfeit evidence.

Speaker 6 (01:33:18):
That was Kevin Clinesmith.
For context, there was the FBIsent an email creating
counterfeit evidence.
That was kevin clinesmith.
For context, there was the fbisent an email to the cia saying
hey, is carter page one of yourguys, because we see something
in here?
And you know his emails showingthat he's communicating with
you guys about russia.
Like as in every time he hascontact with russia, he calls
the cia and he's actually anasset of the cia to spy on
russians and actively works withthe cia.
And they go oh yeah, no, he'sone of our guys.

(01:33:40):
And then you know what he didhe inserted the word not.
He altered the email to insertthe word not so that the fbi
wouldn't automatically stoplooking at carter page because
he's an intel asset.
They inserted the word not toget the warrant.
They they did that.
They did that.

Speaker 25 (01:34:00):
That became the predicate for a sworn statement
in the FISA court.

Speaker 8 (01:34:06):
That is in the inspector general's report.
Yes, sir.

Speaker 25 (01:34:08):
Are you aware of other instances?
The department of justiceemployees fraudulently creating
evidence to submit to court?

Speaker 8 (01:34:16):
Every instance that I'm aware of Senator would be
appropriately investigated and,hopefully, appropriate action
would be taken.

Speaker 25 (01:34:24):
Mr Rosenstein, on May 17th, you appointed Bob
Mueller the special counsel.
On June 29th, you signed thethird FISA application.
On August 2nd, you signed thesecond scope application.
You came into a profoundlypoliticized world and yet all of
this was allowed to go forwardunder your leadership.

(01:34:45):
That, unfortunately, leads toonly two possible conclusions
either that you were complicitin the wrongdoing, which I don't
believe was the case, or thatyour performance of your duties
was grossly negligent.

Speaker 6 (01:35:02):
It was the former.

Speaker 9 (01:35:05):
He doesn't smile.
Did you see that smile thatcame on his?

Speaker 6 (01:35:07):
face.
It wasn't grossly negligent.
We're right on target, we'reright on timeline.
Yeah, wow, the Obama, thesepeople committed treason man
right in front of our faces andlied to us about it for years.
They, they, people committedtreason man right in front of
our faces and lied to us aboutit for years.
Their narrative is notsupported by the documentation.
The Nunes Ratcliffe Trumpnarrative is being supported by
the documentation, their ownwords, their own emails.

(01:35:30):
We're doing this by the book.
We've got an insurance policy,rod Rosenstein hey, you know,
the boss doesn't know we'retalking.
Who's the boss?
Obama, not Trump.
Rosenstein appoints a man withmemory problems, cognitive
issues oh, moeller, he'll puthis name on it.
But Weinstein's running thething right.
Super corrupt, super corrupt.

(01:35:50):
And people like Lindsey Grahamand Ted Cruz, to his own extent,
kind of ran cover for theseguys, you know, kind of made it
easy for them to, to get going,you know, to to continue on I
mean had the republican partyeven been maybe five or six more
stronger voices, they couldhave built a coalition and
actually done something aboutthis, but instead we, I guess.

(01:36:13):
I guess we have to give themsome credit because we got the
information.
I mean, they dripped it on us?

Speaker 9 (01:36:17):
no, but we had to go through four years of kabuki
theater, or 10.

Speaker 6 (01:36:21):
Well, yeah, sure it's all kabuki theater, though it's
all kabuki theater and some ofus went to prison.
Yeah, literally, like actuallyit sucked.
Okay, grant cardone, who uh ranfor mayor, he said this it it's
official California's land grab, just informed by FEMA in

(01:36:41):
California.
If your home was affected byfires and you are required to
spend 50% of the previous home'svalue to fix it, you will be
forced to raise the entireproperty structure to a new
quote.
Flood water requirements willbe enforced to raise a perfectly
good property three to fourfeet at a cost of 40 to 50
million.

(01:37:02):
This will make it impossible foranyone to rebuild, adding years
to completion.
Everything the Californiagovernment suggested about
coastal approvals, fast trackinget cetera, it was a lie.
So I'm guessing what that is isdoing something like this where
you have to raise it up.
I don't know, and I'm sure you,looking at that as an engineer,
you're probably like how deepdoes that, those concrete pylons
go?
On a sand beach Probably prettydeep, right?

(01:37:23):
You're not doing the horseshoemethod here.
You're planked down pretty deepHorseshoe, not horseshoe, the
snowshoe method, right whenyou're on.

Speaker 9 (01:37:30):
Saw you get big and flat.
No, it's on top.
That's not going to work.
No.

Speaker 6 (01:37:36):
Anyways, pretty, pretty bad.
Yeah, california, it's afreaking mess.
Ok, and then the last thinghere is Donald Trump's mic drop
moment.
He had this he got asked aquestion yesterday about the
meeting with Putin and if hecould broker a deal or make a
deal, and this is what he had tosay.

Speaker 10 (01:37:57):
Well, we're going to have a meeting with Vladimir
Putin and at the end of thatmeeting probably in the first
two minutes I'll know exactlywhether or not a deal can be
made.
Because that's what I do I makedeals.

Speaker 6 (01:38:10):
How will you know?
Oh, you know, if you could makea deal, I'll know in like two
minutes.
How will you know?
That's what I do I make deals.

Speaker 9 (01:38:15):
Yeah, what a deals.
Yeah, what a dumb questionwhere have you been?

Speaker 6 (01:38:18):
what are you doing?
Yeah all right, guys.
That's it for today.
Thank you for joining us onrumble private, especially pony
boy, who always makes it over tojoin the after show and we will
talk to you guys again tomorrow.

Speaker 2 (01:38:28):
Bye old woman, man, man, sorry, what night.

(01:38:53):
Lives in that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an

(01:39:14):
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh how do you do?

Speaker 3 (01:39:35):
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.

Speaker 2 (01:39:47):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,A self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes ohthere you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 3 (01:40:01):
If only people would Please, please good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.

Speaker 2 (01:40:08):
Then who is your lord ?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major.

(01:40:29):
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings?
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,

(01:40:49):
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.

(01:41:10):
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.

(01:41:31):
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}When Authority Lies: From Food Pyramids to Vaccine Narratives

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

24/7 News: The Latest

All Episodes

When Authority Lies: From Food Pyramids to Vaccine Narratives

Stuff You Should Know