August 8, 2025 • 54 mins
Beneath the polished narrative of American politics lies a raw truth: we are peasants caught in a power struggle we never asked for. This episode peels back the curtain on the forces transforming our country while the average citizen bears the burden of each political decision.
The Seattle CHOP/CHAZ saga reached its inevitable conclusion after autonomous zone protesters found themselves outmaneuvered by a simple permit application. When Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes applied to hold a demonstration in the occupied park, Mayor Jenny Durkin faced an impossible choice: grant the permit and risk violence or dismantle the zone entirely. Meanwhile, local businesses have launched a scathing 56-page lawsuit against the city for abandoning them to vandalism, property damage, and danger.
Justice finally arrived for General Michael Flynn as newly released notes expose how former President Obama personally directed aspects of the investigation against him. These bombshell documents reveal Biden suggesting the obscure Logan Act as a weapon against Flynn – a 200-year-old law never successfully enforced but conveniently featured in an episode of "The West Wing."
Perhaps most revealing is Washington Governor Inslee's admission that mask mandates serve primarily as symbols to "raise consciousness" rather than addressing genuine health concerns – a position actually supported by the New England Journal of Medicine, which acknowledges masks offer "little, if any, protection" outside healthcare settings.
We've entered an information war where speaking truth has never been more crucial. When protestors who demand defunding police suddenly cry out for officers after being attacked, or when politicians like Pelosi accuse Republicans of "trying to get away with murder," the hypocrisy demands our response. The time for polite silence has passed – stand your ground and turn the mirror on those attempting to reshape America through intimidation and division.
Ready to join the resistance? Connect with me @PeasantsPod on Twitter and Parler, on Facebook at The Peasants Perspective, or via email at peasantspod@gmail.com.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
thumbchicks had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb, we'regetting screwed, man.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed.
All the revolution's gonna beThrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
(00:39):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
And welcome to anotherincredibly busy news day.
Yesterday it was like the dambroke.
There were so many things goingon.
(01:00):
We've got James Flynn is nolonger a political prisoner.
The Court of Appeals has lethim off.
We've got a bunch of stuffgoing on, so we're going to get
into it today, and I actuallywant to start out with a little
bit of Donald Trump.
You got to hear what he had tosay yesterday, but the radical
left.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
They hate our history , they hate our values and they
hate everything we prize asAmericans, and we're right,
because our country didn't growgreat with them.
It grew great with you and yourthought process and your
ideology.
The left-wing mob is trying todemolish our heritage so they
(01:40):
can replace it with a newrepressive regime that they
alone control.
They're tearing down statues,desecrating monuments and
purging dissenters.
It's not the behavior of apeaceful political movement.
It's the behavior oftotalitarians and tyrants and
(02:01):
people that don't love ourcountry.
They don't love our country.
They don't love our country.
The left is not trying topromote justice or equality or
lift up the downtrodden.
They have one goal the pursuitof their own political power,
for whatever reason, but that'stheir goal.
(02:27):
That really seems to be theirgoal, their goal of their
sickness.
And if you give power to peoplethat demolish monuments and
attack churches and seize citystreets and set fire to
buildings, then nothing issacred and no one is safe.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
Nothing is sacred and no one is safe If you give
power to tyrants to attackbuildings, do graffiti.
Nothing is sacred and no one issafe.
That is so true.
That is so true.
Donald Trump has summed it upexcellently.
Okay, I want to go through.
I'm going to kind of jump topicto topic to topic today to try
to get all the information I can, and then who knows if we're
(03:00):
even going to get to it all.
So let's go to Chaz first ofall.
So a little bit of insiderinformation on Chaz that I found
out.
So Chaz, the Capitol HillAutonomous Zone.
So it was named the AutonomousZone and after about three or
four days of being called Chaz,the Autonomous Zone, some city
people came in and said hey, youcan't call yourself the
(03:20):
Autonomous Zone becauseautonomous makes it seem like
you're not, not, you'veseparated from the state and
you're like on your own.
And we can't, we, like, can'tallow that.
Like, we will come in and takeyou out.
So the organizers, inconjunction with the city
managers, came in and said okay,we'll call it chop the, uh, the
capitol hill occupy protest.
Okay, so now it's the.
(03:41):
It's reminiscent of occupy wallstreet right, or occupy wall
street.
So now they're reminiscent ofOccupy Wall Street.
Right yeah, occupy Wall Street,so now they're the Occupy
process, Capitol Hill Occupyprotest.
So CHOP, that gave Jenny Durkina plausible out to say, oh,
this is a peaceful protest,these guys are just occupying
this space and that's totallysafe and okay.
So they did that.
(04:02):
Well then, a brilliant man who'sbeen banned from every known
platform out there His name isGavin McGinnis.
Now, who is Gavin McGinnis?
Gavin McGinnis is the formerleader of the proud boys.
I actually think he'sre-involved himself with the
proud boys at some point.
But what the proud boys are isit's basically like a bunch of
rednecks, people who arepatriots, ex-military, gay,
(04:24):
straight, black, white, asianmen, women.
They call themselves the proudboys.
They do body, they do, they'lldo free.
I don't know if it's alwaysfree, but I'm pretty sure it's
usually free.
They'll do free security at,like college events for people
like Ben Shapiro or Ann Coulter.
So these guys are just.
They're like the antithesis ofAntifa.
In fact, there's a famousincident where Antifa had said
(04:45):
that they were going to come andtake out and Colter beat her up
, whatever, drag her out of therestaurant and she was having
lunch with a couple proud boyswho were there, kind of as her
bodyguards, and a fairly decentsized mob of Antifa showed up
and they were so outgunned asfar as bicep size with the proud
boys they ran off.
Anyways, there's all kinds offunny stories.
So that's who the Proud Boysare.
(05:05):
The Proud Boys oftentimesthey're really active down in
Portland where Antifa has kindof had a real foothold for a
long time, and that's where youget a lot of the street clashes
that you can see on the internetbetween Antifa and a bunch of
white guys, a bunch of rednecks.
(05:27):
Usually is what it looks trade.
I don't know if that's reallythe case.
And anyways, that's the ProudBoys.
So the Proud Boys are a publicorganization.
They're no different thanAntifa.
Whatever you consider Antifa,you've got to at least give
Proud Boys the same.
I don't think they'reinternational terror.
I don't think anybody's evergotten hurt from the Proud Boys.
It wasn't, you know, activelybeing Antifa on the streets, but
nonetheless they decided.
Gavin McGinnis went down to thecity of Seattle and he applied
for a protest permit, a permitto be able to hold a protest in
(05:50):
the capital, the park that wasinside of the CHOP.
So half of CHOP is just a bigpark, a public park so he wanted
to hold a public protest inthat park.
So look at the position thisput Jenny Dirk, who used to be a
US attorney.
The position it puts her in isnow she has to grant that
protest on First Amendmentgrounds.
You can't not grant a protest.
(06:12):
I mean, you can't sit here.
You granted a protest to BlackLives Matters, okay.
You can't not grant it to white, to Proud Boys, okay.
Like you can't sue, oh, theseguys are terror, those guys
aren't.
You can't pull it off.
She would never prevail incourt with that argument because
of who she gave the originalpermit to for the Occupy protest
.
So he applied for the permit.
She freaked out because sheneeds to now grant this permit.
(06:34):
She grants this permit.
There's going to be a war, okay, if Proud Boys show up inside
CHOP between Chaz Simone or RazSimone and all of his thugs and
all of the guns and there was atotal of four shootings inside
of there in a matter of threedays right, it would be a war.
It would be an absolutenightmare for the city of
(06:55):
Seattle.
And so Jenny Durkin flipped out, called Gavin McGinnis and
begged him to not apply for thatpermit and she agreed to
disband the CHOP.
She is avoiding the legalchallenge and the legal trouble.
Obviously, this thing isn'tlooking good.
Obviously, there's multiplereasons why this thing needed to
(07:15):
go away, but it was acounter-protest that put it out.
Somebody got the wise idea andsaid, well, if they can speak,
we can speak.
And who knows what would havehappened, who knows how that
would have really gone down, butit would have been good Now,
along with the Chaz.
These people are stupid folks.
These people are stupid.
(07:37):
I'm going to play you a video.
This is one of the men who wasshot inside of Chaz.
Keep in mind.
He's there through the night, alawless area that's claiming to
be autonomous.
No police officers are allowedin.
They've got signs up to saythis is a no-cop co-op, a no-cop
co op.
When I see a sign that saysno-cop co-op, I assume there's
(07:59):
no cops in this cooperative areawe're in.
This man chose to come down tothe no-cop co-op known as Chaz
and then Chop.
He chose to participate in anabsolutely ridiculous protest.
He chose to involve himselfwith people he shouldn't have
been involving himself.
I'm throwing everything in thekitchen sink at this guy.
(08:22):
What I'm about to play you tome is the most unacceptable
thing I've ever heard.
It is unacceptable from top tobottom.
It's unacceptable from the cityside, because this guy's right,
but this guy's also wrong.
This is the problem with oursociety no personal
accountability.
None, zero, zilch.
Our politicians don't takepersonal accountability.
(08:43):
The peasants rarely ever takepersonal responsibility.
We always look to thegovernment or someone else for a
handout.
Nobody takes personalresponsibility.
Where's the morals of thiscountry, the Confucianism, the
personal resolve for rightliving?
This is ridiculous.
All right, Let me play thishere resolve for right living.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
Okay, got, this is ridiculous.
All right, let me.
Let me play this here.
Yo, I was shot in Seattle atChaz on Friday.
The cops left me out there todie.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
I need help.
Okay, the cops left me outthere to the die.
I hope your buds alreadyboiling.
What were you in protest for?
To protest disbandment of thecops.
You get that right, Like.
Do you understand the entirepoint of the protest, the entire
movement that you'reparticipating in, the entire
reason why you're in the Chaz isbecause you want to disband and
(09:38):
get rid of the cops.
You don't want them in yourlife.
I apologize, guys, I hatescreaming into the microphone.
It's really early in themorning and I'm real fired up.
Speaker 4 (09:45):
Somebody in the legal or media to get my story told
and get it out there.
I got shot five times.
Need you guys help Yo?
I was shot in Seattle.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
He got shot five times and now he's looking for
legal help, lawyers.
Whoever he's going to get freehelp, they're going to sue the
city.
They're going to sue thisperson, sue that.
They're probably going to sueDonald Trump, for goodness sakes
, and you know who's going tofront the bill.
Because someone's going to paythis guy.
Someone's going to end uppaying him a settlement.
The city's going to tell him toshut up, pay him a million
bucks, or he's going to get somekind of ridiculous settlement.
(10:18):
Because he got shot inside ofthe no cop co-op, where the city
wasn't enforcing their laws,where they gave up on a precinct
.
He participated in a defund,the police protest.
He participated in the verything that he's now complaining
about.
Isn't it convenient that whenyou get shot, all of a sudden,
(10:39):
you feel like you deserve thecops?
Yes, we all feel that way,buddy.
That's why we're all scratchingour heads at what's going on
with these protests and riots.
It is complete idiocy, idiocy.
We're trying to disband thepolice over this stuff.
Okay, this guy just.
(10:59):
He just really got me fired up.
So now, in addition to this guy, who's now going to sue the
city and get legal help becausehe got shot and got left there.
I remember I told you I wasgoing to play the video, but
it's just full of swear words,where Roz Simone is like hey to
the paramedics, you got to comehelp the guy.
He's bleeding.
That's that kid, totally legit,right?
The paramedics are sittingthere.
Look, everything about this isa mess from top to bottom.
(11:21):
At the end of the day, jennyDurkin, the blood's on her hands
, the blood is on Jenny Durkin'shands.
She should resign, obviouslyshe should resign.
So not only did he leave a guybleeding in the streets which I
agree with him he got leftabandoned there.
Now I have a huge personalissue with him because he he
(11:43):
chose to be there and the factthat now he calls out is the
reason why we get into thesepickles in America.
What's good for thee is notgood for me, and what's good for
me is not good for thee.
Right, it's just like inWashington DC.
I'm not gonna play it becausethe audio is just horrible and
you can barely hear it, butthere's a scene where a
transgender guy in a pink bikiniruns up to one of the CBS media
(12:07):
or ABC media and literallyassaults him and robs him right
there on air and the securitycomes in and takes the guy out.
And the anchor woman, the womanwho's doing the report, who has
been doing reports about thesepeaceful protests and about how
the protesters aren't throwingrocks and the police are the
ones instigating all theviolence.
That woman looks and goes andwho has been pro-defund.
(12:30):
The police, as she's gettingattacked by a transgender man in
a pink bikini outside of theWhite House.
She goes where are the policewhen you need them?
Caught on a hot mic.
That's the problem, right?
Oh yeah, no cops until it'stime.
Okay, next thing, there are morethan a dozen businesses inside
of the CHOP zone in Seattle'sCapitol Hill.
(12:52):
They have filed a 56-page classaction lawsuit against the city
of Seattle.
They're seeking unspecifieddamages.
They could ask for billions.
They could ask for billions.
The terror they've gone through.
I posted a video.
You can go.
Look at all my social medias.
I posted a video.
I drove around the CHOP.
You can see the neighborhoodthat they're in.
Take a look at it.
It's a nice neighborhood.
This is Capitol Hill.
(13:12):
This is like the wine andcheese in the evening part of
town.
It's just barely across thehighway from the main.
You could see skyscrapers.
If you're standing on someone'sroof.
It's like you're right there,it's Capitol Hill, you're in the
heart of downtown, basicallythe beautiful residential area
of downtown.
I mean a two-bedroom townhousein there can't cost less than
like $1.3, $1.4 million.
(13:34):
That's the area these guys tookover.
Those are the citizens, thoseare the businesses that were
abandoned.
Okay, let me read you the listof these businesses Hunter
Capital LLC, liquid and Wine LLC, enterprise and Car Tender.
Car Tender is the one that gotbroken into the Richmark Company
and had a fire started.
Sage Physical Therapy, kathleenCapels an individual, onks
(13:58):
Homeowner Association, madronaReal Estate Services, madrona
Real Estate Investors or someother real estate investors Pike
Associates, redside PartnersApartments LLC.
So this is a lot of theproperty owners, but as well as
a couple of these businessowners.
Nice little class action lawsuithere, and in the claim they say
the rights.
So they're giving a little bitof a pass to Chaz saying hey,
they're supposed to peaceablyassemble and everything.
But they say the lawsuit doesnot seek to undermine the chat
(14:19):
participants message right, butwe have been overrun by.
We have been the residentbusinesses, employees and
residents in and around CHOP,which have been overrun by the
city of Seattle's unprecedenteddecision to abandon and close
off an entire city neighborhood,leaving it unchecked by the
police, unserved by the fire andhealth services and
(14:41):
inaccessible to the public atlarge.
The city's decisions hassubjected businesses, employees
and residents of thatneighborhood to extensive
property damage, safety dangersand an inability to use and
access their properties.
On June 8, 2020, the city ofSeattle abruptly deserted the
Seattle Police Department's EastPrecinct on the corner of 12th
Avenue and East Pine in theSeattle's Capitol Hill
(15:01):
neighborhood, leaving behindnumerous barriers that had
previously been used as a linebetween the police and the
protesters.
When the city abandoned theprecinct and the nearby barriers
, a number of individuals whohad been in the area took
control of the barriers and usedthem to block off streets in
and around the East Precinct.
In the days and weeks after thecity abandoned the East
Precinct, chop participants haveoccupied the public streets,
sidewalks and parks in the areaat all hours of the day and
(15:25):
night.
Rather than seeking to restoreorder and protect the residents
and property owners within CHOP,the city instead chose to
actively endorse, enable andparticipate in the occupation of
CHOP.
The city has provided CalAnderson Park, a public park
located at the center of CHOP,to CHOP for the use of staging
grounds supporting CHOP'soccupation of the surrounding
area, supported by the city.
(15:46):
Countless CHOP participants nowreside in the park at all times
of the day and night, havingturned it into a tent city.
At any given time, hundreds ofCHOP participants are camped out
in the park.
Violence, vandalism, excessivenoise, public drug use and other
crimes are rampant within thepark.
These guys filled this out andfiled it under oath, or, you
(16:09):
know, in the courts.
The city's conduct has resultedin CHOP being blocked off from
public access, among otherconduct detailed below.
The city recently provided theparticipants with concrete
barriers to use to block thestreets, which CHOP participants
have indeed used to barricadethe streets.
The borders have at times beenclosed, been guarded by armed
(16:29):
CHOP participants who overseewho can and cannot enter CHOP.
As a result, the streets arebarred to most all vehicular
traffic, making it virtuallyimpossible for residents and
businesses to access theirbuildings, receive deliveries
and provide goods and servicesto the few customers willing to
enter CHOP.
The city's behavior has madeCHOP the officers will not even
(16:51):
approach the area of theshooting until approximately 20
minutes after the shooting andno professional medical response
was available for at least 15minutes.
So that's talking about theshooting.
At other times, even duringlife and death emergencies, the
police have acquiesced todemands from CHOP participants
that they have abandoned thearea.
The city acknowledged thesafety issues.
(17:12):
It created, in particular,nothing that there are dangerous
conditions at night, but thecity has nonetheless chosen to
maintain the policy providingresources to support CHOP.
And then this last paragraph.
This is crazy.
The city's conduct has enabledthe widespread destruction and
vandalism of private property.
Graffiti and guys.
The graffiti is horrible, it'severywhere.
(17:33):
Everything around CHOP istagged.
You can go check my video.
Everything is tagged.
The city's conduct has enabledthe widespread destruction and
vandalism of private property.
Graffiti is pervasivethroughout CHOP.
It is not only on barriers,streets, sidewalks, but also on
nearly every private buildingwithin CHOP.
Graffiti that is painted overalmost immediately returns.
(17:54):
The property owners have beentold by CHOP participants that
if they dare to paint overgraffiti, their buildings will
be more severely vandalized oreven burned to the ground.
The city has done nothing toprevent this conduct, but
instead has actively endorsedand supported the ongoing
occupation of the CHOP area andthe destruction of property that
occupies.
As a result, property tenants,property owners and their
(18:16):
tenants have not been able tofully use their property owners.
Property owners and tenantshave, for instance, had to lock
and barricade their garages andloading areas for risk of having
CHOP participants entering andvandalizing them.
So, as you can see, it's a 56page lawsuit.
The city of Seattle is toast.
It's toast.
This is crazy.
This is crazy talk.
And you know what?
(18:37):
I hope that Bill Barr.
I hope that Bill Barr, as faras any kind of federal support
can support these guys, the cityof Seattle was warned by
everybody and their dog not tolet this proceed.
Everybody and their dog not tolet this proceed.
Okay, so that's CHOP.
Okay, yesterday we had a prettyamazing breakthrough in the
(18:58):
Michael Flynn case.
So, michael Flynn, a couplethings happened.
First of all, going back to theMichael Flynn case, michael
Flynn's been sitting in court.
He's had Judge Sullivan.
Judge Sullivan is the corruptjudge who I've mentioned before,
has some issues with his ownson.
I got a new accusation on thattoday too, and a new allegation.
So Judge Sullivan was workingwith Elijah Cummings inside of
Baltimore.
They're defrauding HowardUniversity.
(19:19):
They were covering up some oftheir own personal and private
sex scandals.
So that's Judge Sullivan.
Judge Sullivan ended up withthe Michael Flynn case.
Michael Flynn pled guiltybecause of the pressure on his
son, as well as the abhorrentamount of money that he spent,
as well as the advice of hisfirst attorneys, who happened to
also be the law firm where EricHolder is a partner.
(19:40):
Eric Holder is the formerattorney general under Barack
Obama who famously said he wasBarack Obama's wingman.
If Bill Barr said that todayhe'd be head on a pike.
But that is who General Flynnwas getting his original legal
advice from, who were alsotrying to protect themselves,
because they were the ones whohelped General Flynn fill out
the FARA registration form, theForeign Agent Registration Act
form that he was being chargedwith lying to the FBI.
(20:03):
There's a whole bunch of seriesof things, but anyways, they're
the ones who helped him fillout that form.
And so, in order to avoid legaltrouble for their own firm,
they essentially threw MichaelFlynn under the bus.
So Michael Flynn said yeah, I'mguilty of lying to the FBI,
because I told the FBI that Ididn't mention sanctions on the
phone call and they claimed thatI did mention sanctions on the
phone call to the Russianambassador.
(20:23):
Turns out he never mentionedsanctions on the phone call.
The FBI was lying about himmentioning sanctions on the
phone call, therefore settinghim up to have committed perjury
, lying to the FBI, when in factit was the FBI who lied to him.
So now he ends up eventuallyhiring Sidney Powell as his
attorney.
(20:45):
Sidney Powell tries to removehis guilty plea.
This is apparently quite theprocess for Judge Sullivan, who
can't just allow this thing togo to trial, and he wants
hearing after hearing as to whyhe shouldn't just throw General
Flynn into jail without a trial.
Obviously nobody wants to go totrial on this thing, because
then there's discovery, there'sa jury, all that kind of stuff.
So, judge Sullivan, after theDOJ finally moves in, there's
declassified documents that arecompletely exculpatory to
(21:05):
General Flynn, showing that hewas absolutely targeted from the
highest levels of the USgovernment because of the things
he knew all the way.
Going back to Libya you can goback and listen to my Libya how
it All Starts, part 1 episode,and we get into the groundwork
of what happened in Libya, andGeneral Flynn was completely
aware of everything thathappened there that led to the
rise of ISIS.
Additionally, general Flynn,there's a lot of things that
(21:25):
General Flynn knew.
He knows quote unquote knowswhere the bodies are buried.
So, general Flynn, judgeSullivan, won't dismiss the case
that the DOJ has dropped.
So now the DOJ, the prosecutionand Sidney Powell are both
telling the judge you got todrop this case.
Nobody wants to try this case.
Judge Sullivan won't do it, sohe appoints another retired
judge to act as the prosecutor,something that is completely
(21:48):
unheard of in the criminaljustice system.
So, sidney Powell I'm sorry forthe quick story here, but I
just want to make sure youunderstand kind of the basic
timeline of events.
So then Sidney Powell files awrit of mandamus which then goes
to an appellate court in the DCcircuit.
The appellate court is made upof three judges.
Two of the judges are appointedby Republican nominees and one
of the judges is appointed byObama.
The three judges hear thearguments from the three sides,
(22:12):
both the DOJ and JudgeSullivan's representatives and
Sidney Powell.
They asked a lot of questionsand that was all last week.
Yesterday they came out withsupporting the writ of mandamus
and they ordered Judge Sullivanto drop the case on a vote of
two to one.
What this means is it means thejustice system Everybody knows
Judge Sullivan or General Flynnis empty.
You look at their sculpturalinformation and it's very
(22:34):
obvious.
He was targeted and what thisdoes is it A releases him as a
political prisoner.
And he even went a step farther.
Yesterday he called in.
Apparently there wasn't a gagorder placed on him, or there
was.
I've heard mixed things.
But either way the result's thesame.
He didn't talk Since he wasindicted.
He has not spoken a word.
I mean nobody has been on theradio, hasn't been on TV.
(22:56):
I've heard of no speakingengagements.
He's made like two Twitterposts, two, three Twitter posts
in a couple years.
You know the American flag, hisgrandson saying the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Very little.
Yesterday he called in randomlyto the Rush Limbaugh show, spent
about four and a half minuteson the Rush Limbaugh show and he
basically said this.
I'll summarize it for you I'mglad that justice is done.
(23:17):
We were really concernedjustice wouldn't be done, but
this is a huge win for justice.
This is a huge win for LadyLiberty that the justice system,
even though it's got all thesecorrupt pieces, eventually you
get to where truth prevails.
And so he says now we're ontothe next phase.
Obviously General Flynn isgoing to be able to sue
everybody involved and he canjust flay this thing open in
civil court really, and criminalcourt.
(23:46):
I mean there's crimes.
There were absolutely crimescommitted in the prosecution and
the persecution of GeneralFlynn.
Okay, so, having said all that,yesterday we got that writ of
mandamus, and so what thatwritten mandamus said is the
evidence that came out on top ofthe written mandamus, sorry.
So there's the two things.
The written mandamus came out,but in addition there was
(24:07):
additional evidence that wasbrought forward to the court
showing that General Flynn wasinnocent.
So let me read you what it wasthat we got yesterday.
So these are new notes.
These came out before they werefiled under seal and actually
Judge Sullivan apparently had acopy of these notes and they
were filed under permanent seal.
So again we are showing thatJudge Sullivan knew this and
(24:28):
still wouldn't release the case.
Okay, so these handwrittennotes, the new notes which
record Comey's accounting toStrzok of the meeting substance,
constitute definitive evidencethat Obama, barack Obama himself
, was personally directingsignificant aspects of a
criminal investigation into hispolitical enemy's top foreign
policy advisor.
(24:49):
So these are what the notessaid.
The notes are written inchicken scratch and there's some
shorthand in here, butbasically these are the notes as
we would read them.
So the NSA, DDAG so these arethe Flynn cuts.
Other countries.
The Deputy Director, attorneyGeneral, leaned forward on the
unclass question mark VP.
So this is Biden.
(25:09):
Biden questions the Logan Act.
Can we get him on the Logan Act?
So this is significant becauseno one has ever prosecuted the
Logan Act and oddly enough,there's a cute little episode of
the West Wing a few years ago,which purportedly is a favorite
show of Joe Biden.
Can you believe this?
This is so I can't even believeit, like it's so ridiculous.
The entire plot of Spygate washatched out of a West Wing
(25:32):
episode.
That's right, ladies andgentlemen.
In the West Wing episode theywent after a general for the
Logan Act.
The reason it's ridiculous onits face is the Logan Act is a
200-year-old law that's neveronce been successfully enforced.
It is, on its face,unconstitutional.
But in a fictional TV seriesyou can use a law like that to
(25:55):
go after a general for talkingto a foreign country.
So, vp Biden, dumb ass Bidenexcuse my language folks.
Biden suggests the Logan Act asif he just watched a rerun of
the West Wing.
Okay, the president says theseare unusual times, vp, I've been
on the Intel committee for 10years and I never dot, dot, dot,
(26:16):
whatever.
President, make sure you look atthings and plus have the right
people on it.
So this is a handwritten notewhere the president of the
United States is directing aninvestigation.
The topic of this conversationis General Flynn's phone call
with the ambassador Kislyak.
This is the moment when theyare setting up the intent to go
(26:39):
after General Flynn.
Now remember, if you look back,the FBI was ready to drop any
investigation into General Flynnbecause they could find nothing
derogatory.
But on this day, after thismeeting, peter Strzok goes back
and texts Lisa Page, hisgirlfriend, and says turns out,
we didn't shut down the Flynncase because of our own
(27:00):
incompetence.
A paperwork error caused themnot to shut down the case, which
was convenient, peter Strzokpointed out in the text message,
because they wouldn't have toopen a new one Big deal.
So the president says make sureyou look at things, plus, have
the right people on it.
They changed out the people whowere looking at General Flynn
too.
Peter Strzok, bob Mueller, youknow the whole, the whole Comey
(27:22):
gang, right, the whole Muellerrich hunt, the 13 angry
Democrats, that's these peoplequote have the right people on
it.
President, is there anything Ishouldn't be telling the
transition team?
Oh, my goodness, you have anoutgoing administration days
before leaving office and youhave the president wondering if
(27:43):
he should disclose things to thenew incoming administration.
Is governance not important?
Is rule of law not important?
Is the new administrationdoesn't need to be fully briefed
on all the functions andworkings of America?
Of course?
Of course You've gotobstruction of an incoming
(28:04):
presidency.
You've got acts of treason inthese notes here, flynn, this is
from the director.
So this is Flynn.
Oh, this is from James Comey.
Flynn says the Kislyak callsappear legit.
So now you have the FBIdirector holding a copy of
Flynn's phone call telling thepresident, the VP and the others
(28:25):
standing there that the callappears legit and then
ineligible happy new year.
Dot, dot, dot.
Yeah right, those are the notes.
Those are the notes.
Make sure you look at thingsand have the right people on it.
Obama is quoted as sayingComey's description that Flynn
and Kislyak calls appear legitshorthand for legitimate and
other notes.
Until this week, thisexculpatory information was
(28:46):
withheld from Flynn and hisdefense team, multiple
congressional committees and theAmerican public.
A lengthy campaign to illegallyleak selectively edited
defamatory information throughmedia accessories damaged the
Trump administration and spurredthe appointment of a special
counsel to investigate anyoneassociated with the Trump
(29:08):
campaign.
This is crazy, folks, crazy.
Crazy in the kind of way thatif we don't get justice, we're
done, we're done.
Okay, another thing I want tothrow it out there.
I want to make people aware whoknows Somebody might do this.
This comes from my tipper, johnhere to help.
Who's the federal witness infederal witness protection?
(29:28):
And John here is saying thatBiden sometimes this stuff is
just really hard to ingestbecause it is like geez.
So with this he says who'scontrolling Judge Sullivan?
So it was Biden who started theLogan Act against Reverend
Flynn and who controls JudgeSullivan?
Judge Sullivan, his son Biden'scoming, and others entered the
(29:50):
others' House of UnderageHorrors H-O-R-R-O-S, where they
could go one in several areas.
So I don't know if I mentionedto you before about on Twitter
there's a girl that goes by thehandle Obama Girl, and John here
to help gave her some tips onsome houses she needed to go
check out.
She went and checked out thesehouses these houses happen to be
the houses that thesecongressional leaders, these
(30:11):
corrupt judges, apparently go toabuse children and she
collected evidence, videoevidence as well as testimony of
the other neighbors, and tookit to the FBI.
She took it to the FBI.
She live streamed a lot of thison Twitter and then, after she
went to the FBI, she got deaththreats.
I mean, almost instantly shegot death threats and then she
ended up going silent for quitea while.
(30:31):
Anyway, she's popped back up,so we know she's safe, but now
she's awaiting.
You know she's on the run.
She's on the run.
She turned over this informationthat was very damning.
She put it all out there onTwitter pictures, evidence,
testimony and everything and nowshe's on the run.
So this is the kind of stuffthat we go okay, is there going
to be justice?
Right, john is here to help.
He's an insider who's on therun as well because the
government wants him gonebecause of the things he knows
(30:53):
about people that are currentlyin government, like Judge
Sullivan and Biden.
Like they don't want theseloose ends out there.
And these loose ends are outthere putting their stuff on
Twitter to researchers.
And Bama Girl was just aTwitter researcher in Baltimore,
in the neighborhood, and shewent out and checked this out
and uncovered something that'shuge and yet, just as a little
individual, she's powerless.
Right, she went and dropped itoff at the FBI.
(31:15):
She gave them all theinformation she had.
She videoed herself doing it sothat she could prove that she
did it and the next thing, youknow, she's run for her life.
You know, sometimes I alwaysthink about Donald Trump.
When he talks about taking theslings and arrows, I mean, geez,
okay, so that's neither herenor there, that's only an
allegation.
(31:36):
That's just as far as Twittergoes.
But you know, when you thinkabout the craziness, you know,
here's a judge, who's the DOJ,says hey, we got nothing to try
and actually even gave the judgea sculptural evidence showing
that General Flynn was set upand he still doesn't dismiss the
case.
You have to scratch your headreally hard.
I have this discussion with mybrother-in-law all the time
where he tries to give peoplethe benefit of the doubt and I'm
(31:56):
like, look man, you can't givepeople the benefit of the doubt
when they've burned you 97 times.
Like you've got an innocentgeneral who spent millions of
dollars on this defense andyou're trying to wrangle some
kind of mental gymnastic reasonwhy the judge shouldn't drop the
case when the DOJ says to dropit.
There's no mental gymnasticsneeded here.
You've got open and obviouscorruption.
(32:18):
You've got to ask the whyquestions.
Why is Judge Sullivan doingthat?
What's going on?
I mean, it's just crazy.
So I want to play this here.
This is a oh.
I do want to mention one otherthing.
This has to do with Black LivesMatter.
So I've heard a lot about a lotof people saying you know black
.
I personally have spoken topeople who are unclear that
(32:39):
black lives matter is a Marxistorganization.
I am disgusted.
Our streets are painted up withblack lives matter.
There's a black lives mattercar in NASCAR.
Now there's black lives mattershowing up everywhere.
What they're doing is they'renormalizing.
They're normalizing Marxism asa political ideology.
(33:00):
Do you remember when DonaldTrump says you know, you are the
ones who built this greatcountry, you and your ideology.
What is our ideology?
He's pointing at us, thepeasants.
What is the peasants ideology?
Right, we, the people, aresovereign.
We, the people, hold the power.
We, the people, willself-govern.
We, the people, will, fromamongst us, appoint people to
govern.
Okay, those people have failedus.
(33:21):
The government has becomeindependent from the people.
It's time for the people toreclaim the government.
Donald Trump is the first stepin reclaiming the government.
We took an outsider, a man ofour own, a man who made his
money in the land and on realestate, just like most of us can
.
Not in hedge funds, not doingthe invisible, not grifting, not
(33:41):
getting billions of foreigndollars in grants and aids.
Donald Trump made his money.
Like every other peasant hasthe ability to make his money.
That's why guys like BarackObama said Donald Trump is the
epitome of the American dream,because Donald Trump didn't need
government corruption.
In fact, he fought governmentcorruption in order to make his
fortune.
In fact, he fought governmentcorruption in order to make his
(34:02):
fortune.
Okay, enough about that.
So this Trump thing, the Trumpresistance, was started by Act
Blue.
Act Blue uses a place calledMomentum Trains and the Sunrise
Movement.
Momentum, does the excuse me,just Momentum.
Momentum has trained the BLMand the Sunrise Movement.
(34:23):
Momentum, does the excuse me,just Momentum.
Momentum has trained the BLMand the Sunrise Movement.
Both are riotous andessentially the same
organization, and so, anyways,you can trace this back here.
Momentum trains on Marxismideology and building social
movements to transform commonsense and win on the most
pressing social issues.
Anyway, so that's what.
That's what's going on.
I mean, the obvious connectionsare there and they're also
starting to get out on the newsand talk about being Marxist,
(34:45):
like really declaring themselvesas Marxist, and that's kind of
good news.
It makes people aware.
Okay, so the next video I wantto play is a real quick video.
It's just from Tom Fitton, buthe just kind of lays out the
Obamagate scandal and just kindof where we're at.
Speaker 5 (34:57):
Okay, I like it.
It it's quick.
James comey, the corrupt fbidirector, discussed the dossier
in the oval office with barackobama and joe biden and, of
course as I affectionately callher, saint hillary of the grand
jury, she paid for the dossier.
No one's asked her anyquestions.
When is barack ob, is BarackObama and Hillary Clinton going
(35:20):
to go under oath or maybe evenbe asked a tough question about
their involvement when it comesto abusing the powers of office
to spy on, suppress and targetyour political opponents?
Barack Obama makes RichardNixon seem like a kid here.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
Okay, so that's what we've got sitting on the Spygate
scandal.
I want to jump to one man.
There's two other things Ireally want to jump to, but I'm
kind of running out of my owntime here.
Okay, this comes from the NewEngland Journal of Medicine and
Dr Fauci was a participant inthis particular study.
And listen to this.
This is just some highlightsout of it.
I'm not going to read it all,but I want to read these
(36:07):
highlights as it pertains tomasks, because a lot of us are
in these mask orders.
Okay, I'm just going to readthe whole thing.
In the past week, Dr Fauci andthe New England Journal of
Medicine have admitted thatmasks are little more than
symbols virtue signaling.
This is right out of the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.
For those of you who shoutscience like it's a turret tick,
(36:27):
it's from the New EnglandJournal of Medicine on May 21st
2020.
Quote we know that wearing amask outside healthcare
facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.
Public health authoritiesdefine a significant exposure to
COVID-19 as face-to-facecontact, within six feet with a
patient with symptomaticCOVID-19.
That is sustained for at leasta few minutes, and some say more
(36:51):
than 10 minutes or even 30minutes.
The chance of catching COVID-19from a passing interaction in a
public space is thereforeminimal.
In many cases, the desire forwidespread masking is a
reflexive reaction to anxietyover the pandemic.
So then the question is askedso why are we ordered to wear
masks?
The answer symbolism.
(37:11):
From the same article in theNew England Medical Journal or
Journal of Medicine, Quote it isclear that masks serve symbolic
roles.
Quote it is clear that masksserve symbolic roles.
Masks are not only tools, theyare also talismans that may help
increase health care workersperceived sense of safety,
well-being and trust in theirhospitals.
So it's symbolic.
Now I want to play jay inslee.
(37:33):
Yesterday.
So, jay, jay inslee had alittle press conference to talk
about this new order wearingmasks, and I mean, aside from
just being completely blown away, that we're just at the point
we're at in America.
This was Jay Inslee's talk andI've got to fast forward to
where he said what I, becauseyou know there's a lot of
introduction stuff, so give mejust a second here, Okay.
(37:53):
So here Jay Inslee is going totalk about the mask.
He just got asked directlybecause yesterday in Lewis
County, which is down in theVancouver area just north of
Portland, the sheriff basicallysaid, after 140 days, Jay Inslee
has decided oh, we should bewearing masks all of a sudden,
right, I mean, this is like fourmonths after the pandemic broke
out and all of a sudden nowwe're being mandated to wear
masks.
I mean, we probably would havecomplied just easily during the
(38:14):
initial first two week lockdown,but after you got the first two
weeks, you don't just keepadding and adding and adding
when you don't have peoplelaying in the parking lot dead
at the hospital.
I mean we've got empty parkinglots still, okay.
So this is Jay Inslee.
Remember what I just read youfrom the New England Journal of
Medicine?
Remember these are the peoplewho are always saying follow the
science, follow the science,follow the science.
Well, this is Jay Inslee, beinga little wise guy who is
(38:36):
following the science.
And look at the way hemanipulates the reasoning here.
He doesn't talk about health,he talks about the symbolism of
health.
Listen to it through.
He's gonna use nice platitudesand nice things that might even
make you go okay, okay, okay.
But listen carefully.
He doesn't give one legitimatehealth reason as to why we're
(38:57):
wearing masks.
Speaker 6 (38:59):
But what motivates people to wear a face mask is,
principally you don't want tohurt somebody else.
You don't want to kill somebodyelse, you don't want to give
people unknowingly a virus.
Speaker 2 (39:12):
Okay, so we just read the science right.
You have to be symptomatic, youhave to be face-to-face.
So since I don't have aspitting problem and I don't
spit in people's faces on aregular basis, I don't talk that
close.
I don't really need a mask.
So the reason we wear them iswe don't want to notice how he
uses the word kill.
Kill somebody else as if yourbreath is a killer breath.
If you don't have symptoms, youare not probably spreading
(39:33):
COVID.
That's the science.
So notice.
He's saying this right, likethis is the symptom, the
reaction, but when does heactually provide any evidence
that that happens?
Speaker 6 (39:43):
the symptom, the reaction, but when does he
actually provide any evidencethat that happens?
That's what really motivatespeople to do this and, as
increasing numbers of peoplerealize, we can unknowingly
infect a grocery store clerk I'mtalking to or my grandparent
that I'm visiting.
As people come to understandthat, that's what motivates
people to wear a mask if theydon't want to hurt somebody else
(40:03):
.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
This is it Again?
If the science was true, if thescience was there, nobody would
disagree.
Remember, these guys bang onthe table and they say science,
science, science, science,science, but there's no science
here.
Okay, there's no science here.
He hasn't said any science.
He's made some.
You know, you could breathe onpeople, but the science says
that it's not contagious likethat.
(40:26):
Its main effectiveness is toraise people's consciousness
about that Its maineffectiveness is to raise
people's consciousness, not tomake you healthier, not to
prevent the death that I justclaimed you would cause, or the
reason you want to wear the maskso you don't cause death.
That's not the real reason.
The real reason we're wearingit is not to actually prevent
(40:50):
health, it's to raise ourconsciousness, to let people
know that we don't want to killthem.
Did you notice that?
I read from the New EnglandJournal of Medicine.
It's quoted in there as sayingit's largely symbolic.
And here's RJ Inslee whofollows the science and dang it
he does.
He's obviously read that NewEngland Journal of Medicine
article showing that masks areineffective except as a way of
(41:10):
symbolism.
So it raises our consciousness.
Speaker 6 (41:14):
To give them confidence that sometimes
there's some peer pressure thatworks.
Speaker 2 (41:20):
Okay so now our government is going to use peer
pressure.
Okay, so the government islaunching a peer pressure that
works.
Okay, so now our government isgoing to use peer pressure.
Okay, so the government islaunching a peer pressure
campaign by making everybodywear a mask to raise the
awareness about this, eventhough it doesn't actually do
anything.
Speaker 6 (41:35):
And to give people license to do this.
Speaker 2 (41:38):
You telling me you're giving my friends and neighbors
and people around me licensefor peer pressure.
I mean, I just want to.
Let's just make sure we getthat full sentence in there.
Okay, let's make sure we hearit all.
Speaker 6 (41:53):
Enforce this when it takes effect on Friday.
This is to raise people'sconsciousness about that, to
give them confidence thatsometimes there's some peer
pressure that works, and to givepeople license to do this now.
This is a misdemeanor.
Okay, peer pressure, and it's amisdemeanor.
Do not abide by this law.
(42:13):
It is the law of the state ofwashington, but we believe that
there will be huge voluntarycompliance with this because of
the peer pressure pressure, lawenforcement activity will not be
necessary, because we would betotal hypocrites.
We're looking for compliance,not citations.
Now our experience today in.
(42:33):
Washington has given usconfidence about that.
Speaker 2 (42:37):
Because we're a deeply blue state and most
people are sheep.
Hence the comment from thesheriff down in Lewis County
Don't be a sheep.
Oh, my goodness folks, we arein crazy land.
He actually did read the thinghe said.
This is largely symbolic.
This is to raise ourconsciousness.
No, it's not actually toprevent sickness, because it
(42:57):
doesn't do that.
It's not.
This is a symbol.
So here's the deal.
I said it yesterday.
He asked me to wear a mask.
I'm going to put my Trump 2020mask on, but there are some outs
.
So I want to make some peopleaware and I want to thank my
friend She'll go by M on thisshow she sent.
She sent me this.
But a couple of things toremember.
If you are a concealed carrypermit holder, you can't wear a
(43:18):
mask.
It's against the law to wear amask if you're a concealed carry
permit holder.
So if somebody asks, just tellthem oh, I'm a concealed carry
permit holder and I'm notallowed to wear a mask.
First of all, that'll make themnot want to confront you.
So that's probably the bestplan to be kept from.
The peer pressure of beingforced to wear a mask is the
fact that you legally can'tbecause you're locked and loaded
.
Ok, so get locked and loadedand if you're not, work towards
(43:42):
that so you don't have to wear amask.
A couple other things.
It's against the law for peopleto make you wear a mask.
You're exempt from wearing amask, mandating a mask under
HIPAA.
So you can say I have a medicalcondition and then if they ask
you to disclose it, you can say,under HIPAA, I don't have to
disclose it and the ADA?
So that's good.
You can do that Online.
(44:03):
You can go and you can look atlinks.
There's actually places whereyou can report ADA and HIPAA
violations and we should I mean,we should flood the zone and
this.
I'm going to just get to mylast little point here.
Okay, I want to play this fromNancy Pelosi.
This, uh, this is crazy.
Just listen to this here inother words, for something to
(44:26):
happen, they're going to have toface the realities, okay so
she's talking about the policereform bill that the democrats
walked away from, which wouldhave been great, but they want
to like totally defund and dothings, so look at the
accusation she makes herebrutality, the rallies of the
need for justice in policing andthe recognition that there are
(44:52):
many, many good people in lawenforcement but not all, and
that we have to address thoseconcerns.
Speaker 7 (44:57):
So when they admit that and have some suggestions
that are worthy of consideration, but so far they were trying to
get away with murder, actuallythe murder of George Floyd.
Speaker 2 (45:08):
There has been another issue as far as the Did.
You hear that she's blaming themurder of George Floyd and
getting away with it on theRepublicans' bill.
What, Okay, here'sRepresentative Jayapal who's
going to support that, so thisis the she's being played the
quote.
She's being asked the questionabout what Nancy Pelosi said
(45:28):
about murder okay, about theRepublicans' murder, and this is
a representative here inWashington.
She represents the Seattle area.
How are Republicans trying toget away with murder?
Well, I think if Republicans aregoing to insist on half
measures, on things like studiesabout chokeholds, that is
absolutely letting people getaway with murder.
(45:50):
Let me play for you Studies forchokeholds, letting people get
away with murder.
I'm not quite sure how thatconnection gets made 100%, but
okay, here's another person who,addressing this murder issue.
Oh, nevermind, I'll skip it, itdoesn't matter.
(46:12):
Okay, so you've got.
You've got otherrepresentatives.
Chuck Schumer jumped in and, uh, he said he supported what
Nancy Pelosi said a hundredpercent, that, uh, the president
and Republicans are gettingaway with murder.
Guys.
They're claiming that we'retrying to get away with murder
like legit murder.
They're trying to pin GeorgeFloyd on Republicans, on
conservatives.
If it hasn't been obvious yet,we're in a knife fight.
In fact, general Flynnreferenced that on Rush Limbaugh
(46:34):
yesterday.
I was in a knife fight forthree years.
We're in a knife fight.
These people do not play by therules.
They use the rules against us.
They know that we are peacefulpeople, us peasants I'm talking
about us, the ones listening tothis call or this podcast.
We're peaceful people.
We want good in the world.
We wanna give people thebenefit of the doubt.
(46:54):
We have a Christian upbringing.
We believe in the basics of the10 commandments.
Right, we can get along insociety.
We settle our differences.
If we can't settle, we agree todisagree and we just don't
associate with people that driveus crazy.
That is the way it should be.
These people are in our grill,they're in our faces okay,
they're infiltrating our schools.
They're changing the curriculumwithout asking, without telling
(47:16):
us, by sneaking things in okay,they're putting communists into
executive-level positions atall levels of government.
It's a wolf in sheep's clothingsituation, if there ever was
one.
If Donald Trump has done onegood thing, it's exposed every
one of them.
He's exposed them all.
General Flynn exposed them all.
He said in his interview withRush Limbaugh last night we
(47:36):
shined a light on truth and thetruth set me free Guys.
This is critical.
The tides have turned.
The tides have turned.
It is time for us to fight back.
I truly believe and a lot ofpeople have been mentioning this
, like why isn't anybody pushingback?
Why isn't anybody pushing back?
(47:56):
It's because the 70%, the vastmajority of people who are
Americans, decent people whojust want to live in peace,
they're armed and they won'tcome out and fight with their
words.
They will come out and fightwith their guns.
It's the truth.
Every single person on thispodcast who has listened to my
(48:18):
voice, I know.
I know that deep down in yourhearts, as you've watched
rioting in our streets, asyou've watched the graffiti get
put on, as you've watchedfriends get sucked up into a
Marxist movement, I know everyone of you has thought to
yourself at what point, at whatpoint does the government become
(48:39):
moot and we, the people, rule?
Because the moment we, thepeople, rule and I've said this
in multiple posts all oversocial media the justice will be
swift and awful.
The justice will be swift andawful To avoid that, to avoid
(49:00):
the civil war.
Keep in mind, folks, inMinnesota there's 1.7 million
people that go out hunting everyyear with a deer rifle.
That's 1.7 million snipers inthe state of Minnesota.
They don't live in Minneapolis,but they know how to hit a
(49:20):
target and, trust me, when theydescend on Minneapolis, there
won't be nothing left.
And I'm not saying that just tobe a rabble rouser, but you've
got politicians calling anentire movement murderous.
You've got them ripping downour history, our statues.
They've infiltrated every levelof our government.
(49:41):
Folks, we are at war.
It's time we start fighting.
It's time when you want to dothe traditional nice thing and
agree to disagree.
It's time that you stand yourground.
You start talking to someonethat's a Marxist, you look them
in the eyes and you tell themare you a Marxist?
Do you believe in commonproperty?
(50:02):
Do you believe in collectivepunishment?
Do you believe in collectivepunishment?
Make them own their shame.
Make them own their shame.
Make them defend collectivepunishment.
Make them defend it.
Okay, there's a statue in thecity where I live, because the
city where we're at is, for themost part, norwegian, and so
there's a Viking.
There's a Viking statue and thewhole community is surrounded
(50:24):
by this Viking.
It's the mascot for the mostpart Norwegian, and so there's a
Viking.
There's a Viking statue and thewhole community is surrounded
by this Viking.
It's the mascot for the highschool.
Well, I got news for you BlackLives Matter protesters.
Vikings held owned slaves andthey owned a lot of them, and
they were not nice people forthe most part.
You didn't want to see theDanes showing up at your
doorstep.
I've thought many times I'lljust pull that statue down, put
a little sign on it and say, oh,they were slave owners, and
(50:44):
then make the ridiculous peoplein my community defend me, the
absurd, or fight against me,which then I can just turn
around.
Well, take the Viking out of it, put anybody's name there.
Why are you toppling statues?
No, I'm not going to do that,and if the statue falls, don't
come knocking to me because Ididn't do it.
Don't come knocking to mebecause I didn't do it, but I'm
saying we've all thought aboutthis.
(51:08):
Guys, it's time to move into thezone where we talk.
You need to be online, you needto be vocal on social media,
because that's where a battle isbeing waged.
It is an information war.
And don't think things onsocial media don't matter, right
?
We need to talk to the peoplein our lives in person and we
need to be clear about things.
It's time We've got to speak up.
We must turn the mirror on thepeople that are ruining our
country.
There is a group of people thatare intentionally ruining our
(51:34):
country.
It's time we turn the mirror onthem.
They've supported crooks andcriminals, crooks and criminals.
We found out yesterday BarackObama committed treason.
The president says it, peoplehave been saying it.
We found the document, thesmoking gun, the handwritten
contemporaneous notes.
(51:54):
This is deadly serious.
It's time to stop playing nicebefore it gets worse.
All right.
On that note, if you like whatI have to say and you like the
show and you like the content,please share it with others.
That's another way you canfight back.
Share the information.
You can find me on Twitter, atPeasantsPod, on Parler, at
(52:15):
PeasantsPod, facebook at thePeasants Perspective, and you
can also email me peasantspod atgmailcom.
Thanks so much, guys.
I look forward to talking toyou later.
Speaker 1 (52:28):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would hearPlease, please, good people, I
(52:49):
am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No-one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you.
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
(53:11):
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the waves he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how did you become kingthen?
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
(53:33):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
(53:55):
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
Supreme executive power Justbecause some watery tart threw a
sword at you.
Shut up.
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
(54:15):
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
thumbchicks had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb, we'regetting screwed, man.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed.
All the revolution's gonna beThrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
(00:39):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
And welcome to anotherincredibly busy news day.
Yesterday it was like the dambroke.
There were so many things goingon.
(01:00):
We've got James Flynn is nolonger a political prisoner.
The Court of Appeals has lethim off.
We've got a bunch of stuffgoing on, so we're going to get
into it today, and I actuallywant to start out with a little
bit of Donald Trump.
You got to hear what he had tosay yesterday, but the radical
left.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
They hate our history , they hate our values and they
hate everything we prize asAmericans, and we're right,
because our country didn't growgreat with them.
It grew great with you and yourthought process and your
ideology.
The left-wing mob is trying todemolish our heritage so they
(01:40):
can replace it with a newrepressive regime that they
alone control.
They're tearing down statues,desecrating monuments and
purging dissenters.
It's not the behavior of apeaceful political movement.
It's the behavior oftotalitarians and tyrants and
(02:01):
people that don't love ourcountry.
They don't love our country.
They don't love our country.
The left is not trying topromote justice or equality or
lift up the downtrodden.
They have one goal the pursuitof their own political power,
for whatever reason, but that'stheir goal.
(02:27):
That really seems to be theirgoal, their goal of their
sickness.
And if you give power to peoplethat demolish monuments and
attack churches and seize citystreets and set fire to
buildings, then nothing issacred and no one is safe.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
Nothing is sacred and no one is safe If you give
power to tyrants to attackbuildings, do graffiti.
Nothing is sacred and no one issafe.
That is so true.
That is so true.
Donald Trump has summed it upexcellently.
Okay, I want to go through.
I'm going to kind of jump topicto topic to topic today to try
to get all the information I can, and then who knows if we're
(03:00):
even going to get to it all.
So let's go to Chaz first ofall.
So a little bit of insiderinformation on Chaz that I found
out.
So Chaz, the Capitol HillAutonomous Zone.
So it was named the AutonomousZone and after about three or
four days of being called Chaz,the Autonomous Zone, some city
people came in and said hey, youcan't call yourself the
(03:20):
Autonomous Zone becauseautonomous makes it seem like
you're not, not, you'veseparated from the state and
you're like on your own.
And we can't, we, like, can'tallow that.
Like, we will come in and takeyou out.
So the organizers, inconjunction with the city
managers, came in and said okay,we'll call it chop the, uh, the
capitol hill occupy protest.
Okay, so now it's the.
(03:41):
It's reminiscent of occupy wallstreet right, or occupy wall
street.
So now they're reminiscent ofOccupy Wall Street.
Right yeah, occupy Wall Street,so now they're the Occupy
process, Capitol Hill Occupyprotest.
So CHOP, that gave Jenny Durkina plausible out to say, oh,
this is a peaceful protest,these guys are just occupying
this space and that's totallysafe and okay.
So they did that.
(04:02):
Well then, a brilliant man who'sbeen banned from every known
platform out there His name isGavin McGinnis.
Now, who is Gavin McGinnis?
Gavin McGinnis is the formerleader of the proud boys.
I actually think he'sre-involved himself with the
proud boys at some point.
But what the proud boys are isit's basically like a bunch of
rednecks, people who arepatriots, ex-military, gay,
(04:24):
straight, black, white, asianmen, women.
They call themselves the proudboys.
They do body, they do, they'lldo free.
I don't know if it's alwaysfree, but I'm pretty sure it's
usually free.
They'll do free security at,like college events for people
like Ben Shapiro or Ann Coulter.
So these guys are just.
They're like the antithesis ofAntifa.
In fact, there's a famousincident where Antifa had said
(04:45):
that they were going to come andtake out and Colter beat her up
, whatever, drag her out of therestaurant and she was having
lunch with a couple proud boyswho were there, kind of as her
bodyguards, and a fairly decentsized mob of Antifa showed up
and they were so outgunned asfar as bicep size with the proud
boys they ran off.
Anyways, there's all kinds offunny stories.
So that's who the Proud Boysare.
(05:05):
The Proud Boys oftentimesthey're really active down in
Portland where Antifa has kindof had a real foothold for a
long time, and that's where youget a lot of the street clashes
that you can see on the internetbetween Antifa and a bunch of
white guys, a bunch of rednecks.
(05:27):
Usually is what it looks trade.
I don't know if that's reallythe case.
And anyways, that's the ProudBoys.
So the Proud Boys are a publicorganization.
They're no different thanAntifa.
Whatever you consider Antifa,you've got to at least give
Proud Boys the same.
I don't think they'reinternational terror.
I don't think anybody's evergotten hurt from the Proud Boys.
It wasn't, you know, activelybeing Antifa on the streets, but
nonetheless they decided.
Gavin McGinnis went down to thecity of Seattle and he applied
for a protest permit, a permitto be able to hold a protest in
(05:50):
the capital, the park that wasinside of the CHOP.
So half of CHOP is just a bigpark, a public park so he wanted
to hold a public protest inthat park.
So look at the position thisput Jenny Dirk, who used to be a
US attorney.
The position it puts her in isnow she has to grant that
protest on First Amendmentgrounds.
You can't not grant a protest.
(06:12):
I mean, you can't sit here.
You granted a protest to BlackLives Matters, okay.
You can't not grant it to white, to Proud Boys, okay.
Like you can't sue, oh, theseguys are terror, those guys
aren't.
You can't pull it off.
She would never prevail incourt with that argument because
of who she gave the originalpermit to for the Occupy protest
.
So he applied for the permit.
She freaked out because sheneeds to now grant this permit.
(06:34):
She grants this permit.
There's going to be a war, okay, if Proud Boys show up inside
CHOP between Chaz Simone or RazSimone and all of his thugs and
all of the guns and there was atotal of four shootings inside
of there in a matter of threedays right, it would be a war.
It would be an absolutenightmare for the city of
(06:55):
Seattle.
And so Jenny Durkin flipped out, called Gavin McGinnis and
begged him to not apply for thatpermit and she agreed to
disband the CHOP.
She is avoiding the legalchallenge and the legal trouble.
Obviously, this thing isn'tlooking good.
Obviously, there's multiplereasons why this thing needed to
(07:15):
go away, but it was acounter-protest that put it out.
Somebody got the wise idea andsaid, well, if they can speak,
we can speak.
And who knows what would havehappened, who knows how that
would have really gone down, butit would have been good Now,
along with the Chaz.
These people are stupid folks.
These people are stupid.
(07:37):
I'm going to play you a video.
This is one of the men who wasshot inside of Chaz.
Keep in mind.
He's there through the night, alawless area that's claiming to
be autonomous.
No police officers are allowedin.
They've got signs up to saythis is a no-cop co-op, a no-cop
co op.
When I see a sign that saysno-cop co-op, I assume there's
(07:59):
no cops in this cooperative areawe're in.
This man chose to come down tothe no-cop co-op known as Chaz
and then Chop.
He chose to participate in anabsolutely ridiculous protest.
He chose to involve himselfwith people he shouldn't have
been involving himself.
I'm throwing everything in thekitchen sink at this guy.
(08:22):
What I'm about to play you tome is the most unacceptable
thing I've ever heard.
It is unacceptable from top tobottom.
It's unacceptable from the cityside, because this guy's right,
but this guy's also wrong.
This is the problem with oursociety no personal
accountability.
None, zero, zilch.
Our politicians don't takepersonal accountability.
(08:43):
The peasants rarely ever takepersonal responsibility.
We always look to thegovernment or someone else for a
handout.
Nobody takes personalresponsibility.
Where's the morals of thiscountry, the Confucianism, the
personal resolve for rightliving?
This is ridiculous.
All right, Let me play thishere resolve for right living.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
Okay, got, this is ridiculous.
All right, let me.
Let me play this here.
Yo, I was shot in Seattle atChaz on Friday.
The cops left me out there todie.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
I need help.
Okay, the cops left me outthere to the die.
I hope your buds alreadyboiling.
What were you in protest for?
To protest disbandment of thecops.
You get that right, Like.
Do you understand the entirepoint of the protest, the entire
movement that you'reparticipating in, the entire
reason why you're in the Chaz isbecause you want to disband and
(09:38):
get rid of the cops.
You don't want them in yourlife.
I apologize, guys, I hatescreaming into the microphone.
It's really early in themorning and I'm real fired up.
Speaker 4 (09:45):
Somebody in the legal or media to get my story told
and get it out there.
I got shot five times.
Need you guys help Yo?
I was shot in Seattle.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
He got shot five times and now he's looking for
legal help, lawyers.
Whoever he's going to get freehelp, they're going to sue the
city.
They're going to sue thisperson, sue that.
They're probably going to sueDonald Trump, for goodness sakes
, and you know who's going tofront the bill.
Because someone's going to paythis guy.
Someone's going to end uppaying him a settlement.
The city's going to tell him toshut up, pay him a million
bucks, or he's going to get somekind of ridiculous settlement.
(10:18):
Because he got shot inside ofthe no cop co-op, where the city
wasn't enforcing their laws,where they gave up on a precinct
.
He participated in a defund,the police protest.
He participated in the verything that he's now complaining
about.
Isn't it convenient that whenyou get shot, all of a sudden,
(10:39):
you feel like you deserve thecops?
Yes, we all feel that way,buddy.
That's why we're all scratchingour heads at what's going on
with these protests and riots.
It is complete idiocy, idiocy.
We're trying to disband thepolice over this stuff.
Okay, this guy just.
(10:59):
He just really got me fired up.
So now, in addition to this guy, who's now going to sue the
city and get legal help becausehe got shot and got left there.
I remember I told you I wasgoing to play the video, but
it's just full of swear words,where Roz Simone is like hey to
the paramedics, you got to comehelp the guy.
He's bleeding.
That's that kid, totally legit,right?
The paramedics are sittingthere.
Look, everything about this isa mess from top to bottom.
(11:21):
At the end of the day, jennyDurkin, the blood's on her hands
, the blood is on Jenny Durkin'shands.
She should resign, obviouslyshe should resign.
So not only did he leave a guybleeding in the streets which I
agree with him he got leftabandoned there.
Now I have a huge personalissue with him because he he
(11:43):
chose to be there and the factthat now he calls out is the
reason why we get into thesepickles in America.
What's good for thee is notgood for me, and what's good for
me is not good for thee.
Right, it's just like inWashington DC.
I'm not gonna play it becausethe audio is just horrible and
you can barely hear it, butthere's a scene where a
transgender guy in a pink bikiniruns up to one of the CBS media
(12:07):
or ABC media and literallyassaults him and robs him right
there on air and the securitycomes in and takes the guy out.
And the anchor woman, the womanwho's doing the report, who has
been doing reports about thesepeaceful protests and about how
the protesters aren't throwingrocks and the police are the
ones instigating all theviolence.
That woman looks and goes andwho has been pro-defund.
(12:30):
The police, as she's gettingattacked by a transgender man in
a pink bikini outside of theWhite House.
She goes where are the policewhen you need them?
Caught on a hot mic.
That's the problem, right?
Oh yeah, no cops until it'stime.
Okay, next thing, there are morethan a dozen businesses inside
of the CHOP zone in Seattle'sCapitol Hill.
(12:52):
They have filed a 56-page classaction lawsuit against the city
of Seattle.
They're seeking unspecifieddamages.
They could ask for billions.
They could ask for billions.
The terror they've gone through.
I posted a video.
You can go.
Look at all my social medias.
I posted a video.
I drove around the CHOP.
You can see the neighborhoodthat they're in.
Take a look at it.
It's a nice neighborhood.
This is Capitol Hill.
(13:12):
This is like the wine andcheese in the evening part of
town.
It's just barely across thehighway from the main.
You could see skyscrapers.
If you're standing on someone'sroof.
It's like you're right there,it's Capitol Hill, you're in the
heart of downtown, basicallythe beautiful residential area
of downtown.
I mean a two-bedroom townhousein there can't cost less than
like $1.3, $1.4 million.
(13:34):
That's the area these guys tookover.
Those are the citizens, thoseare the businesses that were
abandoned.
Okay, let me read you the listof these businesses Hunter
Capital LLC, liquid and Wine LLC, enterprise and Car Tender.
Car Tender is the one that gotbroken into the Richmark Company
and had a fire started.
Sage Physical Therapy, kathleenCapels an individual, onks
(13:58):
Homeowner Association, madronaReal Estate Services, madrona
Real Estate Investors or someother real estate investors Pike
Associates, redside PartnersApartments LLC.
So this is a lot of theproperty owners, but as well as
a couple of these businessowners.
Nice little class action lawsuithere, and in the claim they say
the rights.
So they're giving a little bitof a pass to Chaz saying hey,
they're supposed to peaceablyassemble and everything.
But they say the lawsuit doesnot seek to undermine the chat
(14:19):
participants message right, butwe have been overrun by.
We have been the residentbusinesses, employees and
residents in and around CHOP,which have been overrun by the
city of Seattle's unprecedenteddecision to abandon and close
off an entire city neighborhood,leaving it unchecked by the
police, unserved by the fire andhealth services and
(14:41):
inaccessible to the public atlarge.
The city's decisions hassubjected businesses, employees
and residents of thatneighborhood to extensive
property damage, safety dangersand an inability to use and
access their properties.
On June 8, 2020, the city ofSeattle abruptly deserted the
Seattle Police Department's EastPrecinct on the corner of 12th
Avenue and East Pine in theSeattle's Capitol Hill
(15:01):
neighborhood, leaving behindnumerous barriers that had
previously been used as a linebetween the police and the
protesters.
When the city abandoned theprecinct and the nearby barriers
, a number of individuals whohad been in the area took
control of the barriers and usedthem to block off streets in
and around the East Precinct.
In the days and weeks after thecity abandoned the East
Precinct, chop participants haveoccupied the public streets,
sidewalks and parks in the areaat all hours of the day and
(15:25):
night.
Rather than seeking to restoreorder and protect the residents
and property owners within CHOP,the city instead chose to
actively endorse, enable andparticipate in the occupation of
CHOP.
The city has provided CalAnderson Park, a public park
located at the center of CHOP,to CHOP for the use of staging
grounds supporting CHOP'soccupation of the surrounding
area, supported by the city.
(15:46):
Countless CHOP participants nowreside in the park at all times
of the day and night, havingturned it into a tent city.
At any given time, hundreds ofCHOP participants are camped out
in the park.
Violence, vandalism, excessivenoise, public drug use and other
crimes are rampant within thepark.
These guys filled this out andfiled it under oath, or, you
(16:09):
know, in the courts.
The city's conduct has resultedin CHOP being blocked off from
public access, among otherconduct detailed below.
The city recently provided theparticipants with concrete
barriers to use to block thestreets, which CHOP participants
have indeed used to barricadethe streets.
The borders have at times beenclosed, been guarded by armed
(16:29):
CHOP participants who overseewho can and cannot enter CHOP.
As a result, the streets arebarred to most all vehicular
traffic, making it virtuallyimpossible for residents and
businesses to access theirbuildings, receive deliveries
and provide goods and servicesto the few customers willing to
enter CHOP.
The city's behavior has madeCHOP the officers will not even
(16:51):
approach the area of theshooting until approximately 20
minutes after the shooting andno professional medical response
was available for at least 15minutes.
So that's talking about theshooting.
At other times, even duringlife and death emergencies, the
police have acquiesced todemands from CHOP participants
that they have abandoned thearea.
The city acknowledged thesafety issues.
(17:12):
It created, in particular,nothing that there are dangerous
conditions at night, but thecity has nonetheless chosen to
maintain the policy providingresources to support CHOP.
And then this last paragraph.
This is crazy.
The city's conduct has enabledthe widespread destruction and
vandalism of private property.
Graffiti and guys.
The graffiti is horrible, it'severywhere.
(17:33):
Everything around CHOP istagged.
You can go check my video.
Everything is tagged.
The city's conduct has enabledthe widespread destruction and
vandalism of private property.
Graffiti is pervasivethroughout CHOP.
It is not only on barriers,streets, sidewalks, but also on
nearly every private buildingwithin CHOP.
Graffiti that is painted overalmost immediately returns.
(17:54):
The property owners have beentold by CHOP participants that
if they dare to paint overgraffiti, their buildings will
be more severely vandalized oreven burned to the ground.
The city has done nothing toprevent this conduct, but
instead has actively endorsedand supported the ongoing
occupation of the CHOP area andthe destruction of property that
occupies.
As a result, property tenants,property owners and their
(18:16):
tenants have not been able tofully use their property owners.
Property owners and tenantshave, for instance, had to lock
and barricade their garages andloading areas for risk of having
CHOP participants entering andvandalizing them.
So, as you can see, it's a 56page lawsuit.
The city of Seattle is toast.
It's toast.
This is crazy.
This is crazy talk.
And you know what?
(18:37):
I hope that Bill Barr.
I hope that Bill Barr, as faras any kind of federal support
can support these guys, the cityof Seattle was warned by
everybody and their dog not tolet this proceed.
Everybody and their dog not tolet this proceed.
Okay, so that's CHOP.
Okay, yesterday we had a prettyamazing breakthrough in the
(18:58):
Michael Flynn case.
So, michael Flynn, a couplethings happened.
First of all, going back to theMichael Flynn case, michael
Flynn's been sitting in court.
He's had Judge Sullivan.
Judge Sullivan is the corruptjudge who I've mentioned before,
has some issues with his ownson.
I got a new accusation on thattoday too, and a new allegation.
So Judge Sullivan was workingwith Elijah Cummings inside of
Baltimore.
They're defrauding HowardUniversity.
(19:19):
They were covering up some oftheir own personal and private
sex scandals.
So that's Judge Sullivan.
Judge Sullivan ended up withthe Michael Flynn case.
Michael Flynn pled guiltybecause of the pressure on his
son, as well as the abhorrentamount of money that he spent,
as well as the advice of hisfirst attorneys, who happened to
also be the law firm where EricHolder is a partner.
(19:40):
Eric Holder is the formerattorney general under Barack
Obama who famously said he wasBarack Obama's wingman.
If Bill Barr said that todayhe'd be head on a pike.
But that is who General Flynnwas getting his original legal
advice from, who were alsotrying to protect themselves,
because they were the ones whohelped General Flynn fill out
the FARA registration form, theForeign Agent Registration Act
form that he was being chargedwith lying to the FBI.
(20:03):
There's a whole bunch of seriesof things, but anyways, they're
the ones who helped him fillout that form.
And so, in order to avoid legaltrouble for their own firm,
they essentially threw MichaelFlynn under the bus.
So Michael Flynn said yeah, I'mguilty of lying to the FBI,
because I told the FBI that Ididn't mention sanctions on the
phone call and they claimed thatI did mention sanctions on the
phone call to the Russianambassador.
(20:23):
Turns out he never mentionedsanctions on the phone call.
The FBI was lying about himmentioning sanctions on the
phone call, therefore settinghim up to have committed perjury
, lying to the FBI, when in factit was the FBI who lied to him.
So now he ends up eventuallyhiring Sidney Powell as his
attorney.
(20:45):
Sidney Powell tries to removehis guilty plea.
This is apparently quite theprocess for Judge Sullivan, who
can't just allow this thing togo to trial, and he wants
hearing after hearing as to whyhe shouldn't just throw General
Flynn into jail without a trial.
Obviously nobody wants to go totrial on this thing, because
then there's discovery, there'sa jury, all that kind of stuff.
So, judge Sullivan, after theDOJ finally moves in, there's
declassified documents that arecompletely exculpatory to
(21:05):
General Flynn, showing that hewas absolutely targeted from the
highest levels of the USgovernment because of the things
he knew all the way.
Going back to Libya you can goback and listen to my Libya how
it All Starts, part 1 episode,and we get into the groundwork
of what happened in Libya, andGeneral Flynn was completely
aware of everything thathappened there that led to the
rise of ISIS.
Additionally, general Flynn,there's a lot of things that
(21:25):
General Flynn knew.
He knows quote unquote knowswhere the bodies are buried.
So, general Flynn, judgeSullivan, won't dismiss the case
that the DOJ has dropped.
So now the DOJ, the prosecutionand Sidney Powell are both
telling the judge you got todrop this case.
Nobody wants to try this case.
Judge Sullivan won't do it, sohe appoints another retired
judge to act as the prosecutor,something that is completely
(21:48):
unheard of in the criminaljustice system.
So, sidney Powell I'm sorry forthe quick story here, but I
just want to make sure youunderstand kind of the basic
timeline of events.
So then Sidney Powell files awrit of mandamus which then goes
to an appellate court in the DCcircuit.
The appellate court is made upof three judges.
Two of the judges are appointedby Republican nominees and one
of the judges is appointed byObama.
The three judges hear thearguments from the three sides,
(22:12):
both the DOJ and JudgeSullivan's representatives and
Sidney Powell.
They asked a lot of questionsand that was all last week.
Yesterday they came out withsupporting the writ of mandamus
and they ordered Judge Sullivanto drop the case on a vote of
two to one.
What this means is it means thejustice system Everybody knows
Judge Sullivan or General Flynnis empty.
You look at their sculpturalinformation and it's very
(22:34):
obvious.
He was targeted and what thisdoes is it A releases him as a
political prisoner.
And he even went a step farther.
Yesterday he called in.
Apparently there wasn't a gagorder placed on him, or there
was.
I've heard mixed things.
But either way the result's thesame.
He didn't talk Since he wasindicted.
He has not spoken a word.
I mean nobody has been on theradio, hasn't been on TV.
(22:56):
I've heard of no speakingengagements.
He's made like two Twitterposts, two, three Twitter posts
in a couple years.
You know the American flag, hisgrandson saying the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Very little.
Yesterday he called in randomlyto the Rush Limbaugh show, spent
about four and a half minuteson the Rush Limbaugh show and he
basically said this.
I'll summarize it for you I'mglad that justice is done.
(23:17):
We were really concernedjustice wouldn't be done, but
this is a huge win for justice.
This is a huge win for LadyLiberty that the justice system,
even though it's got all thesecorrupt pieces, eventually you
get to where truth prevails.
And so he says now we're ontothe next phase.
Obviously General Flynn isgoing to be able to sue
everybody involved and he canjust flay this thing open in
civil court really, and criminalcourt.
(23:46):
I mean there's crimes.
There were absolutely crimescommitted in the prosecution and
the persecution of GeneralFlynn.
Okay, so, having said all that,yesterday we got that writ of
mandamus, and so what thatwritten mandamus said is the
evidence that came out on top ofthe written mandamus, sorry.
So there's the two things.
The written mandamus came out,but in addition there was
(24:07):
additional evidence that wasbrought forward to the court
showing that General Flynn wasinnocent.
So let me read you what it wasthat we got yesterday.
So these are new notes.
These came out before they werefiled under seal and actually
Judge Sullivan apparently had acopy of these notes and they
were filed under permanent seal.
So again we are showing thatJudge Sullivan knew this and
(24:28):
still wouldn't release the case.
Okay, so these handwrittennotes, the new notes which
record Comey's accounting toStrzok of the meeting substance,
constitute definitive evidencethat Obama, barack Obama himself
, was personally directingsignificant aspects of a
criminal investigation into hispolitical enemy's top foreign
policy advisor.
(24:49):
So these are what the notessaid.
The notes are written inchicken scratch and there's some
shorthand in here, butbasically these are the notes as
we would read them.
So the NSA, DDAG so these arethe Flynn cuts.
Other countries.
The Deputy Director, attorneyGeneral, leaned forward on the
unclass question mark VP.
So this is Biden.
(25:09):
Biden questions the Logan Act.
Can we get him on the Logan Act?
So this is significant becauseno one has ever prosecuted the
Logan Act and oddly enough,there's a cute little episode of
the West Wing a few years ago,which purportedly is a favorite
show of Joe Biden.
Can you believe this?
This is so I can't even believeit, like it's so ridiculous.
The entire plot of Spygate washatched out of a West Wing
(25:32):
episode.
That's right, ladies andgentlemen.
In the West Wing episode theywent after a general for the
Logan Act.
The reason it's ridiculous onits face is the Logan Act is a
200-year-old law that's neveronce been successfully enforced.
It is, on its face,unconstitutional.
But in a fictional TV seriesyou can use a law like that to
(25:55):
go after a general for talkingto a foreign country.
So, vp Biden, dumb ass Bidenexcuse my language folks.
Biden suggests the Logan Act asif he just watched a rerun of
the West Wing.
Okay, the president says theseare unusual times, vp, I've been
on the Intel committee for 10years and I never dot, dot, dot,
(26:16):
whatever.
President, make sure you look atthings and plus have the right
people on it.
So this is a handwritten notewhere the president of the
United States is directing aninvestigation.
The topic of this conversationis General Flynn's phone call
with the ambassador Kislyak.
This is the moment when theyare setting up the intent to go
(26:39):
after General Flynn.
Now remember, if you look back,the FBI was ready to drop any
investigation into General Flynnbecause they could find nothing
derogatory.
But on this day, after thismeeting, peter Strzok goes back
and texts Lisa Page, hisgirlfriend, and says turns out,
we didn't shut down the Flynncase because of our own
(27:00):
incompetence.
A paperwork error caused themnot to shut down the case, which
was convenient, peter Strzokpointed out in the text message,
because they wouldn't have toopen a new one Big deal.
So the president says make sureyou look at things, plus, have
the right people on it.
They changed out the people whowere looking at General Flynn
too.
Peter Strzok, bob Mueller, youknow the whole, the whole Comey
(27:22):
gang, right, the whole Muellerrich hunt, the 13 angry
Democrats, that's these peoplequote have the right people on
it.
President, is there anything Ishouldn't be telling the
transition team?
Oh, my goodness, you have anoutgoing administration days
before leaving office and youhave the president wondering if
(27:43):
he should disclose things to thenew incoming administration.
Is governance not important?
Is rule of law not important?
Is the new administrationdoesn't need to be fully briefed
on all the functions andworkings of America?
Of course?
Of course You've gotobstruction of an incoming
(28:04):
presidency.
You've got acts of treason inthese notes here, flynn, this is
from the director.
So this is Flynn.
Oh, this is from James Comey.
Flynn says the Kislyak callsappear legit.
So now you have the FBIdirector holding a copy of
Flynn's phone call telling thepresident, the VP and the others
(28:25):
standing there that the callappears legit and then
ineligible happy new year.
Dot, dot, dot.
Yeah right, those are the notes.
Those are the notes.
Make sure you look at thingsand have the right people on it.
Obama is quoted as sayingComey's description that Flynn
and Kislyak calls appear legitshorthand for legitimate and
other notes.
Until this week, thisexculpatory information was
(28:46):
withheld from Flynn and hisdefense team, multiple
congressional committees and theAmerican public.
A lengthy campaign to illegallyleak selectively edited
defamatory information throughmedia accessories damaged the
Trump administration and spurredthe appointment of a special
counsel to investigate anyoneassociated with the Trump
(29:08):
campaign.
This is crazy, folks, crazy.
Crazy in the kind of way thatif we don't get justice, we're
done, we're done.
Okay, another thing I want tothrow it out there.
I want to make people aware whoknows Somebody might do this.
This comes from my tipper, johnhere to help.
Who's the federal witness infederal witness protection?
(29:28):
And John here is saying thatBiden sometimes this stuff is
just really hard to ingestbecause it is like geez.
So with this he says who'scontrolling Judge Sullivan?
So it was Biden who started theLogan Act against Reverend
Flynn and who controls JudgeSullivan?
Judge Sullivan, his son Biden'scoming, and others entered the
(29:50):
others' House of UnderageHorrors H-O-R-R-O-S, where they
could go one in several areas.
So I don't know if I mentionedto you before about on Twitter
there's a girl that goes by thehandle Obama Girl, and John here
to help gave her some tips onsome houses she needed to go
check out.
She went and checked out thesehouses these houses happen to be
the houses that thesecongressional leaders, these
(30:11):
corrupt judges, apparently go toabuse children and she
collected evidence, videoevidence as well as testimony of
the other neighbors, and tookit to the FBI.
She took it to the FBI.
She live streamed a lot of thison Twitter and then, after she
went to the FBI, she got deaththreats.
I mean, almost instantly shegot death threats and then she
ended up going silent for quitea while.
(30:31):
Anyway, she's popped back up,so we know she's safe, but now
she's awaiting.
You know she's on the run.
She's on the run.
She turned over this informationthat was very damning.
She put it all out there onTwitter pictures, evidence,
testimony and everything and nowshe's on the run.
So this is the kind of stuffthat we go okay, is there going
to be justice?
Right, john is here to help.
He's an insider who's on therun as well because the
government wants him gonebecause of the things he knows
(30:53):
about people that are currentlyin government, like Judge
Sullivan and Biden.
Like they don't want theseloose ends out there.
And these loose ends are outthere putting their stuff on
Twitter to researchers.
And Bama Girl was just aTwitter researcher in Baltimore,
in the neighborhood, and shewent out and checked this out
and uncovered something that'shuge and yet, just as a little
individual, she's powerless.
Right, she went and dropped itoff at the FBI.
(31:15):
She gave them all theinformation she had.
She videoed herself doing it sothat she could prove that she
did it and the next thing, youknow, she's run for her life.
You know, sometimes I alwaysthink about Donald Trump.
When he talks about taking theslings and arrows, I mean, geez,
okay, so that's neither herenor there, that's only an
allegation.
(31:36):
That's just as far as Twittergoes.
But you know, when you thinkabout the craziness, you know,
here's a judge, who's the DOJ,says hey, we got nothing to try
and actually even gave the judgea sculptural evidence showing
that General Flynn was set upand he still doesn't dismiss the
case.
You have to scratch your headreally hard.
I have this discussion with mybrother-in-law all the time
where he tries to give peoplethe benefit of the doubt and I'm
(31:56):
like, look man, you can't givepeople the benefit of the doubt
when they've burned you 97 times.
Like you've got an innocentgeneral who spent millions of
dollars on this defense andyou're trying to wrangle some
kind of mental gymnastic reasonwhy the judge shouldn't drop the
case when the DOJ says to dropit.
There's no mental gymnasticsneeded here.
You've got open and obviouscorruption.
(32:18):
You've got to ask the whyquestions.
Why is Judge Sullivan doingthat?
What's going on?
I mean, it's just crazy.
So I want to play this here.
This is a oh.
I do want to mention one otherthing.
This has to do with Black LivesMatter.
So I've heard a lot about a lotof people saying you know black
.
I personally have spoken topeople who are unclear that
(32:39):
black lives matter is a Marxistorganization.
I am disgusted.
Our streets are painted up withblack lives matter.
There's a black lives mattercar in NASCAR.
Now there's black lives mattershowing up everywhere.
What they're doing is they'renormalizing.
They're normalizing Marxism asa political ideology.
(33:00):
Do you remember when DonaldTrump says you know, you are the
ones who built this greatcountry, you and your ideology.
What is our ideology?
He's pointing at us, thepeasants.
What is the peasants ideology?
Right, we, the people, aresovereign.
We, the people, hold the power.
We, the people, willself-govern.
We, the people, will, fromamongst us, appoint people to
govern.
Okay, those people have failedus.
(33:21):
The government has becomeindependent from the people.
It's time for the people toreclaim the government.
Donald Trump is the first stepin reclaiming the government.
We took an outsider, a man ofour own, a man who made his
money in the land and on realestate, just like most of us can
.
Not in hedge funds, not doingthe invisible, not grifting, not
(33:41):
getting billions of foreigndollars in grants and aids.
Donald Trump made his money.
Like every other peasant hasthe ability to make his money.
That's why guys like BarackObama said Donald Trump is the
epitome of the American dream,because Donald Trump didn't need
government corruption.
In fact, he fought governmentcorruption in order to make his
fortune.
In fact, he fought governmentcorruption in order to make his
(34:02):
fortune.
Okay, enough about that.
So this Trump thing, the Trumpresistance, was started by Act
Blue.
Act Blue uses a place calledMomentum Trains and the Sunrise
Movement.
Momentum, does the excuse me,just Momentum.
Momentum has trained the BLMand the Sunrise Movement.
(34:23):
Momentum, does the excuse me,just Momentum.
Momentum has trained the BLMand the Sunrise Movement.
Both are riotous andessentially the same
organization, and so, anyways,you can trace this back here.
Momentum trains on Marxismideology and building social
movements to transform commonsense and win on the most
pressing social issues.
Anyway, so that's what.
That's what's going on.
I mean, the obvious connectionsare there and they're also
starting to get out on the newsand talk about being Marxist,
(34:45):
like really declaring themselvesas Marxist, and that's kind of
good news.
It makes people aware.
Okay, so the next video I wantto play is a real quick video.
It's just from Tom Fitton, buthe just kind of lays out the
Obamagate scandal and just kindof where we're at.
Speaker 5 (34:57):
Okay, I like it.
It it's quick.
James comey, the corrupt fbidirector, discussed the dossier
in the oval office with barackobama and joe biden and, of
course as I affectionately callher, saint hillary of the grand
jury, she paid for the dossier.
No one's asked her anyquestions.
When is barack ob, is BarackObama and Hillary Clinton going
(35:20):
to go under oath or maybe evenbe asked a tough question about
their involvement when it comesto abusing the powers of office
to spy on, suppress and targetyour political opponents?
Barack Obama makes RichardNixon seem like a kid here.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
Okay, so that's what we've got sitting on the Spygate
scandal.
I want to jump to one man.
There's two other things Ireally want to jump to, but I'm
kind of running out of my owntime here.
Okay, this comes from the NewEngland Journal of Medicine and
Dr Fauci was a participant inthis particular study.
And listen to this.
This is just some highlightsout of it.
I'm not going to read it all,but I want to read these
(36:07):
highlights as it pertains tomasks, because a lot of us are
in these mask orders.
Okay, I'm just going to readthe whole thing.
In the past week, Dr Fauci andthe New England Journal of
Medicine have admitted thatmasks are little more than
symbols virtue signaling.
This is right out of the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.
For those of you who shoutscience like it's a turret tick,
(36:27):
it's from the New EnglandJournal of Medicine on May 21st
2020.
Quote we know that wearing amask outside healthcare
facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.
Public health authoritiesdefine a significant exposure to
COVID-19 as face-to-facecontact, within six feet with a
patient with symptomaticCOVID-19.
That is sustained for at leasta few minutes, and some say more
(36:51):
than 10 minutes or even 30minutes.
The chance of catching COVID-19from a passing interaction in a
public space is thereforeminimal.
In many cases, the desire forwidespread masking is a
reflexive reaction to anxietyover the pandemic.
So then the question is askedso why are we ordered to wear
masks?
The answer symbolism.
(37:11):
From the same article in theNew England Medical Journal or
Journal of Medicine, Quote it isclear that masks serve symbolic
roles.
Quote it is clear that masksserve symbolic roles.
Masks are not only tools, theyare also talismans that may help
increase health care workersperceived sense of safety,
well-being and trust in theirhospitals.
So it's symbolic.
Now I want to play jay inslee.
(37:33):
Yesterday.
So, jay, jay inslee had alittle press conference to talk
about this new order wearingmasks, and I mean, aside from
just being completely blown away, that we're just at the point
we're at in America.
This was Jay Inslee's talk andI've got to fast forward to
where he said what I, becauseyou know there's a lot of
introduction stuff, so give mejust a second here, Okay.
(37:53):
So here Jay Inslee is going totalk about the mask.
He just got asked directlybecause yesterday in Lewis
County, which is down in theVancouver area just north of
Portland, the sheriff basicallysaid, after 140 days, Jay Inslee
has decided oh, we should bewearing masks all of a sudden,
right, I mean, this is like fourmonths after the pandemic broke
out and all of a sudden nowwe're being mandated to wear
masks.
I mean, we probably would havecomplied just easily during the
(38:14):
initial first two week lockdown,but after you got the first two
weeks, you don't just keepadding and adding and adding
when you don't have peoplelaying in the parking lot dead
at the hospital.
I mean we've got empty parkinglots still, okay.
So this is Jay Inslee.
Remember what I just read youfrom the New England Journal of
Medicine?
Remember these are the peoplewho are always saying follow the
science, follow the science,follow the science.
Well, this is Jay Inslee, beinga little wise guy who is
(38:36):
following the science.
And look at the way hemanipulates the reasoning here.
He doesn't talk about health,he talks about the symbolism of
health.
Listen to it through.
He's gonna use nice platitudesand nice things that might even
make you go okay, okay, okay.
But listen carefully.
He doesn't give one legitimatehealth reason as to why we're
(38:57):
wearing masks.
Speaker 6 (38:59):
But what motivates people to wear a face mask is,
principally you don't want tohurt somebody else.
You don't want to kill somebodyelse, you don't want to give
people unknowingly a virus.
Speaker 2 (39:12):
Okay, so we just read the science right.
You have to be symptomatic, youhave to be face-to-face.
So since I don't have aspitting problem and I don't
spit in people's faces on aregular basis, I don't talk that
close.
I don't really need a mask.
So the reason we wear them iswe don't want to notice how he
uses the word kill.
Kill somebody else as if yourbreath is a killer breath.
If you don't have symptoms, youare not probably spreading
(39:33):
COVID.
That's the science.
So notice.
He's saying this right, likethis is the symptom, the
reaction, but when does heactually provide any evidence
that that happens?
Speaker 6 (39:43):
the symptom, the reaction, but when does he
actually provide any evidencethat that happens?
That's what really motivatespeople to do this and, as
increasing numbers of peoplerealize, we can unknowingly
infect a grocery store clerk I'mtalking to or my grandparent
that I'm visiting.
As people come to understandthat, that's what motivates
people to wear a mask if theydon't want to hurt somebody else
(40:03):
.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
This is it Again?
If the science was true, if thescience was there, nobody would
disagree.
Remember, these guys bang onthe table and they say science,
science, science, science,science, but there's no science
here.
Okay, there's no science here.
He hasn't said any science.
He's made some.
You know, you could breathe onpeople, but the science says
that it's not contagious likethat.
(40:26):
Its main effectiveness is toraise people's consciousness
about that Its maineffectiveness is to raise
people's consciousness, not tomake you healthier, not to
prevent the death that I justclaimed you would cause, or the
reason you want to wear the maskso you don't cause death.
That's not the real reason.
The real reason we're wearingit is not to actually prevent
(40:50):
health, it's to raise ourconsciousness, to let people
know that we don't want to killthem.
Did you notice that?
I read from the New EnglandJournal of Medicine.
It's quoted in there as sayingit's largely symbolic.
And here's RJ Inslee whofollows the science and dang it
he does.
He's obviously read that NewEngland Journal of Medicine
article showing that masks areineffective except as a way of
(41:10):
symbolism.
So it raises our consciousness.
Speaker 6 (41:14):
To give them confidence that sometimes
there's some peer pressure thatworks.
Speaker 2 (41:20):
Okay so now our government is going to use peer
pressure.
Okay, so the government islaunching a peer pressure that
works.
Okay, so now our government isgoing to use peer pressure.
Okay, so the government islaunching a peer pressure
campaign by making everybodywear a mask to raise the
awareness about this, eventhough it doesn't actually do
anything.
Speaker 6 (41:35):
And to give people license to do this.
Speaker 2 (41:38):
You telling me you're giving my friends and neighbors
and people around me licensefor peer pressure.
I mean, I just want to.
Let's just make sure we getthat full sentence in there.
Okay, let's make sure we hearit all.
Speaker 6 (41:53):
Enforce this when it takes effect on Friday.
This is to raise people'sconsciousness about that, to
give them confidence thatsometimes there's some peer
pressure that works, and to givepeople license to do this now.
This is a misdemeanor.
Okay, peer pressure, and it's amisdemeanor.
Do not abide by this law.
(42:13):
It is the law of the state ofwashington, but we believe that
there will be huge voluntarycompliance with this because of
the peer pressure pressure, lawenforcement activity will not be
necessary, because we would betotal hypocrites.
We're looking for compliance,not citations.
Now our experience today in.
(42:33):
Washington has given usconfidence about that.
Speaker 2 (42:37):
Because we're a deeply blue state and most
people are sheep.
Hence the comment from thesheriff down in Lewis County
Don't be a sheep.
Oh, my goodness folks, we arein crazy land.
He actually did read the thinghe said.
This is largely symbolic.
This is to raise ourconsciousness.
No, it's not actually toprevent sickness, because it
(42:57):
doesn't do that.
It's not.
This is a symbol.
So here's the deal.
I said it yesterday.
He asked me to wear a mask.
I'm going to put my Trump 2020mask on, but there are some outs
.
So I want to make some peopleaware and I want to thank my
friend She'll go by M on thisshow she sent.
She sent me this.
But a couple of things toremember.
If you are a concealed carrypermit holder, you can't wear a
(43:18):
mask.
It's against the law to wear amask if you're a concealed carry
permit holder.
So if somebody asks, just tellthem oh, I'm a concealed carry
permit holder and I'm notallowed to wear a mask.
First of all, that'll make themnot want to confront you.
So that's probably the bestplan to be kept from.
The peer pressure of beingforced to wear a mask is the
fact that you legally can'tbecause you're locked and loaded
.
Ok, so get locked and loadedand if you're not, work towards
(43:42):
that so you don't have to wear amask.
A couple other things.
It's against the law for peopleto make you wear a mask.
You're exempt from wearing amask, mandating a mask under
HIPAA.
So you can say I have a medicalcondition and then if they ask
you to disclose it, you can say,under HIPAA, I don't have to
disclose it and the ADA?
So that's good.
You can do that Online.
(44:03):
You can go and you can look atlinks.
There's actually places whereyou can report ADA and HIPAA
violations and we should I mean,we should flood the zone and
this.
I'm going to just get to mylast little point here.
Okay, I want to play this fromNancy Pelosi.
This, uh, this is crazy.
Just listen to this here inother words, for something to
(44:26):
happen, they're going to have toface the realities, okay so
she's talking about the policereform bill that the democrats
walked away from, which wouldhave been great, but they want
to like totally defund and dothings, so look at the
accusation she makes herebrutality, the rallies of the
need for justice in policing andthe recognition that there are
(44:52):
many, many good people in lawenforcement but not all, and
that we have to address thoseconcerns.
Speaker 7 (44:57):
So when they admit that and have some suggestions
that are worthy of consideration, but so far they were trying to
get away with murder, actuallythe murder of George Floyd.
Speaker 2 (45:08):
There has been another issue as far as the Did.
You hear that she's blaming themurder of George Floyd and
getting away with it on theRepublicans' bill.
What, Okay, here'sRepresentative Jayapal who's
going to support that, so thisis the she's being played the
quote.
She's being asked the questionabout what Nancy Pelosi said
(45:28):
about murder okay, about theRepublicans' murder, and this is
a representative here inWashington.
She represents the Seattle area.
How are Republicans trying toget away with murder?
Well, I think if Republicans aregoing to insist on half
measures, on things like studiesabout chokeholds, that is
absolutely letting people getaway with murder.
(45:50):
Let me play for you Studies forchokeholds, letting people get
away with murder.
I'm not quite sure how thatconnection gets made 100%, but
okay, here's another person who,addressing this murder issue.
Oh, nevermind, I'll skip it, itdoesn't matter.
(46:12):
Okay, so you've got.
You've got otherrepresentatives.
Chuck Schumer jumped in and, uh, he said he supported what
Nancy Pelosi said a hundredpercent, that, uh, the president
and Republicans are gettingaway with murder.
Guys.
They're claiming that we'retrying to get away with murder
like legit murder.
They're trying to pin GeorgeFloyd on Republicans, on
conservatives.
If it hasn't been obvious yet,we're in a knife fight.
In fact, general Flynnreferenced that on Rush Limbaugh
(46:34):
yesterday.
I was in a knife fight forthree years.
We're in a knife fight.
These people do not play by therules.
They use the rules against us.
They know that we are peacefulpeople, us peasants I'm talking
about us, the ones listening tothis call or this podcast.
We're peaceful people.
We want good in the world.
We wanna give people thebenefit of the doubt.
(46:54):
We have a Christian upbringing.
We believe in the basics of the10 commandments.
Right, we can get along insociety.
We settle our differences.
If we can't settle, we agree todisagree and we just don't
associate with people that driveus crazy.
That is the way it should be.
These people are in our grill,they're in our faces okay,
they're infiltrating our schools.
They're changing the curriculumwithout asking, without telling
(47:16):
us, by sneaking things in okay,they're putting communists into
executive-level positions atall levels of government.
It's a wolf in sheep's clothingsituation, if there ever was
one.
If Donald Trump has done onegood thing, it's exposed every
one of them.
He's exposed them all.
General Flynn exposed them all.
He said in his interview withRush Limbaugh last night we
(47:36):
shined a light on truth and thetruth set me free Guys.
This is critical.
The tides have turned.
The tides have turned.
It is time for us to fight back.
I truly believe and a lot ofpeople have been mentioning this
, like why isn't anybody pushingback?
Why isn't anybody pushing back?
(47:56):
It's because the 70%, the vastmajority of people who are
Americans, decent people whojust want to live in peace,
they're armed and they won'tcome out and fight with their
words.
They will come out and fightwith their guns.
It's the truth.
Every single person on thispodcast who has listened to my
(48:18):
voice, I know.
I know that deep down in yourhearts, as you've watched
rioting in our streets, asyou've watched the graffiti get
put on, as you've watchedfriends get sucked up into a
Marxist movement, I know everyone of you has thought to
yourself at what point, at whatpoint does the government become
(48:39):
moot and we, the people, rule?
Because the moment we, thepeople, rule and I've said this
in multiple posts all oversocial media the justice will be
swift and awful.
The justice will be swift andawful To avoid that, to avoid
(49:00):
the civil war.
Keep in mind, folks, inMinnesota there's 1.7 million
people that go out hunting everyyear with a deer rifle.
That's 1.7 million snipers inthe state of Minnesota.
They don't live in Minneapolis,but they know how to hit a
(49:20):
target and, trust me, when theydescend on Minneapolis, there
won't be nothing left.
And I'm not saying that just tobe a rabble rouser, but you've
got politicians calling anentire movement murderous.
You've got them ripping downour history, our statues.
They've infiltrated every levelof our government.
(49:41):
Folks, we are at war.
It's time we start fighting.
It's time when you want to dothe traditional nice thing and
agree to disagree.
It's time that you stand yourground.
You start talking to someonethat's a Marxist, you look them
in the eyes and you tell themare you a Marxist?
Do you believe in commonproperty?
(50:02):
Do you believe in collectivepunishment?
Do you believe in collectivepunishment?
Make them own their shame.
Make them own their shame.
Make them defend collectivepunishment.
Make them defend it.
Okay, there's a statue in thecity where I live, because the
city where we're at is, for themost part, norwegian, and so
there's a Viking.
There's a Viking statue and thewhole community is surrounded
(50:24):
by this Viking.
It's the mascot for the mostpart Norwegian, and so there's a
Viking.
There's a Viking statue and thewhole community is surrounded
by this Viking.
It's the mascot for the highschool.
Well, I got news for you BlackLives Matter protesters.
Vikings held owned slaves andthey owned a lot of them, and
they were not nice people forthe most part.
You didn't want to see theDanes showing up at your
doorstep.
I've thought many times I'lljust pull that statue down, put
a little sign on it and say, oh,they were slave owners, and
(50:44):
then make the ridiculous peoplein my community defend me, the
absurd, or fight against me,which then I can just turn
around.
Well, take the Viking out of it, put anybody's name there.
Why are you toppling statues?
No, I'm not going to do that,and if the statue falls, don't
come knocking to me because Ididn't do it.
Don't come knocking to mebecause I didn't do it, but I'm
saying we've all thought aboutthis.
(51:08):
Guys, it's time to move into thezone where we talk.
You need to be online, you needto be vocal on social media,
because that's where a battle isbeing waged.
It is an information war.
And don't think things onsocial media don't matter, right
?
We need to talk to the peoplein our lives in person and we
need to be clear about things.
It's time We've got to speak up.
We must turn the mirror on thepeople that are ruining our
country.
There is a group of people thatare intentionally ruining our
(51:34):
country.
It's time we turn the mirror onthem.
They've supported crooks andcriminals, crooks and criminals.
We found out yesterday BarackObama committed treason.
The president says it, peoplehave been saying it.
We found the document, thesmoking gun, the handwritten
contemporaneous notes.
(51:54):
This is deadly serious.
It's time to stop playing nicebefore it gets worse.
All right.
On that note, if you like whatI have to say and you like the
show and you like the content,please share it with others.
That's another way you canfight back.
Share the information.
You can find me on Twitter, atPeasantsPod, on Parler, at
(52:15):
PeasantsPod, facebook at thePeasants Perspective, and you
can also email me peasantspod atgmailcom.
Thanks so much, guys.
I look forward to talking toyou later.
Speaker 1 (52:28):
Who are the Britons?
We all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would hearPlease, please, good people, I
(52:49):
am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No-one lives there.
Then, who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you.
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
(53:11):
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the waves he think he is.
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how did you become kingthen?
The Lady of the Lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
(53:33):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
(53:55):
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
Supreme executive power Justbecause some watery tart threw a
sword at you.
Shut up.
I mean, if I went round sayingI was an emperor just because
some moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up.
Will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
(54:15):
Come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.