When Those in Power Play Dirty: Exposing Political Corruption and Cover-ups

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
I don't like it.
We gotta do a campaign.

Speaker 4 (00:14):
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth
Bunchik had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb we're gettingscrewed, man.

Speaker 1 (00:29):
Every time we turn around we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's got to stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, Every one of us.

(00:52):
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasants Perspective.
Sorry, and like every day, I'mstill opening up the chats.

(01:15):
So thank you very much forjoining us.
It was a great day, you know,yesterday or I should say not
yesterday this morning, as I wasdriving in, I was like man, you
know, I feel like every daysometimes.
Unfortunately, we just kind ofcover a similar, similar topics.

Speaker 8 (01:31):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:32):
And uh, and then I had this little voice inside my
head was like, don't worry aboutit, People come to you to hear
about those topics because theywant to ignore them the rest of
the day.
And I was like actually, thatis the feedback I get, get.
It was like one of the one ofour show listeners that
oftentimes reach out to me.
I was like that's exactly whatthey would say.
Like you know what.
We're gonna keep at it becausethat's exactly the point of this

(01:53):
.

Speaker 7 (01:53):
This is news commentary and this is news and
you know sometimes what we do isa little bit like the truman
show, but you know, sometimespeople need daily reassurance
that everything's going to beokay.

Speaker 1 (02:03):
Yeah, yeah, basically weed and boys on on youtube.
Welcome, welcome every morningit's always good to see you in
there.
Our show is growing.
It's kind of fun.
It's really fun watching.
Just slowly but surely it'spicking up watching.
The hours watched increase.
I mean we're I don't know 27000 views or something.
At this point I have no idea.

(02:24):
It's pretty awesome, prettyawesome.
Oh, look, here we go, jonahtakis, it's a good, warm morning
.
Yes, we are in the throes ofsummer, aren't we?

Speaker 7 (02:35):
supposed to get cooler today where we're at, and
tomorrow is supposed to rainall day.
I'll take it.

Speaker 1 (02:42):
I'm excited to live here in the rain, so moved here
in 2013.
Weather never bothered me.
Never bothered me because, youknow, I'm in and out of an
office Just driving the rain ohit's nice.
And I have a metal roof atnight oh, it sounds so cool.
Listen to this.
You know we live in the.
We live in the northwest.
And then I started workingoutside.
Aha, I was waiting for that.

(03:06):
And then it was like thisfreaking rain will not stop.
I worked what felt like a decadewith a wet sweater on you know,
because you just wear a highvis hoodie out on a job site and
you're wet all the time.
I just got used to beingcompletely muggy, wet inside my
sweater.
I'd work, I'd shovel, I'd rake.
Sometimes people would come upto me, aren't you like I'd just
be beating sweat and I'm wearinga sweater and they're like

(03:27):
what's going on?
I take the sweater off, I gettoo cold, yeah, and I'm already
wet anyways.
It's bristling, and then, ofcourse, when it really rains, it
slows down the job site.
So I started to kind of likedetest the weather up here yeah
but this summer, even likethrough the hot days, I I'm like
well, I'm mostly inside, andit's been nicer.

Speaker 7 (03:46):
And then if you're a laborer some days you're putting
on that wet vest in the morning.
Ooh, ooh.

Speaker 1 (03:52):
You know what I'm talking about.
My big thing lately has beensocks.
Right, I wore uh, I wore.
Socks are very important.
I wore merino wool socks thickwork socks every day for years,
to where we have dozens anddozens of pairs.
I hate them.
I don't like the way they feelon my feet, but you need warm

(04:12):
feet, and so merino wool is theway to go for a work boot.

Speaker 7 (04:15):
Well, you don't want to get trench foot either.

Speaker 1 (04:17):
Don't want to get trench foot, yeah, and if you
wear cotton socks they just getdestroyed, yep.
So I've been wearing wool socksand uh, now I don't need to
wear wool socks and I'm like Ijust want to wear nice soft
cotton socks.
The other thing too in prisonthe socks were horrible.
They had a.
I haven't worn a pair of sockswith a with a seam in them in

(04:37):
the front of the show since Iwas eight.
Right, that's what they got.
Oh my god, they were horrible.
They caused blisters on yourtoes.
They were horrid.

Speaker 7 (04:46):
They had no heel, of course, right they're just a
tube sock well, the only goodstory about those is they got
two heels.

Speaker 1 (04:54):
Oh my yeah, it's kind of like flipping your underwear
inside out after enough timethey do wear in a certain
direction.
Yeah, that was the mostannoying thing was wearing
crappy socks.
And then, when I was in dc, theshoes we had you know, they
give you flats, they give you,like these little slip-on flats,
but you can buy off, commissary, a pair of tennis shoes.

(05:16):
Well, in dc they were russellbrand, everything was russell
brand, and these shoes werehorrible.
They were horrible shoes, infact.
They made my feet numb.
I walked a lot in prison.
Like that's how I took up mytime.
I'd walk the block, I'd walkback and forth on the top tier,
just, and then when I got toPhiladelphia, you'd walk in

(05:37):
circles.
I got to Missouri, I'd walk thetrack and in both Philadelphia
and in DC I had crappy shoes andit made my feet numb.
I couldn't feel my toes, like Iactually got numb feet.
And talk to a guy who ranmarathons and he's like, oh,
that's pretty normal, it has todo with the shoes and blood flow

(05:57):
.
And he's like, yeah, you got toget better shoes.
And I'm like, yeah, because Ihave a lot of options in here.
Anyways, they were bad.
The American conservative ran apiece yesterday that is a
really good piece.
It's called Peace AfterConquest the Armenia.
Azerbaijan, peace as unpalatablelessons for everyone.

(06:21):
Unpalatable lessons foreveryone.
So here it says that Armenia Ican say that word Azerbaijan
peace summit can be claimed tobe the most significant
achievement of President DonaldTrump's second term foreign
policy.
As his administration, I got todo some some talking this

(06:43):
morning.
As his administration, I got todo some some talking this
morning.
Warm me up, as hisadministration constantly
reminds us, trump, a man chasingan ever elusive Nobel Peace
Prize, is the peace president,so much so that he is seeking
peace in badlands of EasternEurope, western Asia, where
three Huntingtonian civilizationblocks, western Islamic and
Orthodox clash, in thechronically bloody Middle East.

(07:05):
The admin also reminds us thathe has settled wars between
Thailand and Cambodia True,indian Pakistan debatable and a
variety of African ethnic groupsPartially true, but there is no
denying this.
This one is different.
Armenia and Azerbaijan werelocked in what seemed to be an
intractable conflict, but thosecountries' respective heads of

(07:26):
state sat with Trump grinningand signing a paper that made
the US a quasi guarantor ofamnesty in the region, albeit
with a heavy dose of Americancorporate involvement, at a
junction in the historic traderoute that might once again
alter the balance of power inthat theater.
I have a degree in politicalscience.
I have a minor in internationalstudies and military science.

(07:46):
My international studies minortook me all over the world
studying how differentgovernments work and
specifically how power shifts.
Because you've got anunderlying power structure of,
say, a religion Islam and thenyou have independent power
structures of nations that areguarding certain resources and
populations and they are eitherprotecting certain minority
groups or they are persecutingthem.

(08:08):
But you have this connectedIslam or you have Christianity,
connects all of Europe andAmerica, right.
So understand that's called thecathedral, so understand that
that those ideas, those valuesof religion carry through space
and time.
And then nations are designedto protect resources, borders,
et cetera, et cetera.
You know so it's like thistiered structure.

(08:30):
So when you look at conflicts inthese regions, a lot of times
it's where you have the clashesof two underlying cathedrals.
When you have Christian,orthodox and you have Islamic
religions under the same nationtrying to share the same
resources, they don't share thesame base programming, they
don't share all the same valuesystems.
Sure, at its deepest core,everything's got a lot of

(08:53):
similarities.
That's why these religions spanthrough space and time is they
hold truths, things like karma,what you sow you reap, et cetera
, et cetera.
But they don't always holdthings like value of life or
human rights, or consciousnessor anything like that.
The American brokered, uh,broke the American brokered.
And so the reason I say that is, when I read something like

(09:16):
this, I'm like this ismonumental.
This could change the course ofworld history.
Right, cause it's these littlehotspots that'll sit and
germinate for a hundred years,and then all of a sudden boom,
world War II breaks out and theJews are the victims.

Speaker 7 (09:29):
Do you have any historical context that you can
give us, like do you know whatthese two countries have been
about?
Let's read it, okay, yep.

Speaker 1 (09:38):
The American Brokered Guaranteed Peace hands over a
20-mile corridor to be developedby the US-Trump route for
international peace andprosperity.
That's what they're calling it,otherwise known as Azerbaijan
as the Zangzir Corridor and inArmenia as the Sunuk Road links
Azerbaijan with Turkey throughArmenia.
It will be operated obstinatelyby an American company, thus

(09:59):
guaranteeing peace and profitand profit.
The route will start ahistorically route, will restart
a route historically used byamerican merchants connecting
turkey and, by virtue, europe,with asia, without having to
cross through either iran orrussia.
The idea is that once thisroute is established, it will
allow turkey to reopen itsborder with armenia, closed

(10:20):
since 1993 armenianAzer conflict.
Turkey's President, recepTayyip Erdogan, was instrumental
in convincing Trump to makethis deal, as well as helping
the American and Azerbaijanisides together.
Both Moscow and Tehran arecircumspect about the project,
but powerless to do anythingabout it.
They do, however, read thewriting on the wall.

(10:41):
This deal, while bestowingprofit to America, also
strengthens Turkish regionalpreponderance over the historic
rivals of russia and persia.
One of the first references toarmenian commerce connecting
asia and europe through thisroute was found in marco polo's
13th century chronicles.
Venetian merchants like polowere trying to trying out new
trade routes and partnersconnecting india to italy,
seeking asian wealth, silk,ivory, jewels, rugs and spices.

(11:03):
The route only gained even moreimportance after mehmed
conquered constantinople,establishing turkish supremacy
around the bosporus and makingthe ottomans guaranteed tours of
order by both land and sea.
The ottomans in turn settledmany armenians from eastern
turkey and crimenia in istanbul.
Armenian migration and tradecontinued to gain momentum as
the ottomans mellowed and becamemore and more for lack of a

(11:24):
better word multiculturalthroughout the 16th century.
So this is like an ancient areaand this conflict is really
ancient too.
Right, there's been a lot ofpopulation movement, armenians
brought into Istanbul and allthis kind of stuff.
It's created a lot of tension.
The pressure of imperialismnaturally liberalized trade
routes and encouraged morecultural dilution.

(11:45):
And there was anothergeopolitical angle the Ottomans
had to be good to the traders todemonstrate that they were
better than the Safid Persianand Russian empires, both of
which were rivals to Ottomanpower.
One of the earliest examples ofborderless trade.
This network connected Surat,madras, calcutta, constantinople
, izmir, moscow, krasnov, live,venice and amsterdam.

(12:05):
All all over it weresignificant armenian and turkish
diasporas and a culturalimprints.
The total volume of goodscirculated through this network
was immense and it was eclipsedonly by the eventual rise of the
british imperial sea sea routesthrough aden and suez.
The current dynamic echoes thepast, with a rapid shift of

(12:25):
balance of power, with thecaucuses towards towards turkey
and the west, as opposed to anyrussian or ironic iranian-led
bloc.
As russia got busy with ukraine, azerbaijan, decisively routed
armenia with turkish backing andreconquered the disputed
nagorno-kabur region between2020 and 2023 oh man, if there's
any native speakers of theselanguages they're like.

(12:46):
Well, turkish drones changedthe battlescape in Armenia and
Syria and bogged down Russia andUkraine.
More importantly, armeniarealized that there's no Russian
Iranian Calvary coming to savethem, and so they effectively
discarded its deep rootedalliance with Russia and rivalry
with Turkey.
So you know Russia being that,trump being that Russian agent,
and all you know russia beingthat trump, being that russian
agent and all you know, hereyou're taking old nations away

(13:07):
from the sphere of influence ofrussia.
The discipline of internationalrelations is all about power
again power in the synonym forpolitics, where neither
ethnicity nor religion are soimportant.
This new hegemonic peace willhave unpalatable lessons for all
sides and prompt a revaluationwithin liberal history and
academy.

(13:27):
As every generation before usis known, conquest is at times a
more stable guarantor ofhegemonic peace and continuous
future and continuous and futilewar to reimpose a broken
balance.
Small powers without a greatpower backing will do better to
accommodate a regional balancethan to rebel against an
impending order.
Sometimes hard power bringsabout a greater imperial
equilibrium for all the actorsinvolved, often overtaking

(13:48):
divisive forces and ideology,religious and ethnic kinships.
It is a big deal, man.
It is a big deal he took.
He shifted the balance of poweraway from persia and russia.
As far as trade is concerned,because that's been one of the
big problems in that region isthose two.
You know Russia's sanctioneddeath, iran sanctioned death,

(14:08):
but they hold the territory,they've got the trade route and
so you're stuck using sea, suezcanal.
You know there's a lot of baddudes in the neighborhood, so
establishing this corridor whichbasically allows them to
completely bypass Iran andRussia on their way to the east,
through countries that havesigned on to the abraham peace
accords and stuff like that.
What a big deal here.

(14:29):
The other thing, too, is turkeyhas been on the balance of
deciding to go with russia.
They're in nato, right, they'reconnected to mainland europe,
but they're the bridge to asia,so, and there is there islamic,
unlike, I think, every othernato country, and so they've
always had this weird tension.
Because you know NATO isagainst the war on terror, but

(14:51):
you know Turkey's kind of likehalfway in the war on terror.
You know they've got differentethnic groups that are Turkish,
that are also spread out, likethere's Kurds in Turkey, there's
Kurds in Syria, there's Kurdsin Iraq.
You know there's some crossover, there's huge crossover, and
Turkey hasn't been the mostwilling partner to have us
playing hopscotch over there toget over to bomb other Islamic

(15:14):
countries.
They've kind of done it out ofnecessity, because of treaty and
because it would be almostimpossible for them to pull out
of NATO.
But at the same time they'vebeen kind of sticking the mud
with NATO too, and in factTurkey was the first one that
said that Ukraine was a no gowhen it came to NATO, which
possibly averted nuclear warwith Russia because they're like

(15:35):
, ok, at least if Turkey says no.
You know what I mean.
So this is like a really bigdeal.
The other thing, too is keep inmind other things have happened.
I think it was, was it Norwayor Finland, sweden, I can't
remember.
One of the Nordic countriesjoined NATO officially in the
last year or two, which wasanother big deal, because if you
go through history, russiafought wars with Finland and

(15:57):
Sweden when they were onekingdom.
They kind of have a frontierthat that touches each other.
Yeah, so really big deal.
The shift of the balance ofpower.
The other thing, too thatdonald trump's been able to do
is not only is he creating peacearound the world and becoming
known as the president of peace,including this significant one
with armenia and azerbaijan, buthe also closed the southern

(16:18):
border without new legislationwhich how long were?
We told that you needed torevamp all the legislation and
do it, and the tools just aren'tthere.
Well, that's not really thecase.
This is carolyn levitt talkingabout the success of the border.
Oh, hold on, that was a greattransition too I'll just say
liars be lying there.

Speaker 7 (16:38):
We go here about the border, you know.

Speaker 15 (16:40):
Oh my goodness, it's so bad all right back to
carolyn at border, presidentTrump continues to deliver on
his promise to make America safeagain, and new reporting from
the Washington Times fullyhighlights the difference in Joe
Biden's disgraceful approach tothe border compared to
President Trump's.
Under Trump, border catch andrelease has dropped ninety nine
point ninety nine percent fromworst Biden month.

(17:02):
You can't get much better thanthat.
This statistic in particular isastounding.
Border Patrol agents caught andimmediately released one
hundred and eighty nine thousandsix hundred and four illegal
aliens into the United States inDecember 2023, at the height of
the Biden border crisis.
But under President Trump,border Patrol agents caught and

(17:22):
released only 20 illegal aliensinto the US in the month of
February.
At the border, president Trumpcontinues to deliver on 20.

Speaker 1 (17:29):
He let 20 of those illegal immigrants into the
country.
I can't believe that Wow.
Catch and release 180,000 downto 20.
That's a closed border.
I think we could probablyhandle 20 immigrants a month.

Speaker 7 (17:43):
I don't know why we had to let 20 in.
Yeah, that's right now.
What the heck if you gotnumbers that low, it seems like
it's pretty easy just to say no,thanks, yeah breaking promises
every day.

Speaker 1 (17:54):
20 wow, that's really impressive.
Uh, I am.
I am of all the things thatI've been impressed with, aside
from pardoning the j6ers, thankyou right.
Aside from pardoning all thej6ers, I am amazed at how much
he's locked down that border.

Speaker 7 (18:11):
I'm not surprised I'm not surprised.
I'm not either, because a lotof it is just perception.
You know, people are going tonot try if they don't think
they're going to make it andthis really goes far to talk
about you know, just do your job.

Speaker 1 (18:23):
Imagine being a border patrol agent, catching
someone and being like okay,you're released and you know,
you know they're cartel, youknow they're they're, you know
just did.

Speaker 7 (18:31):
a lot of these border agents have been there for, you
know, multiple administrationsThey've had to deal with,
whatever the policy was.

Speaker 1 (18:40):
Try, try to tell them that the president doesn't
matter.
Right the voting doesn't matter.

Speaker 7 (18:44):
Oh my gosh, you want to get a hot take?
Just go ask a couple of thoseguys.

Speaker 1 (18:48):
Yeah, seriously, if I was differently inclined, I'd
seriously consider joining DHSright now.
It looks like a fun job.
Dress up and battle out or walkaround on domestic streets
Tackle people.
It's awesome, make a difference.
Meanwhile, trump's now tryinghis hand at local law
enforcement.
He's taking over DC.

Speaker 7 (19:07):
They had like 20s on arrest and 40s on arrest, which
is quite a bit for a 10 squaremile area and I like how it's
like.
Well, this is just a test.
We're getting ready to come outto your neighborhood and all
these you know blue, blue areasare like not on our watch.
You stay out of our city.

Speaker 1 (19:23):
What's funny is TikTok is full of old timers in
DC, like old black men in their50s and 60s.
You kids stay off the streets.
I get out of DC.
Now is not the time to begangbanging.
It's the kids, man.
It's the kids.
You got to keep them away fromjacking cars.
It's so funny because I'vewatched like four or five of
these like just tick tock videosof guys in DC being like, oh,

(19:45):
these guys are rolling up inhere.
This is the fifth time today acop car is driven by my shop.
You know it's like it's awesome.

Speaker 7 (19:52):
This morning I had an old grandma that gave me some
words of inspiration in my memerole.
She's all hey, I don't know whoneeds to hear this, but you
know there's crackheads outthere that are broke they to
hear this?

Speaker 1 (20:06):
but you know there's crackheads out there that are
broke, that are still gettinghigh.
So get out there, get after it.
Yeah, I had that I.
I sent a meme.
This is probably really similarto the one that we're talking
about.
I sent a meme to our friendearl.
Oh, he sent me a small letterlast night.
Holy smokes, things huge.
I have to go read that afterthe show, okay.
So I sent me a small letterlast night Holy smokes, things
huge.
I have to go read that afterthe show, okay.

(20:26):
So I sent him a meme the otherday that said uh, I'm pretty
sure it's the same way you'retalking about it.
Where is it?
It was so funny.
I said do crackheads say Idon't get high to tape because
I'm broke?
No, they make it happen.
Don't let a track crackhead tryharder than you today.
That's right.
I sent that to earl becausehe's literally living on the

(20:47):
streets like he spent the nightin a shelter last night next to
a crackhead getting his licensetoday and then we can put him on
a bus.
Yeah, so, uh forager on rumblesays as a scout, we looked at
the trees to see, to see moss,to see moss growth, to determine
north where you are at.
Moss grows on all sides of thethat's right that's true that is

(21:10):
very true, pray the rosary.
Good morning everyone.
Yes, good morning, pray therosary.

Speaker 7 (21:14):
Thank you for joining us today depending on where you
are, you can get tricked too,because some of the trees like
in ellensburg, you know they'rethey're wind ripped.

Speaker 1 (21:22):
Oh yeah, the north might be the wrong direction yes
, it's pretty, yeah you're, youget into the, you get into the
olympics for sure.
And it's like no, it's moss 360yeah, yeah, that's sometimes
pierce that.
Yeah, that is so crazy.
We have a rainforest here, yeah, like it rains a lot in seattle
, but it actually technicallyrains more in new york because

(21:42):
it rains harder.
So you know, that was one thingthat blew me away, ron.
What is a lot of inches of rainfor us to get in a day Like?
What is it?
It's rained all day and what islike the normal accumulation?

Speaker 7 (21:54):
Well, I know a thing about this.
That's really not the rightanswer, or not the right
question to ask, because itvaries so greatly across the
state depending on where youlive.
So, and you know this because-you go to swim with no rain yeah
right in swim.
They get about 12 inches a year.
Yeah, so you know, if you get ahalf inch storm up there, that

(22:16):
would be a tremendous storm ahalf inch what about here?
Where we're at well down inport orchard, which is only, you
know, 40, 50 miles away, theyget 65 inches a year, so it's
like triple what you get insquim and a good size rainfall
in that area would be about aninch okay and then in forks they

(22:39):
get 140, some inches a year.
That's 12 feet of rain, so astorm out there could be inches.

Speaker 1 (22:48):
So the reason I asked this?
Because when I got to missouriwe have these rainstorms right,
we had hurricane warning, nothurricane tornado warnings all
the time and it would rain sohard.
I was like I've not seen rainthis hard since brazil.

Speaker 7 (23:03):
The tropical rain.
So, and then intensity is atotally different topic.

Speaker 1 (23:08):
It would rain for an hour.
It'd be two inches Right In anhour.
It was like it was crazy andI'm sure we've got lots of
listeners here.
Well, that's normal where Ilive.
Listen up here.
It rains all day.
An inch is a lot of rain.
It's like normal where I live.
Listen up here.
It rains all day.
An inch is a lot of rain.
Yeah, it's like holy cow.
It rained all day long and itrained hard and it rained an

(23:29):
inch.
Then you get to missouri and, oh, it rained for an hour and it
rained four inches I'd watch thegutters because you know we're
in a building gutters totallyjust flowing over the downspouts
, blowing back up, not goingunderground at all, you know
just, and it was just flooded.
And then it'd get sunny andyou'd see the the water bake off

(23:50):
and you'd start sweatingbecause the humidity and it was
like, wow, that was crazy and Ikept thinking like it's, it's
sunny every day here, except fortwo hours when it rains.
I know florida's like that andthat's how brazil was.
Brazil was like that, like youknow, you'd get that afternoon
rain and you'd get an inch ortwo in an hour and then it'd be
sunny again.
So in dc, trump's taking hiscrack, just like he did at the

(24:11):
border, cleaning up the border.
He's taking a crack at, uh,running the city and getting rid
of the crime.
So his approach is go hard, gofast.
He's got like 800 extra agentswalking around all the different
fbi, marshals park department.
They're all deployed right nowsaturation unison yes, so there
was a press conference yesterdaywith the chief of police, who's

(24:32):
just?
Uh, she's the I think she's themetropolitan chief of police,
or whatever.
She just relieved the other guyand now she's in on the job and
she got asked a question aboutthe chain of command and I
thought this was a reallyinteresting answer for somebody
in law enforcement.
What does the chain of commandis now?
What does that mean?
Okay, if you didn't catch thatone more time, you ready.
What does the chain of commandis now?

(24:54):
Well, is it Cam Bondi, speakingfor the mayor?
Oh, and now the citycouncilwoman.

Speaker 11 (25:02):
So the executive order is clear.
Um the president has requestedmpd services and our home rule
charter.
Um outlines the process.
Um the president designatedattorney general bondy uh as his
proxy uh to to request servicesthrough me okay that was pretty

(25:25):
funny chain of command.

Speaker 7 (25:27):
What are you talking about so?

Speaker 1 (25:28):
who's the chain of command?
Now, like, who do you answer towhat's that?
You know why.
You do it to yourselves like I,I, I want to believe you know
what the chain command is.
Right, you probably follow itlike you know who your boss is,
you know who your lieutenantsare, but the fact that you don't
even know the phrase chain ofcommand is kind of startling.
Yeah, like it kind of screamsout dei higher yeah, a little

(25:51):
bit yeah, pray.
The rosary says please send therain down here to san diego.
Well, we wouldn't want to dothat, because then san diego
wouldn't be beautiful, sunny sandiego and, based on how you
guys handle forest fires, Idon't think your city is set up
for flash flooding you probablylook like the grand canyon, yeah
I don't know.
I don't know that you guysshould get rain, because

(26:12):
politically I don't know if youguys can handle it well, uh, I
didn't mention.

Speaker 7 (26:16):
You know, the intensity is a different topic
for area and I'm sorry to bringthis back up, but three and a
half inches per hour is maximumintensity that you can expect
around here, so you really wanta good storm.
Three and a half inches, that'spretty intense in an hour.

Speaker 1 (26:30):
Yeah, and that would be really intense.
Oh yeah, uh, the thing abouthere is is we're waterlogged yes
so the ground can absorb quitea bit at, you know, an inch a
day like it does.
It's just pretty good.
But the water table in a lot ofplaces is only like 12 inches
deep or less, like it's prettyshallow about three feet on my

(26:51):
property.
Yeah, so if you get, if you geta really heavy rain like that,
like you can get saturated-pretty saturated, yeah, and it
doesn't have anywhere to go.
So just the news ran a pieceyesterday that he teased out.
The headline is shut, shut itdown.
Bombshell FBI timeline exposespolitical interference in the
Clinton corruption prose probe.
So this shouldn't reallysurprise anybody.
That's, you know, not beenhiding under a rock for the last

(27:13):
decade.
But essentially the FBI wascontinuously shutting down any
investigations into the HillaryClinton matter or the Clinton
Foundation, and one of them isSally Yates.
Do you remember who Sally Yatesis?
Sally yates?
Do you remember who sally yates?

Speaker 7 (27:27):
is dude.

Speaker 1 (27:27):
I don't remember the details, but I do remember the
name sally yates sat in on themeeting with biden, obama,
brennan, clapper okay, uh andmccabe and I think comey was
there and they were discussinggeneral flynn and they were like
we got to get General Flynn.
She was in on that meeting.
After when Trump came intooffice, she became the interim
acting director attorney generalwhile they were getting ready

(27:52):
to put Jeff Sessions in, andTrump did the Muslim ban, as
they called it, which was theimmigration ban for countries
that don't do backgroundchecking and vetting Muslims.
Venezuela was also included onthat list, but it got labeled
the Muslim ban.
She refused to enforce it, soshe had to get fired.
Of course, people gave her allthese accolades.
I'm so proud of you for denyingthe president, not following
the chain of command and, youknow, for not doing your job,

(28:15):
which you're supposed to do.
Blah, blah, blah.
So Sally Yates apparently wasone of the people that was
shutting down things.
Sally Yates said shut it down.
Then deputy attorney generalSally Yates is quote is
demanding the derailed timelineof political impediments that
agents in New York and littlerock, Arkansas and Washington DC
reported.
She literally wrote in an emailshut it down.
The agents tried to get help offederal prosecutors to

(28:37):
determine whether or what crimesoccurred while Hillary Clinton
served as secretary of state,notably because at the time, her
family foundation solicitedhundreds of millions of dollars
from foreign and US interestswith business before her
department, Andrew McCabe, gotinvolved, saying things like
this the declassified timelinerevealed the Justice Department
indicated they would not besupportive of an FBI

(28:58):
investigation.
End quote.
The timeline also shows inmid-February 2016,.
Mccabe ordered that quote noovert investigation steps were
allowed to be taken in theClinton Foundation investigation
.
Quote without quote, withouthis approval, a command he
allegedly repeated numeroustimes over the coming months.
Wow.

Speaker 7 (29:17):
Wow yeah.

Speaker 1 (29:18):
Timeline detailed how Sally Yates ordered one of the
federal prosecutors to shut itdown in the March of 2016
timeframe.
Aliates ordered one of thefederal prosecutors to shut it
down in the March of 2016timeframe.
Federal prosecutors in theSouthern District of New York
and the Eastern District of NewYork reportedly said in August
2016 that they would not supportthe investigation the Clinton
Foundation, according to thetimeline and that no explanation

(29:39):
was given.
They went around to say theywere, they had questions
concerning regarding the statuteof limitations around the
investigations, with one stillunnamed official saying they
wanted to close the chapter andmove on.
Uh, he goes on to say.
He goes on to talk about theclinton foundation allegations,
which had been the focus by thebook clinton cash by peter
switzer.
Uh, an unnamed investigator mayhave had one or two brief

(30:02):
discussions in the fall of 2015with an assistant use attorney
in the nation's capital, with amember of DOJ's public integrity
section, according to thetimeline, where Clinton
Foundation was quote likelyancillary and with the intention
of informing the redacted DOJofficials that an investigator
was continuing to study thematter and possibly predicate an
investigation.
So they just kept shutting itdown.
Like they kept popping upArkansas, d DC, new York,

(30:26):
everywhere they were at it keptpopping up and they just kept
shutting it down.
Paula Batty, then assistantdirector in charge of the
Washington field office,described McCabe of his negative
and annoyed and angry about theClinton Foundation cases, with
McCabe saying that they, the DOJ, say there's nothing there and
with the McCabe asking why arewe even doing this?

Speaker 7 (30:45):
She's just like gatekeeper.

Speaker 1 (30:46):
Dude.
Mccabe's wife was running foroffice in Virginia and the
Clintons were donating to her.
Mccabe's drove a Porsche towork and people made comment of
like how can you afford thisPorsche?
You know we make good money,but just barely good enough to
live in the area, not to live itgood and have a Porsche.

Speaker 7 (31:04):
Yeah, fbi agents are not really rich people yeah.

Speaker 1 (31:10):
Anyways.
So this article is just full ofthese quotes like that, you
know.
Shut it down, stop doing.
It was advised, noinvestigation action was to take
place unless McCabe authorizedit.
Just over and over and overagain, they kept doing this.
Yeah, yeah, and a gatekeepergatekeeper and you know these
are very powerful people.
Like a guy like andrew mccabemost people don't know who he is
.
He's he's calling the shots,he's the one that's enabling the

(31:33):
clintons to pay for play andall this stuff.
And then it just cascades right.
It becomes a cover-up, itbecomes uh, it just becomes
something that none of us arecomfortable with.
Left or right, there has to beaccountability, there has to be,
otherwise this will continue,and the reality is this has been
going on.

Speaker 7 (31:54):
The more you look at this, the more you realize that
without accountability, thiswill continue.
Yeah.
And I mean it'll just ping pong, ping pong back and forth.

Speaker 1 (32:06):
Yep One dirty trick after another and interesting
news.
Laura Loomer had her defamationdeposition in the Bill Maher
defamation deposition, oh, inthe bill mayor uh defamation
case.
Do you know what this is allabout?
Not really so bill mayoraccused laura loomer of sleeping
with donald trump and so lauraloomer sued bill mayor.
Yeah, he's like well he's notsleeping with milani, probably
sleeping with laura loomer.

(32:26):
So bill mayor, uh.
So laura loomer sued bill mayor.
Well, she had herdepositionosition and she's the
self-appointed loyalty enforcer.
Well, her deposition was alittle off the rails in a
particularly wild exchange.
Loomer, practically roast,practically roasted
Representative Margie, margieTaylor Green.
As someone who puts roast beefin her pants, what are the basis

(32:48):
for you saying she puts, forsaying she puts Arby's in her
pants?
Mayor's legal counselor askedshe carries roast beef in her
pants.
What are the basis for yousaying she puts, uh, for saying
she puts Arby's in her pants?
Mayor's legal counselor askedshe carries roast beef in her
pockets?
Loomer responded what is yourbasis for saying she puts roast
beef in her pockets and in herpants?
The council pressed because Iknow she likes to eat at Arby's.
Loomer said for the clarifyingthat she believes green puts the
meat sandwiches in her pantsand she believed Green would
agree with that statement.

(33:08):
Are you making a derogatorycomment about her sex life by
talking about Arby's in herpants?
The council asked no, I'mtalking about Arby's, the
sandwiches, I'm talking aboutArby's.
I would.
I'm very direct person.
Loomer said If I was making aderogatory comment I would have
said it.

Speaker 7 (33:24):
Hold on.
Is this our ad campaign thatwe're reading?

Speaker 1 (33:27):
No, is this an arby's commercial?
Her definition.
Immediately after the arby'sexchange, loomer offered another
gym without provocation.
She believes senator lindseygraham is gay, told me in
confidence that lindsey grahamis gay.
Loomer said hold on, missloomer, there's no question,
responded mayor's attorney.
Loomer sued mayor at hbo inoctober for the late night.

(33:49):
Host suggested loomer might beeffing Donald Trump and the far
right activist had since claimedthat Mayor's joke tanked her
odds at landing a White Housegig.
It probably did.

Speaker 7 (33:58):
Sounds like a really good write up for an SNL skit.

Speaker 1 (34:04):
She puts in her pants Are you talking about?

Speaker 7 (34:07):
are you talking about some?

Speaker 1 (34:08):
innuendo no.

Speaker 18 (34:10):
I'm talking about armies.

Speaker 1 (34:13):
Totally off the rails , man, I'd be be like I'm not
here to testify the whole time.
Tiffany and carlito.
Good morning, sapphire patriot.
There's supposed to be a bigdocument drop today on more
killery, documented documentsand corruption.
I believe I just read it.
Yeah, there might be more, butI think that was what it was.
Morning.
Peasants says sapphire patriot,and are you?
Is that what you are going overnow?
Yeah, that was that's exactlywhat I was going over.

(34:36):
We got an early morning show,so we can sometimes beat
everyone else to the punch.
So this is John Solomon and he'sreflecting back and the story
is way back in 2016,.
Might have been 2017.
John Solomon goes out to hismailbox and there's two men in
suits waiting for him.
They're two FBI agents,presumably, and they're like

(34:58):
listen, we have a tip for you.
There's a dirty trick going on.
We have awesome powers here atthe go in the government and
those powers are being used toplay a political dirty trick on
the American people, and that iswhat started John Solomon's
reporting on Russiagate andslowly starting to unravel on
that.
They pointed him in the rightdirection.
Whoever those two agents are,which John Solomon, to my

(35:20):
knowledge, has never disclosedand likely never will, are one
of a handful of people who savedAmerica.
If America is to be saved,you'll be able to credit those
two people.
You'll be able to credit peoplelike Patrick Byrne.
There's a couple dozen peoplethat, literally, behind the
scenes, saved America.

Speaker 7 (35:40):
Yeah, we call them the greatest American heroes.

Speaker 1 (35:42):
Yes, and we'll probably never know their names,
right, it's kind of likeWashington spies.
You know, the reason we won theRevolutionary War had a lot to
do with the spy networkwashington set up, and we still
don't know who those people arebut we'll still be forever
grateful.

Speaker 13 (35:55):
We will be forever grateful yep yeah, it has been a
whirlwind of a couple weeks.
You know the guys werewondering john, just to start.
No, yeah, start here you.
You once told us the storyabout guys showing up at your
house with information or askingyou about, I mean with, what's
been going on, I mean anythinglike that happening now.

Speaker 5 (36:12):
I mean this is crazy no, but I gotta say, those two
guys who just showed up at myhouse at 11 o'clock at night
after I got off the entity onenight, uh, what they told me has
been so preciously true,perhaps worse than I understood.
Even a few years ago, when I wasfirst credited with sort of
unraveling parts of the russiacollusion case, they kept saying

(36:32):
to me the intelligencecommunity and fbi were used to
carry out a dirty trip againstthe american people using the
most awesome counter-terrorism,counter-intelligence tools that
they had been given.
In other words, we weaponized,uh, the like, we weaponized our
counter-terrorism andcounter-intelligence tools to

(36:54):
run a psychological operation onthe American public to deceive
them into believing that the manthey had elected as president
was actually a Russian studentfor Vladimir Putin.
And when I look at it now, itis far more extensive, far more
complete, far more involving ofso many different people.

(37:14):
You know we've gotten Housemembers and senators and leakers
and consultants, and it was amass conspiracy to undo the will
of the American people for the26th election and to fool them
into thinking the man they hadjust elected was a was a russian
asset and um, it is.

(37:35):
Perhaps you know, I think, backnow at watergate and the moment
we learned, that moment that thepublic learned, in the moment
that republicans learned thatrichard nixon even remotely
considered asking the cia tointerfere with the f?
Fbi in the investigation ofWatergate man, the world turned
on Richard Nixon.
Here the CIA and the FBI arerunning the operation.

(37:57):
They are literally turningthemselves against the very
citizens that they've beenentrusted to protect and they're
trying to deceive them.
And I can't think of a moreperilous operation to the
underpinnings of our democracy,our constitutional republic,
than what these people did andthose two guys.

(38:20):
They gave me a hint.
I had no idea.
It was a lot worse than I everimagined.

Speaker 1 (38:25):
Yeah, and they might not have even known how bad it
was.
Later in the show, we're goingto introduce you to Admiral Mike
Rogers, who's another one ofthese people that very well may
have saved America.
All right, so this is DonaldTrump he's being asked about.
You know all these disclosuresthat have been going on, and you
know Trump seems pretty set onwhat he wants to see.

Speaker 10 (38:45):
Great, actually we had the Russia.
I had to go through the RussiaRussia hoax, to go through the
Russia Russia hoax and it wasactually it's.
It was a strain on therelationship.
I actually told him.
I said you know, they got thisphony investigation going on
Russia, russia, russia totallyphony created by Adam Schiff,
shifty Schiff and HillaryClinton and the whole group of

(39:05):
them, and it made it verydangerous for our country
because I was unable to reallydeal with Russia the way we
should have been.
I'm looking at Pam because Ihope something's going to be
done about it.
These people put our country atgreat danger.
And Adam Schiff it was all madeup.
It was a hoax.
The Mueller report came out.
They all hated me.
They had 18 Trump haters andthey said I did nothing wrong.

(39:27):
They were, they could, theycouldn't believe, they couldn't
find anything After years ofinvestigation.
It was all a hoax.
It was a hoax created by theDemocrats, but in particular,
schiff, and crooked Hillary, thewhole group.
And now we've learned all thestuff that's come out over the
last two months is incrediblethrough intelligence and

(39:49):
hopefully something is going tohappen with it.
These are people that put ourcountry in danger, in real
danger.
I want to thank you all verymuch.

Speaker 1 (39:56):
Thank you very much yeah, they put our country in
real danger.
It wasn't just about you knowthe status quo.
They prevented peace withrussia and settlement with
russia.
They the ukraine war, in myopinion, is a direct domino fall
of the Russia hoax and theUkraine impeachment and just
everything going on there.

(40:17):
Russia was begging us to dealwith, you know, the Crimea and
the 2014 coup in Ukraine andthey were begging us for help
Nothing.
Did you watch Joe Rogan withAnna Paulna paulina luna
yesterday?
No, so I saw clips.
I didn't watch the actualpodcast dude.
She went full on alien book ofenoch.

(40:38):
She talked about seeingpictures and stuff in a skiff of
extraterrestrial life,interdimensional beings.
She talked about they havetechnology that they cannot
reverse engineer.
She's like it would be likedropping a cell phone off to
cavemen, like no capacity to doanything, that they have this
radiating technology and uh yeahyou gotta watch it you gotta

(40:59):
watch it she went full-on bookof enoch and everything man and
she's got a biblical worldview.
But holy smokes, holy smokes.
She talked about anarchy.
Talk about Anaki.
Interesting times.
Interesting times.
So this is John Solomon againtalking about the investigation
into Adam Schiff and whether theClinton pay for play scheme was

(41:21):
going on, which is part of thearticle I just read racket.

Speaker 8 (41:27):
We've all known for a long time that James Comey
exonerated Hillary Clintonwithout authority to do so and
without finishing hisinvestigation when it came to
the classified emails.
Tonight, we're going to tell youabout the other Clinton
investigation, one that wasrunning in three separate FBI
offices New York, Washington andLittle Rock.
It was a predicated criminalinvestigation that was examining

(41:50):
whether Hillary Clinton ran apay-to-play scheme that
delivered favors from herpurchased Secretary of State
while foreigners and others paidlarge sums of money to her
family foundation, the ClintonFoundation, run by Bill Clinton
and their daughter, eventually,Chelsea Clinton.
Three separate agencies, threeseparate bureaus, offices of the

(42:12):
FBI believe they had predicatedevidence to pursue that Every
time they tried to move the balldown the road in the shadows of
the 2016 election, they gotshut down.
I mean, they got shut down atthe highest levels of their
agency, Andrew McCabe, thedeputy director, a man who
potentially had a conflict ofinterest with Hillary Clinton.

(42:32):
He his wife got money fromHillary Clinton's former
campaign chair to run for aVirginia state Senate and, by
the way, McCabe attended themeeting where that assistance
was solicited.
He eventually was conflictedout, but not before he gave the
order.

Speaker 1 (42:46):
Mccabe attended the meeting where they asked the
Clintons for money.
Abe attended the meeting wherethey asked the Clintons for
money, just line them up andshoot them, man.

Speaker 7 (42:59):
What is going?

Speaker 1 (43:00):
on here, I don't know , I went to prison for shaking a
bike rack.
I went to prison for shaking abike rack man.
I was in there with a guy thatwas serving a couple of years
because he stole $70,000 in PPEloan funds $70,000.
$70,000.
Couple years because he stoleseventy thousand dollars in ppe
loan funds.
You know, seventy thousanddollars.
Seventy thousand dollars.
The clintons are dealing inbillions, billions yeah you know
, seventy thousand dollars,that's a tragedy, that's a crime

(43:21):
.

Speaker 7 (43:21):
Billions, that makes me smart I don't even know what
to say, I'm just speechlessmeanwhile he's shutting down
investigations into clinton'sthat they just solicited money
from.

Speaker 1 (43:35):
Yeah, um, okay, like prima facie problems like on its
face.

Speaker 8 (43:43):
It is agents that you won't investigate or do
anything on this unless Iapprove it.
Downstream from them, four,three different from them four
different US attorneys' officesunder Barack Obama were asked
for help by the agents.
Agents need help.
We need a grand jury, we needto get evidence, we want to move
the case down the road.
All three of those four officestold the agents you're on your

(44:07):
own, we will not assist you inyour pursuit of criminal charges
against Hillary Clinton.
And then, perhaps the mostextraordinary statement in the
document that we are going toshow you on screen now they can
put it up as you're looking herethe deputy attorney general for
Barack Obama, sally Yates,explicitly told the FBI shut it

(44:29):
down, meaning the corruptionprobes of hillary clinton.
Think about this.
While donald trump was out onthe campaign trail chanting lock
her up.
Maybe there was a good reasonto lock up hillary clinton, he
would argue.
Every night, the obama justicedepartment was telling the fbi
agents who also thought theremight be a reason to lock up
hillary clinton shut it down.

Speaker 1 (44:47):
Remember those words but you know, I mean, it's not
that big a deal when you reallythink about it in the big scheme
of things, because at the endof the day, it's what we believe
that matters.
It's not what we know.
Can we say that?
Not what we know, it's what webelieve.

Speaker 9 (45:02):
So, for example, if you're a democrat and you
believe this, then this is alllike just probably a hoax itself
uh and I'll knock on some woodhere because we got two months
left I am extremely proud of thefact that over eight years we
have not had the kinds ofscandals that have plagued other

(45:25):
administrations, and when I metwith the president-elect, I
suggested to him that having astrong White House counsel that
could provide clear guidepostsand rules would benefit him and
benefit his team, because itwould eliminate a lot of
ambiguity and I think it will beup to him to make

(45:49):
determinations about how hewants to approach it.
I know what worked for us and Ithink it served the American
people well, and because I hadmade a promise to the American
people that I would not fallinto some of the familiar habits
of Washington, that I wanted anew kind of politics, this was

(46:12):
one indicator and at the end ofeight years I think I can say
the American people I deliveredon that commitment.

Speaker 1 (46:21):
It's good.

Speaker 7 (46:22):
Does that say Lima, Peru, yeah?

Speaker 1 (46:23):
he was in Lima, peru.
Okay, well, I think that's good.
I mean a scandal-freepresidency for eight years.
I mean it's great, you'recontrolling the media.
You've got the FBI shuttingdown investigations into your
cabinet members that are doingpay-for-play schemes.
I mean, yeah, no, it's atotally new way of doing
business in DC, like it used tobe.
We might actually find some ofthat stuff out in real time.
But no, you got that figuredout.
That's a new way of doingbusiness.

(46:45):
It's scandal-free and it doesn'tmatter.
What we know, doesn't matterwhat's real, just matters what
we believe, you know.
And I think that's why trumpwas like hey, you know, we'll
let hillary clinton go.
She's, you know, spent throughenough.
It's hard enough, because whatwe believe right, we want to
maintain the sanctity of thesanctity of the presidency.
Unfortunately, they keptcalling donald trump a traitor
and a russian asset hitler, andso I think the seal on that's

(47:07):
pretty much broken at this point.
And there's other playersplayers in this too, because,
remember, the conspiracy isn'tjust covering up Hillary Clinton
, it's not just going afterGeneral Flynn, it's not just
creating a Russiagate narrative,it's not also pulling all the
levers of voter fraud andgerrymandering during that time
period.
And then it's not just covidand the lockdowns and the
destruction of the economy tomake it so that the roaring

(47:30):
Trump 2019 economy couldn'tcontinue.
It wasn't just about gettingmask, mandate, compliance and
stuff like that and getting youto inject things into your arms
that hadn't been properlyresearched.
It wasn't about suspending thestate constitutions so that you
could have emergency powers inorder to take in millions of
mail-in ballots in states thathave never done that.
And then it wasn't just aboutchanging the way that votes were

(47:52):
counted from.
You know distinct, decentralized, elementary but, instead of
putting it in large, centralizedcounting centers.
It wasn't just about badplumbing in those different
places, separated by hundreds ofmiles, that, just
simultaneously with one hour,all had shut down plumbing
issues where the counting gotstopped.

(48:12):
It wasn't just that.
It wasn't just about Joe Bidendeclaring himself the president
elect and then starting theoffice of president elect, which
has never happened before.
It wasn't just about the CIAslow rolling the report, saying
that China interfered with theelection and Russia did not.
It wasn't just about theRepublicans having a weak spine

(48:34):
and not saying, hey, there'sclearly some type of voter fraud
here on, you know, perpetratedby the same people Perkins,
cooley, mark Elias who kind ofperpetrated this whole
Russiagate thing.
It's not just all about that.
Like you got to.
It's not just that, because youknow we could just brush all
that under the rug, right?
Yeah?
I mean it's not like it's allconnected.

Speaker 7 (48:54):
It's not like it's the same people it's not like
it's all affecting my life.

Speaker 1 (48:57):
A hundred percent yeah, no, nothing at all.
So I mean just just for context, like you know.
I mean they're still lookinginto some of the connections,
like anthony fauci and the biolabs and how all that went down.
This is tulsi gabbard talkingabout it, but the thing that um.

Speaker 19 (49:12):
We are working with uh jay badacharya, the new nih
director on uh, with, as well assecretary kennedy.
Um is looking at the gain offunction research uh that, in
the case of the wuhan lab, aswell as many others around, many
of these other bio labs aroundthe world, was actually US

(49:34):
funded and leads to thisdangerous kind of research that,
in many examples, has resultedin either a pandemic or some
other major health crisis.

Speaker 14 (49:45):
Let me ask you specifically because we already
know that EcoHealth Alliance waspartnering with this Wuhan lab
to do gain, to do gain offunction research.
That's right.
We just have never been able tohave somebody say and it was
that exact experiment that ledto this COVID bug, but have we
gotten there?
What's the new thing thatyou're digging in on?

Speaker 19 (50:04):
We are working on that with Jay Bhattacharya and
look forward to being able toshare that, hopefully very soon.
Okay, that specific linkCorrect, adacharya, and look
forward to being able to sharethat, hopefully very soon.

Speaker 14 (50:10):
Okay, that that specific link, uh correct
between the gain of functionresearch and what we saw with
covet 19 I mean that would beextraordinary because, just so
the audience knows if that'strue, if it was peter dazik's
research with the wuhan, andwhat would be really crazy is if
we then got some connectionthat there was some like reason

(50:31):
to have it happen in 2020, rightduring the week of impeachment
over ukraine.

Speaker 1 (50:36):
Like how funny would that be ifit like not only did we create
the virus, but what if weactually released the sucker?
Yeah, timely timely, yeah, andgot.
And of course we know china wasmeddling in the election and
they were more than willing tomake it look like wuhan was
having people drop dead in thestreets and I mean it was
dystopian.

Speaker 7 (50:56):
Oh yeah, remember the images of them welding doors
shut welding doors shut.

Speaker 1 (51:01):
You remember the piles of cell phones and all
those 20 million less cell phonecontracts this month and one
month?
Oh my gosh 20 million.
What if?
What if?

Speaker 7 (51:10):
What if what if.
What if, what if.

Speaker 1 (51:12):
Do you remember this?
Do you remember scenes likethis happening literally like
every day?
Some people in our audience?
This is going to give you coldsweats.

Speaker 3 (51:20):
I'm sorry but you need a mask if you're going to
be in here, that's okay.

Speaker 9 (51:24):
I know I'm sorry, but you're not going to treat
people like that.
What?

Speaker 17 (51:27):
do you mean Sheriff?
Hey Joe, it doesn't matter.

Speaker 10 (51:32):
Hey, hey, tony.
How are we doing?
We're fine.
If a healthy person with a maskgets exposed to a COVID-19
person without a mask, thenthey've got a 70% chance of
catching it.

Speaker 12 (51:47):
But if we all wear them, then we can reduce the
transmission rate to 1.5.

Speaker 9 (51:50):
You don't even know what you're talking about.
1.4% of nothing is what?

Speaker 10 (51:55):
And actually, Joe, this is simple because there is
a state mandate.

Speaker 1 (52:00):
No, it's not enforceable.
It is enforceable.
That's the sheriff in the movie, right?
No, it's not enforceable.
What is 1.45% of zero?
You don't know what you'retalking about, right?
They subjected us to that.
That happened to us.
I thought I had to interactwith the police over mass Right,

(52:21):
I got.
I got banned from goodwillbecause I wouldn't wear a mask.

Speaker 7 (52:25):
I remember when I first came to this podcast I was
like hey, what's gaslightingthere?
There you go, that'sgaslighting there.

Speaker 1 (52:30):
There you go, that's gaslighting.
Yeah, I don't trust thegovernment says pray the rosary
daily to handle anything incalifornia unless it aligns with
their corruption.
They're in the news trying tosteal the homes, the palisade
fires and put up low-incomehousing yeah, which you know is
not going to be low income.
It's ridiculous.
Okay, charlie kirk mentions thecovid stuff on msnb or c CNBC.

(52:51):
He's actually made a big stepup.
He's making the mainstreammedia.
He's not just making Fox Newshits.
He was on him.
I think he was on Morning Joeon MSNBC and here he is on CNBC.
I remember Candace Owens onetime told Joe Rogan Charlie Kirk
will be president one day.
I think he's going to make aplay for politics at some point.

Speaker 17 (53:09):
I mean clearly he's going to make a play for
politics at some point.
I mean, clearly and with thewimp, would you ultimately like
a more a country that's brought,that's genuinely brought
together, that trusts what'shappening, that feels that
everything is credible, thatthere's a coming together?
I assume you want that Ofcourse, but in a post-COVID

(53:29):
world.

Speaker 10 (53:32):
And again how could that ever happen with the left
or the right?

Speaker 20 (53:34):
I think I totally agree and I'll just say look in
a post-COVID world we are justan idealist to believe that.

Speaker 17 (53:40):
Hold on, andrew.
You're not the left, you're notintolerant, you're not going
with this.

Speaker 20 (53:44):
We did not receive any apologies from the ruling
class that lied to us repeatedlyduring COVID the lockdowns, the
efficacy of the vaccine, themask mandates, school closures
and we just act as if it didn'thappen.
And I don't think the Americanruling class understands the
undermining of their credibility.
That happened when the entirecountry had their lives thwarted
, especially young people.

(54:04):
We're just supposed to reopenthe country and be like well,
why don't you trust us anymore?
Well, it's because all you havethe Hunter Biden laptops,
russian disinformation the inteloperation, signed this letter
and you know I'm making a goodpoint here because there was no
contrition.
That is one example, and againI could go one after the other.

Speaker 17 (54:22):
I would say that actually COVID to me, I mean,
this is actually generational,is actually very much like the
2008 crisis in a way thatspawned Occupy Wall Street.
This has sort of spawned adifferent sort of political
movement.
Do you want to do Russian?

Speaker 3 (54:35):
collusion Do you want to do the laptop, Do you want
to do?
I mean, take your pick on theway things are covered in this
country.

Speaker 17 (54:42):
All I'm suggesting, though, is this full-on,
constant re-litigation of whattook place in the past, as
opposed to a clear-eyed view ofwhat's happening now.

Speaker 20 (54:52):
I would just interject respectfully that it's
not just really.
First of all, no one was heldaccountable largely for what
happened.

Speaker 17 (54:59):
That's why I said it's sort of like 2008, because
a lot of people thought allthose bankers were supposed to
go to jail.

Speaker 20 (55:03):
frankly, and honestly there should have been.
I think there should have beensome administration of justice.
That's a separate issue.
I was I was young at the time.
I can only speak about whatwe're living through now and a
lot of the covid injustices weare still seeing today with
younger people and their abilityto own homes, with the
inflation that President Trumpis trying to fix.
That was inherited by Joe Biden.
So what I'm getting at and Iknow a lot of the C-suite of

(55:25):
America watches this program.
They might understand where isthis populist fervor coming from
is that you have missed themark on so many of the
proclamations you made to theamerican people.
Explain to me.

Speaker 1 (55:36):
explain I love how that guy's like well, we just
leave it in the past it's kindof like the 2008 crisis.

Speaker 7 (55:43):
Yeah, yeah, not really not really.

Speaker 1 (55:46):
Yeah, exactly, not really.
So here's one.
You know we haven't gotten anapology for this stuff yet.

Speaker 7 (55:54):
No, these people are still, they all don't even want
to admit that anything evenhappened.

Speaker 1 (55:59):
Let's see if I can zoom this in.

Speaker 16 (56:01):
I'm definitely not going to be able to read this,
oh shoot.

Speaker 7 (56:03):
Okay.

Speaker 1 (56:09):
All right.
So this is an email from JamesClapper, who was the director of
national intelligence.
That's Tulsi Gabbard's positioncurrently to Rogers, michael
Rogers, john Brennan and JamesComey, and Stephanie O'Sullivan
was CC.
Dear Mike, john and whatever,jim, I understand your concern.

(56:30):
It is essential that we man,this is a horrible copy.
Okay, it is essential that we.
This is, ah.
All right, let me find itsomewhere else here.
Give me just a moment.
That was a bad copy.
Other ones, other better ones,I've got saved.

(56:53):
I zoomed in my screen and noweverything's like does your your
phone.
Do you have your phone set onold man vision?
No like the letters are big andstuff.
No, I can see great so myphone's been making the switch
oh and it's been frustratingbecause it's I'm not making.

Speaker 7 (57:13):
I'm not making the switch, it's making the switch
oh, it's just things that youcan't see and boom.

Speaker 1 (57:19):
I think so like I think it's doing the whole
facial tracking thing.
It must see me squinting orsomething that's probably
watching your eyes go like thisall right, I understand your
concern.
it is essential that we cia, nsa, fbi, odni be on the same page,
and we are all supportive ofthe report in the highest
tradition of quote.
That's our story and we'resticking to it.

(57:40):
This evening, cia has providedthe NIC the complete draft
generated by the fusion cell.
We will facilitate mutualtransparency as possible as we
complete the report, but moretime is not negotiable.
We may have to compromise ournormal modalities, since we must
do this on such a compressedschedule.

(58:02):
This project is one that has tobe a team sport.
Jim James Clapper Sounds likesome code.
That's our story and we'resticking to it.
Barack Obama says Trump's anagent and Pete on hookers in
Moscow, and so this is a teamsport.
Everybody needs to pull thesame direction.

Speaker 7 (58:20):
Right what?
Make sure you're on board, andso this is a team sport.
Everybody needs to pull thesame direction.
What?

Speaker 1 (58:24):
Make sure you're on board.
So Mike Rogers, who's Admiral?
Mike Rogers, who's, at thispoint, the head of the National
Security Administration, repliesthis I've just returned from a
TDY overseas and been updated onthe current status of our
efforts to produce.
Joint product related to Russiaattribution and intent of the
DNC-DCC hacks.
Joint product related to Russiaattribution and intent of the
DNC DCC hacks.
I know that this activity is ais on a fast track and that

(58:44):
folks have been working veryhard to put together a product
that can be provided to thepresident.
However, I wanted to reach outto you directly to know of some
concerns I have with what I'mhearing from my folks.
Specifically, I asked my teamif they had sufficient access to
the underlying intelligence andsufficient time to review that
intelligence.
On both points, my team raisedconcerns that they were.
They were clear that at thestaff level, folks have been

(59:05):
forward leaning and trying toensure that we have an
opportunity to review and weighin.
But I'm concerned that, giventhe expedited nature of this
activity, my folks aren't fullycomfortable saying that they've
had enough time to review all ofthe intelligence to be
absolutely confident in theirassessments.
To be clear, I'm not sayingthat we disagree substantively,
but I do want to make sure thatwhen we are asked in the future
whether we can absolutely standbehind the paper, that we don't

(59:26):
have any reason to hesitatebecause of the process.
I know that you agree with thisis something that we need to be
100% comfortable with before wepresent it to the president.
We have one chance to get thisright and it's critical that we
do so.
If the intent is to create anintegrated product of the CIA,
fbi, nsa jointly authored thatwe can all defend, we need a
process that allowed us all tobe comfortable, and I'm
concerned that we are not thereyet.
In addition, if NSA is intendedto be a co-author of this

(59:49):
product, I personally expect tosee even the most sensitive
evidence related to theconclusion.
However, if your intent is tocreate a CIA only or CIA FBI
authored product product, then Iwill stand down on these
concerns.
I would welcome your thoughtson these points and any
adjustments we might we mightmake to the process to ensure
that we all have the necessarylevel of confidence in the final
assessment.
Vr mike, admiral mike rogers,united states navy commander.

(01:00:14):
Us cyber command director,director, nsa Chief, CSS Fort
George G Meade, md.
Wow, that's a lot of titles, soStand down sailor.
I'm not doing it.
He's like I got somereservations and I'm going to
have to be under oath at somepoint.
I'm not doing it and you mayremember this NPR reported on

(01:00:37):
November 22nd 2016,.
Just a few weeks after theelection, NSA head meets with
Trump, but team doesn't giveObama heads up.
Admiral Mike Rogers, afterseeing what they did to create
that intelligence report,privately went and met with
Donald Trump and Trump Tower.
A lot of people have been payingDonald Trump a visit at Trump
Tower in New York City mostlypeople being considered for jobs

(01:00:59):
in the new administration butone meeting stands out Navyiral
mike rogers sat down with trump.
He is the head of the nationalsecurity agency, he's in the
military chain of command and itappears he never told the
commander in chief he was doing.
This author and columnist jamesbamford writes about the
intelligence community and saysit is hard to underestimate the
roles right rogers played.
He is really the most.
He has really the mostimportant job basically in the

(01:01:20):
history terms of intelligence,because the nsa has everything
and he could see what they weredoing.
He could see theircommunications and then they
wanted him to basically pretendlike he hadn't and he went and
warned trump and that's what set, that's what tipped Trump off.
So Trump has Adam Schiff andHillary Clinton dead to rights.

Speaker 2 (01:01:43):
This is Mike Benz talking to Benny Johnson about
you have a post up sayingHillary Clinton is absolutely
guilty of a criminal conspiracyto defraud the American
taxpayers and Intel communityand so on.
How would that prosecution go?
Is that like too much of a pipedream to even dream, to even
dream about?
Dare a boy, dream Mike.

Speaker 3 (01:02:02):
I'm dreaming right now.
I think that Trump was mercifuland naive and innocent when he
first became president in 2017,after saying that Hillary
Clinton would be in jail.
And then Hillary Clintoncampaigned on putting Trump in
jail.
They nearly did.
They shot him in the face, theyhit him with 91 felonies, 1,000

(01:02:25):
years in prison if Trump didn'twin the election.
And now you know they're deadto rights here.
Hillary Clinton clearly approvedthis plan to falsify
information in order to portrayDonald Trump as being backed by
Russia, and they conspired withthe head of the Central
Intelligence Agency theinformation in order to portray

(01:02:46):
Donald Trump as being backed byRussia, and then conspired with
the head of the CentralIntelligence Agency, the head of
the FBI, potentially the formerpresident of the United States
himself.
I don't think you're going tohave riots in the streets if
John Brennan and Hillary Clintonare arrested.
Hillary clinton is, uh, is notexactly a beloved figure on the

(01:03:09):
left.
I, I think that you could.
I could see there being atremendous amount of civil
disturbance if barack obama isindicted, even though he looks
guilty as well, but I, I, Ithink that he and then you also
don't know immunity he also hasimmunity.
Hillary doesn't think that, andthen you also don't have
immunity.
He also has immunity, hillarydoesn't right, but I think that
you don't even need um.
I think that that havinghillary clinton and john brennan
indicted for this um, you asand simply alleged the

(01:03:33):
conspiracy that that theyfalsified information to
conducted fraud, to falsifyintelligence in order to run
this, this gambit, and thentheir only defense is that they
really believe their own BS.

(01:03:54):
I mean, that's the only defensethat they would have.
You have an agreement and anaffirmative act in furtherance,
so you have the two necessarylegal components in order to
bring the indictment.
Their only defense is that,well, we really believe that
russia?
Uh, it wasn't.
We didn't know it to be, eventhough it was false.
We didn't know it to be falseat the time, and I think that's

(01:04:15):
belied, uh, by several things.
We have the, have thecircumstantial evidence around
intent from these emails in theclassified annex, the emails in
John Brennan's handwritten notes, but they didn't.
This was the magic behind theTrump prosecution.
They never had an intent forTrump to commit crimes, but they

(01:04:38):
charged him anyway.
This Justice Department, ifthat's rule of law, then it has
to be brought against for fortrump to commit crimes, but they
charge them anyway.
They can this justicedepartment.
If that's rule of law, that hasto be brought against hillary
clinton and john brennan too ifthat's rule of law, it has to be
brought against john brennanand hillary clinton.

Speaker 1 (01:04:50):
However, the media is making some shocking admissions
eve over at cnn, as ed heredescribes.
They are admitted that theprosecution against Trump was
part of the operation AdvisorsLiz Smith seemed to let the cat
out of the bag.

Speaker 20 (01:05:05):
This week telling CNN all those felony convictions
against the president were nota real case, just part of a
planned Democrat Partyresistance.

Speaker 21 (01:05:13):
Why the base is mad at some of the leaders in
Washington is not becausethey're not left enough.
It's because, you know, chuckSchumer came out with no
strategy, no forewarning, andjust said we're going to fold on
the CR.
I mean, I think he could havedone a better job of explaining
what the strategy was and whatwe're going to do, but there
wasn't anything like that.
I think Democrats are learning,and I'm going to agree with you
that Democrats cannot only bethe party of resistance.

(01:05:35):
We cannot, like.
We resisted so hard between2017 and 2024.
Like we prosecuted him,convicted him of 34 felony
counts and guess what?
He still got elected.
So I don't know how much harderyou can resist.

Speaker 6 (01:05:49):
Are you admitting that the case against Trump in
New York was part of theorganized Democratic party?

Speaker 21 (01:05:53):
It was a Democratic prosecutor and I thought it was
unwise.
I went on Fox News and said itwasn't wise.
There were a lot.

Speaker 6 (01:06:03):
Just to be clear everybody who now touts the 34
felonies take it from Liz.
This was not a real case.
This was a plot to upend thepresidential campaign.

Speaker 21 (01:06:10):
I just think it was a boneheaded move by Alvin Bragg
.

Speaker 9 (01:06:14):
Spinning.
In some ways.
The liberal lawfare never ended, with Comey still showing
symptoms.

Speaker 7 (01:06:19):
Dude.

Speaker 1 (01:06:23):
Symptoms.
The liberal lawfare never endedwith comey still showing
symptoms, dude symptoms.
So the democrats you know, theyknow these cases weren't real,
they know this was part of theresistance ever, and you know I
can like mike bent says theironly defense is they drank the
kool-aid.
That's their only defense.
But you can't give that creditto everybody.
For, for example, svetlanaLakova, who is she?
She's the woman that the Obamaadministration, through this

(01:06:44):
whole Russiagate thing, accusedof having an affair with General
Flynn and she's like a motherof a brand new seven-month-old
baby and happy, and all of asudden the news on the biggest
newspapers in the world SvetlanaLakova and General Flynn are
having an affair.
You know how that went over inGeneral Flynn's marriage.
You know, how that went over inher marriage Not so well.
They have no connection.

(01:07:04):
They met each other for likeseven minutes at a dinner and
all of a sudden they're havingan affair you know what I mean.
Like it was big deal, and she'san English citizen, I believe.
And so she goes.
She posts this.
No wonder Nicole Wallace waslooking totally miserable when
she had to report the news ofthe Russian hoax conspiracy
grand jury Her when he was atthe SGE and after he resigned

(01:07:25):
from the FBI.
The investigation revealedRichmond this is her ex-husband
had been the source for MichaelSchmidt, one of the reporters

(01:07:47):
credited with writing thearticle at issue in the New York
Times since at least 2008.
Richmond first spoke withSchmidt regarding the
investigation into illegalactivity in sports Prior to
Richmond becoming the SGE.
Schmidt visited Richmond'shouse numerous times.
The New York Times quotedRichmond several several times,
both on the record and onbackground and stories regarding
jim comey.
After he was terminated bypresident trump, comey used
richmond as a conduit to conveythe media memoranda of his

(01:08:09):
meeting with president trump.
Oh, illegal leaks going to thisman and he just happened to be
at the time this woman's husband.
So she is living in a housewhere her husband is receiving
Some more news breaking thishour to tell you about of lies
and is reporting them in the NewYork Times, the paper of record
, and here she is reporting onthe grand jury investigations.

(01:08:32):
That likely and I believe he'snow her ex-husband, by the way,
but I'm sure there's someoverlap here between her and him
and the involvement, what theyknew and when they knew it.

Speaker 12 (01:08:42):
That's why she has ordered a grand jury
investigation into the so-calledRussia gate conspiracy
allegations made by the directorof national intelligence, Tulsi
Gabbard.
The senior Trump administrationofficial, confirms to NBC news
that investigation was firstreported by Fox news.
These are unsubstantiated andlargely you watched it happen.

Speaker 1 (01:09:06):
You watched it happen .
These are unsubstantial.
You were part of it.
You have firsthand knowledge.
You're probably going to go toa grand jury and be like did you
know your husband was meetingwith the fbi and receiving not
only illegal classified leaksbut incorrect ones to boot?
Do you know that you were apart of an operation psyop the
american people?

(01:09:26):
These are unsubstantiated.

Speaker 7 (01:09:28):
You were there I'm gonna take the fifth.
I'm taking the fifth.
Yeah, you're gonna hear a lotof that gravy.
Oh man, now laura logan, I'msorry to break into your thought
here.
I just got a alert on my phonethat they're doing level three
evacuation in thurston countyfor entire towns.

(01:09:49):
What, yeah, um, I'm I'm notsure what this is about, but
this might have something to dowith oh, it's brush fires.
I was like, oh shoot, I wasjust talking to my wife
yesterday is the reactor goingdown?
blowing the.
What I was just talking to mywife yesterday about the
possibility of mount rainierblowing it's top.

Speaker 1 (01:10:10):
Okay, so that's brush fires yeah, okay, we can handle
a brush fire, but if rainiergoes, I'm I'm out.

Speaker 7 (01:10:17):
Yeah that's why I was like I gotta break a boat.

Speaker 1 (01:10:20):
I go, hijack a yacht and just head straight west.
Just go until the rocking stops.
Holy cow, that would be bad.

Speaker 7 (01:10:27):
That was a close one oh, the thing that kind of teed
me off was it the south end ofrainier road and I was like
rainier oh the whole town ofbeing evacuated.

Speaker 1 (01:10:36):
Uh, jason shepherd.
Jason Shepard, who?
This right here was reported byLaura Logan.
She posted this and she saidtake a look at how invasive they
were when going after Americancitizens for a quote
insurrection that never happened.
They will do it again, givenhalf a chance.
They only stopped because you,the people, stopped them by

(01:10:57):
electing Donald Trump.
So it's going through.
You're saying basically all theinformation they wanted from
social media companies and allthe different sources they could
get it.
But this is what really caughtmy eye here All internal or
external reviews, studies,reports, data analysis and
related communications regardingyour platform and
misinformation, disinformationand misinformation relating to
the 2020 election.

(01:11:17):
So basically anybody who postedanything excuse me, counter
narrative to 2020 efforts tooverturn, challenge, otherwise
interfere with the 2020 electionor the certification of
electoral college results.
I got a lot of informationthere and this is what really
got me domestic violentextremists, including racially
or ethically motivated violentextremists, militia violent
extremists, sovereign citizenviolent extremists which, by the

(01:11:39):
way, when I've met mostsovereign citizens, whatever
that means, means I've beenaccused of being.
They're not violent, they justthink that they're living and
they think that you know the lawshould provide some protections
to them and not be constantlyasking things from them.

Speaker 7 (01:11:54):
And most of the time, they just want to be left alone
.

Speaker 1 (01:11:56):
Yes, that's exactly right.
They just want to be left aloneto grow their carrots.
They would really appreciate itif they could drill a well
without jumping through everyhoop known to man.

Speaker 7 (01:12:06):
They're sovereign carrots and their sovereign
water the sovereign citizens.

Speaker 1 (01:12:11):
I find it hilarious, because sovereign citizen is not
a threat to anybody, but thepower itself.
Okay, that's it.
They're not a threat to anybody, but power itself.
They're not a threat to theirneighbors, they are not a threat
to the local police departmentor the sheriffs.
They are not a threat to thelocal walmart they are the most
agreeable people around.
They just are a threat to thepower structure itself and some

(01:12:33):
of them are a little bitconfused well, sure, I mean.
who's not confused in a worldwhere trump's a Russian agent
and Hillary's Well, yeah.
Dollars and put on your mask,because then we can lower the
spread rate from zero to zero.

Speaker 7 (01:12:48):
Well.

Speaker 1 (01:12:48):
I'm not saying the rest of us aren't confused,
they're just a little confused.
I'm like you know it could beeveryone else's Like there's a
real, there's a real possibilitySovereign citizens actually
haven't figured out.
You guys are the fools that areputting on masks, and you know
what I mean.
Like like hello yeah, weoverthrew the british empire
over a two percent t tax I'llsay you're over here, being like

(01:13:10):
marginally, I only pay about 67of my income in taxes.

Speaker 7 (01:13:13):
I'll say it again, I'm not saying that we're all
not confused they're a littleconfused.

Speaker 1 (01:13:18):
Well, who wouldn't be in this world?
Violent extremist QAnon OK,there you go.
And other extremists associatedwith efforts to overturn the
2020 election, including January6th 2020 attack, attacks
against other state capitals andattempted attacks against the
2020 inauguration of Joseph RBiden Jr.
Foreign malign influence the2020 election, including known
or suspected coordinationbetween foreign and domestic

(01:13:40):
influences to interfere in the2020 election.

Speaker 7 (01:13:43):
And then, of course, they want to exclude everything
from china I used to tell mykids when I drop them off for
school um, in the morning, whenI when they're out the door, I'd
be like, have fun storming thecastle, have fun storming the
castle.

Speaker 1 (01:13:59):
So Donald Trump wrote this.
He said very unfair media isworking on my meeting with Putin
, constantly quoting firedlosers and really dumb people
like John Bolton, who just saidthat, even though the meeting is
on American soil, putin hasalready won.
What's that all about?
We are winning on everything.
The fake news is workingovertime.

(01:14:20):
No tax on overtime, by the way.
If I got Moscow and Leningradfree as part of the deal with
Russia, the fake news would saythat I made a bad deal.
But now they've been caught.
Look at all of the real newsthat's coming out about their
corruption.
They are sick and dishonestpeople who probably hate our
country, but it doesn't matterbecause we are winning on
everything.
My wife and I were talking aboutthe asian comedian that we did

(01:14:42):
yesterday.
Where he goes.
You know if you're talking tosomeone who's like well, let's
take mag.
I mean, make america greatagain.
I mean it seems reasonable.
America is not doing so.
Hot math scores are down, testscores are down, blah, blah.
You know he goes on.
And then you know there was a.
There was a social pact madewith promise to the people that
if they went to school, got goodgrades, got a good, a good job
and were good citizens, thateverything would work out, and
those promises never reallymaterialized.
And then, you know, he startedoutsourcing to China and sent

(01:15:04):
all the manufacturing to Asia.
And because some of you guysdidn't stay in school, we don't
really make anything here.
And now he goes.
But you don't read enough anddon't have the vocabulary, so it
just comes out as let's go.
That's how I feel here.

(01:15:29):
The idea of the peasants.
I don't know what you're doing,but it's wrong.
Poke, poke, poke with the pitch, for you know.
Oh, all right, so we havereached the end of this part of
the show.
So we are going to jump over toprivate and we've got a couple
more videos to watch one fromkatherine austin fits talking
about the central banks and howthey're sovereign, and then
we're going to hear about ericweinstein and how physics has
come to a complete halt you wantan outro.
You want to skip the outro ohman, we got about 15 seconds.

(01:15:51):
People in the chat can decideif they want an outro or not,
otherwise we can skip it.
I don't see anybody commentingyet.
I know there's a delay.

Speaker 7 (01:16:00):
Well, yeah, they're typing furiously, but it takes
about 20 seconds for us to getit, oh let's see, we'll give it
five, five.

Speaker 1 (01:16:12):
Oh, left behind without.
Don't forget to visit left andbehind way now, I haven't been
good about plugging that on theum, public side.
Uh, things are going reallywell over there.
They had a board meeting.
I just hear secondhand it justeverybody knows I have no direct
involvement in left behindwithout.
I just you know every now andthen Nancy Pelosi's husband.
Yeah, yeah, my wife, my wifewill tell me.

(01:16:33):
You know I have a board meetingtoday and you know can you
watch the kids or whatever, soI'm aware of when things happen.
But they, they have beenhelping multiple I mean so many
families, over a hundred kids,just amazing feedback, doing
presents and stuff for them.
It's just awesome.
And they're constantly workingon grants.
That seems to be their wholelife is working on grants and

(01:16:54):
little $500 grants here, athousand dollar grants there,
and then, of course, privatedonors, some people sending a
hundred dollars a month.
It all makes a huge difference.
They said that they'd raisedshe told me she'd raised $5,000
in private donors this last year.
Wow, all of that went to kids,all of it.
It's amazing, it's just it's soawesome.
And then, of course, they got adecent size grant that supported

(01:17:18):
them through most of the year.
And again, it's just such agood little program.
And they do things like gostand out in front of the
Walmart with a booth.
Walmart's been a really goodsupporter.
By the way, they up theirdonations.
They do like a quarterlydonation, which is really fun.
I just I'm constantly impressedwith my wife and putting that
together and continuing to do it.

(01:17:39):
I mean it.
Like many, many times I'vethought that is the last legacy
of this.
Everything that I'm doing iswas just so that she could start
that, you know, and I hopesomeday that that thing lives on
in perpetuity and can helpthousands and thousands and
thousands of kids.

Speaker 7 (01:17:55):
Well, and I also hope that we get our elections
figured out.

Speaker 1 (01:17:58):
Yeah, that too, that too, and I'm hoping the prison
population decreases, decreases,so there's less kids you need
to do that with.
But all right, nobody commentedin the chat so we're gonna go
out without an outro.
So we will talk to you guysthat are not on rumble premium
tomorrow and those of you thatare sticking around.
We'll see you in seconds.
Are we private now?

Speaker 7 (01:18:18):
Are we private now?
Well, trying to Update stream.
Stream exclusively.

Speaker 1 (01:18:29):
We're exclusive Good late morning peasants, Okay.

Speaker 7 (01:18:33):
Not working.

Speaker 1 (01:18:34):
It's not working.

Speaker 7 (01:18:35):
No, so we're still public.
Yeah, all right.
We're just hanging out with thedrab public Public on YouTube.
Oh, my goodness, all right Wellwe can finish it.

Speaker 12 (01:18:44):
We just got a couple videos we're schlepping and
plumbing here All right, so thisis Catherine Austin Fitz.

Speaker 1 (01:18:48):
Regardless of whether we're private or not, you're
here, we're still.
You know something rhymed withthat.
All right, you're All right,you're here, and this is
Katherine Austin Fitz, and she'stalking about banking, central
banking specifically.
A little bit of music in thebackground on this, but it's
just another one of thosetidbits that most people don't
know.
If you look at the group ofpeople who meet, okay, so now

(01:19:10):
we're private.
Welcome private people.

Speaker 18 (01:19:12):
If you look at the group of people who meet through
the BIS.
What's that?
Bis is the Bank ofInternational Settlements and
it's the central bank of centralbanks.

Speaker 20 (01:19:19):
Where is that?

Speaker 18 (01:19:20):
located.
It's in Basel, Switzerland.

Speaker 1 (01:19:23):
We'll just refresh it .
We'll just refresh it.

Speaker 7 (01:19:26):
The premium content is fresh, fresh.

Speaker 18 (01:19:30):
I look at the group of people who meet through the
BIS.

Speaker 20 (01:19:33):
What's that?

Speaker 18 (01:19:34):
BIS is the Bank of International Settlements and
it's the central bank of centralbanks.

Speaker 20 (01:19:38):
Where is that?

Speaker 18 (01:19:38):
it's in basel, switzerland.
It has 63 of the most powerfulcentral banks as its members,
and the new york fed and the fedare both shareholders.
They became shareholders in1994.
In one sentence what's the?
What's the purpose?

Speaker 20 (01:19:51):
of the bank of international settlements.

Speaker 18 (01:19:52):
Okay, so there are two things you need to know
about the bank of internationalsettlements.
I'm not sure my brain's bigenough for this, but keep going
it is it has sovereign immunity.
It's above the law.
It's its own country, right,it's its own country.
It has its own police force and, essentially, other than one of
its staff being in a caraccident or you know minor
things, no one has the legalauthority to move against it.

(01:20:14):
Number two it can move moneyand hold it on its bank, on its
balance sheet, and manage moneysecretly.
If I want to steal 21 trillionfrom the US government and park
it on the balance sheet of theBIS, it can move it anywhere in
the world and it can keep it onits balance sheet secretly.

Speaker 16 (01:20:33):
First of all, where does its power come from?
Who empowered it to havesovereign immunity in the race?

Speaker 18 (01:20:37):
It was created after World War I and it was created
in theory to manage thereparations of the German
government.
But if you read the realhistory, it was because the Bank
of England and the centralbankers wanted an entity that
had sovereign immunity.

Speaker 1 (01:20:56):
Remember that diagram I was drawing for you today,
coming from the private, they'retheir own thing.

Speaker 7 (01:21:02):
Yeah, I know would it be easier if we could just
trade stamps like in prison andwhy'd she have to pick 21
trillion as a number for herexample?

Speaker 1 (01:21:13):
well, that just happens to be what's missing and
what I think was plowed intounderground bunkers.

Speaker 7 (01:21:17):
Oh, I just thought, that was funny though that was
funny.

Speaker 1 (01:21:21):
No, that was.
The whole point of thatdiscussion with Joe Rogan was
there was 21 trillion missingdollars.
She's like it's all in our debtbut we have nothing to show for
it, and when we actually followthe money where we can, it dead
ends in a hole in the ground.
Looks like an undergroundbunker to me.
So this is Eric.
Eric, what's his name?
It's not.
It's not Weinstein, is it?

(01:21:42):
Yeah, so Weinstein?
Jeez, all right, I knew thatwas his name, but then I started
thinking of the guy that's injail.
Can't remember his name.

Speaker 17 (01:21:54):
Now he's also a.

Speaker 1 (01:21:55):
Weinstein yeah exactly, all right.
So, anyways, he's talking aboutphysics and something that I
knew on the periphery, but theway he explains it I'm like, oh,
that makes sense.

Speaker 16 (01:22:05):
Physics has gone stagnant in terms of how we
usually measure progress.
The way we measure progress isthe change in something called
the action or the Lagrangian, aspecialized device, and that
used to change a lot and then in1973, it stopped changing.

(01:22:25):
The major thing that we have iswe have no new ideas about how
to change the Lagrangian thatanybody finds that exciting or
interesting.
So there's been no progress.
Nobody goes to Stockholm to geta Nobel prize because they
changed the Lagrangian of theworld and there's this bizarre
force field that anybody whowants to talk about physics and
doing something new, inparticular leaving or traversing

(01:22:48):
time or multiple dimensions oftime, anything that's really
close to what might be possiblegets slammed.
And we don't know why, becauseit's very cheap to explore ideas
and we have no new idea.

(01:23:09):
But the only thing about a newidea in physics is that a new
idea changes the balance ofpower in the world.
Physicists are the onlyoccupation in the country that
doesn't have full free speech.
My point is I don't think ourgovernment knows the real
secrets of physics.
If I had to make a bet tomorrow, I don't think there's a secret

(01:23:32):
government office that knowsphysics okay.
I think that there were a bunchof very smart people who knew
how dangerous physics was andthat the idea that we would
continue to do it in publicstruck them as insane because it
could lead to destruction.
When I tell you that the mostdangerous idea in human history

(01:23:55):
is maybe there's a neutralversion of the proton, that's
supposed to sound insane, butthe entire chain of ideas
results in nuclear fusionhappening on earth at the
direction of the president ofthe united states and that's
what I'm trying to get at whichpeople don't understand, which
is.
You probably don't even realizethat the department of Energy

(01:24:18):
is really the Department ofPhysics, because we pretend that
it's the Department of Energy,like we had a war department
that became the Department ofDefense.
We're scared of the possibilityof physics.
We don't even want to talkabout it.
Literally no other occupationhas lost free speech like

(01:24:45):
physics.
There is a special doctrinecalled restricted data that says
you cannot write physics on anapkin, even if you have nothing
to do with the government Ithink even if you're not an
American if it has anything thatcould possibly have to do with

(01:25:06):
nuclear weapons, in other words,any advance that might have to
do with nuclear weapons.
You have to recognize that theinstant you put pen to paper or
you start talking to somebody,you're committing a violation of
the 1917 Espionage Act.
And if you think that's crazy,start exploring the words

(01:25:27):
Restricted Data, 1917 EspionageAct, 1946 and 1954 Atomic Energy
Acts, the doctrine of bornsecret.
It is illegal to pursue Qclearance data if you don't have
a Q clearance.
But if you're creating Qclearance data out of your own
head as a byproduct of trying todo physics, you are actually

(01:25:50):
potentially committing a capitaloffense.

Speaker 7 (01:25:56):
Wow, I didn't know that.

Speaker 1 (01:25:58):
And you sovereign citizens are wacko, yeah right,
all we want to do is think stop,stop.
No, that is interesting.
I didn't know that and itdoesn't surprise me at all it
doesn't surprise, it doesn'tsurprise me at all.
But again, just going with thislarger theme, the government is

(01:26:18):
way bigger than we think it isand it is a smoke monster.
It is a house of cards.
It is built upon a whole bunchof stuff that, if the American
public actually knew andinternalized things like the BIS
and its sovereign immunity, ifthey actually internalized and
understood things like the FBIcovering up some of the most
heinous crimes that you canpossibly imagine, most heinous

(01:26:39):
crimes that you can possiblyimagine, you know, because we
haven't even gotten into and weprobably won't get into the
human trafficking stuff that theclans are alleged to be
involved in.
You know, when Trump makes ajoke about you've stolen a few
villages in Haiti, he's nottalking rhetorically, like
there's really accusations thatthey smuggled kids out of Haiti
you know, and did some badthings down there.
So if the people knew that we'rebeing held back from things

(01:27:02):
like free energy specificallyfor the purpose of keeping you
on the teat, yeah right, it it'dget pretty rough.
It'd get pretty rough.
So my, my, my gut feeling isget out now, become
self-sustaining now, maybe, youknow, be sovereign now I hate to
say sovereign citizen, you know, I don't want to be on

(01:27:22):
anybody's list.
Oh no, I figure I'm at the topof that list at this point.
Anyways, all right, guys.
That's it for the show today.
We will talk to you guys againtomorrow bye, old woman, man,

(01:27:56):
man, sorry, what night.

Speaker 4 (01:27:58):
Lives in that castle over there.
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
You automatically treat me likean inferior.
Well, I am king, oh, king, eh,very nice.

(01:28:21):
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There's some lovely filth downhere.
Oh, how do you do?
How do you do?
Good, lady, I am Arthur, king ofthe Britons.
Whose castle is that?

(01:28:42):
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.
Didn't know we had a king?
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working classes oh,there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

(01:29:03):
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified

(01:29:24):
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs Be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major Be quiet
.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering

(01:29:48):
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,

(01:30:09):
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.

(01:30:31):
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
You, you, you, you, you, you.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}When Those in Power Play Dirty: Exposing Political Corruption and Cover-ups

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

When Those in Power Play Dirty: Exposing Political Corruption and Cover-ups

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce