Whose Gang Is Bigger? Trump's Show of Force in American Cities

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Damn, I'm screaming, I'm screaming.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth
Bunchik had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake, let them eatcake we're getting screwed, man
.

Speaker 4 (00:27):
Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's gotta stop.
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants that take the brunt of
everything.
It's gotta stop.

(00:48):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning, peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofthe Peasants Perspective.
Every day, it's a blessing.
Yes, ron, you're getting prettygood at like just coming in

(01:13):
here and getting it going.
Man, I always thought I wouldbe.
I thought I'd be the one thatwalks in and the mic just starts
talking.
We have a good time here.
Last night we had our big 171776.
We had our trust creation class, which was really fun, and, uh,
we had a good group there.

Speaker 6 (01:31):
I think I need one of those yeah someone.

Speaker 4 (01:34):
Someone had a uh comment.
They're like building theairplane as we fly it.
Then she's afterwards, shemessaged me and she's like I see
that sometimes on peasantsperspective and I'm like, yeah,
we're pretty much like, okay,we're plugging the computers in.

Speaker 6 (01:48):
We've got no wings yet, but we're taking off.

Speaker 4 (01:53):
Anyways, it's so fun.
I was also telling someoneyesterday.
I was like, yeah, we got, wegot money last month.
It was like it's almostunbelievable.
Like we, we didn't break even.
I actually started doing themath on all the hosting stuff,
but yeah, don't start that.

Speaker 6 (02:09):
We're getting close.

Speaker 4 (02:11):
No, no way.
No, we were close.
We were close to, like, breakeven, which is kind of fun.

Speaker 6 (02:18):
Anyways, all right.

Speaker 4 (02:19):
I'm just getting the pop out chats up again building
the airplane as we fly it andall the hosting stuff pop out
chats up again building theairplane as we fly it and all
the hosting stuff.
But oh yeah, now I can heardon't start that we're getting
close, that I can see there'sthe delay which you know is
expected.
But uh, it kind of cracks me upa little bit because I'm like,
well, that's why the commentstake like three minutes to come,
like, hey, somebody in thecomments me and then it will

(02:42):
come like five minutes laterafter I've looked it up.
Yes, ponyboy, good morningpeasants, weedem boys and good
morning Farazier and Jonatakis.
I know who that is.
That's my papa.
Okay, so in today's episode weare going to start out with a

(03:05):
little piece I like to call mygang is bigger than your gang.
Okay, this, this is uh.
Yesterday in dc the boys rolledin troops are now moving down
wilshire.
They're headed towards centralla right now you can see lots of
reinforcements.
I'm sorry.
It's huge.
It's huge bro Troops.

Speaker 6 (03:34):
This is very big.
I don't know how big that is,but to him it's huge.

Speaker 4 (03:38):
Wow.
Okay, so that was LA, but thesame thing is going on in DC.
Right, the troops are moving inokay so last night this, uh
last night this was filmed bysome dc residents isn't this
just like a tuesday night?
well, no, apparently this partof the neighborhood they don't
come to.
Oh, that's what the guys.

(03:58):
That's what the guy is sayingin here.
This is the commentary on this.
One is feds and unmarked carsare conducting stops along
georgia avenue northwest tonight, which is farther north than
I've seen them go in washingtondc so far filmed as an
anonymously submitted trafficstop in georgia, but just a
random traffic stop.
So this was the downtown dcarea where there's like food and
stuff like that.

(04:19):
They're just out walking thestreets.
Apparently they've been doingthis all over dc.

Speaker 6 (04:39):
They've just been the hell look at this guy.

Speaker 4 (04:48):
So when I was going back and forth to DC for trial,
try to find some food, somesketchy parts around there and
that's just a 10 square miletown, like so.
A lot of times when we look atcrime statistics and stuff like
that, it's hard for us tounderstand All those crime

(05:18):
statistics are not in like LA,where it's a small town, in
Phoenix, where it's this hugehouse in the desert or a place
in the desert, or even Utah,where it expands for miles and
miles Salt Lake City does, right, no, dc, when you're talking
crime stats, we're not talkingBaltimore, we're not talking
Arlington, you're talking about10 square miles and you've got
the highest murder rate almostin the world.
If I'm not mistaken, it mightbe in the world in a 10 square
mile area, right, and thepopulation is only like 800000

(05:41):
people.
It's an incredible amount ofcrime in a very small area.
So, yeah, this, these guys justwalk in the streets.
You know people out just havingtheir meals, and my gang's
bigger than your gang.
There's.
There's a narrative that themainstream media is starting to
push about Trump being anauthoritarian.
Right, it was an authoritarian.
He came in, he got rid of USAID, he's firing people.

(06:03):
He's an authoritarian.
He's authoritarian.
Now, for some of us, we're likeserve your right, dum-dums, you
know, like we want everybodyfired, but for a lot of people,
this is like traumatizing.
This is scary, this is, this is.
This is bad, and so, of course,you know, people like us, we
want to look at it with cleareyes.
Janine pierrot, judge janinepierrot, who's nowC attorney,

(06:24):
she posted this little thing shesaid in the last 18 months
these are all people under 18who've been shot and killed in
DC.
Keep in mind 10 square milearea.
I drove farther than 10 milesto get here today.
Yeah, a lot farther.
You did too.
Ok, 10 square miles in the last18 months.
These are the people that havebeen killed.

(06:46):
There's another page, yes, and,of course, what color are they?
Well, all of them are blackJeez.
So this DC crime thing, rememberhow I've mentioned.
It's a segregated society.
There's the.
That's where the blacks live,this is where the whites live.
These people all work onCapitol Hill or work for law
firms or lobbyists.
Those people are opening doorsand swinging hammers and

(07:08):
flipping burgers and valetingcars.
You have the service industry,which is this entire community,
and then you have the lawcommunity, government, community
, and it's it's, you know, thewhite people that make a lot of
money.
They are like oh, we shouldhave some DE dei policies and
have some black people here.
What can we hire them to do?
Oh, we can hire them to besecurity, or we can hire them

(07:29):
you know what I'm saying.
So they get diversification bybasically hiring down, and you
know what?
I'm saying yeah, and well, butthat's the population that's
there.
I know dc had slaves right.
Like you go, we go read historyand it's like well up in that
area, that's where all you know,it's like that's still the area
.
Yeah I guess, it's rough, it'sbad man anyways.

(07:53):
So, uh, this is scott jenningson cnn.
It was an extreme problem ofcrime and the reason this is
significant is this panel.
This is in dc.
These guys have their littlestudio.
They're probably, you know, 300yards from the Capitol here.
I don't know where their studiois, but it's all close there
300 yards from a murder.

(08:16):
Well, no, probably three milesfrom a murder.
Ok, these guys are on thelittle Capitol Hill side of town
.
Ok, that's the point.
Here you got 10 square miles,three square miles of what you
think of as DC, the Capitol mallarea and that little tight
Smithsonian and the bridge andthe you know, all the good views
of the Potomac and all thatstuff.
And then you've got the rest ofthe rest crime ridden.

(08:36):
That's where I went right up tothe Potomac.
I could look across the riverto Maryland, my cell, my cell
window, my four inch window, youknow, ensconced in concrete, I
could look out across thepotomac.
I was up in the corner of dcand, uh, you know the inmates,
they're all black, they're allblack.
I remember, like when I wasdown in in, uh, when I was down

(09:00):
in solitary, that floor, thatthat it was kind of like a dual
tier thing.
Anyways, there were three whiteinmates.
We were all january sixers.
Everyone else on the wholeblock was black and I kept
thinking how is it possible indc that this is intake, like

(09:20):
people?
You know, this is where peopleare coming in, I can see who
who's coming in.
I'm in solitary, we're all insolitary, but you know, like,
how is there no other whiteinmates?
I don't know.
Ok, so this is Scott Jennings,and the reason I'm saying that
is it's significant because,scott Jennings, these guys are
in DC, scott.

Speaker 13 (09:37):
Well, the polling that you should the buffering
Combining people, the bufferingcombining people who thought
extremely, uh, the crime is anextreme problem or crime is a
moderate problem was 91 percent.
So that is I totally so 91percent of people who live in a
jurisdiction think it's amoderate or an extreme problem.

(09:59):
This is not a figment ofanyone's imagination.
This is not mass hysteria.
This isn't some collectivehallucination.
It's real.
People who live there know theyaren't safe, and so I don't
know, chuck, why anybody wouldcare, whether it's a police
officer Arthur, to your point ora National Guardsman or a park

(10:20):
police, who also were outpatrolling, apparently.
I don't know why they wouldcare.
If there are more eyes and earson the street, that makes them
feel like if somebody is goingto do something criminal or
violent or untoward, there maybe a greater chance that someone
sees it.
And so it's a 30-day project.
Last night there were 23arrests, and they also picked up
some illegal guns, which themayor was just talking about and

(10:42):
the police chief was justtalking about.
Why don't we give them 30 days,see the results and then maybe
the residents of dc and theleadership, he can say well,
this worked, this didn't, here'show we could tweak it and do
better.
It's a 30 day by the way I.

Speaker 14 (10:54):
I find it interesting, and probably it's a
good thing, that republicansnow are talking about illegal
guns on the streets, becauseprior to or other the gun laws
in dc are part of the problem.

Speaker 4 (11:07):
It's good good people who don't want to get in
trouble can't carry a gun.
There's scott jennings in adifferent take saying similar
things.

Speaker 13 (11:13):
There's an obvious difference between dc and any
other city in america.
You know, a few months ago Iwas in union station and saw a
body hit the floor at the bottomof the escalator in union
station because there was amurder right in front of me up
on the second floor.
I was going to get a tie and Iheard the shots and saw the body
hit the floor.
So I've been listening all daylong to people trying to make

(11:33):
some argument that Washington DCis a safe place.
It's not a safe place and wecan argue about statistics and
numbers.
There's a police commanderright now on suspension because
there's some allegation that thestatistics have been altered,
but we can argue about that allday long.
Nobody in their right mind wholives there or visits there on a
regular basis would tell youthat Washington DC is safe and

(11:55):
everybody who goes there knowsit.

Speaker 4 (11:57):
I feel the same way about Seattle.
Last week I had to go toSeattle on Friday downtown.
It's been basically the wholeday there.
This place is crazy, you know.
I mean every big city's kind ofcrowded and every big city's
got a little extra trash.
Every big city's got a fewhomeless people running around,
but in seattle it's kind ofridiculous, you know, and I
don't even know.
I actually think they've made asignificant effort to try to

(12:18):
clean it up, which is stillpretty egregious that it's as
bad as it still is yeah, youknow I don't go to seattle
anymore.

Speaker 6 (12:25):
Um, I know that they've cleaned it up and it's.
It is supposedly vastly betterthan it has been in years prior,
but still not interesting to meyeah.

Speaker 4 (12:37):
So we've got to watch this.
I've said it for many years Idon't care if the boot is coming
from the right foot or the leftfoot.
It's still a boot on my neck.
When I see the images and Ithink it's funny.
You know, my gang's bigger thanyour gang.
It's basically Trump using thepower of the stick to get some
you know performance and nobodycan argue.

(12:57):
Crime's up, let's fix it.
Crime's up, let's fix it.
Ok, we've got a federal federaltakeover.
Oh, I thought I was arepublican.
I don't like federal takeovers.
Hold on.
I thought small limitedgovernment.
Wait, let dc burn men, let itgo.
They can't manage themselves.
They'll figure it out you know,what I mean like that's my
attitude and trump's like no,we're gonna fix it.
Now, there he is.
Home rule there.
You know dc is set up the wayit's okay, you're doing it in dc

(13:21):
, you're not doing it inBaltimore.
It makes me feel a littlebetter.
But you did just try this in LA.
But wait, it was only over.
Ok, they were attacking federalproperty.
Ok, there's a lot of federalproperty in places.
You know a pretty broad mandate.
So there is.
There is definitely some concernabout gearing up on domestic
streets, right, because then youknow the flavor of the day.

(13:43):
Trump's going after crime.
Trump's got a real thing aboutstraight down the line.
Look, a gun crime is gun crime,drugs are drugs.
It doesn't matter yourpolitical affiliation.
You did a thing.
But other administrations inrecent years didn't quite see it
that way, right, they kind ofwere politics is more important
than actual crime.

(14:04):
You're a dissident, go to jail.
You know they round like Ithink january sixers are.
Just you can only look at thosevideos of fbi walking through
the streets.
If you're january sixer, ifyou're just completely in
delusion, I get cold sweats in away, because I'm like those are
the guys who came after us,like they're on patrol, it's not

(14:24):
like they just got hired in thelast six months.
These guys have been around awhile and these are the guys
that worked at the organizationthat targeted me and my family
and now I'm like, oh go, fix mycrime problem.
You made me an outlaw.
I have a hard time being onyour team.
You know what I mean.
Anyways, to lighten things uphere, this is a really funny

(14:51):
comedian, ronnie Chung, and he'stalking about basically how in
America we have real problems,right, and he just kind of lays
out here and maybe this is whythe show works.
It's maybe got some vocabularythat some people don't have, but
he explains the MAGA movementand this is one of the better

(15:12):
explanations I've really seen.
Ron, I think you'll enjoy this.

Speaker 11 (15:14):
I would probably start that conversation with
what we do agree with, right.
There'll be a logical place tostart a difficult conversation,
for example, maga Make America.

Speaker 4 (15:26):
We're going to refresh this because it's funny.
We got to make sure you get it.
Okay, he's saying so how do youstart talking to someone who's
MAGA?
Oh no, I got it.
How do you start?

Speaker 11 (15:36):
talking to someone who's MAGA we start that
conversation with what we doagree with, right.
That would be a logical placeto start a difficult
conversation.
For example, maga, make AmericaGreat.
Again, they have a point.
America is not doing so greatright now.
Our kids' math scores are down.
Our children's science scoresare down.
When judged according tointernational metrics,

(15:57):
healthcare systems are not doingso great.
Wealth gap disparities areincreasing exponentially.
There was an implied promise toa generation of Americans that
if you do certain things, workhard, go to college, be a good
person, you would have certainoutcomes.
And those outcomes didn'tmaterialize for majority of
people because baby boomers andtrans and decision-making
positions lowered the capitalgains tax so that their network

(16:19):
essentially compounds year afteryear.
And post-World War II, USleadership traded the domestic
manufacturing industry fornational security by making the
US dollar the defaultinternational trade currency,
which gave America the abilityto impose economic sanctions on
foreign countries through a USfinancial banking system but
consequently increased the valueof the US dollar astronomically
, which made it impossible foranyone to manufacture anything

(16:40):
in America, although the logicat the time was that Americans
were supposed to upskill enmasse away from the menial
manufacturing jobs.
Everyone hears too much of whatdumbasses say in school.
So we just traded domesticmanufacturing to Asia and the
rest of the world at the expenseof working-class families.
But if you don't read enough,it comes out as let's go, brenda

(17:01):
, and it's like you have a point, but you don't have the
vocabulary to describe yourreality.

Speaker 4 (17:07):
I would probably start that conversation it comes
out as let's go brendan.
And inside of that is and thedomestic manufacturing was
traded off to china.
Which the logic?
I thought that was so funny,and how does it express itself?

Speaker 6 (17:21):
let's go brendan so I don't know if that uh audience
felt like they were gettingtheir money's worth there.

Speaker 4 (17:30):
No, I think that's hilarious.
So you know, you think aboutthe crime in DC and if you're
just like make it stop and yousee troops walking through the
street, you're like let's go,brandon.
That's the only thing.
You know, how did we get here?
We got here because everybodydidn't do their jobs.

Speaker 6 (17:45):
It's so true.
Let the dictator do his job.

Speaker 4 (17:48):
The parallels between Donald Trump and Julius Caesar
are interesting.
Julius Caesar dealt with a lotof the same bloated Roman
government and he had to come infrom the outside and be like no
, we have to fix it.
Steve Bannon talks about how wegot here.
So the expression of MAa islet's go right in that you're

(18:09):
talking about a generation oftrending.
The exponential wage gap hasbeen increasing.
It's like oh yeah there was a,there was a promise made to a
generation of people that if yougo to school, go to college,
get good grades, be a goodperson, that certain outcomes
and those outcomes didn'tmaterialize well.

Speaker 6 (18:24):
That's why, if you're my age, you don't believe any
of these promises.
That's why our entiregeneration knows that social
security benefits do will notexist for us.
You know what I mean I talkedto every yes.

Speaker 4 (18:38):
The baby boomers are so concerned with it and I'm
like I never expect to see adime.
No, they've been you.
It's bankrupt like get yourbenefits, I know you pay yeah,
yeah, get them all you can forme, but I'm way beyond thinking
I'm ever going to get anythingback from these guys.
Yeah, you know what I mean.
You can't even build a park inmy county.

(18:58):
What do you think I'm gonnaexpect medicaid in 30 years, if,
if if I get social security,it'll be enough to cover a
cheese sandwich oh, my goodness,and everything they proposed to
us 401ks, worse than pensions,pensions all those went bankrupt
.
Yeah, you know what?
The best thing to do is ashoebox of gold you know what I
mean and five acres of landthere's your.

(19:19):
There's your retirement plan,all right.
So steve bannon is is isexplaining how we got here.
He's one of these people withenough vocabulary to explain it
all and exactly what trump isdoing to fix it.
And you know, the republicanparty has been part of the
problem in the usaid.

Speaker 18 (19:35):
Let's let's be honest.
Eli crane and these guys triedto zero it out in the
appropriations process two yearsago all night fights on the
house floor.
And who saved it?
The Republican establishmentsaved it and didn't even have
the balls to look into where themoney was going.
The money was going to allthese NGOs that were supporting
the invasion of the country, allthese NGOs throughout the world

(19:55):
and the United States that weresuppressing conservative voices
.
That was brought to you by thecontrolled opposition
Republicans.
This is the reason you've gotto differentiate between
Republicans and the MAGAmovement.
The Republican Party is one ofthe reasons the country's in
this situation.
You mentioned Bill Barr andthese guys.
We've won since Nixon.

(20:17):
You know we've won as manytimes as we've lost.
We've been in control as muchas the Democrats have.
How did the country get intothis crisis?
Because the Republican Party islike the Washington generals to
the to the Democrats HarlemGlobetrotters.
They're just controlledopposition.
It's all performative.
They never really did anything.
They just kind of went alongwith the system.
That's the difference in Trump.

(20:37):
Trump is direct action down avertical to actually make
fundamental change, and that'swhy the system is reacting.
The system's traumatized.
I understand that he's a bluntforce instrument.
He's going to give the system apunch and it's going to be
traumatized.
That's kind of the purpose ofthe exercise and that's why he's

(20:59):
relentless.
He will not back off.
That's different than thesecountry club Republicans who
have essentially gone along withthis for 40 or 50 years and got
the country in this jam.
This is why the MAGA movementdetests rhinos, detests country
club Republicans.
We hate them more than we hateradical Democrats.

Speaker 4 (21:19):
It's my concern that as we go, blunt force trauma
things which listen when peoplemake arguments to me about, well
, the constitution like man,like we're a little bit past
that.
We're past that at this pointit's like, okay, we're looking
for results.
I mean, we're all idolizingKelly down in El Salvador.
I mean, I'm pretty sure he'sgoing to change title of

(21:39):
president to dictator, you know,something like that.
Uh, but yeah, we're at thepoint where it's like, no, we
need results.
Like this is how you have newregimes.
This is how we got the new dealwith bloated government
spending.
Like this is how you got the14th amendment in the district
of columbia and reconstruction.
You came to conflict.

(21:59):
Someone's got to win, someone'sgot to lose.
Guys like ban had been sayingthat for a long time.
Trump understands that.
That I'll tell you.
John Brennan understood it.
Someone's got to win, someone'sgot to lose.
Right, this is.
This is a zero sum game here ontheir end of things.

Speaker 6 (22:12):
Yeah, he was shooting away.

Speaker 4 (22:15):
I mean there's always someone in charge, Always some
second hand are looking for myextra grain.
There's always, you know,there's always someone that's
looking for my, my extra crop togo and they're trying to pitch
me something.
You know I'm going to goprotect the hill and Dale and
Valley over there Give me yourpotatoes, okay, okay, why do I
want to go over to the hill?
and Dale?
You know, henry yesterday wasreading a little Henry David

(22:37):
throw, he talks about the hill.
Over the hill and Dale, fightlittle soldiers.
What are they doing?
No idea.
Fight little soldiers, little.
What are they doing?
No idea.
I'm gonna go fight my brother,you know.
Okay, into the chat.

Speaker 6 (22:48):
well, I'm really glad that he mentioned the uh,
rhinos, the, you know, the, whatthe country club republicans
and the republican party ingeneral, because this is a
problem that you know.
When I talk to my family orwhoever they, they always are
like well you know, theRepublicans are going to fix it.
Yeah, no, this is a hugeproblem and I don't trust any of

(23:13):
these people.

Speaker 4 (23:14):
No, no Into the chats .
Frazier, nice morning.
To start today, pray the rosarydaily.
Happy Wednesday.
Yes, ponyboy, in Austin peoplewere smoking weed next to the
cops on the street.
I know, man, and there arepeople in prison that were like
I think they have commuted andor pardoned everybody with
marijuana charges in the federalsystem, unless you had like
violent charges with it.
But, bro, a lot of people losta lot of time.

(23:37):
I mean, could you imaginesomeone in the 1970s being like
seeing a video of someone'sopenly smoking weed next to a
cop?
Today, when someone has livedin a bad, in bad, they get used
to bad and small adjustment canbe seen as not bad.
Yeah, it's the frog and boilingwater example, which I think
has been disproven.
That doesn't really happen.
They will jump out at a certaintemperature.
But either way, the examplesets in for kids, right?

(23:59):
Yeah, uh, you know, in acommunity with no murder, one
murder a year gets normalizedpretty quick, you know.
And then two?
And then what do they say?
One, one, one death is atragedy, a million is a
statistic.

Speaker 6 (24:13):
Yeah absolutely.

Speaker 4 (24:15):
That's one of the things I do appreciate about
Donald Trump.
When it comes to the Ukrainewar, he's constantly bringing
back dying people.
It's not just math Carlitz.
Good morning from Houston,texas.
Yes, yes, yes.
And then same thing.
Good morning y'all down in uhon youtube tiffany and carlito,
sapphire patriot.
Good morning peasants.
Yes, good morning everybody.

(24:35):
You guys are great, okay.
Um, so steve bannon mentionedun, or the un, and he mentioned
USAID.
At the beginning he said USAID.
You know, those guys wanted,they were going to abolish it a
couple of years ago inlegislation and they had all
night long debating.
It was like the long knivescame out over this obscure one
percent of the budget for an aidthing which we, everybody knew

(24:58):
wasn't giving foreign aid Like.
Well, not that hard to figureout, it's an intelligence op.
Well, they're.

Speaker 6 (25:04):
All the politicians sure had a good idea.

Speaker 4 (25:06):
They were not drilling wells in Africa.
That was not what was going on.
They weren't fighting over it.
We're not preventing AIDS inSouth Africa.
That was not what USAultimately was doing.
Usa was going to a lot ofCatholic charities to help
immigration at the border andetc.
Etc.
Etc.
Well, tim burkhart's beentalking a lot about how this
money would go out and it wouldget funneled back through these

(25:29):
ngos.
There's two tie-ins that I'mgoing to make here with this
idea of politicians sendingmoney out right and then it
coming back, both throughcorrupt means like what he's
going to describe, as well asthrough more traditional
financial means.
But it becomes a dagger to us,the people.
Let me, let me so so is thislike karmic?

(25:50):
well, no, I'll, just I'llexplain how the carrots and
sticks are set up in such a waythat it it's hurting us, okay,
preventing us from doing theobvious thing of lowering
interest rates in my not theonly thing.
But we'll, I'll show you.
So he's going to talk about UNand NGO funding.

Speaker 5 (26:04):
That's the deal with the bad gum NGOs, non-government
organizations.
They get a heck of a lot ofyour money, though, and here's
how it works.
They're not non-government,because you and I fund it.
We borrow the money to send tothem.
Afghanistan, for instance,where we had the bill to defund
the Taliban it's in the Senatenow, and the the bill to defund
the taliban it's in the senatenow.
But and the other side?

(26:24):
Oh man, they pitched a bit whenwe added ngos.
We're cutting them off.
Because here's what happens yougot these billionaires who hate
our guts whenever, destroyeverything we stand for.
They'll put a million dollarsin some group that has some
fancy name feed the children.
I don't know, maybe that's notan accurate one, but anyway you
get the picture.
And so they'll put a milliondollars in there, which is

(26:45):
nothing to them.
Pennies on their dollars.
And so they, they, they applyfor this federal money.
And then they the unelectedbureaucrat in Washington says,
oh, they got a million dollarsand they're legit.
And so then they literally haveput billions upon billions of
dollars in this thing.
Afghanistan alone, over athousand non-government

(27:07):
organizations are working outthere, and you add the UN stuff,
and we think it could bemultiples of thousands of
organizations working out ofthere All this bogus stuff.
I mean, do you really believewe're spending $10 million on a
dadgum drag show?
Where's the money go?
Right back in the pockets ofpoliticians, probably some in
washington.
That's it is so.
There's a paper trail.

(27:28):
Somebody's going to find outabout it, but we know it
probably goes into dark moneycampaigns fighting good
republicans as well, and uh,anyway, it's got to stop.
And thank you, donald trump andjd vance.

Speaker 4 (27:43):
Dadgummit, dadgummit so like my granddad so a couple
weeks ago we heard about how actblue board members were
refinancing houses worth about200 000 with 20 million dollar
refinance mortgages whoa, and itwas all of them, not one, not
two, not a couple people on thelower level part of act blue.

(28:03):
All of them, not one, not two,not a couple of people on the
lower level part of Act Blue,all of their board.
And once they figured out oneboard member had it.
They said let's do a littletitle search on these other
board members, not just thepersonal residences.
You know their rentals so.
So money goes out, comes backand all of a sudden you've got

(28:26):
Democrats that normally wouldn'tbe able to campaign.
I mean, some of these peoplehave wild ideas you know what I
mean and they can't fill 30people in a room.

Speaker 6 (28:37):
But they're flush with cash now.

Speaker 4 (28:38):
But they're flush with cash.
They've got these donors, wow.
Small dollar donors too, don'tyou see?
Look at them.
They must be legitimate.
Yeah, must be legitimate?

Speaker 6 (28:46):
yeah, it must be legitimate, because they can
raise some serious coin.

Speaker 4 (28:49):
Yeah, and the republicans going along with it.
Some of them are getting moneytoo, and then, on top of that
right, large amounts of money,billions of dollars, go out.
Ron, do you think you could,you know, live off maybe two
percent interest on a billiondollars?
Uh, I could try you probably beokay.
Probably be okay.
Probably maintain your standardof living.

Speaker 6 (29:09):
I mean right.
I mean I might have to likeswitch over to, like you know,
fancy cokers yeah.

Speaker 4 (29:16):
So imagine a situation where the government
gave you a bunch of capital andyou could take that capital and
you know, once you understandhow to do this on a big level
and that it's possible, thenit's just a matter of shell
companies and funneling right.
You'll have some slippage, butit wasn't your money in the
first place.
So what if a bunch of brokersmake their cut?
Eventually you funnel it backto some institution that can buy
, I don't know, something liketreasury notes that are kicking

(29:38):
off four or five, six percentinterest and you've got the
money to buy those notes forfree, and now you've got the
expansion on the interest andyou can just kind of live off
that.
So imagine a scenario whereyou're a politician and you're
funneling money through NGOs and, yeah, some of it comes back
into campaign coffers and stufflike that, but some of it just
gets straight up invested.
Well, okay, yeah.

(29:59):
So imagine that scenario, as welistened to Thomas Massey
explain to Theo Vaughn.
So imagine that scenario as welisten to Thomas Massey explain
to Theo Vaughn exactly who ownsour debt.

Speaker 17 (30:07):
Who do we owe the money to?
Some of it is owed toinstitutional investors like the
big banks in the United States.
Some of it is owed to sovereignwealth funds like China, japan,
other countries that buy ourdebt for us.
It's, and here's.
Here's the problem right now,and here's the problem Right now
.
They're telling us we don'twant to buy your debt at 2% or

(30:29):
3% or 4%, we want at least 5%return.
And so everybody thinks theFederal Reserve is setting
interest rates.
You know, there's all thisdiscussion Will the Fed raise
the rate?
Will the Fed lower the rate?
The reality right now is theFed can't do much, because if

(30:56):
they lower the rate to, let'ssay, 4 percent.
That and try to tell people tobuy our debt at 4 percent, the
people who normally buy our debt, those foreign countries and
those institutional investors,are saying you're not a good
investment at 4 percent, we want5 percent.
And that's that's a big problem.
Because just to put it inperspective, you know, let's,
let's round this number.
Just to put it in perspective,you know, let's, let's round
this number.
If it were $30 trillion and wewere paying 5%, that's that's.
That is $16,000 per family.
I've already done the math.
I'm not doing all that in myhead right now, but it's $16,000

(31:16):
per family of interest that weare paying, got it?
So when you pay your taxes foryour family, the first sixteen
thousand dollars goes to nothing, except for the interest that's
paid to those foreign countriesand to the big bankers.

Speaker 4 (31:31):
OK, and what if those foreign companies and sovereign
wealth funds and bankers werejust plowing back the money that
they were getting through theNGO funnel into things like
Treasury notes to get that fouror five percent and now they can
hold the, the us hostage?
Right now I don't know thepercentages, for all I know if
that is even happening, it'sminuscule, or it could be the

(31:54):
whole freaking market.
Do you know?
Do you know that qatar'ssovereign wealth fund isn't
completely compromised of oflegislatively enacted
allocations to ngos throughthings like usa id, epa, etc.
Etc.
I mean these gold bars that theepa was 78 billion dollars

(32:15):
shoveled out the back.
What?
And it didn't all make it back.
To act blue, only a billiondollars made it into kamala
harris's campaign.
What about the other 69 billion?
Do you think those maybe gotinvested in t-bills and uh is
holding jerome powell hostagesaying, hey, we won't, we won't
buy them at four percent, so youcan't drop rates.
Do you see what I'm saying?

(32:36):
yeah and jerome's.
Like I got the presidentthreatening to fire me and these
guys are over here threateningto essentially not buy my notes.
My notes have to be marketableor else the whole thing falls
apart, because then everybodywill find out.
There's no gold anywhere inthis whole equation man, he's in
a tough spot.
yeah, I'm not giving him anycredit for nothing, but I'm just
saying, once you start openingthe door to corruption, once you

(32:59):
start opening the door to usaidfunneling money to corrupt
actors, when you've got $20million going to Pakistan for
gender study awareness class andit's like no, no, there's no
way you dumped $20 million tosomething like that in Pakistan.
They wouldn't have it.
I've met a.
Pakistani, he wouldn't have itnot happening.

(33:23):
Where's the $20 million?
How much you know?
Again, he wouldn't have it nothappening.
Where's the 20 million dollars?
How much you know?
Again, we're talking scale.
Yeah, we're talking people whodon't think they'll be
prosecuted.
We're talking people so brazenthat they'll finance a house
with a 20 million dollarmortgage that has a 200000
dollar or 200000 dollar taxassessment.

(33:46):
There's that like in our faceabout it.
How do we know that theseforeign sovereign wealth funds
aren't compromised with primaryamerican dollars?
How do we know that when donaldtrump gets these settlements
from these law companies thathe's gone after, like I don't?
I mean, I know he's perkins coo, he's still in the fight, you
know.
But all these eli curl, I don'tknow.
There was a whole bunch of themthat came and it's like we're
donating a billion dollars tocauses that the president wants.

(34:07):
We're donating 600 billion, 600million dollars in causes that
the president wants.
Where did they get this money?
Don't you make disbursements toyour partners?
You just got that.
That's, that should be thewhole thing.
Like you just go bankrupt600600 million to causes that
the president directs.

(34:27):
Do you know how unreasonable ofa settlement that sounds like?
Where do these guys?
Who pays them?
How big are your contracts?

Speaker 6 (34:35):
I don't know, but that's a lot of money.

Speaker 4 (34:37):
That's not ambulance chasing money.

Speaker 6 (34:38):
No.

Speaker 4 (34:41):
Do you think they're in the game?
Do you think Trump is basicallybasically like that's how
you're refunding the money?
Because I, you know, if I blowthis whole thing up, the bond
market blows up, everythingblows up.
So give it back and give it tothese guys who should have
gotten the help.

Speaker 6 (35:00):
There's definitely some money laundering going on.
Dude when.

Speaker 4 (35:05):
I heard that a law firm was going to pay a billion
dollars.
Yeah, and I'm like Immediatelysuspect.
How big is this law firm Right?
Who are your clients?
What are you litigating?
What are the settlements you'regetting?
I don't understand this.
What, what clients?

(35:35):
What are you litigating?
What are the settlements you'regetting?
I don't understand this.
Like what?
What?
Who's nothing to see here,taylor, they're just gonna kick
it over.
Wow, madam ma'am, good morning,okay.
Yeah, so I don't know.
I am this is me off and leftfield.
I'm just looking at thisinformation and once you open
the door, it's like, yeah, henryDavid Thoreau talks about, we
load the gun and then we hand itto our government and we have
Please point this at my headit's completely, it's total

(35:58):
insanity.
So, in the meantime, excellentthings are happening because,
just like Trump, going into DCand being like my gang is bigger
than your gang Right, cleaningup some riffraff.

Speaker 6 (36:10):
All right, tell me something.

Speaker 4 (36:13):
Tell me one.
Tell me one.
Here's a good one.
This is going to affect peoplein our world.
The EPA and the Small BusinessAdministration have teamed up
and they have fixed a seriousproblem caused by a bunch of
stupid regulations.

Speaker 20 (36:28):
Welcome back the EPA announcing a fix to diesel
exhaust fluid, guidance aimed athelping America's farmers,
truckers and equipment operators.
Joining me now, live from theIowa State Fair, is EPA
Administrator Lee Zeldin and USSmall Business Administrator
Kelly Loeffler.
Great to have you both here.

Speaker 4 (36:45):
OK, I always got to comment on this.
There's certain people I alwayswant to make you aware of.
Kelly Loeffler was an owner inan NBA team.
Her husband is the president ofthe New York Stock Exchange
Whoa, ok.
She became a senator when therewas a vacancy in Arizona in
Georgia, excuse me and servedfor two years as senator and
then went to run for reelection.
She lost her seat because itwas a special election just

(37:07):
after Trump's election, likeJanuary 3rd of 2021.
And because of all theallegations of voting fraud no,
it was like January 10th, it wasafter January 6th Because of
all the allegations of votingfraud, a lot of Georgians sat
out.
Georgia was one of the hotspots for all these things.
Ruby Freeman, ok.
And so Kelly Loeffler you'dthink would have fought harder.
She sat in the background, shedidn't make any definitive

(37:28):
statements and then, for me,glaringly, on January 6th, she
was one of the Republicans thatstood up in the Senate at night
and was like Donald Trump's done, it's over, it's unbelievable.
He was going to do this.
I was going to vote to sendVoting to confirm Joe Biden.
So Donald Trump has beenmagnanimous love, probably
because he wants to have someconnections to the New York
stock exchange to grant her aseat inside of the cabinet as

(37:49):
the small business administrator, which, admittedly, they
probably know a little somethingabout business.
Okay, so she's probablyqualified for that position.
I'm not saying she's not, but Ialways am like, hmm, I know who
you really are.
Yes, I know who you really areTainted.
Yes, I know who you really are.
Lee Zeldin, on the other hand,seems like a warrior.

Speaker 20 (38:08):
Thank you so much for being here, and, lee, I want
to kick things off with you.
Tell us about the fluid.
What is the issue and what areyou trying to fix?

Speaker 3 (38:22):
maria, as I travel the country, I've been hearing
from truck drivers and farmerscomplaining about death, asking,
demanding, pleading for a fix.
What happened about a decadeand a half ago in putting this
new DEF system into place thediesel exhaust fluid system, the
combat nitrous oxide is that inorder to create an inducement,

(38:46):
in order to get people to comply, there'd be this massive
deratement in the engine.
So all of a sudden, whether itis because you don't have fluid
in or just the system's notworking, within four hours your
vehicle, your engine's now goingdown to five miles per hour.
So think heavy duty trucks,off-road equipment, motor cut

(39:09):
have you been in a vehicle thatdoes this?

Speaker 6 (39:11):
uh no, but I've been in vehicles that use def and it
is a pain in the ass.

Speaker 4 (39:15):
It is a pain in that butt my current truck that I
drove here this morning strippedout before they made it illegal
.
Strip it out, hey, the wholesystem out gone.
Uh, you criminal?
No, it was done before thedeadline and I didn't do it
either, so it's not my problem,okay, but either way, I just.
I just happen to know whodoesn't matter they're doing

(39:39):
away with those regulations.
If you ran out of def, your carwould throttle down to five
miles an hour.
So it's like it was horribleFarm equipment tractors,
excavators which is going tolimp mode.
They call it limp mode and youget into limp mode.
I mean it's literally you mightidle for miles to go and you
and there's no reason you can'tdrive, the computers won't let

(39:59):
it go over and there's no reasonthey were inducing you to fill
up the DF by putting you in limpmode.
They'd make you think you're.
I'd watch people physicallyabuse their truck.
They'd go to jail if the waythey treated their truck when it
would go into limp mode if itwas their spouse or significant
other.
You know, I watch them breaksteering wheels and put cracks
and dashes, just banging on thething, so angry that it's in lip

(40:22):
mode.
All policy and regulation, noreality Coaches, no practicality
.

Speaker 3 (40:27):
Heavy-duty pickups.
They, out of nowhere, weregoing at five miles per hour,
basically shut off Farmers.
They're pulling their hair outand for so long pleading for a
solution, but unfortunately thathasn't been coming Well.
Today, working closely with SBAAdministrator Kelly Leffler, we

(40:52):
are so excited to be able tomake this announcement to get
these manufacturers finally tofix these derailments.
The farmers are going to bethrilled.
The truck drivers are going tobe thrilled.
Couldn't happen soon enough.

Speaker 20 (40:59):
Because, kelly, I mean, the bottom line is it's
small business who's reallybeing impacted, Right as we just
said, farms, trucking companies, construction companies have
been dealing with this for years.

Speaker 14 (41:11):
You're absolutely right, maria, and I want to
congratulate AdministratorZeldin for getting this big win
for farmers.
I grew up on a family farm.
This has been a tremendousburden on the farming community,
on truckers, to have to dealwith this massive green new scam
, regulation and what'shappening today is just another
step in Trump, the Trump agendaand deregulation and having fair

(41:35):
trade and cutting taxes.
This is real results for theAmerican people and for American
farmers and this is longoverdue and I'm so grateful to
President Trump for hisleadership for farm families,
for truckers, for hardworkingAmericans that rely on these
heavy duty equipment for trucktrucks, for tractors, and really
solving this massive problemthat's going to result in seven

(41:58):
hundred and twenty seven millionmillion every single year in
savings for farm families.
It's a huge deal.

Speaker 4 (42:06):
Welcome back to EPA.
I hope they make it to whereyou can get rid of the DEF
system.
It's one thing if you want tomaintain it on your vehicle, but
it's a huge power loss.
It's a whole extra expense.
It's such a pain in the butt.
Meanwhile, donald Trump thetrump, the dictator,
authoritarian, whose gang isbigger than your gang, maduro,
is getting call, is settlingscores all around the world.

(42:27):
Here's newt gingrich talkingabout a call he got recently.

Speaker 8 (42:30):
I happened to get a call sunday night from cambodian
leaders who are nominatingpresident trump for the Nobel
Peace Prize and they areecstatic at the role he played
in stopping a potential warbetween Thailand and Cambodia.
And every time you turn aroundhe's doing something which is

(42:51):
entirely amazing.
So I think the stage is beingset in 2026 between a very
successful, hardworking Americanpresident who represents
American values, focuses onAmerican interests, and a
Democratic Party dominated bybig government socialism with

(43:12):
radical values.
And that's a choice, I think,between a Trump boom and
Democratic gloom, and my guessis this will be the biggest
off-year election since FranklinRoosevelt in 1934.
I happen to get a call.

Speaker 6 (43:28):
So a reference that is lost on most people.
So Trump's, he's so old.

Speaker 4 (43:36):
Trump's agenda is uniform.
He's clearly nuanced.
For people like me who've kindof watched his every move for a
decade Now, he's very nuanced inhow he acts.
He's.
He's by no means a chaotic.
He's a blunt force instrumentbecause he can be, but he's by
no means backed into a cornerand and only has one card of

(43:57):
tricks, but the carrot and thestick.
There's times when you use thecarrot, there's time you use the
stick.
Right now in dc he's using astick.
He's a show he's doing show offorce.
He's gonna arrest a lot ofpeople and then he's gonna pull
back and be like how's that feel?
How'd that feel?
Did it hurt?
A couple people leave thecommunities?
Are the streets safe?

(44:17):
Can you walk out at night?
Did we get them all?
Anybody left?
You see what I'm saying?
Like you want to try it again,coming in a huge show of force
for parents that lose theirtempers.
This is the flip the beds.
Get the kids figured out thepoint.
You got to clean your room,otherwise it looks like this.
It's like you want?
You want thugs.
I'll show you thugs.

(44:38):
My thugs are bigger than yourthugs.
That's what he's doing.
He's like my gang's bigger thanyour gang, so we want peace
like traditionally.
This is what gangs this is whatwas explained to me in prison
the whole point of a gang is toprotect the innocent and the
people who can't can't helpthemselves, that are being
picked on by the government orby something.
That's how a gang starts, andthen pretty soon, the gang of
course starts if you're notunder our protection sounds like

(45:01):
you're describing ourgovernment.

Speaker 6 (45:03):
That's what it's just a big gang my gang's bigger
than your gang exactly.

Speaker 4 (45:08):
It's a big gang and this gang protects you from that
gang and it's just a big gang.
Okay, so trump's method is thesame.
So what has he doneinternationally?
I would suspect the navys havebeen really busy.
I would suspect a lot of theseproblems that these countries
have had that are like reallylong problems.
I would suspect whole CIAoutposts have just been defunded

(45:29):
and cut loose and all of asudden the tension is going away
, or he's probably letting somefight it out real quick and then
he's like do you really want tofinish this?
You know pakistan and india.
Do you really want to escalatethis thing?
Do you really want dogfights inthe sky?

Speaker 6 (45:45):
what do you think about the mention of the nobel
peace prize?

Speaker 4 (45:48):
he's been nominated so many times.
I don't know that anybody elsehas ever been nominated as much.
I'm curious.
Should we ask grok, thesmartest among us, what do you
think about the?
Prize period oh, I think it'sstupid yeah yeah, I think it's
retarded.
Yeah, how excited like when,when, listen, you get barack
obama the nobel peace prize andhe's quoted as saying I don't
know why I got this, I haven'tdone anything.

(46:09):
I got elected I've.
You know, I was a communityorganizer in chicago that
nobody's really aware of what Iorganized, and I was a senator
for two years.
He organized his president runnobel peace prize, you know?
No, I'm sorry, like it doesn'tmean anything to me.
I know, I wonder, I wonder whattrump thinks about it.
I don't think he respects itmuch.

(46:30):
I think he wishes that it meantsomething.
I think he wishes that pulitzerprize, prizes, meant something.
But these accolades becomemeaningless when they the moment
, moment.
Corruption touches, corruptiontouches them.
It's just, yeah, exactly.
Funnels to nothing.
No titles, no tiaras, nonobility.
Right yeah, your actions.
Speak for yourself.
You know what, you know what'ssignificant?
No, nobody's dying.

Speaker 6 (46:50):
Nobel peace prize is almost to me like, you know, um,
um trophies for everybody.
You know it's kind of like thatit's not the same thing,
because not everybody gets theNobel peace prize, but it has
that same value.

Speaker 4 (47:09):
On one hand, someone like Mahatma Gandhi could be
given.
Probably was, I don't even know.
I think he, I think he wasprobably got a Nobel peace prize
.
He did incredible things.
He did really incredible things.
It was that.
For whatever that prizerepresents, I want it to
represent that I want people whomake change on the scale of
mahatma gandhi to receive thoseawards.

Speaker 6 (47:29):
The only problem is that he's standing alongside a
bunch of other people thatdidn't really do that, like
greta thornburg what?

Speaker 4 (47:36):
like greta thornburg, yeah, no, no, I don't know.
I don't know if she has.
I don't think she has one.
I'm pretty certain she doesn't.
She's so brave, but she, she'slike.
That's the conversation.
Well, greta thornberg, she'sjust such an activist for
climate change.
She should be nominated for anobel peace prize.

Speaker 6 (47:51):
Same breath yeah, you see them so yeah that poor
little girl's been abused.

Speaker 4 (47:55):
In my opinion, you know, donald trump gets the
abraham accords and, uh, barackobama got the peace price.
But barack obama, under hisregime, destabilized libya,
basically let the rise of isisand the caliphate.
You know, yeah, that's why hegot it.
No, exactly, he got itpreemptively, you know, because
barack obama had to set theconditions for donald trump to

(48:16):
come in and actually bring peaceright.
You know, we had to show hey,it's bad enough, right, you guys
all fighting, maybe you shouldsign a treaty.
Jeez, donald trump did use hispen yesterday, removing all
censorship and social media inthe usa, which isn't really true
, but what he's done is he'spulled back to a section 230
protection.

Speaker 22 (48:33):
Therefore, today, I'm signing executive order to
protect and uphold the freespeech and rights of the
American people.
Currently, social media giantslike Twitter receive an
unprecedented liability shieldbased on the theory that they're
a neutral platform, whichthey're not.
I'm not an editor with aviewpoint.
My executive order calls fornew regulations under Section

(48:58):
230 of the CommunicationsDecency Act to make it that
social media companies thatengage in censoring or any
political conduct will not beable to keep their liability
shield.
That's a big deal.
They have a shield.
They can do what they want.
They have a shield.
They're not going to have thatshield.
My executive order furtherinstructs the Federal Trade

(49:19):
Commission FTC to prohibitsocial media companies from
engaging in any deceptive actsor practices affecting commerce.
This authority resides inSection 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission.

Speaker 6 (49:32):
OK, so basically, how long before we get censored,
how long before we get?

Speaker 4 (49:38):
censored.
Basically, what he's saying is,if they have censorship for
political reasons and he'salready made it to where in the
government.
If you're talking to thesesocial media companies, it's
like it better be about a childpornography account, better not
be about anything political atall.
They want no censorship.
So I don't know, man.

Speaker 6 (49:57):
Like I kind of can't wait to get a strike.
Can we sue somebody?
Yeah, I don't know.
Like I kind of can't wait toget a strike, can we sue
somebody.

Speaker 4 (50:00):
Yeah, I don't know.
Like I think it's good Rightthe two 30 protection is really
tricky Cause like it is.
Okay, you know, somebody comesinto the chats and says
something crazy I have.
Now what if I miss it and don'tdelete it?
Am I now responsible for whatpeople in the chats are saying?
That's why you have theprotection.
Like well, I didn't say it, Ijust.
I'm just here hosting a show.

Speaker 6 (50:21):
No, you can't police that.

Speaker 4 (50:23):
Rumble has no business.
Rumble's not here.
I don't know who Rumble is.
I've never met him.
Stream there seem to be apretty decent platform.
Their streaming technology istop notch.
Love it makes perfect sense,but at the same time they can't
be responsible for what I'msaying.

Speaker 6 (50:43):
No, I clicked a box.

Speaker 4 (50:44):
It's all free speech.
You know, I read it.
It was like rights reserved.
But yeah, okay, we are notgoing to private chat yet, but
when we do, I just want to teaseout for those that stick around
on rumble and our premiumsubscribers, we are going to be
listening to a john oliverbreakdown on chuck schumer.
It is one of the funniestthings I've ever seen.
This is the left attacking theleft so you gotta hear it right,

(51:07):
you, you guys are gonna have.
I have a sweet spot in my heartfor john oliver.
We have a different world views, of course, but he's another
one of these.
Like, the reason he can attackthe left is he still does have
some common sense.
When I was in prison, I had totake a course where the entire
course, this was the whole thingto get credits for you know

(51:27):
good time credits, and you gotto be enrolled in classes.
It was a finance class.

Speaker 3 (51:32):
It was a fight.

Speaker 4 (51:33):
They determined needs .
I had no needs, by the way.
This was the.
Do you want the big prisonstory or want the little story
about joe?

Speaker 6 (51:40):
holliver um, I think I want the big one, because I'm
not understanding what you'retalking about now.
What are you talking about?
Your needs and the financialclass?

Speaker 4 (51:48):
you go to prison.
They have what's called thefirst step act, and part of the
first step act is they do anassessment on you and when you
take that assessment, theydetermine what your needs are,
and it's an it's based onmultiple factors.
There's a survey you take andthen there's a and you have
needs.

Speaker 6 (52:02):
Are we talking about?

Speaker 4 (52:03):
needs for education for example, if you have kids,
they say you have a parentingneed so you take a parenting
class.
If you have financial struggles, you have a couple financing
classes you can take.
If you have anger management,there's some anger management
classes.
If you have addiction, thenthey have a 12-step program okay
, so they have you take betweenyour pre-sentence report.

Speaker 6 (52:23):
I thought you were like I need me some toiletries,
I need me some clothes, these,are.

Speaker 4 (52:27):
these are these are classes they're going to ask you
to take in order to qualify forthe time credits for first step
act.

Speaker 6 (52:33):
Okay.

Speaker 4 (52:34):
So I was in a weird situation because I didn't agree
to anything, I didn't sign anypaperwork anywhere.
Where they did make me sign onthreat of solitary confinement,
I would cross out, because theymake you sign paperwork that
says voluntarily.
They literally make you sign apiece of paper that says you
voluntarily came into prison,and then you know what?

Speaker 6 (52:50):
Nope, I would like to leave anytime.

Speaker 4 (52:56):
Yeah, I am not here voluntarily.
Well, what happens if I don'tsign this paperwork?
Well then you go into the holeand you don't get commissary,
and you don't get phoneprivileges and blah blah.
So I could just serve sevenyears here without ever getting
a phone call.
Well, that's why you have tosay you're here voluntarily.
Yeah, so anyways.
Uh, so, I, I, it is the.

(53:21):
It's the belly of the beast,it's the bowels of the system.
And all of a sudden, when youhear things like everything's
voluntary, it's like, oh no,it's voluntary under voluntarily
sign that paper get inside thecow.

Speaker 6 (53:31):
What are you guys starting that fire for?

Speaker 4 (53:32):
yeah, oh my gosh.
So anyways, you're supposed totake a survey.
Well, I delayed taking thesurvey until they were like
listen, if you don't take thesurvey, you're going to the hole
.
So I don't.
I would make them get to thepoint where they were like we
have to take physically coerciveaction in order for you to
continue.
But I was completelynon-violent.

(53:53):
No, I didn't disagree or arguewith anything, but I put
everything off until they cameand were like if you don't do it
, by this moment you know.
So I didn't forced complianceforced compliance, yes.
So when I took the survey, Ianswered all the questions
accurately and everybody wastelling, no, you got to lie on
the survey because you need abunch of you need a bunch of

(54:14):
needs like you want to take allthese classes.
Well, I ask inquiring,inquiring questions.
I was like I feel like wecalled it prisoncom, which is
rumor mill.
I feel like prisoncom.
You guys all want to pretend tobe more F ups than you actually
are, which is already prettybad, because you think that the
BOP wants to.
You know, put you through theseclasses and then correct your
behavior and you'll get creditfor that.

(54:35):
I don't see it that way,because the way I read the rules
, I just have to be programming,so they're forcing you to take
those classes.
I get to elect what classes Itake because I don't have needs,
but as long as I'm programming,I get the time credits anyways.
So I can take the easy classesand the non dumb classes, right,
and I don't anyway.
So when I did the survey, when Iwent and met with the case

(54:56):
manager, he was like you have noneeds.
The only need I had was becauseI was over 40.
I had to take a uh aging withyour or uh healthy aging body
class or something like that.
This is over 40 which thepakistani taught.
That was from al-qaeda.
He was the future for that andwe just signed in on day one,

(55:19):
and then he signed us in all theother days because all it was
was watching a uh anatomy videoabout the anatomy of your body
so we watched the first 15minutes and he goes.
I think that's enough for today.
It was an hour class andeverybody had signed in and he's
like I'll sign you guys all innext class.
So we didn't even have to go toclass.
The scam is in already.
Oh, totally.
But you know, they get paidlike 500 per head to be enrolled

(55:41):
in the class.
The bop is making money.
They don't really.
You know, they're not reallyabout your outcomes, like you're
never getting out of here, sothis more money laundering
totally such a scam so I had noneeds.
So because I had no needs andbecause the pre the because I
never cooperated with thegovernment in any way, they

(56:03):
technically didn't know I hadkids, like my wife had to sign
in as a visitor and I had to puther on my visitor list.
She wasn't just like normallyyour spouse is granted just
automatic visitor visitor rights, not mine.
I had to get her backgroundchecked and approved and
everything for her to come visit.
Because because my my pretrialsentencing said I had no
dependents, no, no wife, no kids.

(56:23):
And I looked at the guy I waslike you know that's not true,
but you're trying to get me toaccept that.
You know, you're trying to getme to negotiate here by saying
correct this, correct that,because I'm engaged.
I won't engage with you.
So I just let them file thereport saying that I owned a car
when I was 13 and that I ownedproperty that I know I'm not
totally unaware of and that Ihave guns.
By by the way, did you know Ihave an sks, something?

(56:44):
They had guns listed on therethat were registered to me, but
I don't own those guns.
I've never owned anythingthat's russian, ever, okay, not
happening and they had that.
I had no dependence.
It's clearly an effort to tryto get me to, in my opinion,
that or they're just retarded,which is also on the table.
You know what I mean?
The credit, the credit reportcompanies don't think I owned a

(57:05):
car when I was 13, but theseguys actually had a make and
model car that was registered tome when I was in like seventh
grade I'm like you, really.

Speaker 6 (57:13):
They're just trying to get you to play the game yes,
trying to get you play the game.

Speaker 4 (57:17):
So I had no needs.
So I go to.
I go to the ceo that's incharge of transgenders and
special needs people, so he'sthe case manager over the real
weirdos.
And, uh, this guy has a ukraineflag tattooed on his arm and he
has an amnesty internationaltattoo.
Really cool guy, one of thebest ceos, in fact.
A real story in the bill.
If I could make him the thedirector of the bop, it'd be a

(57:40):
better place.
Wow, kind of a bleeding heart.
Good guy.
Okay, started out as a rough andtough co, you know, bashing
people's heads.
In one night he was working in10 building, which is the psych
ward, and a guy had smeared crapall over the walls and thrown
crap on the windows.
And when he came in he was like, oh my gosh, so they were about
to like pepper spray him andrestrain him and all this stuff.
And like, in this moment ofclarity, he's like dude, what is

(58:01):
going on with you today?
Guy was screaming.
He goes they didn't feed metoday.
What?
Yeah, the guards didn't feed metoday.
So he goes back to the bubble.
He's like did you guys give himhis food?
And there's a tray of food himtoday?
No, he hasn't ate today.
So what's his?
And he's in solitary.
So what's his action?
Smear poop on the wall.
Try to get some attention right, cause they'll probably feed me

(58:23):
in the next place they take me,because at this point you've
given up on the idea that you'reever getting out of the wall,
the room.
So he was like, oh my gosh.
So he went down to the kitchen,some food right anyways.
That got him really cross withthe staff and almost got fired
over it.
But he was just getting hisdegree and he ended up

(58:46):
simultaneously watched adocumentary called the im.
That made him have a differentparadigm change.
And so he ended up saying I'mgoing to stay in the bop, and
not only that, I'm going to goto the administrative side and
actually make a difference.
And to the extent that he could, he could.
He was always watching out forpeople's good time credits,
making sure they got enrolled inthe right classes, because the
BOP is notorious for liketelling you you have a need, but
not telling you that the classis starting.

(59:08):
So then when you miss the class, you you lose.
The way it works is you loseall of your good time backwards.
So it's not like they just hitpause on your learning time you
lose it all.
So it's not like they just hitpause on your earning time you
lose it all.
So guys would.
Guys would miss like a drugclass that they didn't know they
had to take because they didn'thave a drug problem, but it
showed up on their needs reportsbecause other inmates had told
them you need to fake your needsand so they didn't think they

(59:31):
had a drug need because it showsup on like page four.
We had this happen to a J6 orhe had a drug and he missed a
class and he was supposed to gohome.
They told him an out date andthen all of a sudden they pulled
the out date and you're like,oh no, you're here for another
nine months Because you justlost all your good time.
He had to get legislatorsinvolved to try to get it and

(59:51):
when they let him out theydidn't even tell him they fixed
the problem.
They just finally sent Insteadof just like the two weeks hey,
you have another place to go.
So I signed up for this classand the only thing it was was a
John Oliver episode on scamsfrom Nigeria, and that was the

(01:00:11):
finance.
The BOP has approved that classfor credits to earn good time,
and all you're doing is watchinga Saturday or a John Oliver
episode.
Okay, that's all it was.
We're going to watch a JohnOliver episode Pretty good,
that's all it was.
We're going to watch a JohnOliver episode Pretty good.
Is this the same thing youwatched in prison?
No, it's a different one, butit's better.
This one is political and it'shilarious.
It's about Chuck Schumer, whichis again the left attacking the

(01:00:31):
left.
I'm all about it, all right.
Serious topic.
Now thank you.

Speaker 6 (01:00:40):
Thank you for listening to my long rambling
story about how the prison it'sstupid.
I'm gathering sometimes, andthis was the, this was the.
What was his position?
The transgender?

Speaker 4 (01:00:50):
It was.
It was, he was the case.
The special program needs Adult, special program needs
administrator or something likethat.
And the special program needsincluded transgenders, people,
elderly, so in elderly in prisonis over 55, so over 55.
And then one other group, youknow whatever was calculated in

(01:01:13):
there.
So he was the case manager forlike special cases, okay, but he
offered the most first step actclasses and so he would end up,
you know like we would go inand talk to him and he would
calculate our time and then we'dgo back to our case managers
and be like, well, this guy overhere says we can get out this
time, and our case manager wouldget so mad at him.
They had emails back and forthbeing like, stop telling these

(01:01:35):
people when they can go home.
They're holding holding us totheir you know they're holding
us to the law and we don't likeit.
We're lazy.
I honestly believe what happensa lot of times with those case
managers is they just let themanila envelope sit on their
desk too long, like where I wasat.
You're entitled to up to 18months of halfway house based on
second chance.
12 months is pretty standard.

(01:01:55):
A lot of prisons because it'sall based on the prison, they're
the ones who file the paperworkA lot of prisons will give you
eight to 12 months, just noquestions asked.
Like you're just getting eightto 12 months halfway house.
So what that means is, if youhave a 10 year sentence at nine
years and two months, you've goteight months of halfway house.
They transition you out, okay.

Speaker 6 (01:02:16):
Let me guess though Does that halfway house?

Speaker 4 (01:02:21):
experience affect their bottom line?
Oh yeah, no, they're makingmore money in the halfway house
because you cost less and theytake half your paycheck when
you're working in a halfway,when you're in a halfway house.
So it's still part of the wholemaking money scheme.
But the idea is I'm out ofprison, I get a cell phone, I
can go out to eat, I can see myfamily, like you can't stay with
them, but they can come visityou all day long, you know.
So it's a, it's a totally.

(01:02:42):
You're out like you'retransitioning.
You're still got a bunch of.

Speaker 6 (01:02:46):
So you're physically out or you're mentally out, or
both you're physically out,mentally, that's your problem.

Speaker 4 (01:02:52):
Yeah, right, but you're still.
You're still in a halfway house.
I mean, there's a warden,there's, you have to check.
You got to be in there at 9 pm,like, but you're living in an
apartment, you can cook food,you know there's, there's
something to it, so and they'reall different.
Of course, some halfway housesare probably horrible, but it's
not prison.
That's the thing.
It's not prison, so it's really.

(01:03:13):
Inmates just want to know whencan I get out of here?
And so when they would?
Yeah, so halfway house get outof here and so when they would.

Speaker 6 (01:03:25):
Yeah, so halfway house.

Speaker 4 (01:03:26):
Okay, that's for the private show right, yeah, okay,
what else are you gonna show?
I'm just, I'm sorry, taylor,the there's the logic in prison
makes perfect sense, but it'sband-aids upon band-aids upon
band-aids upon band-aids, withlaziness like I honestly think
where the prison I was at wouldgive you six months at the most
halfway house and everfrustrated people would transfer
there from other prisons andthey'd be like I should be going

(01:03:48):
home like in a month or two,and then they'd be told oh no,
you're here another year and Ithought I was.
I was eligible for 18 monthshalfway house.
No, we only give six hereit's's devastating.
Devastate.
I've watched men cry, you know,just thinking about the fact
that I told my daughter I wouldmake her graduation.

Speaker 6 (01:04:05):
Right.

Speaker 4 (01:04:06):
I haven't seen her since she was five years old and
I was going to see her highschool graduation finally.
And now it'll be another brokenanother broken promise that your
whole life you've just been oneillusion of a man, right.
And why?
And the case managers?
Why?
Why can the prison in arkansasdo 18 months?
Why can the that prison overthere do 18 months?

(01:04:27):
Why can those guys?
Why do we do six?
You know why?
Because our case managers wouldlet those files sit on their
desk a little too long andthey'd miss the deadlines to get
you in.
And then they'd be like, oh,I'll get to it.
So now, since that deadlinepassed, I have another month.
And then it would sit there andthen another month would pass
and pretty soon somebody thatlike had to go home because now
they're six months old.
I gotta dig his pile out, getthis applied, for that's all it

(01:04:49):
was.
They just had to put it in thecomputer.
There's no reason why wecouldn't have full halfway house
again.
It's incompetence, corruption,laziness.
I'll tell you one thing thingBrett Weinstein really lays out
the carrots and the sticks whenit came to this MMR vaccine
protocol and how significant itis that they canceled all these,
because we might have beenstaring down a real scary

(01:05:09):
situation.

Speaker 10 (01:05:11):
I'm not saying that this is true, but I'm saying at
the level of a viable hypothesis.
Think about pharma'spredicament.
Viable hypothesis, Think aboutpharma's predicament.
Pharma had a technology thatallows it to play a new game
that was going to be profitableat a brand new level.
It had a technology that wasgoing to allow it to type a

(01:05:33):
sequence into a computer and godirectly to a so-called vaccine.
That means all pharma needed inorder to inaugurate a brand new
profit stream was the name of adisease that was credibly scary
.

Speaker 14 (01:05:49):
And you have the fastest drug development
protocol on record.

Speaker 10 (01:05:52):
Right, and you can skip right past all the safety
stuff, because all you got to dois fake the safety data once.
You've got to just get yourcontractors to rig up an rct
that suggests that your platformis safe, and then, from then on
, it's well, the platform issafe, is the antigen safe?
Is platform is safe?
Is the antigen safe?
So it's going to be boom, boom,boom right.

(01:06:12):
Injectable after injectable isgoing to be flying through the
fda.
Everything's going to be fasttracked, which means that a
whole range of pathogens thatcould not be addressed in this
way before they could only beaddressed symptomatically, you
know, with traditional drugs,but they couldn't be addressed
with something that couldcredibly claim to prevent their

(01:06:34):
spread those things weresuddenly going to be in range.
Every cold was now going to besomething for which you could
get a shot to prevent it, and sothis all becomes a question of
perception.

Speaker 4 (01:06:45):
Could you imagine living in a world where every
single scary disease they couldkick out an MMR vaccine?
Like some people, I reallythink.
Like people describe tattooingas an addiction.
You know, you get.
I don't know if it's the painor whatever it is it's an
addiction.
I think some people got kind ofhooked to this going to get my

(01:07:06):
booster shot thing.
Have you ever talked to someonethat's had six shots?
Oh yeah, it's weird, isn't it?
Yeah, it's weird it is weird.
I understand two, I understandfour, I understand the two and
then the two boosters.
But when you're like at six,people were like, well, I
thought I'd just throw a littleModerna in there.
My Pfizer, what A littlepotpourri.
Yeah, I thought you know, ifone's good, two's better, two

(01:07:32):
companies Like what?
Meanwhile they look flush,their eyes are falling out.
There's a couple of people Iknew that started to look pretty
sickly, but then I've seen themagain and they've recovered.
So, whatever you know, maybethey were just going through
something.
President Trump, I thought thiswas an interesting clip and I
actually don't know exactly whenthis clip was, so I couldn't
find exactly when it's kind ofwas presented like it was recent

(01:07:54):
.
But I just thought this wasreally interesting because we're
dealing, we're hearing about alot of leaks.

Speaker 22 (01:07:59):
The leaks are real.
You know what they said, yousaw it and the leaks are
absolutely real.
The news is fake because somuch of the news is fake.
So one thing that I felt it wasvery important to do and I hope
we can correct it, becausethere's nobody I have more
respect for well, maybe a littlebit, but than reporters, than
good reporters.
It's very important to me andespecially in this position,

(01:08:27):
it's very important.
I don't mind bad stories.
I can handle a bad story betterthan anybody, as long as it's
true.
And you know, over a course oftime I'll make mistakes and
you'll write badly, and I'm okaywith that.
But I'm not okay when it isfake.
I mean, I watch cnn.
It's so much anger and hatredand just the hatred.
I don't watch it anymorebecause it's very good.

(01:08:47):
He's saying no, it's okay jim,it's okay, jim, you'll have your
chance.
But I don't remember.
The leaks are real.

Speaker 4 (01:08:54):
You know what they say.
When I listen to that I'm likethis sounds like a reasonable
person.
I'll make mistakes.
You guys can write about them.
I'm fine with that, right, Ifeel the same way.
You can criticize me, I'mreally open to it.
I'm comfortable in my own skin.
But the lies, the lies are lies.
And so the reason that clip isrelevant is because here John

(01:09:15):
Solomon yesterday broke anotherhuge story.
These are coming out likedrumbeats.
There were multiple releasesyesterday and I didn't have
enough time to go through them,enough to understand them to
bring them onto the show.
So hopefully they'll make theirrounds.
But we're starting to see thedata dump.
Every day there's a new release.
There's another one today onhow many times the FBI was

(01:09:36):
blocked from continuing toinvestigate the Clinton
Foundation, how many times theFBI was blocked from continuing
to investigate the ClintonFoundation.
So every day this is like acascade of this information.
Where we had the conspiracywall, we had the outline all
together, hillary Clinton paidfor the Steele dossier.
But now we're starting to fillin the context.
James Comey is trying toprotect his own reputation.
He's directing the New YorkTimes to write specific articles

(01:09:57):
to change the narrative, thepaper of record stuff like that.
So that's what John Solomonbroke yesterday.
Is James Comey actuallyproactively treasonously leaking
?

Speaker 25 (01:10:08):
That's the story for you first here on the show
tonight, before we even put astory up on just the news.
It turns out it wasn't the onlysuspected leak that the FBI
came across.
Only suspected leak that theFBI came across.
In fact, it identified about adozen stories in the legacy
medium that drafted and createdthe Russia collusion narrative,
which we now know to be fullydebunked.

(01:10:28):
That contained national secretsinformation that was classified
all the way up to the highestlevel, the stuff that only
presidents and FBI directors getto see.
Tonight we're going to tell youabout another person that they
had concerns about.
He was FBI Director JamesComey's media mole that's what
they used to call him inside theFBI.
He worked around the FBI pressoffice as a private citizen

(01:10:51):
working as a special governmentemployee.
He was a Columbia Law professornamed Daniel Richmond.
And when the FBI finallyconfronted him and said, hey,
what were you doing?
Talking to the media, headmitted his job was to make, to
improve or polish the image ofJames Comey from some of the
negative coverage he was gettingand to set the narrative, to

(01:11:11):
basically shape the narrative onRussia collusion and other
stories in Washington.
And when they confronted himand said, hey, you met with
James Comey.
You got some classifiedinformation.
You then talked to a reportervery soon after who reported
some of that classifiedinformation.
He said this is going to turnout to be one of the great
denials in all of Washington'shistory.
There's a lot of Washingtonspeak.

(01:11:31):
This one will be remembered asa famous one.
I don't think I leaked.
If you give me a discount,basically saying I deny doing
that with a discount.
In other words, you have togive me a little discount on my
truthfulness when I deny that Ididn't leak that information.
With that information, the FBIand the Justice Department
decided, like they did with AdamSchiff, not to pursue any

(01:11:51):
further criminal investigation.
They didn't bring people beforea grand jury.
They didn't ask CongressmanSchiff now Senator Schiff to
come before a grand jury.
They didn't ask CongressmanSchiff now Senator Schiff to
come before a grand jury.
They basically left it at thesesort of wily interviews and
intriguing pieces of evidencethat certainly pointed to a
large number of leaks.
We're going to make all thesedocuments available over the

(01:12:12):
next several nights on just thenews dot com.
Be sure to check out 830 againtonight We'll have the new dump
and you got a little bit oftaste of it early here today I
like that.

Speaker 4 (01:12:21):
I didn't do it with a discount.
Basically, that is a verylawyerly way and you have to get
in the dictionary for discount.
It's a very lawyerly way ofbasically being I'm lying to you
, but it's okay, because I'mtelling you the truth about
lying to you, yeah.

Speaker 6 (01:12:38):
It's an admission.

Speaker 4 (01:12:41):
It's an inversion.
It's I didn't leak it, butyou'll have to understand.
There's a discount there, as inI'm lying to you, but it's okay
, because I'm telling you thehighlight you need.
That's the what I want you tounderstand.
But I'm not lying to you bytelling you a lie, because I'm
telling you that I'm lying inthat same sentence.
It's like what now the sophistryright.

(01:13:04):
It's unbelievable.
This is eric swalwell.
This is from 2019.
This is eric's uh, yeah, Ithink it's 2019.
This is eric swalwell having aactually pretty decent,
hard-hitting interview.
And again, just to remindpeople how serious these people
were about their allegationsabout Trump and Russia Sometimes
on the right it's easy for usto be gaslighted where they're
like well, we didn't actuallysay Trump was colluding with

(01:13:25):
Russia.
We were just saying Russia wasmeddling in the election.
Oh OK.
And then Donald Trump justdidn't want to pursue that.
And who wouldn't want to pursuetheir enemies?
So if he's not their enemy, hemust be a friend.

Speaker 23 (01:13:42):
That's the logic they were using, but they were a
little more overt than that.

Speaker 7 (01:13:43):
Draw the line and not accuse the president united
states without any evidence ofbeing an agent of russia.
Yeah, he's betrayed our countryand I don't I don't say that
lightly.
I worked as a prosecutor forseven years and I betraying the
country.

Speaker 23 (01:13:50):
By the way, we want evidence before you say that.
But you said an agent of russiayeah, he, he works on their
behalf.

Speaker 7 (01:13:56):
he, since he met with uh v in Helsinki in July, where
he took the interpreter's notes, hasn't told any US official
what they discussed.
He has taken us out of Syria,which is a top priority of
Russia.
He sought to diminish or pullout the US from NATO and he's
easing sanctions on VladimirPutin's friends who are under
investigation.

Speaker 23 (01:14:16):
But he didn't pass sanctions against Russia.
He has armed Ukraine, he haskilled 200 Russians in Syria.
I mean, those aren't theactions of an agent of Russia
either.

Speaker 7 (01:14:25):
He signed, I think you know, begrudgingly sanctions
against Russia after Congressand people expressed concern and
he got backed into it.
But as soon as he could he haspulled those away.
And so what?
Makes him an agent of.
Russia.
After it was revealed that theRussians were attacking our
democracy, he went to a pressconference and said Russia, keep
doing it.

Speaker 23 (01:14:43):
We're familiar with that sequence of events as a
prosecutor.
But as a prosecutor thatwouldn't be evidence in court.
I mean, as a prosecutor youknow the difference between hard
evidence and circumstantialevidence.

Speaker 7 (01:14:53):
I think an admission by a defendant is the most
powerful evidence.
And saying, saying askingsomebody to continue to commit a
crime after they've alreadycommitted a crime.
I mean that is eagerness tocollude, I don't know what else
to call it.
And then I think you haveconsciousness of guilt by all of
these follow-up, cover-upactions.
Again, people only tell someoneelse to lie, people only lie

(01:15:14):
themselves, people only obstructjustice if they're afraid of
what the underlying truth wouldreveal.

Speaker 23 (01:15:19):
And I'm not hearing the evidence that he's an agent
of Russia.

Speaker 7 (01:15:22):
Yeah, I think it's pretty clear.
It's almost hiding in plainsight.
You saw somebody standing nextto more of this.

Speaker 4 (01:15:29):
It's hiding in plain sight.
It's right there.

Speaker 6 (01:15:32):
Geez.

Speaker 4 (01:15:33):
They were pretty serious about this and they were
.
You know he's wrestling hiswords quite a bit to no, no,
he's acting on Russia's behalf,like I mean all these like
totally Republican agenda items,like minimizing expenses with
NATO and getting them to paytheir fair share, you know
things that?
No, that's that's.
That's that's helping Russia byby getting NATO to build up.
That's helping Russia becauseNATO is not going to pay and so

(01:15:57):
that's going to weaken their,their political plus.
What are we talking about?
right well, he armed ukraine andhe just killed 200 russians.
Russian agent that's whatrussia would want him to do, is
to make it look like he'sagainst them obviously obviously
we really are dealing withsmoke monsters here, aren't we?

(01:16:19):
Okay, this was a CNN clip.
This is a.
This is a guy talking aboutTrump's threat to take over
major cities.
And again, just misinformation.

Speaker 19 (01:16:29):
It's great to have you here, sir, because you hear
that warning there.

Speaker 4 (01:16:32):
No, excuse me, let me make sure I didn't just.
Oh yes, that's right, here wego.

Speaker 19 (01:16:42):
The mayor of what she believes could happen and we
do hear do hear the presidentsaying other us major cities
could be next year.
I wonder if that's a pledgethat you take seriously tonight.

Speaker 21 (01:16:51):
Well, sadly we do, because I think the bottom line
is that President Trump doesn'tlike public safety.
He's a convicted criminalhimself.
He pardons people who arecriminals and do pretty
dastardly things like cause thedeaths of five different law
enforcement officers duringJanuary 6th sick.

Speaker 4 (01:17:17):
Um, we have a fund to make bronze statues of these
officers that died on january 6.
We just need a name, maybe asmall thumbnail picture from
their instagram or facebook.
We just want to know any ofthem.
So, five this is a philadelphiadistrict attorney.
This guy goes into court everyday under threat of perjury,
with rules of ethics guiding him, and he's prosecuting people
that I met in philadelphiabecause I was in prison prison
in Philadelphia downtown.
That's where the prison is.
It's downtown like in askyscraper.

(01:17:39):
I was on the 13th floor.
Okay, I got put in lockdownthere.
And, uh, this is thePhiladelphia district attorney
prosecuting some people that Imet that claim that they're
innocent and he's lying.
He's lying.
Five people, five cops, did notdie that day at all.
Nor can you really reasonablyconnect any deaths after that

(01:18:03):
fact to january 6, unless you'rejust, you know, calling a
suicide connected to some newsevent yeah, we played a clip
yesterday, was it, or the daybefore, where somebody made a
claim that was like hundreds ofpeople died 170 officers were
injured?
yeah, there was, I mean.
But you know, injury starts tobe kind of uh, stretched, you

(01:18:24):
know what injury.
And then you've got ones likefinon, who's in a hospital bed
with a broken rib.
Didn't happen, didn't I mean?
Yeah, he went to the hospital,got got everything put on but
video, you, I got injured afterthe fact.

Speaker 21 (01:18:39):
Yeah, man, I'm good, I'm good, I'm good and all of a
sudden, by midnight, you'relaying in a hospital bed like I
don't know something my kid putson band-aids all the time, just
for fun anyways, I'm justsaying, this guy's a district
attorney, you know so there isno indication that this man is
in favor of law-abiding behavior, of public safety, but he is in
favor of power, he is in favorof fascism, he is in favor of

(01:19:00):
ending democracy, and what he'strying to do here is not normal,
as wanda sykes, one of my faves, would say.
It's not normal to act like youcan go into a city that is
having tremendous progress, 30year low in crime, and call it
an emergency and bring in abunch of troops who aren't even
trained for this kind of work.
He may think he's going to tryit in other places, but the fact

(01:19:22):
is, legally he has much less ofa right to do any of this in
other cities, and he better nottry it in philly these guys are
leaning on the law and meanwhilethe people are like we're about
to grab our pitchforks and pokeyou in the ass.

Speaker 6 (01:19:35):
Yeah, for real.

Speaker 4 (01:19:37):
Because if crime is that high at a certain point
their gang becomes bigger thanyour gang.
I mean, is that not the problemwe have with the cartels?
I mean, are their gangs notbigger than some of these state
governments can't deal with themand that the feds turn a blind
eye?
You think?

(01:19:59):
You think the idaho statetruples can handle the trend de
agua?
I know, in aurora, colorado, Imean, it's just a couple
apartment buildings that aretaken over by a foreign gang.
Are you here yourself, martha?
In america, how many?
How many apartments is okay?
How many communities need to berun by foreign cartels?

Speaker 6 (01:20:11):
are they still holding those?

Speaker 4 (01:20:13):
I believe they got that cleaned up okay, but I'm
not certain again.
Sometimes these things come andgo in the news cycle yeah, come
and go seattle, yep okay.
Charlie kirk breaks down theanimosity between kash patel and
adam schiff and kash patel arearch enemies.

Speaker 16 (01:20:32):
Why?
Well, adam schiff was the onethat was the driving legislative
force behind Russiagate.
Adam Schiff was the one thatwent on TV and said that there
was credible evidence thatDonald Trump was a compromised
Russian agent.
Then Kash Patel was the stafferfor Devin Nunes, former
prosecutor.
Without him, we never wouldhave known about the FISA
warrant abuse and we never wouldhave gotten to the bottom of

(01:20:53):
Russia gate.
So Adam Schiff knows who CashPatel is, because Cash Patel
revealed Adam Schiff to be apathological snake liar and Adam
Schiff should be worried.
Us Senators will not be exemptfrom this kind of racketeering
operation.

Speaker 4 (01:21:12):
Menendez is in jail.
He's in prison right now.
George santos is in prisonright now.
Senators will not be exemptplay cut 262 this is someone we
cannot trust.

Speaker 12 (01:21:28):
this is someone who lacks the character to do this
job, someone who lacks theintegrity to do this job, and no
one is a bigger or moredangerous sycophant than Kash
Patel.
This political hack does notdeserve to be in this building.
Our Republican colleagues,intimidated by this president

(01:21:49):
and threats of primarychallenges from the MAGA world,
may vote to confirm him, but, asmy colleagues have said, they
will have to live with that vote, be accountable for that vote.

Speaker 16 (01:22:01):
I mean, do you want to see why we're drawing 2,000
kids at a liberal campus?
This is what they have.
This is their team.
You got Danang Dick Blumenthal,you got the retired professor,
the beret man, peter Welch, andyou got Adam Schiff, who very
well might be a criminal Mightbe.
Elon Musk responded to ourtweet saying Adam Schiff is a

(01:22:21):
criminal.
He's done some very dark deeds,yeah.

Speaker 27 (01:22:27):
Yeah, yeah.

Speaker 6 (01:22:28):
I don't think you need to hedge anything there.
He's a criminal.

Speaker 4 (01:22:32):
Well, I don't know, man.
I mean really, let's get asofficial as we can get now.
Keep in mind I was condemnedfrom this podium too right like
matthew graves got up on thethird anniversary of january
well, I guess and played a videoof me in his speech from.
I don't know if it was thispodium, but it was the doj.

(01:22:52):
Either way, I have beenslandered by a top government
official behind one of thesepodiums.

Speaker 6 (01:23:00):
All right, let's go through the process and find out
.

Speaker 4 (01:23:02):
Let's go through the process and find out how Adam
Schiff and his perspective.
I know some people hate when Itake the contrarian point of
view.
I'm just trying to point outhere this stuff matters, but it
doesn't either.
Okay, the only thing thatmatters.
They could slander me all theywant.
I would have been happy forthem to do it.
It's when they put on thebracelets, the handcuffs, the
things got serious.
So slander all you want.
That's just politics, right.

Speaker 27 (01:23:24):
So I want to see bracelets and has already said
he wants to see adam schiff heldaccountable for the countless
lies he told the american peoplein relation to the russia gate
scandal.
I brought tulsi Gabbard out tothis podium to talk to you about
all of that and thisadministration is taking
accountability very seriously.
As for this new FBIwhistleblower report, I
understand Kash Patel last nightdeclassified a 302 FBI document

(01:23:47):
showing that a whistleblowerwho is a Democrat, a career
intelligence officer who workedfor Democrats on the House Intel
Committee for more than adecade, repeatedly warned the
FBI in 2017 that then Rep AdamSchiff had approved leaking
classified information to

Speaker 26 (01:24:05):
senior then-President Donald.

Speaker 27 (01:24:07):
Trump over the Russiagate scandal.
This is obviously a bombshellwhistleblower report.
Hopefully more people in thisroom will cover it as such, and
I have a quote from the FBIdirector for all of you.
He has said this For years,certain officials used their
positions to selectively leakclassified information to shape
political narratives.
It was all done with onepurpose to weaponize

(01:24:29):
intelligence and law enforcementfor political gain.
Those abuses eroded publictrust in our institutions.
Enforcement for political gainthose abuses eroded public trust
in our institutions.
The FBI will now lead thecharge with our partners at DOJ,
and Congress will have thechance to uncover how political
power may have been weaponizedand to restore accountability.
That's what the administrationis focused on, and hopefully
we'll see some more mediareports on this whistleblower

(01:24:51):
allegation.
If this were reversed, if thiswere, if this were allegations
against the president or any ofthese cabinet officials, I'm
sure everyone in this room wouldcover it as such.

Speaker 6 (01:25:02):
Yeah, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:25:03):
So I make the point.
I've been slandered behind thatpodium.
Adam Schiff now can come outand go.
Oh, it's not serious.
They say political thingsbehind the podium all the time.

Speaker 6 (01:25:13):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:25:14):
And so a lot of people are looking at this.
Was this just?
This is retaliation, or is itjustice?
Do you know how to spot thedifference?
I think it's justice.
I'm clearly in that camp, okay,but you know, another person
that should really be worried isLetitia James.
So the guys that have beendoing digging into her, this is

(01:25:38):
what they have to say.
Oh, and I muted it for goodmeasure.
Hold on, I know what I did here, maybe.
Ah, I thought I I muted thewhole tab because it started
playing and I couldn't hit stop.
Boo.

(01:26:01):
How do I?

Speaker 9 (01:26:02):
All right hold on.

Speaker 4 (01:26:07):
Sorry, guys Just get a freshie.
Can't get it?
Okay, yeah, I can do that.
Can't get it?
Okay, yeah, I can do that.

Speaker 6 (01:26:23):
This should work, uh-oh.

Speaker 4 (01:26:32):
There we go I'm muted to the tab, and then I can't
unmute the tab when it's Allright, here we go.

Speaker 28 (01:26:40):
Letitia James is in central.
Single financial disclosure toNew York State as far back as
2019 contains false information,with her signature on it.
Every single mortgage on herproperty in Brooklyn from when
she purchased it contains falseinformation the Virginia

(01:27:02):
property.
When she claims, like the powerof attorney that she signed was
a mistake.
You know, whatever Implicatesher the situation that she has
is she put pen to paper.
I didn't, donald Trump didn't.
Maga didn't do it, you didn'tdo it.
She owns this fraud.
She did it Every singlefinancial disclosure to New York

(01:27:26):
State.

Speaker 4 (01:27:27):
She came after Donald Trump over what amounted to a
whole handful of ticky, tacky,nonsense stuff, nonsense,
nonsense stuff.
Banks that said we weren'tinjured, we weren't harmed.
She came after him, but yet sheherself committed mortgage
fraud in an epic case ofboomerang, you know, and an epic
case of projection.

(01:27:47):
I accuse others of doing that,which I myself am doing.
Matt taibbi had a conversationwith chris cuomo and he's
changed his opinion on whetherhe's we're going to see
indictments or not.

Speaker 9 (01:27:56):
I think there are going to be indictments.
I was very skeptical on thatquestion, even a couple of weeks
ago, but I have heardrepeatedly from these folks that
they understand that this isnot a hearts and minds contest
and that they are not doing thisfor show, and if they don't end
up in a courtroom that theywill, this will be a massive

(01:28:18):
political failure for them.
So I do think that there willbe significant indictments.
I just don't know what for Imean I?
I think that's a very importantquestion to ask right now.
We know the grand jury has beenconvened, but they haven't
really given us a strongindication about what crimes
they might be investigating ithas to be that.

Speaker 1 (01:28:36):
I mean, that's what we've seen with all of these
things.
I mean even the durham thingthat just came up.
You know the cases that he maderight.
The guy pleaded guilty to fuckhim with an email, and then the
other two guys it was you liedto us and they lost both cases.
Um, so you know, that's what italways comes down to.

Speaker 9 (01:28:54):
So that's a good point, but what I've, what I've
heard from these folks, is thatthey understand how, that, the
optics of that and what thatlooks like to voters, and they
are going to try for, I think,something more substantive, even
if it comes up short.

Speaker 1 (01:29:13):
Do you that the clintons wind up being exposed
to prosecution?

Speaker 9 (01:29:21):
I keep being told that I'm not under.
I'm not sure I understand howthat uh can be the case, but I
keep being told that hillaryclinton is actually a target in
these investigations.
Um, clinton is actually atarget in these investigations.
It may turn out that somethinghaving to do with her original
email situation will be wrappedinto some kind of conspiracy

(01:29:43):
case, but I don't know what itis and I don't see it, so I
would.
I mean, this is where this isme, the careful reporter, saying
I would caution people not tothink that there's anything
there yet before we see it.

Speaker 4 (01:29:56):
You know, for, like the Boyle brothers, who know
about the Bill and Clinton Billand Clinton Clinton Bill and
Hillary Clinton Foundation, orwhatever it's called Clinton
Foundation, financial crimes areeverywhere but they're hard to
prove.
They're hard to prove becausethe numbers go and then they
split and they split and there'san invoice.
But this invoice was fake, butit looks like a real invoice.
You see what I'm saying.

(01:30:17):
So into a jury, they're like.
But I like hillary, I'm withher.
And so that's like, yeah, howthey're going to tie them in,
it's obvious.
They've got problems, obvious.
Okay, we're going to jump overto premium and we are going to
watch this john oliver clip ithilarious.
We're also going to revealclandestine has an interesting
little thought here, because oneof the things Trump did is he

(01:30:40):
sent a letter to the Smithsoniansaying they're going to come in
and review not only all oftheir books but also all of
their artifacts and the tunnels.
So for the Q official out there, the tunnels Trump's going into
the tunnels on the same daythat he militarizes dc.
Oh my gosh, military tribunalsmight be coming.

(01:31:00):
So we'll be talking about that.
On the other side, in premium,we'll save the fun hysterics for
that.
So with that, we'll talk to therest of you guys again tomorrow
.
Rumble people.
We'll talk to you a little bitlonger in just a minute.

Speaker 2 (01:31:36):
Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that
castle over there.
I'm 37.
What, I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
What I object to is that youautomatically treat me like an

(01:31:56):
inferior.
Well, I am king, oh, king, eh,very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, there is.
There's some lovely filth downhere, oh.

Speaker 15 (01:32:16):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons and I amyour king.

Speaker 2 (01:32:28):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You, I thought we were anautonomous collective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the gang.
That's what it's all about.

Speaker 15 (01:32:42):
If only people would Please please good people, I am
in haste who lives?

Speaker 2 (01:32:47):
in that castle?
No-one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What Then?
Who is your lord?
What?
I told you?
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority.
In the case of purely internalaffairs, be quiet.

(01:33:09):
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king?
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then the lady of the lake, herarm clad in the purest,
shimmering semite, held aloftExcalibur from the bosom of the

(01:33:30):
water, signifying, by divineprovidence, that Ithur was to
carry excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.

(01:33:50):
Be quiet.
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up If I went round sayingI was an emperor.
Just because some moistenedbint had lobbed a scimitar at me
, they'd put me away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.

(01:34:13):
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Hey, that's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

Speaker 4 (01:34:25):
and we're back.
All right, welcome to the party.
The after show.
Okay, so I talked about thesmithsonian before we left, so
this is from the white houseletter to the smithsonian
internal review of smithsonianexhibits and materials.
As we prepare to celebrate the250th anniversary of our
nation's founding, it is moreimportant than ever that our
national museums reflect theunity and progress and enduring

(01:34:46):
value that define american story.
In the spirit and in accordancewith the executive order 14253,
restoring truth and sanity toAmerican history Truth and
sanity to American history wewill be leading a comprehensive
internal review of selectedSmithsonian museums and exhibits
.
This initiative aims to ensurealignment with the president's

(01:35:07):
directive to celebrate Americanexceptionalism, remove divisive
or partisan narratives andrestore confidence in our shared
cultural institutions.
This review is a constructiveand collaborative effort, one
rooted in the Smithsonian vitalmission and its extraordinary
contributions.
Our goal is not to interferewith the day-to-day operations
of the curators or staff, butrather support a broader vision
of excellence that highlightshistorically accurate, uplifting
and inclusive portales of theAmerican heritage.

(01:35:29):
Get ready, buddies, we'reopening your books over there at
the.
Kennedy center we found $ ready.
Buddies, we're opening yourbooks over there.
The kennedy center we found 26million dollars in phantom
income.
What do you think?
The missonian's laundering?
Huh right.
And then on top of that, thisis clandestine again.
Who's you know kind of one ofthese accounts that gets a lot
of good stuff?
The white house just sent aletter to the smithsonian
notifying them that there willbe a comprehensive internal
review of their entire operationto include inspection of their

(01:35:50):
collections.
This comes the day after trumptook federal control of DC, took
control of Metropolitan Policefor 30 days and deployed the
National Guard to DC.
The Smithsonian Museums have aninfamous underground tunnel
system connecting a vast networkof museums underneath the
National Mall.
Yeah, I'm going full tinfoilhat.
Trump just deployed theNational Guard to DC and the
next day he says he's going tosearch the Smithsonian Tunnels.
Maybe I'm just reading too muchinto this, but my non-senses

(01:36:13):
are tingling.
Ask Grok to Google search forit.
The Smithsonian tunnels andtunnels under DC are no secret
or some kooky conspiracy theory.
They exist and are widely known.
They are supposedly used totransfer artifacts, staff
supplies etc.
Between facilities.
Grok's answer is yes.
There are tunnels between theSmithsonian buildings and the
Washington DC, primarily usedfor utility and logistical
purposes.
These tunnels connect variousSmithsonian museums, such as

(01:36:36):
those along the National Mall,to facilitate the movement and
staff, supplies and artifactsbetween facilities without
disrupting public spaces.
For example, the Arts andIndustries Building, the
Smithsonian Institute Building,the Castle and other nearby
structures are linked byunderground passageways, but the
house utilities like heating,cooling and electrical systems,
as well as storage and massareas.
Then, just to add an additionallayer of weirdness to this whole
thing, the Smithsonian Insigniais literally a Masonic sun, the
same sun designed as also foundon Epstein's island in the form

(01:36:59):
of a massive sundial.
Maybe just a coincidence, butspooky nonetheless.
Huh, that's deep tinfoil hatstuff there, but clandestine.
You know, it's funny to me howmany of the Q things are like
actually happening.
But the narrative now isdifferent.
Yeah, like you know, on january7th we were all like trump,

(01:37:21):
trump's in charge of dc.
They've brought the military todc and it's going to be mass
arrest for treason and trumpflies off in.

Speaker 6 (01:37:31):
Uh, and what was the frog's name?

Speaker 4 (01:37:34):
pepe, pepe yeah pepe went deep underground.
He went to hibernation.
All right, now for the longtease.
John oliver, clip on.
Uh, chuck schumer.
I'm gonna go ahead and refreshthis, just in case.

Speaker 26 (01:37:45):
So again, this is the left attacking the left, but
it is freaking hilarious Iactually wanted to talk less
about chuck schumer himself andmore about two of his favorite
people, joe and Eileen Bailey.
They're a couple that,throughout Schumer's career, he
has talked about a lot.

Speaker 24 (01:38:00):
They're a middle class couple in Massapequa,
which is a suburb on Long Island, joe and Eileen Bailey.
This middle class couple theybought into Reagan Republicanism
in 1980.
Joe and Eileen are worriedabout losing their jobs or their
friends' jobs.
The Baileys really don'tbelieve in trickle down.
They don't believe in a wholelot of government spending but
they believe in tax breaks forkids to go to college.

(01:38:21):
He's an insurance adjuster andlives in the New York suburbs.
By New York standards he makes$50,000 a year.
If he lived in the middle ofthe country he'd make $40,000.
Wife works in a medical office.

Speaker 26 (01:38:37):
She makes about 20.
She might make 15 elsewhere andyou know, this is all.
I have guided my political lifethrough the Bailey's.
The Bailey's have guided ChuckSchumer's political life, which
is a little weird given theydon't exist.
Seriously, he invented them.
Schumer first introduced theworld to the Bailey's in his
2007 book Positively.
American winning back themiddle class majority one family
at a time.
American winning back themiddle class majority one family
at a time.
In it he mentions the Baileysan astonishing 265 times in 264

(01:39:00):
pages, but he'd apparently beentalking about them for years
before the book was published.
One of his former spokespeoplesaid he's always asking what
would the Baileys think?
And, to be fair, schumeracknowledges that some may find
this a little weird.

Speaker 24 (01:39:14):
If you ask my staff, I've been talking about and
talking to the Baileys for 15years.
I have conversations with them.
One of my staffers once said Ihad imaginary friends to the
press Got me in some trouble.
But these people are real and Irespect them and I really love
them and I care about them.

Speaker 26 (01:39:33):
OK, sure, but they're literally not real,
chuck.
But even if you can understandthe potential utility of
creating a prototypical voter inyour head, this goes way beyond
that, because Schumer's giventhe Baileys an unnecessarily
detailed backstory.
For instance, he said Joe takesoff his cap and sings along
with the national anthem beforethe occasional Islanders game.

(01:39:56):
Ok, and when their daughterMegan oh yeah, they've got kids,
by the way told Eileen a friend, was caught cheating on a quiz,
eileen was appalled becauselying is not tolerated in the
house ever.
Also, eileen apparently helpswith the clothing drive at her
church and her father had aprostate cancer scare a few
years ago.
Again, this is a made-up family.

(01:40:16):
None of these people exist.
But wait, I'm still not done.
Apparently, joe Bailey wouldnever have a goatee.
They watch Sex and the City andDesperate Housewives, though
Joe pretends not to like eithershow.
They think most baseballplayers probably take steroids
and if they were to ever go outto a Chinese restaurant, they
would order Kung Pao Chicken.
That is a JRR Tolkien level ofgratuitous backstory, and I

(01:40:39):
don't say that lightly.
But the Baileys do seem to havea lot of sway over Schumer's
politics, as he brought them upwhen discussing everything from
the 2008 financial crisis tocyber security, which he framed
as protecting the security theBaileys feel when they go online
to buy birthday presents and tohear Schumer tell it.
The Baileys' views can becomplicated.

Speaker 24 (01:41:00):
The Baileys are not anti-immigration, but they are
anti-illegal immigration.
They really dislike the Enronexecutives who stole money, but
they hate the people who burnthe flag even more.
They are pro-choice.
They understand that afundamental decision like that

(01:41:23):
should be made by the individual, but they're glad their church
isn't.

Speaker 26 (01:41:29):
Really, are you sure about that?
And the more you hear about theBaileys, the more it feels like
they represent a veryparticular slice of the
electorate.
Schumer said that theysupported the civil rights and
anti-Vietnam War movementsbecause they understood that
morality was on the side of theprotesters.
But starting in the late 60s,when those protesters cursed the

(01:41:50):
returning veterans and StokelyCarmichael advocated armed
resistance against the whiteruling class, the Bailey's were
lost, which fun fact is both amisleading history of the civil
rights movement and what peoplewho never supported it tend to
say.
And yet Schumer will insist theBailey's concerns are
widespread and that they couldjust as easily have been the
Ramirez's of Portchester, theKim's of Elk Grove, california,

(01:42:13):
or the Salims of Dearborn,michigan.
But crucially, for all he talksabout how much he loves the
Baileys, they don't seem toreturn that love Because in 2021
, he explained how the Baileyshad voted in the past few
presidential elections.

Speaker 24 (01:42:27):
They voted for Clinton and then they voted for
Bush.
They're not a member of oneparty or another, they're
independent.
Did they vote for Donald Trumptrump?
Both of them did in 2016.

Speaker 26 (01:42:37):
joe bailey still did in 2020 with miss skippings,
but she didn't the baileys votedfor trump and just this march a
reporter actually got an updateon their voting history.

Speaker 22 (01:42:56):
You said the Bailey's voted for Trump in 2016
.
They split Trump Biden in 2020.
I'm wondering who they votedfor in 2024.
Probably voted for.

Speaker 24 (01:43:04):
Trump Probably voted for Trump.
But if you ask them why, Ithink they'd say above all crime
.

Speaker 26 (01:43:11):
OK.
So to recap, of the six votesthe Baileys had across the last
three presidential elections,five went to Donald Trump, most
recently because of crime, which, for what it's worth, was down
in every category last year,with violent crime at its lowest
rate in 20 years.
They also think the civilrights movement went too far and
aren't against immigration,just illegal immigration.

(01:43:32):
And this is the couple who, inChuck Schumer's own words, have
guided his political life.
And at this point it might beworth asking is that a good idea
?
Because the truth is, schumer'sdevotion to his imaginary
friends may help explain why heand the Democratic Party have
been so underwhelming in recentyears.
Because he seems to be focusinga huge amount on the interests

(01:43:54):
of the Baileys from Long Island,while forgetting other voters
actually exist.
And look, I'm not saying thathe shouldn't think about how his
messaging plays with suburbanmiddle class voters with pretty
right off centre views, althoughthey're not theoretically
winnable in the future.
What I am saying is, bytailoring your policies so

(01:44:14):
heavily to them, you are pullingyourself to the right and in
doing so could be alienating notonly the rest of your base but
new voters looking for a partythat speaks for them.
So, senator Schumer, at leastwhen it comes to formulating
policy.
It might be time to break upwith the Bailey's, which really
shouldn't be that hard to do,given that, politically, it

(01:44:34):
seems they've already broken upwith you.

Speaker 4 (01:44:40):
His imaginary voters are voting for the opposite and
they're made up.
This has been fact-checked.
The Bailey's don't exist.
He's made a prototypical, aprototype of a voter, and he's
been doing it for 20 years.
I talk to invisible people.
They've even leaked that I haveinvisible.

Speaker 6 (01:44:57):
They're very real though my staff thinks I'm crazy
, you are crazy, I think it'shilarious.

Speaker 4 (01:45:02):
He's like, which probably won't be that hard
because they've pretty muchalready broken up with you.

Speaker 6 (01:45:07):
Yeah, they voted for trump why would he imagine that
that's so funny?

Speaker 4 (01:45:16):
he mentions him 264 times in 260 or 265 times in 264
pages the whole book's aboutthe baileys, they're totally
made up the baileys on longisland.
Oh my gosh.
It's so funny anyways, thatthat was fun.
I thought I'd share that withyou as a longer clip, so I
wanted to play it in the private, but it just made me laugh.

(01:45:38):
When you look at some of thesecharacters, I mean they're just
that.
They're characters, man,they're just a figment of
reality.
The Baileys of Long Island.
All right, folks, we're goingto talk to you again tomorrow.
Thanks for coming.
Don't forget to check leftbehind, withoutorg and all that
kind of stuff.
And tomorrow I think we're evengoing to take a crack at

(01:45:59):
running our first ad.
So talk to you guys againtomorrow.

Speaker 2 (01:46:25):
Bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in
that castle over there?
I'm 37.
What I'm 37.
I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind you
looked.
Well, I object to it.
They automatically treat melike an inferior.

(01:46:46):
Well, I am king, oh king.
Eh, very nice.
And how do you get that?
Eh, by exploiting the workers,by hanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety, if there's ever going
to be any progress.
There's some lovely filth downhere oh.

Speaker 15 (01:47:05):
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I am Arthur, king of theBritons.
Whose castle is that?
King of the?
Who, the Britons?
Who are the Britons?
Well, we all are.
We are all Britons, and I amyour king.

Speaker 2 (01:47:18):
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into it again.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would Please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.

(01:47:38):
Then who is your lord?
What I told you, we're ananarcho syndicalist commune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
Yes, but all the decisions ofthat officer have to be ratified
at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of purely
internal affairs Be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major.

(01:48:00):
Be quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
Order.
Who does he think he is?
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, I can become king.
Then.
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
samite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,

(01:48:22):
signifying by divine providencethat I, arthur, was to carry
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quiet.
You can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(01:48:45):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up, come and see theviolence inherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.

(01:49:06):
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Whose Gang Is Bigger? Trump's Show of Force in American Cities

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Whose Gang Is Bigger? Trump's Show of Force in American Cities

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce