Why Law And Order, Not Labels And “Experts,” Decide Whether Free People Stay Free

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
SPEAKER_25 (00:12):
Next day.

SPEAKER_19 (00:58):
We're those people.
We're those people.
Good morning, Doug.
Welcome.
Welcome, peasants.

SPEAKER_26 (01:10):
Never know what you're gonna get for this.

SPEAKER_19 (01:11):
Doug beat Pony Boy and Ron to say good morning in
the chat.
It's good to good to have youguys.
Um, I know that Doug today istraveling down to DC because the
Mexicans won't go into DC to doconstruction.
So he's driving down fromMaryland to go to DC to do some
construction.
Uh, pretty fun.
All right.
I've got this little video here,and it's kind of not relevant to

(01:33):
anything, but it's just kind ofone of those impact things.
You know, keeping with the themethat we're all peasants, we
gotta live here.
Okay, like a war can come byyour neighborhood, and
eventually you still gotta livethere.
There's a lot of people rightnow living and you know, out
there picking their carrots andcucumbers and and uh zucchini on
civil war battlefields, you knowwhat I mean?

(01:54):
So this video is out of Ukraine,it's just some drone footage,
and what it what the captionsays for every kilometer.

SPEAKER_26 (02:01):
Hey, that reminds me.
Have you ever watched any ofthose old Vietnam movies and the
helicopters are flying around?
You always see the peasants downthere planting grass uh rice.
Always.
Yeah, they're the peasants, justlike us.
We're living here, they'reliving there.

SPEAKER_19 (02:16):
While the kings and queens are riding by, we're over
in the shops, tink, tink, tink,building horseshoes for them,
you know.
Right.
Planting a rice.
Yeah, planting the rice.
Like, oh well, I guess I guesswe'll be speaking English in a
generation.
You know, turned out we lost.
All right, so along the frontbetween Ukraine and Russia, for
every kilometer of space,there's 2,900 kilometers of

(02:39):
fiber optic cables that havebeen left behind from their
drones.
Oh, geez.
So look at this little videohere.
Just an overhead view.
It's like a spider web.
Yeah, it's just a spider web.
They say this will take decadesto clean up if it ever is fully
cleaned up.
These are fiber optic lines justrunning up on top of the trees.
Because what was going on was inthe beginning of this war, these

(02:59):
drones would fly out and they'duse the little EMF and they'd
fall to the ground.
So then pretty soon the nextstage was have a fiber optic
cable at radio frequency, andthey would literally let these
things unspool thousands ofyards, miles, right?
Until they'd get to theirtarget.
So this is what the the front inyou between Ukraine and Russia
looks like now.

(03:19):
It's just covered, just litteredwith fiber optic cables.
People got to live there.
You know what I mean?
Like that's an ecologicaldisaster.
I don't know, I don't know howlong fiber optic cable takes to
break down or you know, I don'tknow if the bird It'll be here
when we're gone.
I imagine the birds don't reallyappreciate it as they're trying
to fly in and out of the treesand their nests, you know what I
mean?

(03:39):
And any bird, any bird with along wingspan like an owl, is
probably having a heck of a timegetting fed in that area.

SPEAKER_26 (03:44):
Maybe they'll figure out how to make it into new
habitat.

SPEAKER_19 (03:46):
Dude, totally yeah, you're gonna find it in sparrow
nests.
It already is, I'm certain ofit.
Yeah.
I remember watching this onevideo where it was like uh how a
10-pair, a$10 or like a$2 pairof scissors kills a thousand
dollar drone or something likethat.
And uh this guy's like laying inthe bushes, and this drone
splice from trees, and as it assoon as it gets past him, he

(04:08):
runs over and he like startsdoing this, and he grabs the
fiber up to go, cuts the line,and then it blows up like over
there, you know.
It's like wow.
Um, this right here was a clipout of Kentucky.
This is a um, okay, this is astate.
Let me see what she is.
She's a state.
Oh, Representative SarahStalker.
I'm pretty sure she's out ofKentucky.

(04:29):
If I'm wrong, sometimes I getthis stuff wrong.
Um, and she's you know, talkingin a committee hearing or
something like this about youknow how shameful it is to be
white.
Oh, I need to change my sound,don't I?
Oh no, yes.
Give me just a second.

SPEAKER_26 (04:44):
Do do do do do praying for Washington.
Thank you.

SPEAKER_19 (04:50):
Oh my goodness, dude, so much rain.

SPEAKER_26 (04:51):
It's been I'm not even thinking about the rain.

SPEAKER_19 (04:54):
Oh, I was thinking about our politics.
Yeah.
Yes, please, pray.
Okay, Beraysia, good morning.
Mada Easel, Mom, hello.
All right, here we go.
Finally figuring out that that'smy mom.

SPEAKER_12 (05:06):
Good about being white every day.
For a lot of reasons.
Because it's a point ofprivilege that I get to move
through the world in a way thatso many of my other colleagues
and friends and family membersin of the community don't get
the privilege to do.

SPEAKER_19 (05:22):
Democrats are the most racist people out there.
Because I'm white.
I'm better.
I walk around knowing how muchbetter I am than you.

SPEAKER_12 (05:31):
And I'm and I'm just a female, but just a woman, just
a white woman.
If I was a white man, I would befunctioning from a point of of
even greater privilege.
Oh.
I think we're missing anopportunity when kids victim
when kids have a moment toreflect about how the color of

(05:51):
their skin does and does notallow them to move through the
world.
It's running running to them andtrying to stifle that and trying
to say you shouldn't feel bad.
So we don't want to, we don'twant to ever expose you to
something that is gonna make youhave to pause and have maybe
some internal feelings.
It's a missed opportunity forsome really good dialogue.

SPEAKER_26 (06:13):
I just realized something.
I just realized something.
I've been squandering myprivilege.

SPEAKER_19 (06:22):
My white privilege card like overdrew.
That's crazy.
They're the most rate, like thejust the thought process.
This is disconnected fromanything else in the show,
right?
It's like, well, I had this teedup yesterday and I wanted to go
over it, but we had to, youknow, wrap up promptly.
And uh I was like, I'mprivileged because I'm white,

(06:42):
and I go walk around the worldknowing that.
So you walk around feelingsuperior, which of course would
make you feel guilty becauseyou're not, right?
Right.
And so then you go around to theblack kids, you're like, I know
that you're inferior, but youknow, leverage it.
Goodbye, man.
These people are again, it'sthese people, right?
Like, I don't even know whatthey're thinking sometimes.

(07:04):
And this mindset as peasants,right?
This is the thing that binds ustogether is our culture and our
society and our traditions andour customs and stuff like that.
And in America, we have a lot oftraditions, law and order.
Uh, we like heroes, you know, welove heroes, we support victims,
we hate bullies.
Like, this is normal.
This right here is inside acourtroom for somebody that I

(07:25):
consider an American hero.
Listen to the way this judge istalking, and when I tell you who
this is, it might blow your minda little bit.

SPEAKER_27 (07:32):
You have no qualms with violating uh the court's
orders because you're innocent.
Because you didn't do anythingwrong.
You were just doing your job.
You have no problem trying tokick an officer.
Your explanation about whathappened is preposterous.
It's on the video.

(07:54):
You have no problem lying toofficers.
It's happened multiple times intheir recorded conversations.
It's just your lies.
No objective person believesthem.
No, at the end of the day, youcared about the Jazz of the
podcast and the people findingover you.
You advocated your position as aservant to the Constitution, and

(08:15):
you chose you over all else.
Yes, you are a charlatan, andyou cannot help but lie as easy
it is for you to breathe.
You betrayed your oath for noone other than you.
And this is what makes MissPeters such a danger to our
community.
It is the position she held thathas provided her the pulpit from
which she can preach these lies.

SPEAKER_19 (08:36):
This is Tina Peters.
This is her sentencing.
Oh.
You know, keeping a copy of thehard drive that showed election
fraud.
But you kicked an officer whenthey tried to arrest you over
it.
Who def who do who is notfollowing their oath?
You, Judge, prevented them fromproviding any evidence in this

(08:57):
trial.

SPEAKER_27 (08:58):
Undermining of our democratic process.
The undermining of the beliefand confidence in our election
systems.
It's not about questioning it.
No one says you can't question,you can't ask.
It's completely different.

SPEAKER_19 (09:10):
It's completely different to prove it.
That you cannot do.
That you cannot do.
You cannot prove election fraudbecause society will fall apart.

SPEAKER_27 (09:20):
And if you don't understand that distinction,
then there's nothing I can sayor do here today that will
change your mind.
Oh my gosh.
So the damage that is caused andcontinue to be caused is just as
bad, if not worse, than thephysical violence that this
court sees on an all too regularbasis.
And it's particularly damagingwhen those words come from
someone that holds a position ofinfluence like you.

SPEAKER_26 (09:41):
This video goes for another five minutes.

SPEAKER_27 (09:42):
Every effort to undermine the integrity of our
elections and public strust inour institutions has been made
by you.
Again, from that lectern, uh thevoting public provided you with
everything you've done has beendone to retain control,
influence.
The damage is immeasurable.
Every time it gets refuted,every time it's shown to be
false, just another tail isweaved.
Is this real?

(10:03):
It sounds like a meme fest.

SPEAKER_19 (10:04):
That is hers.
That's what a sentencing hereis.
Like you should, you know, thethe letter you got from my
judge, that's what he read.
Oh in my sentencing.
And you know, you you read itand you're like, yeah, yeah,
imagine just sitting there.
Oh my god.
Who's lying?
Who's who's breaking their oath?
Who's who's enabling our countryto be stolen out from under us?
Like, it's one of those.

(10:25):
I I I hate this.
I hate it.
I hate the fact that we live ina society where second and third
order effects have morepunishment than the original
thing.
Listen, if you steal anelection, I'll support anything
an election worker does toexpose it if it turns out to be
true.
Nobody has disproven TinaPeters' evidence.
They haven't even taken anattempt at it.
They've just thrown her in jail.

(10:45):
That's all.
And yesterday, Donald Trumppardoned Tina Peters.
What does that mean, though?
Because she's in a Coloradoprison.
Right.
So obviously, traditionally,there's been the separation of

powers (10:55):
federal charges, state charges.
The governor can pardon statecharges, the president can
pardon federal charges.
There's an overlap here withthis Tina Peters case.
This was a federal election.
The feds should havejurisdiction, right?
If they would have tried tointervene during her trial,
tradition would have them havebeen able to make it a federal
case.
But of course, Biden wasn'tgoing to intervene and get in

(11:16):
the way because then Trump wouldhave been able to pardon her
eventually.
Right.
And so they've got her locked upin that prison.
My knowledge is as of today,she's on um solitary
confinement.
And likely now that she's beenquote unquote pardoned, we'll
continue to be on solitaryconfinement.
Wonderful.
The governor of Colorado and theAttorney General have both come
out.
We're not letting her out, noway, no how.
Trump can't do that.

(11:37):
Well, I guess we'll see.
And unfortunately, I don't likethis because, you know, we you
know, we talk about precedent,right?
And well, the precedent's beenset.
And my argument a lot of timesthat, you know, we're not
setting precedent.
The precedent was set.
When you do the thing theDemocrats have done, you're not
setting precedent.
You're just you're justfollowing suit.

SPEAKER_26 (11:55):
Well, and how much force do you have to use to
remove somebody from a prison?

SPEAKER_19 (12:01):
It wouldn't take much in reality.
You know, you send 30, 40, 50marshals, and she's walking out
of there.
Because the guards in therearen't going to stand up to the
marshals because then they mightend up in a federal suit.

SPEAKER_26 (12:12):
Well, what if the state does something stupid?

SPEAKER_19 (12:15):
Ah, good question.
Good question.
This sets up clearly what'sgoing to happen is this is going
to go to the Supreme Courtprobably pretty quickly.
Because if she's pardoned andshe should be free, then every
second she's in there, her civilrights are being violated.
Oh, yeah.
So likely the Supreme Court willbe.
And they are.
And they could you could flip acoin as to how they're going to
decide on this, right?

(12:36):
I don't think that they're goingto totally be like, oh, feds can
pardon state charges, but if thefeds have jurisdiction over
those state charges, they mightbe able to.
Um the other thing that thatthis does too is that is this
would prevent, for example, oneof the big concerns amongst
January Sixers, because peoplelike the attorney general in
Pennsylvania have said, well,we're going to bring state
charges against the JanuarySixers now.

(12:57):
Right.
And so it's like, well, I wantmy federal pardon to cover any
alleged state, you know what Imean?
Yeah.
So it's for for me, it's like50-50.
I don't know how it's going togo.
Um, but that's that's going on.
And the vitriol of which theywent after Tina Peters, you can,
I mean, you just listen to therest of that sentencing the
judge did, it makes your skincrawl.

(13:18):
Yeah.
You know, it's like theycompletely ignore the the bigger
issue.
Well, you kicked a cop.
Well, why was the cop arrestingme?
Why was he talking to me at all?
You know what's really hilariousis the guys that get the biggest
settlements when they getfalsely imprisoned or falsely
arrested are the ones who fuckedthe cops the hardest.
Like you'd think they'd havefelony charges for assault and

(13:39):
battery.
But what happens is if the copis found to have acted
improperly to detain thatperson, you have a duty to fight
back.
And anything you do to fightback is viewed as self-defense.
Yeah.
Right?
There are actually a couplerandom cases out there where
cops were killed in the processof illegally detaining and
arresting someone, and thatperson was found innocent.

SPEAKER_22 (13:59):
Oof.

SPEAKER_19 (14:00):
You can defend your life.
And when you're being detainedand arrested, that is your life.
Now, you can choose to actdifferently.
The odds are not in your favorif you act improperly.

SPEAKER_26 (14:09):
No, they're not.

SPEAKER_19 (14:10):
But the reality is it's fruit of the poisonous
tree.
You know, I saw this in Missouriwhile I was in prison there.
There were two or three, two,there were two inmates that had
life death sentences in MissouriState prisons.
And, you know, as they wentthrough their appeals, they were
found innocent.
Not a technicality error.
They were found innocent.

(14:30):
Okay.
Okay.
So the judges said innocent,case dismissed, released from
prison.
Andrew Bailey, who's now theco-deputy director of the FBI,
who was the attorney general inMissouri when I was there,
petitioned a court to keep themin because, you know, they'd
committed offenses while theywere in prison.
They'd gotten in trouble whilethey were in prison.
One of them had been in for 20years.

(14:50):
They were trying to use theirprison record as justification
to keep them on death row, Ron.
That's Andrew Bailey, yourco-director of the FBI.
Okay.
Now, this creates all kinds ofconsternation for us peasants
because you never know whenyou're going to end up in the
crosshairs of an unjustgovernment.
And I do believe we have anadministration right now that's
really trying to bring back lawand order.

(15:10):
Just follow the laws.
If you don't like the laws,change them.
This is Christy Noam essentiallysaying just that yesterday in
her um in her house hearing.

SPEAKER_31 (15:19):
I think it's shameful to see the defense of
individuals who break our laws.
We are a nation of laws.
If we are not a nation of laws,we're no nation at all.
And that is what we are doingevery day, is following us.

SPEAKER_19 (15:29):
If you guys don't like the law, the problem is
when the government defends thelawbreakers, aka the election
stealers or the violentcriminals that get shorter
sentences, right?
That is a nation of laws wherethere's some reasonableness in
it, not what we're experiencingtoday, where things get
weaponized.

SPEAKER_31 (15:51):
You don't complain.
I was raised by a dad who saidwe don't complain about things.
We fix them.
Well, go fix them.
If you don't like the law, quitbellyaking, quit hitting and
attacking our ICE officers.
Quit going out and protestingand screaming vile things at
them.
Quit calling their names.
We wouldn't let our children dothat.
Go do something that actuallymatters by having an honest
debate and changing the law.
That's your jobs.

(16:11):
You all should be fired, in myviewpoint.

SPEAKER_19 (16:14):
Carlit says, Buenos dias from sunny beaches in
Puerto Rico.
And I say deport them all.
Uh Puerto Ricans are I spent adecent amount of time in Puerto
Rico because I had a son thatwas born there prematurely and
passed away there.
But uh yeah, Puerto Rico'sreally funny because you're in
America, it's a territory,everybody is a citizen, but it
is not the United States.

(16:35):
It is it's not Chinatown.
I mean, you didn't you're not inAmerica, you're clearly in
Puerto Rico.
The goods and services aredifferent.
The goods and services aredifferent, and the language is
different, oddly enough.
It's weird.
But uh yeah, kind of a kind of acool place.
Okay, so change the laws, right?
We're a nation of law andorders.
You're the legislature.
Don't tell me not to enforce alaw, change it.

(16:57):
You've got the ability to do it,change it, right?
It's incredibly important forAmerica to stay on top, for our
culture to prevail, because ourculture is what's literally
holding up the Westerncivilization.
And what is Westerncivilization?
Because we say these phrases andwe don't always understand what
it means.
When we talk about the Easterncivilizations, the Eastern
civilizations, by and large, arecollectivist.

(17:19):
Okay.
They don't necessarily believein the individual, and that the
individual is sovereign from hislocal society.
Okay.
Right?
You're part of a tribe, whoeverthe chieftain is, the president,
the king, the emperor, whatever,is patriarch, it's patriarchal,
right?
It's not merit-based always,it's patriarchal.
Now, the east has westernized.

(17:41):
India is obviously a bigdemocracy and things like that.
But very much the Easternphilosophy is based around some
collectivism.
In the West, we developedliberalism.
What is liberalism?
It's the belief that your soulis inherently good.
It's the belief, well, unlessyou're Catholic, then you
believe it might be fallen inoriginal sin.
But beyond that, it's the ideathat you are individually

(18:03):
created by your creator and thatyou yourself have your own
consciousness, your own mind,and you can make your own
decisions.
That distinguishes the East fromthe West.
In the East, you don't alwaysget to make your own decisions.
Okay.
In the West, we support theindividual.
Now, how they go and fit insociety isn't starts with that

(18:24):
individual choice.
So liberalism leads tovolunteerism, it leads to
republican forms of governmentor democracies, right?
But the idea that my votematters, that we're all equal,
and maybe collectively we cancome together, but there has to
be some mechanism where Ivolunteer, where I enter into a
political society and apolitical association.
Does that make sense?
Our founding fathers understoodthis.

(18:44):
That's why they were able tosay, look, I get that you're the
king, but we happen to also bekings in our own households.
So you know what I mean?
Like all men are created equal.
It's obvious when we'll let youhave one vote.
So when yeah, we'll let you haveone vote.
So when we talk about Westerncivilization, we're literally
talking about the individual.

(19:05):
We're talking about the factthat you get to make your
choices.
Okay.
So when Elon Musk is heretalking about how America has to
survive because the whole Westdepends on it, this is deadly
serious.

SPEAKER_41 (19:16):
If America is not strong, then what do businesses
matter?
America is the central pillarthat holds up a Western
civilization.
And if that pillar falls,everything falls.

SPEAKER_19 (19:33):
So uh you were one of the founders, the two
founders.
Yeah.
If America falls, everythingfalls.
America is propping up thezeitgeist that you matter.
If you get out of that Westernbubble, you no longer matter.
Look at the way that Islamtreates their soldiers as

(19:53):
fodder.
And I shouldn't say Islam,Muslim nations.
They treat their soldiers asfodder.
I'll never rem I'll neverforget.
Hearing from a um a militaryperson.
I can't, he was in the army, buthe was overseas in Afghanistan.
And they had this some Talibanfarmer.
It wasn't Taliban, it was justAfghani farmer, farmer.
But he's out there farming hisfield and he's got this tractor,

(20:14):
right?
And he's plowing.
It's just it's not big, he said.
It said it was, you know, justprobably no bigger than your
tractor, right here, right?
But he's pulling a rototiller.
And out in front of the tractor,he's got his children walking.
Oh, geez.
And uh the soldier goes, I knowexactly what this is all about.

SPEAKER_26 (20:30):
Oh my gosh.

SPEAKER_19 (20:31):
And the soldier's like, what's going on here?
And he's like, Well, you know, Ican replace my kids, but I can't
replace my tractor.
He's got his kids out therelooking for landmines, yeah,
walking in front of the tractor.
Yeah, okay.
That is incomprehensible in theWest.
It's incomprehensible.
But in the East, yeah, yeah, youmight have to lose a kid or two

(20:55):
to make sure the tractor sticksaround so I can feed the family.
I understand the math.
Yeah.
But that's where the West isdifferent.
We're on the verge of losingthat.
Europe, as according to DonaldTrump and his national security
plan, is 20 years away frombeing an irrelevant
civilization.
Total civilizational collapse.
They're beyond the point of,unless they do dramatic policy

(21:16):
changes in order to deport orwhatever, they're on the verge
of kind of losing the Westbecause they're importing these
other ideologies and there's noeffort to try to change the
mindset.
So I know sometimes, you know,when we look at this, the whole
peasant's perspective is we'vegot to sit here and live here
while they do their thing.

(21:37):
But their things sometimes dohave real technical effect on
us, right?
As of late.
As of late, yeah.
And so we really want to be ableto see it for what it is because
we still live in a country whereyou volunteer.
You still do, and it's easy tosee it.
Go look at the Amish, they don'tvolunteer.
Why don't you live that way?
Well, I don't you can you can beAmish with a cell phone and a

(22:01):
utility contract and a mortgage,right?
But you don't have to volunteerfor every other little thing,
you don't have to be thatcaptive person.
Donald Trump was talking tomembers of Europe because now
it's becoming very, very clear.
Europe has a military-industrialcomplex just like we do, and
they have an influence complexalmost more than we do.

(22:22):
And they really want to go towar with Russia, they really
want to defend Ukraine and dothat whole thing.
And Trump's wiping his hands ofit, right?
And he's saying, listen, youguys got to get smart.
What are we doing in Ukraine?
Okay.
And he's and he was telling himbecause he's basically giving
Zelensky till Christmas tofigure out the peace deal.
He's pulling all US support,which means Ukraine's done.
Like if Russia wanted to takeall of Ukraine, he's telling

(22:45):
NATO and uh Europe, yeah, goahead, defend it.
You we'll sell you anything youwant, but we aren't supporting
it or advising it because we'reon the verge of World War III.

SPEAKER_32 (22:55):
I have a great relationship with the countries
of Europe, as you know.
I took a I took GDP, I took whatthey're spending uh as a
percentage of GDP, but it was attwo and they weren't paying, and
now it's at five, andeverybody's amazed.
But that five percent is a lotof it's coming back to the
United States.
With that being said, uh, I'dlike to see the killing stop.

(23:19):
25,000 people died last month,soldiers, mostly soldiers, but
some people also where bomberswere dropped.
But for the most part, 25,000soldiers died last month.
I would love to see it stop.
And we're working very hard.
It doesn't really affect theUnited States unless it got out
of control.
You know, a thing like that, asyou probably know, because you

(23:40):
are a professional, a realprofessional, which is something
I don't say about a lot of otherpeople, but uh, you are a great
professional.
Things like this end up in thirdworld wars, and I told that the
other day, I said, you know,everybody keeps playing games
like this, you'll end up in athird world war, and we don't
want to see that happen.

SPEAKER_19 (24:02):
25,000 people died last month in that conflict.
25 think of the scale of that.
That's larger than thepopulation of North Kitzap.
That's everybody being gone.
Yeah, that's huge.
It has to stop because theliberal West who believes in the

(24:22):
individuals, like, what's themath on this?
I mean, are we really fightingover?
I I get it.
You got territorial integrity, Iget it, right?
But some of those people votedto become part of Russia.
They were, you know what I mean?
Like the Crimea area.
This has been going on for awhile.
It's just not our business.

(24:43):
People don't realize how quickthings can fall apart if we
don't follow the laws.
Back in Christy Gnome's hearing,do you remember?
So showing on my screen here, goahead and show it.
So this woman right here, she'sthe woman that's under federal
indictment for assault on afederal officer because she went
and protested at an ICEfacility.
So she got a chance to uhcross-examine Christy Gnome.
It's kind of an interestinginterchange here.

(25:03):
Officials assessment.
Excuse me.
It's the guy next door, TimKennedy, is talking.

SPEAKER_21 (25:08):
She talks next.

SPEAKER_22 (25:09):
Okay.

SPEAKER_21 (25:10):
Operating in a heightened threat environment
for several years now.
Yes.
Yes or no?
Would you say New York City issusceptible to these kinds of
security threats?
Yes, and that's why they shouldspend forty million dollars.
With New York City being thenumber one, I reclaim my time.

(25:31):
With New York City being thenumber one third threat in this
nation they have, it'sunconscionable$134 million in
urban area security initiativefunding for the city of New
York.
What compels you to knowinglymake our cities less safe with
these funding cuts?

SPEAKER_19 (25:50):
What compelled Okay, so the Trump administration has
come in, they've cut tons offunding for these safety
initiatives and stuff like that.
Now we get the buzzwords at thispoint.
$141 million for safetyinitiatives in the North
neighborhood.
Dude, you could remodel theentire neighborhood for that.
So where's the money going,right?
First of all.
And if we've been giving thismoney and been supplying it, why

(26:10):
is New York still the number oneterror threat?
Okay.
This is now where Christy makesher real point.

SPEAKER_21 (26:24):
Secretary no murderer out of$134 million.
Honor our detainers.

SPEAKER_19 (26:29):
Honor our detainers.
The money means nothing when youleave the criminals on the
streets.
Jeez.
The money means nothing,military industrial complex,
when 25,000 people are dying.

SPEAKER_26 (26:40):
Remind me who that dude was.
That's guy some somebody fromNew York.
Yeah, he's a representative fromNew York.
And he feels like he gets toyell at the secretary.

SPEAKER_19 (26:50):
Yeah, well, she talked over him that shot her.

SPEAKER_26 (26:53):
Yeah, that was kind of annoying.

SPEAKER_19 (26:54):
This is Mr.
Bernie Thompson, one of thechairmen of the J6 committee.
This guy's a real work of art.
And uh now you remember it wasjust a few weeks ago an Islamic
extremist from Afghanistan thatwas enabled by the CIA to be on
a death squad was brought intoWashington State and put up in

(27:16):
free public paid housing up inBellingham, Washington, and
drove all the way across thecountry and shot two National
Guardsmen blocks from the WhiteHouse with a revolver in the
head.
Now, Bernie Thompson, he hedoesn't think that that's any
kind of an act of terrorists anunfortunate event.

SPEAKER_07 (27:32):
Madam Secretary, you and the gentleman from CT NCTC
uh reference the unfortunateaccident that occurred with the
National Guardsman being killed.

SPEAKER_31 (27:46):
You think that wasn't an unfortunate accident?

SPEAKER_07 (27:48):
I mean there's a terrorist.
No, wait, wait.
Look, I'll get it straight.
Then you can He shot ourNational Guardsman in the head.
Look, Miss Chairman, were youdirect witness?
It wasn't a forklift accident.
Okay.
Allow me to ask my question.

SPEAKER_19 (28:07):
Ask.
Not axe.
Ask.

SPEAKER_07 (28:10):
Madam Secretary, you and and the gentleman from CT
NCTC.

SPEAKER_19 (28:16):
So he's basic that was the clip right there.
So he's like, it was anunfortunate situation.
Tulsi Gabbard responded to thatthis morning.
And again, just painting theproblem.
You we can see the problems, butyet we are uncable of fixing
anything because the people whoare supposed to fix it can't
even acknowledge what a terrorattack looks like.
It was an unfortunate event.
Well, it's yeah, it's not aforklift accident.

(28:38):

SPEAKER_26 (28:39):
It's not a fender better.

SPEAKER_19 (28:40):
Yeah, which causes us to have breakdowns in rule of
law.

SPEAKER_28 (28:44):
It is absolutely infuriating.
Uh, this is someone who is avery, very senior leader in
Congress, uh, who for a longtime has led the Homeland
Security Committee in Congress.
And the fact that he cannot andrefuses to directly identify
this attack for what it was, aterrorist attack on our own soil

(29:06):
against our National Guard, menand women in this case, uh, who
are putting their lives on theline.
Their direct mission was to keepthe American people safe right
here on our streets inWashington, D.C.
Uh, this exchange really pointsto the egregious and
long-standing problem, Brian,that we've seen, which is
leaders, some on both sides ofthe aisle, who refused to

(29:29):
identify this Islamous terroristthreat for exactly what it is,
which is one of the reasons whywe find ourselves in the
position that we're in today.
It is absolutely see it for whatit is.

SPEAKER_26 (29:41):
Do you how do you how many hour drive is it from
Washington to DC?
It's like 3,000 miles.
I know.
Not a short drive.
That is a freaking long act.

SPEAKER_19 (29:51):
Two-day or three-day drive.
It's a long drive.

SPEAKER_26 (29:54):
It's like three, four days.

SPEAKER_19 (29:56):
Yeah.
So, you know, when when when youhave elected officials and you
have government officials whocan't clearly identify a simple
terrorist attack, that's itdoesn't get any more clear than
that, right?
When you when you have electedofficials and government
officials who can't identifywhat is a crime or what isn't,
or you have a judge out inColorado that thinks that
election fraud is, you know, notas important as the fact that

(30:17):
you kicked an officer and youknow are are making people
question the integrity of theelection.
You can question it, but youcannot prove that the election
was stolen.
That would cause chaos and civildisorder.
You're right.
You're right.
Because all the virtuous peoplewho have been raised to have
this guild complex that theygotta follow the law and you
know, drive the speed limit andstop at the stop sign when

(30:38):
nobody's around, because that'swhat America does.
I mean, how many times have youstopped at a stop sign on
country roads where there's notanother car for miles?

SPEAKER_26 (30:47):
Oh, a few times.
And why'd you do it?
I'm not gonna admit to not doingit.

SPEAKER_19 (30:52):
And why'd you do it?
Because there was a stop sign.

SPEAKER_22 (30:54):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_19 (30:56):
Hey, if you have, you know, crimes, maybe we
should just address themdirectly.
You know, of hey, if somebody'sbringing drugs and that's
killing our kids, maybe weshould punish the drug dealers.
But you've got media, you've gotDemocrats, even with this stuff
going on in the Caribbean,blowing narco boats out of the
water or confiscating this oiltanker, you've got media, which
are clearly on the side of theDemocrats and whatever that's

(31:17):
going on, that can't evenidentify the difference between
a fishing boat boat.

SPEAKER_00 (31:22):
If you can seize a tanker without killing anyone,
if you can seize an oil tankerwithout killing anyone,
shouldn't that have been the waythat these fishing boats were
also stopped?

SPEAKER_11 (31:31):
Fishing boats?
Are you you're what are you whatis a fishing boat?
Well, the drug runners?
Those aren't fishing boats.
Yeah, but those aren't fishingboats.
If you can seize the boat,they're turbo.
They're turbocharged.
Okay.
Well, let's talk about ArticleII authority.
The president of thecommander-in-chief has
identified and designatedterrorist organizations who are
cartels.
Those aren't fishing boats.

SPEAKER_19 (31:52):
Those are turbocharged drug running boats.
They've got four engines on theback that say 250 on them.
Which, by the way, if you wantto know the cost of an outboard
engine, add a zero.
Add two zeros to the to thehorsepower.
So you got two$25,000 or four$25,000 motors on the back.
These aren't fishing boats.

(32:13):
Open hole, by the way.
Open hole.
No fishing poles.

SPEAKER_11 (32:16):
No fishing poles.
So there's no legal questionthat he has the legal ability to
blow those boats out of thewater.
And they will continue.
This, however, these wereeconomic sanctions by the
president as delegated byCongress.
Those were enforced by civilauthorities with the aid of the

(32:37):
U.S.
Navy.
So we're talking about two verydifferent things.
But if you're asking me if Ihave sympathy for
narco-terrorists killingAmericans whose boats that are
carrying the drugs that killAmericans, I don't.
I have sympathy for my neighborsin Missouri.
They've been poisoned, die.
We finally have a president whocares about them more than the
Democrats care about going downto El Salvador to drink

(32:59):
margaritas with terrorists.
That's how I feel about it.

SPEAKER_34 (33:02):
Do you believe that the Trump administration should
try to overthrow Maduro'sregime?

SPEAKER_11 (33:06):
That's not uh that we're not talking about that at
all.
We're talking about actuallyenforcing sanctions.
And so, um, and again, sort ofletting the world know that we
have important interests in ourown industry.

SPEAKER_39 (33:15):
But it is something the administration is weighing.
The president was talking about.

SPEAKER_11 (33:20):
I don't know what you're talking about.
I mean, that's that's anassertion you're making.

SPEAKER_19 (33:23):
Senator Hawley has expressed opposition to this.
So he sees it clearly.
Hawley sees it clearly.
I'm telling you, Missouri is theconservative capital of the
world right now.
Like all the best legal minds.

SPEAKER_26 (33:33):
I don't think I'm just having the realization that
I don't think I could be apolitician like this guy because
I'd be punched at death.

SPEAKER_19 (33:41):
They've become desensitized to the stupidity,
clearly.
And yeah, I mean, so do youremember back in Seattle in
2020, that whole Chaz Chopincident?

SPEAKER_26 (33:52):
Do I?

SPEAKER_19 (33:53):
Do we?
But before I move on to that,pray the Rosary Daily axe.
Yes, that's right.
Bernie Thompson says, Can youaxe the I saw this video where
some black guy was like, nameone thing a white person can do
that a black person can.
And then the next clip was likean annunciation video, and it
was like A S K.

SPEAKER_21 (34:13):
Ask.

SPEAKER_19 (34:14):
And then it went back to the black guy, and he's
like, I don't know why they sayit like that.
I I don't know.
I don't get it.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I'm from the Inner MountainWest.
I oftentimes don't say my T's inthe middle of words.
So, for example, it's mountains,not mountains.
All right, anyways, okay.
So back when the Chaz Chopincident happened, right?
That I don't remember how manyweeks it was.

(34:36):
Memory escapes me.
It was two, three, four weeks,whatever it was.
It was longer than that.
Yeah, and they took over somecity blocks and it started out
summer of love, and we're justgonna let these basically a big
glorified homeless encampmentthat just attracted a lot of
street festival weirdos duringthe afternoon.
It's summer of love.
Look, everybody's justtransgender, and you know, men
are holding men's hands, andit's just awesome, right?
But then at night things got alittle crazy because that's when

(34:58):
you know open air drug market.
Yeah, no normal people wenthome, and during the night it
was open air drug market, therewas rapes, there was assaults,
there was prostitution, andultimately murders.
Yes.
So what happened that night wassome black teenagers made their
way through Seattle, made overthere to where Chaz Chop was,
and they basically drove aroundsome of the barricades that had

(35:20):
been placed out to keep trafficfrom coming in.
And when they did that, the ChazChop security, if you remember,
there's videos of guys handingout AK-47s and and AR-15s out of
a Tesla trunk, right?
Warlord, Chaz Warlord, right?
So the security team, who'ssupposed to be providing
security, law and order andeverything, opened fire on this
car.
They were lost trying to figureout how to get out.

(35:42):
And it's, you know, middle ofthe, I don't know, midnight, one
in the morning, whatever it was.
Kids were up to no good,anyways, but they got shot,
murdered right there.
Okay.
So initially, Chaz Chop on thevideo that, you know, is
everybody's got a cell phonerecording, is the white
supremacists are coming in tokill us.
Kill them, kill them, kill them.
So they shoot them, and thenwhen they go to the vehicle to

(36:02):
uh, we killed the whitey,there's two black kids laying
there bleeding out.
Oh my gosh, we killed some blackkids.
Well, then people are like, pickup the show casings, do this, do
that.
911 gets called, fire departmentshows up, fire department turns
around.
We're not allowed to go intochess chop.
So the guy sat there dying, youknow, dead in the car.
The crime scene was completely,you know, tampered with.

(36:22):
And then ultimately whathappened was when the when the
investigators got called out,they were told not to go in to
the crime scene.
So yesterday, the family starteda trial against the city of
Seattle, you know, wrongfuldeath suit and failure to
provide protection, etc.
And this is the uh investigatorfrom Seattle PD testifying about
just that.

SPEAKER_24 (36:43):
So Detective Cruz, on June 29th, 2020, you were
notified of this shooting ataround 4 a.m.
Is that correct?
Yes.
What time did you arrive at thescene?
7 45, I believe it was.

SPEAKER_19 (37:00):
So happening happen the the shot happened at like
two or three in the morning.

SPEAKER_24 (37:04):
So that that's probably close to a five-hour
delay, is that correct?

SPEAKER_25 (37:12):
3 a.m.
was the time of the call, Ibelieve.
And then we arrived at 7 45.
Four hours and 45 minutes rightnow.
Did you request immediate accessto the scene?
I was immediately told that Idid not have access to the
scene.

SPEAKER_19 (37:33):
Because they came over the city, Ron!

SPEAKER_25 (37:37):
Why do you think that you have been having five
hours?
There was an order for us to notenter the scene.
Where did that order come from?
Chief Mahaffey.

SPEAKER_24 (37:58):
How did that make you feel?

SPEAKER_39 (37:59):
Rejection, Your Honor.

SPEAKER_24 (38:02):
Did you agree with Chief Mahaffey's order?

SPEAKER_19 (38:05):
Objection, Your Honor.
Did you agree?
Clearly not.
So what happened was in theinterim time, usually as soon as
the call comes out, first youknow, the first police show up,
they secure the crime scene.
You have to maintain theintegrity of the crime scene.
By the time these guys gotthere, the casings had been
picked up, the bodies had beentampered with, everything
nothing was viable.

(38:26):
Nothing would survive chain ofcustody, nothing.
And to this day, no one has beencharged with those murders.
Oh, wonderful.
Those people pay property taxesthat live in there.
They were held hostage by that.
They had, you know, they had tolike people were using
electricity on the street,forcing them to run um uh
extension cords outdoors so theycouldn't lock their doors at

(38:48):
night.
What do you pay property taxesfor if not for fire services and
police services?
But there was a no-go zone in anAmerican city?
How many apartment buildings isit okay for Trendagua to take
over?
How many blocks of our cities isit for them to take over?
It wasn't the summer of love.
Rape, murder, burglary, arson.
I don't know if arson is, Idon't know.

SPEAKER_26 (39:08):
Well, remember when they took over the local police
department there, too.
I mean, they took over thepolice station.

SPEAKER_19 (39:15):
The police precinct was right there, yes.
So we can go, well, that's abreakdown in law and order.
People that are telling us, hey,don't you got to follow the
laws?
Well, I thought we had a law inthe book that said that you had
to respond to murders.
Now, the government, we knowthis because we've been covering

(39:36):
this for years now.
The government's clearlyfractured from within, right?
You've got people inside thegovernment that are every bit as
much a criminal as anybody onthe outside.
You think Tina Peter overreactedwhen she kicked a cop?
Imagine being an FBI agentreleasing information on ICE
officers so that they can beattacked.

SPEAKER_37 (39:54):
Tom Holman.
Tom, where are these leakscoming from?

SPEAKER_36 (40:00):
Well, look, we w we think it's coming from inside.
And uh we know the first leak ofAurora is under current
investigation.
We think we identified thatperson uh under investigation
right now.
Uh the the California leak.
Uh secretary gnome.
You know, she's correct of someof the information we're
receiving, tends to lead towarduh the FBI.

(40:21):
Uh but I talked to DeputyAttorney General all this
weekend.
They've opened up a criminalinvestigation, and uh they have
promised that not only thisperson lose their job and lose
their pension, they won't go tojail, they won't criminally
prosecute.
So we're all over it.
We got thank goodness.

SPEAKER_19 (40:37):
I wonder how many people in the Seattle Police
Department and the Seattle CityCouncil and the mayor's office
went to prison.
Do you know?
Yeah, I know.

SPEAKER_26 (40:45):
Zero.

SPEAKER_19 (40:47):
You know, I uh when when government holds government
workers accountable and there'sa legit thing there and it's not
weaponization, it's usuallyhorrendous.

SPEAKER_26 (40:56):
Well, recall when there was some questions coming
up, a lot of people's phonerecords all got deleted.
Yes, they deleted everything.
The cover up acknowledges andthese were public records.
Public records.
This was not privateinformation.
Public records got deleted likeyears worth.

SPEAKER_19 (41:15):
Yes.
So we have to be a nation of lawand order.
We have to be treated equallyunder the law.
Otherwise, society does breakdown.
As sure as the sun rises in themorning and sets in the evening,
society will break down.
We have to have a high trustsociety.
We want to have law and order umimplemented.

(41:35):
Unfortunately, the people whoget affected when law and order
gets implemented are the peoplethat have been corrupt and
criminally minded.
And it appears to me a largeportion of our government, at
least I don't when I say a largeportion, I don't know if that's
50%, but some percentage, whichis too big, opposes the
application and enforcement ofour laws.

(41:57):
I came to this whole realizationover this tanker being co uh
confiscated.
They're like, oh, we're justimposing sanctions.
That tanker's been sanctionedfor years.
I'm like, so you're telling mefor years that thing has been
crossing the ocean into Iran asa sanctioned taker and no one
did anything about it?
Yeah, yeah.
No, but don't worry.
We signed a piece of paper wayback then.
I'm sure there was a pressrelease.
How many if that thing everpulled into an American port,

(42:19):
I'm sure they would have seizedit.
How many more of these arethere?
Oh, there's dozens more likethis.
Yeah, Venezuela itself has likesix or seven of these tankers.
So this is just the first one.
But they're all sanctioned.
These are ghost boats.

unknown (42:31):
Right?

SPEAKER_19 (42:32):
And so it's like it's not even an act of war.
When people are like, what's anact of war?
It's like, no, this is likeinternational contracts.
Like this is being enforced theway it was supposed to be
forced.
They put up the sanction, youknow, so many days go by and
then they go out and collect it.
Unfortunately, they just youknow never followed through.
So a law that's not enforced isnot really.

(42:52):
So now the Democrats arestarting to get real antsy about
trying to impeach Donald Trump.
The walls are closing in.
To use James Carville's phrase.
The walls are closing in.
So again, Trump's had articlesof impeachment filed against
him.
So has Christy Noam and so hasone of the others, right?
Now, this is what kills me.

(43:13):
Donald Trump was impeachedtwice.
Um and then when Republicans getin power and have the House and
the Senate, how many times didBiden get impeached?

SPEAKER_26 (43:25):
Zero.

SPEAKER_19 (43:26):
Were there not like a thousand and nine reasons to
impeach Biden?
Yes.
Okay.
I mean, we're to the point nowif they've avoided all of his
auto pins, which by the way, ifthose auto pin executive orders,
blah, blah, blah, blah, arestill in effect, that's a
violation of law now, too,right?
So yesterday the House voted toimpeach Trump.
This is the second time they'vedone it since uh he's been in

(43:48):
office.

SPEAKER_34 (43:57):
That included House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries,
Democratic whip Catherine Clark,and the Democratic caucus chair
Pete Aguilar.

SPEAKER_19 (44:05):
Which those guys are definitely yes votes if he ever
actually gets impeached, right?

SPEAKER_34 (44:09):
Impeachment should be a sacred tool.
It requires comprehensiveinvestigations, including
hearings.
And overall, the Democrats arepretty frustrated that their
colleagues are beginning toweaponize impeachment.
One senior Democratic membertelling Axios, quote, it feels
like a lot of people are usingthe impeachment stuff as a
campaign tactic.
Now, although this attempt byCongressman Green was defeated,

(44:31):
it represented a big shift inthe numbers from his last
impeachment resolution in June,which had 79 members voting with
him.
This time he got 140 Democratson board.
Meantime, cabinet members likeChristy Nome, Pete Heggseth, and
RFK Jr.
are facing their own impeachmentthreats.

SPEAKER_26 (44:49):
Joining with this really is all about campaign and
you know, campaigning for money.
They're like, look how hard I goin the paint for you know, I'm
impeaching the truth, you know.

SPEAKER_19 (44:59):
You know what it reminds me of?
It reminds me of in the circus.
You get those carnival guys thatswallow a bunch of alcohol and
pull the fire.
Yes.
But every now and then the fireworks back in their mouth and
blows their cheeks out.
Okay.
It's a problem.
Yeah, it's a real problem.
That's why we don't just do itfor fun at home.
Like it's specialists at thecarnival or blowing flames
because it can work back in.

(45:19):
Okay.
Yeah, it's a real big deal.
That's kind of how this feels.
Okay, it's kind of how it feels,but you're playing with fire.
So yeah, we're doing it forcampaigns.
Well, what if you get enoughvotes?
And also, yeah, like HakeemJeffries says, impeachment
should be sacred.
Okay, but it should be reservedfor when you really need it.
And guess what?
You know, we really needed itwith Alejandro Majorcas.

(45:40):
He actually was impeached by theHouse, and then the Senate was
like, nah.
Right?
So Christy Nohm was asked toresign if she is not impeached,
and she leaned into it.
This is what we should all bedoing.
I am sick of your lies.

SPEAKER_01 (45:53):
The American people are sick of these lies.

SPEAKER_19 (45:56):
Deported!

SPEAKER_01 (45:57):
Go home!

SPEAKER_19 (45:58):
You gotta go home.
I can't understand youcorrectly.

SPEAKER_01 (46:01):
The American people are sick of these lies.
American people demand truth.

SPEAKER_31 (46:06):
America is very happy that finally they have a
president in the White Housethat gets up every day to keep
them safe.

SPEAKER_01 (46:12):
Madam Secretary, your incompetence and your
inability to truthfully carryout your duties of Secretary of
Homeland Security.
If you're not fired, will youresign?

SPEAKER_31 (46:22):
Sir, I will consider you're asking me to resign as an
endorsement of my work.
Thank you very much.

SPEAKER_19 (46:31):
When morons are asking you to resign, you just
lean into it.
So this is uh Alex Degrassi, aGOP strategist, talking about
what just happened in Indianayesterday.
They were supposed toredistrict, they had a map, they
were gonna go solid red, and theDemocrat the Republicans
apparently struck a deal withneighboring Maryland.
Or I don't even know ifMaryland's it's not neighboring,
but they struck a deal withMaryland, which makes no sense.

(46:53):
I mean, I'm not gonna makeexcuses, but I think the reality
is.
So these two states struck adeal.
Let's not redistrict or changeanything, and we'll just stay

(47:15):
the same, right?
Except there's a problem.
The Republicans once again gotfleeced.

SPEAKER_13 (47:21):
I'll bring reported.
So they reached out to this guy,Bob Ferguson, name I've never
heard of, but it's now breakingon the internet.
He's I think their state senatepresident.
The reality, Steve, is theytricked them and said, Hey,
we're not going to redistrict ifyou don't redistrict.
And the reality is they can'tredistrict in Maryland because
they get tossed, and we wouldprobably actually pick up a seat
there, um, or two with theSupreme Court, which Republicans

(47:44):
control, and they know that.
And so we would have actuallyliked that.
Because we could have actuallypicked up four seats with this
little equation, two in Indianaand possibly another one or two
in Maryland, to be frank withyou.
And so it's that's a huge.
I mean, this is coming out onthe internet.
I mean, literally, as I'mgetting ready to go on the show,
as I'm waiting.

SPEAKER_19 (48:02):
So the Republicans, like idiots, were like, Yeah, we
won't redistrict, so you godon't redistrict, except if
Maryland redistrict, we wouldhave picked up some seats.

SPEAKER_13 (48:09):
Watching the the the court situation.
It's that they got totallyplayed, or this guy is totally
bought and paid for and corrupt.
I mean, it sounds like both,most likely.
Yeah.
Um, so they've I mean, what typeof Republican, Steve, okay,
who's in touch with the WhiteHouse is reaching out to
Democrats to cut a deal.
I mean, these are vicious,psychotic people that we're up

(48:32):
against.
And I think, look, turningpoint, there were a lot of
groups here on the groundworking.
I think it's tough to controlthese things, obviously, from
afar.
And I think it's a wake-up callfor everyone that it's gonna
take a lot of effort, a lot ofshoulder to the wheel to really
rid ourselves of this taintwithin our own party.
People that are willing to putthe Democrats first and you

(48:53):
know, put the House majority atrisk.
I mean, this is really sickstuff, Steve.

SPEAKER_33 (48:57):
This is really it's not, it's it's it's not the
House majority.
They they they want to get ridof Trump.
They they don't mind sacrificingthe House to take care of Trump.
Today, it couldn't be moreevident.

SPEAKER_19 (49:08):
Let's just say They don't mind sacrificing the House
to take care of Trump, theydon't mind sacrificing you to
get to him.

SPEAKER_26 (49:14):
Was there any kind of a public process with these
people who are making thesedeals for between these two
states?

SPEAKER_19 (49:20):
No, no, they vote and they have committee
meetings, but all the stuff iscut in the back room.

SPEAKER_26 (49:26):
Right.
And then we find the publicfinds out after the fact when
nothing can be done of howstupid this deal is.
It's why are we doing it thisway?

SPEAKER_19 (49:35):
And then there's no punishment.
You know, probably already rightnow, there's a bunch of internet
sleuths going over Bob Fergusonfrom Maryland and finding out
who he is, and he's in a hotelroom, and it's like, do
something.
Okay, John Thune, the House orthe uh Senate major uh Senate
president or whatever, no, he'snot Senate president, it's the
VIP, it's whatever he is,majority leader.
Senate majority leader, Trumpput out the statement a couple

(49:56):
days ago basically sayingGrassley hasn't gotten rid of
this blue slip thing, and he wascalling directly on John Thune
to eliminate it and get hisdistrict judges and state
attorneys appointed, right?
Federal federal uh stateattorneys.
We had another resignation likeAlina Haba, we had another one
of these resignations out ofDelaware where they haven't been
able to get appointed, and thejudges have essentially iced

(50:18):
them out of being able topractice law.
Imagine that you're in ajurisdiction where the federal
government is basically tied up,can't put drug dealers in
prison, can't arrest kidnappersor do anything because the
attorney that the presidentappointed is being blocked by
those blue state senators, whichare really angling for
impeachment and are using lawand order and the chaos that

(50:40):
lack of order, law and ordercreates in their districts to
turn around and be like, look,Trump hasn't fixed our problems.
He's made them worse, actually.
That's what's going on inWashington.
We're gonna get to this later,but when we talk about gas
prices, like no one's jumping upand down for gas prices here,
but in other parts of the world,they're celebrating.
Okay, so this is John Thune whenhe's being asked about the blue

(51:01):
slips, right?
We got to get these judgesthrough.
Milly, mealy, mealy.
In Portuguese, there's a wordcalled moly, right?
Someone is very is moly.
It's like soft wet noodle.
Okay, like you got no backbone,but yet that's not really the
case here with Thune.
He's got a backbone, he's justgot a backbone to defend the
Democrats.
That's what I don't understandabout this.

(51:21):
You had four years of Biden, itcannot get worse.
Mass illegal immigration, totalbreakdown of law and order,
weaponization of government, andthese guys are concerned about
what if they get back in power,so you're playing nice.
No, put them in blankety blankprison.

(51:41):
Win the game.
Win the game.
That's what you gotta do.
Win the game.
So here's John Thune basicallysaying, I don't want to win.

SPEAKER_38 (51:50):
Asking Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a
fantastic guy, to get somethingdone.
Ideally, the termination of blueslips.
Too many great Republicans arebeing sent pack-in, none are
getting approved and signedPresident GJT.
Um, can you explain to peoplejust real quickly what a blue
slip is?
And are you going to dosomething that will deal with
his concerns?

SPEAKER_42 (52:10):
Well, this is something that applies just to
district court judges and andU.S.
attorneys, and it allowsindividuals, the senators from
those states, to be able to signoff on the people who are
nominated to those positions.
That doesn't apply to circuitcourt judges, obviously doesn't
apply to Supreme Court judges.
And we have moved his nomineesthrough the process at a record
rate.
Um we will by the end of thisyear have a record number of his

(52:31):
uh nominees approved to theexecutive branch, got his
cabinet confirmed at the fastestrate possible.
We'll continue to work on thejudiciary uh data, but this is a
procedure that's been in placefor a long time that both
Republicans and Democratssupport because that it gives
them some input at theparticularly in those judges,
the uh judicial appointmentsthat are made in their
individual states, some inputinto that decision-making

(52:53):
process.

SPEAKER_38 (52:53):
So you don't anticipate changing it?

SPEAKER_42 (52:55):
I don't think it's gonna change.
It's been in place for a longtime, and like I said, there are
there are Republicans on theJudiciary Committee and off the
Judiciary Committee, uh, forthat matter, um, who support
this and support it strongly.

SPEAKER_19 (53:06):
It's a protection racket.
100%.
It's not constitutional, itmakes no sense, other than as a
Democrat senator, you get toapprove the district judges and
the attorneys who would be usedto prosecute you.

SPEAKER_26 (53:19):
So why don't we have red slips?

SPEAKER_19 (53:23):
Well, the Democrats call them blue slips too.
Or the we both they're just blueslips, okay.
It's this idea that the homestate senators get to sign off.
They get a veto vote.

SPEAKER_26 (53:32):
Yeah, this doesn't make any sense at all.

SPEAKER_19 (53:34):
Exactly.
So you've got these states thatare wildly corrupt Illinois, New
York, Washington State, Oregon,California, and you can't get a
federal prosecutor or districtjudges in there that will
actually uphold the law or do itbecause they're beholden to the
senators for their jobs.

SPEAKER_26 (53:50):
Oh, this makes less than no sense.

SPEAKER_19 (53:56):
I know.
I know.
You'd think that when we votefor a president, he gets his
cabinet.
You know, it's advice andconsent of the Senate, which
basically means approve them,but tell us if there's anything
you're concerned about.
Okay.
That's what it means.
RFK was sitting down with umdecision desk 24.
This is a little bit of an olderclip.
You're a lawyer and an adult notbeing um uh not being an expert

(54:20):
in science and stuff like that.
And RFK has the best response tothis, and this is incredibly
important for us as Americans toget in our heads.
As peasants, we are in anunfortunate situation because
we're often told to trust theexperts.
Right.
Peasants are keenly aware of weknow what we don't know, right?

(54:40):
I don't know the law, so I hirean attorney.
I don't know, you know medicine,so I hire a doctor.
Totally normal, right?
People have certain expertise,right?
But we eventually get into aspot where we start to trust the
labels.
I go to the doctor and I'm like,oh, he's a doctor, he's good.
Well, did he graduate at the topof the class or the bottom of
the class?

SPEAKER_27 (55:00):
What university did he go to?

SPEAKER_19 (55:02):
Like, there's a lot of questionsyou can ask.

SPEAKER_26 (55:05):
There's an old joke.
It's a what do you call a guythat graduates from medical
school with a 3.0 GPA?
Doctor.
Doctor.

SPEAKER_19 (55:14):
Exactly.
C's get degrees.
That's right.
So obviously, it's easy to justsay, well, the expert label or
the certification oraccreditation means very little.
And that's what RFK is sayinghere.
It's like, listen, Americanshave to do their own research.
We have to start trustingourselves.
We've allowed them to say, trustus, we're the experts.

(55:36):
Trust us, I have a badge, trustme, you know, I did everything.

SPEAKER_26 (55:40):
Hold on.
I want to take that a little bitfurther.
And what I really wish wouldhappen is that these experts
would be able to explain it, andthey should be able to because
they're experts in a way thatthe common man can understand
and become educated about thetopic too.

SPEAKER_19 (55:54):
But instead, what they do is they strongman the
argument by putting their cloakof authority over it and be
like, you can't pierce this.
Exactly.
It's the same thing that thejudge did.
He goes, You can questionelection, but you can't prove it
wrong, right?
That because you're an electedofficial and you've got to toe
the line.
See what I'm saying?
So here she's asking thisquestion.
Well, you know, you're not anexpert.

SPEAKER_10 (56:14):
You're a lawyer and an activist.
You're not a doctor or ascientist.

SPEAKER_08 (56:18):
Listen, we live in a democracy.
We don't have a priesthood here.
We don't have a high priest whoare telling us we're in charge
of our own lives, and Americansneed to do their own research.
And, you know, listen, peoplesay trust the experts.
That became a mantra duringCOVID.

(56:40):
I brought over 500 cases, andalmost all of them involved a
scientific controversy.
My job is to read science, tolearn it, and to be able to read
it critically.
In every case I've ever brought,there's an expert on that side
and an expert on this side.
When I brought them on, when webrought the Monsanto case, there
were three experts from Harvard,Stanford, and Yale.

(57:02):
And we had three experts fromHarvard, Stanford, Yale.
And they were saying exactly theopposite thing.
Oh, you know, saying trust theexperts to me makes no sense at
all.
Trusting the experts is afunction of religion and uh and
totalitarianism.
It is not a function ofdemocracy.

(57:23):
In democracy, we questioneverybody.

SPEAKER_10 (57:25):
We have a lot of questions I want to get to, but
before we do, I want to directour viewers to our website to go
deeper on the science ofvaccines as well as Mr.
Kennedy's positions on it.
Speaking of, here's our experts.
We can't review foreign policy.
We have resources available foryou online and encourage you to
check them out atnewsnationnow.com.

SPEAKER_19 (57:47):
Because we're experts on gathering the
information for you.
It's funny because on the leftthey have this trope, do your
own research, do your ownresearch.
They make fun of conservativesfor doing that, but it's like,
okay.
Yeah, I'm gonna do my ownresearch.
How do you know you're not beinglying to?
Those people aren't experts.
Why?
Because they have a collegedegree?
Do you think the college degreedoes anything for them?

SPEAKER_40 (58:09):
First of all, you don't need college learn it
learn stuff, okay?
Everything is availablebasically for free.
Uh you can learn anything youwant for free.
It is not a question oflearning.
Um there there is uh a valuethat colleges have, which is
like you know, seeing whethersomebody's is can somebody work

(58:31):
hard at something, including abunch of sort of annoying
homework assignments, and stilldo their homework assignments uh
and and kind of soldier throughand and and get it done.
You know, that's that's like thethe main value of college.

SPEAKER_19 (58:46):
And then also you you know, if you you if you the
main value of college is youfinish something you started.
That's it.
That's it.

SPEAKER_40 (58:55):
You want to hang around with a bunch of people
your own age for a while insteadof going right into the
workforce.
Um so I think colleges arebasically for fun and to prove
you can do your chores, butthey're not for learning.

SPEAKER_19 (59:09):
So I see experts, he's got a degree.
You know, it's so funny.
I have a political sciencedegree.
So do I have an authority totell you you're a political
opinion?
No.
I remember I had a professor onetime, he taught both religion
classes and political science.
And uh, I was in one of thecrossover classes where I got
credit for both my religiousundergraduate and my uh my

(59:30):
major.
And he goes, Oh, yeah, no,you're a political science
degree at a religiousinstitution.
So, you know, you absolutely arequalified to have an opinion.
Unfortunately, your expertise isin the very area that everyone
is qualified to have an expertopinion, politics and religion.
He's like, but you have no bonafides.

(59:50):
All you did is all you have is areading list.
Now, this attitude of trust theexperts, and when the experts
make these declare declarationsand explain.
Things and they use the toolsthey use, statistics and
whatnot.
Oftentimes we get reallynegative policy that has really
negative impact, especially whenapplied over time.
Hermit Dillon addresses thiswhen it comes to discrimination

(01:00:11):
in the workforce.
How did we, in the name ofgetting rid of discrimination,
end up over-discriminating?

SPEAKER_14 (01:00:17):
The line we were discussing, which I'm a big fan
of, is disparate impact seems tojust it literally makes
everything illegal becausenothing is actually equal
except, I guess, true randomchance, right?

SPEAKER_02 (01:00:28):
It it it really shifts the burden to get away
from the plaintiff and to theemployer to defend themselves.
And when you use statistics, asyou know, Mark Twain famously
said about statistics, lies, andand damn statistics, you know,
you can chop and slice and dicethem and prove anything.
You know, yeah, we havestatisticians here in the civil

(01:00:48):
rights division who you can givethem a premise, they'll be able
to come up with some formula toprove it.
That's did you hear that?

SPEAKER_26 (01:00:55):
Oh, yeah.

SPEAKER_19 (01:00:56):
We have some statisticians here in the civil
rights division that will justdo whatever we want.
Uh we just here's a premise andgo go make it work so we can
present it in court and putsomebody in jail or fine.

SPEAKER_02 (01:01:08):
And so, as to Title VI, when the United States gives
federal funds, whether it's in acontract basis or grants, we
have now issued a guidance thatsays that this 50 years of
discrimination against franklylaw-abiding practices and
businesses and recipients isover.

(01:01:28):
It is harming a lot of people,it is wrong, and you should go
back to having to proveintentional discrimination.
By the way, there may bestatistical cases to be brought
there.
That's so we're not banning theuse of statistics.
What we're saying is we're notgoing to let people use
statistics to assume a defaultof discrimination, and people
are gonna have to prove theircases.

(01:01:49):
And that includes the governmentsometimes.
That includes me.
If I have to bring a caseagainst a school district or
against a university, I have touse my evidence and prove the
case, not just to have a defaultassumption of discrimination,
because that has hurt so manypeople in our country.
It has eroded merit-basedhiring, it has put companies on

(01:02:12):
the defensive, it has encouragedand now institutionalized quotas
from every institution,including the boardrooms of
America's largest corporations,because they're all government
contractors.
And so this is so damaging.
And if we can just reverse thatback to an assumption that
Americans are good, generallyspeaking, we follow the law.

(01:02:32):
If something bad happened toyou, prove it with intentional
discrimination evidence.
I think that is really a greatdevelopment for all Americans.

SPEAKER_19 (01:02:39):
Because the line we are discussing, which I'm a big
fan of, is this individual isresponsible for their choices.
And they're not supposed to getsung up in some statistic that
says this company overhiredwhite people, so you gotta go.
And we're bringing in Betsy Sue,who says, Can I ask you a
question?
I know that was reallydiscriminatory.
That was pretty bad.
But that's what's going on,right?

(01:03:01):
The trust the experts crowd, thetrust the statistics, and then
statistics get manipulated toshow that there's broad spectrum
discrimination, which isn'thappening, but it convinces
people like the person we playedat the beginning of the podcast,
who's like, I'm so superiorbecause I'm white, and I know
that, and I know that's why Iget the jobs.
So you guys need to quit yourjobs and give it to black
people.
Of course, you wouldn'tvolunteer to quit her job,

(01:03:22):
right?
We're about ready to run an adhere.

SPEAKER_26 (01:03:24):
No, I've been trying to but it's saying we don't meet
the requirements.

SPEAKER_19 (01:03:28):
Well, how's that how's that possible?

SPEAKER_26 (01:03:29):
We got like I have no idea what's going on.
This must be broken.

SPEAKER_19 (01:03:33):
Crazy.
Okay.
Another thing that happenedyesterday, and I didn't know
that this was going on, andagain, there's so many things
that we don't know are going on.
Only people in the arena thatare actually dealing with this
sometimes know what's going on.
But one of the things that washappening in 39 states around
the country is that whensomeone's parents died and they
became orphans, they oftentimesgo into the foster care system.

(01:03:57):
If the parents had pensions,retirement plans, etc., etc.,
the rightful, lawful, legalbeneficiary are those kids,
those orphans.
Did you know the states werestealing those pensions and uh
you know uh assets of those kidsin foster care system?
Yeah.
So JF RFK addressed this.
Robert F.
Kennedy Jr., you're HHSsecretary.

SPEAKER_17 (01:04:18):
I'm Alex Adams, I'm the assistant secretary for the
administration for children andfamilies.

SPEAKER_08 (01:04:23):
We're here today to talk about a development that
speaks to the very heart of ourwork, protecting children from
systems that lose sight of theirbest interests.

SPEAKER_19 (01:04:32):
Protecting children and everybody from systems that
lose sight of their bestinterests.
We've got a homeless programthat encourages homelessness.
We have a national securitysystem that invites terror
terrorists into our country,right?
At HHS, our guiding principle issimple.

SPEAKER_08 (01:04:48):
Every child deserves a home and a fair chance to
thrive.

SPEAKER_17 (01:04:56):
That's exactly right, Secretary Kennedy.
What we've seen at the statelevel is in 39 states, when a
child's parents die and thatchild enters foster care, that
child is entitled to thesurvivor's benefit that those
parents had earned.
What 39 states are doing isthey're taking those dollars
from those foster youth andusing those to offset state

(01:05:19):
agency costs.
It is wrong.
And that's why we are notifying39 states today of that practice
and asking them to end thisnationwide.
So they're taking the benefitsthat ought to go to the child
and they're taking it for theirstate bureaucracy.
That's exactly right.
These were earned benefits thatthe parent had earned through
participation in the workforceor other survivors' benefits.

(01:05:42):
When I served as the director ofthe Idaho Department of Health
and Welfare, I saw firsthand thetragedy that happens in our
foster care system.
Too many youth age out tohomelessness.
Too many youth lose resourcesthat they could have used to set
themselves up for lifelongsuccess.
I ended that practice in Idaho,and I'm here with Secretary
Kennedy's leadership to stopthis practice across every

(01:06:04):
state.

SPEAKER_08 (01:06:05):
Taking decisive action like this is why I asked
Alex to come to Washington, andhe has hit the ground running.
He recently repealed 2,000 pagesof outdated sub-regulatory
guidance because rules shouldserve children and not bury them
in bureaucracy.

SPEAKER_17 (01:06:22):
My team also launched a national initiative
aimed at right-sizing the ratioof foster homes to children in
foster care.
Today there are 57 foster homesfor every hundred foster
children.
We're partnering with states tochange that.
We're cutting red tape soagencies can spend less time on
paperwork and more time on whatmatters.
Kids.

SPEAKER_08 (01:06:42):
And the Trump administration, we're committed
to ensuring that every child inAmerica has the chance to reach
their full potential.

SPEAKER_19 (01:06:50):
Thank you for your service, Alex.
Thank you, Mr.
Secretary.
Could you imagine, you know,being an orphan and knowing that
your parents left you something,you get caught up in foster
care, and then you go to get outof it, and you're like, I want
to go to college, I'm gonna usethat money.
Oh, I'm sorry, we gave it toyour foster parents who abused
you or whatever.
Sucked it up in the bureaucracy.

(01:07:11):
You know, aged out tohomelessness when they may or
may have had resources that theycould have used.

SPEAKER_26 (01:07:16):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_19 (01:07:17):
Dude.

SPEAKER_26 (01:07:18):
That's not tragic.
It's no problem.

SPEAKER_19 (01:07:20):
And I actually wonder, my parents, you know,
took in a uh took in my my aunt.
Uh when my grandparents passedaway, my aunt special needs, and
so my parents have, you know,guardianship of my special needs
aunt.
Okay.
And of course, the assets of mygrandparents go to her.
My parents stepped in and becameagents of the state to care for
her.
So they're like the foster homefor her, you know, the guardians

(01:07:41):
or whatever it works.
So they were able to like keepthe house and stuff like that.
But that was all going out thedoor if they hadn't stepped up
to, you know, be thebeneficiaries of those assets by
caring for the kid.
Anyways, uh pretty interesting.
Uh, another thing, too, that'sgoing on is is when you listen
to people like Marjorie TaylorGreen and so many of these other

(01:08:02):
politicians, their big buzzwordis affordability, affordability,
everything's expensive.
That is a real problem.
But again, clear eyes, how didit happen?
CNN ran a segment where theirlittle pundit on there kind of
threw it back in their face.
You guys are complaining aboutall these problems, but you
know, Trump's only been inoffice a little bit.

SPEAKER_09 (01:08:18):
You can look at the chart of inflation over the last
50 years, right?
And you'll see two big bumps,two big bumps.
On top of those big bumps areJimmy Carter and Joe Biden.
And those cliffs, and thosecliffs that fall off are Ronald
Reagan and Donald Trump.
Your dollar is worth 20% lessright now, today, because of 21%

(01:08:38):
CPI inflation under Joe Biden.
Your wages are$3,000 lessbecause your average salary and
your your average real Americanwages went down by$3,000.
That's a Joe Biden thing.
You can look at the chart.
That's Joe Biden.

SPEAKER_19 (01:08:52):
Everybody's complaining.
It's so funny when you see thesecharts, right?
It's like Biden inflation, andthen Trump gets elected and it
goes like this, and now it'sgoing like that.
They're like, prices are toohigh.
Trump needs to be impeached.
Now keep in mind the clip I'mgoing to show you: inflation has
happened the last five years.
Significant inflation.
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
So a dollar today is theequivalent of a dollar 20,

(01:09:16):
according to his percentage fouryears ago.
So you can just knock 20 centsoff per dollar as far as
spendability.
Okay.
So when you're talking aboutbuying commodities, things that
intrinsically hold value, anounce of silver is an ounce of
silver, a gallon of gasoline isa gallon of gasoline, right?
The input to get it is static.
And so as the dollar devalues,naturally the prices have to go

(01:09:39):
up because the people who aredrilling the gas have to go buy
lunch, and lunch got moreexpensive.
So there's a there's a directcorrelation.
But at the end of the day, thepetrol dollar, you know,
anything, it's based on acommodity that is a weight and
measure.
One gallon of oil, one ounce ofgold or silver.
Do you see what I'm saying?
So when you look at the cost ofthat, that's where you can see
inflation.
So when we're talking aboutgasoline, that's another one of

(01:09:59):
those static commodities.
A gallon of gas never is notjust a gallon of gas.
Four years ago, when DonaldTrump lost the election, I could
buy one gallon of diesel at mygas station by my house for one
dollar and eighty-seven cents agallon.
I took a picture of it.
Okay.
I took a picture of it.
January 20th, 2021.

(01:10:21):
Uh 12 days before or uh 22 daysbefore I was arrested.
I took a picture of the price ofgas.
Gas shot up.
Right now, diesel's over$5 agallon.
Yep.
So, but around the country,certain states haven't added on
taxes.
It's gotten pretty good.

SPEAKER_30 (01:10:36):
It's another$1.93 on the burden of the gods road.
Gas prices in Colorado areextremely low.
Colorado ranking fourth lowestnationally, according to AAA.
I came here um out of my way toget gas because it's a lot
cheaper here.
In El Paso County, the averagegas price per gallon is two

(01:10:57):
dollars and thirty-four cents.
Two dollars and forty-one centsa gallon in Pueblo County.
I mean, this is insane, right?

SPEAKER_20 (01:11:07):
Gas is a dollar ninety-three, which is awesome.
I can't believe it.
I haven't seen these pricessince 2021.
I don't know.

SPEAKER_19 (01:11:16):
What?
And then and then it wasactually 20 cents cheaper
because of the inflation factor.
You're under$2 a gallon aftergoing through a 20% inflation
hike.
Why are gas prices so low?

SPEAKER_16 (01:11:30):
Miners are making fuel, plus and less people are
driving.
Drive's priced.

SPEAKER_30 (01:11:34):
In other words, that is more supply, but less demand.

SPEAKER_16 (01:11:37):
There's stations in Colorado that are$1.70 a gallon,
and you haven't seen that sinceCOVID.
That's great.
Okay.

SPEAKER_19 (01:11:43):
No, gasoline does not work on a supply.
Everything works on supplydemand, but that's not what's
going on here.
It's not, it's not less demandover supply price goes down
here.
When there's less demand, theyactually raise the price because
they have static costs.

SPEAKER_16 (01:11:57):
Right.
So it doesn't jive.
For families.
That's great for consumers.
That's great for um Christmasbudgets.

SPEAKER_30 (01:12:04):
Especially with the holidays coming up, like every
bit helps.
So for people who buy gas, theytell me that they hold prices
continue to stay this low, oreven better, go down in price.
How much does it usually cost toput you know gas into your
truck?

SPEAKER_20 (01:12:19):
Oh my gosh.
Well, I have a 37-gallon gastank, so it's a lot.
It can be a hundred dollars ormore if I fill it up.
Uh today, one second.
It was only$44.
It was only$44.
$44, but I put in like 18gallons.

(01:12:43):
Jeez.
22 22.4 gallons.

SPEAKER_30 (01:12:49):
And Colorado Springs, Live Wood.
News 5.
Colorado Springs.

SPEAKER_26 (01:12:56):
I remember when the gas pumps around here were all
set to quit pumping at$100.

SPEAKER_19 (01:13:02):
I know I remember I'd have to run my car twice.
Yeah.
I, when I bought your family'sbusiness, the amount of diesel
buying, we had dump trucks,flatbeds, excavators, loaders,
skidsters, it was like$30,000,$40,000 in fuel a month.
It was staggering.

(01:13:22):
And obviously, I bought thebusiness during the Barack Obama
administration when gas was fourdollars plus a gallon percent.
Trump came in and then droveprices down.
We became profitable.
Like that alone, you know, whenyou're spending$20,000 or$30,000
on fuel and all the work is thesame, the calendar feel like I
figured out the magic.
And all of a sudden, fuel priceis cut in half, and we're like,

(01:13:45):
you know that$30,000?
Now we have$15,000 surplus.
Woo! It was like hey, hey, wecan plow it back into the
business.
Company party.
Oh my goodness, company morale.
So yes, now the lastadministration just stood up and
lied to you about the economy.
Mixed signals in terms of whatthat looks like.

SPEAKER_35 (01:14:01):
Um inflation is down from where it was.
As measured by the overall CPI,it has slowed to an average 2.5%
pace.
This is down from what thepresident inherited in two
inherited 2.9% in January.
Today it's at about 2.5%.
So we're trending in the rightdirection with more to come.
And I would remind you, whenPresident Trump left office in
his first term, inflation was1.7%.

(01:14:23):
And the previous administrationjacked it up to a record high
9%.
So again, in 10 months, thepresident has clawed us out of
this hole.
He's kept it low at 2.5%.
And we believe that number isgoing to continue to decline,
especially as energy and oilprices continue to decline as
well.
Maybe it wasn't high underBiden.
They're just saying it's not agood thing.
Well, nobody reported on itbeing high under Biden.

(01:14:49):
But I will just add there's alot more scrutiny on this issue
from this press corps than therewas.
Well, in the previousadministration said that too.
My predecessor stood up at thispodium and she said inflation
doesn't exist.
She said the border was secure,and people like you just for the
border.
Those were two utter lies.
Everything I'm telling you isthe truth backed by real factual

(01:15:10):
data, and you just don't want toreport on it because you want to
push untrue narratives about thepresident.

SPEAKER_19 (01:15:14):
My predecessor got up here and said inflation's not
a problem.
The border's closed.
And you guys were like, Yes,yes, it is.
Peasants, the border's closed.
Well, then where did thisGuatemalan family got 22 people
coming from next door?
And they tell us they'reillegal.
I don't know.
They must have airdropped.
The border's closed.
I don't know about that.
I love that Elon Musk went downto the border and saw that was

(01:15:36):
actually a huge turning pointfor him, right?
It's like, well, the stuff aboutthe border.
He goes down to the border, andhe's like, it was a mass of
humanity trying to cross thatborder.
So now we have other great news.
Again, this Trump administrationis doing a lot, despite all the
things that we wish that wouldbe different in the FBI and the
DOJ.
At the end of the day, the stuffthat RFK is doing, that impacts

(01:15:58):
real peasants.
There's no more of a peasantthan our orphans and widows.
Right.
Like if we can't take care ofour orphans as a society, what
can we do?
Like, that's the ultimatepeasant.
Someone's a very good thing.

SPEAKER_26 (01:16:12):
Well, all the vaccination work he does touches
every person that's ever bored.

SPEAKER_19 (01:16:16):
So yeah, it's huge.
So they're they're doing allkinds of stuff.
Now, it's giving net results.
Even people like Thomas Masseyand Rand Paul are a tax or a
tax.
Well, how about this?
What if I could present somekind of way where the American
people could maintain theirfinancial liberty and not be
taxed?

(01:16:37):
And we could do the thing thatyou're chiming about every day,
lower the deficit.

SPEAKER_15 (01:16:41):
Trade balance minus 52.8 billion.
That's a better lower tradedeficit than we expected.
We were looking for a numbercloser to 62 billion, and that
follows a revised minus 59billion.
Minus 52 billion would be thelightest going back to wow,
we're really going back.

(01:17:03):
Well, my records go back to1992.
And to find a smaller numberthan mine is 52 billion, we're
all the way back to June of2020.

SPEAKER_19 (01:17:15):
Right?
So basically he's going, uh, thedeficit is decreasing.
The trade imbalance, we're we'reselling stuff, Ron.
We're finally selling things.
And we're buying domestic.
Right.
Probably, yeah, there's lessforeign goods coming over
because there's a decision to bemade about how much volume you
want to ship because you'regoing to pay a tariff and stuff

(01:17:36):
like that, which then encouragesAmerican products to be on the
shelves.
So we have a rising GDP, we haverecord all-time stock market
prices, we have record preciousmetal prices, which doesn't bode
well for the dollar, but youknow, whatever.
As long as they're not printingnew money, we're kind of stuck
with the money in circulation,right?
Dude, it's working.

(01:17:58):
Right?
Give this guy two or three orfour years on this trajectory,
take out a COVID nightmare, andwe would be really strong as a
country.
The stronger America is, thebetter we preserve freedom and
Western liberal values aroundthe world.

SPEAKER_26 (01:18:12):
Yeah.
Let's just not do another COVIDepisode.

unknown (01:18:16):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_19 (01:18:17):
Yeah.
Now, this is um uh she's a NewYork, she's a New York assembly
woman here.
Uh her name is Titus, and she'son C SPAN, and she take they
take a call from on theRepublican hotline, and we're
gonna listen to the beginning ofthe call, and then I'll
summarize it and jump into whereshe talks.

SPEAKER_23 (01:18:34):
Talk to Dennis next in New York, Republican line.
Go ahead, Dennis.

SPEAKER_37 (01:18:38):
Yes, I'm a veteran correct in Medicare.
Um, I've been trying to getquestionable blood pressure
medicine under the Bidenadministration since 2021 to
2024.
And I've always had a hard timegetting a prescription reflect
anything else.
It's to the point of 1000 hours,unless the new medical, the

(01:19:01):
legal and group going in andout.
I couldn't even get to thecounter because the reason a
prescription class goes andcustom medical.

SPEAKER_19 (01:19:11):
Actually, we're just gonna listen to the whole thing.

SPEAKER_37 (01:19:13):
A month ago, I was left into the hospital, heart
failure, and I didn't know, andfor the last six months I come
to find out that I got kidneyfailure, contrast, and heart
failure.
Now one time medical means theyknew about those, and no, he's
not even democrats.

SPEAKER_19 (01:19:35):
This guy had kidney failure, the doctors knew it,
never let him know.

SPEAKER_37 (01:19:39):
Illegal immigrants work with the medicine that
weapons hurt immersive people.
I'm talking about becauseillegal immigrants even phones
and the medical system and thehospital system about this a
year ago.

(01:20:00):
To the American people.

SPEAKER_19 (01:20:01):
Okay.
So here we go.
We get to see it.
This is raw.
This is how they think of you.

SPEAKER_03 (01:20:07):
Well, let me say I'm sorry for your health problems,
and you should have gone to yourmember of Congress and asked
them to help intervene for youwith Medicare.

SPEAKER_19 (01:20:15):
Oh, go go go to your member of Congress and get them
to do something that should beroutine.
You're just going to go get aprescription filled.
Oh, you got to call Congress.
You can't.
You want Tyler?
Congresswoman.
Really?

SPEAKER_22 (01:20:28):
Oh my God.

SPEAKER_19 (01:20:29):
Really?
So so oh yeah, why don't youcall and get a favor from a
politician?
I'm sure they'll exchange thefavor for your vote.

SPEAKER_03 (01:20:35):
But Biden's gone, so let's talk about what you can do
in the future.
As far as blank Oh, noaccountability.
I mean on the on the immigrants.
U.S.
law says that immigrants do notqualify for Medicare.
So But you've been arguing thatthey do, and we know for a fact
that they've been paying for it.

SPEAKER_19 (01:20:52):
Oh, the U.S.
law.
Well, if the law's not enforced,it's not a law.
You are giving governmentservices to illegal immigrants.

SPEAKER_03 (01:21:01):
I don't know who is in front of you in line, but uh
let's look at what caused yourproblem, see if we can help
solve it now instead of justblaming other people.

SPEAKER_19 (01:21:11):
Let's look at what caused your problems instead of
blaming other people.
Well, I did go to the doctor toget checked out.
They found out I had kidneyfailure, but they forgot to tell
me.
You know, oh yeah, no, I try toeat healthy.
I follow the food pyramidstrictly.
I eat all the canola oil you cansell me.
I use Crisco and margarine.
I use enriched wheat grains thathave all kinds of GMO products.
Yeah, let's talk about why I'msick.

SPEAKER_26 (01:21:32):
I only hit the McDonald's on days ending and
why.

SPEAKER_19 (01:21:35):
Well, dude, the thing is, is I see this as an
absolute betrayal of theAmerican people.
You made us sick by regulatingfarmers and regulating
agriculture and regulate,regulating our food supply and
big business, big agriculture,put chemicals in our food.
They sold us industrial wasteproducts as cooking oil, right?

(01:21:59):
All of that.
And then you wonder why we havehealth problems.
And then you put in people fromthe third world in front of us
in line.
This guy's got all kinds ofmedical problems, and we should
talk about what caused this.
Oh, I think what caused it waswhen New York banned, you know,
local farmers' markets.
I think that's what caused it,lady.
Okay.
It is crazy.
There are all kinds of thingsthat are caused by manipulation

(01:22:22):
of the system.
Another thing that was caused bymanipulation of the system is
silver, which I'm a big fan of,right?
Silver is shooting to the moonright now.
J um JP Morgan just went long onall their positions.
They've been short on silverforever.
Like that's their standardposition.
They flipped long yesterday,which means silver's going to
the moon.
And a lot of this has is becausesilver is an industrial metal.

(01:22:44):
It's a shrinking supply.
And the trading market hasmostly been paper because they
fractional reserved their actualsilver, thinking you'd never
actually come and collect onyour bullion.
Right.
And so this woman from commodityculture is explaining that.

SPEAKER_29 (01:22:58):
It always works like this.
When something is suppressed fora really long time and then you
let the brakes off.

SPEAKER_19 (01:23:04):
Law and order, enforcing our laws, getting rid
of corruption.

SPEAKER_29 (01:23:08):
Then it shoots in a direction.
The pendulum swings.
So technically, you know,silver's been suppressed for
many, many, many, many years.

SPEAKER_19 (01:23:17):
Law and order hasn't been exercised.
The border's been wide open formany, many years.
Are you surprised that you'vegot ICE officers running around
your neighborhood trying to fixa catastrophic problem?
I know I'm comparing silver toit, but the laws of supply and
demand, the human nature, it'spretty consistent, isn't it?

SPEAKER_29 (01:23:33):
But it really was the start last year.
And I think we talked aboutthis, where in the US, where
it's primarily a paper market,and the paper market has been
leading the globe in pricing.
Which the paper market iscreated by experts.
But it started to shift lastJanuary into a physical market

(01:23:56):
when the US imported a wholebunch of physical silver and a
whole bunch of physical gold.
And then we had backwardationwhere the current prices for
delivery were much higher thanthe future prices.
Because why would that happen?
Well, because people don't thinkthey're going to be able to
deliver in the future, becausesilver is a diminishing asset.

(01:24:19):
It gets used up inmanufacturing.
And it seems like the transitionto it's not complete yet, not by
any means.
And I think that's when we'regoing to see the four-digit
number for silver.
Um, but what's really happeningis the physical, we're in a
transition where where numberone, affordability matters

(01:24:42):
again.
And number two, supply anddemand is ultimately gonna
matter again.
And we're already in that trithat transition.

SPEAKER_19 (01:24:51):
Our entire culture is transitioning.

SPEAKER_26 (01:24:54):
She mentioned a big word in there that I didn't know
what it was, but it basically inmy mind meant that this is a
there needs to be a reckoningbetween the physical market and
the paper market.

SPEAKER_19 (01:25:06):
There has to be a reckoning between the laws on
the books and how they'reenforced.
There has to be a reckoningbetween services offered to
citizens who bought into theprogram, voluntarily associated
themselves with the nation ofthe United States.
There is a difference between acountry and a nation.
A country is the land and herpeople.

(01:25:27):
You are a product of the land.
You volunteer to enter into apolitical association called a
nation.
I agree with the left whenthey're like, what's a border?
It's an arbitrary line on paper.
Yes.
Because inside of this border,we have a political association.
Our gang is bigger than yourgang.
Right.
So when you volunteer to go intoit, you expect things to be the

(01:25:48):
way it was sold to you.
If you go to school and you geta job and you pay into Social
Security and you save forretirement or you vest your
pension, then we'll take care ofyou in the future.
Yep.
And it's all based on law andorder.
As long as the laws areenforced, growth will be
natural, will respond to marketconditions.
But when you suppress that andyou start having paper markets

(01:26:09):
for commodities, when you starthaving laws that are put on
books for campaign purposes, butthey're never enforced, which
misleads American people becausein good faith, we'll follow the
law not knowing that ourneighbor is not, which creates
an unfair playing field.

SPEAKER_25 (01:26:24):
Yep.

SPEAKER_19 (01:26:25):
It's horrible.
All right, guys, that's it forthe public show today.
You've got to stick around.
Can we get an ad going?

SPEAKER_26 (01:26:30):
We can.

SPEAKER_19 (01:26:31):
Let's do it.
Stick around for the ad.
We only got one in this episode.
Boom.
Let's do it.
And it's worth it.
And you guys do need to get yourmorning coffee.
This is a morning call-out fiveshow for sure.

SPEAKER_26 (01:26:41):
Still haven't tried 1775 coffee.
Now it's your shot.
The 1775 starter kit justdropped.
Only a thousand units.
You're getting the bold darkroast that hits hard, the smooth
medium roast, and the vitalitymushroom coffee for clean energy
and laser focus.
No crash.
All single origin, small batch,toxin-free and mold for you.
Plus, you're also getting a goldspoon clip because Freedom isn't

(01:27:03):
scooped with plastic.
A frother stronger enough,strong enough to stir up your
coffee and your mother-in-law'sopinions.
And a black 1775 Tumblr.
$170 worth of coffee and gear.
Yours for$99.
This is for the ones who've beenwatching 1775 blow up on Rumble,
wondering if it's actually worthit.
Spoiler, it is.
Oh yeah.
Go to 1775coffee.com slashstudio and grab your starter kit

(01:27:26):
before they're gone.
Bold beans, clean fuel, and amorning routine that stands for
something just like Rumble does.

SPEAKER_19 (01:27:35):
Yes, sir.
And we had a great huge audiencetoday, big for us.
Um, those of you on Rumble, getget your comment in.
We still have to get so manychatters every month, and we're
still a little shy.
We're only halfway through themonth.
If everybody went and commentedright now, we would reach our
goal for the month, no problem.
And those of you who joined uson X today, thank you very much.
Looks like we have a bigaudience there.
YouTube, the one person onYouTube that's there.

(01:27:56):
Hi, and of course, Facebook.
So we're glad you guys are allthere.
We rumble is our home, and wewould love for you, if you're a
regular listener of the show, tojoin us on Rumble, get involved
with the chat, and get involvedwith the community.
We also, uh many people involvedhere are also over at
1776live.us, learning how tocreate personal solutions to
navigate the world that wedescribe here every single day.

(01:28:18):
All right, we're gonna jump overinto premium only, private,
private, and uh, we're gonna begoing over this J6 pipe bomb
story.
There's two big revelations thatcame out yesterday.
And uh the one revelation camefrom uh subcommittee chair
Louder Milk.
He talks about someinconsistencies in the FBI
story.
Uh before we get over toprivate, uh Thomas Massey did

(01:28:40):
another interview yesterdaywhere he talked about this pipe
bomber thing.
And he goes, Well, he stillbelieves the pipe bomber is the
Capitol Hill police officer,clearly.
He's very concerned that thisarrest kind of derails that
investigation because it wasbeing investigated.

SPEAKER_22 (01:28:52):
Uh-huh.

SPEAKER_19 (01:28:53):
And uh he had a lot of different things to say.
He's had more whistleblowerscome forward with more
information, and he basicallysays, if that's the pipe bomber,
then immediately they need toarrest a FBI agents and DOJ
agents because there's crimesinvolved on them as to why they
didn't get this guy earlier.

SPEAKER_26 (01:29:11):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_19 (01:29:11):
Right.
And so he's like, and then thefact that the prosecutor is in
charge is like a huge red flag.
You know, this is the same guywho's trying to put Trump in
jail, and now you're gonna havehim on this case.
This could be impeachment numberthree, right?
But Trump did encourage thisguy.
Look, it was all him, and hepardoned everybody, right?
Could get really bad.
So Louder Milk's looking intothis, and Liz Harrington,
Trump's former spokeswoman, hada lot to say about this too.

(01:29:33):
So we'll see you guys over inprivate.
Bye.
Okay, so here's Barry LouderMilk talking to Benny Johnson,
and uh he reveals a couplethings.
So let's take a listen to this.
It's it's uh a little bit of alonger clip, but for those of
you that are constantly lookingfor more context, this is
important.

SPEAKER_18 (01:29:49):
Concurrent miracles that would have had to happen
for these bombs to have beendiscovered at the same time, sit
in the middle of the sidewalk.
You know, what I mean, wheredoes that lead you?
I I guess you don't know yet,but that implies a much broader
conspiracy, doesn't it?

SPEAKER_06 (01:30:04):
Well, it does, and that's the thing that we try to
avoid is just going down aconspiracy path, but taking a
theory and trying to prove itwrong.
But there's still so manyquestions regarding this because
one of the things that hasraised our eyebrows is as we go
and we look for video on January6th, because we want early
morning video on January 6th tosee uh did anybody go back to

(01:30:26):
these locations.
Unfortunately, that videoapparently doesn't exist
anymore.
We do have the the January 5thvideo, but uh we've been told uh
that uh no one ever preservedJanuary 6th.
So that does raise our eyebrowsa bit.
But you're right, both deviceswere placed.
Either, you know, the the persondoing the pipe bomb wasn't very

(01:30:49):
experienced.
He he was just trying to getthem down and go, uh, or they
were left to be found.
And so uh it is it is prettyamazing.
And you know, Mrs.
Younger said she walked out herback door, it wasn't there
earlier in the morning, but shesaw it later, and it would, you
know, give uh reason to believethat she would have noticed it

(01:31:09):
if it was there in the morning.
So that's one of the reasons wedo want to talk to her.

SPEAKER_19 (01:31:12):
Hey, you so the person who found the pipe bomb
came out, walked right by thearea, looked there, didn't see
it, came out again later and sawit.
So the pipe bomb was placed onJanuary 5th, but on January 6th
it wasn't there, was there?
When the Capitol Hill policeofficers responded, they went
only to the two spots the pipebomb was planted.
That's the only place theylooked.
But we have no video footagefrom that night to the next

(01:31:36):
morning.
Now keep in mind, this is allaround the Capitol complex.
So the idea that they didn'tpreserve this stuff, it's like,
well, in our criminal defensetrials, you you showed where we
walked.
So, and and you know, videofootage to confirm it and all
that kind of stuff, right?
So it's like, you know, becausehere's your ping, but here we
have footage of you showing thatyour phone was in your pocket.
So it's confirmed that you, youknow, someone else wasn't

(01:31:56):
walking with your phone.
You didn't put the phone on theon the back of a pack on your
dog and let him run loose.
And you know, like so there's alot of questions there, but
don't worry, Bonjino and CashPatel and Pam Bondi and Janine
Shapiro, they got their man.
Just blew my mind here.

SPEAKER_18 (01:32:11):
I'm sorry, I if you if you don't mind staying just a
few more minutes.
Like you just told me that is uhso according to the FBI,
according to the internals atthe FBI, there are 39,000
different visual elementsshowing the putty guy, right?
Pipe bomber, we call him the CVirkle bomber, uh, showing this

(01:32:33):
guy, his thick coke bottleglasses, right?
You know, dorky, spectrumy kidfrom the suburbs.
Um there's 39,000 videos showinghis movements that night from
different camera angles.
Washington, DC, Capitol Hill, inparticular, is the most
surveilled area arguably in theworld.
Uh, there are so many cameras upthere.

(01:32:56):
Yes.
And you're telling me that thereare no, there's no footage from
January 6th of the actual areaswhere you would have to travel
to place these pipe bombs.

SPEAKER_06 (01:33:09):
Now, we do have cameras along some of these uh
uh any Capitol Police camerasthat we have.

SPEAKER_19 (01:33:16):
By the way, that walk that you're seeing right
there, this this walk, to me,this is conclusive.
There's a video of the CapitolHill police officers walking.

SPEAKER_06 (01:33:26):
Oh, yeah, and there's a limp along some of
these uh uh any Capitol Police.

SPEAKER_19 (01:33:30):
She hadn't a leg injury.
Yeah.
So there's a there's a gatelimp.
It's you can it's right there.

SPEAKER_06 (01:33:35):
Oh yeah, you can see that we have both legs that show
some of the walking paths, thosedo exist.
But none of the camera angleslike behind the RNC, behind the
DNC, uh that we know of thatexist today.
Waving at the Capitol Police.
Look at that.
Yep.

SPEAKER_19 (01:33:55):
Waving at the Capitol Police behind the DNC.

SPEAKER_06 (01:33:58):
There's police records that we know of that
exist today, of where the thisperson would have been at the
closest angles.
And so that has inhibited ourinvestigation into this theory
of maybe they were placed backout again.
And this is something new thatwe've just come across.
Um, so uh so it's not, no, it'snot.

(01:34:21):
We're we're starting to scourthrough all the Capitol Police
uh cameras because there is aCapitol Police building over by
the DNC.
It's called the FairchildBuilding, and they do have
cameras there, and that's beensome of the cameras that uh have
given us most of the evidence.
So our team is going backthrough, and it you know, it
takes a while.
When you look at how manycameras there are and you're
looking for hours of video,because we're talking about this

(01:34:42):
device was put out at you know,uh around 8 p.m.
on the 5th.
Now we've got to look from 8p.m.
all the way to 1 p.m.
on the 6th uh to see did anyoneelse go by there?
Was there any other traffic, anyyou know, suspicious activity
going on there?
So that that takes a while.
But again, these are theoriesthat we're trying to you know uh

(01:35:04):
go through step by step, box bybox, and try to come up with
what is what is a reasonableexplanation as to how the Secret
Service dog didn't hit on theone device, Mrs.
Younger didn't see the other.

SPEAKER_19 (01:35:18):
Evidently, the Secret Service dogs have
horrible bomb training becausethey made multiple passes, but
it was a viable explosive, Ron.
Mm-hmm.
Hmm.
Our drug dogs suck, or herexplosive dogs suck.

SPEAKER_06 (01:35:31):
You know, it's just a logical conclusion is possibly
they weren't there at that time.
But then you have to ask, ifthey weren't, why were they
picked up?
Why were they placed again?
And so uh, you know, it couldcome out that that she just
missed it and that the dog didhit on it and the the hammer
wasn't paying attention, but itdid make several passes or you

(01:35:52):
know, weather condition,whatever.
But yeah, when you have thatmany circumstances, uh generally
where there's smoke, there'ssome level of fire.
So we have to, we have to trackthis down.
And another thing that I hopethat's happening, and I believe
they're gonna they're doingthis, is the FBI looking at his
cell phone data to see if hecame back again.
If he didn't, then did he havesomebody he was working with?

(01:36:14):
Was there a co-conspirator thatcame in and actually uh uh
either set the timers or pickedup the devices and put them back
out?

SPEAKER_18 (01:36:22):
You have so many.

SPEAKER_19 (01:36:26):
You got some gaping holes in your story here, right?
This is obviously reallyimpactful to me.
No pipe.

SPEAKER_26 (01:36:33):
That's the first time I saw the picture of that
pipe bomb in that spot next tothat rat thing.
And that is the smallest pipe.
That's like a one-inchgalvanized pipe.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right.
I mean, what were you trying toblow up?
The park bench, I guess.

SPEAKER_19 (01:36:51):
I doubt it would have done too much through the
brick wall it was next to, butyeah, exactly.
Liz Harrington, formerspokesperson for Donald Trump,
she sees it clearly.

SPEAKER_39 (01:37:00):
How do you stand up there and have a press
conference and give each otherhigh fives and do, you know, a
victory lap?
And did you read the affidavit?
Did you look who's prosecutingthe case?
Did you ask maybe any questionsabout where this evidence came

(01:37:21):
from?
I I know they claim that theychanged some of the case agents
out, but this is insane.
You cannot have the people whotried to frame President Trump
and put him in prison for life,give him a death sentence to
make him impossible for him torun again, still at the DOJ, in

(01:37:43):
his DOJ.
How are they still workingthere?
How are they not the ones?
She should be on the other sideof that table answering
questions, being interrogated.
This is so corrupt.
The fact that you would slideover that offer full of lies.
And this is why the FBI theythey claim they're making

(01:38:04):
reforms.
I don't see it.
It's that's not reform when youhave a person who tried to frame
President Trump leading yournew, oh, so convenient, the
random black kid who lives inthe basement, who has autism,
who walks his dog around theneighborhood, apparently only

(01:38:26):
always wearing shorts, neverwears pants, wears his red
Crocs.
I don't know.
That's what the neighborsapparently say.
That's oh, how convenient he hasno ties to the Capitol Police,
he has no ties to any governmentagency.
Um maybe Judge Janine, CashPatel, Dan Bon Gino, and Pam
Bondi should have asked aquestion, huh?

(01:38:48):
If this is the pipe bomber, whydid Biden's FBI go to such
lengths to cover it up?
It makes no sense.
It's insane.
If this was the guy, they don'tcare about some narrative.
Like if this was just somerandom guy, there was no
government connection, then theywould have just arrested him.

(01:39:11):
You know, if this is the guy, itinsults our intelligence and it
should insult their intelligencebecause they're smart people.
But what are you doing?
I'm sorry.
I don't want to be supercritical because I know it's
extremely difficult to go inthere and try to change things.
However, come on, have someself-respect.
You can't stand up there and doa press conference and expect us

(01:39:34):
to believe this garbage becauseit's garbage.
I'm sorry.
Jeffrey Epstein didn't killhimself.
Okay.
Thomas Crooks didn't act alone.
And this kid is not the pipebomber.
According to the evidence I'veseen, when I read that
affidavit, you know what itlooked exactly like to me?
The Mueller Report.
It looked like spinuendo.

(01:39:56):
I think Lee Smith or somebodylike that, back when the Mueller
report came.
Came out, they said, you know,it's all this like insinuation
and obfuscation.
And when you read it, you'relike, wait, there's nothing
there.
And they're experts at thisbecause that's what they do.
They lie and they leak becausethey're experts.
Trust the experts.
Things out and they put thingsin that don't make sense.

(01:40:18):
And that's what that affidavitis.
They don't have any evidenceagainst this guy.
They could go after anybody forbuying sandpaper and N taps and
pipes.
It was two years before January6th.
I mean, it's just absurd.

SPEAKER_19 (01:40:32):
Every every plumbing contractor is like, whoa, I buy
a lot of bomb material.
But no gunpowder, no for none ofthe other accelerants.
Maybe they were in his garagethe whole time.
Uh-uh.

SPEAKER_39 (01:40:45):
And I don't know what they're doing.
I don't know what they're doing,but they need to figure it out
because you're letting FBIprofessionals who have been
destroying this country, by theway, and will destroy the
country if, God forbid, uhanother, you know, illegitimate
president gets in like JoeBiden, they will destroy this

(01:41:07):
country.
And it'll be way worse thanJanuary 6th.
It'll be way worse.
So they need to clean house.
Start with this JocelynBallantyne.
That's insane.
Why is she even there?
It's absolutely appalling.
How do you stand?

SPEAKER_19 (01:41:24):
Massey revealed something.
The day after he did hisinterview with Steve Baker, uh,
the number three in charge ofthe Capitol Police resigned as a
result of that interview.
Oh and it used to be an ATF,which is part of this whole
allegations of what was going onthere.
Right?
So Massey didn't say directlywhat it was, but there was
something unrelated, and thatwas his cause for resignation.

(01:41:44):
But at the same time, it wasdirectly caused by his uh
interview.
He believed some small number ofCapitol Hill police were in on
this.
Um they put other Capitol Hillpolice officers' lives at risk.
He says they uh started thatriot.
Uh they created the scenariothat was a it was like you know
dropping a match, not just likein a tinder box.

(01:42:06):
Dude, uh on its face, it lookscorrupt.
It is corrupt, it is wrong.
Jocelyn Valentine should havealready been arrested.
There are real crimes.
Offering Enrique Antario a deallike that to lie, encouraging a

(01:42:28):
lie is a crime.
Every plea deal that's like thatis a crime.
They want you to agree, though,and understand and volunteer,
but it's rough.
All right, guys, that's it forus today.
Thank you so much for stickingwith us in the sub sub uh
premium premium side.
I was subscription, premium,private, whatever.
Thank you for joining us overhere.
We'll talk to you again probablyMonday.

SPEAKER_05 (01:43:14):
What knight lives in that castle over there?
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37, I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call you man.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
Well, you didn't bother to findout, did you?
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind, you look
what objective is youautomatically treat me like an
inferior.
Well, I am king.

(01:43:35):
Oh, king, eh?
Very nice.
How'd you get that, eh?
By exploiting the workers, byhanging on to outdated
imperialist dogma whichperpetuates the economic and
social differences in oursociety.
If there's ever going to be anyprogress, we'll be still down
here.
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I'm Arthur, King of the Britons.

(01:43:57):
Whose castle is that?
King of the British The Britons.
We all are.
We are all Britons.
And I am your king.

SPEAKER_04 (01:44:06):
No, we have a king.
I thought we're an autonomouscollective.

SPEAKER_05 (01:44:09):
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship.
A self-perpetuating autocracy inwhich the working class is.
That's what it's all about.
Only people leave these goodpeople.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What?

(01:44:29):
I told you.
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
But all the decisions of thatofficer have to be ratified at a
special bi-weekly meeting.
If I think by a civil majorityin the case of purely internal
affairs to be quiet, or by atwo-thirds majority, in the case
of being quiet.
I order you to be quiet.

(01:44:52):
I'm your king.
You don't vote for king.
Lady of the lake.
Signifying by divine providencethat I asked was to carry
Excalibur.

(01:45:13):
That is why I'm your king.
Listen, strange women lying inponds, distributing swords is no
basis for a system ofgovernment.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony.
Be quite but you can't expect towield supreme executive power
just because some watery tartthrew a sword at you.

(01:45:34):
Shut up! I mean, if I went roundsaying I was an emperor, just
because some moistened bitch hadlocked a scimitar at me, they
put me away! Shut up, will you?
Shut up! Now we see the violenceinheriting the system! Shut up!
Have we seen a violenceinherited in the system?
Help, help! I'm being repressed!Bloody peasant! Oh, what a
giveaway! You hear that?
Did you hear that, eh?

(01:45:56):
That's what I'm on about.
Do you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Burden

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Why Law And Order, Not Labels And “Experts,” Decide Whether Free People Stay Free

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Burden

All Episodes

Why Law And Order, Not Labels And “Experts,” Decide Whether Free People Stay Free

Stuff You Should Know