Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
SPEAKER_11 (00:54):
You see the peasants
in the background with the kings
and kings walking around.
Where are those people?
Where are those people?
Runt.
Good morning, peasants.
Welcome to another episode ofThe Peasants Perspective.
Runt was just telling me he wentto church and they had the
Christmas edition, and it's likeevery other Christmas edition.
(01:15):
What what are you what were yousaying there?
Uh what like Christmas Mass isthe first time.
This is morning time.
SPEAKER_13 (01:23):
It gets
misunderstood, maybe.
So we had our Christmas, youknow, sacrament, you know,
service.
Uh-huh.
And it was a carbon copy or acookie cutter of every other
Christmas um sacrament serviceI've ever been to anywhere.
(01:45):
But like with all those other,you know um services, it works
every time.
Every time I feel, you know, notjust Christmas, but I feel our
savior's love.
Every Christmas.
It works.
Yeah.
Even though it's a carbon copycookie cutter, and you could it
(02:06):
could be a rerun.
That's what I meant.
Yeah, no, it's good.
SPEAKER_11 (02:09):
I I you know, it's a
wonderful life that's been
around for like many, manyyears, and everybody, every time
they watch it, my wife watchedit this weekend.
She said it was amazing.
I've never watched it.
Oh, really?
SPEAKER_14 (02:19):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_11 (02:23):
But yeah, Christmas
is great, man.
Every time a bell rings, Angelgets its wings.
Yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (02:29):
Live.
SPEAKER_11 (02:31):
Not true.
SPEAKER_13 (02:33):
But great movie.
Yeah.
SPEAKER_11 (02:35):
Well, there was a
really busy weekend this
weekend.
Matterizel, good morning.
Hello, mom.
Uh, pony boy, good morning.
Shantini, good morning.
So glad to have you guys here.
Ooh, TIF Time, good morning.
I'm I'm, you know, this is likeChristmas vacation, like
Christmas week for me and myhouse.
Yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (02:52):
And that's that's
what my wife said.
She's like, you guys are stilldoing the podcast.
SPEAKER_11 (02:55):
Yeah, I mean,
otherwise we'll like lose our
momentum.
Like, we're up to we're we're upto like a solid dollar an
episode right now.
My son came in and asked me howmuch I make at work,
specifically the podcast, right?
And I was like, whoa, it's liketwo dollars an episode.
So he went back and told mywife, Dad makes two dollars an
episode.
I was like, that's about it.
SPEAKER_13 (03:17):
I haven't made
anything.
SPEAKER_11 (03:18):
Yeah, you haven't
made anything.
I'm like, two dollars anepisode.
We're barely clearing thehosting fee on the audio side.
This is a labor of love, believeme.
Well, this weekend, probably thethere was two big things, right?
You had the Epstein file droplast weekend.
Uh-huh.
Uh, you know, on like the oldshow Peanuts, Charlie Brown.
(03:40):
Epstein.
Epstein.
That's what the news feed feltlike on whatever Thursday or
Friday afternoon.
It was like, oh my goodness,lots of new pictures of nothing.
You know, bunch of black boxes,totally no surprise there.
Um, nobody's gone through anyemails or anything that I've
seen, any deep dives.
But good gravy.
What a what a mess.
(04:00):
Uh, one of the great things thathappened this weekend was they
had the Ampfest going on.
Did you see anything about thatin your social media?
SPEAKER_13 (04:07):
I don't know if I
know what Ampfest was.
SPEAKER_11 (04:09):
Ampfest is the
turning point USA.
SPEAKER_13 (04:10):
They're getting
amped.
Yeah, I think I saw a few clipsand people were upset with
Tucker Carlson and somebody elsefor using as a platform for
themselves or some nonsense.
SPEAKER_11 (04:21):
Bro, so we played a
little clip from because it
started like last Thursday.
We played a little clip from BenShapiro, who basically got up
and it was like Candace Owens isa conspiracy theorist, and you
know, you can't just be askingquestions, and uh Alex Jones is
a conspiracy theorist, and hebasically and Tucker Carlson is,
you know, an anti-Jew shill andstuff like that.
He was kind of he actually kindof really did go off on
(04:42):
everybody.
And his whole thing was, trustme, I'll tell you what the news
is.
Sure.
Well, this became quite thedebate because then it was like,
Are you talking about us puritytests?
Tucker Carlson got up, he gavehis rebuttal, and he's just
like, you know, Charlie Kirkliterally like one of the last
things he was doing was makingsure I could speak at this
because his donors didn't wantme speaking here, aka probably
(05:03):
Jewish donors, right?
And uh Megan Kelly got on.
She's like, How dare Ben Shapirocritic because he criticized
Megan Kelly as well, and uh howdare he criticize us?
And she's like, you know, thefact that he thinks that he can
speak as to who is approved MAGAor approved in this movement,
just shows how little he knowswhere he really stands in the
(05:24):
movement.
And then Steve Bannon got outand he's like, Shapiro hates
Donald Trump, he's never droppedit, he didn't care where he
goes.
Oh my goodness.
So it became like, you know,conservative influence or turf
wars, you know, over themovement.
SPEAKER_13 (05:40):
And uh it reminded
me of the moment, what's that
guy's name?
Uh Sam.
Uh shoot, I'm gonna forget hisname now.
But he was like, Oh, you gottabe an expert in order to talk on
the subject kind of thing.
SPEAKER_11 (05:52):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (05:52):
And I was like, eh.
SPEAKER_11 (05:54):
Yeah, it just became
kind of like this, you know.
Well, here's here's a little uhwell, we'll just we'll just scan
a couple of these here realquick.
Since it was big, big news allweekend.
Oh, I gotta change my audio.
This is Christmas week, so we'retaking it easy.
Our raid went over well, by theway.
We got credit for it.
So thank you guys for doingthat.
(06:14):
We gotta do it four more timesthis month.
Oh, jeez.
It's like that's like every day.
Oh my goodness.
Yeah, actually, we do.
Bro, we need to do it every day.
Okay, where is the little thingthat says sound?
There we go.
I think I've never done thisbefore.
Okay, so here's uh we'll justplay a couple little clips here.
(06:34):
Here's Steve Bannon.
SPEAKER_10 (06:37):
And that cancer
spreads.
SPEAKER_11 (06:42):
Okay, Ben Shapiro's
like a cancer, that cancer
spreads.
There's this one.
SPEAKER_10 (06:50):
And he was all, you
know, I'm going to, you know,
it's all about the truth.
Ben, I've known you a long time,brother.
You can't handle the truth.
SPEAKER_11 (07:01):
So as you can see,
it was a lot of fun there.
Lot of fun.
Let's see.
We got, oh, you know, just tonsof nonsense pictures.
Oh, there was this.
I did the uh oh my god.
We were showing the fiber opticcables, yeah, and it was over
the the woods.
Yeah.
Well, this is a music.
SPEAKER_13 (07:26):
Look at that, dude.
That looks like CGI for a movie,dude.
SPEAKER_11 (07:30):
Every one of those
was a pathway of a drone that
was a bomb to kill people.
Oh flying over houses.
Now, this whole area is empty,it's been deoccupied, right?
Can you see why?
Holy cow! It's just insanity.
Uh I I tell you, man, war isjust so ugly left no matter
(07:53):
what.
Um, oh, this is really funny.
Uh Tib Waltz.
There was so much content thisweekend.
SPEAKER_26 (07:58):
One of I don't want
to say the number, it's
countless numbers.
I every night I get an update onthis of the threats to our
federal money on everything wedo.
Because look, right now it'svery clear the federal
government is weaponized againstMinnesota.
SPEAKER_11 (08:12):
The whole federal
government is weaponized against
Minnesota.
They're talking about 50% of thestate's budget has been going to
fraud.
Okay, like the scale of this isbeyond comprehension.
Wow.
Okay, imagine a million-dollarhouse.
There's enough fraud just in oneof their little programs,$9
billion to buy$9,000 milliondollar houses.
Wow.
(08:32):
I mean, the scale of this isjust unbelievable.
So, but the federal funds areall under attack.
We don't know what we're gonnado with our budget.
SPEAKER_26 (08:38):
Um, the issues of
things that should be states
right, states to control,they're threatening us with
this.
And this is what happens whenyou have a floundering
presidency, and and it is aboutthose ballrooms and everything
else.
Now we're back on transgenderfolks, and these are health care
providers providing the bestguidance to parents and children
to get their care.
So we're a means.
Um, it's on every front.
(08:58):
It's uh it's CDLs, it's it'stransportation money, it's money
across the board that that thatthey have weaponized.
SPEAKER_11 (09:06):
Did he now feel look
desperate?
He looks desperate.
I mean, seriously.
Um, Harmeet Dillon's going afterBrad Rassitzberger.
Oh, big big news last week.
First, we started by asking forbomb.
The uh poll tape poll tapes inGeorgia for the election.
I mean, 315,000 minimum voteswere completely made up, didn't
come from anywhere, aren't on apoll tab.
They just added them to thesystem.
SPEAKER_14 (09:27):
Uh-huh.
SPEAKER_11 (09:28):
And there's there's
a really interesting story.
So you had one county thatdidn't want to certify the
election.
And so, you know, phone callcomes in, you got to certify it.
We're not going to do it becausewe don't have the numbers, or
the things nothing's adding up.
We can't clear a small littleinternal audit.
Our poll tabs and our ballots,they're not matching.
And so they Secretary of Stateended up sending guys with
badges and guns to there, andthey looked at it and they
(09:50):
brought and they and they sentwith them dominion reps.
Okay.
And they all sat down and theycouldn't figure it out.
So then they said, Well, we needto do an audit.
It said, Well, we can do anaudit, but you can't do it with
the election people.
They went to a high school andenlisted a sophomore class,
closed everything down, and hadthe sophomores hand count the
ballots with the dominion repsthere trying to work the
machines and figure out how toreconcile, and they couldn't
(10:11):
reconcile it.
And then the Secretary of Statepeople basically put their hands
on their guns and said, certifyit, and they did.
And this all came out in liketestimony.
They took them to a high schoolclass to count ballots, and it
was wrong.
They couldn't reconcile it withthe tabs, and they still
certified the election.
And there, there's likeeverybody's basically said,
Yeah, we screwed up, except forBen Rathensburger, who's, you
(10:32):
know, the guy that's gonna go tojail for all this.
It's like, ah, I didn't screwup.
Anyways, hard meeting.
So she sued a bunch of statesfor their uh information, which
is great.
Here's this one here.
One just dropped today.
SPEAKER_12 (10:48):
But when it comes to
actual election rigging and
stolen elections, there's beennone of those yet.
Do you think they have thecourage, Liz?
SPEAKER_18 (10:57):
Well, they if they
don't have it now, they need to
get some and they need to getsome patched because we're
running out of time here,Emerald, as we've talked about
it.
Look, it's Christmas, to CBS,and oh, you know, they say uh
it's really it's he's going intoa tough midterm election year
next year.
Okay, according to who?
(11:18):
According to who?
To fake news and your narrativethat you're seeding because
you're gonna cheat like hell inthe midterms?
That that's what you're doing,and that's what they're gonna
do.
So we can't let that happen.
We have we have so much limitedtime.
SPEAKER_11 (11:32):
Anyways, the
evidence is just unreal.
Um you go through stuff likethis.
SPEAKER_08 (11:42):
A decision by the
board was made to do a hand
recount to ensure accurateresults of the election.
SPEAKER_01 (11:50):
Wasn't that the
DeCab County Election Board
attorney?
Play it again, Sam.
SPEAKER_08 (11:56):
A decision by the
board was made to do a hand
recount to ensure accurateresults of the election.
SPEAKER_01 (12:03):
What?
Isn't that what I've been sayingfor 20 years?
SPEAKER_08 (12:07):
Do a hand recount.
SPEAKER_11 (12:11):
So we decided that
was when he was talking about
going to the high school.
Anyways, so that's deep in mybookmark feeds from last week.
That's not the show today.
Should we get on with the show?
Yeah.
Okay, so this is Donald Trump.
Uh Douglas, good morning.
Mighty easel made up name by myhusband.
My name is Lisa.
(12:31):
I know, mom.
SPEAKER_13 (12:34):
You should just put
like somebody else in the chat.
SPEAKER_11 (12:38):
Okay.
Hello.
My mom's name is Muddy Easel aswell.
My dad's picking Latin names.
I love it.
Okay, so this is Donald Trumpsaying something that I've been
saying, and that is there is adifferent interest between the
young generation and the oldergeneration when it comes to
homes, home equity, and homevalue.
Um, this is important becausethis is this is policy in the
(13:00):
making, right?
There's you you're you're in anuntenable situation in the
position of the president oranybody dealing with finance,
banking, housing, and stuff likethat.
Because on one hand, you can'tlet boomers' home equity slip or
they end up dying penniless innursing homes or something like
that.
SPEAKER_13 (13:16):
Well, their equity
will slip if this is the new go
forward thing, because if if theyoung ones are not going to be
buying the homes that the oldones are in, that equity doesn't
exist.
SPEAKER_11 (13:27):
Exactly.
And there's people not sellingbecause they don't want to find
out that their home's not worthwhat they think it's worth.
Okay, so this is him addressing.
SPEAKER_29 (13:36):
You talked in your
address last night about
housing.
Yeah, are you still consideringa national emergency over
housing?
SPEAKER_25 (13:41):
I'm looking at it.
What would that look like?
You know, I have two, there'stwo thoughts on housing.
You have a lot of people havehousing that because we have
such a strong time and such astrong market there, houses are
very valuable.
It's a big part of their uh networth, their house.
I don't want to knock thosenumbers down because I want them
(14:02):
to continue to have a big valuefor their house.
At the same time, I want to makeit uh possible for young people
out there and other people tobuy houses.
In a way, they're at conflict.
In other words, you create a lotof housing all of a sudden and
it drives the housing pricesdown.
So I want to take care of thepeople that have houses that
(14:23):
have a value to you know totheir house that they never
thought possible, that have sortof made them wealthy and happy,
and you know, especially intheir later years.
Gotta be careful with that.
I want to keep them up.
At the same time, I want to makeit uh possible for people to go
buy houses.
SPEAKER_11 (14:41):
These two ends are
he's correct.
He said it really simply,they're at odds with each other.
And that is something I'm like,uh, because the reality is the
youth will win.
The buses are gonna be free,like they will eventually have
housing.
It's going to be unacceptablefor somebody that's 30 that's
looking at their checkbook,going it's impossible to buy a
(15:02):
house.
I'm looking at, oh, you know,never.
SPEAKER_13 (15:04):
And if there's a
hundred million homes on the
market all at once and nobody'sbuying, the equity is worth
zero.
Yeah.
SPEAKER_11 (15:11):
Yeah.
So, anyways, it's like the buseswill be free.
There will be housing.
Like, it's not a matter ofresources, it's a matter of some
financial calculation on whatyou think your house is worth.
But yeah, if you can't occupyit, it's gonna be a problem.
All right, so at Amfest, TulsiGabbard got up and she had this
is kind of our opening statementhere.
This is what I want us to focuson.
SPEAKER_28 (15:33):
Too often, we the
American people are told we must
choose between liberty orsecurity.
And which side often wins out inthat proposition?
Liberty loses.
And the warmongers claim thatthey are doing what they are
doing for the sake of oursecurity.
(15:54):
It's a lie.
SPEAKER_11 (15:56):
That speech, right?
That was an incredibly powerfulspeech because she basically
came out against all of themilitary industrial complexes,
right?
This idea that we have to tradeour security for liberty is a
false dichotomy.
That doesn't have to be thecase.
That's the whole point of havingthis great country.
(16:16):
And she's saying that there arehuge forces at work that want to
prevent the work of peace.
Rob Schneider sat down with theEpic Times, and he had a little
bit to say about this too.
He spoke with theeditor-in-chief of the Epic T of
the New York Times, and prettyrevealing.
And this kind of makes you seewhy we see the headlines we see
coming out of the news newsmagazine newspaper formerly
(16:39):
known.
I was gonna say something.
Let's listen to Rob.
SPEAKER_04 (16:42):
My friend had dinner
with the the editor-in-chief of
the New York Times a few yearsback, and uh he said, Is
objectivity something thatyou're concerned about?
And his answer was, I believe itis my moral imperative to make
sure that Donald Trump does notbecome president of the United
States again.
So what does that mean?
And then I I it just kind ofgoes to show the difference, and
(17:05):
you could see it in theheadlines, the same the same
situation of the formeradministration, the Biden
administration, and the samesituation, and the headlines are
much more uh jarringly tribal inin favor of the previous
administration.
So that's a um I think that'svery telling uh of where we're
at now, to where, I mean, uhit's almost I would say not
(17:29):
almost, but it is approaching uhwhat the former Soviet Union
had.
And that's why, like my friend,like Ilya Baskin, who was from
the Soviet Union and knew whatit was like.
SPEAKER_03 (17:39):
I don't know why
your country, why you guys would
go and want that, but you areapproaching it, and that you
can't see it's communism, thatthat is what's happening, and
that you can't see that is anincredible, uh horrible thing
that you are approaching.
SPEAKER_04 (17:54):
And so what happened
was that he would tell you that
um Noam Chomsky would tell youthat uh the Soviet Union, people
knew the Pravda, the n the andTAS, the you know, the the uh
government mouthpieces.
No one believed it.
They knew it was just you knowgarbage that what the government
wanted.
And and so where did they go fortruth?
(18:17):
Where did they they find outwhat's really happening in their
society?
And it was he was person toperson.
What did you hear?
What do you know?
And that's exactly whathappened.
And I think ex- And that's whatwe're doing here with the
peasants' perspective.
SPEAKER_11 (18:29):
Yeah, you know what
I mean?
Pretty much.
I mean, really, because why?
Because I recognize that that'sall pravda.
I recognize that the New YorkTimes is hellbent on destroying
Donald Trump or conservatives orChristians or white cisgendered
men or new people.
They're just fully fascist, youknow, fully fascist.
Yeah, fully fascist.
And yet I even have asister-in-law who's from China,
(18:51):
Hong Kong, you know, and shesays the same thing.
The difference between you guysand them is they know the news
is fake.
Right?
You guys don't.
Carlitz, is this where heannounces the 99-year mortgage?
Ha ha, bring those prices down.
Yeah.
Elon Musk is like, well, we'lljust give you a robot.
The robot will go make money topay for the house.
Universal high income.
(19:13):
So Rob Schneider makes a reallyprescient point there, right?
I mean, he's like, the news isabsolutely fake.
Here's Tulsi Gabbard continuingon talking about just that, how
the warmongers use the media tocreate hysteria.
SPEAKER_28 (19:27):
But what I've seen
over these months is that every
time they make progress and theymove closer and closer to that
hope for peace, the warmongersin the deep state step up and
try to do everything they can tostop them.
Predictably, they use the sameold tactics that they've always
used.
The deep state within theintelligence community
(19:48):
weaponizes intelligence to tryto undermine progress.
They leak it to their friendsand the mainstream propaganda
media to try to spread this andpush a false narrative.
They foment fear and hysteria asa way to justify the continuing
of the war and their efforts toundermine President Trump's
efforts towards peace, and do sospecifically in this case, in
(20:13):
order to try to pull the USmilitary into a direct conflict
with Russia, which is ultimatelywhat the EU and NATO want.
We cannot allow this to happen.
We have to see clearly what'shappening before our very eyes
and stand united in this causeof peace.
SPEAKER_15 (20:41):
Lots of people there
clapping.
SPEAKER_11 (20:47):
It's like silent.
So that's really good news.
Uh Representative Paulina Luna,she gave a speech and she says
something that again, we'vetouched on this many times, but
you know, in another episode ofDo You Know What Time It Is?
All the media, mainstream legacymedia is essentially Pravda,
right?
But we have this virtue that,oh, it's the fourth branch of
(21:09):
government, it's the it's the uhjournalism, it's oversight.
They hold they hold the publicaccountable, it's the news, and
it's well, is it really that orare they telling you what to
believe, right?
It's it's at the somewhere inthe world.
It's part of the programming,European governments decided
that they could do propaganda.
And we saw it in all of theEuropean governments leading up
(21:29):
to World War II.
You saw it in Russia, and atsome point the United States was
a little late in the game.
They're like, Yeah, we likethis.
You guys can like control yourpopulation with the news.
We've perfected it.
Because we could because we havethe illusion of free press when
the reality is we have alicensed press, right?
All these big outlets, they havelicenses.
It's people like us that come upfrom the bottom.
(21:50):
And this is the hard part forthem to tamp town, the
influencer crowd, right?
Like, I mean, our crowdsinfluence them very little, but
eventually, potentially, wecould have an independent large
show that could move asignificant voting block.
There's a handful of people outthere, like Joe Rogan.
You know, he appears not to bebought off.
He just kind of does his ownthing.
He can sway an election if hewanted to.
It's a lot of power.
(22:11):
Okay, this is representativeAnna Paulina Luna, and she is
making another good point afterall the infighting that happened
on the stage at Ampfest and allthe finger pointing that you
see, especially if you spend alot of time online, it actually
all boils down to this.
SPEAKER_16 (22:26):
You may not like
Tucker Carlson or Ben Shapir or
Steve Bannon or me.
But guess what?
If the radical left wins, you,us, and them, we all hang
together.
We can duke it out on stage, butremember the fight ahead.
Because we are all in this fighttogether, and we have crossed
(22:48):
this Rubicon, and it's importantto remember who the real enemy
is, and that is the radical leftthat killed my friend Charlie
Kirk.
SPEAKER_11 (22:59):
There was a lot of
talk of just that, you know.
This is us versus them.
They're not wrong.
I mean, this is the first timein my living memory that you've
got someone of significantprominence that was prompted to
say something like this.
SPEAKER_29 (23:14):
In the United States
of America, you don't have to
apologize for being whiteanymore.
SPEAKER_13 (23:21):
Wow.
SPEAKER_11 (23:24):
Yeah.
Like this was a prettybroad-reaching conversation,
okay?
All right, so let's talk alittle bit about the Epstein
stuff.
We're gonna go this Epsteinstuff is just absolute nonsense.
We've covered enough of it, butwe're gonna hear a little bit
from Todd Blanche.
So, one of the issues with theEpstein thing is is uh is the
(23:47):
idea that Trump's covering stuffup and that somehow his whole
entire purpose of gettingelected into office and every
action he's taken from the TrumpKennedy Center, which by the way
they renamed the Kennedy CenterTrump Kennedy Center.
Oh my goodness, they're rollingin their graves, to the
ballroom, to the narco-terrorstrikes, to peace negotiations
with Putin.
SPEAKER_06 (24:07):
Everything is a
distraction from Jeffrey
Epstein.
To be clear, releasing the filesis not what President Trump has
ever had an issue with.
When he calls this a hoax, he'stalking about the fact that
there's this narrative out therethat the Department of Justice
is somehow hiding or protectinginformation about him, which is
completely false, as evidencedby the fact that the Epstein
(24:28):
files existed for years andyears and years.
And you did not hear a peep outof a single Democrat for the
past four years.
And yet we're supposed tobelieve that lo and behold, all
of a sudden, out of the blue,Senator Schumer suddenly cares
about the Epstein files.
That's the hoax.
And that's the hoax that thathas existed for months and
months and months.
This isn't about whether wewould release or not release the
(24:50):
Epstein files.
As a general matter, we do notrelease the files of criminal
investigations and prosecutions.
There's laws around that.
There's laws that protect umthat protect victims, that
protect the innocent.
So we're doing something herethat is more transparent than
we've done in any criminalinvestigation in the history of
this country.
Don't forget that.
(25:12):
So what do you what'd you writedown there?
SPEAKER_13 (25:15):
Writing down myself
to note, um, because I wanted to
talk about the clips you wereplaying at the Amp Fest or
whatever.
They were talking about um usversus them.
Yeah.
And it was pretty divisive.
Um, and I was like, it's notexactly a unifying message.
(25:36):
And does this mean that we'vebeen successfully divided as a
country?
SPEAKER_11 (25:42):
Yeah.
Oh yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (25:43):
Okay.
Yeah, for sure.
That's different than thefeeling that I have had in the
past, like pre-COVID.
Uh-huh.
Post-COVID, I think I thinkCOVID has exposed a lot of this
more than um people thought wasgonna happen.
Between COVID and the electionsteals, I think that there's
been a big exposure that haschanged the way that we see
(26:07):
America and individually andcollectively.
And I think that a part of thatis this divisiveness that has up
until that point, we've beenable to successfully unify and
stay in this, you know, there'salways been Democrat-Republican
talk, but we're always beenAmericans.
(26:29):
Nobody's talking about being anAmerican anymore, except for the
people on the right.
SPEAKER_11 (26:33):
Well, that's just
it.
And and you have to recognizethings don't happen in a vacuum,
right?
So one side wants to tell thenarrative without any of the mud
on their own side.
And so let's just look at theleft for a second.
Who is the modern left?
They're communists.
Yeah.
They're communists.
Absolutely.
So who's bitter about the UnitedStates of America?
(26:53):
Oh, I don't know.
The communists who were senthere by Mother Russia to
infiltrate and do the long marchthrough the institutions and
take over education, theMarxists, like literally, we're
talking the John McCarthy erapeople and their children who
they brought up in this systemin order to take over the United
States.
Go look at Hillary Clinton andher master thesis um on rules
(27:16):
for radicals.
What's his name?
Who wrote Rules for Radicals,Radicals, was talking about
basically putting pressure onthe government from the outside
until you overthrow it.
Hillary Clinton was like, no, itneeds to be from the inside,
right?
So these people have had anagenda running parallel with the
Soviet Union up until 1989.
And then all of a sudden, theSoviet Union disappeared.
(27:38):
So they're a little bitter aboutthe winner of that war, and
they're still here ingovernment.
James Comey voted forcommunists, John Brennan voted
for communists.
Uh, who was the other one?
These these were unabashed.
I voted for a communist backbefore communism failed as a
system.
(27:58):
And now they're allied withChina because what is that?
Communism.
Oh, and and you know, it wasworth if you listen to people
who run communist propaganda.
Well, every major economicsystem kills people.
Well, people die all the time.
I mean, the cultural revolutionin China was just the price you
pay for Shanghai.
Yeah, I don't know.
Do you see what I'm saying?
Like to them, it's about the theends justifies the means.
(28:23):
And so when you look at themodern left, we are not talking
about an American politicalparty.
We're talking about culturalMarxists, international Marxists
who ally with othercollectivists.
And we've reached a point inthis country where, yeah, some
one of these systems is gonnahave to win or lose.
We're changing the entire under,you know, capitalism underpins
(28:45):
America.
And we're at the point where thefinancial system is changing.
Which direction are we gonna go?
Are we gonna go in a systemwhere you get individual credit,
or are we gonna go to a systemwhere they just package us all
up as a one nation and Americapays the bill?
Because that's how China is.
China pays the bill.
You know, Xi Jinping signs thathis entire population will act
(29:05):
as a slave state to make sure weget enough widgets, gidsmos, and
gadgets.
Do you see what I'm saying?
Whereas in America, that's notthe case.
In America, I have to sign on tobe the be the security for a
credit.
The whole system's changing.
We're going to a digital systemand it's up for grabs.
Are we going to go individualliberty or are we going to go
some kind of collectivist model?
And I think, and obviously,that's what we're seeing in our
(29:27):
politics here.
So is America divided?
Yes.
Does America know it's divided?
Not always.
SPEAKER_13 (29:33):
Not always.
So I would say half of Americaknows that we're divided.
The other half is in a freakingcult.
SPEAKER_11 (29:42):
Yeah.
Um I think that a lot of peoplestill think it's red, blue,
Democrat, Republican, and thenRepublic.
Listen, uh, Hunter, uh, HunterBiden just did a podcast with
Sean Ryden five hours.
I started listening to it thismorning on the way in.
The guy's acting like, you know,in America, we should not be
divided.
You know, the really rich.
(30:03):
They're getting rich.
This is a guy who's$1.5 billionfrom the Chinese, millions of
dollars from the Ukrainians,Romanians, Kazakhstanis, and
you're over here being like, Ijust don't know what's wrong
with our politics anymore.
I don't know why we're sodivided.
What?
You know what I mean?
The saying that America isdivided, let's not be divided.
(30:25):
Look, I'm the I'm the I can sitacross the aisle and I still
view you, my political enemy, asa fellow American.
The left will now put on thatcloak because they're caught.
Does that make sense?
They've benefited from cheatingin elections, they've benefited
from narco-terrorism, they'vebenefited from the drug trade,
they've benefited from themilitary industrial complex, the
prison industrial complex, thebig business, the big
(30:46):
agro-industrial complex, all ofit.
And now they're going to belike, oh, but yeah, no, we're
still peasants, right?
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,no, no.
We're we're past that.
We're past that.
So when Anna Paulina Luna saysone side has to win, one side
has to lose, we on theconservative right, who believe
in individual freedoms, have torecognize they want to kill you.
(31:09):
There's there's an a vignette inthe book Atlas Shrugged by Ayn
Rand.
And the one of the maincharacters, the heroine of the
story, Dagny, right?
So they go to rescue the othermythical character in the book,
John Galt.
And when they go to rescue JohnGault, he's being tortured by
the collectivists who've takenhim capture, and they want him
to fix the economy because youknow the collectivists have been
(31:31):
running the economy, and planeshave fallen out of the sky,
trains stop running, coal's notbeing mined, you know what I
mean?
And so they're like, Listen,you're the smartest man and you
can fix the economy.
We want you to do it.
And he's like, you know,literally being tortured.
He's like, okay, I'll dowhatever you guys say.
They're like, fix the economy.
And he's like, what would youlike me to do?
And they're like, we'd like youto fix the economy.
He's like, yeah, I'll do exactlywhat you want.
(31:51):
And like the collectivists haveno answer.
They want him to use his brain,and he's like, Well, I'll do
what you want me to do.
So he turns it around on him.
Anyways, they go to rescue JohnGault and Dagny at one point
there's a guard and she's like,Let us in.
We need to get this man.
And at this moment, like thebattle lines have been drawn.
And she's like, Are you gonnalet us through or not?
(32:12):
Because the people who sent youhere to guard this door, they
didn't tell you why you'reguarding the door.
They just told you to guard thedoor.
So, do you value your paycheckor do you value truth, freedom,
or whatever?
Anyways, the guy makes adecision and he's like, Well, I
was gonna guard the door untilsome manager tells me not to.
She shoots and kills him.
When I read that part in thebook, I was like, all of a
(32:34):
sudden now the hero's themurderer.
Right.
Right?
In cold blood.
Well, the book goes on toexplain essentially, sometimes
there's a moment you have tochoose.
Right.
And that was one of thosemoments where Dagny had to
choose and that guy had tochoose, and you're at an
impasse, and one side has towin, one side has to lose.
And that's unfortunately, if wedon't see the future early
(32:58):
enough to where we can turn theship, it does get to a point
where one side has to win andone size has to lose.
And this is a biblicalprinciple.
Sometimes you have to salt theearth, root and stem.
You have to remove the entiretrace of a civilization because
of because of how dangerous itis to this group that prevails.
SPEAKER_13 (33:20):
But wouldn't it be
easier and nicer for everybody
if we could just write the ship?
SPEAKER_11 (33:24):
Yeah, that's the
beautiful thing about we could
write the ship, right?
We really could write the ship,and now it comes down to
elections.
So it becomes there's theselittle focal points where it's
like, do you believe that weshould have an election not on
machines, paper ballots, handcounted, voter ID?
Do you believe that?
Well, no, I I think voter IDkeeps blacks from voting.
(33:48):
You can't see the obvious thing.
Does that make sense?
Yeah.
Like, and that's that's wherewe're fast approaching.
There's no deadline for this,there's no cutoff, there's no
moment, but you're approachingthis situation where people are
making decisions that have otherimpacts that if you don't
understand where collectivismgoes, we will have food lines
(34:09):
and mass starvation becausethat's what they want.
Because their economic systemwill not pay your pensions,
buddy.
Right?
Their economic system depends onyour kids, but not on your
grandparents.
It depends on your prime of lifebeing given to them to work for
whatever means they want and notfor you.
These are all things that youknow play into the big picture.
In fact, let's go ahead and justjump over some of this Epstein
(34:31):
stuff because it's pointless.
Representative Massey and Rokanaare threatening to impeach Pam
Bondi because enough informationto get didn't get released.
So I went and grabbed the bill.
I looked at the bill and I waslike, okay, it's got victims can
be blacked out, and then it'sgot ongoing investigations can
be blacked out, and then it hasnational security and foreign
policy purposes.
And that's probably just whatthey did.
(34:52):
So that's exactly it.
It's like, you know, nationalsecurity could be, you know why
that could be anything.
That could be well, anything.
Exactly.
The 1947 National Security Actis just a rubber stamp that says
you can never see this ever,ever, ever.
And there's no justification,there's no adjudication, there's
nobody to sue to undo thoseseals.
Pretty convenient.
Pretty convenient.
And then on top of that, theongoing investigation.
(35:14):
So as long as the DOJ says yes,it's an ongoing investigation.
Oh, we have an ongoinginvestigation into the people
that are blocked out.
All of a sudden, noinvestigations ever get closed.
Yeah.
Now these were written by Rokanaand Massey.
So when Massey are like, well,they didn't release all the info
and they didn't give us thelist.
And listen, you wrote the bill,you gave them the outs to be
able to cover that stuff up.
(35:34):
So as long as they say the rightwords, this has just become
political theater where you getto argue and say you didn't
release all the files.
What are you covering up?
But the truth of the matter is,Democrats have had power all
this time.
Trump had four years, four yearsago, and you know what happened?
Epstein got arrested and thenkilled himself.
Okay, so you know, as far asimmediately.
Yeah.
(35:54):
As far as that's concerned, youknow, the only president who's
taken any action against anybodyin these elite sex trafficking
rings has been President Trump.
So at a certain point, you guysare kind of barking.
You're all talk, no show.
Mike Benz um revealed this isthe key to the Epstein.
Bear Stearns put him as BCCItrades in 1979 as it made
(36:17):
millions helping the CIA, Brits,Saudis, and Israelis disguise
covert cash by clearing$13billion with BCCI, a CIA money
money laundering bank.
Epstein simply developed thatcliendele niche.
So basically, you know, thewhole Iran-Contra scandal.
Epstein was the money guy.
Oh.
Okay.
(36:37):
And that's it goes, it goes allthe way back to there.
That's where Bill Barr hasinvolvement with Epstein, not
just his dad hiring, but BillBarr obviously covered up for
Iran Contra, and Epstein was themoney guy.
So Epstein's roots go all theway back to Ronald Reagan and
tie in with that circle.
Now that makes perfect sensebecause moving forward, who
(36:57):
becomes the Democrat Party?
The neocons, right?
Or at the time they were neoconsand then they became they became
uh neoliberals, and you had thecontinuation like bombers still
nation building, right?
Like you there's yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (37:11):
I wonder what Oliver
North would say about all this.
SPEAKER_11 (37:16):
Not reliable.
Not reliable.
Uh Oliver North took to fall forall of that.
And uh yeah, not it wouldn't bereliable.
It'd still be interesting.
Yeah, it would be interesting.
Pony Boy says, if we don't hangtogether, we'll all hang
separately, should be themessage.
They're doing the old divide andconquer.
Yes, they are doing the olddivide and conquer.
And they'll do it with anything,which is why we have to be
(37:38):
principally based, right?
We have to know which directionwe're going.
We have to recognize politics ispolitics.
There's a lot of stakeholdersand a lot of vested interests.
So, yes, policy making is messy,but directionally, right?
Are there kids in locker roomsor men, men, and boys, boys, or
women, women, and you know whatI'm saying?
Like, are we making the bigsteps to go the right direction?
(37:59):
And I think the answer is yes.
Now, there's still derangedpeople out there who literally,
just like Rob Schneider talksabout with the Soviet Union and
Pravda, Washington StateSuperintendent and Public
Instruction.
Got a little bit of that comingup in the show.
Oh.
Speaking of, okay.
So this is uh Devin Nuneztalking about Jack Smith and the
ongoing Russia collusionnarrative.
SPEAKER_20 (38:19):
Evidence that shows
that this was actually a witch
hunt from day one, and you thinkthey wanted that, and that's why
they went to Mar-a-Lago.
But Devin, we've been talkingabout this for 10 years, and
still I haven't seen anyaccountability.
Will there ever be anyprosecutions?
SPEAKER_05 (38:37):
Well, look, that's
that's the important point of
what came.
I said this on your show, what,three or four years ago,
whenever the raid happened, andand then it took until just last
week when the news broke thatyes, what I said three years ago
was actually true.
They were looking for thatdocument that you have in your
hand.
So, what does that mean?
That means that I think thatMar-a-Lago, President Trump, and
(38:58):
his family are at the center ofthis.
Uh, I think that the, you know,in Florida, this now puts
jurisdiction clearly in Florida.
And that's how you getaccountability is by bringing
criminal charges, criminalinvestigations in Florida
against people who perpetratedthis on the American people.
Because, look, as we know, we'vegot all kinds of problems in the
(39:19):
court systems.
Anything that ends up in thebroader DC area or in a blue
state is problematic.
The beauty of this is that thejurisdiction now, because of
that evidence that came out inthe past week, that they were
looking for that document atMar-a-Lago, I think that's the
center of this wholeinvestigation because it was
preposterous.
It sent messages all over theglobe that America now is a
(39:44):
third world country where we'reraiding a former president's
home.
That was a it was a message sentaround the world.
It now has to be cleaned up.
People are going to be heldaccountable.
I'm I'm I strongly feel thatway.
And this was an important pieceof evidence that came out in the
last.
Week.
SPEAKER_20 (40:00):
Well, I mean, what
if it doesn't get concluded
while President Trump is inoffice?
What if President Trump finisheshis term and leaves office?
Does everything go away?
SPEAKER_05 (40:12):
Well, look, I think
if if President Trump uh leaves
office, uh, it will depend onwho who follows in his
footsteps, but you can't take10, 15 years of corruption and
clean it up in 10 months.
Uh, but that's what uh I knowthat Cash Patel, uh uh Attorney
General Bondi, they're doingtheir best to get it done.
And look, let's see, a lot ofevidence has come out.
(40:34):
First, you got to get the facts,you got to get the evidence, and
then you have to build the case.
Uh, my guess is that there'll bemultiple investigations that are
ongoing right now.
SPEAKER_20 (40:43):
And and and the Jack
Smith behind closed doors
interview.
What is your takeaway there?
Um, he said politics had nothingto do with anything that he was
doing, Devin.
SPEAKER_05 (40:56):
Right.
Jack Smith is a leftist.
Uh, he's a very dangerous manwho's been at the center of
power working with Obama's toppeople for he's known as their
their henchman, the guy thatthey sent in, their fixer, so to
speak.
Uh so whatever Jack Smith saysin public, he actually means the
opposite.
Or another way to say it iswhatever he accuses you of doing
is what he's actually doing.
SPEAKER_20 (41:19):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_11 (41:19):
And and I've seen
that that that is one of the
things that is important tounderstand is there are people
out there who wear vestiges ofpower that say the opposite
every time.
They will always tell you you'redoing the thing they're doing.
They'll make you defend whatthey're doing, that you're not
(41:40):
doing it, and it muddles thewater.
And it's it is to precision.
Jack Smith is that.
Well, we're gonna accuse you ofelection interference.
Excuse me?
What weren't we just sayingthat?
Yeah, you were, right?
Isn't this what Rudy Giulianiwas saying all this time was
election interference?
Yes, but now we're gonna paintyou with it.
But but but but we had thecredible evidence.
(42:01):
Well, we don't, but we have thebully pulpit.
SPEAKER_20 (42:03):
Before, uh many
times.
As as uh the Democrats have uhliked to say in the past that
President Trump is a threat todemocracy, while in fact they
are in the middle of obstructingdemocracy by selecting people
instead of electing people, uh,et cetera, et cetera.
SPEAKER_05 (42:22):
Exactly.
And that's that's where I thinkthese investigations need to go.
Uh and look, uh, ultimately, youknow, justice uh delayed is
justice denied.
Uh, but I feel strongly that theteam that President Trump has in
place is going to track allthese issues down and hold
people accountable.
SPEAKER_11 (42:39):
All right.
Well, well, I sure hope so.
And Devin Nunes is in you know,pretty good communication with
the president since he's CEO ofhis company.
So I I really hope that we getsome accountability.
Roger Stone addressed this atAmphest as well.
SPEAKER_24 (42:54):
Sure, not the past,
but there is one matter we have
to clean up.
It has now been 156 days sincethe director of national
intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard,exposed through all of the
declassified documents that theRussian collusion hoax was the
greatest single dirty trick inAmerican politics.
(43:17):
It was an abuse of power inwhich the full authority of the
United States government wasused to topple a duly elected
president.
But more precisely, there was aseditious conspiracy that was
born in the Oval Office in 2016with Barack Obama president, Joe
(43:39):
Biden, Susan Rice, the NationalSecurity Advisor, uh Vice
President Biden, as I say, uhCIA director, Islamic convert
and communist CIA director JohnBrennan, the FBI director, James
Comey.
This list goes on.
(44:01):
My question is a simple one.
It is not about revenge andretaliation, it is not about
retribution, it is aboutaccountability and justice.
SPEAKER_11 (44:18):
That is just it.
It's about accountability andjustice.
When I think about what happenedto me, because I stood up to a
stolen election on January 6th,and I think about pushing a
gate, and then I think about aseven-year prison sentence, that
was retaliation.
That was revenge for speakingup.
It had nothing to do with what Idid.
It had everything to do withwhat it represented.
SPEAKER_13 (44:40):
Well, it was telling
the rest of America the same
message of you speak up, you'regonna get seven years.
SPEAKER_11 (44:46):
So when we talk,
yeah, when we talk about down in
Portland, at federal charges, agirl stabbed an ICE officer with
a knife three times.
Okay.
Stabbed actually stabbed twoofficers, I think, a total of
three stabs that werepenetrative, okay, like blood
everywhere.
She got three months probation,federal charges.
(45:07):
Okay.
So yes, there's definitely atwo-tier just system of justice.
But when he talks about justice,that's the American ideal.
It's not retribution.
If you do something wrong, youdo the time, right?
And that's what has to happenbecause they did something
wrong.
There has to be some level ofaccountability.
Otherwise, what will happen isthe pendulum swinging, right?
At some point, and I'm notsaying guys like me, including
(45:31):
myself in that group, but peoplewho have been targeted, families
who were destroyed because oftransgender activism, families
who were destroyed because ofmedical bills gone awry because
of the rising cost of medicalbills, families that can't get
off the ground, or young men whocan't start a family because of
the cost of housing.
At some point, they take yourhouse.
(45:53):
At some point, they just takethe goods and services without
paying.
At some point, that's how thependulum swings, and that's how
you end up having the entiresystem fall apart.
If there can't be justice, ifthere can't be accountability,
it totally will fall apart.
So Roger Stone's right to bringthat up.
What do you got for us there,Ron?
SPEAKER_13 (46:11):
Let's check it out.
Still haven't tried 77 coffee.
Now's your shot.
The 1775 starter kit justdropped.
Only a thousand units.
You're getting the bold darkroast that hits hard, the smooth
medium roast, and the vitalitymushroom coffee for clean energy
and laser focus.
No crash.
(46:31):
All single origin, small batch,toxin-free and mold-free.
Plus, you're also getting a goldspoon clip because freedom isn't
scooped with plastic.
A frother strong enough to stirup your coffee and your
mother-in-law's opinions, and ablack 1775 tumbler,$170 worth of
coffee and gear, yours for$99.
This is for the ones who've beenwatching 1775 blow up on Rumble,
(46:55):
wondering if it's actually worthit.
Spoiler, it is.
Go to 1775coffee.com slashstudio and grab your starter kit
before they're gone.
Old beans, clean fuel, and amorning routine that stands for
something just like Rumble does.
SPEAKER_11 (47:09):
I think my favorite
line in there is spoiler, it is.
All right, we got to do a raidthis morning.
So Ron's gonna get that going atsome point here, and we want you
guys to go and spread the goodword of the peasants.
Go into the other chats, droplinks, let them know we're here,
and we want them to come joinus.
So those of you that can dothat, Ron will get that going
here in just a minute.
And I am gonna go ahead and playthis little clip right here.
(47:33):
This is HUD Secretary ScottTurner talking about they just
completed a study on immigrationand rents.
SPEAKER_17 (47:54):
Uh HUD just put out
uh its own report uh uh backing
up this argument about um howbig of an impact immigration has
had on the housing supply sideof this issue.
Can you elaborate a little bitmore on uh on the report that
came out of HUD and what it hadto say about immigration
regarding housing?
SPEAKER_11 (48:15):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_23 (48:16):
Absolutely.
So during the Bidenadministration, you know, there
were very weak uh immigrationpolicies with open borders.
Over 12 million uh illegalaliens came over our border
unchecked, uh, no transparency,no accountability, driving up
the housing affordability,driving uh down the supply for
American people.
(48:37):
We're here to support Americancitizens.
And with our report, you seethat the foreign-born population
from 2021 to 2024 increased bysix million.
In that period of time in ournation history, that is the most
ever uh that we have recorded.
And if you look at uh PresidentTrump and look at the border
(48:57):
over the last six months, zerouh illegals were uh crossed over
uh into our country.
Uh rent prices have gone down uhmonth by month over the last
four months.
Two million illegals have leftour country.
So it's no coincidence that aswe check uh illegal immigration,
that rent prices come down.
SPEAKER_11 (49:19):
That's really
significant, right?
Bringing rent prices down.
And what they basically aresaying is in the areas that were
most impacted, New York and thecities that were taking, you
know, basically every sanctuaryjurisdiction, city or state
otherwise, rent prices doubled.
The demand was double, whichcreated a huge increase in rent
demand.
Right.
That one of the interestingthings I've thought in this
(49:40):
area, at least up where I'm at,right?
We're up there, is rents kind ofhave been stable for four or
five years.
Like what we could have rentedour house three or four years
ago is about what we could haverented it for today, but we
don't have a mass immigrationthing in North Kitts app.
SPEAKER_14 (49:55):
No, right?
SPEAKER_11 (49:55):
But when you talk to
people that are over in Seattle
or down in like Lakewood andFife, that area where there is a
lot of immigration, rents havebeen stupid.
What do you got there?
I don't know.
I'm just watching the chats.
Holman needs to come to Houston.
Yeah, he does.
Did the raid go successful?
How did that I don't know?
I might not have done it right,I was guessing if I did it
right.
(50:16):
We need to do a little.
It doesn't look like anybodyfrom our group jumped over into
the the raid there, so let'ssee.
SPEAKER_13 (50:22):
I just saw a couple
of good mornings, and I was
wondering if that wasconversation on the other chat.
SPEAKER_11 (50:27):
I don't think so.
SPEAKER_13 (50:28):
Okay.
SPEAKER_11 (50:30):
What do you need to
figure out, figure it out here?
Oh I don't see so many things tolearn with this.
SPEAKER_13 (50:41):
Am I doing that
right?
Slash raid.
SPEAKER_11 (50:49):
See, there's uh
RMTP.
It's just it's forward slashforward slash raid in as the
chat channel owner modery.
Paste copy journal to chat,press enter to initiate the
raid, confirm the details, andnotify his videos of the raid.
You have been notified.
There we go.
Pow.
Boom.
All right, there you go.
Go in, spread the word, bringthe peasants back.
My raiders.
(51:09):
We're sending the raiders out.
We have our digital art.
Go raid the morning answer withJennifer Horn.
Go let her know we're here.
The peasants have arrived.
Well, look, the peasants'perspective has raided this
stream.
I'm looking at it here.
Go chat.
Go spread the good word.
How fun is that?
Oh, that's hilarious.
(51:30):
What a fun little game we play.
SPEAKER_13 (51:32):
We're gonna be like
the uh digital gangas can.
SPEAKER_11 (51:35):
Yeah, we might have
to change the name to like
Peasant Vikings or something.
SPEAKER_13 (51:38):
Yeah, Genghis Khan.
SPEAKER_11 (51:39):
CST tip time.
Howdy from Brazier, great to bewith you from the Peasants
Perspective podcast, thePeasants Perspective Howdy.
Love it, you guys.
Yes, how great is that?
All right, we'll go ahead andkeep talking in the background.
Carlito mentioned Tom Holman.
Tom Holman gave a speech atTPUSA, and good howdy.
SPEAKER_02 (51:56):
We are gonna get it
done.
Promise number two that he kept.
The biggest deportationoperation in the history of this
nation.
In less than a year sincePresident Trump's been in the
Oval Office, we're in the yearabout 650,000 deportation, which
(52:16):
blows any record out of thewater.
So he's already he's alreadybeat every record there when it
comes to deportation.
But we got nearly two men lefton their own, because they knew
Ice was out there looking forhim, they decided to leave on
their own.
So record number of removals.
Forget this.
While Pam Bondi is suing theDepartment of Uh uh the
(52:37):
Sanctuary Cities, once we beatthe Sanctuary Cities, once we
bring all 10,000 new agents onthe ground, you ain't seen
nothing yet.
SPEAKER_11 (52:51):
They got 10,000
agents coming, and Tom Holman
was also on with MariaBartolomo, and he revealed
something that is like goodnews, really good news.
SPEAKER_02 (53:01):
I want to mention
one other thing.
Just reported last week.
300,000 children went missingunder Joe Biden.
They weren't looking for them,they couldn't find them.
So far, the Trump administrationkept its promised American
people.
They have they've alreadylocated 129,000 of these
children, thanks to the work ofFBI, DHS, and HHS.
SPEAKER_13 (53:34):
Well, that's a
number.
SPEAKER_11 (53:37):
So the morning
answer responded, Howdy and
Peasants Perspective, we're alocal morning show in Los
Angeles.
Hope y'all enjoy.
We are a Washington uh stateshow.
Try to be national, butcommentary for the common man.
We do cover national news.
(54:01):
How fun.
Woohoo! The morning answer withJennifer Horn.
We love it.
What a great thing.
Okay, so 129,000 people.
I when I think about that, it'slike the entire population of
Bremerton.
That's probably like close tothe population of our whole
county.
Uh our county is 270,000.
270,000.
So basically that's likeSilverdale Bremerton population.
(54:21):
Yes.
Something like that.
Uh that is an incredible amountof kids that have been gathered
up, which then also goes intowhere are they?
Where are they being housed?
Are they going back to theircountries of origins?
Are they being reunited withtheir parents?
Like, who knows?
I mean, this is one of thosethings where God bless Tom.
SPEAKER_13 (54:39):
Well, I'll tell you
what.
When I originally heard thatthere were 300,000 kids missing,
I thought, well, hold on.
That's a really big number.
Either there's no way thatthat's true, or how are they
tallying that?
And then to hear that we'verecovered nearly half is equally
(55:00):
as incredible.
It's huge.
It's a huge number of people.
I just can't, I don't even knowwhat that looks like.
SPEAKER_11 (55:07):
I know.
And I think that's the thingthat the Democrats and the
Communists they count on scalebeing their friends.
Stalin famously said it.
One life is a tragedy, a millionis a statistic.
SPEAKER_13 (55:18):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_11 (55:18):
But yet we feel the
pain of one life.
If your son or daughter goes towar and loses their life, you
feel it.
It's your only child, right?
These kids that have beenmissing, each and every one of
them has a unique story.
Each and every one of them havepeople that touched or harmed
them along the way that needs tohave justice exercised on them.
Each and every one of them, youknow what I'm saying?
(55:39):
Like Yeah, in a way that can'tbe described when you're talking
about a million of them.
The scale of this is beyondbelief.
There were indictments that weredropped yesterday on the leaders
of Trende Agua in the UnitedStates.
Patrick Byrne addresses thisbecause obviously he's been
deeply involved in the Venezuelaand the whole how this is all
working.
But these this Trend de Agua,the indictments included human
(56:01):
trafficking and how theybasically give these people a
ticket, they call it a ticket,and they have to pay it off,
which is this never-endingpayoff.
So they're either in work camp,slave labor, or sex labor.
SPEAKER_07 (56:11):
This is evil,
though.
Americans, what's reallyimportant is to understand this,
not like, gee, a whole bunch ofbank robbers and bad guys got
rounded up.
It's that the front line of aforeign of World War III that
was sent to overthrow ourcountry or to finish us off.
Really, the the we got itsoftened up over the last five
years, the finishing us offforce just got indicted.
(56:34):
Which means we can take andindicted not just for being
normal criminals, but criminalswho have been trafficking arms,
crossing national lines, sextrafficking, and using extortion
to do so.
Extortion against the girls andtheir families.
They call the girls themultadas.
Did you see that in theindictment?
The multadas of a multa inSpanish is like a fine or a
(56:58):
ticket in the sense of a parkingticket, a fine.
So these are to say the multadasmeans the girls who have been
fined or ticketed becausethey're they're registered, they
get smuggled in, and thenthey're sent to do, they have to
do sex work to pay off their umtheir deal, their, you know,
their mul the multa.
(57:18):
And so they're the multadas, andthey never get out of it.
The fine just goes up, and I'msure there's interest and this
and that.
They're using extortion againsttheir family members.
I mean, this is evil.
I mean, these are just pure evilpeople.
SPEAKER_11 (57:30):
Absolutely.
So, meanwhile, while we're stillarguing about the former dead
sex trafficker named JeffreyEpstein, the real sex
traffickers got indicted.
You know, the ones that wereinvolved in bringing 300,000
kids, but yet we're stillarguing about Epstein and oh,
we're gonna indict Pam Bondy,who just dropped an indictment
(57:55):
on the actual sex traffickerswho brought over hundreds of
thousands of kids.
But oh, they covered up DonaldTrump's face, or somebody next
to him, or psyop.
100% psyop, right?
Here you've got Tom Holmansaying we've recovered 129,000
children currently today thatwere held in captivity, bondage,
(58:16):
sex trafficking, you know, childlabor trafficking, all that kind
of stuff.
And yet we're like, well, backin '97, this girl got on a plane
ride.
Is it important to get justice?
Yes, it is.
And if there's one thing welearned, this Clinton, by the
way, the Clinton pictures.
I mean, this guy had lots ofpictures in pools and blah blah
blah with kids.
Dead to rights.
(58:37):
Okay.
Dead to rights.
I don't know if there's evergoing to be anything done
because you know, nationalsecurity, but we should.
JD Vance, uh, Fraser says, Do weget back in by rejoining?
I don't know what you mean.
I'm assuming that's rejoiningour chat.
Uh, probably.
I don't know.
Anyways, that was fun.
That was fun that uh JenniferHorn let us join in there.
That's a pretty um okay.
(58:57):
So this is JD Vance, and thisagain, he Erica Kirk endorsed
him for 2028, and that was kindof the thing.
I mean, JD Vance is the heirapparent as far as the 2028 run.
And JD Vance not only said youdon't have to be ashamed to be
white anymore, which is like,but then he went on to say this
(59:19):
these are great, contrast thiswith Barack Obama, who said
America is no is not a Christiannation.
SPEAKER_29 (59:26):
More than any time I
can recount, people are talking
about American identity andfiguring out what it is that
unites us.
But I want to say somethinghere.
The only thing that is trulyserved as an anchor of the
United States of America is thatwe have been, and by the grace
of God, we always will be aChristian nation.
SPEAKER_13 (01:00:00):
Hear you talk, but
there's a huge amount of
applause.
Yep.
And I'm applauding for that toyou.
Great enthusiasm.
SPEAKER_29 (01:00:17):
Now I want to be
explicit because of course the
fake news media will twisteverything that I say.
I'm not saying you feel aboutthem the same way I do.
I'm not saying you have to be aChristian to be an American.
I'm saying something simpler andtruer.
Christianity is America's creed.
(01:00:40):
The shared moral language fromthe revolution to the civil war
and beyond.
Across that history, ourcountry's major debates have
always centered on how we couldbest as a people please God.
That greed.
Think about it.
That creed motivated ourunderstanding of natural law and
(01:01:03):
rights, our sense of duty toone's neighbor, the conviction
that the strong must protect theweak, and the belief in
individual conscience.
Even our famously American ideaof religious liberty is a
Christian concept.
Because we're all creatures ofGod, we must respect each
(01:01:24):
individual's pathway to thatGod.
But over the last 50 years,there has been a singular focus.
SPEAKER_11 (01:01:33):
Over the last 50
years, so we talked about is
America divided, the answer isyes.
For the last 50 years, what wasgoing on 50 years ago?
The height of the Cold War.
And you had a secular,atheistic, collectivist power in
the form of the Soviet Unionspreading its spies and
tentacles in an amoral way.
(01:01:54):
You want to use, you want to usesex spying, do it.
You want to use drugs to getinfluence?
Do it.
You want to commit fraud, do it.
Because the ends justify themeans.
It doesn't matter how manypeople we kill.
If the end result is utopia, itwas worth it.
Okay.
That was going on.
And they sent infiltrators tocorrupt the young minds of
(01:02:15):
Americans.
There's a lot of boomers, right,who have not lived out their
Christianity, though they mightclaim to be, because of that
type of influence.
Okay.
You cannot vote your way out ofan indoctrinated society.
That is the stark reality checkhere.
Okay.
So the debate has always beenyes, Democrat, Republican, but
(01:02:38):
we're both Christian.
That's what makes us neighbors.
That's what makes us countrymen.
Right?
It's that shared value.
But 50 years ago, there was anintentional effort by a foreign
adversary to infiltrate ourcountry and take over.
And that adversary is notcalling the shots anymore.
The children of that generationwho bought into that early stage
of the doctrine doctrinationbecame the Nancy Pelosi's, the
(01:03:01):
Chuck Schumers, and many ofthese names that have, you know,
Christian in name only, right?
SPEAKER_29 (01:03:08):
A war that has been
waged on Christians and
Christianity in the UnitedStates of America.
And let me say, of all the warsthat Donald Trump has ended,
that is the one we're proudestof.
SPEAKER_11 (01:03:30):
If you've got
someone that's on the other side
of the political aisle as aDemocrat, but is you know a true
Christian that truly understandsthe golden rule, I wouldn't be
worried about being thrown injail for them because they
wouldn't want to throw me injail because then I could throw
them in jail.
They would just go, well, whatdid you actually do that you
need to be punished for?
Because for us as Christians,accountability and justice
matter.
(01:03:51):
And I'd be like, You're right, Imade a mistake.
I gotta, you know, pay a fine ordo whatever.
Does that make sense?
It's like, yeah, you're right, Ibroke the rules.
It becomes almostself-enforcing.
The system's voluntary becausewe live the golden rule.
And we might debate tax rates,but we're not out to kill each
other.
But once you introduce theactual collectivist versus
(01:04:11):
individualism, once youintroduce a secular communism,
or as Tulsi Gabbard goes on toexplain, it's not just secular
communism, it's Islam itselfthat have partnered up and share
the same ideology because Islamis collectivist, so it
identifies with Marxism.
It uses it very well.
This is what Tulsi Gabbard hadto say about the actual enemy
(01:04:33):
today.
SPEAKER_28 (01:04:34):
Which issued a call
to action to use American legal
and political systems toimplement Sharia law.
This is already underway inplaces.
This is already underway.
SPEAKER_11 (01:04:46):
This is not a
politician.
I mean, right?
This is not a House ofRepresentative member that's
playing to a far-right district.
This is the director of nationalintelligence.
Every single intelligence agencyfrom all five uh all five
military intelligenceoperations, the CIA, the FBI,
the DEA, there's 27 differentmilitary or uh intelligence
(01:05:10):
operations that answer to thiswoman right now.
So when she says this, take alisten.
Okay.
She says this, take a listen.
SPEAKER_28 (01:05:18):
Already underway in
places.
This is already underway inplaces like Houston.
This is not something that maypossibly happen.
It is already happening herewithin our borders.
Patterson, New Jersey is proudto call themselves the first
Muslim city.
They are working to implement intheir own governments these
(01:05:40):
Islamic principles that areforced on people through the use
of laws or violence.
The bottom line is this when wetalk about the threat of
Islamism, this politicalideology, there is no such thing
as individual freedom orliberty.
As Charlie said over and overagain, it is fundamentally
incompatible with our nation'sfoundation of freedom.
SPEAKER_15 (01:06:10):
That's something too
that I've mentioned before.
SPEAKER_11 (01:06:13):
They don't believe
in the individual soul.
SPEAKER_28 (01:06:15):
When we understand
that our freedom comes from God
and no one else, we understandthe seriousness of this Islamist
ideology threat because it meansthey deny that God is the one
who has bestowed this right tofreedom in every one of us.
SPEAKER_11 (01:06:35):
It is the exact
opposite of our core beliefs
about well, God created us andhe made us individuals.
They don't have that same thing.
God created you and you're justpart of his will.
There's no concept of self andthe I am and your own individual
connection with God.
It is fundamentally theopposite.
And anybody who studies it cansee it.
SPEAKER_13 (01:06:56):
It's a death cult.
SPEAKER_11 (01:06:58):
Huh?
SPEAKER_13 (01:06:58):
It's a death cult.
SPEAKER_11 (01:06:59):
It's a death cult,
yeah.
And so despite our wanting to beopen and inclusive, it has to be
on our terms.
This is our country, after all,a Christian nation that has
infused and informed everydebate and conversation we've
had.
And that's what's at stake here.
Even people like Nicki Minaj,who took the stage, had this to
(01:07:22):
say about that.
SPEAKER_21 (01:07:25):
We won't be silenced
ever again.
We will speak up for Christianswherever they are in this world.
We won't be silenced ever again.
We will speak up.
That was a short clip, yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (01:07:40):
I never thought I'd
be listening to a Nicki Minaj
with any kind of seriousness.
SPEAKER_11 (01:07:45):
I know, I know.
So Nicki Minaj was asked aboutthis, and she kind of misspoke
and said assassin for JD Vance.
SPEAKER_21 (01:07:52):
I feel that there
are people out there who felt
good about chastising Christiansright here in our country.
And it's kind of really, reallysick.
(01:08:13):
We can't let people like that bein power, you guys.
That's the truth.
I can sugarcoat it and laugh andkiki, but the truth is I am here
today to tell you guys that.
We absolutely cannot let peoplewho have a problem with us
(01:08:40):
worshiping God.
We cannot have them in power.
We cannot have them in power.
All you have to do is look atwhat is happening in other
places in the world.
Look at what is being done toChristians all around the world.
(01:09:02):
And ask yourself why people inthis country that were in
positions of power felt socomfortable to try to take our
voices from us.
They were that afraid, they arethat intimidated, they are that
(01:09:24):
insecure, they are that smallinside that hearing us and
seeing us worship God irritatedthem.
Our spirit irritates thembecause when we speak, they get
shown up.
(01:09:45):
When the truth walks in theroom, the lies hide.
They don't come out willingly.
You gotta pry it out of them.
They hide because they don'twant you or anyone to know who
they really are behind closeddoors, because even they know
(01:10:06):
how evil it is to try to deprivepeople of worshiping God.
SPEAKER_11 (01:10:12):
Amen.
We love you.
It was an interesting speech.
Yeah.
I mean, it was an interestingspeech.
We still got a couple, we stillgot another clip that we're
gonna come from her.
Now, one of the things that uh Isaw this weekend, this is in the
uh, this is one of thegovernment's little policy
papers here.
And it's this is memorandum forthe Secretary of State, the
(01:10:33):
Secretary of War.
This is from December 19th, andit's subject winning the 5G race
by the authority vested in me aspresident by the constitution
and the laws of the UnitedStates.
I hereby direct Section One,purpose the next generation of
mobile communication networks,6G, the tear run, will be
foundational to the nationalsecurity, foreign policy, and
(01:10:54):
economic prosperity of theUnited States.
Wow, they got a lot invested inuh, you know, how we get our
phone calls.
I mean, LTE worked all right.
I mean, I'll be honest with you,we could have left it at 3G.
I mean, I just need a call and atext.
This technology will play apivotal role in the development
and adoption of emergingtechnologies like artificial
intelligence, robotics, andwhat's that word say right
(01:11:17):
there, Ron?
SPEAKER_13 (01:11:18):
Oh, geez, I can't
read that.
SPEAKER_11 (01:11:20):
Implantable
technologies.
Oh, 6G will also provide faster,more resilient, more secure
communication network that canbe utilized for national
security and public safetypurposes.
I don't like the wordimplantable.
SPEAKER_13 (01:11:32):
No, I know that the
I I used to hear they used to
say wearables.
Wearables.
That was the new thing becauseit was wearables would be like a
smartwatch or a Fitbit.
Right.
Okay.
Implantables is like they don'twant you taking it off.
SPEAKER_11 (01:11:45):
Yeah, inflammables
is dystopian.
Right.
Representative Anna Polino Lunapointed this out.
Now there is a massive problemhere.
This is just as big a deal asthe boomers with their home
equity and Gen Z with theirliving in their parents'
basement that have home equity.
Okay.
There's as big a divide here.
Donald Trump has aligned himselffor these purposes with the tech
(01:12:07):
bros.
Okay.
And the tech bros are all aboutthe control grid and all about
all that kind of stuff.
Okay.
And the financiers of the worldwant to use the control grid
because they want to make surethat you pay your debts and they
want to auto-draft your creditcard.
Okay.
And we're going to end up movingaway from currency per Elon Musk
because we're going to haveuniversal high income, which
means we're moving to a socialcredit score.
(01:12:28):
It won't be money that you spendbased on what you sell, it'll be
based on social credit.
How much credit do we gonna giveyou to do certain things?
How much good will you do with acouple extra robots?
It's it's gonna be interesting.
SPEAKER_13 (01:12:39):
I love how nobody
makes the connection that a
wearable or a smartphone, even,is the same thing as an ankle
monitor.
SPEAKER_11 (01:12:47):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_13 (01:12:48):
And nobody ever
figures that out.
SPEAKER_11 (01:12:49):
Ankle monitor with a
camera and a voice.
Yeah.
So Anna Polina Luna, it kind ofpushes off the the uh digital ID
onto Elizabeth Warren, butDonald Trump is pushing it
pretty hard.
SPEAKER_16 (01:13:02):
Currently in the
Senate, we have Elizabeth
Warren, who's been pushing toallow digital ID in the United
States of America.
We know the dangers of digitalID and what it could mean.
It doesn't matter if you're onthe left or the right, if they
don't like what you're saying,they can silence you.
And yet, we just had SpeakerJohnson, of which I'm very proud
(01:13:24):
to say, that he has committed togoing to literal war with the
Senate if they do not codify inthe appropriations process a
permanent ban in digital ID.
And that is exactly what we needto maintain freedom in this
country.
SPEAKER_14 (01:13:37):
Okay.
SPEAKER_13 (01:13:38):
And if you keep
taking your digital ID off,
we're gonna implant it in you.
SPEAKER_11 (01:13:43):
That's where we're
going.
You know, there's a I postedthis weekend on X because Scott
Pesser's like, oh, in WashingtonState, you're not gonna get
voter ID because people won'tsign it.
And I posted, I said, there's apoison pill because it says we
want voter ID, we want real ID.
Real ID is that digital ID.
Once you get real ID, you'vekind of given in.
That was you volunteering to bemarked, labeled, and that's it.
(01:14:06):
Everything you do online now,there's no plausible
deniability.
That was you.
Everything you buy, I mean, itis it is the beginning of it,
right?
And they'll pitch it to usbecause, well, those who have
real ID don't get deported, andthose who have real ID can have
a bank account, and those whohave real ID can use this new
financial system.
Look, you can go on the planefast.
Yeah, you get 10 free Chuck andCheese tokens if you get your
real ID and get on board withthe new system, okay?
(01:14:27):
So the whole thing is is leadingthat direction.
I appreciate that they'refighting it because it is like,
listen, I understand strongborders, I understand a
passport, get everybody who'snot supposed to be here here so
that those of us that are herecan have the assumption of
having needed to be here, right?
Allow the states to havedisparate and different ID
cards.
SPEAKER_13 (01:14:46):
They will use that
as the reason that you need it.
We need the real ID so we knowwho here is real.
SPEAKER_11 (01:14:52):
That's what they're
pushing.
It's it's Machiavellian, andunfortunately, a leader like
Donald Trump gets sucked intoit.
Yeah, I know we need the real IDbecause we got to get the people
out of here.
And I'm like, yeah, we do haveto get the people out of here,
but is it at the cost of menever having freedom again?
SPEAKER_13 (01:15:07):
And that yes, it
reminds me of the thing.
Because maybe I should justdeport me to Uruguay.
It reminds me of the clip thatyou played of Catherine Austin
Fitz.
Donald Trump will usher in.
Yep.
SPEAKER_11 (01:15:17):
So let's bring Biden
in who's totally incompetent,
and we'll never get theRepublicans and the vast
majority of the country toaccept real ID, but he'll open
the border, cause all kinds ofchaos, and then the people will
clamor for real ID to get thepeople who can't qualify for it
out the door.
Exactly.
Machiavellian at his best.
Uh, AOC had this to say.
(01:15:38):
Now, remember, it's okay to bewhite, it's okay to be white,
and it's okay to be Christian,but AOC is still concerned about
being male.
SPEAKER_19 (01:15:48):
And they are able to
radicalize and target and
exploit a generation of youngboys, in particular, away from
healthy masculinity and into aninsecure masculinity that
requires the domination ofothers who are poorer, browner,
(01:16:09):
darker, or a different genderthan them.
And that is why they areresonating online because they
are appealing to the most basicand worst parts of human nature
to divide us.
Oh, okay.
SPEAKER_13 (01:16:23):
Who are those people
they hired to nod?
SPEAKER_11 (01:16:26):
I don't know, man.
Listen, there's the thing, andyou have to, I came to this
understanding clearly morerecently than not.
You cannot outvoteindoctrination.
You cannot change that, right?
We can fix the electionapparatus.
But for example, here inWashington State, and I see it
with my teenagers who we'vehomeschooled, but anytime their
(01:16:48):
friends come around, or anytimethat they get kind of into that
online bubble where we're notfully conscientious of what's
happening, I'm like, where doyou get these ideas?
A joke was recently our daughtertexted another sibling, like,
mom's racist.
Now, if you know my wife, that'sthe furthest thing from reality.
But my wife will say somethinglike the Asian family or
(01:17:09):
something.
And my kids have picked that upas now that's racism, right?
Where are they getting that?
Where are they getting that?
You you see what I'm saying?
I I I had a discussion at thedinner table just the other day,
and I said, kids, words are notracist, deeds are, right?
Don't don't look at someone'swords, look at their deeds.
Now, often words follow deedsand words can precede deeds, but
we don't we don't hold wordsagainst people, right?
(01:17:31):
Right.
So I was like, you got to lookat deeds.
This is Chris or Reichdoll, ourWashington State superintendent
of public education, okay,talking about gender.
Now he does this with everytopic, but again, brace
yourselves, brace yourselves.
I haven't heard this clip, but Ican hear this.
SPEAKER_09 (01:17:47):
Is what they're
putting out into our public
schools.
We have a civil rights frameworkin this state, it includes trans
youth.
This is a biological question.
It is quite simply inaccurate tosay biologically that there are
only boys and there are onlygirls.
SPEAKER_11 (01:18:02):
Okay, that is what
they're pushing.
Everything they talk about inschool biology is to avoid the
solidifying of males are malesand boys and girls are girls.
Right.
What was said at HHS the otherday, right?
No, no, because it's a spectrum.
SPEAKER_09 (01:18:20):
There's there's a
continuum, there is a science to
this.
There are children who are bornintersex.
There are children.
SPEAKER_11 (01:18:26):
There's like 0.0001
people that have to do.
We can deal with that on acase-by-case basis.
SPEAKER_13 (01:18:32):
We don't need to
frick our we don't need to break
our entire system.
SPEAKER_09 (01:18:36):
No.
Children whose chromosomes andtheir hormones aren't consistent
with their sex at birth.
That's not a debate we're gonnahave today.
I just want to remind you of ourcivil rights obligation.
Our state laws make clear thatstudents get to identify and
participate in activities basedon the gender in which they
identify.
SPEAKER_11 (01:18:54):
We're gonna uphold
that law.
You cannot outvote thisnonsense.
You have to just pull your kidsout.
When you have an entiregeneration of kids that are
indoctrinated that way, even ifthey think it's a little kooky,
they've absorbed it, right?
They've absorbed it.
This is Nicki Minaj when asked,you know, what about boys being
boys?
And we're gonna skip over kindof the assassin comment.
(01:19:17):
She made a misspeech.
SPEAKER_22 (01:19:18):
And what do you
think about for young men?
For young men.
SPEAKER_21 (01:19:22):
And for young men,
don't be new scum.
Um, yes, see, they are youngmen.
You have amazing role modelslike our and some dashing
(01:19:42):
president, and you have amazingrole models like the assassin JD
Vance, our vice president.
Alright, we're gonna skip.
And when I there was a littlebit of you have to laugh about.
SPEAKER_22 (01:20:00):
The sense of the
word assassin all of a sudden
she's like, she's an assassin.
Anyways, truly, I have beencalled every single this moment
amazing woman, but I know herheart.
SPEAKER_11 (01:20:10):
And the matter of
graciousness kind of covers for
her for using the word assassin.
SPEAKER_22 (01:20:18):
I will not judge
that then.
Thank you.
SPEAKER_21 (01:20:21):
Um, for lunch for
boys, boys, be boys, amen.
Be boys, it's okay.
Be boys.
It's nothing wrong with being aboy.
SPEAKER_11 (01:20:36):
Even a toxic one
that wants to pick on girls and
brown people.
It's ridiculous.
The stuff that AOC connects.
Alright, guys, this is this isum another video too.
This is coming out of NorthKorea, or excuse me, this woman,
Young Americans, she's fromNorth Korea, she's you know a
survivor, and she's explaininghow it's incremental, right?
(01:21:00):
Communism starts with a prettyface and it ends in an open-air
concentration camp everyfreaking time.
And you can go back through deepworld history and you'll find
the same thing over and overagain.
When a society is based on theindividual and people
voluntarily take care of theirneighbors, those societies last
(01:21:20):
a long time.
When a society turns in onitself and becomes collectivist,
those societies eat themselvesinto oblivion, and you can go
back into deep world history tosee it.
SPEAKER_00 (01:21:36):
But it actually
began with a very handsome man
with a very nice, charmingsmile, like Mam Dani had.
There are three of them, right?
(01:21:57):
So he came along and he was ayoung, passionate man, and he
said to my grandmother's thisbeautiful story.
It is so evil.
They are greedy capitalists withmoney, and there are poor
peasants who cannot go tohospital, who cannot even send
their kids to school for free.
(01:22:17):
This is wrong.
Like I can do something aboutthis.
How about we do something calledsocialism and collectivism and
give opportunity to everybody?
Nobody starves, nobody is notgetting education, everybody
gets a free education, everybodygets free healthcare, and
everybody gets free housing andfree food from the government.
(01:22:40):
And it sounded so awesome,right?
It sounded so compassionate.
Like we don't want our neighborto be on the home, homeless and
suffer, right?
So with that beautiful promise,my grandmother and my
grandfather gave up their rightsone by one.
They first gave up their freedomof speech because there are some
(01:23:02):
horrible people saying thingslike capitalism was good.
So we had to get rid of freedomof speech.
And they also had to give upprivate property because you
cannot be richer than somebody,right?
We had to take all the thingsfrom the rich people first to
create this paradise.
So let's abolish privateproperty.
Nobody owns their home, nobodyhas a car, nobody owns land.
(01:23:24):
It's a public thing.
So they gave up that.
And then they also eventuallyhad to give up their freedom of
movement, freedom of religion.
One by one, they gave up alltheir rights in the just name of
this paradise where everybody isequal.
Eighty years later, now, guys,we all know that North Korea is
(01:23:45):
not a paradise.
It became the biggestconcentration camp, a nation
state, in human history.
The entire nation became apolitical prison camp.
Nobody allowed to in, nobodyallowed to leave.
And with this promise ofequality, the regime divided
(01:24:05):
people into 51 different castesystems.
The regime got an idea.
Oh, we can do something aboutit.
We still can divide people.
They decided to divide up basedon who our ancestors were.
If your great-grandfather was alandowner, they say your blood
is tainted, your genetics isoppressive.
SPEAKER_09 (01:24:26):
History does repeat,
but it sure is hell, right?
SPEAKER_11 (01:24:29):
Yeah, it does.
That is the truth of the matter.
And that is, you know, in a deepsense, that is what gives me a
lot of motivation for thispodcast.
I know that you feel very muchthe same.
It's trying to re-establish, aspeasants, right, this idea of
being tied to the land.
It's to re-establishChristianity, it's to
(01:24:50):
re-establish individualism, tomake selfishness great again.
What do I mean by makingselfishness great again?
The way Ayn Rand describes it,it's the highest virtue.
When you make yourself better, arising tide raises all boats.
If I want to make a profit,presumably at some point I got
to employ somebody who might nothave the natural characteristic
to be entrepreneurial, or youknow what I'm saying?
(01:25:11):
It's we all have a place to fitwhen we all take care of
ourselves.
If we all focus on taking careof ourselves, then and part of
the capitalism value propositionis I make money when I provide
value for other people.
You know what I mean?
A rising tide raises all boats.
Christianity instills that inus.
(01:25:32):
Other systems take that from us.
That's why they hateChristianity.
That's why they oppose it sodiametrically, is because in
their in their mindset, the onlyway their system can work is
when everybody's finally in onit.
And so it just consumes andconsumes.
And then even when they finallyget it, like in North Korea, it
starts to eat itself.
(01:25:52):
Christianity doesn't do that.
It's diametrically opposed.
So, anyways, all right, guys,that's it for us today.
We are gonna forego the privatebecause we did a raid and
everything, and that was alsofun.
This was great.
Oh, I'm I'm still looking at theuh the raid over here.
So many of you guys went overand chatted.
That's awesome.
Very cool.
All right, guys.
Um, and I got, yeah.
(01:26:12):
All right, we'll talk to youagain tomorrow.
Bye-bye.
SPEAKER_27 (01:26:40):
What night lived in
that castle over there?
I'm 37.
What?
I'm 37, I'm not old.
Well, I can't just call youma'am.
You could say Dennis.
I didn't know you were calledDennis.
I did say sorry about the oldwoman, but from behind, you're
not getting to it.
The automatic treatment is likean inferior.
Well, I am king.
(01:27:01):
Oh king.
How'd you get that, eh?
Or hanging on to outdatedimperialist dogma, which
perpetuates the economic andsocial differences in our
society.
There's never gonna be anyproblem.
How do you do?
How do you do, good lady?
I'm Arthur, King of the Britons.
(01:27:23):
Whose castle is that?
The Britons.
We all are we are all Britons.
And I am your king.
You're doing yourself.
Why are living in adictatorship?
A self-perpetuating autocracy inwhich the working class is
opening classes.
(01:27:44):
That's what it's all about.
These good people, I am inhaste.
Who lives in that class?
Then who is your lord?
We can never what?
I told you we're in anarco-syndicalist commune.
We take it in turn to act as asort of executive officer for
the week.
But all the decisions of thatofficer have to be ratified at a
(01:28:06):
special byweaking meeting.
If I think by a civil majorityin the case of your internal
two-thirds majority in the caseof being quiet, I order you to
be quiet.
Are you king?
The lady of the lake.
(01:28:34):
Signifying by divine providencethat I asked was to carry
excalibur.
That is why I'm talking.
Listen, strange women, not animportant distributive sword, is
no basis for a system ofgovernment.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some classical aquaticspeech.
(01:28:55):
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just
because some water returns.
Shut up! Shut up! Now we see theviolence in character! I'm being
(01:29:18):
repressed! Oh what a giveaway!You hear that's what about?
Do you see a repression me?
You saw it in your