Your Government Is Lying About COVID Numbers, and Here's the Proof

Send us a text

The modern American peasant lives at the mercy of powerful elites who manipulate systems to maintain control—and COVID-19 has exposed this reality more clearly than ever before.

When Florida news outlet Fox 35 investigated COVID testing data, they discovered something shocking: dozens of labs reporting 100% positive test rates with zero negative results. Upon contacting these facilities, they found negative tests were being conducted but somehow disappearing from official reports. This bombshell revelation forces us to question everything about the pandemic response. If basic data is being manipulated, what other deceptions are occurring behind the scenes?

Meanwhile, the New York Times—once America's paper of record—has devolved into what former editor Barry Weiss describes as "a performance space" where ideological conformity trumps truth-seeking. Her explosive resignation letter reveals a newsroom where colleagues openly bullied those with centrist views, calling them "Nazis" and posting axe emojis next to their names. This cultural revolution within our most prestigious media institutions explains why coverage of important stories like President Trump's successful MS-13 crackdown (with terrorism charges against gang leadership and thousands of arrests) receives minimal attention.

Perhaps most disturbing is Governor Cuomo's catastrophic nursing home policy that sent COVID patients directly into facilities housing our most vulnerable citizens. While the Javits Center and hospital ships sat nearly empty, thousands of elderly New Yorkers died alone, their families unable to say goodbye or even hold proper funerals. This tragedy perfectly illustrates how detached leadership decisions create devastating real-world consequences for ordinary Americans.

From the troubling connections between Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and Dr. Fauci to the ongoing persecution of General Flynn, powerful forces continue working to preserve their control. But as more people awaken to these realities, the tide may finally be turning. Join me in exploring the truth they don't want you to hear.

Support the show

https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective

www.PeasantsPerspective.com

www.LeftBehindandWithout.org

www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ

www.DollarsVoteLouder.com

buymeacoffee.com/peasant

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her
subjects had no bread, do youknow what she said?
Let them eat cake here.
You take the bomb.

Speaker 3 (00:13):
We're getting screwed , man.
Every time we turn around we'regetting screwed.
Oh, the revolution's gonna bethrough podcasting for sure.
That's the only way we talk.
It's the little guys.
The little guys that take thebrunt of everything.
It's gotta stop.

(00:37):
Peasants, man, we're justpeasants, Every one of us.
You watch those old movies.
You see the peasants in thebackground with the kings and
queens walking around.
We're those people.
We're those people.
All right, welcome peasants.
I appreciate you coming out foranother day.
Let's get it out of the way.
I'll tell you where you canfind me, like I do all the time.

(00:58):
You can find me at PeasantsPodon Twitter, at PeasantsPod on
Parlery the Peasants Perspectiveon Facebook and PeasantsPod at
Twitter, at Peasantspod onParlery the Peasants Perspective
on Facebook and Peasantspod atgmailcom.
Love hearing from you guys,Appreciate all the stuff that
you guys send me.
I really do enjoy it.
Okay, so today we're going tohave, we're going to go over a
handful of different things.
We're going to kind of bouncearound on topics, but I want to

(01:21):
go over President Trump'sTwitter feed.
So yesterday, President Trumphad a handful of good meetings.
President Trump had a handfulof good meetings.
He had one in the Oval Officethat had a lot of law
enforcement there and let's playa little bit about this.
But this briefing was dedicatedmainly to the progress that's
made against MS-13.
So MS-13 is the gang comes outof El Salvador.
It was brutal, brutal gang.

Speaker 4 (01:44):
So I'm just going to play these videos because I
think they kind of speak forthemselves.
This is about MS-13, and we'llhave another announcement next
week with the Attorney General,the FBI and others concerning
our cities, because theleft-wing group of people that
are running our cities are notdoing the job that they're
supposed to be doing and it'snot a very tough job to do if
they knew what they were doing.

(02:05):
So we'll be talking about thatnext week and probably have an
announcement as to what we'replanning to do to help them.
They're supposed to be askingfor help and they don't want to
ask.
So maybe they're proud or maybethey think it's bad politically
, but we can't have happenwhat's happening.
But we're here today to providean update.

Speaker 3 (02:25):
I actually want to jump in and touch bases on that.
So, as you can see thepresident's talking about, you
know, sending federal resourcesto the cities that are
struggling with law and order.
Well, interesting thing aboutthis.
So when you do like a game planand you do game theory and you
kind of go through the crisisand you go through all the
different if, then statements,you know if we do this and we
get the president to act thatway, then this will happen and
you can kind of go through it.

(02:45):
So it feels like 2020 has justbeen an exercise in absurdity,
obviously, but an exercise intrying to push Donald Trump in a
certain direction that wouldhurt him politically.
So, for example, not I mean,and there's multiple
cross-currents of agendas.
So by saying this, I'm notsaying this is the only reason
something's been happening, butby not taking care of the inner

(03:07):
cities and enforcing rule of lawand allowing the riots and the
protests to continue, byhandicapping the police officers
so that they can't do anything,the crime rates rising, letting
prisoners out of inner cityprisons, I mean all of this
stuff combined.
The expected reaction fromDonald Trump, from the left, was
what I mean.
What does the left criticizeDonald Trump all the time for

(03:29):
being a dictator, for being afascist, for being Hitler, right
?
And so the expected responsehere was, as soon as Donald
Trump saw the breakdown in lawand order, as soon as he saw
police precincts being run over,that the expectation was he
would just immediately send inthe troops.
And he doesn't do that right.
He just doesn't send the troopsanywhere unless they're asked,

(03:49):
because National Guard gotdeployed in a few different
places.
You know, once it.
Finally, once the local leadersasked which is kind of takes
away the whole Trump sent troopsargument, right, like, for
example, when the mayor ofMinneapolis and the governor
both they Trump didn't sendtroops on day one or day two or
day three, it wasn't for likewhat?
Four or five days.
And then finally they asked forthe troops Boom problem solved.

(04:12):
Washington DC is a differentstory because that's actually a
federal city.
It's under, like, presidentTrump is the mayor of Washington
DC, even though he's not themayor, but you get the point
right.
I mean, it's federal land.
So what Donald Trump is doingin these cities, what they're
going to do to clean up andthey've already started this a
little bit two weeks ago withOperation I think it's Legend
and they started it in KansasCity.
But the US government, thefederal government, the

(04:34):
executive branch, has a lot oflaw enforcement.
You think about Secret Service,irs, dea, atf, doj, fbi.
All of those agencies have SWATteams, all you know, and
multiple SWAT teams spread outall over the country.
I mean, we're talking like avery large police force,
essentially, so you can usethose tasks force to go make

(04:55):
arrests.
We do it all the time.
So that's, that's the federalresponse that I would expect
next week and that can operatevery covertly.

Speaker 4 (05:01):
So here here we go On my administration's all out
campaign to destroy MS-13, avile and evil gang of people.
We've just concluded a historicoperation leading to the arrest
and indictment of dozens ofsavage MS-13 members and leaders
all across the country.
So this is something that'staken place over the last few

(05:22):
days.

Speaker 3 (05:24):
So MS-13, we're kind of in the wrap-up stages here,
so we're just going to keepgoing with this.
We'll play.
There's a couple of differentclips, we'll just go right
through them.

Speaker 4 (05:32):
More than 20 of the criminals we indicted and
arrested in the past seven dayswere illegal aliens.
Yesterday, for the first timeever, the Eastern District of
Virginia.
Thank you very much.
Indicted MS-13 leaders oncharges of terrorism.
So we have the MS-13 leader oncharges of terrorism and that's
first.
Is that correct?
Yes, mr President, usingterrorism, which gives us extra

(05:56):
strength.

Speaker 3 (05:57):
So what's significant about that is obviously MS-13
operates domestically.
They're international.
I mean they're coming upthrough Mexico and through El
Salvador, but by using thecharge of terrorism that unlocks
a lot of federal governmentpower I mean we're talking
Patriot Act type power.
So by using terrorism, wrappingup one of their leaders, that
means they can continue tomonitor, block money, go after

(06:20):
everybody, not just the MS-13gang members, but anybody and
everybody involved.

Speaker 4 (06:24):
In New York and Nevada, 21 MS-13 members and
leaders have been indicted or incharges including murder,
kidnapping and drug trafficking.
The DOJ has also announced thatit will seek the death penalty
for a bloodthirsty MS-13 leaderresponsible for the despicable
killing of seven Americans,including two teenage girls.

(06:45):
More than 20 of the criminals.
We security for our people.
We want the rule of law.
We want law and order.
In the last three years, icehas deported over 16,000 gang
members and arrested over 2,000members of MS-13.
Think of those numbers 16,000and arrested over 2,000 members

(07:05):
of MS-13.
Think of those numbers 16,000,and arrested over 2,000 members
of MS-13.
We've also deported a lot ofthe MS-13s out of our country.
This week's actions by theJoint Task Force Vulcan is the
most recent offense to we.
Really this has been a bigoffensive in my administration's
war on foreign gangs, of whichwe came into this administration

(07:28):
and we said what's going on?
We had gangs from countriesthat you wouldn't believe.
Well, radical left.

Speaker 3 (07:34):
Yes, that is true.
When Donald Trump came intooffice, there was a mess.
In fact, I was really botheredby Peter Schiff yesterday on Joe
Rogan's podcast it's aterrorism chart bothered by
Peter Schiff yesterday on JoeRogan's podcast, I was really
bothered by Peter Schiff becausehe doesn't understand how the
political pressures would work.
Okay, I'm going to come back tothat, though Let me one more
video.
I skipped over it.
This is Bill Barr, and he'sexplaining kind of the

(07:57):
operations that go after thesegang members, but listen to his
description of their motivation.

Speaker 6 (08:02):
Today we were talking with the president about three
actions we took.
Melgar Diaz was indicted in theEastern District of Virginia.
First time we've used terrorismcharges against a member of
MS-13.
He was responsible foractivities in 13 states, 20
cliques in the United States.

(08:23):
He was also the person whowould green light assassinations
in the United States.
The orders come from ElSalvador or the request to
assassinate people go down to ElSalvador and he would green
light the head we also took down.
This was an HSI case in LasVegas.

(08:47):
We took down the Hollywoodclique, which operated not only
in Nevada but also in Californiaand in the Eastern District of
New York again Long Island andwe took down 21 members and the
leadership of that organization.

(09:08):
And then, finally—these are theNew York indictees.
And then, finally, I announcedthat we are going to seek the
death penalty against AlexeiSayins, who is a leader in the
Eastern District of New York, aleader of MS-13 there.

Speaker 3 (09:29):
Okay, he didn't actually mention it, but he
mentions in the full presscoverage how these gang members
essentially did nothing but beviolent, like one of the gang
members that they're chargingwith.
It was like there was nofinancial motivation to his
crimes, it was just pure terrorand, anyways, super savage.

(09:50):
Ms-13, you know, if youremember, back when Trump was
running for office, he talkedabout animals.
You know these people areanimals, animals coming across
the border.
He was referring to MS-13 gangmembers.
When you go listen to that clip, their're just one of the most
savage gangs that have ever comeinto our country and I'm so

(10:12):
happy to see it getting rolledup.
There's some things that justscare me to death and gangs is
just one of those things.
It's that infiltrative, theyoperate under your noses, kind
of things, and MS-13, originallypeople would comerative, they
operate under your noses, kindof things, and MS-13, you know,
originally people would comeover.
They had a lot of tattoos and,you know, were almost kind of
easily identifiable, but theystarted recruiting people and

(10:32):
they started encouraging theirmembers not to get tattoos and
things like that so they couldblend in, which, you know you
can feel what you want abouttattoos, but the whole point is,
you know, they were very smartand savvy in the way they
infiltrated and came in.
So I love the fact.
I mean 16,000 gang members,2,000 MS-13 members, that's a
lot.
That's an army of people.
I mean, that is so so manypeople, so love to see that

(10:57):
happening.
Okay, peter Schiff, I wastalking about this.
So Peter Schiff is a businessmogul.
He's, you know, made a bunch ofmoney doing whatever.
He's always promoting gold,gold based on the currency, and
he voted for Trump in 2016.
He predicted that he would winbecause, basically, he felt like
Hillary Clinton was bad andAmerica figured it out.
But then he predicted somethings.

(11:18):
He predicted a financial crashin 2020.
Didn't predict COVID, but thefinancial crash, which, honestly
, there was a financial stormbrewing regardless, which I do
think there's a lot of truth tothat, and I don't think we're
out of the woods when it comesto, like, our financial system,
the Federal Reserve and ourmoney situation and our debt
situation.
I think all of those thingsstill have to be worked out.
I think it's a big problem.

(11:40):
I think inflation is a bigproblem, anyways.
So, but Peter Schiff got on JoeRogan's podcast yesterday and I
actually couldn't even toleratethe second half of it.
But and here's the reason,because Peter Schiff's throwing
out something at all.
You know Biden's going to getelected because Biden's got a
better plan and people are goingto want change and they're
unhappy with Trump because X Y Zand X Y Z.
And you know Peter Schiff hemade.

(12:01):
He made some points like yeah,in a normal world we would be
disappointed at some of thethings Trump hasn't been able to
get accomplished, but thishasn't been a normal world.
I mean, when you listen toTrump allies and Trump advocates
and you get into the detailsabout the people that he had to
surround himself in his firstterm in office, you realize
really quickly that Trump didn'thave a first term.

(12:21):
He didn't have allies, hedidn't have people in his corner
, he had a whole bunch of crises.
You know Peter Schiff wastalking about spending money and
he had to have signed thisomnibus bill and he shouldn't
have signed that bill.
It was so much debt.
And you know he had $700billion for the US military.
I mean, what kind of spendingis that?
Well, peter Schiff, are youtaking into account the fact
that very little money was spentto actually reinforce our

(12:43):
military, that most of themilitary money seemed to have
been going into these foreigndeals and foreign contracts.
We had to rebuild the military,quite literally.
We had to rebuild huge aspectsof the military.
We had to fix our steel supplychain.
That was part of that, becausewe were getting cheap knockoff
steel from China, japan, russia.

(13:03):
They were selling us certifiedsteel that wasn't correctly
certified, which is why we had ahard time getting the F-35 off
the ground because the metalkept bending when they would fly
it.
You know, the battleshipsweren't reinforced the way they
were supposed to be.
At one point there was anoperation that was proposed that
Donald Trump wanted to moveforward with and a general came
and said, oh, please don't do it, we don't have enough

(13:23):
ammunition.
I mean, we had a depletedmilitary.
So when someone complains about, you know, trump signing a big,
huge budget package, you haveto take that kind of stuff into
account.
Right, he comes into office andhe has to pick up the pieces
where Barack Obama left off, andit's not truly fair to assess
all of that.
You know, spending necessarilyto Trump, I mean, yeah, sure, he

(13:46):
could have vetoed it, but thenagain we could be completely
defenseless.
You know, when you, when youlook at the bigger picture of
things.
And you know where we're atwith coronavirus and the and the
international threats that faceus.
Gosh, that was.
I mean I can't even imaginefacing this with the depleted
military I mean it's it's hardenough as it is with the size
military we do have.
So, anyways, he's complainingabout that.

(14:08):
And then the other thing, youknow, the coup against the
president.
I mean, he's had a genuinelawfare, a plot against him to
try to remove him from officeand it's been vicious Every
single day.
He's got to fight against that.
Anyways, I just I have a hard,I personally have a hard time
with people who just don'tunderstand reality.
I mean, even with Barack Obama,even with Barack Obama, the shoe

(14:30):
has to fit on both feet, right,you got to give certain leeway,
like I wouldn't blame BarackObama for the Great Recession.
I don't blame it on him, Iblame it on George Bush Jr.
Right, old Jr is the one whogot us into the financial
recession, that whole.
The first month of therecession was December 2007.
So I mean, you can't blame iton Barack Obama, who didn't get

(14:50):
elected for another year afterthat.
So you know, now you can talkabout Barack Obama with the lack
of recovery.
That's fine, but you can'tblame Barack Obama for the whole
recession and that's just theway it is.
But with Trump you've got theseextra factors, you've got this
investigation that shut him down.
I mean, this is Trey Gowdy andSenator Lindsey Graham.

(15:12):
They were on Trey Gowdy'spodcast yesterday and listen to
how Lindsey Graham describes thewhole Mueller investigation
into Donald Trump.
I mean, imagine being thepresident and having this going
on the entire time and you'recompletely innocent.

Speaker 2 (15:25):
Well, you know, the Mueller investigation was one of
the most high-profile events inAmerican history.
To be honest with you, theywere investigating the Trump
campaign of 2016, and apparentlybeyond.
For colluding with a foreigngovernment, People were indicted

(15:47):
.
Nobody's been indicted or goingto jail for working with the
Russians.
But what do we know now, Trey?
Because of the work you did andyour colleagues in the House,
we know that the CrossfireHurricane was probably one of
the most corrupt investigationssince Judge Gerhuger at the FBI.
The Horowitz report, the IG forthe Department of Justice

(16:09):
exposed all kind of troublingproblems.

Speaker 3 (16:14):
So Lindsey Graham is correct here and this is great.
I mean, we're getting to apoint where it's getting into
the zeitgeist and the collectiveconsciousness that you know.
Essentially, donald Trump waskind of hosed in the whole deal
but, by the same token, wherewas Lindsey Graham?
Where was Trey Gowdy?
I mean, matt Gaetz also placesa lot of blame on Trey Gowdy for

(16:37):
not helping get subpoenas.
When we had the House, theSenate and the presidency, he
backed off and he got onnational TV and said what the
FBI did was, you know, fine andevery American should be proud
about the opening, specifically,of Crossfire Hurricane and the
investigation into Trump andFlynn.
So you know, these guys are insome way cover-up artists.
For three years now we've beenhearing Lindsey Graham talk

(16:57):
about he's going to holdcommittee meetings and hold this
or hold the other, and he heldone meeting with Rod Rosenstein
and and then I haven't seenanything else since.
But he did send out a bunch ofsubpoenas.
So we'll see what happens.
But you know these we got tohold them accountable.
It's great that they're talkingabout it.
It's great that it's out there.
That's kind of like the lensthat I see the Trump presidency.
I kind of look at it and Ithink, man, I'm blown away at

(17:20):
how much he has gotten done,considering the facts.
The whole Peter Schiffnarrative about oh, he just
didn't get it done Like okay,yeah, you're the president,
you're the most powerful personin the world, but if Donald
Trump has shown us anything,it's that that position can be
neutralized and if people aren'tplaying off the same sheet of
music or, you know, all workingtogether, you're going to have

(17:41):
some serious issues.
So a couple other thingshappened this week.
Here's one of the things thathappened was Barry Weiss from
the New York Times.
So she was the op-ed editor andthen she took over.
A couple weeks ago they firedtheir editor of the news and so
Barry Weiss took over.
Barry Weiss I'm mostly familiarwith her because she's done a
couple podcasts with Joe Roganand she considers herself

(18:02):
center-left and anyways, she'sresigned from the New York Times
and she's written in herresignation letter.
It's pretty scathing and I wantto kind of go over a little bit
.
So she kind of gives somethanks and things like that, and
then here's what she says.
She said but the lessons thatought to have followed the
election because you know theywere all shocked by the 2016

(18:23):
election.
Lessons about the importance ofunderstanding other Americans,
the necessity of resistingtribalism and the centrality of
the free exchange of ideas to ademocratic society have not been
learned.
Instead, a new consensus hasemerged in the press, but
perhaps especially at the paper,that truth isn't a process of
collective discovery, but anorthodoxy already known to an

(18:46):
enlightened few, whose job it isto inform everyone else.
Twitter is not on the mastheadof the New York Times, but
Twitter has become the ultimateeditor, as the ethics and mores
of the platform have becomethose of the paper.
The paper itself hasincreasingly become the kind of
performance, a kind ofperformance space.
Imagine this, the New YorkTimes being described as a

(19:07):
performance space.
Remember, this is supposed tobe the paper of record.
Right Stories are chosen andtold in a way to satisfy the
narrowest of audiences ratherthan allow a curious public to
read about the world and thendraw their own conclusions.
I was always taught thatjournalists were charged with
writing the first rough draft ofhistory.
Now, history itself is moreethereal than thing molded to

(19:29):
fit the needs of a predeterminednarrative.
This is scathing.
This was an editor at the NewYork Times.
My own forays into wrong thinkhave made me the subject of
constant bullying by colleagueswho disagree with my views.
They have called me a Nazi anda racist.
I have learned to brush offcomments.
I have learned to brush offcomments about how I am writing

(19:51):
about the Jews.
Again, several colleaguesperceived to be friendly with me
were badgered by co-workers.
My work and my character areopenly demeaned on a
company-wide Slack channel wheremasthead editors regularly
weigh in, where some co-workersinsist I need to be rooted out
of this company if the companyis to be a truly inclusive one.
While others post ax emojisnext to my name, still other New

(20:14):
York Times employees publiclysmear me as a liar and a bigot
on Twitter, with no fear thatharassing me will be met with
the appropriate action.
They never are.
There are terms for all thisUnlawful discrimination, hostile
work environment, constructivedischarge.
I'm no legal expert, but I knowthat this is wrong.
I do not understand how youallow this kind of behavior to
go inside your company in fullview of the paper's entire staff

(20:37):
and the public, and I certainlycan't square with how you and
other Times leaders have stoodby while simultaneously praising
me in private for my courage.
Showing up for work as acentrist at an American
newspaper should not requirebravery.
Part of me wishes I could saywhat my experience was unique,
that the truth is thatintellectual curiosity, let

(20:58):
alone risk-taking, is now aliability at the Times.
Why edit something challengingto our readers or write
something bold, only to gothrough the numbing process of
making it ideologically kosher,when we can assure ourselves of
job security and clicks bypublishing our 4,000th op-ed
arguing that Donald Trump is aunique danger to the country and

(21:19):
the world, and soself-censorship has become the
norm?
What rules that remain at thetimes are applied with extreme
selectivity.
If a person's ideology is inkeeping with the new orthodoxy
and they and their work remainunscrutinized, everyone else
lives in fear of the digitalthunderdome.

(21:39):
Online venom is excused as longas it is directed at the proper
targets.
Op-eds that would have easilybeen published just two years
ago would now get an editor orwriter in serious trouble, if
not fired.
Can you believe that this issupposed to be the paper of
record, right, like the New YorkTimes?
We've known this.
I mean.
It's a rag.
It's been junk for a while.
It's basically ever since Trumpannounced.

(22:01):
The New York Times has justbeen completely failed.
But this is like an insider Imean, this is Barry Weiss.
She was the editor of all theseop-eds, she was the editor of
the news desk.
Like this is scathing.
It is perceived.
If a piece is perceived aslikely to inspire backlash

(22:21):
internally or on social media,the editor or writer avoids
pitching it.
If she feels strongly enough tosuggest it, she's quickly
steered to safer ground.
And if, every now and then, shesucceeds in getting a piece
published that does notexplicitly promote progressive
causes, it happens only afterevery line is carefully massaged
, negotiated and caveated.
It took the paper two days andtwo jobs to say that the Tom

(22:45):
Cotton op-ed fell short of ourstandards.
We attached an editor's note ona travel story about Jaffa
shortly after it was publishedbecause it quote failed to touch
on important aspects of Jaffa'smakeup and its history.
End quote.
There is still None appended toCheryl Strayed.
There's still none appended toCheryl Strayed.

(23:08):
Fawning interview with thewriter, alec Walker, a proud
anti-Semite who believes inlizard Illuminati.
So they go through and theylike Tom Cotton's Senator, tom
Cotton's op-ed, they've got tocaveat things and put out
warnings and all this differentstuff.
Got to caveat things and putout warnings and all this
different stuff.
In fact, I think they pulledhis down, whereas you have this

(23:28):
other case where you've got this, someone who's an anti-Semite
and believes in the lizardIlluminati.
They just published theirinterview with no caveats or no
nothing, because it's part ofthis preconceived notion the
paper of record is more and morethe record of those living in a
distant galaxy, one whoseconcerns are profoundly removed
from the lives of most people.
This is a galaxy in which, tochoose just a few recent

(23:52):
examples, the Soviet spaceprogram is lauded for its
diversity, the doxing ofteenagers in the name of justice
is condoned, and the worstcaste system in human history
includes the United States,alongside Nazi Germany.
Even now, I am confident thatmost people at the Times do not
hold these views, yet they arecowed by those who do.
Why?

(24:12):
Because people, they believethe ultimate goal is righteous.
Perhaps because they believethat they will be granted
protection if they nod along asthe coin of our realm, the coin
of our realm language isdegraded in service to the
ever-shifting laundry list ofright causes.
Perhaps because there aremillions of unemployed people in
this country and they feellucky to have a job in the
contracting industry?

(24:33):
Or perhaps it's because theyknow that, nowadays, standing up
for principle at the paper doesnot win plaudits.
It puts a target on your back.
Too wise to post on Slack.
They write to me privatelyabout new McCarthyism and that
has taken root at the paper ofrecord.
All this bodes ill, especiallyfor the independent minded young
writers and editors.

(24:54):
So this is I love it, man.
I love it.
I love it when people justspeak the truth Few years late.
Barry Weiss, you're a few yearslate, but I'm glad that you're
finally speaking the truth.
Okay, something else that'shappening.
So Beijing is realizing that alot of the Western nations that
they've been bullying around,buying off, paying off for a

(25:15):
long time, are just not havingit anymore, specifically the
Five Eyes Networks, theAnglophone countries.
So Australia is beginning.
Australia has kind of alwaysbeen.
They're the ones that the UNand China, anytime they want to
like run an experiment I'm goingto call it a PSYOP right,
anytime they want to run a PSYOPon the West, it always happens

(25:37):
in Australia first.
First of all, they're closer toChina.
They have a differentconstitution.
It's just the first place thatpeople go for influence.
When you're trying to influencethe West, australia tends to be
kind of like the back door, soto hard enough, in my opinion.
I'm probably a pretty hardlineron China because I just think

(26:07):
you know, destroy the CCP now,while you still can it's kind of
my attitude before it getsworse, but it's really good news
.
So this is an article out ofthe Epoch Times headline
Australia Begins UnprecedentedPushback Against Beijing.
And that's great news, reallygood news.
All right, something else that'sin the headlines and I think is
going to continue to be in theheadlines for a little bit, is

(26:28):
the situation Continue to be inthe headlines?
Coronavirus Guess what it's inthe news the coronavirus testing
.
So we're we've had tons andtons of anecdotal reports of you
know, my test came backpositive.
I never took one.
Or you know I didn't have anysymptoms and my test came back
positive.
Or you've got you know I nevergot tested but they said I had
COVID.
I mean you've got anecdotalexperiences all over the place

(26:52):
and there's been a lot ofsuspicion of foul play, a lot of
questioning of motivations.
You know people question is itbecause the hospitals get paid
more if you do get coded withcoronavirus?
I mean there's a whole series ofthings I listen to a lot.
I mean there's a whole series ofthings I consume a lot of
content, I listen to a lot ofdifferent podcasts and I change
a little bit day to day.
I don't always listen to thesame thing, but yesterday I
found myself listening to RushLimbaugh and he had people

(27:13):
calling in.
And multiple people werecalling in with firsthand
experience.
You know nurses, one personthat does insurance coding at a
hospital, and they were talkingabout how the coding is
incorrect, the way they'rediagnosing people, people that
don't have COVID.
If they even have a singlesymptom, they don't even test
them, they just go ahead andmark them down as a COVID
patient.
I mean, it was like call aftercall talking about that.

(27:34):
Well, there was a news crewdown in Florida Fox 35, that
decided to go do a little bit ofdigging because they saw
something a little bit funny.
So listen to this news report.
And what they did was theyfound that a bunch of labs
seemed to be reporting 100%positive testing rates, and so
these journalists went digging.
Take a listen.

Speaker 4 (27:55):
Robert, what did you discover about how they're
counting the coronavirus tests?

Speaker 7 (28:00):
Yeah, there seems to be confusion, brian, on so many
levels here with the coronavirusnumbers.
Now we were tipped off that thenumbers didn't quite look right
.
On the state's daily casereport and looking at the
breakdown of test labs, Iquickly noticed astronomical
positivity rates.
Now, mind you, florida'sCOVID-19 positivity rate is
currently at just under 11percent.

(28:22):
But dozens of labs reported ashaving 100% positivity, some
only reporting positive cases.
The negative column absolutelyblank.
So I asked myself how could100% of people getting tested at
these locations be testingpositive?
So I reached out to several ofour major hospitals in the area
Orlando Health and the OrlandoVA confirming errors in their

(28:46):
numbers in that report.
So after several requests forcomment today the Florida
Department of Health confirmingthat some small private labs
have failed to report negativeresults, some reporting zero
negative results.

Speaker 3 (29:01):
I love how the state health department said some
small private labs.
Guys, when you look at thislist and you look at the number
of tests they were doing, theseare not small private labs.
I mean by small maybe they havea small office space or
something like that, but theywere doing a lot of tests.
This wasn't limited.
There were a few of these labsthat only did 90 tests and 90
positives, but I mean, some ofthese labs were doing thousands

(29:22):
of tests.

Speaker 7 (29:30):
So the department says it is working to obtain
those results and update thestatewide report to fix those
inaccuracies.
But these labs are required bythe state to report all test
results, positive and negative.
A spokesperson here's somethingelse that kind of adds to the
confusion A spokesperson for LeeMemorial Hospital that's out of
the Fort Myers area tells methat they believe there is a
problem with the state's datagathering system because it is

(29:51):
their knowledge, theirunderstanding, that the negative
results from their hospitalwere submitted to the state.
So, brian, more questions to beanswered, but this news all
coming as so many Floridiansalready are doubting the numbers
being reported by the state, somany Floridians already are
doubting the numbers beingreported by the state.

Speaker 3 (30:08):
Okay, so the real concern with this is who's doing
this right?
When the first anecdotalexperiences came out, we just
assumed let's just say we'remainstreamers, right, we're only
going to believe the mostobvious of truths that are
presented in front of us.
We don't read into things verymuch.
So we start hearing theseanecdotal experiences.
Well, every single anecdotalexperience, you know, oh, maybe

(30:29):
that was a bad test.
I mean, they do happen.
You know tens of thousands oftests.
You're going to have a few badones.
That takes care of one falsepositive narrative.
And then you've got the.
You know there was just agenuine error, like the person
doing the coding put in COVIDwhen they should have put in
cancer or something like that.
You can kind of go throughthese little scenarios where you
can excuse a small percentageto just human error, things like

(30:50):
that.
But when you've got situationswhere you have dozens and dozens
of labs reporting 100%, you'vegot hospitals that are reporting
100% but they themselves thinkthey're reporting like 9%, like
the one he mentioned where thelab was saying, no, we're
turning in our negative testresults, but somehow between the
hospital and the state, thestate is turning around and
reporting him as 100% positive.
So where's the hanky-panky here?

(31:13):
Where's the funny businesshappening?
Is it happening at the hospitallevel?
Is it happening at the lablevel?
Is it happening at the statereporting level?
Is it happening at the state,you know, press publishing level
?
Where's the funny businesshappening that they're inflating
these numbers?
Man, it's just, you know,constant, constantly asking
questions.
As peasants, we kind of have tolive with all this right Like

(31:34):
we're not in the seats of power,we're not in a position to be
able to like, do or influencemuch, but at the same time we
have to make life decisions Likeshould I put on a mask or not?
Is there a deadly virusfloating around that I need to
worry about?
Can I go visit grandma orgrandpa at the nursing home?
You know, we've just heard,like, over the over the course
of the last few months, we'vejust heard story after story of

(31:55):
people who've, you know, hadtough decisions to make.
You know, people who, who can'tbury their loved ones.
I mean, all these things matter.
We're the peasants,no-transcript shutting down

(32:34):
businesses.
But now we're suspect that thevirus numbers are not accurate,
but you're still shutting downthe businesses.
This is a five alarm fire inFlorida, right?
I mean, this is like if you'reliving in Florida and this is
happening to you and you'rewatching your Republican
governor, ron DeSantis, fallingvictim to these fake numbers.
Someone's sabotaging RonDeSantis, or is he in on it?

(32:56):
Right?
There's no trust anywhere whenthis stuff is constantly
happening.
Someone's got to take the bullby the horns.
We've talked a couple times thisweek about Dr Fauci.
He is on the outs and I haveheard from multiple different
sources that have sources insidethe White House and elsewhere
that the jig really is up for DrFauci.

(33:16):
So he hasn't spoken to thepresident for a few weeks.
The coronavirus task force hasessentially been disbanded.
I don't know if it's officiallydisbanded or not, but they're
not meeting much anymore and,from what I understand, this is
what we're going to see with DrFauci.
So they've distanced him fromthe president.
So they've put some time anddistance away of Dr Fauci giving
advice or really talking ordoing press conferences with the

(33:39):
president and now they'resmearing Dr Fauci.
This is normal when you've gotto basically change public
opinion on someone, because ifTrump were to just say fire Dr
Fauci three weeks ago, fourweeks ago, when Dr Fauci was the
world's foremost health experton this stuff, it would have
been very politically bad forTrump.
I mean, it would have just beenthis endless thing about how

(34:01):
he's ignoring the science,ignoring this, ignoring that,
but because he keeps Dr Fauciaround, he allows Dr Fauci to
continue to run his mouth andcontinue to say things that are
inconsistent.
Over time these people exposethemselves right as they
continue to be inconsistent.
They continue to ebb and flowwith the political demand,
saying what they want to say.
In fact, there's a really cutelittle puff piece put out on Dr

(34:24):
Fauci.
I think it came out yesterday.
Anyways, it's just one of thoseGQ magazine type pieces.
You know America's doctor, butPeter Navarro put out a skating
op-ed in USA Today, which I readyesterday, saying basically Dr
Fauci hasn't been accurate orright about anything, he's Dr
Doom and Gloom and just kind ofgoes into detail on that.
I think that's excellent.

(34:45):
So we're going to see a littlebit of smearing of Dr Fauci and
then the real fun is when hegets indicted, which I'm hearing
more and more is that hiscrimes, some of his financial
crimes, are very easy toundercover.
He's got a lot of times where,as the director of NIH, he's
steered government grants andthings like that to businesses

(35:05):
that he has ownership in, whichis a huge conflict of interest.
And all this is happeningbecause the reality of the fact
is, with coronaviruses there arereal consequences.
I mean, the virus is real.
I think at this point, you know, was it made in a lab?
Where did it come from?
Who's responsible for it?
Those are all questions thatwe're asking.
But the reality is there is avirus, there is a coronavirus

(35:27):
floating around and it causessome problems, I mean,
especially if you're one ofthose people, you know, one of
those high-risk category people.
So here I'm going to play thisvideo here and this is kind of
in fallout to Andrew Cuomo inNew York, the governor.
He put out that poster a coupledays ago with going over the

(35:49):
hill, going over the hump.
I don't know if you've seen itfloating around on social media.
It's really kind of, in myopinion, kind of a grotesque
poster.
I think it's in very poor, badtaste and I think it's being
received that way generally too.
I mean, I played yesterday avideo of Jake Tapper kind of
ripping into Andrew Cuomoyesterday, a video of Jake
Tapper kind of ripping intoAndrew Cuomo.
That's the left eating the leftright.

(36:10):
Well, this is a Fox News piece.
This is Brian Kilmeade again,and he's actually just talking
with Fox News' meteorologistJanice Dean.
But listen to Janice Dean'sexperience with coronavirus and
kind of what she's feeling, andI have to say that this is
echoed in not just her situationdirectly with coronavirus, but
there's the other forms of thissame kind of suffering.
I've got a guy that I work withthat delivers septic tanks for

(36:31):
me and his father died duringthe coronavirus lockdowns and he
couldn't bury his dad, couldn'tidentify, couldn't do anything
for weeks and weeks and weeks Imean I think it was like four
weeks after his dad died beforethey could finally hold a
makeshift funeral with just afew people I mean the guy's
entire life and when it finallygoes to die, you can only have
no more than 10 people couldattend the funeral.

(36:53):
How tragic is that?
I mean that's just so tragic.
Okay, so listen to Janice Dean.

Speaker 8 (37:00):
My husband lost both of his parents his mom, dee, in
an assisted living facility andhis dad in a nursing home.
They died of coronavirus alone.
We never had a funeral, wenever had a wake, we weren't
able to see them before theydied.
And to see Governor Cuomo ontelevision just this past week
talking about his love life andthis disgusting poster that is

(37:25):
basically a depiction of 32,000people that died, it's not funny
, it's tone deaf and it makes myheart hurt because we're still
mourning our loved ones and wethink that part of the reason is
is because Governor Cuomoallowed over 6,000 COVID

(37:47):
recovering patients into nursinghomes for 46 days straight
6,000 COVID positive patientsinto nursing homes for 46 days
straight.

Speaker 3 (38:02):
That's a big deal.
That's a really big deal.
Here's Donald Trump yesterdayor two days ago, excuse me
talking about Governor Cuomo'smanagement.

Speaker 4 (38:14):
Our senior citizens.
We could have used it for otherpeople.
They could have used it insteadof sending our seniors back
into nursing homes that wereinfected, where you lost
thousands of people.
Thousands of people in New Yorkdied because of poor management
by the governor and it's a verysad thing to see and very sad
to watch and very sad to look atthose statistics.

(38:35):
But we have a.
We have an incredible JavitsCenter that we built with
thousands of beds I think it was2,800 all ready to go and they
could have sent people there orthey could have sent senior
citizens there instead ofsending them into the nursing
homes.
And after all of that work andgetting it done, the Army Corps

(38:56):
of Engineers I mean the job theydid was incredible.
They built it in a matter ofdays.
When it was all completed, femaeverybody was there doctors we
ended up getting doctors.
They said we can't man it.
I said so we'll man it andwoman it.
And that's what we did.
We brought in doctors, nurses,everything.

(39:17):
We're all set.
We said where are the people?
They didn't send the people.
Very few people came in.
They could have sent them intothe Javits Center.
They could have sent them tothe hospital ship which was
virtually unused, but we werethere.
By contrast, my administrationacted very early to ban travel.

Speaker 3 (39:36):
So you know Donald Trump.
I think this is the first timethat he's openly laid the
thousands of people who died inNew York on the poor management
by the governor, laid thethousands of people who died in
New York on the poor managementby the governor.
Now, keep in mind, donald Trumpusually blames China.
So I mean he's really pointinga finger here.

(39:57):
The pressure is on for GovernorCuomo, it's really on, and I'm
curious if he's going to be ableto survive this.
I mean this is a scandal ofepic proportions, this is death.
I mean survive this.
I mean this is a scandal ofepic proportions, this is death.
I mean this is a governor who,basically, thousands of people
died because of hisdecision-making.
I don't know, man, I reallywonder.
And here's the other thing Allacross the country, people are
starting to figure out who BillGates is.

(40:19):
There are all these people'sinterconnected, you know
relationships.
Social media is great for thisbecause it kind of spreads this
around and it gets out in thezeitgeist.
Well, it's out in the zeitgeistto the point that mainstream is
starting to pick up on this.
This is Newsmax.
Listen to this.
Reopen in the fall.

Speaker 9 (40:37):
What do you think about that from the press.

Speaker 3 (40:40):
Okay, I got to caveat this a little bit.
So this is a video of somebodyhas to record the TV, right?
Because a lot of times theseclips go up and then the news
channels have the ability to putthem up on YouTube or whatever,
and they oftentimes get editedbecause these things go out live
with only a few seconds delay,but then sometimes the messaging
is wrong or the content's wrongor things like that.

(41:01):
This is one of these videosthat kind of just disappeared,
but you can only find theselittle handheld clips of the TV
screen, so the audio is not thatgreat and this guy's going to
kind of go off here.
But this is the stuff I've beentalking about.
This is the stuff I've beenresearching and finding out
about Bill Gates, and he's notgoing to make direct accusations
about Bill Gates, but listen tothe connections, remember I've

(41:22):
said it many times You've got toremember the names, remember
the people.
When you start seeing thesepeople overlapping and
overlapping and overlapping, youstart to really wonder what
their associations are and howthey're working together.

Speaker 9 (41:33):
So take a listen and making it very clear that he
wants schools to reopen and, infact, there could be negative
outcomes for those that don'tWell one.
We should definitely open upthe schools and we need to stop
listening to Dr Fauci, who isfunded by Bill and Melinda Gates
, and all of your listeners knowthis.
I know this, you know this, weall know this.
But Jeffrey Epstein is not agood man and Bill Gates spent a

(41:57):
lot of time with Mr JeffreyEpstein.
So I don't think we should belistening to a pedophile for how
to treat our kids, period, andwe shouldn't be listening to
people who spend time withpedophiles as it relates to our
kids.
So if Bill Gates wanted towatch my kids as a babysitter, I
wouldn't let him do it.
I'm certainly not going to usea vaccine he recommends, and
Bill Gates has asked Dr Fauci toserve on his board for the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation.
So stop listening to Bill Gatesand Dr Fauci.

(42:19):
They are corrupt individualsand Bill Gates hangs out with
pedophiles consistently.
Why would he hang out withEpstein?
Why would he do that?
It's sick.
Okay, all right, clark.

Speaker 3 (42:30):
So what's interesting about that is so Bill Gates
started hanging out with JeffreyEpstein and he started hanging
out with Jeffrey Epstein afterJeffrey Epstein was a convicted
pedophile.
So the entire time that BillGates and Jeffrey Epstein knew
each other, bill Gates knew whoJeffrey Epstein was.
The entire time You've heardCindy McCain talking about it

(42:53):
being an open secret they knewwhat this guy was into.
He flaunted it.
He flaunted it.
If you want a really goodresource, you can go listen to
Eric Weinstein's podcast, thePortal.
He has a episode called theConstruct Jeffrey Epstein or
something like that.
He met Jeffrey Epstein in personyears ago, long before Jeffrey
Epstein was convicted.
The first time he was invitedthere.
He worked for some differenthedge funds, knew a lot of rich

(43:15):
people and he was going to gomeet the richest of the rich,
right, the Epstein.
And he went to his Manhattantownhouse and right when he
walked in they put him in a.
They had him sit in a, you knowlike a waiting room kind of
thing, and he's sitting there.
And he's sitting there, he'slooking around.
There's all kinds ofinteresting art, oddball art and

(43:37):
he looks at this one, an oldlipstick camera and he's like
what the heck?
And he says it was almost.
It was oddly placed enough, asif they were testing me, like am
I looking for the camera?
Am I looking around for it?
Am I aware that I'm beingrecorded?
And he says, as soon as he foundthe camera, he kind of stared
at it and went and sat back downand then almost immediately
they came in and got him Almost,as if it was a response to him
finding the camera.
He said.
So then he goes in, sits inwith Epstein and Epstein brings

(44:00):
in a girl who he estimated to belike 20, 21, 22.
She was young, she wasn't, hedidn't, he did not suspect she
was underage whatsoever.
He says.
I want to make that clear.
That would have been highlyinappropriate.
He said and he talked about youknow, there's this thing with
men powerful men, older men,they're attracted to younger
women.
I mean that's just a thing,right?

(44:24):
I mean we all know that ithappens, it is what it is.
But as long as the woman's oldenough to consent and do that,
she's bargaining with her sexualpower.
The older man's bargaining withhis money, whatever the case is
, right, there's a relationshipthere, no matter what you think
about that, it's just the way itis.
But that is completelydifferent than someone who goes
after truly underage girls,right?
So while this is odd and weird,this isn't unheard of or you
know the end of the world, Iguess you could say.

(44:44):
But here's what is weird.
So Jeffrey Epstein comes in totalk to him and he brings this
assistant, who's this gorgeouswoman, and he sits her on his
knee, on his leg Like he sits ina chair, and she comes and sits
on his leg.
So while he's talking to EricWeinstein, he's literally
bouncing this girl on his legand every now and then, whatever
he pinches her, whatever thecase is, and she'll giggle or

(45:09):
squeal and it becomes like adistraction and Eric is
completely like flabbergasted atthis.
Like they start talking and herealizes really quickly that
Eric Weinstein is not what he'scracked up to be.
He's not quite like other hedgefund.
You know other brilliant peopleand things like that.
He said it felt like it wasmore of a construct and he
actually went home and he usedthat word construct.
He's a made man.
Right, he's intelligence.
He's a made man.
He's not really what he appearsto be.
So Eric Weinstein sniffed itout years ago and talked about

(45:33):
it, wrote about it and it'sreally interesting.
So that's kind of like whoJeffrey Epstein is.
He would do that kind of stuff.
So when you hear that from EricWeinstein, who's essentially
kind of a nobody, and then youhear about Bill Gates spending I
think it was 27 times that theymet on record that we know of
that's significant.
And then you look at thatoverlap with Dr Fauci.
You look at the Bill andMelinda Gates Foundation, which

(45:56):
is very obviously corrupt.
Remember it was the Bill andMelinda Gates Foundation a
handful of episodes ago.
Quite a while ago, we talkedabout how Bill Gates isn't
allowed back into India becausethere's almost 497,000 kids are
paralyzed because of vaccinesthat were a dud that Bill Gates
and his foundation administeredin India.
He's not allowed in Italy.

(46:16):
You can go look up a parliamentmember in Italy submitting a
bill basically banning the GatesFoundation from Italy because
of his ill practices.
You can kind of go on and on.
There's a whole list ofcountries that have banned the
Bill and Melinda GatesFoundation because of their
vaccine work.
It's been really bad.
They've had other issues withtheir HIV work, which has kind

(46:36):
of been their flagship.
They've had other vaccineissues that you can go digging
into.
So I like what this guy said.
I mean it's a little bitincendiary, but he's not wrong.
Don't take advice from thesepeople.
They do not have your bestinterests in mind.
We as peasants have to approachall of this with open eyes.
We have to see it for what itis.
See the world as it is right.

(46:57):
These people do not have ourbest interests at mind, and
every day the science, the data,is backing us up.
People are not dying from thisdisease anymore.
It's essentially over.
Which then makes you say, well,why more shutdowns, why masks,
why all these different things?
This is about control.
I mean it's becoming so obviousthat it's about control.

(47:19):
If we're not having a continueddeath rate, let's just open
back up.
If we have to live with thisvirus, so be it.
We had to live with the flu.
We have to live with otherviruses that make their way
around.
Work on a vaccine, do whatyou're going to do, but open the
country back up.
So a couple other things, andI've got these sources.

(47:39):
These are sources that I'veheard people talking about, so I
don't have anything written togo with this or a video
necessarily, but I'm sure onewill surface soon.
But Donald Trump is making acouple strategic changes that
hopefully I think in the nextfew weeks will help control the
narrative around coronavirus,specifically with the numbers
like these reporting errors.
As these reporting errorsbecome confirmed more and more,

(48:03):
it's making more and more sense.
Trump is taking the reportingfigures away from the CDC, so
somehow he's bringing it intothe White House task force where
he can monitor it a little bitbetter and try to catch the
miscounts quicker and stuff likethat.
That'll be awesome.
I mean, hopefully in a fewweeks we start seeing the

(48:23):
reported cases going down, whichwould be nice, even with the
testing going up, and I think alot of that's going to have to
do with figuring out the correctway for counting these deaths.
President's in a funny spotpolitically, remember?
He got behind the shutdown 14days to save America.
Then it turned into 30 days tosave America.
You know the virus was real.
Our reaction to it has beencompletely different and a lot

(48:46):
of that reaction has been drivenby the local officials.
Governors, mayors, citycouncils, things like that have
been the biggest culprits in alot of the malfeasance that's
been lashed upon us.
Okay, last thing for today, andthis is just a little preview
for what I think is coming.
So the General Flynn case.
There's word that this week ornext week he will be completely

(49:10):
exonerated.
There's going to be anotherdump of information and the word
is that this dump ofinformation is going to be some
of the highest level exposure,showing that.
You know, we all, we all knowGeneral Flynn is innocent at
this point.
But now we're going to find out.
Not only is he innocent, butwhat we suspected.
He was directly targeted and itsounds like we're going to get

(49:32):
those documents.
At that point, this case is Imean, this case is already over.
It's just a matter of when'sJudge Sullivan going to finally
let it go.
But as long as he's keepingthis case open, they're going to
keep bringing out the damningdocuments.
It's the left, whoever'scontrolling Judge Sullivan,
whoever's telling him, and itcould be just his personal
self-interest he might bethinking.
Everything he's got is on theline too, which it kind of is.

(49:53):
I've covered before theaccusations against him and his
son, the stealing and raidingmoney that Judge Sullivan out of
Howard University, his almamater in conjunction with Elijah
Cummings the former they passedaway member of the House of
Representatives.
That was a longtime House repfrom the city of Baltimore,
which is just outside ofWashington DC, so right in that

(50:15):
same neighborhood, and you'vealso got violent crime with his
son, some cover-ups.
I mean, judge Sullivan's not agood guy and the information on
him is out there.
So once this case is over, Isuspect we're going to see some
consequences for Judge Sullivan.
Okay, this is GeorgePapadopoulos.
Now, george Papadopoulos, I'vecommunicated with him multiple
times, talking to him.

(50:37):
He owes me a signed autographbook.
He sent it to me twice, hasn'tshowed up to my house, but
anyways, he owes me a third one,I guess.
But George Papadopoulos wastargeted by the FBI and CIA and
we know now, and they sent aconfidential informant to talk
to him and the whole Russia case, kind of, was supposed to be.

(50:57):
This Australian diplomat,alexander Downer, had a
conversation at a wine bar withGeorge Papadopoulos and
supposedly Alexander Downer,who's a diplomat for Australia
gave a tip to the FBI thatGeorge Papadopoulos knew about
the WikiLeaks emails and thatthe Russians were helping Trump
and that's what supposedlylaunched the whole investigation
into Trump.
So, george Papadopoulos there'sa whole backstory with George

(51:19):
Papadopoulos.
He was given $10,000 cash.
Then he was going to fly toAmerica.
He didn't want to take themoney on a flight because he
knew.
First of all, he thought it wasa setup, totally thought it was
a setup.
He called it.
When it happened, he left thecash in a safe back in Greece.
He flew to the US.
When he got to the US, therewere FBI agents waiting at the
airport to pick him up becauseif he came in with a $10,000

(51:42):
cash, they would say that cashcame from something bad or he
wouldn't declare it.
Whatever the case was going tobe, they were going to pick him
up for the cash.
He didn't bring the cash withhim, so they picked him up on a
probable cause warrant.
What's a probable cause warrant?
It means that they observed himcommitting a crime.
What crime did they observe himcommitting, landing at the

(52:04):
airport, coming in from overseas?
There was no observable crime.
They went to pick him up on acompletely different crime and
he smelt it and left the cash inthe safe.
Well, he kept the cash all theway through his entire trial and
he actually ended up pleadingguilty, spent like 14 days in
jail Not a huge deal, butnonetheless he was an innocent
man that had to go to jail andhe kept that cash.
And that cash apparently hastraced back to the CIA through
the serial numbers.
So it was money that was givento this informant, who then gave

(52:27):
it to George Papadopoulos, whothen did not bring it to the US.
So George kept that evidenceand has turned it in.
So that's kind of George's verybasic backstory.
But George was interviewed andhe was talking about General
Flynn.
So listen to this.

Speaker 5 (52:42):
This case is effectively over.
General Michael Flynn isspeaking public.
He's had an incredible attorneyin Sidney Powell defend him to
the end and helped get himexonerated, and I believe, the
moment that Judge Sullivanfinally drops this case, the way
he should have at least a monthago, general Flynn is going to
go on offense, they're going toactivate him and he's probably

(53:03):
going to be a very importantcontributor to the campaign and
possibly impact this electionmoving forward, because so much
of what happened to GeneralMichael Flynn runs directly
through the Obama White Houseand the guy running against
President Trump is none otherthan Vice President Joe Biden.
So I think that's a main reasonwhy there is so much pressure

(53:24):
on keeping this gag, if you will, on General Flynn, because he
does know where those bodies areburied.
He knows exactly why he wastargeted and he knows who
targeted him, and the person whotargeted him according to open
reports now, who was involved,at least in unmasking him was
none other than Joe Biden.
So I'm pretty sure that thathas somewhat a reason for why

(53:46):
this judge is maintaining thispeculiar stance against the
general.

Speaker 3 (53:52):
So Joe Biden, gloves are going to come off.
That was the title of the showyesterday.
The gloves are coming off.
They're coming off againstFauci.
They're coming off againstGates.
Flynn is going to get freedhere soon and then he's going to
start talking.
He knows, quote unquote, wherethe bodies are buried and Flynn
absolutely is not going to letthis stand.
Flynn wants justice and hewants the system fixed.

(54:14):
So I'm excited.
I am very excited for thefuture.
I mean I have my reservationsright.
I mean we're just peasants.
We got to reasonable people.
It's been done for a long time.

(54:41):
But even people on the left,especially moderates, they've
seen the curve to the left.
They're starting to wake up oneby one.
They're being red-pilled one byone.
They're waking up for alldifferent kinds of issues.
When it hits home, you wake up.
The silent majority is beingactivated and I'm hoping between
now and the election we justsee one indictment after another

(55:01):
.
We see one.
You know, more and morecriminal networks rolled up and
the pressure gets more and moreon the top.
The squawking is going tocontinue.
There's going to be narrativeshifts, there's going to be all
kinds of crazy stuff between nowand November 3rd.
That happened, but most of it,I think, is going to be
manufactured.
It's going to be manufacturedbecause the people on the ground
are being taken up.

(55:21):
I mean, the Democrats arehaving to use Antifa.
These guys are wusses.
I look through the mug shots ofthe people that have been
arrested for Antifa and theyreally are the snuggie-wearing,
cocoa-drinking,live-in-your-parents-basement
type people.
It's really quite hilarious.
But okay, that's it for today.
Peasants Podcast.
If you like the show, pleaseshare it.
Love that.
You can find me on Twitter atPeasantsPod.

Speaker 1 (55:41):
on Parler at PeasantsPod and Facebook at the
Peasants Perspective, and you amyour king.
I didn't know we had a king.
I thought we were an autonomouscollective.

(56:02):
You're fooling yourself.
We're living in a dictatorship,a self-perpetuating autocracy,
in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class
into the game.
That's what it's all about.
If only people would, please,please, good people.
I am in haste.
Who lives in that castle?
No one lives there.
Then who is your lord?
We don't have a lord.
What I told you?

(56:23):
We're an anarcho-syndicalistcommune.
We take it in turns to act as asort of executive officer for
the week, yes, but all thedecisions of that officer have
to be ratified at a specialbi-weekly meeting.
Yes, I see, by a simplemajority in the case of pure
internal affairs, be quiet.
But by a two-thirds majority inthe case of more major, be
quiet.
I order you to be quiet.
All the lads who think he is.

(56:45):
I'm your king.
Well, I didn't vote for you.
You don't vote for kings.
Well, how do you become kingthen?
The lady of the lake, her armclad in the purest, shimmering
semite, held aloft Excaliburfrom the bosom of the water,
signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry

(57:05):
Excalibur.
That is why I'm your king.
Listen strange women lying inponds distributing swords is no
basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power derivesfrom a mandate from the masses,
not from some farcical aquaticceremony Be quiet.
But you can't expect to wieldsupreme executive power just

(57:25):
because some watery tart threw asword at you.
Shut up.
If I went round saying I was anemperor just because some
moistened bint had loved ascimitar at me, they'd put me
away.
Shut up, will you Shut up?
Ah, now we see the violenceinherent in the system.
Shut up.
Oh, come and see the violenceinherent in the system.
Help, help.
I'm being repressed, bloodypeasant.

(57:46):
Oh, what a giveaway.
Did you hear that?
Did you hear that?
Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Did you see him repressing me?
You saw it, didn't you?
©.
Transcript, emily Beynon.