Words They Don’t Want You to Say: The Psychology of Linguistic Oppression

The Power of Language: Unveiling the Psychology of Linguistic Control

In this episode of PsyberSpace, host Leslie Poston digs into the psychology behind the control and censorship of language, examining how it impacts us psychologically, socially, and politically. The discussion touches on historical and contemporary examples, including the strategic choice of words in South American dictatorships, the erasure of terms like 'diversity' and 'gender' in the U.S., and the euphemistic language used by corporations and governments. Highlighting theoretical and empirical research, Poston explores the profound effects linguistic control can have on thought, resistance, and identity. The episode underscores the importance of maintaining truthful and inclusive language as a means of resistance and psychological healing.

00:00 Introduction to the Language of Oppression
01:07 The Power of Language in Shaping Reality
02:23 Linguistic Deprivation and Cognitive Dissonance
03:35 Historical Examples of Language Control
11:38 Corporate and Governmental Language Policing
20:04 The Psychological Impact of Linguistic Oppression
25:24 Reclaiming Language for Resistance and Healing
28:05 Conclusion and Call to Action

Research

Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Bardon, T., Brown, A. D., & Pezé, S. (2017). Identity regulation, identity work and phronesis. Human Relations, 70(8), 940-965.

Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62-65. 

Bourne, E. (1970). The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7(3), 223-251.

Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (Eds.). (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Edelman, M. (1985). The symbolic uses of politics (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. 

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Gonzalez, R. (2018). Lives in limbo: Undocumented and coming of age in America. Current Anthropology, 59(6), 741-762.

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111-153. 

Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. Basic Books.

Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Martín-Baró, I. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology (A. Aron & S. Corne, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. 

Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725. 

Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. Secker & Warburg.

Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162-166. 

Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331-369. 

Sapir, E. (1929). The status of lingui