Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show. Rush, we stent.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Ready to negotiate with the United States. Indeed, we have
offered zero for zero tariffs for industrial.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Goods, Kelly Nash.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
We will eliminate the trade deficit with the United States,
and we're going to also eliminate trade errors.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
And Kelly show, now how we're going to spin that
in such a negative position. On Morning Joe Tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
And Trump just posted on truth social this morning that
the South Korea is not only going to zero, but
South Korea is sending over what he calls a plane
full of their top officials because we're going to negotiate
not just tear iff stuff, but we have other things
that we've wanted to negotiate with them. And he said
(00:48):
China is now reaching out. The thing about South Korea
that fascinated me. Now it's certainly when people heard net
and Yahoo said that.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
He was going to take off it.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
Okay, everybody gets that, Okay, like they need us desperately
right now. But I didn't realize South Korea had so
many restraints and controls on border on a trade I mean,
they pretty much have shut themselves off for and I
get it. Every country wants to protect a certain industry
(01:20):
or you know, if you if your country has a
certain band, I get it. You know, we would do
the same thing here, and we have to some degree.
But I didn't realize how controlling South Korea have been
with us on trade barriers and the like. Well, you know,
the fascinated by that.
Speaker 1 (01:36):
The thing that I'm fascinated about is I'm not certainly
considering myself an economics expert, as me admitting this right now,
I did not realize that the majority of our GDP
is not grossmetic domestic product. It's not what we produce.
Did you know that that that's that? Then our GDP
(01:57):
is the only one in the world that is not
of like that.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Well, I knew that our GDP was an oversimplified version
of the definition, which when someone explained that to me
just in saying that, I'm like, well, that doesn't surprise me,
because we can't even get a straight unemployment number.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
Well, seventy percent of the US GDP is what we buy.
So we are the we'reth the economy for the world
the world.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
We are the marketplace, we are the flea market for the.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
World, and we are also unable to pay for any
of it, which is why we are the world's debt
leader by far now thirty seven trillion dollars in debt.
We can't afford a flipping thing. And yet the world
needs us to keep buying in order for them to
(02:46):
keep going.
Speaker 3 (02:47):
And so this.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Whole trade war thing is fascinating because there's about eighteen
thousand different possible endings to it in scenarios like what
happens to specific China. So China sells roughly eighty three
percent of all manufactured goods in the in the country
of China to the United States. If the United States
(03:11):
stops buying that in general, en mass, what if Trump
just said you're not allowed to sell here. You're just
not allowed, you cannot come to America. Do the Europeans
pick up the slack? That doesn't seem possible. They would
have to go into some massive debt in order to
buy it. So then China is stuck with and again
every one of their companies, which are all state owned,
(03:33):
are way over leveraged buying the stuff that they needed
to make this stuff. So they have trillions and trillions
of dollars worth of crap that only Americans will buy.
The Australians aren't interested in it like the TEAMU basically
is almost exclusively to us.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Yes, So the truly sad part of this is going
to be what are the other ramifications of Trump being
able to level the playing field like China and in
Japan as well any India because it is so overpopulated
with the sweatshops in China particular that you and I
are just opposed to. I know I am and Lebron
(04:11):
James to this day can kiss my workless non athletic
ass because of the way that China literally kills people
within ten years of working in one of their sweats
they would.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
Say, we're not killing people, We're killing the wiggers. Guys.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
They do not get human that's true. They do not
get human classification in China. They're treated kind of like
the Democrats treated blacks here in America. They get the
three fifths, you're not a human.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
So in like Japan, and I believe in China to
a smaller degree because of the industrial age in Ai
reinventing now agriculture, which AOC plainly describe the other day.
She has no idea what's going on in the American
farms and doesn't deserve to ever put into a spoon
of food in their mouth.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
Him see the AOC comments.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Well, she was talking the other day about we're not
gonna pick cotton anymore.
Speaker 3 (05:04):
Oh no, that's Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Oh sorry, I'm sorry, not AOC. Although AOC doesn't deserve
another food spoon of food either, But Jasmine Crockett certainly
deserves no spoon of food ever. Nobody picks cotton anymore,
You stupid winch We do that with machines. How progressive
is the AI gonna get? I don't know. I can
(05:27):
tell you this just using machinery available now. They actually
stopped using it in some of the countries because he
had nothing for the people to do. Now, these are
people who are too stupid to do anything else, not
because they're idiots, but because they're uneducated. They're uneducated because
the government won't allow them to be educated. They don't
want you to learn nothing in China. So we in
(05:50):
America we volunteer to be stupid, not because we're stupid people,
but because we're volunteering not to be educated. Which is
going to be the true test of Americans very soon,
having to do with ais availability of things like agriculture
and fabrics and those kind of things. But it is
going to be interesting to see for those of us
who have bemoaned the fact that we have sweatshop employees.
(06:10):
In many countries, those sweatshop employees will be promptly marched
to a open pit which they probably would be forced
to dig, shot in the head, and then buried because
they're not going to take on the responsibility of having
to put a food of a spoon of food in
their mouths when they're not going to contribute to the economy.
And that's one of the more fascinating things about this
(06:32):
whole conversation. All those sweatshops. Remember we read the stories
about I think it was in China where people they
put nets around the building because the employees will get
to the top of the building instead of working another day,
they want to jump off of the building and kill
themselves by landing in the street thirty stories down and
make straw strawberry jam splat. They put nets around the
(06:55):
building so they they couldn't jump off the building. But
we're not going to need Chinese workers now screwing in
little iPhones because all that's could be done by robotics.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
Well, now again, Apple CEO Tim Cook says there's a difference,
and he wants to make a clarification. Wiggers do not
work on Apple product the average hourly rate currently for
a Chinese because if you're a Chinese resident, you're then
you're educated enough to work on electronic gear. What Apple
(07:30):
is paying right now to those employees' averages in US
dollars twenty two to fifty an hour to work on
those products. Again, what you're making in the sweatshop if
you're a wigger, which again is about I think it's
roughly is it. Fifty million people are considered wiggers, and
they are an oppressed people, and they are considered subhuman
(07:51):
by the Chinese, and they make on average nothing. They
are literally just fed, barely, watered, barely, and if they
haven't opportunity to kill themselves, they will that they're the
ones making the nikes. But Tim, Tim was making the point. Listen,
it's not cheap labor in China. It's what they've got
(08:12):
is an educated workforce that's even more educated than the
US workforce.
Speaker 3 (08:17):
God.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
Yes, he's saying, we can't find the types of people
that we would need to do that now again, what
Howard Lutnik said the other night is pretty revealing, and
that to your point, most of the manufacturing that's coming
back to the US, if it comes back, is going
to be replacing humans with just robots.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
We'll just use the word robots.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
But so he was saying, if I had a young person,
I would learn how to work on robots, Like that's
going to be basically that skill set is going to
be like that of a plumber. So the plumbers of
the nineteen fifties are going to be the guys who
can work on robots in the twenty fifties. There you go,
(09:02):
but there's not going to be a lot of those
jobs either. That's not like I mean, how many how
many do we need? Do you know what I'm saying?
Speaker 3 (09:10):
Like they break down.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
You have an office filled with ten thousand robots, you
need what four or five mechanics? I used to need
ten thousand, Yeah, but I used to need ten thousand people. Right,
you don't need that ten thousand robots. Let's say you
need one per hundred. Okay, you're still only going to
hire forty guys. Yeah, So the workforce is going to
go through this massive overhaul and then we're going to
see how that's going to shake out. And I was
(09:34):
thinking about after he made a comment the other night,
because I have I was thinking about changing out one
of my outdoor spickets. I thought, I got to crawl
under the house. Now, how would a robot do that?
I believe if you're.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Going to be a plumber, you still have a plenty
of years to enjoy the top dollar that you can charge,
because I don't know how you get a robot climb
under a house in three places.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Any trade I mean again, that's the path to the
middle class had been available to manufacturing for decades, the
fifties through the nineties. You didn't need a skill set,
you needed a good attitude. I'm willing to work hard.
(10:20):
If you're willing to work hard, and you're willing to
do backbreaking work in America for forty or fifty years,
you could earn yourself into the middle class. The good attitude,
work hard. Attitude doesn't get you squat anymore. So those
jobs have all gone away. They've been shipped overseas. That
started in nineteen seventy seven with the passage of NAFTA.
And if you one of the more funny videotapes that
(10:44):
you'll see online these days is a myriad of presidents
and politicians talking just like Donald Trump. But they were
talking like this in the eighties, the nineties and the
two thousands. Barack Obama going on and on and on
about how America got shortchanged in NAFA and and we
sent all these jobs away, and pointing at John McCain
and saying, John, you're the one who co signed that
(11:06):
you are a fan of NAFTA.
Speaker 3 (11:07):
You screwed the American workers.
Speaker 1 (11:09):
And now we don't have an opportunity for somebody in
the Midwest to come out of high school who is
not going to be college educated and make a living
in America. They're going to have to be a fast
food worker. They're not going to learn how to code.
That's not in their skill set. They're screwed. You screwed them,
John McCain. And John McCain's like, shut up, John McCain anyway.
(11:30):
But the point being is now we have an opportunity
to not only bring back the manufacturing, and I think
the more important part of the manufacturing in the US
is really for the national security. You've got all your
medicines coming from China right now, you've got a lot
of military equipments being produced over there. I didn't realize
that for every battleship we've made, they've made two hundred.
(11:52):
Absolutely they are on fire out career. Yeah, for naval activities.
They want to go to war. So I mean, it's
it's scary. So I think for our own national security,
it's great that we're going to manufacture here in the homeland.
I also think that it's important for supply chains. So
if there's another global pandemic where the world shuts down,
at least it's in our country. We can control that.
(12:14):
But as far as how do you get into the
middle class, you're going to have to have a skill set. Now,
it's not going to be a high threshold. Again as
being a plumber a high threshold. It's been available for
all Americans. Anybody right now can go to a technical
school if you think you can become an electrician, a plumber,
(12:37):
those types of traditional trades. It's available. And like my wife,
you know, is a real estate agent. She has demands
for plumbers, carpenters, electricians, all these skill sets and she
cannot find people. And these people are charging exorbitant prices.
(12:57):
They're all well into six.
Speaker 3 (12:59):
Figures these people now absolutely.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
So I'm not saying they're not worth it, but I'm
also saying that's a skill set that I think a
lot of Americans could have. They've opted out of it
because they've been told this fairy tale of you've got
to go to college in order to make six figures.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
So now, as and you're right, it's going to be
interesting to see how all that plays out, because it's
every time you think you get a grip on it,
you learn something else about ais capabilities and you go.
Speaker 3 (13:30):
Holy crap. Look at that headline right there. Love it.
Speaker 1 (13:35):
As we record this at ten o'clock in the morning,
the headline now is stocks are tracking for their best
day in three years.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
So my prayer last night was and I realized this
is going to be a little this is a little aggressive.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
But what did God say? Said a lot of things.
Speaker 2 (13:50):
It's see a lot of things. I love to ask
Kelly that there's a lot of things that have read
in the Bible. Pray in all things. My prayer last night,
Dear Lord Jesus, tomorrow when the market opens, don't let
it happen all at once. Don't let it happen at
nine thirty in the morning. Just get a little nudge
(14:12):
at nine thirty. But around eleven thirty, twelve o'clock, I
pray that the Dow Jones Industrial l average scream up by
ten thousand points. I know that's a lot to ask.
I'm not asking for me in my four oh one
k certainly it would appreciate it. But just let it
scream up to ten thousand points, because what does that do?
(14:34):
That puts the this takes the whole. Elon Musk, Hey, hey,
Elon's gotta go. Whatever the chant was, did you see
all of the videos from the unorganized grassroots effort from
thirty different locations all across the country, who were all
chanting the same line.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
Yes, And Elon Musk had that interview where he was
showing the guys were like, well, how'd you get these signs?
Speaker 2 (14:57):
They just handed him to us. Now you get out
at the gate, did you miss yours? Here here's some
handouts they give you.
Speaker 3 (15:03):
I don't even know what it says.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
I don't even know what sac what is this?
Speaker 2 (15:09):
All?
Speaker 3 (15:09):
Right?
Speaker 2 (15:09):
So now then you got to go back to well,
le's see, let's just go back to Saturday for a second,
wait to talk about this on the podcast.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Yes, but I just real quickly, I want to mention
I like the fact that you wanted to explode at
eleven thirty. Yeah, because even though it may not, it
will help your four one k. But that's not your
main reason. I think that it really still is about you,
because it'll give you the most entertaining lunch break you've
ever had when you sit down at noon and turn
on MSNBC and watch them try to explain that.
Speaker 3 (15:35):
I want to.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
See that little crooked smile on who's that winch that
hosts the Eleventh Hour now, Stephanie Rule, Yes, I want
to see that little crooked smile go flat. You could
always tell how great it is for them to spend
this crap by the way that her smile crooks.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Hey, by the way, did you know that yesterday? I
didn't even know. How did I not know this?
Speaker 1 (15:58):
That Charlie Kirk was in Columbia yesterday? I did not
know that he's showing pictures on his social media pages
right now. He was at the University of South Carolina.
Rainy day in Columbia didn't stop thousands for showing up
for Charlie Kirk and he's outside in the rainstorms on
the University of South Carolina and did not know that.
And they are going nuts for this guy. I mean,
(16:21):
this is fantastic to see this video. He's out there
throwing Trump hats at the crowd.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
Now, I was wondering why we would getting no coverage
on our tragic loss of a USC student. I'm even
sure where he was from. What was his hometown?
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Oh, the kid who died a couple of weeks ago,
about it was like a week ago. Yeah, he was
and he got killed by an illegal alien.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
Over the weekend, I finally saw a national news story
where somebody was talking specifically about the crisis, but on Saturday,
and I tried to make it over in time, and
I didn't because George Soros. I guess they only let
him clock in until six. Then everybody left, but the
very mad no mad protesters because they were no mads
(17:05):
because they didn't have a permit. And I thought that
was nice of them not to protest in Charleston because
they didn't file for a permit. Now, what kind of
spine do you have when you show up for Hey, hey,
you're ruining our country? Hands off when you actually pay
attention to amnicible certification and protest availability based on your permit.
(17:30):
What kind of spine do we have here? Well, are
you non South Carolinians coming into protest? But they were
plenty of South Carolinians there too, because I saw where
the Saluti County Democrats are going to go to Newbury
for their protest because they don't want to drive all
the way into town. And I get it, parkins of pain,
I got it. So the very mad no mad protesters
(17:53):
came to Columbia, and it was an interesting group of people.
I'd counted eight and now it can only come up
with seven. It's the Trump Hayden election denying pro Federal
Department of Education LBG t q I I, the II
in that stands for illegal immigrant, protect the Social Security,
(18:14):
Medicare and Medicaid baby Hayden protesters. So you had this
huge group. It was like the eight tribes of Israel
coming together to face the Orange Goliath. But there was
no David in the crowd.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Well, I would say that you're in a trick bag
if you're a Democrat, because you have to abide by
government regulations. Right, you can't say that the government.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
The democracy is on the line, I know.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
But if they but their whole thing is we want
more government power. So when the government says you don't
have a permit yet, you can't go against that. So
that's that's one of their trick bags that they put
themselves in. But I you know, look, I also think
part of it might have been Core needed to try
to force more people at the Columbia rally, which still
(19:03):
only had it looked like about maybe two hundred people
at it.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
I think that most people estimated it to be about
a thousand.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
Was it that much?
Speaker 2 (19:10):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (19:10):
Was that much? Okay, one thousand people?
Speaker 2 (19:12):
That's what you had to pull together eight groups to
get a thousand people.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Again, most people are not feeling like Elon Musk is
trying to rob you of democracy or whatever. We did
have a breaking news report this morning which is fascinating
that the new court documents that were released this morning
from the DOJ shows that the guy Ryan Routh who
(19:38):
attempted to assassinate Donald Trump on the golf course, that
in let me just go to the actual things in
August of twenty twenty four. I'm just reading from the
court papers here. Routh attempted to acquire anti aircraft weapons
as direct evidence of his assassination attempt. Routh sought to
(19:59):
purchase the vices from an associate that he believed to
be a Ukrainian with access to the military weapons. He
told him, I would like to kill Donald Trump. I
need the equipment so that Trump cannot be elected. He
would be very bad for the Ukraine. Do you think
(20:19):
that Trump would be good for Ukraine? And so then
the two continue to discuss his plans to kill Donald Trump.
So my question is did they act, Did the Ukrainians
sit on that information, or did the Ukrainians tell the
Americans and the Joe Biden administration, as you pointed out
(20:43):
in our off air comments, did not.
Speaker 3 (20:47):
Up.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
Trump's Secret Service protection denied it denied the request revidly,
and and Routh was making the thing. Let's see, he said,
first off, he's almost on like he wanted to get
him for free. Those weapons are paid for and supplied
for by the US military by the taxpayers, so I
already paid for that weapon. Secondly, they get lost on
(21:08):
the all the time on the battlefield. No one in
the Ukraine would miss just one lost, so just and
they got a picture of the gun that he wants.
I mean, this thing is insane looking. It's like it's
like a legit like rocket launcher, Like he was going
to just sit in the trees and fire a rocket
at Donald Trump on a golf course.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
That would do it. He would have eviscerated him. Even
if he didn't hit him.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
You wouldn't have to worry about him and being to
turn his head only a quarter of an end.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
You're not gonna get the what do they call it,
the quarter inch miracle or whatever miracle you get that.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
You know, when Zalinski's out on the campaign trail for Kamala,
what do you think the chances are that his government
shared that information with sharing it period. And if he
had shared it, who's he gonna share it with? He's
gonna share it with Biden. What did Biden do deny
the request for more? Yeah, that's what I'm Biden did
everything accept drop off bottle water and crackers for this
(22:06):
dude as he was sitting in the bushes outside of
the damn golf course.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
I feel like this is going to be the Republicans
are going to make a big deal out of this.
I hope, I hope So the DOJ's already got this information,
and they're the ones who put it in their paperwork
and released it this morning. So I'm hoping that the
Republicans take this and do make a big deal out
of it. I know a lot of times we don't
want to make a big deal about stuff from the past,
(22:32):
but who knew what when right. It's kind of like
the whole COVID thing. That's still important to prosely to
prove all of it, that Fauci was involved with the
creation of the actual coronavirus, that we paid for it,
and then we didn't do enough to stop it from
being used against us, that they really wanted to use
(22:54):
that just for some sort of murna test run. All
of that stuff needs to be proved and beyond a
reasonable doubt. For most Americans. Put it in their face,
let them see it. Let them see that, do we
have a psychopath who wanted to kill the front runner
for the presidency and that either our quote unquote allies
in the Ukraine, or even worse, the sitting president of
(23:17):
the United States, who was a political enemy of that guy,
made the decision to squash that information and maybe even
reduce secret Service Forces. It's kind of like a King
David when he gets up.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
To the front line.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
When Trump's on the eighteenth toll, everybody pulled back.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Well leave you Riyah out there, poor you, Riyah.
Speaker 3 (23:39):
He just thought he's doing the right thing. Are the
correlations are endleists? Because Riyah had a hot wife? That's right?
All right?
Speaker 2 (23:47):
So God, but you're right, we do need to find
if Americans could just find out that one. I mean, now, okay,
the assassination to Donald Trump would have been horrific for
a lot of Magat supporters, got you, But when you
find out all across this land that we were supporting
the miniature mad scientist and as wuhan little shop of
(24:08):
horrors over there, we actually paid for these crackpots to
go in and play with their damn chemistry set and
then kill off our family members. That should do it.
That should be the end, and that would be a
blessing for the Democrats. That should be an end to
the Democrat Party, which they pushed back on taking the
(24:30):
advice of I've forgotten who it was. Was it the
LSU skeletor down there, Ah Mary mad.
Speaker 3 (24:41):
Comer or uh Chromer. I'm looking at James Carvill Carvel?
Speaker 2 (24:47):
Was it Carvill who said they need to trash the
whole thing or come up with a new name for
the party. That would be a godsend if you could
trash the history of your party. I hope they never
have the opportunity to do that because you go to
live with it. You did it to live with it.
So now could if we could only get that to
the American people, that could be the end of the
Democrat Party, which would be a blessing. And I'll put
(25:09):
that on my prayer list for tonight after we hit
ten thousand in the market today.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Now, I think I misspoke on our rash thought today, Jonathan. So,
I think what I said was that doctor ed Simmer
was for forced vaccinations. That if I said that, I apologize.
What he was for was for forced quarantine of asymptomatic
(25:34):
individuals during COVID different still horrific. You're not capable of
spreading the disease. We all know you're not. If you're
not symptomatic, you cannot spread the disease. And you're saying
that just because they tested positive for COVID can't spread it,
that you want them locked up if needed by the military.
(25:57):
That was his position back in twenty twenty to and
Governor Henry McMaster, that was your nominee to lead the
new health Department, and that blew up in his face tremendously.
And now Henry McMaster in less than a week, has
got another problem because it was the lady who was
(26:20):
the understudy of Ed Simmer who has now been nominated
to lead the other part of the department.
Speaker 2 (26:26):
The Department of Environmental Services used to be called Environmental
Control under d Heck. Now it's the Health Department of Health,
and then separately it's the Department of Environmental Services that's
Myra Reese.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
And if you go to Henry McMaster's Twitter account, I
mean April third is when he tweeted out his support
for Simmer, he got totally the word ratioed. By the way,
for those of you are not familiar with the term,
ratio means that you put out something on social media
supporting what ever position of whatever, And ratio means that
(27:03):
the majority of the people who commented had a countering opinion,
we'll say.
Speaker 2 (27:10):
And in this case, a lot of very colorful opinions expressed.
Speaker 1 (27:15):
Yeah, I would say of the one hundred and ninety
two comments given on the April third tweet from Henry
McMaster about Ed Zimmer, about one hundred and ninety of
them were against Ed Simmer.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
When some people do that on social media just so
they can boost up their activity level, which helps them
with their click availability. But government Master obviously not trying
to be a social media influencer here. No, no, he
put it out as the real deal.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
Yesterday he tweeted out his support for Myra Reee and
that has forty nine comments right now, and I would
say forty or more or against Myra. And they're the
reasons that MAGA would be against anybody, right if you've
had a history of like she's a thirty year beer
(28:00):
right off the bat, that raises a lot of respect.
Speaker 3 (28:02):
Yet wait a.
Speaker 1 (28:03):
Minute, thirty years she's been a bureaucred that's on her bio,
Like she's proud of that. Shouldn't be proud of that.
So that's like check number one. Then they just start
looking at things that where you sought she was an
associate of Ed Simmer. We already know we don't like
Ed Zimmer, So you know what I'm saying, why are you?
And so now they're all coming out against Henry McMaster,
(28:26):
and they're saying, at this point, the general consensus seems
to be at this point, just shut up.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
And it's surprising because he went out of his way
to get a lieutenant governor run who wasn't necessarily a
who wasn't a bureau cred it, did not have years
of elected public service. So I was kind of a
surprising position for him.
Speaker 1 (28:44):
And the environmental I don't want to call him wackos.
That's not my intention here. The people who are very
passionate about environment.
Speaker 3 (28:52):
Which I am one, all right, a lot.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
Of them have chimed in on the conversation as well,
not for Myra Reese or against her. That I've seen
probably ten or fifteen of these people posting about the chemtrails.
They are really against that, and I'm just trying to
find some of them here. Let's see, how are you
(29:15):
protecting South Carolina when you allow the DoD and Shaw
Air Force Base to continually manipulate our atmosphere with their
damn chemtrails?
Speaker 2 (29:24):
You don't read more about that. Florida has already passed
their legislation.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
Yeah, and that's some people. Yeah, some people have pointed
that out that Florida has a lot has stopped that.
Pam c tweets Adam, here's a great idea to help
the environment, ban the camtrails, stop poisoning us Henry. So.
I mean, you know, he's trying to get a new
environmental person and so I guess that's why they picked
that mantle up and ran with it. But he's having
(29:50):
a very rough time right now. You know, It's funny
because you look at Scott Bessen, south Carolinian, who was
talking about on Meet the Press. One of the things
he was most impressed with was how Mike Johnson was
able to keep the Republicans together. And he was like,
you know, the big story has been the infighting that's
(30:12):
going out with the Democrats, the Pannikins, But the Republicans
are keeping it together.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
The Dusicans are taking a deep breath right now.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
It doesn't seem like the Republicans are keeping it together
though in South Carolina we have a civil war going
on in the Republican Party in South Carolina.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
Well, looking here at the at the market again, before
we wrap this up, let's see if about eleven thirty, Kelly,
Let's see if the good Lord if I did I
bend is ear enough.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
You just want to have the best lunch break ever
and watch their heads implode.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
That's going to be I won't even need barbecue potato
chips to go with my sandwich. M
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show. Rush, we stent.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Ready to negotiate with the United States. Indeed, we have
offered zero for zero tariffs for industrial.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Goods, Kelly Nash.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
We will eliminate the trade deficit with the United States,
and we're going to also eliminate trade errors.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
And Kelly show, now how we're going to spin that
in such a negative position. On Morning Joe Tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
And Trump just posted on truth social this morning that
the South Korea is not only going to zero, but
South Korea is sending over what he calls a plane
full of their top officials because we're going to negotiate
not just tear iff stuff, but we have other things
that we've wanted to negotiate with them. And he said
(00:48):
China is now reaching out. The thing about South Korea
that fascinated me. Now it's certainly when people heard net
and Yahoo said that.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
He was going to take off it.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
Okay, everybody gets that, Okay, like they need us desperately
right now. But I didn't realize South Korea had so
many restraints and controls on border on a trade I mean,
they pretty much have shut themselves off for and I
get it. Every country wants to protect a certain industry
(01:20):
or you know, if you if your country has a
certain band, I get it. You know, we would do
the same thing here, and we have to some degree.
But I didn't realize how controlling South Korea have been
with us on trade barriers and the like. Well, you know,
the fascinated by that.
Speaker 1 (01:36):
The thing that I'm fascinated about is I'm not certainly
considering myself an economics expert, as me admitting this right now,
I did not realize that the majority of our GDP
is not grossmetic domestic product. It's not what we produce.
Did you know that that that's that? Then our GDP
(01:57):
is the only one in the world that is not
of like that.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Well, I knew that our GDP was an oversimplified version
of the definition, which when someone explained that to me
just in saying that, I'm like, well, that doesn't surprise me,
because we can't even get a straight unemployment number.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
Well, seventy percent of the US GDP is what we buy.
So we are the we'reth the economy for the world
the world.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
We are the marketplace, we are the flea market for the.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
World, and we are also unable to pay for any
of it, which is why we are the world's debt
leader by far now thirty seven trillion dollars in debt.
We can't afford a flipping thing. And yet the world
needs us to keep buying in order for them to
(02:46):
keep going.
Speaker 3 (02:47):
And so this.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Whole trade war thing is fascinating because there's about eighteen
thousand different possible endings to it in scenarios like what
happens to specific China. So China sells roughly eighty three
percent of all manufactured goods in the in the country
of China to the United States. If the United States
(03:11):
stops buying that in general, en mass, what if Trump
just said you're not allowed to sell here. You're just
not allowed, you cannot come to America. Do the Europeans
pick up the slack? That doesn't seem possible. They would
have to go into some massive debt in order to
buy it. So then China is stuck with and again
every one of their companies, which are all state owned,
(03:33):
are way over leveraged buying the stuff that they needed
to make this stuff. So they have trillions and trillions
of dollars worth of crap that only Americans will buy.
The Australians aren't interested in it like the TEAMU basically
is almost exclusively to us.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Yes, So the truly sad part of this is going
to be what are the other ramifications of Trump being
able to level the playing field like China and in
Japan as well any India because it is so overpopulated
with the sweatshops in China particular that you and I
are just opposed to. I know I am and Lebron
(04:11):
James to this day can kiss my workless non athletic
ass because of the way that China literally kills people
within ten years of working in one of their sweats
they would.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
Say, we're not killing people, We're killing the wiggers. Guys.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
They do not get human that's true. They do not
get human classification in China. They're treated kind of like
the Democrats treated blacks here in America. They get the
three fifths, you're not a human.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
So in like Japan, and I believe in China to
a smaller degree because of the industrial age in Ai
reinventing now agriculture, which AOC plainly describe the other day.
She has no idea what's going on in the American
farms and doesn't deserve to ever put into a spoon
of food in their mouth.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
Him see the AOC comments.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Well, she was talking the other day about we're not
gonna pick cotton anymore.
Speaker 3 (05:04):
Oh no, that's Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Oh sorry, I'm sorry, not AOC. Although AOC doesn't deserve
another food spoon of food either, But Jasmine Crockett certainly
deserves no spoon of food ever. Nobody picks cotton anymore,
You stupid winch We do that with machines. How progressive
is the AI gonna get? I don't know. I can
(05:27):
tell you this just using machinery available now. They actually
stopped using it in some of the countries because he
had nothing for the people to do. Now, these are
people who are too stupid to do anything else, not
because they're idiots, but because they're uneducated. They're uneducated because
the government won't allow them to be educated. They don't
want you to learn nothing in China. So we in
(05:50):
America we volunteer to be stupid, not because we're stupid people,
but because we're volunteering not to be educated. Which is
going to be the true test of Americans very soon,
having to do with ais availability of things like agriculture
and fabrics and those kind of things. But it is
going to be interesting to see for those of us
who have bemoaned the fact that we have sweatshop employees.
(06:10):
In many countries, those sweatshop employees will be promptly marched
to a open pit which they probably would be forced
to dig, shot in the head, and then buried because
they're not going to take on the responsibility of having
to put a food of a spoon of food in
their mouths when they're not going to contribute to the economy.
And that's one of the more fascinating things about this
(06:32):
whole conversation. All those sweatshops. Remember we read the stories
about I think it was in China where people they
put nets around the building because the employees will get
to the top of the building instead of working another day,
they want to jump off of the building and kill
themselves by landing in the street thirty stories down and
make straw strawberry jam splat. They put nets around the
(06:55):
building so they they couldn't jump off the building. But
we're not going to need Chinese workers now screwing in
little iPhones because all that's could be done by robotics.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
Well, now again, Apple CEO Tim Cook says there's a difference,
and he wants to make a clarification. Wiggers do not
work on Apple product the average hourly rate currently for
a Chinese because if you're a Chinese resident, you're then
you're educated enough to work on electronic gear. What Apple
(07:30):
is paying right now to those employees' averages in US
dollars twenty two to fifty an hour to work on
those products. Again, what you're making in the sweatshop if
you're a wigger, which again is about I think it's
roughly is it. Fifty million people are considered wiggers, and
they are an oppressed people, and they are considered subhuman
(07:51):
by the Chinese, and they make on average nothing. They
are literally just fed, barely, watered, barely, and if they
haven't opportunity to kill themselves, they will that they're the
ones making the nikes. But Tim, Tim was making the point. Listen,
it's not cheap labor in China. It's what they've got
(08:12):
is an educated workforce that's even more educated than the
US workforce.
Speaker 3 (08:17):
God.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
Yes, he's saying, we can't find the types of people
that we would need to do that now again, what
Howard Lutnik said the other night is pretty revealing, and
that to your point, most of the manufacturing that's coming
back to the US, if it comes back, is going
to be replacing humans with just robots.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
We'll just use the word robots.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
But so he was saying, if I had a young person,
I would learn how to work on robots, Like that's
going to be basically that skill set is going to
be like that of a plumber. So the plumbers of
the nineteen fifties are going to be the guys who
can work on robots in the twenty fifties. There you go,
(09:02):
but there's not going to be a lot of those
jobs either. That's not like I mean, how many how
many do we need? Do you know what I'm saying?
Speaker 3 (09:10):
Like they break down.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
You have an office filled with ten thousand robots, you
need what four or five mechanics? I used to need
ten thousand, Yeah, but I used to need ten thousand people. Right,
you don't need that ten thousand robots. Let's say you
need one per hundred. Okay, you're still only going to
hire forty guys. Yeah, So the workforce is going to
go through this massive overhaul and then we're going to
see how that's going to shake out. And I was
(09:34):
thinking about after he made a comment the other night,
because I have I was thinking about changing out one
of my outdoor spickets. I thought, I got to crawl
under the house. Now, how would a robot do that?
I believe if you're.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Going to be a plumber, you still have a plenty
of years to enjoy the top dollar that you can charge,
because I don't know how you get a robot climb
under a house in three places.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Any trade I mean again, that's the path to the
middle class had been available to manufacturing for decades, the
fifties through the nineties. You didn't need a skill set,
you needed a good attitude. I'm willing to work hard.
(10:20):
If you're willing to work hard, and you're willing to
do backbreaking work in America for forty or fifty years,
you could earn yourself into the middle class. The good attitude,
work hard. Attitude doesn't get you squat anymore. So those
jobs have all gone away. They've been shipped overseas. That
started in nineteen seventy seven with the passage of NAFTA.
And if you one of the more funny videotapes that
(10:44):
you'll see online these days is a myriad of presidents
and politicians talking just like Donald Trump. But they were
talking like this in the eighties, the nineties and the
two thousands. Barack Obama going on and on and on
about how America got shortchanged in NAFA and and we
sent all these jobs away, and pointing at John McCain
and saying, John, you're the one who co signed that
(11:06):
you are a fan of NAFTA.
Speaker 3 (11:07):
You screwed the American workers.
Speaker 1 (11:09):
And now we don't have an opportunity for somebody in
the Midwest to come out of high school who is
not going to be college educated and make a living
in America. They're going to have to be a fast
food worker. They're not going to learn how to code.
That's not in their skill set. They're screwed. You screwed them,
John McCain. And John McCain's like, shut up, John McCain anyway.
(11:30):
But the point being is now we have an opportunity
to not only bring back the manufacturing, and I think
the more important part of the manufacturing in the US
is really for the national security. You've got all your
medicines coming from China right now, you've got a lot
of military equipments being produced over there. I didn't realize
that for every battleship we've made, they've made two hundred.
(11:52):
Absolutely they are on fire out career. Yeah, for naval activities.
They want to go to war. So I mean, it's
it's scary. So I think for our own national security,
it's great that we're going to manufacture here in the homeland.
I also think that it's important for supply chains. So
if there's another global pandemic where the world shuts down,
at least it's in our country. We can control that.
(12:14):
But as far as how do you get into the
middle class, you're going to have to have a skill set. Now,
it's not going to be a high threshold. Again as
being a plumber a high threshold. It's been available for
all Americans. Anybody right now can go to a technical
school if you think you can become an electrician, a plumber,
(12:37):
those types of traditional trades. It's available. And like my wife,
you know, is a real estate agent. She has demands
for plumbers, carpenters, electricians, all these skill sets and she
cannot find people. And these people are charging exorbitant prices.
(12:57):
They're all well into six.
Speaker 3 (12:59):
Figures these people now absolutely.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
So I'm not saying they're not worth it, but I'm
also saying that's a skill set that I think a
lot of Americans could have. They've opted out of it
because they've been told this fairy tale of you've got
to go to college in order to make six figures.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
So now, as and you're right, it's going to be
interesting to see how all that plays out, because it's
every time you think you get a grip on it,
you learn something else about ais capabilities and you go.
Speaker 3 (13:30):
Holy crap. Look at that headline right there. Love it.
Speaker 1 (13:35):
As we record this at ten o'clock in the morning,
the headline now is stocks are tracking for their best
day in three years.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
So my prayer last night was and I realized this
is going to be a little this is a little aggressive.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
But what did God say? Said a lot of things.
Speaker 2 (13:50):
It's see a lot of things. I love to ask
Kelly that there's a lot of things that have read
in the Bible. Pray in all things. My prayer last night,
Dear Lord Jesus, tomorrow when the market opens, don't let
it happen all at once. Don't let it happen at
nine thirty in the morning. Just get a little nudge
(14:12):
at nine thirty. But around eleven thirty, twelve o'clock, I
pray that the Dow Jones Industrial l average scream up by
ten thousand points. I know that's a lot to ask.
I'm not asking for me in my four oh one
k certainly it would appreciate it. But just let it
scream up to ten thousand points, because what does that do?
(14:34):
That puts the this takes the whole. Elon Musk, Hey, hey,
Elon's gotta go. Whatever the chant was, did you see
all of the videos from the unorganized grassroots effort from
thirty different locations all across the country, who were all
chanting the same line.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
Yes, And Elon Musk had that interview where he was
showing the guys were like, well, how'd you get these signs?
Speaker 2 (14:57):
They just handed him to us. Now you get out
at the gate, did you miss yours? Here here's some
handouts they give you.
Speaker 3 (15:03):
I don't even know what it says.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
I don't even know what sac what is this?
Speaker 2 (15:09):
All?
Speaker 3 (15:09):
Right?
Speaker 2 (15:09):
So now then you got to go back to well,
le's see, let's just go back to Saturday for a second,
wait to talk about this on the podcast.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Yes, but I just real quickly, I want to mention
I like the fact that you wanted to explode at
eleven thirty. Yeah, because even though it may not, it
will help your four one k. But that's not your
main reason. I think that it really still is about you,
because it'll give you the most entertaining lunch break you've
ever had when you sit down at noon and turn
on MSNBC and watch them try to explain that.
Speaker 3 (15:35):
I want to.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
See that little crooked smile on who's that winch that
hosts the Eleventh Hour now, Stephanie Rule, Yes, I want
to see that little crooked smile go flat. You could
always tell how great it is for them to spend
this crap by the way that her smile crooks.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Hey, by the way, did you know that yesterday? I
didn't even know. How did I not know this?
Speaker 1 (15:58):
That Charlie Kirk was in Columbia yesterday? I did not
know that he's showing pictures on his social media pages
right now. He was at the University of South Carolina.
Rainy day in Columbia didn't stop thousands for showing up
for Charlie Kirk and he's outside in the rainstorms on
the University of South Carolina and did not know that.
And they are going nuts for this guy. I mean,
(16:21):
this is fantastic to see this video. He's out there
throwing Trump hats at the crowd.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
Now, I was wondering why we would getting no coverage
on our tragic loss of a USC student. I'm even
sure where he was from. What was his hometown?
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Oh, the kid who died a couple of weeks ago,
about it was like a week ago. Yeah, he was
and he got killed by an illegal alien.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
Over the weekend, I finally saw a national news story
where somebody was talking specifically about the crisis, but on Saturday,
and I tried to make it over in time, and
I didn't because George Soros. I guess they only let
him clock in until six. Then everybody left, but the
very mad no mad protesters because they were no mads
(17:05):
because they didn't have a permit. And I thought that
was nice of them not to protest in Charleston because
they didn't file for a permit. Now, what kind of
spine do you have when you show up for Hey, hey,
you're ruining our country? Hands off when you actually pay
attention to amnicible certification and protest availability based on your permit.
(17:30):
What kind of spine do we have here? Well, are
you non South Carolinians coming into protest? But they were
plenty of South Carolinians there too, because I saw where
the Saluti County Democrats are going to go to Newbury
for their protest because they don't want to drive all
the way into town. And I get it, parkins of pain,
I got it. So the very mad no mad protesters
(17:53):
came to Columbia, and it was an interesting group of people.
I'd counted eight and now it can only come up
with seven. It's the Trump Hayden election denying pro Federal
Department of Education LBG t q I I, the II
in that stands for illegal immigrant, protect the Social Security,
(18:14):
Medicare and Medicaid baby Hayden protesters. So you had this
huge group. It was like the eight tribes of Israel
coming together to face the Orange Goliath. But there was
no David in the crowd.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Well, I would say that you're in a trick bag
if you're a Democrat, because you have to abide by
government regulations. Right, you can't say that the government.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
The democracy is on the line, I know.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
But if they but their whole thing is we want
more government power. So when the government says you don't
have a permit yet, you can't go against that. So
that's that's one of their trick bags that they put
themselves in. But I you know, look, I also think
part of it might have been Core needed to try
to force more people at the Columbia rally, which still
(19:03):
only had it looked like about maybe two hundred people
at it.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
I think that most people estimated it to be about
a thousand.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
Was it that much?
Speaker 2 (19:10):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (19:10):
Was that much? Okay, one thousand people?
Speaker 2 (19:12):
That's what you had to pull together eight groups to
get a thousand people.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Again, most people are not feeling like Elon Musk is
trying to rob you of democracy or whatever. We did
have a breaking news report this morning which is fascinating
that the new court documents that were released this morning
from the DOJ shows that the guy Ryan Routh who
(19:38):
attempted to assassinate Donald Trump on the golf course, that
in let me just go to the actual things in
August of twenty twenty four. I'm just reading from the
court papers here. Routh attempted to acquire anti aircraft weapons
as direct evidence of his assassination attempt. Routh sought to
(19:59):
purchase the vices from an associate that he believed to
be a Ukrainian with access to the military weapons. He
told him, I would like to kill Donald Trump. I
need the equipment so that Trump cannot be elected. He
would be very bad for the Ukraine. Do you think
(20:19):
that Trump would be good for Ukraine? And so then
the two continue to discuss his plans to kill Donald Trump.
So my question is did they act, Did the Ukrainians
sit on that information, or did the Ukrainians tell the
Americans and the Joe Biden administration, as you pointed out
(20:43):
in our off air comments, did not.
Speaker 3 (20:47):
Up.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
Trump's Secret Service protection denied it denied the request revidly,
and and Routh was making the thing. Let's see, he said,
first off, he's almost on like he wanted to get
him for free. Those weapons are paid for and supplied
for by the US military by the taxpayers, so I
already paid for that weapon. Secondly, they get lost on
(21:08):
the all the time on the battlefield. No one in
the Ukraine would miss just one lost, so just and
they got a picture of the gun that he wants.
I mean, this thing is insane looking. It's like it's
like a legit like rocket launcher, Like he was going
to just sit in the trees and fire a rocket
at Donald Trump on a golf course.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
That would do it. He would have eviscerated him. Even
if he didn't hit him.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
You wouldn't have to worry about him and being to
turn his head only a quarter of an end.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
You're not gonna get the what do they call it,
the quarter inch miracle or whatever miracle you get that.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
You know, when Zalinski's out on the campaign trail for Kamala,
what do you think the chances are that his government
shared that information with sharing it period. And if he
had shared it, who's he gonna share it with? He's
gonna share it with Biden. What did Biden do deny
the request for more? Yeah, that's what I'm Biden did
everything accept drop off bottle water and crackers for this
(22:06):
dude as he was sitting in the bushes outside of
the damn golf course.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
I feel like this is going to be the Republicans
are going to make a big deal out of this.
I hope, I hope So the DOJ's already got this information,
and they're the ones who put it in their paperwork
and released it this morning. So I'm hoping that the
Republicans take this and do make a big deal out
of it. I know a lot of times we don't
want to make a big deal about stuff from the past,
(22:32):
but who knew what when right. It's kind of like
the whole COVID thing. That's still important to prosely to
prove all of it, that Fauci was involved with the
creation of the actual coronavirus, that we paid for it,
and then we didn't do enough to stop it from
being used against us, that they really wanted to use
(22:54):
that just for some sort of murna test run. All
of that stuff needs to be proved and beyond a
reasonable doubt. For most Americans. Put it in their face,
let them see it. Let them see that, do we
have a psychopath who wanted to kill the front runner
for the presidency and that either our quote unquote allies
in the Ukraine, or even worse, the sitting president of
(23:17):
the United States, who was a political enemy of that guy,
made the decision to squash that information and maybe even
reduce secret Service Forces. It's kind of like a King
David when he gets up.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
To the front line.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
When Trump's on the eighteenth toll, everybody pulled back.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Well leave you Riyah out there, poor you, Riyah.
Speaker 3 (23:39):
He just thought he's doing the right thing. Are the
correlations are endleists? Because Riyah had a hot wife? That's right?
All right?
Speaker 2 (23:47):
So God, but you're right, we do need to find
if Americans could just find out that one. I mean, now, okay,
the assassination to Donald Trump would have been horrific for
a lot of Magat supporters, got you, But when you
find out all across this land that we were supporting
the miniature mad scientist and as wuhan little shop of
(24:08):
horrors over there, we actually paid for these crackpots to
go in and play with their damn chemistry set and
then kill off our family members. That should do it.
That should be the end, and that would be a
blessing for the Democrats. That should be an end to
the Democrat Party, which they pushed back on taking the
(24:30):
advice of I've forgotten who it was. Was it the
LSU skeletor down there, Ah Mary mad.
Speaker 3 (24:41):
Comer or uh Chromer. I'm looking at James Carvill Carvel?
Speaker 2 (24:47):
Was it Carvill who said they need to trash the
whole thing or come up with a new name for
the party. That would be a godsend if you could
trash the history of your party. I hope they never
have the opportunity to do that because you go to
live with it. You did it to live with it.
So now could if we could only get that to
the American people, that could be the end of the
Democrat Party, which would be a blessing. And I'll put
(25:09):
that on my prayer list for tonight after we hit
ten thousand in the market today.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Now, I think I misspoke on our rash thought today, Jonathan. So,
I think what I said was that doctor ed Simmer
was for forced vaccinations. That if I said that, I apologize.
What he was for was for forced quarantine of asymptomatic
(25:34):
individuals during COVID different still horrific. You're not capable of
spreading the disease. We all know you're not. If you're
not symptomatic, you cannot spread the disease. And you're saying
that just because they tested positive for COVID can't spread it,
that you want them locked up if needed by the military.
(25:57):
That was his position back in twenty twenty to and
Governor Henry McMaster, that was your nominee to lead the
new health Department, and that blew up in his face tremendously.
And now Henry McMaster in less than a week, has
got another problem because it was the lady who was
(26:20):
the understudy of Ed Simmer who has now been nominated
to lead the other part of the department.
Speaker 2 (26:26):
The Department of Environmental Services used to be called Environmental
Control under d Heck. Now it's the Health Department of Health,
and then separately it's the Department of Environmental Services that's
Myra Reese.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
And if you go to Henry McMaster's Twitter account, I
mean April third is when he tweeted out his support
for Simmer, he got totally the word ratioed. By the way,
for those of you are not familiar with the term,
ratio means that you put out something on social media
supporting what ever position of whatever, And ratio means that
(27:03):
the majority of the people who commented had a countering opinion,
we'll say.
Speaker 2 (27:10):
And in this case, a lot of very colorful opinions expressed.
Speaker 1 (27:15):
Yeah, I would say of the one hundred and ninety
two comments given on the April third tweet from Henry
McMaster about Ed Zimmer, about one hundred and ninety of
them were against Ed Simmer.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
When some people do that on social media just so
they can boost up their activity level, which helps them
with their click availability. But government Master obviously not trying
to be a social media influencer here. No, no, he
put it out as the real deal.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
Yesterday he tweeted out his support for Myra Reee and
that has forty nine comments right now, and I would
say forty or more or against Myra. And they're the
reasons that MAGA would be against anybody, right if you've
had a history of like she's a thirty year beer
(28:00):
right off the bat, that raises a lot of respect.
Speaker 3 (28:02):
Yet wait a.
Speaker 1 (28:03):
Minute, thirty years she's been a bureaucred that's on her bio,
Like she's proud of that. Shouldn't be proud of that.
So that's like check number one. Then they just start
looking at things that where you sought she was an
associate of Ed Simmer. We already know we don't like
Ed Zimmer, So you know what I'm saying, why are you?
And so now they're all coming out against Henry McMaster,
(28:26):
and they're saying, at this point, the general consensus seems
to be at this point, just shut up.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
And it's surprising because he went out of his way
to get a lieutenant governor run who wasn't necessarily a
who wasn't a bureau cred it, did not have years
of elected public service. So I was kind of a
surprising position for him.
Speaker 1 (28:44):
And the environmental I don't want to call him wackos.
That's not my intention here. The people who are very
passionate about environment.
Speaker 3 (28:52):
Which I am one, all right, a lot.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
Of them have chimed in on the conversation as well,
not for Myra Reese or against her. That I've seen
probably ten or fifteen of these people posting about the chemtrails.
They are really against that, and I'm just trying to
find some of them here. Let's see, how are you
(29:15):
protecting South Carolina when you allow the DoD and Shaw
Air Force Base to continually manipulate our atmosphere with their
damn chemtrails?
Speaker 2 (29:24):
You don't read more about that. Florida has already passed
their legislation.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
Yeah, and that's some people. Yeah, some people have pointed
that out that Florida has a lot has stopped that.
Pam c tweets Adam, here's a great idea to help
the environment, ban the camtrails, stop poisoning us Henry. So.
I mean, you know, he's trying to get a new
environmental person and so I guess that's why they picked
that mantle up and ran with it. But he's having
(29:50):
a very rough time right now. You know, It's funny
because you look at Scott Bessen, south Carolinian, who was
talking about on Meet the Press. One of the things
he was most impressed with was how Mike Johnson was
able to keep the Republicans together. And he was like,
you know, the big story has been the infighting that's
(30:12):
going out with the Democrats, the Pannikins, But the Republicans
are keeping it together.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
The Dusicans are taking a deep breath right now.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
It doesn't seem like the Republicans are keeping it together
though in South Carolina we have a civil war going
on in the Republican Party in South Carolina.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
Well, looking here at the at the market again, before
we wrap this up, let's see if about eleven thirty, Kelly,
Let's see if the good Lord if I did I
bend is ear enough.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
You just want to have the best lunch break ever
and watch their heads implode.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
That's going to be I won't even need barbecue potato
chips to go with my sandwich. M
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.