Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show. Jonathan Rush and
Wall Street.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Analysts have coined a new term called the taco trade.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
They're saying Trump always chickens out. What's your response to that,
Kelly Nash?
Speaker 2 (00:12):
But don't ever say what you said.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
That's a nasty question. Jonathan and Kelly Show. Now there's
the Taco Tuesday. I didn't see coming, but I don't
read the words of what's the dude's name, Robert Anderson.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
I believe, okay, he's a Wall Street I thought this
was Business insider Robert Armstrong.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
But nonetheless, Taco Trump always chickens out was the question,
very bravely asked by a CNBC reporter whose name I
have no idea.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
And you'll probably never see her near the White House again,
but she is.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
The most celebrated. She has the balls. According to one meme,
I saw interesting photo to ask the real question. Speak
truth to power.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
And to that guy Robert whatever his name is, from
the Business Insiders, asking or stating in his article that
that's what a lot of traders are saying. I would
love to see which traders have come up with the
name taco. Who are these people? Or again, it's unnamed sources.
You write your fantasy and then just assign it to
other unknown people.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
All right, Well, we certainly have seen Wall Street go
up and down and up and down and up and down,
and a lot of different things that come out of
Washington policy, which has always been fascinating to me, because
these guys always drive, supposedly, at least when they talk
to you about investing your money, it's always very analytical
and statistical and P and E and a bunch of
acronyms we don't even know. Here's the latest acronym that
(01:42):
they offer you taco. At least it's been attributed to them.
So Wall Street today or I guess after yesterday's trading close,
the futures went through the ceiling tampered down a little
bit before it actually opened this morning. But you know,
it's funny because if you take what Trump is doing
(02:02):
in his explanation, which was I thought pretty self explanatory,
is what he's doing here and we haven't It's not
like we haven't seen this done before. When you start negotiating,
you're going to start, You're going to start how you're
going to start? Low Kelly, where are you going to
start with that.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
Well, it depends on what I'm trying to get done.
But I think Trump likes to start at a high
tiff rate and then once he gets some concessions, start lowering.
That seems to be his thinking.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
At least if you could get China to open up markets. Previously,
we were not even in Canada. I didn't even realize
until the show of things started with a terrorist said
our banking industry isn't allowed to do business in Canada.
I didn't even know that happened.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
Yeah, well, they've treated us very badly, very poorly. By
the way, I thought it was interesting people going after
Trump because he continues to allude to this idea of
making Canada the fifty first state. Yeah, which I don't
know that that's ever going to be a thing. Well,
I don't think he wants that. Well, but I think
that it's really when I thought about it some more,
the way he went after the European Union and talking
(03:04):
about how the whole point of the European Union was
to kind of join forces to abuse the United States. Well,
if he could get Canada to they can still be
a sovereign nation kind of like you know, Finland and
Sweden and Denmark and whatever. They're all sovereign nations. But
as he said, they don't even get a vote at
(03:25):
what the European Union's doing. There's like five people who
decide on behalf of all the other like nations. This
is how the European Union's going to negotiate. I think
he would like to see the United States have that
power over basically NAFTA. Can we have Canada and Mexico
and say that that is our union and that we
(03:46):
negotiate on behalf of all three countries. I think that's
the kind of juice he's looking for.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
Well, and he may very well end up getting it,
because we're going to see these and I know everybody
wanted to get the deals done. Now now now now
you only had a like one hundred and sixteen diferent
trade dealers you're renegotiating. You know, Scott Bessett can't stop
down to do all of them. So we had to
put together all the people that are going to negotiate
these things. And then you start the negotiation process. And
as we talked about before, you're going to start in
(04:13):
particular with China for instance, very high. But he had
up the cost of all the things that he wanted
China to do. See them stop producing fitanol or at
least the raw materials where they were produced in Mexico
done so, then you start ticking off the list of
successes and accomplishments. Meanwhile, the Democrats are sitting over here.
They've already launched a commercial this morning. They say they're
(04:36):
going to be running during the mid terms. Seems like
they prematurely launched the commercial, but nonetheless, it's about how
the big beautiful bill is going to do nothing but
rob from the poor and give to the rich.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
And I'm surprised there's any more money left to rob.
I'm being told that we're thirty seven trillion in debt
because Elon Musk has wiped out everybody's four ow and
K and social Security And I mean, what did he
serve like one hundred and what is it like one
hundred days or something like that, whatever it is, and
now he's wiped us out, and then he's left. He's
gone back to you know, that's it's expensive blowing up
(05:09):
rockets like he did the other day. So he needed
all your four oh one K for that, so he
got his access to it. When he was in Doze,
but now that he got it all, he left Doze.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
He's taking all your personnel information as it was explained,
is explained to us by Gosh Weisser name Escape.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
And me, was it Maxine Waters?
Speaker 1 (05:25):
Yes, it was Maxine. He's already taken all your personnel information,
and he's already taken all your money. So his work
is done here. Now it's going to take all that
cash and he's going to go back and work a
little bit. I guess on SpaceX because their last two
launches have not been successful.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Yeah, I know those are, Like I said, those are
expensive when they blow up a rocket like that.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
A little expensive. All right. So now we're going to
see more of this pan out today as we're going
to see trade negotiations starting to come to a finalized
point where we're actually going to get signatures. I guess
should we ask can we use the used the Biden
notut open or is that automatically somehow laund your money
into his family? Man Comer is on it now, and
(06:10):
I am so glad that we have the law or
the law fare. Yeah, I'm so glad that we have
the law fairer coming so strong, right, now how many
I should go back to the web page. I remember
counting it up about a month ago. We have more
than two hundred lawsuits. Nine of them have been settled
at that point. But I wouldn't do want to go
(06:31):
back to that webpage again. Somebody's compiling all the current lawsuits.
You got Harvard taking Trump to court. You got the
three panel judges that came out yesterday said you can't
do the trade negotiations to begin with. So and you
would think Wall Street would have futures of like thirty
seven thousand, given that the three panels, three panel judges, Obama,
(06:53):
a Trump, and a Biden appointee have all come down.
So this is and what's supposed to be a nonpartisan
this is absolutely a tripartisan agreement that Trump has overstepped
his balance by even negotiating a trade deal. What does
he think he's doing as the president?
Speaker 2 (07:09):
You know? Yeah, the Lawfair is interesting.
Speaker 1 (07:12):
I think that.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
Wall Street is going to do much better pretty soon.
I think that as these tariff deals are worked out,
that you're going to see a huge infusion of cash
into the United States.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
Well, I love the fact the Lawfair is coming this strong.
Get all the cases you want to get because here
comes Comer. Now, previously in American history and even Trump
did this with Hillary Clinton, he didn't go after her
because she was a former First Lady. Previously, we have
had this kind of what is it like a professional
(07:49):
courtesy amongst politicians where they don't drag each other through
the gutter. But keep bringing it, keep bringing Trump to
court because James Comer is coming. And this time I
unlike previous and I'm the first one to criticize him.
He kept promising we were going to get all the
information we had to do with the Biden family and
all the shell companies they set up with all the
(08:09):
money that they had extracted, the money launcher, through the
different policy deals, through Hunter's business dealings, and through James.
Don't forget about him. He was very busy as well.
Keep it coming because now just for the use of
the Auto Pen having to do with the fact that
Joe Biden himself and we have an official lawsuit now congratulations,
I've forgotten the name of the company, but they were
(08:30):
damaged financially because of Biden's policy signed by the Auto
Pen and they claimed that he at the time because
he was asked about it and had not mentioned that
prior and had not mentioned it after. He at the
time could not have signed that executive order. It had
to be used with an auto pen, and he didn't
(08:50):
even know what the deal was. And they're bringing him
to court now. They get a lawsuit on the Joe
Biden administration for the use of the auto pen because
Biden himself did not authorize that executive action. That is
the entire nut of their lawsuit.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Well, and I think that there's even worse news for
the Biden administration with Dan Bongino announcing that they're reopening
all the stuff regarding cocaine in the White House pipe
bomb January sixth, You know who leaked the Dobbs decision,
those types of things. They say after looking at the
(09:26):
files for one hundred days, the FBI did not investigate.
So we what you're telling me right now that the
FBI closed cases that they didn't investigate. That's what Bongino said.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
So that is a when you say a four year
cover up led by Christopher Ray. Christopher Ray, you're looking
at prison, Joe Biden, You're looking at prison because you
can't pardon yourself. All the people involved are now crapping
themselves as the entire swamp circles to make sure that
they can protect themselves from what's coming down the pipe.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
And the great thing is that all you got to
do is listen and remember their own words, because they
told you that this was an insurrection with an armed mob.
Now with all the investigations haven't been known at this point,
or at least the things they did investigate and released
the information which was all damaging to the people that
happened to be there, whether they were a part of
the people walking through that were invited by security or
(10:21):
they were actually there waving crutches and threatening believes it's
dangerous of people exactly. Of all the things that they said,
we had one weapon that was found in the trunk
of a car three blocks away, if our remember correctly,
the most damaging of all the weapons was in fact
the pipe bomb, and the closest to the location where
the attack took place was the pipe bomb. And now
(10:44):
we're finding out they didn't even investigate.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
That there was no real investigation. And again I heard
some guys on MSNBC last night, some former deputy director
of the FBI or something like that. He was saying,
you know, this is really going to hurt America investigation
because look at all the resources that you have to
use to go and investigate these things now, So like
(11:08):
organized crime, I guess we're going to halt all organized
crime investigations. We're going to allow violent gangs to begin
raping and murdering people in the streets because we're going
to have to take what like fifty agents. We have
thirteen thousand plus agents, we got twenty thousand analysts, and
you're saying that all of them have to stop in
order to find out who put cocaine in the White House.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
And at the same time that interview is going on,
you had Cash Bettel being interview when he was talking
specifically about another guy you may remember, James Camy not
comer call me remember call me Yeah. So with his
eighty six forty seven meme that inspired yet more persons
to put up eighty six forty sevens and the like
(11:50):
as memes and the like. Now he's having to take investigators,
as you mentioned, all of the cases that he would
rather see us spend our time investigating to go talk
to people who have threatened the President of the United
States based on the fact that the former head of
the FBI said it's okay to put those kind of
things out there on social media.
Speaker 2 (12:09):
Well, he thought it was funny, and a lot of
other people want to get in on the fund, and
it's not a lot of fun. When the agents start
knocking on the door, I guess that's when the fun ends.
It's all fun and so there's a knock on the door.
Speaker 1 (12:20):
But think at my house, that's when the that's when
the fot You can pack that, smile up and put
it in your pocket. I'm wonder if Fitzer here, I'm.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Wondering if if the Democrats have it. You would think
that they would do at least one simple thing to
help debunk one of the conspiracy theories. One of the
conspiracy theories had always been that Hunter Biden was selling
paintings for a million dollars a pop because it was
buying access to the president. As far as I can tell,
(12:51):
Hunter Biden has not sold a painting in six months.
You would think somebody would just go, some rich Democrat
would go, all right, I'll buy one or two just
so it looks like he can still sell his paintings.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
That's a great point. So I'm excited to note that
the law fair is coming harder and faster. And you
guys over at MSNBC who don't understand negotiations plainly, by
the fact, Now if you notice that they've expanded their
time periods on most of their hosts. Our shoulderless girl,
what's her name, Anna Cabrera? Sounds right. She was always
(13:23):
on for an hour. Now she's on for two. That's
how good it is. Wonder how that negotiation went.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
Anna, You're going to be doing two hours now, Yeah, for.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
The same amount of mine.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
We're good.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
So plainly MSNBC talking heads don't understand negotiations or or
they're not good at it. But then I am so
glad that to bring it, bring it, bring it, bring it,
bring it, because maybe this will do away with this
dam professional courtesy we've seen previously where Donald Trump, who
did his first time he ran for office, you know,
to lock her up with something that started I think
(13:56):
primarily from the followers, but he was all in on it.
But when he got to a point where he could
lock her up, did he lock her up? Did he
investigate her? No?
Speaker 2 (14:04):
So now we're and I wanted to point out that
and I think everybody knows this, But just as a reminder,
Donald Trump knew as early as twenty seventeen that Hillary
Clinton is the one who launched the whole Russia lie,
so that whole time that he was being prosecuted, he
knows who's behind it. And he did not use his
Justice Department to go after her.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
No, he didn't.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
He could have. He was well within his rights.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
But now that we're going to continue to take Donald
Trump to court, I'm glad to see it. Bring more
of it, bring it all because all you going to
do now the Republicans are finally starting to understand if
you want to win this game, you got to play
by the same rules. The Democrats have always taken advantage
of the opportunity and done things Republicans didn't want to
(14:50):
get in the mud with. Okay, well, you know something,
get in the mud. Bring Biden's ass and his fan
because what's going to happen now with this investigation having
to do with the auto pen that's going to bring
more things into question. If he could really get some
of these staffers in and I understand all the staffers,
according to some of the talking heads on Fox News,
(15:10):
are lining up with their attorneys. But if you can
start showing some cracks in this, you're going to get
deep into this administration. And this is where you're going
to find out where Jill is really going to find
her ass and a crack. Can't wait. Squeeze it like
a vice, Just friggin squeeze it. This family has perpetrated
(15:31):
at a money laundering scheme we have not seen to
No one is ever even thrown out, and an allegation
to something like this has ever happened before the way
that it did under this administration. I can't wait to
see this. And I hope that the lawfare now is
going to go both ways. That's my prayer. Let the
(15:52):
law fair go both ways.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
The Bidens are a unique case because if you look
at most money laundering schemes, who's normally hurt in a
money laundering scheme. There's other criminals that are hurt by that,
there's maybe some legitimate, legitimate business people. But if you
look at what the Biden scheme was about, it was
actually about hurting all of America. A simple, easy to
(16:16):
understand one where you don't have to go like Barisma
and all that sort of stuff and try to figure
out how that all worked. You can literally just look
at the Pen Biden Center, which is hysterical to me,
was pitched as a think tank. Joe Biden is the
leader of a think tank. Sounds like a freaking sitcom.
But anyway, the Biden Penn Center was paid for by
(16:37):
the Chinese government for thirty million dollars. They stroke to
check for thirty million, and then paid Joe Biden a
million dollars a year to lead a think tank, and
people like Anthony Blincoln got jobs there, and a bunch
of these future Biden staffers were paid to do absolutely
nothing other than use it as a place to apparently
(16:58):
haphazardly store were classified documents, which again we're never prosecuted.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
I'm excited about the opportunity for Comber to actually get
something done this time, and if they put down their
professional courtesies and take the Biden family to task. Oh
and there's a bunch of other people that aren't necessarily
members of the family, but they swore an unholy oath.
Now in the state of South Carolina, yesterday it was
officially passed fourteen point seven billion dollar state budget, despite
(17:28):
concerns from some members. Well there's several different concerns here.
One of them that lead off with this article of
the Posting Courier is the eighteen thousand dollars per lawmaker
per year in district expenses, and legislators threatened to sue.
Now we've got one particular Republican, Wes Climber, who is
(17:50):
pointing out that this can't be done in this measure.
If you want to vote yourself a pay raise, go
right ahead, but you can't do it inside this budget bill.
And he says it according to the state constitutional constitution,
it is in fact unconstitutional. And he's going to have
one of South Carolina's foremost representatives in law Fair, Dick Carputlian,
(18:10):
represent him. Dick's very proud to do that.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Well, if you look at what Dick Carpulian and West
Climber are saying, it seems like an open and shut case.
This is a violation of the state constitution. The method
that they use, not the end result, but the methods
that they used to get it passed is a violation
of the state constitution. We have a bunch of either
rogue lawmakers or we have lawmakers who don't understand the laws,
(18:35):
which in either instance is a horrible news for us
as South Carolinians.
Speaker 1 (18:40):
It's also very strange and that from what we've always
been told, the lawyers inside the General Assembly make fun
of the members who would not lawyers because they know
the law, which would lead you to believe they know
how to write a law. Well, plainly, we've had enough
constitutional challenges that goes before the Supreme Court here in
the state to South Carolina that would demonstrate that they
(19:02):
don't know the law as much as they claim to
because they don't know how to write a law without
it being challenged in the Supreme Court facing them to
go back and rewrite the law.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
I mean, are we now keeping former Chief Justice John
Fugh on retainer so he can help guide these people
on how to write laws, because every time they seem
like they were sitting in front of him going, oh crap,
I didn't know that.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
I think if we bring the House and the Senate
subcommittees together whenever they want to hash out one of
these deals, it seems like we're to invite at least
the Supreme Court Justice Ahead, Justice Over, maybe a couple
of members of the Supreme Court over to give them
a little guide that says they write this because they
come out and bring something to the floor that's now
going to end up back in front of them because
(19:44):
it's unconstitutional, or so says West Climber at this point,
and Dick Carputlian his attorney of record.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Yeah, and again, if you want to read the story
in the posting Courier, I think they map it out
pretty easily that this is definitely in violation of the Constitution.
You're going to go to court and you're gonna lose. However,
there is a last second option here, which would be
that Henry McMaster veto is this, and if he does
veto this, I think that's in the best interest of
(20:12):
everybody because then it would force the lawmakers to come
back and redo the work and then and then it
would be done the right way and save us a
bunch of, you know, legal bills.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Now in the article, it also brings up as proviso
seems to be the hot word another proposal to claw
back state funds from the City of Columbia over local
ordinates spanning the practice of conversion therapy, and we talked
about that yesterday drew opposition from some Democrats, but masters
Oll reporters he intended to allow the proviso to stand
to the final budget, adding that he believed the city
ordinance itself to be on constitutional.
Speaker 2 (20:45):
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure he's right with that.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
Ye, and certainly there's we've already heard from the state
attorney general that in fact that is the right position.
But again, you can sue over anything, so that'll end
up being another lawsuit out of this budget bill.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
What was the uh was the quote that you were
reading yesterday and you were like, you were just so
incredulous that this woman said the way she said it.
It was pretty funny. I can't remember the exact wording,
but it was that this over the oppression of the government,
the government oppression of free speech. Uh, you know, it
will only be made worse if they don't allow us
(21:20):
to ban this free speech.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
Which brings us back to one of the more comical
videos I saw yesterday. It's not comical. Let me just
take that word back for a second. I laughed out
loud because I can't believe how far out of control
this city has gotten. But if you happen to see
if they had a couple of terms in this video
that made me laugh out loud. This is where the
comedy came in. So it's Seattle, Washington or was it Portland, Oregon?
(21:48):
It's always one of those two cis.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
Those are the hottest of nutbeds.
Speaker 1 (21:51):
Was it Chaz or was it what was he? What
was the other city center they took over? Oh cha
Chazz in Portland? Yeah, and the Chop was the other one.
I can't remember if this was Chas or Chop. I
think this is Chop Proper. It was Chop Proper's where
it was. So there was a group of Christians who
wanted to have a rally and they were in support
(22:13):
of family values, which did not include gender affirming care
from miners in the absence of their parental consent. That
was one of the things that they were, you know,
kind of gathered around. Is one of their battle cries.
They didn't want that to happen anymore.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
I've got to have a battle cry because they're about
to be in a battle. It sounds like they were in.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
A battle as a matter of fact, So they were.
There was there was a new term for antifa, which
is going to come to me, trans trans Tifa. So
trans Tifa shows up with a newly formed front line
of offense and defense. It would seem, judging on their size,
called Meal Team six. Now these were some big girls.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Now are they girls becoming boys or boys becoming girls?
Speaker 1 (22:56):
That's the question. They were they were they were becoming linebackers.
I can tell you that they weren't good. I don't
know what it is. But as they were turned Mill
Team six, which was I thought the best turn of
a phrase, even better than taka Mill Team six is
lined up on the street and they literally attacked the
(23:17):
Christians and the mayor comes out against the Christians because
the Christians agenda does not align with the city's values. Well,
no shit, what they've got? Hello, I just said it.
When you've got hundreds and hundreds of people who were
attacking a group who has authority to hold an event.
(23:40):
And by the way, the mayor picked the location, I
wonder why he wanted to put them there, because these
people don't own automobiles. They had large weapons to drag
with them.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Now the mayor of Seattle, is this the same one?
Maybe it's a new one, but I remember like three
years ago the may of Seattle had to move out
of his house because they attacked him.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
That Oh gosh, that's right. I think this is a
new mayor.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
Though, So they ran they ran out not quite liberal
enough screening town.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
So they've got their own. They got their own Transtifa mayor.
Now who is coming out after the Christians?
Speaker 2 (24:23):
He deployed Meal Team six.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
Yeah, first Amendment, be damned, here we go. You're not
going to be assembling here after we gave you authority
to assemble and told you to assembol here.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
Yeah, you know what we're gonna We're gonna put here's
what you do with your protest Christians. We're gonna put
a duck hat on you and then have you sit
down so you can be sitting ducks as Meal Team
six around their position.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
Sadly, some of the video that you saw was quite startling,
and that you not only saw two factions who were
having a disagreement, but when one faction starts actually assaulting
a mother who is there with a small child, and
you realize how dangerous this is now in America to
actually exercise your right to a symbol you have no
(25:10):
right to as symbol according to the mayor of that city.
Speaker 2 (25:14):
Well, that's why all of these liberal quote unquote sanctuary
cities and stuff This is exactly why Tom Holman and
the FBI and just our national police forces need to
get involved. It's like Tom Holman was talking about, we
don't have problems in Florida and even Texas right now
with immigration. We have problems in Boston and Seattle and
(25:38):
places where the government has made a decision that they're
not going to follow the constitution, They're not going to
follow the laws of this nation, and so they have
to flood these areas now to make sure that America,
because you're still an American, whether you're part of Meal
Team six or you're part of the Christian Coalition or whatever,
your voices can be heard, should be heard without fear
(26:00):
of getting your ass kicked. And if one side's kicking
the other side's ass, it doesn't matter if you're the
right or the left. We got to make sure that
we stop that.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
So the Transtifa evolution out of antifa, evolution out of
antifa is now going back to our quote a minute
ago from the ACLU representative here in the state of
South Carolina about the oppression of voices. Is oppressing voices
because Donald Trump is an authoritarian, So you have to
(26:35):
fight authoritarianism with authoritarianism.
Speaker 2 (26:38):
Is that what they've sold these people on, only if
you're on the right side of history. That's the way
they look at it.
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show. Jonathan Rush and
Wall Street.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Analysts have coined a new term called the taco trade.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
They're saying Trump always chickens out. What's your response to that,
Kelly Nash?
Speaker 2 (00:12):
But don't ever say what you said.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
That's a nasty question. Jonathan and Kelly Show. Now there's
the Taco Tuesday. I didn't see coming, but I don't
read the words of what's the dude's name, Robert Anderson.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
I believe, okay, he's a Wall Street I thought this
was Business insider Robert Armstrong.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
But nonetheless, Taco Trump always chickens out was the question,
very bravely asked by a CNBC reporter whose name I
have no idea.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
And you'll probably never see her near the White House again,
but she is.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
The most celebrated. She has the balls. According to one meme,
I saw interesting photo to ask the real question. Speak
truth to power.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
And to that guy Robert whatever his name is, from
the Business Insiders, asking or stating in his article that
that's what a lot of traders are saying. I would
love to see which traders have come up with the
name taco. Who are these people? Or again, it's unnamed sources.
You write your fantasy and then just assign it to
other unknown people.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
All right, Well, we certainly have seen Wall Street go
up and down and up and down and up and down,
and a lot of different things that come out of
Washington policy, which has always been fascinating to me, because
these guys always drive, supposedly, at least when they talk
to you about investing your money, it's always very analytical
and statistical and P and E and a bunch of
acronyms we don't even know. Here's the latest acronym that
(01:42):
they offer you taco. At least it's been attributed to them.
So Wall Street today or I guess after yesterday's trading close,
the futures went through the ceiling tampered down a little
bit before it actually opened this morning. But you know,
it's funny because if you take what Trump is doing
(02:02):
in his explanation, which was I thought pretty self explanatory,
is what he's doing here and we haven't It's not
like we haven't seen this done before. When you start negotiating,
you're going to start, You're going to start how you're
going to start? Low Kelly, where are you going to
start with that.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
Well, it depends on what I'm trying to get done.
But I think Trump likes to start at a high
tiff rate and then once he gets some concessions, start lowering.
That seems to be his thinking.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
At least if you could get China to open up markets. Previously,
we were not even in Canada. I didn't even realize
until the show of things started with a terrorist said
our banking industry isn't allowed to do business in Canada.
I didn't even know that happened.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
Yeah, well, they've treated us very badly, very poorly. By
the way, I thought it was interesting people going after
Trump because he continues to allude to this idea of
making Canada the fifty first state. Yeah, which I don't
know that that's ever going to be a thing. Well,
I don't think he wants that. Well, but I think
that it's really when I thought about it some more,
the way he went after the European Union and talking
(03:04):
about how the whole point of the European Union was
to kind of join forces to abuse the United States. Well,
if he could get Canada to they can still be
a sovereign nation kind of like you know, Finland and
Sweden and Denmark and whatever. They're all sovereign nations. But
as he said, they don't even get a vote at
(03:25):
what the European Union's doing. There's like five people who
decide on behalf of all the other like nations. This
is how the European Union's going to negotiate. I think
he would like to see the United States have that
power over basically NAFTA. Can we have Canada and Mexico
and say that that is our union and that we
(03:46):
negotiate on behalf of all three countries. I think that's
the kind of juice he's looking for.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
Well, and he may very well end up getting it,
because we're going to see these and I know everybody
wanted to get the deals done. Now now now now
you only had a like one hundred and sixteen diferent
trade dealers you're renegotiating. You know, Scott Bessett can't stop
down to do all of them. So we had to
put together all the people that are going to negotiate
these things. And then you start the negotiation process. And
as we talked about before, you're going to start in
(04:13):
particular with China for instance, very high. But he had
up the cost of all the things that he wanted
China to do. See them stop producing fitanol or at
least the raw materials where they were produced in Mexico
done so, then you start ticking off the list of
successes and accomplishments. Meanwhile, the Democrats are sitting over here.
They've already launched a commercial this morning. They say they're
(04:36):
going to be running during the mid terms. Seems like
they prematurely launched the commercial, but nonetheless, it's about how
the big beautiful bill is going to do nothing but
rob from the poor and give to the rich.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
And I'm surprised there's any more money left to rob.
I'm being told that we're thirty seven trillion in debt
because Elon Musk has wiped out everybody's four ow and
K and social Security And I mean, what did he
serve like one hundred and what is it like one
hundred days or something like that, whatever it is, and
now he's wiped us out, and then he's left. He's
gone back to you know, that's it's expensive blowing up
(05:09):
rockets like he did the other day. So he needed
all your four oh one K for that, so he
got his access to it. When he was in Doze,
but now that he got it all, he left Doze.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
He's taking all your personnel information as it was explained,
is explained to us by Gosh Weisser name Escape.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
And me, was it Maxine Waters?
Speaker 1 (05:25):
Yes, it was Maxine. He's already taken all your personnel information,
and he's already taken all your money. So his work
is done here. Now it's going to take all that
cash and he's going to go back and work a
little bit. I guess on SpaceX because their last two
launches have not been successful.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Yeah, I know those are, Like I said, those are
expensive when they blow up a rocket like that.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
A little expensive. All right. So now we're going to
see more of this pan out today as we're going
to see trade negotiations starting to come to a finalized
point where we're actually going to get signatures. I guess
should we ask can we use the used the Biden
notut open or is that automatically somehow laund your money
into his family? Man Comer is on it now, and
(06:10):
I am so glad that we have the law or
the law fare. Yeah, I'm so glad that we have
the law fairer coming so strong, right, now how many
I should go back to the web page. I remember
counting it up about a month ago. We have more
than two hundred lawsuits. Nine of them have been settled
at that point. But I wouldn't do want to go
(06:31):
back to that webpage again. Somebody's compiling all the current lawsuits.
You got Harvard taking Trump to court. You got the
three panel judges that came out yesterday said you can't
do the trade negotiations to begin with. So and you
would think Wall Street would have futures of like thirty
seven thousand, given that the three panels, three panel judges, Obama,
(06:53):
a Trump, and a Biden appointee have all come down.
So this is and what's supposed to be a nonpartisan
this is absolutely a tripartisan agreement that Trump has overstepped
his balance by even negotiating a trade deal. What does
he think he's doing as the president?
Speaker 2 (07:09):
You know? Yeah, the Lawfair is interesting.
Speaker 1 (07:12):
I think that.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
Wall Street is going to do much better pretty soon.
I think that as these tariff deals are worked out,
that you're going to see a huge infusion of cash
into the United States.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
Well, I love the fact the Lawfair is coming this strong.
Get all the cases you want to get because here
comes Comer. Now, previously in American history and even Trump
did this with Hillary Clinton, he didn't go after her
because she was a former First Lady. Previously, we have
had this kind of what is it like a professional
(07:49):
courtesy amongst politicians where they don't drag each other through
the gutter. But keep bringing it, keep bringing Trump to
court because James Comer is coming. And this time I
unlike previous and I'm the first one to criticize him.
He kept promising we were going to get all the
information we had to do with the Biden family and
all the shell companies they set up with all the
(08:09):
money that they had extracted, the money launcher, through the
different policy deals, through Hunter's business dealings, and through James.
Don't forget about him. He was very busy as well.
Keep it coming because now just for the use of
the Auto Pen having to do with the fact that
Joe Biden himself and we have an official lawsuit now congratulations,
I've forgotten the name of the company, but they were
(08:30):
damaged financially because of Biden's policy signed by the Auto
Pen and they claimed that he at the time because
he was asked about it and had not mentioned that
prior and had not mentioned it after. He at the
time could not have signed that executive order. It had
to be used with an auto pen, and he didn't
(08:50):
even know what the deal was. And they're bringing him
to court now. They get a lawsuit on the Joe
Biden administration for the use of the auto pen because
Biden himself did not authorize that executive action. That is
the entire nut of their lawsuit.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Well, and I think that there's even worse news for
the Biden administration with Dan Bongino announcing that they're reopening
all the stuff regarding cocaine in the White House pipe
bomb January sixth, You know who leaked the Dobbs decision,
those types of things. They say after looking at the
(09:26):
files for one hundred days, the FBI did not investigate.
So we what you're telling me right now that the
FBI closed cases that they didn't investigate. That's what Bongino said.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
So that is a when you say a four year
cover up led by Christopher Ray. Christopher Ray, you're looking
at prison, Joe Biden, You're looking at prison because you
can't pardon yourself. All the people involved are now crapping
themselves as the entire swamp circles to make sure that
they can protect themselves from what's coming down the pipe.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
And the great thing is that all you got to
do is listen and remember their own words, because they
told you that this was an insurrection with an armed mob.
Now with all the investigations haven't been known at this point,
or at least the things they did investigate and released
the information which was all damaging to the people that
happened to be there, whether they were a part of
the people walking through that were invited by security or
(10:21):
they were actually there waving crutches and threatening believes it's
dangerous of people exactly. Of all the things that they said,
we had one weapon that was found in the trunk
of a car three blocks away, if our remember correctly,
the most damaging of all the weapons was in fact
the pipe bomb, and the closest to the location where
the attack took place was the pipe bomb. And now
(10:44):
we're finding out they didn't even investigate.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
That there was no real investigation. And again I heard
some guys on MSNBC last night, some former deputy director
of the FBI or something like that. He was saying,
you know, this is really going to hurt America investigation
because look at all the resources that you have to
use to go and investigate these things now, So like
(11:08):
organized crime, I guess we're going to halt all organized
crime investigations. We're going to allow violent gangs to begin
raping and murdering people in the streets because we're going
to have to take what like fifty agents. We have
thirteen thousand plus agents, we got twenty thousand analysts, and
you're saying that all of them have to stop in
order to find out who put cocaine in the White House.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
And at the same time that interview is going on,
you had Cash Bettel being interview when he was talking
specifically about another guy you may remember, James Camy not
comer call me remember call me Yeah. So with his
eighty six forty seven meme that inspired yet more persons
to put up eighty six forty sevens and the like
(11:50):
as memes and the like. Now he's having to take investigators,
as you mentioned, all of the cases that he would
rather see us spend our time investigating to go talk
to people who have threatened the President of the United
States based on the fact that the former head of
the FBI said it's okay to put those kind of
things out there on social media.
Speaker 2 (12:09):
Well, he thought it was funny, and a lot of
other people want to get in on the fund, and
it's not a lot of fun. When the agents start
knocking on the door, I guess that's when the fun ends.
It's all fun and so there's a knock on the door.
Speaker 1 (12:20):
But think at my house, that's when the that's when
the fot You can pack that, smile up and put
it in your pocket. I'm wonder if Fitzer here, I'm.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Wondering if if the Democrats have it. You would think
that they would do at least one simple thing to
help debunk one of the conspiracy theories. One of the
conspiracy theories had always been that Hunter Biden was selling
paintings for a million dollars a pop because it was
buying access to the president. As far as I can tell,
(12:51):
Hunter Biden has not sold a painting in six months.
You would think somebody would just go, some rich Democrat
would go, all right, I'll buy one or two just
so it looks like he can still sell his paintings.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
That's a great point. So I'm excited to note that
the law fair is coming harder and faster. And you
guys over at MSNBC who don't understand negotiations plainly, by
the fact, Now if you notice that they've expanded their
time periods on most of their hosts. Our shoulderless girl,
what's her name, Anna Cabrera? Sounds right. She was always
(13:23):
on for an hour. Now she's on for two. That's
how good it is. Wonder how that negotiation went.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
Anna, You're going to be doing two hours now, Yeah, for.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
The same amount of mine.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
We're good.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
So plainly MSNBC talking heads don't understand negotiations or or
they're not good at it. But then I am so
glad that to bring it, bring it, bring it, bring it,
bring it, because maybe this will do away with this
dam professional courtesy we've seen previously where Donald Trump, who
did his first time he ran for office, you know,
to lock her up with something that started I think
(13:56):
primarily from the followers, but he was all in on it.
But when he got to a point where he could
lock her up, did he lock her up? Did he
investigate her? No?
Speaker 2 (14:04):
So now we're and I wanted to point out that
and I think everybody knows this, But just as a reminder,
Donald Trump knew as early as twenty seventeen that Hillary
Clinton is the one who launched the whole Russia lie,
so that whole time that he was being prosecuted, he
knows who's behind it. And he did not use his
Justice Department to go after her.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
No, he didn't.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
He could have. He was well within his rights.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
But now that we're going to continue to take Donald
Trump to court, I'm glad to see it. Bring more
of it, bring it all because all you going to
do now the Republicans are finally starting to understand if
you want to win this game, you got to play
by the same rules. The Democrats have always taken advantage
of the opportunity and done things Republicans didn't want to
(14:50):
get in the mud with. Okay, well, you know something,
get in the mud. Bring Biden's ass and his fan
because what's going to happen now with this investigation having
to do with the auto pen that's going to bring
more things into question. If he could really get some
of these staffers in and I understand all the staffers,
according to some of the talking heads on Fox News,
(15:10):
are lining up with their attorneys. But if you can
start showing some cracks in this, you're going to get
deep into this administration. And this is where you're going
to find out where Jill is really going to find
her ass and a crack. Can't wait. Squeeze it like
a vice, Just friggin squeeze it. This family has perpetrated
(15:31):
at a money laundering scheme we have not seen to
No one is ever even thrown out, and an allegation
to something like this has ever happened before the way
that it did under this administration. I can't wait to
see this. And I hope that the lawfare now is
going to go both ways. That's my prayer. Let the
(15:52):
law fair go both ways.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
The Bidens are a unique case because if you look
at most money laundering schemes, who's normally hurt in a
money laundering scheme. There's other criminals that are hurt by that,
there's maybe some legitimate, legitimate business people. But if you
look at what the Biden scheme was about, it was
actually about hurting all of America. A simple, easy to
(16:16):
understand one where you don't have to go like Barisma
and all that sort of stuff and try to figure
out how that all worked. You can literally just look
at the Pen Biden Center, which is hysterical to me,
was pitched as a think tank. Joe Biden is the
leader of a think tank. Sounds like a freaking sitcom.
But anyway, the Biden Penn Center was paid for by
(16:37):
the Chinese government for thirty million dollars. They stroke to
check for thirty million, and then paid Joe Biden a
million dollars a year to lead a think tank, and
people like Anthony Blincoln got jobs there, and a bunch
of these future Biden staffers were paid to do absolutely
nothing other than use it as a place to apparently
(16:58):
haphazardly store were classified documents, which again we're never prosecuted.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
I'm excited about the opportunity for Comber to actually get
something done this time, and if they put down their
professional courtesies and take the Biden family to task. Oh
and there's a bunch of other people that aren't necessarily
members of the family, but they swore an unholy oath.
Now in the state of South Carolina, yesterday it was
officially passed fourteen point seven billion dollar state budget, despite
(17:28):
concerns from some members. Well there's several different concerns here.
One of them that lead off with this article of
the Posting Courier is the eighteen thousand dollars per lawmaker
per year in district expenses, and legislators threatened to sue.
Now we've got one particular Republican, Wes Climber, who is
(17:50):
pointing out that this can't be done in this measure.
If you want to vote yourself a pay raise, go
right ahead, but you can't do it inside this budget bill.
And he says it according to the state constitutional constitution,
it is in fact unconstitutional. And he's going to have
one of South Carolina's foremost representatives in law Fair, Dick Carputlian,
(18:10):
represent him. Dick's very proud to do that.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Well, if you look at what Dick Carpulian and West
Climber are saying, it seems like an open and shut case.
This is a violation of the state constitution. The method
that they use, not the end result, but the methods
that they used to get it passed is a violation
of the state constitution. We have a bunch of either
rogue lawmakers or we have lawmakers who don't understand the laws,
(18:35):
which in either instance is a horrible news for us
as South Carolinians.
Speaker 1 (18:40):
It's also very strange and that from what we've always
been told, the lawyers inside the General Assembly make fun
of the members who would not lawyers because they know
the law, which would lead you to believe they know
how to write a law. Well, plainly, we've had enough
constitutional challenges that goes before the Supreme Court here in
the state to South Carolina that would demonstrate that they
(19:02):
don't know the law as much as they claim to
because they don't know how to write a law without
it being challenged in the Supreme Court facing them to
go back and rewrite the law.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
I mean, are we now keeping former Chief Justice John
Fugh on retainer so he can help guide these people
on how to write laws, because every time they seem
like they were sitting in front of him going, oh crap,
I didn't know that.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
I think if we bring the House and the Senate
subcommittees together whenever they want to hash out one of
these deals, it seems like we're to invite at least
the Supreme Court Justice Ahead, Justice Over, maybe a couple
of members of the Supreme Court over to give them
a little guide that says they write this because they
come out and bring something to the floor that's now
going to end up back in front of them because
(19:44):
it's unconstitutional, or so says West Climber at this point,
and Dick Carputlian his attorney of record.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Yeah, and again, if you want to read the story
in the posting Courier, I think they map it out
pretty easily that this is definitely in violation of the Constitution.
You're going to go to court and you're gonna lose. However,
there is a last second option here, which would be
that Henry McMaster veto is this, and if he does
veto this, I think that's in the best interest of
(20:12):
everybody because then it would force the lawmakers to come
back and redo the work and then and then it
would be done the right way and save us a
bunch of, you know, legal bills.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Now in the article, it also brings up as proviso
seems to be the hot word another proposal to claw
back state funds from the City of Columbia over local
ordinates spanning the practice of conversion therapy, and we talked
about that yesterday drew opposition from some Democrats, but masters
Oll reporters he intended to allow the proviso to stand
to the final budget, adding that he believed the city
ordinance itself to be on constitutional.
Speaker 2 (20:45):
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure he's right with that.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
Ye, and certainly there's we've already heard from the state
attorney general that in fact that is the right position.
But again, you can sue over anything, so that'll end
up being another lawsuit out of this budget bill.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
What was the uh was the quote that you were
reading yesterday and you were like, you were just so
incredulous that this woman said the way she said it.
It was pretty funny. I can't remember the exact wording,
but it was that this over the oppression of the government,
the government oppression of free speech. Uh, you know, it
will only be made worse if they don't allow us
(21:20):
to ban this free speech.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
Which brings us back to one of the more comical
videos I saw yesterday. It's not comical. Let me just
take that word back for a second. I laughed out
loud because I can't believe how far out of control
this city has gotten. But if you happen to see
if they had a couple of terms in this video
that made me laugh out loud. This is where the
comedy came in. So it's Seattle, Washington or was it Portland, Oregon?
(21:48):
It's always one of those two cis.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
Those are the hottest of nutbeds.
Speaker 1 (21:51):
Was it Chaz or was it what was he? What
was the other city center they took over? Oh cha
Chazz in Portland? Yeah, and the Chop was the other one.
I can't remember if this was Chas or Chop. I
think this is Chop Proper. It was Chop Proper's where
it was. So there was a group of Christians who
wanted to have a rally and they were in support
(22:13):
of family values, which did not include gender affirming care
from miners in the absence of their parental consent. That
was one of the things that they were, you know,
kind of gathered around. Is one of their battle cries.
They didn't want that to happen anymore.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
I've got to have a battle cry because they're about
to be in a battle. It sounds like they were in.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
A battle as a matter of fact, So they were.
There was there was a new term for antifa, which
is going to come to me, trans trans Tifa. So
trans Tifa shows up with a newly formed front line
of offense and defense. It would seem, judging on their size,
called Meal Team six. Now these were some big girls.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Now are they girls becoming boys or boys becoming girls?
Speaker 1 (22:56):
That's the question. They were they were they were becoming linebackers.
I can tell you that they weren't good. I don't
know what it is. But as they were turned Mill
Team six, which was I thought the best turn of
a phrase, even better than taka Mill Team six is
lined up on the street and they literally attacked the
(23:17):
Christians and the mayor comes out against the Christians because
the Christians agenda does not align with the city's values. Well,
no shit, what they've got? Hello, I just said it.
When you've got hundreds and hundreds of people who were
attacking a group who has authority to hold an event.
(23:40):
And by the way, the mayor picked the location, I
wonder why he wanted to put them there, because these
people don't own automobiles. They had large weapons to drag
with them.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Now the mayor of Seattle, is this the same one?
Maybe it's a new one, but I remember like three
years ago the may of Seattle had to move out
of his house because they attacked him.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
That Oh gosh, that's right. I think this is a
new mayor.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
Though, So they ran they ran out not quite liberal
enough screening town.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
So they've got their own. They got their own Transtifa mayor.
Now who is coming out after the Christians?
Speaker 2 (24:23):
He deployed Meal Team six.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
Yeah, first Amendment, be damned, here we go. You're not
going to be assembling here after we gave you authority
to assemble and told you to assembol here.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
Yeah, you know what we're gonna We're gonna put here's
what you do with your protest Christians. We're gonna put
a duck hat on you and then have you sit
down so you can be sitting ducks as Meal Team
six around their position.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
Sadly, some of the video that you saw was quite startling,
and that you not only saw two factions who were
having a disagreement, but when one faction starts actually assaulting
a mother who is there with a small child, and
you realize how dangerous this is now in America to
actually exercise your right to a symbol you have no
(25:10):
right to as symbol according to the mayor of that city.
Speaker 2 (25:14):
Well, that's why all of these liberal quote unquote sanctuary
cities and stuff This is exactly why Tom Holman and
the FBI and just our national police forces need to
get involved. It's like Tom Holman was talking about, we
don't have problems in Florida and even Texas right now
with immigration. We have problems in Boston and Seattle and
(25:38):
places where the government has made a decision that they're
not going to follow the constitution, They're not going to
follow the laws of this nation, and so they have
to flood these areas now to make sure that America,
because you're still an American, whether you're part of Meal
Team six or you're part of the Christian Coalition or whatever,
your voices can be heard, should be heard without fear
(26:00):
of getting your ass kicked. And if one side's kicking
the other side's ass, it doesn't matter if you're the
right or the left. We got to make sure that
we stop that.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
So the Transtifa evolution out of antifa, evolution out of
antifa is now going back to our quote a minute
ago from the ACLU representative here in the state of
South Carolina about the oppression of voices. Is oppressing voices
because Donald Trump is an authoritarian, So you have to
(26:35):
fight authoritarianism with authoritarianism.
Speaker 2 (26:38):
Is that what they've sold these people on, only if
you're on the right side of history. That's the way
they look at it.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.