06 23 25 SC voices are being suppressed? In Charleston?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show.

Speaker 2 (00:04):
US President authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats
to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program.
Kelly Nash as President Trump has stated the United States
does not seek war, but let me be clear, we
will act swiftly and decisively when our people, our partners,

(00:25):
or our interests are threatened.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
Kelly Show, I didn't realize that the six bunker buster
bombs we dropped in a run would not nearly equal
apparently the quakesent off in DC.

Speaker 3 (00:40):
Yeah, they're they're trying to get the Trump and authorized.
He's uh, he's facing another impeachment and you know he's
got It's interesting because now we're dividing inside parties. So
you got Fatterman pro Trump, yes, and he got Massy.
By the way, there's a new gambling line. Okay, Will

(01:04):
Donald Trump this is a legit. You can bet money
in Vegas on this right now? Will Donald Trump refer
to Thomas Massey as a masshole? That's an actual betting
line in Vegas.

Speaker 1 (01:20):
I hope that comes true. I want to put money
on that. And Tim Kayin's Tim Kaine's coming off the
part bench where he sits across the street, watches children
play in playgrounds. Tim Kaine's coming because he looks like
a barunda, I'm sorry, gives me the Willie's looking at
that dude. He's coming off the part bench because he

(01:42):
says Congress should have been I love the fact that
there was not one leak out of Trump's team about
any of this going down.

Speaker 3 (01:50):
Well, I saw Mark Kelly, he was on an interview
saying basically, he should have talked to us about it.
He needed this, And I'm like, why would he tell
you when one of your staffers or somebody would have
absolutely leaked it.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
Look if Millie would call the Chinese and give him
a heads up, if this was really an attack, why
in the hell would Trump allow anybody in the typical
Washington DC Beltway to get any glimpse of what the
hell's going on around here.

Speaker 3 (02:18):
I totally took the headfake, though. I really thought that
this was gonna be a quiet weekend.

Speaker 1 (02:23):
That We're gonna have two taco takes. But I did
hear my superhero Trey GOUDI say late Friday, because I
was driving back from Saluta listening on I guess it
was Brett Beershaw And by the way, what's up where
Brett bear rapping wrapper?

Speaker 3 (02:37):
Sugar Hill game was like a month ago.

Speaker 1 (02:40):
I saw it over the weekend anyway, Trey Goudi said
that he didn't believe it was going to be two weeks.
He thought it was going to be days, and he
was right. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:49):
I mean, look at the end of the day, whether
it was this weekend or next weekend or whenever it,
it had become a parent that something had to be done.
And for those of you who are questioning, like why
why would it have to have been done? Because you know,
we all remember Colin Powell telling us that there's weapons

(03:13):
of mass destruction, and the UK intelligence told us that
there's weapons of mass destruction. That's not what we're talking about, though.
What we're talking about is enriched uranium, which can actually
be measured and has been measured, and when you get
above sixty when it's at sixty percent or more, that's
considered weapons grade uranium. At ninety percent is when it's

(03:38):
considered a nuclear bomb. And we have agencies that were
actually they weren't just telling you they are doing it,
they were telling you exactly how many kilograms of enriched
uranium there is, and at what levels they were at,
which was well in excess of sixty percent, And there's
absolutely zero reason to be above sixty percent if you're

(03:59):
just looking for clear energy. The only reason to do
this is to make a bomb. Now, there's plenty of
denials from the Iranians that that's what they were trying
to do. But then there was also in the not
too distant past, plenty of proclamations that you're all going
to soon rue the day they were talking that way
when Joe Biden was the president. They stopped talking that

(04:20):
way when they saw he was not going to be
the president, and no, we're not doing that. Why would
we ever do that? And now you know this is
find out time. This was Donald Trump gave him sixty
days to cut a deal. And I heard Marco Rupio
say yesterday, I wasn't aware of this. Perhaps you had
heard somebody say it earlier that for ten days they

(04:42):
went dark, that the United States and Iran, or excuse me,
and the United States and Iran had no communication for
ten days, that the president, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense,
nobody could get a hold of anybody in Iran for
ten days, which is what really set this thing off.

Speaker 1 (05:02):
Yes, if you had just picked up the phone at
the phone, you might not even answering the phone over here.
Yeah they're doing something. Yeah, they're up to something. It's
not good. They won't even take our phone call for
fear they'll well, I don't know what the fears will be,
but certainly they might not have a conversation. When when
you stop talking, Chomp's going to start acting because he's
been begging you to talk, gave you sixty days to talk,

(05:24):
begged you to talk for sixty days, then you act
like you wanted to talk. Then he told you that
deal is no longer available.

Speaker 3 (05:33):
The interesting thing is, you know when they say it's
not a because I know there's a lot of MAGA people,
and I understand the MAGA people that are upset over this,
and like he's the peace president. What happened to the piece?
And I get it, But this was a legit threat
to you wherever you are. And what I mean by

(05:55):
that is according to the the agency that was monitoring this,
they said that they had enough enriched uranium that was
on the cusp of going to ninety to be a
threat to every person on earth. So if you are
on the earth, then were you were at risk? And

(06:17):
again they weren't just targeting. I know some people say
they weren't. Really they didn't really mean it. When they
said death to America, they really meant death to Israel.
We could have cut Israel loose. And you know who
didn't want us to cut Israel loose, by the way,
would be Egypt and Jordan and all those countries around there,
because they would have been very negatively affected if Israel
has ever wiped off the map. And what about the

(06:38):
poor Palestinians. If you wipe Israel off the map, what
happens to all the Palestinians? They all go bye bye.
But also there's two forms of the Muslim faith, and
one is called Sunni and the others called Shia. The
people who are the Mulahs that run Iran, they're Shia's.

(06:59):
They hate Thees. And it's like it's worse than the
Catholics and the Protestants in Northern Ireland because the Catholics
and the Protestants they don't really want to kill all
of each other. They just want to establish dominance over
one another. That's right, That's not what the Mulas want.
The Mulas want every Muslim who practiced the Sunni faith dead.

(07:21):
And that doesn't mean just in the Middle East. That
means in Canada, America, if we can find you like
it'd be like again if we were if it was
the Catholics and the Protestants. Imagine that somebody in Northern
Ireland said we're going to kill all the Catholics. Hell, yeah,
we want to kill everybody the Vatican, but we also
want to find them in Brazil and Mexico, in California

(07:43):
and Russia. If you're a Catholic, you gotta die. That's
that's the kind of insanity that these people have and
are on the cusp of getting a nuclear Well, they were,
I think the cusp is long since past.

Speaker 1 (07:56):
That's why the infidels had to stand up before. No
matter what the Democrats tell you, there was no eminent threat.
There was no clear and present danger. Here's the thing
about a nuclear bomb. Once you have a nuclear bomb
loaded in a silo, when you bomb that thing, now
that gets a little messy. And not just for the Iranians,

(08:16):
it gets messy for I don't know where the trade
winds are going to be blowing that particular day. For
anybody who's down went of a trade wind, here comes
the nuclear fallout. You have to strike them now, Otherwise,
once it becomes clear and present, you've already played in
their hand. There was an eminent threat. They've been telling
you since nineteen seventy eight, death to America. And furthermore,

(08:40):
we've known, by their own admission and also concluded by
the UN that they are in reaching a uranium past
the point of the agreement, and the JCPOA still stood
in full standing with the Europeans, so they weren't in
accordance with that, even though Trump pulled us out of it.
So yes, there was a clear and present danger. And
guess whose troops in nearby if for no other reason

(09:03):
to keep stability in the region as much as possible ours.
So yes, there is a clear and present medium and
short range missile threat to Americans who are there. Because
you're a bad player to begin with, and you keep
telling us how bad you're going to be.

Speaker 3 (09:20):
Well, and the thing that's really kind of disgusting now
is we're hearing these soft individuals. I'll just say soft,
because there's some on the right and there's some on
the left. But there's a bunch of soft individuals who
are saying, well, now, what about the sleeper cells, Jonathan.
You know what, what if they go to the local

(09:40):
homegrown IgA and just start slaughtering Grandma's in the parking lot.
Because part of guess what that was gonna happen either way,
because whether they had a nuclear weapon or didn't have
a nuclear weapon, Joe Biden allowed million of people into

(10:00):
this country. There's twenty one million illegals here. You know,
they were trying to estimate. I heard Tom Holman trying
to estimate how many he knows of twelve hundred Iranians
that he would classify as terrorists here in the country.
But he also says, I think a lot about the
I think it was two.

Speaker 1 (10:19):
Million million get away getaways.

Speaker 3 (10:21):
We don't know who they're affiliated with, what they'refore why
they even wanted to get away, Because when they were
getting away at that time, the good thing would be
to turn yourself in, because that's why you get the
free phones and the free healthcare and the free foods
and all that sort of stuff. So why did they
want to get away?

Speaker 1 (10:36):
So target rich environment of all those people that came
through the under the darkness, cover of darkness, or the
diversion of our border patrol having to then pretty much
play nurse maid so they could get away through the desert.
Pretty high percentage probably of persons who aren't here to

(10:57):
do anything other than bad things.

Speaker 3 (11:01):
So those people are here. And then if you thought
that US just appeasing Iran and letting them get a
nuclear weapon was somehow going to make the people in
the homeland of America safer, why do you think they
would have sleeper cells here? Do you think that they
had the sleeper cells here just for fundsies? The sleeper

(11:23):
cells are here to kill us.

Speaker 1 (11:25):
Yeah, how much of that one point seven billion we
dropped off was actually used to transport person south of
the border and then give them instruction to cross the
border and then wait for further instruction.

Speaker 3 (11:34):
I'd be fascinated. I don't think we'll ever get it,
but it would be an interesting report to see how
much taxpayer money was used to feed, clothe house, maybe
even medical attention for people that are here specifically to
kill us.

Speaker 1 (11:51):
It would be interesting to be a distrapulate that number.

Speaker 3 (11:54):
Yeah, thanks Joe Biden. I know that they're not at
Martha's Vineyard though, that's where they're not.

Speaker 1 (11:58):
And that's a one yeah, corrected by somebody. It's only
one point three billion. You're right. The other four hundred
million was for four prisoners. That was the whole premise
of why we gave them the money to begin with,
because the money we gave them wasn't even our money.
It was their money that we've been freezing. I got it.
I understand all that. You're still handing one point seven
billion dollars in non American currencies because everything you want

(12:21):
to buy is going to be from countries who aren't
who is who are solely or not USA companies, So
everything you want to buy is going to come from China,
Russia or wherever. So I get it. Yeah, you're right
about that. It wasn't one point seven one point three
the other four hundred millions so we can get four
Americans back. Wow, But wasn't it all their money to

(12:41):
begin with? It's what huh?

Speaker 3 (12:43):
It was all their money to begin with anywhere, that
wasn't even the four hundred million is Therefore, there was
just an unfreezing of an account that had the one
point seven billion dollars locked in it, and we should
have just given to him. And the what is that
the Chinese end, because that's where they've been getting money.
Now listen for those of you who say they weren't
a legitimate threat. I think another thing that changed the
calculation was was it like eight nine, ten days ago

(13:06):
when Israel got struck, specifically a hospital with a hypersonic missile.
And there's only two countries on the planet that are
supposed to have that technology. And when I say supposed to,
I mean not like legally authorized, I just mean according
to all military intelligence, there's only been two countries that
ever cracked the code on how created a hypersonic missile,

(13:26):
the United States and China. Now I'm not unless Joe
Biden gave it to him, which I'm not ruling out.
I mean, Joe Biden may have given hypersonic missiles to
the Iranians, but it certainly would seem like the Chinese
are the ones who sold it to them. And when
you started seeing hypersonic missiles firing in and that's why
the Iron Dome couldn't stop it, they hadn't seen it before.

(13:48):
And you know, oh, could are you telling me that
you don't think that the Iranian scientists are clever enough
to take some of that enriched uranium and put it
on a hypersonic missile. Absolute now, huh, So everything had
to stop and stop quickly.

Speaker 1 (14:04):
The operative words are at death to America. Since nineteen
seventy eight, seventy nine, we've heard that chanted The other
operative words over the weekend were declaration of war. There
was no declaration of war. That's why you didn't need
Warpowers Act. Even if you wanted to use it, still
didn't have to have it because you got the constitutional
availability of doing it. And furthermore, that would be plainly stated.

(14:28):
Even though Trump said a regime change would not be
a bad idea, and that's not a bad idea, not
the apparently anybody in the administration has ever said, other
than the reference yesterday, that they wanted the regime change.
As a matter of fact, I've argued that they wouldn't
have wanted the regime changed because up until they went
totally dark ten days prior, they were already having conversations

(14:49):
with the persons in charge to be able to bring
about some kind of negotiated deal. So Iaran would not
have a nuclear warhead to put on a missile that
we know they've a already gained the technology to learn
how to build. So if there's no declaration of war,
then there's no reason to have the Congress weigh in
on it. But you're going to hear more and more

(15:11):
arguments this is unconstitutional, from AOC all the way to
Tim Kaine.

Speaker 3 (15:15):
Well, and just so we know what Donald Trump wrote
seventeen hours ago, he posted on truth Social it's not
politically correct to use the term regime change, but if
the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again,
why wouldn't there be a regime change? Miga, miga, and

(15:38):
so he again. I think that unless you're dishonestly reading that,
If you're honestly reading that, Donald Trump's not saying we're
going to change it. He's encouraging the Iranians, which is
what everybody has said all along the change. Nobody thinks
that the current Iranian regime is good, including the vast

(15:58):
majority of Iranians. Nobody likes these people because they are oppressors,
and they're not only homicidal maniacs, they're suicidal maniacs. You
have a group of people that are that want to
die in order to get their virgins. They want you
to kill them. So they're homicidal, suicidal, religious fanatics. And

(16:20):
Donald Trump is just kind of throwing a little flame
on the fire. Hey, we've been hearing rumors that there's
a lot of Iranians who are very upset and who
want to get their country back. You know what, they're
kind of proving to you that they don't have the
power that you thought they had. We can fly over
that country all day and night. They can't stop us.
They can't stop the Israelis. They're not as strong as

(16:44):
you think they are. Perhaps now is a great opportunity
for you to make Iran great again.

Speaker 1 (16:51):
Mega. I'm suprised he wasn't wearing a Mega hat.

Speaker 3 (16:54):
I'd like to see Iran be great again.

Speaker 1 (16:57):
Speaking of oppressive government, Kelly have to look far to
find one. According to the Posting Courier article today, you
can only you only have to drive two hours away
to go to Charleston. But the uptick and protests locally
and nationwide. Charleston activists continue to push back on what
they believe as an unconstitutional ordinance requiring permission from police

(17:20):
to demonstrate. Local organizers remember from the No Kings protest
that we talked about said they felt like being they're
pushed aside to demonstrations that were held for Hampton and
Brittleback Parks rather than more highly visible Marion Square. Tactic
protesters believe is intended to minimize their impact. Absolutely, because

(17:48):
we've seen the impact of some of these as it
includes setting crap on fire and throwing bricks through buildings.
Buildings are local owned businesses. It's not allowing public assembly
in public space. They can be appreciated by the public appreciated. Oh,
and that's the whole purpose of the right of the assembly,
so that you can call attention to what you believe
in public, said Carol Jackson, who was owned City Council

(18:11):
in July twenty twenty one when the new protest rules
were passed.

Speaker 3 (18:15):
Well, look, if you're the new rules, I don't know
when the new rules, because actually, if you go back
to the sixties, there was plenty of protests that actually
actively set out to stop commerce, which is not free speech.
Free speech is not me having the ability to physically

(18:35):
prohibit somebody else from coming into your store, or me
physically prohibiting in some instances what we're seeing now in
some of these bigger cities is shutting down highways. That's
been a big thing in Europe for a while, and
now it's come to America where they'll get one hundred
people to block the Golden Gate Bridge. And what are
you going to just take your truck and run me over,

(18:56):
because you'll be arrested for murder. Guaranteed you will be
a murder if you run over the protesters. But why
are they allowed on the bridge to block it so
that nobody can go from Oakland to San Francisco and
vice versa. That's what they want to do. And if
you want to start having a get together a protest
down in the center of Charleston where all the shopping

(19:19):
is taking place and all of the commerce is taking place,
well that's going to be a problem for the local businesses. Now,
you can still have your free speech, you can film it,
you can put it up on your YouTube and your
Instagram and your X channels and all of that. You
have all of the free speech, but what you do
not have is access to prohibit people from freely moving

(19:42):
about and or the opportunity to intimidate shoppers out of shopping.

Speaker 1 (19:48):
Well, this is going to go continue its way now
in a lawsuit because city and police officials in Charleston
say they are not considering any changes to the ordinance,
which they say complies with the First Amendment.

Speaker 3 (20:00):
Yeah, you had the right to speak.

Speaker 1 (20:02):
You spoke.

Speaker 3 (20:04):
I think the real problem for the what do they
call it again, the No Kings protest, is that for
the vast majority of Americans, not everybody. I know, it
got kind of crazy in LA, probably some other big cities.
I think I saw something from Portland or whatever. But
of the three hundred and thirty million Americans, three hundred
and twenty million plus yawned. They didn't see it, they

(20:25):
didn't care about it, They're not interested in it. So
the only way that they can make you interested is
if I set your office building on fire. Now you
have nowhere to go to work on.

Speaker 1 (20:36):
Suddenly I've got your attention.

Speaker 3 (20:37):
Yeah, oh, now you're interested in the No Kings.

Speaker 1 (20:39):
Now you're gonna help you to sit down and listen
to what our demands are. I mean, our protest is about.

Speaker 3 (20:44):
Exactly, can we shut the highway down so you can't
get to work? Can we make your house an unsafe place?
We'll stand out like those late that those people that
were chased down by the horse. What was his name,
Mount something or other, Mount Riley, Mount Riley. Those people
were causing a ruckus. They were on a megaphone screaming

(21:07):
at people who were Again, it was just a quiet
Saturday afternoon in Charleston. They're living off of one of
the Rutledgs Avenue, and all of a sudden we got
these people walking up and down the streets yelling no
kings no kings on. Well, now I'm intimidated. I'm sitting
in my house, me and my grandmother, and I have
you protesting out in front of my house. This is

(21:28):
this is not free speech, This is not the First Amendment.

Speaker 1 (21:31):
The Reverend Adam Schumacher, co chair of the Everyday People Organization, says,
we are gathering here today, friends, because our First Amendment
permit was denied by the city of Charleston. Okay, the
denial of our rights to free speech is fundamental to
all of us, but especially privileges those in positions of

(21:53):
power at the expense of the rest of us. We
need to come together here in Charleston to see that
those restricted ordinances are repealed once and for all. We
will march the streets anytime we like, shut down streets
anytime we like, so that you are mandated to hear
our bitch.

Speaker 3 (22:14):
Well, it's like liberals have changed the definition of a vaccination.
They've changed the definition of a woman. They're changing the
definition of speech. Now speak, you can speak.

Speaker 1 (22:24):
Speak.

Speaker 3 (22:25):
You can't do it on a microphone. You cannot you know,
blast it into my house. You can't shut down traffic.
Traffic is not speech. You stealing iPhones and rebox and
you know, air Jordans or whatever. That's not free speech.
This is not just because I don't are the majority
of Americans are not responding to you the way you

(22:47):
want us to respond to you. Doesn't mean you didn't
get your free speech.

Speaker 1 (22:50):
It was a man arrested in charge for trespassing after
a warning for resisting arrest during a Hampton Park rally.
At least he was trying to access a bridge that
crosses the pond, which police typically use to separate any
counter protesters. We're trying to keep a little peace in
this peaceful demonstration by keeping the two counterparts apart with
this bridge. This guy says, no, I'm going to go,

(23:12):
He's gonna go launch the forward attack and you got
attorneys now weighing in, like Aliminenkis, I'm not sure. I
upow's your name, Executive director of the South Carolina for
Criminal Justice Reform. Attorneys are concerned about what they see
as a pattern of suppression of speech in Charleston.

Speaker 3 (23:33):
It's a pattern of putting you in designated protest areas.
If you want to have protests, they have to be
organized and they have to be limited. You cannot just
overthrow a city. And it would be interesting, I mean,
if for what they're calling for, even though Charleston does
lean left, it would be very interesting if oh, we

(23:57):
see that you now are just letting people protest anywhere
and shut down everything and do whatever they want. Okay,
well here comes MAGA. Now you're gonna have all the
red hats and they're going to be marching against the
blue hats, and then you're gonna have chaos, You're gonna
have violence.

Speaker 1 (24:12):
Well, in furthermore, we're gonna have that the police not
even be able to come monitor it so that we
can try to keep the MAGA away from the other protesters.
So then we get a full fledged street brawl.

Speaker 3 (24:21):
That's what I'm saying. If I was in the police,
I'd say, well, you all want your free speech, have
your free speech. We'll turn it into I mean, this
thing escalates to Charlottesville in about five seconds.

Speaker 1 (24:32):
Very well could have. So this is going to be
continued with another lawsuit that we will follow as it
goes through the progression. Now as we here in South Carolina,
particularly in Charleston.

Speaker 3 (24:47):
In Charleston, well, Charleston's where we launched the Revolution, we
launched the Civil War. I mean, they got a lot
going on in Charleston now they're revolting against the words