Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Shows.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
For a four year period of time, the truth about
the origins of the Russia collusion hoax was hidden from
the American people. Kelly Nash, everything's faked with the Democrat
Take a look at what they just found about about
your Dotti. Everything is faked. There are a bunch of
sick people.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Kelly Show.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Oh, we learned so much, but did we really learn anything?
According to all the hosts on the Sunday shows, we
didn't learn anything. This is all news. We don't have
any new news.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
I mean, it's so interesting that they're acting as I mean,
they are the ones gaslighting us right now, but they
act as if it's the Republicans specific well, not even
a Republican, because is Tulsey Gabbert a Republican. I thought
she was a she was aman was a Democrat. I
thought she was now a non partisan person. But whatever
(00:53):
she is, that she is gaslighting you, that she is
releasing information and making a big deal about stuff that
we all have already known.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
We already knew this.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
I didn't know a lot of this stuff. Maybe I
didn't pay close enough attention to the Democrats when they
revealed all this back in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
I think we've known this, so then we eve we
had parties. Of December eighth, that was when they had
the meeting with Brendan and talking about there was no
Western collusion. And then the next day.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
You're saying December eighth is in the December eighth twenty seventeen, yeah,
or twenty sixteen, I'm sorry, twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
And then December night, this when Obama said, go back
and fine. I don't like that answer. Find me another one.
I thought we even had parties. Didn't we have parties?
Speaker 1 (01:35):
I don't remember. I kind of remember years long investigations.
I remember impeachments.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
I remember the four years.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
If we've been knowing this for years, why did we
impeach Trump? Why did that happen?
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Look?
Speaker 1 (01:51):
The only thing you could say about what happened back
in twenty seventeen, eighteen, and nineteen. At the minimum, all right, listen,
you know, I know Tulsea Gabberts used the the phrase
it was an attempted coup. Maybe you don't feel comfortable
going that far. At the minimum, you have to say
it was used to derail the first couple of years
(02:13):
of the Trump presidency. It was a you can't even
say distraction. It was a full time, we've got to
handle this crap crisis.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
It wasn't just a black cloud over the White House.
It was a full blown for what's the stages of
alarm fire?
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Oh, hurricanes five?
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Right? Yeah, we're at stage five. Yeah. It was a
hurricane every day.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
And you know, I just look at the last six months.
So Donald Trump's been the president for six months. I
heard Gavin Newsom this weekend. He's decrying the last six months.
He's saying he's repealed everything we've done the last fifty
years in just the first six months. Maybe that's true.
Maybe he has ended because it's been about fifty years
of liberal insanity that's just been building up and building
(03:01):
up and building up, and Trump is repealing it all
the way back. But imagine if Donald Trump had not
been shackled with all of this back in twenty seventeen,
how much difference he could have made just between twenty
seventeen and twenty eighteen. Sure, I mean this is obviously
long before we would He had a very successful presidency.
(03:21):
That presidency if you didn't have the COVID and I
don't want to call it a distraction, but that reset everything,
and people like myself were not happy with Donald Trump.
I still voted for Donald Trump in twenty twenty, but
if people like me were not happy with Donald Trump
with the way he was handling it, I'm sure there
was other people who were not happy with it and
(03:41):
didn't vote for him. So that probably cost him the
twenty twenty election, at least if you were considering that
a fair equal election. If a lot of people subscribe
to the theory that Joe Biden is not the most
popular person who's ever run for president, that he picked
up ten to fifteen million coach that he didn't actually
get there's that theory, and that also falls at the
(04:04):
Trump administration one's fault because they were not lawyered up.
They did not protect the ballot box properly. In the
twenty twenty election. We heard that complaint coming from you know,
even his own son in law. That's right, his own
son in law talked about that.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
And what was a guy's name that went nuts right
in the middle of the campaign, the guy who really
was pushing for the lawyering up and then he went crazy.
It was like it was a Florida man, Steve.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Drank blank on his last name. But yeah, he was
another one of those guys who was kind of ousted
from the campaign because he was he wanted to get lawyered. Yeah,
he was saying, you're going to get they're going to
overthrow the election because they're what they're doing is they're
changing state laws illegally to help them cheat.
Speaker 2 (04:49):
Yes, he was the only one screaming it.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
Well, along with what's his face? I think Jared Kushner
was a big fan of that as well. But Jared
Kushner couldn't be kicked out.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
So now over the weekend, we've got a big EU deal. Well,
now we're finding out all the problems with the EU deal,
particularly the sympathies of the American journalists to the EU
because apparently this is a bad deal for them. I mean,
we're taking full advantage of our strong arm tactics coming
out of the Trump administration. He's strong arm and he
(05:21):
was as if he's trying to arm wrestle with the
Incredible Hulk again.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
I mean, the people from the European Union, the leadership,
they said it was a great deal.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
They seem to be smiling and shaking hands.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Yeah, what's her name again? Is it Olivia or something
like that, the lady.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
Or now in hindsight, even the Americans. We've got some
American journalists here and also some stock market analysts on
MSNBC talking about how bad this deal is. I mean,
we're going to pretty much bring the UK to his knees.
Is that what we're trying to do in the free world?
We're going to protect the West by bringing it to
his knees. I mean, you can spin. I mean obviously
(05:59):
they spin, spin, spin. Everybody spins. We even spend. Everybody
has to spend a little bit. But just based off
the fact that even if you knew nothing, the fact
that the European Union signed it would tell you it's
not a bad deal. That they wouldn't sign something that
they would think would be to their own detriment. As always,
(06:21):
Trump always says everything must be a win win, otherwise
we don't want to be a part of it. We
want Europe to do fine. We also are more interested
in the United States. They should be more interested in
Europe and less interested in the United States in order
for them to be successful. The European Union has made
the decision that they need access to the American consumer.
(06:43):
And in order to get access to the American consumer,
they're going to do a couple of things, one of
which is invest into the United States. It's like six
hundred billion dollars and there's like fifteen percent tariff that's
going on. I mean, there's all these things in order
to get access to you, the American consumer, because y'all
won't stop spending money. You're insatiable. We've got to be
able to get our goods to the market. Yes, if
(07:06):
we can't get our goods to the market, why I
make them. That's true, So we've already gonna make them.
We got to have an end user.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Nobody buys like Americans. The end users are all in America.
We are insatiable with crap. And if you don't believe it,
just watch television. We will buy that damn frying pan,
the no stick frying pan, and there's a better one
coming next week.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
We'll buy anything. We'll buy them both.
Speaker 1 (07:33):
We'll buy them both and then we'll do our own
TikTok video about how we'll test them. Yes, we just
paid forty five dollars for each one of them. And
now we're going to test them and throw one of
them away.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
Literally, we'll buy anything and everything. And that's what we
do in America and consumers. We're a consumeration.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
I mean, you look at during the Biden administration when
buy and Trump. Trump did flood the market with cash,
as did Biden during COVID, and at one point there
was like the the the amount of savings in the
bank was like over a trillion dollars that the US
consumer had in the bank. And before COVID was over,
(08:12):
we were bankrupt again. Yes, we had wiped out all
of our savings. And that savings I put that in
parentheses or quotations, was because the government was mailing you
checks for thousands of dollars.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
Easy companiesy go, you got those it. That's our frigging
motto around here.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Couldn't couldn't keep it, didn't want to keep it. And
you know what, they didn't want you to keep it either.
I remember George Bush, George W. Bush, complaining that y'all
weren't spending money, and you responded properly. You got out
there and you spent yourself into bankruptcy. Again. Congratulations, Because
if you don't go buy shoes the terrorists win. That
(08:50):
was the cry, you got to go buy stuff. And
again that's partly true. I mean, it's not a false
narrative that if Americans stopped spending money, then businesses are
going to start slowing down. And as they're slowing down,
they're going to be laying people off. And you're gonna
go into a tail spin. You're gonna do all waoymen.
Once more people got laid off, I'm gonna pull back
(09:12):
on my spending because that don't what's gonna happen to me.
And as you pull back on your spending, more companies
are gonna have to lay off. And it's just so
just keep free spending every time you go. Tell Sally
every time she buys another dress, she's helping to make
America great.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
Don't get caught up at the ying and the yang.
The ying and the yang. Well, I should come up
with the difference. It's Chinese terminology because similarly, that's where
we're going the tick in the talk, the TikTok. All right,
so now outside of the fact that we already knew
all this new information, we already look, nobody knew this.
(09:47):
Everybody's seen Brennan's notes.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
Nobody saw those personal lists.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
Of book the notebook. Remember that they made a movie
out of it. It's kind of like that other love
story movie. But this was about politics and stuff.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
And you know, you and I are talking about it
as if all the audience knows what we're talking about.
You might not know what we're even talking about right now,
because this was kind of relatively breaking news in the
last week or so. John Brennan's personal notes on December ninth,
in the Oval Office, he wrote in his notebook in
his own hand, Putin does not care who wins the election.
(10:22):
He says, he's well positioned no matter who wins.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
I gotta crap on both of them.
Speaker 1 (10:27):
So how is it that on December ninth, that is
the official position of Barack Obama John Brennan, Jim Comer.
The list goes.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
On Clapper, Clapper, Clapper out the favorite of all the clapper.
Speaker 1 (10:41):
They're all in on it. They all know that Putin
does not care, and yet December tenth, they're putting out
press releases saying the intelligence community has information now that
Putin was rigging or attempting to rig our elections to
help Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
And how do we know that more so in particular
because the face of all that the person who was
sitting on that then House now in the Senate, but
the then House Senate subcommittee who told you there is
absolutely Adam Schiff said it every night to every news
organization known to man. Every day he said, we have
more and more information conclusively that Donald Trump is a
(11:21):
Russian asset. You know.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
It's what'll be interesting with Adam Schiff is I don't
think you're going to be able to prosecute Shiff.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
Oh, you can't get him.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
He's protected because he's going to be able to say
what I saw when I said, I can't tell you
what I've seen, but I have seen it. What he
had seen was provided to him by Comy Clapper and
that crew. So he has deniability. They don't have deniability.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Also, he was speaking as a congressman, which allows him
the protection although he wasn't on the House floor. He
was speaking about his responsibilities on the House subcommittee or
a committee.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Well, I mean if he knew what he was saying
was a lie and he was using it in order
to weaken the country, then I think he would be
part of what's his name was talking yesterday to Maria
Bardaroma and not Lindsay Radcliffe. Yes, Ratcliffe. And he said,
because she was asking, are there going to be prosecutions,
(12:26):
And he said, well, we've referred. I've referred, and Tulca
Gabbard has referred. So we'll see if the DOJ is
going to go ahead and try to prosecute. But what
I believe is beyond a shadow of a doubt because
she was asking specifically on treason. But he said, I
don't know, that's up for them to decide. However, I
(12:48):
am sure that there was a conspiracy, that these people
worked in collusion together. They were in a meeting together.
They went into the meeting with certain information, they left
the meeting on December ninth with different information and different
talking points. They colluded on something, and conspiracy is a
(13:10):
crime if the whatever you're conspiracy or conspiring on is illegal.
I don't know if they're going to call it treason.
I don't know if they're going to just you know,
there's a bunch of different potential charges. But he said,
the interesting thing about a conspiracy charge, not a treson
charge or another types of charges that we've talked about.
You know, whether it's you know, lying under oath and
(13:31):
those types of things, which has a five year window
on and some of those people are not going to
be able to be gotten on that. Others are. I mean,
like Hillary Clinton, I think is right at the five
year mark from her testimony. But more importantly, the conspiracy
charge doesn't go start the clock until the conspiracy has stopped.
(13:52):
And as he pointed out, the conspiracy is active today.
Speaker 2 (13:56):
Yeah. I have one person described it as there is
no statute of limitations on the she charged and I'm like,
that is bizarre. I did not know that to be
the case.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Well, he said, it starts once the conspiracy is admitted to.
They have not admitted to it, so it hasn't started yet.
Speaker 2 (14:11):
Gotcha. Now, the statute of limitations certainly we haven't do
with perjury and the like. You're right, Hillary Clinton's right
at the five year because she was last testified last
in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
But Colly, they've got Cally if they want to, Oh
sure they've got and they got Clapper. Yes, they've got Clapper.
They can get they can get them right now. Crapper
Clapper should be being charged with perjury as we speak.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
Yeah, I think if you wanted to put a totem
pole up for me anyway, because it would change for everything.
I think if you took the totem pole of trees
in US, and I can use that word without it
necessarily having a legal definition of this conversation, but if
you wanted to put enemies of the state, I think
that it's Brennan on top. Boy. It's a close second.
It's a close second with Clapper, and Comy gets a
(14:57):
third position because I really think Comy wasn't as smart
as the other two. He just did a good job
of being a facilitator of it all. Comy's a heartless
mercenary who do whatever he wants, whatever he can do
to make it beneficial for himself.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
The Louisiana Senator John Kennedy describes all three as not
nice people.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
John Senator Kennedy kills me. All right, So we've got
all that going on, and we can't even get the
celebration having to do with the UK now because we
have to constantly back up and describe all the news
that isn't news because we've known this. It's twenty twenty certainly,
and a lot of it's twenty sixteen and Michael Steele,
I was thinking of today. How would you like to
(15:44):
wake up being Michael Steele today? No matter where you
are on the planet, you are, in fact the architect
of a dossier that was so full of crap. None
of it was true. But the reason you would smile
about it, even though you wake up realizing you're the
enemy of most of the free world, is that you
(16:05):
made so much money off of this. You got paid
by Hillary Clinton, you got paid by the US government
through the CIA and the FBI. This dude made bank.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Just for clarification, Michael Steele is the former head of
the Republican Committee. Christopher Steel Christie but Michael, I wouldn't
want to be either one of them.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
Michael Steele I hate almost as much as christs. But
if you're Christopher Steele, you're waking up in London this morning,
and you are the highest paid piece of crap that
God ever allowed to walk upright, You literally peddled horseshit.
Wow my wow, wow. I don't know. I don't know
whether to be angry or envious. Here's the guy who
(16:48):
took literally he went to the bottom of the ocean,
let's say, and scooped up the lowest thing on the
face of the earth, a fifty pounds bag of whale crap,
and brought it back to the surface, packaged it up,
put in the three ring binder, delivered it to Dan Brennan,
and then.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Maybe well he delivered it to Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Oh, Hillary Clinton, Yeah, she's got the first He got
the first pay check from her, got paid, then got
paid from the US government and you go back. Now,
I guess he's in London. I don't know where this dude.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Is, Christopher Steele.
Speaker 2 (17:22):
Lets see where from and I bet he's still got
a really bad barber.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
He lives in Farnham, Surrey, which I'm sure very tony
suburb outside of London. And by the way, he didn't
get done getting paid.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Then.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
In twenty twenty four, I just saw, I don't know
anything about this book. He wrote a book called quote
Unredacted Russia, Trump and the Fight for Democracy. So in
twenty twenty four he went back to the same well
and I'm just reading a review of it. Steele predicts
a new world order if Donald Trump wins the presidency
again in November. He is more dangerous than any US
(17:57):
adversary China or Iran, could ever be. The Republican Party
and the former president who dominates it are the gravest
threat to Western democracy and the rule of law. Increasingly
the willing handmaidens for Vladimir Putin. So he in twenty
twenty four, Now, if we all knew this, if we
(18:17):
all knew about all the stuff that we now have
had released to us from Tulsea Gabbard, how could this
guy even put a book out? Who would publish it?
Speaker 2 (18:27):
Good point?
Speaker 1 (18:28):
But in twenty twenty four is a history book. Yeah,
in twenty twenty four, you've got people like some guy
I think his name is Joe Biden talking about how
Trump is a threat to democracy because he's a willing
to say that idiot who he never said that he
was participating in it, just that he's a willing idiot
for them to be a handmaid for Putin.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
So now you want to talk about gas lighting. The
whole reason that this is out is because Tulsa Gabbard
is trying to butt kiss DJ by cover by using
this to cover up the tragedy that has to be
kept secret, the Epstein files, which the Democrats and the
(19:12):
Republicans want to see because they've both been promised that
unlike what Kristin Welker said yesterday. Kristin Welker said, the
reason we're so interested in the Epstein files is so
that we can get justice for all of these thousands
of victims. These girls to be boys too. But that's
(19:35):
what Kristin Welker said. If you ask the average American
who even knows about the Epstein files, I think he
could be lucky to get fifty fifty, maybe sixty percent
to say the reason why the information should be released
is to make sure we get justice for the victims.
I would say that the overwhelming majority of people who
(19:56):
know about the Epstein files, ninety five percent on each
side of the would say we want to get the
information released because we know it's gonna be damaging for
the other side politically, and that's why we want the files.
But Telsea Gabbert is covering all that up by throwing
us more red meat, by giving us Barack Obama supposedly
in a treasonous file which she is now referred to
(20:19):
the DOJ.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
Well interesting theories there, one of which is that both
sides are apparently filled in that if there was an
Epstein file case, both sides whether they're actual politicians or
perhaps just some of their biggest donors are in there,
because otherwise Joe Biden's DOJ had access to those files
(20:45):
for four years and never even hinted at releasing anything.
If there was something in there on specifically Donald Trump
that they would have thought was damning and or any
of the Republicans, why they release it? And the answer
would be because there's also stuff on their guys in there,
So that's why they couldn't release it. And that's the
(21:06):
theory as to why they're the Republicans can't release it
now is oh crap, we're gonna We're gonna shoot ourselves
in the foot here if we release this. But you
know what a great friend I guess Tulca Gabbert is
to Christine Omes because it's Christy Omes disaster, this this whole.
And I would say, if I'm just being honest, Tulca
(21:29):
Gabbert is not a friend of Christine Elms because Tulca
Gabbert has just created another massive headache for Christine Ome
in the sense that what are you going to do now?
I just held a press conference, I named names, I
just talked about Barack Obama involved in a treasonous act
against the current president and your boss, Christy. It's up
(21:52):
to you, though, are you gonna press charges if she
goes zero for two dodi A pim Bondy, Christine No
no I pim Bondi. Pim Bondi is the one who
over promised and under delivered completely. And now what is
she going to do with this information if she doesn't
(22:12):
press charges on somebody quick? You got to come up
with something here. I don't think I don't think that
what they have done, both both her and Ratcliffe. I
think Ratcliffe have put a lot of pressure on her
right now. Some are saying the left is saying it's
to distract us from the Epstein files. Obviously, no one's distracted.
We all we're all fully aware that the Epstein files,
(22:35):
if there already, have not been released, and they and
sure the Magabase still demands justice, and the Magabase legit
wants justice even even up to if Donald Trump himself
has to go to prison. MAGO wants that MAGA would
want Trump in a prison cell if he was involved
(22:56):
in child exploitation.
Speaker 2 (23:00):
That this is one of the things I've been praying for.
I told you before, Sally and I pray every night.
One of the things I'm praying for is that with
the truth would be known inside the Beltway of the
capital of the United States of America, where so many
people are being abused and taken advantage of, and many
of them victims of their own government, no matter who
is caught up in it, With the truth be known. Please,
allow the truth be shouted from the rooftops, as it
(23:21):
says in the Bible, and let the chips fall when
they may so I'm all in on that.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
Yeah again. MAGA is not the Republican Party. MAGA is
is a political movement made up of people with diverse backgrounds,
diverse socioeconomic places in life, but different races, homosexuals, straits.
(23:47):
I've even seen some transgendered people in MAGA. MAGA is
basically two or three things have to be core to
the MAGA belief But in the middle of that is
justice for and we will we demand it we America.
If the least amongst us is being violated, then all
(24:11):
of us are being violated. And that's part of the reason,
not the only reason, but part of the reason for
the immigration outrage by MAGA. Think about the lower level
of the socioeconomic crew here. So if you are despite
the races, you're Latino, you're black, you're white, whatever, but
you are lower income, you are minimum wage type of
(24:34):
employee and incomes. What are we saying now twenty five
million people or so twenty five million people who have
no skill sets other than they've got a hell of
a back. They can work like nobody else, they can
build things, they can do those types of things. Not clever,
(24:54):
not smart, not skilled, just I can build a deck,
I can do whatever. We're going to undercut all of
those people have been kicked off. They're not able to
compete with those people because they're better off on the
public dole than they are trying to compete at under
(25:15):
minimum wage labor wages, which is what we've done to them.
So we've kicked twenty to thirty million people right out
of the system and said you're better off on welfare.
These people wanted to work and now they're on welfare.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
Well, and then economic analysis will be able to prove
that we're actually bringing the hourly wages for middle class
workers and lower middle class workers up because we're taking
those people that were taking their jobs and putting them
on the government doll and I'm glad that the employment's
going up because you've got to pay more taxes to
take care of this class of people that you moved
out of the way, so we can make that number
(25:49):
of work economically. But when Kristin Welker said the other
day or yesterday that that's what we're really concerned about,
we as Democrats basically because she's speaking is one of
the media persons who is a Democrat. We as Democrats,
are really concerned about the children. You mean, the children
you allowed to come across the border, the six hundred
(26:11):
and something thousand children. You don't even know where them
they are. Well, I mean you're concerned about the children
now suddenly.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Well, think about how much she celebrated when Donald Trump
announced that we found thirteen thousand missing children. That's all
they've been talking about on the media. Donald Trump is
an American hero. He found thirteen thousand missing illegal immigrant
children and is now going to attempt to re reunite
them with their families back south of the border. You
haven't heard a peep out of that.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
And now suppose that you've got Trump who says he
is allowed to pardon Maxwell if he wanted to pardon her.
I don't think you might is ever going to be
talking to him about giving her a pardon so that
she can come forward information. Ay, she knows the minute
she steps out of prison, Hillary Clinton's going to.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Have her killed, period, full stop.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
You can get out of prison all you want. Your
ass is going to be on the sidewalk dead, hopping
around like a fish for about fifteen to twenty seconds,
and typically the heart bleeds out. But then this leads
us to the greatest question of all. We all know
that the Yellen salmon is not pronounced. Why is it
that the S in shelean is not pronounced? Nobody can
(27:19):
decide to the news covers how to say her name.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
I think we're going silent on the S right that
seems to be a uniformly has been decided. It's Gallan.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Guh Lean.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
I don't know how you get gu lean out of
that spelling, but that's what we got.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
The S is silent, like the Allen salmon. But going
with it. That's the way. Okay, we got that solved.
Now we can move forward.
Speaker 1 (27:41):
Yeah, I don't know what Trump wants to give her
a pardon on. I mean, she's been convicted. She's already
done what three years. She's in a cakewalk prison from
what I'm told, I mean a prison that offers yoga
and a running track and these types of things. And
so she's living a pretty good life for someone who's
been involved with hundreds, if not thousands of sex trafficking.
(28:02):
That she was found guilty of grooming the young girls
and then bringing them to the clients. I mean, that's
a pretty horrible person and she should do some very
serious time. I wish it was in a harder prison,
to be honest with you, But I mean, I guess
is the trade off for Donald Trump is a political payoff,
(28:23):
because there's going to be some pushback on Maxwell if
she's ever let out of prison. But what if Maxwell
offers up, let me just go, let me go. Pie
in the sky, Pie in the sky. Bill Clinton is
frog marched. Bill Clinton is going to be convicted of
having sex with a thirteen year old prostitute. Do you
(28:43):
make just is that enough for Donald Trump? That one
name Steve Jobs or not Steve Jobs. What's his name?
Bill Gates? Bill Gates goes down. Those are two of
the biggest names that used to frequent the freak island.
I don't think that she could ever have enough information.
(29:05):
In all honesty, I don't know what she could possibly say,
because it's now it's just your word, convicted, child sex draft.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
What if the spider webs as big as as some
people claim it is that it consumed you know, half
of DC and then something you've got half of the
Congress is going to get booted out. You got a
special election to coverage for the senators, but you got
half of the Congressman, you're going to go to two
hundred and fifteen members in Congress. Look at the upheaval
that would mean for the country. And we've already seen that.
Bill Clinton, I mean, Trump talked about locking up Hillary
(29:33):
Clinton for three years when he was on the campaign trail,
but he's really never going to lock up a former
first lady of a president, let alone Bill Clinton the president,
for any charge, any charge at all.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
I don't know that. Again, if whatever Maxwell says right now,
why does it matter. I don't understand why it would
matter because unless she has some sort of documentation, and
where that documentation have been, wouldn't it have already been discovered.
Wouldn't all this documents in the thousands of boxes that
(30:06):
they took from Epstein's homes.
Speaker 2 (30:09):
What about all the thousands of hours of videos supposedly
they had at one point.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
They still have them. But according to what's her face,
that's just child porn. But it was commercially produced child porn.
And the implication is that that stuff has already been solved,
those victims have already been identified, and the predators have
already been put in jail. That happened decades ago. That's
the implication. That's not the way it's being read by Maga.
(30:36):
Maga's like, if it is thousands of hours of child porn,
I want to know who's on it. I want to
know who's in there. The fact that Jeffrey Epstein bought
child porn, he's dead. I want to know more. But again,
we're kind of getting into the weeds of the Epstein case.
I don't think that that's going to do as much good.
I don't think that really a whole lot can change
at this point, because if they're saying there's nothing there,
(31:00):
how are you going to overrule them?
Speaker 2 (31:01):
How are you going to.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
Say that there is a there there. You've already got
cash Betel and Bongino saying there's nothing there. If there
was something there, that's the way they should say it.
If it was something there, it was already cleaned out
by the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
Yeah, because the one thing we know for sure is
the Democrats Republicans. If you believe the fact they are
hiding Somethingy're going to continue to hide it because and yes,
with the jeopardy position of the elite get away with
it while the while the underclass has to pay the
penalty on everything they ever do, from a parking ticket
to jaywalking, the elite get away with skirting the law.
(31:39):
And I thought no one was above
Speaker 1 (31:41):
The law, especially not the president exactly
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Shows.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
For a four year period of time, the truth about
the origins of the Russia collusion hoax was hidden from
the American people. Kelly Nash, everything's faked with the Democrat
Take a look at what they just found about about
your Dotti. Everything is faked. There are a bunch of
sick people.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Kelly Show.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Oh, we learned so much, but did we really learn anything?
According to all the hosts on the Sunday shows, we
didn't learn anything. This is all news. We don't have
any new news.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
I mean, it's so interesting that they're acting as I mean,
they are the ones gaslighting us right now, but they
act as if it's the Republicans specific well, not even
a Republican, because is Tulsey Gabbert a Republican. I thought
she was a she was aman was a Democrat. I
thought she was now a non partisan person. But whatever
(00:53):
she is, that she is gaslighting you, that she is
releasing information and making a big deal about stuff that
we all have already known.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
We already knew this.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
I didn't know a lot of this stuff. Maybe I
didn't pay close enough attention to the Democrats when they
revealed all this back in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
I think we've known this, so then we eve we
had parties. Of December eighth, that was when they had
the meeting with Brendan and talking about there was no
Western collusion. And then the next day.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
You're saying December eighth is in the December eighth twenty seventeen, yeah,
or twenty sixteen, I'm sorry, twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
And then December night, this when Obama said, go back
and fine. I don't like that answer. Find me another one.
I thought we even had parties. Didn't we have parties?
Speaker 1 (01:35):
I don't remember. I kind of remember years long investigations.
I remember impeachments.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
I remember the four years.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
If we've been knowing this for years, why did we
impeach Trump? Why did that happen?
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Look?
Speaker 1 (01:51):
The only thing you could say about what happened back
in twenty seventeen, eighteen, and nineteen. At the minimum, all right, listen,
you know, I know Tulsea Gabberts used the the phrase
it was an attempted coup. Maybe you don't feel comfortable
going that far. At the minimum, you have to say
it was used to derail the first couple of years
(02:13):
of the Trump presidency. It was a you can't even
say distraction. It was a full time, we've got to
handle this crap crisis.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
It wasn't just a black cloud over the White House.
It was a full blown for what's the stages of
alarm fire?
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Oh, hurricanes five?
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Right? Yeah, we're at stage five. Yeah. It was a
hurricane every day.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
And you know, I just look at the last six months.
So Donald Trump's been the president for six months. I
heard Gavin Newsom this weekend. He's decrying the last six months.
He's saying he's repealed everything we've done the last fifty
years in just the first six months. Maybe that's true.
Maybe he has ended because it's been about fifty years
of liberal insanity that's just been building up and building
(03:01):
up and building up, and Trump is repealing it all
the way back. But imagine if Donald Trump had not
been shackled with all of this back in twenty seventeen,
how much difference he could have made just between twenty
seventeen and twenty eighteen. Sure, I mean this is obviously
long before we would He had a very successful presidency.
(03:21):
That presidency if you didn't have the COVID and I
don't want to call it a distraction, but that reset everything,
and people like myself were not happy with Donald Trump.
I still voted for Donald Trump in twenty twenty, but
if people like me were not happy with Donald Trump
with the way he was handling it, I'm sure there
was other people who were not happy with it and
(03:41):
didn't vote for him. So that probably cost him the
twenty twenty election, at least if you were considering that
a fair equal election. If a lot of people subscribe
to the theory that Joe Biden is not the most
popular person who's ever run for president, that he picked
up ten to fifteen million coach that he didn't actually
get there's that theory, and that also falls at the
(04:04):
Trump administration one's fault because they were not lawyered up.
They did not protect the ballot box properly. In the
twenty twenty election. We heard that complaint coming from you know,
even his own son in law. That's right, his own
son in law talked about that.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
And what was a guy's name that went nuts right
in the middle of the campaign, the guy who really
was pushing for the lawyering up and then he went crazy.
It was like it was a Florida man, Steve.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Drank blank on his last name. But yeah, he was
another one of those guys who was kind of ousted
from the campaign because he was he wanted to get lawyered. Yeah,
he was saying, you're going to get they're going to
overthrow the election because they're what they're doing is they're
changing state laws illegally to help them cheat.
Speaker 2 (04:49):
Yes, he was the only one screaming it.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
Well, along with what's his face? I think Jared Kushner
was a big fan of that as well. But Jared
Kushner couldn't be kicked out.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
So now over the weekend, we've got a big EU deal. Well,
now we're finding out all the problems with the EU deal,
particularly the sympathies of the American journalists to the EU
because apparently this is a bad deal for them. I mean,
we're taking full advantage of our strong arm tactics coming
out of the Trump administration. He's strong arm and he
(05:21):
was as if he's trying to arm wrestle with the
Incredible Hulk again.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
I mean, the people from the European Union, the leadership,
they said it was a great deal.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
They seem to be smiling and shaking hands.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Yeah, what's her name again? Is it Olivia or something
like that, the lady.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
Or now in hindsight, even the Americans. We've got some
American journalists here and also some stock market analysts on
MSNBC talking about how bad this deal is. I mean,
we're going to pretty much bring the UK to his knees.
Is that what we're trying to do in the free world?
We're going to protect the West by bringing it to
his knees. I mean, you can spin. I mean obviously
(05:59):
they spin, spin, spin. Everybody spins. We even spend. Everybody
has to spend a little bit. But just based off
the fact that even if you knew nothing, the fact
that the European Union signed it would tell you it's
not a bad deal. That they wouldn't sign something that
they would think would be to their own detriment. As always,
(06:21):
Trump always says everything must be a win win, otherwise
we don't want to be a part of it. We
want Europe to do fine. We also are more interested
in the United States. They should be more interested in
Europe and less interested in the United States in order
for them to be successful. The European Union has made
the decision that they need access to the American consumer.
(06:43):
And in order to get access to the American consumer,
they're going to do a couple of things, one of
which is invest into the United States. It's like six
hundred billion dollars and there's like fifteen percent tariff that's
going on. I mean, there's all these things in order
to get access to you, the American consumer, because y'all
won't stop spending money. You're insatiable. We've got to be
able to get our goods to the market. Yes, if
(07:06):
we can't get our goods to the market, why I
make them. That's true, So we've already gonna make them.
We got to have an end user.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Nobody buys like Americans. The end users are all in America.
We are insatiable with crap. And if you don't believe it,
just watch television. We will buy that damn frying pan,
the no stick frying pan, and there's a better one
coming next week.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
We'll buy anything. We'll buy them both.
Speaker 1 (07:33):
We'll buy them both and then we'll do our own
TikTok video about how we'll test them. Yes, we just
paid forty five dollars for each one of them. And
now we're going to test them and throw one of
them away.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
Literally, we'll buy anything and everything. And that's what we
do in America and consumers. We're a consumeration.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
I mean, you look at during the Biden administration when
buy and Trump. Trump did flood the market with cash,
as did Biden during COVID, and at one point there
was like the the the amount of savings in the
bank was like over a trillion dollars that the US
consumer had in the bank. And before COVID was over,
(08:12):
we were bankrupt again. Yes, we had wiped out all
of our savings. And that savings I put that in
parentheses or quotations, was because the government was mailing you
checks for thousands of dollars.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
Easy companiesy go, you got those it. That's our frigging
motto around here.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Couldn't couldn't keep it, didn't want to keep it. And
you know what, they didn't want you to keep it either.
I remember George Bush, George W. Bush, complaining that y'all
weren't spending money, and you responded properly. You got out
there and you spent yourself into bankruptcy. Again. Congratulations, Because
if you don't go buy shoes the terrorists win. That
(08:50):
was the cry, you got to go buy stuff. And
again that's partly true. I mean, it's not a false
narrative that if Americans stopped spending money, then businesses are
going to start slowing down. And as they're slowing down,
they're going to be laying people off. And you're gonna
go into a tail spin. You're gonna do all waoymen.
Once more people got laid off, I'm gonna pull back
(09:12):
on my spending because that don't what's gonna happen to me.
And as you pull back on your spending, more companies
are gonna have to lay off. And it's just so
just keep free spending every time you go. Tell Sally
every time she buys another dress, she's helping to make
America great.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
Don't get caught up at the ying and the yang.
The ying and the yang. Well, I should come up
with the difference. It's Chinese terminology because similarly, that's where
we're going the tick in the talk, the TikTok. All right,
so now outside of the fact that we already knew
all this new information, we already look, nobody knew this.
(09:47):
Everybody's seen Brennan's notes.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
Nobody saw those personal lists.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
Of book the notebook. Remember that they made a movie
out of it. It's kind of like that other love
story movie. But this was about politics and stuff.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
And you know, you and I are talking about it
as if all the audience knows what we're talking about.
You might not know what we're even talking about right now,
because this was kind of relatively breaking news in the
last week or so. John Brennan's personal notes on December ninth,
in the Oval Office, he wrote in his notebook in
his own hand, Putin does not care who wins the election.
(10:22):
He says, he's well positioned no matter who wins.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
I gotta crap on both of them.
Speaker 1 (10:27):
So how is it that on December ninth, that is
the official position of Barack Obama John Brennan, Jim Comer.
The list goes.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
On Clapper, Clapper, Clapper out the favorite of all the clapper.
Speaker 1 (10:41):
They're all in on it. They all know that Putin
does not care, and yet December tenth, they're putting out
press releases saying the intelligence community has information now that
Putin was rigging or attempting to rig our elections to
help Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
And how do we know that more so in particular
because the face of all that the person who was
sitting on that then House now in the Senate, but
the then House Senate subcommittee who told you there is
absolutely Adam Schiff said it every night to every news
organization known to man. Every day he said, we have
more and more information conclusively that Donald Trump is a
(11:21):
Russian asset. You know.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
It's what'll be interesting with Adam Schiff is I don't
think you're going to be able to prosecute Shiff.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
Oh, you can't get him.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
He's protected because he's going to be able to say
what I saw when I said, I can't tell you
what I've seen, but I have seen it. What he
had seen was provided to him by Comy Clapper and
that crew. So he has deniability. They don't have deniability.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Also, he was speaking as a congressman, which allows him
the protection although he wasn't on the House floor. He
was speaking about his responsibilities on the House subcommittee or
a committee.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Well, I mean if he knew what he was saying
was a lie and he was using it in order
to weaken the country, then I think he would be
part of what's his name was talking yesterday to Maria
Bardaroma and not Lindsay Radcliffe. Yes, Ratcliffe. And he said,
because she was asking, are there going to be prosecutions,
(12:26):
And he said, well, we've referred. I've referred, and Tulca
Gabbard has referred. So we'll see if the DOJ is
going to go ahead and try to prosecute. But what
I believe is beyond a shadow of a doubt because
she was asking specifically on treason. But he said, I
don't know, that's up for them to decide. However, I
(12:48):
am sure that there was a conspiracy, that these people
worked in collusion together. They were in a meeting together.
They went into the meeting with certain information, they left
the meeting on December ninth with different information and different
talking points. They colluded on something, and conspiracy is a
(13:10):
crime if the whatever you're conspiracy or conspiring on is illegal.
I don't know if they're going to call it treason.
I don't know if they're going to just you know,
there's a bunch of different potential charges. But he said,
the interesting thing about a conspiracy charge, not a treson
charge or another types of charges that we've talked about.
You know, whether it's you know, lying under oath and
(13:31):
those types of things, which has a five year window
on and some of those people are not going to
be able to be gotten on that. Others are. I mean,
like Hillary Clinton, I think is right at the five
year mark from her testimony. But more importantly, the conspiracy
charge doesn't go start the clock until the conspiracy has stopped.
(13:52):
And as he pointed out, the conspiracy is active today.
Speaker 2 (13:56):
Yeah. I have one person described it as there is
no statute of limitations on the she charged and I'm like,
that is bizarre. I did not know that to be
the case.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Well, he said, it starts once the conspiracy is admitted to.
They have not admitted to it, so it hasn't started yet.
Speaker 2 (14:11):
Gotcha. Now, the statute of limitations certainly we haven't do
with perjury and the like. You're right, Hillary Clinton's right
at the five year because she was last testified last
in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
But Colly, they've got Cally if they want to, Oh
sure they've got and they got Clapper. Yes, they've got Clapper.
They can get they can get them right now. Crapper
Clapper should be being charged with perjury as we speak.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
Yeah, I think if you wanted to put a totem
pole up for me anyway, because it would change for everything.
I think if you took the totem pole of trees
in US, and I can use that word without it
necessarily having a legal definition of this conversation, but if
you wanted to put enemies of the state, I think
that it's Brennan on top. Boy. It's a close second.
It's a close second with Clapper, and Comy gets a
(14:57):
third position because I really think Comy wasn't as smart
as the other two. He just did a good job
of being a facilitator of it all. Comy's a heartless
mercenary who do whatever he wants, whatever he can do
to make it beneficial for himself.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
The Louisiana Senator John Kennedy describes all three as not
nice people.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
John Senator Kennedy kills me. All right, So we've got
all that going on, and we can't even get the
celebration having to do with the UK now because we
have to constantly back up and describe all the news
that isn't news because we've known this. It's twenty twenty certainly,
and a lot of it's twenty sixteen and Michael Steele,
I was thinking of today. How would you like to
(15:44):
wake up being Michael Steele today? No matter where you
are on the planet, you are, in fact the architect
of a dossier that was so full of crap. None
of it was true. But the reason you would smile
about it, even though you wake up realizing you're the
enemy of most of the free world, is that you
(16:05):
made so much money off of this. You got paid
by Hillary Clinton, you got paid by the US government
through the CIA and the FBI. This dude made bank.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Just for clarification, Michael Steele is the former head of
the Republican Committee. Christopher Steel Christie but Michael, I wouldn't
want to be either one of them.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
Michael Steele I hate almost as much as christs. But
if you're Christopher Steele, you're waking up in London this morning,
and you are the highest paid piece of crap that
God ever allowed to walk upright, You literally peddled horseshit.
Wow my wow, wow. I don't know. I don't know
whether to be angry or envious. Here's the guy who
(16:48):
took literally he went to the bottom of the ocean,
let's say, and scooped up the lowest thing on the
face of the earth, a fifty pounds bag of whale crap,
and brought it back to the surface, packaged it up,
put in the three ring binder, delivered it to Dan Brennan,
and then.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Maybe well he delivered it to Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Oh, Hillary Clinton, Yeah, she's got the first He got
the first pay check from her, got paid, then got
paid from the US government and you go back. Now,
I guess he's in London. I don't know where this dude.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Is, Christopher Steele.
Speaker 2 (17:22):
Lets see where from and I bet he's still got
a really bad barber.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
He lives in Farnham, Surrey, which I'm sure very tony
suburb outside of London. And by the way, he didn't
get done getting paid.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Then.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
In twenty twenty four, I just saw, I don't know
anything about this book. He wrote a book called quote
Unredacted Russia, Trump and the Fight for Democracy. So in
twenty twenty four he went back to the same well
and I'm just reading a review of it. Steele predicts
a new world order if Donald Trump wins the presidency
again in November. He is more dangerous than any US
(17:57):
adversary China or Iran, could ever be. The Republican Party
and the former president who dominates it are the gravest
threat to Western democracy and the rule of law. Increasingly
the willing handmaidens for Vladimir Putin. So he in twenty
twenty four, Now, if we all knew this, if we
(18:17):
all knew about all the stuff that we now have
had released to us from Tulsea Gabbard, how could this
guy even put a book out? Who would publish it?
Speaker 2 (18:27):
Good point?
Speaker 1 (18:28):
But in twenty twenty four is a history book. Yeah,
in twenty twenty four, you've got people like some guy
I think his name is Joe Biden talking about how
Trump is a threat to democracy because he's a willing
to say that idiot who he never said that he
was participating in it, just that he's a willing idiot
for them to be a handmaid for Putin.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
So now you want to talk about gas lighting. The
whole reason that this is out is because Tulsa Gabbard
is trying to butt kiss DJ by cover by using
this to cover up the tragedy that has to be
kept secret, the Epstein files, which the Democrats and the
(19:12):
Republicans want to see because they've both been promised that
unlike what Kristin Welker said yesterday. Kristin Welker said, the
reason we're so interested in the Epstein files is so
that we can get justice for all of these thousands
of victims. These girls to be boys too. But that's
(19:35):
what Kristin Welker said. If you ask the average American
who even knows about the Epstein files, I think he
could be lucky to get fifty fifty, maybe sixty percent
to say the reason why the information should be released
is to make sure we get justice for the victims.
I would say that the overwhelming majority of people who
(19:56):
know about the Epstein files, ninety five percent on each
side of the would say we want to get the
information released because we know it's gonna be damaging for
the other side politically, and that's why we want the files.
But Telsea Gabbert is covering all that up by throwing
us more red meat, by giving us Barack Obama supposedly
in a treasonous file which she is now referred to
(20:19):
the DOJ.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
Well interesting theories there, one of which is that both
sides are apparently filled in that if there was an
Epstein file case, both sides whether they're actual politicians or
perhaps just some of their biggest donors are in there,
because otherwise Joe Biden's DOJ had access to those files
(20:45):
for four years and never even hinted at releasing anything.
If there was something in there on specifically Donald Trump
that they would have thought was damning and or any
of the Republicans, why they release it? And the answer
would be because there's also stuff on their guys in there,
So that's why they couldn't release it. And that's the
(21:06):
theory as to why they're the Republicans can't release it
now is oh crap, we're gonna We're gonna shoot ourselves
in the foot here if we release this. But you
know what a great friend I guess Tulca Gabbert is
to Christine Omes because it's Christy Omes disaster, this this whole.
And I would say, if I'm just being honest, Tulca
(21:29):
Gabbert is not a friend of Christine Elms because Tulca
Gabbert has just created another massive headache for Christine Ome
in the sense that what are you going to do now?
I just held a press conference, I named names, I
just talked about Barack Obama involved in a treasonous act
against the current president and your boss, Christy. It's up
(21:52):
to you, though, are you gonna press charges if she
goes zero for two dodi A pim Bondy, Christine No
no I pim Bondi. Pim Bondi is the one who
over promised and under delivered completely. And now what is
she going to do with this information if she doesn't
(22:12):
press charges on somebody quick? You got to come up
with something here. I don't think I don't think that
what they have done, both both her and Ratcliffe. I
think Ratcliffe have put a lot of pressure on her
right now. Some are saying the left is saying it's
to distract us from the Epstein files. Obviously, no one's distracted.
We all we're all fully aware that the Epstein files,
(22:35):
if there already, have not been released, and they and
sure the Magabase still demands justice, and the Magabase legit
wants justice even even up to if Donald Trump himself
has to go to prison. MAGO wants that MAGA would
want Trump in a prison cell if he was involved
(22:56):
in child exploitation.
Speaker 2 (23:00):
That this is one of the things I've been praying for.
I told you before, Sally and I pray every night.
One of the things I'm praying for is that with
the truth would be known inside the Beltway of the
capital of the United States of America, where so many
people are being abused and taken advantage of, and many
of them victims of their own government, no matter who
is caught up in it, With the truth be known. Please,
allow the truth be shouted from the rooftops, as it
(23:21):
says in the Bible, and let the chips fall when
they may so I'm all in on that.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
Yeah again. MAGA is not the Republican Party. MAGA is
is a political movement made up of people with diverse backgrounds,
diverse socioeconomic places in life, but different races, homosexuals, straits.
(23:47):
I've even seen some transgendered people in MAGA. MAGA is
basically two or three things have to be core to
the MAGA belief But in the middle of that is
justice for and we will we demand it we America.
If the least amongst us is being violated, then all
(24:11):
of us are being violated. And that's part of the reason,
not the only reason, but part of the reason for
the immigration outrage by MAGA. Think about the lower level
of the socioeconomic crew here. So if you are despite
the races, you're Latino, you're black, you're white, whatever, but
you are lower income, you are minimum wage type of
(24:34):
employee and incomes. What are we saying now twenty five
million people or so twenty five million people who have
no skill sets other than they've got a hell of
a back. They can work like nobody else, they can
build things, they can do those types of things. Not clever,
(24:54):
not smart, not skilled, just I can build a deck,
I can do whatever. We're going to undercut all of
those people have been kicked off. They're not able to
compete with those people because they're better off on the
public dole than they are trying to compete at under
(25:15):
minimum wage labor wages, which is what we've done to them.
So we've kicked twenty to thirty million people right out
of the system and said you're better off on welfare.
These people wanted to work and now they're on welfare.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
Well, and then economic analysis will be able to prove
that we're actually bringing the hourly wages for middle class
workers and lower middle class workers up because we're taking
those people that were taking their jobs and putting them
on the government doll and I'm glad that the employment's
going up because you've got to pay more taxes to
take care of this class of people that you moved
out of the way, so we can make that number
(25:49):
of work economically. But when Kristin Welker said the other
day or yesterday that that's what we're really concerned about,
we as Democrats basically because she's speaking is one of
the media persons who is a Democrat. We as Democrats,
are really concerned about the children. You mean, the children
you allowed to come across the border, the six hundred
(26:11):
and something thousand children. You don't even know where them
they are. Well, I mean you're concerned about the children
now suddenly.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Well, think about how much she celebrated when Donald Trump
announced that we found thirteen thousand missing children. That's all
they've been talking about on the media. Donald Trump is
an American hero. He found thirteen thousand missing illegal immigrant
children and is now going to attempt to re reunite
them with their families back south of the border. You
haven't heard a peep out of that.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
And now suppose that you've got Trump who says he
is allowed to pardon Maxwell if he wanted to pardon her.
I don't think you might is ever going to be
talking to him about giving her a pardon so that
she can come forward information. Ay, she knows the minute
she steps out of prison, Hillary Clinton's going to.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Have her killed, period, full stop.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
You can get out of prison all you want. Your
ass is going to be on the sidewalk dead, hopping
around like a fish for about fifteen to twenty seconds,
and typically the heart bleeds out. But then this leads
us to the greatest question of all. We all know
that the Yellen salmon is not pronounced. Why is it
that the S in shelean is not pronounced? Nobody can
(27:19):
decide to the news covers how to say her name.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
I think we're going silent on the S right that
seems to be a uniformly has been decided. It's Gallan.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Guh Lean.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
I don't know how you get gu lean out of
that spelling, but that's what we got.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
The S is silent, like the Allen salmon. But going
with it. That's the way. Okay, we got that solved.
Now we can move forward.
Speaker 1 (27:41):
Yeah, I don't know what Trump wants to give her
a pardon on. I mean, she's been convicted. She's already
done what three years. She's in a cakewalk prison from
what I'm told, I mean a prison that offers yoga
and a running track and these types of things. And
so she's living a pretty good life for someone who's
been involved with hundreds, if not thousands of sex trafficking.
(28:02):
That she was found guilty of grooming the young girls
and then bringing them to the clients. I mean, that's
a pretty horrible person and she should do some very
serious time. I wish it was in a harder prison,
to be honest with you, But I mean, I guess
is the trade off for Donald Trump is a political payoff,
(28:23):
because there's going to be some pushback on Maxwell if
she's ever let out of prison. But what if Maxwell
offers up, let me just go, let me go. Pie
in the sky, Pie in the sky. Bill Clinton is
frog marched. Bill Clinton is going to be convicted of
having sex with a thirteen year old prostitute. Do you
(28:43):
make just is that enough for Donald Trump? That one
name Steve Jobs or not Steve Jobs. What's his name?
Bill Gates? Bill Gates goes down. Those are two of
the biggest names that used to frequent the freak island.
I don't think that she could ever have enough information.
(29:05):
In all honesty, I don't know what she could possibly say,
because it's now it's just your word, convicted, child sex draft.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
What if the spider webs as big as as some
people claim it is that it consumed you know, half
of DC and then something you've got half of the
Congress is going to get booted out. You got a
special election to coverage for the senators, but you got
half of the Congressman, you're going to go to two
hundred and fifteen members in Congress. Look at the upheaval
that would mean for the country. And we've already seen that.
Bill Clinton, I mean, Trump talked about locking up Hillary
(29:33):
Clinton for three years when he was on the campaign trail,
but he's really never going to lock up a former
first lady of a president, let alone Bill Clinton the president,
for any charge, any charge at all.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
I don't know that. Again, if whatever Maxwell says right now,
why does it matter. I don't understand why it would
matter because unless she has some sort of documentation, and
where that documentation have been, wouldn't it have already been discovered.
Wouldn't all this documents in the thousands of boxes that
(30:06):
they took from Epstein's homes.
Speaker 2 (30:09):
What about all the thousands of hours of videos supposedly
they had at one point.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
They still have them. But according to what's her face,
that's just child porn. But it was commercially produced child porn.
And the implication is that that stuff has already been solved,
those victims have already been identified, and the predators have
already been put in jail. That happened decades ago. That's
the implication. That's not the way it's being read by Maga.
(30:36):
Maga's like, if it is thousands of hours of child porn,
I want to know who's on it. I want to
know who's in there. The fact that Jeffrey Epstein bought
child porn, he's dead. I want to know more. But again,
we're kind of getting into the weeds of the Epstein case.
I don't think that that's going to do as much good.
I don't think that really a whole lot can change
at this point, because if they're saying there's nothing there,
(31:00):
how are you going to overrule them?
Speaker 2 (31:01):
How are you going to.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
Say that there is a there there. You've already got
cash Betel and Bongino saying there's nothing there. If there
was something there, that's the way they should say it.
If it was something there, it was already cleaned out
by the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
Yeah, because the one thing we know for sure is
the Democrats Republicans. If you believe the fact they are
hiding Somethingy're going to continue to hide it because and yes,
with the jeopardy position of the elite get away with
it while the while the underclass has to pay the
penalty on everything they ever do, from a parking ticket
to jaywalking, the elite get away with skirting the law.
(31:39):
And I thought no one was above
Speaker 1 (31:41):
The law, especially not the president exactly
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.