09 16 25 You have the right to say whatever you want ..... but

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show. Jonathan Rush, South.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
Carolina is a right to work state. You have the
right to say whatever the hell you.

Speaker 3 (00:09):
Want, Kelly Nash.

Speaker 2 (00:11):
You can say what you want. Our government is not
going to arrest you for saying what you want. However,
your employer has the right to terminate you.

Speaker 3 (00:20):
And Kelly Show.

Speaker 1 (00:21):
I found that today and it has been widely circulated
enough to pop up on a feed that had nothing
to do with the search I was putting in a
search for Jasmin Crockett.

Speaker 3 (00:29):
Oh.

Speaker 1 (00:30):
That is Sean Kent from Kent Law in Manning, South Carolina,
in a video he posted after he had received more
than a couple of phone calls from persons in and
around Manning or in the state of South Carolina who
had lost their jobs.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
I mean, it's it's really common common sense that you
have the freedom of speech in America. We will not
prosecute you, we will not put you in prison, we
will not find you necessarily depending on what you said.
That may you know, the the screaming of fire in
a crowded theater, That may get you a fine. But

(01:06):
you can say pretty much anything you'd like in America.
But as to his point, of course, there's consequences. I mean,
for example, if you were to go into your restaurant
that you work at and say to the waiters or
excuse me, to the customers, all the food here actually sucks.
It's horrible. The best thing you could do for you

(01:27):
and your family is get up and leave. You're saying
that the employer doesn't have the ability to fire that
person because of that. It's their freedom of speech. We're
not going to call the cops unless he said the
food here is poisoned. Oh yeah, then we're calling the cops.
You still have the freedom to say it. But if

(01:47):
you just say that the food here sucks, you should leave.
Of course the employer can fire you.

Speaker 1 (01:53):
Now, yesterday, this what we recorded before we knew that.
We knew what Clemson's decision would be, as he has
a closed door It was a closed door session for
the Board of Directors. We had already read the state
Attorney General's statement and it was I guess I could
think it was solicited by Clemson.

Speaker 3 (02:15):
Yeah, Jim Clements, the president of Clemson. It's funny that
his name is Clements, the president of Clemson, had asked
the attorney General, I would like to fire some people here,
but I'm being told that if we fire like a
tenured professor simply because they did a happy dance to
the idea that someone was murdered, that were violating their

(02:38):
free speech, can we fight? Can we fire people because
they well? And according to the attorney general, yes, you
can take corrective action. And he was basically saying that
where does he say here? The First Amendment protects freedom
of speech, but it does not shield threats, glorification of violence,

(03:00):
or behavior that undermines the mission of a state institution.
And so if Clemson is trying to be inclusive, not
exclusive to only people who hate right wingers, if they
want to be inclusive to people of all races and
nationalities and religions and all of that which is part
of their stated mission, you can fire people who violate

(03:23):
the mission of your institution. And as he says, the
Clemson or any other state university should never be paralyzed
by fear of prosecution when dealing with employees who publicly
endorse political violence.

Speaker 1 (03:38):
Now we have some attorney here in South Carolina who
naturally want to jump on much more like the free
advice you just heard from Sean Kent at Kent Law.
We had a couple who say, look, it's not within
your purview, as we had representatives in many highly placed
House and Senate members calling for Clemson to fire these
individuals and then threatened defunding or at least I think

(04:01):
that was actually born on the internet as people were
demanding that you defund Clemson, to tell them that, look,
you can defund Clemson if you want, that's within your purview,
but you can't step in until Clemson to fire professors.

Speaker 3 (04:17):
Okay, well, let's try to follow the logic there. So
you're saying that two employees posted something that is offensive,
and you're saying that the state has the right to
defund Clemson because of the actions of those two. I
think it defund him for any reason, but we cannot.
But the Clemson can't fire them. So in other words,

(04:38):
Clemson has to go out of business because two employees,
like one of them said, the murder of Charlie Kirk
makes today one of the most beautiful days of my life.
That now we can't fire them. We can't, but we
will defund the entire university. Send all the kids home,

(05:01):
fire all the professors. But you can't fire that one.
Come on, man, you don't even You're not even close
to making sense.

Speaker 1 (05:09):
Several other of our highly profiled South Carolina political leaders,
Lindsay Graham chimed in, free speech doesn't prevent you from
being fired if you're stupid, and that poor judgment, which
goes back to the case that I think that's pretty
much the bottom line for all the arguments being made.
You have all the right in the world to say
whatever you would like.

Speaker 3 (05:30):
I mean, we had this problem going back to the
Colin Kaepernick days when people were saying, you're violating his
free speech by not allowing him to take a knee
during the national anthem, and we I thought we pretty
much had handled it. Then the NFL or any owner
of any organization can fire anybody for anything. That's like
in your contract, it says if you represent the team

(05:54):
in a way that I, as the owner or the
general manager the management team finds unbecoming. In other words,
I don't like your haircut, your cut, you're fired. Your
breath stanks, you said something we didn't like, you are fired.

Speaker 1 (06:09):
Now they written in your contract. If they came to me,
iHeartMedia could come to me and of course. Yeah, but
now maybe written in your contract and it is that
I have an opportunity to remedy that. But still the
end result is if you're gonna put your heels down
and this is what this is your battle, this is
your mountain to die on, you will die on that mountain.

Speaker 3 (06:29):
What do what do they think free speech means? I'll
give you another example. If if there was what is
the libs favorite show? Is it Morning Joe? Is it?
What's her name? Rachel mad Cow? Whoever their favorite show?

Speaker 1 (06:41):
Out?

Speaker 3 (06:41):
So Rachel mad Cow is stuck with a guest, and
MSNBC books this guest, and the guest comes on and
says something to the extent of Rachel, I find you
to be the most anti American person I've ever heard,
and I think most of your opinions are drivel, and
this show is a nightmare to watch. You're saying that

(07:04):
MSNBC does not have the right to fire the guest.
They have to be a permanent guest. You've booked them,
you said every other Tuesday they're coming on, So every
other Tuesday they must continue to come on and bash
Rachel Mattow on our own show. Of course, you're not
firing them. I should say, firing somebody is not squashing

(07:25):
your freedom of speech. Freedom of speech means that you
will not be prosecuted by federal or local authorities regarding
your I have the right to say America sucks. I
can say it all day long, and iHeart can say
that doesn't align with our values. You are now out
of a job.

Speaker 1 (07:44):
Many people quickly pointed to the Greenville teacher scenario. Greenville
County School is a vote the code of Ethics and
social media policies which emphasized teachers being a role model
for their twelve K through twelve students when they fire
their teacher. So, in fact, they pointed to specific clauses
and the contract that this person signed off on them

(08:06):
should have been well aware of that they would be
held to a code of ethics as we discussed, and
in this case, it also specifically spelled out social media policies.

Speaker 3 (08:16):
Look, and I would expect the teacher, going back to
twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three, if there was a
teacher who was posting online f Joe Biden, I would
expect them to be fired. Yes, I would, and I
would not fight to defend that individual. I agree with
the position f Joe Biden, but I don't think that
you have the I understand that while it's your opinion

(08:40):
and you can share it with whomever you want, it
does not defend you from the consequences. What is the
old saying, You can choose your sin, but you can't
choose the consequences.

Speaker 1 (08:47):
That's what Keby said.

Speaker 3 (08:49):
I think others have said it as well.

Speaker 1 (08:51):
Blumbpster University unequivocally condemns any and all expressions that endorsed, glorify,
or celebrate political violence. The university state was said with deeply.
The de inappropriate comments made on social media and response
to the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk remprehensible and do
not reflect the university's values and principles that define our
university community.

Speaker 3 (09:11):
So they support white supremacy, and that.

Speaker 1 (09:16):
Word community I think comes into play in a larger
picture because as we sit in the state of South Carolina. Now,
if you said this at UC Berkeley, Oh, they'd throw
it in parade for you. What do you mean they
would the university and the state would throw a parade
for professors who are making.

Speaker 3 (09:32):
Oh who made the comments? Not what you just saw
clems and say.

Speaker 1 (09:36):
No, no, no, no, because it says university values, principles
that define our university community. And I think community is
a strong argument in this conversation too, although we haven't
gotten into that necessarily.

Speaker 3 (09:49):
But when you say community, let's think about like Harvard.
Uh huh, So the community of Harvard hates Israel. The
community as a bod ninety percent of the people there
wish that Israel did not exist as a state. And
that's the professors and the students. So you're but you're
saying that when the university steps up and sanctions people

(10:12):
who say that they're in violation of their own community.
But the university is now doing that. Well.

Speaker 1 (10:18):
When I use the word community, I was meaning of
the state of South Carolina, not necessarily just the camp
Oh oh, there are community standards that come into play here,
which we.

Speaker 3 (10:28):
All of Massachusetts and northern California would agree that Israel
should be wiped off the map. So again, even by
that standard, but what I'm saying is that we're seeing
these community Stanford and others are caving and saying, you
can't say death to Israel. You can't say from the
river to the sea, you cannot celebrate the death of Israelis.

Speaker 1 (10:51):
Yeah, well, the head of the Treasury ahead of that
community is checking their bank accounts. And then there's other
commentary that led from a I guess just came of
a rally that I'd read a little bit about. I
think I hadn't read about it until today, but I
had seen where like Pamela Evatt, several other people were
in Anderson at the community center there, and some of

(11:12):
the comments that are being repeated in this article and
also shared online come from that particular gathering at the
Civic Center in Anderson.

Speaker 3 (11:22):
What they say, well, in the article that.

Speaker 1 (11:25):
Was posted, the headline is Charlie Kirk visual Conservative Leaders
divide Clemson's response to faculty social media post. So there
was an availability in an article to read from some
of the persons who I think, one of them is
very closely tied to the actual turning point USA. But
also that event had several high profile University of South

(11:46):
Carolina politicians where there was a gathering, and some of
the comments you're reading in.

Speaker 3 (11:51):
The paper came from those.

Speaker 1 (11:53):
So there's certainly a lot of conversation in the state
today and even the University of South Carolina professor, law professor,
and I've forgotten his name, but it come to me
in a just a second. Chimed in with a little
bit of an admonishment for the position of the state
or for Clemson University and saying, basically, his comments outside

(12:14):
of the classroom were not in no way reflective to
the actual content of the education. So there's going to
be a lot of different arguments made here as this progresses,
and I'm certainly I'm sure they're already lawyered up over there.
Mister whatever his name is.

Speaker 3 (12:31):
It doesn't matter what your values are, you know, like
what you say you were teaching. What matters is you
made a public ass of yourself. On top of making
a public ass of yourself, you actually insinuated that it
is a good thing. Because there was another comment made
something about how Charlie Kirk. I don't have it in

(12:52):
front of me, but Charlie Kirk was like a cancer
to America, and America just got healed today. So when
you say something like that just because they're on the right,
and you think that everybody agrees with me, I mean
there's plenty of people. If somebody said the best thing
that could happen to America today, is somebody puts a

(13:14):
bullet in the head of Jasmine Crocket. If you state
that position and you mean it, and you should be fired.
Nobody should be able to say that. And it's not
because she's on the left or the right. It's because
you never celebrate the death of anybody. I don't know
why is that such a hard concept for the left

(13:34):
to grasp. They don't grasp it.

Speaker 1 (13:36):
One thing, This can become painfully evident for a lot
of I say painfully evident for a lot of people.
I'm trying to remember the name of the company or
the name of the business in Charleston where the owner
put up a comment about Charlie Kirk and immediately started
getting pushed back in Charleston, which then began to spread
across the state and across the country, apparently because he
was quick to backtrack.

Speaker 3 (13:56):
Is that there was such.

Speaker 1 (13:58):
An unum uneducated understanding of the persons that Charlie Kirk
was reaching and how far that reach had actually spread.
It was bubbling just beneath what we know is the
mainstream media, because that's where the young people of the
college campuses do not get their news. That's where they

(14:19):
don't go to get news, and we've seen that play
out more than a couple of times. But the ground
swallow support that made itself very evident, very quickly, caught
a lot of people by surprise. Otherwise they wouldn't put
themselves out there like that. I mean, look, if you're

(14:40):
running a tattoo shop in Charleston, the last thing you
want to do is a fend persons in that age group.

Speaker 3 (14:46):
Hello, well, I just you know, I understand it's divisive
in the sense that we have a lot of people.
I would say maybe fifteen percent of Americans who were
probably celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk. Is that a
fair number? You think ten to fifteen percent.

Speaker 1 (15:03):
I would hope it would only be ten to fifteen percent.

Speaker 3 (15:06):
And I would say the majority of those ten to
fifteen percent probably fall in the age demographic of thirty
to sixty, So if you're talking about college kids, it's
much less. But again, if you're running in a circle,
let me like. I don't have a Blue Sky account, thankfully,

(15:29):
but somebody was reading some of the posts on Blue
Sky on the radio and one hundred percent of Blue Sky,
which if you don't aren't familiar with it. That was
what a social media platform that was created specifically to
try to end Twitter after Elon Musk bought it and
they said that it was becoming too trumpified and all

(15:49):
that sort of stuff, too maga for their liking. So
they all fled to the safe zone of blue sky.
And so you're in this you know, echo chamber of well,
I see this person hates him, and this person hates him,
and this person hates him, and then you it's pretty
easy over. I would imagine several weeks of reading your
social media feeds to come to the conclusion that everybody

(16:12):
hated this guy, and they're sure.

Speaker 1 (16:14):
When you when you're particularly if you're just looking at
Don Lemon or Rachio Matta.

Speaker 3 (16:20):
Lemon, because Don Lemon keeps putting it, making an ass
of himself by asking people things and and people just
call them a moronto his face.

Speaker 1 (16:27):
And trying to figure out who's actually producing that program
that he puts together. Does he have any does he
have any friends left? Because he goes to the streets.
If people just beat the hell happened again last night?
Did people just beat the hell out of him? What
about Charlie Kurrk because he's a racist. He should have
been killed right Well, no, yeah, I mean, and that's
the African American female on the street that he thought

(16:50):
was going to just chime right in with the answer
that he wanted.

Speaker 3 (16:53):
Kind of like when he goes to the African American
communities in some of these big cities. Would you want
the National Guard here? Hell yeah, I would like him here.
I'd like to like the army, I'd like to can
you bring in the air Force?

Speaker 1 (17:03):
He really comes off like a prejudiced kind of person,
doesn't he when he goes out with these baity questions
and areas where he thinks they're gonna prop him up.

Speaker 3 (17:10):
I'm just shocked that he airs them. You filmed yourself
being ridiculed, and you put it on air.

Speaker 1 (17:17):
I guess you'll do anything to get hits once you're done.

Speaker 3 (17:19):
But again to the bigger point of it, it's easy
for people on the right if you've developed a Twitter
feed or a Facebook feed or whatever, where it's pretty
much group think. Everybody's in that realm. One we'll see
one which will outdo another, which gets more traction, so
they put up another one that's a little more egregious,

(17:39):
and then before you know it, your timeline is filled
with whatever death to Joe Biden. You know, all these
types of things, and if you read that long enough,
that becomes the norm. And so you don't feel out
of touch or out of sorts when you're saying something
about I am so happy that so and so died,

(18:02):
I am so happy that whatever happened today, that the
Israelis finally got their come up. It's you know, whatever
it is at your position is in that group think,
and then you somebody who's not in that group think,
who's just normal, sees it and goes, did you really
just celebrate that the fact that they put babies in ovens?

(18:24):
That's what you celebrated. That they raped people so hard
that they actually broke the insides of their bodies. That's
Does it sound bad now that I say it out loud, Yeah,
it sounds freaking horrific.

Speaker 1 (18:37):
Yes, it sounds pretty bad. And now that, as you
point out, we live in these well described silos of information. Uh,
and then we see the occasional troller. These trollers live
at the top of these silos. There's nothing but try
to increase their social media standing by trolling over these silos,
but they know they're going to get a lot of reaction,

(18:59):
and they dropped that down there like a top word
to lure and a lot of the people. Now they're
getting also worked up. They've got to attack it, so
you're playing right into their hands. But speaking of talking
to particular persons inside of silo, let's go to the
chat room where our buddy Tyler said, Hey, I wish
I had the quote in front of me. I can't figure.

Speaker 3 (19:21):
Out, guys, some bad news that whole thing that happened
at the university that was me?

Speaker 1 (19:26):
Sorry, who was he talking to? He says, Hey, guys,
bad news?

Speaker 3 (19:30):
I'm guessing it would have been the furry community.

Speaker 1 (19:33):
I guess what is it? Bad news for them because
they're all of like mindset that he's created traffic problems
in and around the campus with all the police presents.
What was what was that statement about it? I'd love
to get a breakdown.

Speaker 3 (19:47):
I would assume that he knew he was going to
be caught and that this is going to come back
on the transgenders and the furries.

Speaker 1 (19:55):
Well, it's definitely coming back on the people in the
chat room because the Feds are certainly going in there
and or got they got a digital hound on every
person in that in that in that chat room, they're
gonna be talking to a lot of people.

Speaker 3 (20:08):
Yeah, all right, So.

Speaker 1 (20:10):
We got all that going on, and I am one
of the things that I've seen and I've saw a
little bit of them in the news as well, but
I've already started seeing it on social media because it's
being shared fervently, the division going on in the in
the church, the number of preachers that are coming out

(20:33):
against Charlie Kirk. And I got to tell you, maybe
there is a lot of videos out there of Charlie
Kirk that I haven't been privy to where he is,
the description of these preachers are giving him.

Speaker 3 (20:46):
You know what they're doing. So it's like when I
just said a minute ago, the whole thing about Jasmine Crockett,
Charlie Kirk would do those types of things, and then
you just snip that little part and you say, here's
the words of kille n An, this is what he believes.
And then you know that if somebody doesn't know you
and they don't take it in context, they just get

(21:09):
that snippet of you saying something like that. You know,
you can get Charlie Kirk saying, like again, I think
we talked about the DEI hires at the Airlines the
other day. You know, in his frustration, he's saying, whenever
I see a black pilot, I assume that they're unqualified.
That's all you got. That's all you got from the snippet.

(21:31):
What he's saying is because the Airlines and Joe Biden
did this, even the qualified black pilots are now looked
at as unqualified because you've said we're going to lower
the standards specifically to get blacks and fire whites. That
isn't that is not a secret. That is an open

(21:52):
known thing, kind of like when you look at the
Supreme Court justice Joe Biden told you I'm gonna only
look at black women. That is it. Nobody else is qualified. Okay.
And now Katanya Jackson Brown seems a little bit dumber
than the rest of them. She puts out statements that
sound like she read them on social media. Your legal

(22:14):
opinion sounds like something I read on X and so, yes,
we look at her with a little bit of a
side eye, and I don't know if she's qualified or
not qualified. But I know that Joe Biden diminished her
as a person by stating that beforehand. So when Charlie
Kirk was making these types of statements, you snipe it,
you put it out there. People go, it's easy to

(22:36):
see that he's a racist. It's easy to see as
a sexist, it's easy to see as a homophobe, it's
easy to see whatever the bad designation, because he's making
a point.

Speaker 1 (22:46):
And that's one of the things we talked about yesterday
is that as I talked to more and more people,
particularly outside of the college age group, where they start
talking about the hate speech of Charlie Kirk, it becomes
very evident, very quickly in the conversation. You really just
have never actually sat down and watched something in context

(23:06):
that was recorded openly and taking on all comers with
any debatable questions or any question at all. For Charlie Kirk. Now,
you're only using information that was harvested and then presented
in such a way to make the case of the
person that you were talking to, rather than actually listening
to the words.

Speaker 3 (23:25):
That Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 1 (23:26):
Well, I mean, look, it's unfortunate, but it's been going
on for I guess ever since man printed the first word.

Speaker 3 (23:33):
I mean, the Bible is pointed to as a very
sexist slave promoting document, you know, and they'll give you
things like I do not permit a woman to teach
or assume any authority over a man. That's in the Bible.
You say that, and so as can I say that
that's a sexist comment. First off, he's referencing a sex Secondly,

(23:56):
he's making it sound inferior. Yeah, okay, then the Bible sexist.
He talks about how slaves should honor their masters. Oh,
so they've endorsed slavery.

Speaker 1 (24:06):
Not only that, they demanded that they be happy about it.

Speaker 3 (24:08):
Be a happy slave, happy slave.

Speaker 1 (24:11):
It's almost twelve o'clock here on this Tuesday, the sixteenth
of September, and I'm assuming by one o'clock we'll see
the actual tanks rolling into Memphis with is Pete Hedseth
going to be on top of the first thing that
rolls into the city of Memphis. As the mayor now
is plainly against Donald Trump coming in, the citizens are

(24:35):
screaming for help.

Speaker 3 (24:37):
Well, I mean, first off, Memphis, or I should say
the state of Tennessee, has a pretty screwed up, I
guess government organization. So like we live, Jonathan and I
are talking to you in Columbia, South Carolina. Outside inside Columbia,

(25:01):
or I should say outside of Columbia, South Carolina is
Richland County. So the Richland County County Council has jurisdiction
in Richland County, but does not have jurisdiction per se
inside the city of Columbia. However, in Tennessee that is different.
So there is a and they use the term mayor,

(25:22):
which is one of the most bizarre things I've ever
heard of. So in Memphis they have a mayor, but
he is trumped by something called the Shelby County mayor.
So Lee Harris might be the guy you're referencing. Lee
Harris is a very anti Trump individual. I'm the Memphis County.
Memphis mayor had said on Saturday Friday. I guess it

(25:45):
was press conference. He said, we all just heard what
Donald Trump said, and I didn't ask for it. I'm
happy to work with the president. It's important that we
get our voice in there and how we're going to
use these resources. The guy from Shelby County said, screw that.
They asked him yesterday what is the best potential outcome.

(26:06):
He almost said the death of Donald Trump. That would
be the best possible outcome. He almost said that. He said,
there is no good that can come from this because
the only thing that Donald Trump is doing. I'll give
the man credit. He is a long term thinker. This
guy thinks that Donald Trump is playing the long game,
and that what Donald Trump is actually doing is he's
already announced that he's running for president or is not

(26:28):
even gonna run. He's canceling the elections. And what he's
doing is he's putting the National Guard in place in
order to stop Memphis from protesting. As if the entire
city of Memphis erupted in protests, it would make a
lick of difference. Nobody would give a rip.

Speaker 1 (26:45):
But the best thing going in Memphis right now is
Saint Jude.

Speaker 3 (26:50):
Oh, that's a fantastic thing. The hotel with the ducks,
Like what was that the Drake. We had a great
time visiting there. That was wonderful and.

Speaker 1 (26:58):
I didn't even realize it when I was bucking down
Beal Street. But most of those are just besides kind
of like going to North Korea.

Speaker 3 (27:04):
I remember standing on Beal Street with you watching a man,
do I think backflips for a block and a half. Yeah,
very impressive, you know. I mean, there's there's some fun
things justin Timberlake's from Memphis, and there's not. I'm not
saying it's a bad place, no, But what I'm saying
is strategically, Donald Trump is not planning ahead at the
age of eighty three to seize power. And what it

(27:26):
all depends on is can I get control of Memphis?

Speaker 1 (27:29):
But anyway, you're not going to see the Gestapo or
the equivalent of the Sas roll into Memphis on tanks
with the DOW.

Speaker 3 (27:39):
The Department of War.

Speaker 1 (27:40):
That's right, the DOW secretary leading the charge to take
over Memphis in a nationalization of any part of Tennessee
or any part of America.

Speaker 3 (27:51):
But I would I would like to remind and I'm
sure Lee Harris is not a rash thought podcast listener,
but if somebody knows Lee here, or you know a
Democrat leader who who is now thinking that way and
they're talking about why it's a danger to have the
National Guard in your communities, let me remind you that

(28:12):
it was the Democrats of the nineteen sixties that did
not want the National Guard in their communities. And the
reason they didn't want the National Guards in their communities
is because the Democrats of the day were stopping blacks
from voting. The Democrats of the day were stopping blacks
from going to school. The Democrats of the day were
making blacks take different buses, drink a different water fountains,

(28:34):
go to crappier schools, live in crime infested areas. Today,
the Democrats of this era are making life miserable for blacks.
It's under their authority that black people, for the majority
in these communities cannot walk safely on the streets. And
it's going to be the National Guard that's going to
free those people. And by god, if Donald Trump decided

(28:56):
to run for office after he frees the people of Chicago,
and he frees them in Memphis, in New Orleans and
every other I bet you E'd overwhelmingly win the black vote.
But he doesn't give a crap because he's not running
for office in four years.

Speaker 1 (29:09):
Well, I can hardly wait to see the videos because
I've been told repeatedly this is why Chicago now is
going to have to gear up. They started, they already
started building a wall.

Speaker 3 (29:18):
I think they got their own militia.

Speaker 1 (29:20):
The state of Illinois, I think, is building a wall.
You're not even going to come close to Chicago because
they're going to see what happens. And Memphis, unfortunately you'll
have to pay the price. But no, you'll be saving Chicago.
That's the message I'm hearing this morning on MSNBC. Anyway,
maybe they could be, maybe I'll misunderstood. I'll continue to
watch