09 22 25 An Insurrectionist in the SC House?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Shows. She does say
that we should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was,
a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that
granted Black Americans the right to vote was a mistake.

Speaker 2 (00:13):
Kelly Nash if AOC and far left believe that's where
the party, the Democratic Party is today, and that'll tell
you why you lost people like me.

Speaker 1 (00:21):
Jonathan and Kelly show. But for the most part they
were sticking with it, even with we saw the revival
as it was called big day yesterday for jd. Vance.
By the way, I think he came out, it's probably
the best political speaker in it all borderlined preaching anyway.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
Well, I think that what we're seeing Jonathan. Now this
may be a little too I don't know what the
word is, but I'll say something I don't normally would
say on the political podcast. But I believe I was
thinking about it. You know, Donald Trump said he believed
God spared his life, and a lot of people believe
God spared Donald Trump's life with a miracle that that

(01:00):
did not hit him right in the head.

Speaker 1 (01:01):
Be hard to argue against it.

Speaker 2 (01:03):
And if you if you believe that, then you believe
that God could have saved Charlie Kirk's life. God didn't
kill Charlie Kirk, but he didn't stop it either. He
allowed it. Why would God not save a young man
thirty one years old, father of two young children, very

(01:24):
young they needed him right and Donald Trump, by all
accounts full life, seventy eight years old at the time.
Why was he saved and not Charlie Kirk. And that's
where a lot of people, that's why a lot of
people don't believe in God, because they would say a
just God would have saved Charlie Kirk, but he didn't.

(01:47):
And I think that this is bringing us to as
Joe Biden would say, what he used to say a
point an inflection, not another one that were what we're saying.
The reason Donald Trump needed to be spared was because
we needed him to be the president. The reason Charlie
Kirk was not spared. And again this is just my
person I'm not quoting scripture when I say this, this

(02:08):
is my own personal beliefs. The reason he didn't save
Charlie Kirk is it would force America to look at
itself and not just America, people around the world. Are
you a lukewarm Christian. Well, if you're a lukewarm Christian,
then you don't believe these types of things. If you're
a studying another faith, you don't believe these things. What
we saw yesterday and what was put in everybody's faith,

(02:30):
was this, Jesus is Lord and Savior or he's not.
If he's your Lord and savior, act like it. If
he's not your Lord and savior, then act like the Democrats.

Speaker 1 (02:41):
Yeah, this is really And I was watching it yesterday
and listening, except when Donald Trump got off the script.
Don't get off the script a memorial services, sir, Stick
to the script.

Speaker 2 (02:52):
At least you know he's real. He is real.

Speaker 1 (02:55):
And he was saying, I am not the Christian that
Charlie Kirk was, and Erica can help me. But not
within what five minutes after she said the answer to
hate is not more hate.

Speaker 2 (03:08):
He said, I hate him.

Speaker 1 (03:09):
I hate him, I hate him the script.

Speaker 2 (03:15):
But the reason she can say I forgive him is
not because she's a great human or a great Christian.
It's because she has the Holy Spirit living inside of her. Sure,
any human whose best friend, never mind your spouse, but
by both of their accounts, was their best friends. That
your best friend is murdered for no reason. How do

(03:37):
you forgive that person? You can't in your own will.
That's that is a spiritual thing that's happening, and there's
a spiritual revival happening in America right now.

Speaker 1 (03:47):
Yeah, and I think that yesterday, although it only got coverage, well,
they have more than a million people tune in just
to the streaming on Turning Point USA. He's my understanding.
I don't know that to be confirmed as a number,
but it was touted as such online yesterday. I knew
that they all gave a wink and a nod to

(04:08):
a blind horse at the beginning of the Sunday shows,
as they mentioned that that service would be upcoming, but
there was no talk of him. But there was a
lot of talk about the First Amendment on the Sunday shows,
and they did draw a correlation to Charlie Kirk having
lost his life for his First Amendment right, not necessarily

(04:29):
in those words, but they did make the correlation of that.

Speaker 2 (04:31):
Not as chilling as losing your late night show.

Speaker 1 (04:35):
And then of course that always went into the Jimmy
Kimmel conversation, and in particular, we meet the Press that
had to first go through Shapiro, who was to his credit,
he pointed that out like three times because the governor's
mansion was set on fire. And by the way, did
we ever get confirmation on what exactly was the beef?
What was the axe to grind with a person who
tried to set the governor's mansion on fire in Pennsylvania? Oh,

(04:58):
I think he was just a homeless He did, to
Shapiro's credit, will go out of his way three or
four times in that interview to say that there is
no correlation between the price my family pays, which he
was talking about the emotional scars of being violated like
that versus someone who actually loses your life. But as

(05:19):
I listened yesterday in preparation for what was then the
entire afternoon, I watched and listened to it. I was
in and out of it most of the day, but
I did see all of her presentation, and I saw
all of Donald Trump's presentation and watched it, not just listened.
But it seemed to be a reoccurring thought process in me.
Is that the Democrats who were celebrating the fact that

(05:44):
Charlie Kirk was shot and killed and there were a
lot of them are now seeing and crying in their
beer because this is a presentation or a representation of
the Maga crowd, because they kept screaming Maga who really

(06:05):
did have a revival yesterday. And the shared commonality just
based on humanity, whether you share the Christian belief or not,
just the humanity of it was winning over a lot
of independence. And then that goes back to the beginning
of this podcast where we showed or listened to Joe
Manchin talking about if AOC and the progressives think that

(06:25):
their positions on by YadA, YadA, YadA are good, then
they don't realize they're driving people like me away. And
I think that the Democrat Party yesterday really started to
see that this thing is going not only going to
be louder, as many said, is this new face of
the until Donald Trump took to the stage yesterday and

(06:47):
start talking about hating his enemies, this face of the
Republican Party is one they didn't want to see represented
and displayed for the American people.

Speaker 2 (06:54):
Well, but who's driving the bus now? For the Democrats.
That's the problem for them is they've allowed the part
to become literally the party of hate, the Democrat Party
is evil, and AOC is evil. Ilhan Omar is evil.
Everybody in the squad is evil.

Speaker 1 (07:11):
Jasmine Crockett jump to the front of the ship that
steer it for the evilness over the past two days.

Speaker 2 (07:16):
Yeah, they are evil people who can watch the exact
same thing that you are, even a sane person, just
the same person can watch and come to completely different
conclusions about what they've seen. That's how you know that
they're deceived, and so they feel like they have a
righteous anger against Charlie Kirk because Charlie Kirk oppressed women.

(07:40):
Charlie Kirk hated racist, He said that black people were
not smart enough to be in Congress. Charlie Kirk said
that women should never have a job. Charlie Kirk, you know,
and they and can you back that up with anything? No,
let's just go ahead and use your what Jasmine Crockett said,
was it on Thursday or Friday? That just because you
commit a crime, you're not a criminal. So even by

(08:03):
her standard, if Charlie Kirk did say any of those things,
he's still not a xenophobe. He's still not a homophobe
because there's many clear instances where he's reaching out across
the aisle to these people. But you won't give him
that grace. You won't give his followers that grace. You
won't give his family that grace. So they are the

(08:24):
Party of Evil right now. They are entrenched in evil.
And you see Chuck Schumer's crap in his pants. Chuck
Schumer goes.

Speaker 1 (08:31):
Drug over to it and he's refusing to go. And
that's exactly what Manchiin was alluding to. Now, Chuck Schumer's
gonna be drugged to the party, or is he. He's
yet to make a determination.

Speaker 2 (08:43):
That's on whether or not he's going to endorse Mamdani.
But in a bigger picture, he can't. He's not I
don't want to say he's not man enough. I'd say
he's lost the ability to guide his party. It's no
longer within his grasp. And so at this point he should,
he should do a triumphant falling on the sword.

Speaker 1 (09:05):
And Hakeem would have to do the same thing.

Speaker 2 (09:07):
Hakeem, by the way, did vote yes for the Charlie
Kirk bill. So I mean, I know there was what
a bunch of Democrats who voted against it, obviously led
by Ilhan and the rest of the crew, but Hakeem
Jeffries voted with the Republicans that we should be honoring
Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 1 (09:26):
And you nearly left the Democrats without a life ring
as they're sinking in their own see. But you we
did have Why in the world we have Brendan FCC
chairman what's his name step out make those comments.

Speaker 2 (09:39):
I don't think we did that. I think he did.

Speaker 1 (09:41):
That is why he's why he stepped out and overstated
his case. And I was being generous when I described
it that way before. But if you give them that
life ring, and then I was totally shocked This morning
on MSNBC coming out of the Way Too Early show,
they did the juxtap position of Erica Kirk with Trump

(10:03):
on the hate issue. But Morning Joe missed that opportunity.
I don't know. There's the producer not feeling well for
Morning Joe.

Speaker 2 (10:09):
What happened there, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (10:11):
But you gave them those two opportunities, and we seemingly
continue to give them a couple of missteps along the way,
where persons associated with the administration or the administration itself
these opportunities to cling to something as they desperately try
to stay afloat otherwise they're only preaching to their progressive
choir who wants to see them take to the streets.

(10:34):
And the only did you The only thing I noticed
yesterday after all the social media postings was the admonishment
of the person's waiting in line to get into the
stadium yesterday and how much trash they left on the street,
which I was I didn't even realize this. They don't
even put trash cans out around the arenas whenever you

(10:57):
have a large crowd like that, because someone pointed out
that's where people can put bombs. Oh see, I don't
think like a criminal, so I don't and I don't
get paid to think like well, that would be thinking
like a terrorist. I don't think like a criminal or
a terrorist, and I don't get paid to think like
persons who would protect them. But I'd never thought about
that before. That's why they don't have trash cans. And

(11:19):
they were told you got to drop everything in your
hands and have a clue. We got a clear bag
policy and we're going to go through a security So
that's why there was so much trash that was built
up as if you know whenever people get together, they
don't create trash.

Speaker 2 (11:32):
Well, yeah, and again people are going to have missteps.
But I think if you're again a sane person, I
think that the message of the Charlie Kirk memorial yesterday,
as well as the message of the Democrat of the
Republican Party in general, if you just judge it versus
the messaging of the Democrat Party. One offers hope, one

(11:55):
offers prosperity, one offers a bunch of great things. The
other one is the Democrats are they're offering basically grievance.
We're upset with our lot in life, then you should
be upset. They're trying to stir and anger in you,
and some people are going to be attracted to that.

(12:17):
I mean, that's just the way it is. So if
you want to find small missteps, you can find them.
But if you want to look at the bigger picture
of things, you're going to see that one party is
for hope and love and all that, and the Democrat
Party may at certain times say that they're for that,
but their actions say it's like Joe Biden was talking

(12:38):
about how you know he was not lying. It's a
battle for the soul of America what he was saying,
and a lot of it. At one point in his
acceptance speech he said something about we are going to
I forget the word that he used, but it was basically,
I'm a friend of the light. He is not a

(12:59):
friend of the light. The Democrat Party is an enemy
of the light. They don't want you shining a light
on what they were doing, what they were doing, what
they are doing, what they are doing is corrupt and evil.
And what they were doing was corrupt and evil. And
when Joe Biden said, like, we're not gonna cut deals
with Russian oligarchs, we now know you did, you'd already

(13:21):
done that.

Speaker 1 (13:23):
That was a great quote. And I'm trying to from
Elon Musk yesterday.

Speaker 2 (13:25):
It's nice to see him in Trump shaking hands.

Speaker 1 (13:27):
Man, And that was that got a lot of traction
on Twitter. Charlie Kirk was the only man that could
bring him together, bring them back together.

Speaker 2 (13:35):
I mean, a lot of good came out of yesterday.

Speaker 1 (13:37):
So now in the state of South Carolina, the posting
couriers taken exception with a gentleman who's going to be
running for the South Carolina House. He's an insurrectionist we
know him to be prosecuted under the Biden administration. Yes,
he was one of hundreds who took the unguided tour

(13:58):
for twenty nine minutes. Mind you, they got him on video.
Now did he destroy anything, No, he did he threaten
to kill anyone? No?

Speaker 2 (14:07):
Did he steal something?

Speaker 1 (14:08):
No, that would have come to light.

Speaker 2 (14:10):
So he's basically walking around indoors in a building's not
supposed to be in. But he didn't know that because
by video evidence we see the police opening the doors
and waving him in. So it appears he was invited in.
But he should have known better than to take the
police up on their generous offer.

Speaker 1 (14:30):
Apparently he should have known better.

Speaker 2 (14:32):
But he so he did. He paid some sort of
price for this, did he, John?

Speaker 1 (14:35):
Oh yeah, yeah, I mean he served him what was it,
twenty one days while he was waiting his I guess
he did. Well.

Speaker 2 (14:43):
He pled guilty. Then he served twenty one days for
being guilty.

Speaker 1 (14:47):
I got it.

Speaker 2 (14:47):
So he went to a federal prison for twenty one days,
he was disbarred, lost his job, and then he got
three years of probation. Now that's all come to an
end because Donald Trump did part. So he does have
his law license again.

Speaker 1 (15:03):
He was His law license was retroactively suspended according to
the article, but it was reinstated. Yes, he's made his
debt to society, and he is, as as we know
just by his presence, he's involved in politics. He's anxious
and possibly eager to serve himself. And yes, he's decided
to make that big pledge. He's going to run for

(15:24):
the South Carolina House representatives. And he has a couple
of friends apparently in the South Carolina House Freedom Caucus,
and here comes the next rub Well.

Speaker 2 (15:36):
The House Freedom Caucus is obviously for this guy. There's
another guy running in the Republican primary named Brian Hill,
who I'm just reading from the posting career finished a
distant second in the twenty twenty three bid for the
North Charleston City Council. He's also running, So that would
let you know that Brian Hill businessman, Brian Hill not,

(15:56):
for whatever reason, not a very good politician. I don't
know a thing about Brian Hill. I don't know anything
about this guy. I just know that if you're trying
to get on the North Charleston City Council and you can't,
and you came in a distant second, and that one
as that's how it's described that your chances of winning
an entire district for the House seat would be even rougher.

(16:19):
It's going to be tougher to get that, And yet
it would seem as if the posting couriers all in
on that guy, as is the Republican Caucus. The Republican
Caucus is working to get Brian Hill to win the
primary because they're deathly afraid that the Freedom Caucus House
Freedom Caucus Chairman Jordan Pace from Goose Creek is apparently

(16:43):
a friend of Johnston's and he has pledged his support
as well as the Freedom Caucus is both financial and
influential support to try to help him win the primary.
So you've got the old guard versus the new guard.

Speaker 1 (16:54):
The establishment Republicans don't want to see the Freedom Caucus
people pick up another seat. That's only going to lead
to more friction in the South Carolina General Assembly.

Speaker 2 (17:04):
So if they make a big deal about January six.

Speaker 1 (17:08):
He's an insurrectionist.

Speaker 2 (17:10):
If they bring that up. If you're using the same
language the Democrats have used against Trump and against his followers,
then I know that you are not what we would
consider a conservative. So if I hear anybody in the
Republican Caucus say anything about this guy's past, it's the
same as if you say Donald Trump is a a

(17:33):
what is it? Multiple times convicted felon. When you say
stuff like that, you delegitimize yourself. You've taken yourself out
of the conversation. So again, I don't have a horse
in this race. I don't neither one of these people
will represent me because I don't live in the low country.
But I would caution the South Carolina Republicans who want

(17:56):
to try to make a deal out of January six,
that will backfire big time on you.

Speaker 1 (18:02):
Well, now today and I'm yet to read this, you
tell me the announcement sorry have been made and then
that we were looking forward and was highly anticipated after
an announcement yesterday from Donald Trump himself that MAHA make
American healthy again, we'd be having a major announcement about autism.

Speaker 2 (18:19):
Yeah, it's Thailand. All use is what is they have
linked to autism and it says that this is something
that Robert F. Kennedy has been talking about for a
while and Donald Trump, promoting it on Sunday says this
is probably the most important news conference I'll ever have.
And basically, when you look at autism rates, I don't

(18:42):
think that they're going to say it's exclusively linked to
ibuprofen or tailand all the brand name, but it's going
to play a big part in it. And ibuprofen has
often been prescribed to women the last forty years when
they have pregnancy problems, if they're uncomfortable, half some ibuprofen.

(19:04):
And we've seen the autism rates skyrocket. So currently one
in every thirty one children born has autism. One out
of every thirty one. Now, when my son was born,
it was like one out of every six hundred, and
they were shocked at that rate because it used to
be like one out of every hundred thousand.

Speaker 1 (19:25):
I remember how shocking the numbers were, and I've forgotten.
It wasn't an autism organization that I was attending where
I heard someone speak on this, but they gave a
stat and for some reason, I remembered hearing Kurt shillings
PSA about a month previous, and Kurt Shilling used some

(19:47):
stats and I'm like, wow, that's really it's amazing how
fast this is now becoming more and more prevalent. And
then after that meeting, I realized, even having only aired
for a month, Kurt Shillings public service announcement was outdated
by new statistical data. I mean it was growing that

(20:11):
the rate was growing so fast it was actually making
the previous public service announcements outdated within a month.

Speaker 2 (20:21):
Yeah, well, if autism can be linked to the mother's
use of ibuprofen, it's very understandable, sure, because that would
be more and more women would be using it, and
more and more children would be born with it. Now,
like I said, I don't think that's going to be
the only thing. Because we didn't we get last week.

(20:43):
I think they have discouraged now or they're no longer
recommending like four of the shots that women get or
the babies get right after they're born. But the number
of shots that are given have like quadrupled since the
time I was born, and.

Speaker 1 (21:01):
Even the shots that we were given when you and
I were born have evolved. The vaccine is not the
same as the one that we received.

Speaker 2 (21:08):
So in the nineteen sixty five, so that's exactly sixty
years ago, autism rates were one in five thousand. Today
it's one in thirty one. So something has been happening.
And when did we start prescribing ibuprofen Because it used
to be aspirin. It used to be aspirin was the

(21:28):
thing that the drug of choice, but then somewhere in
the eighties or nineties, ibuprofen started becoming the preferred suggestion.
And I remember people saying that aspirin was too tough
on your tum tum, so you should make the switch
to ibuprofen. So it'll be interesting to see if they

(21:49):
can link advil tail and all all those types of
things and their growth, you know, through the years. So
but I mean, it's already if you go to the
ibuprofen Wikipedia page, they're already talking about it.

Speaker 1 (22:05):
I'm sure.

Speaker 2 (22:06):
So yeah, I mean, it's it's it's a huge deal.
And look, I'm in full transparency. I obviously I not
Obviously you might not know my background. I have an
adult son who is born autistic back in the early nineties,
so that is certainly something that is frustrating, We'll say,

(22:27):
is that the government approved and recommended certain things that
apparently led to severely alter my son's life. Would he
would have had a completely different life had his mother
known don't take ibuprofen, or perhaps don't give him these
shots when he's born.

Speaker 1 (22:46):
Fox News is announcing that, and it may be just
a repeat of the announcement that you've already given us.
But there will be a four o'clock press conference today
with Donald Trump about autism, and I'm sure Robert F.
Kennedy Junior will be there to answer questions, So that'll
be coming up later today. Now, over the weekend, there

(23:07):
was a lot of outrage on Saturday as they were
prone to do up in arms screaming the Trump administration
has already deemed Antifa a domestic terrorist organization, when plainly
Joe Biden's already told you Antifa is like America. It's
an idea.

Speaker 2 (23:29):
It's just an idea, Isn't that what the mob used
to say. We're not real, We're just an idea.

Speaker 1 (23:34):
Now, Alex Demwett pointed out to me the other day,
admonished me hard hard. I took it right on the nose, Kelly,
there is no president of Antifa, there is no management
structure of Antifa, so it can't be a terrorist organization.
It's just an idea.

Speaker 2 (23:54):
I mean, are most terrorist organizations like they have like
elections for presidents.

Speaker 1 (24:02):
But where do you hear what the DOJ is cooking
up here with some kind of kooky idea that they
want to bring back to the table with reco charges
for people who actually were supporting, supplying, and yes, organizing
the idea. That's going to put a wrinkle in your
whole argument that Antifa is just an idea.

Speaker 2 (24:22):
Yeah, I mean they have funding. Somebody's funding this.

Speaker 1 (24:26):
Somebody's buying the brick, somebody the bricks, somebody organizing and
dropping those bricks off into perfect places. We saw in
the Summer of Love. That's the first time we saw
the ship. The ship has come in for the bricks.

Speaker 2 (24:37):
Where all the placards come from? Yes, do you think
that Antifa who's.

Speaker 1 (24:41):
Buying the hours They have placards made.

Speaker 2 (24:44):
And they are against organization, they are against they are
the pro chaos crew, right, and yet they somehow are
able to all get matching placards. Come on, man, Obviously
there's some sort of plan behind it somebody, And now
we know, I mean we I've seen multiple Antifa members
and or protesters admit to being paid to be here.

(25:08):
So there is a group behind there that is an
anti American cause, Who is the anti American cause? And
if you're having anti activity, anti American activity that's being funded,
who's funding it? And once we discover who's funding it,
shouldn't they be punished for their anti American Because again,
anti American behavior doesn't just hurt white people. It hurts

(25:31):
black people, it hurts gay people. Plainly, in the summer
we saw that it hurts all Americans. All Americans are
being injured by a group that is trying to tear
the nation apart. So wouldn't even the transgender community should
want these people stopped.

Speaker 1 (25:48):
Even the anarchist, probably the most notable anarchist now is
the Soro senior. Even he recognizes you get to ask
some organization here, Otherwise where are the bus is going
to know? They got to show up? And how you know?
The placker guys are going to be their own time
with the T shirts, much like the guys with the bricks.
So even anarchists understand there has to be organization. Oh

(26:11):
and as we learned a long time ago, organization administration
and a strong lobbyist. They've got plenty of lobbyists around
d C. Plainliest we see people like AOC and the
like defending their right to stand up. And we even
heard Nancy Pelosi say, while people learning in the streets protesting,
I don't understand. Well, yeah, we went through a lot
of that. And how did that just come to be?

(26:33):
Was it organic? As you continue, it was a grassroots effort.

Speaker 2 (26:38):
I look, I believe people like AOC, I'll say, the
younger crew, the ilhan Omars, the aocs, the Presley from Massachusetts,
this crop, I believe are true believers. They believe with
every fiber of their being. What they're saying is just
I would say that people the older ILK, a lot

(27:02):
of them don't believe it. They just want to hurt
the country. I think AOC actually thinks she's helping.

Speaker 1 (27:09):
Oh, I can hear the commitment in her voice. Yeah,
he believes that. Jasmine Crockett believes it.

Speaker 2 (27:13):
Yeah, that they're that that if if they this is
their contribution to helping. But they're being they're actually useful
idiots that are being funded by somebody or some organization
to be determined later by after an investigation, who will
eventually lead to George Soros that that this is the

(27:39):
work of a of an individual and a group of
people who would love nothing more than to destroy the
United States of America.

Speaker 1 (27:47):
And as we see their efforts continue, and they will,
we will go back to the very beginning of the
conversation and what was pointed out plainly by Neil Sedaka's
nephew today on I can't remember his name, but I
know his uncle is Neil Sonaka.

Speaker 2 (28:04):
Is it Harry? I'm sure I remember his name too.
The guy who's over the top, he said, what are they.

Speaker 1 (28:10):
Doing over with frets? Think this is from September of
twenty twenty five, this is now and talking about the
polling for the Republicans versus the Democrats in light of
what we discussed a minute ago. Whether Antifa is actually
a terrorist organization or not, the end result is the same.
And then you expose that with what we saw yesterday.

(28:34):
Outside of a couple of moments where it really didn't gibe,
but what Eric was preaching in that moment, more and
more independence are going to line up with what the
Republicans are standing for proudly, and that's going to be
a sad day for a lot of people, except for
people like Joe Manchin, who would then be to go
on the Sunday shows and tell you I told you so.

Speaker 2 (28:55):
I did see a funny TikTok video over the weekend.
This guy, middle aged, white dude, and he's opening up
his garage door, and so the camera is supposed to
be the view of somebody who's coming to talk to him. Now,
we don't hear what that person's saying. We just get
his responses to each what and you can pretty quickly

(29:16):
under it, kind of like the old Bob Newhart phone calls,
where they sometimes they'll read oh, no, no, no, and
then they'll just and so you understand what that person
is saying. And the gist of what you're saying was, hey, no, no,
I know it's late. It took you a long time
to get here, but we've been expecting you. Yeah, I
mean it's a long trip to get here from the
far left, but we're glad that you came.

Speaker 1 (29:37):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (29:37):
No, a lot of people have come because of the
whole Charlie Kirk thing, and that set it off, you know,
And then the rest of it was jokes about yeah, no, no,
we got some food left for you in the kitchen.
We got some meat loaf in there. No it's real meat. No, no, no,
tofu real meat. Oh, how we're going to retaliate. We're
just gonna go to church, We're gonna pray. No, no,
we have no plans to burn anything. We're not gonna riot,

(29:59):
We're not gonna anything. We're not gonna loot. And it's
basically the idea that there are people right now being
pushed from the left. They don't want to be put Look,
you can go back to before. Look obviously Elon Musk,
Robert F. Kennedy Junior, Yes, what's his name, the Joe Rogan.

(30:22):
I mean, there's a long list of people who are
on the left and are still on the left. They
cannot tollerate. There's something about them that they just knows.
They're repulsed by the Democrat Party.

Speaker 1 (30:34):
Right now, we have actually arrived at the bridge too far.

Speaker 2 (30:40):
Yes, and eventually, if America survives, and I do put
an if on that, I believe it will survive. But
I can also see an ending of America and a
civil war type of thing. But if we survive, this
current crew of Democrats will be pushed into their own
either they'll be a third party. Is Elon Musk introduced

(31:01):
that would then push the Democrat Party into like the
Green Party era, you know what I'm saying, Like it
would be that small, yes, and there would be a
common sense left wing type of party. That's what I
would imagine what happened. Or the current crop of Democrats
would be replaced by common sense Democrats and they could

(31:22):
hang on to the name of the Democrat Party, but
it'll be tough to keep that name alive because that
the brand image is just destroyed.

Speaker 1 (31:29):
Right now, you think we'll see the Michigan Democrats decide
that maybe they will go back to somaliass No, those
are the Minnesota one Minnesota excuse me, they will go
back to Somalias. It's they're proud Somalia's first and foremost,
and they will be able to try socialism and these
other grand ideas they have in their own country.

Speaker 2 (31:47):
It really is amazing when you look at the front
runner for mayor, you look at their representatives in the Congress,
you look at some of their town council members in
and around Minneapolis and those suburbs around there. How far Somalian,
which is like what does that term even mean? Like
I can't how big is Somalia. But they've invaded Minnesota

(32:10):
and they're taking it over, and the people who live
in Minnesota for the most part, are supporting it, which
is bizarre.

Speaker 1 (32:17):
And they clearly understand their job in the US House
and Senate coming is to stand up for the people
of Somalia and to make Somalia great again.

Speaker 2 (32:26):
You've got well, wouldn't that be for the first time?

Speaker 1 (32:28):
Well, you know something, maybe it would. I don't know.
I'm not much on Somalian history, so I might have
to go back and qualify the comment. Otherwise we get
a brand new hat coming.

Speaker 2 (32:37):
Make Samalia Messa no ms A. Well you use them
A for make and Somalia Make Make, Make Somalia Again, don't.

Speaker 1 (32:51):
We'll find out what their PR team wants to use
and get back to you.