09 23 25 Did DJT reinstate the 1st Amendment?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to The Jonathan and Kelly Show, Jonathan Rush.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
Not only did Trump get banned from Twitter, Google, Apple
at Amazon removed the Parlor app from their.

Speaker 3 (00:10):
Platforms Kelly Nash, don't worry.

Speaker 2 (00:13):
Mister president. There are still plenty of apps you do
have access to. Say, you could play Pokemon Go. You
and Donnie Junior can hunt Pikachus together.

Speaker 3 (00:21):
The Jonathan and Kelly Show WOC.

Speaker 1 (00:26):
It was hysterical yesterday watching all the videos populate from
Jimmy Kimmel from years ago, maybe the only to view
all these people that were outraged that Donald Trump had
in fact fired personally according to them, Jimmy Kimmel, and
then yesterday apparently Donald Trump, in a totally unforeseeable move,
reinstated the First Amendment.

Speaker 4 (00:48):
I mean, it's ironic that there were so many people
demanding for Trump's resignation and all these other things after
they didn't even know that ABC had already decided to
Jimmy Kimmel back on. I mean, they're like, so, either
Donald Trump is a feckless authoritarian who's not much of
an authoritary.

Speaker 3 (01:08):
We've already known he's not much of a racist.

Speaker 4 (01:11):
And then I saw another thing that said the protests worked,
and I was like, what are they talking about?

Speaker 3 (01:16):
Thirty people they showed up.

Speaker 4 (01:17):
They said that AB excuse me, the parent company, Disney.
There's at least two media reports saying that Disney has
lost three billion dollars three billion dollars since suspending Jimmy Kimmel,
that so many people canceled their Hulu contracts, so many

(01:40):
people canceled their Disney vacations, so many people canceled their
Disney cruises. There I am to believe that three billion
dollars of commerce was ended in the last what four days?

Speaker 1 (01:52):
You're in here to tell me that a show that
generates own average less than a million viewers.

Speaker 4 (02:01):
Less than two hundred thousand a night.

Speaker 1 (02:03):
Yeah, you're here to tell me. You're here to tell
me that those very that must be the top one
percent watching them, because those will be the only that's
the only way the math works. To tell me that
six hundred and fifty thousand people have actually now bent
the knee of ABC Disney Disney ABC because of their
revolt and financial pushback of everything from Disney cruises. Do

(02:28):
we have cruise ships right now set adrift somewhere in
the Caribbean, the crews. The crews jumped overboard and just
left the persons there to find for themselves.

Speaker 4 (02:37):
Probably, I would assume protesters set them ablaze.

Speaker 3 (02:40):
Right, Let's set the boats on fire for Jimmy.

Speaker 4 (02:43):
And then they launch a grenade or something into the
cruise ships.

Speaker 3 (02:46):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (02:47):
That has to be true. It's on the internet. Nobody's
going to give any misinformation here, actually not. ABC stand
on the credibility of who you are. ABC. There's no misinformation.
Disinformation could of the news that.

Speaker 4 (03:00):
The most logical answer is actually the answer, and that
what really happened is what actually what ABC said happened,
which was that they felt as if he was inflaming
the nation with some of his what they used ill
timed jokes. They didn't even condemn the jokes.

Speaker 3 (03:17):
NBC.

Speaker 4 (03:18):
They just said that they were ill timed too soon, Kelly,
too soon, and that they wanted to have cooler heads prevail.
So they suspended him indefinitely. But after having what they
described as meaningful conversations with Jimmy Kimmel, they're going to
return him to the air tonight. In other words, the
two people that Donald Trump you know, has martyred are

(03:40):
both on the air.

Speaker 3 (03:41):
Yes, yes, so it's Stephen Colbert out there.

Speaker 1 (03:45):
How how awkward and embarrassing was it to hear him
nearly groveling for CBS. Do you have an announcement CBS
anything you want to announce? As if they're going to
reinstate him and take him off of his what will
be the end of his current contract, and then he
will be taken off because he's owned to what may
for something.

Speaker 4 (04:04):
And you know, some I had a couple of idiots
yesterday on my YouTube channel talking about how I don't
know anything and that the only reason that he's still
on the airs because he has a contract. And I'm like,
are you I want you know? I didn't say it
as rudely as I was thinking, but it's like, do
you not understand how many people get fired in the

(04:26):
middle of contracts to get bought out. You can either
be fired for cause or we can just if we
were bowing the knee to the President of the United States,
we would immediately fire this guy and then we would
do tar and feather him.

Speaker 1 (04:39):
And according to your own description to Donald Trump, the
authoritieran that you are, he would make ABC hole. But
whatever it costs them. We get rid of that, Jimmy Kimmel,
I mean, not with his own personal money, if he chose,
but with taxpayer money, because he would say, as you
would say, that the authoritarian in him would dictate that
for the good of the country. Jimmy Kimmel must go.

Speaker 3 (04:57):
All that was playing out in front of your eyes,
was it?

Speaker 4 (05:00):
And Stephen Colbert, who is fired at the end of
his contract, I mean, do we think he's not telling
Trump jokes between now and next June?

Speaker 3 (05:08):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (05:09):
And do you think we're not going to open up
with a double down? He's sorry, told you I'm going
to double down now he's probably gonna make I don't
know what he's going to do tonight to double down.
Is there some way that they could in fact superimpose
the recently closed grave of I'm not even gonna describe that.

Speaker 4 (05:28):
No, but I would think that he would say that
the shooter is in fact not just a MAGA member,
but a Trump family member. You know, is something like that,
I mean, just go ahead and say this is Donald
Trump's nephew.

Speaker 1 (05:41):
Well, we know that DJT is in fact an avid hunter.
I'm sure he's got a thirty odds.

Speaker 4 (05:47):
Are you talking about dj T or dj A tjj.

Speaker 1 (05:49):
TJ is an avid hunter? Yes, yes, so he would
while being super mposed superimposed on a headstone.

Speaker 3 (05:57):
We'll just put that.

Speaker 4 (05:58):
Okay, you think dj T Donald Trump Junior is in
fact the shooter. They reframed the wrong guy.

Speaker 1 (06:05):
Even if Donald Trump Junior's grandmother was available for a
comment today, wouldn't she describe him as maga?

Speaker 3 (06:13):
That's what happened the other day.

Speaker 1 (06:14):
According to the to Tyler Robinson, his grandmother said he
was maga. So we're standing on the words of his grandmother.

Speaker 3 (06:20):
That it was maga.

Speaker 1 (06:21):
What else do you need? And why is it the
ill time joke? If it's the truth? Is there ever
a bad time to tell the truth? Kelly, Maybe you're
gonna see all that play out and you're gonna hear
a Gavin.

Speaker 3 (06:32):
How do they ever get Gavin Newsom lined up for
the program tonight?

Speaker 4 (06:35):
Well, I'm happy to see that, like cities like Seattle
and Washington, d C will not get Jimmy Kimmel tonight. God,
that's got to frost him over there, I mean, and
I wonder what the ratings will be because the ratings
have again fallen by seventy five percent in the last
year and a half, seventy five percent he's off. So
what happens when he loses sixty markets? Wow, I mean

(06:58):
you're gonna fall another seventy five percent.

Speaker 1 (07:00):
He was contemplating this yesterday. Plainly, they're going to be
able to think the market by a market viewership, and
then they're going to tell you because there will be
markets that won't air. Yet that based on their calculations
of the markets who did a IF and in fact
been on all of the abcal feelies, you had seen
a six thousand percent increase in viewership for Jimmy Kimmel.

(07:20):
And that's America's open embrace. If we love you, Jimmy Kimmel,
thank you for standing up for our first Amendment. We're
nearly going to give you the Patrick Henry Award.

Speaker 4 (07:29):
Does Jimmy Kimmel save democracy? Is this that? What we
just saw? His brave fight of four days sitting at home.
That was his brave fight.

Speaker 5 (07:38):
Well, what about the video of him celebrating the fact
that they took the president off the Internet years ago
and they wouldn't even allow him on any other platforms
except for what was it, Pokemon? He didn't invite him
to be on Pokemon.

Speaker 4 (07:49):
If you are a liberal, then you would say, I mean,
it's not a problem for them. This is not a
mental gymnastics thing. One stands for truth. One is a liar.
Donald Trump, as a liar, should not have access to
any platforms. Jimmy Kimmel told you the truth that that
shooter is a maga guy, and so since he's the
truth teller, brave truth teller, he should be on all

(08:11):
platforms we should like MSNBC has done more to promote
the Kimmel Show than ABC has in ten years. This
morning became must see TV.

Speaker 1 (08:20):
Ali vitally said not less than three times that it's
must see TV between five am and six six am
this morning. She's working on NBC, who I think still
has that phrase protected to promote an ABC show, which,
by the way, Jimmy Fallon should offer up his hour

(08:40):
to hour on television course and simul cast it. And
if Steven Kobeer really wanted to be the champion of
the First Amendment, he would do the same. As a
matter of fact, I think the Federal Communications Commission under
Brendan is.

Speaker 4 (08:54):
It Burke whatever his name is.

Speaker 3 (08:56):
Yeah, the idiot who made the comments previous.

Speaker 1 (08:59):
I think that the FC she should should dictate and
demand that they pull out a roadblock where every broadcast
availability originated from and possibly outside of the United States
of America. Maybe Mexico and Canada will get in on this.
Should all simulcast this episode of the Jimmy Kimmel Show

(09:19):
to make sure all Americans get an opportunity to lick
the goodness.

Speaker 4 (09:23):
So I have to stop watching Doctor Pimple Popper because
the Learning Channel is going to have it. Okay, Well,
that's Jonathan Rush's suggestion.

Speaker 1 (09:32):
You just plainly demonstrated how I'm not an accounting of
the four hundred actors like Tom Hanks who signed on
to a very stern written letter. I'm saying, you've already
demonstrated how ABC had to quickly realize the demand of
the public, and with that kind of demand, it would
necessitate a roadblock. SAMO cast broadcast to Jimmy Kimmel tonight

(09:53):
to make sure that Gaven Newsom is able to explain
to all of us in layman's terms. Because he's a politician,
he gets the big thoughts how the First Amendment works
and what the restraint should be on the FCC and
then certainly how we should flog march Donald J. Trump
into a prison the closest one available, or at least
flying El Salvador to be imprisoned.

Speaker 4 (10:15):
Well, it's unfortunate that it's going to be Gavin Newsom
as his guest, because Gavin Newsom famously ended up agreeing
with Charlie Kirk when he invited Charlie Kirk onto his
podcast and he said, I agree that men should not
be allowed in women's sports. It's a fairness issue, and

(10:35):
Charlie Kirk was pushing him, why don't you do more? Well,
maybe I will, maybe I will. So wait a second.
You agreed with a homophobe, a trans of phobe. You
don't believe the science that says that I can just
be whoever I feel like I want to be. You
agreed with Charlie Kirk. And now I made fun of
Charlie Kirk's murder and you're going to come out here.
What are you going to defend Charlie Kirk?

Speaker 1 (10:57):
And we already know that Gavin Newsom son it's a
big Charlie Kirk fan. He's probably still in mourning as well.

Speaker 4 (11:02):
Be Look, anybody with a soul is in mourning. That
that has nothing to do with how great of a
person Charlie Kirk was. But the fact that you saw
an assassination and you saw the grieving widow. You don't
need to know anything else about Charlie Kirk. You don't
need to know anything Charlie doesn't matter. What matters is

(11:22):
his wife. Is her just she's destroyed and two little
children will never know their father. That's all you That's
all you need to know to be in mourning.

Speaker 1 (11:32):
Well, I'm glad you brought it. The fact that Gavin
Newsom in fact, did agree with Charlie Kirk in that
particular incident. And all it takes is one.

Speaker 3 (11:42):
Oh yeah.

Speaker 4 (11:42):
Once you once you agree, you're tainted forever that you.

Speaker 1 (11:45):
Have any commonality when a thought process, and heaven forbid
any action that you have already threatened. You're a threat
to democracy, sir, but you have threatened it, which brings
us to our South Carolina story of the day. M M.

Speaker 4 (11:59):
This is again, I don't know how anybody can run
for the Freedom Caucus ever, again knowing that R. J.
May founded the Freedom Caucus and this is the word,
is this the word of like Mika Brazinski or somebody. No,
this would be the words of one of the most
mainstream Republicans in the great state of South Carolina, who

(12:21):
is the House Whip. And he said that, I what
did he say again, I'd be surprised if anybody would
run for the Freedom Caucus knowing the the something about
the horrific nature the allegation.

Speaker 1 (12:35):
He wont especially running at RJ's district specifically, can say
they want to join in the organization that he created,
after all the horrible things he's been accused of that
led to the Republicans splitting the state House and creating
thus the Freedom Caucus.

Speaker 4 (12:53):
And yet the guy who appears to be the front
runner at this point is a friend of the Freedom Caucus,
and Freedom Caucus members are going to help campaign for him,
led by Jordan Pace, And so the the what do
we call him, the establishment GOP in South Carolina, they're
gonna have their guy go up against this because they

(13:16):
you have to return a sense of normalcy. The swamp
wants normalcy.

Speaker 1 (13:21):
Yes now. And it's going to expand I'm sure well
past District eighty eight because we have special elections scheduled
in District twenty one, eighty eight and twelve now eighty
eight is a focal point because of Rjmay. By the way,
I'm glad he was found guilty. It's gonna be frog
marched off to prison.

Speaker 4 (13:41):
Did that happen?

Speaker 3 (13:42):
No? No, it's not.

Speaker 4 (13:44):
Oh okay.

Speaker 1 (13:48):
When you read this article, you nearly come to realize
that he's running a pedophile trafficking organization here in South
Carolina for the cartel without at this point any due
process and certainly not a jutification of any of those
those comments. Now, I'm not trying to take up for Rjay,

(14:08):
but I can tell you this I know, and I
don't want I'll go and apply it to myself. I
got a feeling that RJ. May has probably supported some
of Djt's policies. I know that I've supported some. Should
I denounce all the policies that RJ. May has supported,
either federally or on the state level.

Speaker 4 (14:27):
I can tell you that RJ. May authored a bill
to name a date. I don't have the date in
front of me, but as a as a South Carolina
Ping Pong Day, is Ping Pong Day going to be
now taken off? The calendar is.

Speaker 1 (14:41):
Going to have to be canceled. That's an endorsement of
who they claim is already a convicted pedophile.

Speaker 4 (14:46):
So as a pedophile, somehow Ping Pong Day is associated
with that.

Speaker 1 (14:52):
And I'm just reading, I'm just learning from the article.
I gotta learn what I look. I got to learn
what I know about what's going on and a bound
by the establishment rules set up by the Republican Party
here in the state of South Carolina.

Speaker 4 (15:06):
Now if rjmay also voted with the majority to increase
teachers pay in South Carolina.

Speaker 3 (15:13):
Oh well, the teacher news.

Speaker 4 (15:14):
Well, the teachers now demand that they give the money back,
keep the money. I don't want the money. I don't
want the child porn money.

Speaker 1 (15:21):
If this is how yesterday we found out from the
posting Courier that because a man who toured the state
House and it ill advisedly on January he.

Speaker 4 (15:35):
Took the pay when the cops opened the door and said,
come on in, you moron.

Speaker 3 (15:41):
You took it, you idiot, you listened to security.

Speaker 4 (15:44):
And he did three weeks in jail, right, twenty one
days in a federal prison for that.

Speaker 3 (15:49):
And we now know he's going to run for the House.

Speaker 1 (15:52):
You're gonna elect an insurrectionist, and now we're going to
find out how in the world can you ever support
something called the Freedom Caucus when plainly what their freedom
description is a whole lot different from ours.

Speaker 3 (16:04):
That's where they got us. See, we thought it was what.

Speaker 4 (16:08):
I'm thinking of if I follow the logic. And again,
this is mainstream Republicans. These are not far left wing
nut jobs that we're talking about. These are GOP. Not
just even the rank and file. These are some of
the leaders of the Republican Party in South Carolina.

Speaker 1 (16:25):
He's a tried and true incumbent and stallwarts of leadership
in the Republican Party here.

Speaker 4 (16:30):
Okay, so let's just follow their logic. The Freedom Caucus
was founded in part by a guy named R. J. May,
who we now believe has not yet been convicted, but
we now believe is somebody who's been engaged in child pornography.

Speaker 1 (16:44):
He was a diet of those ten counts of distributing
child pornography.

Speaker 4 (16:47):
Hence, the whole Freedom Caucus is sullied and can never
be redeemed because their founder was involved with child porn
It must be dissolved. Let me, then, let me do
what if you agree with that argument, how can you
then poke holes at the argument that the Democrats have
been making for years. America was founded by slaveholders. Hence

(17:09):
the founding of this nation was sullied by the stain
of slavery. We should dissolve the United States of America
and reinvent it.

Speaker 1 (17:18):
This is the best news Omar has ever had. A
way Omar gets a wind of what's happening here in
the Republican Party the state of South Carolina, She's going
to hold this up as a great example of a
while the Constitution must be burned, shredded must be and
the Somalians is going to be part of writing our
new constitution.

Speaker 4 (17:37):
Shouldn't they be the only ones allowed to write it?
I mean, if we're going to be fair.

Speaker 1 (17:44):
This is the craziest thing when when when you read
the article, and I'm going to go back and read
it again, maybe I'm misinterpreting the words that are printed,
playing the English so that I can easily comprehend and
understand exactly what they're saying.

Speaker 3 (17:59):
But there's no.

Speaker 1 (18:00):
Way to get around the point in the fact that
that's what they're saying. The man already, I'll read it
to you one more time.

Speaker 3 (18:07):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (18:07):
How anyone, especially running an RJAS district specifically, can say
they want to join the organization that he created after
all the horrible things he's been accused of, and that
he led the Republicans splitting the state House.

Speaker 4 (18:23):
That apparently now that's again, that's not some left wing
nut job. That is a guy named Brandon Newton, who
is the House majority whip.

Speaker 1 (18:31):
Yes, so.

Speaker 4 (18:34):
Well, I mean this guy is the mainstream and they
talk over and over again about how they're going to
run a guy. I mean, I don't want to diminish
anybody's campassador. Huh name is that? His name? The guy
who came in as is described in the paper as
a distant second for a town council seat. And so

(18:58):
this is their guy. But now because he will fall
in line with what the Republicans want. Apparently sure he
has this. He's not been successful as a candidate so far,
but perhaps with the will and backing of the entire
Republican caucus, we can now get this guy elevated and
across the finish line. Although it would appear by early

(19:20):
polling numbers that the guy who is called himself a
Freedom Caucus member, although he's not in the Freedom Caucus,
hasn't been elected anything, but that's who he aligns with
that they're gonna get. I mean, this guy is like
double ahead of this guy, and you're the only hope
he has is if the swamp can rise up and
convince enough people in South Carolina to vote for a

(19:42):
guy I don't want to. I mean, it's just look,
we've got problems in Columbia, big, big problems. The problems
that we have were not created by the Democrats. They
are created by the Republican Party of South Carolina. The
Republican leadership has led us into this hole. When we

(20:04):
talk about roads and bridges and how they're collapsing and
how we have I think it was the fourth worst
roads in America. That is a Republican exclusive issue. When
you talk about the failing of the school districts in
this state, that is a Republican issue. I understand that
we have one county that was run by Democrats and

(20:25):
we do now finally have a v But I've never
asked miss Weaver, but I bet you if she was
to be aligned with either wing of the party, it
would be the Freedom Caucus wing people and the Freedom
Caucus are the minority of this group, but they are
the loud folks who really want to see reform and
change for the state of South Carolina. If you're happy

(20:46):
with the way things are going, then just keep it
going as is. If you think that we can do
a lot better, I mean a lot better, I mean
like night and day better, then maybe take a look
at what the Freedom Caucus has to say. But I
don't I don't even see anything close to saying that
because the Freedom Caucus had one founder that had something
to do with child porn. It's not like child porn

(21:08):
was the kind. Do you swear and oath the child
porn then you can be in the Freedom Caucus.

Speaker 1 (21:15):
Well here comes the really tough one.

Speaker 4 (21:18):
But there's a tough one.

Speaker 1 (21:20):
Yeah, we're gonna have to change protocol.

Speaker 4 (21:22):
What does that mean?

Speaker 1 (21:23):
And the House floor and probably the Senate. Okay, I'm
pretty sure, pretty damn sure that our Jmay has actually
said the pledge of allegiance. Well, I can't share the
words our Jmay.

Speaker 4 (21:38):
Is he a game cock or a Clemson fan?

Speaker 1 (21:40):
Oh my god, look at all that we had to
burn the whole damn place down. We're talking about a
scoorished earth policy for God's sake.

Speaker 4 (21:49):
Sounds like a Democrat's dream.

Speaker 1 (21:52):
Now, before we get out of this podcast, Kelly has
a unique perspective on this. So yesterday's announcement with autism
from the Oval Office with RFK Junior, when the Tailan
announcement came out, and that was it, Tell me about
what you were thinking, why you were listening to the
words and mispronounced that.

Speaker 3 (22:13):
Otherwise.

Speaker 1 (22:15):
I think we learned during COVID that you're better off
whenever there's something of scientific nature. And I would do
the same thing. I would walk to the podium and
introduce RFK Jr. Well, but big announcement with the studies,
and I'll let RFK Junr speak to that now and
step back.

Speaker 4 (22:31):
Yeah, I mean if you didn't follow it that closely. Basically,
what they are saying is they want parents to be
informed that there were thirty one studies done. In twenty
seven of the studies, they found a linkage that increased
use of thailand al while the mother is pregnant may

(22:54):
in fact be one of, not the exclusive cause for
the rap bid increase of autism amongst children, particularly male children.
As it was pointed out we used to be at
like one out of every seventy five hundred California's new numbers,
or one out of every twelve boys born has autism today,

(23:16):
So I mean something has gone horribly wrong, which is
going to be a threat to our own survival as
a people. A lot of these autistic children are not
going to be able to actually procreate. They're not going
to be able. Not only are they not able to procreate,
they're not able to sustain themselves. They're going to be

(23:36):
dependent upon society to provide for them. So it's of
the utmost importance that we figure out why is it
that so many children are now being born with autism?
And again, thirty one studies done looking and again you
can't do a true study in the way that we
would like to see it done. In other words, take

(23:58):
five thousand women, five thousand pregnant women. You would put
twenty five hundred in one group, twenty five hundred in
the other group, and one group you'd give them up placebo,
and the other twenty five hundred you'd have him take
tailand all and then see what the results of the
births are. That's unethical to do. You can't force a
mother to take Thailand all or a placebo. So they're
never going to run that study. So all they're going

(24:18):
to do is look at ladies who did admit to
taking Thailand all during their or were maybe even prescribed it.
You know, a lot of women are prescribed tailand All
because again it's supposedly very very very safe. But the
women who took the increased dosages of Thailand all they
did see in twenty seven of the thirty one studies

(24:40):
an increased rate of autism. So with that being said,
all's the president and all the President's men were saying
is we would like mothers to have an informed decision
that that data is out there. And the pushback came
fierce on this because tailand All spent on average with

(25:01):
just the news networks one hundred million dollars a year,
so CBS News, ABC News, Fox News, they get from
Thailand All about one hundred million dollars a year in advertising,
so it's in their vested interest to make sure, uh oh,
let's cover for tailandhol. I'll take you back to the
nineteen thirties, is when you got the first studies that

(25:22):
showed a link between increased smoking and increased lung disease
cancer specifically. In nineteen fifty there were two studies that
came out that were considered watershed. I mean, these were
groundbreaking studies. One in the US one in the UK.
Both showed a rapid increase again for lung cancer amongst smokers.

(25:44):
Those were kind of squashed and put away for at
least fifteen years, because it wasn't n til nineteen sixty
five when we started seeing the Attorney General, not the
Attorney General, the surgeon General say they wanted a warning
on cigarettes. So I don't think you got that to
nineteen sixty seven. And then we saw another increase with

(26:07):
the warnings beginning in the mid seventies. I think seventy three,
we got one. We got to change again in seventy nine,
and they keep trying to up that. But they knew
for twenty to thirty years about the dangers of cigarettes
and they didn't tell anybody. And you can even see
a nineteen seventy three memo from Phillips and Morris executive

(26:27):
talking about even though that's out there, the target demo
are teenagers, and the target demo feels invincible. Let's play
up that fact. Yeah, it's dangerous. Let's target that that
it's dangerous, but you can prove how much stronger you are.
They wanted to kill children for money, and that's where

(26:48):
we're at today. They don't mind sacrificing a couple of
million kids to autism if they can keep their profits.
That's true of the media outlets, that's true of the
tailan All manufacturers. By the way, Thailand All Manufacturer is
not just the only one who use a stiment of feend.
They'd sell that in other countries under different brand names,
not like I think here is it Johnson and Johnson,

(27:11):
or it's Glaxio. I think is who sells it here?
But there's other companies that sell it in European countries.
There's other companies that sell it, and they're all consolidated.
They're meaning they're they're circling the wagons. Don't link these
things together because that would be horrible for business. But
how much business are we even talking about? Jonathan? That
was the thing that's really mind boggling to me, because

(27:33):
if I just think about who takes Thailand all, I
take Thailand all. I know a lot of guys who
take tailand aw' I would assume that it would go
about fifty to fifty fifty percent women fifty percent men.
Inside the women group, what percentage are pregnant at any
given time? I mean, are we talking about five ten
percent of their sales annually.

Speaker 1 (27:51):
It's not like when they did the link with cervical
cancer and baby powder. It's not like everybody stop using
baby powder. I can buy baby powder.

Speaker 4 (28:00):
Today still by a lot of people don't even know
about that.

Speaker 1 (28:02):
And I recommended that women who are in childbirthing years
in particular, but women use a lot of or exposed
to a lot of baby powder, but certainly available. You're
right as you limit the available market of who you're
actually But this is how greedy we see the American
lobbyists be able to step in. And now they're very

(28:25):
frustrated because plainly that's been broken to a large degree.
But I know that autism is a very sensitive subject
for a lot of our listenership, and as we mentioned
a few minutes ago, the numbers that are increasing, the
new stat in California is mind boggling. But as and
Kelly shared yesterday his personal connection with autism and his family,

(28:46):
and I know that a lot of people who could
be listening to this podcast realize how serious this is.
And I thought maybe a lot of people, because I
don't have it a personal attachment, not exactly to the
closest in relationship that you do. But as I was
watching it yesterday, I just kept waiting for another shoot
to drop. Please tell me more, because we desperately need
to find My dad still thinks it somewhere on the corn.

(29:08):
We modified so much food in this country. He thinks
this in the corn somehow. But everybody seems to have
a theory. We're just hoping one of these scientists will
be able to take these theories. And maybe it's a stew,
maybe it's a hodgepodge of maybe it's something in a
certain variety of corn and a certain amount of exposure
to tailand all and aceta metaphin, and then whatever else

(29:29):
happens to be in the mix.

Speaker 4 (29:30):
It gets worse every year. That's the one thing. So
I mean, my son was born in nineteen ninety three
and he was in a group that was like a
rate of I think I goes one out of like
every nine hundred, which was still shockingly high, one out
every night. But today's one in twelve, and we.

Speaker 1 (29:47):
Know we have people are actually considering that those will
be a reason why they would not have children. They're
seeing the stats and they're going, this is like playing
Russian roulette. We're going to hold off on that.

Speaker 3 (29:57):
Well.

Speaker 4 (29:58):
I don't think you're going to get an answer in
our li lifetime like as to why, because, like you said,
there's so many factors that have changed since the nineteen fifties.
So what chemicals did we start adding to the food process,
what vaccinations have we added? What everything? I mean, tiland
All started getting prescribed around the nineteen sixties. I do

(30:21):
remember his my son's mother, she would take tailand all
rather often for a number of different ailments. Whether it
was she was tired, because she was she worked at
that time as a waitress, and so she would be
often tired and have some aches and pains and she
would take some of that. You know, again, I don't

(30:42):
think any individual is to blame. I don't even think
tiland All is to blame. You know, they wouldn't have
known this, nobody, but if but when you see the linkage,
when you got twenty seven studies, and all they want
to talk about is the four that didn't find any
it's you know, look at the global warming or now
climate change. You know, Barack Obama kind of famously tweeted

(31:04):
in twenty thirteen ninety seven percent of scientists agreed that climb.
He called it global warming at the time, stell global
warming is real, man made and dangerous. That's those were
his words. It's real, it's man made, and it's dangerous. Now,
there was a rebuttal of that about maybe two years later.

(31:27):
And I loved the way the headline was putting the
con in consensus, because what we what you couldn't have known,
is that of all the papers that they looked at,
which was I mean, it was thousands of papers that
had come to the conclusion and again ninety seven percent
agree it's man made. Climate change or global warming is

(31:49):
man made according to the experts. Well, this crew went
and dug into those papers. What they found was again
six twenty six percent of the papers actually offered no opinion.
Think about that, Jonathan. They said ninety seven percent of

(32:09):
the papers, ninety seven percent of the people agreed that
it was man made, when in fact, sixty six percent
offered no opinion. So how could that be? And they
just defaulted to if they didn't say it wasn't man made,
then it was sous. Yeah, So sixty six percent of
scientists in twenty thirteen had no opinion. They said there's

(32:33):
no way to link it to man. Then out of
the remaining what is that forty four percent or thirty
four percent, whatever that is left, say thirty four percent
of them it was thirty three percent. So again we're
splitting it up, so it would be basically, I'm guessing
around twelve percent. So sixty six percent said no opinion.
Twelve to fourteen percent said there is a light indicator

(32:58):
that shows that it's man made. So you're talking at
like eighty five percent of the papers said it's either
no conclusion or maybe possibly a conclusion. The overwhelming majority
said it's not man made. And yet Barack Obama and
the scientific community and everybody who's vested in making sure

(33:19):
that they can get control over you said, look at that.
It's the science has been settled.

Speaker 1 (33:27):
The President of the United States, the man who warned
you about misinformation that's not aging. Well, we're late for
a conference call. Have a great day, South Carolina. We'll
be back after the big broadcast. I can't wait to
watch Jimmy can I'm not watching Jimmy