Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Jonathan Rush James Comer apparently made the representation on the
floor of the House that I sat down with Jeffrey Epstein,
had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein, have contributions from Jeffrey Epstein.
He's a stone cold liar.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
Kelly Nash the keem Jeffrey's campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
That's what we found in the last document Back.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
And Kelly Show WOC.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
You can't help but feel sorry going into Thanksgiving week
for a lot of these House and Senate staffers who
will be in DC, not at home enjoying a Thanksgiving
meal with their family, because they've got a mountain of
documents to pour through to make sure that they get
their political ankles out for their House and Senate members.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
You know, the I feel like we're watching pro wrestling America.
America really does not have our priorities straight. The public
is demanding this Epstein thing. Okay, the public would like
to think that there's some sort of you know, rich,
(01:08):
powerful cabal behind the scenes where there's all these billionaires
and trillionaires and they're having not only sex with underage girls,
but then Epstein is blackmailing these people in order to
do unspeakable things on his behalf as well. That's what
they would like to think is happening, and that's why
they're over lessed. Poll I saw from Maris had something
(01:29):
like ninety four percent of Americans demand that it be released.
Donald First off, remember Dan Bongino made his name off
of saying there was going to be stuff in there
and we were all going to be shocked. And then
Dan Bongino got in there and he looked at it
and he had to come out and have one of
the most awkward interviews you've ever seen in history when
him and Cash Bettel were like, we really thought there
was stuff in there. There's nothing there. There is no
(01:51):
more information. All the information has already been released. Now
they keep putting out document dumps. We got so far,
we've had I think fifty five thousand documents have been
released regarding the Epstein thing, and we've learned not a
damn thing. And now there's gonna be We have thirty
days now to get the rest of it out, whatever
is left behind, and you're not gonna find anything else.
(02:13):
I mean, the names have been named, like the guy
from Harvard, Larry Summers. We all knew about that. That
wasn't new. I'm surprised he resigned. We all knew about
Bill Clinton. There's nothing new there. There's nothing new with
any of these people, So don't I think everyone now
the fact that you get almost one hundred percent of
(02:35):
both the House and the Senate. One guy said he
wasn't gonna vote for it. Very principled guy said, I
don't want innocent names being released and doing damage. But
other than that, when you have one hundred percent on something,
you already know that it's a uniparty, you know that
they're in on it together. And then the fact that
the uniparty could not convict Plasket of doing something at
(02:59):
least uns seemly. That's the level for a censure. Are
you doing something unseemly because you knew? In twenty eighteen,
the front page of the Miami Herald interviewed fifty Epstein victims.
Six months later, you're now texting with him. How can
we get Donald Trump? That is at least unseemly. You
(03:20):
became his hand puppet. Jeffrey Epstein put his hand up
your tush and said, do what I tell you to do.
You say what I tell you to say, and she
did it and they couldn't get a censure on her.
Ralph Norman's the one who brought it up, and they could.
He sent me a text last night. He can't believe
it either. I cannot believe how weak the Republican Party
has become.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
Unless he was sexting, according to Crockett, then you might
have a you might have a bone to pick if
they were sexting together, all right, But certainly we understand
whether the American public would come to the conclusion given
that we have seen the sweetheart deal initially from the
Epstein will go through the whole list of things, and
then then the absence of information, you have conspiracy theories.
Now with the Internet set on fire, so there's plenty
(04:01):
of opportunity for people to get their appetite wet, but
they can never get seemingly enough water to calm it.
Because you have the information available, and now it's available,
and now we're gonna see more and more information as
they pour over it next week, and the poor staffers
in the DC House and Senate chambers will be or
in their offices will be locked in.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
But think about what you're saying, though, because John F. Kennedy,
it's all out there now. They ran on that. Here
comes all the Kennedy secrets. What did we learn? Not
a flipping thing. They got it right. In nineteen sixty
three he was shot by one dude. Was it a
magic bullet? I guess. So that's what the information shows,
(04:42):
what you've seen on Epstein. They're gonna put it all
out in about thirty days, forty days from now, we're
gonna hear that's not it, It can't be it.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
This is it.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
This is all you got. There's no more.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
Pote in is is now? You get it now, this
is what the public wanted. You're gonna get it.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
But they're gonna say we didn't get it that' so
they're going to say Trump held it back. Trump and
Pam Bondi conspired in order to So this is going
to make Trump look bad in the long run.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
All right, Hey, going a second, we got to go
to the hotline. Kelly Nash. Welcome on the phone, our
Lieutenant Governor Pamela Ethic. Good morning, Hey, good.
Speaker 5 (05:13):
Morning, good morning, my friends. Are you all getting ready?
One week from today is Turkey Day, Happy Thanksgiving because
I won't be tucking to you guys next week.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
Yeah. No, We're gonna have a short week like so
many other people. You guys have got any big plans
for you.
Speaker 5 (05:29):
I am cooking for twenty two people.
Speaker 4 (05:33):
At my house.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Wait a minute, you're cooking. You didn't say I'm running
for governor. For God's sake, somebody else cooked this.
Speaker 5 (05:40):
No, you know as a mom, it's kind of my
happy place. Like on Wednesday, I'll start baking all my
pies and I make an amazing butterscotch bunk cake, and
my uh I start, I start pre mixing all my
size and putting them in the refrigerator. And I'll wake
up right and early on Thanksgiving morning, put my turkey
(06:00):
in the roaster. Stuff it, put it in the roaster.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
And if there were you on the campaign trail, behind
the bus will be the Pamela Abbot food truck. I
want to taste that.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
You're trying to raise some money for the campaign. You
can have a bank sale.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
Now that's a great idea. Okay, now, okay, so let
me ask you look at me asking the question to
say favorite side. I've been hearing this question get asked
all over, So tell me both. What is your favorite
Thanksgiving side?
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Well, I'm kind of boring. I'm actually like a fan
of spinach, so if I can just get like some
steamed spinach, I love that. But I know everybody else
goes with green bean castrole.
Speaker 5 (06:45):
I know, I do know. I like green beans. I'm
not the big green bean casserole fan because I can
get a little mashey, So I'm with you on that.
Speaker 4 (06:52):
But spinach.
Speaker 5 (06:53):
That is the first time I've heard spinach as a
favorite side. So there you go, You're unique. I like that.
Speaker 3 (06:59):
My doctor actually said I need to back off on
the spinach because I have too much iron in my blood. Wow.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Wow, my doctor's never said that to me. My doctor
said cut back on the macaroni and cheese. So that's yeah,
I'm not doing that this Thanksgiving either. That's probably don't
invite my doctor to my house for Thanksgiving. Let's talk
about being on the campaign trail as the lieutenant governor
but also in particular running for the governor's office, and
(07:26):
let's talk. I want to ask you specifically first about
one of the things making the news this week, but
the redistricting. What are you thinking about the possibility? And
it was brought up by another candidate running for governor,
but also now it's being picked up by the Freedom
Caucus and actually now presented as a redistricting to make
sure everybody has an opportunity to vote for someone else
(07:46):
other than James Clyburn.
Speaker 5 (07:48):
Well, you know what Politico had asked me this question too,
and I'm going to tell you guys, exact question to them.
If you can guarantee me by breaking up that one
district that we're not gonna put any other districts that risk.
I am all for it, but I would be I
would you know, I'm an accountant, so I kind of
look at the numbers. I don't know how you slice
(08:11):
that up, and you would definitely have to take You'd
be taking conservative votes from two other districts, right, you
would be giving those districts more blue votes, So you'd
be purpling three districts. And I think the DNC would
love nothing more than to dump a pile of money
(08:35):
into South Carolina. Now, I'm just talking strategy, I'm not
talking feelings. Right, Let's talk facts and then we can
talk feelings. The facts are that the Democrats would come
in and look to really try to pump a lot
of money into getting more representation from South Carolina, right,
(08:58):
So that would scare me a little bit. If you
could show me facts wise how you could cut that
up and we would have a clean sweep on Republicans,
I would lead the band on that. Anything I can
do to make sure that the president has more representation
in DC by Republicans, I would do well. Facts. Now,
(09:22):
you know, we want to talk feelings. Let's figure out
what we're talking about.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
We're talking with our Lieutenant Governor, Pamela Evitt and the
idea of redistricting. We do live in a sixty to
forty state, meaning about sixty percent of South Carolinians voted
for Trump, forty percent voted for Kamala Harris. It's the
exact opposite in Massachusetts, and in Massachusetts they haven't had
a Republican representative in many, many years. California is very
similar in the sense that about forty percent of Californians
(09:46):
voted for Donald Trump, and their voters just voted to
break their own constitution and have a redistricting happening right
now because they don't want to have Republicans represented there.
Speaker 4 (10:00):
Now.
Speaker 3 (10:00):
When you're talking about like our districts. I know two
of the three right off the top of my head
would be Joe Wilson and Russell Frye. Russell fries only
had one election he won that big time. He won
sixty five percent of the vote. Joe Wilson typically around
sixty percent of the vote as well, so he could
they could both lose a little bit of Republican support.
(10:21):
I think the thing that really ticks off a lot
of Republicans about James Cliburn is that he does represent
South Carolina, which is an overwhelmingly read state, and not
only is he elected year after year, he's like not
even challenged. He is like a king maker, is what
they call him. This guy's one of the most powerful
people in DC, and he shouldn't even be allowed to
(10:42):
be comfortable in his seat. It should at least feel
like he has to fight to keep it every year.
Because he doesn't feel like he has to fight for it,
he can be as liberal and as crazy as he
wants to be.
Speaker 5 (10:53):
You know, I again, I agree with you on all
those points, and I feel bad for the Republicans that
are in there that you're right, feel super defeated and
they don't come out and vote, which probably makes them,
which probably makes our dismal primary turnout what it is? Right,
because they they just think it's not it's not going
to make a difference. You know, I just were you know,
(11:15):
Russell Fry is solid and doing such a great job.
Now you bought of Russell's district.
Speaker 4 (11:21):
I guess I was thinking more it would be into
SD one.
Speaker 3 (11:25):
Well, yeah, I was thinking of it's warm seven and
Wilson's in two. Those would be the three that they
would be touching.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Now.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
I just looked up Nancy May. She won fifty eight
point two percent of the vote in the last election,
so and she I mean, I don't want to speak
ill of her specifically because you're on the phone, but
we have seen better candidates. But if she's winning about
sixty percent of the vote down there, that seems like
it's a pretty safe seat right now.
Speaker 4 (11:56):
Well, again, is it? Is it?
Speaker 5 (11:57):
Because in those districts and and I'm.
Speaker 4 (12:00):
Just I'm just throwing what if?
Speaker 5 (12:02):
Because I think when you start talking about these things,
there has to be a strategy involved in it, right,
So is it what happens or do they see the
Democrats and those districts not come out because they don't
feel like it's going to help. And what does that
do if you change the mix and the DNC comes
in and throws a bunch of money at those districts?
Speaker 1 (12:23):
Right? Like?
Speaker 5 (12:24):
Would that change the makeup of who shows up to vote?
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Like?
Speaker 5 (12:28):
That's why I'm saying, if you if we could put
all the numbers, and I hope somebody has done this,
and I in full clarity, I have not. I've just
kind of looked at the map and said, ooh, what
could happen here? But if if somebody could actually put
numbers to paper and figure out, you know, what makes
(12:49):
it a you know, a better you know, a better
district for us in a representative Cliburn's district Congressman Cliburn,
then I would say, Okay, let's do it if we can,
If we can, if we feel like we have done
the homework.
Speaker 4 (13:06):
But I would, I would.
Speaker 5 (13:09):
I would say that if we can't say that with
all certainty, we're gonna we're gonna end up having to
face the DNC and the money that they will bring
in to try to turn that around. So hey, we
can do it, and the data shows it. I'm a
data person.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Cliburn got one hundred and eighty two thousand and fifty
six votes in his last election, and Duke Buckner came
in second as the Republican with one hundred and twelve
three hundred and sixty votes, So he wins that district
about almost sixty forty. It was fifty nine and a
half percent to thirty seven percent, and then a bunch
of you know, independent people, United Citizens parties and those
types they divvied up the rest of it. But yeah,
(13:50):
I mean, it sure would be nice to at least
have Cliburn have to check his rhetoric a little bit
in order to win an election.
Speaker 5 (13:58):
These are one of these things that I just feel
proud that South Carolinas sent so many Republicans to help
out Donald Trump. You look at states like you mentioned Massachusetts,
and you think, like, how did it get that way? Democrats,
you know, they're they're you know, melting down over this
idea of Texas redistricting and states redistricting. But they've been
(14:21):
doing it for years. I mean, you see it in California,
see it in Massachusetts.
Speaker 4 (14:26):
They have been jerry mandering this to where.
Speaker 5 (14:30):
Republicans get no voice at the DC level. So I
think I think the Democrats should just sit back and
just realize that once again Donald Trump has brought to
the forefront uh and took the took the little off
all the shady things that they do.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
You know, one of the things I'm always pushing about
two things, water and electricity.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
UH.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
I was very excited to see where there are servers
now being built. I forget in which status in actually
has a cooling system that does not depend on sucking
mortar out from under the feet of South Carolinians into
deep into the aquifers, so that we're able to cool
these things with modern technology and cool its in the like.
But also that a lot of these server farms are
(15:17):
going to have their own self contained generation of power.
So I'm hoping that as we move forward, because we're
seeing these servers pop up everywhere, the server farms, that
we'll be able to take advantage of that and actually
legislate it so that we do protect our state's resources
and we are doing something to help with our energy
because we know the infrastructure so weak. Given that you
(15:40):
do not serve in the legislator, and we know that
as lieutenant governor, you're not the President of the Senate,
how are we going to be able to get these
legislat tours in line to have a long term vision,
because now we're reading about this, Santi Cooperdale is going
to end up costing us more more money than it
was first announced.
Speaker 5 (15:58):
First, let's talk about the cooling. So I was in
Spartanburg a few weeks ago. Data centers were a topic.
Spartanburg has a data center. It gives Spartanburg County the
second highest it's the second highest tax revenue generator in
the county. They rely strictly on natural gas. Their data
(16:23):
center does not rely on electricity, so it's not draining
on the grid, and it uses fans to do its
cool system instead of water. So that technology is being
in Spartanburg right here in South Carolina, So kudos kudos
to them for bringing all the latest technology. I was
in d about a month ago talking about this exact topic.
Speaker 4 (16:46):
We were hearing from a lot.
Speaker 5 (16:48):
Of experts in the field talking about how technology continues
to get better and better, and we are using less
and less electricity in data centers and less less water.
So the technology is really making a lot better environmentally
from all the reports that I heard. You know, Santi Cooper.
(17:12):
The good thing about Santy Cooper is the money that's
coming from the building, and we kind of saw that.
I don't know where the initial prices came from.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
We saw it in.
Speaker 5 (17:22):
Georgia where the prices were underestimated on the front end
because prices continued to go up to the permitting process.
But Santy Cooper's build this go around is coming with
all private investment dollars and not coming as a burden
to the taxpayers as the build is happening. So I
(17:43):
think there is a there's a couple differences and nuances
that didn't happen the very first time around. And I'm
glad you clarified that I'm not I don't preside over
the Senate, because some people that are running for governor
think that.
Speaker 3 (17:55):
I think that the.
Speaker 5 (17:56):
Lieutenant governor still presides over the Senate. I thought it
was kind of interesting and a bit comical.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
Talking with the attendant governor family Evatt. I saw a story,
I think this is News thirteen, the television thing about
the College of Charleston, and you're featured in it talking
about young conservatives are now on the move on college campuses.
Are you seeing that in person or is this just
something that you're reading about. What maybe where's this vibe
(18:23):
coming from that the young conservatives are back on the rise.
Speaker 5 (18:26):
So I was I was invited to speak at a
Turning Point event at the College of Charleston. I was
there last week and lots of young kids turned out
from the Citadel, from Charleston Southern, from the College of Charleston.
I mean, guys, we can turn on the TV and
see that kids and record numbers are showing up at
(18:48):
Turning Point events, that are showing up at Young Republican events.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
I think we have to seize.
Speaker 5 (18:55):
The moment that we have now as our kids on
college campuses have felt very bolden.
Speaker 4 (19:01):
Unfortunately, it took.
Speaker 5 (19:03):
The you know, the political assassination of Charlie Kirk to
make them stand up and say enough is enough. You know,
I think that we as adults have to now stand
behind them and stand with them. I can see as
I travel around the state the Young Republican groups are
getting bigger and bigger. So I feel like we are
(19:26):
at a point now where conservatives on campus aren't as
afraid as they used to be to stand up and say, hey,
this is who I am, this is what I believe.
Speaker 4 (19:36):
These are my.
Speaker 5 (19:37):
Conservative views, and you know what, these are my Christian values,
and I'm not going to be embarrassed to stand up
for them. And I'm not going to let you put
me down and cower and now say things that I
don't believe, or just really hide in the shadows because
I'm worried about being criticized. So I say kudos to
all the young people out there, and please to all
(19:58):
of us who embra our Christian ves and our conservative values,
stand with them and don't allow them to be bullied anymore.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
You know, again, given the point that we don't have
a very strong position for our governor has written in
the state constitution, we have long since heard criticism about
magistrate judges or circuit judges or the like. And now
we've even got new word this week. I didn't even realize.
As a South Carolinian born and raised, prior to nineteen
seventy three, legislators were not available and not nominated illegally,
(20:32):
they were not by law, they're not nominated to become
Supreme Court judges. We changed that, and now we got
yet another former legislator who wants to be on the
Supreme Court, probably will get the nod, and it just
seems that we're steeped more and more in this judicial corruption.
How do you, as a governor, not given that you
don't have the full authority, how do you get the
(20:55):
General Assembly to move on this so we can clean
this up? Because it just smells to high heaven.
Speaker 5 (21:00):
Well, you know, I always think, you know, that people's
perception becomes their reality, and the perception on legislators. You know,
we're only one of two states where the General Assemblies
the General Assemblies able to choose judges that serve on
the bunch. The governor and I for the last few
years have been talking about it.
Speaker 4 (21:21):
We believe that in South.
Speaker 5 (21:23):
Carolina we should change that, and we believe that the
governor should appoint and the General Assembly can confirm. Let's
base it on merits, you know, make sure that people
have the criteria or the skills that you know, we
want them to have. Let's agree on what that is,
and make sure they're term limited and that we have
(21:44):
a review process. Because we've seen around the country where
judges start off great and then all of a sudden,
you know, they come off the rails. We want judges
that will give maximum sentences for career politicians or career
politicians career criminals. Sometimes it can be both, right, sometimes
we've seen, as we've seen in a lot of levels,
(22:05):
sometimes they can be both. But we want to make
sure that they are giving these you know, maximum penalties
and put them in jail and get them off the streets.
And so I think that's something that South Carolinians want.
You know, you're right, the governor can't make that happen.
There are some candidates saying they can make it happen.
(22:26):
The governors should be able to advocate for this, but
the people of South Carolina have to reach out to
their elected officials in the General Assembly and say, all right,
enough is enough. This is not the look we want.
And we've seen that with other issues when people come up,
and I always say, reach out to your elected officials
and tell them what you want. Be graceful, be kind.
(22:49):
You know you don't have to do not send them
emails and call them names, and you know, threaten that
you're going to get them out of office. I mean,
have a real honest commerce station and say this is
just not a good look for the state. And then
let the General Assembly do the right thing.
Speaker 3 (23:05):
Talking with Pamela Evitt, Lieutenant Governor, and I'm not intentionally
trying to put you at odds with the governor, but
I'm a lot of us were perplexed last week when
Henry McMaster was asked about Scout Motors, and specifically Scout
Motors had decided to open their headquarters in Charlotte and
(23:26):
not here in north South Carolina, where we've given them
one point three billion dollars and incentives to be here,
and they are going to open up their plant and
they are going to employ thousands of people, and we
all understand that, but apparently the white collar jobs, the
big dollar jobs, they're all going to go to Charlotte.
And when he was asked about it, he said something
(23:46):
to the extent of it would have been nice to
have their headquarters in South Carolina, but we're a blue
collar manufacturing state, and that seems to really diminish. Like
the people coming out of Darlamore School, business is supposed
to be some of the finest executives in the world,
some of the best business brains on the planet Earth,
(24:06):
and the idea that they couldn't fill jobs here in
South Carolina with that seems rather insulting to a lot
of us.
Speaker 5 (24:13):
Well, I think that's that's very disappointing for me too.
Speaker 4 (24:16):
I think that's why.
Speaker 5 (24:17):
You know, let's face it, when it comes to advanced manufacturing,
South Carolina, we do it the best in the world.
And it's large in part to our amazing technical college system,
which you we've all talked about and how blessed we
are to have them here. But I'm very excited about
the diversification of opportunity here in South Carolina. You know,
(24:39):
I was down in Palmetto Bluff. I was on a
panel talking to life science community, whether it be research,
whether it be you know, innovation when it comes to
new techniques in the medical world, and these these companies
(25:00):
are looking at South Carolina and these are high paying jobs.
You see what's happening with University of South Carolina and
their Brain Center that's being built, you know, prepared to
do a lot of research where it comes to Parkinson's
and all timers and all brain related ailments. That brings
a lot of talent, a lot of white collar talent
(25:23):
to the table, keeping our best and brightest here. When
you look at what's happening with MUSC Children's Hospital, and
Saint Jude partnering up with them to bring research here
on brain tumors in children. I mean, these are all
great paying jobs. The world has seen that not only
(25:46):
can we build the coolest things in the world here
in South Carolina, but we have the talent to break
through to all different industries. And I've been talking a
lot about since I announced my run for governor, how
I see a big, bold dream for the state of
South Carolina. And I feel like our college and universities
(26:08):
are pumping out the best and brightest and that I
don't care what industry you're in, you're going to look
at South Carolina because of the talent we have here.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
Well, certainly we have been describing our American society and
certainly in the state of South Carolina, it's very divisive.
We're divided as we look forward to next week. Given
that you are not only a Clemson fan but a
Tiger mom, how is it that you're going to be
able to support the Tigers next Saturday while not being
concerned about losing your game? COG vote.
Speaker 5 (26:38):
Well, you know what, I say this all the time,
and you know I think you know. I saw you
guys at the well I saw Kelly. I don't know
about Jonathan, but I saw Kelly at the game Cat
game that I was at. You know, my daughter went
to USC School of Law, my son is at Clemson.
My husband's a Clemson guy. Now, I I consider myself
(27:01):
an equal opportunity tuition payer.
Speaker 4 (27:04):
So I paid tuition.
Speaker 5 (27:06):
I pay tuition or have at four different colleges undergraduate degrees,
technical college degrees, law degrees. So what I'm going to
do is I'm gonna I have decided to wear South
Carolina blue, and I.
Speaker 4 (27:21):
Am going to enjoy the game.
Speaker 5 (27:24):
I think it's actually gonna be a good game based
on both of our records, no matter what school you're
looking at. So I think we should all go there,
have a great time, enjoy our friends, and realize that
here in South Carolina, there's a lot of things we
disagree on, but we all love college football.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
And we all agree that our teams sucked this year because.
Speaker 5 (27:43):
No matter who we sha for see, I was being
kind mean, you guys went right for the jugular.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
Oh well, we're just trying to being we all agree.
Speaker 5 (27:55):
Let's can we disagree. We all love college football, make
it more pleasant. We don't add the divisiveness.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
Guys, don't add to that.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
Lieutenant Governor Pamela Abbott. The next time you're in Columbia,
I'm hoping that one day you'll actually come into the
studio for a visit. It's always good to have you
on the phone. We'd love to have you on that
microphone over there.
Speaker 5 (28:14):
Well, guys, I would love to do that. I know
on I'm going to have my team reach out to you,
and it won't happen unless we get it on the calendar.
So I'm going to have them reach out to you.
I look forward to sitting in the studio with you both.
I hope you all have a happy and blessed Thanksgiving.
And to all of your listeners, please have a happy
Thanksgiving and count the blessings you have. And most of
(28:36):
those blessings are going to be sitting right around your
Thanksgiving table. I know mine will be well.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Happy Thanksgiving.
Speaker 5 (28:43):
Happy Thanksgiving, guys, and go Tigers, Go game Cocks.
Speaker 4 (28:47):
I mean, yes, well, what about this Saturday.
Speaker 5 (28:55):
We have Clemston playing Furman, we have USC playing Coastal
Like we're just playing all of our own teams this week,
so you know what South Carolina teams are going to
be winning this week.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
That's awesome. That's why we're winners.
Speaker 4 (29:09):
That's right, Thank you, Thanks guys,
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Jonathan Rush James Comer apparently made the representation on the
floor of the House that I sat down with Jeffrey Epstein,
had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein, have contributions from Jeffrey Epstein.
He's a stone cold liar.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
Kelly Nash the keem Jeffrey's campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
That's what we found in the last document Back.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
And Kelly Show WOC.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
You can't help but feel sorry going into Thanksgiving week
for a lot of these House and Senate staffers who
will be in DC, not at home enjoying a Thanksgiving
meal with their family, because they've got a mountain of
documents to pour through to make sure that they get
their political ankles out for their House and Senate members.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
You know, the I feel like we're watching pro wrestling America.
America really does not have our priorities straight. The public
is demanding this Epstein thing. Okay, the public would like
to think that there's some sort of you know, rich,
(01:08):
powerful cabal behind the scenes where there's all these billionaires
and trillionaires and they're having not only sex with underage girls,
but then Epstein is blackmailing these people in order to
do unspeakable things on his behalf as well. That's what
they would like to think is happening, and that's why
they're over lessed. Poll I saw from Maris had something
(01:29):
like ninety four percent of Americans demand that it be released.
Donald First off, remember Dan Bongino made his name off
of saying there was going to be stuff in there
and we were all going to be shocked. And then
Dan Bongino got in there and he looked at it
and he had to come out and have one of
the most awkward interviews you've ever seen in history when
him and Cash Bettel were like, we really thought there
was stuff in there. There's nothing there. There is no
(01:51):
more information. All the information has already been released. Now
they keep putting out document dumps. We got so far,
we've had I think fifty five thousand documents have been
released regarding the Epstein thing, and we've learned not a
damn thing. And now there's gonna be We have thirty
days now to get the rest of it out, whatever
is left behind, and you're not gonna find anything else.
(02:13):
I mean, the names have been named, like the guy
from Harvard, Larry Summers. We all knew about that. That
wasn't new. I'm surprised he resigned. We all knew about
Bill Clinton. There's nothing new there. There's nothing new with
any of these people, So don't I think everyone now
the fact that you get almost one hundred percent of
(02:35):
both the House and the Senate. One guy said he
wasn't gonna vote for it. Very principled guy said, I
don't want innocent names being released and doing damage. But
other than that, when you have one hundred percent on something,
you already know that it's a uniparty, you know that
they're in on it together. And then the fact that
the uniparty could not convict Plasket of doing something at
(02:59):
least uns seemly. That's the level for a censure. Are
you doing something unseemly because you knew? In twenty eighteen,
the front page of the Miami Herald interviewed fifty Epstein victims.
Six months later, you're now texting with him. How can
we get Donald Trump? That is at least unseemly. You
(03:20):
became his hand puppet. Jeffrey Epstein put his hand up
your tush and said, do what I tell you to do.
You say what I tell you to say, and she
did it and they couldn't get a censure on her.
Ralph Norman's the one who brought it up, and they could.
He sent me a text last night. He can't believe
it either. I cannot believe how weak the Republican Party
has become.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
Unless he was sexting, according to Crockett, then you might
have a you might have a bone to pick if
they were sexting together, all right, But certainly we understand
whether the American public would come to the conclusion given
that we have seen the sweetheart deal initially from the
Epstein will go through the whole list of things, and
then then the absence of information, you have conspiracy theories.
Now with the Internet set on fire, so there's plenty
(04:01):
of opportunity for people to get their appetite wet, but
they can never get seemingly enough water to calm it.
Because you have the information available, and now it's available,
and now we're gonna see more and more information as
they pour over it next week, and the poor staffers
in the DC House and Senate chambers will be or
in their offices will be locked in.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
But think about what you're saying, though, because John F. Kennedy,
it's all out there now. They ran on that. Here
comes all the Kennedy secrets. What did we learn? Not
a flipping thing. They got it right. In nineteen sixty
three he was shot by one dude. Was it a
magic bullet? I guess. So that's what the information shows,
(04:42):
what you've seen on Epstein. They're gonna put it all
out in about thirty days, forty days from now, we're
gonna hear that's not it, It can't be it.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
This is it.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
This is all you got. There's no more.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
Pote in is is now? You get it now, this
is what the public wanted. You're gonna get it.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
But they're gonna say we didn't get it that' so
they're going to say Trump held it back. Trump and
Pam Bondi conspired in order to So this is going
to make Trump look bad in the long run.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
All right, Hey, going a second, we got to go
to the hotline. Kelly Nash. Welcome on the phone, our
Lieutenant Governor Pamela Ethic. Good morning, Hey, good.
Speaker 5 (05:13):
Morning, good morning, my friends. Are you all getting ready?
One week from today is Turkey Day, Happy Thanksgiving because
I won't be tucking to you guys next week.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
Yeah. No, We're gonna have a short week like so
many other people. You guys have got any big plans
for you.
Speaker 5 (05:29):
I am cooking for twenty two people.
Speaker 4 (05:33):
At my house.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Wait a minute, you're cooking. You didn't say I'm running
for governor. For God's sake, somebody else cooked this.
Speaker 5 (05:40):
No, you know as a mom, it's kind of my
happy place. Like on Wednesday, I'll start baking all my
pies and I make an amazing butterscotch bunk cake, and
my uh I start, I start pre mixing all my
size and putting them in the refrigerator. And I'll wake
up right and early on Thanksgiving morning, put my turkey
(06:00):
in the roaster. Stuff it, put it in the roaster.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
And if there were you on the campaign trail, behind
the bus will be the Pamela Abbot food truck. I
want to taste that.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
You're trying to raise some money for the campaign. You
can have a bank sale.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
Now that's a great idea. Okay, now, okay, so let
me ask you look at me asking the question to
say favorite side. I've been hearing this question get asked
all over, So tell me both. What is your favorite
Thanksgiving side?
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Well, I'm kind of boring. I'm actually like a fan
of spinach, so if I can just get like some
steamed spinach, I love that. But I know everybody else
goes with green bean castrole.
Speaker 5 (06:45):
I know, I do know. I like green beans. I'm
not the big green bean casserole fan because I can
get a little mashey, So I'm with you on that.
Speaker 4 (06:52):
But spinach.
Speaker 5 (06:53):
That is the first time I've heard spinach as a
favorite side. So there you go, You're unique. I like that.
Speaker 3 (06:59):
My doctor actually said I need to back off on
the spinach because I have too much iron in my blood. Wow.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Wow, my doctor's never said that to me. My doctor
said cut back on the macaroni and cheese. So that's yeah,
I'm not doing that this Thanksgiving either. That's probably don't
invite my doctor to my house for Thanksgiving. Let's talk
about being on the campaign trail as the lieutenant governor
but also in particular running for the governor's office, and
(07:26):
let's talk. I want to ask you specifically first about
one of the things making the news this week, but
the redistricting. What are you thinking about the possibility? And
it was brought up by another candidate running for governor,
but also now it's being picked up by the Freedom
Caucus and actually now presented as a redistricting to make
sure everybody has an opportunity to vote for someone else
(07:46):
other than James Clyburn.
Speaker 5 (07:48):
Well, you know what Politico had asked me this question too,
and I'm going to tell you guys, exact question to them.
If you can guarantee me by breaking up that one
district that we're not gonna put any other districts that risk.
I am all for it, but I would be I
would you know, I'm an accountant, so I kind of
look at the numbers. I don't know how you slice
(08:11):
that up, and you would definitely have to take You'd
be taking conservative votes from two other districts, right, you
would be giving those districts more blue votes, So you'd
be purpling three districts. And I think the DNC would
love nothing more than to dump a pile of money
(08:35):
into South Carolina. Now, I'm just talking strategy, I'm not
talking feelings. Right, Let's talk facts and then we can
talk feelings. The facts are that the Democrats would come
in and look to really try to pump a lot
of money into getting more representation from South Carolina, right,
(08:58):
So that would scare me a little bit. If you
could show me facts wise how you could cut that
up and we would have a clean sweep on Republicans,
I would lead the band on that. Anything I can
do to make sure that the president has more representation
in DC by Republicans, I would do well. Facts. Now,
(09:22):
you know, we want to talk feelings. Let's figure out
what we're talking about.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
We're talking with our Lieutenant Governor, Pamela Evitt and the
idea of redistricting. We do live in a sixty to
forty state, meaning about sixty percent of South Carolinians voted
for Trump, forty percent voted for Kamala Harris. It's the
exact opposite in Massachusetts, and in Massachusetts they haven't had
a Republican representative in many, many years. California is very
similar in the sense that about forty percent of Californians
(09:46):
voted for Donald Trump, and their voters just voted to
break their own constitution and have a redistricting happening right
now because they don't want to have Republicans represented there.
Speaker 4 (10:00):
Now.
Speaker 3 (10:00):
When you're talking about like our districts. I know two
of the three right off the top of my head
would be Joe Wilson and Russell Frye. Russell fries only
had one election he won that big time. He won
sixty five percent of the vote. Joe Wilson typically around
sixty percent of the vote as well, so he could
they could both lose a little bit of Republican support.
(10:21):
I think the thing that really ticks off a lot
of Republicans about James Cliburn is that he does represent
South Carolina, which is an overwhelmingly read state, and not
only is he elected year after year, he's like not
even challenged. He is like a king maker, is what
they call him. This guy's one of the most powerful
people in DC, and he shouldn't even be allowed to
(10:42):
be comfortable in his seat. It should at least feel
like he has to fight to keep it every year.
Because he doesn't feel like he has to fight for it,
he can be as liberal and as crazy as he
wants to be.
Speaker 5 (10:53):
You know, I again, I agree with you on all
those points, and I feel bad for the Republicans that
are in there that you're right, feel super defeated and
they don't come out and vote, which probably makes them,
which probably makes our dismal primary turnout what it is? Right,
because they they just think it's not it's not going
to make a difference. You know, I just were you know,
(11:15):
Russell Fry is solid and doing such a great job.
Now you bought of Russell's district.
Speaker 4 (11:21):
I guess I was thinking more it would be into
SD one.
Speaker 3 (11:25):
Well, yeah, I was thinking of it's warm seven and
Wilson's in two. Those would be the three that they
would be touching.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Now.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
I just looked up Nancy May. She won fifty eight
point two percent of the vote in the last election,
so and she I mean, I don't want to speak
ill of her specifically because you're on the phone, but
we have seen better candidates. But if she's winning about
sixty percent of the vote down there, that seems like
it's a pretty safe seat right now.
Speaker 4 (11:56):
Well, again, is it? Is it?
Speaker 5 (11:57):
Because in those districts and and I'm.
Speaker 4 (12:00):
Just I'm just throwing what if?
Speaker 5 (12:02):
Because I think when you start talking about these things,
there has to be a strategy involved in it, right,
So is it what happens or do they see the
Democrats and those districts not come out because they don't
feel like it's going to help. And what does that
do if you change the mix and the DNC comes
in and throws a bunch of money at those districts?
Speaker 1 (12:23):
Right? Like?
Speaker 5 (12:24):
Would that change the makeup of who shows up to vote?
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Like?
Speaker 5 (12:28):
That's why I'm saying, if you if we could put
all the numbers, and I hope somebody has done this,
and I in full clarity, I have not. I've just
kind of looked at the map and said, ooh, what
could happen here? But if if somebody could actually put
numbers to paper and figure out, you know, what makes
(12:49):
it a you know, a better you know, a better
district for us in a representative Cliburn's district Congressman Cliburn,
then I would say, Okay, let's do it if we can,
If we can, if we feel like we have done
the homework.
Speaker 4 (13:06):
But I would, I would.
Speaker 5 (13:09):
I would say that if we can't say that with
all certainty, we're gonna we're gonna end up having to
face the DNC and the money that they will bring
in to try to turn that around. So hey, we
can do it, and the data shows it. I'm a
data person.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Cliburn got one hundred and eighty two thousand and fifty
six votes in his last election, and Duke Buckner came
in second as the Republican with one hundred and twelve
three hundred and sixty votes, So he wins that district
about almost sixty forty. It was fifty nine and a
half percent to thirty seven percent, and then a bunch
of you know, independent people, United Citizens parties and those
types they divvied up the rest of it. But yeah,
(13:50):
I mean, it sure would be nice to at least
have Cliburn have to check his rhetoric a little bit
in order to win an election.
Speaker 5 (13:58):
These are one of these things that I just feel
proud that South Carolinas sent so many Republicans to help
out Donald Trump. You look at states like you mentioned Massachusetts,
and you think, like, how did it get that way? Democrats,
you know, they're they're you know, melting down over this
idea of Texas redistricting and states redistricting. But they've been
(14:21):
doing it for years. I mean, you see it in California,
see it in Massachusetts.
Speaker 4 (14:26):
They have been jerry mandering this to where.
Speaker 5 (14:30):
Republicans get no voice at the DC level. So I
think I think the Democrats should just sit back and
just realize that once again Donald Trump has brought to
the forefront uh and took the took the little off
all the shady things that they do.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
You know, one of the things I'm always pushing about
two things, water and electricity.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
UH.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
I was very excited to see where there are servers
now being built. I forget in which status in actually
has a cooling system that does not depend on sucking
mortar out from under the feet of South Carolinians into
deep into the aquifers, so that we're able to cool
these things with modern technology and cool its in the like.
But also that a lot of these server farms are
(15:17):
going to have their own self contained generation of power.
So I'm hoping that as we move forward, because we're
seeing these servers pop up everywhere, the server farms, that
we'll be able to take advantage of that and actually
legislate it so that we do protect our state's resources
and we are doing something to help with our energy
because we know the infrastructure so weak. Given that you
(15:40):
do not serve in the legislator, and we know that
as lieutenant governor, you're not the President of the Senate,
how are we going to be able to get these
legislat tours in line to have a long term vision,
because now we're reading about this, Santi Cooperdale is going
to end up costing us more more money than it
was first announced.
Speaker 5 (15:58):
First, let's talk about the cooling. So I was in
Spartanburg a few weeks ago. Data centers were a topic.
Spartanburg has a data center. It gives Spartanburg County the
second highest it's the second highest tax revenue generator in
the county. They rely strictly on natural gas. Their data
(16:23):
center does not rely on electricity, so it's not draining
on the grid, and it uses fans to do its
cool system instead of water. So that technology is being
in Spartanburg right here in South Carolina, So kudos kudos
to them for bringing all the latest technology. I was
in d about a month ago talking about this exact topic.
Speaker 4 (16:46):
We were hearing from a lot.
Speaker 5 (16:48):
Of experts in the field talking about how technology continues
to get better and better, and we are using less
and less electricity in data centers and less less water.
So the technology is really making a lot better environmentally
from all the reports that I heard. You know, Santi Cooper.
(17:12):
The good thing about Santy Cooper is the money that's
coming from the building, and we kind of saw that.
I don't know where the initial prices came from.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
We saw it in.
Speaker 5 (17:22):
Georgia where the prices were underestimated on the front end
because prices continued to go up to the permitting process.
But Santy Cooper's build this go around is coming with
all private investment dollars and not coming as a burden
to the taxpayers as the build is happening. So I
(17:43):
think there is a there's a couple differences and nuances
that didn't happen the very first time around. And I'm
glad you clarified that I'm not I don't preside over
the Senate, because some people that are running for governor
think that.
Speaker 3 (17:55):
I think that the.
Speaker 5 (17:56):
Lieutenant governor still presides over the Senate. I thought it
was kind of interesting and a bit comical.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
Talking with the attendant governor family Evatt. I saw a story,
I think this is News thirteen, the television thing about
the College of Charleston, and you're featured in it talking
about young conservatives are now on the move on college campuses.
Are you seeing that in person or is this just
something that you're reading about. What maybe where's this vibe
(18:23):
coming from that the young conservatives are back on the rise.
Speaker 5 (18:26):
So I was I was invited to speak at a
Turning Point event at the College of Charleston. I was
there last week and lots of young kids turned out
from the Citadel, from Charleston Southern, from the College of Charleston.
I mean, guys, we can turn on the TV and
see that kids and record numbers are showing up at
(18:48):
Turning Point events, that are showing up at Young Republican events.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
I think we have to seize.
Speaker 5 (18:55):
The moment that we have now as our kids on
college campuses have felt very bolden.
Speaker 4 (19:01):
Unfortunately, it took.
Speaker 5 (19:03):
The you know, the political assassination of Charlie Kirk to
make them stand up and say enough is enough. You know,
I think that we as adults have to now stand
behind them and stand with them. I can see as
I travel around the state the Young Republican groups are
getting bigger and bigger. So I feel like we are
(19:26):
at a point now where conservatives on campus aren't as
afraid as they used to be to stand up and say, hey,
this is who I am, this is what I believe.
Speaker 4 (19:36):
These are my.
Speaker 5 (19:37):
Conservative views, and you know what, these are my Christian values,
and I'm not going to be embarrassed to stand up
for them. And I'm not going to let you put
me down and cower and now say things that I
don't believe, or just really hide in the shadows because
I'm worried about being criticized. So I say kudos to
all the young people out there, and please to all
(19:58):
of us who embra our Christian ves and our conservative values,
stand with them and don't allow them to be bullied anymore.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
You know, again, given the point that we don't have
a very strong position for our governor has written in
the state constitution, we have long since heard criticism about
magistrate judges or circuit judges or the like. And now
we've even got new word this week. I didn't even realize.
As a South Carolinian born and raised, prior to nineteen
seventy three, legislators were not available and not nominated illegally,
(20:32):
they were not by law, they're not nominated to become
Supreme Court judges. We changed that, and now we got
yet another former legislator who wants to be on the
Supreme Court, probably will get the nod, and it just
seems that we're steeped more and more in this judicial corruption.
How do you, as a governor, not given that you
don't have the full authority, how do you get the
(20:55):
General Assembly to move on this so we can clean
this up? Because it just smells to high heaven.
Speaker 5 (21:00):
Well, you know, I always think, you know, that people's
perception becomes their reality, and the perception on legislators. You know,
we're only one of two states where the General Assemblies
the General Assemblies able to choose judges that serve on
the bunch. The governor and I for the last few
years have been talking about it.
Speaker 4 (21:21):
We believe that in South.
Speaker 5 (21:23):
Carolina we should change that, and we believe that the
governor should appoint and the General Assembly can confirm. Let's
base it on merits, you know, make sure that people
have the criteria or the skills that you know, we
want them to have. Let's agree on what that is,
and make sure they're term limited and that we have
(21:44):
a review process. Because we've seen around the country where
judges start off great and then all of a sudden,
you know, they come off the rails. We want judges
that will give maximum sentences for career politicians or career
politicians career criminals. Sometimes it can be both, right, sometimes
we've seen, as we've seen in a lot of levels,
(22:05):
sometimes they can be both. But we want to make
sure that they are giving these you know, maximum penalties
and put them in jail and get them off the streets.
And so I think that's something that South Carolinians want.
You know, you're right, the governor can't make that happen.
There are some candidates saying they can make it happen.
(22:26):
The governors should be able to advocate for this, but
the people of South Carolina have to reach out to
their elected officials in the General Assembly and say, all right,
enough is enough. This is not the look we want.
And we've seen that with other issues when people come up,
and I always say, reach out to your elected officials
and tell them what you want. Be graceful, be kind.
(22:49):
You know you don't have to do not send them
emails and call them names, and you know, threaten that
you're going to get them out of office. I mean,
have a real honest commerce station and say this is
just not a good look for the state. And then
let the General Assembly do the right thing.
Speaker 3 (23:05):
Talking with Pamela Evitt, Lieutenant Governor, and I'm not intentionally
trying to put you at odds with the governor, but
I'm a lot of us were perplexed last week when
Henry McMaster was asked about Scout Motors, and specifically Scout
Motors had decided to open their headquarters in Charlotte and
(23:26):
not here in north South Carolina, where we've given them
one point three billion dollars and incentives to be here,
and they are going to open up their plant and
they are going to employ thousands of people, and we
all understand that, but apparently the white collar jobs, the
big dollar jobs, they're all going to go to Charlotte.
And when he was asked about it, he said something
(23:46):
to the extent of it would have been nice to
have their headquarters in South Carolina, but we're a blue
collar manufacturing state, and that seems to really diminish. Like
the people coming out of Darlamore School, business is supposed
to be some of the finest executives in the world,
some of the best business brains on the planet Earth,
(24:06):
and the idea that they couldn't fill jobs here in
South Carolina with that seems rather insulting to a lot
of us.
Speaker 5 (24:13):
Well, I think that's that's very disappointing for me too.
Speaker 4 (24:16):
I think that's why.
Speaker 5 (24:17):
You know, let's face it, when it comes to advanced manufacturing,
South Carolina, we do it the best in the world.
And it's large in part to our amazing technical college system,
which you we've all talked about and how blessed we
are to have them here. But I'm very excited about
the diversification of opportunity here in South Carolina. You know,
(24:39):
I was down in Palmetto Bluff. I was on a
panel talking to life science community, whether it be research,
whether it be you know, innovation when it comes to
new techniques in the medical world, and these these companies
(25:00):
are looking at South Carolina and these are high paying jobs.
You see what's happening with University of South Carolina and
their Brain Center that's being built, you know, prepared to
do a lot of research where it comes to Parkinson's
and all timers and all brain related ailments. That brings
a lot of talent, a lot of white collar talent
(25:23):
to the table, keeping our best and brightest here. When
you look at what's happening with MUSC Children's Hospital, and
Saint Jude partnering up with them to bring research here
on brain tumors in children. I mean, these are all
great paying jobs. The world has seen that not only
(25:46):
can we build the coolest things in the world here
in South Carolina, but we have the talent to break
through to all different industries. And I've been talking a
lot about since I announced my run for governor, how
I see a big, bold dream for the state of
South Carolina. And I feel like our college and universities
(26:08):
are pumping out the best and brightest and that I
don't care what industry you're in, you're going to look
at South Carolina because of the talent we have here.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
Well, certainly we have been describing our American society and
certainly in the state of South Carolina, it's very divisive.
We're divided as we look forward to next week. Given
that you are not only a Clemson fan but a
Tiger mom, how is it that you're going to be
able to support the Tigers next Saturday while not being
concerned about losing your game? COG vote.
Speaker 5 (26:38):
Well, you know what, I say this all the time,
and you know I think you know. I saw you
guys at the well I saw Kelly. I don't know
about Jonathan, but I saw Kelly at the game Cat
game that I was at. You know, my daughter went
to USC School of Law, my son is at Clemson.
My husband's a Clemson guy. Now, I I consider myself
(27:01):
an equal opportunity tuition payer.
Speaker 4 (27:04):
So I paid tuition.
Speaker 5 (27:06):
I pay tuition or have at four different colleges undergraduate degrees,
technical college degrees, law degrees. So what I'm going to
do is I'm gonna I have decided to wear South
Carolina blue, and I.
Speaker 4 (27:21):
Am going to enjoy the game.
Speaker 5 (27:24):
I think it's actually gonna be a good game based
on both of our records, no matter what school you're
looking at. So I think we should all go there,
have a great time, enjoy our friends, and realize that
here in South Carolina, there's a lot of things we
disagree on, but we all love college football.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
And we all agree that our teams sucked this year because.
Speaker 5 (27:43):
No matter who we sha for see, I was being
kind mean, you guys went right for the jugular.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
Oh well, we're just trying to being we all agree.
Speaker 5 (27:55):
Let's can we disagree. We all love college football, make
it more pleasant. We don't add the divisiveness.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
Guys, don't add to that.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
Lieutenant Governor Pamela Abbott. The next time you're in Columbia,
I'm hoping that one day you'll actually come into the
studio for a visit. It's always good to have you
on the phone. We'd love to have you on that
microphone over there.
Speaker 5 (28:14):
Well, guys, I would love to do that. I know
on I'm going to have my team reach out to you,
and it won't happen unless we get it on the calendar.
So I'm going to have them reach out to you.
I look forward to sitting in the studio with you both.
I hope you all have a happy and blessed Thanksgiving.
And to all of your listeners, please have a happy
Thanksgiving and count the blessings you have. And most of
(28:36):
those blessings are going to be sitting right around your
Thanksgiving table. I know mine will be well.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Happy Thanksgiving.
Speaker 5 (28:43):
Happy Thanksgiving, guys, and go Tigers, Go game Cocks.
Speaker 4 (28:47):
I mean, yes, well, what about this Saturday.
Speaker 5 (28:55):
We have Clemston playing Furman, we have USC playing Coastal
Like we're just playing all of our own teams this week,
so you know what South Carolina teams are going to
be winning this week.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
That's awesome. That's why we're winners.
Speaker 4 (29:09):
That's right, Thank you, Thanks guys,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Betrayal: Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a brand new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack. And make sure to check out Seasons 1-4 of Betrayal, along with Betrayal Weekly Season 1.