Inside The ASQA IQ Update: Risks, RPL, And Real Oversight

Compliance isn’t a mystery box; it’s a system you can see, test, and improve. We take you inside the latest ASCA IQ update and unpack what it really asks of RTOs ahead of the 2025 standards: equivalent quality for international delivery, marketing that matches reality, RPL that stands up to scrutiny, and student monitoring that proves learning is happening.

We start with the high‑risk areas the regulator is calling out. International delivery has to mirror domestic standards, with documented third‑party agreements, clear supervision, escalation points, and proof that online platforms enable real engagement, practice, and assessment. We talk through how to verify placements offshore, support language and digital needs from day one, and demonstrate trainer feedback and skill progression when supervision is remote.

From there, we zero in on marketing and recruitment. No more vague promises or blurred fee details. We share how to align course codes, licensing info, refund terms, and all additional costs with the national register, and why a structured pre‑training review beats pressure recruitment every time. Then we dig into RPL: mapping that makes sense, sufficient and current evidence, assessor comments that explain decisions, and validation that keeps outcomes consistent across assessors and partners. If gaps exist, gap train—don’t shortcut.

We round things out with student progression, attendance, and governance. You’ll hear how to link scheduled hours to delivery, supervise practice online, document early interventions, and set clear rules for at‑risk students. On governance, we outline what active oversight looks like: reading compliance reports, tracking finances, testing controls, and updating risk registers. To make it actionable, we finish with a practical checklist: marketing audit, deep RPL review, monitoring system overhaul, third‑party and international mapping, and a refreshed risk register with real controls.

If this helps sharpen your systems, follow the show, share it with your quality team, and leave a quick review so others can find it.

Send us a text

Support the show

Thank you for tuning in to the RTO Superhero Podcast!

We’re excited to have you join us as we focus on the Revised Standards for RTOs in 2025. Together, we’ll explore key changes, compliance strategies, and actionable insights to help your RTO thrive under the new standards.

Stay connected with the RTO Community:

• RTO Job Board Facebook
• RTO Job Board LinkedIn
• RTO Community Facebook

📌 Don’t forget to:
✔ Subscribe to the RTO Superhero Podcast so you never miss an episode!
✔ Share this episode with your RTO network—compliance is a team effort!

🎙 Listen now and get ahead of the compliance changes before it’s too late!

📢 Want even more compliance insights? Subscribe to our EduStream YouTube Channel for our FAQ series on the New Standards for RTOs 2025! 🎥

🔗 Subscribe now: EduStream by Vivacity Coaching

✉️ Email us at [e-mail]
📞 Call us on 1300 729 455
🖥️ Visit us at vivacity.com.au

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_00 (00:46):
Welcome to the RTO Superhero Podcast.
Today's episode breaks down thelatest ASCA IQ update in depth.
This issue covers a wide span ofcompliance pressure points, and
each point signals realexpectations for RTOs under the
2025 standards.
The update is dense, detailed,and strategic.

(01:10):
This episode expands every themeso your systems can match the
level of scrutiny ASCOR isapplying.
Settle in because there is a lotto cover.
The first major theme isinternational delivery.
ASCA highlights a rapid rise inrisk across the sector.
This rise includes weakoversight of offshore training,

(01:32):
unclear third-party controls,gaps in supervision, and missing
evidence of equivalency indelivery.
ASCA notes that someorganizations still treat
international delivery as aseparate or lower risk stream.
It is not.
International students mustreceive the same level of

(01:55):
training, assessment, supportand oversight as domestic
learners.
If delivery occurs offshore, theorganization must show clear
control over the service.
This includes documentedagreements, mapped
responsibilities, access totrainers, monitoring systems,

(02:16):
escalation points, and evidenceof how issues are resolved.
No part of the arrangement canbe left vague.
ASCA has seen cases wherepartners deliver most of the
service with little supervision.
This is a direct governancerisk.
It breaches the newaccountability and risk

(02:38):
management standards.
The organization must show thatit owns every part of the
service.
It must show how each risk iscontrolled, tested, and
reviewed.
Another part of theinternational delivery focus is
student experience.
ASCA highlights cases whereinternational students receive

(02:59):
limited support, uncleartimetables, and inconsistent
information about attendancerules.
Support services must beaccessible, relevant, and
timely.
Language, literacy, and digitalneeds must be addressed before
enrolment and throughoutdelivery.
If offshore delivery usesdigital platforms, the

(03:23):
organization must show that theplatform allows meaningful
engagement, real practice, andreal assessment.
If supervision is remote, theevidence must show how trainers
observe performance, providefeedback, and check skill
progression.
If students require placement,the organization must verify

(03:45):
that placement environments meetthe training product
requirements.
International delivery cannotrely on assumptions.
It must be documented,monitored, and aligned to the
same standard as every domesticprogram.
The second theme in the updateis marketing and recruitment.

(04:06):
ASCA reports an increase inmisleading claims, unclear fee
structures, and vagueinformation about pathways.
The update warns against anymessage that suggests rapid
completion, guaranteed outcomesor shortcuts around volume of
learning.
Marketing must match reality.

(04:28):
It must show accurate codes andtitles.
It must use correct licensinginformation from the relevant
industry regulator.
It must provide clear feedetails, refund terms, payment
schedules, and any additionalcosts that a student may face.
This includes materials,equipment, software, travel, and

(04:51):
placement expenses.
If a third party promotes thecourse, the organisation owns
the message.
Every detail must match thenational register and the
organization's own scope.
Incorrect claims lead tobreaches of information and
transparency and can also leadto regulatory action for

(05:12):
misleading conduct.
One of the biggest risks in theupdate is pressure recruitment.
ASCA notes cases whererecruiters push students to
enrol without explainingworkload, attendance
expectations or support needs.
The new standards requirepre-training review that checks
skills, digital readiness andsuitability for the

(05:35):
qualification.
This is not just an LLN tool.
It is a structured review ofwhether the student can meet the
course demands.
If the student needs extrasupport, the organization must
provide it and document it.
If a qualification is notsuitable, the organization must

(05:55):
advise the student beforeenrolment.
The update makes it clear thatpoor recruitment feeds poor
outcomes and poor outcomessignal systemic risk.
The third theme is recognitionof prior learning.
ASCA highlights widespreadissues in RPL practice.

(06:15):
Common problems include missingevidence, poor mapping, quick
decisions, unclear assessorcomments, and inconsistent
outcomes.
RPL must meet the same standardas any assessment.
It must comply with theprinciples of assessment and the
rules of evidence.
The decision must be fair,flexible, valid, and reliable.

(06:40):
Evidence must be sufficient,current, and authentic.
If evidence is incomplete, theorganization must not issue the
unit.
If gaps exist, the student musthave the chance to complete gap
training.
The update warns againsttreating RPL as a fast track to

(07:00):
completion.
This practice harms students,workplaces, and the integrity of
the VET system.
The outcome standards requirerigorous judgment.
Records must show how theassessor reached the decision.
If multiple assessors assess thesame unit, outcomes must be
consistent.

(07:21):
Where third parties areinvolved, oversight must be
strong.
The organization must validateRPL decisions and adjust tools
where issues appear.
A deeper point in the update isconsistency of evidence.
ASCA notes that some RPL filesuse evidence that is outdated or

(07:43):
irrelevant.
Currency is critical.
Evidence must show currentcapability.
If the evidence is from anindustry that has changed
significantly since the work wascompleted, the assessor must
check that the skills stillmatch the training product.
If the student holds overseasqualifications, the organization

(08:07):
must confirm alignment withAustralian standards.
This includes safety,legislation, and industry
requirements.
RPL decisions must never rely onjob titles or assumptions.
They must rely on evidence.
The next major theme is studentprogression and attendance.

(08:28):
ASCA highlights gaps inattendance logs, inconsistent
tracking of progress, poorintervention records, and
missing evidence of trainerfeedback.
Under the 2025 standards,progress must be monitored
through structured systems.
Each student must receive enoughtime for instruction, practice,

(08:50):
application, and feedback.
If students fall behind, theorganisation must act early.
Intervention must be documented.
If a student needs extra time,additional support or a modified
schedule, the organisation mustrecord this.
If the student disengages, theorganization must follow its

(09:13):
policy, notify relevant parties,and ensure fairness in its
approach.
Attendance is also linked totraining design.
ASCA highlights cases wherescheduled delivery hours do not
match the actual hoursdelivered.
If the delivery mode claimssupervised learning, students

(09:34):
must receive supervisedlearning.
If the schedule claims setpractice hours, those hours must
exist.
If the course uses onlinedelivery, the organization must
show how practice is supervisedand how engagement is monitored.
Attendance is not just aformality.

(09:56):
It forms part of the trainingand assessment strategy.
It must be accurate, consistent,and traceable.
The update also covers a widerset of issues across the sector.
This includes incompletetraining plans, outdated
learning materials, missingplacement agreements, limited

(10:16):
industry engagement, and weakassessment validation.
Every one of these issuesconnects directly to the new
outcome standards.
Training must be engaging andstructured.
Assessment must be fit forpurpose.
Work placements must meet therequirements of the training
product.

(10:36):
Industry engagement must informdelivery.
Continuous improvement must usedata, feedback, and validation
outcomes.
The update also highlightsgovernance.
Governing persons mustunderstand risks, track
finances, manage third parties,and oversee quality.
They must have access toaccurate information.

(10:59):
They must review compliancereports, student data,
validation outcomes, and riskregisters.
They must take action whenissues appear.
The new standards are clear.
Governance cannot be passive.
It must be active, present, andaccountable.
Now let's move through practicalsteps.

(11:22):
Start with a full marketingreview.
Check every public message.
If anything is unclear, correctit.
If any third party promotes yourcourses, check their content
too.
Update your marketing register.
Record your checks.
This aligns with information andtransparency.

(11:42):
Next, run a deep RPL audit.
Select a sample of files frommultiple training products.
Check the mapping.
Check the evidence.
Check assessor comments.
Fix any issues.
Update your RPL tools if needed.
Strengthen your guidance forassessors.
This aligns with assessment andRPL standards.

(12:05):
Then review your studentmonitoring system.
Check your attendance records.
Check progress logs.
Check trainer feedback comments.
Check how interventions arerecorded.
Create clear rules for when astudent is considered at risk.
Train staff on these rules.
This aligns with trainingsupport and student progress

(12:26):
monitoring.
If you deliver internationallyor through third parties, map
the entire delivery chain.
Check agreements, supervisionstructures, escalation processes
and reporting.
Check whether partners providethe same quality of delivery.
Schedule regular reviews.
Document every step.

(12:48):
This aligns with governance andthird party oversight.
Finally, review your riskregister.
Add items for misleadingmarketing, poor RPL, weak
attendance systems,international delivery risk, and
any gaps identified throughinternal audits.
Assign controls, review themoften.

(13:10):
The ASCAIQ update is clear.
Quality is built through strongsystems, accurate information,
valid assessment, and realoversight.
No shortcuts, no assumptions, nogaps.
Use this update as a wide anglereview of your RTO.
Strengthen every part of youroperation.

(13:32):
Record improvements, keepevidence, protect your students,
protect your training products,protect your registration.
Thank you for listening to theRTO Superhero podcast.
Keep reviewing, keep checking,and keep delivering strong
training built on quality andintegrity.