See id.
Episodes
Luke and Ryan are finally back at it! This time with an episode on dogs, cats, and how they relate to the Constitution! Tune in to hear about why the Constitution doesn’t extend certain privacy protections to animal abusers. Huge thanks to Kayla A. Bernays and her excellent Law Review Note published in the Arizona Law Review.
References:See generally Kayla A. Bernays, We’ve Still Got Feelings: Re-Presenting Pets As Sentient Pro...In this episode, Ryan and Luke discuss some basic Administrative law frameworks, the definition of sandwiches, and serving alcohol gratuitously. Be sure to tune in!
In this grab-bag episode, Ryan and Luke discuss a wide range of topics including new years resolutions, gym memberships, illegal searches, and the absence of chicken futures markets. Take a listen!
Links: Gym membership ArticlePolice Search ArticleIn this episode, Ryan and Luke discuss some legal history around Thanksgivin(g), discuss some cases about chickens and turkeys, and explain what they’ve been up to the last couple of weeks! Tune in to their Thanksgiving episode!
In this episode, Ryan and Luke talk about amending the Constitution, and a host of legal ethics issues. They are studying for a test called the MPRE. Take a listen!
In this week’s episode, Ryan and Luke dive into some fun Halloween-inspired cases with haunted houses, tombstones, and chainsaws! Give it a listen!
Resources:
Stambovsky v. Ackley House
See generally Stambovsky v. Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. ...
In this episode, Ryan and Luke discuss torts, sleds, and the time-value of money. The guys touch on what intent means for intentional torts, discuss the elements of negligence, and briefly cover tort reform with that infamous “hot coffee” case. Take a listen!
Sled in a corner.
...In this episode, Ryan and Luke look at some contract fundamentals: offer, acceptance, and consideration. They also briefly reflect on the recent Senate Judiciary hearings and what what it means for our system of democracy. Take a listen!
Resources:
See generally Hawkins v. McGee, 146 A. 641 (N.H. 1929) (discussing the contractually binding effect of a guarantee).
See generally Lucy v. Zehmer, 84 S.E.2d 516 (Va. 1954) (explaining ...
In this episode, Ryan and Luke look at the Due Process Clause, explain the difference between procedural and substantive due process, and discuss what determines whether something is a fundamental right. Take a listen!
Chat About See id.