Why IT Governance Fails CFOs When Boards Ask the Question

Send us a text

Most CFOs approve technology investments that look sound on paper, align with leadership expectations, and receive board approval, only to find themselves defending outcomes they never controlled. When strategy decks and financial results diverge, boards do not blame systems or process. They look to finance.

This is not an execution failure. It is an IT governance failure.

What the Podcast delivers

In this briefing, former Global CIO Jayson Hahn explains why IT governance consistently fails CFOs, how misaligned definitions of success between CEOs, CIOs, and finance create hidden exposure, and why boards uncover these gaps months after capital is committed.

You will hear:

Why alignment is not governance

How capital moves before economic logic is agreed

The three questions boards expect CFOs to answer, and why most governance models fail to provide them

A practical framework CFOs can use to regain control, credibility, and board confidence

This Podcast introduces the Command, Control, Confidence governance framework, designed to ensure capital decisions are tied to business outcomes, ownership, and board-level metrics before dollars move.

If you want clarity before your next board conversation, subscribe for the next briefing, where we break down how boards evaluate IT return, and the three numbers CFOs must have ready.