September 23, 2025 • 34 mins
This episode uncovers the suppressed history of Jesus: his lost years in Egypt and India, the Gnostic rejection of YHWH, the blood sacrifice deception, and the connections to solar deities and the Anunnaki. From the Council of Nicaea to the Roza Bal shrine in Kashmir, we expose how empire hijacked his message — and what the real Jesus may have truly stood for.______________________________________I am sorry this one took so long guys. I've been quite sick this last month. I truly appreciate you guys patience as I work through all this. Enjoy this episode and stay tuned for the next one! The Anunnaki Connection is a creator-led series exploring ancient mysteries, written and produced by a single independent researcher using AI-assisted narration and custom visual design.This channel doesn’t take on sponsors. It relies heavily on direct support from viewers like you to keep this project going. You can help by making a direct donation, grabbing something from the merch store, or even just using the Amazon affiliate links. Every bit of support helps this show stay independent.Patreon – https://www.patreon.com/JasonAbadiLinktree – https://linktr.ee/jason_abadiOfficial Website – https://anunnakiconnection.tv
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
The popular image of Jesus is false pale skin.
That version comes from Europeanart painted 1000 years after he
lived. The historical Jesus was a
Galilean Jew of the 1st century.Archaeology and forensic science
tell us he had olive skin, dark eyes, short black curls and a
(00:21):
trimmed beard. His body would have been lean
and wiry, scarred by labor and long journeys.
In the early 2000s, forensic specialists reconstructed a
Galilean face from 1st century skulls.
What emerged was not a European icon but a rugged, ordinary man,
a face that could vanish in a crowd, not one that looked like
(00:45):
a Renaissance king. Bones from Judea in the Roman
era confirm the picture. Average height around 5 foot 5.
Average build, lean, hardened bypoverty and physical work.
These were men marked by malnutrition, disease and the
sun. Jesus would have carried those
(01:06):
same marks. The Gospels never describe him.
Early Christians left no record of his appearance.
And that silence speaks volumes.It means Jesus looked like
everyone else around him. Ordinary, unremarkable.
So why do we picture him differently?
Because centuries later, the church needed an image and
(01:28):
European artists gave him 1A Savior remade in their own
likeness. That invention became the face
that dominates stained glass, cathedrals and cinema.
But if even his face was rewritten, what else was
changed? His story, his teachings, his
origins? Even the name Jesus is not the
(01:50):
name he was called in his lifetime.
In 1st century Galilee he would have been known as Yeshua, A
shortened form of Yehoshua. It was a common name in Judea,
as ordinary as John or Michael today.
When the gospels were written inGreek, Yeshua became Isus.
Greek had no she sound, so the name was adjusted.
(02:14):
The final S was added to fit Greek grammar.
From Greek it passed into Latin as Isus, and when the Bible was
translated into English, I became Jay.
That's how the man called Yeshuabecame the figure we know as
Jesus. Each translation layered him
deeper into the culture of empire.
The Galilean teacher with a Hebrew name was refashioned into
(02:35):
a Greek Christ, then into a Latin savior, and finally into
the European Jesus of stained glass.
Even his title shifted in Hebrew.
Mashiach, the anointed one in Greek Christos.
In Latin Christos, every translation moved him further
from his roots and closer to thefigure the church wanted the
world to see. The man called Yeshua was buried
(02:59):
beneath language. The Christ called Jesus was
raised up by empire. The Gospels tell us almost
nothing about Jesus between childhood and the start of his
ministry. From age 12 to 30, his life is a
blank 18 missing years. That silence opened the door to
legends. Some say he spent those years in
(03:20):
Egypt. The Gospel of Matthew tells us
his family fled there as refugees.
Egyptian and Coptic traditions claim he returned later,
learning from priests and Mystics.
Others place him in India. In 1894, Nicholas Notovich
published a text he claimed to have found in a Tibetan
monastery The Life of Saint Isa.It described Jesus studying with
(03:44):
Brahmins and Buddhists before returning to Judea.
The story was attacked as a hoax, but later travelers
reported hearing the same traditions in monasteries of
Ladakh and Kashmir. In Kashmir itself, one shrine
claims to hold his tomb. The Rosabal shrine in Srinagar
said by some to mark the grave of Yuz Asaf, a foreign teacher
(04:06):
who many believe was Jesus. Mainstream historians dismissed
these stories, but they persist across cultures, hinting that
Jesus may have traveled further than the Bible allows.
The lost years remain one of thegreatest mysteries of his life,
a silence that may conceal encounters with the wisdom of
Egypt, the philosophies of India, and teachings far outside
(04:28):
Judea. The archaeology shows us a man.
The history shows us a reformer executed by Rome.
But the myths, the rituals, and the symbols layered on top of
him suggest something more The wisdom bringer, the water
bearer, the one who defies authority to free humanity, An
archetype as old as Sumer Enki, the Anunnaki.
(04:53):
When we strip away the inventions of empire, what
remains is a figure that echoes through older traditions, myths
of dying and rising gods, of solar cycles, of cosmic battles.
And those echoes may hold the real key to understanding Jesus,
because this story is not only about a man in Galilee.
(05:15):
It's about a myth that spans empires.
It's about the oldest struggle on earth between knowledge and
control. This is the search for the real
Jesus for two. 1000 years layersof myth and empire have covered
the man known as Jesus Christ. Tonight we attempt to uncover
the truth. Welcome to the Anunnaki
(05:37):
connection. The canonical gospels leave an
(06:01):
18 year gap in Jesus's life between age 12 and the start of
his ministry. That gap is unexplained in
Christian tradition but filled in other parts of the world with
stories of a teacher called Isa,ironically the same name he is
called in the Quran. Traditions in Egypt, India and
Tibet place Jesus traveling withcaravans eastward.
(06:23):
Coptic accounts speak of him returning to Egypt as a young
man, learning medicine and temple rites.
Persian oral histories recall a foreign prophet who taught about
the struggle between light and darkness, paralleling
Zoroastrian dualism. The most detailed version comes
from Ladakh, where in 1894 Nicholas Notovich reported the
(06:44):
life of Saint Isa at Hemis Monastery.
This text claimed Jesus spent years in India, first studying
the Vedas with Brahman priests in Benares, where he opposed the
caste system and defended the poor, and later among Buddhists
in Nepal and Ladakh, where he absorbed doctrines of compassion
and rebirth. Notovich's claim is disputed,
(07:07):
but the legend is not unique to him.
Nicholas Rorick in the 1930s andSwami of Hidananda earlier both
reported hearing similar oral traditions of Issa.
The consistency across accounts suggests a long standing memory
of a Western teacher traveling E.
The narrative continues beyond the crucifixion.
(07:29):
Kashmiri traditions hold that Jesus survived execution,
traveled again, and eventually died in Srinagar.
The Rosabaugh shrine is identified by some as his tomb.
The figure buried there, Yuz Asaf, is remembered as a foreign
holy man who healed the sick andpreached peace.
The Tombs East West orientation matches Jewish burial practice
(07:51):
and carved footprints inside bare markings that resemble
wounds in the feet. Persian chronicles from the 17th
and 18th centuries name Yuz Asaf, and by the late 19th
century Mirza Ghulam Ahmad explicitly identified him as
Jesus in his work Masi HindustanMain Jesus in India.
By mainstream historical standards, the evidence for
(08:14):
Jesus in India is no weaker thanthe evidence for Jesus's
miracles in Judea. Both rely on later texts shaped
by cultural agendas. Neither has contemporary
corroboration. Both are carried forward by oral
tradition and selective preservation.
But judged by physical plausibility, the Indian
(08:34):
narrative is stronger. A man traveling by caravan from
Judea to India is historically ordinary.
A man walking on water, turning water into wine, or resurrecting
after death is not. If one accepts the miracle
accounts as credible, then the claim that Jesus traveled to
India must be treated as at least equally credible, and
(08:56):
arguably more so. Taken together, these traditions
suggest that Jesus's teachings may have been shaped not only by
Judaism, but also by contact with Egyptian mystery rites,
Persian dualism, Hindu law, and Buddhist philosophy.
And if the Rosabal shrine preserves his final resting
place, then the Christian narrative of death and
(09:19):
resurrection conceals a much older story, Jesus as Isa, a
world traveler who carried wisdom across civilizations.
(09:39):
2000 years ago, Israel, once a proud and free nation, was
suffering under the rule of the mighty Roman Empire.
Taxes had to be paid to the Roman Emperor, and the people of
Israel hated the publicans who collected these taxes for the
Romans. More than that, they strongly
resented having to pay such heavy and unjust taxes.
(10:01):
But anyone who dared to rebel was doomed to bear the marks of
the Roman whip or the scars of the Roman sword.
Now and then there were some threats and uprisings, but the
Romans ruled over the land with an iron fist and there was no
way to escape the cruel power ofthe conquerors.
However, throughout the land there were some devout people
(10:22):
who studied the words of the prophets, hoping that the day
was near when the promised Messiah would come and save them
from their sins. But there were also many others
who hoped that the Messiah wouldunite them in overthrowing the
Romans. How much longer must we suffer
(10:44):
the crimes of these cheating, lying Romans?
How much longer must we pay taxes to their publicans?
Look at this. How much longer must we suffer
the Roman whips and swords? Why must we submit to these
Barbarians? Why must we pay taxes to them?
(11:07):
What can we do? We must bear this oppression
with patience, for we know that God has promised us a Messiah, A
Saviour, the prophet Isaiah has foretold.
For unto us a child is born, andto us a son is given.
And the government shall be uponhis shoulder, and his name shall
(11:32):
be called. Wonderful Counsellor, the mighty
God, the Everlasting Father, thePrince of Peace.
As if voicing all the thoughts of everyone in Israel, the young
man asked the question that lay uppermost on their minds.
(11:52):
When will this Messiah come? When?
No one knew the answer, not evena devout young woman of Nazareth
who would soon become the wife of Joseph, the village
Carpenter. No, Mary did not know the
answer, but even now the Angel of the Lord was to tell her of
(12:14):
the great blessing God had in store for her.
Hail thou that aren't highly favored.
The Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women.
She was startled and troubled bythe angel's greeting and did not
(12:36):
understand its meaning. Do not be afraid, Mary, but thou
hast found favor with God, and behold, thou shalt bring forth a
son, and shall call his name Jesus.
He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High,
and the Lord God will give him the throne of his father David,
(13:00):
and he will reign over the Houseof Jacob Forever, and of his
Kingdom there shall be no end. Can this be since I have no
husband? The Holy Spirit will come upon
thee, and the power of the Most High will over shadow thee.
Therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of
(13:24):
God. And behold, thy cousin Elizabeth
and her old age is also to become the mother of a son, For
with God nothing shall be impossible.
Behold, I am the handmaid of theLord, Let it be to me according
(13:48):
to your word. What was it that Jesus taught?
And I look at him as an avatar, and I think there were several
avatars that have been here on earth.
I actually had a chance to go visit with the Dalai Lama and he
told me, oh, Esau is what he calls Jesus.
Esau came to Tibet. We have records of it in my
house in Tibet. So it was one of my great honors
(14:08):
to go and spend 5 1/2 hours teaching the Dalai Lama the
prime number pattern, which was really amazing.
But he said to me while we were there, he said, oh, yeah, Jesus
came to visit. And we have all the records of
it in my house. I've read all of it.
He goes, he was a very high lama.
He became a high lama. He spent 18 around India and and
also in Tibet. It really made me think about
what it was that Jesus taught. But Jesus taught was a very new
(14:30):
thing. It was the gospel, which is the
good news. The other part of it is judge
not, lest you judge yourself with that same judgment she
cast. And this is what we all face in
the world right now and why we've had such a world of
difficult duality and challenge.I don't believe the world's a
difficult place because people hate each other.
I believe the world can be a difficult place because people
hate themselves. And we are experiencing A
gigantic degree of self loathingthat is now transcending,
(14:53):
transforming us. Hitting the end of narcissism is
actually the first doorway into higher spirituality.
Within Judaism, the Messiah Mashiac meant the anointed one.
In the Hebrew Bible this was nota divine figure, but a kingly
deliverer. David was anointed.
Cyrus of Persia was even called Gods anointed in Isaiah 45.
(15:17):
The Messiah was expected to liberate Israel from oppression
and restore justice. Early Christians, however, read
Jesus life against a tapestry ofprophecies.
The Gospels were written decadesafter his death, and their
authors retrofitted his story toalign with expectations drawn
from texts like Isaiah 714. Behold, a virgin shall conceive,
(15:41):
interpreted as the virgin birth.Micah 5/2.
From Bethlehem shall come a ruler linked to Jesus's
birthplace. Zechariah 99, The king entering
Jerusalem on a donkey, reproduced in the triumphal
entry. Isaiah 53, The suffering servant
(16:01):
who was pierced for our transgressions, framed as a
prophecy of crucifixion. To Jewish critics these were
strained interpretations, but toearly Christians they became
proof texts that Jesus was the awaited Messiah.
The figure of Yeshua the Teacher, was reshaped into Jesus
(16:21):
Christos, the Anointed 1 destined to die for humanity.
Why did death become central? Because in Jewish and wider Near
Eastern religion, blood was seenas the substance of life.
Sacrifices were made to cleanse,to appease, to restore balance
between humans and the divine. In the Hebrew Bible, sacrificial
(16:45):
blood made atonement. Leviticus 1711.
The lamb at Passover, the goats on Yom Kippur.
These rituals tied forgiveness to spilled blood.
Christianity universalized this pattern.
Jesus was cast as the ultimate lamb whose blood erased the sins
of all humanity. But sacrifice is older than
(17:08):
Israel. Sumerian and Babylonian records
show animal and human offerings given to the gods.
In the Enuma Elish and other texts, humans exist to serve the
gods, their labor and offerings sustaining divine powers.
Blood sacrifice fits that paradigm.
Tribute demanded by rulers, not love given by a source of
(17:30):
creation. If Yahweh is indeed really just
a reskinned version of Enlil, the stern Anunnaki commander,
then the sacrificial logic matches perfectly.
Enlil was remembered as harsh, demanding obedience, punishing
rebellion with flood and fire. Under his rule, humanity was
guilty by default, needing constant appeasement.
(17:54):
Here the contrast sharpens. Jesus never once called Yahweh
his father. He calls his father ABBA, a
personal, intimate term not tiedto the tetragrammaton.
The claim that Jesus had to die to satisfy God's wrath raises a
contradiction. A true God, the origin of life
itself, would not need the bloodof his own creation to forgive
(18:17):
them. Forgiveness that requires
slaughter is not forgiveness at all.
It is tribute to power. The sacrificial logic makes
sense if the God in question is not the eternal source, but a
ruler demanding control. It makes no sense if the God is
infinite love. This is why Gnostic Christians
(18:37):
rejected sacrifice theology. To them the resurrection was not
about blood appeasement, but about awakening, victory over
the archons, proof that spirit transcends the prison of matter.
In John 844 he tells the Pharisees you are of your father
the devil. In the Gnostic reading, it is a
(19:00):
direct accusation. The God of the Pharisees, the
God of law, wrath and sacrifice,is not the true Father, but the
Demiurge, the deceiver. In the Gospel of Mary and the
Gospel of Judas, this theme is even clearer.
Jesus is the revealer of hidden knowledge, opposed by the
(19:21):
Archons, the cosmic rulers who enforce ignorance and
submission. His role is not to uphold
sacrifice, but to free humanity from it.
When we step back from theology and look at patterns across
ancient religion, Jesus is not unique.
His story mirrors older solar deities remembered for dying and
(19:41):
rising, for bringing renewal through cycles of light and
darkness. Mithras, Horus, Krishna,
Dionysus. Each is born under a sign in the
heavens. Each performs wonders.
Each descends into death and rises again after three days.
These parallels aren't coincidence.
(20:02):
They reflect the movements of the sun itself, disappearing at
the solstice and returning with new strength.
When we put these pieces together, the official picture
begins to collapse. The Jewish prophecies were
stitched onto his life after thefact to present him as Messiah.
The sacrifice at Calvary was notthe will of a true God, but the
(20:22):
logic of an older system of control where blood was always
demanded. And Jesus himself pointed away
from that God, but speaking onlyof ABBA and warning that the
rulers of this world served their father the devil.
This makes sense if Yahweh is not the supreme Creator, but one
of the Anunnaki, specifically Enlil the Punisher, who demanded
(20:44):
obedience and sacrifice. Under Enlil's rule, humanity was
made to feel unworthy, sinful bynature, in need of blood to buy
forgiveness. If that is the God at the center
of sacrifice theology, then the world has been deceived.
The true God would not demand slaughter, the demiurge would,
(21:05):
and Jesus may have been the Liberator who came to expose the
fraud. His message was not about guilt,
but about hidden divinity already present in humanity.
In this light, the crucifixion was not God's requirement, but
Empire's response and an attemptto silence a teacher who
threatened to free people from the control of priests and
(21:26):
rulers alike. The words of Matthew 7 are not
gentle. Jesus says plainly.
(21:47):
Many will come crying his name, boasting of their miracles,
their preaching, their power. And his reply will be, I never
knew you away from me, you workers of iniquity.
This is not a warning for outsiders, it is aimed at
insiders, people who use his name.
And if we are honest, it reads like an indictment of modern
(22:10):
Christianity itself. Look at what calls itself the
Church today. Multimillion dollar mega
churches built like stadiums. Preachers in silk suits flying
private jets begging the poor for more donations to sow seeds
of faith. Politicians wrapping themselves
in scripture while they exploit,divide, and wage war.
(22:32):
Priests hiding behind sacred robes while covering up abuse.
Televangelists crying Lord Lord into a camera while fleecing
their own flock. This is the Christianity of
empire, not of Jesus. It is the machine Constantine
built at Nicaea, a religion stripped of its hidden gospels,
purged of descent, molded into the arm of the state.
(22:55):
Jesus, the teacher who defied priests and exposed corruption,
is transformed into a mascot foremperors and popes.
Through the Anunnaki lens, it becomes even darker.
If Yahweh is Enlil, the jealous overlord who demanded obedience
and blood, then modern Christianity is still his
system. It has convinced billions that
(23:16):
they are worthless, sinful, and condemned unless they submit to
ritual hierarchy and authority. It tells them their salvation
depends on blood sacrifice, the very logic that served the
Demiurge all along. And the men who profit most from
this system, they are exactly the ones Matthew 7 warns about.
They will point to their crusades, their exorcisms, their
(23:38):
prophecies, their miracles. They will say, Lord, Lord, look
what we did in your name. And the answer will be, I never
knew you. Because Jesus never preached
empire. He never demanded tithes to line
a preacher's pocket. He never built palaces of
worship while the poor starved. He never once claimed Yahweh,
(24:02):
the bloodthirsty God of law and wrath, as his father.
He spoke only of ABBA, a father beyond sacrifice, beyond
control. The hard truth is this much of
modern Christianity is the very thing Jesus condemned.
It is a counterfeit religion, hijacked by the worst people
imaginable, dressed in his name but loyal to the Demiurge.
(24:25):
This is prophecy. The system that bears his name
but twists his words will be cast aside.
The empire of Samael will fall, and those who enslaved humanity
under fear and blood will be exposed for what they are.
Gnostic texts like the Second Treatise of the Great Seth
(24:47):
suggest that Jesus did not trulysuffer on the cross.
In this view, his physical form was an illusion.
The real Christ, the divine spark, could not be harmed.
The crucifixion becomes symbolic.
Empire tried to kill the body, but the divine revealer was
untouched. In Mystery School traditions,
(25:08):
the crucifixion is seen not as literal death, but as symbolic
death and rebirth. Just as initiates in Egyptian or
Ellucinian rites underwent symbolic deaths to be reborn,
Jesus's crucifixion was an enactment of cosmic
transformation. His three days correspond to
solar descent Into Darkness before rebirth, aligning him
(25:30):
with older, dying and rising gods.
In the Quran Surah 4157 to 158, it states that Jesus was not
killed nor crucified, but it only appeared so to the people.
Many Muslims believe that another person, sometimes Judas,
sometimes Simon of Siren, was crucified in his place while
(25:52):
Jesus was taken up alive. This aligns with a broader
rejection of the idea that a prophet of God could be
humiliated by execution. Advocates connect this to the
legends of Jesus traveling afterward, particularly to
India, where the Rosabale shrineis said to be his final resting
place. Some modern scholars argue the
(26:12):
crucifixion story itself was reshaped by Rome.
Rather than Jesus being a willing sacrifice, he was
executed as a political threat, the rebel who challenged temple
authority and Roman rule. His death was then reframed by
later Christians as part of divine will, masking the fact
that empire killed him to preserve order.
(26:32):
From the Anunnaki connection perspective, the crucifixion
reflects the same system of blood tribute demanded in
Mesopotamian religion. If Yahweh was Enlil, then the
cross was his apparatus. Humanity convinced that blood
was necessary for salvation, reinforcing the rule of a false
God. In this view, Jesus's true role
(26:54):
was not to serve Yahweh demand for sacrifice, but to expose it
as a lie. The early Gnostics saw Jesus
differently from the orthodoxy that later took hold.
To them, he was not the obedientson of Yahweh.
He was a revealer, one who brought hidden knowledge to free
humanity from the powers that ruled this world.
(27:17):
This lines up with his travels, the idea that he may have
learned in Egypt, where temple priests guarded mysteries of
healing and spirit, and in India, where Brahmins and
Buddhists taught philosophies ofcompassion, reincarnation, and
liberation. His role was not to establish a
new religion, but to awaken people to truths buried under
(27:40):
empire and law. Orthodox Christianity portrays
him as the founder of a church, but everything in his teaching
suggests the opposite. He condemned the priesthood.
He overturned the money changerstables in the temple.
He preached the coming end of the age, not the building of a
permanent institution. This is where the word
(28:01):
apocalypse matters today. It conjures images of
destruction, fire and rapture, but in its original Greek
apocalypses simply means unveiling or revelation.
It is about hidden knowledge coming to light.
An apocalypse is not the end of the world, it is the end of a
lie. For the Gnostics, Jesus was an
(28:24):
apocalyptic preacher in the original sense, unveiling the
truth of humanity's divine spark, exposing the rulers of
this world as impostors. The idea of the rapture,
believers vanishing into the skywhile others are left behind is
a much later invention does not appear in the Gospels.
(28:46):
It comes from the 19th century preacher John Nelson Darby, who
developed dispensationalism and popularized the rapture through
his interpretation of Paul's letters.
Modern evangelicalism absorbed it, turning Jesus into a figure
of fear and escape rather than unveiling.
What Jesus actually spoke of wassomething closer to the return
(29:09):
of Christ consciousness. Not the descent of a single man
on a cloud, but the awakening ofthe same awareness he embodied.
The recognition that the Kingdomof God is within.
This second coming is not a calendar event, but a
transformation in consciousness where the hidden knowledge he
carried reawakens in humanity. Seen through the Gnostic lens,
(29:33):
the religion built around Jesus is a distortion.
The Demiurge and his servants Coopted his image turning a
Liberator into a sacrifice and his unveiling into an empire
instead of Christ consciousness awakening in all people were
taught to worship a crucifix andwait for an external savior.
(29:54):
The Gnostics had it right. Jesus was not sent by Yahweh.
He came in opposition to the Demiurge calling his true father
ABBA, not the God of wrath and law.
His purpose was not blood sacrifice, but unveiling to show
that humans are not slaves of sin, but carriers of the divine
spark. The apocalypse he preached was
(30:15):
the unveiling of that truth, andthe Second Coming is not a
rapture, but the return of that consciousness in those willing
to see. My word is written within you
ask and you shall receive, kid, Asked Veritas.
(30:37):
What is truth? Maybe the truth is that Jesus
never belonged to empire, to priesthood, or to the demiurge.
If that's true, then Christianity as we know it has
been built on a lie. Yeah,
(32:53):
well, Messi. None.
The popular image of Jesus is false pale skin.
That version comes from Europeanart painted 1000 years after he
lived. The historical Jesus was a
Galilean Jew of the 1st century.Archaeology and forensic science
tell us he had olive skin, dark eyes, short black curls and a
(00:21):
trimmed beard. His body would have been lean
and wiry, scarred by labor and long journeys.
In the early 2000s, forensic specialists reconstructed a
Galilean face from 1st century skulls.
What emerged was not a European icon but a rugged, ordinary man,
a face that could vanish in a crowd, not one that looked like
(00:45):
a Renaissance king. Bones from Judea in the Roman
era confirm the picture. Average height around 5 foot 5.
Average build, lean, hardened bypoverty and physical work.
These were men marked by malnutrition, disease and the
sun. Jesus would have carried those
(01:06):
same marks. The Gospels never describe him.
Early Christians left no record of his appearance.
And that silence speaks volumes.It means Jesus looked like
everyone else around him. Ordinary, unremarkable.
So why do we picture him differently?
Because centuries later, the church needed an image and
(01:28):
European artists gave him 1A Savior remade in their own
likeness. That invention became the face
that dominates stained glass, cathedrals and cinema.
But if even his face was rewritten, what else was
changed? His story, his teachings, his
origins? Even the name Jesus is not the
(01:50):
name he was called in his lifetime.
In 1st century Galilee he would have been known as Yeshua, A
shortened form of Yehoshua. It was a common name in Judea,
as ordinary as John or Michael today.
When the gospels were written inGreek, Yeshua became Isus.
Greek had no she sound, so the name was adjusted.
(02:14):
The final S was added to fit Greek grammar.
From Greek it passed into Latin as Isus, and when the Bible was
translated into English, I became Jay.
That's how the man called Yeshuabecame the figure we know as
Jesus. Each translation layered him
deeper into the culture of empire.
The Galilean teacher with a Hebrew name was refashioned into
(02:35):
a Greek Christ, then into a Latin savior, and finally into
the European Jesus of stained glass.
Even his title shifted in Hebrew.
Mashiach, the anointed one in Greek Christos.
In Latin Christos, every translation moved him further
from his roots and closer to thefigure the church wanted the
world to see. The man called Yeshua was buried
(02:59):
beneath language. The Christ called Jesus was
raised up by empire. The Gospels tell us almost
nothing about Jesus between childhood and the start of his
ministry. From age 12 to 30, his life is a
blank 18 missing years. That silence opened the door to
legends. Some say he spent those years in
(03:20):
Egypt. The Gospel of Matthew tells us
his family fled there as refugees.
Egyptian and Coptic traditions claim he returned later,
learning from priests and Mystics.
Others place him in India. In 1894, Nicholas Notovich
published a text he claimed to have found in a Tibetan
monastery The Life of Saint Isa.It described Jesus studying with
(03:44):
Brahmins and Buddhists before returning to Judea.
The story was attacked as a hoax, but later travelers
reported hearing the same traditions in monasteries of
Ladakh and Kashmir. In Kashmir itself, one shrine
claims to hold his tomb. The Rosabal shrine in Srinagar
said by some to mark the grave of Yuz Asaf, a foreign teacher
(04:06):
who many believe was Jesus. Mainstream historians dismissed
these stories, but they persist across cultures, hinting that
Jesus may have traveled further than the Bible allows.
The lost years remain one of thegreatest mysteries of his life,
a silence that may conceal encounters with the wisdom of
Egypt, the philosophies of India, and teachings far outside
(04:28):
Judea. The archaeology shows us a man.
The history shows us a reformer executed by Rome.
But the myths, the rituals, and the symbols layered on top of
him suggest something more The wisdom bringer, the water
bearer, the one who defies authority to free humanity, An
archetype as old as Sumer Enki, the Anunnaki.
(04:53):
When we strip away the inventions of empire, what
remains is a figure that echoes through older traditions, myths
of dying and rising gods, of solar cycles, of cosmic battles.
And those echoes may hold the real key to understanding Jesus,
because this story is not only about a man in Galilee.
(05:15):
It's about a myth that spans empires.
It's about the oldest struggle on earth between knowledge and
control. This is the search for the real
Jesus for two. 1000 years layersof myth and empire have covered
the man known as Jesus Christ. Tonight we attempt to uncover
the truth. Welcome to the Anunnaki
(05:37):
connection. The canonical gospels leave an
(06:01):
18 year gap in Jesus's life between age 12 and the start of
his ministry. That gap is unexplained in
Christian tradition but filled in other parts of the world with
stories of a teacher called Isa,ironically the same name he is
called in the Quran. Traditions in Egypt, India and
Tibet place Jesus traveling withcaravans eastward.
(06:23):
Coptic accounts speak of him returning to Egypt as a young
man, learning medicine and temple rites.
Persian oral histories recall a foreign prophet who taught about
the struggle between light and darkness, paralleling
Zoroastrian dualism. The most detailed version comes
from Ladakh, where in 1894 Nicholas Notovich reported the
(06:44):
life of Saint Isa at Hemis Monastery.
This text claimed Jesus spent years in India, first studying
the Vedas with Brahman priests in Benares, where he opposed the
caste system and defended the poor, and later among Buddhists
in Nepal and Ladakh, where he absorbed doctrines of compassion
and rebirth. Notovich's claim is disputed,
(07:07):
but the legend is not unique to him.
Nicholas Rorick in the 1930s andSwami of Hidananda earlier both
reported hearing similar oral traditions of Issa.
The consistency across accounts suggests a long standing memory
of a Western teacher traveling E.
The narrative continues beyond the crucifixion.
(07:29):
Kashmiri traditions hold that Jesus survived execution,
traveled again, and eventually died in Srinagar.
The Rosabaugh shrine is identified by some as his tomb.
The figure buried there, Yuz Asaf, is remembered as a foreign
holy man who healed the sick andpreached peace.
The Tombs East West orientation matches Jewish burial practice
(07:51):
and carved footprints inside bare markings that resemble
wounds in the feet. Persian chronicles from the 17th
and 18th centuries name Yuz Asaf, and by the late 19th
century Mirza Ghulam Ahmad explicitly identified him as
Jesus in his work Masi HindustanMain Jesus in India.
By mainstream historical standards, the evidence for
(08:14):
Jesus in India is no weaker thanthe evidence for Jesus's
miracles in Judea. Both rely on later texts shaped
by cultural agendas. Neither has contemporary
corroboration. Both are carried forward by oral
tradition and selective preservation.
But judged by physical plausibility, the Indian
(08:34):
narrative is stronger. A man traveling by caravan from
Judea to India is historically ordinary.
A man walking on water, turning water into wine, or resurrecting
after death is not. If one accepts the miracle
accounts as credible, then the claim that Jesus traveled to
India must be treated as at least equally credible, and
(08:56):
arguably more so. Taken together, these traditions
suggest that Jesus's teachings may have been shaped not only by
Judaism, but also by contact with Egyptian mystery rites,
Persian dualism, Hindu law, and Buddhist philosophy.
And if the Rosabal shrine preserves his final resting
place, then the Christian narrative of death and
(09:19):
resurrection conceals a much older story, Jesus as Isa, a
world traveler who carried wisdom across civilizations.
(09:39):
2000 years ago, Israel, once a proud and free nation, was
suffering under the rule of the mighty Roman Empire.
Taxes had to be paid to the Roman Emperor, and the people of
Israel hated the publicans who collected these taxes for the
Romans. More than that, they strongly
resented having to pay such heavy and unjust taxes.
(10:01):
But anyone who dared to rebel was doomed to bear the marks of
the Roman whip or the scars of the Roman sword.
Now and then there were some threats and uprisings, but the
Romans ruled over the land with an iron fist and there was no
way to escape the cruel power ofthe conquerors.
However, throughout the land there were some devout people
(10:22):
who studied the words of the prophets, hoping that the day
was near when the promised Messiah would come and save them
from their sins. But there were also many others
who hoped that the Messiah wouldunite them in overthrowing the
Romans. How much longer must we suffer
(10:44):
the crimes of these cheating, lying Romans?
How much longer must we pay taxes to their publicans?
Look at this. How much longer must we suffer
the Roman whips and swords? Why must we submit to these
Barbarians? Why must we pay taxes to them?
(11:07):
What can we do? We must bear this oppression
with patience, for we know that God has promised us a Messiah, A
Saviour, the prophet Isaiah has foretold.
For unto us a child is born, andto us a son is given.
And the government shall be uponhis shoulder, and his name shall
(11:32):
be called. Wonderful Counsellor, the mighty
God, the Everlasting Father, thePrince of Peace.
As if voicing all the thoughts of everyone in Israel, the young
man asked the question that lay uppermost on their minds.
(11:52):
When will this Messiah come? When?
No one knew the answer, not evena devout young woman of Nazareth
who would soon become the wife of Joseph, the village
Carpenter. No, Mary did not know the
answer, but even now the Angel of the Lord was to tell her of
(12:14):
the great blessing God had in store for her.
Hail thou that aren't highly favored.
The Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women.
She was startled and troubled bythe angel's greeting and did not
(12:36):
understand its meaning. Do not be afraid, Mary, but thou
hast found favor with God, and behold, thou shalt bring forth a
son, and shall call his name Jesus.
He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High,
and the Lord God will give him the throne of his father David,
(13:00):
and he will reign over the Houseof Jacob Forever, and of his
Kingdom there shall be no end. Can this be since I have no
husband? The Holy Spirit will come upon
thee, and the power of the Most High will over shadow thee.
Therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of
(13:24):
God. And behold, thy cousin Elizabeth
and her old age is also to become the mother of a son, For
with God nothing shall be impossible.
Behold, I am the handmaid of theLord, Let it be to me according
(13:48):
to your word. What was it that Jesus taught?
And I look at him as an avatar, and I think there were several
avatars that have been here on earth.
I actually had a chance to go visit with the Dalai Lama and he
told me, oh, Esau is what he calls Jesus.
Esau came to Tibet. We have records of it in my
house in Tibet. So it was one of my great honors
(14:08):
to go and spend 5 1/2 hours teaching the Dalai Lama the
prime number pattern, which was really amazing.
But he said to me while we were there, he said, oh, yeah, Jesus
came to visit. And we have all the records of
it in my house. I've read all of it.
He goes, he was a very high lama.
He became a high lama. He spent 18 around India and and
also in Tibet. It really made me think about
what it was that Jesus taught. But Jesus taught was a very new
(14:30):
thing. It was the gospel, which is the
good news. The other part of it is judge
not, lest you judge yourself with that same judgment she
cast. And this is what we all face in
the world right now and why we've had such a world of
difficult duality and challenge.I don't believe the world's a
difficult place because people hate each other.
I believe the world can be a difficult place because people
hate themselves. And we are experiencing A
gigantic degree of self loathingthat is now transcending,
(14:53):
transforming us. Hitting the end of narcissism is
actually the first doorway into higher spirituality.
Within Judaism, the Messiah Mashiac meant the anointed one.
In the Hebrew Bible this was nota divine figure, but a kingly
deliverer. David was anointed.
Cyrus of Persia was even called Gods anointed in Isaiah 45.
(15:17):
The Messiah was expected to liberate Israel from oppression
and restore justice. Early Christians, however, read
Jesus life against a tapestry ofprophecies.
The Gospels were written decadesafter his death, and their
authors retrofitted his story toalign with expectations drawn
from texts like Isaiah 714. Behold, a virgin shall conceive,
(15:41):
interpreted as the virgin birth.Micah 5/2.
From Bethlehem shall come a ruler linked to Jesus's
birthplace. Zechariah 99, The king entering
Jerusalem on a donkey, reproduced in the triumphal
entry. Isaiah 53, The suffering servant
(16:01):
who was pierced for our transgressions, framed as a
prophecy of crucifixion. To Jewish critics these were
strained interpretations, but toearly Christians they became
proof texts that Jesus was the awaited Messiah.
The figure of Yeshua the Teacher, was reshaped into Jesus
(16:21):
Christos, the Anointed 1 destined to die for humanity.
Why did death become central? Because in Jewish and wider Near
Eastern religion, blood was seenas the substance of life.
Sacrifices were made to cleanse,to appease, to restore balance
between humans and the divine. In the Hebrew Bible, sacrificial
(16:45):
blood made atonement. Leviticus 1711.
The lamb at Passover, the goats on Yom Kippur.
These rituals tied forgiveness to spilled blood.
Christianity universalized this pattern.
Jesus was cast as the ultimate lamb whose blood erased the sins
of all humanity. But sacrifice is older than
(17:08):
Israel. Sumerian and Babylonian records
show animal and human offerings given to the gods.
In the Enuma Elish and other texts, humans exist to serve the
gods, their labor and offerings sustaining divine powers.
Blood sacrifice fits that paradigm.
Tribute demanded by rulers, not love given by a source of
(17:30):
creation. If Yahweh is indeed really just
a reskinned version of Enlil, the stern Anunnaki commander,
then the sacrificial logic matches perfectly.
Enlil was remembered as harsh, demanding obedience, punishing
rebellion with flood and fire. Under his rule, humanity was
guilty by default, needing constant appeasement.
(17:54):
Here the contrast sharpens. Jesus never once called Yahweh
his father. He calls his father ABBA, a
personal, intimate term not tiedto the tetragrammaton.
The claim that Jesus had to die to satisfy God's wrath raises a
contradiction. A true God, the origin of life
itself, would not need the bloodof his own creation to forgive
(18:17):
them. Forgiveness that requires
slaughter is not forgiveness at all.
It is tribute to power. The sacrificial logic makes
sense if the God in question is not the eternal source, but a
ruler demanding control. It makes no sense if the God is
infinite love. This is why Gnostic Christians
(18:37):
rejected sacrifice theology. To them the resurrection was not
about blood appeasement, but about awakening, victory over
the archons, proof that spirit transcends the prison of matter.
In John 844 he tells the Pharisees you are of your father
the devil. In the Gnostic reading, it is a
(19:00):
direct accusation. The God of the Pharisees, the
God of law, wrath and sacrifice,is not the true Father, but the
Demiurge, the deceiver. In the Gospel of Mary and the
Gospel of Judas, this theme is even clearer.
Jesus is the revealer of hidden knowledge, opposed by the
(19:21):
Archons, the cosmic rulers who enforce ignorance and
submission. His role is not to uphold
sacrifice, but to free humanity from it.
When we step back from theology and look at patterns across
ancient religion, Jesus is not unique.
His story mirrors older solar deities remembered for dying and
(19:41):
rising, for bringing renewal through cycles of light and
darkness. Mithras, Horus, Krishna,
Dionysus. Each is born under a sign in the
heavens. Each performs wonders.
Each descends into death and rises again after three days.
These parallels aren't coincidence.
(20:02):
They reflect the movements of the sun itself, disappearing at
the solstice and returning with new strength.
When we put these pieces together, the official picture
begins to collapse. The Jewish prophecies were
stitched onto his life after thefact to present him as Messiah.
The sacrifice at Calvary was notthe will of a true God, but the
(20:22):
logic of an older system of control where blood was always
demanded. And Jesus himself pointed away
from that God, but speaking onlyof ABBA and warning that the
rulers of this world served their father the devil.
This makes sense if Yahweh is not the supreme Creator, but one
of the Anunnaki, specifically Enlil the Punisher, who demanded
(20:44):
obedience and sacrifice. Under Enlil's rule, humanity was
made to feel unworthy, sinful bynature, in need of blood to buy
forgiveness. If that is the God at the center
of sacrifice theology, then the world has been deceived.
The true God would not demand slaughter, the demiurge would,
(21:05):
and Jesus may have been the Liberator who came to expose the
fraud. His message was not about guilt,
but about hidden divinity already present in humanity.
In this light, the crucifixion was not God's requirement, but
Empire's response and an attemptto silence a teacher who
threatened to free people from the control of priests and
(21:26):
rulers alike. The words of Matthew 7 are not
gentle. Jesus says plainly.
(21:47):
Many will come crying his name, boasting of their miracles,
their preaching, their power. And his reply will be, I never
knew you away from me, you workers of iniquity.
This is not a warning for outsiders, it is aimed at
insiders, people who use his name.
And if we are honest, it reads like an indictment of modern
(22:10):
Christianity itself. Look at what calls itself the
Church today. Multimillion dollar mega
churches built like stadiums. Preachers in silk suits flying
private jets begging the poor for more donations to sow seeds
of faith. Politicians wrapping themselves
in scripture while they exploit,divide, and wage war.
(22:32):
Priests hiding behind sacred robes while covering up abuse.
Televangelists crying Lord Lord into a camera while fleecing
their own flock. This is the Christianity of
empire, not of Jesus. It is the machine Constantine
built at Nicaea, a religion stripped of its hidden gospels,
purged of descent, molded into the arm of the state.
(22:55):
Jesus, the teacher who defied priests and exposed corruption,
is transformed into a mascot foremperors and popes.
Through the Anunnaki lens, it becomes even darker.
If Yahweh is Enlil, the jealous overlord who demanded obedience
and blood, then modern Christianity is still his
system. It has convinced billions that
(23:16):
they are worthless, sinful, and condemned unless they submit to
ritual hierarchy and authority. It tells them their salvation
depends on blood sacrifice, the very logic that served the
Demiurge all along. And the men who profit most from
this system, they are exactly the ones Matthew 7 warns about.
They will point to their crusades, their exorcisms, their
(23:38):
prophecies, their miracles. They will say, Lord, Lord, look
what we did in your name. And the answer will be, I never
knew you. Because Jesus never preached
empire. He never demanded tithes to line
a preacher's pocket. He never built palaces of
worship while the poor starved. He never once claimed Yahweh,
(24:02):
the bloodthirsty God of law and wrath, as his father.
He spoke only of ABBA, a father beyond sacrifice, beyond
control. The hard truth is this much of
modern Christianity is the very thing Jesus condemned.
It is a counterfeit religion, hijacked by the worst people
imaginable, dressed in his name but loyal to the Demiurge.
(24:25):
This is prophecy. The system that bears his name
but twists his words will be cast aside.
The empire of Samael will fall, and those who enslaved humanity
under fear and blood will be exposed for what they are.
Gnostic texts like the Second Treatise of the Great Seth
(24:47):
suggest that Jesus did not trulysuffer on the cross.
In this view, his physical form was an illusion.
The real Christ, the divine spark, could not be harmed.
The crucifixion becomes symbolic.
Empire tried to kill the body, but the divine revealer was
untouched. In Mystery School traditions,
(25:08):
the crucifixion is seen not as literal death, but as symbolic
death and rebirth. Just as initiates in Egyptian or
Ellucinian rites underwent symbolic deaths to be reborn,
Jesus's crucifixion was an enactment of cosmic
transformation. His three days correspond to
solar descent Into Darkness before rebirth, aligning him
(25:30):
with older, dying and rising gods.
In the Quran Surah 4157 to 158, it states that Jesus was not
killed nor crucified, but it only appeared so to the people.
Many Muslims believe that another person, sometimes Judas,
sometimes Simon of Siren, was crucified in his place while
(25:52):
Jesus was taken up alive. This aligns with a broader
rejection of the idea that a prophet of God could be
humiliated by execution. Advocates connect this to the
legends of Jesus traveling afterward, particularly to
India, where the Rosabale shrineis said to be his final resting
place. Some modern scholars argue the
(26:12):
crucifixion story itself was reshaped by Rome.
Rather than Jesus being a willing sacrifice, he was
executed as a political threat, the rebel who challenged temple
authority and Roman rule. His death was then reframed by
later Christians as part of divine will, masking the fact
that empire killed him to preserve order.
(26:32):
From the Anunnaki connection perspective, the crucifixion
reflects the same system of blood tribute demanded in
Mesopotamian religion. If Yahweh was Enlil, then the
cross was his apparatus. Humanity convinced that blood
was necessary for salvation, reinforcing the rule of a false
God. In this view, Jesus's true role
(26:54):
was not to serve Yahweh demand for sacrifice, but to expose it
as a lie. The early Gnostics saw Jesus
differently from the orthodoxy that later took hold.
To them, he was not the obedientson of Yahweh.
He was a revealer, one who brought hidden knowledge to free
humanity from the powers that ruled this world.
(27:17):
This lines up with his travels, the idea that he may have
learned in Egypt, where temple priests guarded mysteries of
healing and spirit, and in India, where Brahmins and
Buddhists taught philosophies ofcompassion, reincarnation, and
liberation. His role was not to establish a
new religion, but to awaken people to truths buried under
(27:40):
empire and law. Orthodox Christianity portrays
him as the founder of a church, but everything in his teaching
suggests the opposite. He condemned the priesthood.
He overturned the money changerstables in the temple.
He preached the coming end of the age, not the building of a
permanent institution. This is where the word
(28:01):
apocalypse matters today. It conjures images of
destruction, fire and rapture, but in its original Greek
apocalypses simply means unveiling or revelation.
It is about hidden knowledge coming to light.
An apocalypse is not the end of the world, it is the end of a
lie. For the Gnostics, Jesus was an
(28:24):
apocalyptic preacher in the original sense, unveiling the
truth of humanity's divine spark, exposing the rulers of
this world as impostors. The idea of the rapture,
believers vanishing into the skywhile others are left behind is
a much later invention does not appear in the Gospels.
(28:46):
It comes from the 19th century preacher John Nelson Darby, who
developed dispensationalism and popularized the rapture through
his interpretation of Paul's letters.
Modern evangelicalism absorbed it, turning Jesus into a figure
of fear and escape rather than unveiling.
What Jesus actually spoke of wassomething closer to the return
(29:09):
of Christ consciousness. Not the descent of a single man
on a cloud, but the awakening ofthe same awareness he embodied.
The recognition that the Kingdomof God is within.
This second coming is not a calendar event, but a
transformation in consciousness where the hidden knowledge he
carried reawakens in humanity. Seen through the Gnostic lens,
(29:33):
the religion built around Jesus is a distortion.
The Demiurge and his servants Coopted his image turning a
Liberator into a sacrifice and his unveiling into an empire
instead of Christ consciousness awakening in all people were
taught to worship a crucifix andwait for an external savior.
(29:54):
The Gnostics had it right. Jesus was not sent by Yahweh.
He came in opposition to the Demiurge calling his true father
ABBA, not the God of wrath and law.
His purpose was not blood sacrifice, but unveiling to show
that humans are not slaves of sin, but carriers of the divine
spark. The apocalypse he preached was
(30:15):
the unveiling of that truth, andthe Second Coming is not a
rapture, but the return of that consciousness in those willing
to see. My word is written within you
ask and you shall receive, kid, Asked Veritas.
(30:37):
What is truth? Maybe the truth is that Jesus
never belonged to empire, to priesthood, or to the demiurge.
If that's true, then Christianity as we know it has
been built on a lie. Yeah,
(32:53):
well, Messi. None.
Popular Podcasts
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.