Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Thank you.
Then out spake brave Horatius,the captain of the gate To every
(01:35):
man upon this earth.
Death cometh sooner or later,and how can a man die better
than facing fearful odds for theashes of his fathers and the
temples of his gods?
Lord McAlay, you are listeningto the Ardaburn Radio
(02:03):
Transmission.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
Then I call on you, in the name of liberty, of
patriotism and everything dearto the American character, to
come to our aid with alldispatch.
The enemy is receivingreinforcements daily and will no
doubt increase to three or fourthousand in four or five days.
Thousand and four or five days.
(02:47):
If this call is neglected, I amdetermined to sustain myself as
long as possible and die like asoldier who never forgets what
is due to his own honor and thatof his country.
Victory or death, that iswilliam barrett travis.
Today is the anniversary march6th the fall of the alamo 1836.
Ladies, ladies and gents, greatletter.
I looked I had in my archivesome years ago I put the letter
(03:11):
over a Megadeth song and Icouldn't find it.
We did that in the studio longago in San Antonio.
But maybe next year and maybeat the end of the episode, I'll
talk a little bit about thathistory, some fascinating Texas
history that doesn't getcirculated as much anymore,
especially after thewhitewashing, the neutering, the
(03:36):
retelling, the reimagining ofTexas history that's happened in
the last 10 or 15 years hasbeen pretty brutal, ladies and
gents, and I've been out in theforefront fighting that battle
for a while now, but maybe we'lltalk a little bit about that.
So it is the 6th of March 2025.
(03:57):
This is the Arterburn RadioTransmission.
I am your host, tony Arterburn.
I'm broadcasting In Defiance ofGlobalist Goblins, the Neocons
and the New World Order, alongwith my co-pilot and co-host,
beans the Brave, from deepwithin the heart of Texas today,
in my home in Denison.
I just got done with the DavidKnight Show Always fun to talk
(04:19):
to David.
We went over a little bit ofour usual time we usually do
about 30 minutes but David and Iget to talking and there's so
much going on.
I mean it really is, and evenhe and I were speculating just
to try to figure out what is allof this for.
We'll talk a little bit aboutthe chaos of the tariffs, the
(04:39):
financial system, justeverything that is absolutely
upside down.
And, like you're trying to read, what is the strategy here, if
you look at the headlines ofDrudge, you see you know Trump
caving on tariffs, or is hecaving?
Or what's going on?
He's placing tariffs on Mexicoand Canada and all around the
world and you know this is somuch to unpack there, because
(05:02):
you look at that.
You look at the financialsystem of the sovereign wealth
fund and all the rest of it.
It starts to, it starts to looklike a, a funhouse mirror
version of economic strategy.
They start talking about thebitcoin strategic reserve and
you're saying, okay, well, thatthat makes sense, you know, uh,
having a fund because we have somany bitcoin already.
(05:22):
And then they start adding inXRP and Cardano and actually
they don't even list BTC at thebeginning and Ethereum and all
this other stuff.
What does this have to do?
How does a country holdbasically stocks at this point?
So we'll talk a little bitabout that.
It's insane things in thefinancial markets.
(05:44):
But I wanted to start off theprogram with something I talked
to David about and earlier inthe week I had found an article
from Jim.
Rickards has been an insider inthe game of currency and
(06:07):
precious metals and some of theasymmetrical warfare that goes
on in the financial system.
He worked for the CentralIntelligence Agency, for CISA
and a lot of the analyzing thatgoes on globally when it comes
to the financial markets.
Anyway, rickards put out thisarticle.
It's up on Zero Hedge.
(06:28):
I want to put it up on thescreen because he mentioned
something in here and this isthe kind of host I like to be
for you, because I know we'renot going to do conventional
stuff but you're going to learnsome things.
I learned something.
I didn't know this, but you'regoing to learn some things.
I learned something I didn'tknow this and it has to do.
(06:49):
Look, and he didn't even reallyget into it much, but let's go
through what he mentions in thisarticle about notes that are
owed to the Federal Reserve fromthe Treasury of the United
States going back to 1934.
And again, this article is ongold's historic rally.
We're heading up to 3,000,folks and not financial advice,
(07:16):
not investment advice.
I just have a calculator and Iknow what's happening to the
dollar.
But I want to get in.
Let me get down here to wherehe brings this up, and it's
talking about the certificatesthat were given the Fed.
(07:39):
Let's see.
I want to kind of paint thispicture for you.
First I'll read this Anothertake on monetizing gold revolves
around the fact that theFederal Reserve currently holds
a gold certificate issued by theUS Treasury in 1934 in
compensation for the transfer ofgold bullion from the Fed to
(08:02):
the Treasury on orders ofFranklin Roosevelt, backed up by
legislation.
That certificate is valued onthe Fed's book at 42.22 per
ounce.
If the Treasury ordered the Fedto write up the value to market
, that would add $760 billion tothe Treasury's general account,
(08:23):
which could be used to financethe US government without adding
new debt.
And then he again this is anote that was given to the Fed
for handing over the gold thatthey held to be repatriated
right After Franklin Rooseveltsaid turn in your gold, and it
went from $20 an ounce to $35 anounce.
(08:44):
And so, and it says, can the USeven sell gold?
So this is where it gets reallycrazy and this needs to be
talked about because I didn'tknow this.
Still, the issue of monetizinggold has to be put in the
context of whether thegovernment can legally sell any
(09:06):
gold at all.
If you convert the Fed's goldcertificate into troy ounces of
gold not dollars, but ouncesit's approximately equal to the
entire US gold reserve today8,133 metric tons today, 8,133
(09:29):
metric tons.
If the Fed's gold certificateis intended to be backed by
physical gold, it's possible.
The government cannot sell anygold without diluting the Fed's
gold certificate.
All right, let that sink in,because we're all talking about
what's in Fort Knox, right?
We talk about the 4,000 or someodd tons that's supposed to be
there, and then other goldthat's held through the Federal
(09:50):
Reserve banking system orwhatever.
Right, we have this gold andsupposedly we have 8,133 tons as
a nation.
So back in 1934, we issued thisnote to the Federal Reserve from
the Treasury of the UnitedStates saying here's gold for
you to back all the you know.
(10:10):
Basically, here's the gold thatwe will hold for you.
Here's what we will back up.
With this note, you hand overyour physical gold.
Now who's really in charge?
Is the Fed in charge, or is itthe US Treasury?
Well, if you read the creaturefrom Jekyll Island and
(10:32):
understand how politics actuallyworks, and you have this
international banking consortiumand combine known as the
Federal Reserve.
It's not audited, it's notfederal, it's not a reserve,
(10:57):
it's insidious, a Luciferianbanking system, and it uses its
tentacles to get into everythingand control everything.
Like John D Rockefeller said,own nothing, control everything.
So it doesn't actually ownanything, right, it just
controls all the mechanismsbecause it controls the money
supply.
So again, let that sink in whatI just said.
And I didn't know that, Ididn't know that there, and I do
this all the time.
Why doesn't Tony know that?
Well, even Rickard said it'snot even put into mainline
(11:22):
anything.
Financial analysts don't look atit, they look at the government
holding the gold.
But if you look at it this way,almost entirely the entire gold
supply of the US is alreadyowed to the Fed, just based off
the 1934 gold certificate hesays.
(11:44):
This is not discussed ineconomic literature to my
knowledge, but it could be asimple derivative of the fifth
amendment constraint thatrequired the treasury to give
the feds something of fair valuewhen the gold was confiscated
in 1934.
This happened when the us wason the gold standard and the
weight and value of gold wereinterchangeable.
(12:05):
He says that's not true.
Today, weight is constant butvalue fluctuates.
It may be the case that theTreasury has to maintain a
certain amount of gold by weight, regardless of value, in order
to honor the original deal.
If this analysis is correct,that's extremely bullish for
gold.
It means the world's largestsingle gold holder, the US,
(12:27):
cannot be a seller.
By the way, if you sold all thegold that the US supposedly has
, the 8,133 tons, it's like $760billion, right?
That covers three quarters ofthe interest payment on the debt
for one year.
That's it, and so you know.
(12:52):
Ask me if I'm confident in thecurrent system to maintain
itself.
No, it's really.
It's just this article, andagain it talks about a sovereign
wealth fund, and I talked toDavid about that today.
We really are like.
The strangeness of what'shappening economically right now
(13:16):
has certainly got my attentionand it's had my attention for a
long time, but it's weirder thanI even anticipated.
I mean, when I went to theBitcoin conference in Nashville
it's like a pivotal point in mylife when I went there, too
strangeness and Trump announcedand this was huge because I'd
been in the space for so longand I never anticipated anything
(13:38):
like that in my lifetime to seethat there was going to be a
former US president andpresidential candidate of RFK Jr
talking about making Bitcoin astrategic reserve, and that, to
me, made sense In a digital age.
It's universal, it's not acompany, it's not controlled by
a board of directors, it's adecentralized in theory at least
(14:00):
, too and it's the way itoperates around the world.
It's decentralized store ofvalue based on energy.
So to me, that made sense.
You know I necessarily.
You know I have some argumentsof why I don't think the
taxpayer should foot the bill oranything like that, to purchase
Bitcoin.
But now we're in tomorrow'sthis summit for a crypto summit
(14:26):
or something at the White House,and before this, they just
started announcing that they'regoing to add XRP and Cardano,
ada and all these other coinsand I go.
What now?
Like that has nothing to dowith those of us who understand,
like what Bitcoin is as opposedto what the crypto space is,
(14:47):
which these are two differentanimals, and so they added that
it's like again, it's likeadding a stock or something.
It makes absolutely no sense.
There's a lot of stuff beingfloated around right now,
there's a lot of misdirection,and until I read this from
Rickards, I guess I wasn't even.
(15:08):
It's almost like we want tomake sure we have the gold
because we have to make surethat the Fed maintains its
ownership of it, which I alreadyknew in large part like.
If you drill down to the, thegold confiscation.
(15:28):
It really wasn't goldconfiscation so much as it was.
You know, turn it in, here'sFranklin Roosevelt.
He just gets elected.
The only thing we have to fearis fear itself.
Oh, and also gold confiscation.
And you take your $20 goldpieces, which are now worth
close to $3,000.
You take your $20 gold pieces,which are now worth close to
$3,000.
(15:49):
You take your $20 gold piecesand your $10 gold pieces and
your five and your two and ahalf, and you go turn them in
and you get a piece of paperfrom the Fed and they give you
the certificate and that goldgoes to the US government and
eventually ends up in placeslike the BIS.
It goes to the Bank ofInternational Settlements.
Which was this heist?
I mean inside, this is a majorheist.
(16:09):
I mean that's what the wholepoint of the setup of the
Federal Reserve folks was aheist.
It is to control the moneysupply and to get the gold, to
take it away from the hands ofthe American people, and they
engineered crises to do it.
I mean, there was the economiccrisis of 1907.
(16:33):
Clearly, clearly engineered.
And it's like we've got to getcontrol of the money supply.
And this is how we'll do it.
And, mind you, we hadn't had acentral bank at that time since
1836.
Talk about 1836.
That's when Andrew Jacksonkilled the second bank of the
United States.
There was no central bank thatthis country did not have one
until 1913.
(16:54):
But they had to do a series ofthings to lay the groundwork to
make that happen.
Even the AI, that doesn't knowany better, yet it's not
supposed to tell you the truth.
Even if you look up what themeeting on Jekyll Island was on
November 22, 1910, they call ita secretive conspiracy.
(17:14):
The AI doesn't even it doesn'tknow it's supposed to cover that
up and say that's not true.
It was all very transparent andI was very secretive and they
knew exactly what they weredoing and it took a while.
You know, uh, the Americansystem, you can't turn the ship
around overnight.
You have to set up some reallyhorrible things.
(17:36):
You have to have 1913.
You have to have, uh, theincome tax, the 16th amendment.
You got to get the 17thamendment for the direct
election of senators.
You got to get the FederalReserve and you got to throw in
these free trade deals.
That's what Woodrow Wilson didand, of course, he took us into
World War I.
He ran on a platform of he keptus out of war and that's the
(17:59):
first place he took us was.
He took us into World War I andthe debt of the US was $1
billion, if my memory serves,and at the end of the war, from
1917 to 1919, 1920, the debt ofthe US was $5 billion.
So, you know, once they gotcontrol of the money supply, and
(18:20):
that's when they take you towar and that's when they, you
know, start.
You know, you look at theCarnegie Foundation, some of the
things that they studied priorto World War I, and this is all
these foundations and otherthings.
It's all the same thing, right?
They're all the tentacles ofthe same octopus.
And you look at what theystudied, they're like, hey, we
want to make some societalchanges, because that's what
(18:41):
people, for whatever reason they, get ultra rich they want to
start farming you and they wantto make societal changes.
They said what's the quickestway to do that.
And they said, oh well, theirthink tank came back and said oh
, it's a war.
You know, it's a way to reformsociety.
Is you need a war?
And then they said, okay, howdo we get one?
(19:02):
And that was 1912.
So, you know, they had theTitanic and you had to make sure
that those people went to thebottom of the ocean, a lot of
people that that were on the,the melons and the asters and
other people that opposed theFederal Reserve.
And then you got to take outWilliam Howard Taft.
So you run Teddy Roosevelt,right, you have to siphon off
votes and you could put in thisintellectual, the first PhD and
(19:24):
only PhD president that we everhad.
We had Woodrow Wilson.
Anyway, this is a long wayaround saying there's a history.
They'd build it up to get to1933, 1934.
And it was a heist.
And now that I understand andI'd never seen it put that way
is that basically the gold forthe US was already turned over,
(19:49):
at least in paper, right.
So you have this foreign entitythat's literally just
parasitically on the bodypolitic of the republic,
controlling events with an IOU,with the full faith and credit
of the US Treasury.
That's what it's supposed to,and that's a very clever thing,
because a lot of that gold thatwas taken anyway in 1934 was
(20:14):
repatriated again to Basel,switzerland.
You can find some of thisthere's great research on this
in Rodney Howard Brown's bookthe Killing of Uncle Sam, and
this is like all these thingsare.
It's funny.
There's really nothing newunder the sun.
It's just about heist and theftand grift.
You know, they can just make itmore complicated and that's
(20:37):
what I'm trying to figure outnow.
It's like if you look at thetariff issue with Trump, I
support tariffs, matter of fact,this is such a strange reality
for me to be in and I can't evenexplain to you how strange it
was for me.
Running for Congress andgetting this is not that long
ago I mean, it's 2013, 2014, andit was like an insane idea.
(21:00):
Then I was like that was evenon my campaign literature.
I supported modest tariffs toreset the financial structure.
One, you know it incentivizedcompanies to move here and make
things here, and you know thecompanies that were already here
not to move and make thingshere, and economic zones and
getting away from the corporateincome tax.
(21:21):
All that stuff, great, but youhave to understand like it's
worlds away.
And now we're in this realmwhere there's tariffs everywhere
but they're not strategic, andyou even, what are they for?
Like you know, there isn't anyreal strategy there, and perhaps
there is, maybe the fact thatI'm missing it is the strategy.
(21:45):
It's just about causing chaosand disruption for the sake of
it, because inside the chaos,there's always an opportunity,
right, there's always somethingto grab onto.
Perhaps that and that's notwhat I'm not seeing Certainly
has completely upended theprecious metals system, and
(22:06):
that's for a good thing, atleast in the short run.
There's probably going to be alot of economic pain based off
the fact that the whole world'sbeen floating on fake for so
long.
You guys understand it's a $400trillion economy with $350
trillion in debt worldwide,globally, right, right?
(22:37):
Well, how do you?
How do you evaluate?
How do you put value when you,when you inject paper currency
that's not backed by anythinginto a financial system, how do
you quantify what value actuallyis?
Woo-woo, you know navel-gazing,kind of philosophical debates
on.
You know superstitiously, likehow many angels can dance on the
(23:00):
head of a pin and stuff likethat.
Well, how much fake makes youknow?
How do you get real value outof fake things.
How do you quantify?
I don't know.
I don't know how you quantifyit, but these little nuggets
where you find out, oh well, allthe gold in the US is already
on paper owed to the Fed.
But they don't say it that way.
It's interesting to unfold andyou know, it's one of those like
(23:24):
you get.
It maybe brings a smile to myface whenever I learn something
Like oh, of course, that's theway, course, that's what it was
the whole time and I didn't seeit, you know, and that's never
been laid out that way.
So interesting, interestingtimes.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, uh,we've got a lot to cover today
(23:44):
too, besides this and I went alittle long but my friend Donald
Jeffries has put out an articleand perhaps I'll talk to the
chat before we get to Don'sarticle.
But he's put out an article andI don't read enough of Don's
stuff on the air.
I follow him, I subscribe andcontribute to his sub stack.
I want to encourage you all todo that.
(24:05):
But he's got a great article onDoge and Trump and uh, what's
going on with with that?
And just the just laying out,trying to make sense of uh, you
know, because we, as analystsand people in alternative media
just want to give you my best,the you know, the best possible
analysis.
Uh, without you know getting Ieven call it.
(24:27):
I said today with to davidknight was like partisan
politics gives you brain damage,because then you can't remember
people cheering on like ohBlackRock, blackrock's got the
ports in Panama.
Big deal Is that good.
Is BlackRock on our team now?
It's BlackRock.
(24:48):
I mean seriously, larry Finkand BlackRock are buying up
these, like in giant swaths ofresidential housing and
outbidding first-time homebuyersand just snatching up.
Why are they doing that?
I've been asking this, you know,and bringing this to your
attention for years, years.
(25:09):
And we're talking aboutBlackRock and you know, has
everybody forgotten ESG,environmental, social Governance
?
Larry Fink himself said thatthey could change behavior
through the financial system andthrough incentives.
So why do they want to farm you?
Why do they want to change yourbehavior?
Oh, that's the overlord complex.
(25:31):
That's what you get fromBlackRock.
How much behavior can theychange if they own giant swaths
of the residential housingsupply in the United States?
What's the end goal there?
That's to change behavior.
It's to change how you live.
It's to change ownership.
What is ESG?
It's to change how you live.
(25:51):
It's to change ownership.
What is ESG?
Environmental social governanceis Marxian politics and policy.
It's cultural Marxism throughthe financial system.
And you may say well, tony,these are some of the world's
richest people.
Why would they want to imposeMarxism?
You haven't listened to myother shows.
You don't understand how itworks.
(26:13):
I mean, again, this is whereyou get cultural Marxism and
Marxian ideology.
That's where it flows down from.
It doesn't come from the bottomup, it comes from the top down.
I mean, I can go through ahistory lesson of Marx and who
Karl Marx was and what, butagain, that's where this is.
(26:38):
The Communist Manifesto callsfor the fifth plank, I believe,
as a central bank.
Now we've adopted every aspectof graduated income tax.
The entire thing of theCommunist Manifesto has been
adopted by the super elitebecause they funded Marx and
because that they put him inplace.
Because this is a top-downtotalitarian system of way of
thinking.
They think of themselves as thelanded gentry of the.
(27:00):
You're the new serfs and theygot to control that.
And you know price controls,all the stuff that you know
emanates from the top down.
Marxism isn't a bottom-up thing.
That's not how any of thatworks.
So ESG is an extension of that,and that's where BlackRock
steps in and these othercompanies.
(27:21):
I mean, this is where we'vebeen talking about this for
years.
There's companies that don'teven try to make money anymore.
They're not even trying to makea profit.
They're not in the black,they're in the red, but they can
borrow as much as they wantbecause, behaviorally, they're
approved.
(27:42):
I'm skeptical of all that stuff.
You've got to keep your head ona swivel.
Stay frosty, friends.
This is not the time to get.
You know, don't become thesheeple.
Get caught up in partisanpolitics, you know?
Hey, if somebody does somethinggreat I mean, I'm all about
Zelensky getting thrown out ofthe White House that sounds
(28:03):
great.
Now do Netanyahu.
All right, let's go over tocomments real quick.
And then I want to jump intothis article from don.
Let me take this off the screenreal quick.
All right, let's jump into this.
See what's going on over onrockfin.
See my friend jason barker'sover there.
(28:26):
Brian deb mccartney good to seeyou.
Karen Carpenter, great show withTiger last night.
Tony, I was on with Angry Tiger.
Great show, had a fun talk.
I think we just did a littlebit over an hour.
Excellent, excellent program,smart show.
(28:49):
We'll have to get Tiger on overhere sometime.
We're going to be recording anew Paratrooper on Sunday with
Danny of the Rabbit HoleConspiracy Podcast and Mr
Anderson and myself, so that'llbe fun.
Let's make sure I got Harps isover on the Twitter stream.
(29:10):
Good to see you, harps.
Let's go and see who's over onRumble.
You can catch this and I needto work on my channels, but the
American Unplugged channel overon Rumble as well.
Knights of the Storm over thereand Birdhouse Blues.
Birdhouse Blues always has someinteresting comments.
Let's see Paleo Armory.
(29:40):
We need a gold-only option forall the tiers on Wolfpack.
Hey, that's an interestingthing you just brought up,
because next week I can't do allthe tiers because that's
impossible for the cost.
But I'm announcing somethingnext week, if you're Wolfpack,
I'm revolutionizing the Wolfpacksystem and I had to brief my
(30:01):
crew on it because you've got tobe ahead of the ball on it, and
we also added the gold grams,so that's free shipping, gold
gram, gold gram, bars, all thatstuff that's already on there
for gold only, but we havesomething coming for that and it
won't be all the tiers, butI've got something in mind.
I'm adding a new in the finaltier to Wolfpack, so stay tuned
(30:23):
for that.
Let's see.
Uh.
Birdhouse blue says I love art.
Well, I appreciate that.
I think this is, uh, my laborof love.
It's all I find, uh, once aweek, a little stream of
consciousness and some articles,and and uh, let's see if we can
pull some uh meaning and getsome good strategy out of all
(30:48):
this.
Uh strategy comes from thegreek wordos, which means leader
of the army.
So in that spirit, let's keepthat mindset.
All right, let's jump on over tothis article from Don, and Don
(31:10):
Jeffries is an American treasure.
It's such a great article I'lldo my best to cover the entire
thing, but he just brings up somuch good stuff because a lot's
happened.
That's what we're good into.
Let me put this up on thescreen.
(31:31):
You can go todonaldjeffriessubstackcom or you
can go to donaldjeffriesmediaand find him, support him, if
you can.
I'm going to have Don on totalk about his new book, the
American Memory Hall.
I just need to schedule it withhim.
Let's put this up on the screen.
(31:52):
This is the iProtest blog andit says Doge, the Epstein list
in World War III, wwe theater,front and center.
So says Donald Jeffries.
I've criticized Donald Trumpcountless times for his pattern
(32:13):
of promising, bloviating andbacking off, or, more often,
flip-flopping.
I coined the term theTrumpenstein Project to explain
his befuddling behavior.
He talked the talk but neverwalked the walk.
All toupee and no cattle Well,now he can't stop walking.
All to pay and no cattle well,now he can't stop walking.
(32:35):
Trump 2.0 has unleashed a seriesof often fine-looking executive
orders in the first month backin office supermodel executive
orders.
He abolished birthrightcitizenship.
He withdrew the us from the who.
He rolled back any recognitionof the transgender lunacy.
He declared an emergency at thesouthern border.
He reaffirmed a commitment tofree speech and against
(32:55):
censorship for what that's worth.
He is ending the annoyingdaylight savings time and now
he's establishing English as theofficial language of the United
States.
Now they all sound really good,but how much will that actually
change?
Already, a federal judge haspredictably ruled that the ban
(33:17):
on birthright citizenship isunconstitutional.
That's what federal judges dounder the odious guise of
judicial review.
In 30 days, really, on his firstday back in office, trump did
more than he did in his previousfour years in the White House,
and he's absolutely right aboutthat.
Look it surprised, you know.
(33:39):
Patrick Henry famously said youknow, I light my path with the
lamp of experience.
I know of no other way ofjudging the future but by the
past.
And so those of us who followhistory and understand, I mean,
you've shown us one thing, andthis certainly has a different
tone to it and there's a speedand there's something to it.
(33:59):
And again, if you hear somebodysays they know exactly what's
going on, they don't.
I'm not even sure the peoplethat are doing it do.
A few days ago, trump staged andit was definitely staged the
most remarkable meeting with aforeign leader that Washington
DC has ever seen.
From the moment he greetedvertically challenged Ukrainian
(34:24):
Democratic leader VladimirZelensky, with a Trumpian troll
at his casual attire mocking himwith I see you dressed up.
It was pure WWE theater.
Zelensky is shown he is willingto wear a suit and tie if the
occasion calls for it, forinstance when he meets with
(34:46):
Israeli Democratic leader BibiNetanyahu.
During the meeting, which wasaired live before the press,
trump and JD Vance both scoldedthe pathetic former Ukrainian
comedian like he was a naughtyschoolboy, not an upstanding
world leader, who was once wowedaudiences by playing the piano
(35:06):
with his penis.
Zelensky's Boris Badenovimpression just didn't
intimidate anyone and Trumpsupposedly wound up throwing him
out of the place.
Yes, trump made certain to havehis hands formed into the
familiar triangle as he met withthe upstanding, quote-unquote
(35:28):
democratic leader of ukraine,just as elon musk made certain
to flash similarly unnaturalhand and finger formations
during his recent visit to theoval office.
I forget what you call thatit's like.
Uh, it's not a mandala, it'ssomething else, something you
(35:49):
make.
It's like the formations ofyour hands.
You know it has something to dowith presence and you see that
a lot with people that willteach that in certain things
like new neuro-linguisticprogramming and other things, I
mean it maybe has something toit, but then you always just get
Illuminati confirmed for it.
Anyway, let's see, it was onceestimated one billion children,
(36:21):
estimated.
One of his estimated onebillion children wiped a booger
on Trump's desk or somethinghe's talking about.
Elon Musk, to be fair, I recallsomeone advising me back in the
misty days of America 1.0,because Don calls it America 2.0
, that I should form my handsintoa triangle when being
(36:41):
interviewed.
Something about how itdisplayed confidence and power.
I don't know.
It didn't work for me.
I don't see how you can feignpower with the other party knows
.
You don't have it.
All those weird things the richand famous do with their hands
obviously must be significant.
They appear to be swearingallegiance to someone, or
(37:04):
something like wearing yourguy's letterman jacket or a blue
collar name tag.
Well, there's something to that.
As I said, there's something tothat.
They do flash those signs.
It would have been a great videoof Trump picking up the
(37:24):
arrogant Democratic leader withthe Napoleon complex and tossing
him onto the lawn of the WhiteHouse, maybe tarred and feather
him using red, white and bluetar.
Poor Vladimir didn't even knowthat he wasn't going to have a
lunch in his honor.
As Trump laughed out at himduring the meeting, he certainly
(37:45):
sounded the right themes.
You're playing with millions oflives.
You're playing with World WarIII.
Zelensky appeared unmoved andhis fan base in Hollywood and
the state-sponsored media wereappalled at how disrespected he
was, treated horribly by thebully Trump and JD Vance, whom
(38:06):
they never failed to denigratefor supposedly wearing eyeliner
pants, whom that never failed todenigrate for supposedly
wearing eyeliner?
I do, yeah, they.
That's another thing.
Whatever happened to theeyeliner story?
That was uh, that was all therage.
Or you can talk about MarcoRubio's foam parties.
Remember that that didn't getbrought up anymore.
Um, let's see, it certainlywould be if eyeliner adored the
(38:38):
face of a random obese, greenhair, heavily tattooed
transgender with a nose ring.
Those who somehow thought thiscartoonish bullwinkle villain in
a black sweatsuit, who refusesto consider us a ceasefire or
stop sacrificing his people in ahopeless cause, was the good
guy, were reaffirming theircommitment to war.
Zelensky appears to want WorldWar III.
(39:01):
So does the entire Americanwoke left.
Nuclear weapons are so cool nowno nukes.
Sorry, can't remember that.
My memory is going a smoked.
A lot of pot back at thoseconcerts.
But nukes are a reasonableoption when you stand with
(39:21):
Ukraine.
Sure, zelensky banned allopposition parties and shut down
newspapers who criticized him.
Parties and shut downnewspapers who criticized him.
But we paid Ben Stiller $4million to slobber all over him.
And Ben Stiller wouldn't lie.
And do I need to remind youthat he can do what he can do
(39:43):
with a piano?
That certainly ought to countfor something.
Would Bono give a concert inthe middle of an alleged war
zone for just a Democraticleader?
Oh, this has all been such ashow, hasn't it?
I was talking, I was mentioningthe other day just topped.
I mean, this is the stuff thatrattles around in my head, but
(40:06):
I've done so many, I read somany articles and did so much
research.
You know, in 2020, 2021,especially Guys, does anybody
remember the first person to getthe COVID jabs was a guy named
William Shakespeare, because allthe world's a stage.
Go look that up.
That was out of the UK and Ihad forgotten that.
(40:31):
All of a sudden it'll pop backup in my mind to remind me
you're still inside.
All this is still going on.
The ops change, the charactersmay be changed, things are
rearranged, but you're still onthe stage.
This is beyond my poor powers tofathom exactly what the purpose
(40:52):
of this, the steel matchencounter between Trump and
Zelensky, was.
To make Trump look tough to theMAGA crowd.
Why was the press there and whowas the guy who blasted
Zelensky for decidedlynon-formal outfit?
I think that was MarjorieTaylor Greene's guy or something
(41:18):
, wasn't it?
The most important question isdid Trump's slimp Zelensky yet
another billion or so during hisunceremonious exit from the
White House?
Exit from the White House.
If Trump permits another pennybefore he outlaws them to be
sent to this arrogant actordictator, then that destroys any
(41:40):
pretense that this was alegitimate event.
But I'm guessing that's whathappened or will happen.
It's a Trumpenstein thing youwouldn't understand.
But if Trump stops the aid toUkraine and continues to lecture
on the dangers of World War III, then that would be a good
thing and it would cause morequote woke warmongers' heads to
(42:05):
explode, which is always fun, Ijust think, completely like Don,
at this moment.
Tds levels were already on redalert prior to the Zelensky
carnival sideshow.
We did continue to hearallegations that Elon Musk and
Doge are really quote cleaninghouse, firing government workers
(42:25):
left and right, many of themthe essential hardworking types
that most of us are largelyunaware of.
One claim is that some of theseterminated employees were quote
working on nuclear weapons orsomething.
That's kind of vague, isn't it?
Actually, the claims on bothsides are pretty dubious.
(42:46):
Musk and Trump brag aboutsaving a gazillion dollars or so
already without eliminating anyagencies, just auditing USAID.
So I'd like more details withthat, please.
And those with TDS Trumpderangement syndrome are
apoplectic about losing theopportunity to pay all those
(43:08):
humble and lovable federalworkers a very generous wage
along with a much better benefitpackage than those in the
boring world of private industry.
Isn't this weird too?
I mean, if you watch the stateof the union, I didn't watch it.
I I saw some of the lowlights.
It didn't seem like a realelection.
(43:34):
It doesn't seem.
Politics is no longer politics.
But I'm always fascinated bypeople that you know.
What did Hillary Clinton say?
She called it the politics ofmeaning.
Right, because if you don'tbelieve in a higher power or you
don't believe in somethingbeyond yourself, you have to
(43:54):
find it.
It's like GK Chesterton saidthat when people don't believe
in God, they don't believe innothing, they believe in
everything.
And so you find these peoplewho make politics their meaning,
and that seems like such anempty place.
I used to think that there wassome meaning to it and and maybe
(44:15):
there is, and maybe I'm just sojaded I can't see it anymore
and just I have the glasses onfrom they live.
So I can't.
I can't do it.
But I noticed this, the articlethat was up on.
You know, al Green theCongressman gets up and he's got
his cane and he's morallyoutraged.
He's going to stop the wholeState of the Union.
He gets thrown out by MikeJohnson and censured by Congress
(44:38):
and all the rest.
But it just really drives homethe fact that people in power
will fight everything but evil,Like, say, you don't disagree
with Trump, fine, you knowwhatever.
But I remember something AlGreen did after you know,
january 6th.
He went out to the steps of theWhite House, like two weeks
(45:02):
later, and he sat out there withhis mask on.
He's like I'm not going to letyou know another January 6th
happen, just like there was anarmy of QAnon people and other
things that are supposedlycoming to the.
They had this.
They kept releasing all thisstuff that people were going to
go back to the White House.
And I remember thinking likeagain and I brought him up I'm
like these people will fighteverything but evil.
(45:23):
They'll fight perceived thingsbut not actual evil.
They don't stand up.
I mean, when's the last timeanybody in that political party
tried to put an end to any ofthese wars?
I mean, talk about Zelensky,talk about millions.
What about the children in Gazaor Yemen or Iraq?
(45:47):
That's just the war part, orthe smuggling that goes on.
The amount of human evil isstaggering the exploitation of
people, the farming of people,the experimentation on people
through big pharma and thingsthat have gone on through big
(46:08):
pharma and things that have goneon, but none of that for some
reason triggered Al Green tostand up and start protesting.
No, it's the State of the Unionwith Trump.
And this is the derangement.
I don't understand.
What about the?
Of course he's going to be,it's going to be partisan, it's
(46:28):
going to do all the stuff.
It's the same thing that Bidendid.
And you have people like JoeWilson is standing up and
screaming at Obama.
You lied, Joe Wilson.
That same congressman wants tomake a $250 bill and put Trump's
face on it.
It's so partisan, it really isexhausting.
(46:50):
I'll go back to don's article,but it really is it.
That's something to think about.
And before you get partisan,like on, and just how?
Why don't people in power everfight evil?
What they talk about, real evil, you know, fight the other team
, but never actually evil, donsays.
(47:17):
I would like to know where allthis public outrage was when
countless American workers inprivate industry were kicked to
the curb through no fault oftheir own in the past several
decades, in the first 16 yearsof this century alone, some
600,000 employees were laid off,outsourced or replaced by cheap
(47:37):
foreign labor by just 11companies.
That's just 11 companies, folks.
The examples are never-ending.
Ibm got rid of 60,000 employeesin 1993.
Sears and Kmart laid off 50,000in January 1993.
Happy New Year.
(47:57):
At&t laid off 40,000 in 1996.
Ford eliminated 35,000 workersin 2002.
General Motors 47,000 in 2009.
Citigroup 50,000 in 2008.
These are just a few instancesof the outsourcing, downsizing
fervor that gripped corporateAmerica beginning in the 1980s.
(48:21):
Dell laid off 26,000 in 2024.
I didn't see any gnashing ofteeth on that over social media,
but there is, he says there's apussyhat level of screeching
over the prospects of governmentcutbacks.
Why this double standard?
Why do the same people whosnickered you should have
(48:44):
learned new skills?
When some useless eater inprivate industry lost his or her
job, abandoned all reason overthe prospect of scrutinizing
federal workers For the firsttime, I might add.
Until now, no one working forthe government had to worry
about being outsourced, replacedby a foreign visa worker.
(49:06):
The joke goes that it'simpossible to be fired from the
federal government, but it's nojoke.
You have to do something reallyawful to lose a government job.
So why, then, is it easy to befired by a private company?
As I can personally attest to,this is especially true in the
so-called right-to-work states,where they can fire you without
(49:27):
cause, as happened to me in 2018.
What Doge is suggesting isfinally looking at various
public employees actually do toearn their generous
taxpayer-provided income.
In private industry, we all havebeen scrutinized.
I've had bosses that literallylooked over your shoulder,
(49:49):
stared a hole through you whileyou were trying to concentrate
on your work.
That would never happen to anygovernment worker.
I had a friend who worked inthe post office back when they
paid extraordinarily well andhad premium benefits.
He described how there was someimmigrant worker whose job it
was to sort mail by zip codethat routinely just tossed mail
into various zip code slotswithout even looking at them.
(50:12):
Well, that's where my mail went.
That goes a long way towardsexplaining why it frequently
takes so long for the mail totravel to such a short distance.
My friend eventually grew tiredof figuring out his job
function and that no one reallysupervised him, so he just
followed the crowd and didwhatever he wanted.
(50:35):
Yeah, that's an attitude, right,it's systemic.
You find it when something getsso bloated.
There's so much of a mixed bagto take from this, by the way.
There's so much of a mixed bagto take from this, by the way,
to navigate these waters withouthaving partisan brain damage.
It's harder and harder to do,but we'll get done.
(50:57):
It'll get done on this program.
I promise you that I'm going toskip around a little bit.
Let's see.
Yeah, and in the same week wesaw rumors and more rumors about
the epstein list finally beingreleased.
Attorney general pam bondi saidshe had it on her desk, then
(51:19):
vented at the fbi for draggingits feet, then dragged her own
feet.
Eventually, a truly ridiculousphoto op of various conservative
quote influencers was widelycirculated, where the likes of
mike cernovich, dc drano whoeverthat is, uh, liz wheeler and
the lips of top tiktok womanwere captured, waving folders
that read the epstein files,phase one.
(51:41):
This phase one consisted ofcompletely redacted pages.
What exactly are the legalramifications of this list?
Anyhow, the authoritiesadmitted taking videos and hard
drives from Epstein's mansion.
Why aren't any influencerswaving them in public?
As I've said, if Trump's name ison any list, maga people will
(52:04):
say it's fake.
If it's not, then those withTDS will say it's fake will say
it's fake.
If it's not, then those withTDS will say it's fake.
While we can watch the WWEspectacles, we don't really know
what's happening.
Both sides have a vestedinterest in making it appear
that Trump is deporting a recordnumber of illegal immigrants.
The official numbers don't seemto bear that out, but the MAGA
(52:26):
people claim it's happening, andthose with TDS claim that he's
already cleaned out the schoolsof Hispanic names and broken up
families.
The same can be said aboutgovernment workers.
Those now with critical stageTDS allege that the government
soon won't have anyone left tomanage it or to mismanage it.
The MAGA people basically agree, cheering at Trump for taking
(52:50):
out the trash.
There was this talk about theDepartment of Education being
abolished, but it's still inexistence, as far as I can tell.
Will Trump actually abolish theIRS, as he suggested doing?
Look for more Freemasonicoccult hand signals from Elon
Musk.
Don Jeffries, is it too much toexpect transparency from those
(53:16):
who govern us?
Why do so many taxpayers balkat the idea of seeing where
their money is going?
This is a whole new level ofStockholm syndrome, our drunken,
abusive national spouse finallybeing on the ropes and millions
are squealing.
No, he swears he'll change.
The USAID disclosures are fakenews.
(53:39):
The fact-checkers, albeit whileon the USAID payroll,
themselves have debunkedeverything Doge has discovered.
Ignorance is bliss when you'relooking at intelligence budgets,
but why?
That's why they've always beensecret.
Millions of people don't care,as witnessed by the reaction to
(54:02):
just a few rays of sunshine onthe rotten, corrupt mess Ron
Paul is advising Doge.
This is why he would have beena great president.
If it results in no one beingheld accountable, then it's
largely for naught.
But for now, I'm popping morepopcorn and enjoying.
(54:24):
The show that's Donald Jeffries, ladies and gents, fun times.
The show that's donald jeffries, ladies and gents, fun times uh
again.
Uh, go support don.
It's just uh.
It's a great uh sub stack andyou know he dumps articles uh
(54:45):
once or twice a week.
Got some good stuff up there.
That's very well thought out.
I mean, we're trying tonavigate these waters in between
partisanship.
What's actually happening?
You know you got the.
The inner lockings and movingsof the us economy right now and
world economy are absolutelyfascinating and terrifying at
the same time, because you havea a chance for it's like going
(55:06):
back and looking at some of thequotes prior to the 1929 stock
crash or 2008,.
You very manufactured by any ofthe stability that you would
find in the world economy andthese tariffs not based on
(55:42):
revenue and not based off ofprotectionism David Knight
explained that very well basedoff of protectionism David
Knight explained that very well,which you have to understand
about tariffs which I support inthe general sense is that
Thomas Jefferson used tariffs tomake sure that no one knew the
tax man, that foreign importsfunded the government.
(56:03):
That way regular people didn'thave to pay the burden of that.
And later in the 19th centuryit was used for protectionism.
You know, post-civil War andthe Industrial Revolution.
It was tariffs.
You know, and this is somethingthat even Abraham Lincoln
(56:25):
that's what he ran on.
You know, I'm humble, abrahamLincoln I'm for the tariff and
I'm for a central bank.
I mean, that was a plank of theRepublican Party, william
McKinley, who was assassinatedprobably for one of those
reasons.
A gold standard and tariffs,this was a part of our national
(56:47):
identity.
This is how we paid for things,it's how we protected our
industry.
But a lot of that changed.
Even Karl Marx wrote about thatprotectionism was conservative
and that free trade hastened therevolution.
That's why he opposed tariffs.
Karl Marx opposed tariffs andopposed protectionism because he
(57:10):
believed that if you got rid ofthose barriers, that it would
make the revolution more.
It would hasten it, it wouldbring it about faster.
You can go look that quote up,by the way.
Almost everything.
I've been over this a milliontimes, but there's something
strange about these.
So I pay attention to wherethis goes.
I'm not sure what it's tryingto set up, but there's a lot
(57:31):
going on here that's beyondnormal politics and beyond
normal economic positioning,because the world is changing.
There's a race towardsresources, ladies and gents,
that's what we're watching.
Resources, ladies and gents,that's what we're watching.
(57:52):
A revaluation, a transvaluation, if you will, and we're on top
of that here.
Appreciate everybody joiningtoday.
Thanks to my listeners over onWWCR, thanks for tuning in
Worldwide Christian Radio.
Be sure, and give us a likewherever you can.
If you can follow us on podcasta pair of truth there give us a
review.
It really helped us help withthe algorithms.
(58:14):
I have some new pair of truththere's coming out real soon.
Like I said, we are recordingSunday.
That'll be a great show overwith with Danny and the rabbit
hole podcast and Mr Anderson.
So, go, go, give us a review.
Make sure you follow that show,that channel and that show.
It would mean a lot to mebecause I got new stuff coming
out and the wise wolf goldencrypto show, new stuff coming
(58:36):
out there, and I'm now puttingup all of the episodes that I do
with David every week to go upexclusively on the wise wolf
golden crypto channel, so gocheck that out.
Uh, big announcement too ForWolfpack those who are Wolfpack
members I have something reallycool that's going to happen next
(58:58):
week by Thursday, justannouncing some changes.
Some of that was going on inthe chat today, so be sure and
stay tuned because there mightbe some other stuff announced
where you could maybe winsomething.
I'm thinking about what I wantto give away, but there's going
to be some giveaways and someincentives and a whole bunch of
(59:19):
cool stuff.
So I appreciate everybody whojoined today and remember that's
Arterburngold is my website.
Remember that's?
Arterburngold is my website.
You can get there and all thelinks to Wise Wolf and all of
the incentives are right there.
Promo code 1776.
All right, so you guys takecare of each other until we see
(59:40):
you next week, All right.
End of transmission.
Thank you.
Then out spake brave Horatius,the captain of the gate To every
(01:35):
man upon this earth.
Death cometh sooner or later,and how can a man die better
than facing fearful odds for theashes of his fathers and the
temples of his gods?
Lord McAlay, you are listeningto the Ardaburn Radio
(02:03):
Transmission.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
Then I call on you, in the name of liberty, of
patriotism and everything dearto the American character, to
come to our aid with alldispatch.
The enemy is receivingreinforcements daily and will no
doubt increase to three or fourthousand in four or five days.
Thousand and four or five days.
(02:47):
If this call is neglected, I amdetermined to sustain myself as
long as possible and die like asoldier who never forgets what
is due to his own honor and thatof his country.
Victory or death, that iswilliam barrett travis.
Today is the anniversary march6th the fall of the alamo 1836.
Ladies, ladies and gents, greatletter.
I looked I had in my archivesome years ago I put the letter
(03:11):
over a Megadeth song and Icouldn't find it.
We did that in the studio longago in San Antonio.
But maybe next year and maybeat the end of the episode, I'll
talk a little bit about thathistory, some fascinating Texas
history that doesn't getcirculated as much anymore,
especially after thewhitewashing, the neutering, the
(03:36):
retelling, the reimagining ofTexas history that's happened in
the last 10 or 15 years hasbeen pretty brutal, ladies and
gents, and I've been out in theforefront fighting that battle
for a while now, but maybe we'lltalk a little bit about that.
So it is the 6th of March 2025.
(03:57):
This is the Arterburn RadioTransmission.
I am your host, tony Arterburn.
I'm broadcasting In Defiance ofGlobalist Goblins, the Neocons
and the New World Order, alongwith my co-pilot and co-host,
beans the Brave, from deepwithin the heart of Texas today,
in my home in Denison.
I just got done with the DavidKnight Show Always fun to talk
(04:19):
to David.
We went over a little bit ofour usual time we usually do
about 30 minutes but David and Iget to talking and there's so
much going on.
I mean it really is, and evenhe and I were speculating just
to try to figure out what is allof this for.
We'll talk a little bit aboutthe chaos of the tariffs, the
(04:39):
financial system, justeverything that is absolutely
upside down.
And, like you're trying to read, what is the strategy here, if
you look at the headlines ofDrudge, you see you know Trump
caving on tariffs, or is hecaving?
Or what's going on?
He's placing tariffs on Mexicoand Canada and all around the
world and you know this is somuch to unpack there, because
(05:02):
you look at that.
You look at the financialsystem of the sovereign wealth
fund and all the rest of it.
It starts to, it starts to looklike a, a funhouse mirror
version of economic strategy.
They start talking about thebitcoin strategic reserve and
you're saying, okay, well, thatthat makes sense, you know, uh,
having a fund because we have somany bitcoin already.
(05:22):
And then they start adding inXRP and Cardano and actually
they don't even list BTC at thebeginning and Ethereum and all
this other stuff.
What does this have to do?
How does a country holdbasically stocks at this point?
So we'll talk a little bitabout that.
It's insane things in thefinancial markets.
(05:44):
But I wanted to start off theprogram with something I talked
to David about and earlier inthe week I had found an article
from Jim.
Rickards has been an insider inthe game of currency and
(06:07):
precious metals and some of theasymmetrical warfare that goes
on in the financial system.
He worked for the CentralIntelligence Agency, for CISA
and a lot of the analyzing thatgoes on globally when it comes
to the financial markets.
Anyway, rickards put out thisarticle.
It's up on Zero Hedge.
(06:28):
I want to put it up on thescreen because he mentioned
something in here and this isthe kind of host I like to be
for you, because I know we'renot going to do conventional
stuff but you're going to learnsome things.
I learned something.
I didn't know this, but you'regoing to learn some things.
I learned something I didn'tknow this and it has to do.
(06:49):
Look, and he didn't even reallyget into it much, but let's go
through what he mentions in thisarticle about notes that are
owed to the Federal Reserve fromthe Treasury of the United
States going back to 1934.
And again, this article is ongold's historic rally.
We're heading up to 3,000,folks and not financial advice,
(07:16):
not investment advice.
I just have a calculator and Iknow what's happening to the
dollar.
But I want to get in.
Let me get down here to wherehe brings this up, and it's
talking about the certificatesthat were given the Fed.
(07:39):
Let's see.
I want to kind of paint thispicture for you.
First I'll read this Anothertake on monetizing gold revolves
around the fact that theFederal Reserve currently holds
a gold certificate issued by theUS Treasury in 1934 in
compensation for the transfer ofgold bullion from the Fed to
(08:02):
the Treasury on orders ofFranklin Roosevelt, backed up by
legislation.
That certificate is valued onthe Fed's book at 42.22 per
ounce.
If the Treasury ordered the Fedto write up the value to market
, that would add $760 billion tothe Treasury's general account,
(08:23):
which could be used to financethe US government without adding
new debt.
And then he again this is anote that was given to the Fed
for handing over the gold thatthey held to be repatriated
right After Franklin Rooseveltsaid turn in your gold, and it
went from $20 an ounce to $35 anounce.
(08:44):
And so, and it says, can the USeven sell gold?
So this is where it gets reallycrazy and this needs to be
talked about because I didn'tknow this.
Still, the issue of monetizinggold has to be put in the
context of whether thegovernment can legally sell any
(09:06):
gold at all.
If you convert the Fed's goldcertificate into troy ounces of
gold not dollars, but ouncesit's approximately equal to the
entire US gold reserve today8,133 metric tons today, 8,133
(09:29):
metric tons.
If the Fed's gold certificateis intended to be backed by
physical gold, it's possible.
The government cannot sell anygold without diluting the Fed's
gold certificate.
All right, let that sink in,because we're all talking about
what's in Fort Knox, right?
We talk about the 4,000 or someodd tons that's supposed to be
there, and then other goldthat's held through the Federal
(09:50):
Reserve banking system orwhatever.
Right, we have this gold andsupposedly we have 8,133 tons as
a nation.
So back in 1934, we issued thisnote to the Federal Reserve from
the Treasury of the UnitedStates saying here's gold for
you to back all the you know.
(10:10):
Basically, here's the gold thatwe will hold for you.
Here's what we will back up.
With this note, you hand overyour physical gold.
Now who's really in charge?
Is the Fed in charge, or is itthe US Treasury?
Well, if you read the creaturefrom Jekyll Island and
(10:32):
understand how politics actuallyworks, and you have this
international banking consortiumand combine known as the
Federal Reserve.
It's not audited, it's notfederal, it's not a reserve,
(10:57):
it's insidious, a Luciferianbanking system, and it uses its
tentacles to get into everythingand control everything.
Like John D Rockefeller said,own nothing, control everything.
So it doesn't actually ownanything, right, it just
controls all the mechanismsbecause it controls the money
supply.
So again, let that sink in whatI just said.
And I didn't know that, Ididn't know that there, and I do
this all the time.
Why doesn't Tony know that?
Well, even Rickard said it'snot even put into mainline
(11:22):
anything.
Financial analysts don't look atit, they look at the government
holding the gold.
But if you look at it this way,almost entirely the entire gold
supply of the US is alreadyowed to the Fed, just based off
the 1934 gold certificate hesays.
(11:44):
This is not discussed ineconomic literature to my
knowledge, but it could be asimple derivative of the fifth
amendment constraint thatrequired the treasury to give
the feds something of fair valuewhen the gold was confiscated
in 1934.
This happened when the us wason the gold standard and the
weight and value of gold wereinterchangeable.
(12:05):
He says that's not true.
Today, weight is constant butvalue fluctuates.
It may be the case that theTreasury has to maintain a
certain amount of gold by weight, regardless of value, in order
to honor the original deal.
If this analysis is correct,that's extremely bullish for
gold.
It means the world's largestsingle gold holder, the US,
(12:27):
cannot be a seller.
By the way, if you sold all thegold that the US supposedly has
, the 8,133 tons, it's like $760billion, right?
That covers three quarters ofthe interest payment on the debt
for one year.
That's it, and so you know.
(12:52):
Ask me if I'm confident in thecurrent system to maintain
itself.
No, it's really.
It's just this article, andagain it talks about a sovereign
wealth fund, and I talked toDavid about that today.
We really are like.
The strangeness of what'shappening economically right now
(13:16):
has certainly got my attentionand it's had my attention for a
long time, but it's weirder thanI even anticipated.
I mean, when I went to theBitcoin conference in Nashville
it's like a pivotal point in mylife when I went there, too
strangeness and Trump announcedand this was huge because I'd
been in the space for so longand I never anticipated anything
(13:38):
like that in my lifetime to seethat there was going to be a
former US president andpresidential candidate of RFK Jr
talking about making Bitcoin astrategic reserve, and that, to
me, made sense In a digital age.
It's universal, it's not acompany, it's not controlled by
a board of directors, it's adecentralized in theory at least
(14:00):
, too and it's the way itoperates around the world.
It's decentralized store ofvalue based on energy.
So to me, that made sense.
You know I necessarily.
You know I have some argumentsof why I don't think the
taxpayer should foot the bill oranything like that, to purchase
Bitcoin.
But now we're in tomorrow'sthis summit for a crypto summit
(14:26):
or something at the White House,and before this, they just
started announcing that they'regoing to add XRP and Cardano,
ada and all these other coinsand I go.
What now?
Like that has nothing to dowith those of us who understand,
like what Bitcoin is as opposedto what the crypto space is,
(14:47):
which these are two differentanimals, and so they added that
it's like again, it's likeadding a stock or something.
It makes absolutely no sense.
There's a lot of stuff beingfloated around right now,
there's a lot of misdirection,and until I read this from
Rickards, I guess I wasn't even.
(15:08):
It's almost like we want tomake sure we have the gold
because we have to make surethat the Fed maintains its
ownership of it, which I alreadyknew in large part like.
If you drill down to the, thegold confiscation.
(15:28):
It really wasn't goldconfiscation so much as it was.
You know, turn it in, here'sFranklin Roosevelt.
He just gets elected.
The only thing we have to fearis fear itself.
Oh, and also gold confiscation.
And you take your $20 goldpieces, which are now worth
close to $3,000.
You take your $20 gold pieces,which are now worth close to
$3,000.
(15:49):
You take your $20 gold piecesand your $10 gold pieces and
your five and your two and ahalf, and you go turn them in
and you get a piece of paperfrom the Fed and they give you
the certificate and that goldgoes to the US government and
eventually ends up in placeslike the BIS.
It goes to the Bank ofInternational Settlements.
Which was this heist?
I mean inside, this is a majorheist.
(16:09):
I mean that's what the wholepoint of the setup of the
Federal Reserve folks was aheist.
It is to control the moneysupply and to get the gold, to
take it away from the hands ofthe American people, and they
engineered crises to do it.
I mean, there was the economiccrisis of 1907.
(16:33):
Clearly, clearly engineered.
And it's like we've got to getcontrol of the money supply.
And this is how we'll do it.
And, mind you, we hadn't had acentral bank at that time since
1836.
Talk about 1836.
That's when Andrew Jacksonkilled the second bank of the
United States.
There was no central bank thatthis country did not have one
until 1913.
(16:54):
But they had to do a series ofthings to lay the groundwork to
make that happen.
Even the AI, that doesn't knowany better, yet it's not
supposed to tell you the truth.
Even if you look up what themeeting on Jekyll Island was on
November 22, 1910, they call ita secretive conspiracy.
(17:14):
The AI doesn't even it doesn'tknow it's supposed to cover that
up and say that's not true.
It was all very transparent andI was very secretive and they
knew exactly what they weredoing and it took a while.
You know, uh, the Americansystem, you can't turn the ship
around overnight.
You have to set up some reallyhorrible things.
(17:36):
You have to have 1913.
You have to have, uh, theincome tax, the 16th amendment.
You got to get the 17thamendment for the direct
election of senators.
You got to get the FederalReserve and you got to throw in
these free trade deals.
That's what Woodrow Wilson didand, of course, he took us into
World War I.
He ran on a platform of he keptus out of war and that's the
(17:59):
first place he took us was.
He took us into World War I andthe debt of the US was $1
billion, if my memory serves,and at the end of the war, from
1917 to 1919, 1920, the debt ofthe US was $5 billion.
So, you know, once they gotcontrol of the money supply, and
(18:20):
that's when they take you towar and that's when they, you
know, start.
You know, you look at theCarnegie Foundation, some of the
things that they studied priorto World War I, and this is all
these foundations and otherthings.
It's all the same thing, right?
They're all the tentacles ofthe same octopus.
And you look at what theystudied, they're like, hey, we
want to make some societalchanges, because that's what
(18:41):
people, for whatever reason they, get ultra rich they want to
start farming you and they wantto make societal changes.
They said what's the quickestway to do that.
And they said, oh well, theirthink tank came back and said oh
, it's a war.
You know, it's a way to reformsociety.
Is you need a war?
And then they said, okay, howdo we get one?
(19:02):
And that was 1912.
So, you know, they had theTitanic and you had to make sure
that those people went to thebottom of the ocean, a lot of
people that that were on the,the melons and the asters and
other people that opposed theFederal Reserve.
And then you got to take outWilliam Howard Taft.
So you run Teddy Roosevelt,right, you have to siphon off
votes and you could put in thisintellectual, the first PhD and
(19:24):
only PhD president that we everhad.
We had Woodrow Wilson.
Anyway, this is a long wayaround saying there's a history.
They'd build it up to get to1933, 1934.
And it was a heist.
And now that I understand andI'd never seen it put that way
is that basically the gold forthe US was already turned over,
(19:49):
at least in paper, right.
So you have this foreign entitythat's literally just
parasitically on the bodypolitic of the republic,
controlling events with an IOU,with the full faith and credit
of the US Treasury.
That's what it's supposed to,and that's a very clever thing,
because a lot of that gold thatwas taken anyway in 1934 was
(20:14):
repatriated again to Basel,switzerland.
You can find some of thisthere's great research on this
in Rodney Howard Brown's bookthe Killing of Uncle Sam, and
this is like all these thingsare.
It's funny.
There's really nothing newunder the sun.
It's just about heist and theftand grift.
You know, they can just make itmore complicated and that's
(20:37):
what I'm trying to figure outnow.
It's like if you look at thetariff issue with Trump, I
support tariffs, matter of fact,this is such a strange reality
for me to be in and I can't evenexplain to you how strange it
was for me.
Running for Congress andgetting this is not that long
ago I mean, it's 2013, 2014, andit was like an insane idea.
(21:00):
Then I was like that was evenon my campaign literature.
I supported modest tariffs toreset the financial structure.
One, you know it incentivizedcompanies to move here and make
things here, and you know thecompanies that were already here
not to move and make thingshere, and economic zones and
getting away from the corporateincome tax.
(21:21):
All that stuff, great, but youhave to understand like it's
worlds away.
And now we're in this realmwhere there's tariffs everywhere
but they're not strategic, andyou even, what are they for?
Like you know, there isn't anyreal strategy there, and perhaps
there is, maybe the fact thatI'm missing it is the strategy.
(21:45):
It's just about causing chaosand disruption for the sake of
it, because inside the chaos,there's always an opportunity,
right, there's always somethingto grab onto.
Perhaps that and that's notwhat I'm not seeing Certainly
has completely upended theprecious metals system, and
(22:06):
that's for a good thing, atleast in the short run.
There's probably going to be alot of economic pain based off
the fact that the whole world'sbeen floating on fake for so
long.
You guys understand it's a $400trillion economy with $350
trillion in debt worldwide,globally, right, right?
(22:37):
Well, how do you?
How do you evaluate?
How do you put value when you,when you inject paper currency
that's not backed by anythinginto a financial system, how do
you quantify what value actuallyis?
Woo-woo, you know navel-gazing,kind of philosophical debates
on.
You know superstitiously, likehow many angels can dance on the
(23:00):
head of a pin and stuff likethat.
Well, how much fake makes youknow?
How do you get real value outof fake things.
How do you quantify?
I don't know.
I don't know how you quantifyit, but these little nuggets
where you find out, oh well, allthe gold in the US is already
on paper owed to the Fed.
But they don't say it that way.
It's interesting to unfold andyou know, it's one of those like
(23:24):
you get.
It maybe brings a smile to myface whenever I learn something
Like oh, of course, that's theway, course, that's what it was
the whole time and I didn't seeit, you know, and that's never
been laid out that way.
So interesting, interestingtimes.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, uh,we've got a lot to cover today
(23:44):
too, besides this and I went alittle long but my friend Donald
Jeffries has put out an articleand perhaps I'll talk to the
chat before we get to Don'sarticle.
But he's put out an article andI don't read enough of Don's
stuff on the air.
I follow him, I subscribe andcontribute to his sub stack.
I want to encourage you all todo that.
(24:05):
But he's got a great article onDoge and Trump and uh, what's
going on with with that?
And just the just laying out,trying to make sense of uh, you
know, because we, as analystsand people in alternative media
just want to give you my best,the you know, the best possible
analysis.
Uh, without you know getting Ieven call it.
(24:27):
I said today with to davidknight was like partisan
politics gives you brain damage,because then you can't remember
people cheering on like ohBlackRock, blackrock's got the
ports in Panama.
Big deal Is that good.
Is BlackRock on our team now?
It's BlackRock.
(24:48):
I mean seriously, larry Finkand BlackRock are buying up
these, like in giant swaths ofresidential housing and
outbidding first-time homebuyersand just snatching up.
Why are they doing that?
I've been asking this, you know,and bringing this to your
attention for years, years.
(25:09):
And we're talking aboutBlackRock and you know, has
everybody forgotten ESG,environmental, social Governance
?
Larry Fink himself said thatthey could change behavior
through the financial system andthrough incentives.
So why do they want to farm you?
Why do they want to change yourbehavior?
Oh, that's the overlord complex.
(25:31):
That's what you get fromBlackRock.
How much behavior can theychange if they own giant swaths
of the residential housingsupply in the United States?
What's the end goal there?
That's to change behavior.
It's to change how you live.
It's to change ownership.
What is ESG?
It's to change how you live.
(25:51):
It's to change ownership.
What is ESG?
Environmental social governanceis Marxian politics and policy.
It's cultural Marxism throughthe financial system.
And you may say well, tony,these are some of the world's
richest people.
Why would they want to imposeMarxism?
You haven't listened to myother shows.
You don't understand how itworks.
(26:13):
I mean, again, this is whereyou get cultural Marxism and
Marxian ideology.
That's where it flows down from.
It doesn't come from the bottomup, it comes from the top down.
I mean, I can go through ahistory lesson of Marx and who
Karl Marx was and what, butagain, that's where this is.
(26:38):
The Communist Manifesto callsfor the fifth plank, I believe,
as a central bank.
Now we've adopted every aspectof graduated income tax.
The entire thing of theCommunist Manifesto has been
adopted by the super elitebecause they funded Marx and
because that they put him inplace.
Because this is a top-downtotalitarian system of way of
thinking.
They think of themselves as thelanded gentry of the.
(27:00):
You're the new serfs and theygot to control that.
And you know price controls,all the stuff that you know
emanates from the top down.
Marxism isn't a bottom-up thing.
That's not how any of thatworks.
So ESG is an extension of that,and that's where BlackRock
steps in and these othercompanies.
(27:21):
I mean, this is where we'vebeen talking about this for
years.
There's companies that don'teven try to make money anymore.
They're not even trying to makea profit.
They're not in the black,they're in the red, but they can
borrow as much as they wantbecause, behaviorally, they're
approved.
(27:42):
I'm skeptical of all that stuff.
You've got to keep your head ona swivel.
Stay frosty, friends.
This is not the time to get.
You know, don't become thesheeple.
Get caught up in partisanpolitics, you know?
Hey, if somebody does somethinggreat I mean, I'm all about
Zelensky getting thrown out ofthe White House that sounds
(28:03):
great.
Now do Netanyahu.
All right, let's go over tocomments real quick.
And then I want to jump intothis article from don.
Let me take this off the screenreal quick.
All right, let's jump into this.
See what's going on over onrockfin.
See my friend jason barker'sover there.
(28:26):
Brian deb mccartney good to seeyou.
Karen Carpenter, great show withTiger last night.
Tony, I was on with Angry Tiger.
Great show, had a fun talk.
I think we just did a littlebit over an hour.
Excellent, excellent program,smart show.
(28:49):
We'll have to get Tiger on overhere sometime.
We're going to be recording anew Paratrooper on Sunday with
Danny of the Rabbit HoleConspiracy Podcast and Mr
Anderson and myself, so that'llbe fun.
Let's make sure I got Harps isover on the Twitter stream.
(29:10):
Good to see you, harps.
Let's go and see who's over onRumble.
You can catch this and I needto work on my channels, but the
American Unplugged channel overon Rumble as well.
Knights of the Storm over thereand Birdhouse Blues.
Birdhouse Blues always has someinteresting comments.
Let's see Paleo Armory.
(29:40):
We need a gold-only option forall the tiers on Wolfpack.
Hey, that's an interestingthing you just brought up,
because next week I can't do allthe tiers because that's
impossible for the cost.
But I'm announcing somethingnext week, if you're Wolfpack,
I'm revolutionizing the Wolfpacksystem and I had to brief my
(30:01):
crew on it because you've got tobe ahead of the ball on it, and
we also added the gold grams,so that's free shipping, gold
gram, gold gram, bars, all thatstuff that's already on there
for gold only, but we havesomething coming for that and it
won't be all the tiers, butI've got something in mind.
I'm adding a new in the finaltier to Wolfpack, so stay tuned
(30:23):
for that.
Let's see.
Uh.
Birdhouse blue says I love art.
Well, I appreciate that.
I think this is, uh, my laborof love.
It's all I find, uh, once aweek, a little stream of
consciousness and some articles,and and uh, let's see if we can
pull some uh meaning and getsome good strategy out of all
(30:48):
this.
Uh strategy comes from thegreek wordos, which means leader
of the army.
So in that spirit, let's keepthat mindset.
All right, let's jump on over tothis article from Don, and Don
(31:10):
Jeffries is an American treasure.
It's such a great article I'lldo my best to cover the entire
thing, but he just brings up somuch good stuff because a lot's
happened.
That's what we're good into.
Let me put this up on thescreen.
(31:31):
You can go todonaldjeffriessubstackcom or you
can go to donaldjeffriesmediaand find him, support him, if
you can.
I'm going to have Don on totalk about his new book, the
American Memory Hall.
I just need to schedule it withhim.
Let's put this up on the screen.
(31:52):
This is the iProtest blog andit says Doge, the Epstein list
in World War III, wwe theater,front and center.
So says Donald Jeffries.
I've criticized Donald Trumpcountless times for his pattern
(32:13):
of promising, bloviating andbacking off, or, more often,
flip-flopping.
I coined the term theTrumpenstein Project to explain
his befuddling behavior.
He talked the talk but neverwalked the walk.
All toupee and no cattle Well,now he can't stop walking.
All to pay and no cattle well,now he can't stop walking.
(32:35):
Trump 2.0 has unleashed a seriesof often fine-looking executive
orders in the first month backin office supermodel executive
orders.
He abolished birthrightcitizenship.
He withdrew the us from the who.
He rolled back any recognitionof the transgender lunacy.
He declared an emergency at thesouthern border.
He reaffirmed a commitment tofree speech and against
(32:55):
censorship for what that's worth.
He is ending the annoyingdaylight savings time and now
he's establishing English as theofficial language of the United
States.
Now they all sound really good,but how much will that actually
change?
Already, a federal judge haspredictably ruled that the ban
(33:17):
on birthright citizenship isunconstitutional.
That's what federal judges dounder the odious guise of
judicial review.
In 30 days, really, on his firstday back in office, trump did
more than he did in his previousfour years in the White House,
and he's absolutely right aboutthat.
Look it surprised, you know.
(33:39):
Patrick Henry famously said youknow, I light my path with the
lamp of experience.
I know of no other way ofjudging the future but by the
past.
And so those of us who followhistory and understand, I mean,
you've shown us one thing, andthis certainly has a different
tone to it and there's a speedand there's something to it.
(33:59):
And again, if you hear somebodysays they know exactly what's
going on, they don't.
I'm not even sure the peoplethat are doing it do.
A few days ago, trump staged andit was definitely staged the
most remarkable meeting with aforeign leader that Washington
DC has ever seen.
From the moment he greetedvertically challenged Ukrainian
(34:24):
Democratic leader VladimirZelensky, with a Trumpian troll
at his casual attire mocking himwith I see you dressed up.
It was pure WWE theater.
Zelensky is shown he is willingto wear a suit and tie if the
occasion calls for it, forinstance when he meets with
(34:46):
Israeli Democratic leader BibiNetanyahu.
During the meeting, which wasaired live before the press,
trump and JD Vance both scoldedthe pathetic former Ukrainian
comedian like he was a naughtyschoolboy, not an upstanding
world leader, who was once wowedaudiences by playing the piano
(35:06):
with his penis.
Zelensky's Boris Badenovimpression just didn't
intimidate anyone and Trumpsupposedly wound up throwing him
out of the place.
Yes, trump made certain to havehis hands formed into the
familiar triangle as he met withthe upstanding, quote-unquote
(35:28):
democratic leader of ukraine,just as elon musk made certain
to flash similarly unnaturalhand and finger formations
during his recent visit to theoval office.
I forget what you call thatit's like.
Uh, it's not a mandala, it'ssomething else, something you
(35:49):
make.
It's like the formations ofyour hands.
You know it has something to dowith presence and you see that
a lot with people that willteach that in certain things
like new neuro-linguisticprogramming and other things, I
mean it maybe has something toit, but then you always just get
Illuminati confirmed for it.
Anyway, let's see, it was onceestimated one billion children,
(36:21):
estimated.
One of his estimated onebillion children wiped a booger
on Trump's desk or somethinghe's talking about.
Elon Musk, to be fair, I recallsomeone advising me back in the
misty days of America 1.0,because Don calls it America 2.0
, that I should form my handsintoa triangle when being
(36:41):
interviewed.
Something about how itdisplayed confidence and power.
I don't know.
It didn't work for me.
I don't see how you can feignpower with the other party knows
.
You don't have it.
All those weird things the richand famous do with their hands
obviously must be significant.
They appear to be swearingallegiance to someone, or
(37:04):
something like wearing yourguy's letterman jacket or a blue
collar name tag.
Well, there's something to that.
As I said, there's something tothat.
They do flash those signs.
It would have been a great videoof Trump picking up the
(37:24):
arrogant Democratic leader withthe Napoleon complex and tossing
him onto the lawn of the WhiteHouse, maybe tarred and feather
him using red, white and bluetar.
Poor Vladimir didn't even knowthat he wasn't going to have a
lunch in his honor.
As Trump laughed out at himduring the meeting, he certainly
(37:45):
sounded the right themes.
You're playing with millions oflives.
You're playing with World WarIII.
Zelensky appeared unmoved andhis fan base in Hollywood and
the state-sponsored media wereappalled at how disrespected he
was, treated horribly by thebully Trump and JD Vance, whom
(38:06):
they never failed to denigratefor supposedly wearing eyeliner
pants, whom that never failed todenigrate for supposedly
wearing eyeliner?
I do, yeah, they.
That's another thing.
Whatever happened to theeyeliner story?
That was uh, that was all therage.
Or you can talk about MarcoRubio's foam parties.
Remember that that didn't getbrought up anymore.
Um, let's see, it certainlywould be if eyeliner adored the
(38:38):
face of a random obese, greenhair, heavily tattooed
transgender with a nose ring.
Those who somehow thought thiscartoonish bullwinkle villain in
a black sweatsuit, who refusesto consider us a ceasefire or
stop sacrificing his people in ahopeless cause, was the good
guy, were reaffirming theircommitment to war.
Zelensky appears to want WorldWar III.
(39:01):
So does the entire Americanwoke left.
Nuclear weapons are so cool nowno nukes.
Sorry, can't remember that.
My memory is going a smoked.
A lot of pot back at thoseconcerts.
But nukes are a reasonableoption when you stand with
(39:21):
Ukraine.
Sure, zelensky banned allopposition parties and shut down
newspapers who criticized him.
Parties and shut downnewspapers who criticized him.
But we paid Ben Stiller $4million to slobber all over him.
And Ben Stiller wouldn't lie.
And do I need to remind youthat he can do what he can do
(39:43):
with a piano?
That certainly ought to countfor something.
Would Bono give a concert inthe middle of an alleged war
zone for just a Democraticleader?
Oh, this has all been such ashow, hasn't it?
I was talking, I was mentioningthe other day just topped.
I mean, this is the stuff thatrattles around in my head, but
(40:06):
I've done so many, I read somany articles and did so much
research.
You know, in 2020, 2021,especially Guys, does anybody
remember the first person to getthe COVID jabs was a guy named
William Shakespeare, because allthe world's a stage.
Go look that up.
That was out of the UK and Ihad forgotten that.
(40:31):
All of a sudden it'll pop backup in my mind to remind me
you're still inside.
All this is still going on.
The ops change, the charactersmay be changed, things are
rearranged, but you're still onthe stage.
This is beyond my poor powers tofathom exactly what the purpose
(40:52):
of this, the steel matchencounter between Trump and
Zelensky, was.
To make Trump look tough to theMAGA crowd.
Why was the press there and whowas the guy who blasted
Zelensky for decidedlynon-formal outfit?
I think that was MarjorieTaylor Greene's guy or something
(41:18):
, wasn't it?
The most important question isdid Trump's slimp Zelensky yet
another billion or so during hisunceremonious exit from the
White House?
Exit from the White House.
If Trump permits another pennybefore he outlaws them to be
sent to this arrogant actordictator, then that destroys any
(41:40):
pretense that this was alegitimate event.
But I'm guessing that's whathappened or will happen.
It's a Trumpenstein thing youwouldn't understand.
But if Trump stops the aid toUkraine and continues to lecture
on the dangers of World War III, then that would be a good
thing and it would cause morequote woke warmongers' heads to
(42:05):
explode, which is always fun, Ijust think, completely like Don,
at this moment.
Tds levels were already on redalert prior to the Zelensky
carnival sideshow.
We did continue to hearallegations that Elon Musk and
Doge are really quote cleaninghouse, firing government workers
(42:25):
left and right, many of themthe essential hardworking types
that most of us are largelyunaware of.
One claim is that some of theseterminated employees were quote
working on nuclear weapons orsomething.
That's kind of vague, isn't it?
Actually, the claims on bothsides are pretty dubious.
(42:46):
Musk and Trump brag aboutsaving a gazillion dollars or so
already without eliminating anyagencies, just auditing USAID.
So I'd like more details withthat, please.
And those with TDS Trumpderangement syndrome are
apoplectic about losing theopportunity to pay all those
(43:08):
humble and lovable federalworkers a very generous wage
along with a much better benefitpackage than those in the
boring world of private industry.
Isn't this weird too?
I mean, if you watch the stateof the union, I didn't watch it.
I I saw some of the lowlights.
It didn't seem like a realelection.
(43:34):
It doesn't seem.
Politics is no longer politics.
But I'm always fascinated bypeople that you know.
What did Hillary Clinton say?
She called it the politics ofmeaning.
Right, because if you don'tbelieve in a higher power or you
don't believe in somethingbeyond yourself, you have to
(43:54):
find it.
It's like GK Chesterton saidthat when people don't believe
in God, they don't believe innothing, they believe in
everything.
And so you find these peoplewho make politics their meaning,
and that seems like such anempty place.
I used to think that there wassome meaning to it and and maybe
(44:15):
there is, and maybe I'm just sojaded I can't see it anymore
and just I have the glasses onfrom they live.
So I can't.
I can't do it.
But I noticed this, the articlethat was up on.
You know, al Green theCongressman gets up and he's got
his cane and he's morallyoutraged.
He's going to stop the wholeState of the Union.
He gets thrown out by MikeJohnson and censured by Congress
(44:38):
and all the rest.
But it just really drives homethe fact that people in power
will fight everything but evil,Like, say, you don't disagree
with Trump, fine, you knowwhatever.
But I remember something AlGreen did after you know,
january 6th.
He went out to the steps of theWhite House, like two weeks
(45:02):
later, and he sat out there withhis mask on.
He's like I'm not going to letyou know another January 6th
happen, just like there was anarmy of QAnon people and other
things that are supposedlycoming to the.
They had this.
They kept releasing all thisstuff that people were going to
go back to the White House.
And I remember thinking likeagain and I brought him up I'm
like these people will fighteverything but evil.
(45:23):
They'll fight perceived thingsbut not actual evil.
They don't stand up.
I mean, when's the last timeanybody in that political party
tried to put an end to any ofthese wars?
I mean, talk about Zelensky,talk about millions.
What about the children in Gazaor Yemen or Iraq?
(45:47):
That's just the war part, orthe smuggling that goes on.
The amount of human evil isstaggering the exploitation of
people, the farming of people,the experimentation on people
through big pharma and thingsthat have gone on through big
(46:08):
pharma and things that have goneon, but none of that for some
reason triggered Al Green tostand up and start protesting.
No, it's the State of the Unionwith Trump.
And this is the derangement.
I don't understand.
What about the?
Of course he's going to be,it's going to be partisan, it's
(46:28):
going to do all the stuff.
It's the same thing that Bidendid.
And you have people like JoeWilson is standing up and
screaming at Obama.
You lied, Joe Wilson.
That same congressman wants tomake a $250 bill and put Trump's
face on it.
It's so partisan, it really isexhausting.
(46:50):
I'll go back to don's article,but it really is it.
That's something to think about.
And before you get partisan,like on, and just how?
Why don't people in power everfight evil?
What they talk about, real evil, you know, fight the other team
, but never actually evil, donsays.
(47:17):
I would like to know where allthis public outrage was when
countless American workers inprivate industry were kicked to
the curb through no fault oftheir own in the past several
decades, in the first 16 yearsof this century alone, some
600,000 employees were laid off,outsourced or replaced by cheap
(47:37):
foreign labor by just 11companies.
That's just 11 companies, folks.
The examples are never-ending.
Ibm got rid of 60,000 employeesin 1993.
Sears and Kmart laid off 50,000in January 1993.
Happy New Year.
(47:57):
At&t laid off 40,000 in 1996.
Ford eliminated 35,000 workersin 2002.
General Motors 47,000 in 2009.
Citigroup 50,000 in 2008.
These are just a few instancesof the outsourcing, downsizing
fervor that gripped corporateAmerica beginning in the 1980s.
(48:21):
Dell laid off 26,000 in 2024.
I didn't see any gnashing ofteeth on that over social media,
but there is, he says there's apussyhat level of screeching
over the prospects of governmentcutbacks.
Why this double standard?
Why do the same people whosnickered you should have
(48:44):
learned new skills?
When some useless eater inprivate industry lost his or her
job, abandoned all reason overthe prospect of scrutinizing
federal workers For the firsttime, I might add.
Until now, no one working forthe government had to worry
about being outsourced, replacedby a foreign visa worker.
(49:06):
The joke goes that it'simpossible to be fired from the
federal government, but it's nojoke.
You have to do something reallyawful to lose a government job.
So why, then, is it easy to befired by a private company?
As I can personally attest to,this is especially true in the
so-called right-to-work states,where they can fire you without
(49:27):
cause, as happened to me in 2018.
What Doge is suggesting isfinally looking at various
public employees actually do toearn their generous
taxpayer-provided income.
In private industry, we all havebeen scrutinized.
I've had bosses that literallylooked over your shoulder,
(49:49):
stared a hole through you whileyou were trying to concentrate
on your work.
That would never happen to anygovernment worker.
I had a friend who worked inthe post office back when they
paid extraordinarily well andhad premium benefits.
He described how there was someimmigrant worker whose job it
was to sort mail by zip codethat routinely just tossed mail
into various zip code slotswithout even looking at them.
(50:12):
Well, that's where my mail went.
That goes a long way towardsexplaining why it frequently
takes so long for the mail totravel to such a short distance.
My friend eventually grew tiredof figuring out his job
function and that no one reallysupervised him, so he just
followed the crowd and didwhatever he wanted.
(50:35):
Yeah, that's an attitude, right,it's systemic.
You find it when something getsso bloated.
There's so much of a mixed bagto take from this, by the way.
There's so much of a mixed bagto take from this, by the way,
to navigate these waters withouthaving partisan brain damage.
It's harder and harder to do,but we'll get done.
(50:57):
It'll get done on this program.
I promise you that I'm going toskip around a little bit.
Let's see.
Yeah, and in the same week wesaw rumors and more rumors about
the epstein list finally beingreleased.
Attorney general pam bondi saidshe had it on her desk, then
(51:19):
vented at the fbi for draggingits feet, then dragged her own
feet.
Eventually, a truly ridiculousphoto op of various conservative
quote influencers was widelycirculated, where the likes of
mike cernovich, dc drano whoeverthat is, uh, liz wheeler and
the lips of top tiktok womanwere captured, waving folders
that read the epstein files,phase one.
(51:41):
This phase one consisted ofcompletely redacted pages.
What exactly are the legalramifications of this list?
Anyhow, the authoritiesadmitted taking videos and hard
drives from Epstein's mansion.
Why aren't any influencerswaving them in public?
As I've said, if Trump's name ison any list, maga people will
(52:04):
say it's fake.
If it's not, then those withTDS will say it's fake will say
it's fake.
If it's not, then those withTDS will say it's fake.
While we can watch the WWEspectacles, we don't really know
what's happening.
Both sides have a vestedinterest in making it appear
that Trump is deporting a recordnumber of illegal immigrants.
The official numbers don't seemto bear that out, but the MAGA
(52:26):
people claim it's happening, andthose with TDS claim that he's
already cleaned out the schoolsof Hispanic names and broken up
families.
The same can be said aboutgovernment workers.
Those now with critical stageTDS allege that the government
soon won't have anyone left tomanage it or to mismanage it.
The MAGA people basically agree, cheering at Trump for taking
(52:50):
out the trash.
There was this talk about theDepartment of Education being
abolished, but it's still inexistence, as far as I can tell.
Will Trump actually abolish theIRS, as he suggested doing?
Look for more Freemasonicoccult hand signals from Elon
Musk.
Don Jeffries, is it too much toexpect transparency from those
(53:16):
who govern us?
Why do so many taxpayers balkat the idea of seeing where
their money is going?
This is a whole new level ofStockholm syndrome, our drunken,
abusive national spouse finallybeing on the ropes and millions
are squealing.
No, he swears he'll change.
The USAID disclosures are fakenews.
(53:39):
The fact-checkers, albeit whileon the USAID payroll,
themselves have debunkedeverything Doge has discovered.
Ignorance is bliss when you'relooking at intelligence budgets,
but why?
That's why they've always beensecret.
Millions of people don't care,as witnessed by the reaction to
(54:02):
just a few rays of sunshine onthe rotten, corrupt mess Ron
Paul is advising Doge.
This is why he would have beena great president.
If it results in no one beingheld accountable, then it's
largely for naught.
But for now, I'm popping morepopcorn and enjoying.
(54:24):
The show that's Donald Jeffries, ladies and gents, fun times.
The show that's donald jeffries, ladies and gents, fun times uh
again.
Uh, go support don.
It's just uh.
It's a great uh sub stack andyou know he dumps articles uh
(54:45):
once or twice a week.
Got some good stuff up there.
That's very well thought out.
I mean, we're trying tonavigate these waters in between
partisanship.
What's actually happening?
You know you got the.
The inner lockings and movingsof the us economy right now and
world economy are absolutelyfascinating and terrifying at
the same time, because you havea a chance for it's like going
(55:06):
back and looking at some of thequotes prior to the 1929 stock
crash or 2008,.
You very manufactured by any ofthe stability that you would
find in the world economy andthese tariffs not based on
(55:42):
revenue and not based off ofprotectionism David Knight
explained that very well basedoff of protectionism David
Knight explained that very well,which you have to understand
about tariffs which I support inthe general sense is that
Thomas Jefferson used tariffs tomake sure that no one knew the
tax man, that foreign importsfunded the government.
(56:03):
That way regular people didn'thave to pay the burden of that.
And later in the 19th centuryit was used for protectionism.
You know, post-civil War andthe Industrial Revolution.
It was tariffs.
You know, and this is somethingthat even Abraham Lincoln
(56:25):
that's what he ran on.
You know, I'm humble, abrahamLincoln I'm for the tariff and
I'm for a central bank.
I mean, that was a plank of theRepublican Party, william
McKinley, who was assassinatedprobably for one of those
reasons.
A gold standard and tariffs,this was a part of our national
(56:47):
identity.
This is how we paid for things,it's how we protected our
industry.
But a lot of that changed.
Even Karl Marx wrote about thatprotectionism was conservative
and that free trade hastened therevolution.
That's why he opposed tariffs.
Karl Marx opposed tariffs andopposed protectionism because he
(57:10):
believed that if you got rid ofthose barriers, that it would
make the revolution more.
It would hasten it, it wouldbring it about faster.
You can go look that quote up,by the way.
Almost everything.
I've been over this a milliontimes, but there's something
strange about these.
So I pay attention to wherethis goes.
I'm not sure what it's tryingto set up, but there's a lot
(57:31):
going on here that's beyondnormal politics and beyond
normal economic positioning,because the world is changing.
There's a race towardsresources, ladies and gents,
that's what we're watching.
Resources, ladies and gents,that's what we're watching.
(57:52):
A revaluation, a transvaluation, if you will, and we're on top
of that here.
Appreciate everybody joiningtoday.
Thanks to my listeners over onWWCR, thanks for tuning in
Worldwide Christian Radio.
Be sure, and give us a likewherever you can.
If you can follow us on podcasta pair of truth there give us a
review.
It really helped us help withthe algorithms.
(58:14):
I have some new pair of truththere's coming out real soon.
Like I said, we are recordingSunday.
That'll be a great show overwith with Danny and the rabbit
hole podcast and Mr Anderson.
So, go, go, give us a review.
Make sure you follow that show,that channel and that show.
It would mean a lot to mebecause I got new stuff coming
out and the wise wolf goldencrypto show, new stuff coming
(58:36):
out there, and I'm now puttingup all of the episodes that I do
with David every week to go upexclusively on the wise wolf
golden crypto channel, so gocheck that out.
Uh, big announcement too ForWolfpack those who are Wolfpack
members I have something reallycool that's going to happen next
(58:58):
week by Thursday, justannouncing some changes.
Some of that was going on inthe chat today, so be sure and
stay tuned because there mightbe some other stuff announced
where you could maybe winsomething.
I'm thinking about what I wantto give away, but there's going
to be some giveaways and someincentives and a whole bunch of
(59:19):
cool stuff.
So I appreciate everybody whojoined today and remember that's
Arterburngold is my website.
Remember that's?
Arterburngold is my website.
You can get there and all thelinks to Wise Wolf and all of
the incentives are right there.
Promo code 1776.
All right, so you guys takecare of each other until we see
(59:40):
you next week, All right.
End of transmission.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.