#503 The Controlled Demolition of America's Economic Power

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
The, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the,
the, the, the, the, the, so, so.

(00:52):
So we have before us theopportunity to forge, for

(01:18):
ourselves and for futuregenerations, a new world order.
Good evening folks.
You're listening to the hour ofthe time.
I'm.
William cooper is against thewall.
The chair is against the wall.
John has a long mustache.
John has a long mustache.
It's 12 o'clock, americans,another day closer to victory,
and for all of you out there, onor behind the lines, this is

(01:39):
your song.
Veteran of three foreign wars,entrepreneur and warrior, poet,
tony arbor, and takes on theissues facing our country,
civilization and planet.
This is the arbor radiotransmission.

(02:02):
Harder Burn Radio Transmission.

(02:37):
He was in charge of theclattering train I had to wait
for that intro to die down.

Speaker 2 (02:57):
I was thinking about a poem today.
I was talking to David Knighton his show.
We were talking about WinstonChurchill and I know I've done
this before here on the program.
But these are justextraordinary times, ladies and
gentlemen.
We're watching the controlleddemolition of the world economy,
starting with our own, and thisis creative destruction.
Uh, this is a a strategy, not atransparent.

(03:24):
We're going to get into thistoday.
This isn't after last week andafter last week's show I had a
lot of emails and peoplereaching out and saying you know
that history lesson that yougave us on tariffs.
It was really good and Iappreciated that and I thought
about it afterwards and I said Idon't know that that's relevant

(03:44):
.
Because I don't know thatthat's relevant, because I don't
think that's what's going on.
We're going to dig in to thatfor sure today, because the more
that I talk to smart peoplelike David Knight, the more that
I studied the markets, the morethat I look at see what's
happened.
This whipsaw back and forth Likewe went through this liberation
day.
Liberation Day, I was thinkingof that poem.

(04:06):
Who is in charge of theclattering train?
The axles creep and thecouplings strain.
The pace is hot and the pointsare near.
Sleep is dead in the driver'sear and the signals flash
through the night in vain, fordeath is in charge of the
clattering train.
That was Winston Churchill'sfavorite poem and he memorized

(04:31):
that when he was a kid and whenI was a young soldier in Iraq I
read like 200 books.
I read the William Manchester'sbiographies on Churchill with
about two or three others.
So I'm well-versed in that.
And as we start looking at thisramp up to another unnecessary,
unconstitutional, satanic war inthe Middle East, it has nothing

(04:55):
to do with American security.
I'm going to dig into thattoday.
I wanted to remind everybodythe Middle East was drawn up by
Winston Churchill drinking aglass of scotch after World War.
I Seriously, these areartificial lines, these are maps
that are just drawn up.
These are constructs of abygone era, different fading

(05:17):
empires, and we're about tocross a boundary that may not be
able to stop the consequencesonce they kick off.
You know watching you should bealarmed, and I don't want to.
I also think there's a lot ofgood things and opportunities
happen.
So I want to paint that.

(05:37):
But at the same time, this wholething with the tariffs and the
whipsaw and the back and forthand a direct conflict.
This is trade wars and currencywars, followed by actual wars
and this blanket set of tariffsthat were set off the market
tanked.
Now we're setting backLiberation Day 90 days except

(06:00):
for one, except for China.
And let me tell you something,folks China was given everything
that they have.
We gave it to them on purpose.
So if we built up China onpurpose, if you go back to 1972
when Richard Nixon and HenryKissinger opened China, it's a

(06:22):
huge move.
I mean, the teleprompter hairdoidiots today in mainstream media
don't know this history.
I don't think they know anyhistory, but they don't know
that history.
It was a moonscape.
You read Pat Buchanan's book.
Pat was with Nixon when he wentto China, and it was.

(06:43):
It had nuclear weapons in 1964.
That is true.
But it was a very backwardnation, a very gray.
It was like you know it was.
Everything was uh, there was noagain.
There was a lot of order, butthere was no hustle and bustle,
there was no life to it.
That's what it's about Buchanan.

(07:03):
He called it a moonscape.
You realize the wealth and thetechnology that was given to
them on purpose.
Because what happens if you lookat the timeline.
It's really important that youpay attention to this, because
politics will suck you into afalse narrative.

(07:24):
I've talked about the allegoryof Plato's cave before.
You think you're watchingsomething, but you're actually
watching something else.
You're going to choose a team,but there is really no team for
you.
You can choose a principle, youcan choose something that you
believe in, but partisanship andwhere we are right now in this

(07:44):
country with all this, it'snonsense, because there's
something else in the periphery.
I'm going to explain this toyou.
We opened China in 72.
And again backwards, theydidn't even have communication
with us, we didn't havediplomatic ties with China.
So we opened China, huge move.

(08:11):
So we opened China, huge move.
And 1973, the next year, thatwas the birth of the Trilateral
Commission, zygmunt Brzezinski,the Rockefellers, which is
basically it's like the nextstep up to get the trilateralist
and it's technocrats and thosewho believe that the
transference of the West intothe East would be necessary for

(08:34):
the technocratic world order,because the Chinese and those in
Asia are better at implementingthose control systems.
You understand that theRockefellers and Rothschilds set
up Mao's China in 1949, thesame way that the Warburgs and
the Rothschilds and theRockefellers set up the

(08:55):
communist state of the SovietUnion, the Bolshevik Revolution,
in 1917.
That was set up by the bankersas well.
So they set up Mouse China.
This is a long-term plan.
Because of their population,because of their resources and
because of the way that thegovernment is structured, they
could create that, to createthis system.
They've been playing with it.
The prototype for the new worldorder that the super elite,

(09:21):
klaus Schwabian, lizard folkwant to create was that the
proto system was the SovietUnion.
Okay, that's why it was set upby the world's richest people.
I know that if you're listeningto this and you and you'd have
this, you know, uh, black andwhite court historian taught
mind frame, then you think thatyou know it's the 20th century,

(09:41):
was capitalism versus communism?
That's not true.
That's again.
That is the Plato's cave.
That's the thing that you'resupposed to see, but not what
actually is.
And the timeline for China 73is a trilateral commission.
74, the United States runs itslast trade surplus ever.
That's what built the country.

(10:01):
We would never have been ableto bail the British out of two
world wars, which we did right,or rather the banking houses,
they're all the same.
We bailed them out of two worldwars that they started, by the
way.
So we would never have beenable to do that had we been a
consumptive nation, a consumingnation and a debtor nation,

(10:22):
instead of a creditor nation anda production nation.
We did.
We reversed all of thosepolicies, starting post-world
war ii and then accelerating theopening of china, the birth of
the trilaterals.
And you have nafta.
Ross perot called it the giantsucking sound.
Like I said it's going to be agiant sucking sound.
That's what it was, and it'sall those jobs and manufacturing

(10:43):
.
Everything just sifted down toplaces like Mexico and there was
offshore to China, free tradepolicies or creative
destructions.
What's the?
The goal of that is I talkedabout that last week with, you
know, karl Marx supporting freetrade.
That's what it's for.
It's to hasten the revolutionand it builds antagonism between
working people and the superelite, or at least the

(11:07):
controllers.
Right, they like thatantagonism.
They think that it's, you know,the money class it's, or the
people that are successful isdoing to them.
You know it's the top, top tier, one percent, and that's who's
pushing that policy.
So you had nafta and all the.
While we're building up china,we're sending them technology,
or the.
We're giving technology to theisraelis who sell it to the

(11:27):
chinese.
And we know about it missiletechnology, military technology,
manufacturing, trade secrets,all that stuff.
That's it and it's beingfiltered.
By the end of the 20th century.
You have china being put intothe World Trade Organization.
I believe that was 99.

(11:56):
And then, going into post-9-11world, the Bush administration
gives China most favored nationtrading status, actually 90 days
to the day of 9-11.
So it's December 11, 2001.
After that, america lost 55,000factories.
One in three manufacturing jobsdisappeared.
The Bush administrationactually, to offset the bleeding

(12:18):
, the absolute hemorrhaging ofeconomic health and wealth on
the system, they counted fastfood workers as manufacturing
because they were buildingsandwiches.
You can go look that up.
That's real, that's how much welost, and so you can cover it

(12:42):
up and you can paper it up for awhile with fake money.
You print it, you print it andyou don't really notice.
It buys less and less.
Why does the price of gold gofrom $280 an ounce in 1999 to
$3,100 an ounce in 2025?
Well, you just should just getsome stocks and just hang on to
stock.
Okay, because it's a monetarymetal.

(13:03):
You're losing all thatpurchasing power.
That's what's happening whenthey're building up this fragile
fake economy.
Meanwhile, trade secrets, jobs,infrastructure, technology, all
that stuff flowing eastward.

(13:24):
I've got an article I'm going tobring up on Taiwan too, before
the show ends.
But I wanted to open with thisbecause this whole Liberation
Day chaos.
There's something elseunderlying this and it could be.
People have said well, trumpwants to create a recession so
he can force the Fed to lowerrates, so we can have happy days

(13:46):
are here again and the stockmarket has this temporary boon.
There's a lesson in that.
That's unsustainable.
First of all, that's noteconomic health, that's a sugar
high and you have 125 percent.
I know this is a lot to followon facts and figures, but it's a
lot to cover, especially sincethe mainstream is not going to

(14:09):
do any of this kind of analysis.
We have 125% of debt to GDP, sothat means that the gross
domestic product of the UnitedStates, 125% of the debt to the
gross domestic product, that'sproduction.
No currency ever survives.
You can't operate a governmentat 130.

(14:31):
History shows that and we'vereached close to that during
times like World War II.
But it's usually like 40%, 35%,not 125, 130%.
But that's where we're going.
We're going to go to 130 debtto gdp ratio, meanwhile trying

(14:54):
to get rates lowered, pushingout new currency into the system
, all that stuff.
So this is like some back youknow, backdoor machiavellian
move.
Supposedly that's what the youknow backdoor Machiavellian move
.
Supposedly that's what the MAGApeople tell me If I'm watching
things on X and the, the um thatI should trust the plan or it's
the art of the deal.
There's a lot more going on thanwhatever this surface level

(15:17):
stuff is.
We gave China everything, doyou understand?
We gave them everything onpurpose.
Start asking yourself thatquestion.
I brought this up on tinfoilhat in December and I think I'm
probably the only person thatdid like this.

(15:40):
Notice this and you'll start.
I'm going to say something.
You're going to notice it now.
Notice when they throw out theterm.
You'll have these Republicanscome out and they'll throw out
the term China hawk.
What the hell is a China hawk?
When did you hear that?
During the time of Paul Ryan,speaker of the House of

(16:00):
Wisconsin.
Eddie Munster, this horrible,horrible human being, a
dead-souled automaton forLucifer.
It's just an awful, awful shill, globalist shill.
He loved the idea of thisglobalization of free trade.

(16:22):
Matter of fact, they hadsomething called the
Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Anybody remember TPP?
It was the follow-up to NAFTA.
By the way, it actuallylegalized slavery in certain
nations like India.
Now you can look this up.
I've been doing this for years.
But one of the cool things aboutthe Republican Party back then
right, really cool is theywouldn't let you read the bill,

(16:46):
like if you're going to vote onit.
In Congress we love free tradeso much and we love bolstering
up and putting China.
We love them so much that youcouldn't read the bill.
You had to go into a basementof the Capitol and they watched
you and you could go through it.
You couldn to go into abasement of the Capitol and they
watched you and you could gothrough it.

(17:06):
You couldn't take copies out soyou couldn't take it home.
You couldn't have your stafflook over it to vote on the damn
thing, and he wouldn't allowdebate on the bill either.
Now, to his credit, when Trumptook office, he killed that.
It was day one that he did that.
He killed the TPP.
It fractured, but all theglobalization continued.

(17:26):
It was just another deal on topof a deal, and the reason I
bring that up is because backthen this was 2015.
You didn't have this term Chinahawk.
They've literally made it up.
You realize they created it sothey could have an adversary.
Russia doesn't really work.

(17:48):
It loses 2 million people ayear in net population.
Their economy doesn't reallygrow larger than, say, the state
of Texas as a GDP.
They're a nuclear-armed country, but it's hard to make that the
left does a pretty good job atmaking them the boogeyman.
That's like the Goldilocks Warfor the left, they want to have
war with Russia because it'sseen as anti LGBTQP, whatever.

(18:13):
And then the right wants warwith Iran because of Israel.
But the the china thing is is anew thing, and this war that
we're having, like this is the.
The consequences of the electionis we're having this.
You can see the whole purpose.

(18:34):
I think I'm starting to thinknow.
It wasn't about jobs, it wasn'tabout infrastructure for the
United States, it's not evenabout income.
This is to start this game andwe've been playing it to have
this direct conflict with Chinaas a boogeyman, because then you
can blame it on China oneverything.

(18:55):
You can blame it on the loss ofthe purchasing power of the
dollar, the collapse of thedollar.
You can blame economic setbacks.
You can blame anything on theother, but never forget we gave
it to them and the RepublicanParty is more responsible than
anything any entity for givingit all away, pawning America's
soul.
At least there were someDemocrats who opposed NAFTA.

(19:17):
I knew one of them verypersonally, one of the old blue
dog Democrats I've got his signup here in my office is Ralph
Hall.
It's a good friend of mine.
He opposed NAFTA, one of thelast ones.
But all the Republican partyhas supported globalization.

(19:37):
They, I used to hear and Iprobably still do there was
advertisements on talk radio,conservative talk about
investing in China and all thatstuff.
They built China up, but nowyou have China hawks and that's
the tell.
There's something gross aboutthat.

(19:57):
There's something sooff-putting when your mind
actually still works and I knowI'm supposed to be anesthetized
with fluoride and zombified bymainstream media, but I see
right through that and at leastI don't talk like this.
Let's take you to this article,just real quick.

(20:17):
This is how delusional we havebecome.
Let's get into this.
We're going to put this articleup on the screen.
First of all.
You look at the headlines ofDrudge and it's got a weather
vane showing Trump pointing.

(20:39):
It's a weather vane.
Which way are we going?
The MAGA is never you never gofull partisan.
It's kind of like.
It's kind of like TropicThunder, right, you never go
full partisan.
Let's put this up here.
This is the kind of rhetoricthat comes out.

(21:03):
And when market term, peopleare wiped out like their 401ks,
their, their iras, theirholdings.
You know from all this, justuncertainty.
Markets hate uncertainty, but Itell you what I hate more than
that is, uh, brain deadpartisanship.
It says that this is msn.
By the way, it says afterPresident Donald Trump's tariff

(21:25):
pledge last week sent stockprices plunging, the pro-Trump
influencer, benny Johnson,offered his three million
followers.
Do you understand the price youpay for not joining these teams
?
It is as an entrepreneur.

(21:47):
It's excruciating.
Three million followers Well,at least I'm interesting.
I feel like the scene on GoodWill Hunting.
You know, I got everything for$1.35 in late fees at the
library and you spent hundredsof thousands, so maybe I didn't
have to give up my soul to dothis.

(22:09):
But 3 million followers.
He gave them a rosy perspectiveon the news.
He says losing money costs younothing.
In fact, it builds quite a bitof character.
Eight months earlier, on a downtrading day under president joe
biden, johnson struck a darkertone.

(22:29):
It's bloody black monday, holymoly.
The kamala harrah crash is here.
See, this is what I'm talkingabout and I just wanted to bring
that up just as a quick exampleof understanding what you're
actually watching, which this isalmost nothing to do with
redoing American manufacturing.

(22:50):
The Rust Belt's rusty for areason.
It's been shut down for years.
That's a long-term build.
You have to incentivizecompanies and investment into
this country.
You have to take and slash thecorporate income tax to country.
You have to take the and slashthe corporate income tax to zero
.
You have to make tax-free zones.
This is like we have to have aMarshall plan for ourselves.

(23:13):
You just can't just throw uptariffs and expect for people to
start moving back.
So that's not what that's aboutthis.
As soon as all the things startdropping away, this is to have a
tension, kinetic tension withchina, and not that you used to

(23:34):
look at this.
I'm not defending china.
They do horrific.
I mean they are a police state.
They're basically a mass grave.
I mean, if you look at thehistory of, mao had killed like
grave.
I mean, if you look at thehistory, mao had killed like 70
million people.
If you look at their, they hada civil war about the same time
that the united states had acivil war.
We had like 600 000 dead.

(23:55):
You know, make it.
You know, 102 or 300 morethousand wounded.
All this, I mean it's a prettybig number.
It was the bloodiest war in the19th century for the West, but
I think the Chinese Civil Warhad like 40 million.
It was some insane number.
Like it's a massive number forthe 19th century.
They have a large population.
That's just how they are.

(24:19):
And Napoleon said that Chinawas a sleeping dragon.
Better let it slumber, best tolet it slumber.
Well, the globalists woke it up1972, and this was in
anticipation of the start of theTrilateral Commission.
Folks, this is a completelydifferent history than what this
isn't.
America versus China.

(24:39):
This is a plan to reshape theglobe in the image of the
globalist, the technocraticelite.
They're playing a sophisticatedgame.
This is like using politics andusing surface-level information
against you.
See, if you listen to my showand maybe I'm not obviously I
leave a possibility that I'mwrong on everything and you

(25:01):
should not trust me ever.
If I say something, go look itup and verify it.
If I'm wrong, send it.
And you should not trust meever.
If I say something, go look itup and verify it.
If I'm wrong, send it to me,I'll correct it.
This is all you know.
This is my best guess, becausethings are.
You have to look at this.
You don't get to that level ofwhere you are like who runs the
country.

(25:21):
You don't get to be presidentif you're just like, oh yeah,
put tariffs on it.
No, no, just bring them down.
No, and raise them up and thendo that.
I mean it's, there's a largerthing at play here, so you have
to suss out what is that?
But at least we're not.
If you're listening, this leastyou're not in that camp of
whatever three million followers.
That guy, just partisan, and itis where ideas and integrity go

(25:48):
to die.
All right, I'm going to skipover Liberation Day.
We talked enough about tariffsand that remains to be seen.
Yeah, and just a little bit,mike.
Even Kitco over on Kitco News,the worst, most consequential

(26:10):
self-inflicted wound in USeconomic policy since World War
II, own goal in 70 years.
They jeopardize the unitedstates ability to sell debt from
security alliances and conducteconomic and foreign policy,
according to former us treasurytreasury secretary, larry

(26:31):
summers.
Well, I don't have to really.
I mean, larry summers is notsomebody I'm looking to for
advice or to follow, but on thisone he's.
He's throwing out somethingthat is, I think, worth a
talking point, which is why itwasn't necessary to throw out
this shock to the system.
Which is why you're watchingthe next headline, so you want

(26:52):
to know the next shooter drop.
That's going to be theinvestigations on insider
trading, like the pump and dump.
Do you understand the level ofblood in the streets when the
markets go down that far, thatfast, and there's a panic and a
sell-off?
Well, if you know that inadvance kind of like the people,
kind of like Deutsche Bank andoffshoots of that had direct

(27:14):
knowledge of you know there'smillions that are still
unclaimed from shorts that wereput on airline stocks before
9-11.
Shorts that were put on airlinestocks before 9-11, and those
banks that held some of thetrades had ties to intelligence.
I'm just saying there's a,there's an over.

(27:34):
I think there's wisdom here.
When you look at the amount ofdamage that was done and then
the swift turnaround because allit takes is a we got a 90-day
reprieve Things start to riseagain.
So, bottom back up to the top.
Gold held off really well.
By the way, we'll talk a littlebit about that too.

(27:56):
I was on with David Knight justtalking about gold's metrics
since 2020.
The Larry Summers is right here.
This is a self-inflicted woundand you have to ask yourself why
.
Why'd they do that?
All right, let's.

(28:16):
Let's go check the chat over on.
If you want to chat, you cancheck out the.
You can check out the AmericaUnplugged channel over on Rumble

(28:38):
.
So what is that?
Krp27?
Yeah, someone near and dear tome listens to that Benny Johnson
.
Oh well that's.
I don't understand that levelof partisanship.
I just can't.
I can't.
That's not analysis to me,that's just clicks and you know
that is being acceptable.
All that kind of stuff, I can'tstand it.

(28:59):
Let's see Knights of the Stormis in the chat.
Let's see Nights of the stormis in the chat.
Uh, brad, be back, that's cool.
Uh, harps is in the chat.
Thank y'all for being here.
I appreciate it.
Yes, we're, we're working onthe chat.
Since we got dumped by uhRockfin.

(29:20):
I, you know I could get into allthe places that I've been
banned from and I'm not evencontroversial, am I that bad?
But I get taken off of channels.
Isn't that terrible, youtube?
You got to be careful.
I'm not on YouTube except forthe Wise Wolf Show, but I can't
do my normal stuff over there.

(29:40):
All right, let's get back intosome headlines and history here.
All right, let's get back intosome uh headlines in history
here.
Uh, I'm going to.
I want to come back to uh,china and Taiwan.
Let's do that last, and then wemay have something on the uh

(30:01):
sociological front that I foundinteresting.
Uh, hopefully we can get timeto to cover that.
Oh, there's just so much goingon on the sociological front
that I found interesting.
Hopefully we get time to coverthat.
There's just so much going onAgain, that's what I always say
when the major headline hits,you've got to ask yourself what
else is out there, what else?
is actually going on, becausethat's the real threat.
All right, let's stop screenand put this one up.

(30:22):
I want to talk about this.
I want to dig into the how andthe why.
This is antiwarcom.
Trump again threatens to attackIran.
Suggests Israel could lead it.
Iran's president reaffirmed onWednesday that Tehran does not

(30:43):
seek a nuclear weapon and saidKhomeini wasn't opposed to US
investment.
On Wednesday, president Trumpagain threatened the possibility
of the US taking militaryaction against Iran and
suggested Israel might lead theattack If it requires military.
We were going to have military,trump told reporters in the

(31:04):
Oval Office when asked if the USwould attack if a nuclear deal
isn't reached with Iran, israelwill obviously be very much
involved in that.
I'll be the leader of that, butnobody leads us.
We do what we want to do.
Well, israel is only involvedin that insofar as they have a

(31:25):
very powerful lobby and they getus to go to war on their behalf
.
They have a very it's AIPAC,they have a very powerful lobby
and that's just historical fact.
I was in several Middle Easterncountries and I never saw an
Israeli troop.
I was in several Middle Easterncountries and I never saw an

(31:50):
Israeli troop.
They have one of the.
It was the third largest armyas far as military strongest in
the world.
It's really powerful.
They've got air force, they'vegot ground forces, top-notch
intelligence with Mossad.
They have all that but theydon't really ever have to use it
because they got us you know wego and send uh al-qaeda, you
know, bomb uh the syriangovernment and use al-qaeda

(32:12):
proxies and isis proxies to takeout their government.
Or you know we'll go in andsame thing in iraq.
We know we'll go in and use theour infrastructure to cause
chaos in the region anddestabilize that, because that's
really what threatens Israel isnation states.
You know 1967, the Six-Day War,the Yom Kippur War in 1973,

(32:36):
this is what threatens Israel.
That are nation states.
It's not the PLO, it's notHamas that they set up.
By the way, it's funny, I'venot said one thing.
That's not a fact.

Speaker 1 (32:52):
It's just not popular .

Speaker 2 (32:55):
Yeah, that's what we do, and if you step, you're so
inundated with.
This is necessary, but thelesson that we have given over
the years and, by the way, anuclear weapon is an old
technology, it's 80 yearsPakistan has a nuclear weapon,

(33:16):
india has a nuclear weapon,north Korea has a nuclear weapon
.
They only have a $40 billionGDP, by the way, they have a
nuclear weapon.
It's an 80-year-old technology,folks.
But the lesson that we gave tothe world was if you don't have
one, you better get one, becausewe'll invade you if you don't.

(33:38):
That's what we do we toppleregimes.
What's the latest from Gaddafiregimes?
What's the latest from Gaddafi,you know?
Once a US ally.
Now same thing with Basharal-Assad and his family.
Once a Cold War US ally, notuseful anymore because you're
growing pretty strong.
It's best just to have chaos inthe region.

(33:59):
You know, or you might haveties to.
You know, hezbollah, maybebecause you're Shia, so that's
not good.
And Hezbollah has ties to thosewho oppose Israel.
Again, it all tracks back tothat and that's why we're all
constantly inundated in theMiddle East.
It's about chaos taking outnation-states.

(34:28):
Trump's latest threat comesahead of negotiations between
the US and Iran that will beheld in Oman this Saturday.
The talks will be attended byIranian Foreign Minister Abbas
Aragaki Is that right?
And Trump's Middle East envoy,steve Wyckoff?
Trump has insisted the talkswill be direct negotiations.

(34:48):
Talks will be directnegotiations, while Al-Gharqi
has said they will be indirect,meaning Omani and mediators will
pass messages between the twosides.
Reports have said that Iranwill need a goodwill gesture
from the US to hold direct talks, such as the removal of some

(35:09):
sanctions, but the Trumpadministration continues to
impose sanctions.
I told a story earlier today onthe David Knight Show.
It's a 22-year-old Tony inAfghanistan.
I got a call.
I said Arterburn, we need youto do security.

(35:34):
There's a VIP coming and you'regoing to just take a trip.
You're going to get on thetarmac, you're going to fly
around.
I said okay, and it was likefive of us and we went out.
I went to the tarmac I wasgetting on the back of the ramp
of the C-130, and I turn aroundand there's Black Beret, four
stars.
It's Tommy Franks.
Anybody knows anything aboutthe lead-up to the Iraq War and

(35:58):
Afghanistan?

Speaker 1 (35:59):
It was.

Speaker 2 (36:00):
Tommy Franks, leader of CENTCOM.
He looked at me and you can'tsalute on the tarmac because you
don't know if there's snipers.

Speaker 1 (36:08):
So you don't salute.

Speaker 2 (36:10):
I just stood at attention and and said, where
are you from?
And I said I'm.
I knew he's from texas.
I'm from texas like you, sir.
He said, well, good, I'm notworried anymore.
So we got on.
We got on the plane and flewaround and it was two f-16s, one
on each wing.
I was like I'm most relaxedI've ever been on a plane in my

(36:31):
life, like this plane isn'tgoing to get shot down.
We flew out to all a meme thatfloats around and it says why

(36:52):
does Iran Iran wants war with us.
Why do they keep built, why dothey put their country so close
to our military bases?
I mean, just literally surroundthem.
And if you watch movies like Wby Oliver Stone, the Dick Cheney
character puts it on a map.
You guys should go watch this.
The Dick Cheney character putsit on the map and shows you the

(37:13):
reason, what they really want.
So the neocons, the warmongers,they're just great deceivers too
.
They fooled so many people inpolitics, americans, especially
Christians.
Unfortunately, next time youhear if you listen to me long
enough, you can't get that wayanymore, because you'll hear him

(37:34):
, you'll hear the rhetoric andyou're like, oh, you're just
full of it, you don't reallycare about the things I care
about, you just want war.
Like Max boot is one of them,like you know he'll.
I could tell you guys so manystories about conservative talk
radio, cause I was in it foryears and now I just quit.
I mean, I just went and did myown.

(37:54):
I'm on WWCR, I'll always keep atransmission, but I could tell
you about how fake and how muchof a game it is.
But Iran is at the center ofthat.
It's always been a push,especially in those circles, and

(38:17):
you got to ask yourself whyIran doesn't threaten the United
States.
In what way?
Have you ever really thoughtthat through?
Like what?
How are they going to get?
Are they going to invade us?
Can they get here?
What are they going to?
Like use bass, boats and stuff.
They don't even have a navy.
I mean they have like a smallthing, like a contingent.

(38:37):
They don't have the.
I mean, if the Nazis couldn't doit, folks, if the Third Reich
who had like technology, if theyhad?
You know we were racing at theend of the war to get their
scientists because they had someof the smartest people on the
planet.
We wanted to make sure that wegot them before the Russians did
.
It was like I, our Nazis arebetter than your Nazis.

(38:59):
That's what they were doing.
They couldn't get us, theycouldn't attack us.
So what is this all about?
That's exactly what I just toldyou.
It was it's resources, it'sisrael, it's military industrial

(39:19):
complex, it's all the things.
It's a hobby horse, you know.
Trump has been increasingsanctions on iran and
threatening the country over itsnuclear program, even though US
intelligence agencies recentlyreaffirmed that there's no
evidence Tehran is building abomb.

(39:45):
It's kind of like I took placepart uh tail end of the invasion
of Iraq and I remember rollingin and we didn't you know
where's our chem gear.
You know, like we didn't havethe top rate chemical gear.
So I thought they were.
I thought they had stockpilesof all this stuff.

(40:08):
Where's all the you know forfor one on Iraq with sarin gas
and other thing, nerve agentsand other stuff?
Well, we we know that they hada certain amount of it, because
we gave it to them to killIranians.
And you have to understand toothat a lot of this Iran stuff is

(40:29):
in direct correlation withRussia too.
That's why it's so dangerous.
It's not just this thing, thisentity that exists unto itself
and if we hit it, it stands.
There's consequences.
I mean, when we went to haveour conferences with Stalin in

(40:51):
World War II, it was in Tehran.
At a Tehran conference, stalin,churchill, fdr that's where
Stalin wanted to meet.
I'll tell you a story quick too.
It's just a little bit ofhistory fun there was at Potsdam

(41:14):
after the war.
You had Harry Truman, you hadWinston Churchill and you had
Stalin, and they were all justcarving up the world.
Basically, it was the end ofWorld War II in Europe and they
were carving up the territories.
Who's going to be involved?

(41:34):
And what are the Russians goingto help with the invasion of
Japan?
All that stuff.
And then Churchill, being theleader of Great Britain, wanted
certain concessions and he had acertain amount of leverage and
he was talking so they allstayed up and they just drank
and drank.
Drinking vodka was Stalin andamount of leverage.

(41:59):
And he was talking saying theyall stayed up and they just
drank and drank.
you know, drinking vodka withstalin and churchill drank too
much and, uh, he woke up hishead hurting and he just had a
panic and he said, oh, I don'tremember, you know.
So he jots off a note to go tostalin.
He's like, oh, you know,premier stalin, you know I, uh,
I hope you had a hope we had.
You know, we can continue ourtalks.
I would love to go overeverything that was said and
reaffirm or, you know, um, justfamiliarize ourself with it,

(42:20):
because he didn't realize, hedidn't remember what he said so
he sends the note over and hegets a
note back and uh, stalin says uh, don't worry, winston, I was
drunk too and the translator'sbeen shot.
So you know there's a reasonthat Iran and I talked about.

(42:44):
Why am I talking aboutChurchill today?
I don't know, he's not even oneof my favorites, he's just an
interesting guy.
He's an interesting warmongerhe was.
But that's a direct link.
There's a little bit of historythere on Russia and Iran.
We do at least one more article.
I've got some folks in the chattoo.

(43:06):
Make sure I'm not missinganybody.
Oh, we got BitSource AMLsolution.
I know those guys.

Speaker 1 (43:14):
Todd, how are you?

Speaker 2 (43:15):
guys, good to see you .
Yeah, if you criticize thebombing of Palestinian children,
they simply call you their,created Hamas, and then they
walk away from the argument.
Saddam Hussein same thingtrained the school of Americas
and installed in 1979.
Yeah, they installed SaddamHussein in 79, tim Osman, which

(43:39):
is bin Laden, and they alsoinstalled that was the 1979 was
the 444 days of Americans heldhostage by the Iranian regime,
the Ayatollah.
And if you recall, the reasonthat they had that revolution in
Iran is because we installedthe Shah back in the 1950s with

(44:01):
Operation Ajax, with theoverthrow of Mosaddegh.
Every time we've done this, itjust turns out really bad.
We get into these situationsand remember it just turns out
really bad.
We get into these situationsand remember the thing with Iran
goes back to the Cold War, soit's not just an Israeli thing,
but that's why we're still there, that's why we have so much

(44:25):
heat on it.
That's good to see you, todd,thanks for being in the chat.
Okay, let's do the last articleof the day.
Let's do a little bit ofhistory too.
Parapolitics and preciousmetals one of my favorite things
to talk about.
All right, let's do naturalnews I found this earlier and

(44:49):
just key points, some historyyou may not know, especially as
we're.
This is a direct correlationwith the conversation we were
having earlier about China andthe tariffs and the trade war
and the asymmetrical war, andwhat you're actually watching
unfold.

(45:09):
It is quite possible, folks,that the technocrats literally
had this as a long-term plan toset up an enemy, to have a new
enemy, and the testing groundthe social credit score, the
CBDC.
That's China.
The testing ground for thetechnocratic new world order

(45:31):
that they want so bad.
That is China.
Natural news China's Taiwaninvasion could come sooner than
expected, as experts warn ofimminent military strike.

(45:58):
China may invade taiwan withinsix months using military drills
as invasion rehearsals.
Taiwan's semiconductordominance makes global supply
chains vulnerable to severedisruption.
China's military testsprefabricated invasion barges,
oh, signaling rapid strikecapabilities.
Biden's open border policycould allow China to exploit US
domestic vulnerability during acrisis.

(46:19):
I'm just reading some keypoints here.
A 2027 invasion could overwhelmTaiwan before US forces respond
, requiring immediatepreparedness.
It's requiring immediatepreparedness.
Well, for those of you who don'tknow the history and I don't
consider myself an expert onthis, but I mentioned this

(46:39):
earlier In 1949, we losemainland China to the communist
forces of Mao Zedong, and, ofcourse, mao Zedong and the
communists are always supportedby the wealthiest people in the
world, as communism is, and theycreate the communist state and
the nationalist forces underChiang Kai-shek flee to a place

(47:01):
called Formosa, which is Taiwan.
And so Taiwan was this Cold Warally for the United States,
cold War ally for the UnitedStates.
And, as a matter of fact, thenext year when South Korea was
invaded by North Korea, thecommunists invaded the South.
When they were invaded andMacArthur was called to respond,

(47:23):
macarthur was in Japan, generalDouglas MacArthur, and he was
going to oversee thecounterstrike and, you know,
free south korea from thecommunist.
He kept threatening to releasechang because he had chang, had
all these you know nationalistforces there on formosa, which
is again taiwan.
They never did, but that wasuntil 1972.

(47:47):
That's what I'm saying.
This is such a huge pivot.
So if you were a cold warrior,if you, you know, were a rock
rib right winger, uh, opening upChina in 72, the Democrats
could have never done it.
It took Nixon.
It was an anti-communist.
You know his entire career.
He brought down Alger Hiss andbeen part of the house on
American activities committee,all that stuff.

(48:07):
As a Congressman.
You know he, he had the kitchendebate with Khrushchev, he got
that famous picture.
I need to get that picture ofNixon putting his finger in
Khrushchev's lapel.
That's such a great iconicphoto, but it took Nixon opening
it up.
I mean it would take that right.
It took an anti-communist toget that done.

(48:29):
To get that done, and after weopened China officially,
something very strange startedto happen.
That's when the United Statesgovernment started to back off

(48:50):
of its support of Taiwan.
As a matter of fact, kissingerand Nixon gave Chairman Mao a
verbal promise I'd say a verbalunderstanding that there was a
one China, there was one China,not two Chinas, and that
eventually it would be a real.

(49:11):
This was implied.
It wasn't put into writing.
So this is the beginning of thepost-gold standard United
States.
When we went off the goldstandard opened China the next
year, and then we have thetrilateral commission.
It's very important tounderstand this history because
this is the beginning of thetechnocratic age.
If you also look at things likethe space races, races 72 is

(49:34):
the last year we went into spaceor did anything.
I'm not well, I guess, if you,we go in the atmosphere but if
the last time we went into wentto the moon?
or did any exploration if youbelieve that right if you even
believe that beside the factthat's, that's not what we.
We don't do that anymore.
We just continue to offshorethings.

(49:54):
We build up infrastructure ofother nations and we have a fiat
centered economy here like debtridden and all that stuff.
So over time we start seedingthings, not only the
manufacturing and technology andsecrets and other things that
go to.
You can look at the years of theClinton White House and it was

(50:17):
just Google like bags of cash.
They would give the Chineseofficials bags of cash.
No, the Chinese officials wouldgive us bags of cash for
missile technology.
There's a lot of that going onin the 90s because it was just
like this arc.
You know, it didn't seem likeit was ever going to.

(50:39):
We'll never get overtaken by,you know, china economically.
Of course we did, because wegave them everything.
I mean, it's a layup, weliterally just handed them
everything.
So we did that.
But I want to bring to yourattention.
There's a document that cameout on January 1st 1979.

(51:00):
And it makes all of this lookreally strange and this will
happen.
More than likely there will bea conflict of some kind before
the decade's out.
China will make a move here onTaiwan and it may be pre-planned
that we have this as some sortof pretext.

(51:25):
but that's what the document wasa verbal understanding, a memo
from Zygmunt Brzezinski, theSecretary of State for Jimmy
Carter at the time, recognizinga one-China policy and cutting
off diplomatic ties with Taipei.
So we abandoned Taiwan onJanuary 1st 1979.

(51:47):
On January 1st 1979.
So you fast forward now andwe're looking at not only we've
given billions into Taiwan, butwe've reversed our own reversal.

(52:08):
The article goes on to say astensions between the US and
China reach a boiling point,some defense experts warn that
Beijing may be preparing for aninvasion of Taiwan within the
next six months, others citing2027, using aggressive gray zone
warfare tactics disguised asmilitary exercises.
Stakes couldn't be higher.
Taiwan's dominance insemiconductor production means

(52:30):
global supply chains, usmilitary readiness and consumer
electronics would faceunprecedented disruption.

(52:56):
Meanwhile, china's belligerentposturing and the fallout from
the Biden-American War, and evenpredating that let's just go to
the Spanish-American War, giantnewspapers which fueled
American narrative in the 19thand early 20th century.
What did William RandolphHearst tell his photographer and

(53:17):
paint the guy who would go out,go down and create cartoons and
other drawings to show what'shappening in places, like when
they had the in Cuba.
And William Randolph Hearsttold him you supply me the
images and I'll supply the war.

(53:38):
And then you, right after that,you had the explosion where the
main, the main was sunk theship, the naval ship for the
United States, which Spain hadnothing to do with, but that was
the battle cry.
Remember, the main to hell wasSpain.
And we take Cuba and then wetake the.

(54:01):
Philippines and Guam.
You know the go to the ManilaBay and Harbor and sink those
old Spanish wooden ships.
But that was a concocted,manufactured war Started by a
false flag.
It's later been determined thatit was basically an on-purpose

(54:22):
setup for the main to hitwhatever.
It hit mine or something.
But it wasn't Spanish, it was apretext for war.
Same thing with World War I.
You have the Archduke Ferdinandmurdered by this shadowy group

(54:43):
called the Black Hand.
It was a Serbius anarchistgroup that had ties to the
British intelligence.
British intelligence thenstarting a series of treaties
being tripped like tripwires.
Nobody could stop it, even hadthe Kaiser crying trying to stop

(55:03):
the army, because he couldn'teven stop it.
Even the leaders couldn't stopit once the army started
mobilizing.
Don't get me started on WorldWar II, so many false flags.
I mean you can get into PearlHarbor too, once the army
started mobilizing.
Don't get me started on WorldWar II, so many false flags.
I mean you can get into PearlHarbor too.
The Gulf of Tonkin, vietnam1964, I believe Lyndon Johnson

(55:26):
just you know deep state hadmurdered JFK and he's got in
driver's seat.
Jfk had that memorandumwithdrawing the troops from
Vietnam and doing a drawdown.
There's interviews saying well,in the final analysis, it's
their war, it's theirs to win orlose.
And then his head gets blown offin Dealey Plaza.
See where this is going.
By the way, the commander ofthe boat in the Gulf of Tonkin

(55:52):
was Jim Morrison's dad from theDoors, and that's like the Jim
Morrison songs are like thetheme song for Vietnam.
So history has some weirdsynchronicities, doesn't it?
Same thing with the Gulf War,the original Gulf War, I mean,
saddam Hussein was given a greenlight by our government to

(56:14):
invade Kuwait.
We got a thumbs up, we armedhim, we gave him the weapons,
and the Kuwaitis were slant,drilling and taking Iraqi oil
and stuff and he said well, thisis just a made-up place on a
map that Winston Churchill drewup drinking scotch.
But then we had our new Hitler.
You understand like all thesethings aren't real.

(56:36):
You got to be careful of allthis.
All the pretext for false flagsare written all over this thing
.
If you don't know your history,then you're just walking into it
blindly.
All right, it does talk, talk,I mean there are, we have open

(57:02):
border issues, which gives themample opportunity, all sorts of
things.
But I think we're to be carefulhere.
I think the wisdom and uh aboutthe tensions with china and
what I've called to yourattention is the term China hawk
Just be really skeptical ofwhatever the hell that means.
The overlords want war and Iwill never abide by that.

(57:27):
There's almost no wars.
I mean you have to prepare forwar.
I'm not a pacifist, matter offact, I'm harder than you know
as far as defense than anybody.
I don't even want to.
I don't want our militarybogged down in unnecessary,
unconstitutional, unwinnablewars.
I think it makes it less strong.
I think you should have youknow.
I think we should be taking outnarco terrorists on the border.

(57:47):
I think we should protectAmerican citizens.
You wouldn't I mean forAmerica's enemies, which are
mostly inside the walls youwould not want me as
commander-in-chief, because I'dactually carry out my orders and
my duties.
I'd die for this country.
I don't know if me politicians,I don't know if I'm looking

(58:11):
around the room and scanning andseeing who actually loves the
republic.
And there's always thisexternal thing, which you've got
to be careful of, that theywant to call your attention to A
pretext for conditioning yourmind for colonizing and priming
your mind for war.
All right, let's check goldprices real quick.

(58:36):
Go to gold, to gold priceme,see if it's not.
If not, we'll go.
You know you can check theprice of gold by going to
wolfpackgold or going towisewolfgoldcom.
You can check as it has a.
Have a ticker on there.
Let's see if we can pull thatup.
Let's do that real quick.
I didn't have it.
Wolfpackgold Always fun.
I'm working on some siteimprovements too, but I'm so

(59:01):
proud of my ticker.
Where's my ticker at there we?

Speaker 1 (59:04):
go.

Speaker 2 (59:05):
Right at the top of the page.
Let's stop the screen.
Put this one up.

Speaker 1 (59:09):
See Wolfpackgold.

Speaker 2 (59:11):
Right at the top.
There you can get live prices.
Oh, we got a nice little pop upthere too.
Yeah, gold 3,160 luciferianbankster notes per troy ounce,
silver 30.90 per troy ounce forthe white metal.
And gold has really done wellin the face of all this market

(59:34):
uncertainty, which should be thetell.
Ladies and gents, that shouldbe the tell.
Much to discuss.
I'll be back next week, Be sureand tune into America.
I'm plugged on Saturday myself,Billy Ray Valentine and the
legendary Don Jeffries.
My website is art of burn Dotgold.
Be sure to look up.
Pair of truthuther, give us areview too.
I got a new Paratruther that'sgoing to come out on the Catcher
in the Rye and JD Salinger thatMr Anderson and myself did on

(59:59):
Sunday.
So you guys take care of eachother.
Thanks for being here.
End of transmission.