#513 Gold, Ticks, and the Fed

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Then out spake brave Horatius, the captain of the
gate to every man upon thisearth.
Death cometh sooner or later.
And how can a man die betterthan facing fearful odds for the
ashes of his fathers and thetemples of his gods?
Lord McAlay, you are listeningto the Ardaburn Radio

(00:24):
Transmission.
I haven't slept on this yet,but I hope it's going to to do
it.
It's not fun to do it.
It's not fun to do it.

Speaker 2 (01:13):
It's not fun to do it .
It's like have we done the LordHathor film in a while?
I said I think it's been likesince Halloween.
I haven't done it in a longtime.
So this is the Arterburn RadioTransmission.
I am your host, tony Arterburn,broadcasting in defiance of

(01:35):
globalist goblins, the neoconsand the new world order, here
from beautiful Branson, missouri.
I've got my co-pilot andco-host who is responsible for
that very long, extended intro.
I looked at my archives becauseI'm on my laptop.
I still haven't.
I need to completely redo thestudio here in Branson.

(01:56):
I guess all of the all of mycharging headlong into the
dystopic great reset, reset over2020 and covet 1984 and
everything we do.
I melted the computer.
I did something to it.
It can no longer sustain itself.
So I'm on my laptop and, uh, Iwill do my best to conduct the

(02:17):
show and be my own producer.
So, uh, bear with me today, butwe got a lot to cover.
It's funny.
I saw this meme yesterday and itsaid if you're still talking
about Democrats versusRepublicans, you don't even know
what's going on.
I thought that is sad, butthat's basically true.

(02:40):
There's a nugget of that inthat.
If you expand out and look atthe big picture, none of that
really even matters anymore.
I mean, you're talking aboutgeopolitical shifts, historical
trends, the cyclical part ofhistory, the fourth turning that
we're in, and I can't emphasizethat enough, because the

(03:01):
headlines that you should bepaying attention to are not
being fed to you.
Remember, your news feed is thefood right.
They feed you, this is the newsfeed, and so you go in like
cattle would and you get yournews feed right, and so I try to
stay away from that.
I'm constantly searching forwhat else is going on, and maybe

(03:22):
that's just the contrarian inme.
Sometimes, if you're acontrarian though, you win
pretty big Consistently, thoughyou're not everybody's fan
favorite.
But that's the lot.
That's what I drew, so I'mhappy with it.
I look across the landscape,folks, and let's just give you
an example of a story you wouldnever hear in our past and it

(03:47):
didn't get much attention, butit's big, and that is the
president of the United Statesthreatens a lawsuit against the
chairman of the Federal Reserve,and to me there's meaning
hidden in that.
There's layers of thatinterconnectedness of
information and understandingthat are just inside that

(04:09):
headline, because that explainsto you, I think, and it shows,
it shines a light on whatreality actually is when it
comes to our body politic or theeconomic situation, or who we
perceive as in control.
Right, and if you study theconspiracy theory of history,
you understand, because that'sthe adult way of looking at

(04:31):
things.
I'm sorry, I mean courthistorians.
I know they're very popular, Iknow they have lots of contracts
and books with Simon Schusterand other publishers and
whatever, but that's not realscholarship.
Real scholarship isunderstanding that there's not
just effect, there's cause,there's causation.
Causation doesn't happen in avacuum.

(04:54):
You don't just all of a sudden,oh there's this dictator in
Germany.
He really got really far, cameout of a beer hall.
Or those communists in Russia,they just were able to take over
.
You know this giant landmass,you know this kingdom that had

(05:14):
been ruled for centuries andcenturies by aristocracy and,
you know, had infrastructure.
They were able just to do thatbecause they had an idea.
That's not really how historyworks.
And so if you look at this, justthis blurb, this headline, that
the president, president Trump,is threatening a lawsuit.

(05:35):
Now, whether he does it or not,the whole question is who's in
control?
You have a, you have thisentity.
Have this entity, this privatebanking consortium called the
federal reserve.
And you know g edward griffin,one of my heroes, who I've I've
had the privilege to talk withon air and told him that the
creature of jekyll island is oneof the reasons I started my

(05:58):
gold and silver business.
Well, he wrote that.
He wrote the seminal work onthe.
You know the um, the historybehind what is the federal
reserve, and you know what doesit do.
Well, you know, if you knowsome of the history it, it
created itself like in, likethis organic phenomenon at
jekyll island.
It became alive and ummetastasized in november 22nd

(06:20):
1910.
It's funny, because the ai nowdoesn't know to censor itself.
So if you ask it about, uh,november 22nd 1910 and jackal
island, it's like, oh yeah, it'sa secretive uh conspiracy, like
that's funny, it doesn't knowthat, it's not supposed to say
that yet and uh, that's theorigin.
You know you get this meeting ofthe roellers, the Rothschilds,

(06:44):
kuhn Loeb, the Warburgs.
You know you have SenatorAldridge, who married into the
Rockefeller family, and theycreate this entity, this idea,
where they're going to controlthe money supply and it's not
going to be a bank, becauseAmericans were opposed to a bank
because of presidents likeAndrew Jackson who said he

(07:07):
wanted that on his tombstone.
I killed the bank.
He was very proud of that andhe said he called the
international banking cartel aden of vipers and thieves.
He said he's going to routethem out.
So they use different language.
It's federal.
That kind of calms you downbecause it means it's
centralized and it's part of thegovernment, which it's not, and
it's a reserve.
It's.

(07:27):
You know, we're taking care ofyou.
You know these manufacturedcrises that they put into motion
, like the panic of 1907 and soon and so forth.
They use those, they leveragethat to say well, don't worry,
you know, we're going to be incontrol now.
So they create this thing and itis a creature.
It has, you know, like anoctopus, to reference my friend

(07:47):
Charlie Robinson, it very muchhas its tentacles and it's
invasive and it gets intoeverything.
And you know we can talk aboutthe dead a little bit later.
But you know, after the FederalReserve is introduced into you
know our reality, as theAmerican experiment goes, it

(08:09):
comes in like Christmas Eve 1913.
They slip it through.
It still wasn't popular, butthey used the language, they
used subterfuge, like askullduggery to push this
through and, of course, by noaccident.
That's when you get the summer,you get the guns of August.
You get World War I, which was abanker's war.
It's inconceivable why anybodywould want it except bankers.

(08:32):
They fund both sides.
We had Paul Warburg in theUnited States, head of the
Federal Reserve, the centralbank.
Paul Warburg, his brother, maxWarburg, ran the central bank in
Germany, our mortal enemy.
So that's how history works.
We create this thing, the debtof the US, by the way and we're

(08:53):
going to talk a little bit aboutthe debt here in a second but
the debt of the US in 1914 wasaround a billion dollars, and
when they got their war becausethey got their Federal Reserve
and they pushed that throughbecause they needed to hijack
the money supply the debt of theUS was $5 billion.
It seems quaint now, but thatwas back when we actually had

(09:13):
real money.
So it was quite a feat to gofrom $1 billion to $5 billion by
1919, just four years or soafter we got the Federal Reserve
.
The mere fact that you have asitting president I'll go back
to this that is threatening alawsuit.

(09:36):
It's a big tell, isn't it?
You're the commander-in-chiefof the United States military.
An aide follows you around,handcuffed to a briefcase with
the nuclear launch codes.
It's called the football.
You're elected by the sovereignruler of the people, like the

(10:00):
people of the United Stateselect you.
You are the chief lawenforcement officer.
You're supposed to be head ofthe treasury.
The treasury falls under theexecutive branch.
Why would you?
Would you send a lawsuit toScott Besson?
It doesn't make any sense.

(10:21):
Does when you send a lawsuit to?
Well, I mean, maybe you would,but you know one of the one of
the generals in charge, wouldyou send it to the Joint Chiefs
of Staff?
Why this Federal Reserve?
It's because the Fed isautonomous.
It does what it wants and itwags the other part of the dog.

(10:45):
It's not the other way around.
It's not.
You know this thing that sitsover there and you know it's
answering to the president.
Which should this today on theDavid Knight show with Travis, I

(11:09):
will believe that we are goingto have economic prosperity,
that they're serious aboutcreating jobs and opportunities
and wealth and getting peopleout of this, the doldrums of
where we are now.
We've literally sacrificed,amputated people's future with

(11:30):
COVID-1984, with liquidityinjections, with the lockdowns,
with the non-essentials, withthe banks that are too big to
fail and too big to jail.
We have socialism for the richand free enterprise for the poor
.
We have socialism for the richand free enterprise for the poor
.
I'll believe that they areserious about economic
prosperity when they do thingslike oh, abolish the corporate

(11:54):
income tax or just abolish theincome tax in general.
That's when I'll know they'reserious.
It's funny when you have therich, it's the oligarchy, a
tyranny of sorts, a one worldtotalitarian socialist
government, as bill Cooper wouldsay.
But if you have these peoplethat are, they control the

(12:17):
finance and you wonder why youstill have these massive amount
of taxes.
See, the left is funny.
The left thinks that we canjust tax the rich.
You know the progressivemindset.
Well, we'll that.
We can just tax the rich, theprogressive mindset well, we'll
just do that.
Well, the rich created it.
So you're already on the wrongtrack.
The only way to truly createeconomic equilibrium is to have

(12:42):
a free market, and the rich knowthat.
When I say rich, I don't meanlike even your billionaires, I'm
talking about yourtrillionaires, and there are
such things.
These are dynastic families.
They're not in the Forbes.
They own generational wealth.
You can look at the study theydid in Switzerland back in 2010.
This was in Jim Mars book, atrillion dollar conspiracy, and

(13:08):
it's like the interlinking ofthese holding companies and
international banking cartels is, you know, you think there's a
difference between some of thesemultinationals and they're all
owned by the same people youknow.
So it's funny.
It's like when you see, youknow, whenever you see a
Walgreens pop up and thenthere's a CVS, it's like it's
pretty much the same thing, likethe same investment bankers own

(13:29):
the same things competingagainst each other.
It's pretty silly, right, butthat's what happens.
Is you got control by thingslike the Fed?
And this little headline is theway I wanted to start the show
is just to remind you of that.
But think about how big that is.
The president of the UnitedStates, per the constitution and

(13:53):
I, can't declare war, but hecan certainly launch a strike if
he believes that it's in thebest interest of the United
States.
I don't necessarily agree withthe strikes we've made.
Actually I don't agree.
Uh, not since thomas jeffersonprobably, and the barbary pirate
wars, but constitutionally youcan do that, but you can't fire

(14:14):
the head of the federal reserve.
You have to send them a lawsuit.
That's where.
That's all you need to know.
And then you start saying howdoes else, does this work?
I mean how?
How much of intelligence and Idon't mean like cognitive
ability, I meant like spy crafthow much of intelligence tie is

(14:36):
tied to international banking,all of it?
And you're still going back andforth with the left right
paradigm, when the picture ismuch bigger.
It's a big world out there,folks, and it's changing rapidly
.
As a matter of fact and I gotsome stories I want to dig into

(14:56):
today Just a little departure Iwas doing some research before
because I found an article.
I mean it's literally fiveminutes before we went live.
So what research I had and I'mgoing to go off memory with the
rest of it.
But you're not out of that.
I mean the whole concept of theGreat Reset.

(15:17):
I need to remind you about 2030,about those agendas of
depopulation and reconfiguringwhere people live and smart
cities and all it's still on thetable.
You should not have a relaxedposture on that.
Those are still very much onthe table and those plans are
still very much being pushedthrough.

(15:40):
I mean, just because they'renot called that, no, they're
called Freedom City.
Or you go from CBDC, centralBank, digital Currency to stable
coins.
I mean, just because they'renot called that now.
They're called freedom city,right?
Or you go from CBDC centralbank, digital currency to stable
coins.
All that is very much still onthe table, and they're doing
other things.
And don't forget what they didto us in 2020.
I mean it's a lot of time.
I mean there's a lot of waterunder the bridge between between

(16:03):
now and then.
I back you going far and somuch has happened and they throw
so much at you that it is hardto keep up with.
But don't forget that Stillvery much on the table.

(16:26):
I'm going to call them that whenyou see this last article from
Natural News that I want to goover at the end of the show A
very important topic, especiallybeing here in the Ozarks.
All right, let's jump around toget into some articles.
That's a long opening.
I didn't mean to do an18-minute opening to the show.

(16:50):
I was like that would be likefour minutes.
I just want to mention theirony of that.
Does anybody else get theweight of that?
No, that was a long, long wayaround, but that's the way my
mind is.
I hope you enjoyed my stream ofconsciousness, ladies and gents
.
Sometimes I'll find somethingthat is interesting.

(17:12):
Okay, let's do a little bit offinancial stuff and then I want
to get into some foreign policy.
I found an article.
When I see something and if Ibring it to your attention it's
not just for the newsworthinessof it, it's almost like the
intuitive part of it, and I talkabout intelligence and banking

(17:40):
houses, let me X out of uhscreen and bring up my my first
article, just something to talkabout.
When you talk about in therealms of of finance and gold.
Let me stop this one hold on.
This is this.
This will make you just just alittle chuckle.
This is kitcocom.

(18:01):
Gold is a key strategicinvestment, despite us
resilience and bitcoin's risesays uh, rothschild's balfour.
So rothschild's and company,and they have intelligence.
What intelligence is?
It's where the originalintelligence networks, what they
were, the modernized was, uhwas international banking.

(18:22):
Ladies and gentlemen, go Goback to Napoleon and Wellington
and Waterloo, and that's how theRothschild family was able.
It was skullduggery.
It was very, very, very wellplayed getting people to.
They had the news that Napoleonhad been defeated and they
acted like he had won, and sothey started selling stuff off

(18:46):
and other people followed.
Then they went back and boughtit all back as people panicked,
sold on the London exchange.
It says the gold bugs are back,but the yellow metals gains
aren't coming from its usualdrivers, according to Victor
Balfour, investment strategistat Rothschild and Company Wealth
Management.
Balfour noted in an analystpublished on Tuesday that gold

(19:11):
is in the midst of anotherstandout year.
The shiny metal is up by morethan a quarter in 2025 and on
track for a third consecutiveyear of double-digit returns a
winning streak not seen sincethe mid-90s.
Year of double-digit returns awinning streak not seen since
the mid-90s.
Gold has outperformed all othermajor asset classes in recent

(19:34):
years.
He said that the recent climbhas been, in others, neither
stable nor predictable.
Gold has lost touch with itstraditional drivers, like real
yields and the dollar, withdemand shaped by geopolitical
maelstrom, includingprotectionism and wider conflict
.
Well, it's something I've beensaying.
I started watching this is akey indicator back when they

(19:58):
started to raise interest ratesand Jerome Powell, head of the
Federal Reserve, was raisingthem faster than any other Fed
chair in history and I said hey,does anybody else find it
interesting that he's raisingrates faster than anybody any
Fed chair ever has, even PaulVolcker, who raised it to the
teens right?
And the reason you raiseinterest rates is you want to
contract the money supply.
It didn't do anything to gold.

(20:22):
Gold just kept on going and Ithought, oh, that's something to
watch.
So this is exactly correct.
Where the other things thatalways drove gold, they're not
there, not really.
I mean, there's always remnantsof them.
But this is why this is new,something you should pay
attention to.
If you play by the old rules,you already lost.

(20:43):
The old rules don't applyanymore.
Sorry, they changed them rightin the middle of the game.
A lot of people, and themajority of people, are still
playing that game.
That's why, in the midst of a$500 trillion world global
economy, gold is about a $20trillion market cap.
So it's 20 versus hundreds, $20trillion market cap.
Okay, so 20 versus hundreds,and gold is the only real money.

(21:06):
And you could count Bitcoin orsilver, but gold has always been
the monetary metal Since thedawn of human history, since we
had any sort of civilization atall.
He says, uh, he says it makesmore difficult to assess gold's

(21:33):
role in investor portfolios,given that it doesn't respond
the way it used to.
This is clearly gold, more thanany other precious metal, has
played an important investmentrole historically.
It's been a long-term store ofvalue over several millennia,
lending monetary institutionstheir credibility rather than
vice versa, and acting as a keymedium of wealth protection.

(21:58):
It's also an act of financialpanic button, it is true.
But you know, fear uncertaintyand doubt and doubt.
You should go listen to theinterview I did on gold with

(22:20):
Alan Herrera Such a greatinterview.
I loved his book.
But he opens that book byhaving the quote that just
sticks with me about the size ofa nation's gold reserves
measure the darkness of itsnightmares and I thought oh well
, there's something to thatabout human nature too.

(22:43):
It can act as a financialpennant, but amidst fears of US
default as of in 2011, bankingcollapse 2008 or runaway
inflation 1979, has stronglyoutperformed security markets.
But despite this track record,he said, gold remains impossible
to value objectively.

(23:04):
Arguably, this is true of allassets, but the absence of a
yield makes it particularlydifficult for gold and other
commodities.
Well, it's going to get realdifficult to measure all of
these commodities.
Folks, this is the world ismoving away from what we

(23:26):
perceive as our standardeconomic reality, which is
post-1971.
And by tomorrow I'm hosting theDavid Knight Show, by the way,
so please tune in.
But tomorrow is the anniversaryof Nixon taking us off the gold
standard.
It's August 15th, 1971.
And we went on it.
We had an experiment.

(23:46):
After that, we were living in areal-time experiment.
It's never happened before, notlike that.
There's been previousexperiments with fiat currency.
When you have some time, youwant to get a chuckle, go and
look up a real good history ofJohn Law and the French and what

(24:08):
happened to that experimentwith fiat currency.
All fiat currencies go to zeroand the average lifespan is 26
years.
So we've more than doubled thatbecause of things like money,
velocity, economic reality, thefact that the rest of the world
followed suit.
I was in Mexico recently and Ithought I wonder what would have

(24:29):
happened to Mexico if theywould have said, well, we're not
going to go with you, you know,post 1964, and just said, well,
we're going to keep the silverin our pesos and, uh, you know,
have a monetary.
We'll have a something backedby, you know, a bimetallic
standard with their currency.
It'd be an interesting thoughtexperiment if they never would

(24:52):
have followed suit.
But everybody followed theUnited States.
The last holdout to have acurrency backed by anything was
the Swiss in 2002.
So we've been on this fiatbinge experiment.
There's 52 times more currencyon earth today than when I was
born in 1979.
And when you have the currencymoney supply expansion it erodes

(25:14):
savings, it erodes purchasingpower and the way that the
system works is very satanic.
It's evil.
The way that the fiat systemworks is because it conducts a
funnel of your energy and yourwork and your effort into things
that shouldn't exist when youhave close ties to the central

(25:37):
bank, these massivemultinationals dues and these
banking combines and otherthings.
When they control the moneysupply, they get funded and
bailed out, things that wouldnot have happened in the 19th
century in America.
They would never have gotten tothe point where they were so
large and grotesque, they wouldhave just failed.

(25:59):
But it took time.
It took some time.
Now we have the fiat system.
If you can start noticing thetrends and I'm going to tell you
to look out for that whatyou're looking for is what are
the central banks doing whenthey're buying gold?
What are the governments doingwith their strategic reserve

(26:22):
assets, like Russia, russia'sbuying silver?
Well, that's interesting.
Then you have the Belt and RoadInitiative by China.
That's interesting.
Then you have the Belt and RoadInitiative by China.
China is making inroads, beingvery smart, very Machiavellian,
very strategic.
You know you get.
People don't realize howimportant strategy is.
Strategy comes from the Greekword strategos, which means

(26:46):
leader of the army.
This is about war and theeconomic war that's being played
right now.
It's not happening on CNBC,you're not.
You know, it's like my, my 401kit's not.
It's not there or I'm going topick that stock.
Nope.
This is the reshuffling, thereordering, the undoing of the

(27:09):
entire post Bretton Woods system1944, 1971, and now, whatever
this is going to be, they putout the feelers right before
they put you on lockdown, calledit the great reset.
I was covering that on my show,a little radio station out of

(27:30):
San Antonio back in 2018, 2019.
You want to go through thearchives?
They call it a great reset fora reason because the current
system is going to go away, butwhat is happening is this race
for rare earth, minerals, forcommodities and for finite
things, and so that could be.
You know, I looked at somethingRay Dalio said recently.

(27:52):
He said the world economy is onthe brink of a heart attack.
He's like you should have atleast 15% allocated in gold or
Bitcoin, and maybe Bitcoin isn'tthe answer for an economic
heart attack.
Maybe it's not as safe as gold,or perhaps it's safer, and it's

(28:13):
an open question.
But the key is not to be insomething infinite right, and
that's the entire system in anutshell.
You have the overproduction ofcurrency.
Everything's been overbuilt orunderbuilt.
The over everything's beenoverbuilt or underbuilt, like
it's things that shouldn't existexist, and things that should

(28:35):
be in place aren't, and that'sbad, and that's because of fiat.
Fiat is literally evil.
I keep saying that.
All right, just a little bit ofan intelligence on gold.
Just a little bit ofintelligence on gold.
I thought that was interestingbecause there's already.

(28:55):
You know, you look at kitcocomand I was doing my research this
morning and they're alreadytalking about could gold go, you
know, three and four timeshigher up until the next five,
ten years?
Of course it can't, of courseit can't, of course it can't.
I mean, you're basing it onwhat?
You're basing it on thepurchasing power of the US

(29:19):
dollar.
And when you place tariffs onplaces like India and you drive
them back into dealing directlywith China, which they just had
massive border disputes with in2020.
It's a major blunder, don't youthink?
And they're already part of theBRICS bloc massive populations,

(29:42):
and they just want tode-dollarize.
De-dollarization is a fact.
Now there's probably somestrategy in there too, with the
players and the powers that be,when it comes to stable coins
and what happens to the dollarafterwards.
But I'm telling you what thereality is now, and that's the

(30:03):
race towards commodities.
So watch that carefully, allright?
Well, let me check the chatreally quick and then I'll go to
the next article, and we haveone last thing to cut.
I want to get to the the end ofthe show.
There's a lot of activity over.

(30:28):
I'm over on rumble and, uh,it's good to see all you guys.
I see guard goldsmith overthere.
There's a lot of activity overon rumble and, uh, it's good to
see all you guys.
I see guard Goldsmith overthere and uh harps in the chat
Good to see you guys.
Brandon Bennett says I canbuild your studio.
Tony, fly me out.
Well, I might uh send me a uhDM, go to go to wise wolf and

(30:50):
tell me, tell me why I shouldfly you out.
Yeah, I appreciate you guys inthe chat.
I can't always keep up with it.
It's being my own producer.
If you guys have any questionsfor me, you can always send them
into the chat.
And then I got to check theYouTube as well.

(31:13):
Let me X out of this reallyquick.

Speaker 1 (31:17):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (31:24):
Yeah, harp says more people are using cash than ever
before Was certainly frownedupon in a lot of circles here in
the United States.
I remember coming acrossstories where you know,
especially at the beginning ofthe great lockdown, the pandemic
where the cash was dirty, youknow, and we had to quarantine

(31:49):
the cash and all that stuff andI'm like, oh, I see there's a
tell here.
Yeah, good to see you guys.
Kenny Evan Powers over in thechat says hi, beans the Brave,
she's right here with me.

(32:09):
And we got lots of good timewith Beans the Brave this week.
I missed her.
I was away from my dog for afew days and it feels like weeks
.
She's right here with me, keepsthe show on balance All right,
as promised.
Almost no commercial breaks.

(32:31):
We have to do this has to belike one of the most jam-packed
hours in radio.
I put a lot into.
I put a lot of information, alot of stories go into one show
one hour.
See what I can get donetomorrow on the David Knight
show.
Wonder how much I can getthrough in an hour.

(32:55):
And then I have two othersafter that.
So, uh, we'll see about guests.
I was so.
I was perusing some of the newsaggregators went through drudge
and I saw this article and Ithought I'd bring it up because
I if you ever get and comeacross something that it is a

(33:17):
headline but at the same timeit's almost like it's uh, it,
you're meant to see it, and ifyou understand the connection to
it, then then you go oh, whydidn't I see that before?
They were talking about that?
Well, here's one of thoseexamples.
Possibly I hope not, by the way.
This would be a terrible thingif I'm right.

(33:39):
But let's dig into this.
This is a link on Drudge.
It's the wine press dotsubstackcom.
It's world war three.
Palantir ceo alex carp saysthree front war with russia,
china and iran very likely.
In other words, it's a lock.

(34:01):
As tensions continue to grow bythe day between the united
states and nato versus russia,china, iran and the brics
aligned nations, the specter ofWorld War III grows along with
it.
Last year, the run-up to the2024 presidential election, tech
giant and defense contractorPalantir CEO, alex Karp, said

(34:23):
that he thinks it's very likelythe US will be involved in a
three-pronged war with Russia,China and Iran.
Karp admitted this in aninterview to the New York Times
in August of last year.
The paper reported he thinksthe United States is quote very
likely to end up in athree-pronged war with China,
russia and Iran.

(34:44):
So he argues, we have to keepgoing full tilt on autonomous
weapons systems because ouradversaries will and they don't
have the same moralconsiderations that we do.
Well, um, do we have moralconsiderations?
Um, it's like the, the samecorporations that you can get

(35:12):
granola bars from, also made innapalm.
Um, do you ever think aboutthat?
Or agent orange?
It's like, you know, I get mymacaroni and cheese.
You know my store-bought boxfood also defoliated.
And you know birth defects andcancer and massive, massive

(35:35):
human toll in Southeast Asia,but no big deal Because we got
some moral considerations.
He said.
I think we're in an age whennuclear deterrent is actually
less effective because the Westis very unlikely to use anything
like a nuclear bomb, whereasour adversaries might.
He said, where you havetechnological parody but moral

(35:59):
disparity, the actual disparityis much greater than people
think.
In fact, he added, given thatwe don't have parody
technologically but we don'thave parody more morally, they
have a huge advantage.
Mr Karp said that we are veryclose to Terminator robots and

(36:20):
the threshold of somewhatautonomous drones and devices
like this being the mostimportant instruments of war.
You already see this in ukraine.
Are we tough enough to scareour adversaries so we don't go
to war?
Do the chinese, russians andpersians think we're strong?
The president needs to tellthem that if you cross these

(36:42):
lines, this is where we're goingto do and you have to enforce
it.
It's funny when you know they.
Here's another story that notcovered anymore.
I covered it here on the show,but um, you go back and look at
the uh signing up or theintroduction of these tech ceos

(37:08):
or tech bros or whatever in thearmy.
Anybody remember that story?
Remember that they got draftedofficers now and they come out
of this little.
It's like they just discoveredthe Cold War protocols and how

(37:33):
the world works geopolitically.
Is anybody else find that odd?
I do so.
I think the part of the reasonwe have a massive cleavage in
our culture is, at the end ofthe day, by and large, only
people who are middle andworking class do all the
fighting he said.
He said he would considerhimself pro-draft.

(37:59):
Also, karp is a bit of an enigmato some when it comes to his
relationship with PresidentDonald Trump and the company,
since Karp is a socialist andprogressive and voted for Biden
in 2020 and backed VP KamalaHarris.
At the same time, he hasdistanced himself politically
from Palantir co-founder PeterThiel, who is the polar opposite

(38:22):
politically and a hugesupporter of Trump.
Early this year, trump cameunder heavy criticism when the
New York Times revealed hisadministration contacted
Palantir to collect all ofAmericans' private and unique
data to build a master database.
Well, that is another thingthat adds to this.

(38:45):
You know that they're using andwargaming out possible
scenarios.
If this is done, what's theintelligence here?
We've crossed a serious Rubiconof reality and so when I see
headlines like this and againyou see the connection it's very

(39:08):
important Because we're one ofmy favorite scenes.
My favorite movie is AnthonyHopkins plays Nixon.
He gets done meeting withChairman Mao.
He's coming back from China,he's on Air Force One, he's

(39:32):
looking out the window and hekind of recounts his time as
being a cold warrior and callingMao a monster and all this
other stuff that he'd done.
And he just has this verystrange quote and he's thinking
to himself and he's like we'rebeyond politics now.
Even the presidency isn't enoughanymore and I always wondered

(39:55):
what that meant.
And what Oliver Stone wastrying to convey is that I think
events sometimes outpaceinstitutions, and that's kind of
where we are in history rightnow.
It's a ethereal thought.
It's maybe out in a little bitesoteric perhaps, or
metaphysical on my part, andthat's fine, because that's what

(40:17):
this show does.
Sometimes it takes those twistsand turns, but we're beyond
politics at this point.
There's something else, andwhen you get these socialist
technocrats because that's whatthey are, I mean, let's make no
mistake about it I mean theupper echelon and especially
those who control finance andtechnology and other things.

(40:39):
It's very rare that you havesomebody who's free market,
because that's not how theyreally made their money.
I mean not really.
I mean you can get a certainamount of generational wealth
Somebody, somewhere, somebodydid something but along the line
you can reinvest it and youhave these hold incomes.
Then you have the politicalaspect of it and they become
very socialist and that's whyI'll know they're serious about

(41:03):
economic development when theystart actually doing anything
about regulation and taxes andincentivizing things, not just
adding new taxes.
If you don't cut the income taxand you add a tariff, you just
added another tax.
Right, you can have one or theother, not both.
Anyway, it correlates here withthis particular story, because

(41:24):
you're seeing something from aninsider who's running
simulations, who's collectingdata, and they see, probably
through their palantir, what thenext step is.
I hope I'm wrong, but it'sinteresting that we get the

(41:47):
Terminator robots, even thoughwe were warned about the
Terminator robots, even thoughwe were warned about the
Terminator robots.
Speaking of being warned, letme take you to the last article
here, and I got to talking aboutthis yesterday or the day
before and I said I'd look intoit, and then it just pops up as

(42:10):
a story on Natural News and myguess is it has a lot to do with
biowarfare.
Let's put this up on the screen.
This is Natural News and Ithink you'll get the title Net

(42:35):
Zero Advocates Propose Ticks toInduce a Red Meat Allergy.
Net zero advocates propose ticksto induce a red meat allergy as
climate solutions, sparking abacklash.
Two US academics proposespreading Lone Star ticks to

(42:57):
induce alpha a Red Meat Allergyas a Climate Strategy.
And this is AGS's.
Alpha-gal Syndrome Triggerssevere allergic reactions,
including anaphylaxis, viatick-borne Alpha-Gal molecules.
Ags now affects up to 450,000Americans, with cases rising due

(43:20):
to tick expansion.
Northward CDC warns thesyndrome can lead to fatal
reactions via medications, notjust food.
Critics decry the proposal asreckless, ignoring risk of
severe health.
Well, it's not just reckless.
Risk of severe health well,it's not just reckless.

(43:43):
That is a you talk about, andthis is where these academics
and so-called academics right,these um eggheads and weirdos
and and it's the same kind ofthing as Yuval Harari at the
world economic forum saying thathuman beings are hackable
animals.
Like this is the where and Isaid this last week.
It's stuck in my mind.
It's the voltaire quote aboutwhere they can make you, uh,

(44:06):
believe absurdities, they'llmake you commit atrocities.
This is an absurdity advocatingan atrocity by.
And this is the mindset, youknow, um of the, the
environmentalists or what youwant to call.
I'm a conservationist.
I want clean water, clean skies, I want them to stop spraying.
They never mentioned that.
The environmentalists, theydon't care about that, they

(44:28):
don't believe that.
They just turn a blind eye toit because it's anti-people At
the root of anything that theenvironmentalists do.
It's anti-humanEnvironmentalists do.

(44:52):
It's anti-human.
They don't care aboutecological disasters of the
Southwest being littered withtrash and human waste and all
that is a pretty good indicatorof that, isn't it?
Two?
Two ethics professors at WesternMichigan University's Homer
Stryker, md schools of medicine,crutchfield and Blake Harris,
have ignited outrage.

(45:13):
This is, by the way, theirethics ethics professors.
Oh, that's good.
It's kind of like all the mixedmedia, the Patriot Act.
I like that.
They've ignited outrage with apeer-reviewed paper proposing

(45:39):
the deliberate promotion ofticks to trigger alpha-gal
syndrome.
A red meat allergy Published inBioethics near their beneficial
blood-sucking argument framesalpha-gal syndrome as a moral
bio-enhancer, asserting thatinducing allergies to cattle,
pigs and lambs could ethicallyprioritize planetary health over
personal choice.
Ie, what they're saying is theyhate human beings.

(46:00):
Um, they don't want you to behealthy and they certainly want
you to get a tick-borne illnessthat is most likely manufactured
.
Um, so that's where these arethe kind of people that lock you
down.
These are the kind of peoplethat, um, stuff old people into,
you know, and it's kind of likethey did in New York with Cuomo

(46:24):
and all the old people thatstuff them into, you know,
closed up rooms in the nursinghomes to make sure that
everybody gets the bioweapon,bioweapon.
The controversial stance hasdrawn sharp criticism, with
opponents calling it a dangerousconfluence of pseudoscience and

(46:45):
ideological overreach.
Oh well, you think.
Yeah, the next time, if you, ifyou, give these people an inch.
I'm talking about the, theseextremists, and that's where
they come.
They come out of academia.
This is the Frankfurt School,ladies and gents.
This is cultural Marxism, writlarge and it's virulent.

(47:09):
It's very dangerous.
Crutchfield and Herth argue thatsince consuming meat is morally
impermissible due to climateimpacts it's so funny climate
impacts.
What does that even mean?
I really don't even know whatthat means, and I've been on the

(47:32):
planet 45 years.
I've read a lot.
I think I'm pretty much aware.
I don't know what you'retalking about.
What does that mean?
Does that mean you're going toclean up the ocean?
Because I never hear youtalking about that.
These climate activists I neverhear them talking about
cleaning up the water.
I don't see them planting treesanymore.
I just see them talking aboutgiving people bioweapons and

(47:55):
depopulation.
Like Bill Gates, if we do areally good job with vaccines
and health care, we can get thatnumber down by 15%.
That's how they think.
Just less people yeah, it's so.
You're so lazy and you don'tthink that people, just anybody
with any kind of what does thateven mean Morally impermissible?

(48:16):
Even mean morally impermissible?
You know there's apsychological profile on
somebody like this and I bet youit's kind of like the they when
they went through uh the atnuremberg, you know, and they go
and see all these uh guys thatuh would control the

(48:39):
concentration camps that are nowlocked up, and they're all,
like you know, kind ofdisheveled and one of the
writers was like we were afraidof these people, these pathetic
pick noses, is what are theyLike?
We're pathetic, but you getthem a little bit of power.
They're just anti-human.
I hate you and don't send yourkids to these schools.

(49:01):
We have to stop with this stuff.
The paper states that promotingtick-borne alpha-gal syndrome
prevents the world from becominga significantly worse place.
It's a pro-tanto, obligatory,okay.
The idea hinges on threepremises that avoids infringing

(49:25):
rights, promotes virtuousbehavior, meat reduction and
combats climate change, whateverthat means.
Oh, by the way, that's the nextround of stuff.
Right, is the climate lockdown.
It's an invisible enemy.
You can't see it, kind ofeither the hijackers on 9-11 or

(49:47):
you know, covid-19 before youcan't see it, can't see it.
It's an invisible enemy.
And now you can't see.
Well, you can see them changingthe climate, because you can
literally see them doingchemtrails and whatever they're
doing.
We don't have access to thatinformation.
Ags forms when a tick biteintroduces alpha-gal into a

(50:10):
person's bloodstream, primingthe immune system to attack the
molecule.
Consuming red meat re-exposessufferers to alpha-gal,
triggering hives, vomiting,anaphylaxis and even death.
Again, it's 450,000 people haveit.
Yeah, growing crisis, both realand perceived.

(50:36):
Alpha-gal's rise isn't solelydue to academic schemes, but
habit shifts and urbanization.
Warmer winters allow ticks tothrive farther north.
Well, it's funny, I meet peoplethat get this and I live in a
highly you know you talk aboutthe Ozarks.
I mean, it's just, I've beenbitten gosh over a hundred times

(50:59):
in the last five years.
It's a ton of ticks, you knowthey just get you.
There's almost nothing you cando about it.
But roughly, you know, lookingat, there's Rocky Mountain fever
and stuff that you can get.
But Lyme's disease isn't asprevalent here in the Ozarks.
It's very small compared to theEast Coast.
Prevalent here in the Ozarks.

(51:19):
It's very small compared to theEast Coast.
And if you look at therelationship between Plum Island
in the 1960s and 70s, which isa bio-research facility for the
US government, and then theexpansion of Lyme's disease, the
US government experimented withticks as a carrier for certain

(51:42):
bioweapons and that's PlumIsland was used for that.
That's where you get.
You know it's very close toLyme Connecticut, where you get
Lyme's disease right.
I don't think any of this stuffis accidental.
It's like when you startmodifying the, you know we got
to modify the mosquitoes.
You know like and play God andyou know this is a Bill Gates

(52:05):
impression, by the way he wantsto dim.
You know, mr Burns style blotout the sun.
Crutchfield and Herther's paperunderscores the urgent need for
rigorous ethical debate andclimate policy.
I would say so.

(52:25):
Um, having people get atick-borne illness, or promoting
that so that they won't eatmeat and then just die, you know
, so we can prevent whatever thehell climate change is to you.
I mean, I believe in climatechange, because they're

(52:45):
currently changing the climate.
Why don't you just have themstop spraying the stuff?
But no, it's because you likethe spray, because it hurts
people.
And then anything that hurtspeople is good for you, because
that's the way you think,because this is cultural Marxism
.
It's why the 20th century is amass grave of ideological deaths
due to Marxism.

(53:06):
It is a satanic philosophy ofthe highest order, and you can
see it permeating throughacademia Really not that hard to
track as more Americans grapplewith A ags.
Misinformation from academicsand the press amplifies fear.
We must prioritize science oversloganeering.

(53:27):
In the end, the lone star tickis no climate savior.
It's a vector of legitimateworry.
The real challenge remainsbalancing humanity's survival
with earth's.
Tinkering with nature'sequations, even in the name of
ethics, may have unforeseen andunpalatable consequences.
Well, I would think so.

(53:48):
Another example of insanity,and you know I want you to think
about that next time you hearsome of these climate activists.
They don't care about anythingbeing cleaned up, they just want
you gone.
You know.
That's why it's all about thisabstract idea and not real

(54:09):
solutions.
I mean, there used to besomething like Greenpeace or
something would have.
You could go, plant a tree.

Speaker 1 (54:17):
Who does that anymore ?

Speaker 2 (54:18):
I plant trees, but you don't see people going out
and advocating planting trees.
That used to be a real thing.
That's something that's greatfor the environment, or just
cleaning things up.
You can do that or a garbageisland, or the Pacific or the
third world countries that dumpmassive amounts of trash, going.
After that they just talk aboutclimate change and then what

(54:40):
you need to stop doing.
You've got to stop eating foodthat may make you healthy,
because you need to look like us.
Have you ever seen somebodythat advocates this kind of
stuff?
They look really healthy, don'tthey?
It's like the health ministersthat are balloons all over
Europe, all over europe.

(55:02):
We, you know, we do that herein this country too, except, uh,
you know, we'll put somebodywith mental um, some kind of
mental disease, in charge ofsomething.
All right, well, there'ssomething look out for.
Uh, another, another set ofacademics pushing bio-warfare
against the American people orthe people of the world.
It shouldn't surprise you.

(55:26):
Harp666 says they are 100%trying to kill you.
They are killing you.
That's true.
Nef Empower says they take awaymy red meat.
I might as well die.
I need to stake at least two orthree times a week.
Oh no, kidding like thatdoesn't even seem whatever.

(55:48):
That alpha that doesn't evenseem like it's in nature.
That doesn't make any sense.
Like that's to me that isintroduced, but I'll have to do
a lot more research before I canproclaim that.
But do your thinking on thatand what's that?
I never heard of this beforeand now I'm hearing of it and I
don't know if it's becausethings got warmer.

(56:14):
All right, let's check spotprices and then I'll get you
guys out of here.
Thanks for being here today.
I got lots of stuff planned forthe show and I've been so busy
lately.
It's always good to um talkwith my support group.
You know it's funny.
A lot of people that lookforward to talking to uh close
friends or, you know, meetingacquaintances, uh, you know,
having a dinner to dinner.

(56:35):
I just go talk to the to theearth.
I go on wwcr and a short wavearound the world and all my
other platforms where you guysjoin me, and I appreciate it.
All right, let's talk about spotprices.
It looks like the yellow metalgold 3334 luciferian bankster
notes per troy ounce for theyellow metal silver's at 3737.99

(56:58):
per troy ounce.
Extremely cheap.
Bitcoin was at $118,000 lasttime I checked At least that was
this morning Up on a bunch ofdifferent geopolitical news on

(57:20):
regulation and other things.
So something to watch as we gointo the weekend.
I hope you guys will join metomorrow on the David Knight
Show.
I'll be live here on thesechannels 8 am Central Time to 11
am Central Time and we'll seeabout.
I'll start working on guestsnow, but we've got lots of
specials going on at Wolfpackand Wise Wolf Gold and Silver.

(57:42):
You can get into preciousmetals as little as $50 a month,
but we go all the way up to$5,000.
Everything in between.
Wolfpackgold promo code 1776.
You want some free silver?
Get over there if you want toturn your soon-to-be worthless
fiat dollars into real money.
That's what my friend CharlieRobinson would say.

(58:02):
All right, you guys take careof each other, from Beans the
Brave, myself and the crew andeverybody here in Branson.
We will see you next week.
Take care.
End of transmission.