#519 What happens when the printer meets the Leviathan?

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_00 (00:57):
Then outspake brave Horatius, the captain of the
gate.
To every man upon this earth,death cometh sooner late.
And how can a man die betterthan facing fearful odds for the
ashes of his fathers and thetemples of his gods?
Lord McAllah, you are listeningto the Artiburn radio

(01:21):
transmission.

SPEAKER_01 (02:11):
Next level production here if you waterburn
radio.
Everything's okay.
Nothing is wrong with yourfinancial system.
Well, I was doing some digginghere before the show and
confirming a little bit of whatI already thought, which is um
accelerating acceleration, toquote our buckminster Fuller,

(02:36):
the futurist, who wrote a bookcalled Grunch of Giants.
He was a genius.
Um he invented the geodesicdome, where you see like an
Epcot center.
He died in the early 80s, but hewrote a book called Grunch of
Giants, and it meant grossuniversal cash heist.

(02:56):
And what it really harkened backto was the the ultimate scam of
fake money and how it infectseverything.
And that's why, through all myresearch and everything that I
do in my professional life, itall really goes back to that.
And I'm really fortunate to be asmall part of this historical

(03:16):
wave that's happening.
And a lot of people, if theylisten to me, uh I hope that it
uh seeps down into theirsubconscious mind and they do
their own research.
Don't just listen to me, go outand find this for yourself.
But the world is changingrapidly when it comes to the
financial system, which infectseverything.
It changes policy, it changesdirection, it changes reality.

(03:39):
The need to do something heinousprobably increases, I imagine,
when you're not when you don'thave sound money, you don't have
a sound system.
I don't mean a sound system inyour car.
I mean with integrity.
You know, fiat currency is theproverbial screen door on the
submarine, okay, when it comesto integrity.

(03:59):
So watching some insane thingsright now.
It's the 9th of October, 2025.
This is the official broadcastof the apocalypse, by the way,
ladies and gentlemen.
Headlines and hidden history.
I thought about that this week.
I need to bring backParatrouther.
And the reason I haven't is on abusy schedule.
And Mr.
Anderson, who I'd love to haveas my co-pilot there on that

(04:24):
program, he hasn't beenavailable.
He's been working, he's ascientist, and uh without
disclosing too much, very busy.
And uh we've been discussingsome topics, and when we do dig
back in, we might do a liveshow, but uh don't tell Mr.
Anderson I have to I have toconfirm that with him first.
But we're gonna dig into someheadlines today.

(04:44):
Um, interesting, interesting uhstuff across the board.
And then the way that I look atit, we'll do some financial
stuff first, and then we'll talka little bit about geopolitics.
I I I took a few days tomarinate over this decision for
National Guard and troops andthe deployment of federal forces

(05:05):
into these cities and bluestates and all the, and it could
be any state.
And I have some thoughts onthat.
There's an article that's up onActivist Post uh by the Mises
Institute, which I think isreally interesting.
Just, I mean, a a perspectivethat is based on liberty, and
I'm starting to see a pattern,and I'll discuss that with you.

(05:25):
You are my support group, by theway.
Um, a lot of people go to uhmeetings and other things, or
they go to their closest friendsand family.
I call I talk to you uh onworldwide Christian radio and uh
the technocratic controlplatforms, so long as I have
them.
If you're wanting to watch me onvideo and you're hearing my
voice, you can find me for nowuh at Tony Arterburn on X and at

(05:47):
Tony Arterburn on YouTube.
Can't believe it.
I'm also over on Rumble on theAmerica Unplugged channel.
So let me let's dig into somefinancial stuff first.
Let's let's get that out of theway.
It's funny.
Uh I wasn't able to do the DavidKnight show today.
I really needed to catch up onsome work.

(06:08):
And I told David, I said, let'slet the next week unfold because
every time I go on the show, Isay, well, we just hit another
all-time high.
You know, it's just anotherweek, and then we kept, you
know, we'd read pricepredictions from these major
firms who have massive amountsof intelligence.
I mean, I'm gonna put this inquotations.
Uh, they have lots ofsimulations and sophisticated

(06:30):
software and everything, andthey'll be like, Well, we're
definitely seeing we could beeyeing$4,000 gold by you know
the second quarter of 2026, andthat's the next week, and it
breaks$4,000 an ounce.
Yeah, uh, you're a little off onyour metrics.
And now those things againaccelerating acceleration.
That's what it's about.
These the met the numbers andeverything that was held up,

(06:53):
right?
This house of cards, and I'mlooking right now.
Let's just go to goldprice.org.
Let me put this up on thescreen.
Live gold prices here at uh 1107 Central Time.
Let me put this up on the 9th ofOctober.

(07:16):
So just give you some data.
$4,019.30 uh for one ounce ofthe yellow metal,$4,000
Luciferian bankster notes make atroy ounce of the yellow metal.
So we're crossing into we'vealready blown past$4,040, I

(07:38):
believe,$4,050.
We we are in uncharted waters,folks.
It's funny, my team last coupleweeks, they're like, is this
right?
They're running thecalculations.
Is this right?
Is this right?
Because because we never seenthese numbers, right?
In gold, especially, you know,we you get into some some math,
especially when you're buyingscrap and other things like

(07:59):
jewelry, it's it's insane.
Uh, silver,$50 and 16 cents pertroy ounce for the white metal.
Folks, I think, as I'vepredicted, not investment
advice.
I don't do investments.
Uh, I do I give protectionadvice.
If you're gonna take your fakemoney and put it into an asset,

(08:21):
physical gold and silver is agood way to go.
Uh, you know, other things too.
Uh, it doesn't have to be justgold and silver.
You can't eat gold and silver.
But look at this is money,folks.
This is a reflection of value.
This is a reflection of energy.
And economics, although it maytake a while, you know,
sometimes you can suppresssomething.

(08:41):
But this is economics, folks.
This is coming out in fullforce.
And I can tell you somethingreally interesting about this
$50.20 an ounce silver price.
We're just getting started.
Some things, and I say things,are buying silver at a record

(09:02):
clip.
I mentioned over the past yearthe decision for Russia to put
silver as a strategic reserveasset on their books officially.
There could be other governmentsdoing that, the BRICS Nations,
especially, anybody who's eyeingto look at that gold-silver
ratio and go, hmm, I wonderwhat's wrong with that.
See, you don't have to be agenius to figure that one out.

(09:25):
You know, I'm 100, not 90, not85.
And so there's something wrongwith that.
Geologically, Earth it's 17 to1.
So if you're dabbling, it's apretty good bet that something's
wrong with that and it's goingto readjust sooner or later when
the paper markets and some ofthe magic tricks wear off, and

(09:48):
people start calling thesecontracts for delivery.
Yeah, something's with that.
And I think we're just gettingstarted.
The reason I say that thatthings, entities, what did Mitt
Romney say?
Corporations are people, myfriend.
Just an idiot.
He said that at the I think atthe Iowa caucus or something, or

(10:10):
it was the Iowa straw pole.
I'm like, why would you do thatin front of working people?
Say corporations are people.
He's a vulture capitalist, not aventure capitalist.
But anyway, the the entities arebuying.
And if you're a current Wolfpackmember, you are dollar cost
averaging.
Very smart.

(10:30):
You're doing a good job.
And that's a good way to buygold, too, is through something
like Wolfpack, where we buy itfor you, and then you get to see
some of the price, and we'regonna talk about this in a
second, some of the pricefluctuations that are bound to
happen.
You're gonna have profit taking,and people say, Oh, see, it was
just uh it was just a bullmarket, it just run up.
No, this is this is history,folks.

(10:51):
This is the change of themonetary order of things.
You're witnessing it in realtime.
It's fascinating.
So$50.17 as of right now for thewhite metal, and we are just
getting started.
I have people by my business isinverted.
I mean, you'd be smart to giveme a call and trade in some of

(11:12):
your fiat for silver right now,because I don't think we're
gonna, I think when we blow pastthis, we're almost to the
all-time high.
It took us 45 years to get here.
My entire life.
45 years to get to thisall-time.
We're gonna blow past that.
And I think that will open up afloodgate of things.

(11:33):
Because$52.50 in 1980, it'sworth about$300 today in
purchasing power.
Something is amiss.
I even ran the gold-silver ratioto what gold and silver were to
each other in 1980, which wasprobably the correct metric
before massive intervention bythe Fed and Paul Volcker and
interest rate raising, and thenyou had Reaganomics and all the

(11:53):
stuff that papered over.
It's 16 to one.
I found that out running a doingthe calculations live on the
David Knight show a couple weeksago.
I said, Oh, see, that's that'swhere it was correct, was 45
years ago.
So something is amiss, still socheap.
And I promise you, like peopleare selling massive amounts of

(12:15):
silver to me right now, and I'mhaving to sell it to the trading
floor.
Don't make me do that.
You can just give me a call.
Get in between those deals andthe trading floor, and I'll give
you a great deal.
Because right now, and by theway, this is some little intel.
Um, used to we get spot.
You go to a wholesaler, can'tget that anymore because they're
buying so much silver andthey're offloading it to, again,

(12:37):
multinationals, central banks,other places.
I I don't know.
I don't have that access.
I just get it to the tradingfloor and then it goes somewhere
because if it wasn't, the pricewouldn't be nearing all-time
highs.
And gold certainly wouldn't bebreaking all-time highs.
But now they're taking a week togive me credit.
So people are offloading stuff,and you know, I have limited

(12:59):
capital.
I'm just small business.
I got two locations, I do what Ican.
But I'm telling you, there isthis is history.
I've never seen this, but I'mbuilt for it.
It's fun.
I don't have Beans the Bravetoday.
Uh, she is uh in the Ozarks,she's protecting the homestead.
He's hanging out with Charlie,who Charlie the Chocolate

(13:20):
Labrador has a cone.
And uh I don't I think the conegot taken off, but she keeps
going deep in the woods andfinding things to fight with.
The sweetest dog in the worldand uh likes to fight a little
bit.
So I got beans there as a backupfor char char today.
All right, first article of theday.

(13:40):
Hey, we're 13 minutes in.
I'm gonna go to the chat too,and we'll we'll definitely go to
the rumble chats.
You got questions, you want totalk about any of this stuff in
the headlines.
I was uh right before we wentlive, I sat down and I hit the
live stream button, and I wasgoing to find the music time on
my laptop, and I just thisthought clicked in my head.

(14:02):
I'm like, I need to talk aboutthe Hobbesian war of all against
all.
I haven't even thought of thatin years.
But uh that's where we are,folks.
Let's go to the first order ofbusiness.
Oh, I need to put this on thescreen.
Hold on.
Just being my own producertoday.

(14:24):
All right, this is Kitco.
Folks, gold will hit 4,400 by Q2in 2020.
That's a nice uh that's one ofthese projections.
So any correction is a buyingopportunity.
So says TDS Bart Mellick.

(14:44):
Gold's definitive move above4,000 an ounce could create some
volatility in the marketplace,but there is very little to stop
this bull market's momentum,according to one market
analysis.
In his latest note on Gold'srally, Bert Mellick, head of
commodity strategy at TDSecurities, said that given the
speed and magnitude of gold'srally, there is a risk that some

(15:06):
investors will take profits inthe near term.
He noted that gold's breakout inAugust prices have rallied$670
an ounce, rising more than 20%in two months.
Folks, gold was$1,100 an ouncein the first quarter of 2020.
I just want to remind you that.
So it rose since August,$670 anounce.

(15:30):
At the same time, with spot goldlast trading at$4,043.80 an
ounce, prices are up more than50% since the start of the year.
The yellow metal looksoverbought, which suggests
anything may question the speedof the Fed's easing or an
increase in volatility couldgenerate a robust downside.

(15:50):
That's basically a fancy way ofsaying profit taking or the
illusion that we're not in atransference of wealth like
we've never seen in the historyof man.
This is because you can't tellthat to people.
You can't come out and say, oh,by the way, we're gonna replace
all of this system, thisexperiment since 1971.
We're gonna replace this with ablockchain digitized system

(16:13):
that's a public-privatepartnership, which is the
definition of fascism, by theway.
But if we're gonna replace this,this system that you've known
and you've grown up with, andthere was a big, you know,
there's a lull in the volatilityof it because one, we were the
Cold War victors, which I'mgonna talk about a little bit
today.
There was this hegemonicdominance of the dollar, and we
kind of did what we wanted, andwe racked up the debt from 1

(16:35):
trillion when I was born to 37trillion now.
Unfunded liabilities and thewhat quadrillions or whatever it
is, and then a foreign policy ofabsolute bankruptcy and
tripwires set up by people nolonger alive, committing
Americans yet unborn to fight inplaces that most people can't
find on the map.

(16:55):
So a lot of genius behind thedecline and fall of the American
Empire.
Way to go.
Looking at the growing downsiderisk, Mellix said that given
gold's gains, there is apotential for prices to fall as
low as$3,600 an ounce.
I don't disagree with that.

(17:17):
But again, the best way to buyright now is to do something
like Wolfpack or one of mycompetitors or from the local
shop down the street.
I'm that's not an infomercial.
I'm just saying that kind ofbuying, if you can dollar cost
average, because you will seesome dips.
Don't listen to people that dosome crazy metric, like you're
gonna have this, it's always upand to the right, and you know,

(17:39):
silver's gonna be 5,000announcer or some crazy number.
I've been hearing that stuff formy entire career.
While risk of a correction orbuilding, Mellick also sees
price lower prices as a buyingopportunity as he expects gold's
uptrend to remain intact throughthe first half of next year.

(18:00):
Yeah, I just I think this is adecoupling.
So you don't turn the averagefinancial talking head on one of
these next networks, you know,went to a fancy school and they
have all these degrees and theyhave all this stuff and they
read the teleprompter.
But they're not talking aboutBasel III, they're not talking

(18:20):
about the Bank of InternationalSettlements in 2021 that makes
took gold from a tier threeasset to a tier one asset, which
is a currency again.
And then by that metric, afterthe invasion of Ukraine by
Russia and the sanctions thatblew up in our face called
blowback, gold surpassed theEuro as the second most held

(18:41):
reserve asset.
So they stopped holding thosecurrencies.
And even the European centralbank came out and said, uh we
think that gold is a threat tothe to the financial order.
You think so?
Then why don't you hold your ownstuff?
Do you hold your own currencies?
That's kind of weird, isn't it?

(19:03):
That these currencies held bythese central banks.
Like, why I thought your own whyisn't you you create the money?
Oh, you hold something else.
That's interesting.
Looking uh through near-termvolatility, TD securities
forecast gold prices to averagearound$4,250 an ounce next year.

unknown (19:25):
Wow.

SPEAKER_01 (19:29):
While broad central bank gold demand has created
long-term value in the goldmarket, TD securities said that
momentum is now being driven byinvestment demand as the Federal
Reserve restarts its easingcycle.
Yeah, quantitative easing.
That is currency creation.

(19:54):
And it's not like they have areserve.
There is no reserve at theFederal Reserve.
It's currency creation, alsoknown as money printing.
Um you can call it anything youlike.
It's an injection of made-upfunds into the system.

(20:14):
And the closer you are to themoney printer, the better off
you are.
That's why all these um bigmultinationals stay really close
to the gravity of that.
It's not real entrepreneurs.
They always get bailed out.
Gore Vidal said it.
I love his quote from years ago.
We have socialism for the richand free enterprise for the

(20:38):
poor.
If you're listening to thisshow, by metrics of people that
are close to the central bank,we're all poor.
We're a few paychecks away fromnot being able to make payroll
or make our mortgage or make ourcar payment.
We don't have access to aprinting press.
And the closer you are to thatvelocity, the better off you are

(20:59):
in the, I guess, for theforeseeable future until that
system gets replaced withsomething else.
The way you hedge against it iswhen that trickle down flows
down to you and you get yourgreen pieces of paper, which are
energy transference.
Read Silent Weapons for QuietWars.
First chapter.
When you get that energytransference, you put it into

(21:21):
something that houses value,something finite.
I have a little bit of I try Iwanted it one of these articles
I look up.
And then you'll reach one ofthese sites, it's a pay site.
Just stop it already.
Do people really do that?
Do you only subscribe?
Like it puts a link out on itssocial media, like the Financial

(21:42):
Times or one of these.
And you can never read, you haveto have to join to read the
Financial Times.
I mean, come on.
And then uh what's the ethics ofthat?
Are you do you get access to thearticle because I read it?
I don't I don't like it.
There shouldn't be paywalls onstuff.
Not like that.
It's a paper.
You know, have advertising, havesomething.
Give you give you a fewarticles.

(22:03):
I don't know.
Subscribe.
It's it's ridiculous.
But I couldn't read it.
It was about Bitcoin and goldminers.
And uh gold miners are havingtheir day.
Meanwhile, TD Securities expectsthat central banks, led by
China, will continue todiversify away from the US

(22:24):
dollar and into gold even afterChina's aggressive purchasing
program since 2022.
Melick noted that the centralbank's gold reserves represent
about 7.6% of total reserves.
China has way more gold, folks,than it's on the books.
They started buying off thebooks secretly at the beginning
of the 21st century.

(22:46):
Now, why is that?
Do you know that on theanniversary of when uh Hitler
declared war on the UnitedStates, exactly, I believe 60
years to the day, uh, which thatwas December 11th, 1941.
Uh, George W.
Bush gave China most favoredtrading status for nations and

(23:10):
got them into the WTO and did asweetheart deal with China.
And then under the Bushpresidency, we lost 55,000
factories, one in threemanufacturing jobs, and it was
so bad, it was so catastrophic,that the Bush administration
started putting uh fast foodworkers as manufacturing because
they built sandwiches.

(23:35):
Go look that up.
There is much more room forChina to grow its gold holdings
when compared to the US isnearly 75%, Sherry said.
I don't believe that, but thisis like this is standard
conventional knowledge.

(23:56):
I've read again, because China'sa net importer, not exporter of
gold.
They have 60,000 gold mines.
60,000.
So they're working around theclock to amass gold because
there's a race for value.
Yeah, they don't tell you thaton TV.
But the Chinese know it.
And uh they're racing towardsthat.

(24:17):
They're getting more and moregold.
I've read estimates that theyhave between public-private
around 16,000 tons, which iswhat we supposedly had at the
end of World War II.
We're supposed we have 8,000 anda half tons right now.
That's neither here nor there.
But it's not this, it's not 7.6%of the total share.

(24:45):
All right.
Yeah, it says this suggests thatif China is truly diversifying
from US dollars, its purchasingprogram will take many years.
Well, I think they'veaccelerated that.
Every once in a while youuncover some thing where gold
transferred away and it why werethey buying it secretly?
Governments keep their assets,true assets, secret.
You know, they keep it moresecret than where their nuclear

(25:08):
weapons are held.
It's the golden rule, folks.
He who has the gold makes therules.
I don't like that rule.
But we live on planet Earth.
Alright, we're gonna jump intosome domestic and then foreign
policy, and I'll I'll do alittle hodgepodge.

(25:30):
It'll it'll be fun.
It'll be a hybrid.
But I wanted to discuss ThomasHobbes.
Very important philosopher.
Wrote Leviathan.
It's interesting, you know, thatbook, and I haven't read all of
it, but I've I've got it on myshelf behind me.

(25:50):
I've skimmed through it overmany years looking at quotes and
different things that Hobbessaid.
Don't agree with Hobbes a lot,but on this particular matter
about the war of all againstall, it really does ring true.
And he named his book Leviathan,which is supposed to be the ship
of state.
And in the Bible, a Leviathan isa giant crocodile.

(26:16):
And I don't know why peopledon't put that together.
It's the same thing, you know.
Um as Nietzsche said, uh thestate is a cold monster.
Let's go to the chat reallyquick.
I always get into these showsand then I don't look to the
chat enough.
Jody Leslie says, Hobbes, tryKant, if not Aristotle outright,

(26:39):
Tony.
Too much coffee there.
Oh, I love all of them.
Um I like uh I love Aristotle,love the golden mean, and I'm
I'm wearing Frederick Nietzsche.
I didn't do that on purpose, Ijust like the shirt.
Let's see, Bronck Stomper 111says, My boss started talking to

(27:02):
me about gold and silver out ofnowhere a few weeks ago.
He's now a member of the Wolf.
Thank you.
I got the next iteration ofWolfpack.
By the way, folks, I need yourprayer.
This is the I feel like I'm inthe twilight zone because I'm in
the middle of a monetaryrevolution, and I just I cannot
get my systems.

(27:23):
I say this is not the rightlanguage.
Let me retrace my steps.
I've had the hardest time justfinding the right fit to fix
some of the e-commerce stuffthat I have.
You would not believe the amountof people that I my team and I
have gone through, and it's justthis one continue.
It should be so easy, but it isnot.
I built the the site, I builtWolfpack on a site I shouldn't

(27:44):
have built it on.
I didn't know.
I just thought the internet wasthe internet, you know.
I didn't know.
I didn't know.
I thought, well, you could haveall these apps and they plug in,
they're universal, they're not.
And we could have been alreadyfive times as large as I am
right now.
It's fine.
We do okay.
But the next iteration ofWolfpack, and uh you can take

(28:05):
this to the bank.
I will make this happen is thethe ability for everyone to be
an affiliate, everybody.
You can just sign up, and if youwant to get a referral fee, and
then we can just you can seethem accumulate and we pay based
off that.
I'm happy to do that.
That's the way that we're gonnabreak it because we can't do uh

(28:25):
normal marketing with normalthings for some reason.
Like it's just doesn't work.
We spend a lot of money on radioand other things, and like it's
just a zero percent return.
Like it just has to be peoplethat know us and see the
product, and it works.
Let's see.
I see Billy Ray Valentine in thechat.

(28:47):
He says, sir, you don't have tocall me that anymore, Billy.
We've uh we've been friends foryears.
You can stop with theformalities.
All right.
Let me see.
Digital uh uh Demonto Force?
Is that right?
Uh that's what's up, Tony.
I see BRV is watching too.

(29:08):
He he is watching, he's alwayswatching, always watching us.
Let me check the uh rumble chatas well, and then we're gonna
dive into some domestic policy.
Let's see, Skunk Hollow RoseGuard.
I like that name.
Is that a place?

(29:32):
A good final stake through theheart of the dollar would be a
new release, Jimmy Carter$20bill.
Um well, you know, poor Jimma.
He was a you know what it'sfunny.
Um my mom called me about sixmonths ago or more, maybe it was
longer, but uh, she runs anantique mall.

(29:54):
And she said, I've got a signedpicture of Jimmy Carter that's
going up on Oxford.
And it was like for a greatpicture that's actually signed,
like a legitimate sign.
And I bought it and I hung it upin my kitchen in Denison.
And I love that picture becauseJimmy Carter was is or was a

(30:15):
good man and um was a was aterrible president.
Um and it's it's kind of areminder to me, and maybe I'm
being a little bit getting offinto the weeds a little bit.
But you gotta have a little bitof he didn't have the whatever
that is, that little bump of thedarkness.

(30:36):
You gotta have just a little,just a taste of it to know what
you're looking at.
I don't think he really hadthat.
I mean, he he was a brave guy insome way, like you know, he is a
Navy veteran and he went toThree Mile Island during after
post-meltdown.
I don't I don't think he waswithout courage.
I think the issue was he didn'tknow what he was looking at.
That's my opinion, you know,with Zignu Brzezinski and the

(30:58):
trial these people, he was partof the Trilateral Commission.
They they had recruited him, youknow, but I don't think in his
heart that he was that way.
Um and he you know stood upagainst uh you know, he wrote
that book on Israel, Peace NotApartheid.
I thought that was uh, you know,pretty he wasn't just a
fall-in-line kind of guy, but itjust reminds I think good man

(31:20):
wasn't built for that.
So I read a story once thatafter he was uh briefed, uh,
this like first briefing,somebody walked in and he was
sitting in the Oval Office athis desk just crying.
Because basically they you knowcame in and told him, you know,
you're a figurehead.
And uh this is how it reallyworks.

SPEAKER_02 (31:38):
Perhaps.

SPEAKER_01 (31:42):
I'm just checking the chat.
Steve says, I sure missed you onthe David Knight show.
I I missed me on the DavidKnight show today, too.
I just texted David yesterday.
I said, I gotta catch up onwork.
I've been at a drive yesterdayto get back up to Missouri to
transport stuff and do all thethings.

(32:03):
Dustin Helms says, I'm gonna tryto make it to the grand opening
of the new Denison store nextweek.
Maybe Tony will be handing outsamples.
I think we have samples.
Uh Yeka texted me this morningabout some things we may give
away.
And uh that is on the 15th.
And everybody's invited.
I think it's at three o'clock.
You can email us forconfirmation.

(32:24):
I think it's in Denison.
We're wise wolf gold, silver,bitcoin in the old bank.
The new the new old bank.
We are open and ready to go.
So that's Wednesday.
Come see us.
All right.

(32:47):
Steve's wise wolf gold at the$50level, perhaps 90% quarters and
dimes going forward.
That's a good way to go.
We got deals on those.
I'm telling you, we got dealson, you get a constitutional
wolf, 250 bucks.
And we're we're trying to loadthose lower packages up with

(33:09):
some variety, too.
It's just getting tougher andtougher.
The packages get lighter andlighter.
Charlie Robinson said, I thinkyou can just put the Alpha Wolf
in like an envelope now.
And it used to be a box, youknow.
And I said, I know, man.
You know, it's the prices.
So if you've been with me for awhile, you're you're doing good.
And I think you'll continue todo well in the coming reset.

(33:36):
Perhaps nothing great about it.
All right.
Let's go to Bronx Stopper 111.
Damn, I'm pretty sure I've gotthree to four people to sign up
over the last few years.
Well, just email me and uh we'rewe'll look into that.
Maybe we'll get you uh some ofthose free samples, okay?

(33:58):
I like to take care of mypeople.
All right.
Um, let's go into so theheadlines, you know, we've got
Activist Post and the MisesInstitute.
This is the domestic issue.
I want to try to cover all ofthis.

(34:20):
Hold on, let me put this up.
Get this on my screen here.
We know we got thesedeployments, and I want to
discuss that a little bit.

(34:42):
You know, we have uh those of usin that study the conspiracy
theory of history, I mean reallystudy it.
Not we don't watch TikTok videosfor our research.
I mean, people that actuallyread books still.
Um how many of us are thereleft?
But that those of us who canthat subscribe to that, that
believe that not everything'sorganic, that at the top, you

(35:05):
know, you make decisions and uhthere's things called false
flags.
There's also things, if we justcrossed the anniversary of
October 7th, and it's hard toknow what's real anymore, right?
But I saw, I believe, a realvideo of Charlie Kirk talking to
Patrick Beck David about a standdown order that Israel, you

(35:26):
know, is that was it a standdown order on October 7th, you
know, was it a stand down?
As I look at this uh issue withthe Trump administration and a
lot of the things that uh BillyRay Valentine's brought up about
this lurch to the supposedright.
I don't necessarily think it'sto the right, I think it's to um

(35:47):
the totalitarian sway orwhatever you want to, the
centralized power is what it'slurching towards.
And you look at the um thedeployment of National Guard and
the crossing of borders with youknow, the commander-in-chief
takes over from this is astates' rights issue.
But I I just really think, andI'll let you guys think about

(36:09):
that.
There must have been think ofthe law fair, think of
everything that went intostopping the second Trump
administration.
Think of all of the raiding ofMar-a-Lago, the I talked about
this as it was going on, the thelaw, the lawsuits, the the
prosecutions, the all this, theall that, right?
And everything, and nothing everwent anywhere.

(36:32):
It's like a putting something ona trajectory.
You know, it's the the strategyof tension, if you will.
It's like the putting him out,he has to be the one.
It's the one under fire, this isthe one under siege, it's the
one under this being persecuted,and all of the rest.
And then you get to theelection, and of course,

(36:55):
everybody comes out later andsays, Oh, well, Biden was um, we
just didn't know, you know, JoeScarborough was like, This is
the best Biden ever.
He's cogent.
I remember all this.
I've never seen him so spry, youknow, all that kind of stuff.
And people just lied.
And then it's just uh that whatJuly debate in 24.

(37:16):
And it's just apparent the guy,you know, it's just this hollow
shell of his former self.
I mean, and he wasn't even greatback in the day, but it was just
terrible.
I mean, awful.
It's like watching it's elderabuse, and then they just kind
of stand down.
I mean, that you have all themoney, you have all the power,

(37:37):
but you just kind of stand down.
And I'm starting to think as weget into this article on the
Mises Institute, I'm starting, Ithink this is a temporary
aberration that whatever if MAGAreally isn't awake and if they
feel like they're winning,you're not winning.

(37:57):
Because this is setting aprecedent.
It's like David Knight says,this is precedent Trump.
He sets precedence.
If this continues to go thisway, and it seems like, by the
way, this is like tokenresponse, too.
They the other side wants thisbecause it sets the precedent,
because this country shouldn'teven really have a Republican

(38:19):
president.
Have you read that have youlooked at the actual numbers?
It's a it's it's so close tocall.
Trump only won by 80,000 votesspread over four states in 2016.
I mean, you gotta you have to beterrible to lose to him.
And that's if even now if youwant to question the validity of

(38:40):
elections, which I'm right therewith you.
I mean, read Don Jeffrey'sHidden History about vote scam.
I mean, I'm not voting.
Unless it's in a local election,I mean I'm close to the earth on
it.
I'm not, I'm not gonna vote in apresidential election.
I'm just not.
I don't see any evidence that itI'm what am I voting for, by the
way, at this point.
But start to look at this inthat paradigm.

(39:01):
This is this is something overdays and days I've been thinking
about, like when I drive insilence with beans, and you
know, we I just take an hourjust to not think about anything
or answer the phone and justdrive, right?
You know, or just whatever, orjust sit.
There's something to thatbecause this is precedence.
We're gonna set a precedent fortotalitarian power grabs.

(39:25):
And this country, by the way, onpurpose, is being reset as a
coast-to-coast California, whichhas permanent rule by one party.
And that party is the DemocratParty, or whatever you want to
call it.
It's like they stood down andthey want this precedent to be
set because you have to agreewith it, right?

(39:47):
And you have to cheer it on.
I saw something that Sam Tripolireposted the other day by some
idiot, and it said it wastalking about how based Trump
was because he wanted to havepublic executions of whatever
drug dealers or whatever.
He said it was based.
And I thought the correct replyto that tweet should be um also

(40:10):
the Epstein client list, the onethat doesn't exist.
Maybe we should public executionof that too, right?
Right.
These people are brainwashed,like you can't see the fascism
that they're rolling out.
Well, just for the record, I seeit.

(40:30):
Billy Ray Valentine says wedon't have a Republican
president.
Oh, that's true.
The Republican Party checked outyears ago, by the way.
If they ever really were athing.
You know, they started in the1850s in Wisconsin as a um
proto-communist commune.

(40:50):
This Republican Party has itsroots in supporting Karl Marx.
I literally go look it up.
It's interesting.
Fruit of a poisonous tree,perhaps.
All right.
I'm gonna get into the article,or I never will.
Again, activist posts.

(41:10):
Go see all the stuff that myfriend Charlie Robinson's
putting up over there.
Good great site.
I happily sponsor it.
Trump's National Guarddeployment centralized power and
undermined federalism.
So says the Mises Institute.
Ryan McMain.
In recent weeks, the Trumpadministration has deployed or

(41:31):
threatened to deploy NationalGuard troops at least five
American cities, includingChicago, Portland, Los Angeles,
and New Orleans.
Many of Trump's supporters havecheered this, claiming that it
is the responsibility of thepresident to send federal troops
wherever he determines they areneeded.
In some cases, deployments haveoccurred over the objections of

(41:52):
the governments in the stateswhere the troops are deployed.
This has led to a complex legalsituation with the governments
of California and Oregon suingthe administration over the
deployments.
Judges, pundits, and lawyerswere surely continued to argue
for some time over the currentlegality of these deployments,
as interpreted by federal judgesin federal court.

(42:13):
The fact is, this is a matter ofdebate at all.
However, it illustrates how farthe United States has come from
the American revolutionary'svision of federal of a federal
republic with a greatly limitedand decentralized military
force.
In the founding era, Americansfeared the existence of a
standing army that could bedeployed at the will of the

(42:35):
federal officials.
Moreover, Americans demandedthat the states maintain their
own independent militias thatcould not be subjected to
federal control without thecooperation of state officials.
This attitude is now long gone.
Instead, we find that both leftand right in the United States
now generally support morefederal control, depending on

(42:57):
which political party is inpower or which group is on the
receiving end of new federalprerogatives.
At this moment, it is the rightthat is in power.
And so it is now conservativeswho are clamoring for more
federal power to deploy troops,expand federal law enforcement,
and further bury the last fewvestiges of the sovereignty once

(43:17):
enjoyed by states' governments.
You know, states don't haverights.
States have powers.
Decentralization is the only waythat you have a functioning
republic, which we've, I don'tknow, you can argue that that
that Rubicon was crossed a longtime ago.
No pun intended.
States have powers, and youknow, it's like much like

(43:42):
Congress, it's the muscles ofatrophy, these states just
getting federal money.
It's like, you know, they're inthe COVID era, the 1984,
COVID-194.
You had the whole all thetrillions that were being passed
out, and all these governors,you know, doesn't matter.
Blue, red states, all the sameto fund the lockdowns.

(44:03):
And you had places like Texas,you know, Greg Abbott's been in
power since 2014.
How's that border, Greg?
Doing a great job.
You have the power not only tocall up the National Guard,
because that's the state'sprerogative, again, because of
the militia.
And they don't.

(44:23):
Now they don't do it properly,or they'll use it for window
dressing.
And again, it goes on to talkabout the dangers of a standing
armory and the creation of adecentralized military in
America.
In the very early years of theUnited States, American

(44:43):
political sentiment was heavilyagainst any standing army under
federal control.
As summarized by Griffin Boveyat the Journal of the American
Revolution, few ideas were morewidely accepted in early America
than that of a danger of apeacetime standing army.
This anti-standing armysentiment motivated colonial
opposition to post-French andIndian War British policies,

(45:07):
intensified after the BostonMassacre, influenced the
writings of most foundingfathers, and remained
politically relevant well afterthe Revolutionary War ended.
This sentiment remained largelyunchallenged until the
introduction of the U.S.
Constitution for the publicratification.
The Constitution's Army Clause,which allowed the U.S.
Congress to raise and supportarmies with biennial funds,

(45:31):
sparked a nationwide debate thatpitted tradition against
innovation, precedent againstnecessity, and federalism
against nationalism.
This has always been a greatcontention.
And even Eisenhower spoke aboutit in his farewell speech where

(45:54):
he talked about themilitary-industrial complex.
You know, he says in the past,we've always been to able to,
you know, beat our uh plowshares into swords, you know,
and uh respond to outsidethreats.
This is, you know, this was likethe the citizen soldier.
You're going back to the TexasRevolution, this was it was uh a

(46:18):
great debate on who was incharge, was it Travis or Bowie?
You know, Travis was in chargeof the regular army and Bowie
was in charge of the militia.
They eventually worked togethertowards their their demise.
But that was the that was thedifference.
You know, Andrew Jackson was ageneral of the militia.

(46:43):
And very powerful.
This is like the standingmilitia.
This was a but it was adifferent a different sect of
the military than just theregular standing army.
And it's interesting too and Iyou know opening up talking

(47:08):
about this, we're crossing somany like we've departed from
where we've been in the pastwith uh federal overreach and
decentralization of power.
But Congress, just like thesegovernors, have atrophied.

(47:28):
They've abdicated their power.
It's kind of like, oh, now Ihave this reflexive need to
defend my my territory and havesovereignty, and I'll use the
Ninth and Tenth Amendment.
Like, oh they don't even knowthat language, it's just left
them.
But all of this about this isnot part of our history.

(47:51):
And I don't think, you know,even these federal agencies, you
know, people have this is theUnited States of amnesia.
People don't have these memorieslike they used to.
I'm go back to 2020.
They you think the powerstructure or the ideals, the
ideology of has changed fromthese alphabet agencies, they
still thought, even whilePortland was daily being, yeah,

(48:13):
they had Molotov cocktails beingthrown at them and the DHS
agents.
I remember this.
They were removing their nametags because they were so
intimidated by Antifa, theydidn't want to be doxxed.
Like the families of DHS, youknow, they didn't want to, and
then they were like, no, thisthe most, you know, the the
threat domestically is theright.

(48:34):
They didn't even mention theleft.
I don't think that that ischanged much.
I think this is a grab forcentralization and for power,
just disguised as somethingelse.
Much like the war in Venezuelais not a bad.

(48:56):
It's funny.
Uh I I was doing some researchbefore the show began, and this
kind of bleeds together the war,the Hobbesian war of all against
all.
I want to read you a little bitof that.
No industry, no culture, no, nonavigation, no knowledge of the

(49:17):
earth, continual fear and dangerof violent death, and the life
of man shall be solitary, poor,nasty, brutish, and short.
And this is where there's nocohesion, there's no order of
things, right?
This is where you get theHegelian dialectic, uh, the

(49:38):
bigger the chaos, the bigger theorder, you know, or order ab
chao.
And that's where they reinstallthe order after all the chaos,
but you have all the domestic,and then you have the foreign
policy.
So I looked up a littlesomething for you today.
And it has to do with Venezuela,because I was like, you know,

(50:01):
where does Venezuela fit in allthis?
Venezuela holds the largestproven oil reserves on earth.
300 billion barrels right therein the western hemisphere.
And of course, Caracas starteddoing business in Yuan, rubles,

(50:24):
gold, and they've been doingthat for quite some time.
This isn't about cartels.
The um point of contention, andI looked it up because I wanted
to talk about the Wolfowitzmemorandum.
And part of the Wolf thepost-Wolfowitz memorandum was

(50:50):
about energy backdrop.
And this is where you get theaddition to this chess piece,
which is I've talked aboutbefore.
I'm looking for the actual umphrase that was used when I

(51:14):
looked it up.
If you'll bear with me.
Again, it's fits with theWolfowitz memorandum, and I want

(51:37):
to talk to you a little bitabout as we close the show.
Back in 1992, Paul Wolfowitz, uhneocon.
This was a leak mem memorandum.
The key points of thememorandum, this was uh at the
Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz.

(51:58):
I think he was one of the peoplethat George W.
Bush called the the bomber boys.
Uh I had to pull security oncefor Paul Wolfowitz when he came
to briefly uh look at the damagethat his ilk had done, the uh
neocon uh boys, the smart set,uh his class project known as

(52:22):
the Iraq War.
And then he wrote thismemorandum that was leaked, and
we're not deviating from that.
As a matter of fact, you know,this antiwar.com has three
different articles about wherewe're headed with NATO and war
in Europe.
Nothing changed.
And if you think the Venezuelais part of uh something about

(52:45):
cartels, this is themisdirection.
You know.
It's like, do you think that thetroops being sent into these
cities is about immigration orsomething uh akin to that, or
law and order, or whatever?
I don't buy it.
This is the strategy of theWolfowitz memorandum.

(53:07):
The strategy reasoned that afterthe collapse of the Soviet
Union, the U.S.
would be the world's onlysuperpower, and the challenge
would shift to preventing anyother state from rising to
challenge that status.
The memo argued that the U.S.
must maintain its militarydominance, so the sense of the
world order is ultimately backedby the U.S.

(53:28):
and credible.
It asserted that the U.S.
should be able to actindependently when needed rather
than always relying onmultilateral frameworks like the
UN.
The draft proposed the U.S.
should sometimes strike first,i.e., preemptively, against
threats, even before they fullymaterialize, especially in cases

(53:49):
involving weapons of massdestruction.
In fact, one draft said the U.S.
should be ready to preempt theuse of nuclear, biological, or
chemical weapons by any othernation, even where our interests
are otherwise not engaged.
So that means the whole world.

(54:20):
This is in a post-9-11 world,but especially from Russia.
The memorandum explicitly warnedagainst allowing Russia, then
still a Soviet successor state,to re-emerge as a military or
geopolitical rival.
It stated the first objective ofU.S.
policy in the post-Cold War erawas to prevent the re-emergence

(54:41):
of a rival new superpower,either in the territory of the
former Soviet Union orelsewhere.
Our first objective is toprevent the re-emergence of a
new rival that poses a threat tothe order.
The memo argued that EasternEurope should remain under the
U.S.
and Western influence to preventRussia from regaining dominance.

(55:05):
This meant supporting NATOexpansion eastward, even before
it was officially on the tablein the 1990s.
And NATO, the North AtlanticTreaty Organization, was created
to thwart the Soviet Empire.
They also had the Warsaw Pact.
But when the Soviet Unioncollapsed, the Warsaw Pact
collapsed with it.

(55:26):
But somehow NATO expands.
And you know, there was a greatline from the Soviet
propagandist that at the end ofthe war, uh Cold War, uh, the
Soviet Union was collapsing.
And he said, We've donesomething far greater to you

(55:46):
than than defeat you.
So we've taken your enemy away,and now you were lost.
I've always remembered thatline.
Yeah, it's about preventingregional hegemons, Russia,
China.
Russia was the archetype of aregional hegemon that could
dominate a vital area inEurasia.

(56:08):
The memo suggested the U.S.
should be willing to use force,alliance, or preemptive policy
prevent any such power fromrising.
This has always been theWolfowitz memorandum.
That's where their thinkinglies.
The neocons never went away.
It's all uh smoke and mirrors,folks.
How's that how's that peacepresidency working out?

(56:34):
Got everything back on all warsback on the table.
It never was off.
Funny, huh?
Yeah, it was a secure energybackyard.
That was the phrase I waslooking for earlier about
Venezuela.

(56:54):
And that's part of thehemispheric energy chessboard.
That's uh actually what I typedin.
I was looking for hemisphericenergy dominance.
And that has to do with uh theWolfowitz memorandum.
These things are interlinkedcartels.

unknown (57:14):
Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 (57:17):
I mean, not that they these alphabet agencies
need cartels really muchanymore.
You used to, when they hadbudget oversight, you know, when
Wild Bill Donovan and JesusJones, Angleton, and all these
guys at the beginning of theformation of the Central
Intelligence Agency when theywere selling uh dope uh heroin

(57:38):
to the you know the jazz clubsand stuff and bringing in heroin
and other things.
When they did that to fuel theirblack budgets and black ops and
stuff, I mean they had to likeraise capital and the same thing
through the you know into the70s and 80s.
But then they would then we juststarted hitting that printing
press, the real crackpipe.

(57:58):
And there's no more oversight.
So they just do what they want.
And I don't think they reallyneed to run drugs.
I guess they can if they want,but um not a need for it when
you have the printing press.
All right, well, I appreciateeach and every one of you.

(58:18):
I'm uh I'm gonna plug for 60seconds.
You've got uh I didn't realizethe time.
Um always great to be here withall of you, and uh and I'll look
forward to being back next week.
I'll run a live show as much asI can.
I didn't want to do one today.
I was uh just tired oftraveling, but uh appreciate you
being here.
It means a lot to me.
Wolfpack.gold, uh preciousmetals delivered directly to

(58:42):
you, not paper.
We uh will send you preciousmetals from my shop in Missouri,
and I source them from all overthe country, but uh mainly Texas
and Missouri.
And uh get your hands on somedollar cost average, real money.
Okay.
Uh interesting, interestingtimes ahead.
May you live an interestingtime.
Uh, we'll be back next week.

(59:02):
Uh tune into America Unpluggeduh on Saturdays, 12 Eastern.
Billy Ray Valentine, DonaldJeffries, myself, and uh
possibly Beans the Brave.
Maybe she'll be back in studioby Saturday.
We'll see you guys then.
I hope you have a great weekend.
Take care of each other.
End of transmission.