Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Deep
Dive.
Today we're getting intosomething really critical in
health care keeping patientsengaged, you know, between the
actual visits.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Yeah, it's a huge
area.
Our sources are pointing tothese two major issues Missed
appointments, which just throwseverything on, derails the whole
care plan, sometimes Exactly,and then also a lot of ER visits
that well might have beenpreventable.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
And these aren't
small problems, right.
They put a real strain on thesystem financially and just in
terms of resources.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Oh, absolutely.
The costs are pretty staggeringwhen you add it all up.
But what's interesting, I thinkfrom the sources, is why this
happens.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
It's not always
patients just ignoring things,
not usually no.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
It often boils down
to more practical stuff like
trouble getting a ride or,honestly, just forgetting an
appointment symbol forgetfulnessyeah, or maybe they have a
symptom and they're just notsure is this serious?
Do I need to go in now?
Or maybe they just feel kind ofdisconnected from their care
team that feeling of distanceyeah, right.
So the big question becomes howdo we, you know, bridge those
gaps?
Yeah, the time outside thedoctor's office.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
Okay, so that leads
us to this idea that came up in
the materials continuous patientengagement, and one specific
example mentioned was thisAddison Care model.
Can we unpack that a little?
Speaker 2 (01:17):
Yeah, sure.
So Addison Care.
As described, it's basically anat-home system.
Think of it as a way to keepcommunication flowing.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Okay, so like
reminders.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
Reminders definitely
For appointments, maybe meds too
, but also helping coordinatetransport, if that's an issue.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
Ah, addressing that
barrier directly.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
Exactly, and even
tools for patients to monitor
symptoms easily and get someguidance on whether they need to
act on them.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
That's interesting,
and the sources mention
something about culturalsensitivity.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Yes, that seemed
pretty key.
It's not designed as a one sizefits all thing.
Apparently it could be adapted.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
How so.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
Well tailoring the
communication style, the
approach to resonate better withdifferent communities make it
feel more approachable, lessclinical, perhaps.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
Which tackles that
disconnect feeling we talked
about Precisely.
So it sounds like it fosters asort of gentle accountability.
That's a phrase used.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
I like that term.
Yeah, it's not punitive, it'sfriendly reminders, supportive
nudges for appointments, meds,self-care.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
Just keeping people
on track, without making them
feel lectured or pressured.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Exactly Like a
helpful partner rather than, you
know, a strict monitor.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
And what about the
providers?
What's the benefit on their end, according to the research,
Well, it's huge for them too.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
These systems can
flag when a patient might be
struggling.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
Like an early warning
system.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Sort of yeah, Maybe
they're reporting worrying
symptoms through the tool orthey've missed a few check-ins.
It lets the care team knowbefore it potentially becomes an
emergency.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
So they can intervene
proactively.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
Right, reach out, see
what's going on, maybe adjust
care, potentially avoiding thatcostly, stressful ER visit
altogether.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
Okay, so this points
to something really fundamental,
doesn't it?
Our sources seem to suggestthat a lot of these utilization
issues they're not just patientsbeing non-compliant.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
No, that's a crucial
insight.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
It's often about
these gaps in support, practical
support, guidance, just feelingconnected when people have that
readily available guidance andthey feel like someone's
actually you know there for them.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
They're better
equipped, they can make more
informed decisions about theirown health.
It empowers them.
Speaker 1 (03:28):
And how does this
connect to the broader health
care picture?
Things like value-based care.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
Ah, good connection.
Well, value-based care, wherethe focus is shifting towards
outcomes and efficiency, notjust volume.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Right getting paid
for keeping people healthy.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
essentially, Exactly
so.
Technologies like this, thesecontinuous engagement models, if
they can demonstrably helppeople stick to their care plans
, reduce avoidable hospitalvisits.
Speaker 1 (03:55):
They become
incredibly valuable tools in
that new landscape.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Indispensable?
Potentially, yeah.
They directly support the goalsof better outcomes and managing
costs.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
Okay.
So pulling it all together,then, the key takeaway from our
sources seems pretty clear.
It's that by actively engagingpatients between visits,
providing that support,fostering connection, we can
actually address the root causesof things like missed
appointments and unnecessary ERtrips.
Speaker 2 (04:21):
It's about making
healthcare feel more continuous,
more supportive, not just aseries of isolated appointments.
Building that bridge.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
Absolutely A more
proactive, supportive experience
overall.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
Which leaves us with
a final thought, perhaps
something for our listeners toconsider.
Go on, just think about howintentionally building these
kinds of support bridges,extending care beyond those
formal encounters, how thatcould really change the game for
health and well-being forindividuals and well for the
whole system.