The Debate on CO2 and Environmental Impact

Climate change: a real threat or just exaggerated noise? Join me, Karl Michael, as I pull back the curtain on the climate change narrative and question the prevailing assumptions. With insights from a global network of over 1,800 scientists, we scrutinize the reliance on climate models that are heavily influenced by human-made inputs. Through a critical lens, we'll explore how Earth's climate has always been subject to natural variability, challenging the exaggerated predictions of global warming and the so-called climate emergency. Prepare to rethink the perceived role of CO2 in our atmosphere as we debunk myths of it being a pollutant and highlight its benefits for plant growth and agriculture.

We take a hard look at the statistics surrounding climate-related disasters, providing evidence that disputes the narrative of their increased frequency due to global warming. Moreover, Karl sheds light on the true costs and questionable effectiveness of climate mitigation measures, arguing against the unrealistic and costly net zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. This episode is all about questioning the mainstream narrative and advocating for a more empirical, self-critical approach to understanding climate science, ensuring that both science and policy are grounded in reality, not ideology.

Support the show

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
The Climate Change Hoax.
If you're suspicious that thisclimate change stuff may be
exaggerated or just total BS,you've come to the right place.
Welcome to the Climate ChangeHoax Podcast With your host,
carl Michael.
Here you'll learn the truthabout the deceivers who want you

(00:25):
to believe we can actuallycontrol the weather.
We cannot.
The real goal is to control you.
This is the Climate Change Hoax.

Speaker 2 (00:43):
And greetings crisis deniers.
Here's some advice from aglobal network of over 1,800
scientists and professionals1,813 to be exact, and that
number is growing.
Climate science should be lesspolitical, while climate

(01:04):
policies should be morescientific.
In particular, scientistsshould emphasize that their
modeling output is not theresult of magic.
Computer models are human-made.
What comes out is fullydependent on what programmers
put into them Hypothesis,assumptions, relationships,

(01:25):
stable constraints, etc.
Unfortunately, in mainstreamclimate science, most of this
input is undeclared To believe.
The outcome of a climate modelis to believe what the model
makers have put in.
This is precisely the problemof today's climate discussion,
to which climate models arecentral.

(01:47):
Climate science has degeneratedinto a discussion based on
beliefs, not on sound,self-critical science.
We should free ourselves fromthe naive belief in immature
climate models.
In the future, climate researchmust give significantly more
emphasis to empirical science.

(02:09):
Climate science should be lesspolitical and more scientific.
Scientists should openlyaddress uncertainties and
exaggerations in theirpredictions of global warming,
while politicians shoulddispassionately count the real
costs as well as the imaginedbenefits of their policy

(02:30):
measures.
The Geological Archive revealsthat Earth's climate has varied
as long as the planet hasexisted, with natural cold and
warm phases.
The Little Ice Age ended asrecently as 1850.
Therefore, it should be nosurprise that we are now

(02:50):
experiencing a period of warming.
The world has warmedsignificantly less than
predicted by the IPCC on thebasis of modeled anthropogenic
forcing.
The gap between the real worldand the modeled world tells us
that we are far fromunderstanding climate change.

(03:12):
Let me say that again we arefar from understanding climate
change.
Climate models have manyshortcomings and are not
remotely plausible as globalpolicy tools.
They blow up the effect ofgreenhouse gases such as CO2.

(03:32):
In addition, they ignore thefact that enriching the
atmosphere with CO2 isbeneficial.
Co2 is not a pollutant.
It is essential to all life onEarth.
Photosynthesis is a blessing.
More CO2 is beneficial fornature.

(03:52):
Additional CO2 in the air haspromoted growth in global plant
biomass.
It's also good for agricultureincreasing the yields of crops
worldwide increasing the yieldsof crops worldwide.
There is no statisticalevidence that global warming is
intensifying hurricanes, floods,droughts and such like natural

(04:13):
disasters, or making them morefrequent.
However, there is ampleevidence that CO2 mitigation
measures are as damaging as theyare costly.
Bottom line there is no climateemergency.
Therefore, there is no causefor panic and alarm.

(04:34):
The net zero CO2 policyproposed for 2050 is harmful,
unrealistic, expensive and totalBS and will not do a damn thing
for the betterment of mankindor the planet.
Cheers.

Speaker 1 (04:53):
You've been listening to the Climate Change Hoax.
We hope you've enjoyed the show.
If you did, make sure to like,rate and review.
See you next time on theClimate Change Hoax.